HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-01779
GREG S. HALL, I IN THB COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff .
.
I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
VS. I
I CIVIL ACTION - LAW
EASTERN SAVINGS BANK, I 14- 1779 (!~L Ju.
Defendant . NO. .YI'-'
.
NOTICE
YOU HAVE BEEN SUBD IN COURT. If you wish to defend against
the claims set forth in the following pages, you must take action
within twenty (201 days after this Complaint and Notice are served,
by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and
filing in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the
claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to
do so the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be
entered against you by the Court without further notice for any
money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief
requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or
other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYBR AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONB, GGOT TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE
CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE
COURT ADMINISTRATOR
1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE
CARLISLE, PA l70l3
(717) 240-
DATE I 4/'ir/9f.
R BARD E. FREEBURN SQ.
WILT, MAGDULE & FREEBURN
I.D.#: 30965
600 NORTH SECOND STREET
HARRISBURG, PA l7l0l-l062
(717) 233-6200
Attorney for Plaintiff
.
GREG S. HALL,
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
plaintiff
.
.
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
VB.
.
.
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
EASTERN SAVINGS BANK,
Defendant
.
.
: NO.
NOTICE
Le han demand ado a usted en 1a corle. Si usted quiere
defenderse de estas demandas expuestas en las paginas siguientes,
usted tiene viente (20) dias de plazo al partir de la fecha de la
demanda y la notification. Usted debe presentar ua apariencia
esrita 0 en persona 0 por abogado y archivar en la corte en forma
escrita SUB defensas 0 SUB objeciones alas demandas en contra de
su persona. Sea avisado que si usted no se defiende, la corte
tomara medidas y puede entrar una orden contra usted sin previo
aviso 0 notificacion y por cualquier queja 0 alivio que es pedido
en la peticion de demanda. Usted puede perder dinero 0 sus
propiedades 0 otros derechos importantes para usted.
LLBVB ESTA DEMANDA A UN ABODAGO INMEDIATAMEHTE. SI NO TIENE
ABOGADO 0 SI NO TIENE EL DINERO SUFICIENTE DE PAGAR TAL SERV!CIO,
VAYA EN PERSONA OR LLAME POR TBLEFONO A LA OFICINA CUYA DIRECCION
SE ENCUENTRA ESCRITA ABAJO PARA AVERIGUAR DONDE SE PUEDE CONSEGUIR
ASISTENCIA LEGAL.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE
CUMBBRLAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE
COURT ADMINISTRATOR
1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE
CARLISLE, PA l70l3
(717) 240- 200
DATE: 4/f?'/91
RI BAR . F EBURN, ESQ.
WILT, MAGDULE & FREEBURN
I.D.#: 39065
600 NORTH SECOND STREET
HARRISBURG, PA 1710l-1062
(717) 233-6200
Attorney for Plaintiff
,. '.~'ho,"_, :\"rlr/!.~-~'-'~:
GREG S. BALL,
Plaintiff
I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
.
.
vs.
I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
I
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
EASTERN SAVINGS BANK,
Defendant
I
I NO.
COMPLAINT
AND NOW, COMES PLAINTIFF, GREGG BALL, BY HIS ATTORNEYS, WILT,
MAGDULE & FREEBURN, AND FILES THE FOLLOWING COMPLAINT:
1. Plaintiff, Gregg Hall,
at 126 South West Street,
Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant, Eastern Savings Bank (ESB I, is a federal
savings bank with offices at Executive Plaza 2, 11350 McCormick
Road, Suite 200, Hunt Valley, Maryland 2103l.
is an adult individual who resides
Carlisle, Cumberland County,
3. At all times relevant hereto, ESB was acting through its
authorized employees, agents and representatives.
4. At all times relevant hereto, Gregg Hall was employed by
ESB as a loan originator in the central Pennsylvania area,
including Cumberland County. During his employment with ESB,
Mr. Hall worked principally out of an office in his home in
Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
5. Pursuant to the terms of his employment, ESB was required
to pay to Mr. Hall a commission for each loan he originated in an
amount equal to One Half of One (.05%1 Percent of the principal
amount of the loan at the time of the loan closing, plus a
commission overage equal to lOOt of the interest rate and points
over and above the Bank's published rates and points as of the day
that the loan is locked in with the Bank multiplied by the
principal amount of the loan at the time of the loan closing.
6. Pursuant to his employment with ESB, Mr. Hall originated
the following loans and earned the following commissions:
,
,
i
"
'i,,';'<'~~;,,~~{y:
'L:"'~N .. . ':~H)"'P ,
", .!II" ':I<';""'""",~"",-' ......_
.,
MORTGAGBB I&AH AMOUNT COMMISSION
KOLB/IMLER $ 80,500.00 $ 402.50
SHBRMAN 109,l55.00 545.78
FREBLBN 276,000.00 1380.00
SCHLEIG 66,000.00 416.25
HARTLAUB 51,900.00 389.25
VIGNA 87,000.00 435.00
BRACE 135,700.00 678.50
KING 52,750.00 263.75
BLOYER 84,550.00 422.75
KEYS 88,800.00 444.00
BELL 68,300.00 341.50
MCCLEARY 72,500.00 362.50
JONES 61,750.00 308.75
WEST 85,600.00 428.00
SMITH 85,000.00 425.00
CIMINO 165,000.00 825.00
MARTIN 60,000.00 450.00
MAHONEY 300,000.00 l500.00
TOTAL: $1,930,505.00 $10018.53
7. EBB has paid to Mr. Hall the following amounts toward the
above referenced commissions and expense reimbursements due:
1993 salary exceeding commissions at
the end of October
$ 646.50
Salary in November 1993
1250.00
Payments for commissions in
December 1993, January 1994,
and February 1994
2299.08
TOTAL:
$4195.58
Balance due and payable to Mr. Hall
for unpaid commissions
$5822.95
8. Despite repeated demands, EBB has failed to pay to
Mr. Hall the commissions due to him.
- 2 -
"":"'i:,.",:~~~':Wf;j:':.:,;'t.:f..-'.;,.,<,.".' ,
p:-'''':'' ':lfl"..~""..'
.-" ,.:",,,...;:.:; oUtr:,...._~_ rDt'...,{' "
9. Mr. Hall has satisfied any and all conditions prscedent
to payment of his commissions and expense reimbursement.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Gregg Hall, demands judgment in his
favor and against Defendant, Eastern Savings Bank, in the Sum of
$5822.95, together with interest, costs of suit and attorney fees.
Respectfully Submitted,
~L.~a
Richard E. Freeburn, Esquire
WILT, MAGDULE & FREEBURN
I.D. II: 30965
600 North Second Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
717-233-6200
DATE:
"1/7J,h1
Attorney for Plaintiff
- 3 -
"'~"~' ~'~t.'\-'"",., _,_~__.,~,_..,..~ .~- "a
VERIFICATION
I hereby verify that the statements in the foregoing COMPLAINT
are true and correct" I understand that false statements herein
are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. 54904, relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
GRE ~
. .J
.,
.;.
-
U,.,J
........
"::2'"
en
.
>-,..
~...
...""
wn:':'t'"
~zC;'%
.....0(.)<.
b.'XO:'-
,.,~~..J
..';.,.~>-
"~; ',-: ;;~~
.' qlHI;;c.
r;U'I'U
j.. :t'o...
='
::;<>
::c
-""
en
.-f
CO
co
a:
....
-
(.~
~
__ .::l\
~ ....
~I ,to.
~-.. '0 \ ~ .
~~
~~ ...,
..:...-. ----:J
-~
~
~
~
.....s.
~
~
~
'\i~
~ ....
~
r.....',.,"""'~,,-.."!'. -:":",-,,,,,'~q,,,,,,~'~',,
... '~,'
" \" -..'. - ...... . .
~
.;.-..
. SENDER: Complete Iteml 1 Ind 2 when addltlanl' ,,,vice. .r. dlllred. Ind campletl Itaml
3 Ind 4.
Put ~ur Iddr,.. In tho "RETURN TO" SpacI on lhe ,eve,1I lido. Failure 10 do thlSlo wl11 prevanl thl. card
f,am b,lng ratumld to you. h urn I 111 r Id au h ".m f h r on II r d n
the dl.1 of delivery. For ad .1 ana all lea ow ng lerVlces all .va. III I, onsu I pOllm..ler or 81'
anacneci 60..1111 for addillanall8rvlce(ll requlltett. .
1. [J Show to whom dallv,red, dat.. and .ddr....... addra". 2. [J Rllulcted Delivery
'. (urrrJ dra",) {urra eh"",)
,_ E;;t;;~r.Is;,'~,,;~ ;1Q"k. 4}rt~.7"ib~(()
, , AA I. II 21 U Sl.(.r4en !yp. of S.rvlc.:
AfI",. "'''c.I1M~/' "\ (J . U R.glstll.d Oln.ured
&lo' C -11 ile r /4 u.... ~ l& C.nlll.d 0 COD
~ Lt /1_ . L /J . S/-& . 0 bprell M.i1 0 R"um R.c.1
,., if1 '&.gYM 1t;J"- ~. ,. ;A..(I7) for Mllch.n .
13 '(). l I J .AA '),. /\" Alw.y. obl.ln "gn.iure of .dd'.....
flaIl, "IV d)./{)sl oreg.ntendDA .DELIVERED.
6.- Slgn.,ur. - A dr..... A 8. Add.. ._'~.Md'll. ONLY If
X <fA ~ rtqu .",: . ~r ^
6.~lgnll ./ .'," Z; /~/? ~
X l~ 0 "'.( ::::
7.0ItloI0.lIV.,v/" II' II' II" /'1' II'/!/ '1'/' j ~1..:~ " .'"
I I III I I I I I I I I! t. "',rPS ~ '
PS Form 3811.-Apr. 1989 DO IC RETURN RECEut
..""... -~-~. '.' ,," ..~.'....
s>,
~;~
-
.;.:>
'~"'J
,.:)
.,
':r-
sr>
:::e
oq
C)
':;)
~'
co
-
IE
oq
......
"'...
;:!'"
41(~ :::J'"
~:eO.--
'-.;;It.)~
:~~Q;.
.', :1':;1
'<',;~V'J
L 1l,:;Je
.',.,Ul;':
.......o;fULIJ
....~Q..
...'"
QU
adt!J!i..,re
Executive Plaza 2, Suite 200
11350 McCormick Road
Hunt Valley, MD 21031
.
.
IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION-LAW
GREGG S. HALL,
Plalntlrr
'5.
.
.
EASTERN SAVINGS BANK,
Defendant
: NO. 94-1779 CIVIL TERM
NOTICE TO PLEAD
TO: PLAINTIFF GREGG S. HALL
You are hereby notified to file a written response to the attached New Matter within
twenty (20) days of service hereof or a judgment may be entered against you.
~~~
ohn B. Consevag . Esquire
Buchanan Ingersoll, P.C.
30 North Third Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101-2023
:>!I<<
GREGG S. HALL, . IN TilE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
.
Plaintiff . CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
.
.
.
V5. . CIVIL ACTION-LAW
.
.
.
EASTERN SAVINGS BANK, . NO. 94-1779 CIVIL TERM
.
Defendant .
.
DEFENDANT'S ANSWER AND NEW MATTER
Now comes Defendant, Eastern Savings Bank ("ESB"), by its attorneys, Richard C. Zeskind,
Esquire (in house Maryland counsel) and Buchanan Ingersoll, P.C. (Pennsylvania counsel), and in
answer to the Complaint, says:
I. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
S. Admitted in part and denied in part. Admitted, with the qualification that no
commission was to be paid on any loan which settled more than 30 days after Plaintifrs
termination, and Plaintifrs commissions would be reduced by the amount of any loss
sustained by ESB if said loss resulted from Plaintifrs negligence.
6. Denied, ESB denies that commissions were earned on the Bell, McCleary and West
loans. These loans settled on 12/14/93, 12/10/93 and 12/16/93, respectively. Each of these
loans settled more that 30 days after Plaintiff resigned from ESB on 11/9/93. It is ESB's
policy to pay loan officers commissions only on loans which settle within 30 days of the loan
officer's termination. This policy was explained to the Plaintiff prior to and at the time of
his resignation, and was understood and agreed to by the Plaintiff.
ESB further denies that commissions are owed to Plaintiff on the Cimino, Martin and
Mahoney loans because none of these loans were closed.
When the commission schedule is corrected by deleting commissions for the six loans
referenced above, the total commissions claimed by Plaintiff is reduced from $10,018.53 10
$6,111.53.
In addition, regarding the Smith loan, the Plaintiff failed to follow repeated
instructions from his superior to advise the borrower or the borrower's agent that the interest
rate would have to be increased. As a result, ESB was compelled to honor the lower interest
rate, and incurred a loss of $1,687.50 upon resale of the loan. This loss was solely
attributable to Plaintiff's negligence. In accordance with ESB policy, as understood and
agreed to by Plaintiff, Plaintiff's commissions were reduced by $1,687.50. When this
amount is deducted from $6,111.53, the total commissions claimed by Plaintiff are reduced
to $4,424.03.
7. Admitted in part and denied in part. ESB admits that $4,195.58 has been paid to the
Plaintiff. In addition, on May 10, 1994, ESB remitted a check payable to Plaintiff in the
amount of $287.67, which check was mailed to Plaintiff's counsel. The gross payment was
$311.50 and represents a commission paid on the King loan, which settled on November 30,
1993. ESB has now paid Plaintiff a total of $4,507.08, which more than satisfies Plaintiff's
reduced claim of $4,424.03, as calculated in paragraph number 6 above.
"', ".~
I,~""",.,>.>,,
~,!'y~~,:'>";
",,' :.\\!:J~;i.~",
';".;,.
8. Denied. No amounts are due and owing to Plaintiff for the reasons stated herein.
9. Denied. The averments contained in Paragraph 9 of the Complaint constitute
conclusions of law to which no responsive averments are required.
NEW MATTER
10. Plaintiff fails to state a claim as a mailer of law.
11. ESB incorporates by reference the answers set forth in paragraphs 6 and 7 above as if
said answers were set forth verbatim in this section as new matter.
12. Full payment of all sums rightfully due to Plaintiff has been made.
13. Regarding the Smith loan, Plaintiff failed to perform the most basic tasks of his job
by failing to follow his supervisor's instructions, and failing to advise a loan applicant of an
increase in interest rates. Plaintifrs conduct was in violation of the terms of his
employment, negligent and caused ESB to incur a substantial loss in the amount of
$1,687.50.
. ,',.
-
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Eastern Savings Bank prays that judgment be entered in its
favor and against Plantiff, and that Defendent be awarded its costs.
.~~M
RIchard C. Zeskind, Esquire
Executive Plaza 2, Suite 200
11350 McCormick Road
Hunt Vailey, MD 21031
(410) 785-2225
JOh~!~
Buchanan Ingersoll, P.C.
30 North Third Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101-2023
Pa. 1.0. #36593
(717) 237-4854
Attorneys for Defendant
t!':-".-~,...:, '-.-;':"'<~"."~
VERIFICATION
I hereby verify that the statements in the foregoing ANSWER TO COMPLAINT are true
and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Fa.
C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
::z~
Assistant Vice President
Eastern Savings Bank, fsb
RC7J1llCj
c:\r...\IlIlI.... IllCj
't'#:~j:;' '
,~ {#"
Richard C. Zeskind
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Richard C. Zeskind do hereby certify that on May 11, 1994, I served copies of the
foregoing Defendent's Answer and New Matter by depositing said copies in the first-class mall
addressed to:
Richard E. Freeburn, Esquire
Wilt, Magdule & Freeburn
600 North Second Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
:c:
"-
en
N
:::.!
"-J
>-
~
.",.
en
-
,.
," ~
:~i. ~;
- ..
.,..!
\41
\:~~.
~~ ."rl':
,
.t-
,
~; ~~
;
I;
If
n
,
,
i
i
!
i
I~
t
'~
GREG S. HALL , : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff .
.
I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs. .
.
. CIVIL ACTION - LAW
.
EASTERN SAVINGS BANK, .
.
Defendant . NO. 94-1779 CIVIL TERM
.
REPLY TO NEW MATTER
1. This paragraph contains no averments of fact, only
conclusions of law to which no response is required. To the extent
that the Court determines that this paragraph contains any
averments of fact, the same are hereby specifically denied.
11. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference thereto the
allegations contained in paragraphs 6 and 7 of his Complaint. By
way of further reply, after reasonable investigation, Plaintiff is
without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
the averment that the Bell, McCleary and West Loans settled on
12/14/93, 12/10/93, and 12/16/93, respectively.
thereof is demanded at the time of trial.
Strict proof
After reasonable investigation, Plaintiff is also without
knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as the
averment that it is ESB's policy to pay loan officers commissions
only on loans which settle within thirty (30) days of the loan
officer's termination. Strict proof thereof is demanded at the
time of trial. Plaintiff specifically denies that any such policy
was explained to him prior to and/or at the time of his
resignation, and/or that it was understood and agreed to by him.
After reasonable investigation, Plaintiff is without knowledge
or information sufficient to form a belief as to the averment that
the Cimino loan did not close. Strict proof thereof is demanded at
the time of trial. Plaintiff specifically denies that the Martin
and Mahoney loans did not close. To the contrary, said loans did
close.
Any implication that the total commissions claimed by
Plaintiff is or should be reduced to $6,111. 53 is specifically
denied.
Plaintiff denies that he failed to follow instructions from
his superior to advise Smith or Smith's agent that the interest
rate would have to be increased, and/or that said instructions, the
existence of which being specifically denied, were repeated. The
allegation that ESB was compelled to honor the lower interest rate
and incurred a loss of $1,687.50 due to Plaintiff's failure to
advise the borrower or the borrower's agent that the interest rate
would have to be increased constitutes a conclusion of law to which
no response is required. To the extent that the Court determines
the said allegation constitutes an averment of fact, the same is
hereby specifically denied. In addition, the allegation that any
loss by ESB is attributable to Plaintiff's negligence, the
existence of any such negligence being specifically denied,
constitutes a conclusion of law to which no response is required.
To the extent that the Court determines the said allegation
constitutes an averment of fact, the same is hereby specifically
denied.
After reasonable investigation, Plaintiff is without knowledge
or information as to the truth of the averment that it was ESB's
- 2 -
policy to reduce Plaintiff's commission by $1,687.50, and strict
proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial. Plaintiff
specifically denies that he understood and agreed to any such
policy. Plaintiff specifically denies that the amount of $1,687.50
should be deducted from the amount of his claim.
Plaintiff specifically denies that ESB has satisfied
Plaintiff's claim.
12. Plaintiff specifically denies that full payment of all
sums rightly due to him has been made by ESB.
13. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference thereto his
reply to paragraph 11. Plaintiff specifically denies that he
failed to follow his supervisor's instructions. The allegation
that his conduct was in violation of the terms of his employment,
negligent and caused ESB to incur a loss in the amount of $1,687.50
constitutes a conclusion of law to which no response is required.
To the extent that the court determines that said allegations
constitute averments of fact, the same are specifically denied.
- 3 -
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands that Defendant's New Matter be
dismissed and that judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff and
against Defendant as set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint.
Respectfully Submitted,
WILT, MAGDULE & FREEBURN
BY:
DATE: ~/7t';?1
IC D E. FREE
I.D.II: 30965
600 NORTH SECOND STREET
HARRISBURG, PA 17108
(717) 233-6200
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
- 4 -
VERIFICATION
I hereby veritY that the statement in the foregoing PLEADING are true and
correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18
Pa, C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities,
"!
GREG S. HALL,
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff
:
.
.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
vs.
:
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
EASTERN SAVINGS BANK,
Defendant
:
NO. 94-1779 CIVIL TERM
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
REPLY TO HB1f MATTER has been duly served on the following by
depositing the same on 26th day of May, 1994 by United States Mail,
postage prepaid, from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania to the following:
John B. Consevage, Esquire
BUCHANAN INGERSOLL, P.C.
30 North Third Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101-2023
~~k~;,('ge
WILT, MAGDULE & FREEBURN
I.D..: 30965
600 North Second Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
717-233-6200
Attorney for Plaintiff
"a;;:'~ ,
,
j
.
f
F
i'
.
I.
i,
~
".......'-~
."...
en
-
r--
'"
-
...
=
>->-
"'.-
<';::
UJ~. '.,-!
,._..gc.-.:#
i:: ClU:_~
;,::'~B;~.:
..,
, -:' ~~
;I~;"'-:
,,' III
," ~" ~
r',' .1:.~-
~.)
C;Q
:c
e>-
m
'='
N