The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About94-02481 ;~A. - ),'.-,;, ':-:;;:..... ..."'~..~*'. - ,/~);;~~;""!;\~~,~,,.,.;, .' . '?-;";'"<;~:'V''' ~ :,'!.;!tf.lt'~-~ ,':: t- .~V:!f. 'I .i-. ';;V,~~_ '-:i;~\'-y< (b d " , , " '. ,~ !:J f~- "::)~ ," th ': ""~ .~" ~t~ . .;~ ,i ':'::~ 'H ~ \^ JUHI3 2 12 PH '9~ ~ . ,'. /i .:- ~ ,0 '" f" v ", ~r i'~ .. 1; ,,"; ...... ?t' . .,.- i:< d. IJfflCE OF Till ,'", flI0N~TAhY CU~jE~LAHDC0U~TY PtNIlS YL VAlIlA IV l~ -,':i,i \,,'$ ~J \ ~, :..:: >1', > . c '.", ,', l~ I '",A ~-~ ~~f . ,'J " ::'~ ; '" ~ ., -. ., " , "-f :~.; ;~" }~ ., :; ~ .~~, , ll'?, " t"'$ " ....: ..11'. '. , , . (<jll,' ...1--. :, !,.~\ f~ '.,~' C; !~> -' ~.~ .. .'''', ~ ;:..-:. !,- ._, ',.. ,", ,--:; ..-: ~'. ". .[. :-:'.. .r' ;. ....:.: ~1 7:~ ....," " .s;:' .' -}:; , :Y; ,. ,.-:-0 " " 1~ ... ....,~. . ?'~ 1,,"; ~! " V-, ""I .A:ri ':';"".t ""-:',.:'.''',td M!.,'~<' . , ~d~ \'11 \ ,'bl-~;\";:' ' f\~' ~1,.t . , -~--. .-;. "};!". _;.:.Y,T ':1. ~~ , , " ',:-.',' .:: 1"'\,". ""'tV'" . ......:.'*'~_:." , _f, ,,:::J. 'j:\-.~t;.~ / . ::'>'1;!i~ >' ,':';-{<l:,", ;',t~~1t~~' '~:'\. Jl) " ":';iJ~ "-'~~,. t '. -,,:-:>';,' ( , -.,.. "-'~'..~,-~ ';S-4;:';;'" ',,'i":'IF ,,_,J16' ',('~'-t~ . -- ':i~t::. .' '.', !. ,- TO, :i '-.-;,:' ~,I~ r," i _1 . ",,- II . ...~ .........-. " \ J. Nevin White 1702 Marseilles Drive Unit 18 Miami Beach, FL 33141 J. Nevin White P.O. Box 2575 Salisbury, MD 21801-2575 J. Nevin White River House Apartments 2311 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 J. Nevin White c/o Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire 227 North High Street Duncannon, PA 17020 J. Nevin White c/o Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esq. Thorncreek Lodge Keene Road Elizabethtown, NY 12932-0937 Roland S. Jones P.O. Box 2575 8288 Robinhood Drive Salisbury, MD 21801 Shari L. Jones P.O. Box 2575 8288 Robinhood Drive Salisbury, MD 21801 R.S. Jones Co., Inc. P.O. Box 2575 538 Robinhood Drive Salisbury, M.D. 21801 R.S. Jones co., Inc. Route 11, Box 538 Salisbury, M.D. 21801 Credit-Line Financial 538 Robinhood Drive Salisbury, MD 21801 Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire P.O. Box 116 227 North High Street Duncannon, PA 17020 45195/lAS Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire Thorncreek Lodge Keene Road Elizabethtown, NY 12932-0937 Roger C. Simmons, Esquire 131 West Patrick Street Frederick, MD 21701 Susan G. Eisner, Esquire 131 West Patrick Street Frederick, MD 21701 Gordon & Simmons 131 West Patrick Street Frederick, MD 21701 Leslie S. Auerbach, Esquire c/o Auerbach & Simmons 8613 Cedar Street Silver Spring, MD 20910 f' George T. Paris, IV, Esquire 148 College Street P.O. Box 567 Burlington, VT 05402-0567 Christopher O'Brien, Esquire 148 College Street P.O. Box 567 Burlington, VT 05402-0567 Wilson, Powell, Lang & Faris 148 College street P.O. Box 567 Burlington, VT 05402-0567 Edward W. Harker, Trustee 1n Receivership of J. Nevin White Lumber Co., Inc. In the Court of Common Pleas ot Cumberland County, Pennsylvania No. 94-2481 Civil Term Summons in Civil Action Law -vs- J. Nevin White Jerry A. Philpott, Esq. R. Thomas Kline, Sheriff who being duly sworn according to law, says he made diligent search and inquiry tor the within named detendant to wit: J. Nevin White, but was unable to locate him in his bailiwick. He theretore deputized the Sheriff ot Dauphin County to serve the within Summons in CiVil Action Law according to law. Dauphin County Return: I William H. Livingston, Sheritf of the County of Dauphin, Commonwealth ot Pennsylvania, do hereby certify and return that I made diligent search and inquiry for J. Nevin White the defendant named in the within writ of Summons in Civil Action and that I am unable to find him in the County of Dauphin and therefore return same NOT FOUND this 7th day of June 1994. So answers: William H. Livingston Sheriff Dauphin County return is hereto attached. R. Thomas Kline. Sheriff, who being duly sworn according to law, says he made diligent search and inquiry tor the within named detendants to wit: J.Nevin White and Jerry A. Philpott Esq., but was unable to locate them in his bailiwick. He therefore deputized th Sheriff of Perry County, to serve the within Summons in Civil Action Law according to law. Perry County Return:George W. Frownfelter, Sheriff, who being duly sworn- according to law say that he made a diligent search and inquiry for the within named defendant to wit: J. Nevin White-Jerry Philpott, Eqs retused service but was unable to located him (White) in his bailiwick, He therefore returns the Summons "NOT FOUND", as to the within named defendant, J. Nevin White. So answers: George W. Frownfelter, Sheriff Perry County Perry County Return: Now, May 12,1994 at 1:30 o'clock P.M. served the within Summons upon Jerry Philpott Esq. at Perry County Court House, New Bloomfield, PA by handing to Jerry Philpott Esq. a true and attested copy of the original Summons and made known unto him the contents thereof. So answers Karen R. Baulay Deputy Sheriff Perry County return is hereto attached. So answers: Sheriff's Docketing Surhcarge Out ot County Dauphin County Perry County $ Costs: 22.0U 6.UU 10.00 17.50 2U.00 75.~U I ~. ~'.~ )'::/-/ /:<r/ / R. Thomas Kline Sheriff pd. by atty 6-Y-94 Sworn and Subscribed To Before Me This .:w!."-Day Of(}". 1994. A.D. C:..... t? fhJ':Cr II , Prothonotary . One , ,-,r .....' 'In The Court or C.:mmo:-. ?1e::s or C:..Jr.~::-:~:t'i=nd C'::W:-;~IY, ?snnsyi'/c:r:io Edward W. Harker 'is. Jerry A. Philpott, Esq, ~o. 94-2481 Civil ---. :!i__ ~ow, May 11, 1994 :9_ !. S~.z:'E' O? C~r:3:::?..!..A..'lD COt.~':'? ?A,.. co . , . . . .., 0- . ::=-.:71 e-:;:uc:::: t:: ~Zl:"'.:t at Perry C:lu:ty :0 ==:-.:t: -.;c ',V:::., ." ... .. . .... -,. ,- :.::s =:pu::.:cu =~ -.,...- :It == ._~.1::t =~ :':.Sk Ot :.::e .:'~:::r. ~g~d<~~ s:ae...~ :t C:=:::er...u:d C.:)u:rr. :3. . Affida.vit or - . :::er-n~ ;';ow, Mav 12 ll? 94 .;.: 1:30 O',.IC~:' . i> 'c. .-- - - .Y __.~~ :== wi";":" Summons o.:pca Jerrv Philnott. Eso. ~t Perry County Court House. New Bloomfield..PA by::u:6;:o Jerrv PhilDott. Esq. md -!I":. bown :0 true and attested him c:py ci = ot~ 0-.,1 SUlI.!!!Lons 3. ,. == .::::;:::s . . :.a:::::t. So =we:. Deputy I{_ ,11', oXt.p'-"-r' y 1:\;"--='1 oi ~ CoW1tT, ?~ Swcr: :me! yj:=-:i:d bc::= == ~ V~ 6v vi /1/7 . , 19t!L COSTS ::.c..~ ""ICE ~OI.Z.AGE .s A,.::wA V~. .';I~~!M.IH~ .ono' ~nmY co.. PA , , ,,,,f.A,.11 . ~tJl)';'irti:~', 1 . '996 ___""""-_______.0 s -oq.- I '-, . C -'\ . ... I d'" PI' .1., Ine Court Of ~mmon:- =::5 01 '-=.J:~.~:.::~:r1::n \..,.:;W-:-;.I"~I,' snnSY'/c:r:l:: Edward W. lIarker 'is. J. Nevin White c/o Je~ry ft. Philpott Esq. ::-roo 94-246,1 Civil :?- "ow Mav 11. 1994 ..:. - . :9_ !. s:~~~ 0:;' C~G::::'=.!.A...'lD COt.~T? ?A... co . . . . . - .- . ==::1'/ c..::uc= t:: .::n=.:::t or Perrv c,u::ty :0 ==::-.:t: .:..;. .,V:::, =:s d..-::u:::cu b.:"~ -~..:- 11 ~ :=u=t ::d ::..!k oi == :n!'l:_~. . -, . r~-<t=? S"ae.-,:! of C==er.:d C"u:tY. ?~ .l\.Sda;vit or - . :::~:"'?l~ ~OW, . ~~ .. o'dea ',r. 1=-.-::1 ::: wi.:":" '~F"'11 ~t =r !::u:~ :0 a. c:py ot = :)::;:-..r ... :tnd -!I';. ic:aw:1 :0 :.::.: .:==:=:s :'-:==1. So =>we:. ~lo-''i 0/ CaWlt'T. ?:.. Swcc :me S".:Csc:-:be:i be=: CO:)!.:) ::.c..-<.v"ICZ ~crU.AGZ oS ==~ l~_ 6yci ,-\.::wA ',J:7 ---~-_...__. s \ II-A SHEIU!'!' I S HE'I'UHN NO. 94-2481 Civil Term PAGE ~ 58 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF DAUPIIIN : I, William H. Livingston, Sheriff of the County of Dauphin, Commonwealth of pennsylvani.a, do hereby certi.fy and return that I made diligent search and inquiry for J. Nevin White the defendant named in the wi thin Writ of Sumnons in Civil Action and that I am unable to find him in the County of Dauphin and therefore return same NOT FOUND this 7th d<lY of June , 19 94 As per office def. pays rent for Apartment at this address but does not live in the Apt. Think he lives in Florida , ' So Answers 17~-.?{. ~~ Sheriff of Dauphin County, Penna. Sworn and subscribed Lo beror" Ill" Lhis 7th day "r June 1994 .".,...-........ -.... ..... ,-~{'kv C!-. ~cv.;~;."'1. PROTHONOTARY Sheri. ff I s Cost $ /l-f'J ..oq. ,In -, lne . . C "' I ,. .. ,t .1 ~T · . ,.'",.- .:\:.,.........1"""1, .,. ........., Court CT .:::mrnO:-l r .=::5 - '--..It. ._0_'. ._iJ.... .........,...,. I J I Panr:syl'lc:ni :::: Edward W. Harker 'is. J. Nevin White :-fo. 94-2481..Civil Term ----. :?_- ~OWt Mav 11. 1994 :9_ !, S:~..!:'? 0:;' C~GZ?.!.A.a.'lD COt-~'!'Yt ?A..., co h=-~ ci.::u= tb: sa:::E oi ORtlnhin c,u:ty :0 =::-.:.r:: .:";c .,V:i:, ::s d:;Ju::.::cu ::~ -....:-:1t == ~ :.:d ::~ of == ;n~:-:i. -/7~~ ALd ~~~~f~ S2e.."'1:t Q~ C:-:'er..;u:d C.1u::t1. ?:l. . Aindaovit or ... . :::er-n~ ~ow, ~!? .- o' .:!cc:: 'tr. !:-.-d == wi":":" '.1pon ~t "='! ::u:cili1; :0 3- c::py at ::.= ~::t-.,I " me -<.:1":- bawn :0 . . :.::= .:::::::3 ~-:=--==t. So =w=. ::;;}.~;;' oi Count'T. ?~ =:~ cy oi 19_ COSTS ::.c..~'VIC::: :-,aU.AGE .-\:::uJAV'!7 oS 5wcr: md S'oIi:::sc:-J:ed =cn: -------..--... 5 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania County of Cumberland Q J ,...J ~~~~ fa5ii~ a:,Sl: c ~ j 1i~ . If -. ' ~Illl O'i--a 0-.. 0 c W Cl ".... ::J.5 a:i:e 1-""'0 s:i.. ~4~ X ( EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. NEVIN WHITE LUMBER CO., INC. v. J. NEVIN WHITE, ROL1IND S. JONES, SHARI L. JCl'lES, R.S. JONES CO., INC., CREDIT-LINE FIN1INCII\L, INC., BEN,JNolIN V.R. mNLON, ESQUIRE, JERRY 1\. PlIILPOTI', ESQUIRE, RCGER C. SIMMONS, F.sQUlRE, SUS1IN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE, GOROON 1IND SI~1MONS, GOORGE T. FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, OIRIS10PHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, ro'iEI.L, LM'G & FARIS, and LESLIE mERBACH, ESQUIRE Court 01 Common Pie... No. 94-2481 Civil Tenn 19.__. III ___ __~},,:,~ ~__~<:~.i~~_=-_.~~"'!______m__..._m J. Nevin \'i11ite, roland S. Jones, Shari I.. Jones, H.S. Jones, Co., Inc, Credit- Line Financial,lnc.. BenjiJlllin v.r. Con1on, Esquire, Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire, Roger C. Simrons, Esquire, Susiln S. Eisner, Esquire, Gordon and SilTITOns, George To _f_.__r:~!J_!!.l_]Y.l_~PSllJg~t._(~!:l]::.:t.!;!t9QIJ~r__Q'Brien, Esquire, Wilson, Pol-.ull, Lang & Faris, and Leslie Auerbach, Esquire: You arc hereby notified that F.dwaro \~. Harker, Trustee in Receivership of J. Nevin White Lumber Co., Inc ._.-----------------------------------------~---_._--------------------------------.-------------- (SEAL) the Plailltill ha S commenced an action in __.~~~l!~~Il~.:___<::~y.i:.~_!:\s:.t:.~<?!'.::..!:?~_____________._____ against you which you are requin'd to del.nd or a dclault judgment lIIay be entered against you, l~wrence E. Welker Date ____.____~I):_~!_.__.__.__.u. 19.J.'!. .~___.___..________________M_____________________ Prothonftary n, ---:~ni/;A-~---- , C" -. ,.' _I', " I' . ","," 'i ,roo' I . ~ Q) Q) . - c. !:t -U.j.JUI> . 00 c.j.J.... H g. Q)H8.W - c . c ~ "" 0-:;1'000 0 ..., .-I' Ul.... 00 rolt ltJ.-I' 0- ,.ri c:: or1.!: .... ..JU ror.Li~U .<:: .... ffi< gj ..~ ~ ~~ UlfooQ) , :> , i.. ~ - Q).!:t ~ , , I .... I UlQ) Q)g>g..o: , , Q) I . C ..., .!:t & gj Q) , , , I U , I Z I '" & ., 00.... g. .... , - u' :]J..J .. ,....j , I , c' C I Q) ~ . ~ , I e! t: HI , , 0.j.J !:t - c , . 0 I .... .I ...,~. 00 Q)~ I ~ H I g. - C.... = 3: . o-i , Q) .' . U1~~~ U t- , Q)I Q) 8' UltJ~C :0. .... ,. It""'t , fool .j.J I , Po. .j.J , jg , it' .-II 00 , '0 ~,o I , Ul ~ ~, c: .... (/) .. I ~i~i~ Ie ...., Q)' ro . c. ~ 00 a C I :>, ..~i H u 0 Ul '0 1).... 0: Ig ....' tIl,ScJ .la-8.ld '... , ,~ ul ~ .j.J, :< ....: ~ ~: qu 014 U' I ....l c: +oJ 01;1 , co , .><: Q)' . Q). ~ 0 00'" rn , , "", ld .j.J' :> ~8~~'B~tn H , .., Zj , .roil , , N' .... , . ~ , I' :r: 0(;' :Egj>c28 .s :> I ~""M t- I ",,' -' .... , o H , "': . I U , LI'l t- , , 3: cl c c c .. .. .. , ~~.. - , I , ~ ....1, ..-j o.~ :]J :u 'll .. I , "0 >1 ~.. "":l ~l r-i , , til Q)I 1J .~ .!:t.!:t.~ ,-, , I .Z :<. "n 5 5 r, 'lJ ~...; U) C . '~':-: "';~dlmai{j~ Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Cumberland ElJ.'IARD W. HARKER, TnlStee in Receivership of J. NEVI N WIIITE LUMBER CO., INC. rE~~ 8~~~ 0;;"'_ W0:i1l ~i~0 ~i1;j- IL'"": ~I 8 ~~i ~p~ a:'i- .......'C =.5t- County of v. J. NEVIN WHITE, ROLJIND S. JONES, SHARI L. JONES, R.S. JONES CO., INC., CREDIT-LINE FINANCIAL, INC., BENJIIMIN V.H. CONLON, ESQUIHE, JERRY A. PlIILPCJI'r, ESQUIRE, R03ER C. SIMMONS, ESQUIRE, SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE, GOlllXlN J\ND SIMMONS, GEORGE T. FJ\RIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CIIRIS10PHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE, WIl,SON, roo/ELL, IJ\NG & FJ\RIS, and LESLIE AUERBACl1, ESQUIRE Court oC c..:ommoll Pleas 94-2481 civil Term 19u__ ~o. .---_.----~-------------------_.._-_. In _____~~_~~~!_J~<:~J._l:!.~_:___~~~_mm_m' u_u_ J. Nevin \'Ihite, roland S. Jones, Shari 1.. Jones, R.S. Jones, Co., Inc, credit- Line Financial ,Inc. , Benjamin v.r. Conlon, Esquire, Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire, Roger C. Silmons, Esquire, Susan S. Eisner, Esquire, Gordon and siJ11l'ons, George To _'!'-"__I:S1~A"iI-J~l-f.~~m!~,r~,--Ql.f.:i.."'~9J2l:!f;ruQ'Brien, Esquire, \1ilson, Po\>o'ell, Lang & Faris, and Leslie t\ueruach, Esquire: You are hereby notilicd that Edward W. Harker, Trustee in Receivership of J. Nevin White Ltunber Co.. Inc .------------------------------------------------.------------------------------------------------ the PlaintiH ha S commenced an action in ___~~l}!J_:__~~y_i.~_~_to~9f1__:_~:_!._______u_u..__u_ against you which you arc re'luin'd 10 defrnd or a dclault judgment may be entered against you, (SEAL) Lawrence E. Welker Dale __mu_.t~y._~!._.....________ 19..?4. .------~----------------------------------------- P~(]~ry , n, nJ.fuAbnfDi,;;1-0-~{f-------- , I 1 '" - ..... o a. :E ~ > , 'M 1 ~ , &l .1 0: u' c: ~i 'M , ., ~ 8'1 ..... I ~ ~l J: ~ ,..:lI ~ 1 .>0: ~, ~.~i ol<l . -, :;: c::l 'MI '0 >, ~ ~, roz ~ (3..; I 1 ml o-i, '~l 'M u, ....: 001 "" ~, C\l ~ . ~ ~ .e . .. c:.. ~ uigt,~~ :l ~Hal1l -0' g'o-i.uig~ I-';) ,-; .r-4 U) ',-1 to ..~~cltl:;:1.c .:I U ro ~:;: U 'M fij .,: gj , .!!< !;jC: Ul...~ti ~~r..~,~~ Ul t:1:U0l:l<t ::J :u ~ ~ 0' ~ j ~'6- & ~ ~ gl,~~ .C'gj ~'M'.-l gJ ~...:I .'@6-ui~'i:i)l UlCJ~C~~!il ~..~ino. ....u6in'tl~.~ OCo-i c::.c~ ti:HC.roo.lO au Of'< ..... C 4-J ~ <ll' ~,gUl'" .. ;~ a .: ~t: '~ 01 ~gj:>fiSo~ .~g.~aiaiai . ~ .., 1O.~.~,~;:j '- vi '2 g. 6- g. ~ ..;~Jl~~~~ f,'-' ... I' , ,Of ,..r i ; ,; ; . ~. 1 , . 1 , i , 1 1 I . 0 , ~ o-i = ~' . o-i u r- ,.. f' ..-4 ~ Po. .j.J ~ Ul C li~;~ e ~ 0 ~ 'M ..... < ~ rn :;:1 '" Zi ' - :> ..,.... r- 'M ~~~ ~ U Commonwealth County of EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. NEVIN \~IITE LUMBER CO., INC. v. J. NEVIN WHITE, ROlJIND S. JONES, SHI\RI I.. JONES, R.S. JONES CO., INC., CREDIT-LINE FINJ\NCIJ\L, INC., BENJJ\t~IN V.R. CONTDN, ESQUIRE. JERRY 1\. nlILPOTT, ESQUIRE, ROGER C. SIt-folONS, ESQUIRE, SUSJ\N S. EISNER, F..SQUlRE, GORDOt'll J\ND SI~1MONS, GEDRGE T. FJ\RIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CHRISTOPHER Q'DRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, PCWELL, I.J\NG & FJ\lHS, and LES'IE J\UERBJ\CH, ESQUIRE ~-,.. of Pennsylvania Cumberland Q-g~ a: ~~~ ~1ij- a:~~ :E=>> Ot!?1ii fE~ ~J O~'O 0:.. c WO ::) e Q) J:1ii.c Q)- ..... 'C_' ,5lijj!: CourL of (;rlmmon Plca.\ :0;0, 94-24B1 Civil Tenn 19____ ------------------------------------- In __. __s:_~':'~~__fl:.~~..i5?~_:__ !~~~_____________m__ J. Nevin White, roland S. Jones, Shilri I.. Jones, R.S. Jones, Co., Inc, Cn.'Clit- Line Financial,Inc., Benjamin v.r. Conlon, Esquire, Jerry 1\. Philpott. Esquire. Roger C. Simrons, Esquire, Susan S. Eisner, Esquire, Gordon and Simrons, George To _T.._X~FJ_~L_D~L_!?!l.!NtF~l.L_9:!r.i!?t9.J2l}~J'__Q'Brien, Esquire, \~ilson. Powell, Lang & Faris, and Leslie J\uerbach, Esquire: You are hereby notified that Edward W. Harker. Trustee in Receivership of J. Nevin White Lumber Co., Inc .------------------------------------------------.------------------------------------------------ the Plaintiff ha s commenced an action in ___~~!.!~_:__~!y_~Lt\P_~!91)___:_~~___________________ against you which you are required to defend or a default judgment lIIay be entered :tgainst you. (SEAL) Date ______m~~Y...~!__m_m__m 19.J_4.. I,awrence E. Welker ._----~:----_._----p~~~~~~;y------------------ n, 'rfor4.~---.... ,-...,., , &r 1/ lq 4. . I-< ~ :v , . t:. ~ .U,j.JUl:> . gj t: ,j.J ..... .... EJ, .... aW . t: . t: t'1l .... O'~'UlO 0 ..., ...... Ul..... Ul ro ..... . 0. ...... t: ~..... .c :E ...:I U ro to. 3: U ~ ..... ~ < gj , .~ ~ Ul....~ , ~ , ~ ~ . ~ .~ ~ I ..... , Ul :V01g ~ , ~ ~ I~ ' . ol & , . c: ...,. & t'1l :v M " [ll j . EJ, ;:j ..... U' , t:l c: , ~ t'1l . Ul el r::: ...., 0,j.J ~ . r::: ~ r ..... , ..., ~. g! ~...:I ., EJ,' ..... Cl ~ . r-i :v " , g!~I-<'O U l' ~I ~ 8' Ul(jt'1l ~~ ... '0 .t"""t ....1 ,j.J I ~ ,j.J .....: ~ 1-<1 ''E ..~ino. la Ul M ....., ro ' r:::'rl I-< Ul I r::: ~i~;~ >, J: .....UOUl'E~..... 0, ~ .....' c2t:..... .cl-< '.... u: .... r::: ' l\l 0. III ,j.J ,< , I-< ...:I' 8 U 0 to. ~ , -, :v , .... C 4-1 , to, ~ :vI , :V' H 0 Ul "" en , "", ~,j.J' > ,j.J 8 . ~ 'B..... ..... "" zi , N' . -ri: ..... 1-<8' 601 ..... . - , " , .s' .s' t: > ...,,., l' I , "":n:>:>:8 .'S ~~~ E "'" "", ..... , "', ' , U I , ~ &:) r::: r::: r::: . . . I , ~ ....., ..... O'f. :v :v:v . , '0 >. >..., H"'" ~, ,:l'~ '.....~..... , ~ ~' I Z ",-,:1 EJ,EJ,;1! ~,.; tf') r: 0' .. ,.;~&lt~t'1lt'1l& EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. NEVIN WHITE LUMBER CO., INC., plaintiff v. J. NEVIN WHITE, ROLAND S. JONES, SHARI L. JONES, R.S. JONES CO., INC., CREDIT-LINE FINANCIAL, INC., BENJAMIN V.R. CONLON, ESQUIRE, JERRY A. PHILPOTT, ESQUIRE, ROGER C. SIMMONS, ESQUIRE, SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE, GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGE T. FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG & FARIS, and LESLIE AUERBACH, ESQUIRE Defendants . . IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW . . 2481 Civil 1994 . NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the Writ to No. 2481 civil 1994 was mailed to all Defendants via certified mail, return receipt requested, on May 11, 1994, and served upon Defendants on the dates listed below. A copy of the receipt for certified mail and return receipt card are attached hereto as evidence of same. May May May May May May May May May May May May May a~1!-a.y/~) Cheryl . Walker Defendant Christopher O'Brien, Esquire Roland S. Jones R. S. Jones Co., Inc. Wilson, Powell, Lang & Faris Shari L. Jones George T. Faris, Esquire Gordon & simmons Susan G. Eisner, Esquire Roger C. Simmons, Esuqire Credit-Line Financial Leslie S. Auerbach, Esquire Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esuqire R. S. Jones Co., Inc. (2d address) Sworn to and subscribed before me this \LI~ of ~ day , 1994. Receint No. P016845630 P016845619 P016845622 P016845631 P016845620 P016845629 P016845627 P016845626 P016845625 P016845623 P016845628 P016845624 P016845621 IIOTARLII. SDl lllllIA. SHAY. HOIAR'f PUBlIC 'r'" CORNWAlL !lIP. UIlAHOH co PA y COMMISSION DPr~ES APllIL 8, lQQ' Return Receint Date 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 13, 13, 13, 11, 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 P 01b 8'15 63U ~ Receipt for Certi~nn: Mall .. No Inaurlnce Coverlge Provided __ Do not ule for Internltlonl' Mill (See Reverie) , C...td.ed F.. Spec'" Dellv...... fee AntrclMl DeltwfY fee ... ...Iuln Recllpl Showtng g: 10 Whom .. 0.11 OIINeftd ; Alturn Receipt Show""" 10 Whom. :; Dell, end Addf.....'. Mdl'IU .... TOTAL Po'\aQI g IF... III ~ o "- Ie Postmark or 0.1. 'S - I \- q t.f W~q-- ~ --- . -.'~ ~ " " . ,> ':';'::~~~;',;,;,"',;,'~' ,:.--~~'~"i' :,t-. c.........i..mo1 ondIor2Ior__" i .110 wlah.to:recet;';ihe;:"<;;i :"I-~~~=::=::~::.::.:=n :~r: A::.:.l;l~~~:.l;. ., :=E.:...~:=-.:.u;:..m.=:::.~~-=.:"'.:: 2. OR.."leted D.liv.ry "I..." 15' _. Conoult atm.lI.rfor III. ' , 1 ~3' Arti~.~d'~i3~~ ~~C . _ POI~.8~r':J' Ii ~p. 1..... . ......." 4b. S.rvle. Typ. ' ' . 8 ILtS ,.gv~ 0 Raglat.lld Olnaur.d '. " ~ 0 7 '&C.rtifl.d 0 coo .l!'. .0 . on 0 Expr... M.lI Dir R.tum R.e Ipt lor 'I, ~Wr. \l\ oS lfo~;HSn 7. O.t. 01 oauv.'l1AY 16 1994 t >- 8. Addr.....'. Addr.a. (Only II r.qu.at.d 'I ' .nd I.. I. paid) F ' Slgnotu'. IAddr.....) .l.ClPO:l-.-711 DOMESnC RETURN RECEIPT .........:f' P 0 1 b 8 11!i h 1 '1 ~ RecelQt for, Certified Mall .. No Inlurence Coverage P'ovid.~ Do not use fOJ International Mall olIIlI:'BB 1500 Rovo,ao' C.""...I ,.. SP4lC..1 0.1,."..)'... R"lllcl~ Oelrt.,.,. ,.. - Rllufn Renipl Show.ng = to Whom . 01'. [)el1Wf1'd - RIllMn JI,nipl Show"'G 10 Wtoom, ~ 0111. end Addr..,..', Addt." .... g III ~ ... ~ lOTAl PolltQl or... $ Po..",,,, '" ~~./ /~ 9if &U;v.:c ~ Sivm.,~ L,'"._. -' I olIO wlahtAi .ocolve tho'", f:~Wlng oOIYlee. lfo. .n oxtr.I:,.' 1. 0 Add........ Add.... -.Ii r f r ~: il. ... .'. Add.o.. 10nl If .equO'led 'I . pold) ~ ..u.o.CIPO:l---.m DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT P 016 845 622 ~ Receipt.fnry Certified Mail '. No InlUfance Covorlge Provided ~.=a 00 not use 'or International Mall (See Rlverle) I SDK~I 0........'1' F.. R'"flCled O'h....,'I' f.. ; Return ReU<p1 Showing en 10 Whom & 0.,. Dell'tfied - . ReMn flKelp' ShO*1fIg 10 Whom, C Otle. end Adckes...', Addle" ~ ..., TOT"'lPoI~. g SFnl III E Ii u. $ Poslmellr. Of' Dele S.\\-q\L- W;V:X9b~ ~ < . ,,-"." ,~", '" "',-'!"-,_._',"~ ;,l.Complote 1- I ondI", Z lOfOdd_rHrvIc:o.. 1.110 wl.hlo ,~'7ttii't,;i ~':(I':.l:= =: ~ ~: :;, the flV.,.. of ttQ form ao thlt WI can foliO, ,Wing ..rvk:a. (Ioi~ "ldr ~'j..-': ',!; ".tumthltClrdtOyou. 'ee). . . . ...:";_'-~"::"",:-:"; :..: ,'~'::''::':'':''" 10 t'" lronl olt... .....pl.co, or on "'" IlK'" ..... ,. 0 Add........ Addru.,,'i .1. W......R_R.c.l,.tAtquomd"on""'__""'_"""bo' 2, 0 RHlrlctad O'lIverY "I ; ..ti .. . "The ReNIn RKeIpt wIII.how to whom the an6cIt WII dllfvertd and the date .. ' 8....-. ConlU!1 o"m'"ar lor I... ;' : I 3l.':-C,I' 9JAd::':deoIO:, Q '. 4.. Artlcl. Number ' " n~ v,~ ~ Po ~ ~~~j' & A(). ~ as'75 'lI.. ~'R=r::~~eJype ;7 A... Iwvd dT~ al:'certlllad l' 8' fW Ul.Al- t;;l ~ Expre.. M.II 1 J _ /1' ') I . . .Dallv.'Y/ At.~ I Ol '", '" .....'. Addr... 10 I.. I. p.ldl I V " roqu"I~ J ' DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT P 016 8115 631 ~ RecefJ)t lor' Certified Mell __ No Inaurlnee COY"lgI Proylded .aw.u:a 00 not UI. fOl 1011ml.lonll Mill (Sle Revo,,,1 $ C..1<I_I'''' S~"IIl-tI'W.."f.." A.stll(;lf'<1 o.hll1y h. 0; fI.lU1n"K''IllS''o,",tng Gl 10 Vonlom a {141. D.I'....I.,t - ! HilL/I" "'K'-'C)I !ohll",ong 10 'I'If"I'" 5 Ol'e, .nd Addl.'WOftI ......hu ., g m ! Ie TOYAl PoUtg, & r... $' Poslm.,k 01 lUte ti-II-~y W,uX ~ ~~ ftj..;"~ ::'I:.'-.,:,CimpIew ~1mI 1lndJor 2 lor IddIdonaI HMcet. ". c:am,.Io.._3.1nd....b. '. .- Prine your nerne end Iddrna on the reYltll of tN. 'onn 10 thlt WI eM ' rtlIlmlNt CIId to you. '. Attach _hit 'onn to the ffOnt 0' thl mtfIpIect. 01 on the beck If 'PIC' -110'_. I . Write .'Return RICIfpc RIqUtu.cr' on the ~ below the .rt6de nurnbet . 'The Rnum Rtcefpt WriIIlhow 10 whom thllftidl WII dllifttld 1M the dll. Ii-rod. .1 f',~';.15~J6~ ' I fU.~~ \J , l4:fs ~ ..4.t1u..ct. RD. '~ --S~7 V\'6 S. Slgn.tu,. lAdd'.....' I .110 willi 10 IICIlv.' II1a lollowlng ..rvIcaI IIOf .n ..1'. I..l: 1, 0 Add'....... Add".. l I J f 7. 0.1.01 O.IIV.,vttAy 1 6 199~ .. l 8, Add"...... Add,... IOnly II ,.qU'"ed 1 .nd In I. p.ld' ~ ".1.01'0:1-'714 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT P,,016,845 629 ~ Receipt for Certified Mall .. No Inlur.nCI Coverage Provld.d ~ 00 not UI. for Internetlonel Mill es.. RIVI,.II T, u,UJ l:l C~I"....t f.. SPK~l [)el_, f.. R,"'<c11Nt o.tl...-.., ,.. ... R.turn AIKI'II1 5howong = to Whom , DlI. o.l""et'" ... Alh"''' Atou",l Sho...1t'Q to Whom. ~ 0.11, end "d$.....'. Adttr.., .., tOf Al Po.~. . .. . f... ! Pollm..' Of 0." II ~ l'l ';)-11- 'I T ! WMk t ~r~' ... t, .Comc>Ie1t~.... 1 tnell.. Z I.r __ HMct.. ' I 1110 wllh 10 rlO"'" IhI I' .~.. homo 3. tnd ... · b. following .Ilvlell If Of IIlI .xtr. i .' Print your nIfM and Idd,... on the flYtrH af thl, form 10 .... WI G.n fHIl mum thII card to you. '''11Od1 thI. r.... to tho 'ron..,.ho moII_, Of on "" ....k II.".. 1, 0 Add"....'. Add"" doe, not permit. "J ' W/lIt"ftttumftt..lp.ft_""'''ontho_btlowthttlllclt_ 2, 0 RIII,lalod D.llvllY I . The Rnum Receipt wllahow to whom the entdI WII deheftd MIl the dI'l , Ii dollvortd. -, ConlUl .tmll , ~3' ~n1CIO A~od~ , "1IJ ~~ '. 4 ~Ial N ber ,{l,Utf; I, ~J~'."'7>": t!j,8IlVIClTYPI J i ICf8 &~ ~'i (jf~=;~::~ g~~~od ", f: (). '{Sry. 1>", 7 ,~ _. 0 Exp,," Mill DE Rllu,n Recllpt for 1 ~ . ~ VTO~~()~ 7, DlllOfOIUVOrvMAy 16199~ f 8, Add"....'. Add".. IOnly If rlllUllled 'I Ind I.. I. plldl ~ OU.l.OI'OlI 114 DO ESTIC RETURN RECEIPT P D1~ 84~ 626 ~ Receipt for Certified Mall .. No Inlurance Coyerage Provided -= Do not u.e for Intlrnatlonll Mall IS.. Reve,.el Poll.g. Cethl.-drH Spec..' o.hv...,. f fll n'tl,.cle<! o.hvety r.. - A,turn Reu,pl Show<ng ~ 10 Wt>om , 011. o..,"led - n,tum A,celpt Sho"lfIQ 10 Whom, 01". end Add,.n..'s Add.." .. c " .., TOTAL Po.~~ g &rM' III E o "- Ie $ Posttnlf" 01' Dale 6-\I-qL\: U)~o/~ ;~f"",'i', :' }i,"{,' _ CompItte,Iternt 1 and/or 2 for IdcftUonII MrVIce,. "'". CampIote....... 3, ond... b. :\),!'-PrInt roW nIIme and Iddrt.. on the raYWII of thl. form 10 that WI can i :....... tHo _to you. J< ;'~,' 'AnKh thlt form to It. 'ront 01 the maUplK', Of' 01. the bldl. If 'PIce .' ; doo'not ponnIt. ' ;"'1 "!- Wrtta '"Rttum Rectfpt RIqUlItId" on the mIIIpiece btIow the.rdcIt number . ',' ..,' -The Rttum RlCelpt w111lhow to whom the artfcIt WI' deAvtrR and the dill I ';Ii _. Conoult IIm..ter for f... "'1,": 3." Artlcl. Addr....d to:[". ". A71cl. Number ,.:1"...._ ~.~. PO lD ~ , ;' "'--' I '4b. S.rvlce Type 6':'\'.:2. \ ' W.Q.4;t - 0 R.gllt'14!'lt 0 Inlurod 1 ' :, .~.;> . BtC.rtl"od~ 0 COD , h="~ JV\D ~no I 0 Expro.. M.1I ~R.tum R.c.lpt f ' , I 7. D.t. of D.lIv.ry " .,.'__' ,":",--,--c <',~"">". I .110 wllh to,rec.lve'th... following IOrvlc.. f!Gron el&. ", 'J' f..l: , 1. 0 Addro......Addro.. I 5: . a: 2. 0 R..trlctod D.IIvery 8. s~.~rc~.~ ! PS FO";;- - . D.c.mber t 881 1 ~ f 8. Addro....'. ddro.. (Only If roqu'"ted 'I . .nd f.. II p.ld) ~ : ,&, Slgn.turo (Addro....) ......- .u.l. GPO: '___.71. DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT " I P U1b li45 '.,25 .......... Rec@!~! ~r A: Certified Mall '. No Inaurance Cover.ge Provided ;:mr~ 00 not ula for International Mail IS.e Reve'le) "".... Cerh'oed r.. Spec..l Del......, ,.. A..tfCl~ Otrlrwety ,.. m Aeturn AKeopt ShOYrw"'Q en 10 Whom & 0... OIl_i'd Ct Rllutn ReUlpl Sho_""O to WtIQm ~ 0.'., el'ld Addl'.....'. Addl." ' .., TOTAl Po'~g. g .r... ~ E l; ... $ Poslm.,k Of 01111 Ie 5-II-qlj-j, WfUJe- ~~ 6,61gnllUre lAddrell..1 7Y', , ", l';' ~~; ;, i I 1110 wllh to rec.1ve the: ,.': following ..rYlee. llor en ext.' , ;.'1' '!, f..l: c '. 1. D Add..II..'. Add.... l "1: I D Inlured J Deoo "a' ~Rlturn Ree.1 for 1, 7. O.t. of O.lIvsry ! , I 8. Add........ Ad r II (Only II requested 1 .nd fll II p.ldl ~ . i p;,.~~'-' -,.. ....,. :'t).,COoftIIIolI1-I- 21..__'''-"' "'1" COoftIIIolI_a,ond""ab, '... ":.e',Printy..,.,." addrtII on tM"""" of this form 10 thIt we CIR : f: """" lhIl 0IId \0 you. -.: ,_'.' Atueh thII tann to the front o' m.1NUpIee4I. Of on the back It spacl , .-.... pormIl. . I:,' W.....'R......R___...Iho.........,._lhoorddo-' : l 'Ii _ - e1M"",,", Receipt wIIlhow to whom the ~ WI' delvtlred end the dati ,,8-' ,1 ~;d~~I~ I~' ,ti ,3~ J~~~ ~, t--\~.:2 lit> ) ~ 1O\I.l.QI'O:l_71. DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT ._ _0-- P 016 845 623 < . ~ Receipt for Certified Mall __ No Insurance Coverage Provided 4IW1::U 00 nol Ule for International Mln CSee Rovera.1 C...",," fM Spec... (Ml""*,,, f.. A,ltrlClecl o.llYefW f.. m R'lUl'n AeulIlt ShoWIng en 10 Whom . 011. o.I/WI'.cI ~ ! A.turn IlKe<p! ShOW"'Q to Whom. 9 Oil'. end Addl.....'. Addr... -, TOTAL PoSl'gI g 'fM' ~ & "- Ie $ Poslm.rk Of Oat. $""- Il-qc.;- . WAitD( ~~)Vy (~f'-~::-:"-,~:~:'- -~. "-'-, ^'--"::~~~-:. :\1',;.: CGoIpIIto i..~t oneil.. Z f."'ddlllonalHrvk:o.. I 1110 wl.hto rec.lv.; the,', "I'" ComllIIl._3........b, fOllowing ..rvlc..lfor;,n-,.litr ":1. ';,: ; _'; ,~:!,:,'~ your I\ImI and 8ddr... on the rever.. 0' thlI form 10 thI1 WI can 'HI: : , ,.......thIoeonl..YOU, ' ~ ... 'AttICh this form to the front o' thl mIiIpIIct. or on the back If ,PICI 1. 0 Addr.....'. Addr... ' , - ... pormIt. ' . ,.1. WIlto.",....,Roc:oIptR__"ontho__bolowthu,,'cIonumbo, 2. 0 R..trlcted D.llv.ry I ' is . The FlttWn ReceIpI wlllhow to whom thI.rddI WH delivered InCI the d.t. i _. Conaull .Im..tor for f... S~~ b\ri;l\M-oO 0 R.gl.t.rod Oln.ured !!l i ~C'rllfled 0 COD ' .Ii ".e~ lruA.t "" 'tl ~l g- 0 J 0 Expre.. M.II ~ Return Rec.lpt t r !I' ,7. Oet.otO~~~.,O ~ >0, 8, Addre....'. Addre.. (Only" requ..l.d t .nd f.e I. p.ldl ~ B. Slgn.lUre IAgenll ! PS FO~' .Dec.mber leel .u..a.GPO: t~714 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT P 016 845 628 ~ Recelpt fOr x:: Certified Mall ~ No InaUfance Cover.ge Provided -mzr=s 00 not UI' for Internlllonel Mell ISle Rev,rl.1 to . J. SPK..I Oel....y f.. RestrICted o.lIve\'Y F.. a; ".tu.n IlKelpt Shol/lfInQ en 10 WIom 6 0.,. Del_led ~ " Rllu.n A.celJlt Show'"Q to Whom. C O.le, and "'esdI.....'. Addl." ~ -. $ TOT AL Pu.~ o 6f... ,; Postma'" or Date lI! 5-/1-'1!f ! W,v*q-~ ~~+".__.... "", /,'t~: .~CompIete ~"'" 1 endJor 2 fOf addItfonIl Hrvlcel. I 1110" wllt:a t~,'-~~W~~~~lt(~;::"_:: '1.'COmpIott h.... 3, ond ... · .. lollowlng .., rvleoo 110' .n " xtro, ".,1: ;'" .-e.,PrtntyourMmland.ddre..on,htr.vefHofthl.formaothatw.can fM): " . .1 .' .: reun IN. ctrd to you. 0' '.: ".::Attech this form to the front of the maIIp',ce. or on the b.ck It eplce 1. Add'.....'. Add,...,.... , i. .....no.ptm'lIt. I' 1,'-'WrItI"RtturnRtceIptAequuttd"onthlrnallplecabekMtht.rtldenumbe, 2 0 R..trietod D.llv.ry , 'ii. Tho R..... R_ wlO....w to whom Iho onlclt woo dtllw.ed ond Iho dote ' .. :,' g _. ' Conoult .tm..ter 10' 100. f~, ~~~ i~=D~ I 1:, FtlD /3 0 f) tlA..~ 0 exp..II M.II ~.t~m Rec"Ptto, 1 ~ ~ MD ~QqLD 7. D.t'OID'"V'~..-:, .L ~: r ~, 8, Add........ Add.... COnly II roqu..tod -; .nd I.. I. p.ldl , ~ : .....--- . Dec.mber 1991 *u.o.OPO:l---.m DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT e.."'ledf" SIlK'" Del....... f.. f'ellltCl~ 0.1...._. ,.. - ReMn Rece",t SPIOwIOQ en 10 WtlOm " o.le 0eI1WI~ en - Reluln Aece.pl Showong 10 Wtlom, co O.le. .nd ,l.ddre'tM'S Addren C ~ $ -. TOTAL Poll'o- g " r... PosttNllo.. 01 O.t. ~ 5-/lq'l E W;w 0 !} "- Ie {', :;;~' ',.:< h~" ;,~'I,,~~"ComPttt. fttm. 1 endIor 2 far ~ftjQnaI MrYIcfl. "'1"'. .,eam_ '- 3, ond". b. .-': ',," : PrInt your name and Iddrtu an the nlVWU of thI. 'orm 10 that w. cen : {~,return this card to you. . ,':e.,e-:Attadt Chla'arm to the front af the mall". or on the beck If 'Pice " .. don not permit. J . Wrilo"RttumR-.,."-tld"antho_bolowtho._llllmbor 2, 0 R..,rlctod Dlllvlry .. .. . The Rttum RKMpt wfIIlhaw to wham the ,rtIcIe WI' dtltwiNd and the dIC, S _. . COItlUIt ol'ml.'or fa, f... I B'~od\J'({ ~ % otNU~ ' , &~~ J..J"o . ~'R~:r:;;:,.Jype Oln.u..d l' IJ.. ,..... '1.. _. ~ ~CI"lflld 0 COD W;~ fC>>f7\Q 0 Exp", MIll E Rllum Rlf"lpl , . ~iJY Jf). 13;; 7. III DoIlv " Add...... I Add... Ind 1"!'i'" plldl - ._~~__.~~_n~ I 11.0 wl.h to recllvl, thl.. fOllowing .INICOI (fa, In Ixtra '). . f..l: i 1. 0 Add..u.... Add..u , Ii r #~~- la' ,;' !I' ~' ... ' g: ..' qUlllld J : .u.a.OPO:._714 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT - . . . P 01b 845 1,21 C..tllledF.. 5*..' O'I.......~ r.. "1""Cled [)el_V f.. ;; RIMn R-';IOCIt Show,ng GI 10 Whom . 0.,_ OelIV..-ed - . nihil" fI~'q)1 Sho'lW\g to Whom, COlli. Ind Add'......' Addr." :> .., fotA.L POIr.g. o lor... e III E c; ... $ ~ PollrNI'~ or Dale 5-/l-QY , LVA^-t~, ~ ,.-, --~--,,".._._.----,-,.. ,~----->, .,.,,~.....- "",",,;' ,-I" ER: ,",t,.. ~ Mma t andICH 2 fOl1ddfdonl1 HfVkeI. <I";-:',=-vo:=~tncI~:;'tht revtrH ofthla form IOthI. w. can 'j- '~," . . .......lHICII1It.you. :' ... AtltCh ChIt form to the front of the maRplece, or on the blCk If 'plce o Addr...ee'. Add'".. , '- not ponnIt, f '.'.., . ~",WrltO''RetumR-''Roquollld''ontho_pIocobolowth..__ 2, 0 R.ltrlcttd D.llv.ry , ." TheRttum Receipt w11lhow to whom the.rt6dI WII delivered and the date : & dthered. Conlult Itmelter for f... :1 3,,' Artlel. Add"...d t~ __ (), . 4. Artlel. Numbe. )'. " . J:r 5. :r l1'l"\.v.)I (JIJ. <>'l4!... I . i' B IS 4b. S.rvle. Typ. I II ~'_ ~J OX 53 ~~~~:::~ g ~~~.d .2' '.' ~ InJ.A~ (Yl () J.I ~O) 0 Expro.. M~ HR.lUm Rec.lpt fo ! v --7) 7. 011. oID.llv~ ~ .2 'i ~"' ~,\~ & . , >0 . 8. Add".I..'. Add.... IOnly II .equ.lt.d J .nd foe II p.ld) . , ' :;".; .u.l.OPO:1.....-71. DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT " " ,," ,--...J,;' ','.', ,'","_."'. ,.,' -,~'7i,":;';~"'';';'" . 'iititfJ...,'c..~~;;tDiB'I~~.~,/,~tii.h~:.;t": ,_.~,__~""'.-:.;:.,~"i.,.. J'l,,;.. . ..,j, .,,'.'...i' .. .,-~'- <"'.:-.....\,- _/~...l\:~....1'."....,:.",1,._-r-..",.+.'-~ '." ~.-_"-,-.,.;.,.t--'- ,....<,'~ '- "";. '". bJetul ~ Jul IB tV' P~':s , i 1'.33 .pM ' qli- c:ilt,.d:\ 1'1-_' '" " ~ ~ .. .';, '.'" '. l 1 ,',I !:l"~ '., ~ #. ~ ~ 'e' .4oJ ~r M1<r ,> 1 'J ',l .. . 'Il '- , , - '. . . .,,"'. ,._'~""""-' /I!.... \. (Rev,01/bn, CIVIL COVER SHEET III, Ttlt JS.... C''o.1 (Ow" ~"l ,rod 11'1. ,...lo'm."OI1 (I,lnll'otd ",,,on ,...,,,,, "p1tc. no. I-Uplll,,,,,,nl tnr ldlnll ....Cl "'WICt III pl,~,"'II' 01 olh., P'-lI"I" IfQu,,.d b, law, '_C,pl" Jllo..d'" b~ IOClI ,ul.. 01 (QUIt T",. lorm, 'PI"o'oed by tilt ;...d",,1 Conl,r'M' 01'1"0. Umlf'd SUI,. ,n S.plrmtM<, IG'.. "'"'l",ltd tOl lh. ut. 01 tn. el"ll 01 Cov'l fOlth. PUlpO" 01 ,nll'tt',..lh' ,,,.ldod,t1 1n.11 ISlE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE Of THE FORMI I (8) PLAINTIFFS ID'lARD \~. HARKER DEFENDANTS SEE A'ITlICHED SHEE:I' COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTlFFCumberland (EXCEPT IN US_ PLAINTIFF CASES) (b) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED DEFENDANT (IN US PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE lOCATION OF THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED (e) ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME, ADDRESS. AND TELEPHONE NUMBER) JoseFh 11. ~'elillo, Esquire AN:iINO & ROJNER 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION ,"-'<1..... """'IO")"'~ (Cbunsel for Esq. defendants Si.mrons, Eisner and Gordon & Si.nm:lns) Suite 700 ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWNI Richard L. Bazelon, Paul B. Bech, Esq. BAZELON & LESS 1515 Market Street, III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES ,"-'<1.... ......"'" (For DlVefllty Cases Only) '0'l1'Ur.lNhF' AHOONlIOX'DA DU1NOAHT} ilC 3 F~.r.1 QU'ltlon (US Goyefn~nl Not a Party) o 1 U.S. Government Plaintiff PTF DEF PTF DEF Cltlun at this SlIl. 01 01 Incorporatld 01 Prlnclp.1 Plac. 0< 0< or BUllnu, In Thl, Stat, Cltllen of Another State 02 02 Incorporat.d and Prlnclpa' Plu. 05 05 01 BUlin... In Anolh,r Stll. ClIll,n or SubJtc' 01 . 03 03 For.lgn Nation OS OS Foreign Counlry o 2 U,$. Government 0 4 Dlv,ralty Def.ndan' (Indlcale CIII.r:enshlp or Parties In Item III) IV. CAUSE OF ACTION ICfTIE THEUS CM.I,AtvT[UJ<<)("WtftCHYOUAAl'lUHON.oWMIE A ""I' S'''''IYfNTOICAUS( 00 1<<)1 an ,AJIIlSOlCtlQtUL ltAtUlU l.JrrlUSI CWYIEM!tYI Count I: Act, 18 U.S.C. S 1961 et seq. Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizatior, s ( II RI CO II ) V. NATURE OF SUIT (PLACE AN. IN ONE BOX ONLY) TORTS PERSONAL INJURY 0310~ 0315 o\oIpIarII PrOduCt ......, o 320 Auaut:, LJtJeII ...- 0330'.....f~. ......, 0340 ""-'" o 34 5 Marne Prtwcl """" 8 350 MotOI VIhoe D35SMQlor\llhcle ..............., 0360 0Iher P___ ......, CIVIL RIGHTS 044' \'i:Jl'ong O"UE~"*ll :J 443 HouIoftgI --. 040<< We4I.', :J 440 0ln.I' Cml RogrI.. CONTRACT o 110 1'IIol/I'vc. 0120 t.l.w><t 0130 a.u..Acl o 140 N~II'lIl'u~ l:I 150 R.c.ow"Y 01 o.to'PIIJ'"'Ilt!t4 6f.1'lI0I~0I --... G 151 1HOoc...,Aa 0152 R<<oo>....olOtl.1II1Jd SlI.Idtnlloanl lhct""'._! C 153 R_"yDlo.tftlIJ'"'Ilt!t4 D1Vtl.,Ift.BtnttfIl. LJ 160 Sl()(lhoIOeI.'$ull. 0190 0Ir0tI ConuIlCf 0195 Ccnl'IC1PrOOllCtuat.lol')' RIAL PROPERTY RlRFEITURE /PENALTY w 1 AgflCl,ll!ur. C 620 O\J'I4tf Fooo & Drug 0625 01\.19 R.lalecl s'Ilu'e 01 P,OPtrt.,. 21 use B81 ::630LiQuOl~, 06040RRlTII,I(to. 0650 Arr..,. R~. :J 660 Oecup'1~' S...ty'H.altl'l '-'69001,- UBOR BANKRUPTCY D 422 AoPeal 2IUSC tsa o 423 WlIhOI.... 2tUSC Hl7 B PfRSONAL INJURT 0362 P.aonaItn,urr- Me(I~~. 0365P..tonal~_ ProducliAbllll, o 368 AaDelIOI P.,IOI\II I~Pr~ ""'" PERSONAL PROPfRTY 0370 OtnerFrllUCl 0371 br. WI Ler>Oong o 380 0Mt P"'IO'III --... o 385 ~ Oa.,.. ProduclUablllr o 400 State .. ; ......-." 0410 AnlI\rvII 0430 8anItIanG s.r-.g o 450 CommIrt.eflCC RlleI'etc o 450 ~w. Xl470~~""~and .,.......---- 0110~S<<'oCe 0150 s.c:ur...,~, ,""'.... 0.75 CuMO'I* Cha... 12USC)410 D'91~alAclt 0192 ECCIf'lOr'hCSlabIolallOn "" o '93 E~Ql"ll'Nf'ltal Man.. DIM ElW'0'o\IccatlonAd [J '95 ',Mdclnl DI InlOtIMllOr'lAd [J 900 ADPHIdF"Oet._bOn IJnOet E~at Acuu kI ....... 09SOCotl~tr1yof SUlleStalIMl o 19o 0.. SUlMOI}o "".... Appeal to Or,lnc:t Transferred from 0 7 Judge from o 5 anolhet distrICt 0 6 Mu!1idISlttc:t Magistrate (speedy) lJllg.llon Judgment DEMAND SUnkno.-JIl Check rES only It c1_m.naed In compl'lnt JURY DEMAND: 11; YES 0 NO PROPERTY RIGHTS 0820 CoQrngtIII n 130 PalM 8840Tt~ SOCIAL SECURITY 0881 HI" 113",1 0862 Biacal"'918nl o 163 DtWCIOlW'N o('()5,(811 0.64 SSlO Tille XVI o '85 RS! 1'0$(11ll 0710 "., Latv S\AII4Itltt "" 0720 l..Ilt>oriUg<TW Rel.IoOI\. 0730 Labcr/'Mgml -, _.Ad 0740 R......,.1.atlOI "" 0790ow..LaDOI 1.II'QIloon :J 791 EmoI Rei 11'1I' s.o.o, Ad PRISONER PETITiONS 0210 lancl Conotmnaloon C 220 forKIoto.n. o 230 R..v L.... , E,.c'lmenr :: 240 lortl 10 lallG C 245 lor'IP,cxNcll>ItlliIl~ i:: 290 AI Cllh.' Rill p,open~ FEOERAL TAX SUITS 0.70 tu.'IUS PIaontdI OIOelendlnll o 871 IRS_llwI:I Pan.,. 2e use 7009 C5'0~ClftlIO"'ltIlt .....~ HItltUC-ottlu. C 530 GIfIe<., .:: 535 0..,.. Pr'IIII, = 540 u.r.u......, Orfoto :: 550"",," VI. ORIGIN (PLACE AN x IN ONE BOX ONLY) o 1 Onglnal PrOCfedll'~ x: 2 Removed Itom Slale Court :- 3 Remandeo from Appehale Court C .. Remslaled 01 Reopened VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: VIII. REL.\TED CASE(S) IF ANY CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION o UNDER FRCP 23 (See Inslruet1ons) JUOGE ---E<!mbo DOCKET NUMBER 1.Q4-nr-1n':\4 DATE SIG~RE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD I cL..(." -g . Vt..---, i?-\-'i'f UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I , INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS CD:\t1'I.ETING CIVIl. COVER SIIEET FORM JS.44 AUlhorily Fnr Cil'il enl'er Sheel The J5.44 ch'iI cQ\'cr !lhcct and Ih4.' infoml31inn contained hc:rrlllllcuhrr rcpl:lct'\ nOI lrlupplcrncn" the filill1!~ and !lcr\'kc of plcadinl! or olherpaper!l as required h)'law, except U!l. provided h) loeul rulc!. of CIIUn. TllI10 furm" appro\'cd b)' Ihe Judicial Conrc:n:n'~ oflhe Uniled Slalc!I in September 1974, ilio required (or the use of the Clerk of CUUrl fur the purpo!'>c nf il1ltialin!; Ihe civil dnd,:cl ",heet. Cnl1!rrlcqucnlly D ch'jJ cm'tf sheel is ~ubmillcd 10 the' Clerk of Coun (or each ch'il complaint ril4.'U, The altornc)' filinJ; a ca\C ,.)hIUld complete the fmm "\ follo.....!I: I. (ull'lalntllTs. DeCendunlS. Enler names 110'1, C"SI, middle iniliall of pl"inliff and defend"nl. If Ihe plainliff or defend.nl i> a ~o..eml11enl agene)'. use only Ihe full name or 5t:uward abbreviation!.. If Ihe plainliff or defendant i.. an oflicial wilhin a ~uvcrnment a~l.!nc).. identif)' rirSlthe .gency and Ihen Ihe ollicial, ~iI"ing bolh n.me .nd lille. (bl COUnl)' of Residence. For each ci..i1 case filed, excepl U.S. pl.inliff cases. cnler Ihe name of the cnunlY whe,e Ihe c;"IIi.led pl.inliff re.ides at the time of filing. In U.S, pl.inliff c.ses. enterthe n.me oflhe counlY in whieh Iherorst IiSled defendanl,..ides at the lime of filing, (NOTE: In land condemnation CIlSCS, the count)' of re~idence of the: "defendant" i~ lhe locllliun of lhe IraCI of land in\llh'cd). (e) Attorneys. Enler fim1 name. address, telephone number, and altorne}' or recurd. If there arc !roc\'eralntlorne}'!o, li\lll~m on an altachment. noting in lhis seclion "(see BuachmenO". II. JurlsdlcUon. The b.sis oCjurisdiclion i. sel fonh under Rule H (al. F.R.C,P.. which requi,e, lh'ljurisdiclions be shown in pleadings. PI.ce an "X" in one of the belles. If lhere is more Ihan one ba!iis of jurbdiclion. precedence i!to ~i\en in the' order shown below. Uniled Slates pl.inlifC. (I) lurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suil> by .~enci.. and ollice" of Ihe Uniled Slales .re included here, United Slales defendanl. (2) When Ihe plainlifr is suing Ihe Uniled Slate). its. officcn. or a~cncies. place an X in Ihi~ hM., Federal question. (3) This refers to suils under 28 U.S.C. 1331. where juriMliclion arisclI under Ihe Conslitulion of the Uniled SIlIle'S. an amendment to lhe Constitution. an aCI of Congress or a treal)' of Ihe United Stales. In case\ where the U.S. is a pan}'. lhe U.S. plainlirf or defend.nt code takes preeedenee. and box I or 2 should be marked. Diversity of citizenship. (4)This refeB 10 suils under 28 U.S.C. 1332. where panies arC'citizen!'. of differenlslates, When Box 4 is checked. the citizenship of the different p3nie~ must be checked. (See Section III below; federal queMion aClions lake precedence over diversil)' cases.) III, Resldene. (cllllOnshlp) oCPrlnclpal Parlles. This section oflhe lS-4-I i, 10 be eompleled if dil'mil)' of cilizen,hip w.s indiealed abo..e. M.rk Ihis seclion for each princip.1 pan)'. IV. Cuuse of Action. Repon the civil slatute directl)' relalcd to lhe cause of aClion and gi\'e a brief description of Ihe cause. V. Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box, If thc nature of suit cannol be delennined, be sure the cause of action. in Section IV above. i~ sufficient 10 enable lhe deputy clerk or the statistical clerks in the Adminislrali\'e Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more than one nature of suh. seleclthe mose definilh'c. \'1. Origin. PI.ce an "X" in one oCthe seven boxes, Original Proceedings. (1) Ca!oes which originate in Ihe United States district coun~. Remo..ed Crom State Court. (2) Proceedings inili.ted in S1.te cauns may be remnved lathe diSlricl eouns under Till< 28 U.S,C.. Seelion 14-11. When the petition for removal is granted, check this box. Rem.nded from Appellare Coun. (3) Check Ihi, boA for c.ses rem.nded 10 lhe districl eoun for further aClion. Us< the dale of remand as Ihe filing dale. Reins1.:ued or Reopened. (4) Check ehi!'. box for cases reinstated or reopened in the di!Olrict court. Use the reopening dale as Ihe filing dale. Tr.nsferred Cram AnolherDiSlricl. (51 For eases tra..ferred under Tille 28 U.S.C. Seelion 1404(.). Do nO! u<tlhis Cor wilhin diSlricl "ansCe" or mullidislrict litigation transfers. Multidislrict Liti~ation. (6) Check Ihis box when 3 multidi~trict case is transferred inlo the disuicl under aUlhorit\. of Tille 28 U.S.C. Section 1407. When Ihis box is checked. do nol check (51 abo..e, . Ap(lCalto District Judpe from Magistrate Jud~menl. 0, Ched thi!'> 00\ for an appeal from a ma~btr.ue's decision. vn. Requested In Complnlnt. Cla\s Action. Place an "X" in this hox if}'ou are liIin~ a class action under Rule 23. F.R.C\'.P. Demand. In thi!'. space enter the dollar amount (in thou!03nds of dollar!l.) bein~ demanded or indie.uc olher demand such 3\ a prcliminarv injunclion. . Jur)' Demand. Check the appropriale boA to indic31e whether or nol a jUIY is hein~ dl:mandcd. VIII. Rflutt'd Cases. Thi!i ~t'ction of Ihe J544 i, u!>cd to rderence rcla'in~ pending C3'iCll if any. If there are relalcd pendin~ ca!'.es. inscn the dnd.et number!> and Ihe corresponding jud~e name!> for !touch cases. Datf and AUornr,' Slgnalure. Date and si~n Ihe civil cmer sheet. . (rC\".07/891 C1" : 1989 - ?31-)IZ , . IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J, NEVIN WHITE LUMBER CO., INC., Plaintiff, v, CIVIL ACTION NO, J. NEVIN WHITE, ROLAND S. JONES, SHARI L. JONES, R.S. JONES CO., INC., CREDlT- LINE FINANCIAL, INC., BENJAMIN V.R. CONLON, ESQUIRE, JERRY A. PHILPOTT, ESQUIRE, ROGER C. SIMMONS, ESQUIRE, SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE, GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGE T. FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG & FARIS, and LESLIE AUERBACH, ESQUIRE, Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA: Defendants Roger C. Simmons, Esquire, Susan S. Eisner, Esquire, and Gordon and Simmons (collectively, "removing defendants"), by and through their counsel, Bazelon & Less, respectfully aver as follows: 1. On June 30, 1994, Edward W. Harker ("Harker") filed a complaint in this Court in a matter entitled Edward W. Harker v. J. Nevin White. et aI., No. 1:94-CV-I034 (M,D. Pa.) ("the federal case"). The federal case has been assigned to Judge Rambo, 2. On July I, 1994, Harker filed a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania in a matter entitled Edward W. Harker v. J. Nevin White. ~, No. 94 Civil 2481 (C.C.P. Cumbo Cty.) ("the state case"), A !rue and correct copy of I!ARKI!R/PDIIII/MNU 07121/94 I the complaint filed in the Slate case is atlached hereto as Exhibit A. The only difference between the state complaint and the federal complaint is that the latter contains an additional one- sentence allegation regarding federal jurisdiction and venue, ~ Complaint in No. 1:94-CV- 1034 at 1 IS. Otherwise, the two complaints are identical. 3, On or about July 6 and 8. 1994. removing defendants received copies of the state complaint. which copies had been sent to 131 West Patrick Street. Frederick. Maryland 21701 by certified mail. 4. The slate complaint that removing defendants received constitutes the initial pleading setting forth the claim for relief upon which the Slate case is based, 28 U.S.C. ~~ 1331 & 1446(b), 5, The slate case is removable to this Court because: a, In the state case. Harker alleges that defendants violated the federal Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations ("RICO") Act. 18 U,S.C, ~ 1961 et seq., which is a "law. . . of the United Slates." ~ Exhibit A '1 118-28; 28 U .S.C. ~ 1331. b. A civil action alleging a violation of the RICO Act is one "arising under" the laws of the United States. 28 U.S.C. ~ 1331; Lichtenber{:er v. Prudential-Bache Securities. Inc.. 737 F. Supp, 43.44 (S.D. Tex. 1990) (RICO action is removable to federal court) . c, The federal district courts "have original jurisdiction of" all civil actions arising under the laws of the United States. 28 U.S.C. ~ 1331. d, A defendant may remove "any civil action brought in a State court" of which the district courts of the United Slates have original jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C, Ii 1441(a). 2 , . e. Because the state case is a civil action brought in a State court, and a civil action of which this Court has original jurisdiction, defendants may remove it to this Court. Lichtenberl!er, 737 F. Supp, at 44. 6. As a general rule, where there is more than one defendant, all defendants must consent to removal of a case from state court to federal court, Lewis v. Rel!o Co., 757 F.2d 66, 68 (3d Cir. 1985). However, this rule does not apply to defendants who "ha[ve] not been served at the time the remaining defendants file their petition.. lll.. "In that situation, the removal petition will be effective provided that it alleges that the defendants who did not join in it were not served in the state procceding." 1.d. 7. All defendants but one have expressly consented to this removal. ~ Exhibit B attached hereto (written consents to removal). 8. The sole defendant whose consent has not been obtained is J. Nevin White, Counsel for plaintiff has informed counsel for removing defendants that Mr. White has not been served and is a fugitive. Under these circumstances, Mr. White's consent to removal is not required, ~~, 757 F.2d at 68. 9. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. ~ 1446(b), this Notice of Removal has been filed within thirty days after receipt by removing defendants, through service or otherwise, of the initial pleading setting forth the claims for relief upon which the state case is based. 10. Written notice of the filing of this Notice of Removal will be promptly given to all adverse parties. Moreover, a true and correct copy of this Notice of Removal will be filed promptly with the Prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County. 3 . WHEREFORE, defendants Roger C, Simmons, Esquire, Susan S, Eisner, Esquire, and Gordon and Simmons, pray that this cause be and hereby is removed to this Court, and that this Court accept jurisdiction of this action, and henceforth that this action be placed on the docket of this Court for all further proceedings, as though the action had been originally instituted in this Court. Respectfully submitted, BAZELON & LESS By: ~u..t. '"8. l? Richard L. Bazelon Pa. Identification No. 02505 Paul B, Bech Pa. Identification No. 59850 Seventh Floor 1515 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 (215) 568-1155 - Dated: August I, 1994 Attorneys for Defendants Roger C. Simmons, Esquire, Susan S. Eisner, Esquire, and Gordon and Simmons 4 t " ! Q w - Exhibit A - .- ~. .. " ., .-..-................'-. .. I . . . . ' EDWARD W. HAJUOm, 'l'rw;~c in :Recaivarllhip ot J. m:vJ:N WlIITE unmxR co., :tNe., :tN 'l'Jm COD'R'l' OF COMMON PLEAS : CUMBERLAND COON'l'Y, PENNS~LVAN:tA CIVIL ACTION - LAW : . . Plllintitt : NO. 94 civil 2481 I I v. . . J. NEVIN WHI'!'E, ROLAND S. JONES ~ SHAlU L. JONES, Jt.S. JONES CO., I INC., CREDI'l'-LINE fINANCIAL, INC., I llJtNJANIN V. R. CONLON, ESQUIRE, I JERRY A. PHILPOTT, ESQUIRE, ROGER I C. SIMMONS, ESQUIRE, SOSAN S. I EISNER, %SQU:tRB, GORDON AND I SIMMONS, GEORGE '1'. FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CHRISTOPHER O'RRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG " P'ARIS, and. USLIE AU1:RBJ..CH, RSQUIRE . . ,~ - .... I~' ...:.., .,' .' . f~' ~~. '" ... - - - :. ,. '. . - :. . ~. ': I" or, .... ~. .t:..' -- - . . :,;:,: -; ~ . . : . . . . .' . . '04fandAnta JUR~ TRIAL DEMANDED poHPL).IN'l' ~. The Pl~intitt, Edward W. Harker, is Trustee in Receivership . of J. Nevin White Lucber co~pany, Inc., and J. Nevin White, and the ~arital estAte ot J. Nevin White and. willa Whito, having been duly appointed by 'l'he Honorablo George Hotter, court ot COllllllon Pleas, cumberland County, pennsylvania. 2. The Defendant, J. Nevin White, ill the husband ot Willa White, the tormer President 'ot J. Nevin White ~er company, Inc., a resident ot the COllllllonwealth ot Pennsylvania at least until . September, 1992, anc:l Gubj ect to the jurisdiction. ot tha Court or Common Pleas, cumberland County, Pennsylvania, in the action ot phite v. White, No. ~730 civil 1981. 3. The De!cnc:lant, Roland s. Jones, is a selt-deccribed , T9SUOi 1 . "~uaines5 A~vocato" with ottices in Maryland, who baa actively partioipated'in the ~nag~ant of ,tho J. Nevin White Lumber Company in Pennsylvania, an~ baa acted as agent, adviso~ and oonsultant t~ J. Novin White in oonnection with hilS legal dealings with is wl~e, Willa, ~d who is currently subject to an injunotive order issued by Th. Honorable, George Hotter not to interfere with the aotivities of the Receiver, Plaintiff Edward W. Harker. ". 'rhe Deto.ndant, Sbari L. Jonos, is the \Ji~a o! Rolan~ S. Jones, an employee and possibly an ovner of R. 8. Jone. Co., Ino., and bas assisted Roland S. Joneg in the die:!lipation and transfer ot aBsots to \lhich Willa White \10.0 entitled, 'or in which ghe possessed a security interest. Shari L. Jones haa also aided Roland 8. Jones in ." biB attc=pt to run the J. Novln White Lu:her 'company. 5. Thc'Detendant, R. S. Jonos Co., Inc., ig A oorporation with its principal plaoe of busin=ss in Salisbury, Karylan~, whose corporate charter or authority to ~o business in Maryland was revo~ed on October 5, 1992, and which has done business in Pennsylvania, both prior and subsequent to that date. . 6. The Defendant, Credit-Line Financial, Inc., is a corporation with it principal place of business in Maryland, owned by Roland S. Jones and Shari L. Jones, which does business in the cOmmonwealth of ,Pennsylvania, but ",hose charter or authority to 40 busineGG "'as revoked in' Y~ryland on Nove~er 1~, 1991. 7. The Defendant, Benjalllin V.R. Conlon, Esquira, i. an attorney licensed to practice lalol in the State of New York, who vas specially 2 . . . atbdtteeS in ,the cO'IIIIII~nwcalth at PennsylVAnia, Courl ot CD_on Pleas, CWIl];)erlaneS County, in order' to represent J. Navin' White in connection with bi. divorce proceedings with willa White, and who has consp~re4 with J. Nevin White and RolAnd S. 'Jones' as parl ot an 'enterprise' , desiqneeS to 8eiza aDsees ot the Whita =arital .~ate 'to which Willa White is entitleeS, or in which she has a aecurity interest, aneS transfer these assets beyond the reach of Willa White and the Courl ot,common Pleas, 'cumbarland county. 8. 'l'he Defendant,' Jerry L. Philpott, Ellquiro is ~ attorney licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth ot Pennsylvania, who at .. , varioUII taes represented J. Nevin White in connection with the. White " divorce and bankrUptcy proceedings, and J. Nevin whi~ Lumber Co., .., Xnc. in connection with a Chapter ~1 bankruptcy tiled in the Middle District: at PennSYlvania. g. !l'he Dafendants, Roger C. simmons, Esquire and susarrEisner, Esquire are attorneys licensed to practice law 1n the state at Maryland, who allegedly represor.t a porluguese corporation known as Euro-Ceramica, Inc. Said. counsel siqned and tiled a declaratory judg=ent in Pederal COurt for the Middle District ot Pennsylvania. Further, Hr. S1m=ons and Ms. Eisner appeared in the Court: at COllllllon - Pleas, cumberlAnd County, in an attempt to intervene 'on behalf at . .Euro-cer9lica in the divorce action of White v. White. 10. The Defendant, Gordon' simmons, ill a partnership organized to practice law in the state of Maryland, and the, Defendants Simmons and Eisner are partners in or e=ployees ot said law firm. 3 11. Tho oerenc1ant, Wilson, POY.ll, Lanq , Paria, is partnership , Qrqani~ed tor the pr~ctioQ ot lAY in the State or Vermont. .12. The OGfcnc1ants, Caorge T. Paris, rv, E,u:zuire and Chriat.ophor O'Brian, Esquire, aro attorney. licen..d t.o prAotioe law in the St.ate ' ot Vermont. Defendant Fari. i. II. partner in the firm of Wilson', powell, UU1g- , Paris, and Da:l:lmdant 0' Brian is believed t.o be an assooiata. . 13. 'I'he oere.ndants, coorqe '1'. P.IIrisa, rv, Esquire and Chrilltophar O'Brien, Esquire aoted as oounsel in a bankruptcy improperly filod in the state ot Vermont, designed to aid in the diB~ipat.ion of assets located in Pennsylvania, properly bolonqinq to Willa White pursuant. " to Order ot the Court 0:1: Co=on P1ClAII, CWIlbClrland Count.y, and who _. therofore partioip~t.cd in the fraud affecting the proparty ot Willa White, locat.ed in Pennsylvania, as dCltAiled bel~w. ~~. The Defendant, Leslie, s. Auerbach, Esquire i. an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of Maryland, who hAil acted Be counsel in bankruptcies filed in the Federal District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on behalt of J. Nevin White and J. Nevin White Lumber company, 'Xnc., and who alBO furthered the ba~~ptcy improperly lodged in the state of Vermont by Roland S. Jones. Attorney Auerbach's activities in connection with these bankruptcies aided in the dissipation of marital assets belonging to willa White, or in which she had a security interest. 15. J. Nevin White and Willa E. White vera married on NOVember 23" ~9" 6. 4 .16. J. Nevin Whito ~n~ big vita mutually operatod a busine.. . . known as 'J.' Ne~ in Whi to IAmbor co., Xno., a PeMlIyl vania oorpora t.ion , . with ita principal place ot business in DunoaMon, .PeMsylvania. . , :I. 7. ~8 1:lWilineflll ot the company consi.t.ee! ot purchl1sinljJ loqs and tiJllbcr which were SIloYn into boards, and Bold on the wholesale mlIrket in "tho UnitAd stat.., Canada and Xroland. :1.8. Hrs. Whito contributed signitiCAntly to the lumber bUlIineas ~nd worked at the plant. tor approximAt.ely t.wenty-nine (2~) years. 19. 'On OGcQlllbor 2"', 1981,' W111a E. Whito tiled tor divorce against J. Nevin Whita. 20. Approximately thirteen (13) Master's Hearings were held in . , this divorce proceeding, and during tho course ot the prooeeding, Hr. White WAS represented by a nWllbar ot attornoy., while )!rs. White was and remains represantod by Richard C. Snelbakor, Esquire. 21. On April 6, :1.988, an Order ot Equit.able Dilltribution intended to conclude the divorce proceedings was entered Which gave ,lIZubstantial as sots: and a large' cash settlement to Willa E. White ($1,662,990.00). The cash award waa to be secured by a Note otthe White Lumber Company, and certain real estato held in Hr. White's individullol n~e located in Centre and Juniata Counties. 22. Yx. White appealed the Order ot E~itabl. Distribution to the Superior court, which upheld the Order generally, but found that the trial Court bad tailed to allow tor tax consequences resultinq trom potential liquidation ot the corporation, and therefore remanded the matter to the Court ot Common Pleaa, cumberland County, to atford 5 .;tho pll.rtiQIlIUl opportunity to prccent evidenoe 'on tho tax ilScuc. 23. 'on or about July 21, 1988, J. Nevin Whit- be90n trlUlllterrinq money trom the J. Nevin White Lu=ber Co., Ino., to tbo Poten~Ant,. R. 8. Jones Co., Ino. These tunds were properly subj eot to thil equitable distribution OrdcrD at the PennoylvAnia State court.. 24. On or about July :21,1.989, J. Navin Whit_ .n~ J. Novin Whito Lumber company hirod Potondll.nt R. S. Jones Co., Inc~ and R. S. Jones , to oct as "business consultant" tor the purposes ot evadin9 the Orders ot the Court of co=on Plell.s lUld detoll.ting tho mll.ritll.l right. ot Willa B. White. 2t!. J. Nevin White and J. Navin White Lumber CompAnY paid R. s. Jones, co., Inc. the SUlll at $7,tlOO.OO to retain the prote5sionalleqal services at Ben:lZUllin V.R. Conlon, Esquire, to assist th8lll in deteatinq tho marital rights ot willa E. White. 26. J. Nevin White, Roland s. Jones, Shari L.Jones, and Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire knowingly utilizsd R. s. Jones Co., Inc., to divert funds IUld assets of J. Nevin White Lumber company to theJ:lselves and J. Nevin White in violation of specific Orders of the Court of Common Pleas of cumberland county, PennsylVAnia. 27. On or about Septamber, 1988, tho Dofondant, J. Nevin ~~ite, authorod notes of consultations with Roland S. Jones concerning the ~iling of bankruptcies 'as a means ot evading his marital problCllls. ThOSQ strategies were discusscd by phone in oonsultation with Roland Jones. A nota dated September 21, 1988, indioatcs that Willa White was the only creditor. 6 I - . ' I 20. On or~out J~nu~ry 18, 1989, tho Detendant., Roland S. JoneD ~nd B~jQmin V.R. Conlon, E~quire, met with Attorney Ri~hard Snelbaker Clt bill oUioe in CUmberl~d. county, pennsylvania, .and thr~tencd to tile b~ptoie. on behalt' ot J. Navin White and his ~~in8ga to deteat the marital right. ot willa E. White in tho avant ,ahe declined to accept A muoh leaaer monatary aottlomont than that to which the Court bed indicated ebe wall antitled. 29. on February 24, 1989, the superior Court ot P~noylvania issued its Opinion ~d Order, atd.=ing the aquit~le ciistribution and remanding tor bearings on the tax consequenoes ot corporate dissolution. .' 30. On SepteCber 25, 19S9, the Detendant, Senjamin V.R. conlon, Esquire, ~oved tor'his admission betore the coure ot Common Pleas, Cwnberland County, to represent J. Nevin White'lS interests. Dotendant Conlon was paid by Roland Joncs ~rom funds tranc~erred to R. s. Jonea Co., Xnc. And acted as counsel to Roland S. Jone~ in other ~tters. 31. On OCtober 31, 1989, A stock purchase agreement was purportedly entered into between a Portuguese corporation, Euro- ceramica, Inc., and J. Nevin White, trans!errinq the lumber company asset~ in return tor a pro~issory note. The Defendant, Roland S. Jones, vas then ~upposadly appointed by this Portuguese corporation as P~esident of J. Nevin White Lumbar co., Inc., with J. Nevin White to remain employed as =anaqar of tha co=pany. 32. Euro-Cera=ica, Inc. wa~ originally incorporated in portugal on March 16, 1968. It currently has no employaes and ~uQPQnded its 7 . I oommoroilll llotivities on November 29, 19,83. Tho company ill not lilSted. as POODcooing ~y assots, ~d all of its. patrimony weD Gold by public auction to the Fudcracao dOli Industrialiall de Setubel. 33. ,Plaintitt believe. and therotore' llver. that at the timo cf the alleged sale o~ stock, Euro-Ccramlca WllG not in businoss, it had an unbalanoed tinancial .ituation due to late paymcntll, and that it was insolvent and une.ble to pay tor tho alleged aal. ot IItock. 34. On November .15, 1989, 'rhe Honore.ble George ao:~er ilSlsued An Order scheduling Hearlngll on the.r~anded divorce proceeding. 35. On November 16, 19S'9, at least three piece. ot property were deeded by J. Nevin Whito to C::"adit Line Financial Corporation or Shari L. Jones tor a Gupposed total oonsiderAtion ot ~3~7,300.00, in direct ,~ violation ot the Court's Order designating the properties as aecurity tor Willa White'. cquite.ble interest. 36. On January 1, 1990, a Rule was issued by the Court 'upon J. Nevin White to produce tinancial records tor the Lumber company. 37. Detendants Roland S. Jones and R. S. Jones co., Inc., authored :mail and utili:r:ed, the United Statss mail to transmit a threatening letter to 'rhomas G. Clark, CPA, as a result ot which ~aid accountant was intilllidatsd and extorted from providing further accounting Qorvioaa to the J. Nevin White Lumber COlllpany. 38. On J~nuary ~1, 1990, tha Lumber COlllpany'. oertitied public accountant, 'Hr. Clark, waa removed from his office. 39. Remand Hoaringa wore hold by The Honorablo George Hoffer between February, 1990, and August ot that aame year. S 40. On AUgust 22, 1990, the supposed sale or the White Lumbar co=pany to ZUro-ceramioa vaa rovcalod tor ~o first tim_ to Willa Whit. and her. attorney. -41. In rcaponac, a Petition tor Speoial Roliet \las tiled by ~~. White's attorney, Richard SnQlbakcr, and a,Rule was i~~uod upon J. Nevin White, J. Nevin White LUlIlbor Company, Inc., Rolanc1ll. Jones, cred~t Line rinancilll Corporation, zmd Euro-CarUlica, roturnable October 31, 1990, to show cause why reliet pursuant to the divorce . ooda ahould not b. qrantad by the Court. 42., Subsequontly, an Ordor was entered by the Court declaring the various transaotions c1e9cribed abovo .IIP being traudulent, revoking the .ale ot the lumbar businas. to Ruro-Ceramica, voiding the real estate transters, imposing a constructive trust on allot J. Nevin :white'lI assets, authorizing the filing ot liens and li. pendens, . enjoining Roland Jones and Credit-Line Financial Corporation trom dealing with or disposing ot any ot the marital assets, or the . pr04ucts thereof, and placing a constructive trust on the assots of J. Nevin White Lwnber Company, Inc. ~3. Tho Defendant, Conlon, appealed this Order, and the appeal was quashed in NOVember, 1990. '44. On DecCUllber 26, 1991, J. , Nevin Whit. authored a =e=o ~ndicating or implying that money WAS to ba placed under tho control o~ a trustee located in Liechtenstein. -4!S. On or about Hay 8, 1992, the Court entered an order a!!lrminq the traudulent naturo of the above-described transfers of 9 '. tho bwain... and roal ..tat., and appointed. 24".rcS Harker .. Itecelver. . '0. . . .U.' Th.'Roce1ver, E~rcS hArJcer,' lIot with J. Nevin White to . . ' . .' d.i8C1\U1. the iJDpli~tion~ ot rocoiverahip and to begin his work. e.fondant Whita induced Hr. Har~er from taking any action prior to thll following Konday,' 80 that the Company'a bUllin088 would not be interrupted. 41. on Monday, Kay 11, 199:t, during tho tiJDe when ZclwarcS..Harker had beon induced to forebear from 80izing company ....t., J. Nevin White filcld a Chapter 11 blU1lC:uptcy in the Kiddle pistrlot ot Pennaylvania. The document listed R. S. Jono. ~. agent, and the " Defendant Conlon a. counsel. 48. Roland S. Jones, on or about Kay 12, 1992, did utilize .. ,~.~ telephone communications to threaten and attempt to IntiJDidQte Plaintitf troll performing hi. duties as Truste. by calling Plaintitt . .t: hOllla and ~oateninq that: Plaintiff retrain from performing his duties. 49. Subsequently, Defendants White, Jones and Conlon hired and consulted with Defendant Philpot~ and Defendant Auerbach concerning this bankruptcy. 50. Edward Harker interv.enad in the b~ptc:y, and together . . with the u.s. Trustee, requested the appointmant: of a' 'l'rUst:ee to supersede the debtor in possession. !rhe Dofendant Auerbach appeared on behalf o't Euro-CerZllllica, objecting to the appointment: of a Trustee. ~1. On June 30, 1992, tha bankruptcy Jud9'e, '!'he Honorable Robert WOodside, dismissed the bankruptcy ag ti10d in bad taith, and as an 10 att:ompt to, Ilvade the ettoot ot StAte Court Ordo.rll enterod in connoction with ~it~ v. White. ~:l. Xn Juno, 1992, I>ctcndant Conlon appoalod, on White's bahalt, . , Judge Botter's decision appointing Edward Harkor all Roceivor. 53. On July 2, 1992, Jerry Philpott replaoed Detendant Conlon .~B counsel in order to pertcct thlB interlocutory appoal. 54. On July a, :1.992, a Gccond ban>-..ruptcy walJ tiled in th8"Hlddle District:. ot PannsylvZLnia on behalt ot the de.btor I J. Nevin White LwIlhor COl:lpany. Thill Chapter 11 bankruptcy listed the Detendant Philpott all counsel. The Detendants Conlon lU'Id Auerbach later entered appoaranco8 a8 cO~8l. ~. 55. Roland B. Jones, Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire, and Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire knowingly ooncealed an aQQot ot the J. Nevin White Lumber Co:cpany, to witl a tet!eral oondclDrlation prooeet!ing . settled tor $200,000.00 tram Plaintiff and the United states Bankruptcy Court. Defendants knovingly tiled incomplete and inaccurate statements vith the Bankruptcy Court in order to conceal Baid condemnation proceeding. 56. Roland s. Jones gave talse and incomplete testimony under cath during Zl banJttuptcy procooding, to vi t: Zl 34:1. meeting held betore the United states Trustee on August 10, 1992. Dur~ng lOaid .meeting, regarding questions concerning assets, depreciation, ant! va~ue& o~ real QlOtate, Roland S. Jonea willfully concealed the a~oresaid condemnation prooeeding. 57. Sometime thereafter, the Oefondant Roland Jones issued a .11, .'--_.. --------..-1 -company Updat.- to all ~ploycc5 ot J. Nevin White L~er Company, Ilpaoitically stating that the o01:lpl1ny hl1c1 Bought protection tro):ll . . possible takeover by tiling bankruptcy in the U. s. BAnkruptcy Court, . . but that nonathelesB, the company vas not having tinancial problama and that the situation resulted trom per~onal ditticulties ot Xr. Whit. that go back manyyel1rs. y~. Jones turther .tatad, "I am sur. that some ot you llI11Y wondor why the company i. in bl1nkruptcy it there are not tinanoilll problema. 11.5 with many nationo.l corporations throughout the country, blUV.ruptc:y is being used tor a vll.riety ot dit:Hculties. !I'heretore, there is no reason to be concerned about the ability ot this oompany to meet its finAncial obligations.- ~8. Xr. Jones also stilted, NThe reason tor seeking banY.ruptoy bAd nothing to do with tinancial difticulties, but was taken to p~event takeover by other parties, arising trom a marrio.ge settlement cUspute. · Exhibit NA". . 11. copy or the company update is attachad herato as 59. On or about August, 1992, Defendant Conlon tiled a pro se action to No. 92-1058 in tha Federal District Court: tor the Middle District ot Pennsylvania against vl1rious defendants, inclUding The Honorable Robert: J. WOodside, Magistrate J. ~drew Smyser, various attorneys, and the First National Bank ot MifflintoWJl, contending that ' , these detendants had conspired to prevent Mr. Conlon trom practicing law and receiving paY1'lcnt 'tor profcssional scrvices rendered, in violation ot the RaCketeering, Intluenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. 51961, ~ ~ (RICO), as well as (2 U.S.C. 51983 and ~2 ,. ""..,--...-- ~,..... .. .~;~ Il51B!5. 60. Ju~qe woodc1de and Ha9ia~ra~. Smysor had beGn involved in d16mi88al of the first bankrup~cy, dcnominated by the Coure a. tiled in bad faith. 61. Shortly attervardc, the DatGndant, Roland S. Joncs" tiled a 8imilar suit to No. 92-1151 against The Honorable Ceo~. E.'Hofter, AttO~8Y ~1chard c. Snelbaker, the Receiver, ~ward W. Hark~r, and ~ttorney ~obQrt ~. O'Brien. 62. ~tendlmt Roland S. Jones alleged 'that thea~ Judqes and Attorneys bad conspired to provent Roland S. Jone. and J. Nevin White trom doing busincss, through banding down alleqodly fraudulent Orders enforcing Willa White's claim tor relief under the Divorce Code. 63. 80th of these suits were di&mi~sed as totally w1thout basis or merit by the Federal District court tor the Middle District ot ~ POMsylvania. 64. Additionally, Defendant Conlon WaS assessed Rule 11 sanctions by the United states District Judge William L. Standish for tiling a frivolous lawsuit.' 65. Tho Di15trict court declined to order Ilimilar Ilanctions against Roland S. Jones because he is not an a~torney, was acting pro se, and the Court believed that be may have misunderstood the nature 'ot the laws involved. 66. The District Court did Ordsr, however, that sanctions would be entertained should he appeal the dismiGsal. 67. These Rrco Complaints requested not only monetary damages, 13 " but also injunotive relief, in an attemp~ to hamper the enforoe.ent . at Court' Orders relAting to the .arital' dispute. . '!'he:,' Also constituted an attempt to throaten and intimidate jUdicial officers and attorne:r's, and to binder the propor adminiDtration o~ justice. 6B. On AUguDt' 7, 1992, A Rule waB issued on J. Nevin White to tlhow caulSe w:,' the OrdcrlS ot Court entered Septelllher IS, 1990, and Kay D, 1992 IShould not be enforced, end wh:,' h. should not b. ~eld in contempt of Court for failure to Abi"'e therewith. Rule vas returnable . at a Hearing to be hald August 26, 1992. 69. On August 27, 1992, the Rule was =ade Absolute, J. Nevin White vas ,found to be in villful cont.empt, and J. Nevin Whit. was ordered to appear in Court on september 1', 1992, at 9:00 a... to d.t~ine appropriate ontorcement remedies and/or sanctions to ensure compliance with the ardors ot the Court. .- , . 70. J. Nevin Wbite failed to appear tor this Hearing and a bench warrant WAS issued for his arrest on september 16, 1992. 71. On or about September 15, 1992, the De!~ndant White left the Commonwealth or Pennsylvania. 72. R. S. Jones co., Inc., Roland S. JoneD, and Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire hava utilized fraudulent mail ~rops and addresses for . J.' Nevin White to conceal the whereabouts ot J. Ngvin White as ll, ruqitivo. 73. On September 15, 1992, the Defendant White's appGlal from the dismissal ot his first bankruptcy was also di~miGsed. 7'. On October 5, 1992, the R. S.' Jones Company'_ charter to do 14 .. businesa in the state of Maryland vas revoked. 75. On November 16, 1992, the interlocutory appeal perfected by o.tendant Philpott vas diamiased. , , 76. On o.cembor 18, 1992, ~ Petition tor Further Special Reli.: vas tiled by Attorney Snelbakcr, and on Jzmuary 25, 1993 an Order vaG entered desi~ting various propertieD aubject to the marital Aotate to Mrs. White. . 77. On April 7, 1~~3, . third bankruptcy vn. filed in Florida , . by an Attorney Waldron on behalf of J. Nevin White individually. Detendant Jones arranged and paid for said bankruptoy prOCeeding. 78. On April 7, 1993, at or abou~ the 5~e 'time .. the ~ird bankruptoy vns beinq tiled, Defendant Auerbaoh appeared before Bankruptcy Judge Woodside and stipulated to conditional diemi8.al ot the second bankruptcy: 'rho Florida bankruptcy \nIS not revealed to the . Court or Plaintiff at Baid time. 79. On April 8, 1993, the Order ot Bankruptcy Judge WOodside vas enterod. 80. On April 8, 1993, zit 10:50 a.m., Defendants Jones and Conlon appeared at the Plaintift'~ office and served upon Plaintiff lL notice ot the Florida bankruptcy. OGtendant Conlon stated that the Florida , bankruptcy nullified Judge Woodside's Order and threatened legal action against Plaintiff if be Eought to enforce said Order or to seize oorporate assets, records or funds. 81. On April 8, 1993, Judge Hoffer ordered Plaintiff to sei~e the corporate bank accounts at Second National Bank and Dean Witter lS . . , , , Reynolds. 8~. 'I'hat BIllIlO day, a "sugge.tion o~ Baw.ruptcy" WAG ~ilad in the Court of Common Pleas, cumborland County. 83. On April 16, 1~~3, the Defendant Conlon phoned the Second National Bank in Maryland atte~ting to inter~oro with tho tranofera o~ tho fundQ to Ed,ward lIl!rker by acoerting A stay ballad upon" the ~loridA bankruptcy. Both OGfendants Conlon and Jonas de=and~d that . the bank'aooounts bo releasad to Jonos. 84. On April 16, 1993, the'Honorable Robert J. WoD<?-t1ide, Chie! Bankruptcy Judgo ~or the Kiddle District ot Pennsylvania, tiled his Ordor and Opinion d!ll=istling tho bankruptcy ot J. Nevin Whita Lumber ." Company, :Ino., spDcifioally ~inding that the Petition was tiled in bCld faith and that the ~iling repreoanted another attempt by J. Nevin Whito to delay having hill wife, who has serioulS medioAl problemG, ~rolll . reoa!vinl7 property to vhich she vas entitled. The Court further ordered that no bankruptcy could be initiated by the J. Nevin White Lumber Company in thi8 or any other jurisdiction tor A period of not less than 180 ,days. 85. On Hay" 1993, the attorney who had filed tho Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Florida, Ed....ard J. Waldron, vi thdrev the bAnkruptcy rather ~an riSk sanctions requested by Plaintiff. 86. On or about May 13, 1993, the Defendant R.B. Jones vas held in conte.J:lpt "by order o~ the Honorable George Hoffer, the Court finding thAt he had withdrawn $271,000.00 trom Juniata Bank and tran~fQrred to llloney to Dean Wittor Reynolds in Ne.... York city, contrary to 16 f ,fP..... . . . . . speeitio Court: .order. Judqo Hoffer ordered thll~ Jone. be jailed until he purged himself of hie eon~ampt:. 87. On HIlY 14, 1993~ Jone. VIlS rclcllsed trom prison beeause.the then-existing bank bal~oo. vore returned. 88. On Hay 19, 1993, a pcrmanen~ injunc~ion VAS issued Ilgllin~~ Roland Jenes, enjoining hiD trom intortering with tho Clo~ion~ of Edvard Harker and ordering Jone. to Ileoount. 89. On June 7, 1993, the Detenc!4nt .:rones, through tho Detendant Philpott, appoaled thie Order. 90. On .:rune 21, 1993, the Detendant Jones tiled accoun~. under s8al. 91. On June 22, 1993, Euro-CerMica, J:nc. purportedly initiated " Il declaratory judgtllent action in the United state. Distric~ Court tor the Middle Dist:rict:. ot PennsylVAnia. Euro-Ccramioa, Inc. vas . supposedly represented by Detendllnts simmons and Zianer ot D8tendan~ Gordon i simmons. 92. The relief requosted in thia litiqation va. an Order declaring that Euro-ceramica was the appropriate owner ot J. Nevin White Lumber Company, although the sale to Euro-ceramica had already been declared a fraud by Judge Hotter. 93. On October 18, 1993, Edward Harker moved to employ special .counsol to aid him in hie Receivership activitie.. 94. On December 2, 1993, another Petition for spacial Relief was filed by Willa White, through her Attorney Richard Snelbaker, and on January 5, 1994, Edward Harker received the Court'. authority to 17 ,.--. '... .,. '-.....-.....,.' . --""- '---1 . appoint an aooountAnt to aid in bi. ASS.Sl:lIlont ot the Lumber Company's :financial situation. . . P~. SomG the company's boo~~'had been obtained by Edward Harker purauant to Court order, tor the tirst time, on Hay 13, 1993, tho date of tho permanent injunction'bearing. S6. At ditferent tiJllBII ther8l'tter, tho Receiver E4ward Harker dia~crod that bo~inning July 21, 1981, a totel or $6S~,204.2l had been tranmtorred from tho J. Navin White Lumbar CompAny'. accounts to R. S. Jones, Inc. through Karch 16, 1993. n. An exhibit detailing the datu and parliculara ot tho monetary transfers is attached hereto as ~xhibit waw. SB. Botore Bdward Harkor received authority trom the Court to SGizo the cOlIlpany'. aBsets, it bad been run in J. Nevin White's absence through lIlB8saqCG conveyed to personnel by Roland Jones, Shari . .'~ Jones, and J. Nevin Whito. Additionally, Roland Jonea would visit :from tiJlle to time. 99. Once Edward Harker assumed operation of the business, he discovered that vast amounts of :forest land had been clear cut by Jones and White, thereby greatly depreciating the value ot property SUbject to Which Willa White's equitablo lion, 3.00. On January 10, 1994, yet a fourth bankruptcy was tiled, this tiJlle an involuntary Chapter 11 petition riled by R. S. Jone~ Company, Inc. in VBrmont. A notice of this bankruptcy walZ filed in the Court ot Co=mon Pleas, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, by Defendant Conlon on January 13, 1994. lB --.- , . ",,,... ..--......... . . 101. The involuntary Petition o! R. B. Jones Compan~ ~sBcrted that John Nevin .White' owned timberland And -. Ilawm,ill operation, . .... al thouqh the business had supposedly been .II,'old :to Euro,-.cor~mica, 'tne., the corporation ",hieh Oe!cndant Auerbach reprallantad bc~ore the Federal District court, Middle Diotriet ot Penn8ylvania. 102. Tho Peti tioncr vas roprcllcnted b~ Defendant. Georqo 'r. Pari~, 'IV, Esquire, and Chri5topher 0' Brien, Esquire, as wall ag Lesli. Auerbech, Esquire. 103. Detencl.ant Leslie Auerbach tiled an Affidavit asserting that J. Nevin White Md boen sorved by' mail, in Vermont, with the bankruptcy Complaint. 10"'. The relief souqht in the bZlJ1l-..ruptcy WAS supposed lllanaqement feea of R. S. Jonea Co., 'Inc. agAinst J. Nevin White in the amount o~ approxinataly $15,000.00. . " 105. On January 2", 1994, the Honorable George Boffer ordered ~dvard Harker ~o intervene in the Vermont bankruptcy. Edvard Harker i~vestigated the matter, finding that there vas no evidence that J. Nevin White resided in the juriGdiction and that, at most, he hed a mail drop. 106. Roland s. Jones, Benjamin V.R. conlpn, Esquire, George T. Faris, IV, Esquire, and 'Christopher O'Brien, Esquire knovingly 'conspired to utilize a false address and place of residence ot J. Navj,n White. 1.07. Roland S. Jones and R. S. Jones co., Inc. knovinqly provided' talse information subject to the ponalty of perjury in an involuntary 111 . . . I . bankruptcy petition alb9in9 that it. Hovin Whit.e lived at UD 11, >>OX . . ..' 1460, Varqanne., V8nont: 0.54111. . , . ,., , ,. . ."... .' 10~. On Karch 16, '19114, the banlc1-uptcy 'V~S dillllli.Daed' by Order ot , . th. Bankruptcy iTudge, and tho Court specitically found that the putative dobtor.maIntained neithor a residence nor dOlllicile in.their juriSdiCtion, a ~act known, by the petitioning oreditor, R. S. Jones Co., :Ino. 1011. ~i8 bankruptcy dismissal was also appecled and dislIIissed, the 7ederal Dlat.riot c~urt finding thAt the action Was a. 'fraud. . . . 110. ~. liti9ation initiated. by Buro-ceramicc, :Inc. tor a . .., . declaratory judgment. was alao dilllllll1se~ as yet. an~t.har att&mpt to collaterally at:t:aok the orders at the Court of COllllllOn Pleas, .'," cumb8rland county, P8nnsylvanic, and in qenaral, to intertare with the enforcement of lawB of the CO:llllllonweclth of PennSYlvania. . . 111. Defendants Cordon, Bisnor, and Cordon. Simmona had appealed. thb diSlllbsal to the Third Circuit Court: ot Appeals, which dismissed it:. 112. Defendant Roland S. Jones knowingly filad a tal sa report with the :Internal Revenue Service alleqing that the J. Navin White Lumber Company was owned by a foreiqn corpcr~tion, to wit: Euro- . Ceramica, and further Roland S. Jones did knowingly utilizQ the United ~tatea Hail for the purpose aforesaid. 113. CUrrently, Defendant Jones is attOlllpting to rea-open J. Nevin White'. bankruptcy procoeding's in tho Bankruptcy Court for the KiddIe Diot.rict of Pennsylvania. . . :30 . 11~. ROland S. Jones, R. S. Jon.. Co., Xnc., Shari L. Janos, Benjamin "V.R. Conlon, Esquire, Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire and Lcclie Auerbach, Esquire, knowingly utilized payments to'R. 6. Jonoa Co., Xnc. to divert tunds tro= the J. Nevin Whito Lumber Company to pay thcmDclves teeD and expenses While concealing the true nature or the pa~ent trom the Plaintiff, Court ot Common Pleas, and tho United Stat~8' Bankruptcy Court. :L15.'Roland S. Jonoa, R. S. JoneB, co., Xno., Benjamin V.R. o . conlon, Esquire, Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire, zmd Leslie Auerbach, Esquire knowinqly utili%ed R. B. Joncs' Co., Inc., to divert monies trom the Dabtor-in-PocGcGsion during a pending bankruptcy proceeding and 'did receiv~ protessional toos without application to the Bankruptcy Court or authorization tor payccnt thereot. 116. Aa a result ot tho Defendants' oonduot, substantial assots . which once comprised the J. Nevin White Lumber Company, and a~aeta otherwise part ot the White :carital estate, have bean dissipated, fraudulently transferred in interstate commerce, or destroyed, drastically reducing tho property ~vailable to the Receiver, Edward W. Harker, to recover on babalf of Willa "''bite. Further, the :lllultiplo bankruptcies and spurious litigations have seriously interfered with the Rec~ivor'a ability to run tho Lumber Company and ~intain it as ,a financially viable entity. 117. rurther, the multiple, vexatious actions and appeals initiated and rurtherod by the various Detendants required the expenditure or substantial 1II0nieB to defend. to the detri:lllent ot 21 I assot. held in Reoeivorohip for the bone fit or Willa White. COtm'1'.~ VrOr~~!ONS OP ~ ~~C~TBERINa ~ CORRUPT ORG~IB~TIONB ~CT ID~ W. EARXER, ~ru.tee in ~.aeivor.hip c~ J. nv:UI nI~JI X.tllllllB~' co., IlfC. ,.. J. !lEVI. WXI!1'J!!, ROUlm B. JODS, a.B. Jom:S co., %2l'0., Sm.Jt% L. JOnB CUDI!t'-LXNlr >>'na.NOXAL, %1>10., B!NJAKIX V.J1.. COm.ol1,. ESQOIJUI, . J:!1UtY A. PRILPO'I'f, :IS QOX!U'.:, ROGER c. BDDtONS, ESQUIU, .. BOSUl B. ZISNER, :!BQtlXU, GORDON.J.ND BIXHONS, QEO~aB ~. ~~S, IV, BBQOIRB, CEJl.IS~OPEEJI. O'~RIEN, ESQOIJUI, WXLS02l', POWELL, L1.)lQ , !')JU1l nnd L!:SLXB AtlZJUlAClt, Z:~Qt1IR.B " , .118;" . Partlg'raphs ':1 through . 117 ere incorpora ted herein by :t'eterance. ..... 11g. Defendant. J. Nevin White, Roland S. Jones, R. S. Jonos, Inc. and Benjamin V.R. Conlon, ~Bquire, initially conspired to create and dir.ot an enterprise calculated to deprive Willa White, aqa later Ed~ard Harker, as Receiver, of ~oney or property and business assets to ~hich they ~ere entitled pur.uant to Orders of the Court ot Common Pleas, cumberland County, ~enn.ylvania, as affirmed by the Superior Court ot Pennsylvania. 120. This enterprise vasdireoted primarily by Roland S. Jones, who coordinated a pattorn or activity dasigned tQ trust rate entorce~ent ot the laws or the Common~ealth o! Pennsylvania, and in particUlar, the Orders of the Court ot COllllllon Pleas, CUlIlberland County, through initiation of a series or tour rraudulent bankruptcies~ by taking multiple frivolous appeals o! Court Orders;a 22 by utilizing- the delay rCE:ultAnt tram S1t.id actions to dissipate llllllets and enrich themselves at tho expense of marital aBBot., by motivating Ii. declaratory judgment purportedly on ,behalf ot Euro-cora.mica, e non- vi~le ohell corporation, and by initiating two bad faith RXCO suits aqclinst Judges, o:t::t:icers of the court, and th4ll Receiver, !:dlotard Harker, as doocribed above, in an attempt to hamper their Lbili~y to administer the law. 121. Defendants Jonoo, Conlon, White and R.S. Jones co., Inc. were aided in their racketeering enterprise by the Defendant attorneys who conopired with Defendants Jones, Conlon, White and R.S. Jones Co., Inc. to file and further fraudulent, ~ham litigations as described above, when they know or should have known the fraudulent purpose ot those various litigations. 122. Defendant Jones, Conlon and White were further aided in . their racketeerin<;1 enterprise through the conduct and use ot. two corporations, R. S. Jone&, Inc. and Credit-Line Yinancia~, Inc., as vehicles to effect the fraudulent transfer of assets out of pennsyl vcmia. R. S. Jones co., Inc., also initiated the final bankruptcy, wbich it Y~ew was i~properly filed in Vermont. 123. Defendant Jones, conlon, White and R. S. Jones Co., Inc. were also aided' in their racketeering enterprise through the action 'of Shari Jones, who conspired vi th them to effect the fraudulent transfer of assets &ubject to the orders of the Court of Co=on Pleas, cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 12.(. The Defendants utilized the United States mail and the 23 .. . _... ..... .'., ,"',',01' '.'~ "" ... .. -~-- l - . telephone wireD to tile pleadings, and make litigation-related , , communications in connection with the tour fraudulent,bankruptcies, two sham RICO actions, sham Pederal declaratorY 1udqment aotion. and spurious appeal., .. described above. 125. D6tendants Jones, Conlon, Auerbnch, FAris and O'Brian conspired to frAudulently allege the residence ot J. Nevin White as Vergonnes, Ve~ont, in order to improperly invoko and ,pursue b~~ptoy in SAid Oistrict while utilizing the =ail. and mail drops to conceal the whereabouts of J. Nevin Whit.. 126. The overall purpODC or the' enterprise desoribed above was to illegAlly frustrAte enforcement ot the'lawful orders ot the Court ot COmmon Pleas, CUlnbcrland county, as afti%'lllcd by the superior Court ot Penmsylvania, thereby depriving the Receiver, Edward Harker, of the ability to recover Assets ot the J. Nevin White Lumber Co., rnc., and . the White marital estate, for the benefit ot Willa White, e..nd hampering the Receiver's a1:liU,ty to etfectively run the IAmber cO%llpany. 127. The' acts of these Detendants, described above, constitute violations ot laws, e..nd conspiracy to violate laws which include, but not limited, to the tollowing: a. bankruptcy fraud pursuant to 18 U.5.C. 1152; b. mail fraud purcuant to 18 U.S.C. 11341; c. wiro traud puruuant to 18 0.5.C. 11343r d. obutruction ot juatic8 pur au ant to 18 U.S.C. 115031 e. violation ot tho Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. 51P51r 24 . .' ....... .,.,............',.,-..:.......,.'.... .;; ~',;_:.'.. ............--................-...,....... ...........-.... t. interstate transportation in aid ot racketeering pursuant, to 18 U.S.C. IlSl!521 q. extortion pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S.A. 1351231 'b. !nteratata transportation ot llIon~y takan by fraud, 18.'D.S.C. 123141 and i. interlltate trAngportation ot stolen or oonverted 2Il0ney or property, 18 U.B.C. 12315. 128. 11.$ l!. res.ult ot thie e.nt~rpriB8, th~ Plaint!!:!: Jt4ward Harker, Receiver, has been ha=perod in hi. ability to receive Whito =arital estate assets, 1U\c1 to run tho Lw=bcr company 80 that it remainod tinanciallY viabla. ~FORB, plaintiff prays that jud~cnt be enterod against the Detendants in an a=ount equal to three timca the desoribod 101l1la8, vhich i. in excess of Twenty Thousand ($20,000.00) Dollars, together . with injunctive relief, and any other appropriate relief permitted by lav. " 25 " ..----... I COUN'l' I I ~BUB! OF PROCEBB ..~ w. K)~X%a, ~ru8~ee in Receiverahip of J. WVJ:X nI'1'1 LtnalZJt co., UIC. v. :r. JlEVDI 1rl1I'l'E, >>.cLAm) s. :rOh"l:S, R. S. ,,"ONES co.,. :UIC., BZNJAKIX V.R.,COYLO~, ESQUIRE, JE~Y A. PBILPO'l''l', ZSQUIRR, >>.cOER c. &XKKONS, ESQOIRE, SOSAN S. EIBh"l:Jt, ZSQOIRK, GORDON Ah~ BIKKONB, OZORGB '1'. ~AaIB, IV, EBQUIRB c:mcrS'l'OPIIJl::R. O'JUlXJtlf, J:SQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, %.).NO , J'AlUJl a.nd LEBLIB Atrl:R1lACE, ESQUIRB 129. Paragraph& 1 through 12B ~OVe are incorporated horain by rQ~QrQnca aa i! Bet out in full. 130. ~. Defendant. White, R..&:. Jona., R. S. Jon.&, Ino., conlon, Philpo~~, Si=onll', :Eir:ncr, Paris, O'Bri~'n, Cordon" Simmons, wilson, Powell, Lang and Paria, and Auerbach all initiated ac~ion., or acted .. counr:ol in connecticn with actions, as described above, which wore puroued net !cr the purpoce ot ob~aininq tho relief requosted, but solely to prevent the proper enforcement of Orders o! the Court of Common Pleac, cumberland County: 131. The Defendant attornoys'}~e~ or should have known of the true purpose of those actionll. ,00'1' 132. Hore particularly, these actions were brought in order to provide J. Nevin White and his co-conspiratorQ ~ith the oppcrtunity to traru:ter assets of the J. Nevin White Lumber company and the 2Ilarital estate,' to individuals, companies, and places beyond the reach ot the Court of Common Pleas, willa ~~ite, or the.Receiver, Edward lIe..rker. 26 .' --.,'.... .' ...'..~..:... ,.u.:.,~. ~ ...~ d. .......,..'........."'!,l,.,..:...., -..,...-..- -.-..o.q.. .. - ~. '- ...~':;,;...;.:......:'~~....:....~.i.~..;r.~ '133. As a result ot this abuse ot process, the Receiver, Edward Harker, has sustained da=aqes ao onumorated =ore pa~icularly above. WHEREFORE, Plaintitt prays that jud~ent be entered against 'the Datendants in an Il;lllount in eXOCGIS ot 'l'Venty Thousand Cfi20,OOO.oO) DollarlOl, C1xclusive ot' intereat and coats, and in excess of any jurisdictional a:ount requirinq'compulsory arbitration. COtm'!' :n r - "" U'D " BO~ W. EARXER, ~ru.t.e 'in Reo.iv.rship ot J. 1mVDf WEI'1'B LtJXBBIt"'CO., INC. V. J. 2mVIN nI'1'S, MUND S. JONllS, R. II. JONEII co., IHC., Jlm.:.:T1X:tH V.R. CONLON, ZSQtlIRE, JJUUtY A. P1lILPO'J:'l', J:SQtlIJl.E, ROGER C. S:tXKONS, ZSQOIRZ, SOS~ 8. BIS~R, .SQOXJl.K, GORDON AND S~H8, OEORGB '1'. F~S, IV, ZSQtlIRB cmu:S'J:'OPlmR O'BRIEN, ZSQOIRE, WILSON, POlfELL, LANG ~ J'UXS and LESLIB :At11!:!UIAC1l, ISQtlIRE . 134. Paragraphs 1 through 133 above are incorporated herein as it set out in full. 135. The Detendants madc reprosentations to the Federal District Bankruptcy Courts for the Middle Oistrict ot Pennsylvania, and to the Court appointed Receiver, Edvard Harker, as. well as the Court ot Common Pleas, CUlnberland County, in pleadings and otherwise which they knew or should have known were talse, inClUding, but not limited to the following: a. that J. Nevin White and the J. Nevin White Lumber Company were legally entitled to protection ot the 27 ~..:...- '......._..t....._....J..~...:_:'... ,....:.~._.___ . b. o. d. -....--.-.-.---- ~_. M . bankruptcy laws and thA ban>:ruptcy oourts ot thQ United states, '. . . that thA varioufJ pc..rties Bued pursuAnt to ~Il t....o RICO actiona tiled by thQ Oatend.anta Conlon and Jones ....ero engagBd in a raoketearing enterprislil ....hlUl it WI"'I obvious and beyond diepute that they wera doing nothing :more than attempting to antorce lawfully ant.rod Court ordora, in oontending that Euro-Cor~ioa, Inc. is'a legitimate purchaser tor ValuB ot tha J. Nevin White LUl:Ilbllr C01llpany, ....hen they )mo......that the only purpose or the IIsalQ- \laB to trustrata the enforoement ot 1 a.... , by parlllittinq tha installation ot R.B. JonQ8 as President, thua allowing ~x. Jones to dissipate the . c01DpMy'a aSBBt. while creating tha appearance that J. Navin White was ~involved, that J. Nevin White r..idQd in the Oi~triot of Vermont ,~. at Vet'genneB, Vermont; Md s. in tail.;I.ng to reveal in the J. Nevin White bankruptcy a pending condemnation proceeding settled tor $200,009.00. 136. As a result ot these traudulent reprosentations, the Receiver, Edward Harker, has been prevented trom recovering assets belonging to the J. Navin White Lumber Company, Inc., and the marital estate, and has been hampered in hie efforts to effectively run the 28 .'~.; ..'._'...~..___.....:.Ih .,~J._...-,.... __'_..._-.l~."h.;..: .:...... ...-" . . . L\1lnDBr Company. Wlt::eREl"ORE, Plaintiff prll.YII thllt ju6qmcnt be entered Il.gainst the Oeten61l.nts in lUlAmount in excess or 'l'wcnty '1'hoUlJll.nd (~20,OOO:oO) .. Dollarll, ,exoluBive ot interost an6 COlltll, and ,in excell. ot any juri5dictional Amount reqUiring compulsory arbitration. eoON'l' IV - laLTCIOtlB p~08ECl1'1'IOlf . ZD~ W. ~PXRR, ~rU.toe iD ~eo.iT.r.hip of J. nv:tlf lmI'1'lI x.mmZR CO., 11>IC. .,. J. WXVZN DI'1'B, ROUND B. JONES, a. s. JOh'E5 CO., INC., EENJAlUK v.a. CONLON, ESQUIRE, JERR':i ).. PRILPO'l'T, ZSQUIU, aoC:r:R c. SXKKO~S, ESQUIRE, SUSAH s. BISNER, BSQU1U, rroRDQH AN't)'SDQ(ONS, GE01l.G!! 'r."J'AIUS, IV, JlSQU1JU: cmu:S'1'OJnD:R C'llJUEll, ESQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG ~ rUIS and LESLIE AtJEU1>.C1l:, ESQtllJUl 137. pll.ragraphc 1 through 136 are inoorporll.ted herein by . reterence .a it Bet out in tulle 138. The litigations inittated by Deten6ants and tiled and turthered by OQ!endant counsel were prompte6 by malicious motives, lUld ,in partiCUlar' to permit the illegal dissipation of assets to which willa White and the Receiver, Edward Harker, wera entitled. 139. The attorney Defendants:: s::hared, kne....-ot or should have kno\om . ot the ~alicious motives involved in initiating these actions. 1"0. The actions \lere all diE:missed as filed in bad faith or without probable cause. 1" 1. As a result or these malicious prosecutions, assets proparly belonging to the mllrital estate \lere seized and transterred, as 29 . I ~ described above. Wl:!ZRll:7'ORX, PlaintHt pray. that jUd9'lllcnt be entared AgAinst the DotendAnt. in an a%:lount in axcaBII ot 'I'\lonty Thousand ($20,000.00) DollArs, exclusive ot intoreat and costs, and in excess or any jurisdictional amount requiring compulsory arbitration. COtrn'1' V - Ptnn'1'tvw D1>JO.OEB BDW1RD .. K1RX3R, ~ru.t.. in ~eoeiv.rship of J. ~IN ~TB LOKBER COKPAN1 Y. J. evnl lmITB, JlOLAi;o' 8. .rONES, BID.llX L. Jone, a. s. JONES co., INO., CREDIT-LINX ~I~CIAL, INC., lIENJ1XIll v.a. C01lL01l, BSQt1IIUl, JEAA'X A. PHILPOTT, ISQOIRE, ROGEa.c. S~ONS, ESQUIRE, SOSAN S. EISNER, IOQ'OIa!, GORDON AND SIKKONS, GEOJlQB T. P~IS, IV, ZBQ'OI~, cmtIS!rOPlmJl O':BJtIEN, :l:SQOIIUl, nL50N, POWELL, L1I1lG .. 7AlUS ud LESLIE At11lFJu.Clt, ESQ'OIJUI .,. 142. Paragraph. 1 through 1~1 Are incorporAted herein by . rateranca a8 if sat out in tull. 143. The aotion. ot all the Defendants, IlS previously described, constitute willfUl and outrageous conduct towards the Courts, Willa White and the Receivor,. Edward Harker, for which not only compansatory, but also a punitive award may be mada. 30 . . WHEREFORE, Plaintif::s prc.y thClt the Court enter an c.ward tor punitive dClmages, in 'addition to compensatory losses. ROBpocttully .ubmitte~, ROVlreR, P.C. D'''d'~ " I ~'i# . 31 . _.._.....~ .. ~WR.. .w .~. . "%'0 II ALL COMPANY J!:).(PLOYJCICS PROW,ROLAND _. JO~S ~OMPAN'Y UPDA"'J'E AI all of you ara awara Navin White hat bfoAn awl.)' for .avaral waak.. AdcH.t1onal1y, th11 cOlllpany hAI .ought protaoUon frolll .. pQruibla tAka-over by hUng b/l.nkruptcy in tha u.s. ~l1krup!:cy Court. ' Bath of I:ba above aituation. have ruultad from peraond 4ifficult!.. of ~r. Whitala that go back &any yaAr.. Lat .. #.a.Utl you that thh aOlllpany 11 paying an ot ita obligation. 011 tl~., .. it.baa done ovar tha yaar.. Your lnlurAnc_ prerduma ara .11 curr.nt and will ru.&ill _0. Your witbMlding ~al: i_ being dapol1ted a. required. he com an i. N .via f nancial l!X"oblAlll1I11 '1'hD rlalon t.or I".le ng Il. ruptcy ad ntlthing to 4c wit ~i~nc1al 6ifflcultiea, but wa. talcan to pravant takaevar by cth.r parti.., orieing from._ ~rria~a a.ttlemant dilpute, tl~ lure that IOIl'\lt of you Il.llY weMar why thll COlllpany 11 11'1 bAnkruptcy if than ara not financial problacl. A. with &Any national corporation. throughout th~ country, bAnkruptcy il baing uaad for. vAri.ty af dH:t1cult1... 'l'heraforo, thare 1& no rlAson to ba conclrned about th.. ability' af thil cacpany ~o .eat ita financial obligationa, However, ... J:IOU .ariouR probl8Jll i. whllther th. cotll~ny a=plOY... will .upport and stand bahind tha company during th. .b.onoa of Nr. Whit.. All .tep. ar. continually t"kan to provide you vith .. ataady job. ~ut. tha complete cooparation and .upport of tha amploy.,.. i. e.sLntill.l :tor thh COJ:lp&nY to produce a prout which 18 ...antiAlly why any c~pll.ny Ixiete. . I haYS avary lntantion to continua fighting for this company during Hr. Whita'. difficultia., howavar, without your aupport and cooparatian, than 1. ntl nead to Ulc6 that aHort. n.caus. of tha vary p~Qble=. outlined. it 1a i=poa.ible for ~a to ba at tha offica a. aftan ~. in tha paat. Rowavar, I do reedv. periodic raport. on t~ operation. Accordingly, I auat .trau tho noad tor lach IUlployu to partorlll hi. jab in the b..t and l.aat-coatl)' ~r ponlbl., which 1. raflactad in our eoat of oparation raport.. '1'og.t:h.r, WI .,il1 ... thh c~p/l.ny progra.. dupHa the preunt difficult!... ror tha b.nafit of th. majority of tha ..ploya.., anyone not wlllintl to cocperata thrutanl the. viability of tho coznpany and aach of your joba. 'rhanfora, it 11 illportant that each of you taka.. per:aonal intarnt in the oparation, if you are intaruteeS 1~ tha job,.t&b11ity ~ch ~a bIen provided by the co~pany for ao Jll4ny )peara. If thare are problacl thAt you baliava .hould ~. called to IlY att.ntion. I.would he glad to dilcu.a tham with you on ~ nt~t visit. I hope ..eh of you 'and your f&DIi11.. hav. e vary plall...nt '1'hankagiving holiday. .... ; ~?r~~- r. ..t..': f. ii, IJ /J 11 '~"..... '.' --:......, _, -#'-' '):'~'\""':"~' ~J"\ ~l<!"."',I-'~"1 r .,. .', ',' ....1..:.~ -1'1"1_" .... ~"'rY-"-'-" .......' ._ - ".... .... . p,.. 'i ..a l%. ", 'TO \ !ulza , ~~.-:r_r.: C:O'.:r)JC. It:,/~ ., .. .. .. .. .. .. . G'Co. 2,::. ':S'~ec. u..,'rtoJt., S3W2 M .. .. .. 5 a'i'l3 .. .. .. .. , 63~1 . 10 .. '.. S'!, L4"7 . .. .. ' .. S3(a~ 8 . .. .. .. S3711 " .. .. .. SS7'S,J . .. I' M 5'3 'l2'1v , '. .. .. .. . to'1 oCaL/ v .. , .. .. .. .I d ISho ' P;:,S. -:!ONE.:s co." =t:"'~ S'L4'2.'iS !./Iz.!'la .. .. .. .. 51{!."I \ :r./liJ.lo .. .. .. . 6'''131.1 0 a/ rs 1'10 .. . .. .. SLi n:a. t' s h J~ a . .. .. .. sl/~89 Gt/ll~ .. . .. .. 5.., (.711 "I }CJo .. .. .. .. 5'i 'eo 7/uJ9O, .. .. .. 5'~8 Zo"i q!,Dj,O .. ~ '. . ~1{88'i ~bo}'lo .. .. .. .. $l.j~t3 ~ J-!>}to .. .. . .. SII ~ -a 'Z v.' q /Io/QO .. .. .. . S''i C? 'a ~y( ~b~)qo .. , . .. 5'1' (. '2. qjlO!qo, " " " 1\ 5451.)3 I I . . ,. .....' ....... ~ , Po rn"" \~! oJ. -'.5'00":"- 10,000-..... ":1,000 -.... 10,000 "")( a, ooo-)t fl, ooo-x r~ so 0 -)(' ~,ooo-)<' 7, I "I r. .".. o 0'00 -,... ~~ 19sct' "," f ".000 -x ~,soo-)t 10,000 -'Y 4,5'00 ->I' "7~.Il/')r' 10, 000. -~ 2, 5'00 -)0- IO,OOO-~ 4; 000 - ... '2, I"ZS" -)('- I a, 000 ""Y CjCJo. '8.7 y 2,500.- X 10,000,00 . ", .....- '., .".. ' P vh: bif (I ~'I " C",nr 'p^~ 're: o:.~ , ... OJ................ .... . ('PAGe- D ,..M-c o!,/q ~ ;c: ,So. ~Ol..ln CO'J~ O'SO;3%. 4' IS' 000 -lo- : ., C/I''Z./'lo .. .. . . SSo "0 .1.000 -)r' 1I11'l./'1o . , . ~ . 6f5 15'(;:) ICf,ooO -)c- " ,:. J r. Jq c> ~ . ~ .. SSIC\1 S; 000 .... ", .. . . -v -..- .' ~O,LI~71_ 1~"lC II~dql ""R.~. ~ ~1"J;'Ut.' f5:l~tJ ... q,'ObO,tlo- \ Ill'" R..-s:-;rOl,.lc:. CO'I ~ ~a\'~ ~ s,ooo-~ ~['aJ'l' II .. .. .. s:s ~y '8,000 -),-'. a/L1/'11 .' " 000 -)( . - I. .. " .. 5'5 "i '" a/18ffl . 10 ... .. $54(;) qc,z.. so)- YI"iRI ~ ~ .. .. sssc'Z. 1ft S"Oo. - l( , s/roJqJ .. .. . .. SS5q~ 7,000 -),- CO!'2Fll I ~ . .. S70S CD,SOO -..... .- " 7ho/'i1 ~ . . SS'7SS ',000 -..- 8/z.ah. .. ~ .. SSq /s " 000 - ......... IO/U.fq, . . . .. 5,"058 -...... I~ooo q ..- .. .. . .. ':l. 00-. .. ----.. ~lA q~? ,~o lqql .Iaohz ~I::' ~o~t:::. co.,;~ /Sr.~ ~ 1"'7 /1.;'7-....... If I.~ /'fa , . I, . . lS'Gsss 10, oeo -..... LJlIsm. .. .. I. .. .. ~ II .. S"S"?B I CO, QOo - .; .';1 }it.lm. , 2 000 -...... .. \ . . S"~,Ci "1 , 2.8 800--''''01'''1''' , . .... C) 11>el:) , s/"lOh, ~ . . . .. is ~ 000- h.Q.ui 1M) ~..u....\.. "/~2. ' .. .. . I. i IO~(Qvj 20,000 -Y"" ~/1'i h'z. . .. I '20, 000 ~ .. to j 10 /I ~ , . q J '{ Jqz. II . . . I 10~,I'1 /11,000 -v q /za.h'l.. ,to .. . . : '0"'/ I~ 000 -v IO/'J9a. . to ~ .. II/WI II!,eoo-'/ c/~}p. .. . . . I / I./~ " I~ooo -v' :t la~ " to .. .\\t::>~ V' &S,CI:::.c::>.t::C ." . ". 1.- . ... . ... , , .. ' ., , .. ., ..~' .. i ~ II .... 0,0'_ ,..,... ,0 . ~.' ",,'0 '-' .'.11.....'......... ,'......\. . ' .....'...'.........'........ ' ...'. ,..'. ....\1. . '., . t)A'l'"Z' . PJo.'1Jo.e,J.$ TO: Itll7.llq~, ~.~, ;$"O~t!. CO.;p.x:. \1/ c;J,,%. _ k , k" . 1l11'71'l~ ,k .. . to '. ", . ' . .. ........ \ IzoJq~ ..,./I7/q,,& . "& 1I.1'1:!. ~. to. ~tl~e-~ c.o.,J:\JC. At ,..., II ~ .. M . , .. . .. . . .. I . ~~.Icb ~,CS" . . \C\~ 'D - ~3~1~'tc Ie{ <<bC\. "=Tq, \ q l.a.C(::) . \C\C1c - \ Ob, '4~~ " \ I ~q \ ..; ~I..o\ q~'cL \C\q~ - b)1Jl4,\L\,..t:lt) \o"o:o~ -=t\,~o.b \h.~~I.\, ~-d1.Q \ , " c.'s:.~ AI'\'n": IIS'i I~O/ 12.18 V co -, .. .. 11,000 .... 15, '000 -0/' 12.,000 -....... ......... \ C\9 z. ~ IS,OOO-V' -...... 2C,OpO I -...... 1,000.. , .. ..- Iqq~ -r (lqi~ -/QG3" ..J. ~~ ./ . - I .1 1 ,...------..-. .---,.-.-....--.. . CERTIFIOATE OF BERVIC! I, ChAryl A. WAlkAr, An a=ployoo 0: Angino , Rovner, P.C., heraby certity that I have thls day served a true a correct oopy'O! PLAINTIrr'8 COKPLAI~7 by certi!led, unital!' s~Ate8 mail, poetage prepaid, return receipt requested, upon, ,thll OetendAnta at the tollowinq address..: J. Nevin White 1702 Marlleille8 Drive Unit 18 , )!iGi Baach, FL 331U J. Nevin White P.O. Box 2575 SalisbUry, KO 21801-2575 J. Nevin White River Houae Apart=enta 2311 North Front Street Harrisbu~, PA 17110 J. Nevin White c/o Jerry A. Philpott, Ecquiro 227 North High Street Dunoannon, PA J.7020 Roland S. Jones P.O. Box 2575 8288 Robinhood Drive Salisbury, ~~ 21801 Shari L. Jones P.O. Box 2575 8288 Robinhood Drive salisbury, y~ 21801 R.S. Jones Co.~ Inc. P.O. Box 2575 538 Robinhood Drivo 'Salisbury, HD 21801 R.S. Jones Co., Inc. Route 11, Box 538 SalisbUry, y~ 21801 44198/01 Credit-Line Finanoial 538 Robinhood Drive SalisbUry, HD .21801 Jorry A. Philpott, Esquire P.O. BOlC 116 227Nortb High street, DuncAnnon, PA J.7020 Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire ~horncreek Lod.Q8 Keene Road . Eli%~othtown, NY 12PJ2-0P37 Roger C. SiMmon_, Esquire 131 West Patriok Stroot Prederick, y~ 2170J. . Susan G. Eisner, Esquire 131 West Patrick Street FrederiCk, HD 21701 Gordon , simmons 131 West Patrick street Frederick, HD 21701 Leslie s. Auerbach, Esquire c/o Auerbach " simmons 8613 Cedar Street silvor spr!ng, He 40910 George T. Paria, rv, Esquire l~8 College Street P.O. Box 567 Burlington, VT 05402-0567 ! e --._, Exhibit B r- R, S. IONES CO., INC. By: CREDIT-UNE PINANCIAL. INC. Dited: July a:r. 1994 " ." ,....,.,."~....-&Yr'I'P..~~{ , ,';, !".:i,~~,,;,~;.~,:~,.'.:f.~;;~~r:li '!~' ~ ~i~~ ').i . ", I. " .. ," '. u..)l~~ I I'..w: 'f,'" " .' i :::'~:':j:~,.t:b~~," I'" ;1'~:"'::ll':~ ::: . '. I' ,'-j.. .i'",'J>I'~' v." ~' . , ' ":""'..',,',....,,,,,...., ,.~l,',' ~ : '..' 'I' ',:"; -: . 'If''": .t':i':tn\.. ,t-!'I ~", 1:.~, '" . . -' " "I ,.)..~t::.tf 1 \" 'I "". '.:,.~.. ,,;';:"":1,' ...,:~I..'II'1.hiiil~I\..':: , ,. ~,.P.I'Io~......:i'41..i,'~~/\~:'. " ':~,,;~11':', :. . ~ ..., ~t;, ''It.'.~ :~~"'; 't~it!~~:;:~.I~l,~II.-h .,"If-t..' . ..,. I ~"\:,.. " '1'~" . :r. .. . j" ,It: . , ' ",...t:OJ \ "~;":~':~I ,P,:..1:. :,: :1 :~Q-- '.::':. .:,.:t1'! . ,,' "r" :.,,;;l,;f)., ~ r .",,:.t~,,~(l, , '" :i::.~;f: ~:~Uq~ c.r' 1t:,"I:'~.~J.(,: '. ','" .. <"" ''':1''!t,ll~n~ ,'~"'.'\;::" 'It IN THE t7N11'ED STATES DJSTR1CT'CO~-. ~..:<~~'~;!\Q~1;R:F. ~ i, t,X~'~ :~~, FOR THE MIDDLB DISTRICT OF PBNNSyt\l~:;.>y~j:[:.~~.{:r\,:" li I.J~:~~~\I'';;. '. . ~.,'~ .'~ l'!:i..;\~ft:.".~l' ~ ' ;r.'-l.!. ~ (', . ..... ~_''''' ,'.. .f ':-. .,:- ol)', . : . ... z:,',\.":r ,\~i\: '" I I ' ~.~ ..- ~. t1 ..ftrttn.""~E LTT'loI'l'l""'" CO ""C . .. ..,'r' ,,, " 'II \ I ' I .I"M': ..., o .I.~Y,"" 1T.n.&..i. liJMD~ .,....~.. ..'...'i"..i:;::..~~:~I)..III.~~!I.::f~.)"r! :-"'\1' , . "",.,,' ,';~ "'~"~'I" '<e" ". .-, "'41"~"'" .... !i'" ~., :,,<'" 'l(<' PI-'n"'", '.' " " r",j~l:r-...,~,.~~jr;J'" ~: ,~",,),l ;;l'f~::' ilIU U,1,I. . 1...... ..,.....r II 1(1'9k " ..,....,~ ,\ . . .." ,..tl.1:. "V.' ir" l I \ l' ~". .' ~.rflr . CML, "CTXOU:;1\ln,~ ,!,' '.' 'i '" .. ,;'..:'a::'(I~.. ' . n . ...,.;t_~-rn-.. ,~,J..;ar.'~~~... . : , : ',.:,;.::i';:,~l:.~:~;:j;.a~ ) ~:l~""h'i\\":\' VIN . .' '. '.I:;q:.l'l', '1':1~'~~~ ;' i~,:{~~"~;.r~' r. NB \\Il:I.rl'J;, ROLAND So IONES. SHARI . . , ': '.l..:".~.."..'l::t.!ll"i' I ~';' .,h" ~, 1. 10NBS 'IS! 10 C INC ""'...DIT . ,.'.: I "\I:."fJl~. ~.l~W1' I t' :\i:;.~,r::~~ ~ . ,...... NES 0., ., .......... - . ,'.: ':'.;~, :'-('~;i~."'~7 ,'~,::if.l'" ,( y........ .......u ""CIA Y ""C "'ENI'~"""" V R. . '., \~ " l"'~ fr)l~"~I!' ".. j . or :""~"'ir.:.r.~ I ";' ~,.g .."""'"""",, ",.,.. J.l., .. t'\-"Y~., ..-'.~/.I,t:....w..\; I ("1+:"ftI. I" , .,' ,". .>' 'X;"(,~,,:i(l' ;"j,J.;)!,:t ~ ,~' >:';~).{J :- CONLON, ESQtJIRE. J'BRRY A. PHn..PCYM', .. .. ,; , "1' H'~:' ", ;,\'~ I !\ '\"1' ~ '('.. t1IRB 'r" :... .,..,"'...~df...i:;S .. , 11)~'1~' ~. ". E!SQ.,~t! ROGEll C SIMMONS ESQ I I. ...... '~'.;I'''.'''.~~ . r,~~: "~'\ ., ........... , ., '", ',:,...~:''''~:I':"I:....\ 'I' '1:1 ,'~' ,', SUSAN S, EISNER. ESQUIRE, GORDON AND . : . ", ,,";.~,..,;;,l'~l;f~'" . . .'.t:)' "I, , I. . . . ;;-I"U.~,"".~9'::r..:.~I'J ~ .11-) rr.a. t. SIMMONS, GEORG:!! T, PAlUS, 'N, ESQUIRE. ,.' :'''i,\;;~~-''.l'i''''~ MI' .'. W:'" ,r'" !\ cmuSTOP"'~ Q'B""!>N "'l'Qt1I'DtI :; -.:.: ~ .:~-k;,~,i;';i.{;.,..~ii~' h :) ': t~, ..-u;;A ~, """ ........ ' . ",'--"~'~".,,'r.' I ":"~' I'., ,.., II. wn.sON, POWELL, LANG" FAlUS, and .: "../':,:,;\~~~!;.;;::Jii'~.,'~\ ;:}~;K :,i: ~ T .....LIB AT..."...... ACH ESQUIRE ' " .' ';/1,?:~:;t"1\'~1l~! '~\\"\~. - 'f ~.li' ....... ...~ .., ' ..;,,~,';:,:\~'-o;:t.V,l-loJI, :.1'E-". '" : , ,'.. ,.. .. ''''t' ...1'... '. :lM." ,r'j F., . ,,".,;..,; ":.:'ii;i;r"li.i 'W';~i~';;~' 't' Defendants. . ' . - ,;,'~:;.. \.,~.-y. '. '\;~'":::t ~,; :"., , ': ..'V I", ::;~i;:",il.,:i'" 'it I 0;0; c)':.\' t' /" ,.~(t"t".f'<\' rrt ' FJ\~ r.. . '.~~r.,.."k'l t~t~. :..' ,::~ [ ~, .1.... .1'!\ilJ"'.. ....!f\ ~u~~ " ' ,'1.,...".,.1' ,", -'. . , ",,' j ..., ,,. ~..\..i '11; ~ . r" JoI" ,f" .. ~ _' ,c r:t :'1:1' ':,CJ., , f. I~"~~:; 'I'}?' . ",':lo.'"'.,,... _:"J"' ~., ~ ~f'Cl'~> # I ., .,.'O;r. "'I , ~:j I' 11;.0 n'" , ' ,'" ,:'...<""'l'.."...'~,:.',"...(, . .' I,,, ". ,{ ,.. . .. '. :'l. ,', . ""-I;f-o,' 01""- l ~, . ......'...I;..I,'.t~.l.~~."i~.':1 ~.rtf:>' II- 1erry A. Philpott, , co-defendant In thb action. hermby. jaln~~.~. ~;~::.\'r.:\,,: :'1' :..', "'~';~W~~~;l' . :" .o" ,~!.... ~ I, ;1'~1,) :1 ~~~~ ~ removal of the matter lcnown II ~WBrd W, Harker v r Navin '~i;';~:~';~;i;i&~" " , ~ ,~I~lr i{t: . " ,', :--: ;::~;:"(';,,,;I;.,,!~ ,~:1 ' :. .,~~~'~ ' . . ... ..... ..', .~~. ,;.1... .\l . joT"/ '~ (C.C.I'. Cumb, Cty) from the Court ot Common P10lJ of Cumber1Ancl:~~~:~,' " .' " i:;~ :~ \: " ..........-...:~......I)'1l.:..~\ \M~,);I..L .' " "':1 tI'I..:.-,..'.....:..'.,'.' I,-.r:~"'" .~~ JI~\ th. United States District Court fur 10 District of Penn.ylv~. .: ';' ~;~.:t%:,;r:i~:~ i . ~:in;~' :t~!i! 'j~'. , ~, ", -"'."};!'''''Fif':l''~ "{I'~ ~,.!ljoI:,. "'t. , .. " ..' '~:'"'f~~\~! ~f.:h " 1'~?1r.~II' .t, '. .~. ...... ..."If......... ,~.. "'l,.;n.. . ~j '\'~' 1 l'~ . . '.."',....:;...c.- '.' "1 ~ - 't 1 r,"J!. R ' . ,,'..'.. ..:". ,. ",;' j t.. ,.! :'\" . . . ~. ...",. - :'l .. j~;!t. tJ 1<.;,,;. I"~~~ ~ ."J ~...,1 f.~:-:';\'t\(. .jj:;;..il .J'\.1T- , " , .-:' ':.,.., 'r.:,;t,:l,I, '~1~"'d'<;"! ;'. 1...:.;..~..':,......::t~I' 'ji ~ R\f4t;::jTI ~ . " ':. "~1" ,,~, .:'~rfllnl.' 't' ~ ~~' ';', ',. . ~ ':"'Q~":.'~":"".;-;"o"~"'-": -~ qi '.", ...t. . " '.': .......J......:.,\~~~ .~f]'.. . '~l ...,,~ "~ . .'" ,...~-:~~~~i.,~h]i~ jf.'.\.S ,~, i.;;l~':l ',., '. . . ;."0',....;,:" ~~,{1",~~' t '~";\ '5 }/ ,,'I.!.,':'h:..'r.o.:-~-~!'~,~'~~~ .)". ti ,ill ~.a . .: ,.: . .,.'~.... ~4~:~~."li.:1\1~.1 :' . ~tll~::"""t~~ \ . . ..t.j"..:t.I"~". ,:...., I . I ." '..: , ,: ':':'.~:~';'~:'~!"rf'J"~' , ~'1;i~ ':'!.,i" , .. ."l' .,.~'.". ;,\1:'~ .. 1ll1I.' '''.~~ " ,,' ,:-,'; e:'-:;-:'" .i::~'~' , ! "\1', :'~'h '" , '. . ... ,..............11 ).'. t,; \IJJ.'t", :-11, . '~ ." :o:,,~, !,~...., ~~ '~',~" , r; ,~ii"r. .~1 l' , ,. "-:"..'.:,.r.'.~lfJ'.j , ~;t,\]. ,ff,,' {.f ,'...::-"., ..1,....' "..... "'k , '. -,'1(", ... ;.'. _ "I~" c... ~... ,. ", ". v, Dattd: 1uly ~ 1994 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EDWARD W. HARKER, TruSlee in Receivership of J. NEVIN WHITE LUMBER CO" INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL AC'nON NO.1g C'I. ').~f I. v. J, I'.'EVIN WHITE, ROLAND S. JONES, SHARI L. JONES. R,S, JONES CO" INC,. CREDIT- LINE FINANCIAL, INC" BENJAMIN V.R. CONLON. ESQUIRE, 1ERRY A. PHILPOTI, ESQUIRE, ROGER C, SIMMONS, ESQUIRE, SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE. GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGE T, FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE. WILSON, POWELL, LANG &. FARIS. and LESLIE AUERBACH, ESQUIRE, Defendants, c.Q~"fr TO. hND .r(m{I)F.R.~J!.:r.~.li')V-\L OF CASE "0 l"F.DF.RAL COURT Benjamin v.n, Conlon, a co.defendanl in this action, hereby joins in and conllCnLS to !he: removal of the mailer known as fllward W. Harker ,", 1. Nevin Wh;l~ et al., No. 94 Civil 2481 (C.Co.P. Cumb, Cty) irom the Co un of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania to the United Stales District Coun fur (he M icldle DiStrict of Pennsylvania, r. Dated: Iul~. 1994 .~ -' -..r IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership err. NEVIN WHITE LUMBER CO., INC., Plalntiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. r. NEVIN WHITB, ROLAND S. JONES, SHARI L. JONES, R.S. 10NES CO" INC., CREDIT. LINE FINANCIAL, INC., BENJAMIN V.R. CONLON. ESQUIRE, JERRY A. PHlLPOTr, ESQUIRE, ROOER C, SIMMONS, ESQUIRE, SUSAN S. EISNER. ESQUIRE, GOP.DON AND SIMMONS, GEOROE T. FARIS, IV, ESQaIRE, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANO &. FARIS, and LESLlE AUERBACH, ESQUIRE, . . Defendanu. CONSQIT TO A~ ,TO'INDER IN REMOVAL OF CA~E TO FEDERAL COURT OC4lrge T. Faris, Christoper O'Brien, and Wilson, Powell, Lang &. Faris, co-dcfcnd.antl in this action, by and through their counsel, hereby join in and consent to the removal of the matter known as Edward W. Harker v. J Nevin White. et aI., No. 94 Civil 2481 (C.C.P. Cumbo Ct)') !rom the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania to the United States District Court for the Middle District of PeMsylvania. Q,- -.... Dated: 1uly~, 1994 Counsel for defendant! GC4lrgc T. Faris, Christopher O'Brien 2nd Wilson, Powell, Lang &. Fans . IN THB UNITBD STATES DISTRICT COURT POll. THB MIDDLB DlSTlUCT OP PBNNSYL V ANI.A EDWARD W. HARIOaR, Trustee In Reoe1vctahlp ot 1. NBVIN WHlTB LUMBER CO., INC., PWnUft, v, CIVIL ACI'ION NO. J. NEVIN WHlTB, ROLAND S, 10NBS, SHARI L, 10NBS, :a.S. 10NBS CO" INC., CRBDIT- LINE FINANCIAL, INC" BEN1AMIN V,R. CONLON, BSQ'UIRB, 1BRRY A. PHILPCYIT, ESQUIRB, aOOER C, SIMMONS, ESQUIRB, SUSAN S. mSNBR, ESQUIRE, OORDON AND SIMMONS, OEOROE T. PARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CHRlSTOPHBR O'B1UBN, ESQUIRE, wn.sON, POVlELL, LANO k PARIS. Md WLIB AUBRBACH, ESQUlRB, Dofcnda,nU. CONSENT TO AND JOINDER IN REMOV AI. OF CAn TO llltDERAL COURT Le.sUe Auerbach, a co-detendant In this action, throuih hIs counsel, hereby Join' in II1d conscnll 10 thIS removal ot the mittel known u Edward W, Harlcer v. 1. Nevin Whl~. et ilL, No, 94 CivU 2481 (C.C.P, CUmbo Cty) tram the Court ot Common Pleu ot Cumberla.n.d County, Pennsylvania to the United SlatoS District Court tor the Middle District ot PCIltlS)'lvanla. Dated: luly& 1994 ~ (2;, t~ Don d B, Kaufman . McNua, Wallace &. Nurick 100 Pine Street. P.O. Box lllSti Hurbbura. PA. 17J08 , Counsel tor DcJMdant Los1.Ie Auerbach, Bsqulro . . CEnTIFICATE OF SEnVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Removal was served this 1st day of August, 1994, upon the following parties or counsel of record, via first class United States mail: Joseph M. Melillo, Esquire Angino & Rovner 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Allen C. Warshaw, Esquire Duane, Morris & Hecksher 305 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17108 Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire Thorneneck Lodge Keene Road Elizabethtown, NY 12931 .. ,~ ,.., <,' '.'-.-. u Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire P.O. Box 116 227 North High Street Duncannon, PA 17020 ""' ..; ..:- ~),.) ~ ::. .. Joseph A. Ricci, Esquire Marshall & Farrell 1323 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17102 Donald Kaufman, Esquire McNees, Wallace & Nurick 100 Pine Street, P.O. Box 1166 Harrisburg, PA 17108 ?~ \3 .M ----- Paul B. Bech '-,- ci:- .. 'I 9 43 All .." FILEO-OfF/CE OF THE PROTHONOTUY , CIIH8EJ1LAHD COUNT\' PENNSYLVANIA ~ ?'" '(< '<."'- ': ~ ' ~'\ ;>..> " '.' ., 1- i<, -f' ",' . " ,~ " " "',,> i I ,',1 :':, . ~, '. , , - '~t . ~' .,-''-..-' \. ' , ,~.....-~ 't EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. NEVIN WHITE LUMBER co., INC., IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : CIVIL ACTION - LAW Plaintiff NO. 94 civil 2481 v. . . . . J. NEVIN WHITE, ROLAND S. JONES, SHARI L. JONES, R.S. JONES CO., INC., CREDIT-LINE FINANCIAL, INC., : BENJAMIN V.R. CONLON, ESQUIRE, JERRY A. PHILPOTT, ESQUIRE, ROGER C. SIMMONS, ESQUIRE, SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE, GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGE T. FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG FARIS, and LESLIE AUERBACH, ESQUIRE, . . . . : . . . . : . . . . . . . . Defendants . . JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER AND NOW, this Z, tt. day of :J.. ~ , 1994, upon consideration of the Motion for Extension of Time filed by defendants Ronald S. Jones, Shari L. Jones, R.S Jones Co., Inc. and Credit-Line Financial, Inc., said Motion is granted and those defendants are granted an extension of time until August 22, 1994, in which to respond to the Complaint. J. 'l!\-:.\l;,'J~' -,i l.PI"..':J C';';'~"~' r -i j A'nL,"';~' ~C, -- ::1:) t ~ ~ ~ .' ~61 H~ DE 11 GZ '~i " EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. NEVIN WHITE PENNSYLVANIA LUMBER CO., INC., Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, . . CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 94 civil 2481 . . v. J. NEVIN WHITE, ROLAND S. JONES, SHARI L. JONES, R.S. JONES co., INC., CREDIT-LINE FINANCIAL, INC., BENJAMIN V.R. CONLON, ESQUIRE, JERRY A. PHILPOTT, ESQUIRE, ROGER C. SIMMONS, ESQUIRE, SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE, GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGE T. FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG & FARIS, and LESLIE AUERBACH, ESQUIRE, : . . . . . . Defendants . . JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Defendants Ronald S. Jones, Shari L. Jones, R.S Jones Co., Inc. and Credit-Line Financial, Inc., by their counsel, Duane, Morris and Heckscher, respectfully request that this Court grant them an extension of time until August 22, 1994, in which to respond to the Complaint in this action. motion, defendants submit the following: 1. This action was commenced on July 1, 1994. In support of their 2. Defendants Ronald S. Jones, Shari L. Jones, R.S Jones co., Inc. and Credit-Line Financial, Inc. received the Complaint by certified mail on or about July 5, 1994. 3. Defendant Ronald S. Jones sought an extension of time in which to answer the complaint from counsel for plaintiff on or . i \ CORRECTION \ 'Ii I j Previous Image Refilmed to Correct Possible Error ~: , EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. NEVIN WHITE PENNSYLVANIA LUMBER CO., INC., plaintiff v. J. NEVIN WHITE, ROLAND S. JONES, SHARI L. JONES, R.S. JONES CO., INC., CREDIT-LINE FINANCIAL, INC., BENJAMIN V.R. CONLON, ESQUIRE, JERRY A. PHILPOTT, ESQUIRE, ROGER C. SIMMONS, ESQUIRE, SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE, GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGE T. FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG & FARIS, and LESLIE AUERBACH, ESQUIRE, Defendants : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, : CIVIL ACTION - LAW . . : NO. 94 civil 2481 . . . . : . . . . : . . . . . . JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Defendants Ronald S. Jones, Shari L. Jones, R.S Jones co., Inc. and Credit-Line Financial, Inc., by their counsel, Duane, Morris and Heckscher, respectfully request that this Court grant them an extension of time until August 22, 1994, in which to In support of their respond to the complaint in this action. motion, defendants submit the following: 1. This action was commenced on July 1, 1994. 2. Defendants Ronald S. Jones, Shari L. Jones, R.S Jones co., Inc. and Credit-Line Financial, Inc. received the Complaint by certified mail on or about July 5, 1994. 3. Defendant Ronald S. Jones sought an extension of time in which to answer the complaint from counsel for plaintiff on or about July 20, 1994, believing that he needed additional time in which to locate and engage competent counsel to represent him in Pennsylvania and further believing that such an extension would be granted since plaintiff had already agreed to an identical extension for several other defendants. 4. By letter dated July 22, 1994, defendant Jones was advised that Plaintiff refused to agree to such an extension for defendants Ronald S. Jones, Shari L. Jones, R.S Jones co., Inc. and Credit-Line Financial, Inc. despite his agreement to grant an extension to other defendants. 5. Almost immediately upon being advised that plaintiff would not agree to the requested extension, defendants Ronald S. Jones, Shari L. Jones, R.B Jones Co., Inc. and Credit-Line Financial, Inc. engaged Maryland counsel. Pennsylvania counsel was retained on July 27, 1994. 6. On July 27, 1994, Counsel for defendants renewed defendant Jones' request for an extension of time and was advised on July 28, 1994, that plaintiff would not concur. 7. The Complaint consists of one hundred forty three (143) paragraphs and five (5) counts. 8. Defendants and their counsel need additional time in which to review and answer the Complaint because of its length and complexity. 9. The grant of the requested extension will not delay disposition of this matter since plaintiff has consented to extensions of time until August 22, 1994, for several other CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On this ~ day of July, 1994, I, Janel M. Emerick, a secretary in the law offices of Duane, Morris & Heckscher, hereby certify that I have served this day true and correct copies of the foregoing ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT and MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT in the above-captioned matter, by depositing same in the United States First Class Mail, postage prepaid, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, to those persons and addresses indicated below: Joseph Melillo, Esquire Angino & Rovner, P.C. 4503 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire 227 High Street P.O. Box 116 Duncannon, PA 17020 Richard L. Baze1on, Esquire Paul B. Bech, Esquire Baze10n & Less 1515 Market Street 7th Floor, Suite 700 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Harvey Freedenberg, Esquire Donald Brower Kaufman, Esquire Michael R. Kelley, Esquire McNees, Wallace & Nurick 100 Pine Street P.O. Box 1166 Harrisburg, PA 17108 ) (11.'/ ~L{ A... IV . ~/ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. NEVIN WHITE LUMBER CO., INC., plaintiff v. J. NEVIN WHITE: ROLAND S. JONES: SHARI L. JONES: R.S. JONES CO., INC.: CREDIT-LINE FINANCIAL, INC.: : BENJAMIN V.R. CONLON, ESQUIRE; JERRY A. PHILPOTT, ,ESQUIRE: ROGER C. SIMMONS, ESQUIRE: SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE: GORDON AND SIMMONS: GEORGE T. FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE: CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE: WILSON, POWELL, LANG & FARIS: and LESLIE AUERBACH, ESQUIRE Defendants ORDER AND NOW, this ~ day of . . . . NO. 1:CV-94-1034 . . . . (JUDGE RAMBO) . . . . . . . . . . r I U:I) HAc,fil';""r,'-' PA -"~.p II..:r, . . . . . DC r ?,.: 1994 . . . . LM',-r':' \~. iLr:-,"r, ~.. / ......,J "'/"11" "'_'. _.~~;r'.,. I':;:, f. 1 -.....j -. ....-.- . . . . . . . . . . : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED r.t~~J, 1994, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal, it is hereby ordered that Defendant J. Nevin White is dismissed from this action, without prejudice, and that the claims against J. Nevin White removed to No. 1:CV-94-1200 be remanded to the Court of Common Pleas, cumberland County, to No. 94 civil 2481. BY THE COURT: f I "~JA J. .. -- ,,'- ..)fl~!T;~ ;,i~,~~~~~i;,;,:. C' lr,;<~.~: ~~> -.. '-.- ..' ,) . j ..33 j . ,- ~. ..-....--.- !o OCT 25 9 ss AH '9~ or 1,,!1:ftce r" ",: ,r"OIl^,TAh'" ..~kt.U'L,~J((). r."'l'l ( I Ft'" , ,. ,-..SIY r,,~., t, Ii,\ N ~!. '.i. ,. -'," ,. .'. '. .' , ~ .. '" '.~"'--"'. :-.-i ;f' fl - . , ' ......-. 'I" EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. NEVIN WHITE LUMBER CO., INC., plaintiff v. J. NEVIN WHITE, ROLAND S. JONES, SHARI L. JONES, R.S. JONES CO., INC., CREDIT-LINE FINANCIAL, INC., : BENJAMIN V.R. CONLON, ESQUIRE, JERRY A. PHILPOTT, ESQUIRE, ROGER C. SIMMONS, ESQUIRE, SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE, GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGE T. FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG & FARIS, and LESLIE AUERBACH, ESQUIRE Defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW . . . . . . : NO. 94 civil 2481 . . . . . . : . . : : . . : . . . . . . . . JURY TRIAL DEMANDED TO THE PROTHONOTARY: PRAECIPB Please reinstate the Complaint for service upon Defendant J. Nevin White in the above-captioned matter. Dated: ~~d.S,I'l'lf 55517/CV ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. WI r;;. J M. Melillo, Esquire ;rj.D No. 26211 ~50 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 238-6791 Counsel for Plaintiff 1 ,.,~ "~;'~'.iM..~J~;~~~t~;;i~:;j.-,,,~;ii~:',~; \ ' ., I .1""'__;'-~'''''''''''~1''l'li')_' L . . _?__ .....".._..__~~._.__.H___ :,,~.~i~~;)'''~ .>-...... -....-.....-...,...- .-...-._._~ . ~ i 1 '..'. -..t -. .----,..- @ .. OCT ZB 10 l' AK '9~ f1LED'IlFrlOE Of THE j>1"'THON~TA~Y CUHOERLAIiP COlJllTY PENN$YlVMjlA /,.t~) -<;~;! "::~": :!- >c{___ ..:;+;" ..,-.,-', ~ t'; " <<11 ~-<: . " . ;. , - " . " /.....-~.. .,~_4.""""_ ,.;"., ,-: "'! i)i 'U ",'- ,- , . - ~ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. NEVIN WHITE LUMBER CO., INC., Plaintiff NO. 1:CV-94-1034 (JUDGE RAMBO) v. J. NEVIN WHITE; ROLAND S. JONES; SHARI L. JONES; R.S. JONES CO., INC.: CREDIT-LINE FINANCIAL, INC.; BENJAMIN V.R. CONLON, ESQUIRE; JERRY A. PHILPOT'l', ,ESQUIRE: ROGER C. SIMMONS, ESQUIRE; SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE: GORDON AND SIMMONS: GEORGE T. F~S, IV, ESQUIRE; CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE: WILSON, POWELL, LANG . F~S: and LESLIE AUERBACH, ESQUIRE "- , . 0 --,. .-; . ._-- HAGn'S':U!l~J. PA OCT ?:! 1994 lftJ.!CC: ~~' '" ~,-,., rL--" ~-n -~' .......-.." L:11.. (--" - - .-...-- Defendants JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER AND NOW, this ~ day of t'lJ~~J, 1994, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal, it is hereby ordered that Defendant J. Nevin White is dismissed from this action, without prejudice, and that the claims against J. Nevin White removed to No. 1:CV-94-1200 be remanded to the Court of Common Pleas, cumberland County, to No. 94 civil 2481. BY THE COURT: " .~..A J. :'" (,:';;, ~. ... ........-. ~'- ;,. :'''\~,'.'i ". *",1,1.'....M-.~, ) L ~ (fJ ~ ~ " ',-' .., "', ~ " OCT 28 10 5'/ ~K 'g~ '-' ,! c' ','I ICO OF ~Ilf , '" Ilr,N'}UF\Y CU~6[\:ll,~O C~I-''lT'\' HHIISYlV~HI~ .....', I-~: " 1\ ..'t !': ), .~ I . ~ -__-.~I.~.~.'.............._, ,...z-..... "'.:;..-."C......'....._~'."'-'~'.'..,..:.'~" 00.... .._....~, " ''0,'.... ._.,.~_~t:>o'_.,;'I~;i(V.~-W!" , . " " - --, ...' EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. NEVIN WHITE LUMBER CO., INC., plaintiff v. J. NEVIN WHITE, ROLAND S. JONES, SHARI L. JONES, R.S. JONES CO., INC., CREDIT-LINE FINANCIAL, INC., . BENJAMIN V.R. CONLON, ESQUIRE, JERRY A. PHILPOTT, ESQUIRE, ROGER C. SIMMONS, ESQUIRE, SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE, GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGE T. FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG & FARIS, and LESLIE AUERBACH, ESQUIRE, . Defendants , , : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA I CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 2481 civil 1994 : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the Complaint to No. 2481 Civil 1994 was mailed to all Defendants via certified mail, return receipt requested, on July 1, 1994, and served upon Defendants on the dates listed below. A copy of the receipt for certified mail and return receipt card are attached hereto as evidence of same. Defendant Christopher O'Brien, Esquire Roland S. Jones R. S. Jones Co., Inc. wilson, Powell, Lang & Faris Shari L. Jones George T. Faris, Esquire Gordon & Simmons Susan G. Eisner, Esquire Roger C. Simmons, Esuqire Credit-Line Financial Leslie S. Auerbach, Esquire Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esuqire R. S. Jones Co., Inc. (2d address) J. Nevin White c/o Philpott Jerry Philpott, Esquire Sworn to and sUbscri~ before e this ~ of day , 1994. Receict No. ~turn Receict Date Z719947784 July 7, 1994 P016845560 July 5, 1994 Z719947776 July 5, 1994 Z719947785 July 7, 1994 Z719947774 July 5, 1994 Z719947783 July 7, 1994 Z719947781 July 8, 1994 Z719947780 July 6, 1994 Z719947779 July 6, 1994 Z719947777 July 5, 1994 Z719947782 July 5, 1994 Z719947778 July 5, 1994 Z719947775 July 5, 1994 P016845637 July 6, 1994 P016~4,5638. J.u~y 6, 1994 {!Atif..Jlll~ ~f~.t{,t/ Cheryl /Y. Walker NOTARl.II. SlAl lOIIl A. SHA~ IIOfARY puellr IlOIITIl CORHlWJ. t1i. llBANON co ." IIY COMIIISSIOIl EDiiIiS APRilS. I "J~ z 719,.Q!!-;o. ?6lf ~ Receipt for ~ Certified Mail __ No Inaurance Coverage Provided .::mr= Do not us. for Inlernatlonal Mall 'See R.....r.el Spec,,1 DeilY.,.,. F.. VT $ c>S 051, 7 R.tllcllO 0.......". fft 8! ~ " ~ :l; . rOT AL Po,tAv- C"". o ~ Postma,k or 0'1' ~&wMr-~ ~ ';-/-11' ReMn RK.'PI ShcMotng 10 Whom . o,le OellWfed nell.lfn A.UI01 ShowlI'Ig to Whom 0.'., end Ad4,."..'. Addre.. . $ -- 1]. c..Jm..... , oneIlof 2 'OIlddltlonll ..rvtcll, I ,.-COmplet.Ite""3. and... b. . , _ .' PrInt your name end addtt.. on the rtVtliH of this 'orm 10 thll w. an - mum thll Clrd to you. . !.' . 'Att.ch thlI form 10 the 'ront 0' _ the mlllplec.. or on the back II 'plce does not permit. .J . Writ. "R.tum R~ Requtttld" on the 1MiIpIK. below the .rtlt.. number . TM R.tum R.cllpt wm ahow to whom the .rtkle WI' delW.M and lhe dat. i & - dtllytrl'd. Consult altmutef for 'BII. I 3, AttIC~' Addre.~ () '~ (!,M. ~ Artl~' Number E ~~ cr~~ ~~ ... -"'. 8 'f;~b ~ 0 1l'eg1.,.red 0 Insured IJ C.rtlfl.d 0 COO b-t 7 0 expr... M.II ~ . ~' UT O~~OJ-t)g, 7 7, 0.,. af O.lIverv I .1.0., wl.h,larecelv.th. lallawlng aervlc.. Ilar.n .xlt. lee': 1, 0 Addre....'. Addre.. I j1 J: r l' 2, 0 R..trlct.d O.uv.ry r ~ il ... .d... .. ~ 8, *VA GPO: 1JG-352.714 Z 719 947 776 ~ Receipt fQT , A: Certified Mail ' ___ No Insurance Coverage Provided .ltnlml 00 not use for International Mail (See Reverla) S1?~ S, :Jhw~, :D!", ...... , II bl 53 r .5'''1.01 MD;;:l1 fdl $ C"III~F.. SPK..I o.h...",~ r.. RestrICted Oel....efy fH lil Q) ~.lu," RK'."" StIow"'Q ~ 10 Whom" 0.1" Otl!Yeled ~ Retum Renlpl Showing 10 Whom, ~ 01'., and Addf.,WNI', Adchu TOTAL Po'lage eS .r.., $ o CD Postmark Of Dale ~ ~.Jr'~' u. ~ 7--/--9'/ IT~~?';-:;:'/;;---:",-"-~-" , ,~-_._---~. '--~-'-',:';': :.'t~;.L~~~londfo'21'Uddltlonol_., 1.1.0 wl.h'to ..c:"iv.tII~,})i 1I'.'CoioqlII\e h.... 3,.nd 4. H, following IIrvlc.. ,lID. .n,.xlI.'j.":!\ I ',~:'Prinl-your nIfM and edd,... on the rlvern 01 thI. fonn 10 wt w. can fee): - " . mum thIJ'c.rd to you. -' . I ;: _" ,Attaeh thl. fonn to lhe front of the mMlpec.. Of on the blck II aPlIte 1 0 Addressee'. Add'... - 1,'1 ~:'.=Rtc....R_ttd'.onthemeB~~wthelrti$nurnbtr . OJ";:',.:',. _.. 2, R..t. .;cI.d 0.11..,., I " 1hI Rltum Rec:l:ipt wllthow to whom the IrtkJI WI' detlvetId and the d.tI g dttiveted. ".~, Consult oltm..ter for fee. 1 3, Anlcl. Add.....d to: . ~ 4., Article N~")bo' E R~S' ~ ~,~F ~' 4b, S.rvl:~. 7 i' 8 0 II) rz;w;c. 3 0 R.gl.tor.d i'. f\. b "ISD I .% Certlfl.d S . ~ M d- 0 Expr... M.II Ji'R.t~rn Fi.c.lpt for ~ 7, O.t. 01 0.11..,., .e ' -~- I Add'.....'. A dr... IOnly If r.qu..I.d 'I end fee I. paldl ~ ,1991 ..u.s,QPO:I.........71. DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT Z 71"1 'J47 'HIS ......... Receipt for ~ Certified Mall ___ No 'nsulance Coverage Provided ~:::u 00 not use fOl International Mail ISoe Revelle) SPKI4II o.l>nf'l' r.. ReIItOCI~ Or.I.....,y F.. '" g AII'IIf"R<<."'ISho."'Q ~ 10 Whom 6 0.,. D.lr",,~ ~ Re',,'n "~.'Pl Sho""""IQ 10 Whom, ::E OI'II,.1Id AddI.'Me"' Acktl." . TOTAL Po.~. o &r.., $ o I POstmark Of Oafll !Curnw~ ~ 1,F1/f __"'4_.___. -.ti' ;.;,....j., ,"" :'";1 Eft: I 'I III CompIIte hlml 1 and/or 2 for addlIJonIIlfMcH. : I' CampIo.. h.... 3, ond 4. · b, . -'-Prtnt yGUf MmI and addl,.. on th. flV.,.. of thlt form 10 .hlt w. can , ...... .... COld to ....' . ~nec:h thlI form to 1M 'ront of ttM maIIpitcI. or on the back " ,pac. - .... ponnlt, i .J .. WJIte .'Return Receipt RlqUHtld" on the rNitp6ec. beiow the.rUdI numbtf t .'., ThI ReNm RtceIpt wII ahow to whom the ,rtlcle WI' deNv.,.chnd Iht datI I ~ g deUvtred. Conlult oltmelter for fee. I 3, ii4~;';d~ ~u. n_f (ik, 4., Ardcl. Number 7 ~ E. 6f:1/./f.":;:fS 4b. S.rvlce TyPtl II g ~~ 0 Rogl.tltld 0 In.urld .9 7 % C.nlllld 0 COD ~ . 0 Expr... M.II ~ V1' 691Dd-~"7 7, .t:OlD~~ 8, Addr.....'. Ad .nd f.. I. p.ldl " ".'\:': I .1.0 wl.h ',10 .'r8cel've 'th. following ..rvlc.. ,(Ior'.n .x,", f..): " 1. 0 Add,.....'. Addr". l! r J: , r !: l' f 2. 0 R..lrlct.d D.llv.ry 6, Slgn.IUr. IAddr.....' 8. Slgn.lur. tAg.nll l .lI .v.a. GPO: .____71. Z 719 947 174 ~ Receipt fnr, Certified Mall '. No Inaufance Coverage Provided ~ 00 not ule for Intllrn,llonal Mail ISee Reve .1 61 SPK". 0tI~" f.. Reltrltled OIhv...y r.. i Altutn IlK'opl s~ ... 10 Whom , 0.'1 o.!~ed .c M ::E o o ~ E .e III Do Rllwn Ree''Ilt s~tng 10 WI'lom. Dell. .nd Adelf.,,"', Addl'" TorAL Poll. .'H, $ ~ 1-I-q~' ilk/S;;;;:"-jC:';:--', ','- 11~.t"'iCoolll>lote ~.... I ondI.. 2'.. ___" ".-1',\::",-== ;:~~:;. the revetH ot thl. fonn 10 INt w' can I ~!Itum IhI...." to \'llU' , ';','e- .:' AtttCh, thII form to the '~t of the mtUpieCI. Of on the back II 'piC, . ,. :,donnatPfrml1. :-.J.;Wrfu ''Aatumn..,Pt R~'led" on thII men__ beloW the ,nk.. number " ," -- The Rltum Receipt will Ihow to whom the IrtJdI WI. delfvtfed Ind the dig . & dtIIft,td. . Contult oltm..t.r for f... I 3,. Article Addr...ed 10' 4e. A,'lcle Number e~ .Jh~ ,d..... ~?~ 4b. serv(.e TYP~?? If () ~ ",~?5' -~, _ , 0 R.gl.t.red Dln.ured Q-Il ~ 171oVN!,.. C.nlfl.d 0 COD r o bpr... M.II ,Ja:R.lurn R.c.lp for !l' ~ - IntJJ1A Mb .J./8b/ 7, DlleolD.llvery Qu ~ ' P-(j -'-17 t 8, Addr.....'. Add.... (Only" requ.lI.d I .nd I.. I. p.,di ' . I .1.0, wl.h'.Io rec.lve the IO/Iowlng '.tvlc.. 1I0r .n exlrll fee', 1, 0 Add..."ee'. Add.... f l i l 2, 0 R..lllcled D.llv.ry 5, Sign. .e. *U"'CIl'O;'~71' DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT Z 71'1 ~,1l7 183 ~ Receipt for Certified Mail '. No InSUfance CovallO. Provided - Do not us. for Inlernatlonal Mall lIIlIl'oD:lI 1500 Rovo"ol Sen' $J>>Cllt De"""" r.. R.ttJOC1~ Ortr~IfY fH ~ R.turn RK'Iell SPIowong '""' 10 Whom & 0.1, OrtIIWl.a .c 2 A'IIM'" R';''I)I ShOwlnQ 10 Whom. iiI o.ll,.nd Addr."..'s Addt... :=;: TOTAL Po.ag. o AfM' o Postmark Of Oal. ~~&o ~ 1-1-9tf 'j, 'r,..;. ;, J/ D R: ; . .'1. .',:~t.ftamt 1 IndlO' 2 'or 'ddlUontI MMe... 'f ,'- CompIet. hi'"' 3. 'nd 4ft . b. '. .~ Print VOut ntme .nd ldeI,... on the Nver.. of tN, form 10 that w. can ; - . rttUtn thI, card to you. ~ ,- !' .- AtIKh thI, form to the front of the m.llpSec., or on the INck if .~c. : - - dot. not Pflmh:. .a . Write "Return R.Cllpt Rtqut.t.d" on the maUplec. below the .rtldt numbl, , - . - The R.tum Receipt wll ahow to whom the .rtJcJe WII deN'nl'td ar,d the d... lS ..""...., Con'Ult 1: 3, An'el. Addro..~: C' , 4., A\ll7'o U w~ 7:'~ III ~~ ;k II , . l.h.:' tJ' 4b, So,vleo Tvpo 8 I I'~l' ~U1.(...C D Rog,.lorod ';:) - -7: A:tCortlllod ~ ./!i:;",{. cS7#7 D eop".. Moll - UT 6S~.;1-~ ~.~~ r. . I 01.0 willi: to ro..'v. 1/1. following ..rvl... 110' .n ..tr. foel: 1, D Addr.....'. Addr... 2, D In.urod DCOD R 7, 8, OU'''0P0:'~7'' -------..----...- Z 71"1 "l1f? 7111 ~ ~:~~:re~f~Bli ~ No Insurance Coverage Provided _= 00 not u.e for International Mail (See Rever. S~llo Poll'", C.t1114dfM SPKIII o.lIVeI'V r.. A..t'iclltd o.,,,,,,,v fq .., g: A'M" R~'!Jlt Sho,",,1nV - to Whom I 0..'1 o.rIYI.1td j Rllu," R_,lpl Shtl'""lnV 10 Whom, Dill. .no Add........ Add.." TarAl Po.II,,1 eS &fM' o ~ E ,f Ul a. ~;;;:;;, %- 1-I-ftf . 'c......: c....' . J-t ?t'.',~i""" ondIo,2 10,oddh_....tce., I .I.owl.h :10' '.cel;~'th. Ii; I !'S'--.:ComPIeI' h.ml3..nd 4.. b.' . following lervlcel(for. n:ex,., "~." '.' J.'.,.'Pr!nt\'Ollf namun.hddr... on tho....,.. 01 thI.,onn oolho, w. Can 1..1:,,, " 1 I. ,mum lhia CIIrd to you. .' ,. ' & .'An.chthl.'ormtolho'ron'o'thom.llpl...,Ofonlhoblcklh..c. 1, 0 Add,.....,. Add,... ,j' I :'. :dotl nol permh. '\, ~ t I"-.J . WIft...R.IumR.....IR_,ad..on'ho_bolow'ho.nlclo.....bo, 2, 0 R..trlcl.d D.llvery <IM'I I . - The RItUm fleeeipl wlll mow 10 whom 1M trtiel. w.. dtUvtred end the d'l. . '" 'I' 5: .ddvtted. Consult altm.ster for fee. .;1 ;' '2 3, ArtlCI.Addr.~.adt:. 4., Artlc!.jI,umbe, "'.' < 'I ~ 2r1'f Ti E 7~.~4 '~6'J. 4b, S.rvlc.Type ; 8 ~,lf:IV~ 0 Regl.tored 0 In.u'ad,!(' : ~ ~ I )il"'C.rtlllad 0 COD t ., I III (V d)/?~ 0 exp,e.. M.I~eturn Receipt 10" J: 7, D.,e 01 Dellve,y : ~, , g' >-, 'f), · 8, Add.'...,.. ",e . Add,... (Only II ,.qu..,. ad.' I end Ill., I. p.ld) I: ; i ~ !;'! ~, .; " 1'-: : ,,:' , , , 9 - .u.a.OPO:'-'-7" DOMESTIC RETURN RECEr:" ' .'....,..-_-~,-,-.. z 'no9 "I4? 780 - Receipt ior ~ Certified Mall id.d - ~ ~~ ~:tU~~~C~o~~;t::~~~i:~:~ Mail .:t:llll'~::a IS.. R.v..... Oll.ge $ C~lll..rtf" S~"lo.ll\I..,f.. R.ltl<l~ Oel"".'y F.. ~ Alt...,n RKI'PI ShowtnQ - 10 Whom & 0.'1 o.l~~ .c Relu,n flKllpl Show,"" to WrIom, ~ 0"., end Addl.".... Addft" :E TOTAL Poll"". $ o 6f.., ~ Po'&;:Jr&tf ~ '}-I-ff lJl Q. ;,:'~'!j'~-' .... '~E R: ;' t .,'~Comptet.ltemI, tlnd/or 2 for.dcfidotW ArvSc... i' I:'Compltt.lte"" 3. Ind 4.. b. . ',-:'Pttnt you, name end Idd,... on the revet.. of tNaform 10 that w. can ' retum tN, Cltd to you. ! .. Attach IN, fonn 10 "'- front 01 the m.llplecl, or on the b.ck " 'PIC, doH not PlnNt. ! .. Writ. .....tum R.celpt RllqUtlted" on the mlilplece below the.ttlctt numbtf . The R'him Receipt will ,haw to whom lhe article WI' dellveM Ind the d," g _od, Con.ult o.tm..t., for f.., , ~?;=~ .. "~~~' Q~!4b ~/7()/ I o Addr.....'. Addr... l! Ii !: . ' ce, .. j .!. il' ..., r.qUllted I : I ".0 wl.h to' ,.celvl' ih. lollowlng ..rvlc.. liD. an ext,. '..1: 1, 2, 0 R..trict.d Oellv.rv 5, Slgn.tur. (Addr.....) 8. ce 6, SIl\nptur9-\Ag.ntJ f), 0 ~ ~-- ~"-~ - ... PS Form . O.c.mber 1991 *""'OPO:I~7t. JI ,I 'ii':.,;:" .(. , DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT Z 719 947 777 < . Receipt for ~ Certified Mall Provid.d - x:. No Inaufance Covorage. 1 Mall , 00 not ute lor lntornBtlonB I!lllff"..ll IS.. R.v....1 ,b - Iwvc c..",..r1 r.. SpK..1 De'",". r.. fl."lltted DelIY"Y r.. .., m RltufnflKeoptSNwwIl'Q P- 10 Whom 8. Date Oel.....ed Aetuln Henlt)! Sho","IOQIO Wr\Om, 0".. .nd ...dd..".... Add. n fOTAl Po.taQ. . r... ~ ::E o ~ (;;;;'&7 o "- III D. $ 7- /~91 -'-~-'-;-'.~--~.~.~._.__..._".^,.,,, . ,...,.:..... -.-.'..>. . 1-''''': .. ',''''' ER: !'-''I:.:-,._~comptete It8ml1 .ndIor 2 'or tddlt_1 Hf'Yfc... ii". ~ Complete hem. 3. Ind 4. . b. r ,-"PrInt YG!"~.nd 1ddtI.. on t~ "VI,., 0' thl, 'orm.o that w. can . tttum thII cifd 10 you. I ! e"tt.ch lhiI form to lhe front 0' thelNllplece. ar on the back If 'pac. dol, not permit. . J .. Wrft,'''',turn Rtulpt RtqUeltlCl" on the mallpiece bttow the article number .. The RItUm f).ctlp! wmlho", to whom the anfde wn delivered and the dl" 8 do"'!Od, J 3., Anlel. Addr...ed 10:-" . t ~, bllJ-~ R ~'3~ ~~~ ~ S~ hwo- (l4D ()/S'OI . -----.-----.- . '. . '" Jl(: I .1.0 wl.h,to,ec.Iv"lh. ,'..: lollowlng IOr.lell (la" in. ."".' 'j': loel: ': 1, 0 Add"....'. Add".. ' : J: ji l 2, 0 R..lrlcled O.lIv.'Y Conlult oalma.tar for. fee. 4., 7r'?lf'h 4b, S.rvle. Typ. o R.gl.t".d 0 In.ured ~enlfl.d 0 COO o Exp".. Mell .lurn Rec.lpl lor 7, 011.01 O.lIv"y r _ ~ ~ : ;t - ,- rr ! 8, Ad, dr.....'. Addr... 10nly " "qullt.d t, ' .nd I.. I. p.ldJ F. ' ,,;. .u.l.ClPO: 1113-312-714 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT ; Z 719 947 762 ~ Receipt for Certified Mall .. No Inlurance Co....r.o. Provided - 00 not UII for Internlllonel Mill oI!I1IrD ISoo R"Y",,"' Special Del.......y r.. Rtlll'lcle>d~.....,F.. 1'O,....LPo.~ o &rM' ~ ~;;;;;. t!Iy o ... lJl 0. 1-1-9l/- . --,-, >r.-" . ",~,.:.,~ -. (t.-..f,~~~'~"endlor 2 forlddltlonll MMee.. , , '''CompIetI _ 3. end.... b, , ! '.'PrInt,your neme and Iddrt.. on the ,..,.,.. of tN. form '0 thlt w. can mUm INs CenI to you, . ',.. Attach 1h1t'form to lhI ftont of the mlllpfec.. Of on the back If .pace don not permit. I' . Wlltl ..R...... Recolpt Requo...... on.... ma_ below.... 1~1c" number 2. 0 Rlllrlclld OOIlYo", 13 . - The Return R,cllp! \ilia show to \lWhom the Miele WII dthertd and the da" I I & - .hertcf. CanlUlt I.m.lte, or ... I 3, Altlcl~ Addroll~~. ~ A7/'t/9'~7 7tf..l.. Ii ~ -J. . 4b, Slrvlco TYPI, 1 B CJ~ ~ f 0 Rogl.,ored Olnlurod Ph..../- ;;t"Cortlfled 0 COO 8IJ 3 Ct.d.eA- ~~ 0 expro.. MIll ~llurn Rlcll 10' 1. /J ,,., t11D .;)0 'j ttJ 7, DOlo 01 OlllYlry ~ -q I .~- '", I 11.0 wllhlo; recliv.', the IoIlowlng urvlcoo (lor .n ..". IHI: 1, 0 Addr....... Addr... 1: !, Ii f r ,~. B ,",' 8, Ad rolnl'l A dro.. IOnly If reqUUled 'I i .nd 10. I. poldl ' ~: 1~ : 6, Slgn.lur. fAgontl ! PS Fo;"; , i, . Oecomho, 1891 ou.a. CIl'O: '-'7'4 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT ' Z 71"1 "147 ns ~ Re~Dt for ~ CertlfllidMall __ No Inlulllne. Coverage Provided curms 00 not UI. fOl Intern'tlonel Mill (5.. Rlv.,..) 5 tot" . c), ::r tJYI.k16, :I~, n' . :2S 5" C'flll-.cl r.. A.-tD S~"'OellYfiyr" fle'flleled c.l~,., 'N 8! _ ReM" Rk'OPI SI\Q",,"\Q to Whom' 0.'1 Oel.....,ed ~ Rellnn Rk''''l ShO....1l'Ig 10 Who ~ o.",'nd AdlhU..'. Addl.n m, _ TOTAL Poltage o .r.., o i Postma/It or oa'e ~ 6urVJ ~~ en Q. $ 1~/-ftf __,-::~n:-.:;.', ~.,.~_~__ -;-;Jr .'".'ro;.. rl.,~ompIol.1..... , oneil.. 2'....ldl......,..rvicft, . 1.110 wllh\!o' ..c.lve:lIi. I 'I ~,'Complol.Ito...3,.nd4a.b, following I.MCOI Cfor,.nOlC1l.j"':', I': ,",.,Prlnt yournomt Ind addtt.. on the ,.WfH 01 thl. form 10 tNt w. can feel: . I :murn ttU'catd 10 you.' . j '.':;AttKh thI, form to the front of the mallplec., or on the hick If .paca 1. 0 Addreaa..'. Add;... t. ".I.~~=':'::; R.~pt RtqUtlttd" on the mallplete btJow thI.ttJda num~' 2. 0 RII.rlcted Delivery t ;, i .~ '. TheRItUmAtcelp!wlnlhowtowhomtheartk:LlwlldtliYltlldandthldat. '. , ," _, Conlull ollm.l1.. fa, f.., o ee. I 3, AS:' Add.....d Z. ~. 4., A71/1~NUti1?7S' i i e ~ I ~ "lr? ,- 4b, Servlc. TVp. cI! : ll' ~ 0 ~ 0'';;' ;) 1"1. . 0 R.gJIl...d 0 Inlured .. . . -4"'" Jund V~ g:'c.nlll.d 0 COO .Ii : S" -a 8 0 II.'" 0 Expresl Mill iir Rllum R.c pI fa, !I C' _ ,': Mb ~18DJ 7,O.t.ofO.llv.ry Jl: ~ - - I, 8, Add'..I..'. AddrelllOn V If requ.ll.d J ' .nd f.. II plld) . I 1991 eU...OPO:'....71. DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT P D1b 845 637 ~ Receipt for Certi:~ Mall .. No Inaur.nee Coverage Provided .cur.u:B Do not u.e tor Internetlonal Mall IS.. Rever..) Spec..' 0.1"'''. ,.. A.t1rc:11'd 0eI....-t. FH en R.Mn R'Uipl S~"'G en 10 Whom , 0.1. DeI_lid - t R.turn R'UlCll Show,"" 10 Whom, !5 Dtt...nd Addl.....'. Addf... .., TOTAL PoIWge $ '~'&r ~ 1--I-q 'I 6, Slgnltu.. /Add......' DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT, . . P Clb 845 1,38 ~ Receipt .for A':: Certified MeR' .. No Insurance Coverage Provided .Ilmr=t 00 not ula for International Mill (Soe Rev.".1 A SPK'" OelIY..y F.. R..ll'lcl~ Delry..y F.. 0; Return R~.'P1 Showing ~ 10 Whom . OI'e Ortl......ed . R.I~n "<<.!pl Sho*rog Kl Whom !i 01,., end Add..'..... Admen . -, TOTAL Po.~ g ..... $ 8t Postmlllr; or 011. l C/.urlw CVr K! '7-I-tILf ~'""i,:;f''-'/~'7':?:'-'';'~-, .. ~', .. . "",;:.<'':""-~~, .~... .. , .. .. " ,..... ',-, : .",~". '~ ':' '.: "'Co""..; """, ',~:~", I':."", -' : ,'Ii,;COmpIotabml {1IldI0I 2 I.. __ ..mee., I 'IIoWI.hto,:',.ceI#';'~:'P:;;'i "'I"!Cornl>IttO - 3, ond "". b, 10110 W, lno II rvlcea ,.l".I~I"".,an "",.xt,,.,.,,,,";.'.J..,,1 ;:,::,e,:PMt your_",,", end IddtHI on the rue,.. of this form IOlhat WI can 'ee): , " "" .. "',, '.' ..',1 i y, ~,retum this ard to you. i; ,.".'A_1Ht lann ID tho I.....f tho _ploe., 01 on tho _ If ..... 1, 0 Addr......,. Add.... .. :;' I) !l't===:=:~.:.":..::~.:::== 2, 0 R~aulctid Dal""ry ,." ",'.1',.,;:' : g do_ad, Con.ult .tm..tar for fee,' "1 3, Artlel. Add''''ed~to: ~ "'" Artlel. Number , ~ it c::P . . t-'O bH S ')\, Ii 0_ . I" 4b. S.rvlce Type II /) f'(!IrIX 4. 0 Regl.t.red ' ~ . tJ M Gh..J Ji!"tertlfled .2' :', ? ..)Vf,t.IA- 0 Exp.... M.n for 1 ~: c.MlAL-trn IA 11tJ;J..(j 7, DetlOI D ...... t 8, Add..... . Add.... (Only If ,.qUllted! ' .nd fee II plld) , , ' " i . 'i:'; "I ;., DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT .. C'i'~",:" ~ '., ......--.- .. , . Aut 3\ 2 11 PH '9~ tII , , ,;" . 'Ji ~ ICl Of T1" ; ,,:1I10H()1,\hY CUHllriHI.ND Cf)UkTY f'tH!;~,h'''AHiA ~.Q ~ . \ ( 0" ~ 'C!f'V , t "...,'.~ .~",>...,;, , , ,) \ , . ,. ... - -- "\ EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. NEVIN WHITE LUMBER CO., INC., Plaintiff v. J. NEVIN WHITE, ROLAND S. JONES, SHARI L. JONES, R.S. JONES CO., INC., CREDIT-LINE FINANCIAL, INC., : BENJAMIN V.R. CONLON, ESQUIRE, JERRY A. PHILPOTT, ESQUIRE, ROGER C. SIMMONS, ESQUIRE, SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE, GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGE T. FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG & FARIS, and LESLIE AUERBACH, ESQUIRE Defendants 4. ., IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW . . . . . . : NO. 94 civil 2481 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . : . . : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLA:INT 1. The Plaintiff, Edward W. Harker, is Trustee in Receivership of J. Nevin White Lumber Company, Inc., and J. Nevin White, and the marital estate of J. Nevin White and Willa White, having been duly 47952/CV appointed by The Honorable George Hoffer, Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 2. The Defendant, J. Nevin White, is the husband of Willa White, the former President of J. Nevin White Lumber Company, Inc., a resident of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at least until September, 1992, and subj ect to the jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, in the action of White v. White, No. 4730 civil 1981. 3. The Defendant, Roland S. Jones, is a self-described 1 ~ ~ . "business advocate" with offices in Maryland, who has actively participated in the management of the J. Nevin White Lumber Company in Pennsylvania, and has acted as agent, advisor and consultant to J. Nevin White in connection with his legal dealings with is wife, Willa, and who is currently subject to an injunctive Order issued by The Honorable George Hoffer not to interfere with the activities of the Receiver, Plaintiff Edward W. Harker. 4. The Defendant, Shari L. Jones, is the wife of Roland S. Jones, an employee and possibly an owner of R. S. Jones Co., Inc., and has assisted Roland S. Jones in the dissipation and transfer of assets to which Willa White was entitled, or in which she possessed a security interest. Shari L. Jones has also aided Roland S. Jones in his attempt to run the J. Nevin White Lumber Company. 5. The Defendant, R. S. Jones Co., Inc., is a corporation with its principal place of business in Salisbury, Maryland, whose corporate charter or authority to do business in Maryland was revoked on October 5, 1992, and which has done business in Pennsylvania, both prior and subsequent to that date. 6. The Defendant, Credit-Line Financial, Inc., is a corporation with it principal place of business in Maryland, owned by Roland S. Jones and Shari L. Jones, which does business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, but whose charter or authority to do business was revoked in Maryland on November 14, 1991. 7. The Defendant, Benj amin V. R. Conlon, Esquire, is an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of New York, who was specially 2 . oC . admitted in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Court of Common Pleas, cumberland County, in order to represent J. Nevin White in connection with his divorce proceedings with Willa White, and who has conspired with J. Nevin White and Roland S. Jones as part of an enterprise designed to seize assets of the White marital estate to which Willa White is entitled, or in which she has a security interest, and transfer these assets beyond the reach of Willa White and the Court of Common Pleas, CUmberland County. 8. The Defendant, Jerry L. Philpott, Esquire is an attorney licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, who at various times represented J. Nevin White in connection with the White divorce and bankruptcy proceedings, and J. Nevin White Lumber Co., Inc. in connection with a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filed in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. 9. The Defendants, Roger C. Simmons, Esquire and Susan Eisner, Esquire are attorneys licensed to practice law in the State of Maryland, who allegedly represent a Portuguese corporation known as Euro-Ceramica, Inc. said counsel signed and filed a declaratory judgment in Federal COU1~ for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Further, Mr. Simmons and Ms. Eisner appeared in the Court of Common Pleas, cumberland County, in an attempt to intervene on behalf of Euro-Ceramica in the divorce action of White v. White. 10. The Defendant, Gordon & Simmons, is a partnership organized to practice law in the State of Maryland, and the Defendants Simmons and Eisner are partners in or employees of said law firm. 3 . ~ 11. The Defendant, wilson, Powell, Lang & Faris, is partnership organized for the practice of law in the state of Vermont. 12. The Defendants, George T. Faris, IV, Esquire and Christopher O'Brien, Esquire, are attorneys licensed to practice law in the state of Vermont. Defendant Faris is a partner in the firm of Wilson, Powell, Lang & Faris, and Defendant O'Brien is believed to be an associate. 13. The Defendants, George T. Faris, IV, Esquire and Christopher o'Brien, Esquire acted as counsel in a bankruptcy improperly filed in the state of Vermont, designed to aid in the dissipation of assets located in Pennsylvania, properly belonging to Willa White pursuant to Order of the Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County, and who therefore participated in the fraud affecting the property of Willa White, located in Pennsylvania, as detailed below. 14. The Defendant, Leslie s. Auerbach, Esquire is an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of Maryland, who has acted as counsel in bankruptcies filed in the Federal District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on behalf of J. Nevin White and J. Nevin White Lumber Company, Inc., and who also furthered the bankruptcy improperly lodged in the state of Vermont by Roland S. Jones. Attorney Auerbach's activities in connection with these bankruptcies aided in the dissipation of marital assets belonging to Willa White, or in which she had a security interest. 15. J. Nevin White and Willa E. White were married on November 23, 1946. 4 . .. 16. J. Nevin White and his wife mutually operated a business known as J. Nevin White Lumber Co., Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business in Duncannon, Pennsylvania. 17. The business of the company consisted of purchasing logs and timber which were sawn into boards, and sold on the wholesale market in the United states, Canada and Ireland. 18. Mrs. White contributed significantly to the lumber business and worked at the plant for approximately twenty-nine (29) years. 19. On December 24, 1981, Willa E. White filed for divorce against J. Nevin White. 20. Approximately thirteen (13) Master's Hearings were held in this divorce proceeding, and during the course of the proceeding, Mr. White was represented by a number of attorneys, while Mrs. White was and remains represented by Richard C. Sne1baker, Esquire. 21. On April 6, 1988, an Order of Equitable Distribution intended to conclude the divorce proceedings was entered which gave substantial assets and a large cash settlement to Willa E. White ($1,662,990.00). The cash award was to be secured by a Note of the White Lumber Company, and certain real estate held in Mr. White's individual name located in Centre and Juniata Counties. 22. Mr. White appealed the Order of Equitable Distribution to the Superior Court, which upheld the Order generally, but found that the trial Court had failed to allow for tax consequences resulting from potential liquidation of the corporation, and therefore remanded the matter to the Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County, to afford 5 . of the parties an opportunity to present evidence on the tax issue. 23. On or about July 21, 1988, J. Nevin White began transferring money from the J. Nevin White Lumber Co., Inc., to the Defendant, R. S. Jones Co., Inc. These funds were properly subject to the equitable distribution Orders of the Pennsylvania state Courts. 24. On or about July 21, 1988, J. Nevin White and J. Nevin White Lumber Company hired Defendant R. S. Jones Co., Inc. and R. S. Jones to act as "business consultant" for the purposes of evading the Orders of the Court of Common Pleas and defeating the marital rights of Willa E. White. 25. J. Nevin White and J. Nevin White Lumber Company paid R. S. Jones, Co., Inc. the sum of $7,500.00 to retain the professional legal services of Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire, to assist them in defeating the marital rights of Willa E. White. 26. J. Nevin White, Roland s. Jones, Shari L.Jones, and Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire knowingly utilized R. S. Jones Co., Inc., to divert funds and assets of J. Nevin White Lumber company to themselves and J. Nevin White in violation of specific Orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 27. On or about September, 1988, the Defendant, J. Nevin White, authored notes of consultations with Roland S. Jones concerning the filing of bankruptcies as a means of evading his marital problems. These strategies were discussed by phone in consultation with Roland Jones. A note dated September 21, 1988, indicates that Willa White was the only creditor. 6 . ~ 28. On or about January 18, 1989, the Defendants, Roland S. Jones and Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire, met with Attorney Richard Sne1baker at his office in cumberland County, Pennsylvania, and threatened to file bankruptcies on behalf of J. Nevin White and his business to defeat the marital rights of Willa E. White in the event she declined to accept a much lesser monetary settlement than that to which the Court had indicated she was entitled. 29. On February 24, 1989, the superior Court of Pennsylvania issued its Opinion and order, affirming the equitable distribution and remanding for hearings on the tax consequences of corporate dissolution. 30. On September 25, 1989, the Defendant, Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire, moved for his admission before the Court of Common Pleas, cumberland County, to represent J. Nevin White's interests. Defendant Conlon was paid by Roland Jones from funds transferred to R. S. Jones Co., Inc. and acted as counsel to Roland S. Jones in other matters. 31. On October 31, 1989, a stock purchase agreement was purportedly entered into between a Portuguese corporation, Euro- Ceramica, Inc., and J. Nevin White, transferring the lumber company assets in return for a promissory note. The Defendant, Roland S. Jones, was then supposedly appointed by this Portuguese corporation as president of J. Nevin White Lumber Co., Inc., with J. Nevin White to remain employed as manager of the company. 32. Euro-Ceramica, Inc. was originally incorporated in Portugal on March 16, 1968. It currently has no employees and suspended its 7 . . commercial activities on November 29, 1983. The company is not listed as possessing any assets, and all of its patrimony was sold by public auction to the Fuderacao dos Industria1ias de Setuba1. 33. Plaintiff believes and therefore avers that at the time of the alleged sale of stock, Euro-Ceramica was not in business, it had an unbalanced financial situation due to late payments, and that it was insolvent and unable to pay for the alleged sale of stock. 34. On November 15, 1989, The Honorable George Hoffer issued an Order scheduling Hearings on the remanded divorce proceeding. 35. On November 16, 1989, at least three pieces of property were deeded by J. Nevin White to Credit Line Financial Corporation or Shari L. Jones for a supposed total consideration of $357,300.00, in direct violation of the Court's Order designating the properties as security for willa White's equitable interest. 36. On January 1, 1990, a Rule was issued by the Court upon J. Nevin White to produce financial records for the Lumber Company. 37. Defendants Roland S. Jones and R. S. Jones Co., Inc., authored mail and utilized the United states mail to transmit a threatening letter to Thomas G. Clark, CPA, as a result of which said accountant was intimidated and extorted from providing further accounting services to the J. Nevin White Lumber Company. 38. On January 11, 1990, the Lumber company's certified public accountant, Mr. Clark, was removed from his office. 39. Remand Hearings were held by The Honorable George Hoffer between February, 1990, and August of that same year. 8 ~'-,,,,.... . 40. On August 22, 1990, the supposed sale of the White Lumber Company to Euro-Ceramica was revealed for the first time to Willa White and her attorney. 41. In response, a petition for special Relief was filed by Mrs. White's attorney, Richard Sne1baker, and a Rule was issued upon J. Nevin White, J. Nevin White Lumber company, Inc., Roland S. Jones, Credit Line Financial Corporation, and Euro-ceramica, returnable October 31, 1990, to show cause why relief pursuant to the divorce code should not be granted by the Court. 42. Subsequently, an Order was entered by the Court declaring the various transactions described above as being fraudulent, revoking the sale of the lumber business to Euro-Ceramica, voiding the real estate transfers, imposing a constructive trust on all of J. Nevin White's assets, authorizing the filing of liens and lis pendens, enjoining Roland Jones and Credit-Line Financial Corporation from dealing with or disposing of any of the marital assets, or the products thereof, and placing a constructive trust on the assets of J. Nevin White Lumber Company, Inc. 43. The Defendant, Conlon, appealed this Order, and the appeal was quashed in November, 1990. 44. On December 26, 1991, J. Nevin White authored a memo indicating or implying that money was to be placed under the control of a trustee located in Liechtenstein. 45. On or about May 8, 1992, the Court entered an Order affirming the fraudulent nature of the above-described transfers of 9 . the business and real estate, and appointed Edward Harker as Receiver. 46. The Receiver, Edward harker, met with J. Nevin White to discuss the implications of receivership and to begin his work. Defendant White induced Mr. Harker from taking any action prior to the fOllowing Monday, so that the Company's business would not be interrupted. 47. On Monday, May 11, 1992, during the time when Edward Harker had been induced to forebear from seizing company assets, J. Nevin White filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The document listed R. S. Jones as agent, and the Defendant Conlon as counsel. 48. Roland S. Jones, on or about May 12, 1992, did utilize telephone communications to threaten and attempt to intimidate Plaintiff from performing his duties as Trustee by calling Plaintiff at home and threatening that plaintiff refrain from performing his duties. 49. Subsequently, Defendants White, Jones and Conlon hired and consulted with Defendant Philpott and Defendant Auerbach concerning this bankruptcy. 50. Edward Harker intervened in the bankruptcy, and together with the U.S. Trustee, requested the appointment of a Trustee to supersede the debtor in possession. The Defendant Auerbach appeared on behalf of Euro-Ceramica, Objecting to the appointment of a Trustee. 51. On June 30, 1992, the bankruptcy Judge, The Honorable Robert Woodside, dismissed the bankruptcy as filed in bad faith, and as an 10 . attempt to evade the effect of state Court orders entered in connection with White v. White. 52. In June, 1992, Defendant Conlon appealed, on White's behalf, Judge Hoffer's decision appointing Edward Harker as Receiver. 53. On July 2, 1992, Jerry Philpott replaced Defendant Conlon as counsel in order to perfect this interlocutory appeal. 54. On July 8, 1992, a second bankruptcy was filed in the Middle District of Pennsylvania on behalf of the debtor, J. Nevin White Lumber Company. This Chapter 11 bankruptcy listed the Defendant Philpott as counsel. The Defendants Conlon and Auerbach later entered appearances as counsel. 55. Roland S. Jones, Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire, and Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire knowingly concealed an asset of the J. Nevin White Lumber Company, to wit: a federal condemnation proceeding settled for $200,000.00 from Plaintiff and the United states Bankruptcy Court. Defendants knowingly filed incomplete and inaccurate statements with the Bankruptcy Court in order to conceal said condemnation proceeding. 56. Roland S. Jones gave false and incomplete testimony under oath during a bankruptcy proceeding, to wit: a 341 meeting held before the United states Trustee on August 10, 1992. During said meeting, regarding questions concerning assets, depreciation, and values of real estate, Roland S. Jones willfully concealed the aforesaid condemnation proceeding. 57. sometime thereafter, the Defendant Roland Jones issued a 11 . "Company Update" to all employees of J. Nevin White Lumber Company, specifically stating that the company had sought protection from possible takeover by filing bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, but that nonetheless, the company was not having financial problems and that the situation resulted from personal difficulties of Mr. White that go back many years. Mr. Jones further stated, "I am sure that some of you may wonder why the company is in bankruptcy if there are not financial problems. As with many national corporations throughout the country, bankruptcy is being used for a variety of difficulties. Therefore, there is no reason to be concerned about the ability of this company to meet its financial obligations." 58. Mr. Jones also stated, "The reason for seeking bankruptcy had nothing to do with financial difficulties, but was taken to prevent takeover by other parties, arising from a marriage settlement dispute. " A copy of the company update is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 59. On or about August, 1992, Defendant Conlon filed a pro se action to No. 92-1058 in the Federal District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania against various defendants, including The Honorable Robert J. Woodside, Magistrate J. Andrew Smyser, various attorneys, and the First National Bank of Mifflintown, contending that these defendants had conspired to prevent Mr. Conlon from practicing law and receiving payment for professional services rendered, in violation of the Racketeering, Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. ~1961, gt ~ (RICO), as well as 42 U.S.C. ~1983 and 12 . 11985. 60. Judge Woodside and Magistrate Smyser had been involved in dismissAl of the first bankruptcy, denominated by the Court as filed in bad faith. 61. Shortly afterwards, the Defendant, Roland S. Jones, filed a similar suit to No. 92-1151 against The Honorable George E. Hoffer, Attorney Richard C. Sne1baker, the Receiver, Edward W. Harker, and Attorney Robert L. o'Brien. 62. Defendant Roland S. Jones alleged that these Judges and Attorneys had conspired to prevent Roland S. Jones and J. Nevin White from doing business, through handing down allegedly fraudulent Orde~s enforcing Willa White's claim for relief under the Divorce Code. 63. Both of these suits were dismissed as totally without basis or merit by the Federal District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. 64. Additionally, Defendant Conlon was assessed Rule 11 sanctions by the United states District Judge william L. Standish for filing a frivolous lawsuit. 65. The District Court declined to order similar sanctions against Roland S. Jones because he is not an attorney, was acting pro se, and the Court believed that he may have misunderstood the nature of the laws involved. 66. The District Court did Order, however, that sanctions would be entertained should he appeal the dismissal. 67. These RICO Complaints requested not only monetary damages, 13 . but also injunctive relief, in an attempt to hamper the enforcement of Court Orders relating to the marital dispute. They also constituted an attempt to threaten and intimidate judicial officers and attorneys, and to hinder the proper administration of justice. 68. On August 7, 1992, a Rule was issued on J. Nevin White to show cause why the Orders of Court entered September 5, 1990 and May 8, 1992 should not be enforced, and why he should not be held in contempt of Court for failure to abide therewith. Rule was returnable at a Hearing to be held August 26, 1992. 69. On August 27, 1992, the Rule was made absolute, J. Nevin White was found to be in willful contempt, and J. Nevin White was ordered to appear in Court on September 14, 1992, at 9:00 a.m. to determine appropriate enforcement remedies and/or sanctions to ensure compliance with the Orders of the Court. 70. J. Nevin White failed to appear for this Hearing and a bench warrant was issued for his arrest on September 16, 1992. 71. On or about September 15, 1992, the Defendant White left the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 72. R. S. Jones Co., Inc., Roland S. Jones, and Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire have utilized fraudulent mail drops and addresses for J. Nevin White to conceal the whereabouts of J. Nevin White as a fugitive. 73. On September 15, 1992, the Defendant White's appeal from the dismissal of his first bankruptcy was also dismissed. 74. On October 5, 1992, the R. S. Jones Company's charter to do 14 business in the state of Maryland was revoked. 75. On November 16, 1992, the interlocutory appeal perfected by Defendant Philpott was dismissed. 76. On December 18, 1992, a Petition for Further Special Relief was filed by Attorney Sne1baker, and on January 25, 1993 an Order was entered designating various properties subject to the marital estate to Mrs. White. 77. On April 7, 1993, a third bankruptcy was filed in Florida by an Attorney Waldron on behalf of J. Nevin White individually. Defendant Jones arranged and paid for said bankruptcy proceeding. 78. On April 7, 1993, at or about the same time as the third bankruptcy was being filed, Defendant Auerbach appeared before Bankruptcy Judge Woodside and stipulated to conditional dismissal of the second bankruptcy. The Florida bankruptcy was not revealed to the Court or Plaintiff at said time. 79. On April 8, 1993, the Order of Bankruptcy Judge Woodside was entered. 80. On April 8, 1993, at 10:50 a.m., Defendants Jones and Conlon appeared at the Plaintiff's office and served upon Plaintiff a notice of the Florida bankruptcy. Defendant Conlon stated that the Florida bankruptcy nullified Judge Woodside's Order and threatened legal action against Plaintiff if he sought to enforce said Order or to seize corporate assets, records or funds. 81. On April 8, 1993, Judge Hoffer ordered Plaintiff to seize the corporate bank accounts at Second National Bank and Dean witter 15 Reynolds. 82. That same day, a "Suggestion of Bankruptcy" was filed in the Court of Common Pleas, cumberland County. 83. On April 16, 1993, the Detendant Conlon phoned the Second National Bank in Maryland attempting to interfere with the transfers of the funds to Edward Harker by asserting a stay based upon the Florida bankruptcy. Both Defendants Conlon and Jones demanded that the bank accounts be released to Jones. 84. On April 16, 1993, the Honorable Robert J. Woodside, Chief Bankruptcy Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, filed his Order and Opinion dismissing the bankruptcy of J. Nevin White Lumber Company, Inc., specifically finding that the Petition was filed in bad faith and that the filing represented another attempt by J. Nevin White to delay having his wife, who has serious medical problems, from receiving property to which she was entitled. The Court further ordered that no bankruptcy could be initiated by the J. Nevin White Lumber Company in this or any other jurisdiction for a period of not less than 180 days. 85. On May 4, 1993, the attorney who had filed the Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Florida, Edward J. Waldron, withdrew the bankruptcy rather than risk sanctions requested by Plaintiff. 86. On or about May 13, 1993, the Defendant R.S. Jones was held in contempt by Order of the Honorable George Hoffer, the Court finding that he had withdrawn $271,000.00 from Juniata Bank and transferred to money to Dean witter Reynolds in New York City, contrary to 16 specific Court Order. Judge Hoffer ordered that Jones be jailed until he purged himself of his contempt. 87. On May 14, 1993, Jones was released from prison because the then-existing bank balances were returned. 88. On May 19, 1993, a permanent injunction was issued against Roland Jones, enjoining him from interfering with the actions ot Edward Harker and ordering Jones to account. 89. On June 7, 1993, the Defendant Jones, through the Defendant Philpott, appealed this Order. 90. On June 21, 1993, the Defendant Jones filed accounts under seal. 91. On June 22, 1993, Euro-Ceramica, Inc. purportedly initiated a declaratory judgment action in the United states District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Euro-Ceramica, Inc. was supposedly represented by Defendants simmons and Eisner of Defendant Gordon & Simmons. 92. The relief requested in this litigation was an Order declaring that Euro-Ceramica was the appropriate owner of J. Nevin White Lumber Company, although the sale to Euro-Ceramica had already been declared a fraud by Judge Hoffer. 93. On October 18, 1993, Edward Harker moved to employ special counsel to aid him in his Receivership activities. 94. On December 2, 1993, another Petition for special Relief was filed by Willa White, through her Attorney Richard Sne1baker, and on January 5, 1994, Edward Harker received the Court's authority to 17 appoint an accountant to aid in his assessment of the Lumber company's financial situation. 95. Some the company's books had been obtained by Edward Harker pursuant to Court Order, for the first time, on May 13, 1993, the date of the permanent injunction hearing. 96. At different times thereafter, the Receiver Edward Harker discovered that beginning July 21, 1981, a total of $654,204.21 had been transferred from the J. Nevin White Lumber Company's accounts to R. S. Jones, Inc. through March 16, 1993. 97. An exhibit detailing the dates and particulars of the monetary transfers is attached hereto as Exhibit "B". 98. Before Edward Harker received authority from the Court to seize the company's assets, it had been run in J. Nevin White's absence through messages conveyed to personnel by Roland Jones, Shari Jones, and J. Nevin White. Additionally, Roland Jones would visit from time to time. 99. Once Edward Harker assumed operation of the business, he discovered that vast amounts of forest land had been clear cut by Jones and White, thereby greatly depreciating the value of property subject to which Willa White's equitable lien. 100. On January 10, 1994, yet a fourth bankruptcy was filed, this time an involuntary Chapter 11 petition filed by R. S. Jones Company, Inc. in Vermont. A notice of this bankruptcy was filed in the Court of Common Pleas, cumberland County, Pennsylvania, by Defendant Conlon on January 13, 1994. 18 , 101. The involuntary Petition of R. S. Jones Company asserted that John Nevin White owned timberland and a sawmill operation, although the business had supposedly been sold to Euro-Ceramica, Inc., the corporation which Defendant Auerbach represented before the Federal District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania. 102. The Petitioner was represented by Defendants George T. Faris, IV, Esquire, and Christopher O'Brien, Esquire, as well as Leslie Auerbach, Esquire. 103. Defendant Leslie Auerbach filed an Affidavit asserting that J. Nevin White had been served by mail, in Vermont, with the bankruptcy Complaint. 104. The relief sought in the bankruptcy was supposed management fees of R. S. Jones Co., Inc. against J. Nevin White in the amount of approximately $15,000.00. 105. On January 24, 1994, the Honorable George Hoffer ordered Edward Harker to intervene in the Vermont bankruptcy. Edward Harker investigated the matter, finding that there was no evidence that J. Nevin White resided in the jurisdiction and that, at most, he had a mail drop. 106. Roland S. Jones, Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire, George T. Faris, IV, Esquire, and Christopher O'Brien, Esquire knowingly conspired to utilize a false address and place of residence of J. Nevin White. 107. Roland S. Jones and R. S. Jones Co., Inc. knowingly provided false information subject to the penalty of perjury in an involuntary 19 bankruptcy petition alleging that J. Nevin White lived at RFD '1, Box 1460, Vergennes, Vermont 05491. 108. On March 16, 1994, the bankruptcy was dismissed by Order of the Bankruptcy Judge, and the Court specifically found that the putative debtor maintained neither a residence nor domicile in their jurisdiction, a fact known by the petitioning creditor, R. S. Jones Co., Inc. 109. This bankruptcy dismissal was also appealed and dismissed, the Federal District Court finding that the action was a fraud. 110. The litigation initiated by Euro-Ceramica, Inc. for a declaratory judgment was also dismissed as yet another attempt to collaterally attack the Orders of the Court of Common Pleas, cumberland County, Pennsylvania, and in general, to interfere with the enforcement of laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 111. Defendants Gordon, Eisner, and Gordon & Simmons had appealed this dismissal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which dismissed it. 112. Defendant Roland S. Jones knowingly filed a false report with the Internal Revenue Service alleging that the J. Nevin White Lumber Company was owned by a foreign corporation, to wit: Euro- Ceramica: and further Roland S. Jones did knowingly utilize the United States Mail for the purpose aforesaid. 113. Currently, Defendant Jones is attempting to re-open J. Nevin White's bankruptcy proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. 20 114. Roland S. Jones, R. S. Jones Co., Inc., Shari L. Jones, Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire, Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire and Leslie Auerbach, Esquire, knowingly utilized payments to R. S. Jones Co., Inc. to divert funds from the J. Nevin White Lumber Company to pay themselves fees and expenses while concealing the true nature of the payment from the Plaintiff, Court of Common Pleas, and the United States Bankruptcy Court. 115. Roland S. Jones, R. S. Jones, Co., Inc., Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire, Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire, and Leslie Auerbach, Esquire knowingly utilized R. S. Jones co., Inc., to divert monies from the Debtor-in-Possession during a pending bankruptcy proceeding and did receive professional fees without application to the Bankruptcy Court or authorization for payment thereof. 116. As a result of the Defendants' conduct, substantial assets which once comprised the J. Nevin White Lumber Company, and assets otherwise part of the White marital estate, have been dissipated, fraudulently transferred in interstate commerce, or destroyed, drastically reducing the property available to the Receiver, Edward W. Harker, to recover on behalf of Willa White. Further, the multiple bankruptcies and spurious litigations have seriously interfered with the Receiver's ability to run the Lumber Company and maintain it as a financially ~iab1e entity. 117. Further, the multiple, vexatious actions and appeals initiated and furthered by the various Defendants required the expenditure of substantial monies to defend, to the detriment of 21 assets held in Receivership for the benefit of Willa White. C01JN'l' I VIOLATIONS O~ THE RACKETBBRING AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT BDWARD W. BARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. HBVIN WHITB LUHBBR co., INC. v. J. HBVIN WHITB, ROLAHD S. JOHBS, R.S. JOHBS CO., INC., SHARI L. JOHBS CRBDIT-LIHB ~INAHCIAL, INC., BBNJAMIN V.R. CONLON, BSQUIRB, JBRRY A. PHILPOTT, BSQUIRB, ROGBR C. SIMMONS, BSQUIRB, SUSO 8. BISHBR, BSQUIRB, GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGB T. ~ARIS, IV, BSQUIRB, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIBN, BSQUIRB, WILSON, POWELL, LANG , ~ARIS and LESLIB AUERBACH, BSQUIRB 118. Paragraphs 1 through 117 are incorporated herein by reference. 119. Defendants J. Nevin White, Roland S. Jones, R. S. Jones, Inc. and Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire, initially conspired to create and direct an enterprise calculated to deprive Willa White, and later Edward Harker, as Receiver, of money or property and business assets to which they were entitled pursuant to Orders of the Court of Common Pleas, cumberland County, Pennsylvania, as affirmed by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania. 120. This enterprise was directed primarily by Roland S. Jones, who coordinated a pattern of activity designed to frustrate enforcement of the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and in particular, the Orders of the Court of Common Pleas, CUmberland County, through initiation of a series of four fraudulent bankruptcies: by taking multiple frivolous appeals of Court Orders: 22 . by utilizing the delay resultant from said actions to dissipate assets and enrich themselves at the expense of marital assets: by motivating a declaratory judgment purportedly on behalf of Euro-Ceramica, a non- viable shell corporation: and by initiating two bad faith RICO suits against Judges, officers of the Court, and the Receiver, Edward Harker, as described above, in an attempt to hamper their ability to administer the law. 121. Defendants Jones, Conlon, White and R.S. Jones Co., Inc. were aided in their racketeering enterprise by the Defendant attorneys who conspired with Defendants Jones, Conlon, White and R.S. Jones Co., Inc. to file and further fraudulent, sham litigations as described above, when they knew or should have known the fraudulent purpose of these various litigations. 122. Defendant Jones, Conlon and White were further aided in their racketeering enterprise through the conduct and use of two corporations, R. S. Jones, Inc. and credit-Line Financial, Inc., as vehicles to effect the fraudulent transfer of assets out of Pennsylvania. R. S. Jones Co., Inc., also initiated the final bankruptcy, which it knew was improperly filed in Vermont. 123. Defendant Jones, Conlon, White and R. S. Jones Co., Inc. were also aided in their racketeering enterprise through the action of Shari Jones, who conspired with them to effect the fraudulent transfer of assets subject to the orders of the Court of Common Pleas, cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 124. The Defendants utilized the United States mail and the 23 ,. . telephone wires to file pleadings, and make litigation-related communications in connection with the four fraudulent bankruptcies, two sham RICO actions, sham Federal declaratory judgment action, and spurious appeals, as described above. 125. Defendants Jones, Conlon, Auerbach, Faris and O'Brien conspired to fraudulently allege the residence of J. Nevin White as Vergennes, Vermont, in order to improperly invoke and pursue bankruptcy in said District while utilizing the mails and mail drops to conceal the whereabouts of J. Nevin White. 126. The overall purpose of the enterprise described above was to illegally frustrate enforcement of the lawful orders of the Court of Common Pleas, cumberland County, as affirmed by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, thereby depriving the Receiver, Edward Harker, of the ability to recover assets of the J. Nevin White Lumber Co., Inc., and the White marital estate, for the benefit of willa White, and hampering the R~ceiver's ability to effectively run the Lumber Company. 127. The acts of these Defendants, described above, constitute violations of laws, and conspiracy to violate laws which include, but not limited, to the following: a. bankruptcy fraud pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 5152: b. mail fraud pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 51341: c. wire fraud pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 51343: d. obstruction of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 51503: e. violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. 51951: 24 f. interstate transportation in aid of racketeerinq pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 11952: q. extortion pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S.A. 139231 h. interstate transportation of money taken by fraud, 18 U.S.C. 12314: and i. interstate transportation of stolen or converted money or property, 18 U.S.C. 12315. 128. As a result of this enterprise, the Plaintiff Edward Harker, Receiver, has been hampered in his ability to receive White marital estate assets, and to run the Lumber company so that it remained financially viable. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that judgment be entered aqainst the Defendants in an amount equal to three times the described losses, which is in excess of Twenty Thousand ($20,000.00) Dollars, together with injunctive relief, and any other appropriate relief permitted by law. 25 comrr II ABUSB or PROCBSS BDWARD W. BARKBR, Trustee in Reoeivership of J. HEVIN RITB LUMBBR CO., INC. v. J. HEVIN RITB, ROLAlfD S. JONES, R. S. JONES CO., INC., BBNJAMIN V.R. CONLON, BSQUIRE, JERRY A. PHILPOTT, BSQUIRE, ROGBR C. SIMMONS, BSQUIRE, SUSAN S. BISNER, BSQUIRE, GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGB T. rARIS, IV, ESQUIRE CHR%STOPHBR O'BRIBN, BSQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG , rARIS IUld LESLIB AUERBACH, BSQUlRE 129. Paragraphs 1 through 128 above are incorporated herein by reference as if set out in full. 130. The Defendants White, R.S. Jones, R. S. Jones, Inc., Conlon, Philpott, Simmons, Eisner, Faris, O'Brien, Gordon & simmons, Wilson, Powell, Lang and Faris, and Auerbach all initiated actions, or acted as counsel in connection with actions, as described above, which were pursued not for the purpose of obtaining the relief requested, but solely to prevent the proper enforcement of Orders of the Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County. 131. The Defendant attorneys knew or should have known of the true purpose of these actions. 132. More particularly, these actions were brought in order to provide J. Nevin White and his co-conspirators with the opportunity to transfer assets of the J. Nevin White Lumber Company and the marital estate, to individuals, companies, and places beyond the reach of the Court of Common Pleas, Willa White, or the Receiver, Edward Harker. 26 133. As a result of this abuse of process, the Receiver, Edward Harker, has sustained damages as enumerated more particularly above. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that judgment be entered against the Defendants in an amount in excess of Twenty Thousand ($20,000.00) Dollars, exclusive of interest and costs, and in excess of any jurisdictional amount requiring compulsory arbitration. COUNT ZZZ - PRAUD BDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Reoeivership of J. NEVZN WHITB LUMBER CO., ZNC. v. J. NBVZN WHITB, ROLAND S. JONES, R. S. JONES CO., INC., BBNJ.NIZN V.R. CONLON, ESQUIRE, JBRRY A. PHZLPOTT, BSQUIRE, ROGBR C. SIMMONS, BSQUIRE, SUSAN S. BZSNER, BSQUlRE, GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGB T. PARIS, ZV, BSQUZRE CHRISTOPHBR O'BRZBN, BSQUZRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG , PARIS and LESLZB AUBRBACH, BSQUlRE 134. Paragraphs 1 through 133 above are incorporated herein as if set out in full. 135. The Defendants made representations to the Federal District Bankruptcy Courts for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, and to the Court appointed Receiver, Edward Harker, as well as the Court of Common Pleas, cumberland County, in pleadings and otherwise which they knew or should have known were false, including, but not limited to the following: a. that J. Nevin White and the J. Nevin White Lumber Company were legally entitled to protection of the 27 bankruptcy laws and the bankruptcy courts of the united states, b. that the various parties sued pursuant to the two RICO actions filed by the Defendants Conlon and Jones were engaged in a racketeering enterprise when it was obvious and beyond dispute that they were doing nothing more than attempting to enforce lawfully entered Court orders, c. in contending that Euro-Ceramica, Inc. is a legitimate purchaser for value of the J. Nevin White Lumber company, when they knew that the only purpose of the "sale" was to frustrate the enforcement of law, by permitting the installation of R.S. Jones as President, thus allowing Mr. Jones to dissipate the company's assets while creating the appearance that J. Nevin White was uninvolved: d. that J. Nevin White resided in the District of Vermont at Vergennes, Vermont: and e. in failing to reveal in the J. Nevin White bankruptcy a pending condemnation proceeding settled for $200,000.00. 136. As a result of these fraudulent representations, the Receiver, Edward Harker, has been prevented from recovering assets belonging to the J. Nevin White Lumber Company, Inc., and the marital estate, and has been hampered in his efforts to effectively run the 28 COUNT IV - MALICIOUS PROSECUTION Lumber Company. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that judgment be entered against the Defendants in an amount in excess of Twenty Thousand ($20,000.00) Dollars, exclusive of interest and costs, and in excess of any jurisdictional amount requiring compulsory arbitration. BDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. lfEVIN 1fBITB LUMBER CO., INC. v. J. HBVIN 1fBITB, ROLAND S. JOlfES, R. S. JOlfES CO., INC., BBNJAMIN V.R. CONLON, BSQUlRE, JERRY A. PHILPOTT, BSQUlRE, ROGBR C. SIMMONS, BSQUlRE, SUSAN S. BISlfER, BSQUlRE, GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGB T. rARIS, IV, BSQUlRE CHRISTOPHER O'BRIBN, BSQUlRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG , rARIS ane! LBSLIB AUERBACH, BSQUlRE 137. Paragraphs 1 through 136 are incorporated herein by reference as if set out in full. 138. The litigations initiated by Defendants and filed and furthered by Defendant counsel were prompted by malicious motives, and in particular to permit the illegal dissipation of assets to which Willa White and the Receiver, Edward Harker, were entitled. 139. The attorney Defendants shared, knew of or should have known of the malicious motives involved in initiating these actions. 140. The actions were all dismissed as filed in bad faith or without probable cause. 141. As a result of these malicious prosecutions, assets properly belonging to the marital estate were seized and transferred, as 29 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that the Court enter an award for punitive damages, in addition to compensatory losses. Respectfully submitted, ANGINO & ROVNER, P.C. Da.... ~~ I l<je( II ) 31 , e 3115.'5112 . S JDHlS CD IHC 11/25'92 11131 '.11 TO. ALL COMPANY EMPLOYKES PROM. ROLAND B_ JONES COMPANY UPDATE A. all of you are aware Nevin White haa baen eway for .averal week.. Addl UonaUy, th18 company baa aought protection from e po..ible t.ke-over by flUng b.nkruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Both of the above dtuaUon. h.v. l'e.ulted frOlll peuonal difficulties of Mr. White'. th.t go b.ck aany yeer.. L.t .e a..ur. you that thie company i. paying aU of lte oblig.tion. on tilDa, e. it ha. done over the year.. Your in.urance premiUl'll. are aU current and wll1 rallleln .0. Your withholding t.. 1. being depo.ite4 a. requir.d. Th. com an i N h via na cial I!rOblem.11 The re..on for ..eking a ruptcy ad noth ng to 0 with linancial'difficultie.. but we. taken to prevant takeover by other partie., ari.ing frolll e marriage ..ttlement dilput.. 1'11I .ure that .Olla of you Ny wonder why tha cOlllpany 18 in bankruptcy if there ere not financial problem.. A. with aeny nit ion. 1 corpor.tionl throughout the country, bankruptcy i. baing u.ad for a veriety of difficultie.. Therefore, thare i. no rea.on to ba concernacS ebout the ability of this COlllpany to .eet it. financi.l obligation.. However. a lIore .adou. problell\ it whether the co.pany employea. will .upport and .t.nd bahind the company during the ab.enca of Mr. White. All .tap. ere ccntinu.lly t~ken to provide you with e .t.ady job. But, the complete coopar.tion and .u~port of tha employe.. i. ...~nti.l for this company to produce a profit which i. ....nti.lly why eny cOIDpany e.l.t.. I hava every intention to continue fighting for thi. company during Mr. White'. difficultie., howaver, without your .upport and cooperaUon. then i. no need to uke thet .ffort. 8Ic.u.. of the vary problem. outlinad, it i. impo..ibl. for me to be et the office a. often a. in the paet. However, 1 do receive perlodic r.port. on the operation. Accordingly, I mu.t .tra.. the n.ed for eacb uploye. to perform hi. job in the be.t and le..t-co.tly aanner po..ible, which 1. reflected in our coat of operation report.. Together, we wll1 .e. thi. cOIIIpany progre.. de.pite the pc-e..nt difficultie.. Par the benefit of the majority of the ..ploya.., anyone not wUllng to cooparata threaten. the viability of tbe company and each of your job.. Therefore, it 11 illportant that each of you taka . pe~.onal intereat 1n the operation, if you are inter..ted in the job .tability which h.. been provided by the company tor ao .any year.. If thare are problema that you belleve .hould be c.lled to IIY attention. I wou14 ba gl.d to di.cu.. them with you on my n..t vi81 t . I hope ..ch of you .nd your f_Uiee heve a very pl.a.ant Thank.glving holiday. f Xhi b;f '11" CPIIC.t" ~~ . p,.. '(I\l&lI. c:",. ' P. rn"" )Ilo TE. "I)~ , R.=:. ~ON~ co.. ~ .'0,000 V .. .' .. .. $.000 ;i!I .. .. .. .. '7500 ;;;- 3Z,SOO.oO \C\B8 LjII~}'iJct 12.!:.. ';S'ONt::. CJ>.,'rNc. 53'iV'Z 'I- '.:5'00-...... 't hz.11 .. .. 0. .. oS 3'4'13 10,000-..... 5117 ~ It .. .. .. ' S3SVI LI,OOO -..... '" hct . .. .. .. S3,..,7 '0. 000 ~ 7,'t Is, . .. .. .. 53"'" 8 3.000 -)it " ~ 1'Ilaq . " .. .. 53711 Cf, 000 -)c S Iii lri ., .. k .. S3.78'/ rz, 500 -)t' I I) JU.J-acf . .. j. .. Sa,S'lv ~. 000 -)<' 1l/11}act .. " .. k S'i o~"I v 7, I '4" ..,... '. .. .. " .I 10 000 -~ It "'R1,'I G:>> I"I~ ,11S}oto 'R's. -:rONES CD,. ;t1'lJc. SLI 'Z.'tS ". 000 -~ -z./1~}'1o .. .. .. .. 5'13"11 Lf.SOO-)r ~/riJllD . . .. . SLI 3L1 0 10,OOO-Y a/sJCJo .. . .. I' SLI 'I 'Z.3 V' y.SOO -)I' s/7Jt:tO . " I, .. S'IS'89 722.8'1v Go /II Clt) .. .. .. . S'i "7C1 10,000. -)( ,,1.190 .. .. .. .. SLf C080 Z,5oo -,.. 7/zr,J90 .. .. .. 5''182.Lj 10000-)( I ~1'Dho .. .. . .. S'I88'f ~ 000 - v ~bo/qo .. .. I, . S'18~3 2 IZS"-)( I q/'3J.Jo .. .. " " 5'1'3211.' 10,000 -)f' q "0/110 .....- .. .. k . S~CJ3CCvr q CIa. ~7 )t' " Cj/J..JIIO .. ~ .. .. SLf' ,,'2 Z,SOO.- 'Ie " II " :)LI5t)'3 10 I 000. 00 LlI lolqu. I' 0 i I . . E xh; bif (1811 , ' D"-n: . p^'1~&: To: c"v. .. . .... . .1............ ..... -~~ 2:) AMT. 0/ ,Iio ~.~,~olo,,)E't. CO,} .:D\X. :5'S03Z, ~ 15', 000 -)( 0/1"/"0 .. Of . . SS'a(.o I.oeo -)( 1111'2-/'0 , . I. . S:5I5'til IQ, 000 -~ 1z,/a/'lO . . . ,. SSlctl ~ooo -y .. . . . -y - ... I/q/ql 'R.~. ~ ~Irl.ll.. esQi~ \ h,/ell R '" ';S'OI ~.. C :uJC. ssar3 ....' \It;... O,} 2 tea/'ll ,. I. I. .. S:5al.j a/Li I'll " .. ,. . 5'S"'II~ a'ls}eu . .. .. .. SS&.4COI Lf/"lRI . ~ ~ . SSSOz. , 5/ro/ql .. ~ " ~ SSSq~ G/12}q1 'I, . . 5S"7OS 7/10;'1 . . . SS7SS Sha}ql . I. - SSq IS lo}l";/I , . .. 5"058 .. .. .' .. q ,; ,130hz. ~.'~. ~oNt:::. CQ,):uoJt. SCO'a~l4>.I, 'ih/'lz, " .. . 5Gsss i 'l/lsJn" : ':. :: S"S?8 "! ,If laDm.', , . . Is,roOq -1 l~aCJ i '. '."'/~ , .. I 75: ,. ..: 10S~v1 . .! 10' I rI' . I/o~< ., .. '10".1 - : I ::~::l ,- .. .... \ \\:)'t i/ s/,zoha · CO/-eRl. .. ~"'1 ;'2. .. 'i I &( /qz. II '1/nh'l. .. lo/,Jqz. . oll$~ .. \la~ '" ., .. . " . . .. . . .. Llo.~.B.....71~ IqQO , q,ooo,DO - 1> S,OOO-X 8,000 -)f- 7, 000 -')( Ciro~.sO" l./ISOO.-)( 7, 000 - ),- G,SOO -"'" 1,000 - I, 000 - v- -v 12,000 000 :- ~__.. .. !lID. q,,'Z .5'0 Iqq I q I, '47-""" , 10, oeo-"'" C'G, 000 - 2, 000 - "'" --ZS, see - - . VOI~E;;:, I ~ Q CQ - "Ql1)et) Ii.QAd "-Q ~ 000- ~..o.\>..\. ZO, 000 -v '2.0,000 ........ le,OOO -v IS', 000 -..... li,ooo -,/ 12, 000 -./ as ,lX:x). t)C) !- . '. 1:>M-f! Ptl'illeu; TO: 'ol~llqz. '2...;:., ~O\JE::' CO.;p.lC. III 51'1~, h .. .. It II J I' J'tl." I. . It . I '. .. , '~Jq"?o R. ~. ~ONE':' C.0.:t\JC. -a.I171Q3 ' , .. ., . ' .. '!l II ",Jq~ .. .. " .. ... ~ .. '" . ~~ ~.cs. " \C\~ '& - i~:;;),~.oo ,qttq. -,.q, \4la.ct) \~c\o - \"3t:), "I4~,11 10.(\\ ..;. ':\lo\ qlD~. \~C\~ - 6)1JI4. \ L\l.\:)t) \C\q~- ""'=\- \,000. t:) \tlJ,o"',~~,Q\ c.~~ A 1m': IIS'i 1290./ 12181/ C' "I, Ooo-V" , 1 5',000 ........ 120,000 -v ...V" ~~ Iqq~ ~ IS,OOO-V' _V" 20, O~O I! ,000 -...... - ..... ,QQ3 ::r~c.. (,q~t -lqq3) ~ I I . , I I I . . CBRTIFICATE OF SBRVICE I, Cheryl A. Walker, an employee of Angino & Rovner, P.C., hereby certify that I have this day served a true a correct copy of PLAINTI~P'8 COMPLAINT by certified, united states mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, upon the Defendants at the fOllowing addresses: J. Nevin White 1702 Marseilles Drive Unit 18 Miami Beach, FL 33141 J. Nevin White P.O. Box 2575 SalisbUry, MD 21801-2575 J. Nevin White River House Apartments 2311 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 J. Nevin White c/o Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire 227 North High street Duncannon, PA 17020 Roland S. Jones P.O. Box 2575 8288 Robinhood Drive SalisbUry, MD 21801 Shari L. Jones P.O. Box 2575 8288 Robinhood Drive salisbUry, MD 21801 R.S. Jones Co., Inc. P.O. Box 2575 538 Robinhood Drive Salisbury, MD 21801 R.S. Jones Co., Inc. Route 11, Box 538 SalisbUry, MD 21801 411198/CV Credit-Line Financial 538 Robinhood Drive SalisbUry, MD 21801 Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire P.O. Box 116 227 North High street Duncannon, PA 17020 Benjamin V.R. Conlon, Esquire Thorncreek Lodge Keene Road E1izabethtown, NY 12932-0937 Roger C. simmons, Esquire 131 West Patrick Street Frederick, MD 21701 Susan G. Eisner, Esquire 131 West Patrick Street Frederick, MD 21701 Gordon & Simmons 131 West Patrick Street Frederick, MD 21701 Leslie S. Auerbach, Esquire c/o Auerbach & Simmons 8613 Cedar street Silver spring, MD 20910 George T. Faris, IV, Esquire 148 College Street P.O. Box 567 Burlington, VT 05402-0567 . Christopher O'Brien, Esquire 148 College street P.O. Box 567 Burlington, VT 05402-0567 wilson, Powell, Lang & Faris 148 College street P.O. Box 567 Burlington, VT 05402-0567 ~.$/tUPt:J-t Cheryl . Walker Dated: July 1, 1994 If: ! It. t ( , \, ,.,,1 fr;r;/; I ),',.........c~" 'f.pA.. "16ff JI>~ i'/~4 -::r 0"> " = -,-'"1;' .~ ~ ..... - -. -~.J - , <2: '" - UJ UJ 2 t- 2 '" <2: c:- 0 III <2: > ,~::I: 4- ,.., ..... ~8 UJ ...I 3 4- c: 0 <lJ ...I >- <lJ .~ , <0 ~ I- 0.. '" <lJ2 ..... '" " ~ .~ 2 .....- c: .c: . ~ ... :J ~ 2 2 Ill> ,~ 0 '<lJ Ill", C- O UJ :JUJ <0 2~4- '" ~!Z <i. Oi III :;: 0.. 1-2 ~ <2:<O<lJ w Z ... W :;: t- o.. ...I 0 U E;fi Z lD 0 -3 0..... it ~ cO U >- <2:~ -,.., "'<lJ t- u. 1llU. .., 0 t- ...I 0:> '" 2 0 ci ... ~ u. 2 ....<2: UJ4-U - ~ olli: ;:: ~ 0 => , N_ ~c::: O:Z UJ '" <2: a: '~ O~ :J - 0 '" - t- UJ ...I CD !::: ~ t- U2~ ...:t a. -2 0.. ZZ III <lJ '" O'~ ='r- ::I: 0 :;: -.., a: :;: => 0-> -'= > 3"" 0 Clo a: 0 Z",--'r- cJ: ' III 0 U Z'" <( U o::CUU- :::S-U 2 . C(" :>:: :;: ...1<2: '" <lJ -...I UJ '" .... t- O>'" > -'= ::I: UJ...I Ol c::.'r- UJ UJ_ e. t- CO - >- <2:<lJCO 2'" <lJ :;:> . '" 3U:;: <2: III 2 =>-o=> 0<lJ=> .::I: 0 - UUZ~ UJ "'...I ,..,'" ,.., .. r'" . . ... ,'- .'. ,1 .,..~ ", .. ~. . EDWARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. NEVIN WHITE LUMBER CO., INC., Plaintiff v. v;. NEVIN WHITE, ROLAND S. JONES, SHARI L. JONES, R.S. JONES CO., INC., CREDIT-LINE FINANCIAL, INC., : ~ENJAMIN V.R. CONLON, ESQUIRE, v.JERRY A. PHILPOTT, ESQUIRE, ROGER C. SIMMONS, ESQUIRE, SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE, GORDON AND SIMMONS, GEORGE T. FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, POWELL, LANG & FARIS, and LESLIE AUERBACH, ESQUIRE Defendants ,wi ... IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND CO., PENNSYLVANIA : CIVIL ACTION - LAW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PRAECIPB FOR ISSUANCB OF waIT OF SUMMONS TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF SAID COURT: Please issue a writ of summons upon each of the Defendants in the above-captioned action. M. Melillo, Esquire I & ROVNER, P.C. 03 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Attorney I.D. #26211 Date: S/q/l(j' 45125/LAS , ',.,,:: ;", '-",' ,.,';,. , < .... .. '. ~- ~' - , -'.;.~tJ~:;~,;:', ,,""._.,,'\" ': ;,,:; . ..:'~i~'':';'': i'>",-~. ~, . " v......,--.Ill-'>Of,,_....,,-~.;.Ji1f.,-'-' >'.....,;J..t. ...*iIc".- ~ \ M~l 9 1.\ ,0 \'~ 19~ ~/L 1~{)1 ~J- ID.O((P " ," \.\)H1CE _:., t ,; _ '.;- .;'i1\ON~T:.ftY ~'I:\4U:'L,'\llr' Ci~'.;HT'1 !!..,ij~'(\ ,',\),{~ ^ ,,- ""1 ~ . 'q , # j . " , - '. , '~.." - . ..-J .-.- '. '. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania County of Cumberland EI:MARD W. HARKER, Trustee in Receivership of J. NEVIN WHITE LUMBER CO., INC. v. J. NEVIN WHITE, ROLAND S. JONES, SHARI L. JONES, R.S. JONES CO., INC., CREDIT-LINE FINANCIAL, INC., BENJAMIN V.R. CONLON, ESQUIRE, JERRY A. PHILrorr, ESQUIRE, RCX;ER C. SIt-M:lNS, ESQUIRE, SUSAN S. EISNER, ESQUIRE, GORDON AND SIt-M:lNS, GroRGE T. FARIS, IV, ESQUIRE, OtRISTOPHER Q'BRIEN, ESQUIRE, WILSON, PCMELL. LANG & FARIS, and LESLIE AUERBAOt, ESQUIRE Court of Conunon Pleas 94-2481 Civil Term 19____ No, ..----------------------------------- In _.___~_~':!~..~~~~_:_.~____.______.____._ J. Nevin White, ro1and S. Jones, Shari L. Jones, R.S. Jones, Co., Inc, eredit- Line Financia1,Inc., Benjamin v.r. Conlon, Esquire, Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire, Roger C. Simrons, Esquire, Susan S. Eisner I Esquire, Gordon and Simrons, George To _1'.._X~_iJ?L.Jy...~Sl'Jg~.._Q:lF..j,,12!:9.l2I)t!F.gIBrien, Esquire, Wilson, Powell, Lang & Faris, and Leslie Auerbach, Esquire: You are hereby notified tha t Edward W. Harker, Trustee in Receivership of J. Nevin White Lumber Co., Inc -------------------------------------------------.------------------------------------------------ the Plaintiff ha s commenced an action in ___~~,~!.e.Ql}.:_.~!Y..i"l.:_~_to!9!L:._~__.______________._ against you which you are required to defend or a default judgment may be entered against you. (SEAL) Lawrence E. Welker Ilate _..__.___~J'_.~!___________.__ 19.J.1 '-----.-.-.-.------p~thj~~t;~-----.-....--.---- By '-"-J~ ~.---J(-1--,~tljjj.~J~ ------- lDeputy , l -. ~. 1:,:;', , ''''~,..' .~w! ;.-.);' '.., elF ! _...4 No. ~,:,~~.!_.!:.!Y!L!2-_ 19__ . )0 Fdward W. Harker, Trustee in Receivership of J. Nln'.!n._~j;,~_~~r_f.9..~W!tc:.~____ v. J. Nevin White, Roland S. Jones, Shari L. Jones, r.S. Jones Co., Inc., Credit-Line Financial, Inc. Benjmdn V.r. Conlon, Esquire, Jerry A. Philpott, Esquire, Roger C. Simrons, Esquire, Susan S. Eisner, Esquire, Gordon and Simrons, George T. Faris, IV, Esquire, Christopher O'Brien, Esquire, Wilson, fbwell, Lang & Faris, and Leslie Auerbach, Esquire ------------------------------------ Summons in Civil Action - Law ------------------------------------ ANiU<<) & RlIINER, P.C. By: Joseph M. ""lilln, Esq. 4503 N. ~t St. Harrisbm:g PA 17110 (717) 238-6791 ------------------------------------ Attorney ~...,~- \. . '---."".',...-"' . "- - ---