HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-04059
c
~
.~
~
I"
"
',I'
,I
,
)'
,
,.,
',I
"
I'
"
.
I ~,I I / '
,I
,i;,','
Q
, 'I'
, ,
,
"
IL';
1
I
,I
'I"
',:
"
,
1i',
. ,
"
"
!' "
)
(
I
1
, I
r
,
"
\ ;1'
"
"
;~
, ,
, . .
I'
"
,
,
\\
" ,
,'io
,
,
,I
" ,
,.III0UJO., Oll.III0Y . HOl,JwrclN: ~. Co
\ I A~1IY8 A'r .......W
.. ."."'TOt ~.....'" lIT,,"" , ,
_1.1..... ...~Y"'NIA .7OfS
"'" ........... -..
BRNBST B. MIXBLL, I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
I 9{:.~-1
v I 94- CIVIL TERM
I
DONNA M. STINSON, I CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
Defendant I
ORD Il R
AND NOW, this ~(). day of July, 1994, upon consideration of a
Complaint for Custody and Request for Interim Order, it is hereby
ordered and directed that pending further Order of Court, that the
Defendant is directed not to remove the minor child, Jeremy E.
Mixell, from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
By the Court,
J.
I'll. '.I I
~ 1111
"
JUL ZO
3 03 rH '9~
'\ ~ Ii 1/ ':"f II: f
Qf I ill 1'".lllow;ahY
r,UMHL Pt, ~'IU l>:' H TY
Ft-' NN S 'fl., .,\1,'-'
,,'
, '
"
,-
BRNBST E. MIXELL, I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLIAS OF
Plaintiff I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
I 94-/lc')'1
v I CIVIL TERM
I
DONNA M. STINSON, I
Defendant I CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
ORDIR or COURT
AND NOW, thil ''''))II,\day of J"II'f ' 1994, upon
condderation of "tli'i;"Attached Complaint, it' s hereby directed that
the parties and their respective counsel appear before Samuel L.
Andes, ESQUi:i:' I~he Conciliatoj:,. at 525 North l2th Street, Lemoyne,
PA, on the ,-:; I day of (' )(.,.~ , 1994, at '3 --L:!...M.,
for a Custo y Conciliation Conference. At such conference, ""n
effort will be made to resolve the issues in dispute, or if this
cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the issues to be heard
by the court, and to enter into a temporary order. All children
age five or older maY also be present at the conference. Failure
to appear at the conference may provide grounds for entry of a
temporary or permanent order.
FOR THE COURT,
BYI , Ahl)' I1tJ~ (y/
Custody Concil ator ~;?;I
YOU SHOULD TAlCI THIS PAPIR TO YOUR LAKYIR AT OIlCI. IF
YOU DO lOT HAVI A LAKYIR OR CAIIIIOT AFrORD OIl, GO TO OR
TILIPHOII TII OrrICI 81T rORTH BILOW TO rIID OUT KHIRI
YOU CAN OIT LIGAL HILP.
OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
CUMBERr~D COUNTY COURTHOUSE
CARLISLE, PA 17013
717 - 240-6200
BRNIi!ST B. MIKELL, . IN THIi! COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff . CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
. /Io.'i,/
v . 94- CIVIL TIi!RM
:
DONNA M. STINSON, .
Defendant . CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
COMPLAINT FOR CUSTODY AND RlOUBST POR INTBRIM ORDBR
AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff, Ernest E. Mixell, by and through his
attorneys, Broujos, Gilroy & Houston, P.C., and avers as follows.
1
The Plaintiff is Ernest E. Mixell, an adult individual, currently
residing at 407F Beaver Avenue, Enola, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
2
The Defendant is Donna M. Stinson, an adult individual, currently
residing at 26 East Main Street, ~ewville, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
3
Plaintiff seeks custody of the following child:
~
Present Address
AsIA
16
DOB. 8/14/77
26 East Main Street
Newville, PA 17241
The child was not born out of wedlock.
Jeremy E. Mixell
The child is presently in the custody of Donna M. Stinson, who
resides at 26 East Main Street, Newville, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
IiAIIll
Bddie Stinson
Jersmy B. Mixell
Relation.hiD
Husband
Son
6
The Plaintiff has not participated as a party or witness, or in
another capacity, in other litigation concerning the custody of the
child in this or another Court.
7
Plaintiff has no information of a custody proceeding concerning the
ohild pending in a Court of thie Commonwealth.
S
Plaintiff does not know of a person not a party to the prooeedings
who has physioal custody of the child or claims to have custody or
visitation rights with respect to the child.
9
Pending further order of court, it is believed and therefore
averred that an interim order should be entered by the Court
preventing the Defendant from removing the child from the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania becausel
A. In approximately 1984, after the Plaintiff and the Defendant
had separated, Plaintiff had advised the Defendant that he would be
seeking partial custody rights of his children through the Court
and shortly thereafter the Defendant left Pennsylvania without
notifying the Plaintiff of her whereabouts.
B. In 1988, the Plaintiff was advised that the parties then six.
year old daughter, Traci Arlene Mixell, died in Georgia, however,
the Plaintiff wae never notified by the Defendant of the death nor
was the Plaintiff acknowledged as being the father of the child.
C. The Plaintiff attempted to ascertain whue the Defendant
resided, but wae unsuccessful.
D. Approximately one year a90, the Plaintiff learned that the
Defendant had returned to this area but had not been so advised by
the Defendant.
lO
The best interest and permanent welfare of the child would be
served by granting Plaintiff custody of the child because I
A. The Plaintiff could provide a more stable environment for the
child, who currently is unsupervised and is doin9 poorly in school.
B. The Plaintiff believes and therefore avers that the child is
bein9 neglected.
11
Each parent who has parental rights to the child have not been
terminated and the person who has physical custody of the child has
been named as parties to the action.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests this Court to grant custody of the
child.
11,/
~ I ,
"
,<."
,
.;'
(il
,"
'i'
,',
"
,
,
. ,
;W~;,"""!'l<'''''WHItl.'''''tq1''''fflil''',lwt!ll"..'''1t'I..,.,.__,ll\t'W-''''''~''''_''II"'I~mc~IIW~''l1fItft~",~1I
, Ii
JUL ZO
3 10", '9'1
nLEr..oFrlCE
tr ~ I, 'j. rnOTllONOUhY
CUI'I~~RI.A"O COlJill'f
. PEH"SVlV~HIA
-I.'-IO.)D ~ 1ILt;:.
So dtJ .4.dtu~-'
-i-~5. >0 ptA.1 p/' 1!:tUI'
I.-
/'/'
I
, '
1.1t:::;
u.:IF 102..2.-2-
f2.4t* 13373
I'.
\ ~
~ '-li'r-'.'.".'~'!W"II
~~"."1'~ r', ,.....h.
", )-
, "
.. " ,
,." A " '\
.f , ..
.... ,
..
. "
.'
..
r
"
,
"
-;"
"
'.
I 1')
, ,
_l'tOUJO.. ClIUtO'l'* HOUlITPN. ,.. Co
, "'"'""H.V...,....W
. NO"," HANDY." .,."...,
1''''''10.1...... ~.NN.YL.v_IA '70'.
I"'. .'!",".". .,.......
.
,
BRNBST B. MIXBLL, I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLBAS OF
Plaintiff I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PBNNSYLVANIA
I 'I(";"tj
v I 94- CIVIL TBRM
I
DONNA M. STINSON, I CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
Defendant I
ORDER
AND NOW, thiB ){)/Ic day of July, 1994, upon consideration of a
Complaint for Custody and Request for Interim Order, it i. hereby
ordered and directed that pending further Order of Court, that the
Defendant i. directed not to remove the Dlinor child, Jeremy B.
Mixell, from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
By the Court,
h/ /f.lZt,(;~ {,.L. 10;.u... J.
,I
..
TRUE COpy FROM RECORD
In Testimony WIl6rSOI, I nar6 IInto ~ my hind
an. d Ihe seal III :lo11d J~ a~;rll". !j-V
lJ\1 II... 4aY 0 Lit. ~19
[, ,. . L 1/, /'Y.tl' a,t,'{ .ti4;ul-q
Prot~onotalY
BRNBST B. MIXBLL, I IN THB COURT OF COMMON PLBAS OF
Plaintiff I CUMBBRLAND COUNTY, PBNNSYLVANIA
I // (! /)-9
v I 94- CIVIL TBRM
I
DONNA M. STINSON, I
Defendant I CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
. ORDIR OF CQlIM
AND NOW, thh dJ.nJ day of ,Jl,.l./" , 1994, upon
condderation of'tliiilittached Complaint., it h hereby directed that
the parties And their respective counsel Appear before Samuel L.
Andes, Bsquire, the Conciliator, 41; 525 North 12th Street, Lepyne,
PA, on the dO th day of "5q;>+ trn IHI''' , 1994, at 3: llO .M.,
for a CUB to y Conciliation Conference. At Buch conference, an
effort will be made to reBolve the issues in dispute; or if thiB
cannot be accomplished, to define and narrow the iSBues to be heard
by the court, And to enter into a temporary order. All children
Age five or older may also be present at the conferenoe. Failure
to appear at the conference may provide grounds for entry of a
temporary or permanent order.
FOR THE COURT,
BYl M) Ja tiHUC A' dNldu, ~.
Custoily Conciliator .
YOU SIOULD TAKB THIS PAPIR TO YOUR LAttYlIlR AT ORCI. IF
YOU DO ROT HAVIll A LAWYIR OR CAHHOT AFFORD om:, 00 TO OR
TILaPIO.1Il THI OFFICI SIT FORTH BILON TO FIND OUT KRill..
IOU CAR GIT LIGAL IILP.
OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE
CARLISLE, PA l70l3
717 - 240-6200
TRUE r..Qi-'Y FROM HECOAO
InT\l:it!rr.:\....~ "h"H,,~,. li.;;", '.!It;: :J!t my hand
;~~s~~~~~/:j;I.I) ,;i."~.~~'.tl"~9 r~1
~J..._1JL...ff~._.
..-::-::.z-. -~rot honotary
IMIST B. MIXILL, I IN TBB COURT 011' COMMON PLBAS 01'
Plaintiff I CUMBIRLAND COUNTY, PINNSYLVANIA
I L!{J,f1
v I 94- CIVIL TIRM
I
DONNA M. STINSON, I
Defendant I CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY
COMPLAIII'1' rOR CUSTODY AIID DQUIST rOR INTIRIM ORDIR
AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff, Ernest E. Mixell, by and through his
attorneys, Broujos, Gilroy' Houston, P.C., and avers as follows.
1
The Plaintiff is Ernest E. Mixell, an adult individual, currently
residing at 40711' Beaver Avenue, Enola, Cumberland County;
Pennsylvania.
2
The Defendant is Donna M. Stinson, an adult individual, currently
residing at 26 East Main Street, Newville, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
..
3
Plaintiff seeks custody of the following child I
IlAIU
Present Address
Au
16
DOB. 8/14/77
26 East Main Street
Newville, PA 17241
The child was not born out of wedlock.
Jeremy E. lolixell
The child is presently in the custody of Donna M. Stinson, who
resides at 26 East Main Street, Newville, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
, '
liIIIIa
Eddie Stinson
Jeremy B. Mixell
Relation.hiD
Husband
Son
6
The Plaintiff has not participated as a party or witness, or in
another capacity, in other litigation concerning the custody of the
child in this or another Court.
7
Plaintiff has no information of a custody proceeding concerning the
child pending in a Court of this Commonwealth.
8
Plaintiff does not know of a person not a party to the proceedings
who hu physical custody of the child or claims to have custody or
visitation rights with respect to the child.
9
Pending further order of court, it is believed and therefore
averred that an interim order should be entered by the Court
preventing the Defendant from removing the child from the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania because:
A. In approximately 1984, after the Plaintiff and the Defendant
had separated, Plaintiff had advised the Defendant that he would be
seeking partial custody rights of his children through the Court
and shortly thereafter the Defendant left Pennsylvania without
notifying the Plaintiff of her whereabouts.
B. In 1988, the Plaintiff was advised that the partie. then .ix-
year old daughter, Traci Arlene Mixell, died in Georgia, however,
the Plaintiff was never notified by the Defendant of the death nor
was the Plaintiff acknowledged as being the father of the child.
C. The Plaintiff attempted to ascertain where the Defendant
re.ided, but was unsuccessful.
D. Approximately one year ago, the Plaintiff learned that the
Defendant had returned to this area but had not been so advised by
the Defendant.
lO
The best interest and permanent welfare of the child would be
served by granting Plaintiff custody of the child because I
A. The Plaintiff could provide a more stable environment for the
child, who currently is unsupervised and is doing poorly ill school.
B. The Plaintiff believes and therefore avers that the child is
being neglected.
11
Each parent who has parental rights to the child have not been
terminated and the person who has physical custody of the child has
been named as parties to the action.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests this Court to grant custody of the
child.
11],:_,) "
!,t. "
".,' \/~j) , '. ,
'1'1'
X
If'
",
,,~-i
,:,-"
",
"
'I
.{i
,I'
,
J:
I
'rl
"
, '
, ,
",r'
,.;,
"
'"
"
{\'
'.1
,i'
,;
i.
"
"
,
,
1''1
1,'1
,
"
:'
"
r'f,
..iI...."',
, I !, . _ . I,,!. - " .' _' " j ~ ' " I. -,'
":"""",~'I,:;"M~~,1f~,,.:ti~W~j~J. ,1\;;~)~;lil'if.\"ji~;~f;~:I"I"'"
,
I 't
._....___....._I..Ioo<_""""f1IIfI<"",.il<lI'l'f~fI~I"'''1 r,' ,
, ' I'I'""Joto,.,.....#i"".,_l..h,,-"_~,
,.,'_,...,.".,H'.'_"....aI'M.....~ ~ '. '
, . II.. 1>4~_I:,.."_~"""",--_"
OF'r:~. .. ...
" " i ,~ ~,
(if
Jut 21 II 'Li, ' II
,
,
~~~~\\
I,,'
i,I-'
"
"
"
"
"
.,
"
L...., +_
.'
.
.
"
.,
,
,
"
"
,
"
"
'''<C''';",
'_"'''-'''''''-,.,
.'
1."'.1'1
i'-l'~G.f!'i(;-
.
,,\~,'~~.
I', ,i, ," ."
'I'
.
"
,
,t.1
'II
,
Ii,'