Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-02614 c... QI. ~. ~.. . ., \.. -.I j , ( c... ~ . '~ ~. 1:0 ~~ il' lO L; " j" .. .', I .. ~r C', ~ \ l~: L . , ~' :-.-. ~W .,,- u.. ,.~::j '. - .~~ or'" ~)l J.... iI" (''1 li.:\ t.. Hil " I ''-1.. I I', to :.i l,.~ 0_ U . . PROCEDURAL HISTORY The procedural history of this case/ which requires a detailed explanation, is set out in the testimony of attorney Maria P. Cognetti, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. Following the testimony of Maria P. Cognetti, attorney for the Plaintiff, relating to the procedural history and the claim for counsel fees and expenses/ and the testimony of the Plaintiff, Susanne Kay Sather, the record was closed. The Master proceeded with the preparation and filing of his report. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The parties were married on January 12, 1979, and separated in June 1992. This is the second marriage for both parties, both party's prior marriages having ended in divorce. 2. Husband has three children to his previous marriage and wife has one child to her previous marriage. All of the children are emancipated. 3. Wife is 48 years of age and resides at 101 Melissa Court, Enola, Pennsylvania. She is in good health. 4. Wife is employed as a real estate closing coordinator with Reager and Adler law firm and earns approximately $24,400.00 per year. She is a high school graduate with some paralegal training. 5. Husband is 64 years of age and resides at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida. Husband retired from IBM in 1986 at which time his net monthly payment from his retirement benefit was $2/614.47. No information on his current benefit is available. Husband also is receiving social . . security to supplement his income. No information is available on the amount of that benefit. Husband has a high school diploma and some college courses. 6. Since the date of separation in June 1992 husband has been receiving the full pension benefit to the exclusion of wife. 7. No information is available as to the state of husband's health. 8. The assets subject to distribution and the value assigned to each asset is set forth as follows with the exception of the marital portion of husband's pension which will be dealt with separately: Real estate at 870 Bird Bay Way/ Venice, Florida, titled in joint names $ 85,000.00 101 Melissa court, Enola, 1 Pennsylvania, titled in wife's name only 1987 Cadillac Brougham US savings Bonds $ 71/000.00 $ 3/975.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 15,694.50 $ 9,287.50 $ 5,062.94 $ 14,626.59 $ 337.50 $ 66,366.96 Nuveen Bonds IBM Stock (100 shares) Nations Bank Checking Account IBM Employees Credit Union IMB Employees Credit Union KIP Kemper Fund 1. This property was purchased prior to the marriage of the parties and put in wife's name. wife, however, because of contributions made by husband toward the purchase of this property, has agreed that the value of the property shall be used for purposes of equitable distribution rather than the increase in value of the property from the date of marriage to the date of separation. 2 " . Marital portion of wife's IBM pension Franklin utilities Fund IRA Fidelity Investments IRA $ 6,196.00 $ 16,914.78 $ 23,372.00 $ 9,444.26 $ 24.000.00 us IRA Banker's Trust IRA Total value of marital assets exclusive of the marital portion of husband's pension which will be dealt with separately $408,278.03 9. The marital portion of husband's monthly pension benefit is $693.00 per month net (based on rounding off the net monthly payment being received in 1992 to $2,600.00). 10. Wife is not entitled to any survivor benefits from husband's pension and she will lose all medical benefits from husband's employment with IBM as a result of the final decree in divorce. Wife does have medical benefits through her prior IBM employment and her present employer. 11. Wife has withdrawn her claim for alimony. 12. Wife has paid R. Mark Thomas, her prior counsel, $750.00. Her fees and costs to her present counsel, Maria P. cognetti, as of January 29, 1996, amounted to $6,710.95. It is estimated that fees subsequent to January 29, 1996, for the hearing and subsequent document preparation will be at least $612.50. Therefore, using the numbers available, wife has incurred fees and costs of $8,073.45. CONCLUSION OF LAW The grounds for divorce are irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. On January 9, 1995, wife filed an affidavit under section 3301(d) of the Domestic Relations Code averring that the parties have been separated for a period in excess of 3 " . two years, since June 17, 1992. The divorce can, therefore, be concluded under Section 3301(d) of the Domestic Relations Code. ANALYSIS OF THE FACTORS AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 3502(a) OF THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS CODE 1. The parties were married and living together in a marital relationship approximately 13 years and have been separated approximately 3 and 1/2 years. 2. Both parties were previously married, both marriages having ended in divorce. 3. Wife is 48 years of age and in good health and is employed as a real estate closing coordinator with Reager & Adler law firm where she earns annually approximately $24,400.00. Her only liability is a small line of credit against the property where she is residing with an approximate payoff of around $3,500.00. Husband is 64 years of age and retired from IBM in 1986. He was receiving a net monthly pension benefit of $2,614.47 at the time the parties separated in June 1992. Husband also is receiving social security but there is no information available as to the amount of that benefit. Further, no information is available as to the condition of husband's heath or his liabilities. 4. Neither party made any contribution to the education, training, or increased earning power of the other party. 5. Neither party will have the opportunity to acquire significant assets in the future; any assets acquired will be from income derived from each party's sources of income. 6. The sources of income of wife would be from her earnings, any interest on savings, and her share of the pension that husband earned at IBM. Husband's income is derived from his retirement with IBM, social security, and interest earned on his investments. Both parties have medical benefits, husband through IBM and wife through her employment previously with IBM and her current employer. 7. Both parties contributed to the acquisition of assets 4 ~ . based on their earnings at the time they were together. Although neither party can be specifically charged with having dissipated assets, husband did convert to his own use and benefit a substantial portion of the marital assets to the exclusion of wife following separation. 8. Aside from the distribution of the marital assets to each of the parties herein, husband does have the nonmarital portion of his pension benefit. 9. The standard living of the parties established during the marriage was middle-class. 10. The economic circumstances of each party are such that each party will be able to provide adequately for his or her own needs considering the income that each of the parties has, and the assets set apart to each of the parties as provided herein. No tax ramifications have been considered in the distribution; however, it is noted that the pension benefit as received by husband is a net benefit and is being distributed as a net benefit after the deduction of appropriate taxes. 11. Neither party is the custodian of any dependent minor children. DISCUSSION EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION Based on the facts found by the Master and the analysis of the factors under section J502(a) of the Domestic Relations Code, the Master believes that an equal distribution of the marital assets is appropriate; however, a small deviation from the equal distribution in favor of wife is provided for with respect to the marital portion of husband's pension benefit. The Master does not find any significant difference 5 - . in the factors that would warrant a distribution other than on an equal basis. Both parties will be able to live in a oomfortable lifestyle based on the incomes of the parties and their investments. The Master, as indicated, has made a small deviation in the percentage of the marital portion of the pension distributed to wife in favor of wife. This takes into account the fact that wife has lost the benefit of any use or earnings on the marital portion in the possession of husband since the date of separation. Further, wife will be making up the shortfall of assets necessary to provide for an equal distribution by way of a monthly payment from husband's pension benefit without the benefit of any interest earnings on the shortfall as opposed to receiving the money in a lump sum payment. In addition, in doing computations with respect to the pension benefit due wife, the Master has taken into account the fact that husband has been receiving the full benefit since the date of separation. An allowance, therefore, is being made in wife's favor for 48 months that wife has been deprived of any of the benefit since the date of separation to June 1996. The Master has considered that IBM will need some time to act on a Qualified Domestic Relations Order assuming the case proceeds to a conclusion in February 1996. And using a June 1996 date for the computations does not seem unreasonable considering wife has been deprived of a portion of the benefit since separation. 6 - . The Master further believes that wife has been fair in allowing the full value of the property where she is residing in Enola, Pennsylvania, to be included as a marital asset without having to try to arrive at an increase in value from the date of marriage to the date of separation. Wife also has withdrawn her claim for alimony, and while husband has had the benefit of a substantial amount of the marital assets wife has had to pursue her divorce action for a considerable period of time and at great expense in order to achieve a distribution of the assets. The total value of the marital assets, excluding the marital portion of husband's pension which is being dealt with separately, are $408,278.03. Each of the parties pursuant to a 50/50 distribution is entitled to $204,139.02. The assets assigned to each of the parties in the recommendations which follow are those assets which are in the possession of each of the parties presently. 2 2. customarily the Master distributes assets in kind to effectuate a distribution. However because in this case a large portion of the assets are in husband's control and their whereabouts unknown presently, the Master concluded that wife would be better served and more secure if she received her distribution and other payments from the pension benefit. The costs and aggravation to wife of trying to locate and attach assets in husband's possession seemed an excessive burden to place on wife in effectuating a distribution. Of course, husband can pay to wife the money he owes her in a lump sum payment avoiding the $1,200.00 monthly payments from the pension. 7 -- . RECOMMENDATIONS EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION MARITAL ASSETS AND VALUES ASSIGNED TO WIFE Real estate at 101 Melissa Court, Enola, Pennsylvania 1987 Cadillac Brougham vehicle Marital portion of wife's IBM pension Franklin Utilities Fund IRA TOTAL TO WIFE $ 71,000.00 $ 3,975.00 $ 6,196.00 $ 16,914.78 $ 23,372.00 $ 9.444.26 $130,902.04 US IRA Fidelity Investments IRA MARITAL ASSETS AND VALUES ASSIGNED TO HUSBAND Real estate at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida US savings Bonds TOTAL TO HUSBAND $ 85,000.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 15,694.50 $ 9,287.50 $ 5,062.94 $ 14,626.59 $ 337.50 $ 66,366.96 $ 24.000.00 $277,375.99 Nuveen Bonds IBM Stock (100 shares) Nations Bank Checking Account IBM Employees Credit Union IBM Employees Credit Union KIP Kemper Fund Banker's Trust IRA COMPUTATIONS Value of marital assets excluding 8 ~ . receive from husband's net monthly pension benefit, wife shall receive as payment on account of the shortfall in the equitable distribution, pension payments, and for counsel fees as provided herein (see discussion and recommendation on counsel fees and costs which follows), the sum of $1,200.00 per month for a total net monthly benefit from husband's pension of $1,600.00. The payment to wife of $1,600.00 shall be net after deduction of all appropriate income taxes. The sum of $1,600.00 net monthly from husband's pension benefit shall be paid to wife pursuant to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order which shall be prepared by counsel. The payment of $400.00 per month shall continue indefinitely until payments from husband's pension cease as a result of husband's death and the sum of $1,200.00 per month shall continue until such time as the shortfall in the equitable distribution, pension benefits and counsel fees due wife in the total amount of $98,436.98 have been paid in full. 3 To secure the distribution due wife as provided herein, wife shall be entitled to a mortgage against the property at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida, in the amount of $98,436.98. Wife shall provide to husband a deed transferring 3. Payable at $1,200.00 per month, the obligation should be discharged in 82 months. 10 ~ - all her right, title, and interest in said property to husband in accordance with the distribution herein only upon receipt by husband of a mortgage in the amount of $98,436.98 to secure wife the payments due herein. said mortgage will be recorded simultaneously with the deed to said property as a first lien on the property. Each payment monthly from husband's pension in the amount of $1,200.00 on account of the shortfall of the equitable distribution, pension payments, and counsel fees will reduce the principal balance of the mortgage in a like amount. No interest will be charged on the mortgage; however, should the Internal Revenue Service impute any interest on the transaction for which wife may become liable for payment of income tax, said tax liability will be added to the principal amount of the mortgage to be paid by husband. In the event husband refuses to sign a mortgage in exchange for the deed to the property, 'counsel shall provide in a court order pursuant to these divorce proceedings and recommendations that a lien be placed against the property at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida, in accordance with the provisions herein. The parties will sign any and all documents necessary to effectuate the transfer of assets to the party receiving the assets as provided herein upon presentation of the appropriate document for signature. The credit which wife has received on account of 11 ~ ~ the pension payment from date of separation in June 1992 is through June 1996. Should this case be prolonged beyond June 1996, the amount of $400.00 per month shall continue to accrue from that date and be added onto the amount due wife and paid back and secured as provided herein. The additional $400.00 per month shall begin to accrue July 1, 1996, until such time as a final order is entered in these proceedings. ALIMONY Wife has waived her claim for alimony. DISCUSSION COUNSEL FEES AND EXPENSES Wife's counsel has testified that fees and costs in pursuing this action will exceed $8,000.00. Wife's counsel further testified that in her opinion this case could have been resolved through settlement or hearing by the expenditure of counsel fees probably not exceeding $2,000.00 should husband have cooperated in the action and helped to provide information on identification of assets and values. Further, the case could have been pursued more expeditiously procedurally if husband had cooperated in the case and participated in trying to bring about a resolution to the outstanding issues instead of ignoring the pending action. Consequently, the Master is of the opinion that a 12 ~ ~ large portion of the fees and costs incurred in this case were as a result of husband's nonparticipation. Husband has simply taken the approach that he will do nothing and let wife incur all of the expense and the burden of proceeding. Husband, therefore, must bear a large portion of the fees and costs in these proceedings as provided in the recommendation to follow. RECOMMENDATIONS COUNSEL FEES AND EXPENSES Husband shall pay to wife the sum of $6,000.00 on account of wife's counsel fees and expenses. The sum of $6,000.00 shall be added to the shortfall due wife in the equitable distribution of assets and wife's portion of the monthly pension benefit from the date of separation through June 1996. The total shortfall with the additional $6,000.00 in counsel fees and costs brings the amount due wife from husband to $98,436.98 which amount shall be paid in accordance with the recommendations made in the equitable distribution portion of this case in the sum of $1,200.00 per month from husband's net monthly pension benefit. Further, the $6,000.00 owed to wife and her attorney on account of counsel fees and costs shall be added to the mortgage against the property at 870 Bird Bay Way, 13 ~ ~ INDEX OF EXHIBITS IDENTIFIED ADMITTED Ex. No. 1 - Plaintiff's attorney 10 19 bills Ex. No. 2 - Projected statement of attorney fees 10 19 Ex. No. 3 - Total fees, costs & expenses 11 19 Ex. No. 4 - Sworn statement of facts 15 19 t""\ ~ THE MASTERI Today is Tuesday, January 3D, 1996. This is the date scheduled for a Master's hearing in the above captioned case. Notice of said hearing was sent to the parties by regular mail on september 26, 1995. No mail has been returned indicating that any of the persons to whom the notice was sent did not receive said notice. The notice was sent to Susanne Kay Sather at her address at 101 Melissa court, Enola, Pennsylvania; to Maria P. cognetti, counsel for Plaintiff, at 132-134 Walnut street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; to the Defendant, John Robert Sather, at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida 34292, and to his counsel at the time the hearing was scheduled, Joseph L. Hitchings at 301 Market street, Lemoyne, Pennsyl\'ania. Mr. Hitchings is no longer representing Mr. sather and withdrew from the action as a result of a petition which he filed with the court, with the court subsequently entering an order on November 3, 1995, granting Mr. Hitchings' motion to withdraw. Since Mr. Hitchings' withdrawal, no other counsel has appeared on behalf of Mr. Sather. It should be noted that present today are the Plaintiff, Susanne Kay Sather and her counsel Maria P. Cognetti. Mr. Sather has not appeared today for the hearing nor has anybody appeared on his behalf. It is further noted that Mr. Sather has not appeared at any point in the action except through Mr. Hitchings. With respect to Mr. Sather's ~ ~ compliance with the proceedings with respect to the tiling ot documents in accordance with the Rules of civil Procedure, Mr. Sather has not filed an inventory and appraisement, an income and expense statement, nor a pre-trial statement. Mr. Sather was directed to file a pre-trial statement by letter from the Master dated April 12, 1995, the pre-trial statement to have been filed on or before Friday, May 5, 1995. Additional time was given to Mr. Sather as a result of a request from his then counsel to file a pre-trial statement later than the May 5, 1995, date. However, no pre-trial statement was ever filed on behalf of the Defendant. A pre-hearing conference was scheduled at the Master's Office for June 22, 1995. Mr. sather did not appear at that conference nor did any counsel appear on his behalf. Attorney Cognetti did appear for the Plaintiff. The parties have been separated for a period in excess of two years and the divorce will be concluded under section JJ01(d) of the Domestic Relations Code. Ms. cognetti is going to be the first witness to testify this morning and she will offer testimony regarding the procedural history in this case, including the pleadings filed and how those pleadings were served on the Defendant. She will further testify as to whether or not she has had any communication with Mr. Sather with respect to the 2 ~ f"tt process of this action. Ms. Cognetti has also raised a claim for counsel feee and expenses and will make a brief statement on the record as to the amount of counsel fees which are due and owing to her, and as the Master understands to previous counsel who was involved in the case prior to Ms. Cognetti's appearance. Ms. Cognetti will be sworn at this time. Whereupon, MARIA P. COGNETTI, Attorney at Law having been called as a witness, testified as follows: EXAMINATION MS. COGNETTI: My name is Maria Cognetti and I respresent Susanne Kay Sather with regard to this matter before the Court today. Prior to my representation of Mrs. Sather she was represented by attorney Mark Thomas. While she was represented by attorney Thomas, he on her behalf, filed a complaint in divorce on July 1, 1992. The record indicates service of that complaint on the Defendant. On or about November 18, 1993, Mr. Thomas filed an amended complaint on behalf of Mrs. Sather, and again, the record indicates service of that document as well. (A discussion was held off the record.) MS. COGNETTI: The complaint and amended complaint, whi.ch I just referenced, were docketed to No. 94 - 2614 and they have since been withdrawn and do not form 3 ~ ~ the basis for today's hearing. What occurred was that subsequent to being served with interrogatories by Mr. Thomas, Mr. Sather then did file preliminary objections to that divorce complaint and was at that time also represented by Mr. Hitchings. Those preliminary orders were filed on April 1B, 1994, and on May 16, 1994, that divorce complaint was, in fact, withdrawn. On that same date a new complaint in divorce was filed, again May 16, 1994, and an affidavit of service was filed by attorney Mark Thomas indicating that the Defendant had been served by regular mail on June 21, 1994. And clearly by the terms of service by regular mail it had been sent and had not been returned to attorney Thomas. No answer was ever filed to that complaint. On or about september. 20, 1994, I had taken over representation of Mrs. sather. On that date we filed a number of documents, one being an amended complaint in divorce, which added the basis for the two year divorce. Another document that we filed on that date was a petition for alimony pendente lite and counsel fees and costs as well as a claim for equitable distribution; and we also filed a petition for injunctive relief on that same date. All of those documents, as well as all other documents filed by us subsequent to that time, have always been sent by certified mail and by regular mail, invariably Mr. Sather turned down 4 ~ ~ certified mail. So as Mr. Thomas knew from the beginning, service by regular mail was our primary route. There were no answers at any point filed to either the new complaint in divorce or the amended complaint filed by myself. There was never an answer filed to the petition for alimony pendente lite, counsel fees, costs, and equitable distribution. With regard to the petition for injunctive relief, the Court gave Mr. sather 15 days to respond, again he was served with that rule by both certified mail and regular mail. The Court had then to correct their rule because they had transposed the parties and issued a new rule on october. 6, 1994, again giving him 15 days to respond, again he was served by both certified mail and regular mail. None of the regular mail has ever been returned. Again he did not respond to that rule. We then filed a motion to make the rule absolute on approximately November 10, 1994, and by order dated November 16, 1994, the Court entered an injunctive order pursuant to our motion directing the various banks and other facilities to freeze any accounts that we could find. As I believe Mrs. Sather points out in her statement, we were never able to find anything; but we did get our order. The final order dated November 16, 1994, was likewise served on the Defendant by both certified mail and regular mail, regular mail not being returned. 5 ~ ~ Up to this point and time we had no personal contact from Mr. Sather whatsoever. On or about January 9, 1995, we then filed a section 3J01(d) affidavit on behalf of Mrs. Sather noting that the parties had been separated in excess of two years. This was again served on Mr. Sather by both certified mail and regular mail, regular mail not having been returned. On or about April 4, 1995 we filed a motion for appointment of the Master. That was sent to Mr. Sather by regular mail, obviously that was not returned either. Mr. Sather has always resided where we have known him to reside. At that point and time, as has already been stated by the Master, Master Elicker directed, by letter dated April 12, 1995, to both myself and Mr. Sather, that certain documents be filed by May 5, 1995. Mr. Sather has never complied with that request. (A discussion was held off the record.) MS. COGNETTI: On June 22, 1995, a pre-hearing conference was held before the Master. I appeared on behalf of my client. Mr. Sather did not appear nor did anybody appear on his behalf. Notice of these things was directed to Mr. Sather by the Master himself. Subsequent to the pre-hearing conference, my client and I developed a statement of what my client's testimony would be at the Master's hearing and we sent this to Mr. Sather, again by 6 ~ ~ regular mail by letter dated August 22, 1995, and we advised him that this would be the basis of the testimony which my client would present at the final Master's hearing and we advised him that if he wanted to make any response whatsoever or to disagree with anything noted in that statement, that he should immediately respond to either us or the Master. No response has been made to counsel up to this point and time, and I do not believe personally that there has been any contact with the Master -- there has been none that I am aware of. On September 7, 1995, I received a copy of a letter directed to the Master from attorney Hitchings and that is when I realized that Mr. Hitchings was back in the case and he stated that he had been retained by Mr. Sather and was requesting a continuance of the October 5, 1995, hearing date. Subsequent to receiving that letter I, on behalf of Mrs. Sather, filed on September 28, 1995, a motion for sanctions. In that motion for sanctions we sought to prevent the Defendant from being able to file all the various documents in what we believed to be untimely fashion. We had requested that the Defendant not be able to file an inventory and appraisement and an income and expense statement or a pre-trial statement and also that he not be allowed to disagree or present evidence contrary to anything that we had put in our statements. A copy of that motion 7 ~ ~ was sent to both the Defendant and to attorney Joseph Hitchings. The Defendant was served personally because in spite of attorney Hitchings' letter there was no appearance on the record. However, attorney Hitchings did in fact accept service of that motion and order on October 3, 1995, and we have filed an affidavit of his acceptance of service. The Court's order of September 29, 1995, with regard to our motion for sanctions had given Mr. Sather 30 days to respond. That is the order that attorney Hitchings had accepted service of; therefore, a response was due at least some time prior to the end of October. What then occurred was that on October 31, 1995, Mr. Hitchings filed a petition seeking to be removed as counsel. As the Master has stated, the Court granted that request on November 3, 1995. When Mr. Hitchings contacted me to make me aware of his withdrawal as counsel, he advised me that he had been directed by Mr. Sather to not file an answer to my motion for sanctions and likewise that he had been directed to take no further participation in the divorce action. Once the 30 days had run, I then filed a motion to make my rule absolute seeking a final order from the Court with regard to my motion for sanctions. The court then determined that there had to be a hearing on this matter in order to make sure Mr. sather had every opportunity to 8 ~ ~ respond and appear. A hearing was then set. No response had been filed at that point and time and on December 28, 1995, a hearing was in fact held before Judge Oler. For the record, Mr. Hitchings appeared to make sure the Court understood that he did not represent Mr. Sather. I attended that hearing along with my client and Mr. Hitchings. At that point and time, even though Mr. Sather did not attend nor contact the Court in any fashion, the Judge did have us conduct a hearing nonetheless to prove our case. At the conclusion of the hearing the Court did in fact grant the relief we had requested by our motion for sanctions. That order was dated, I believe, December 28, 1995. And that basically gets us up to this point and time. THE MASTER: Now, why don't you proceed then with the attorney fees testimony. MS. COGNETTI: With regard to the issue of counsel fees -- I have been representing Mrs. Sather since basically the very end of August 1994. I took the case over from attorney Mark Thomas. As my client will attest she had approximately $750.00 in counsel fees with Mark Thomas at that point and time. I have with me as an exhibit today all of my monthly bills to Mrs. Sather. I bill Mrs. Sather at $175.00 per hour and we bill monthly. And these are copies of every 9 ~ ~ month's bills from the first time I had anything to do in this case, which was August 29, 1994, up through basically yesterday, January 29, 1996. Would you like that marked as an exhibit, sir? (Whereupon, Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 1 was marked for identification.) MS. COGNETTI: The total of the bills encompassing Plaintiff's Exhibit No.1 is $6,710.95. The odd numbers being because we bill for long distance phone calls and things like that. That covers through yesterday. We had estimated for today's time three hours for this matter and then we estimated basically a half an hour for future time for the review of the Master's recommendations. That total would be $612.50 and I would note that that does not include any time for future follow-up of this case or assisting Mrs. Sather in any document preparation or follow-up or getting what she may be entitled to. The $612.50 is noted on Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 2. (Whereupon, Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 2 was marked for identification.) MS. COGNETTI: On Plaintiff's Exhibit No.3 I simply have a total of the two numbers which comes to $7,323.45. That would be the total of my bills for Mrs. Sather and then the additional bills for Mr. Thomas. That 10 ~ ~ basically covers the majority of my time in this case. (Whereupon, Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 3 was marked for identification.) THE MASTER: Ms. Cognetti, can you comment as to whether or not, in your opinion, fees were incurred arising out of Mr. Sather's nonparticipation in this action. MS. COGNETTI: Absolutely. As the Master knows, I have vast experience in these kinds of cases and this would have and should have been a fairly simple case with easy to identify assets. The problem arose in that at the parties' separation Mr. sather took over possession and control of the majority of the assets. The majority of these fees that we have racked up so to speak, have come from the pursuit of Mr. Sather in identifying and valuing assets that were beyond the control of my client. serving interrogatories that never got answered, having to seek a petition for injunctive relief because we became aware of the fact that the somewhat massive accounts that existed on date of separation were being rapidly depleted. Then there was no answer to the petition for injunctive relief and then we had to go through all the various legal steps of then getting the order. Once we got the order for the injunctive relief we then had to contact every bank or basically holding company that we could think of where there had been any marital assets and 11 ~ ~ serve them with a copy of that, ask them for information as to whether or not the accounts were still in existence, ask them for information as to what withdrawals had been made by Mr. Sather and what assets might still be there. That work created a vast majority of some of our legal fees in this case because these were really simple assets. If Mr. Sather had been present and cooperating and assisting in this case as he would have been had he appeared and had counsel, we simply had matters of okay, here's that IRA, here's what it's worth, boom, that's done. Something that would have perhaps taken a half an hour per asset ended up being many, many hours per asset. The same is true of Mr. Sather's pension by which we have been kind of compelled to use old numbers because we have not had any cooperation from Mr. Sather. His then brief reappearance in the case through Mr. HitChings created an awful lot more counsel fees because Mr. HitChings got in the case. Mr. Hitchings and I had one or two meetings and many phone calls where we briefly tried to settle the case. For a while it went along normal lines and then all of a sudden Mr. HitChings was back out of the case and as I have already described, between the normal process prescribed by law by Which I had to get my motion for sanctions, then the fact that the Judge decided a hearing was in order we again wasted -- wasted -- a vast amount on 12 ~ ~ counsel fees on that type of thing which should have been absolutely unnecessary. So I would say the case easily could have been a case where either to get to settlement or to this point and time should have been one of your basic kind of $2,000.00 total cases, and in effect, ends up costing my client easily over $8,000.00 and a lot of aggravation and unfortunately puts us in a position -- although we are not complaining -- puts us in a position of having to work with some old numbers on Mr. sather's side. So, yes, clearly the vast majority of these fees in my estimation were caused by Mr. Sather's failure to appear, failure to respond, failure to file anything in a timely fashion, and then unfortunately appearing and disappearing again in a rapid fashion -- have created these fees. (A discussion was held off the record.) Whereupon, SUSANNE KAY SATHER having been called as a witness, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MS. COGNETTI: Q First of all let's start with your name. State your name, please. A Susanne Sather. Q And you reside at that 101 Melissa Court, Enola address, Mrs. Sather? 13 ~ ~ A Yes, I do. Q First of all, have you been in attendance for the time of this hearing this morning? A Yes, I have. Q Were you here and present and listening to my testimony? A Yes, I was. Q Did you understand all of it? A Yes. Q Are you in agreement with the items that I discussed and testified to? A Yes, I am. Q And, in fact, with regard to the counsel fees to Mark Thomas, did I adequately represent approximately what you had paid to Mr. Thomas prior to my entry of appearance? A Yes. Q Did I adequately portray basically the problems that we've had in this case due to your husband's kind of lack of cooperation? A Yes. Q Mrs. Sather, do you recall preparing in August what we titled a sworn statement of facts? A Yes, I do. Q Would you look that over, please, and make sure 14 ~ ~ that that's a copy of the document that we had previously prepared? A Yes, this is what I have. (Whereupon, Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 4 was marked for identification.) (A discussion was held off the record.) BY MS. COGNETTI: Q Other than some minor corrections that we are going to discuss in a couple of seconds; is that statement still your testimony as of today? A Yes, it is. Q Now, Mrs. Sather, let's just take a couple of minutes to clear up some of the items contained within that statement. First of all, with regard to your property at Melissa Court; do I understand that that is in your name only; is that correct? A Yes. My name prior to Sather. Q And that you actually purchased it prior to your date of marriage? A That's correct. Q Are you, however, satisfied that this Court consider that property marital property? A Yes. Q With regard to your IBM pension. Okay? A Okay. 15 t) 1"\ o Now, with the fact that we have just noted that he had 30 years and with B of those years being marital does that make the marital portion of that monthly check approximately $693.00? A '{es. o Now, if he has gotten increases since 1992, you are unaware of those, correct? A Correct. o Is it your testimony that you are unaware of the amount of his social security income as of today. A '{es. o But he does receive 60cial security? A '{es. o How old would he be now? A About 64. o And that $2,614.00, 60 that I repeat myself five times, was the net amount of his check? A Net, yes. o One other item on our statement. At the time we did our statement we were unsure a6 to the value of the savings bonds; is that correct? A That's correct. o Since that time have we had various meetings and communications with your husband's attorney such that we are now aware of the value of those bonds? 17 ~ ~ A Yes. Q And as of 1995 were they worth approximately $57,000.00? A Yes. Q And are all of those bonds in your husband's possession or control? A They are. Q Mrs. Sather, is it satisfactory to you today to withdraw your claim for alimony? A Yes. (A discussion was held off the record.) BY MS. COGNETTI: Q Mrs. Sather, back to the subject of your husband's pension for a minute, did he retire from IBM while you two were still together? A Yes. Q At that point and time did he file or at least execute certain documents to obtain his pension? A Yes. Q And are you personally aware of whether or not when he opted to take his retirement whether he chose an option which would give you any survivor benefits upon his death? A He chose the option that I would not get survivor benefits upon his death -- we chose. 18 (j; N '- - l:; j'::: .. t5 .. ~~ - i ):;~ , () ~: 1,);1: fF. i' 0.. ;",::j ~~~'" f'.J ~.. ,~~ 1 i".: :; cn I:' j i:1 I 1.11 ~: ;6.1. -' ~'- IJ_ ..n '3 0 I....) ;,,) ,-,/ '-" SUSANNE KAY SATlIER, PluintilT IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. NO. 2614 CIVIL 1994 JOHN ROBERT SATlIER. Defendunt: IN DIVORCE It uppeuring thutthe Muster's Report in the ubove stuted euse hus been filed for ten (10) duys, thut no timely exceptions huve been Iiled thereto, that the costs have been fully paid and that ullthe requirements onuw and Rules of Court huve been met, you are hereby directed to submit the suid euse to the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, at the next sitting thereof. Respectlully Submitted. Maria P. ogne I, ~squire Sup. Ct. 1.0. #27914 132-134 Walnut Street P.O. Box 689 Harrisburg, P A 17108-0689 (717) 232-2103 Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: TO THE PROTHONOTARY: I, , Prolhonolury ofthe Court of Common Pleas of Cumberlund Counly, do hereby certily thallhe cosls in lhe ubove slated case have all been paid, including lhe Musler's Ice. Prolhonolury z. , fS/Y? A I ,( I., ." / "' lJ / v,:..:)I': (.t~~ /vlll ~'{ C'/~ (t:t.J/': 7-'.!/C)~,rd.~(;."- ;: I ;tt)~h'/~/' iLl (i /{. t .It ,:1/ .. {)()j/,,-' ~;t:,t' i J/I/./A (rC)l..' /..1'1 (.I 1. IV t,~ ;;':;""L/{iL'{L./('. 57-.'- (lI!Ji~ (' ($"( ~ If"/.) . / // t.) /3 , /,1 fje f : 5~ .. .. /) '~ 4 l..~ Iv , A (, J .L.I i~.:i (((( yt/ -J&/'; c-)//11/f;e / S;t(ftt.K:. /:,. ,)'(""1: /.1 111. '11./ ,:/ 7i-; /I,;';! :;7t:/['.~;' 4:/'~)~ / c:" '? ~J / I I .' IF I /-1 tlvf- /V()7 t!o(t) 'yJ~,t.it'1C-iJ /;) 7Tfu; 1?t.7/ ON (-r IS tJ/lJt V /Jc.t!/JOS~ / /V/l7U;r~$J r)tJ/t /l-II-J-/Z/!lIh..,E /lb ;J1lE.1//IIL. f:r}ilJtf'tJrL'I I !-lAv~ JVO-/'I3~~ S'OCCL-;5;:S{'UC /hVA / IV u{.,J ~/(),s"7- /l-//!Ic"'{ ;J/lJ c.';'I/O/~ '/ -rD jJ/107ac..r M V /JII7C::/...E~'T.5 ""1//(,,- H.'(- L (. i:..,I/,'\/.:.-j>' '::;-://'1'/f::- J...-I t';ur.....' /11':' c- 5'ut-)/h).'~--r:'!~ ,6',/ /)'//Ih!r/{ ,~I )Ji-""'t.-'tL/t..,,..J7A Ilt;;(/" IVlit:." i..' t /1,) ;?I.'C/I-' I?: Ilft:-: d ..A / 1/ i :;;, tJ ,Vi .{' /: J. ~ '/ ;;,(.' c: 1 l..f c' ,of..//, I JJ ~ II.V:..'( E;-. -: 11 / G It.-I -;C;AJ(J ~G ~/L( PI.. 0 yC/J 4A-J.. /f5~ ;2l.-7iIt.tl~ -fULj, 1$" ~U/2-c' ;3t/ Y&11-(2.> "MtJ5 _ ,# ;!;J/It'-lC/C.;zJ /("W/C:.€ ~HjJ/,t7 ycYJ .M;?1CIL-it!-d ~U 111f 1 f rDllt..:5 f. ,t.( (J .5 " I' ,5 ~ - e.... /EI.. ' 11 ,,//,( ( ,,1(./(,<,.<..1;- /!VIC() "'-(C, . . ~I (~~. ~- Mt? ,/.fa. rlA-~u,.,"'ilC. . - IV L::: -r I'IIJK, l' otU ~t: oS '> ~ .c'_" . IV '1'-:: ", .. ., .,- 'J,-, I ,~ t-~<< ....;)!Ji (., ."'1 / S . I "i I v ''(,I. \---. / 'i' ~ :'\ .p.. j c;.. on' I bV- - ,. ... /rl'l:/ ~:),.,/ t/ I; .5,/ tjl5' 1 ~ .~ -' "1",/1 I ;/ .~I (j ~ "'/ .... /'1' "~ ......;;'\ '1 ~ ICj'f~. ;<~:! V ;.,:>' :f,'! Yb'7 ~ - b I ., tJ / f- t S ~~)IY1 iL f: tJ I- 1-'c.7/ /t.~J..(~I(j-''' 1It--rHuuqll tuc:.. St=.7"A7UJ7'bJ IV c/odC:- ~t:- /t!r'.2- / eoAJ77Iu'()~zj -rtJ fJ/JY IIt...L &.p MY /,JI'/'f::J; 6,~ Pe;/l.JSES "7Tltl.()c.kf1-! Oc!.-m/"'~L'CJPj~tj , ' ,~ ?&/LE I / PRtL.f::;7J -rb jI)/1<1 IICfL S/1/t)ft=. (J ? Iv( 'I 11! 11.)$1 ti,J 4-~ /bu () c.J.1 J /~~'/ ;~ ., Nt J>' @' ,# ::;"}:I "" c....-."(, . / t/ ~) .J //;~ ' # ~ 6) 3..1.2. /l--/6'.,) ./ It) fV //; /:.;~.s (,I) " "1 ,,,~ 0Vl;J .,rf tj.( /;{ A'C.S' ~; ".,.'Af' II ,- c-:; If/I;; -)( ~ Ntl.; 6) .-,-'JS' ,11,^- !. y {,/ ~ ?S~Y- .~ 7 ,,- -- ,.., .:' ': ~ ;1:?~/t~~ p' /l6/j / (:;f?- ,Ij/y ~" ~==. /iJ--7/!c- f.' A'$~'{)MI;tJc;, hllJI1c.. L)/ZIJ{!;r!. t.'v7"{!lt..(!:.:/J .' . -<J \- '" ~ ".Ht ..__....~. .... .. ...--.- .~, . ~ " ..... ~ ~ f -::1C 1J1~ [$/,1-7'G If CdtJII/ /J 0 M I A/ /v,1/! /0/ /t/ec/sS/f at' ,EtJ tJ t. /J. / ,0~.. --r:;,s l,(.'t::,i/J6!-lLrY 1[.1/)-5' ''/(JnV7LV /2;/td'If1'/~.~~j IN S~.,:Jr:. ;/;/77 /1.$" ,1'L.-l=7c?.. 7(1f:-:- ;:i )1/I/'fCI'/tE-1J /1q.e-ffM~:7ifr, /1.;tfr!.fI.. /}c.Jt!G ~6 / f7JU1{.h~(EzI f}.J-~ l!:#7/1213: ~()W'~ J'/1t/MC'"'"#7 /l?JL1 0...05r,u~ (fu-r ~~oo) /IV AICd &J~ s/.,)....5/hv'A/~ ;JMlfA'/~€=- ~ ~r1H #/ft-~ C # .:r5oo) /'1lJ e;v,Js /6 c:::M-11d..?ttI p,c Mu:. ()W III tf:7Z;;l~h;:J" 01(;; #01.;(0 o~o/heJ Miff ~cY1 /f1 t.. . /J ?f10 t'?-R.d $1'/11 IUI/V 1/GtJ/CE rL~ t/~ /~95 #Z~OO() 7t? .f'pf,f (/!Pili ~ t) M / It! / () J,( /lfJ jJ ,e/l1 $til tf.uJSS A/G7" . . ,- ....J A'('l'J~)!rf(' -.. )5G/dltE l'/ J~ wI'! TI-/t!:1( :P- ~GI((.4/t I-rHL- -;;OlhtJ 7~/11 @ Alllr:.t:: ~/tElltJ6 ACJ7' =1-...;/ t~ f/~/t.ud fll.. ~ - 117"C&; (,:c.-ItIL/c;;-Vc.:;zj -/0 7:/f/5/17i"I(f"K ~' Ill.' !kl/C!;!.. ,t~()IIt..A7V ....SL71cctl,{cJ."N'/ l JI.';>;/IP-;>l.f. :. ~ .- ~S;'d ~//9/JY - J//w fAce ~<:}ooo $" /;; M .s7-0~~ /..7'-.;{ cSMrLEs - ~II$.SVM/AJG; C/Z T; A ~~ - () /h:...otE:. 11/ t.j (16 /, -"-t~ -~. ...' :t~ ~ .. * A 1/7 N71 H- f ~d?U'u~Ck.. /I!5SUu/lll tJd elo /~11 , ..6, If/'ll . .. , I ~ ' (Vl.tJ /Lc...4C- kl1 &/t./f[jD fJ()~ (//..1-1'. 517? ~~.t:" t/O Iff' FOOT (:}/tL/lcJCcLL - /dJ/li I ~/Lti />/{]~ 7~) 7cJrf1t./:5oAi OJ/'; ICJ4Jc!H t/7 / 'toot? J;Sr; t/;!t.LJt! 1111.Jt?oC! 6 d AI!..~4t..- !-i:G-~ If - ;1..16 ~(:;Nc'Tr/ UJ,J1lEN/JS,' -m,/-r SbI5,SrM'171"t(. J.:erj/lL Pt:CS 1!.G:'.5iJ/.."I~ heCJ,t..( t/d /l1(/5cu!;,e~ I/VnlC..~c,o//!7C'C./6 S' / /1/-71./6: IV Crr L-I/c;..i~ ;:"e:(!.lr=I/tE-tJ /I, lJl,fC{)/!'cK! Y I\GP{)~S7- r:,CoM '1l-tf::::: (loCj,u{;;TfI ,1.11-0 (J t:-PfC!,G'!;1, _____. ~_ N.s 6XfN13-r11 M;{)~S' 7i1,1/ A~/1c..- fE~$. .... tiQ;;f-~Ot(}tJ /f~ roLLOo.J$; /J Ilott.;t/ey &9'~rrl /31(J IIJ~~' "16710, Job /hJt;C/,il/17&1 ~LUA;~S b/Z.;~) 1l-rrtfJ),fNE,Y ;it: ffItJNI!S' AtLUAl4Y'S 150,00 I!cCue:'-v{[:L -filL 7ibyL(;fS' ,6jL(~/Il/~ IS ;.)or /l;:,sC-Y:V/)Ti!.jJ ,t;ulil-f 7ii7.~ &'>/t(/'t'/J/AJ7/ j:.-,fuj FoIZ CV1$6 /VO, d~-'8':t.- /f'P'Z' ~/c.:.t::i1 yVL. 7'" 1/ / ?fz... IhV.t1 IV / r/!.iJ 121/ tJN o;u /l(IIY Iii IC/ff, tile 7i/oNI1-S lJ/rffA~u/ ,BcCVJU~l::. ;c,(y /t/To,e;tlE-tI f1LC:t1 /I-rtI O$7kC77ol/ /f~(JIN'~ mrn- fJurMJ7/rt:-1 o.5'tJ z./J71I1J6:. If, SA/lf(}({ / IV~ ;1/0/ 4- ,.fc.s/~bVf tJf2 fl61tJ;1!5YL.-Ymv/4 /,d/-/-,!;,v 1HG C!tl~/ f1 /-.1/7 N'f tull- 5 f-jI H1 Ilrro!tIv'Et(.5/ \I~11;tJ5()Aj /JUH-IE/S'/CWlltL-r I AJ/~ Nt:~ !3/LU!J ;!1C :P;5oD Foil -1/f1.t-12... ....... ~ -.......... ~ H___ t .tl 1 /(t.yJj{E.stlJrA 1/ tJ/fJ IN 7711$ MI}--'n.:1C. If If is -/liE;. 6:J(/Il-/~' tJf1/AJ/b'/I) 77IA-?' 1 drk:(Jt..tJ g~ fJ~AJllr.../?-t!:zJ HIe. G~'N(E&}-rltU~ J,.6C; lit:.- fu:;; S' rlf//l. f.i..V/2J~' 711-,11 .:9110(/(....1. /JO'f f!1!(/8 Jjt::(;N ;JC.Ct!":J:bHtf Y " -p::lc;xJ :JrlcJut-A,u, ^ ~ ~ / ~ ...,;((;'. rc./J1 il) -rl;::' r !:;(:.- ~C!./I.k) L-l z.t.A 10 Ii.. -rHe cJ;/Ju.JII/i./;.'/IIJ'lc:;J /-l::r:j/IL E;XP~:1lJ.s.t. / ltdUt:: A-/~XJtf.,(Jt:d IN M 'I ~~ f~ICJ.s6 0;:'" ('II-~' f=- N'o. r:<3&'5'-IP9~ f ',"/t1l C~O> "".ley I rT d11O{)cA &6 IVo;re:d -rff1'f'l I lj//j /Vert" tr~CIWG;. 77-1(3; /vI1't5-rc--b ,15&?tllt:f (JM77C- f fJu tJ/J 7O~sJJ/N ,H:/Jl2tJltlt-y ~/ /99(." l-r "J';:'OIC /nJ ~tJJJal fib ~/ "TO fthLNvbr~ rl- fI€ t jJ&N.s. E /J JIlA M 1/-/ L / -r WI 71n.u 7ftG ~jt) AIt "I eON S'/It../!l'ItJ/. fJLt!.ol/5f:- /l-tJUIS'r:: I~ 7HcA...(:. /ldC::.. rv/t71/e-L 9UC::-SP'l9AJ s; tJ/2 At/c!UMt,u-r"p-T/ 0101 ljC? 01 1lIE-6 .. L::;:;; 1tJ(!.(f- ;t..e:-y -;0//,t/ II, rSff7~ '. ,fl'J/l'tc.. H '. . ' . g JJOG!.UUfDUfd-r/&,J ~~N4 /) /)b7i t!.G,tV/(f NI IN eo M & f:1)(Jt7~1 r A- t- ~ . 1~/.If If- /r~dl-t-- l:s{~rrG e X/-l1 ,'if I -r (!.. _ /1Y--I::t; (!.. 13 _lrtklY. tI1____A- .. l"'-"-'~---' , ....-.-. ,-13 . .l /l:el/r:.- br;rre:. e-.-r /IT Ib rr ~ fJ~ I/7LI 71H- ,fJ.t!.oy;~,e:t Y kKftl15 I{ IE: I F IRGM /hUrllt.- !J!Z() rJt!/Lt"y' b%/1--1 (.3rT 0/) If ... . _. __ ,.__. _ ,m.._ .oO. --. i,_ /nM:rt',8 A€tf/k- F~s ~/fh;g,-r I '. . '.'-" ,"' ."'p .-. ",,""--", ..- ~' , I'/IIEREAS, lIerchelroath, in consideration of Sather making payments as aforesaid, agrees that Sather shall have an undivided one-half interoat in tho condominium unit togother with an un- divided one-half interost 1n tho cOlllmon elementul allll I'IlmHEJ\S, the parlleu Iwrato deaire to set fOl.th their respective rights with regards to the condominium unit and to confirm theh" understanding in wri ting. NOW, 'l'IIEREPOHE, it is agreed lJy and between the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, in consideration of covenants and promises herein contained, and in consideration of the foregoing recitals, which recitals are incorporated by re- ference, as follows: 1. lIerchelroath hereby acknowledgeD receipt of the sum of Two 'l'housand Five Hundred ($2,500.00) Dollars from Sather which said sum was used to make the down payment for the purchase of a condominium unit known as 101 Melissa Court, Suite 101, West- wood Village, together with an undivided 1. 507% interest in the cOl1U1\on element. 2. Sather hereby agrees to pay to lIerchelroath, on or be- fore the lOth day of each month the sum of One lIundred Forty- Three Dollars and Forty-'l'wo Cents ($143.42), which said sum shall be applied towards the principal and interest of the purchase money mortgage. In addi lion, Sather agrees to pay to lIerchelroat:h one-half of the monthly condominium charge imposed by the con- dominium regime together with any annual assessment imposed by the condominium rogime. Sather shall pay one-half of the monthly common charge on or before the lOth day of each month. With re- gards to an annual assessment imposed hy the condominium regime, Sather agrees to pay to lIerchelroath ono-half theroof within thirty (30) day a after rucelpt of the notice of assossment. l'urther, Sather agroeu to pay ono-half of Lho Ilpplicable real -2- . . ... estate taxes, insurance, publio sewer and other utility charges for the condominium unit. 3. lIerchelroa th shall 1.10 enti l:led to the interest deduction for tho pUl:chane monoy mortga<je for federal income tax purposes. 4. lIet'cholroa th shall be en ti tled to take ap r~al estate taxes paid on account of the ownership of this property as a deduction for federal income tax purposes. 5. lIorchelroath hereby acknowledges that Sather has an undivided one-half interest in the condominium unit together with an undivided one-half interest in the 1. 507% of the common element. 1\t Sather's option, lIerchelroath shall, if requested, execute a general warranty deed to him, subject to the purchase money mortgage, for Sather's undivided one-half interest in the condominium unit and the common element. 6. With sixty (60) days' notice to the other party, each party shall have the right to terminate this 1\greement. In the event that either party elects to terminate the 1\greement, then the other party shall pay to the party electing to terminate one-half of the net equity in the subject property. Net equity shall be determined by fixing the fair market value of the condominium unit to include the undivided interest in the conunon element as of the date of notice to terminate. 'fhe fair market value of the condominium unit, together with the undivided in- terest in the conU1\on element, shall be as mutually agreed or, if no agreement can be reached, then each party shall be required to retain a competent appraiser to fix the value of the real esta te. 'l'he average value of the two appraisals shall be deemed the fair market value of the subject property. Deducted there- from shall be the balance due on the purchase money mortgage as of the date of election to terminate. Real estate taxes shall be adjusted as of the date of notice to terminate. Further, -3- -, . seven (7\) per cen\: shall also be deduc\:ed from the fair market value of the property which said sum represents real estate brokel" s conullission and \:ransfer taxes. If the par\:y who did not elect \:0 tCl:minate the arran<jcment is unable to obtain the neces- sary funds tu purchase the interest of the tcrmiilating party, '. then the property shall be lis\:ed for sale wi\:h a repu\:able real es\:ate company or sold privately/ as the parties agree. In the even\: of a sale to a \:hird par\:y/ then \:he ne\: proceeds derived from said sale shall be divided equally between the parties. 7. Each of the parties hereto agrees tha\: he or she shall execute any and all documents, to include deeds to give full force and effect to this Agreement. O. If either par\:y breaches any provision of this Agreement, the other shall have the right, a\: his or her election, to sue for damages for such breach, and the party breaching this Agree- ment shall be responsible for payment of reasonable legal fees and costs incurred by \:he other enforcing his or her righ\:s under \:his Agreement, or seek such other remedy or relief as may be available to him or her. 9. 'l'his Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties and there are no representations, warranties, covenants or undertakings other \:han those expressly set for\:h herein. 10. A modification or waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective only if made in writing and executed with the same formality as this Agreement. 'l'he failure of either party to insist upon strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent default: of \:he same or similar na\:ure. -4- . . : . , /MiM1W!itfp"" .13. . PIlOPEIl'I''i SE'I"I'LEMEN'l' AGREEMEN'!' ------- - THIS AGREEMEN'l' is made th is 'iJo _day of Sr:.P7~ . ,1978 between JOliN HOlllm'j' Iill'l'lIEIl of 101 HelisslI Court, Enola, Cumberland Cuunty, Peutluylvania, here! Inafter referrp.d to lIll lIusl'anrl ^ N o JOAN LOUISE SATHER of 5220 Deerf iald Avenue, Mechan icsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, hereinafter referred to as Wife. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the par t ie s hereto were married on July 3, 1954 I and WHEREAS, the Husband received a Divorce from the bonds of matrimony on :S C(Jr- 19781 and ?-,?; WHEREAS, the parties desire to make arrangements with regard to joint property acquIred during their marriage liS well as with regard to other l il]ht" ilnrl obI igiltions growiny Ollt of said mar riage I NCM 'l'HEREFORE, cons ider ing the above cond it ions and c ircum- stances and in consideration of the covenants and promises hereinafter to be mutually kept and performed by each party, as well as for other good and valuable consideration, it is agreed as fo11CMs: (1) Wife shall be entitled to the full use and possession of the mar ita 1 dwelling located at 5220 Deerf ield Avenue, Mechan icsbur g, Cumber land County, l'ennsylvan ia. I~ ife shall assume full res pons ib 11 ity for any and a 11 encumbrances on sa id premises and shall hold Husband harmless from the payment of any amounts due on said encumbrances. Wife shall also pay all utilities, taxes and other expenses connected with saId premises. If wife should des ire to sell sa ill premises Husband shall join in sa id conveyance. Wife shall be entitled to all net proceeds realized l2:YHi/$/T F FOlln Ap.IfDV'd OMO No, 03,A.lb A, U,S, DEPARTMENT OF IIOUSINI.l III UflDAN DEVELOPMENT SETTLEMENT STATEMENT 0, TYPE OFLOAN: -1-rTrIlA 7, [] I,,,IIA :1, [J CONV, UNINS, ~. (""I VA Ii 1::1 CllNV, INS u,-riL~-NUMiitll:-~ /, LUANNUMUi", 0, MOnTGAGE INsunANCE CAS~ NUMUEII: Tllil (ami /1 (um/shBllIO give Vall e 1I,1Iemolll of actuel lellleme/ll com, Amounll pe/d '0 and by Ihe Iet/lemelll elle/ll Ire C, NOTE: Ihown, "eml mlfked "(p,u,c,1" wo" paid au II/do ,ho clol/ng: II,oy If' Ihown ho" (or //I(ormal/onal purpoles ",d a" nor includrei /n Iho 101,ls, 0, NAME OF OonnOWEn: E, NAME OF SELLEn: F, NAME OF LENOEn: Donald Neil Tranter,Jr. Theresa W, Tranter, husband Rnd wire G, PROPERTY LOCATION: Lot 31, Lake Meade Subdivision, Reading Twp., Adams County, PA John R. Sather & Susanne K. Sather, his wife, and The Peoples State Bank Joan Suther. single pel'S n ;-; '.' , II, SETTLEMENT AOENTr 'j ,f~ ~\ :l.~'j Robert G.,~i8hpm, Esq. I'ij H)'j I'LACE OF SETTLEMENT!' ' Clayton RIIWilcox, Esq. I _ i "'.-: ) t ~ I I. SETTLEMENT OATE, March 2, 1984 J, SUMMAnY OF OOnnOWEl1'S TIlANSACTlON 100,011055 AMOUNT DUE FI10M 0011110WEI1: 101. Conulc, "'" prlct 10000_00 102. P,non,l properly 103. S.H1.m.nt ch.raelloborrowt'r IlIne 140:l1 479_00 104, 105, Adjullm,nu (or ""m, p,id by uUt'r in ,dv,nCl 106. CltY/lown lUll 10 "'- 101. County IIXel 10 ) /.n 0/. 108. Alllum.nll 10 / 109,C::"hnnl , 110, l11.t..ater prorntiOll -.!L. 6/1 112, 120, GROSS AMOUNT DUE FROM BORROWER 10,524.58 200, AMOUNTS PAID OY 011 IN OEtlALF OF 0011110WEn, '201. D,polll or IIrneU money 1 nnn 00 202. P,lncln.llrnounl 01 new 10lnlsl 7 ~nn.nn 203. hiUlng lo,nhl 'Ik,n lublectlo 204, 205, 205, 201, 200, 209, AdjllllmMtI for item, un/Mid by JtlltU 210, Citvllown lUll 10 211. County tUII 10 212. Aueumlllu ,,, 213, 214, 215 216, 21/, 210, 219, - 220, TOTAL PAID OY/FOR BORROWER 8,500.00 300, CAStl AT SETTLEMENT FI10MITO OOI1I\OWEI1 JOl. 01011 .mount dUll from hOllow'!r lime 12UI ~~~6a-:-aB~ 302. lelt .mounn IlIld b../lor hlHlOWllf llilll! 2201 303, CASH (IXFROM) 2,024.58 (0 TO! BORROWER K, SUMMAI1Y OF SELLEIl'S TIlANSACTlON 400, 0110SS AMOUNT DUE TO SELLEI1. 401. ConUlell.I.. price 402. Perlonal prop,,. 4U3, 404, 405, Ad/uunumrt for it,m' paid br "II" in ad.'."" 406, CItV/lown IUel to 407. CounlV lUll 10 408. AUtume"n to 409, ,110, ~11. ~12. 420, GROSS AMOUNT DUE TOSEI.LER 10,045.58 500, nEOUCTlONSIN AMOUNT DUE TO SELLEn, 601. Excll.. de Dillin! Inurucllol1l) 602. Selll,mu"t char '110 selle, IIln. 14001 603. Exlulng 108nll) lskellluhiect to 604. Payoff olllnl mmtgage loan 505. Pavall of second mortgage loan 600, 601, 600, 609, Adjultmt'lIu lor item. unpaid'IV "II" 610, City/town IlItel 10 611. CounlV llUles to 612, ^n1!1I1Il8nll 10 613, 511, 615, 510, 611. 510, 510, 520, TOTAL REDUCTION AMOUNT DUE SELLER 1,368.90 000, CASU AT SETTLEMENT TO/FI10M SELLEI1 601. G,all ""OUI1I dU'la ..II.. II",. ~201 liL 0/,5. SR 602, len ,,,lIUCliolllln Imount flu" Iflllef Wne 6201 ll.--: 603, CASII (j(] TO) (0 FROM) SELLEn The und,rsigned hereby acA"owledg, receip, of, cumpl'led copy of p,ges I ,,,d 2 of Ihis sr"em,nt ,,,d '''y '11,ch""",. referred 10 herei" DOHOWllf 8,676.68 SeHer ---------.-- ------'------+------ 511111__ Borrower ------------ _. _._______n_.___~_ _____._ ........II...If.....,"fC IB:tT; STOCKI(OLDEIt RELATIONS &90 tladl.on Avomue NeH Vork, Naw Vork 10022 TllANSFEIt 011 STOCI{ DUlliNG CAI.ENDAlt YEAIl 1007 JOIIII R DATIIER 101 IIELIDM r.r ENOLA PA 17026 e;r 1-11 ~ If (j loin! NlImber uf Shora. shoN" Dnlclil 7Ul 1011 Aceounl liD. 6U-~200-U3ti-OU ---- -._-- --_. - -------- ----_._-- -_._~--- -----,._--" - . -------_. h.,uo Du lu tluo~IO" tt.:.uu u..llJ Ihllnhor J.ll\.llt lJ..l.. rlull;hor IltloU'J On lu tt~""hol' of 3horns of thn.'os of 5h.wo, of Shot.os -----.- ------ --..---.---. -_.__...._- -----. ---_. -' --~_. --------- 09/3UI17 1 10/11117 1 1111'0/77 1 I2IWt77 1 121'0177 1 U1/31110 1 1Il/10170 1 1121<0/70 1 03131178 1 U{t/)(1/7A 1 Ilfi/l!.i/71l 1 05/3117/1 1 06/30178 1 U7I14170 1 00/15170 1 00/31/78 1 09/29178 1 10/13170 1 11115178 1 11/30170 1 12/29170 1 01115/79 1 02115179 1 02120/79 1 03/30179 1 04l30/7? 1 UO/26179 290 05/26/79 1000 06/29179 12 09120179 17 12131179 21 03/31/80 20 06130/80 2~ 09/30/80 20 12131180 21 03/31/81 25 06130/01 25 09/30/01 26 12131181 29 03/31/02 27 06/30/02 26 0?/30/02 2~ 12131/02 19 03/31/83 10 06130/83 15 09/30/83 1~ 12130183 13 03/30/M 16 06/29/84 16 09/30/84 16 12I31/M 15 03/29/85 13 06/20/85 16 09/30/85 15 12131185 13 03/31186 13 06/30/86 13 09/30/86 5 NOTE. Itl PRIOR VEARS HE HERE REQUIRED TO REPORT TO TIlE INfERIlAL REVEUUE SERVICE ALL TRANSFERS OF STOCK ACQUIRED ArTER JAIIUARY I, 1964 TIlROUGIl TilE EIII'LOYHS STOCK PURCIIASE PLAN OR RECEIVED AS A RESULT OF A STOCK SPLIT OR A STOCK OIVIOEtlD IF AllY OF TilE UUDERLVlIlG SIlARES HERE ACQUIRED TIIROUGIl TIlE EHPLOYEES STOCK PURCIlASE PLAII. HE ARE 110 LOIIGER REQUIRED TO SEIID TIllS IIIFORIIATIOII TO TilE GOVERIIHEtlf OUf TIlE IIITElUlAL REVEIlUE CODE STILL REQUIRES TIlAT HE SEIID TIlE WrOlltlATIOII TO TIlE STOCKIIULOER. . .. Xndllloto9 full nhl'lf-On h~"und 'HI R rnt>lIlt III n rdud~ SI)Ht DI' ~tDr.I~ divhlomll':llioh t'lny hwn ,up,~I,'lyl~~q Ih~I:OG acquh'nd undo I' tho IIJ11 [llploYO'l~ I titor.l~ PUI'ch,no PIon on aI' n Hm' J"nu.tII'Y 1, lCU...... br II-I;g I -r II /flM . ~/!AJ~,ct/L l,c .s:f;;41L - If'il - /*5 At) cO"! &11J-r Rc:PLr=C!/.> 7HC ;slt-IIIUS. ()r /~;1.-1 ..rroe/~ I!EL/) IN Nil /ll;;tV/E /J,"r 71-ltS. t:/JiJ {)f-- 17 $'1, /l!tJ>.( &1= 7ilE5>t:::. :JildtZ.6S W L.:.-rz..{; /1:/i' all II S c;6 j-J Fr~.e ". .J/17V / f7 f A-/(/ Jj 1r:..p,ec.'5.C;l!'/ /VI/hu (/Ie lnU(1c"t!/Y". fmtJCt/~;c_ Y(JU,(. ;/7rc;\jr'ltJAJ _;;iJ/ot/c..,1 BE J/'"e Lcc:'7'~A -/ei 'I)-It.. /!Sft::/P I slC.c.~d -1lfll;cJ:5//C!7ia,J.$ /-(,JIL ~ /hilA /00 S~-5 /5.50t!:::lJ IN U"fy If7~ 7/~5E.. J/M7f-ES tutf:1L~ I SSl.Jt!:6 A-s jJ~r ()r A- P~()IC PtJ/l- ~NE S'rtX!'k .5iLIT ~ /1115' ,Mcll/IJr 7H-/fT /8M lutPIJt./j /550E /'IIL-tf:. /Vc'i'vI S)iA-lt..E::5 /tJL- bf(!/-f YfdlZE I~. tb.J5~p:JCN/LY /.gA// /.s~uc.6.' /.;Jj .;5//5 70 M6 / /II ~~CC):;fA/; -n t4tJ 12 -r 7'3 S'-I:5 p~ /JetE-- S.A:-/ r .$rOC!? K: , 4(b~v(E;'ILI /il-1.5 ./JOCUMeN/ A'C.SD ~v5 "77fIJ7' / jJtJ!l(!/ITfac.:7J FI t!t= fJdE-.5fJL/r SIh1/2..6S. /1PiC:1L "/fiG. ;tI/1121l.J/ltf~ 111/ ;fi~~ 7'9: 7;1(;; ~~ rcJllt;:- I ~ c3 J{ jJ,e.{; . S,tJ L I ;r JIf~5 fJ ;tlj~ 70 -::r~ /71. 7JfOSE- 3% SIIIhtt:.5' 13€"C?/I/LI~ /.5..2 S/-J~'f3;; /#-r~ .7iit= NAY /f1f S~tlT $1,200.00 per month shull continue until such time liS the shortlilll in the equituble distribution, pension benefits und counsel fees due Wife in the totulllmount of $98,436.98 hllve been pllid in full. To secure the distribution due Wile liS provided herein, Wife shull be entitled to IImortguge IIguinst the property ut 870 Bird Buy Wuy, Venice, Floridu, in the IImount of $98,436.98. Wile shull provide to Husbund u deed trnnslerring 1111 her right, title, und interest in sllid property to Husbund in uccordunce with the distribution herein only upon receipt by Wife ofu mortguge in the umount 01'$98,436.98 to secure Wife the pllyments due herein. Suid mortgllge will be recorded simultuneously with the deed to suid property us u first lien on the property. Euch pllyment monthly Irom Husbund's pension in the IImount of $1,200.00 on uccount of the short filII of the equituble distribution, pension puyments, und counsel lees will reduce the principul bulllnce of the mortgllge in II like umounl. No interest will be churged on the mortguge; however, should the Intemul Revenue Service impute uny interest on the trnnsuctionlor which Wife mllY become Iiuble for puyment of income tux, sllid tux liubility will be udded to the principul umount of the mortguge to be puid by Husbllnd. In the event Ilushllnd refuses to sign IImortgllge in exchllnge lor the deed to the property, the Court directs thut II lien he plllced IIgllinst the property lit 870 Bird Buy WilY, Venice, Floridu, inllccordunce with the provisions herein. The pllrties lire directed to signllny und 1111 documents nccessury to eflectuute '. the trllnster of IIssets to thc purty rccciving the IIssets liS provided herein upon presentation of the appropriate documcnt for signature. The credit which Wi fe hus received on IIccount of the pension payment from datc of sepurntion in June 1992 is through Junc 1996. Should this eusc hc prolonged beyond Junc 1996, the amount of $400.00 pCI' month shall continue to IIccrue tram that date and be added onto thc umount due Wifc und paid back and secured liS providcd herein. The additional $400.00 per month shull begin to accrue July I, 1996, until sueh time as a Qualified Domestic Relations Order is entered in these procccdings. 5. Husband shall pay to Wife the sum 01'$6,000.00 on aecount of Wife's counsel tecs and expenses. Thc sum 01'$6,000.00 shall bc addcd to the shortfall duc Wifc in the cquitablc distribution ofasscts and Wifc's portion ofthc monthly pcnsion bcncfit from thc datc ofseparDtion through Junc 1996. The total short filII with thc additional $6,000.00 in counscl fecs and costs brings thc amount duc Wile from Husband to $98,436.98 which amount shall be paid in accordancc with Paragraph 3 hcreof: Furthcr, the $6,000.00 owcd to Wifc and her attorncy onllccount of counsel fecs and costs shlll1 be addcd to the mortgagc against the propcrty at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida, so that thc total amount due on that mortgllge shall be $98,436.98. BY THE COURT: J. ~.~~~~~~~~~~~-~-----~--~-~~~~~~ 8 ~- . . . . 8 8 ~ 0: ~ IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : . OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY 8 ~ .: ~ ~ ~ . ..~ 8 8 STATE OF '~~~ PENNA. ~ 8 . ~ .. . SUSANNE K. SATtlER,!i · ~ ....... P' ..... Plaintiff 'i No. ...~.~,~.~.......... .................1994 · . .,..,. ..... J ~ iii " ., .' Vel'SIIS i.,[' 8 iii JOHN ROBERT SATHER, ': 'P' ..... I 8 . Defendant;! - . 8 8 ~ ~ 8 ~ DECREE IN . ~ ij 8 DIVORCE ' I!I . ~ AND NOW, .. .. .... .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. " 19.9.6.... It Is ordered and ~ ., SUSANNE K. SATHER If ~ decreed that ................................................., plaintiff, ': ,. JOHN ROBERT SATHER If . and. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ., . . . . . .. defendant, ~ ~ are divorced from the bonds of matrimony. ~ ~ M 8 The court retains jurisdiction of the following claims which have : S been raised of record In this action for which a final order has not yet : ~ been entered; ~ M.' . ~ 8 .",..........., I......................................................... I =.' . .................. ........................................................ ;, ~ ~ " Dy The Courtl " !~ 8 ^t1~.il .... J I~ ~ . I~ ~ . I~ 11 Prothonotnry i .' I~ '.' ~ .' ___-..-..___ .................,...........-..-_.............--._~ ...._._.., _ ."...._ . ' '. __. . . . W . __~~_~~~_*~.*****.~**~*.~.~~:~.~*ro~. SUSANNE KA Y SATHER, Plaintifl' IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. NO. 2614 CIVIL 1994 JOHN ROBERT SATHER, Defcndunt IN DIVORCE ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this day of ,1996, rccommendation having bcen liIcd on Fcbruary 2, 1996, and no timely cxceptions liIcd thcrcto, thc Master's rccomrncndation is acceptcd and IIdopted as follows: I. Plaintifl: Susanne Kay Suther, and Delendant, John Robert Sather, arc hcreby divorccd from thc bonds of matrimony. 2. Thc following maritalllsscts and values have bcen assigncd to Wile: a, Rcal estate at 101 Melissu Court, EllOla, Pcnnsylvania $ 71,000.00 b. 1987 Cadillae Broughum vehicle $ 3,975.00 c. Marital portion of Wile's IBM pension $ 6,196.00 c, US IRA $ 16,914.78 $ 23,372.00 d, Franklin Utilities Fund IRA f. Fidclity Invcstmcnts IRA ~ TOTAL TO WIFE $130,902.04 3. Thc thllowlnlllllurllulussets IIItd vulues havc bcen assigned to Husband: f. 11IM Employees CrcditUnion $ 85,000.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 15,694,50 $ 9,287.50 $ 5,062.94 $ 14,626.59 $ 337.50 u. l{clll cstulc III 870 Bird BIlY Way, Venicc, Florida h. lJS SlIvlnlls Bonds c. NuveenBonds d. 11IM Stock ( 100 shllrcs) c. Nlltlous Blink Chccking Account g. IBM l~mployces Crcdit Union h. KIP Kemper Fund $ 66,366.96 I. Blinker's Trusl IRA $ 24,000.00 TOTAL TO HUSBAND $277,375.99 4. Furthel'/nore, Wile shul1 rcceivc II distribution 01'$92,436.98, which is bascd on thc tiJl10winll computlltlons und shllll hc pllid Irom Husbllnd's pcnsion liS furthcr dctailed hereunder: Vuluc of mllritulusscts Wile Is cntitled to reeeivc excluding the mllritlll portion of Ilusband's pcnsion $204.139.02 Vuluc ofmuritulussels ussigncd to Wife excluding the Illllrltul interest inllushllnd's pension $130.902.04 Shl1l11hll on Wile's distrihution of Illurital ussets excluding thc Illaritlll portion 01' Ilushund's pension $ 73,236.98 Vulue of Illuritulassets Ilushand is entitled to reeelvc excluding the murital intercst in Husband's pcnsion $204,139.02 $1,21111.011 pCI' month shull continue until such time as the shortfall in thc equitablc dlstrihutlon, pcnsion henefits and counsel fees due Wife in the total amount 01'$98,436.98 huvc hccn puld in litll. To secure Ihc distrihution duc Wile as provided herein, Wifc shall be cntitled to u mll/1gugc uguinst thc propcrty at 870 Bird Bay Way, Vcnice, Floridu, in the amount of $1)8,436,1)8. Wile shllll provide to Husband a deed transferring 1111 her right, title, IInd intcrcst in sllid propcrty to Husband in aecordance with the distribution herein only upon rcccipt hy Wile ofu mortgllgc in the amount 01'$98,436.9810 sccure Wile the payments duc hcrein. SlIid mortguge will be recorded simultaneously with thc deed to said property us u first Iicnon the property, Elich payment monthly Iromllusbllnd's pcnsion in the unHnmtof'$I,21111.00 on uccount of the shortfilll of the equitable distribution, pension pllymcnts, und counsel fecs will reduce the principal bulance of'the mortgagc in alike umount. No intercst will bc chllrged on thc 1110rtgugc; however, should thc Intcrnal Rcvcnuc Service impute uny interest on thc transllction liJr which Wife muy becomc lIuhlc fhr puyment of' income tax, said tax liability will be lidded to the principalul1lount of'thc mortgagc to bc paid hy Ilushllnd, In thc cvcnt Hushand rcfilses to signu mOl'tgllge in exchangc IlJr thc deed to thc property, thc Court directs thut II lien bc pluccd ugainst the property atl!711 Bird Bay Wuy, Venicc, Floridu, inuccordllncc with thc provisions herein, The purties urc directcd to sign IIny und all documents neccssary to eflectuate the transfer of assets to the party receiving the assets as provided hcrein upon presentation ofthe appropriate document for signature. Thc credit which Wife has reccived on account of the pcnsion payment from date of separation in Junc 1992 is through Junc 1996. Should this cusc bc prolonged bcyond Junc 1996, the alllount 01'$400.00 per month shllll continuc to accruc trom that date and bc added onto the amount due Wife and paid back and securcd as provided herein. The additional $400,00 pCI' month shall begin to accrue July I, 1996, until such time as II Qualified Domestic Relations Ordcr is entered in these proceeding~. 5. Husband shall pay to Wife the sum 01'$6,000.00 on account ofWifc's counsel lees and expenscs, The sum 01'$6,000.00 shall be added to the shortfall due Wife in the cquitable distribution ofasscts and Wile's portion of the monthly pension bene lit from the date ofscparation through Junc 1996. The total shortfall with the additional $6,000.00 in eounscl fees and costs brings the amount duc Wile from Husband to $98,436.98 which amount shall bc paid in accordance with Paragraph 3 hercof. Furthcr, the $6,000.00 owed to Wife and hcr attorney on account of counsel fces and costs shall be udded to the mortgllgc uguinst the property at 870 Bird Buy Wuy, Venicc. Florida, so that thc total umount due on that mortgagc shall be $98,436.98, BY THE COURT: J. .' 3, Thc following marital asscts and values have bccn assigned to Husband: a. Real estate at 870 Bird Bay WilY, Vcnice, Florida $ 85,000.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 15,694.50 $ 9,287.50 $ 5,062.94 $ 14,626.59 $ 337.50 b. US Savings Bonds c. Nuvecn Bonds d. IBM Stock (\00 shares) e. Nations Bunk Checking Account t: IBM Employees Credit Union g. IBM Employees Crcdit Union h. KIP Kempcr Fund $ 66,366.96 i. Banker's Trust IRA $ 24.000.00 TOTAL TO HUSBAND $277,375.99 4. Furthermorc, Wile shall reccive u distrihution 01'$92,436.98, which is bas cd on the following compututions and shall bc puid from Husband's pension as further detailed hereunder: Value ofmaritulussets Wife is cntitlcd to reccivc excluding thc muritul portion nf II1Ishund's pension $204,139.02 Valuc ofmaritulllssets usslgncd to Wile cxcluding thc marital interest inllushund's pension $1~0.902.04 Shortfilll on Wile's distrihution ofmurllul usscts cxcluding thc maritul portionofllllshund's pcnsion $ 73,236.98 Vuluc ofmuritulussets Ilusbund is cntilled tn receive cxcluding the murltul intercst in Ilushund's pcnsion $204,139.02 $1,200.00 pCI' month shall continuc until such time as the shortlhllln thc equitable distribution, pcnsion benefits and counsel fecs due Wilc in tllll total amount 01'$98,436.98 have becn paid in filiI. To sccurc thc distribution due Wile as provided hcrein, Wile shull bc cntitled 10 IIlllortgagc IIgainst thc property at 870 Bird BIlY WilY, Venice, Florida, in thc IImount of $98,436.98. Wife shall providc to Husband a dccd tfllnslerring all hcr right, titlc, and interest in said propcrty to Husband inllccordancc with thc distribution hcrcin only upon receipt by Wife of alllortgllgc in thc amoant 01'$98,436.9810 securc Wile the pllyments due herein, Said mortgagc will be recorded simultancously with the dced to snid property as afirstlicn on thc property. Each pnYlllentmonthly Irom Husband's pcnsion in the alllount 01'$1,200.00 on account ofthc shortfilll ofthc cquitablc distribution, pension payments, IInd counsel Ices will rcduce the principnl hnlancc of the Illortgllge in a like amount. No intcrest will be chargcd on thc mortgage; howcver, should the Internal Revenue Service imputc any intcrcst on thc transaction for which Wife Illny bceomc Iinblc lor payment of incomc tax, said tax lillbility will be added 10 thc principal amount oflhc Illortgage to bc paid by llushund. In the event Ilusband rclhses 10 sign u mortgngc in cxchangc IiII' Ihe deed to the property, the Court directs that a Iicn bc pluced against thc property at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venicc, Floridn, in accordance with thc provisions hcrein. Thc partics nrc dirccted to sign any unl! all doculllcnts neccssary to eflcctuate the transfer of asscts to the party recciving thc asscts as providcd hcrein upon presentation of the appropriatc document for signaturc. Thc crcdit which Wife has received on account of the pcnsion paymcnt Irom date ofscparntion in Junc 1992 is through Junc 1996. Should this cusc bc prolonged beyond June 1996, the amount of $400.00 per month shull continue to accruc from that datc and be added onto the Illllount due Wife and paid back Ilnd sccured liS provided herein. The additional $400,00 pcr month shall begin to accrue July I, 1996, until such timc as a Qualified Domestic Relations Order is entercd in thcse procecdings, 5. Husband shllll pay to Wife the sum of$6,OOO.OO on uccount of Wile's counsel fees and expenses, Thc sUlllof$6,OOO.OO shall bc added to thc shortlilll due Wife in the cquitablc distribution of assets und Wife's portion of the monthly pcnsion henelit from the date of separation through June 1996. Thc total shortlilll with the additional $6,000.00 in counsel fees and costs brings the IImount due Wile from Husband to $98,436.98 which amount shall bc paid in accordance with Paragraph 3 hcreof: Further, thc $6,000.00 owcd to Wile and her IIttorney onllccount of counsel Ices und eosts shall bc add cd to the mortgage againstlhc property lit 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florldu, so Ihllt the totlll amount due on tllllt mortgage shull bc $98,436.98. BY THE COURT: J, , " ['-' ~. ", .--." · (J') I , ~ ~t: j l>J Ul ==' C 0::1: l>Jf- f-Cl:[-< rJj::J W O<Cl>J :>~Un:M l>J;..!iic; Uf-< t'- O::Zn:~ 0-, l>J :>0:;- HUO":: t:l Zll. 0": ~ ?:x: . O~ W ....J:t..J WO:f-<Ul U ~I b: H HOJO~l ~;;:Zo: tt..:J r.::: o U<:' U t " h~ a:~ .. ~Ql~ -'l? . ~ iii~ ::IE'~ ..10> i z f!/Y~ .. ! I 1!t;/fr;;!T l"tl c! Ie. r..:/[ Iff tJl()c5)/tct~. /vl/Js-rck:., {)O/!,( t!;~t:l.1!7tJA c?uOA./71/ (~JU.e TI1CH,/..S'(;- f' I)/~.. l/lI/vOUEJ2 .._)?;- {l./I;r. t. ( ~(( / yJ ,4 ~ I '7 0 / 3 f}tP ; SotS ; J/h:9z'(?(. j?f/ o?t/yI S/;l1lr!t? / S'IJ71(cK. JE"1'~L"/Jr;C'I1./$ /e' /l-;'//s;7~1f'.s A;O()~7' SiR I Ir / j;'r/t){ jl/eJ'f' /Oe;}){!;I(I/(ElJ 1;vI 7if-/ s 11 tit ON I -r /.s l)/l./L.v Rcc'/h);;e- / /u/lJC./;?:~ ~(/12 )/'1 /hZl~ /lJc:.; /:; /ib 4tEC//:I/(. /(Vi!Je'VrL',/ I ;-111-1.)(:: /\/0 -I' ;G~c.,-,u c.)c..J C('c .5s!'uc /hVA. / I'v (){,J ~1'U5/ /L-.'.J;ICc /tIV' {,'- /1 () I~ I -rD ,!J/l err,!.:; (I r MY /;V 7l:;:" t: .';, T S r;)~/& r:bL-~ C;tL...J//t./0' 5;'l1ft- /..,1 ~ AlTs' /-Irt. E- S'u,;; /) 0 /~;r cr!~ ,6) 'I .1-// /Jc! r/ t.d lJoc? I)IV( ~ A./TA 7li,et! Iv II c.~ .( t: /h:"J;J ./ () /-) p. ;-J-;[ " l' ;;:r .AIL//::>/ VA/ I'F J.'~ 7;; 4-' (; /1.-/ t:cA./T - 11 / ,g jt.-I -;;;AJU ~ ~ ;';~/l( P j, c' 1.,/ t:' /) /1 }e'l 7/ Ie! f..l) --;;;;v U /.) ( l"u ,-, OUt -r:' / If ....~ ',/4-'" ') , I IV,. W _ -;}t./L7_ <iff(' ,3t> Yt!fit25 6 /1.-;'05' - P jt:llll' .j.,' I ~.jJ l i- iI// (~ (",...f f~i (' ('.: /1 ,1-'//11:" I.:..' , ~.< d 'l/t u I r 1 tj ? (6'/1/: ,!, ! 1-ff?.5 .. ~ - ~ ~. "t /f?Pz ~ / ;; f _'1 '" /f/'lY ~ /'lP':: ..... ~ /rffb ~ 3 / It t<--f E '7/.t ( /(./ C! ;<.)'7"" /11./ e fJ M~ /1(0, ,#0. 1'I;f-~U.f""~"f..._ ~~ c.'..s :> tY c.:: -r It!JK.-1'1 t)'I..) .~..{II-g'(: ..-<()Il p<;L(,L AS J i:., .:< r;, I r If, f/4 A?10 ;; 51 tjI~1 ~J)7t/ /1 f1 II s1 .?;tY0 IS 57 '1;;1 (~S' )' (30,S: .' - b I ) tJ/ f-E 6" S/.h1fl E: ~ r 1:6 // ~-~J.-IZ=,u-r 1Iz..-rHOUC;Y11 Jue.. S.h~/JJUf7~:t.1 IIU dOAJ'e:- ?),t'- /~fr?'L. " {iJoAJ77I1./J~/J -ro fJ/JV lIt... e., r;;:: MY Wt ,ct:.:s 6.-:;r ;J(,:/l.-'sc.s 7i1tLOc.k;jH O(!.7()L~7L.(};:- /t!t/::{, ~;('E ?&;tL I / PI7([r:;7j -ro 1//"<( /fEd- ~<)j1~c () r: M'I ~,(.)$lt7,u .1-~ ~LL ()(J:5 ; /-?'C/.2. I r; t/3 /rJ fC/ If Ycw.f Iffl> ~ .1./ - ~I :7\ rd.'> (/' /.,~ fi/~':: 8~j /~ N~.5 (1) ~ " ~l / /J Ale.5 CC/> * ~ Ntl,c; ~j '#",,:;:<.:< ~.2, " v?~~ '7rlf) """/l-./f '7/15:' ~"", -= 6 Yf/-- ~ .lyt,Y- ..- ~1 ~1 , -- ''''I p'" h ~ ~?6 - /i'6:? 1/3Y?-- ;:'::1/ ~..tu ~. /~'--.r /Ic:- f; 4.-f~'CJtL(/,Nc:. hn/IIL l)//tJC",L l,V''7t..:/t. (To.A \J ~ ...... ~ t ~ ..g \-- " "Q. t ~ I..t 1 .. -::JC ,f(.~ l :5"7/1-7'"(:;- A- 0tJ/IJ tJo ;t11t() /UM /0/ ,AI~t:./SSR at" JENtlt../J/ /J,f-... ~5 ;JLO/J(!-7l.-rY Iv/1-5- .Jt1I1Vn.V Ibttt!/f71:;-~ IN S~.,,:Jr:. /9 ? 7 /I,S' ~c:7e 77i{;- 1/ /l11/fc-rIb'J /lqeHt!-ft!:.-;U'/~ jJo,.eefl.. fJ/ZIt!.G ~~ / f?~v/:.d~'i.l -r'J-fr=- E-N7//26 ~ot.UAi Jl/lY.M'<51/r 1hv'L1 (3;..C)S )1r.kj Clo...y( ~ 30 00) 1/1./ AI W &i ;:'- Su-s-/ht/.1/E:.s ~/i.CJIW/.sE- -7r) ./'~~..4-V #/fL.t: Cll.:rS'oo) I'N c!.eJtV.s / bC12fi-r10N p;C /f/tL~ ()tu Ny--:;r#1 /J, "!HE ~q~.o 0 ^o/f1lJ aJ/f5 !JrYl/1-t4. 13 3'10 4Ri1 ,81'tV /U/J1I II Gfti I ~ E f-L~ tJq; /~?j- #l~~?OO 7" 5~tf (fhA.J!JO,A.!I/tJ; uu /1fJ;J t'/J1.$Cil rjr.o5S #.G7' .1;-- .. :P- 11(;-~f //;1/ -r /Ie -;k;/hV 1./..:/' "l~J..' rt/ !Z.. " //1 C ; C'PL .:: "7 .,- ;JC:IcJ,c..c I I~ Sd 7/-1t!:IZ (j) J../JI(.~ ~/~~/lLJ6 ACJ/ 7f..J/ t~ ~~duAl Ik "." ~~ - /lfL&: G::,,,;{ V~-V~z1 -/C.,) 7: If / c)/I-r~ ~ IN jJ;2/{.JI!.- PI! ()/J E/ifV <-,-9:::71{ (:/--I {l' j(}( ~ jf.g~/f~~ 't ~~ui -If/193''/. J1w/Ac!CC ~qooo ~ I $, / /JIL-t 's7-t::JC'tt:: /..7-:~ lS/Y/}l2t S - */lS!:>'OMIA.-'G; 9~ 7; A ~/J'J;Ck - I'- :t: {,~JLOt:: #/'-1; (I b ~ 'W. :t \t' .:x.-IlIlNV7/ H-, t?<Olj,<./>"(!;c /l5Su;ttrJ lltJd Q e~ /1/11 {!/I/J /t..t..4e_ 1Zt./J~d/l-IJo fJul!(f..rl. 9177 ~~;{)O ,A, /f/11 1.1 FooT (-I/lI.'/)UCC/6 - AJ/lr I ~/t.te li?i If}) ~'I~/,50Al 0;$ A}I{J~II t/7 / 'j:c-'oO K~1; (lILf)E. !j7;t113cocJ / 6 .. d AtEqlk- F~~s /I - ;tI ~ COcr N e= t1 I eLJ~J'{€ N./1 s 771/J, ..so,S.5.r/J1JTlItL_ ..L:er;/JL Pt!-t::'s I:t;SUI-..'f<:i:. f::;/tJ,t..( t/,V/I;()~I!U IIVn1C.!20c;-/f-/CJL'JG .s: / Ill1Ut;: N er/ t:v~_ i.>~-{!.It!:.v'~ /f ~/$C()lJcey f(Epu~sr ~ R--OM 'l1-t-~ C?-oqlJ€.7f I ,L;;-0 (J f-P/ (!.f; ~" I ,8 /~/5 L.~o/;f}lilll M{jucs' 77irli AEfi/1C fEES !31t./f'1I ~LJo cUN /l-s. Ii) LL OOJ S ; Il Ilv;t;t/~y c1")G;'~ rlt pILL/Air;;:: //7J77(I/ /J /f~dJ ;9;-LUIVCi' _SO !ltr OJ! Ncy ;it: 77/t,lNI!5.' ;9liL//VifS # 67/0, 9.5 b/Z,~D f50t 0 0 ........ /t0tV€-v~~ -rii~ 7II01L!45 /3;LLINcf IS' ;Jor A5S-~--/t177!0 ,wrrl-f W7,~ &JA./~tAlA17/ Pui FoR (!A$"6 ;VO, ,d~"?lr.~- ,- /?'P(! F/c-~ Vt.JLY II /?yz.... /huLf tl//T/f.LS{'//tJN tJIU Nil Y IJ( /C/ff-, ;ilL 7flvNIIS IJlrff4j.,~t:u./ P~C/lU5t::. jt.-(y //7TtJl?././c-V rlLELl /Itt! CG7t:CT!cJ/'I /i1ZC; U/I\/0" 711/J'T fJurW71 ~ "I I ..5"tJ Z 1971/ Alt:. If J SI111f[~!{ / I!.J/15 ;1! 07 A- tfC$/6[:rv--r tIP jJ~//.-11/5'YL )///1L'~/! (1/'/-lt/l/ 1H~ c!l,'/.! flljll/1.1'1 ;ull.5 PIt tl1 f}/fo/l.ltJt-L/S/ -~t3/tlU-,~tJ,,-/ ;JuP'?IE,_)71=ttlflfLr I /v/E!J Net< f1/LccA ;VIe I//_c;{/[J /t}f/.. 7;-ltl1L ~ " ~ t ~ 1 /(LyJ/{E5t'tUrA iitJlf/ IA.J 7711.5 MII'/TC:lC.. If /1 / S -1F!{;. f(J()r2-t.5' tJ!l/IV/t/AJ 7TIA-r / c1!ko{.,t1 &. fJ{tM/ftjZC:zJ H1L_ G;~-;UC!!:urrl;U6, t~Cj /IL f(;~ s. Fit;';?" ~')12-,t. 7/]717- ..-:f/kJVCh tJo-r Illlt/!::: l3~tJ jJt:.Ct-:~:b/Jf1.. y/ /H~xJ ;Jrlouc..AAl?- ~-. R/hIJ-rI~(' A jJe;v/)[jz-eA 10-12, 71it:: ()NtU/lIl/!/JA.Jft:.:~ /-.L~I1L L-;K j)~7IJSE I 1-I/!r.J'E A-13<::)t;)1Z3et:J IN /14'1 iJ~ f~ICJSe o? CIl-Sf:: N'o. ~3 &' 5' -;9y.;J, f /11I a"oS. I'vey I 17 ,J'1ll.-Vc:.-4 &E- NO"f'E1'j -r~ / ~/,Ij 1VCf/ Irt.CIc-U{:. 77iE 1--I/I:;7L~5 15~t?()I2.,l (JAJ71c f j);t.I ?IN 7DES.() I1t( ff8,e. Oir(.!.l( (;,1 /9C/ (.;" lr 7C;"OIC: ,..frV ctrtC: ~51 /!f- c:::r::-/-o7C. 7- '1D fb1t..ft.t t./4/!''7?;c /I ,f! J (J&/'J 5 t:- /J III 4 M 1/7 L / -r WI 7J-r; .<J T If(;;. rf?! IV .LJ 1"1 Y (? ON 5 7 ~ /lolJ /. fJ L e- 11 >~ /rtJ ~J / :5 c I ? 71-1 e:-n.t:. /Ill E:- 1V1271/c:7L yJUC: ::'-71' c...<l,v oS t)12 l1t/t.'UMt AJ7If r; otJ fje9Jt)JI2f!-l~ {-;J~r)L:'6 A~ ~c--y -;;a/V 1, cS}rT/-~ ;{);:!;r.-~ I. _-,. ,_....-/' 11/(/1 c. H '. fl; . "- ..:r ,-~-_.- i' .. ." UJn i.... r!?' -. ,-~ <. .1... '. 'It _I 1.-. (?~ .' tf) '~1'1 ce;: , ; 'ill' [L" , " , J I}... ; ~. , i l,. I' . ) I ( ; '-' LJ " . , - " WIIEREAS, lIerchelroath, in consideration of Sather making payments as aforesaid, agrees that Sather shall have an undivided one-half intorest in the condominium unit together with an un- uivided one-half interest in the common elementsl and . I'/IIEIU,I\S, the parties herete desiro te set forth their respective rights with regards to the cendominium unit and to confirm their understanding in writing. NOW, TIIEIU,PORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto, intending te be legally bound hereby, in consideration of covenants and promises herein centained, and in consideration of the feregoing recitals, which recitals are incorporated by re- ference, as fellows: 1. lIerchelroath hereby acknowledges receipt of the sum of Two 'l'heusand Pive lIundred ($2,500.00) Dellars from Sather which said sum was used te make the down payment for the purchase of a condeminium unit known as 101 Melissa Ceurt, Suite 101, West- woed Village, tegether with an undivided 1. 587% interest in the common element. 2. Sather hereby agrees to pay te lIerchelroath, on or be- fore the lOth day of each menth the sum of One lIundred Ferty- 'l'hree Dollars and perty-'l'wo Cents ($143.42), which said sum shall be applied tewards the principal anu interest of the purchase money mortgage. In audition, Sather agrees to pay to lIerchelroath ene-half ef the monthly conueminium charge imposed by the con- dominium regime together with any annual assessment imposed by the cendominium regime. Sather shall pay one-half of the monthly commen charge on or befere the 10 th uay of each man th. IH th re- gards to an annual assessment imposed by the condominium regime, Sather agrees to pay te Herchelroath one-half thereof within thirty (30) days after receipt ef tho netice ef assessment, Further, Sather agrees to [lay ono-hul( of the applicable roal -2- , ' .... " esta te taxes, insurance, pUblic sewer and other utility charges for the condominium unit. 3. Ilerchelroa th ahall be enti tIed to the interest deduction fOl' tho purchaso money mortgago for federal income tax purposes. . 4. Ilerchelronth shall ve ontltlOlI to take a~l real ostate taxes paid on account of the ownership of this property as a deduction for federal income tax purposes, 5. Ilercholroath hereby acknowledges that Sather has an undivided one-half interest in the condominium unit together with an undivided one-half interest in the 1. 587% of the cOl1unon element. At Sather's option, Ilerchelroath shall, if requested, execute a general warranty deed to him, subject to the purchase money mortgage, for Sather's undivided one-half interest in the condominium unit and the common element. G. With sixty (GO) days' notice to the other party, each party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement. In the event that either party elects to terminate the Agreement, then the other party shall pay to the party electing to terminate one-half of the net equity in the subject property. Net equity shall be determined by fixing the fair market value of the condominium unit to include the undivided interest in the conunon element as of the date of notice to terminate. 'l'he fair market value of the condominium unit, together with the undivided in- tereat in the conmlon element, ahall be as mutually agreed or, if no agreement can be reached, then each party shall ve required to retain a competent appraiser to fix the value of the real e8tate. The average vnlue lJf the two a[>proi80l8 shall bu deemed the fair market value of the subject property. Deducted there- from shall be the balance due on the purchase money mortgage as of the date of election to terminate, Real estate taxes shall be adjusted as of the date of notice to terminate. Further, -3- . . '- seven (7\) per cent shall also be deducted from the fair market value of the propol.ty which said Bum represents real estate broker I s COlllllli8sion and transfer taxes. If the party who did not elect to terminate the arrangement is unable to obtain the neces- . sary funds tu purchaso the interest of the terminating party, " then the property shall be listed for sale with a reputable real eetate company or sold pl'ivately, as the parties agree. In the event of a sale to a third party, then the net proceede derived from said sale shall be divided equally between the parties. 7. Each of the parties hereto agrees that he or she shall execute any and all documents, to include deeds to give full force and effect to this Agreement. B. If either party breaches any provision of this Agreement, the other shall have the right, at his or her election, to sue for damages for such breach, and the party breaching this Agree- ment shall be responsible for payment of reasonable legal fees and costs incurred by the other enforcing his or her rights under this Agreement, or seek such other remedy or relief as may be available to him or her. 9. 'l'his Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties and there are no representations, warranties, covenants or undertakings other than those expressly set forth herein. 10. A modification or waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective only if made in writing and executed with the same formality as this Agreement. 'rhe failure of either party to insist upon strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent default of the same or similar nature. -4- r .. HANS D. KIRSTEN Realtor 8ird Sov Reoltv, Int. MEMBER OF VENICE BOARD OF REAllORS eJ( ffI $-/ r .iJ ~"" ,', .'-~'" '1.1.".\'." . ",.\.r'tJ. -". . . _:-,u '." . FOR ALL YOUR REAL ESTATE NEEDS: _Qs;.l<oper .12,. .199.5...., ..___.._m._______._.________ ..In regard tal Unit t9B,UllUc,ling )3,oird .IJay_U.,. 1l1J'd_...._ ._ Day V i 11age,_a1s.o_'mR~!UI!LIl7Q..!H.r;.LIl!!Y~'!y.' Ven ice.LFl!D._ 34292 Owners Name: Sather Value of unit probable actual neqotiated selling price: $76.000 Gross. less Brokeraqe fee $4,940 (6~), less documentary stamps on deed $532.00. ~ net $70,520.00 not taking into consideration pro-ration's ------- -_._~-- ~------- .- #. ;. Z?~]). - ------.-- Realtor at Bird Bay Realty 15 plUS years I . WE ARE A .. '" COMPUTER ...... ..'.\....'0 fICE\)'... --t 1t:_!, "'t..,.,., ~i " ,.\ " t, ,,~-t!. ,-. :." ');:1 ~~, .':~' ";.l-.~ ;. :. ,'.,. '.' .... , ' Office (813) 485.4804 Q lWUm:n IB REAltOR GII MiS FAX (813) 485-4806 CELLULAR (813) 350-0441 &00 Venice l3y-I',1SS N,. Suile A · Venice, norilld 30\2'.12 ow. 1I " from the sale of said premises, (2) W ire shall be entitled to full title to and possess ion of all Curnil3hin<]s and appliancefJ in the above mentIoned marital dwellil1<J. IIlM(!ver, \'/1(0 shall return to lIusbanu all of his tools st ill rellla il1il1<] in s.:lid marit.al Jwelliny. . (3) lIusbanJ slHlll Ll: entitleu to Cull title lb and possess ion of the boat, motor and tra iler acqu ired by the par ties dur ing their marriage. Wife agrees to execute any docum~nts necessary to have full title to said items vest in Husband. (4) Husband shall be entitled to full title to and possession of the realty acquired by the parties in Adams County, Pennsylvania, to wit: Lot Number 31, Lake Meade, East Berlin, Adams County, Pennsylvania. Wife agrees to execute and deliver to Husband a Deed, and/or any other necessary documents, convey ing to him all her right, title, and interest to said realty. (5)Th is llgreement shall be construed under the laws of the Conll1\ollllNllth cf Pennr,\'lvaniil. If any prov is ion of this Agreement is held to be invallrl or unenfor.ceable, all other provisions shall continue to be in full force and effect. (6) '1'his Agreement shall bind the parties hereto, their respect ive he irs, executors and ass igns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, have hereunto set the ir hands and seals the day and year first written above, (UO, 1 klw' ~s ~~,-W~ ._~_ IS"^"I Hobert <ilier g~(ISEALI Lou se ler (2) JE:;)f Ht I!> / T F . rorm AppfOvl"1I OMO No, 03.R.1I, A. 0, lYrE or LOAN: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT I. L]nIA 2, [] FmllA 3. [] CONV, UNINS. 4, [] VA 0, 0 CONV, INS, SETTLEMENT STATEMENT 0, rilE NUMUEI1: 17' LOAN NUMOEII: 0, MOI1TGAGE INSUI1ANCE CASE NUMUEII: C, NOTE: TI,I, lor", I' IlIrn;s"od "I glvo YOII e ,'n,o",ol/loI o1I:/IInl ""'0"''''11 com. A",oUIII' "eldlO el/dby ,," "lf/,mont e/l'1/1 If' 111011'1/. Iro"" mnrAe" "(I/,O.C,)" were "nM oU/fillo flI. clOfll/g.' r".y ." '''011'1/ "." lor I"'om,,t/ol/" purpo,., .Tld ." not Inc/udtlfll/ ,,,. /rIlnls, Q, NAME OF OQII110WEIl' I NAME or tirt,UII: , NAMI' OE UNOUl: Donald Neil 'l'r lIn te r , .J r . Juhn It. Slither (. SUllunne Theresa W. 'l'rnntcr, Ie Snther, his wife. nlHI The Peoples State Blink husband lInd wife JOlin Suther, single penlln . .", ;. , G, PROPERTY LOCATION: II, SElTLEMENT AQINTl j I. SETTLEMENT DATE: Lot 31, Lake Neade 'j I" Robert G'I,B1g~am, Esq. March 2 , 1984 Subdivision, Reading ',...1 ~,q Twp, , Adams County, PA PLACE OF SETTLEMENT! Clayton R. Wilcox, Esq, t '~." 'l J, SUMMARY OF OOl1nOWEll'S TI1ANSACTlON K, SUMMAnY OF SELLEn's TIlANSACTlUN 100. onoss AMOUNT DUE FnOM uonnDWER: 400, onDSS AMOUNT DUE TO SELLEI1: 101. Con'r.tllll.. prlel fO 000 nn 401. Canlf,cll,lu flrlc. 1 n nnrlnn 102. P,'lon.1 proplflV 402. P,non.1 'UO'JlflV t03. SIIII.mlnl ChlUII110 borrower IIln. 14001 /,7Q nn 403, 104, 404, IDS, 405, Ad/ultm,nfl (Of ",nll p,id hr .tllt' lit ~dr'IIC1' Adjuumrnu fOf it"", p,id br .tllI" in .dr,n" 106, Clty/tawn tU'1 '0 ""'- 406. Cily/1awn IIUI 10......, 107. County tue. '" ) an Q/, 407. Counly lu" 10 ...... /,n 0/. lOB. A.llum.nll '0 / 400. ^ueumenll 10 / 109,<:"hnn1 , 409, C:"hnn 1 / 110. .110, ~ater prorn tiau_____ _----1l..JilL_ ~\'Illter prorlltio11 ',.64 112, 412, /20. GROSS AMOUNT DUE 420, Gf/OSS AMOUNr DUE FROM BORROWER 10,524,58 TO SEl.LEf/ 10,045,58 200. AMOUNTS PAID BY on IN OEIIAlF OF OOnROWEn: 500, nEDUCTIONS IN AMOUNT DUE TO SELLER, 201. Depolit or tlrnen money 1 nnQ,OO -601. Ekeen dellolll (lie Inllruclionsl 202. P,incinll.mount of new 10lnlsl 7'~nn nn 602. S.llIl1lntlnl chlfnella 1,lIe, llin. 14001 1 "lIlR Qn 203. Elillt1ing lalnhlllken lubjcct In 603. Ellilllllg loanhl taken lubiect 10 204, 604. rlynfl allirlllnlJrlgage loin 205, 605. raVol1 of II!cand mOllglge loan 206, 600, 207, 601, 200, OOB. 209, 509, ArfjIJumrnu for itrm, unp,id bV .,~IIt!r AdjuUnlellU fnr i,enll unp,id bV "If" 210. City/town tu" '0 610. City/lown 1111" '0 211. County tuel '0 611. County la.el '0 212. Anenmel1u 10 612, AuennlllllU '0 213, 613, 214, 611, , 215 010, 216, 610, 217, OIl, 210, 61B, - 210, 61B, 220, TOTAL PAID BY/FOf/ 520, TOTAL REDUCTION AMOUNT 1 ,368,90 BORROWER 8,500.00 DUE SELLER 300, CAS" AT SETlLEMENT FRUMlTO OOl1nUI'/EII 600, CASII AT SETTLEMENT TU/FnOM SEllEn 301. Grall o"'ollnl due from hOllower IIUlt' I~UI ~&'~~a~~B, GOl, Olnllll11l0u~1 due 10 ullet Hin'_420L_~ 1f:-%n~~~ 302 leu Imounll Illld 11../101 hOllOoN'" -1~;;2-ii>> 6U2, leu tflflUCllolllln Immllll dUIIII!II"lIinft 62U) 303, CASH ( IJl.FROMI 2,024.58 603, CAS" (l!] TOI 8,676,68 (0 TO) BORROWER (n FROMI SELLER rII, und,nlgnod "".lIy DcA 110 w/tlfg. reeo;", ole comp/.ted copy 01 p.ge, / end 2 01 rill, ""emenl ./lCf.llY .,tec"menl. relerrod 10 herel" OOHOW., ---- --- ---------- 5ell,,_ --- - Borrower - _..+-------- .-.------. --- Sellll -~-+--- ..".t"1111""1 'He " C:lnvn,"""''' ..,.....u '"Ivl iBl\i S'l'OCI{JiOWEll RELATIONS &90 ""dhon Ave""" IleH Vork. New York 100U TRANSFER OF STOCI{ DUlliNG CALENDAR YEAR 1987 JOIIII R DAlliER 101 IIHIn!lA cr ENOLA M 17026 eAH1~/-r (j lnlnl NumbOl' uf Shol'os Ghnlo'ln Un!r.;'il 701 lUll Account 110. &0-'t200-0lU-00 ---- ---.- _.- - ....-.._._.... -_. ..'- -_..__._-- -,~,---_.._. ---.-.----.-- ..--- ------- tt.IUU 0.. lu UUl'~JQI' ltol.\IU Udll, 'hkllhor httUlJ u..lu ttull,har I ""UI' On to U\llTIbOI' of Sh:lI'uS of t.hnl'ol of 5h.,,'ol of Sltnr'us ___ _______ _____.'__n.___ -.---.-.-.- __________ _._______ .4--__ .-----_.!..-.-_- ------ 09/3U/77 I IU/51117 I II/H/77 I 121161.77 1 I2IJUI77 I UUlll/O I UUI&170 1 U2I2U/78 1 03131178 1 U4/1',I10 I OU/IU170 1 05151170 1 06/30178 1 U7I14110 1 00/15118 1 00/31/70 1 09/29178 1 10/131/0 I 11115178 1 11/30170 1 12129170 1 01115119 1 0211&119 1 02120179 1 03/30179 1 0ft/J01/9 I U5126119 29_ 0&/26179 100- 06129179 12 09120119 17 12151119 21 03/31/00 20 06/30/80 r4 09150/80 20 12131100 21 03/31/81 25 06/50/01 2U 09/30/01 26 12131/61 29 03131/02 27 06/30/02 26 09/30/112 24 12131/02 19 113131/03 10 06130103 15 U9/30/03 I" 12130103 JJ 03/30/04 16 06/29/64 16 09/30/04 16 12131104 15 03129/85 JJ 06/20/8S 15 09/30/05 15 12131185 JJ 03/31/86 JJ 06/30/86 JJ 09/30/06 5 tlOTE I III PRIOR VEARS HE HERE REQUIRFU TO REPORT TO TIlE INIEIlIIAL REV[IlUE bERVICE ALL TRAIISrEllG DE STOCK ACQUIRED All ER JAtIUARV 1, 196" TlIROUGII TilE EItI'LOVEtS STOCK PURCIIASE "LAII OR RECElVEO AS A IlESUI.T nE A STOCK SPLIT UIl A STUCK OIVIOEIIU Ir ANV DE TIlE UIIOElll.VUlO SIIARES HEilE ACQUIREO TIIROUGII TIlE Et11'I.OYEES STOCK PURCIIASE PLAN. HE AilE NO LONGER REUUlREO TO SEtlO TIIIS UlrORIIATlllI1 TU TIlE GOVERtltWr our TilE UIIERIIAL nEVEIAlE cuoe STILL REQUIRES TlIAT liE SEIIO TilE WrOlltlAlIUfI TU TIlE STOCKIIULOEIl. M IlldlllntolJ filiI SII:'H'f!1"'. ir....und nil n I'n!~lllt nf n "tuet; 81)lit 01' t.tfwl~ Il1vtdrolUl \':1,101, .'my h"'lI ultlJ8~'lyl"n GIIn"t.!G nCljllil'nd Ul1dlJl' thlJ ]1111 tllploYUll\'il Gturk IIUI'(:II..,50 Ilh," on rH' nrtf'l' .Ji'tflUill'Y 1, 111M.. , /iJM ~1f1/511 f( , 1J!/lAJ5'H;L I~ s:f;;4IL - Iff1 - /;+-'5 ~~~OA.-tc!-tV-r ~kec!r5 7Ht SH-.1IU$ or I ~.J..-I ...'S'ro[.J IL.. IIE..UJ lit! N v /IIA M t.:.. A-'r 77ft!:- t:AJiJ Of- Ie; :11. #t1>'r ()i= 7ilt::'~E St/tlttGS 1Jt:::1LL /2JL'Ctll 1/5 L~ /1 Fr~K!. '-.J/iILl /f7f A'Il/Jl 1J t. fJ I!.c.- ~ C /I./'/ ;VI II- /~ 1 r 1/ L r12.U flt'L1 ry" li/J(,J("~-t.e.. YtJU,(.. ;!7rc/t)7'IVA/ .;Jllot/c., J. 8E .J".~Jcc:'rc'.L1 -/0- 7}f6 IIS7'c'IPI $~66 ~1(II;U5/le7itJ,u5 FUlL '::<1 /hV tJ. /00 S/-f/J72L$' /55 (/t!::zj I AI )4;( Y /f7C, 7Jfr::;;5"E.. ~#ht-E.5 t.U&LC;- /$Sl)/E-IJ /I-s l/f1?r f!)r A- p~()I(_ rtJlC-- tJt1/E. SrtX!'k. .5iL/7: -/I17s' ;UE/I/IJ'- 7H/f7 / gAl lutP/Jt.tJ / SSOE. -r1lL-t:€:: /V~'t(/ 0)-()!r2~ ~/JL C7fc!/-f- Yl-dllE- /~. Cbu5~fXJ&v'TLr /.gA/! / >>uC3.6. . /47' ,;5/IS 70 M~ IN J:~-ca;;;;1/;-oc5W /J~ f3 $5 tP~ /JeE- Sit; r .$rOeEK.. 1Io(b~(AE:lL/ -UI,s{ '/::'oCU,ut:'N,/ ,4-CSJ ~J5 -TltfJ"/ / tVt.;"t!/l7fac..7J F/(/t:: {JI2E-.5Pt.Jr S Ifl) 12.65 /1 f""1t:.A- '/iIr;.;1.-1 111/12/ /lei" G- 111/ J;u~ '79: I;H;/:,~ rcJll~ I I-I&-/J. 3Jf !It::.b'' SIC; r c:511~~ fJ ;e/tJl2 /0 -:r/llt!.: /71, 1JfOSE- 3Y :Sfl/hZES' !3€C?I1J/,!f; /.5,2 S/-I/l72:e;; /I;t:-ro-:< 7;#3 NAY /11f S~tlT SUSANNE K, SATHER, Plainllff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 94.2614 CIVIL TERM . )'~ . vs. CIVIL ACTION . LAW JOHN ROBERT SATHER, IN DIVORCE Defendant RULE TO SHOW CA.USE AND NOW, this !/.:l?1L day of ,Xfl~<"j'"I/", "0, t995, upon consideration of the attached Motion to Quash Subpoena a Rule Is hereby Issued upon Plalnllff, Susanne K. Sather, to show cause why the Subpoena directing Joseph L. Hitchings. Esquire 10 testify on the Plalnllffs behalf althe hearing scheduled for December 28. 1995 at 3:30 p,m. should not be quashed. Rule relurnabte althe hearing scheduled for December 28, 1995 at 3:30 p.m. BY THE COURT, ) IIM"~/,(J ~ ,p.. '- 4<J J, {:-ll r " I ,., t, f" i . '....,_,' , i_ ;'. ~ f .. 003549-OOOO5IDecemb., n. 1995/JLlI/M1I/49314 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Joseph L. Hhchlngs, of the law firm of Johnson, Duffie, Stewart & Weidner, do hereby certify that I served a true and correct copy of the attached Motion 10 Quash Subpoena by Unhed States Mall, first class, postage prepaid, upon the parties tlsted below: Marla p, eognettl, Esquire 132-134 Walnut Street P.O. Box 689 Harrisburg, PA 17108 John R. Sather 870 Bird Bay Way Venice, FL 34292 Date: J ~ - :t ). - q..s exhibit A ..1'..".11'1.'."111....'. It,., ~""llll @ COMMONWEAL I'll OF I'ENfliSYL \' AflilA COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND SUSANNE K. SATHER, Plaintiff v. Filc No. 94-2614 JOHN ROBERT SA TilER Dcfendant SUBPOENA TO: Joseph L. Hitchings, Esq, Johnson, Duftic, Stcwart & Wcidner 30 I Markct Strcet P.O. Box 109 Lemoyne. PA 17043 I. You are ordered by the court to come to the Cumberland County Courthouse, Courtroom #5, 1 Courthouse Square, Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, on Thursday, December 28, 1995, at 3 :30 o'clock, p.m" to testify on behalf of Susanne K. Sather in the above case, and to remain until excused. 2. And bring with you the following, Your tile regarding JOIUl Robert Sather. If you fall to attend or to produce thc documcnts or things rcquircd by this subpoena, you may be subjcctto lhe sanctions authorized by Rule 234,5 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedurc, including but not limited to costs, attorncy fees and imprisonmcnt. ISSUED BY A PARTY/COUNSEL IN CO~IPLlANCE \\1TH Pa,R.C.P. No. 234.2(a) NA~IE: ~l3ria P. Cogncttl. Esquire ADDRESS: 132-134 \\'alnut Street 1',0. Box 689 Harrisburg. I' A 17108 TELEPHO:-':E: (717) 232-2103 SUPREME COUR riD /:27914 , DATE: .,,,>tl.~ j/ Ilj~ \ ' Seal of the Court DY 1'I-IE COURT: L {', I '; -'," :.. ... .. c , ~ ( l 1_ Deput~' OFFICIAL NOTE: This form of~ubpocm\ shall be used whencl'cr a subpocna is issuabl . including henring, in cl1nllcctlor. with dcpnsitions nnd hcliw nrbitratl1rs, mastcrs. cOllllubsilJucrs. 1'1.:, ill clll1lp\iun.:c Ilith Pu,R,C'.I'. No. 234,\, If u Suhpllcna lilr pl'llductklfl of d.lcumcnts, r,'wr.~ .'1 thillgs b lblr,'d, clll1lplctc paragraph 2, ',... ~ 1 , exhibit B OOlH9.0000,rO<tobt, 31, 1991IJLIIIMH/UO~O SUSANNE K, SATHER. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiff NO. 94.26t4 CIVIL TERM vs. CIVIL ACTIOS. LAW JOHN ROBERT SATHER. IN DtVORCE Defendant ()RDER OF COURT I AND NOIV, thll .3 VLday of "'I:d..( lILt.C L, , t99S, upon the Petition of counlet for the : Defendant in the abo\'e referen~ed divorce action. said request for relief is granted and the appearance of Joseph L. I Hitchings, Esquire and the law tirm of Johnson, Duffie. Stewart &: Welliotr, is hereby withdrawn from representation I I of Defendant in the al1o\'e referenced divorce action. I I BY THE COeRT, r lWJ)"I.' ,-. I ulC'" (1'.(0 '.. :J I ~~ I " II " ;I II TRUE COpy FA In TestI'mIly \IihRreof OM RECORD end I~ 3cl.l1 of ~Id C I ~re unlo 59! my ~~nd ?~~_;(: !~da ourt,~ C'..Jrlis/e, fl;! . '(L.1. {. ~;, (J~, " {'fa)' ,,I . ( /.. ..L!... Protnor,.J7.1~y /.:zy. ,I I' I , i I i I I , , I I , OOl5H.OOOOlIO<lob.,] I. 1991IIL\lIMftI~aO:O Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMOS PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PE~~SYLVANIA NO. 94.26t4 CIVIL TERM CIVIL ACTION . LAW SUSANNE K. SATHER, vs. JOHN ROBERT SATHER. IN I.)!VORd]f .; .,..'\: . ,..-:!" . ~~;~ '" -*'...,. -:; :'0 PETITIO.\' TO I\'ITHDR.4 IV AS COUNSEl. 0;;", 't~. z: !>or' ,." '" 3:.;'r. n i=~ ;:~ 11'1 ~ ~r- AND NOW, ~omu tht Pttltloner, Joseph L. Hlt.:hlngs and the law firm ur':'Johnso&. Duftie. SteVo'art & U'1 Weidner, and petitions the Court for allow3J1~e to withdraw as counsel for the Defendant In the above referen.:ed matter, and a\'ers as follows: I Defendant I, l. The Defe..dant. John Robert Sather, Is an adult Individual residing at 870 Bird Bav Wav. Venke. ' -' I I Florida 34292. I i 2. The dil'N.:e a~tlon was Initiated b~' Plaintiff. Susanne K. Sather, who filed a Dl\'or.:e Complaint against: the Defendant on July l. 1992. This Dll'or.:e Complaint was subsequently withdrawn, and a new Divor.:e Complalr.t I was tiled to the above do~ket numbtr on May 16, 1994. I 3, On O.:tober 10, 1995. the Petitioner entered Its at'pearan.:e In the new dlvor~e a::[on 00 behalf of the, Defendant. , 4, On or about April 14. 1995, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Appointment of Muter. A pre-hearing I .:onferen.:e Voas held bei,'re E. Robert EIi.:ker. 111. Divor.:e MJster on June 22. 1995, and a Muter's Hel:ing h3.\ been s.:heduled lor Januar~ 30. 1996, I I 5, On ur abuut September 29. 1995. the Plaintiff tiled a MOllun fur San.:tlons pursu:lllt to Pa,R,C,P, , 1920.33 and 4019. a~ a result of Ihe Defendant's alleged fallurt 10 a':llvely panlclpate In the Instl.1t dilor.:e a.:tlon, I! II I: I! OOI$49,OOOOSIO<lDbcr 31. 1995IJLHIMH'UO~0 I I 1 6, A Rule to SholV Cause was entered by the Honorable J. Wesley Oler. Jr. on September 29, 1995. I providing the Defendant thirty (30) days from the date of service within which to answer the aforementioned MOlion, ! , I 7, Petitioner prepared a draft Answer to the Plaintiffs Motion. which was forwarded to the Defendant' for his re\'iew and signature on or about October 20, 1995. 8. On Tuesday. October 24, 1995. the Petitioner received a telephone call from the Defendant who: advised that he had received the draft Answu. that he did not want the Petitioner to lile the same on his behalf, nor : did he want the Petitioner to further represent him or partidpate in this divorce action as his anorney. 9. Petitioner requested, and Lile Dtfendant agreed tv advise the Petitioner in writi~g of his desire tv I discharge the Petitioner irom representing him in this divorce action, To date, Petitioner has not received said wrinen ' , discharge from Defendant. although Defendant advises he mailed the same on OClober 30, 1995. 10. By lene: dated October 26. t 995. and by telephone conference of October 31. 1995. Petitioner conlirmed Defendant's desire to discharge Petitioner from representing him in the divorce a:tlon. and advised Defendant that a Petition tv Withdraw as Counsel would be filed. t 1, Deiendl:,t advised petitioner he concurs In the Petition to \Vithdraw as Counsel. WHEREFORE, the undersigned requests this Honorable Court to allow Petitioner, Ivseph L. Hitchings. Esquire and the law lirm of Iohnsl'n, Duftie, Stewart & Weidner to withdraw from representation of Defendant In this, dl\'orce action, Respectfully submlned, JOHSSO:-:. DUFFIE. STEWART & WEIDSER Date: frl- ~ 1-15 J.J5eph L. Hltdlin~l Anorney I. D. t'o. 65551 301 Market 5ueel P.O, Bo\ 109 l.em11yne. PA 170n,OlO'J Td~rhllne (7Ii) i6H54J v. I I I I I I I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW SUSANNE KAY SATHER, Plaintiff JOHN ROBERT SATHER, Defendant NO. 94-2614 CIVIL TERM IN REI PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO Pa. R.C.P. 1920.33 AND 4019 MOTION TO MAKE RULE ABSOLUTE ORDER OF COURT this ~o1Lday of November, 1995, upon consideration AND NOW, of Motion to Make Rule Absolute, a hearing is SCHEDULED in this matter for Thursday, December 28, 1995, at 3130 p.m., in Courtroom No.5, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. BY THE COURT, J. Maria P. Cognetti, Esq. 132-134 Walnut Street P.O. Box 689 Harrisburg, PA 17108-0689 Attorney for Plaintiff John Robert Sather 870 Bird Bay Way Venice, FL 34292 Defendant, Pro Se _ C!.-cfuu< m\(\'Lc..l. p./'fI~~' .b. fl. Ire p. U) ~ t}1 iE~ Cl 9-:n ." ," an .. ~)~ t4~~ I - P ~Ci ,', ." ~~ :x ~~ - i .. r-;I ..J EXHIBIT "A" - LIST OF ASSETS MARITAL PROPERTY DATE OF NON,MARITAL ASSET POSSESSOR VALUE VALUATION PORTION LIENS 870 Bird Bay Way Venice, FL Husband Unknown None None 101 Melissa Court Enola, PA Wife Unknown None $2,700.00 . Balance due on Mellon Bank Line of Credit 1987 Cadillac Brougham Wife $3,975.00 5/95 None None US Savings Bonds Husband Unknown None None Nuveen Bonds Husband $15,694.50 6/17/92 None None IBM Stock (100 shares) Husband $9.287.50 5/2/95 None None Nations Bank Checking Ace!. Husband $5,062.94 5/22/92 None None IBM Employees Credit Union Husband $14,626.59 5/31/92 None None IBM Employees Credit Union Husband $337.50 6/1/92 None None KIP Kemper Fund Husband $66,366.96 10/6/94 None Nona Husband's IBM Pension Husband $368,984.95 5/3/95 None None Wife's IBM Pension Wife $38,044.93 5/3/95 $23,587,86 None Wife's Franklin Utilities Fund IRA Wife $16,914.78 12/94 .. None Wife's US IRA Wife $23,372.00 12/94 .. None Wife's Fidelity Investments IRA Wife $9,444.26 12/94 .. None .. Wife believes a portion of these accounts may be non-marital as they were acquired before the parties' marriage. Wife Is allemptlng to locate supporting documentation EXllInIT "A" Week Month Year: (Fill in Appropriate Column) Insurance Homeowners/ Renters 8,25 Automobile 34.00 Life Accident Health other Automobile Payments $ $ $ Fuel 80.00 Repairs Maintenance 40.00 Licensesl Registration 4.17 Auto Club 2.58 Medical Doctor 25.00 Dentist 25.00 Orthodontist Hospital Medicine SUSANNE KAY SATHER, Plaintill' : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. : NO. 94-2614 JOHN ROBERT SATHER, Defendant : CIVIL ACTION - LAW : IN DIVORCE PRAECIPt: FOR WITHDRAWAL/ENTRY OF APPEAltANCE TO THE PROTHONOTARY: Kindly withdraw my appearance on behalf of the Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter. ~~.~ )(~A ~ R. MARK THOMA ,ESQUIRE 54 E. Main Street Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 (717) 697-4650 By: DATED: Kindly enter my appearance on behalf ofthe PlaintilTin the above-captioned matter. i(a{ltic. ~.(C~ . MARIA P. C GNETFI SQUIRE Sup. Ct.\. D. #27914 132-134 Walnut Street P. O. Box 689 Harrisburg, P A 17108-0689 (717) 232-2103 By: DATED: September 12, 1994 .. ~ . . (OINH (LIL) 6890'80ILI ~IIIAIJ.u'>d '8Jnq.\JJ'1l bill) ""I '() 'd mauaU3 a "!"'W J.I \a.'UIO....." , '. . In '" ." /".1 U.> u.) ..... I,' u; ~i . . . 'j .. ~ .~_.., ~ .< c.a ~ . " ... 'i ! II '" eJ~ 'I ~ 8Q.: ill} ~ ~ /G ~ g 'I: - E1> ~ j (OIt'mlLILl 6890'801LI 'IUIAI('UU>d '8JnQ'IJJ'1l . 689 .110' '0 'd !II;'U)10J iJ "!~"\\T JO mum..., ~~.~ ~ ""t,,. "7\:.. -.. . ... ~ ...... .. f;' u. ..... J.l .... - 1\ }.I ....... C ~ 'oJ . , . ,. ~ - '" 'Ii S! II ",!:: ~ r:rs,1'I ~ ~U d ~, Oc.: ill I ::l ! III ~ ~ 'C ~ ~ IS ~ j ( ''::\. \ -'. ./ - "r-\) ...,., fft .U r~,_' '-"'" .;::) ~ --. '-"" ::\- r....... ~. ,,;~ u. c~ ....... ~ , - c.o \'if r-) r-. .:::. . ..... ,-, 4. Defendant has adequate earnings to provide for the Plaintiffs support and to pay her counsel fees, costs and expenses. 5. Plaintiff lacks sullicicnt property to provide for her reasonable needs. 6. PluintilTis unable to support herself through appropriute employment. 7. Defendant has sullicient income and assets to provide continuing support for the Plaintiff. 8. PlaintilTnnd Defendant possess various items of marital property which are subject to equitable distribution by lhis Court. WHEREFORE, Pleintitl' prays this Honorable Court enter an Order making equitable distribution of the marital property and uwarding her alimony, alimony pendente lite, counsel fees, expenses and costs. Respectlully Submitted, /kca ~-iL Maria P. C6gnetti ~ quire Sup. Ct. J.D. #279'14 132-134 Walnut Street P.O, Box 689 Harrisburg, P A 17108-0689 (717) 232-2103 Dated: September 14,1994 12. Section 3505(a) oflhe Divorce Codc provides: "Where it appears to thc Court that a party is about to remove himselfor herselfor his or her property from the jurisdiction ofthc Court or is about to dispose ot: alienate, or encumber property in order to deteat alimony pendente lite, alimony, child and spousal support or similar award, an injunction may issue to prevcnt such removal or dissipation and such property may be attached as provided by the Rules of Civil Procedure. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that this Honorable Court grant the within Petition for Injunctive Relief and enjoin and restrain Respondent from encumbering, dissipating, selling or otherwise alienating any and all marital asscts of the parties. Respcctfully Submitted, . . )/' .-: . / {{L((ll C C LJ:.'Ll "- Maria P. Cognetti, ~s uirc Supreme Court ID# 27914 132-134 Walnut Strcet P.O. Box 689 Harrisburg, P ^ 17108-0689 (717) 232-2103 Dated: (t!14/tl4 .... . ~. .,. ". 15. On September 20, 1994, Plaintiff, through her current eounsel, Maria P. Cognetti, Esquire, tiled thc loll owing documents: Amcnded Complaint under Section 3301(c) or 3301(d) of the Divorce Code; Petition for Alimony, Alimony Pendentc Lite, Counsel Fees and Expenses, and Equitable Distribution; and, Petition lor Injunctive Relief. 16. On September 21, 1994, upon consideration of the Petition for Injunctive Relief, the Court issued a Rule to Show Cause, Rule returnablc in Iifleen (15) days. Defendant did not tile a fornlBl response nor respond in any fashion. 17. On October 6, 1994, upon consideration ofthe Petition for Injunctivc Relief, the Court issucd a corrected Rule to Show Cause, Rule returnable in fifteen (15) days. Dcfendant did not tile a responsc. [The Iirst Rulc to Show to Cause had erroneously transposed Plaintiff and Delendant.] 18. Since Defendant had not tiled any response whatsoever, Plaintiffliled a Motion to make Rule Absolute on November 10, 1994. 19. On November 16, 1994, upon consideration of Petitioner's Petition for Injunctivc Relief and subsequent Motion to Make Rule Absolute, an Ordcr of Court was entered which enjoined Delendant from removing uny funds from any depository, institution or other financiul entity which holds investments or accounts until such time as final resolution of the economic claims involved in the above-captioned divorce action. ~ ., .' . . prepared Pre-trial Statement. Delendant's counsellurther statcs thnt granting such requests would allow the review of "addilionlll information which may not have been brought out at the lirst Pre-triul Conlercnce." Copies oflhese lellers arc attuched hereto und incorporated hcrein us Exhibits "II" und "I". 30. Delendant has been nonexistent for the entire divorce process, has not cooperuted, and has not provided Plaintill'wilh uny type of discovery materials. 31. Considerable time and expense has been expended on the part of the Plaintiff in an attempt to obtain inlbmlation that would have been contained in Defendant's Pre-triul Statement. In an ellbrt to obtuin information, and more specifically, to locate nssets within the Defendant's control, Plaintill's counsel has written the following lellers to people other than the Defendant: a. On September 21, 1994, a letter was written to the IBM Pennsylvania Employee Federal Credit Union. A copy ofthis leller is uttached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "J". b. On September 21, 1994, a letter was written to the U.S. Trust Nuveen Processing, requesting inlbrmlllion on accounts. ^ copy ofthis letter is attached hereto and incorporated herein us Exhibit "K". c. On September 21, 1994, a leller was written to Nutions Bunk, Customer Service Department, requesting information regarding uccounts paid. A . ., .. copy of this letter is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "L". d. On September 21, 1994, a letter was written to KIP-Kemper Financial Services, attention to Shureholders Services, requesting information on accounts. A copy of this letter is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "M", e. On November 9, 1994, a second letter was written to the IBM Pennsylvania Employee Federal Credit Union in order to obtain addition information. A copy of this letter is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "N". f. On November 9, 1994, a Ictter was written to Michael Whitney, Kemper Service Company, rcquesting information on accounts. A copy of this letter is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "0". g. On December 2, 1994, a third letter was written to the IBM Pennsylvania Employee Federal Credit Union, with an cnclosed copies of the November 16, 1994, Order of Court enjoining any removal of lilOds. A copy of this letter is attached hereto and incorporated herein us Exhibit "P". h. On December 2, 1994, a second letter wus sent to U.S. Trust, Nuveen Processing, with an enclosed copy ofthe November 16, 1994, Order of Court. A copy ofthis letter is attached hereto und incorporated herein as Exhibit "Q". .. ... . }o i. On December 2, 1994, a letter was sent to Michael Whitney, Kemper Service Company, with an cnclosed copy of the November 16, 1994, Order of Court. ^ copy ofthis letter is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "R". j. On December 2, 1994, a second letter was sent to Nations Bank, Customer Service Department. with an enclosed copy ofthe November 16, 1994, Order of Court. A copy ofthis letter is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "S". k. On January 12, 1995, a third leUer was written to U.S. Trust, Nuveen Processing, requcsting further information on accounts. A copy of this leuer is aUached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "T". I. On April 21, 1995, a leller was wriUen to Bridget A. Weeks, Kemper Service Company, inquiring as to the released monies of an account which was in joint namcs. A copy ofthis leller is allached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "U". 32. Plaintilrhas been put to considerable expense in the preparation of her casc which would not have beennccessary but lor Delcndant's obstructive and non-compliant behavi'lr. 33. Plaintifl'has becn severely hampered in the prcparation of her casc by not .. ., ~ having had direct access to infonnatlon which was solely In the posscsslon of the Defcndant. WHEREFORE, under the authority of Pa.ItC.P. 1920.33 and 4019, Plaintiff respectlully requests that this Ilonorable Court entcr an Order sanctioning Defendant as follows: a. Prohibiting Delendant from Introducing into evidence any Information or testimony in opposition of Plaintifl's Income and Expense Statement, Inventory and Appraisement, and Pre-trial Statement; b. Refusing to allow Defcndant to oppose Plaint ill's claim pertaining to equitable distribution of marital property and other ancillary economic relief; c. Prohibiting Delcndant from introducing into evidence a Pre-trial Statement, Inventory and Appraisement, and Income and Expense Statement; d. Directing Defcndant to pay Plalntill's reasonable counsel Ices, costs and expenses incurrcd in connection with the excess work creuted by Defcndant's conduct, and in connection with the filing, preparation and disposition ol'the instant Motion and in excess work in the amount of $2,500.00; and, . , . JJa",<<J1:l'dlr( Marin P. CogncUi 132-134 Wolnut Streel 1'.0, Box 689 lIorrlsburg,l'A 17108-01189 (717) 232-2103 Fox (717) 232-5775 rl1,t1c:c !.Indled to "'mlly IIId Maulmonl,ll.,w KARliN A. SIIERlFF lisa' A" 'tlnl MAlliA r.COONIm1' , Fellow. AmcrlclI1 Academy ur Matrlmonlall.lWYCI'1 August 22, 1995 IiENT VIA FIRST CLASS A.tiD CERTIFIED MAIL John R. Sather 870 Dird Bay Way Venice, FL 34292 RE: Sather v. Sather Dear Mr. Sather: As you know from previous documentation, your divorce hearing is set before Master Elicker for Thursday, October 5, 1995,10 begin at 9:00 a.m. in his office. Please be advised that on that date we plan to presenl teslimony and evidence along the lines 01' the swom statement 01' facls which I have forwarded for your review and information. If you would plan to contest the facts as sel forth inlhat slatement, you should contact Master Elicker immediately and advise him 01' your posilion. If the Master does not hear from you to the conlrary, it is very likely Iltnt he will accept our statement of the facts as Irue and correct and enter an Order along Ihose lines. Thcrcforc, it is very imperative for you to have some input in this process. This can be done, as 1 have said above, by written communication with Master Elicker. You can wrile 10 him al9 North Hanover Street, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013. I would grcatly appreciale il if you would copy any such correspondence to me as well. We will look forward 10 hearing from you in this regard. Vc~ Iruly your~/-.:+/, /t(cudf. &~1l-t L~ MarinI'. cjigncI~) MPC/kl11 Enclosure cc: Master Robert Elicker (w/cnc.) Susanne Sather (w/o enc.) "~,-..~'~.~. ......:7 /' . "'-.- " ~. 0( . REeF' ~ED APR 1 3 1~ OFFICE OF DIVORCE MASTER CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 9 North Hanover Streel Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 240'6535 E. Robert Elicker, " Divorce Mosler Tracl"o Colver April 12, 1995 Olllee Maneger/Reporter Maria P. Cognetti Attorney at Law P.O. Box 689 Harrisburg, PA 1710B-0689 RE: Susanne Kay Sather vs. John Robert Sather No. 2614 civil 1994 In Divorce We.t Ihore 697-0371 Exl, 6535 John Robert Sather 870 Bird Bay Way Venice, Florida 34292 Dear Ms. cognetti and Mr. Sather: By order of Court of President Judge Harold E. Sheely dated April 5, 1995, the full-time Master has been appointed in the above referenced divorce proceedings. A divorce complaint was filed on May 16, 1994, raising grounds for divorce of irretrievable breakdown and the economic claim of equitable distribution. On September 20, 1994, an amended complaint in divorce was filed averring that the parties were separated for a period in excess of two years, No date of separation was stated in the complaint, On January 9, 1995, an affidavit under section 3301(d) was filed by the Plaintiff averring that the parties have been separated since June 17, 1992, a period in exceES of two years. Therefore, grounds for divorce are apparently not at issue. In addition to the economic claim of equitable distribution, which was raised in the complaint, the Plaintiff filed a petition on September 20, 1994, raising additional economic claims of alimony, alimony pendente lite, and counsel fees and expenses. The petition also raises equitable distribution but, as noted, that count was previously raised in the complaint, . SUSANNE KAY SATHER, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs. NO. 2614 CIVIL 1994 JOHN ROBER SATHER, Defendant IN DIVORCE RE: Pre-Hearing Conference Memorandum DATE: Thursday, June 22, 1995 Present for the Plaintiff, Susanne Kay Sather was attorney Maria p, Cognetti and her law clerk Michelle Stokes. The Defendant, John Robert Sather, has not had any counsel appear on his behalf in the action nor has there been any communication from Mr. Sather in response to the pleadings filed and in response to the Master's notice to file pre-trial statements or appear at today's conference, The parties were married on January 12, 1979, and separated on June 17, 1992, A divorce complaint was filed on May 16, 1994, raising grounds for divorce of irretrievable breakdown of the marriage and the economic issue of equitable distribution. Subsequent to the filing of the complaint the Plaintiff filed additional economic claims of alimony and counsel fees and expenses. Wife has also filed an affidavit under section 3301(d) of the Domestic Relations Code averring that the parties have been separated since June 17, 1992, a period in excess of two years. Therefore, the divorce can proceed on the basis of the parties having been separated for a period in excess of two years, There are no children born of the present marriage although wife has one child to a prior marriage and husband has three children to a prior marriage. Neither party is contributing to the other party any support or alimony pendente lite. Wife is 48 years of age and resides at 101 Melissa court, Enola, Pennsylvania, where she lives alone. According to her pre-trial stat~ment the property is subject to a lien in favor of Mellon Bank in the approximate amount of $2,700.00. We will need to have a current payoff of that lien close to the date of the hearing, Wife is a high school graduate and has taken some college courses, She is currently employed with Reager & Adler, P.C. as a closing coordinator and has a biweekly gross income of $896.92. Wife has no other sources of income . . other than som~ interest which she may be earning on liquid asset accounts, Wife does not complain of any health problems. Husband is 63 years of age and resides at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida. We do not know whether he is living with anybody at the present time. He is a retired manager from IBM, his retirement having occurred in 1986. Husband is a high school graduate and also has had some college courses. He has a monthly pension of $2,614.47 and also receives social secuirty monthly although we do not have that amount at thls time. We have no evidence that husband is experiencing any health problems. Wife owns the property at 101 Melissa court, Enola, Pennsylvania, in her name only and according to her counsel that property was owned by wife prior to the marriage and, therefore, is premarital proeprty. We are, consequently, looking to the increase in value of the property from date of marriage to date of separation in doing the equitable distribution computation. The property, however, at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida, is in joint names, and we will need to have a value established for that property for the equitable distribution computation. Wife on her pre-trial statement has listed various items of marital property which include a 1987 Cadillac Brougham vehicle. Aside from that partiCUlar tangible asset, all of the other assets listed in wife's pre-trial statement (except for the real estate), are liquid assets inVOlving interest in savings bonds, stocks, accounts, pension plans, and IRAs. with respect to the pensions and wife's IRAs there is a possibility that a portion of each of those particular assets were acquired by one of the parties prior to the marriage, and, therefore, we need to determine what portion of those assets are ma~ital, For instance, with respect to husband's pension, we will need to have counsel provide a coverture formula to determine what portion of that pension was earned during the marriage of the parties, Another issue with regard to the pension of husband is that he has been receiving his pension since 1986, but more importantly to our particular economic situation in resolving this case, is that he has been continuing to receive the pension since the parties separated in June 1992, Therefore, a portion of those payments received since the parties separated would be attributed to wife's interest and wife will be entitled to some reimbursement for her interest in the monthly pension payments which husband has been receiving totally. Wife's counsel is going to prepare a statement of . wife regarding the factors in the Divorce Code relating to equitable distribution, identification of assets, and values or assets and have that statement prepared and sent to Mr. Sather and to the Master, At the time of the hearing which will be scheduled, wife and her counsel and any supporting witnesses will appear and testify to the information contained in the statement. Based on that testimony, if we do not have a response from Mr, Sather and participation from him in the case and his statement on the record at the hearing, we will proceed on the basis of tho information presented by wife's testimony to make findings of fact and recommendations in resolving the economic claims. wife's counsel is also requested to prepare a statement of a proposed resolution of this case taking into account the various assets, values of those assets, and who may have received the benefit from assets prior to the date of the hearing, For instance, it is alleged that husband has taken considerable amounts of money from marital assets and converted those assets to his own benefit and use. specifically one account we are aware of that such a withdrawal has occurred is the Kemper Fund. According to information wife's counsel has presented, husband made two $25,000.00 withdrawals from that fund receiving a total of $50,000.00 of marital assets. The Master has suggested that with regard to any shortfalls which wife may have experienced as a result of husband's conversion of assets to his own name, that we will have to look to the pension to make up those shortfalls and also to the real estate in Venice, Florida, which is owned in joint names, Counsel for wife has indicated that she will probably withdraw her claim for alimony. A hearing is scheduled for Thursday, October 5, 1995, at 9:00 a,m, Notices will be sent to counsel and the parties. (~ E. Robert Elicker, II Divorce Master CCI Maria P. cognetti Attorney for Plaintiff John Robert Sather Pro Se HOMCE A. 10HN~ON IEIlIl Y Il DUFFIE IlICH^1l0 W. ~TEW^IlT C. 1l0Y WEIDNEIl. III EOMlIND G. MYEIlS '^MES A. 10HNSON D^VID W. D,LUCE M\.PH H. WIlIGHT, Ill. D^VID I. lANU lO~EPH L. HITCHINGS lAW OFFICES JOHNSON, DUFFIE, STEWART (/ WEIDNER 301 MARKET STREET P. O. BOX 109 LEMOYNE, PENNSYLVANIA 170043.0109 t(Q)~r l1LEPHONE 717,761-4540 l1UCOPlEI\ 717.761,30IS September 6. 1995 .1 E. Robert Elicker. III. Esquire Office of Divorce Master 9 North Hanover Street Carlisle. PA 17013 Re: Susanne K, Sather v. John R, Sather No. 2614 Civil t994 In Divorce Dear Mr. Elicker: Please be advised this firm has been retained to represent Mr. Sather with regard to the above referenced divorce action. I am in receipt of an Order scheduling a Master's Hearing before you for October 5. 1995. Mr, Sather will be out of the country the entire month of September. thereby preventing proper preparation for the October 5" hearing. Accordingly. I am writing at this time to request a continuance of the Master's Hearing so as to enable me to meet with Mr. Sather and prepare and submit a pre-trial statement. We also request that you schedule a pre-trial conference to review Mr. Sather's pre-trial statement. I have spoken with Ms, Cogneni, counsel for Mrs. Sather. who advises that she opposes any such continuance. and will object to a pre,trial statement tiled on Mr. Sather's behalf. It Is our position that allowing Mr. Sather to file a pre,trial statement. and scheduling an additional pre-trial conference. will enable yourself and Ms. Cogneni to review additional information which may not have been brought out at the first pre,trial conference. I sense from my client that he would ultimately like to see this case senled, and allowing the pre,trial statement amI scheduling an additional pre-trial cOllference could facilitate a resolution of all economic issues without the need for a hearing. Please advise me of your decision on our request. Very truly yours, JOHNSON. DUFFIE. STEWART & WEIDNER Joseph L. Hitchings JLH:mh:46476 cc: Marla Cl1gneni. Esquire John R, Sather - 'J'aEPIIONIl (117) 232-2103 .Atl' ~N ,y MiU'ia P. Cogllctti 132,134 Walnul Slreet P. O. Box 689 Harrisburg, PA 11108-0689 TE1.ncoPlER (111) 232-5715 September 21, 1994 U.S. Trust Nuveen Processing 7th Floor 770 Broadway New York, NY 10003 RE: SUSANNE SATHER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 202-36-6103 Dear Sir or Madam: I represent Susanne Sather. I have enclosed a photocopy of an authorization whieh I received from her permiuing the release of information regarding any accounts maintained in her name alone, or in her name with another individual. I am requesting that you provide me with the following information, as of June 17 1992 through the present: 1. Type of account. 2. Title of account. 3. Date or opening account. 4. Opening baluncc. 5. Value or account on June 17, 1992. 6. Prescnt valuc or account. - .. . . ." .A'{I ~N r/ Maria P. Cognctti 132,134 Walnut SlrcC( 1'. O. nux 689 Harrisburg,l'A 17108,0689 '\'I!UlcoPIBR (717) 232,S77S TELEPIIONB (717) 232-2103 September 21, 1994 Nations Bank Customer Service Department P.O. Box 25118 Tampa, FL 33622-5118 RE: SUSANNE SATHER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 202-36-6103 Dear Sir or Madam: I represent Susanne Sather. I have enclosed II photocopy of an lIuthorization which I received from her permitting the relellse of infommtion regarding any accounts maintained in her name alone, or in her name with IInother individual. I am requesting that you provide me with the following information, as of June 17, 1992 through the present: \. Type of account. 2. Title of account. 3. Date of opening account. 4. Opening balance. 5. Value of IIccount on June 17, 1992. 6. Present value or account. \. \,- ..--A'~~! -. IF@Uti 'Y1@ll!Jli\J UIJi]If@Uti!Nl~'U'[J@1iIl 11/13/95 DATE ____.___._________ FILE NO. Suther R.: .__,__~.__.'''. [J P.r yourr.qu.st o P.r our discussion on .. .---~-_..__.__._.__.._._"_.- _._--_._.~._--_.._~--_.__...~-_.. v. Suther Encloeed lor your Inform.Uon: Pleuse fl ud your copy of Joseph HitchInlls' ---_._.~-------------_._-- PetItion to Withdrow os Couusel in the obove- [) To upd.t. you In th. progr.n of this m.lI.r, (R.t.ln for lulu.. ref.renc.1I d..lr.d,) ---,+------ _._...-------~._--_....,.-----_.._----_.__. referenced mutter. ---_.._--_._-~---~------_.- Pl.... conl.ct thl. office II you h.ve eny que.Uon. or require en appolntm.nl to dl.cu..lhe enclo.ed mat.nal.. To: IE. Roberl Elicker, EsquIre "I Divorce Huster Cumberlund COunty 9 N. Hunover Street Curlisle, PA 17013 L .J LAW OFFICES OF MARIA P. COGNETTI \32.13. WALNUT STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1188 HARRISBURG. PA m08-01188 TelEPHONE: 11171232.2103 ,aRN 1110 -.-.""....,."*".,.. . i . , . . . - - _. . OO:J'549.oGOOS/Oclobcr 31. 1995IJLllIMHI48020 6. A Rule to Show Cause was entered by the Honorable J. Wesley Oler, Jr. on September 29, 1995, providing the Defendantthlny (30) days from the date of service within which to answer the aforementioned Motion. 7. Petitioner prepared a draft Auswer to the Plaintiffs Motion, which was forwarded to the Defendant for his review and signature on or about October 20, 1995. 8. On Tuesday, Octoher 24, 1995, the Petitioner received a telephone call from the Defendant who advised that he had received the draft Answer, that he did not want the Petltloner to file the same on his behalf, nor did he want the Petitioner to funher represent him or panlcipate In this divorce action as his allomey. 9. Petitioner requested, and the Defendaut agreed to advise the Petitioner In writing of his desire to discharge the Petitioner from representing him in this divorce action. To date, Petitioner has not received said wrillen discharge from Defendant, although Defendant advises he mailed the same on October 30, 1995. 10. By leller dated October 26. 1995, and by telephone conference of October 31, 1995, Petitioner confirmed Defendant's desire to discharge Petitioner from representing him In the divorce action, and advised Defendant that a Petition to Withdraw as Counsel would he tiled. 11. Defendant advised Petitioner he concurs in the Petition to Withdraw as Counsel. WlIEREFORE, the undersigned requests this Honorable Coun to allow Pel It loner, Joseph L. Hitchings, Esquire and the law firm of Johnson. Duffie, Stewart & Weidner to withdraw from representation of Defendant In this divorce action. l Respectfully suhmllled, JOHNSON, DUFFIE, STEWART & WEIDNER Date: In- '!., "1 :> B' Joseph L. Hitchings Allorney I.D. No. 65551 30 I Market Street P.O. Box 109 Lemoyne, PA 17043-0109 Telephone (717) 761-4540 Lr> 0"') ,. - .t ).- - "r'-; ~ '-' rl ('Y) c::::> . ... <.) ,'\''- = ... ......~.illlJ..~~ '~." j.J.?'..;,....~.,/~i;"'.j.~~.-~.6-.';(,-~:.t..,~,~.g\'~.~..i'.:~.\~.'.'~;.~~~;.~f'. 'ltl ~'!"""<>"I?l$c~il<-~, , '"~ )~i~~)'~,~~:}.'~?i;t?J{~.~:i;1{t'~0~ 1"'f;f!r;;/~','^"",~,~~'.' ... 1m ' .f+~'"r"~.,-t,. :'~ii:V~l,,'i>',;.r1'i" ., . -" , ,~]1~~t~~U~)1I~~:!i/; ~-\:V-,\~;'/f;f!y,~t~~(~'E{~~i!:~.:r'JI " -~, SUSANNE K. SATHER, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 94.2614 CIVIL TERM Plaintiff vs. JOHN ROBERT SATHER, CIVIL ACTION - LAW IN DIVORCE Defendant RULE TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOW, this ~day of -1>, t. ...L.. eJ , 1995, upon coll5lderatlon of the attached Motion to Quash Subpoena a Rule Is hereby Issued upon Plaintiff, Susanne K. Sather, to show cause why the Subpoena directing Joseph L. Hitchings, Esquire to testify on the Plaintiff's hehalf at the hearing scheduled for December 28, 1995 at 3:30 p.m. should not be quashed. Rule returnable at the hearing sch~'l1uled for December 28, 1995 at 3:30 p.m. BY THE COURT, tI "AJ',;.f } uJ I,- .Y I . C[~,'litc~(f' .N\\} ,}y~ ~ J1J f mID .O::F1CE OF TI'f: riiTI'C'::OTfoJ'\Y 95 o:c 21 nl II 11'/ CU""J" r 'I ":'. '~,""UNlY lIlt \.IIJ~'oL1 v"; l [I'"'' IC'II\"'\I:^ L.I~I'1v . I I, 003549-OOOO5/Dcccmbcr 22, 19951ILH/MH/49314 .. Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 94-2614 CIVIL TERM CIVIL ACflON - LAW SUSANNE K. SATHER, vs. JOHN ROBERT SATHER, IN DIVORCE Defendant MOTION 7'0 QUASH SUBPOENA The Movant, Joseph L. Hitchings, Esquire, of the law firm of Johnson, Duffie, Stewart & Weidner, respectfully moves the Coun pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. No. 234.4(11) for an Order quashing the Plaintiff's Subpoena for the following reasons: 1. The case is scheduled for a hearing on December 28, 1995 at 3:30 p.m. In Cumberland County Court. On December 14, 1995, Plaintiff, Susanne K. Sather, issued and served a Subpoena on Joseph L. Hitchings, to appear and testify on Plaintiffs behalf and to bring with him the following: "Your file regarding John Robert Sather." A true and correct copy of this Suhpoena Is attached hereto as Exhlhlt "A". 2. The Movant, Joseph L. Hitchings, Esquire, was counsel of record for the Defendant, John Robert Sather, In the above captioned divorce action pursuanlto an entry of appearance filed October 10, 1995. This representation was withdrawn pursuant to an Order of Court signed by the Honorable 1. Wesley Oler, Jr. dated November 3, 1995. A true and correct copy of the Ordcr of Coun and Petition to Withdraw as Counsel Is attached hereto, Incorporated herein by reference and marked as Exhibit "B". 3. As a result of the allorney client relatlunshlp previuusly entered Into between the Movant and the Defendant In this action, any testimony rendered by the Movant would necessarily Involve confidential matters arising out of his position as former counsel of the Defendant. 4. The Movant has informed the Dcfendantof the hcarlng set for Dccember 28, 1995 as well as the fact that he had been subpoenaed to bring his file on this case and to testify on behalf of the Plaintiff. The Defendant has 003549-OOOO51Dcccmbcr 22, 19951JLH/MH/49314 CERTIFICATE OF SBRVICE I, Joseph L. Hitchings, of the law firm of Johnson, Duffic, Stewart '" Weidner, do hereby certify thll I served a true and correct copy of the attached Motion to Quash Suhpoena by United States Mall, first clan, postqe prepaid, upon the parties listed below: Marla P. Cognelll, Esquire 132.134 Walnut Street P.O. Box 689 Harrisburg, PA 17108 John R. Sather 870 Bird Bay Way Venice, FL 34292 Date: .I ~ - :t ), - q..s exhibit A Exhibit B OOH49.0000sI0~lobcr 31. 199s/JLH/MH/480~O '. Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 94.2614 CIVIL TERM CIVIL ACTION . LAW SUSANNE K. SATHER, vs. JOHN ROBERT SATHER, IN elVORcfif .; "'T:' 1:' I I ,..,1" . ;r:~':,-: e;~;t~ PETITION TO W1THDRA W AS COUNSEL ~~] ~ ~ ,.~~~~l" :g ~~ AND NOW, comes the Petitioner, Joseph L. Hit~hings and the law firm'l1(;;Johnsoc. Duffie, Stewart & VI Weidner, and petitions the Court for allowance to withdraw as counsel for the Defendant In the above referenced malter, and avers as follows: Defendant 1. The Defendant, John Robert Sather, is an adult Individual residing at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida 34292. 2. The dil'or~e action was Initiated by Plaintiff, Susanne K. Sather, who filed a Divorce Complaint against the Defendant on July 1. 1992. This Divorce Complaint was subsequently withdrawn, and a new Dl\'orce Complaint was tiled to the above do~ket number on May 16, 1994. 3. On O~tober 10, 1995. the Petitioner entered its appearan~e in the new divorce action on behalf of the I Defendant. 4. On or about April 14. 1995, Plaintiff tiled a Motion for Appointment of Master. A pre-hearing I conference was he!.! l>dore E. Robert Ellcker,l\I, Divor~e ~Iaster on June 22, 1995, and a Master's Hell'ing has been I s~heduled for lanuary 30, 1996. I I 5. On or about September 29, 1995, the Plaintiff tiled a Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. i 1920.33 and 4019. a~ a result of the Defendant's allege.! failure 10 actl\'ely paniclpate In the Instant dil'orce action. I I , 003549.0000s/0Clobcr31. 199s/ILHiMHi480Z0 '. . . . VERI FICA TION I f.' ri, I, Joseph L. Hlt~hlnlls, verify that the slatements made In the forellolnll Petition to Withdraw as Counsel are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, Information and belief. 1 understand that false statements herein are made SUbJM to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. 14904 relatlnllto unsworn falsification to authorities. Date: In. ?f. 7 s 1.. I Joseph L. Hitchings (~ ... ~ M 1;; .1 - II a~ - ~., - ,- - ~~! U.'11 :<: Q;"i (I ". N ~ .U) ~ r: I,. Ll. N i) ~ ~ a .l' ! <-, 1,1(,1 r; Ld u:;c.. C-l ::; <t ~- In ) (ll t) I I t , . LAW OFFICES OF MARIA P. COGNETTI 132-134 Walnut Street P.O. Box 689 Harrisburg, PA 17108-0689 (717) 232-2103 INVOICE 112409 November 1, 1995 SUSANNE SATHER 101 MELISSA COURT ENOLA PA 17025 CLIENT II 291 MATTER II 324 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH OCTOBER 31, 1995 RE: DOMESTIC RELATIONS FEES Matter: 324 Oct 03/1995 Oct 03/1995 Oct 03/1995 Oct 06/1995 Oct 06/1995 Oct 10/1995 Oct 19/1995 DISBURSEMENTS t~atter: 324 Oct 01/1995 Oct 09/1995 Oct 31/1995 DOMESTIC RELATIONS Conference with Attorney Office conference with Attorney Letter to Prothonotary Telephone conference with client Letter to Attorney Telephone conference with client Telephone conference with client Fees This Invoice $354.00 postage Photocopies 2.93 10.00 DOMESTIC RELATIONS Billing error Disbursements This Invoice $12.93 ------------ Total Fees and Disbursements $366.93 $691. 50 Prior Balance ------------ Receipts/Retainer Applied to Prior Balance $691. 50) LAW OFFICES OF MARIA P. COGNETTI 132-134 Walnut Street P.O. Box 689 ~ Harrisburg, PA 17108-0689 (717) 232-2103 INVOICE 112296 October 1, 1995 SUSANNE SATHER 101 MELISSA COURT ENOLA PA 17025 CLIENT II 291 MATTER II 324 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH SEPTEMBER 3D, 1995 RE: DOMESTIC RELATIONS FEES Matter: 324 DOMESTIC RELATIONS Sep 01/1995 Telephone conference with client; telephone conference with Attorney Sep 11/1995 Review correspondence from Master Sep 13/1995 Research and preparation of Motion for Sanctions Sep 14/1995 Review Motion for Sanctions Sep 19/1995 Review Petition Sep 26/1995 Telephone conference with Master Sep 27/1995 Preparation of Motion for filing Sep 27/1995 Review Petition Sep 27/1995 Telephone conference with Attorney Fees This Invoice DISBURSEMENTS Postage Photocopies 12.00 67.00 Disbursements This Invoice Total Fees and Disbursements Prior Balance Receipts/Retainer Applied to Prior Balance Amount applied from Retainer This Invoice $612.50 $79.00 $691.50 $0.00 $0.00) $0.00) LAW OFFICES OF MARIA P. COGNETTI 132-134 Walnut Street P.O. Box 689 Harrisburg, PA 17108-0689 (717) 232-2103 INVOICE 111435 February 1, 1995 SUSANNE SATHER 101 MELISSA COURT ENOLA PA 17025 CLIENT II 291 MATTER II 324 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH JANUARY 31, 1995 REI DOMESTIC RELATIONS FEES Matter I 324 Jan 04/1995 Jan 04/1995 Jan 05/1995 Jan 05/1995 Jan 10/1995 Jan 11/1995 Jan 26/1995 Jan 27/1995 DISBURSEMENTS Matten 324 Feb 01/1995 DOMESTIC RELATIONS Prepare Income & Expense Statement; telephone conference with client Organize financial information for Inventory & Appraisement Letter to Defendant; letter to Prothonotary Prepare Pre-Trial Statement Prepare Inventory & Appraisement Finalize Inventory & Appraisement; telephone conference with client; letter to Nuveen Trust Telephone conference with bank; telephone conference with client Telephone conference with client Fees This Invoice $400.00 DOMESTIC RELATIONS Disbursements This Invoice $0.00 -..---------- Total Fees and Disbursements $400.00 $0.00 Prior Balance LAW OFFICES OF MARIA P. COGNETTI 132-134 Walnut Street P.O. Box 689 Harrisburg, PA 17108-0689 (717) 232-2103 INVOICE #1342 January 1, 1995 SUSANNE SATHER 101 MELISSA COURT ENOLA PA 17025 CLIENT # 291 MATTER # 324 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1994 RE: DOMESTIC RELATIONS FEES Dee 27/1994 DOMESTIC RELATIONS Review correspondence Review correspondence from Kemper Telephone conference with client Letter to client; preparation of Plaintiff's 3301(d) Affidavit and Defendant's Counter Affidavit Letter to client Matter: 324 Dee 09/1994 Dee 20/1994 Dee 22/1994 Dee 22/1994 Fees This Invoice $202.00 DISBURSEMENTS Matter: 324 Jan 01/1995 DOMESTIC RELATIONS Disbursements This Invoice $0.00 ------------ Prior Balance $202.00 $0.00 Total Fees and Disbursements ------------ Receipts/Retainer Applied to Prior Balance Amount applied from Retainer This Invoice ( ( $0.00) $202.00) $0.00 TOTAL DUE LAW OFFICES OF MARIA P. COGNETTI 132-134 Walnut Street P.O. Box 689 Harrisburg, PA 17108-0689 (717) 232-2103 INVOICE #1231 November 30, 1994 SUSANNE SATHER 101 MELISSA COURT ENOLA PA 17025 CLIENT # 291 MATTER # 324 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH OCTOBER 31, 1994 RE: DOMESTIC RELATIONS FEES Matter: 324 Nov 07/1994 Nov 07/1994 Nov 08/1994 Nov 09/1994 Nov 10/1994 Nov 14/1994 Nov 21/1994 Nov 29/1994 DISBURSEMENTS Matter: 324 Nov 09/1994 Nov 30/1994 DOMESTIC RELATIONS Review Interrogatories Preparation of preliminary analysis of assets; lengthy telephone conference with Kemper; letter to Kemper; letter to IBM; telephone conference with client Telephone conference with client Preparation of Motion to Make Rule Absolute File documents with Court Review 91 and 92 tax returns. Review Court Order. Letter to Kemper, IBM, Nation's Bank and U.S.Trust; letter to Defendant. Fees This Invoice $465,50 DOMESTIC RELATIONS Fax Transmission 5.00 Disbursements This Invoice $5.00 ------------ Total Fees and Disbursements $470.50 $0.00 Prior Balance the summer of 1991, Mr. Sather did not speak to me for IImt entire summer, approximately 2 months. At that time we had an argument over my son from my prior marriage. My husband had not spokcnto my son for a pcriod in cxccss oftwo years. Howcvcr, atthc cnd of that summcr Mr. Sather asked mc to rcturn to Florida, which we always did at that timc ofycar. Sincc hc appcarcd to have determincd that things were back to nonnal, I agrccd to rcturn to Florida with him. At Christmas limc howcvcr wc oncc again camc back to thc Pcnnsylvania arca lor the holidays. Things wcrc once again bad bclwccn my husband and my son, Mark. (Mark Iivcd inthc homc in Pennsylvania whilc wc were in Florida cach year.) Howcvcr, at the cnd ofthe Christmus holiday that ycar I did in fact once again return to Florida with my husband. Things wcrc linc as long us I would not rock the boat. In June of 1992, wc once again rclurned to Pcnnsylvaniu. Atthut time, we had not cven becn home two days when he startcd in on Mark immediatcly. Hc told me that hc want cd Mark's belongings rcmoved from thc shcd. Sincc hc was still not spcaking to Mark, it bccamc my obligation to convcy this to Murk. When thc itcms wcrc not rcmoved from the shed by the next day, he directed me to throw my son ont of the housc. I did in filct convcy this to Mark out of a fcar that Mark and my husband might hurt cllch olhcr. Mark thcn packcd his belongings and did in factl110vc oul. I was hystericlIl utthllt point. (livcd with this dccislon for about two days. Ilhcn askcd my husband to go bllck to Floridll without me. Hc acquiesced and removed himself Irom the Pennsylvllnia home soon therealler. We have not seen elleh other sinee Ilmt dllY. 4. On or ahout July I, 1992,1 contacted un ullorlley and tiled for divorce here in Cumberlllnd County. Duc to proccdurul problems (hilt Divorec Complaint was eventually withdruwn on May 16, 1994 IInd a second Complaint was tiled on that same date. The Divorce Complaint was thcllllmcnded on Septcmber 20, 1994. Finally, a Motion for Appointment of a Master was Iiled on April 4, 1995. 5. With regard to the relevllnt lilcts of this case, they arc liS follows: - Mr. Sather IInd 1 have been marricd lor a period of approximlltely 16 years. - This was II second marriage lor both of us. My tirst marriage lasted approximately threc yellrs and Irom tlmtmarriagc 1 have my son, Mark, who is 26 years of age. That marriage ended in divorcc. Mr. Sathcr was likewise marricd previously and I belicvc his prior marriagc may havc lasted approximlltely 20 ycars. Fromlhat marriagc he has thrce children: Kevin, age 38; Glcn, approximutely 33 or 34; and Jell; approximatcly 28. I lis marriagc likewise cnded in divorcc. - 1 was born on Junc 19, 1947 and am 48 years of age. 1 U1n in good health. My present station in Iile is basically of a middle e1ass person. My sole sourcc of income at this timc is from my cmploymcnt with Reager and Adler as II real estate closing coordinator. At the present time [make approximately $24,400 per year. I hllve II high school diploma and mn currently taking some parnlegal courscs. I have heen so employed since approximately April 1993 and plan to remain at this joh Illr liS long liS possible. [have no eslale other lhan what I helieve to he marital property. Furthcrmorc, I havc onc major deht at this time which is a line of credit with Mellon Bank to whom I owc $3,500. This was primarily Illr my legal lees and my son's wedding. Other than that [ have basic ordinary deht. I helievc it is signi ficantto notc thai there was absolutely no marital debt atlhc time of my scparation Irommy hushand. - My hushand was horn on Novcmhcr 29, 1931. [havc no knowledge as to my husband's currcnt hcalth nor as to his ClllTcnt station in life. To the best of my knowledge my husband is retired from IBM and rcccivcs hllth his IBM rctircmcnt and his social security incomc. Imn ahsolutcly unawarc of whether or not my husband has other employment at this time. My hushand also hns his high school diploma and has some college courses. His field is in financial planning and managcment. To the best of my knowledge I helieve my hushand could he employed at this time and there would he no good reason why hc would not be so employed. I am unaware of whether or not my husband has any dchts althis point in time. However, as staled ahove, there were no marital dehts III the lime of our separation and he therefore has nnt he~n responsible for the payment of any such murital debt. Neither of us eontrihuled to the education, training or increased canting power ofthe olher party. . Olher thanlhe gcnerul growlh of our prescnt assets, I do nol believe that either of us has any speeial opportunities for lilture acquisilionof assels and income. However, I would note Ihllt since Ihe lime of our scparulion my husband has been in sole possession and control of all of the VIIS I mlljority ofmllrilal assets other Ihan the home in which I reside. Therefore, any acquisilions he hus been able 10 makc in lighl of that fhct are not within my knowlcdge. . As slated above my primary and only source of income is Ihrough my employmenl. My employer provides me wilh some medical coverage and I am responsible for paying the remainder. The coverage provided to me Ihrough my employmenl is not nearly as good as what my husband has Ihrough his IBM coverage. Furthermore, I have just slarted being able 10 contribute to a 401 K plan. I believe that I put in 6% of my salary. Right now there is no mutch from my company.(l also of course havc my IBM pension.) There arc no other benelits from my cmployment. . My husband slill has his IBM hcalth coveragc which includes medical, denial and, I belicve, eyc as wcll. Likewisc hc is currenlly receiving his IIlM retirement benefils. I am unawarc of any olhcr benclits he may he receiving from IBM. His other source of income known 10 me is his social security. I have no knowledge as to whethcr or not my husband has any other sources of income at this time. However, \ would note, since my husband hus been in control of all of our various murital assets he most likely hus receivcd all of the dividend and intercst income from those assets. I have no way of knowing how much that would be. _ \ would delinitely state that during the course of our marriage, my husband and \ equally contributed to the acquisition, preservation and/or appreciation of our marital property. In fact, for most items, we paid in an exactly equal amount. However, since our separation, my husband has been solely responsible for the dissipation of fairly massive amounts of assets. \ will discuss this in greater detail when I get to the part of what assets we have or had utthe lime of our separation. _ There is no property which would be set apart to me as my own separate property. \ am unaware as to what, i I' any, separate propcrty my husband muy have acquired since our separation. I would have to assume Ihat based upon the circumstances any post-separation propcrty has bcen acquircd by his usc of our marital assets. _ With regard to the s(andurd of living which we enjoycd during the marriagc,\ would suy thut it would he considcrcd at least upper middlc cluss. We basically bought a new, fairly expensivc, vchicle cvery three ycurs. (Gcncrally u Cudillac) Wc took a vucution out of the country atleusl oncc a year und vucationed in Floridu (prior to moving thcre) utleusttwice a yeur. Wc would generally cut out oncc a week. I busically felt thut we were in a position to bc ablc to afford ahnos( anything that wc might rcquirc. At somc point, wc thcn bought a sr.cond homc which wc basically uscd as our vacation homc. Wc cvcntually split our timc bctwccn Florida and Pcnnsylvania. Atthc prcscnttimc I basically do nonc ofthc abovc. I havc nottakcn a vacation, othcr than long wcckcnds, sincc our scparation. FurthcmlOrc, I am still driving a 1987 Cadillac with approximatcly 100,000 milcs on it. I am unawarc as to what my husband's currcnt standard of living may bc. - My cconomic circumstanccs at this point intimc arc simply Ihatlmakc approximatcly $24,000 pcr ycar and havc CXPCnSCS wcll in acccss ofthat amount. I havc a homc with no mortgagc paymcnllhcrcon and that is basically how I havc bccn ablc to makc cnds mcct. I am unfamiliar wilh what my husband's cconomic circumstances may bc at this point in timc. - Ncilhcr my husband, to the bcst of my knowlcdgc, nor mysclfwould or are the custodian of any minor childrcn. 6. With rcgard to thc asscls owncd by mysclf and/or my husband at the timc of our separation, I havc bccn ablc (0 piccc togcthcr Ihc following dala. I can notc whallhe various asscts arc or should bc and whalthcir currcnt valucs arc or would havc bccn. Whcrc my infomlation is skctchy is simply bascd upon thc (l\ctthatnot only did my . . Husbond's IBM Pension Wife's IBM Pension Wife's Frnnklin Utilitics Fund IRA Wife's US IRA Wile's Fidclity Invcstmcn(s IRA Husband's (Jankcr's Trust IRA minimum $368,984.95. $ 14,457.Q7 $ 16,914.78 $ 23,372.00 $ 9,444.26 $ 24,000.00. or the abovc listcd asscts my husband is in control orall the asscts morkcd by an "." I hovc been ablc to dclcnllinc thot hc hns rcmoved all the monics from the KIP Kempcr Fund, Nations Bnnk Chccking Accounl, and the IBM Employecs Credit Union Accounts. I Ulll unaware or the present disposition or thcse monies ns wcll as the other assets in his posscssion. With the above factors in mind it is my belicrthnt an equitoble award by this Court would be comprised or the lollowing: a. Thc home located nt 101 Melissn Court, ErlOln, Pennsylvnnia, should become my sepornlc propcrty. b. ^ Qualified Domcstie Rcln<ions Order should be entercd dircctcd 10 IBM, OFFICE OF DIVORCE MASTER CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 9 North Hanovor Streel Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 240.6535 E. Robert Elicker, II Divorce MBsler Tracl.JoColwer Apri112,1995 Office Manager/Raporter Maria P. Cognetti Attorney at Law P.O. Box 6B9 Harrisburg, PA 17108-06B9 RE: Susanne Kay Sather vs, John Robert Sather No. 2614 civil 1994 In Divorce w.., Ihore 697.0371 Exl.6535 John Robert Sather B70 Bird Bay Way Venice, Florida 34292 Dear Ms. cognetti and Mr. Sather: By order of Court of President Judge Harold E. Sheely dated AprilS, 1995, the full-time Master has been appointed in the above referenced divorce proceedings. A divorce complaint was filed on May 16, 1994, raising grounds for divorce of irretrievable breakdown and the economic claim of equitable distribution. On September 20, 1994, an amended complaint in divorce was filed averring that the parties were separated for a period in excess of two years, No date of separation was stated in the complaint, On January 9, 1995, an affidavit under section 3301(d) was filed by the Plaintiff averring that the parties have been separated since June 17, 1992, a period in excess of two years. Therefore, grounds for divorce are apparently not at issue. In addition to the economic claim of equitable distribution, which was raised in the complaint, the Plaintiff filed a petition on September 20, 1994, raising additional economic claims of alimony, alimony pendente lite, and counsel fees and expenses. The petition also raises equitable distribution but, as noted, that count was previously raised in the complaint. SUSANNE KAY SATIIER, : IN TilE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : vs. I CIVIL ACTION - LAW I I NO. 2614 CIVIL 1994 JOliN ROBERT SATIIER, Defendant IN DIvonCE ORDEn AND NonCE SE'I"rING IIEAIlING To: Susanne Kay Sather Maria P. Cognetti John Robert Sather , Plaintiff , Counsel for Plaintiff , Defendant , Counsel for Defendant You are directed to appear for a hearing to take testimony on the outstanding issues in the above captioned divorce proceedings at the Office of the Divorce Master, 9 North Hanover Street, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, on the 5th day of October ,l995,at 9:00 a.m., at which place and time you will be given tile opportunity to present witnesses and eKhibitG in support of your case. By the Court, ~ CRA-o-..f \=== Harold E. Sheely, ,Judge Date of Order and Notice: 6/22/95 By: (~ 12t;j-!J;~~~ Divorce Master IF YOU DO NOT IIAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPIIONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO PIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL IIELP. Court Administrator Fourth Floor, East Wing Cumberland County Courthouse Carlisle, PA l70l3 Telephone (717) 240-6200 ~ SUSANNE KAY SATHER, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 2614 CIVIL 1994 vs. ~ JOHN ROBER SATHER, Defendant IN DIVORCE RE: Pre-Hearing Conference Memorandum DATE: Thursday, June 22, 1995 Present for the Plaintiff, Susanne Kay Sather was attorney Maria P. Cognetti and her law clerk Michelle Stokes. The Defendant, John Robert Sather, has not had any counsel appear on his behalf in the action nor has there been any communication from Mr. Sather in response to the pleadings filed and in response to the Master's notice to file pre-trial statements or appear at today's conference. The parties were married on January 12, 1979, and separated on June 17, 1992. A divorce complaint was filed on May 16, 1994, raising grounds for divorce of irretrievable breakdown of the marriage and the economic issue of equitable distribution. Subsequent to the filing of the complaint the Plaintiff filed additional economic claims of alimony and counsel fees and expenses. Wife has also filed an affidavit under Section 3301(d) of the Domestic Relations Code averring that the parties have been separated since June 17, 1992, a period in excess of two years. Therefore, the divorce can proceed on the basis of the parties having been separated for a period in excess of two years. There are no children born of the present marriage although wife has one child to a prior marriage and husband has three children to a prior marriage. Neither party is contributing to the other party any support or alimony pendente lite. Wife is 48 years of age and resides at 101 Melissa Court, Enola, Pennsylvania, where she lives alone. According to her pre-trial statement the property is subject to a lien in favor of Mellon Bank in the approximate amount of $2,700.00. We will need to have a current payoff of that lien close to the date of the hearing. Wife is a high school graduate and has taken some college courses. She is currently employed with Reager & Adler, P.C. as a closing coordinator and has a biweekly gross income of $896.92, Wife has no other sources of income ~ other than some interest which she may be earning on liquid asset accounts. Wife does not complain of any health problems. Husband is 63 years of age and resides at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida. We do not know whether he is living with anybody at the present time. He is a retired manager from IBM, his retirement having occurred in 1986. Husband is a high school graduate and also has had some college courses. He has a monthly pension of $2,614.47 and also receives social secuirty monthly although we do not have that amount at this time. We havs no evidence that husband is experiencing any health problems. Wife owns the property at 101 Melissa Court, Enola, Pennsylvania, in her name only and according to her counsel that property was owned by wife prior to the marriage and, therefore, is premarital proeprty. We are, consequently, looking to the increase in value of the property from date of marriage to date of separation in doing the equitable distribution computation. The property, however, at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida, is in joint names, and we will need to have a value established for that property for the equitable distribution computation. Wife on her pre-trial statement has listed various items of marital property which include a 1987 Cadillac Brougham vehicle. Aside from that particular tangible asset, all of the other assets listed in wife's pre-trial statement (except for the real estate), are liquid assets involving interest in savings bonds, stocks, accounts, pension plans, and IRAs. With respect to the pensions and wife's IRAs there is a possibility that a portion of each of those particular assets were acquired by one of the parties prior to the marriage, and, therefore, we need to determine what portion of those assets are marital. For instance, with respect to husband's pension, we will need to have counsel provide a coverture formula to determine what portion of that pension was earned during the marriage of the parties. Another issue with regard to the pension of husband is that he has been receiving his pension since 1986, but more importantly to our particular economic situation in resolving this case, is that he has been continuing to receive the pension since the parties separated in June 1992. Therefore, a portion of those payments received since the parties separated would be attributed to wife's interest and wife will be entitled to some reimbursement for her interest in the monthly pension payments which husband has been receiving totally. Wife's counsel is going to prepare a statement of . wife regarding the factors in the Divorce Code relating to equitable distribution, identification of assets, and values of assets and have that statement prepared and sent to Mr. Sather and to the Master. At the time of the hearing which will be scheduled, wife and her counsel and any supporting witnesses will appear and testify to the information contained in the statement. Based on that testimony, if we do not have a response from Mr. Sather and participation from him in the case and his statement on the record at the hearing, we will proceed on the basis of the information presented by wife's testimony to make findings of fact and recommendations in resolving the economic claims. Wife's counsel is also requested to prepare a statement of a proposed resolution of this case taking into account the various assets, values of those assets, and who may have received the benefit from assets prior to the date of the hearing. For instance, it is alleged that husband has taken considerable amounts of money from marital assets and converted those assets to his own benefit and use. Specifically one account we are aware of that such a withdrawal has occurred is the Kemper Fund, According to information wife's counsel has presented, husband made two $25,000.00 withdrawals from that fund receiving a total of $50,000.00 of marital assets. The Master has suggested that with regard to any shortfalls which wife may have experienced as a result of husband's conversion of assets to his own name, that we will have to look to the pension to make up those shortfalls and also to the real estate in Venice, Florida, which is owned in joint names. Counsel for wife has indicated that she will probably withdraw her claim for alimony. A hearing is scheduled for Thursday, October 5, 1995, at 9:00 a.m. Notices will be sent to counsel and the parties. E. Robert Elicker, II Divorce Master CCI Maria P. cognetti Attorney for Plaintiff John Robert Sather Pro Se OFFICE OF DIVORCE MASTER CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 9 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 240-6535 I, Robert IlIck.r, II Divorce Master w.., Ihore 697-0371 Exl. 6535 Tracl olD Col~.r Oil Ice Manager/Reporter Maria P. Cognetti Attorney at Law P.O. Box 689 Harrisburg, PA 1710B-06B9 September 7, 1995 Joseph L. Hitchings, Esquire JOHNSON, DUFFIE, STEWART & WEIDNER 301 Market Street P.O. Box 109 Lemoyne, PA 17043-0109 RE: Susanne Kay Sather vs. John Robert sather No. 94 - 2614 In Divorce Dear Ms. Cognetti and Mr. Hitchings: I am writing in response to Mr. Hitchings' letter of September 6, 1995, requesting that the hearing scheduled for October 5, 1995, be continued and that we reschedule the case for another pre-hearing conference. Both requests are denied. Mr. Sather has had adequate time to become involved in this case and to obtain counsel previously, and I am not going to grant additional time simply because he is going to be away in september and has not taken the initiative to involve himself in this case earlier, The Master was appointed on April 5, 1995, pre-trial statements were directed to be filed by May 5, 1995, and a pre-hearing conference was held on June 22, 1995. On all occasions Mr. Sather has been notified and his decision now to decide to appear in the action and request additional time for preparation should not work to the detriment of Mrs. Sather and her counsel who wish to go forward with the case. Mr. Sather has known since late June that the hearing has been scheduled for October 5, 1995. We do have an issue as to Mr. Sather's failure to file a pre-trial statement and if Ms. Cognetti wishes to raise that issue, I am informing her that it should be raised by a motion to the Court, prior to the hearing, on a petition for sanctions the summer of 1991, Mr. Sather did not speak to me for (hat entire summer, approximately 2 mon(hs. At that time we had an argument over my son from my prior marriage. My husband had not spoken to my son lor a period in excess of two years. However, at the end ofthat summer Mr. Sather asked me to return to Florida, which we always did at that time ofycar. Since he appeared to have deternlined that things were back to normal, I agreed to return to Florida with him. At Christmas time however we once again came back to the Pennsylvania area for the holidays. Things were once again bad between my husband and my son, Mark. (Mark lived in the home in Pennsylvania while we were in Florida each year.) However, at the end ofthe Christmas holiday that year I did in fact once again return to Florida with my husband. Things were fine as long as I would not rock the boat. In June of 1992, we once again returned (0 Pennsylvania. At that time, we had not even been home two days when he started in on Mark immediately. He told me that he wanted Mark's belongings removed from the shed. Since he was still not speaking to Mark, it became my obligation to convey this to Mark. When the items were not removed from the shed by the next day, he directed me to throw my son out of the house. I did inlhct convey this to Mark out of a fear that Mark and my husband might hurt each other. Mark then packed his belongings and did in Ihctmove out. I was hysterical at that point. I lived with this decision for about two days. I then asked my husband to go back to Florida without me. He acquiesced and removed himself trom the Pennsylvania home soon thereafter. We have not seen each other since that day. 4. On or about July I, 1992, I contacted an attorney and filed tor divorce here in Cumbcrland County. Due to procedural problems that Divorce Complaint was eventually withdrawn on May 16, 1994 and a second Complaint was filed on that same date. The Divorce Complaint was (hen amended on Scptember 20, 1994. Finally, a Motion for Appointment of a Master was filed on April 4, 1995. 5. With regard to the relevant fucts ofthis case, they are as tollows: . Mr. Sather and I have been married for a period of approximately 16 years. . This was a second marriage for both of us. My lirstmarriage lasted approximately three years and from that marriage I have my son, Mark, who is 26 years of age. That marriage ended in divorce. Mr. Sather was likewise married previously and I believe his prior marriage mny have lasted approximately 20 years. From that marriage he has three children: Kevin, age 38; Glen, approximately 33 or 34; and Jeff, approximately 28. I lis marriage likewise ended in divorce. . I was born on June 19, 1947 and am 48 years of age. I am in good health. My present stnlion in life is basically of a middle class person. My sole source of income at this time is from my employment with Reager and Adler as a rcal cstatc closing coordinator. At the present time I make approximately $24,400 per year. I have a high school diploma and 11I11 currently taking some paralegal courses. I have been so employed since approximately April 1993 and plan to remainutthis job for as long as possible. I have no estate other thun what I believe to be marital property. Furthermore, I have one major debt at this timc which is a line of credit with Mellon Bank to whom I owe $3,500. This was primarily lor my legal fees and my son's wedding. Othcr than that I have basic ordinary debt. I believe it is significant to note that there was absolutely no marital debt at the time of my scparation from my husband. . My husband was born on November 29, 1931. I havc no knowledge as to my husband's current health nor as to his currcnt station in Iifc. To thc best of my knowledgc my husband is retired from IBM and receives both his IBM rctirement and his social security income. 11IIllubsolutely unaware of whether or not my husband has other employmcnt at this time. My husbund also hus his high school diploma and has some college courses. His field is in financial planning and management. To the best of my knowledge I believe my husbund could be employed at this time and there would bc no good reuson why he would not be so employcd. I am unawure of whether or not my husbund hus uny debts utthis point in time. However, us stuled ubove, there were no marital dcbts at the time of our sepuration and he there tore has not been responsible for the payment of any such marital debt. Neither of us contributed to the education, training or increased earning power of the other party. _ Other than the general growth of our present assets, I do not believe that either of us has any special opportunities for future acquisition of assets and income. However, I would note that since the time of our separation my husband has been in sole possession and control of all of the vast majority of marital assets other than the home in which I reside. Therefore, any acquisitions he has been able to make in light of that fact are not within my knowledge. - As stated above my primary and only source of income is through my employment. My employer provides me with some medical coverage and I am responsible for paying the remainder. The coverage provided to me through my employment is not nearly as good as what my husband has through his IBM coverage. Furthennore, I have just started being able to contribute to a 401 K plan. I believe that I put in 6% of my salary. Right now there is no match from my compnny.(1 also of course have my IBM pension.) There are no other benefits from my employment. - My husband still has his IBM health coverage which includes medical, dental and, I believe, eye liS well. Likewise he is currently receiving his IBM retirement benefits. I am unaware of any other bcnefits he may be receiving from IBM. His other source ofincome known to me is his social security. I have no knowledge as to whether or not my husband has any other sources of income at this time. However, I would note, since my husband has been in control of all of our various marital assets he most likely has received all of the dividenrland interest income from those assets. I have no way of knowing how much that would be. - I would definitely stale (hat during the course of our marriage, my husband and I equally contributed to the acquisition, preservation and/or appreciation of our marital property. In fact, for most items, we paid in an exactly equal amount. However, since our separation, my husband has been solely responsible for the dissipation of fairly massive amounts of assets. I will discuss this in greater detail when I get to the part of what assets we have or had at the time of our separation. - There is no property which would be set apart to me as my own separate property. I am unaware as to what, if any, separate property my husband may have acquired since our separation. I would have to assume that based upon the circumstances any post-separation property has been acquired by his use of our marital assets. - With regard to the standard of living which we enjoyed during the marriage, I would say that it would be considercd at least upper middle class. Wc basically bought a new, fairly cxpensive, vehicle every thrce ycars. (Generally a Cadillac) We (ook a vacation out ofthe country at least once II year and vllcationcd in Florida (prior to moving thcrc) at least twicc II ycar. We would gencrally cat out oncc II week. I basically felt that wc wcrc in a position to bc able to offord almost anything that we might rcquire. At some point, we then bought a second home which we basically used as our vacation home. We eventually split our time between Florida and Pennsylvania. At the present time I basically do none ofthe above. I have not taken a vacation, other than long weekends, since our separation. Furthermore, I am still driving a 1987 Cadillac with approximately 100,000 miles on it. I am unaware as to what my husband's current standard of living may be. - My economic circumstances at this point in time are simply that I make approximately $24,000 per year and have expenses well in access of that amount. I have a home with no mortgage payment thereon and that is basically how I have been able to make ends meet. I om unfamiliar with what my husband's economic circumstances may be at this point in time. - Neither my husband, to the best of my knowledge, nor myselfwould or are the custodian of any minor children. 6. With regard to the assets owned by myselfandlor my husband at the time of our separation, I have been able to piece together the following data. I can note what the various assets are or should be and what their current values are or would hove been. Where my information is sketchy is simply based upon the fact that not only did my wherein IBM is immedia(ely diree(ed to forward to me monthly checks In the net amount 01'$2,600 for 0 period often years. c. I would retain my pension with IBM os well os my three IRAs. d. I would get 0 mortgage on the house in Florida in the amount 01'$85,000.00 f. My husband should be ordered to pay me counsel fees in the amount of $5,000 for and toward the legal lees I hove accrued in this moiler. I certainly hope that this history and lilcts will be of some help to the Court. This will be substantially the basis of my lestimony to be presented to the Court at the hearing to be held October 5, 1995. Thank you lor your time. \, 6(/;<1.'"' k.Z'J: xfiZ1~ . 'SUSANNE KAY SA ER Sworn to and subs$!bed befo ~ me this" day of '" 1995 j Notarial Sea' knn A. Shen". No'ory Public Ham.burg. Dauphin Counly My COmmlSlIoij E.p1rlll MlIIch 9. lUUO ....,~~,"',... . -~ v. I IN THB COURT OF COMMON PLEAS or I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PBNNSYLVANIA I I 94-2614 CIVIL TERM I I CIVIL ACTION - LAW I IN DIVORCE SUSANNE KAY SATHBR, plaintiff JOHN ROBERT SATHER, Defendant IN REI PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO MAKE RULE ABSOLUTE GRANTED ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 1995, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion To Make Rule Absolute, which motion relates to Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1920.33 and 4019, and following a proceeding at which the Defendant did not appear, notwithstanding that he received notice of the date, time and place for such proceeding, and at which the Plaintiff wa. represented by Maria P. cognetti, Esquire, the Plaintiff's Motion To Make Rule Absolute is granted, and pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of civil Procedure 1920.33(d) (1), it appearing that the Defendant has filed no pretrial statement in this case, the Defendant is barred from offering any testimony or introducing any evidence in support of or in opposition to claims for the matters required to be contained in a pretrial statement. It is expressly found that no good cause has been shown for the Defendant's failure to file a pretrial statement, and it is further noted that he has not filed an inventory or an income and expense statement. Reasonable attorney's fees are awarded to the SUSANNE KAY SATHER, I IN THB COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PBNNSYLVANIA I v. I 94-2614 CIVIL TBRM I JOHN ROBBRT SATHER, I CIVIL ACTION - LAW Defendant I IN DIVORCB IN REI MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOBNA GRANTED ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 1995, upon consideration of the Motion To Quash Subpoena filed by Jo.eph L. Hitchings, EBquire, the motion is granted, and Mr. Hitching.' testimony in thiB proceeding iB limited to the factB alleged in his Petition To Withdraw AB Counsel previouBly filed. By the Court, I Maria P. Cognetti, BBquire Coun.el for Plaintiff John Robert Sather 870 Bird Day Way Venice, Florida 34292 Defendant, Pro Se JOBeph L. Hitchings, EBquire B. Robert Elicker, II, Divorce MaBter IBlr ll..>11....... ",,,,.('LA. 1/3/ q(" J, 'G). ir. N ,~ h .", t:':' l=; .. .')r~ - (..'t."t ~;€' .- ( ... .~ () ;): -.; ~.~ ~~ ,.....) !I::' " N ..~ ~ {l i:. I I,,' -,. -. U,i r1.1 ~l)rr, , r~, I..., ~ju. u.. u.. ..,., ::J 0 c,;. u . SUSANNE KAY SATHER, I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA I v. I 94-2614 CIVIL TERM I JOHN ROBERT SATHER, I CIVIL ACTION - LAW Defendant I IN DIVORCE III RE I MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA GRANTED ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 1995, upon cOl;1sideration of the Motion To Quash Subpoena filed by Joseph L. Hitchings, Esquire, the motion is granted, and Mr. Hitchings' testimony in this proceeding is limited to the facts alleged in his Petition To Withdraw As Counsel previously filed. By the Court, I Maria P. Cognetti, Esquire Counsel for Plaintiff John Robert Sather 870 Bird Day Way Venice, Florida 34292 Defendant, Pro Se Joseph L. Hitchings, Esquire v'E. Robert Elicker, II, Divorce Master Islr , SUSANNE KAY SATHER, I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA I v. I 94-2614 CIVIL TERM I JOHN ROBERT SATHER, I CIVIL ACTION - LAW Defendant I IN DIVORCE IN REI PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO MAKE RULE ABSOLUTE GRANTED ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 1995, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion To Make Rule Absolute, which motion relates to Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1920.33 and 4019, and following a proceeding at which the Defendant did not appear, notwithstanding that he received notice of the date, time and place for such proceeding, and at which the Plaintiff was represented by Maria P. Cognetti, Esquire, the Plaintiff's Motion To Make Rule Absolute is granted, and pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1920.33(d) (1), it appearing that the Defendant has filed no pretrial statement in this case, the Defendant is barred from offering any testimony or introducing any evidence in support of or in opposition to claims for the matters required to be contained in a pretrial statement. It is expressly found that no good cause has been shown for the Defendant's failure to file a pretrial statement, and it is further noted that he has not filed an inventory or an income and expenee statement. Reasonable attorney's fees are awarded to the v.. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 94 .~ .;lu 11 CIVIL TERM LAW - DIVORCE SUBANNE KAY SATHER, plaintiff JOHN ROBERT SATHER, Defendant COMPLAINT COMES NOW, the plaintiff, SUSANNE KAY SATHER, by and through her attorney, R. MARK THOMAS, ESQUIRE, and avers as follows: 1. The plaintiff is SUSANNE KAY SATHER, an adult individual, who currently resides at 101 Melissa Court, Enola, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 17025. 2. The defendant is JOHN ROBERT SATHER, an adult individual, who currently resides at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida 34292. 3. Plaintiff has resided in the Commonwealth of PennsylVania for at least six months prior to the filing of this complaint. The defendant currently resides in Florida. 4. The plaintiff and defendant were married on January 12, 1979, at Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 5. A previous Complaint was filed on June 1, 1992, with an Amended Complaint filed November 18, 1993, but that Complaint has been withdrawn by Praecipe. 6. The marriage is irretrievably broken. 7. The plaintiff requests the court to enter a Decree of Divorce. 8. Plaintiff has been advised of the availability of marriage counseling and that she may have the right to request the court to require the parties to participate in such counseling. Being so advised, plaintiff does not request that the court require the parties to participate in counseling prior to a Divorce Decree being handed down by the court. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff prays that a Decree in Divorce be entered divorcing plaintiff from the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between plaintiff and defendant. COUNT II 9. Paragraphs 1 through 8 are incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 10. The parties own marital property which is subject to equitable distribution. 11. Plaintiff requests the Court to equitably divide, distribute or assign the marital property between the parties, without regard to marital misconduct, in such proportion as the Court deems just after consideration of all relevant factors. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court to enter an Order of equitable distribution of marital property pursuant to the divorce code. Respectfully submitted, If {av{ . MARK THOMAS, ESQUIRE Attorney for Plaintiff 54 E. Main Street Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 a; - :c .... '" ~1' N (A'-) ~~ ~: ...~ ,1;.... ~l,,: o! (,) (,) Irl c -'--",: , " VI I") " - ~ ~ .r ...... t" o - ''''' ~ Cl .: =t ~ T. ~ ~..t , . . , : <I 'J ... 'v') \ii &:.l l-. VI I ....,) ll'-- \ \)Q "'- .... ....... \ "lot II' IlIIV'1O CO......O.......I..T" O. .......nVA..I" DI'.IlITYINT a. HUt..fH V"~L AECOROS COu..' " I DIVORCE R CORD OF OR ANNULMENT (CHECK ONEI 0 Cumberland [i] HUS'AND N"U, "WI" ''''ftlfltr/ u. John R . Sa Lhel' "1I101"C' SI,.."c' ",0 Ofr. 'ora 0' ... "" t." 870 Bird Bay Way, Venicl' F lor I .Ia NU"''''' . ".CI .."~ aL.Ck aTH'r:1"C'lr. o. Uut 2 0 "'''''''1 WIFE ....10'.. NAM' I'''''' /lItdd,., fUrl' Susanne K . Rechel 10 "IIIDI"CI .It'"' C'" 0 101 Melissa CourL, Ctr. 'oro, ", r.p CbtIMr ."" Bnola, Cumberland, Pennsylvonla 11 NUUI'" W"'ITt I L.C. OT"'I" II.-coh' a. 'HII 2 lXJ 0 0 . " 'uel a. Ic"uttrrl l$b"., ,.,.,,,. ClDiI"'rrl D' THI' Cumberlond Peansyl vania "'.""1.0' 1 . ..u...... O. CHIL "" NU"''''' 0' DI'I"OI~' CMIL 11 PLAIN I OR'N THII alliiN U"DIIlI 11 MUII.ND WI" O'M'" IlMet'r' "'.'''''AOI 0 0 0 :0 0 .. NU...."0' "UH.ND WI' I IILIT CuUoOY DT"lfIlIIOMlI,1 " LIOAL a"DU"OI 'Olll CHILOIll,,, TO 0 0 0 0 DIVa"CI Dill .....UL...NT TOOY . .. DATI D. OIC"1I llIoffflll 'Ofr' Ir." U DATI ""O" , IIN' TO VITAL "ICO"OI U IIO"ATU"IO' TIlI.NlCKIIINQ eLl". IL NU" " IUTI 'ILl OA" . 0' II"'H L O. II"T" UIU"'L accu'ATIO". ReLired . OA" O' 111lI'M II 'L.CI 0' II"'" . II 31 29 If'"~ .,. '. New York 11I'11 r - 6 19 ',7 fSU" 01 ,.,.",. Cll/'IfrrrJ Pennsylvania EsLaLe Closing Coordina- OA" 0' ,...",11 THII .....IIIIIAOI "UIIA"O o . 12 79 WI" o DTHlIlllloec,t,1 o '''''''rill 3301(c) and (d) . .' 'lI!:o' 'lit>' ... ... ... '::.:' ....llC, ... 'lit> ... ':<<' ,:.;. ,:+:, ':+:' ':.:' ':.:' ':.:- .:<<, ,:<<"~"'lC'::'lIC<:-lC>::'lIt>..'lIt>: 'lit>' ....:'*J .' .' --' . l' , , ~ :) 8 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : 8 OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY . ~ . ~ STATE OF *1 PENNA. : , . 8 SUSANNE K. SATIIER.i ' : Plnintiff N().,J~,~,~.........., ................,1994 : 'Vp~n" $ . JOliN ROBERT SATIIER , 'Defendnnt . , , ~ ~ , '; , DECREE IN · * ~ . DIVORCE : 8 ' '...' AND NOW, .. .. .. .. .. .. , .. .. .. .. .. .. .. " 1996,..,. It Is ordered and , , - * decreed that""," ,~~,s,~~~~~"~.,' ?,A:l:I!~~~. '" , , ,,' , , ," , ,'" '" plaintiff, ~ .. , ~ and ,,~~!f,N, ,~~~,E,~~, ~,A,~I,I~~, , " "" " ' ,,' " " , , " , , " " " ", " defendant, ~ . are divorced from the bonds of matrimony, ~ 8 .. , M , The court retains jurisdiction of the following claims which hove a . been raised of record In this action for which 0 final order has not vet a s been entered; : ~ M i : ~ """"""""""""""""""""""""""","",..,"""""', ~ 8 ............,...., ..........,..,.........................,........'......, I!! . ~ ~ ~ 8 Dy The Cour'l e I~ " ^ lIe.1l J. I ',' i i~ ~..-...,.... e "'..-....,..."'.:".;,~.~ * * ",..~..,. *':':":"': "'..~ ~r~,!,,:,.~.!:'f~' ~q~!V " ,/ ......: ,- ~...... REC[ , ~ED APR 1 3 1995 '* ,.. ~ OFFICE OF DIVORCE MASTER CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT OF COMMON Pl.EAS 9 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 240,6535 E. Robert Elicker, II Oivorco MaGlo! Tracl Jo Colver Apr il 12, 1995 Offlco ManagoriRoportOl Maria P. Cognetti Attorney at Law P.O. Box 689 Harrisburg, PA 17108-0689 Well Shore 697,0371 Exl. 6535 John Robert Sather 870 Bird Bay Way Venice, Florida 34292 RE: Susanne Kay sather vs. John Robert Sather No. 2614 civil 1994 In Divorce Dear Ms. cognetti and Mr. Sather: By order of Court of President Judge Harold E. Sheely dated April 5, 1995, the full-time Master has been appointed in the above referenced divorce proceedings. A divorce complaint was filed on May 16, 1994, raising grounds for divorce of irretrievable breakdown and the economic claim of equitable distribution. On September 20, 1994, an amended complaint in divorce was filed averring that the parties were separated for a period in excess of two years. No date of separation was stated in the complaint. On January 9, 1995, an affidavit under Section 3301(d) was filed by the Plaintiff averring that the parties have been separated since June 17, 1992, a period in excess of two years. Thereforc, grounds for divorcc arc apparcntly not at issue. In addition to the cconomic claim of equitablc distribution, which was raiscd in the complaint, the plaintiff filed a petition on Scptenilier 20, 1994, raising additional economic claims of alimony, alimony pendente lite, and counsel fees and expenses. The petition alBO raises equitable distribution but, an noted, that count was previously raised in the complaint. ,. ~ EXHIBIT "G" ~ ~ SUSANNE KAY SATHER, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs. NO. 2614 CIVIL 1994 JOHN ROBER SATHER, Dcfcndant IN DIVORCE RE: Prc-Hearing Confcrencc Mcmorandum DATE: Thursday, Junc 22, 1995 Prcscnt for thc Plaintiff, Susannc Kay Sather was attorncy Maria P. cognctti and her law clerk Michelle Stokes. The Defendant, John Robcrt Sathcr, has not had any counsel appear on his bchalf in thc action nor has thcre been any communication from Mr. sathcr in response to the pleadings filed and in response to the Master's notice to file pre-trial statements or appear at today's conference. The parties wcre married on January 12, 1979, and separated on June 17, 1992. A divorce complaint was filed on May 16, 1994, raising grounds for divorce of irretrievable breakdown of the marriage and the economic issue of equitable distribution. Subsequent to the filing of the complaint the Plaintiff filed additional economic claims of alimony and counsel fees and expenses. Wife has also filed an affidavit under section 3301(d) of the Domestic Relations Code averring that the parties have been separated since June 17, 1992, a period in excess of two years. Therefore, the divorce can proceed on the basis of the parties having been separated for a period in excess of two years. There are no children born of the present marriage although wife has one child to a prior marriage and husband has three children to a prior marriage. Neither party is contributing to the other party any support or alimony pendente lite. Wife is 48 years of age and resides at 101 Melissa Court, Enola, Pennsylvania, where she lives alone. According to her pre-trial statement the property is subject to a lien in favor of Mellon Bank in the approximate amount of $2,700.00. We will need to have a current payoff of that lien close to the date of the hearing. Wife is a high school graduate and has taken some college courses. She is currently employed with Reager & Adler, P.C. as a closing coordinator and has a biweekly gross income of $896.92. Wife has no other sources of income ~ ~ other than some interest which she may be earning on liquid asset accounts. Wife does not complain of any health problems. Husband is 63 years of age and resides at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida. We do not know whether he is living with anybody at the present time. lie is a retired manager from IBM, his retirement having occurred in 1986. lIusband is a high school graduate and also has had some college courses. He has a monthly pension of $2,614.47 and also receives social secuirty monthly although we do not have that amount at this time. We have no evidence that husband is experiencing any health problems. Wife owns the property at 101 Melissa Court, Enola, Pennsylvania, in her name only and according to her counsel that property was owned by wife prior to the marriage and, therefore, is premarital proeprty. We are, consequently, looking to the increase in value of the property from date of marriage to date of separation in doing the equitable distribution computation. The property, however, at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida, is in joint names, and we will need to have a value established for that property for the equitable distribution computation. Wife on her pre-trial statement has listed various items of marital property which include a 1987 Cadillac Brougham vehicle. Aside from that particular tangible asset, all of the other assets listed in wife's pre-trial statement (except for the real estate), are liquid assets involving interest in savings bonds, stocks, accounts, pension plans, and lRAs. With respect to the pensions and wife's IRAs there is a possibility that a portion of each of those particular assets were acquired by one of the parties prior to the marriage, and, therefore, we need to determine what portion of those assets are marital. For instance, with l'espect to husband's pension, we will need to have counsel provide a coverture formula to determine what portion of that pension was earned during the marriage of the parties. Another issue with regard to the pension of husband is that he has been receiving his pension since 1986, but more importantly to our particular economic situation in resolving this case, is that he has been continuing to receive the pension since the parties separated in June 1992. Therefore, a portion of those payments received since the parties separ~ted would be attributed to wife's interest and wife will be entitled to some reimbursement (or her interest in the monthly pension payments which husband has been receiving totally. Wife's counsel is going to prepare a statement of ~ to- wife regarding the factors in the Divorce code relating to equitable distribution, identification of assets, and values of assets and have that statement prepared and sent to Mr. Sather and to the Master. At the time of the hearing which will be scheduled, wife and her counsel and any supporting witnesses will appear and testify to the information contained in the statement. Based on that testimony, if we do not have a response from Mr. Sather and participation from him in the case and his statement on the record at the hearing, we will proceed on the basis of tho information presented by wife's testimony to make findings of fact and recommendations in resolving the economic claims. Wife's counsel is also requested to prepare a statement of a proposed resolution of this case taking into account the various assets, values of those assets, and who may have received the benefit from assets prior to the date of the hearing. For instance, it is alleged that husband has taken considerable amounts of money from marital assets and converted those assets to his own benefit and use. Specifically one account we are aware of that such a withdrawal has occurred is the Kemper Fund. According to information wife's counsel has presented, husband made two $25,000.00 withdrawals from that fund receiving a total of $50,000.00 of marital assets. The Master has suggested that with regard to any shortfalls which wife may have experienced as a result of husband's conversion of assets to his own name, that we will have to look to the pension to make up those shortfalls and also to the real estate in Venice, Florida, which is owned in joint names. Counsel fOl" wife has indicated that she will probably withdraw her claim for alimony. A hearing is scheduled for Thursday, October 5, 1995, at 9:00 a.m. Notices will be sent to counsel and the parties. (~ E. Robert Elicker, II Divorce Master eel Maria P. cognetti Attorney for Plaintiff John Robert Sather Pro Se ~, ,., -&'i' tJ;f!uJ <'/ Maria P. Cognctti 132-134 Walnut Street p, 0, OOK 689 Jlanisburg, PA 17108-0689 .. ~ ~' '\'EU!l'UONE (717) 232-2103 'J'EucoPIER (717) 232-5775 Septcmbcr 21, 1994 IBM Pennsylvania Employee Federal Crcdit Union 6108 Carlise Pike Mechancisburg, P A 17055 RE: SUSANNE SATHER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 202-36-6103 Dcar Sir or Madam: 1 reprcsent Susanne Sather. 1 havc encloscd a photocopy of an authorization which 1 reccived from her pennitting thc release of information regarding any accounts maintained in her namc alonc, or in her name with another individual. 1 am requesting that you providc mc with the following infomlation, as of June 17, 1992 through thc present: 1. Typc of account. 2, Titlc of account. 3. Datc of opcning accollnt. 4, Opcning balancc, 5. Value of account on Junc 17, 1992. 6, Prescnt valuc of account. . ~ ... .. EXHIBIT "M" . . ~ .. '! EXHIBIT "U" SUSANNE KAY SATHER, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW I I I I I I I NO. 94-26l4 CIVIL TERM v. JOHN ROBERT SATHER, Defendant SUPPLEMENTAL DECREE RESPECTING ECONOMIC CLAIMS AND NOW, this :z.l Sot day of March, 1996, the Master's recommendations are accepted and adopted as follows I l. The following marital assets and valuee have been assigned to Wifel a. Real estate at lOl Melissa Court, Enola, Pennsylvania $7l,000.00 b. 1987 Cadillac Brougham vehicle 3,975.00 c. Marital portion of Wife's IBM pension 6,l96.00 d. Franklin Utilities Fund IRA l6,914.7S e. US IRA 23,372.00 f. Fidelity Investments IRA 9.444.26 TOTAL TO WIFE $130,902.04 2. The following marital assets and values have been assigned to Husband I a. Real estate at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida $85,000.00 b. US Savings Bonds 57,000.00 c. Nuveen Bonds l5,694.50 d. IBM Stock (100 shares) 9,287.50 e. Nations Bank Checking Account 5,062.94 f. IBM Employeee Credit Union 14,626.59 g. IBM Employees Credit Union 337.50 '}.........( J~_.u- ..-- -{.JL h. KIP Kemper Fund i. Banker's Trust IRA TOTAL TO HUSBAND 66,366.96 24.000.00 $277 ,375.99 3. Furthermore, Wife shall receive a distribution of $92,426.98, which is based on the following computations and shall be paid from Husband's pension as further detailed hereunder I Value of marital aesets excluding the marital portion of Husband's pension wife entitled to receive $204,139.02 Value of marital assets excluding the marital intarest in Husband's pension assigned to Wife Shortfall on Wife's distribution of Marital assats excluding the marital portion of Husband's pension Value of marital assets excluding the marital interest in Husband's pension Husband is entitled to receive l30.902.04 $ 73,236.98 $204,139.02 Value of marital assets excluding the marital portion of Husband's pension assigned to Husband Excese of in kind distribution to Husband 5277.375.99 $ 73,236.98 The marital portion of Husband's IBM net monthly pension benefit is $693.00. Of that marital portion Wife shall be entitled to receive a net monthly payment of $400.00. Since June 1992 to June 1996, based on Wife's entitlement to payment of $400.00 per month from Husband's net monthly pension benefit, Wife shall be entitled to receive for a total of 48 months at $400.00 per. month the Bum of $l9,200.00. Therefore, the shortfall in the equitable distribution to Wife of $73,236.98 plus the ohortfall on the monthly pension payments due Wife which Husband has received of $l9,200.00 add up to a total shortfall in the distribution to Wife of $92,436.98. In addition to the $400.00 per month which Wife is entitled to receive from Husband's net monthly pension benefit, Wife shall receive as payment on account of the shortfall in the equitable distribution, pension payments, and for counsel fees as provided herein, the sum of $1,200.00 per month for a total net monthly benefit from Husband's pension of $l,600.00. The payment to Wife of $1,600.00 shall be net after deduction of all appropriate income taxes. The sum of $1,600.00 net monthly from Husband's pension benefit shall be paid to Wife pureuant to a Qualified Domestic .lelations Order which shall be prepared by Wife's counsel. The payment of $400.00 per month shall continue indefinitely until payments from Husband's pension cease as a result of Husband's death and the sum of $1,200.00 per month shall continue until such time as the shortfall in the equitable distribution, pension benefits and counsel fees due Wife in the total amount of $98,436.98 have been paid in full.l To secure the distribution due Wife as provided herein, Wife shall be entitled to a mortgage against the property at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida, in the amount of $98,436.98. Wife shall provide to Husband a deed transferring all her right, title, and interest in said property to Husband in accordance with the distribution herein only upon receipt by Wife of a mortgage in the amuunt of $98,436.98 to secure Wife the payments due herein. Said mortgage will be recorded simultaneously with the deed to said Payable at $1,200.00 per month, the obligation should be discharged in 82 months. property as a first lien on the property. Each paymen~ monthly from Husband's pension in the amount of $1,200.00 on account of the shortfall of the equitable distribution, pension payments, and counsel fees will reduce the principal balance of the mortgage in a like amount. No interest will be charged on the mortgage, however, should the Internal Revenue Service impute any interest on the transaction for which Wife may become liable for payment of income tax, said tax liability will be added to the principal amount of the mortgage to be paid by Husband. In the event Husband refuses to sign a mortgage in exchange for the deed to the property, the Court directs that a lien be placed against the property at 870 Bird Bay Way, Venice, Florida, in accordance with the provisions herein. The parties are directed to sign any and all documents necessary to effectuate the transfer of assets to the party receiving the aesets as provided herein upon presentation of the appropriate document for eignature. The credit which Wife has received on account of the pension payment from date of separation in June 1992 is through June 1996. Should this case be prolonged beyond June 1996, the amount of $400.00 per month shall continue to accrue from that date and be added onto the amount due wife and paid back and secured as provided herein. The additional $400.00 per month shall begin to accrue July 1, 1996, until such time as a Qualified Domestic Relations Order is entered in these proceedings. 4. Husband ehall pay to Wife the sum of $6,000.00 on account of Wife's counsel fees and expenses. The sum of $6,000.00 shall be RLED-OFFlCE Cr. ',' C r"" '" ,--. "'T '.rv )1 '/. : . ::\, ~i; 96 JUI. ~9 I'll I: L3 cu/r;'j"'" " .",' \11.",-. \w. ,;,.,.*,,11 PENNi3\LV/M'\ .j 1 QDRO Page 2 6. The Alternate Payee is entitled te a portion of the Participant's benefits under the Plan as set forth below. The Plan is hereby directed to pay Alternate Payee's share directly to Alternate Payee. 7. The Participant is currently receiving a monthly pension under the Plan. 8. This QDRO assigns to Alternate Payee the following amounts of the Participant's monthly pension: (a) $400 net (after deduction of all approptiate income taxes) per month for the remainder of the Participant's lifetime, plus (b) $1,200 net (after deduction of all appropriate income taxes) per month for the remainder of the Participant's lifetime or until a total amount of $99,236.98 has been paid. 9. Payments to Alternate Payee shall commence on September I, 1996. 10. If the Alternate Payee dies before the Participant, the Alternate Payee's share of the Participant's pension shall be immediately and full restored to the Participant. 11. Participant agrees to arrange or to execute all forms necessary for the Plan to commence payments to the Alternate Payee in accordance with the terms of the QDRO. 12. In no event shall the Alternate Payee have greater benefits or rights other than those which are available to the Participant. The Alternate Payee is not entitled to any benefit not otherwise provided by the Plan. The Alternate Payee is only entitled to the specific benefits offered by the Plan as provided in this Order. All other rights, privileges and options offered by the Plan not granted to Alternate Payee are preserved for the Participant. 13. The Plan shall issue individual tax forms to the Participant and Alternate Payee for amounts paid to each such person. 14. In the event that the Plan inadvertently pays to the Participant any benefits that are assigned to the Alternate Payee pursuant to the terms of this QDRO, the Participant shall immediately reimburse the Alternate Payee to the extent that he has received such benefit payments and shall forthwith pay such amounts so received directly to the Alternate Payee , "~ql661 0 T ~\1W l;OINEl IIJLI 6H9(l'NOILI ;IU1lA1~IUU~ 'llJnq'IUlII 689 ">0 '() ',I !lIau9o~ iI v,.VlV JUI,UWO .'lIr) . , . . '1 I 'e r~ I a ~~! ~ ! d .~ ~ [ ~ I j r. ~ ~ t oJ - ... , .-..":;\ .'"() ::> . . . II is the responsibility of the Alternate Payee to keep a current mailing address on file with the Plan at all times. 6. The Alternate Payee is entitled to a portion of the Participant's benefits under the Plan as set forth below, The Plun is hercby dirccted to puy Alternute Payee's shure directly to Alternate Payee, 7. The Purticipant is currently receiving a monthly pension under the Plun. H. This QDRO assigns to Alternate Payee the following 1II110unts ofthe Participant's monthly pension: (a) $450,00 (Four hundred and fitly Dollars) gross per month lor the remainder of the Participantjs lifetime, plus (b) $1,350,00 (Thirteen hundred and filly Dollars) gross per month for the remainder of the Participant's lifetime or until a total amount of $111,642.00 (One hundred eleven thousand and six hundred lorty-two Dollars) has been paid. 9. Payments to Alternate Puyee shall be eflcctive as of September I, 1996. 10. If the Alternate Payee dies before the Participant, the Alternate Payee's share of the Participant's pension shall be immediately and fully restored to the Participant. II. Participant agrees to arrunge or to execute all forms necessary lor the Plan to commence payments to the Alternate Payee in accordance with the terms of the QDRO, 12. In no event shall the Alternate Payee have grelller benefits or rights other than those which arc available to the Participunt. The Alternate Payee is not entitled to uny bcnefit not otherwise provided by the Plan, The Alternate Payee is only entitled to the specific benefits oflcrcd by the Planus provided in this Order, All other rights, privileges and options oflcred by thc Plan not grantcd to Alternate Payee are preserved lor the Participant. 13. The Plan shall issue individual tax lorms to the Participant and Alternatc Payee for amounts paid to each such person, 14. In the evcnt that the Plan inudvertently pays to the Participantuny bcnefits that arc assigned to the Alternate Puyee pursuuntto the terms of this QDRO, the Participant shall immediately reimburse the Alternate Payee to the extent that he has received such benefit puymcnts und shalllllrthwith puy such umounts so received directly to the Alternate Payee within ten days of receipt, In the event the Plan inudvertently pays to the Alternate Payee any benefits thature not assigned to her pursuant to thc terms of this QDRO, the Allernutc I'uyee shall immediutely reimburse the Participant to the extent that she hus received such benefit payments and shalllorthwith puy such umounts so received directly to the Purticipunt within ten days of receipt. , ,