HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-04453
\ ' I
d;
I
.1
"
,~
,11
.1
~
r'J
I
'I,
i
.\i
'I
II
j
I;\J
'i,
.
.,
,
'i
'I
"
,
"
J
i
,
,
?-
~
1
.~
-
~
"
I,
,i
I'
'I
,,,
:'
"
, ,
~ I,
"
I,
i
j I
I
i, " q
, ,
,
, , Ii
"
'I
(3)
. '
,
KINGSBURY AS60CIATES,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURTS OF COHMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
94 " 4882 CIVIL TERM
IN EJECTMENT
v.
GREGORY G. ANDERSON,
Defendant
STIPULATION AND AGR!eM!NT
Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, a Pennsylvania general
partnership with its principal place of business located at 2920
Dickinson Avenue, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, and, Defendant, Gregory G.
Anderson, an adult individual residing at Lot No. 35, Kingsbury Mobile
Home Park, 5169 East Trindle Road, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania desire
to enter this stipulation and Agreement in order to resolve litigation
pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County.
Plaintiff and Defendant, desiring to resolve amicably all
litigation among them raised in the above"captioned matter, including
all causes of action or claims raised therein, hereby stipulate and
Agree as follows I
1. Plaintiff and Defendant agree that all funds presently held by
the Prothonotary of Cumberland County shall be released to Defendant
Gregory Anderson upon signing of this Agreement and stipulation and
upon transfer of title to his mobile home located at Lot No. 35 of the
Kingsbury Mobile Home Park to Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates; and
a. Defendant Gregory G. Anderson agrees to immediately transfer
hie complete interest and title to the mobile home p~esently looated on
Lot No. 35 of the Kingsbury M~bile Home Park to Kingsbury Assooiates,
3. plaintiff, Kingsbury Assooiates shall permit Defendant, Gregory
G. Anderson/ to remain in the mobile home until september 15, 1995/ and
Defendant Gregory G. Anderson specifically agrees to remove himself and
pereonal property from the mobile home and the Kingsbury Mobile Ham.
Park on or before September 15, 1995, and
4. plaintiff Kingsbury Associates shall pay Defendant Gregory G.
Anderson an amount of $1,500.00 upon Anderson's moving from the
Kingsbury Mobile Home Park, provided the mobil~ home remains in its
present condition and Anderson, is current on ~all rent in the amount
of $220.00 for the months of July 1995/ August 1995 and a portion of
September 1995/ or as long as he resides within the mobile home, and
5. Defendant Gregory G. Anderson shall continue maintaining the
mobile home in its present condition until he permanently vacates the
mobile home on or before September 15, 1995 in accordance with this
Agreement and stipulation and order of Court.
6. Counsel for Kingsbury Associates shall hold title of the mobile
home in escrow after it has been transferred to Kingsbury Associates
until September 15/ 1995 or when Defendant moves from the Kingsbury
Mobile Home park, which ever first occurs.
3
7. Pl~intiff shall prepare a Praeoipe to Settle, Disoontinue and
Dismi.. the above-atated aotion upon Defendant Gregory G. And~rson's
moving from the Mobile Home Park,
8. In the event Defendant Gregory G. Anderson has not moved
hi..slf and personal property from the mobile home and the Kingsbury
Mobile Homs Park prior to september 15, 1995, Defendant Gregory G.
Ander.on agrees that the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County
.hall i.sue an Order directing the immediate ejection of Plaintiff from
the Kingsbury Mobile Home Park and from the mobile home,
9. N~ing in this stipulation and Agreement shall be oonstrued as
a sale or exchange of assets.
10. Plaintiff Kingsbury Associates and Defendant Gregory G.
Anderson agree that Kingsbury Associates shall have oomplete control
and possession of the mobile home after Defendant Gregory G. Anderson
vaoates the mobile home prior to September 15, 1995.
11. By executing this Agreement, Plaintiff Kingsbury Associates
hereby releases, acquits and forever discharges Anderson from any and
all claims, demands, charges, penalties and causes of action which were
raised or could have been raised in tho above-captioned matter.
Likewise, Defendant Gregory G. Anderson hereby releases, acquits and
forever discharges Kingsbury from any and all claims, demands, charges,
penalties and causes of action which were raised or could have been
raised in the above-oaptioned mutter.
4
IN REI PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
A pretrial conference was held in the chambers of
Judge Oler, sitting in for the Honorable George E. HOffer, on
Wednesday, April 26, 1995. Present on behalf of the Plaintiff
was Andrew C. Sheely, Esquire. The pro se Defendant, Gregory G.
Anderson, did not appear at the pretrial conference nor did he
submit a pretrial memorandum.
This is an ejectment action. Plaintiff owns a
mobile home park, and Def~ndant hae allegedly remained on the
premises after refusing to sign a lease and has violated park
rules and regulations. Plaintiff seeks ejectment or eviction
and past r~nt.
It is noted that Defendant failed to amend
certain portions of hls New Matter in an AnSWer to Plaintiff'S
complaint, sRid amendment having been required by a pretrial
order in response to Plaintiff's preliminary objections I as a
result, those paragraphs have been the subject of a "default
jUdgment" taken by Plaintiff. It is believed that those
paragraphs are consequently no longer to be considered in the
case.
l:i~ 4.,
~~ IH jJ r~. ~
;:J ,~ ::~
~-
i ~ ~ ,;1 0 f. '
,~ fL. ~ ~ ~
~O
~. ~ r~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.
~ .
~~~ ~ [2 ~ ... ,r. ~
~ = ,< ~ ~"'
f.L. ~ ...-j '(,j ~ ~ ~
081 ~ (5, ~ .~
I\; ~M ~ ~ (,.8 ~~~..~
~~~H , ~o. ~h~
i r, ,
l:l .,~'<,r.~~
; g ,~ < ~ r.
"h~" L rJ
o. ..... ~~
r,~
#
.
l<INGSBURY ASSOCIATES, I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
plaintiff I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
I CIVIL ACTION " LAW
I
V. I 94 " 4453 CIVIL TERM
I
GREGORY G. ANDERSON t. I IN EJECTMENT
Defendan I
R.OUIST WOR FINDIHWi or FACTS AND CONCLUSIQN8 OF LAW
plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, by and through counsel of Andrew
c. Sheely, Esquire, hereby files this ReqlJest for Findings of Facts and
Conclusions of Law in accordance with Order of Court dated Apr.il 26,
1995 and the attached memorandum.
1. Plaintiff Kingsbury Associates is the owner of the Kingsbury
Mobile Home Park located at 5169 Trindle Road, Hampden Township,
Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant presently resides on Lot No. 35 in the Kingsbury
Mobile Home Park.
3. No lease agreement exists between Plaintiff and Defendant for
the lease of Lot No. 35.
4. Plaintiff provided Defendant with a oopy of a lease and Park
Rules and Regulations.
5. Defendant refused to anter a lease agreement prior to the
initiation of the above-captioned law suit.
6. Defendant was advised of violations of Park Rules and
Regulations regulating the construction of additions and modifications
on the mobile home within the park.
7. Defendant has no leqal owner.hip intere.t or lea.e aqreement in
referenae to Lot No. 35 in the Kinqsbury Mobile Home Park.
8. Defendant previously refused to abide by park rules and
requlations and refused to oomply with Plaintiffs requeHts to properly
install a deok and poroh roof.
RBOUBST rOR CONOLUSIONS or LAW
9. Plaintiffs are entitled to ejeot Defendant and his mobile home
from the Kingsbury Mobile Home Park.
10. Plaintiffs are entitled to all rental oharges whioh have been
paid into the prothonotary of Cumberland county in lieu of bond and
whioh are presently being held by the Prothonotary of Cumberland
County.
11. Plaintiffs are entitled to immediate possession of Lot 35 of
the Kingsbury Mobile Home Park.
12. Plaintiffs are entitled to all reasonable costs and attorney
fees.
DATE I June 5, 1995
l
ndrew c. Sheely
1 West Main Stre
Shiremanstown, P
(717) 737-8761
Pa. I.D. No. 62469
2
7. Defendant ha. no legal own.r.hip int.re.t or 1.... .gr.e~.nt in
r.f.r.nc. to Lot No. 3~ in the King.bury Mobile Ham. Park.
B. Def.ndant previouslY refused to abide by park rule. and
regulation. and refused to comply with plaintiffs requests to properly
in.tall a deok and porch roof.
~IOUIST FOR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
9. plaintiff.. are entitled to eject Defendant and hi. mobile home
from the Kingsbury Mobile Home Park.
10. plaintiffs are entitled to all rental ohargms which have been
paid into the prothonotary of cumberland county in lieu of bond and
which are presently being held by the Prothonotary of cumberland
county.
11. plaintiffs are entitled to immediate possession of Lot 35 of
the Kinqllbury Mobile lIome Park.
12. plaintiffs are entitled to all reasonable costs and attorney
feeB.
DATE I June 5, 1995
Resp~otfully submitted,
}~I /
ndrew c. -sheely, E quire
1 West Main Street
Shiremanstown, PA 011
(717) 737-8761
Pa. 1.0. No. 62469
2
KINGSBURY ASSOCIATES, I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintitt I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYINANIA
I
v. I CIVIL ACTION - LAW
I
GREGORY G. ANDERSON, I 94 - 4453 CIVIL 'l' E lUll
Detendant I
I IN EJECTMENT
f~!OIP~ ENTRY or JUDGMBNT BY DBrAULT
TO THE PROTHONOTARY I
LAWRENCE E. WELKER
cUMBERLAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE
CARLISLE, PA 17013
Kindly enter a judgment by default in favor of p~aintiff, Kingsbury
Associates, and against Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson, as to Defendant I 13
failure t.o replead paragraphs 30, 31, and 32 of Defendant's New Matter
in accordance with Order of Court dated February 27, 1995. A copy of the
February 27, 1995 Order of Court is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
a certificate that written notice of intention to file a Judgment by
Default is attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
IIp; I '2,/1'1!;;
By I AItiI/II ( SAu I.--
Andrew c. Sheely, Esquire
Pa. I.D. No. 62469
1 West Main street
Bhiremanstown, PA 17011
(717) 737-8761
Attorney for plaintiff
Kingsbury Associates
~
r~ \)
~~ ~
hR ~
~.
~ \ \ ~~
'-1...
~:1
- ~ ~ ~
1'.,."
,~
.1'-s.
".
".~
, ,
,
I,i
Defendant never signed the written lease agreement and oontinues to
refu.. to enter a lease agreement while exeroising possession and
oontrol over that portion of Plaintiff'~ property desoribed as Lot No.
3~ in the ~ingsbury Mobile Home Park.
In addition, Plaintiff has repeatedly attempted to notify
Defendant by certified mail of Defendant's continuing violations of
Park Rules No. 14 oonoerning construotion of additions on Mobile 1I0mes
and late payment of rent. In short, Defendant refuses to sign a lease
or oomply with regulations concerning the construction of additions,
refused to pay rent payment in timely fashion and violates other park
rules and regulations.
11. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff, ~ingsbury Associates, filed an Amended Complaint on or
about November 18, 1994. Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson, filed an
Answer, New Matter and Counterclaim to Plaintiff's Complaint on or
about December 19, 1994. Plaintiff filed Preliminary Objections to the
Defendant's Answer, New Matter and Counterclaim on or about J'anuary 10,
1995. Following argument Court, an Order dated February 27, 1995
issued by the Honorable J. Wesley Oler, Jr., directed Defendant to file
an amended pleading in reference to certain paragraphs of Defendant's
New Matter. As a result of Defendant's failure to file an amended
pleading, plaintiff, after serving a Notice of Intent to take Default
Judgment, entered a default judgment in reference to the Order of Court
dated February 27, 1995.
2
Prior, to the February 27, 1996 Order of court, Defendant's prior
attorney, Floyd Baturin, Esquire, filed a petition for leave to
withdraw as oounsel for Oefendant. The Petition to Withdraw was
granted and Attorney Daturin withdrew from the oase as of Karoh 7,
1996.
III. ~Ller ReQUeSTED BY PLAINTlrr
Kingsbury Assooiates seeks to have Defendant ejeoted andlor, in
the alternative, evicted from the Kobile lIoma Park for refusing to
enter a lease agreement with Plaintiff and for failing to complY with
Park Rules and Regulations after being notified of such violations.
PlaintiffS further request that Oefendant Anderson remove the mobile
home and all other possessions from the mobile home park in accordance
with the ejeotion and eviction action.
Plaintiffs ruquest the Defendant pay for all rent which is
presently due to Plaintiffs from his use of the mobile home park lot
during the term of the pending action. Accordingly, plaintiffs request
an Order of Court distributing all funds presently in Escrow to
Plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs further request that Defendant pay Plaintiffs costs,
expenses and legal feos.
IV. STATEME~T OF THE LEGAL ISSUES
.. Whether Defendant Anderson should be ejected from his
exclusive poe.ession of Let No. 35 located in the lingsbury Kobile
Bo.. >>ark tor failing to enter a leasa agr.ement with Plaintiff
~lnqsbury Associates?
3
b. In the alternative, whether Defendant Ander.oh .hould be
evioted for violating 'ark Rule. and Regulation. after reoeivinq
notiae of park rule. and regulation. oonoerninq failure to ...k
approval of the landlord prior to oonltruotion of an addition.
i. WITNESS,.
1. Robert E. Goodling
2. Russell C. Goodling
3. Carlea M. Lenker
4. Plaintiff reserves the right to oall additional witne.se.
provide suffioient notioe is provided to Defendant.
VI. LIST or EXHIBITA
1. copies of all letters sent to Defendant requesting that he sign a
lease.
2. copies of all letters sent to Defendant advising him of var.ious
violations of Park Rules and Regulations and requesting that
Defendant leave the park.
3. Misoellaneous photographs of the mobile home owned and/or operated
by Defendant at the mobile home park.
4. Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement these exhibits with
additional information to the extent such becomes available.
VII. REOUESTED STIPULATIONS
1. Plaintiff Kingsbury Associates is the owner of the Kingsbury
Mobile Home Park located at 5169 Trindle Road, Hampden Township,
Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant presently resides on Lot No. 35 in the Kingsbury
4
Mobil. Hom. Park.
3. No l.a.. a9r..ment .xiete between Plaintiff and Defendant.
4. Defendant has in~talled aluminum skirtin9 on hie mobile home.
~. Defendant was advised of violations of Park RUles and
Re9ulations regulating the construction of additions and modifioations
on the mobile home within the park.
6. Defendant has no legal ownership interest or lease agreement in
reference to Lot No. 35 in the Kingsbury Mobile Home Park.
VIII. DISCOVERY
No disoovery was requested by either party.
IX. ESTIMATED TIME OF TRlA~
Plaintiff believes that a non-jury trial would likely last two (1)
- (2) hours.
X. STATUS OF SETTLE"ENT NEGOTIATIONS
The parties were extremely close to settling the matter last year
and Plaintiffs forwarded a settlement agreement in accordance with
repreeentations made by counsel for Defendant. However, on the eve of
eettlement, Defendant refused to sign a lease or stipulation as
requested as part of the settlement offer notwithstanding meeting all
of the requested terms as requested by counsel for Defendant.
DATE I APRIL~, 1995
~f
11
5
. ~ I .
'I)
.
iiI
I.)
, "/
1'1;
.)
'"
, ,
\~)
-t !
~
~> ~
::It-' .... ,.J .... z ~ a
~~ .... r.: ~ - ;:
E ,- .~ ~ 0: ~ - 'I
,.J 'C e ~ ~ ~
~ ~ JJ . ,:: ,:: z
c...~ - ~3 ~~ lJ
. .- '-'Po ~
. - . JJ ..-: z ~ ,..
U' ,- -to.. Il!C c=.-. ~: 0
',L.~ .. :.- .... . U.J U ,..
,- ~ VI U.J ~~- OJ
C-iZ u :.- ~ U1 Z '"
co ~ z Z
E-u.... 1'1 ~ j it ~ OJ Z
~ Vl '" ::;...-!'"~ 0. 0
8~~ ..,. . ';:;.: ""1" ~ IX :t
..,. ~ <..:: o '"" 0 <.i 0.
I- 'w! c....; Z IX ~
I ~ ;;.. ~IX 0( " :J
~U.J-' ..,. "" "".....b. 1lI III
0- S f;:"'-7 ,.. U1
~~ . ~ ~ ~I'==~ Ii
~du ~ ~. I- C IX
~:=:u ~
:t
""" \I~"'" ".. .;~., \I, 'III ~" II. IN "" ~
')1.,1\11'1)1 fll""."'ll"II' "'1" ',\,
Vd.
Itl 'rnE cou~'r OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUHllE/lI,"NO COUN'rv, PENNBVLVMHA
NO. 94 H5l CIVil, T~;IlH
KINGSBURY ASSOCIATES,
~IBiIlIiU
GRF.OORY o. ANOF.RSON,
pllfendBllt
CIVIL /lCTION . [,/III
I N ~;,JIo:(~'['H~:N'I'
hN>>HiB_T2-AMEMDED_~QMf~^lnl
HI.TIUiEH JmTEILIIN)} <:Q~N'f~R';:IJMH
/lNO NOli, thu 16th d~v of lleeel1lher, 1994, eOI1lI!~ thll Ill/fl!nd~llt, 011/90ry G,
/lnderaon, by Bnd throuqh hla altornl!Yu, Blltul'ln ~ Bnl.Urlll, nnd IInnwers as
follows:
1. Neithl!r adnu1IUti nlH 111!1l1etl. Ill/fundallt In without kllowled~n or
aufflellmt InfotlnllllOn illlt!, thlJlIlfoll!, ntnct proof thllleof in demanded at time
of tl'111I.
2- /lrhnl t ted.
3. /ldl1li t ted.
4. Dellied.
Ilf the premises:
leases.
5. Admit t IJd.
6. "dmi tt ed.
Plaintiff did not sequin' all "lmllll!dlat.1! right t.o possession"
Plaintiff acquired the property subject to any eXlBtin9
~!1ltLL. E.1F.<:1'.MMX
7. This paragrBph in nol 8 fact.UBI aVl!rmen~ and thus requires no
respollsl!.
8. "dmi ltl!d.
- 1 -
9. /ldmlthd In purt on,i danlttd in pint. J t 10 odmithd thot Oefendont
never RIl/lled thll leaue aqrllement vroffllred, bill lJefendllnt deniea thet he
refuseR to rmtllr inli, nn IllJIHoprintrt lenR'1 ~ql'trllllent wlth l'luintiff oftel'
undarntllndill\l nil oondiUlJlIR clJlllluclod thlltlltrJ. 1'1)11 ['laiIlIHI: won ullwillin\1 to
dlRouon any 1II0dj,fI,I:aJloll to lh'l terlM Ilf thll leaRe n9tellmellt IHI pruentttd. 'rhe
Defendant attempted 011 Ill!VlIllll o"I'lIni<JJlu to diacuna Il now lllanll u\1tel!ment, but
Pleintiff refused to do RO.
10. Admitted.
11. /ldmitted III patt alld denllld III part. It Ls admitted that Plaintiff
haa been unuuoceBsful In dilllctlng Ilofendnllt to rllmOVI1 thll mobile home and
himself from tho ptllllliucu. It ia dt/lIllld thnt I)ofelldunt did not- remove lhe
"addition": there wnn 110 "~dditLoll" to remove.
12. D'!IIied. It in dtll1ied that till' 1'Inillllff in I!ntillod to illllTlediatll elld
IIxclusivll POBSIl5Ui<lJI of lalldll wlli',1l Il,!f<uldl\nt currently occupios. 0n the
cOlltrnry, Il<,felldllnt La entit.led t.] IIlIII'lill III pOllueasioll. Pldnliff acquired
property subject to nny tlxiatillq luauoll,
13. Admitted.
1I11F./lE~'ORE, DefllllduM, Gn.'IIl1ry ,;. And"laol1, rUBVllot,[ull y rllqullal:B Your
Ilonornnl e COllrt.:
") To dlamlna PIAillt Ifllll Alllel1l!od eOlllplnlllt:
D) To ""t'OI' ;)111)l'dlll of I~OIJlI: dlrllci'ln'l P1Allltlff, Kl.nganury
/lBPocinten, t:o Gunume 1l.1["11r101l1:'1l ':'"111 "onI6. 1<1\101 "ont:u And ft}Il~: nl1d
C) To ordur Any nthuI lolief dllllmad jU5t and Il~ul.tahlll.
- 2 -
~!I11T-.JL....E.YJS;lliti
14, Thl~ plrlQrBph l~ not a factual aVQcment and thus rQ,ulre~ no
reBpllnBI/,
15. Admllt:ud!1l pllrl Illld tI"lli"d III pall, It III /Illlllllll1d Ihal P1IIIllUff
aent Oefl/ll,j.lllt (JIl'lt about Puhluary 2J, l'J'J4, Il 1,,11,,1 by '~O)lltfj,.tlllm!l.
pufelldlllll In wilhultl IOlowl"I\IYt) <II' Iluffidl'!lll Illflll'lllBlIOIl liB to thl'! allllhmt~ of
thl/ Item of COl'tI [I'ld mllll II lid , Ihlll:l/fuPI, BIl'id pluof thlll,)of, la dl/lnllmfl/d at
lillll' t)f lriul.
16. /ldllllt bjd,
17, A,IIIIj II uti,
10, Neilher admilted Ilor dUIl!ed. Pl/fulldunl la withuut kllowlnd9u or
sufflcll/nt illforllHltion 'lfi tll th.) trllth 01 vllraelty uf this aVllnlll/nt and,
Iherl/forll, alrid proof 1.lwn>of III dmllnndlld al. Iimu uf \ llBI.
I? fldmiU",1 In pill 1 Iml 01'1111,.,1 In [hll"', II iei udm\l:l:o,d Ihlll PI,liIlUff
BUilt Peft'lldunl a 1,,11,,1 by ,',-'rI. t t i IOd 11I111 I o.lIl or uboul JUIll' Ii, 1994, Pl/fclldunt
Is without knowl,.d9" 0' BlJffld'lIll inf,ltIl1ution 11'1 t.0 Ih" cont.ent.s of thll Ill/m
of c,nl! ll",1 mol I ,Ind, IIlf'l'u[oru, ntrlcl proof UWI,'of ill d,'mullded at time of
tdal,
20, N,.ilh"l. "dmill",! nOI '\Iml",\' 1l,'f,-'nILlllt ill wil'houl. knowllldge or
suffL~lollt. lnfurmulLon an to tho tlut.h or varocLty of thLa IIvArmcnt und,
I.l.L'rl'fule, dl'id [lloof I.h'~I"lIf In ,Il.)mnn,i",! 01 lIw' of 11!01.
21. /ldm!t.t.,d.
2~, Admlll...,\ in pOl't an,I').'1I1PII In [lall, It in ndmil.ted I.hat. Floyd M.
Boturin, o..[lIlldnllt's ~ttnlnO)y, luouivud U lottllr dnt.ed June 22, 1994, BLqncd by
n. 1':. Klnir, }I III d"1I1,',1 Ihot noi,\ 1,:"t'~1 nlah'" "I.hnl od,'ndllnt wall in
vjt)laUnn 01' PIIlIt 11IJl".'\ ,I lid I. "'JI Ii ,II j'JII:',. ,".
- :I .
23, AdmHted,
H/lEREl1'ORI\, OufulloJUIlI, 01'u901'Y 0, AII,IIII'"oll, l'eBpel.ltflllly rl,l'llhlsts Your
lIol\ornblu COUltl
II) To dl allli uu 1'1111 III j fI' 11 1\1II'!II<lOlt etJlIIldalllL:
II) To onter nil Oldur of Court dlraatlllQ Plnllltlff, Klngubury
Assolliotoa, to uusullle pefendulII's C<lllll ennln, 11I9UI <lOul.u Blld fllou: snd
C) To Indor nllY 'llhor 1111 jnf defmod JUBt alllJ "'Iui.tnble.
~Q.!1JfLllL_. ...TJl./iJJJ?J\.eIl
24. This pnragraph In Ilot a fuelllal ilvurlllolll, ulld Lhlls rllqlli.roll 110
responsu,
25, OOlliud. pofolldallL donlpu thlll. he hUD <Ioprivod rlullltlff of full IlSl!
und Blljnymul\t of Plni.llliff'B proporly,
26, Pl!llied. It in d"IIJu<l Ihul Pllf'.'IldulII hila dnplivet/ PlaillUff from the
reasonuble UBIl and 1'0111111 of Plai.ntiff's pl'nporty, Ilnfondanl has Peen making
nIl of hi" rent pllYIII<'1)ls, Ilufplldanl'll nmt in paid in full i1nd cOllaiBtent to
relltB of Gimllal IlIllls In the moblln hom,' plllk.
III1EHEI'ORI';, Iln"'ndanl, Ilro'1'1I:Y G, Andonlon, 1'1.'lIpod.fully roqueots Your
llonol'ablQ Courtl
A) "0 dimnlllll Plaintiff's Anwlldnd Complaint;
AI To I!lllor 011 OrdHr of Cuurt dlrectln~ Plaintiff. Klngabury
Asuoc!al.eo, 1.0 ROlllllIl1! Ilpf()nd'IIlI'fl ':,)IJI'I. '~UIlt:O, leg"l ,:oflls and fena: Rnd
c) To ordnr allY ulher rnli.ef dosmed just alld BqultnblB.
.4-
NEILJol^'lliB
In further r~sponse to the Plaintiff's Complalllt, Oefendalll, Gregory a.
/lndllrson, Hllbmlltl thl! ('ollowil111 Nl'w Mllth'l', Itl Wltl
27, ~in9sbury /ltlSOdatllH IH"I'Jilllcl tlllld ptopllny by Ileed datolPd I\UgUHt 10,
1992, and I'Qcol'd~d Ramll HHplembll1' II, 1~~2, aoQl1irlllQ Iho property nllhjool 10
oxlstl1l9 IQaellu Bnd cOllcllllonu, If allY,
20. I)o('elldlllll Iu willin,! I" 1!1111'1 1111</ 'I l,elllll' ^Ql~"mllnt with the Pluin-
tiff, howevel, thl! Ll!aso /I<H1I1111111nI whi'.'h Plalnlif'f h'lIl pl'off'lIl'od Is
IInaooopluble 10 Ih.. 1)I!1"lldUIlI IUllli'}I1I1II1I'II. OpedfleBlly, I.hll pl'oviaions
ooncerlling water lllld lhe l'eHpollHlbillty of lhe reuplll'llvl' patties III oonnectioll
wHh property damage lire 1I1111'uI1"l1allll'.
29. Effol:t.s by Plalnli tf havOl h''''1l 1J11I11Iccl!s~lful ill altempl.il1g 10 remove
the Dotf'ndalll ulld hill mubil" homll 11',,11I Ihe 1I111hil,' hmlll' park, 101' there is IJO
legAl ulld JUHlitlabl1l teaSoll 01 I'IIUSOIlS that tho Defendullt should be removed
f rom the mohil e hUllle purl\.
30, DlltiIJ9 lhl' mOl1lh "t ",,,hllla,y 1~~'1, w'~lIlh'lI' <)oll,lillol1l1 were extreme Dlld
thllte Wil:l all "blJlldnllr,,! of snO\I. Nonetheless, il: wns Plainl:i.ff'fl obligAtion al1d
reapul1olbllit.y ttl have I'he l'oo1dwayo ill nnd 10 lhll mob!11! home [lark prompll y und
properly dellted fol' ili I 1 h" t.lf,id,ml:Il. 'rh" Pl"lnl: iff hlld fail'ld to do ao, ulld
wos neql,!ctllll in 1'l.,movlnIJ (1111) "I""I'1IJIJ tlJl' :'1I0W II <1m Ih" I <lildw;IY~1 ilnd pallw
which mllde 11111111' impllHBAbl1l ['II dnyn alld, l:h')I'>1fol'n, Il"fendanl was ptohi.hi t",d
hom 1f111Vin9 I hi' mold I" hom,' patll und wlln 1I0able II) '1,,1 to hill plllCI' of
employmenl: for ,I bll;li or lout (1) ,l.1y" whio'il ~el1lJII;"d in lost. WDqllB. In
llddil.ioll, no mili) dl'liv",y 01' 1'1,,11111' WIHl pOIl/dhl" tOt thill l.imll Pl'llud,
- Ii -
31. Dtf~ndant did 1101 constrijct all addition onlo his mobil~ home. /lfter
the severe weat.hllr cOlldll1ol1u of thlJ winter of 1994, Ollfolldallt'll mobile home
was damaged and, in an nllempt to !:IJPSH the damnge, Defel1~ant merely roplllred
hin ptopll!:ty by I' IJJl lold 111) Iho d1l1l1i1'1"0I hOllt 11101'11 to II1",U<l... II 131111111 potoh
arell. Dllfendnllt. wae llllllwnnl th'lt h" Ilood..d pdot npprovlIl by I'llIillll.f.f I.n
ladeI' to roplll1 hln Plo[10tly. BulJl1t")lIlmUy Dnlel101l1lll hllu <111 sevf1I'al occlIsions
requested thllt Plailltiff plepalo in wtltill9 a list of what is acceptable IInd
1101 IIcoeptable ful' /lIohile boml' UWllPln whlJlI aHetin\l theil' pl'oJllnty, this
re'lueet hae bp-en ignol'ed by th,' I'I,ti1111 ff. Furthel, lJofol1dallt had in fact
personllll y gUile 10 t 1]1' 1IIIIIII'doll 1'ownshlp BOl'ough ofllc.! 10 em, if II building
pennit was llecllsl1ary for the repair he wnllted to mllke 011 his mobile home alld he
was advised Ihat boclluHe hiB repail wan Ilot a permBIlBIlI ntructute or over the
cost of $500.00 it wan nol llec@001ll'Y lot him to obtnlll II buildillg permit. III
addition, t.ht!re is l1olhill') ill Wl'il.i1l9 In Ih., Mobile /Iome Park RulllB and
Rl!glllallonB nlolting that mohl "1 home owners nl!e,1 to tlhlolin building p'!l'Illlls
ft 011I lIulllpden Townnhi p. IJd I'ndun I had 1)O!1'n In f (>I m"d hy an agont or PI' j nd pa 1 of
the Plallltlff, RUBsel1 noodlil1g, Ihat Ih" sides of Ih~ IIl'ea which Defendant had
reblli It mllllt be removed ond Defolldill1l has done II').
32. On or about ,JUlie 27, 1~'J4, '~ollnsel for Defendant. wan lloll.fled by a
typewril.tell lel.tr! 111'111,.,1 by ;ill ;11)"nl rOl' Plaill! iff Ilwl HI, GOIodling hud
asked that no lII'lI:(! ''''lIllll:III,'II''1I b" dl)n.. l)1l th,! Defendant's 1II0hile home.
Defl?lldant has cOlllplied with Ihln r"'IIII'IlI. 111 the !laml! 1,'tt:nr,lhlft'n,lunt'n
coullB,,1 WIIIJ inlotllll'd thai D,,[''Il,Jllnl 'n 111111 la,'kod th,' [""l"'! nldtllng, Yilt
pr,'vlnllllly, Dpf,,,,,lant had 1"'011 Ii II I ifi..d thnl Ihl' nWn('tll of Ih,' IIInbiltl hOIll" park
W"l'~ to't'llj"ilUn'J that. II"W Ilkl.tllli'l b,- I Ii:; 1 ,Ii Illd. I\l)W,-V''', IJ,'f...ndalll:' ~J sill ~t.i nq
wan Ul'l'IOlv..d by I'Llliililf by 11,1111"1 In l/lillll'l ""IIIr!IIl" OK", III 1"''In,dll 10
- () -
tho Bkl~lin9 Plalntlft haB Ilot plllvid"ll the I,,"[dent'a of the mol.ll.le home pa~k
wllh a Wtitten cOllY Ilf the Rull1B 11U.1 Rel/ulat [llnB ClJncll~nlnl/ I.hll ukirlinl/ is/illlll,
31. Thll~e alll ,)lh"I lIIobllo hrJlIl'! I'WI\I!l.8 WhOll1l Bkirlln9 IR similar IInd/ol
idllnth'ol to Ihul ,)1 1l1'''''n,IUIII'" 1111<1 plililll ill ill nol 'l/If'1I<'I1I1) I h., skil'lill\l
Isaull upl'Jn thellll lll.hll! 1II0bil" hl)IJI" OWllttl iI I ,'ni.]l.nl) III Ib,! JIB11." IllId thlltllforll,
aocording III I.lto Mohll.! 1I01ll'! 1'11111 Ilil!hl" Ad, ""l I'./i. /;"(',1')0.1(,'), Plaillti[!
Bhllll not hav" Ih" Ilght l.fl .!vir:! thl! Dllfolldant.
H. Dofllndanl. hUH 1101 violllltHI IIny of 1.11<' lIIobil,) hOIll" palk ruluB IInd
re9ulatJollB, Rllt flHth by thft PllllnUff, nOI hall tho IJefolldant hl'llachlld the
lllRUII 0" violal'1l11 any Iwo U) l"llk 1I11'!1\ wilhill il :;Ix lIIolll.h I"" iooJ nil
eplld f l'~olll y Rill: f"..th in I h" Mllhll II 110,'''' Pillk Ili \/hl.f, A,'I, iiI! P. 6. 8nc, 3?O. I,
,lIld, thernfole, accordillg 10 Ih,' Act., L)1l" Plaillt.lll. IIhallnol. hUVOl 11m rlghl.to
eVI"t th" D,)(elldAllt /tom th." 1II0bil" hOIll" pall'..
.35. Defllndunl. hiw cOlllillllitlly lIIi1d,' hil! ">IJlIt! pUYIII'>Il\<l in a tillJl>ly fallhjl)n
and, ollly 1)110 ",Olll.h, Fl!b!1l8ry 1'l'H, 1l"fell,l~nl Withheld hlB !ental paYlnflllt until
Plaint.lff tanlt <'III"> o1f itH (jbl\t)lItl(jIlIlIlI1tII"l1pollliihllili'!1\ in Ih'l rellloval of
~now hOIll thl! p~r1t tlJiloIw~ys ilnd f,)otpaths.
36, fiil1l~" Pl,linl iff ,Ia,; ,1"ll\liretl Ihe P!'opotly, 1'1 IIi IJIill' hllH t:lJpelltodly
bflell harASslll\/ thu llefelldAll1. by olll~llll~ hilll 0111 fl(jlll th,. nth.r park ~fl9Idonts.
ill An "Umllpl. I'l IllI"" Iii,> Il..fvndanl. tn l"i1vll thl) mohile h01ll11 pArk.
III1EREFORI~. Defendant. (j1~901'Y Q, Anderson, !HRp",:'lflllly tn'Illlluts YOllt
Jlonllrnbl.. Courl.:
A) "n Mamill9 Plol.lIl.i[["1 AUI>1Il,IO)d "~nllll'lainl;
A) '1'<, "n't,~1 .JII Old", 01 ":01111. IJir,'din') Plaintiff, rUnq:Jhuty
AA:H)ciat:/~:J, to anfdlJt\e nl~t:c'lldilnt 1:-, f'IJllll ('ltnln, I "IJ.11 1~f)IlI_n ,md (pf':l; .Inrl
I~) 'I'n r)l"dPt .lIlY I:thl)l- I f~1 i I'f dlll.'IIl"11 JH:l' .Hld ,..rlld t.1hlf',
- 7 -
r:O!m.m%AII.i
l7, "hl.l IIVI.lIIII~ntH 'If)llt'llllnll III PIIlIlIJIIII'hll 1 thLough 3li 1I1Q incorporated
hUI,,11I hy 11'11'1 1'1 iI' I' 1111 IIII)'I"h I"" n,IIII" WI'II' lexl\1iI11y 11"[ forth.
311, 0\11111'1 I"" 11I1)111" lI[ """'11011 Y I '1'l4. w"ilt.h~r condi I: lllllB were extLeme and
111"1" WillI 1111 111"11I.1111\0'1' ,II "'111\1. It Willi Plilillllff'a obllgal'!'lll nlld LGapOllai"
hlllly \',1) h'IV" Ih.. IllIlllwllyn 1111111'.111) t.he IIII)bll" hlllll" pillll PLolllptly and
pi 1)1"" I Y 1'1 "'11.'..1 1111 "II I",. 1"11 i,lt'1I1 t\,
1'). 1'"'' 1'1111111111 ""01 [;Ii I,.d I:,} huvt) I.he l:oildWllya III und to thl! 1II0bile
hIHl'" plllk 1'llIlIIldly 'lIl,lpIl)l'l'lly dl'lItl',1 11)1,111 I'he renid"lIln IIlId Willi
11',I)I,,,'llnl III '''llIlIvlIl', ,111.1 ,'I"'llil1q U". ~11')W ftom Ih.. ton,lwllYs III\.j paths which
11I'1'\" 111111I1' Iml"llll',"dl' ,,,, oIl1yn ,lilt!, 11"'1 dutl', 11<:(.,1111'1111 wan ptohibill!d ftolll
l'''IVIII'J Ih" llinhll" h"IIl" lJl1I11 1I11t! WiHl ul1ilble to get to hiu pl&ce of employment.
lOI ,I IIItld 01 11)\11 (1) ,Iayu wlildl "'lIlIlled ill 10Bt. Wil'I"S of ilpproximal.ely
"hl'l'" 111111.11",1 (tJ1110 00) Oollllrr,.
1I11~;n~;I'()HI':, ll"! "II,llIlIt/nOllllh'rcl ,Ii ilia 11 I , Cl"lgIHY (1, Alldl,raoll,
1''''I'",'irlllly 1'''IIl''fllll Ynllt lI'lllnl,\hl,' COllt!:
A) 'I'n "111"1 1111 0111"1 nl COllr! <Iin:clcill\l 1'laintiff/Counl.erdefelldnnl..
Killl,nhlllY AllrJO,'I,II"II, In ,,)llIIbIlI11" ll'lf"ntlilnl/C1lulll.n,:dailllnnt'a lOlli, wages; ilndl
II) 'rn 1'1I11t1 ,III 01',1,.[ of Cnllrt. di t"ding l'lninl.i f[/Coullt'Jrdefendnnt,
~ Illqllhll\'Y Aflfil.It:1 ill "11, In IIIlBUmO llof,.mtllllllfCIJI.ll1!erd nimant' R court posts, legal
l'or.1 rJ nu" (!'!.In: 11Il"
- 8 -
I
~). 1)4-4553 Ctvt I Tunll
I. .. ~"". Ilndlal , 'I>> ,"ljlllOfl.I.IIV1UI, I .110 wl.h 10 f.cll~. th. J
I. ,. I"... I, .... .. · ~, 'ulluwlny u"I... !lur .n ..".
I ",.". VDl.lI ,tlnll "'" ,.tlt".. Of1'hf "YII., " Ihlt 'a,", 10 lhet w. un ,..11
ItbIm thI. ~If" I. ylMl. '
, . AII'L'h Ihl.IlJlltIIII th. lumlli' Ih. 1Il.1Ij)lln. Ill'''' lh.lmk I' \11.1:1 1. II A'lIhulUu', Add,.",
dun 1'111' p.lfllll I
' . Will. ,.,t"UlII ""'1111 ""JIJ.t1.IJ" IJlllh,lllllllll.rt ,,,,I!lW Ih. "tllllllllmb." ;l, I I H.."lcluIJ Ou!l,,",V
. 1h, ".luIII HlullI' I/loIH lhu'h' IIJ YwhUlI1lh. .lth:l. ...... ""hlt'I." 11111' lh, il,ll
r~~;,:~;;:c~- - :~{~~~fl]~;;~:::""!'" -~ J
5002 LlJNl<lJR STIU1l!T ,~,"II.d II COD .r
MIlCHANICSIllJHG I'A 17055 I I .,""", Moll I J nu'",n n.CUIIlI,.,
."/,oiii.oiO.;fl....yM.J.l;IiIIlIiIIL. --. ..
. _._.... nun ..._ ..S.-L9::t't."..u__..1
6, A,'d'....... Add,u.. 10nly" ..qu..lld I
and 'eu II IHIIlJI ~
6. 6Iuniiiij,o'iAddi.....I-'
-
DOMESTIC PETUIIN IIECEIPT
",
I . Cl)mpl..." ;1"11' 1 Inil/llI 110/ Alj,hlmfl.l I\II"'U:"
" tumpl.l. lI.m. 3. 1M ... & h
. P,i"1 'VQut 11.111. Itlld .dd".. Iln Ih. 'IVllllt. ollhl' lImn II) th.I 'hll [Ill
,.,hm1thl, Cirillo ~Ilu.
. "nleh Ihl, flllm 10 Ih, 1101\1 ollh. 1Il111111'CI, III IIl1lh, h.~~ If '1IIl' 1, [I Add,aueQ'1I Add,...
.... "oll,,"nll
" Wtll."AlIlJ"l'f{uC.IPIAIIIII,"I.tl"Onlhltlllllljll.C.h.loYwtlll1.,lIch,flUJI1bll 2, I J nu.trlel d Dullvorv I
I . Thl A,lum A,ulPI 'hIli .IWI' II) who/lllh. .tlld, WII 11,11"''''11 ""0.1 th. .1'1. It,
!!!!!Y.!!!!L________~___.______.___,___._._ __.. fED~~~II"'BtlllJr fur 'dO,
13. ArUel. AddrulIS.d to: 4s,---Arlir.la NIJll1lJdt .---------
. KINGSBUHY t-lIBILB HOMll I'AllK .-.-_.__E.Ji5_L91..!U~.L__J
BOX 2333 4'1' 5..>lc. T~p.
MIlCHANICSllUHG I'A 17055 ~~:~:,~::~Ud:: ~~~Ud I
rN;,p,o.. Mull I. J Au,"", Aoc.lpl '0'
-~;:'-jjBIl) ';,-"58-li~o;.vmM .QUmdlII!L_,
.-1
requ...1d
I ,hso Wldh to ,oedl"lt thl
tQIIIJWlllU IOt\lh:lJa Ito, on QIIlIr. i
t.ul: I
I '6 Fnrm
...
"'"
n
(.
1-'
..,
-;'-_1
U-J
.<:;.
COMMON~EALllt Of f'ENN6YLIIANIA
_t__-,.----...--.----...-m .-.....
COUIIT Of CllMMllN f'LLA6
NOTICE OF APPEAL
I 110M
ClIMllIlIt! .ANIl ~'i'(III~I'Y
9th' JUOICrAHl16 fi t'f
DISTRICT .IUSTICE JUDGMENT
COMMON "LEAH N" ~ 4 - L/ tiS 3 C.' YLL__._
NOTlGE OF APPEAL
NUlu:ll lh IJIVl'll Ih,ll Ill" IIPpl/lllIn! Il.n 1111.111 III IIll! llhuVl1 ClIllll III CtllIlllllfll PIlIlI~ ,lll,lPIUill1 hUlllllw jlllhllllllllllPIUhlllld IIY 11111 DIm I!.;! Ju.liclJ
Ulllhl1 dilli! 11'111111 !lw t:jlt.1! IlliHltllllllltlllllhlW
OIUlOORY 0. AN!lllltSON
iiiiiiiri -IJ~ ""."~/I'"
l'li\
lrl:::j~ .~~l~.n;ttl~' I';;rnu;
['LJ') . .. ....
\, ,~
. --I iI. "iiib"---
ijl~i lJ" ,,"'ll,,"'O
.!H~l) B, 'l'rlndlu llLJ1d. !,ot 35 MuchunicaburH PA 17055
:~~7;;;~";~.' . ~;;;~~;;I;~' ~)hJlu 1I0lOU puri ,. (iruulJrv n. ^l1iliJrsoIL----.~
CI.IU~ hlJ. 1I~11/l''''". 1)1' ..."".~l...'" I,lll I". .."W'"".~ II" j"UI"
rA 10_.___._.__ .---- ....-- .' /"/;'.',,A. H. ";I'I,"I~~ II.: I''''
LT 1\l~H. _Jl.OOD250... ~-- ~,' ;r-:.; .. <:-
Tim hll)l~k will Ill! bl'Jlll'd ONI Y wl1PIl 11m tlllt.1111l1l Ib 'l'qullI!d I/nd.'. 1'.1
n .C.I' .JI' N" 100HB
TlUb Ntllll~P III "PIlI!,II, WI\l'1l 11'1111"'111\ IIY Ihl' lJ,~lllll .JLl~lln', will tllll'lillt! lib
II SlJPl:HSlllLAS 10 11lP ItldUIIH'1l1 hll Ihl~~l'bblllllln lhl~ t:,l~l'
9 fl' l' QIri&
.. ,"i:.~(.m ,. . {{ ,,/I../I.l..l( ... -..,--
.'i'IJlt,lf'O,'o/IJ','I/III/ltJI,IIYoJ ''''/1111
/I ."Jlwllim, W.IS el.1/m,mr (..;Oll P,I, H,C,P,J.I',
No, !aVlaj) lit ,Id/Oll Iwfmtl {lIslria JustiCIl, II"
MilS,. r/U A CUMPLAlN,. Wlt/,i" rw/!/,IV (201
""V' "",,, f"lII~ '"' NO nct: 0/ APN AL.
PRAECIPE TO ENTER RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT AND RULE TO FILE
(rltis $'/(.'(1011 of 1"'11/ to II,' "~'I'" ()N/~ Y lV/,,!/I "fJ/wl/.mf W,'~ nl:fINIJI1NrfSI1,l (1" lre,fl"I.!), No, 1001fl/ In .Jaw" 'JtJ{orrJ tJiSf,idJu6ticl1.
IF NO r liSEn, d,",.".." IWlIIl.'O/lY 0/ I/IUIU! fIt ,/Ill'I!.11 to Iw ,oi/HIt/'" II/lOll "IIlwl/tNIl.
PRAECIPE: r"I'"..IJ,",",,"y
. Ktnllshllry Mohllu lIoll\u Purk
LIl1I1l Ill!.' llpllll ___~__ ._..... .__,.__..._n~__'_______ ,Uppt.llllllJ!r.), tu flllJ 0 ClIlI1plO!l1t ill tlm IJPIHlol
N.IIIIl.'III,/flfll'lIr,'I!hl
IClllllllltJlI PII'.I!> N'l 9~' L/ if.) 3 C ,IVI J 'Tt. fdll Wllhlll lWPllly (201 d.IY~ illltJI \l!IYIClJ ullllllJ lII' !lufhll' un try ulju{IOIllUlllUf !lun pros.
. '!
,;" ,; '1/ :If/.L./'/;fi ~"-li' -.-' .
~- I . ~'Itlll"-;; ",'/J,II.", ur h/. ,utOfllUV Of "fI'"''
RULE: fll... Ktnl!shllry Moh! lu lIomo Pflr~n.._, "1'1','11",,(.1
N.IHIt.' .,, .,tJl"'II.,,.(~1
(11 YUlI illH Illlldll!d Ih,11 .1 tllIl' I~ tlt'll'lIy 1'1l1t!Il'd IIpUIl ytlll Itl lill!;t t.:tJlIlplillllt IlIlhis illllll'lIl w,lhln twellty 120lliaYli ahut thlJ datu of
5lHytl:I, 01 Ihl~ 111111 1I1hltl yuu IIV IH!l~I)tI,,1 ~HI'Jln, I)' IIY I.:lJIIIIII,'11 III 111\1151'11'1/11 m.tll,
121 II Y'"' <III "," fol.." "'""1'1..'''1 w"IJII111J.. ""11'." JUDGMENT OF NON PrlOS WILL rJ[ ENTEIlED AGAINST YOU,
(31 Tlli.' tI,IIt' lit !)I!I'JI(I! ot thi5 n,11I II bPtVIUl Willi hy 1l1i1d II!l1hIJ dU111 of 1110111111)
Oltu:.JJ<.1.9' K__,'01.!t.
. Qtdu..:m,_.'3J.1ud C'Ji.-j;-"___
u Slf"""I/f/I~~V or O"plJrv
.....;
I ~.J;
'~l)lHn HI.!; III lit: FILf.:D WITH pnOl HONO rAllY
l
~.
,
1'111 lill' III' IiFIII/1e1: UF No IICI: ')1' ^"I'I;/\L Arm 1Il/llc 10 I-ILl't;UMPlAINT
11/,.\, II ,,!' ,'f 'fd , I'''''''!! fir r Ii I " 1111 rUI,\'! III ( I" / i" " ';11 ,It I" "IUI!i tiil ri,i/,; Ij I,: d/,(J 0/1 '-'/f', J., "/liillr;fll"'~ II'/,\lt:,/
ClJMMfl/ll~'H lH I H OJ II j;!'JNli. )'I_~JI\I'III\
COlIN!) lIr
MFIl>/lVII
,., 101
",iI ,I I" 11"lli,jll Ij'lt"
'.
,,1.1/','''/',', ","J
" ' 'ill 'f I rill, i'J" [" I III /'1111' ,I, l' Ij, II; 'I" PLI ,I 11'1
I'l
I" I 'Ill ';1'" Ii d I'll I, " d II(H lilli' I'li' II, I In 11;/',/
t'l i "'" If ,I
ill'", 11111/1. I Ihpl
110,11\ Il" lilli,
!lldl!, il'lt h'l '" 1111'1'1111 ,III ilL111 dill i III"
'(\"'II tllll Illlk II'
,I Idd, ,d .!ll
5WIJIH:
1I1P1
1/\11 1111,11.111 /01.111
j)J\')' 111
:ilJl,l~il:1I 111111 I II r t lill
1'1
10/"'/('I/ld'
1''')11,1/11;' ,.,,,/f"',/'./'i" ""11,," ,/r"/,l"" J.Ii/.
~Il'l' I '.. II il" '" .11 , .! III' " "II
~ r.s
n 7""
~ 'I\:-
~ '-'
~,
-- V\
..t:;
-C <:>
~
0l
<:::.c
I ii" II I "!fqil'l'ld
1\11
1\1,
r.)
()
1~
,~. "-..
~' t)
"'*
"-...h_ .
\11111" II'
I i ',i II" 1 : ' : I'd I ~'Ij 1 '. ii'
I',I"'.! 1'1',/111',1' ,,1111,111,1111'1,111./11
Il/II',I'llill, dlltl''1l!dl.ll'dllllioll. .1'IUIl'I'
1,'/ r','jld'l <1111"11',1.' ,.lllIl.tll .n.lll'. II' tlilll ;,ll.i,II.,j IIlJIf'I.
,'I',
,'I IHljl,Hi'rIl1" Ifil
In 1
,tll;lJI I'J'H" t' 1/1 l\r't'l-,tI "p,'ll IIII' .1!11l.1:"p/ I IIj
11,/ li'I";IHI '1'i',HI' I II', It" lot,.ti j,. '1",1,,,,111
'I 1
~1, , () -j;.d
r,1),'~tj(tJ ~,;{J.;:M!~~ .L...--. ~;;;;'?", .,1(,,,;,,
\ ..
+. .c:.
~ l.1J 0
01 0 ll)
Cl 0 C;
: '-:8:
t
'J
~{'
~ r ~
. ,'P'
'. Ii
..-' "
,"
" ,
'1'1 CO
r 1'1'
,
.,J'. , N
l.""'it " ....
, , ;4; ~
"', "
,
.' ,.
.. .. ..
'of; .. ~
NOTICE OF A"flFAL
~llillfNWIAIIIIIIII'INNIIYl.V/\NIA
I' . l;:;~II'II'I~:~~;';I;I;I~~
'JlII I J "dii! ",,;(i'[1'1
I III}~.I
IlltHlIlCT .IWirler. JlIllClMENT
l;lIMiIlllN I'll A~ N" '1'-1,. L.f il 53 (' I II I L
NOTICE OF Afll'EAL
Nnlot I' ,~ 1j'~1 II 111.11 till' "1'111'11,1111 1111\ Id'lll III IIl1' '1IInl'l' elll"l III ClllllUll II I 1'11I,1~ .Ill ,,"p. .,1 II .HII till' pld'jln"1I1 jI'IHtl'llld IIy 1111/ 1)",11 It I JII~IIt.:I!
11111111' ILlb' IllId oil 1111'1.;:1\1' 1111,,11111111'11 Itl'l1lW
~IJUI"'~' ," .~~~I' IlIII
,'II'
I H~J;'[2'i~'Il~"i.'" l',;rnur
L",~
"" I'IIUI
""1." III "'1'.1' .101
CllUilllRY n. flNlllII~'iIlN
5\()1) n. Trlmllu ll.<lIId. '~)t 35 Muchwl!I:ubufK
:~?;,;,,~;;;~"" k'I;;'~~;);;;~ ~1Jil.u HUIlk!
P^
17055
1/\ 1'1.
I I IIIH.
OUUU25U.
Purk "CltfUIlOrv G. ArultJf5U1l
l'.j'lhlll'd'~ III .11'1111,,....' IJII III /l1~r..r~ .jh "~."'I
,~,~" l ,..,"" ' ,. (i I. " "-~"
"'t. " ---..----..-
I~ II'qllltl!d lindt'. 1'.1
II
,1"/11'/(,11I'
iAJ,'~ O,/IIt/"m (t"m
1',1,
II,G'P..}P.
Ihl~ 1)1'111, ','.,11 I", "'lIl1'd UNlY \\,111'0 11'1', 1I.1I,11",11
II t: I' .11' N" lililill!
Nil 'mUfti! III ,Irflllll IW(d,I' Ih\lfll' JjJ~,i".t/, I",
MIIST Jill A ':OMI'I.A/NT WIl/"" rWl/lllv ()OJ
'/.IV,' "II", "'III,) /," NO nc/.' "~I AI'I'/.' Ai.
111,.. f\j1l!"1 ,J! /\11111,11, .....1\.'11 I",.\"d II'.' till' 1),'11'" JII',IOI", '.-.<111111111,111' ,l~
.1 StJPLlI~ill)1 ^~i 11\ 1111' l',oIqllll.,1I t,lt 1l'1"""~"'IIII~'IIII'" I ,0'>1'
~.I{,t!. I .', . ) ii, ((;) ),. ,....llI )'1,;,
,'),,/II,"IIIl' .111 ,,'//1,"'11'.111 ,(, 11'1';;1';'(;
PIlAECIPE TO ENTER IIUI.E 1'0 "ILE COMPLAINT AND RULE TO FILE
'fillS .,,', fl,"I I,f 'rJ1/1I fll/l}! 1I:i1'" ,'NI)' 1\/11:1/ "'i",!/I",,' ~,"',J'" '" II NI),\NII.HJl' f'." '" r:V/.IJ MI, ,oUft1,,,, iJdlt.Jn Im/ofl1 f)wru:r .If/fit/OJ,
Ir NO r 11SI11 '/,'I,ul, I/lUIi IdJlV of /IlHH.fIOI .I/J/)I:,,111I lit.' M..fll'I' 1If1"" ,1111",1/1,1/1)
PRAECIPE: 1,)1'1111111111."...'1
1-1111111/1' IJI\lIII..____
Kln!l~hll"Y Mill!! III IInnN! I'lIrk
.--,..----......-.-.--.----
N,I/lI"')/"/i/l,_'II.I'fI!
if, In. I \\'lIll'fl 1\\'1,'111'11101 1I.IV" ,dIl'l'
, .1111'11111/1/1\1. to 11111 il compl.lll1t III 11m .111111I111
1/11. '11/...' ('
IC,'lIlll,,,,,III, .j', r'J'J -.I.J ~I VI I
~Pl VIi'l' nlllJIII tH 511111/1 unifY of jll{hll1Wtll ,)1 /lOll Il/'CI~,
,I /
1.1" . .~' ---
.1~,.: I....,'.-':_~,.::~L_~~..l!...~~.!.._..__.__.___._
, .J S,o'"'''}''' 01 ,,",Julll"" dr "Ia .,t/O""IV I/r 'IIIrIM
RULE: I".
Klng6hllry ~klhllu IIOllll.l 1'111'1\ '. """""",,,,1
N,'III"H,I//,.'I!n"I/
ill )',111,111' II/lld,,;,j 111,11 .111111' 1\ 111:11'11'( "1I1Iill''' lIP')11 ';1)11111 Itllt .11:11111111,11111111 tlll~ 1IIIIll!lll \\llhIIlIYWllty (:lO) d.IY~ ulll/! III.. 11.11l! of
~1!t'I"" "I 1111" 11.11' 1(111)!) '1IJIt II,' p"",l)o.11 ""....IIl' III IlY U'llIlu:t1 III 11!II.HllIllIl IIltll!.
1)1 II y''', "" ""I I,',' d' '"''11',''''' ",'I"" III" I"''''.,' JlJUliMI'N 101 NON I'II()~ WILL Hr IN r~IlU) ^G^,N~I Vmj.
1.0 1111 dolII' III ~1,'I~ln! ,,1111I~ IlItH d ~lItVIIII W.I~ II", 1Il,1I11'i Il1lId,lItilll 111111111\'1,
Ulllo: 1,1 1/ Ii ~
'IL
.. 10'1
8J.J!.~L 1)7,
f2.;~._.J.~ f,.~_____
S'I/,I..,,,m, r1f p,~';1,'IfY /U tJ,IIIII'V
COIIIII 111.1
"
,
II) ....
~ '1
--.
~
-
-
1~5J
,i
J
~
< ~ ~
~~
~ z ~ ~ "
0..1 "C .... to- q
E 4- ~ 0: ~ - ...
.... ,.J e ~ lJ ! a
i .~ ~ . ..... 'i g;
~,~
~ I~ ~~~ [1lI ~ ~ ~
'> 00: ." ~ u "
g;~1 ........
.- ~o.. o ~ z ~
u ~~~~ ~~~~z
~;~ t'1 IX IX 0. 0
In ::> . :J 0 . 1:
oot '-'
oot I f-Z~~
I ~ ~~~g; 0( ,.. :J
oot 1lI - III
~ ~ 0-
!::~~ffi ,.. U1
~ Ii
, 0:
i3 u :i ~ p:@ ~
:t
, ,
"
.. . ,;
1.""1,\1' "J\I""'III\I,,,' m,..".
L"'~~ OJ.lIf.,nlil.t).,.",..'"
. . , :' .0(1
",c/ (r~'
. 0(1'
\.
II""
II""
"-,
:~d
, ,
'.'
.
. ,
-< ~
~~
Z ~ ~ ,..
il.~ .... - ,.. ~
~. Q: ~ - ..
E .- -'
. ,.J .~ e~p~~
~ ~,~ ~
~~ 1lI Z > ,..
~~~ ~ <~ ~ ~ 3 ~ -
.- ...0.. U t
> ~ ti:~> o ItS OJ U1
.- U1 Z '"
~a~ u . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> ~c~ Z
l'1 ~ II: IX 0. 0
'" . ~ 0 <.i J:
~~~ oot ;., <.:l 0.
oot i 0( Z IX ~
I ~ 1lI ,.. :J
oot - III
0- ,.. U1
~~~ . ~ it
~ IX
~
:t
.
,
..r kl".lbury 11,....rlon\lnurvlfI.pll
KINGSBURY ASSOCIATESt I Iii THE COtJR'r OF COMMON PLEAS
Plain iff I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
I
v. I CIVIL ACTION - LAW
I
GREGORY G. ANDERSON, I 94 - 4453 CIVIL TERM
Defendant I
I IN EJECTMENT
PITITIOH TO INTIRV!NI PURSUANT TO
1A-8.a.p. NO. 2326
Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, by and through counsel of
Andrew C. Sheely, Esquire, of the Law Offices of James D. B09ar,
respectfully files this Petition to Intervene in referenoe to
Floyd M. Baturin, Esquire's, Petition for Leave of Court to
Withdraw as Counsel and respoctfully avers as followSI
1. On or about January 27, 1995, Petitioner, Floyd M.
Baturin, Esquire, filed a petition for Leave of Court to withdraw
as counslll.
2. The Order of Court and attached Rule to Show Cause were
served upon Plaintiff on or about February 3, 1995.
3. The Rule to Show Cause attached to the Petition did not
request any action by Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates in
reference to the Petition to Withdraw as counsel.
4. The determination upon the merits of Petitioner's
Petition to withdraw as Counsel may affect Plaintiffs legally
enforoeable interest as it is likely that Defendant will oontinua
-,; .'
'.','J..
'J- " "
,
~i' .. .,
ij '.i "
" " I
, '" , ,
t1) "
, ,
I ,'I
r"'., " I
11 "
~~
~ ~ ~, jJ ;:~
~ ~ .. ~ . i::
'0 i? .~ ~ ~ ~
!H ,~
...J n.4--< ~
'H ~I ~ I-
. ~ j It; ..E
~ 5 . I'" i ~~~~
@J ~~ ...:. /lJ ~ ?:1
~~p; ~ ~c.ir:i~~
~ ~L ~-. ~ ~ ~a!~~~
. ~
8~~ ! :>
U .
u ~~ .I~
~
~e~'~ t:
~ ;;';~ .~
" '
I I I I
.
KINGSBURY ASSOCIATES,
t/d/b/a KINGSBURY MOBILE
HOME PARK,
Plaintiff
v.
I IN THE COURTS OF COMMON PLEAS OF
I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
I
I CIVIL ACTION - LAW
I
I 94 - 44.fJ CIVIL TERM
I
I
I IN EJECTMENT
I
GREGORY G. ANDERSON,
Defendant
COMPLAltfi
Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, by and through oounsel of Andrew
C. Sheely, Esquire and James D. Bogar, Esquire, hereby files this
Complaint in ejectment and respectfully avers as followSI
1. Plaintiff is Kingsbury Associates, a Pennsylvania general
partnership, t/d/b/a Kingsbury Mobile Home Park, with its principal
place of business located at 2920 Dickinson Avenue, Camp Hill,
Pennsylvania 17011.
2. Defendant is Gregory G. Anderson, an adult individual,
residing at Lot No. 35, KingSbury Mobile Hume Park, 5169 Eaat Trindle
Road, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055.
3. Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, is the record legal owner of
oertain real estate being improved with a mobile home park, being known
as Kingsbury Mobile Home Park, same being situate in Hampden Township,
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, having been acquired by Deed dated
August 10, 1992 and recorded September 11, 1992 in the Cumberland
County Reoorder of Deeds office in Deed Book "W", Volume 35, Page 610,
same being bounded and described as followSI
ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT of ground situate in Hampden Township,
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, bounded and desoribed in
accordanoe with a survey dated Auguet 17, 1992, survey Book No.
1007, of Hartman and Associatee, Inc., ae followSl
BEGINNING at a point in the oenter line of the Trindle Road, at
the line of land now or late of Marlin Bretz, said point bein9
looated 200 feet more or less North East of the oenter line of
Sheely Lane, thence from said Point of Beginning, by land now or
late of Harlin Bretz, land now or late of William D. Hornberger,
land now or late of Wilson A. Ebert, and land now or late of
Monroe J. MoCauslin, Sr. North 44 degreee ~4 minutes 00 seoonds
West a distance of 455.00 feet to a point on the line of land now
or late of the United states of America (Ships Parts Control
Center), thence by the line of land now or late of United States
of Amerioa North 63 degreea 55 minutes 00 seconds East a distance
of 354.68 feet to a point, thence by land now or late of William
C. Hall South 38 degrees 36 minutes 00 seconds East a distanoe of
238.90 feet to a point at or near a fence post, thence by land
now or late of william C. Hall South 44 degreeu 06 minutes 00
seoonds East a distance of 207.64 feet to a point in the oenter
line of the Trindle Road, thence by the center line of the
TRindle Road South 63 degrees 55 minutes 00 seconds West a
distance of 323.92 feet to a point, the Plaoe of BEGINNING.
SAID TRACT contains 143,752.68 square feet or 3.30 acres.
SAID PREMISES havJ.ng thereon erected a two (2) story frame
dwelling and gar.age and l.leJ.ng known and numbered as 5169 Trindle
Road, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, and a thirty-two (32) pad
mobile home park.
A copy of the Deed is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and
inoorporated herein.
4. Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, acquired an immediate right to
possession of the premises by virtue of the August 10, 1992 deed as
referred to in Paragraph No. 3 hereinabove, said being recorded in the
Cumberland County Recorder of Deeds office in Deed Book "W", Volume 35,
Page 609.
~. Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson, currently resides in a mobile
home located on Lot No. 35, Kingsbury Mobile Home Park, saJ.d lot being
2
eituat.d on Plaintiff'e real property ae described in Exhibit IlA".
6. Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson, ie ourrently the equitable
and/or le9al owner of the mobile home lcoated on Lot No. 3~, Kingsbury
Mobile Home Park, said lot being situated on Plaintiff's real property
as described in Exhibit "A".
COUNT I. !JIOTMINT
7. Paragraphs 1 through and inoluding 6 hereinabove are
incorporated herein by referenoe thereto.
B. Defendant Gregory G. Anderson was provided with a written lease
agreement, park rules and regulations by Plaintiff on or about
september lB, 1992.
9. Defendant Gregory G. Anderson never signed the written lease
agreement and continues to refuse to enter into a lease agreement.
10. Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson, has exercised and continues
to exercise exclusive possession and control over that portion of
Plaintiff's property described as Lot No. 35 in the Kingsbury Mobile
Home Park.
11. Efforts by Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, directing
Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson, to remove the mobile home and himself
from Plaintiff's property have been without success.
12. Plaintiff is entitled to immediate and exclusive possession of
lands which Defendant currently occupies.
3
13. Der.ndant has not executed a new lease over that portion of
Plaintiff'. property desoribed in Lot No. 35 in the Kingsbury Mobile
Home Park.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Kingsbury Aesooiates, respeotfully reque.t.
that this Honorable courtl
(1) Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff, Kingsbury
Associates, and against Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson, for
possession of Lot No. 35, Kingsbury Mobile Home Park, said
property being described in full by d~ed dated August 10,
1992 and reoorded in the cumberland County Recorder of Deeds
office in Doed Book "W", Volume 35, Page 6091
(2) Enter an Order of Court directing Defendant, Gregory G.
Anderson, to immediately remove the mobile home, himself and all
possessions from plal.ntiff's property, Lot No. 35 Kingsbury Mobile
Home Park, Hampden Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, all
at Defendant's costl
(3) Enter an Order of Court directing Defendant to pay for
and assume Plaintiff's court costs, legal costs and feesl and
(4) Any other relief deemed just and equitable.
COUNT II. 8VICTION
14. Paragraphs 1 through and including 13 hereinabove are
inoorporated herein by reference thereto.
4
1~. on or about February 23, 1994, Plaintiff sent Detendant
Greqory G. Anderson a l~tter by oertified mail directing Defendant to
remove himself and his mobile home within thir.ty (30) days for non-
payment of rent.
16. Defendant refused to acoept servioe of the February 23, 1994
letter.
17. On or about March 9, 1994, Plaintift sent Defendant Greqory G.
Anderson a letter by regular mail advising that Defendant failed to pay
a late relltal fee in the amount of $32.00 and requesting that such
amount be paid within ten (10) days.
lB. Defendant refused to acce~t the March 9, 1994 letter and it
was returned to Plaintiff.
19. On or about June 6, 1994, Plaintiff sent Defendant Gregory G.
Anderson a letter by certified mail advising that Defendant had
violated the Mobile Park Rules and Regulations by failing to obtain
approval from Plaintiff or a building permit from Hampden Township
prior to constructing an addition on his mobile home located at Lot No.
35.
20. The June 6, 1994 letter further advised Defendant Gregory G.
Anderson that this was his second violati.on and that he should leave
the rosidence within fifteen (15) days.
21. Defendant Gregory G. Anderson refused to acoept the June 6,
1994 letter which was Bent certified mail.
5
23. On or about Jun. 22, 1994, Plaintiff. provided further written
notification to Floyd M. Baturin, Esquire, attorney for Defendant
Gre90ry G. Anderson, that Defendant was in violation of Park Rules and
Regulations in lieu of construction the addition and that Defendant's
mobile home lacked the proper skirting.
23. No lease agreement was executed between Plaintiff, Kingsbury
Associates, and Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson for any term.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, requests that this
Honorable Court enter judgment against Defendant and in favor of
Plaintiff, direct that Defendant immediately vacate the trailer located
and Lot No. 35 and award Plaintiff money damages and lost profits in an
amount in excess of eight hundred ($800.00) dollars.
~UNT IIII TRESPASS
24. Paragraphs 1 through and including 23 as set forth in count I
and II hereinabove are incorporated herein by reference thereto.
25. As a result of continually maintaining a mobile home and
other possessions on Plaintiff's riot No. 35, Kingsbury Mobile Home
Park, Defendant has deprived plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, of the
full use and enjoyment of Plaintiff's property.
26. As a result of maintaining a mobile home on Plaintiff's
premises as set forth herein, Defendant has deprived Plaintiff,
Kingsbury Associates, of the profits derived from the reasonable use
6
;if,
.
!JJ:':
~,-
1'1
,.
,'.J
,''''
,gl
~ ~
-t ....
!z. ..., C
~ .... .... S
;Q~ ,- ~ I:t! ~ a
.... .... a:: Z ;::
::lr' k -
'- 'ii C 0: ~ - 'I
it IJ1 .~ ,~ e ~ 0<
- 0: .... ".... Z ~
r: .... ~ ""....
a:: ~...r: ~ "
o..j JJ ~S' . :;.'.' > ,..
E- Z ~~ Itlll 0 ~
. :.- ~ u ~
(:.. ~ ...r,;,.- .... . oct! OJ
,"' -"" .....:u U1 Z '"
u-j7. :.- ~g U.J ~<r. ~ Z ~
ColS '- ~ j - ~ z
u 0.~ Co.- 0: 0. 0
E-u.... u- ~ ~
~ <r. 1'1 <r.u.. 0 <.i
~~r- 'n . b.~ z IX
..,. ~~ 0..:; 0( ,.. ::l
u:;':>=:: ..,. !: ,~ 1lI lD
~ffi~ 1 ~ ~- ;: U1
..,. a:: ~, I'il~ it
0- ~~.~ 8 [to:
IX
~~2 . ~ "
~ ............- . ~r= x
'tl u ~,.Jo..
. .
~I"G8BURY ASSOCIATES, ) 1" THE COURT OP COKHON PLEAS OP
t/d/b/a ~INGSBURY KOBILE I CUKBERLANO COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
HOME PARK, )
PI sinti ff ~ CIVIL ACTION -. I,M,
)
V~. I 94 - 4453 CIVIL TERM
)
GRI!GORY G. ANOI!RSON, I
Oefendant ) IN EJECTMENT
QIlPlm.....Qf:.t;Q!JID'
ON Till S
day of
___.' 19'H, upon consid,ration of
Oef~ndant'B Preliminary Objecliolls, it ia hereby ordered that Plaintiff shall
within tw~nty (20) days fill! an ullwnded '~ol11plaillt whioh motl) specifioally
desotibes the llemiutian of 1110nllY Ilill11't9l!/l and l'lBt pnlfHa of Plaintiff undtH
CO\lnts II Ilnd III of Plaintiff.'s cQmplui.nt.
RY THI!: COURT
,
,
KINGSBURY ASSOCIATES, ) IN THB COURT 0' COKHON PLBAS 0'
t/d/b/a KINGSBURY MOBILB I aUHBBRLANO COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
HOMB PARK, )
Plaintiff I CIVIL ACTION -- LAW
)
va. I 94 . 4453 CIVIL TBRM
)
GREGORY a. ANOBRSON, I
Oehndant ) IN BJBCTMBNT
Q.BlJElL9L.;:QlI 8.1'
ON 'l'IIlU _____d8y o[ ________, 1994, II: Is hQ~(jby o~dQrl)d thut
lle[(1l1dant'8 1'1'I!lillli11BIY 011.1,,<'\10118 ill thO) 111\IIIIa of a Molioll to lllBmlall
P\audlng Based 011 Lank of Capanlty To aUe Pur8unnt to I'a. R.C,P. 1026(a)(5) III
sllstalned, that I'lnintiff:'s l:ollll'lail1t Is dl8l11issed.
BY, TilE COURT
J,
KINGSBURY ASSOCIATIS, ) 'N THI COURT OP COHMON PLIAS OP
t/d/b/I KINOSBURY HOBILI J CUHBIRLANO COUNTY, PINNSYLYANIA
HOHI PARK, )
Plaintiff I CIYIL ACTION -- LAN
)
VI, I 94 - 4453 CIVIL TERM
)
ORIOORY O. ANOERSON, I
O,fendlnt ) IN EJECTHP:NT
DEPENDANT'S PRILIHINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIPP'S COMPLAINT
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUOOEB OP SAID COURT I
/lNI) NOW, [0 wll; 1I11~ 12th day of 6eplel1lb'!I, I'I'H, <Jte'joty 0, IInder-
~on, the Defendant, adinq lhrolll,h lhlll attorneya, U/I'I'URIN & BA'I'U/lIN, without
admittlng or acknowledglllq any 01 thH aVHrmentll Bel forth ill the ~ald complaint
to PI} true, in such 11I0nn"r and loulI aB lhe 61111111 IIrll alll1glld, IIlld withOll1: anawer..
lng thereto, re~ervin9 unto the allld Defendant the rIght to file an Anawer in
accordance with PII. 11.~'.1'. No. 1017, mllkeo prellmlnury objediol1a In the Ilsture
of:
A MQTJON rOR A HORE SPECIFIC COMPLAINT
PURSUANT TO PI. R.C.P. 1028(11(31
and in ~upport thereof avern:
COUNT II. EVICTION
J. Plalnt.lfl'~ ((lIl1pLllnl IJIl,I..1 '>J1J1ltll of ltB Whereforeclau~e
d..mllndn ".. ,l1Ion"y (111111111/"" and I,mt proliln in 1111 amoullt. of aHcena of eight
hundred ($800.00) dollalll," wllhout Indlcating or Itemizing what this amount
repreaents,
2, Plaintilf':! ':olllplalnt faih] to attach any n''''lIm..nt.i1tion itemizing
the amount of damages on,j 1 ,,,,t prOrll1l l""wllt.ed by Plaintiff nil r''IlIil...d by
Ph. R.C.P. 1019.
- 1 -
KINGSBURY ASSOCIATES, I IN THE COURTS OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
I
v. I 94 - 44~3 CIVIL TERM
I
GREGORY G. ANDERSON, I CIVIL ACTION - IN EJECTMENT
Defendant I
PLAIHTlrr'B PRILIMIHARY OBJICTIONS TO HI. KATTIR
~ COUHTIROLAIK
Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, by and through counsel of Andrew
C. sheely, Esquire, hereby files these Preliminary Objections to the
allegations set forth in Defendant's New Matter and Counterclaim, and
respeotfully states as follows:
1. Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, filed an Amended complaint
on or about November 18, 1994.
2. Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson, filed an Answer, New Matter
and Counterolaim to Plaintiff'S Complaint on or about Deoember 19,
1994.
t. FAILURI OF PLEADING TO CONFORM TQ
-BYMI OF COURT PURSUANT TO PA R.O.P. NO. 10281AI121
3. Paragraphs 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 of Defendant's
New Matter does not oonform with Pa. R.C.P. No. 1022 by failing to set
forth facts in separate paragraphs containing only one (1) material
allegation of fact.
4. Paragraphs 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36 of
Defendant's New Matter fail to comply with Pa. R.C.P. No. 1019(a) in
that said paragraphs fail to cite facts in a concise and summary form.
5. Paragraphs 38 and 39 of Defendant's CounterclAim violate ~
R.C.P. No. l019(f) in that said paragraphs fail to eet forth averment.
of time and plaoe with suffioient speoifioity.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Kingebury Assooiates, respectfully requ.et.
that this Honorable Court require that Defendant file an amended
pleading in acoordanoe with the Rules of court, or in the alternative,
that Defendant's New Matter and counterclailn be dismiesed with
prejudice.
II. IN8Ur~ICIBNT BPBClrICITY IN A PLBADING
6. Paragraphs 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36 fail to oontain
sufficient averments of fact which would enable Plaintiff, Kingebury
Associates, to frame a proper answer and defense.
7. Defendant's Answer and New Matter fails to set f.orth specific
dates within February of 1994 in support of the factual allegations
raised in the New Matter and counterclaim which would enable Defendant
to frame a proper answer and defense.
8. Defendant's counterclaim demands lost wages of approximately
Three Hundred ($300.00) Dollars without indicating or itemizing what
this amount represento.
9. Defendant's counterclaim fails to attach any documentation
itemizing the amount of damages as required by Pa. R.C.P. No. 1019.
'WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, respectfully requests
that this Honorable Court require that Defendant file a more specific
pleading which sets forth allegations of fact, including times and
dates, so that Plaintiff is able to file a proper answer and defense to
2
",
')
"
. I
'.
,
~~ Ij.j
~~ 4.. ,~ ::~
;j
.:5 ~ ~ .
!!~~ n: e ~ ~ f,
.-, ~ j ~I f r-
eo..
. a. ~ ~ ~t:
~ . 8
~ tl . <'! ~
~ s ~~ ~ ~ ~
~ 8 ,-1 , ~ 8 !; ~ ~
8 ~~~ :;- ~ ,- fr. ~
~ '::: B ~ ~ u ;i: ..~b.~~f,
~ ~~M"
~.n " ~ -< ~ r-
g '" @ ~g
~ ~ J ~ 3
"
.
KINGSBURY ASSOCIATES, I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
I
v. I CIVIL ACTION - LAW
I
GREGORY G. ANDERSON, I 94 - 4453 CIVIL TERM
Defendant I
I IN EJECTMENT
AKINDID COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, by and through counsel of Andrew
C. Sheely, Esquire and James D. Bogar, Esquire, hereby files this
Amended Complaint and respectfully avers as followsl
1. Plaintiff is Kingsbury Associates, a Pennsylvania general
partnership, with its principal place of business located at 2920
Diokinson Avenue, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011.
2. Defendant is Gregory G. Anderson, an adult individual,
residing at Lot No. 35, Kingsbury Mobile Home Park, 5169 East Trindle
Road, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055.
3. Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, is the record legal owner of
certain real estate being improved with a mobile home park, being known
as Kingsbury Mobile Home Park, same being situate in Hampden Township,
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, having been acquired by Deed dated
August 10, 1992 and recorded Septembet. 11, 1992 in the Cumberland
County Recorder of Deeds office in Deed Book "W", Volume 35, Page 610,
same being bounded and described as follows:
ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT of ground situate in Hampden Township,
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, bounded and described in
aocordance with a survey dated August 17, 1992, Survey Book No.
1007, of Hartman and Associates, Inc., as follows:
BEGINNING lit a point in the oenter line of the 'rrindle Road, at
the line of land now or late of Marlin Bretz said point being
located 200 feet more or lQSS North East of the oenter line of
Sheely Lanel thence from said point of Beginning, by land now or
late of Marlin Bretz, land now or late of William D. Hornbergor,
land now or late of Wilson A. Ebert, and land now or late of
Monroe J. McCauslin, Sr. North 44 degrees 64 minutes 00 seconds
West a distance of 455.00 feet to a point on the line of land now
or late of the United States of America (Ships Parts Control
Center) I thence by the line of land now or late of United states
of America North 63 degrees 55 minutes 00 eeoonds East a distanoe
of 354.68 feet to a point, thence by land now or late of William
C. Hall south 38 degrees 36 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of
238.90 feet to a point at or near a fence post, thence by land
now or late of William c. Hall South 44 degrees 06 minutes 00
seoonds East a distance of 207.64 feet to a point in the center
line of the Trindle Road, thence by the center line of the
TRindle Road South 63 degrees 55 min~tes 00 seconds West a
distance of 323.92 feet to a point, the Place of BEGINNING.
SAID TRACT contains 143,752.68 square feet or 3.30 acres.
SAID PREMISES having thereon erected a t.wo (2) story frame
dwelling and garage and being known and numbered as 5169 Tl'indle
Road, Hechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, and a thirty-two (32) pad
mobile home park.
A copy of the Deed is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and
inoorporated herein.
4. Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, acquired an immediate right to
possession of the premises by virtue of the Auguet 10, 1992 deed as
referred to in Paragraph No. 3 hereinabove, said being recorded in the
Cumberland County Recorder of Deeds office in Deed Book "W", Volume 35,
Page 609.
5. Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson, currently resides in a mobile
home located on Lot No. 35, Kingsbury Mobile Home Park, said lot being
situated on plaintiff's real property as described in Exhibit "A".
2
6. D.fendant, Gregory G. Anderson, ia ourrently the equitable
and/or le9al owner of the mobile home and addition looated on Lot No.
3~, Ringebury Mobile Home Park, said lot being aituated on Plaintiff'e
real property as described in Exhibit "A".
COUNT I. IJICTMINT
7. Paragraphs 1 through ~nd including 6 hereinabove are
inoorporated herein by reference thereto.
8. Defendant Gregory G. Anderson was provided with a written lease
agreement, park rules and regulations by Plaintiff on or about
september lB, 1992.
9. Defendant Gregory G. Anderson never signed tho written lease
agreement and continues to refuse to enter into a lease agreement.
10. Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson, has exercised and continues
to exercise exclusive possession and control over that portion of
Plaintiff's property described as Lot No. 35 in the Kingsbury Mobile
Home Park, by using said lot for the location of a mobile home and
addition.
11. Efforts by plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, directing
Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson, to remove the mobile home, an addition
and himself from Plaintiff's property have been without success.
12. Plaintiff is entitled to immediate and exclusive possession of
lands which Defendant currently occupies.
3
13. Defendant ha. not exeouted a new lease over that portion of
Plaintiff'. property desoribed in Lot No. l~ in the Kingsbury Mobile
Hom. Park.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Kingsbury Assooiates, respeotfully requests
that thie Honorable Courtl
(1) Enter judgmont in favor of Plaintiff, Kingsbury
Aeeooiates, and against Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson, for
poeseBsion of Lot No. 35, Kingsbury Mobile Home Park, said
property being described in full by deed dated August 10,
1992 and reoorded in the Cumberland County Recorder of Deeds
office in De~d Book "W", Volume 35, Page 609/
(2) Enter an order of Court directing Defendant, Gregory G.
Anderson, to immediately remove the mobilo home, himself and all
possessions from Plaintiff's property, Lot No. 35 Kingsbury Mobile
Home Park, Hampden Township, Cumberland county, Pennsylvania, all
at Defendant's cost,
(3) Enter an Order of court directing Defendant to pay for
and assume Plaintiff's court costs, legal costs and fees/ and
(4) Any other relief deemed just and equitable, inclUding
the release of all funds presently held by the Prothonotary in the
above-captioned matter to Plaintiff.
COUNT II. EVICTION
4
14. Paragraph. 1 through and inoluding 13 hereinapove ~re
inoorporated herein by referenoe thereto.
1~. On or about February ~3, 1994, Plaintiff Bent Defendant
Gregory G. Anderson a letter Py certified mail direoting Defendant to
remove himeelf. and hi~ mobile home within thirty (30) daYB for non-
payment of rent.
16. Defendant refused to aooept service of the February 23, 1994
letter.
17. On or about March 9, 1994, Plaintiff sent Defendant Gregory G.
Anderson a letter by regular mail advising that Defendant failed to pay
a late rental fee in the amount of $32.00 and requesting that suoh
amount pe paid within tell (10) daYB.
lB. Defendant refused to accept the March 9, 1994 letter and it
waB returned to Plaintiff.
19. On or about June 6, 1994, Plaintiff sent Defendant Greqory G.
Anderson a letter by certified mail advising that Defendant had
violated the Mobile Park Rules and Regulations by failing to obtain
approval from Plaintiff or a building permit from Hampden Township
prior to constructing an addition on his mobile home located at Lot No.
35.
20. The June 6, 1994 letter further advised Defendant Gregory G.
Anderson that this was his second violation and that he shoUld leave
the residence within fifteen (15) days.
5
31. Defendant Gregory G. Anderson refused to aooept the June 6,
1994 letter whioh was sent by oertified mail.
22. On or about June 22, 1994, Plaintiff provided further written
notifioation to Floyd M. Baturin, Esquire, attorney for Defendant
Gregory G. Anderson, that Defendant was in violation of Park RUles and
Re9ulations in lieu of construotion the addition and that Defendant's
mobile home lacked the proper skirting.
23. No lease agreement was exeouted between Plaintiff, Kingabury
Assooiates, and Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson for any term.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, req,uests that this
Honorable Court enter judgment against Defendant and in favor of
Plaintiff, and
(1) direct that Defendant immediately vacate the trailer
looated and Lot No. 35 and award Plaintiff money damages and lost
protito in an amount in excess of Thirty-Two and No/loa ($32.00)
dollars,
(2) Enter an Order of Court directing Defendant to pay for
and assume Plaintiff's court costs, logal costs and fees;
(3) Any other rulief deemed just and equitable, including
the release of all funds presently held by the Prothonotary in the
above-captioned matter to Plaintiff.
6
COUNT IIII TRI8P~S8
24. Paragraphs 1 through and inoluding 23 as set forth in Count I
and II hereinabove are inoorporated herein by referenoe thereto.
2~. As a result of continually maintaining a mobile home and
other possesBions on Plaintiff's Lot No. 35, Kingsbury Mobile Home
park, Defendant has deprived plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, of the
full use and enjoyment of Plaintiff's property.
26. As a result of maintaining a mobile home on Plaintiff's
premises as set forth herein, Defendant has deprived Plaintiff,
Kingsbury Associates, of the profits derived from the reasonable use
and rental of Plaintiff's property.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, requests that this
Honorable Court enter judgment against Defendant and J.n favor of
Plaintiff, and
(1) direct that Defendant immediately vacate the trailer
located and Lot No. 35 and award Plaintiff money damages and lost
prOfits in an amount in excess of Thirty-Two and No/l00 ($32.00)
dollarsl and
(2) Enter an Order of Court directing Defendant to pay for
and assume plaintiff's oourt costs, legal costs and feesl
(3) Any other relief deemed just and equitable, including
the release of all funds presently held by the Prothonotary in the
above-captioned matter to Plaintiff.
7
v.
IN THE COURT OF COMM()N PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 94-4453 CIVIL 'l'ERM
IN EJBCTMEN'1'
KINGSBURY ASSOCIATES,
Plaintiff
GRBGORY G. ANDERSON,
Defendant
IN RBI P~AIN'1'IFF'S PRBLI~RY OBJECTIONS
'1'0 NBW MAT~ND COUNTBRCLAIM
BBFORE HBSS and OLER. ~
Qf1~ION and ORDER OF COURT
Oler, J.
This oase in ejeotment arises out of an allegedly wrongful
aontinuation of posaession of a lot in a mobile home park by
Defendant. For disposition at this time are prllliminary objolloLions
of Plaintiff to Defendant's new matter and oounterolaim. The
preliminary objections oonsist of a motion to strike or dhmiss for
laok of conformity to rule of oourt,' a motion for a more specifio
pleading, I and a demurrer. I
The motion to strike or dismiss is basClld upon the failure of
various paragraphs of Defendant's new matter to be oonfined to a
single material fact,' and/or to be in conoise and summary form,!
and the failure of certain paragraphs in Defendant's counterclaim
to be speoific.' The motion for a more speoifio pleading is based
See Pa. R.C.P. 1028(al(2).
I See Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(3).
I See Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(4).
. See Pa. R.C.P. 1022.
! See Pa. R.C.P. 1019(a) .
. See Pa. R.C.P. 1019.
NO. 94-4453 CIVIL TmRM
on a failure of various paragraphs in Defendant's new matter to
contain suffioient factual averments tlJ permit a proper reeponse,
an absence of dates in the new matter and oounterclaim, and a lack
of itemization of damages in the counterclaim.
Tholl general
demurrer is based on an alleged failure of the counterolaim lito set
forth faota which support a cause of aotion against Plaintiff."7
Among the paragraphs in Defendant's Answer to Amended
Complaint with New Matter and Counterolaim are the following I
30. During the month of February 1994,
weather oonditions were extreme and there was
an abundance of snow. Nonetheless, it was
Plainti~f'a obligation and responsibility to
have the roadways in and to the mobile home
park promptly and properly cleared for all the
residents. The Plaintiff had failed to do so,
and was lIeglectful in removing and olearing
the snow from the roadways and paths whioh
made same impassable for days and, therefore,
Defendant was prohibited from leaving the
mobile home park and was unable to get to his
plaoe of employment for a total of four (4)
days which resulted in lost wages. In
addition, no mail. del.i.vory or piokup was
possible for this time period.
31. Defendant did not construct an
addition onto his mobile home. After the
severe weather conditions of the winter of
1994, Defendant's mobile home was damaged and,
in an attempt to repair the damage, Defendant
merely repaired his property by replacing the
damaged front steps to include a small poroh
area. Defendant was unaware that he needed
prior approval by Plainti~f in order to repair
his property. Subsequently Defendant has on
several occasions requested that Plaintiff
7 Plaintiff's Preliminary Objections to New Matter and
Counterclaim, paragraph 10.
2
NO. 94-4453 CIVIL TBRM
get to his plaoe of employment for a total of
four (4) day. which resulted in lost wagee of
approximately Three Hundred ($300.001 Dollare.
Oral argument was held on Plaintiff's preliminary objeotione
on Wednesday, February 1, 1995. No brief was submitted on behalf
of Defendant, nor did he appear in parson or through oounsel.'
DISCUSSION
Motion to strike or dismiss. Under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil
Prooedure 1022, eaoh paragraph of a pleading is to "oontain a. far
as praotioable only one material allegation." Under Rule 1019(a)
"[ t) he material faots on whioh a aause of action or defense is
based [are to] be stated in a conoise and summary form." Where a
pleading is not in oonformity with suoh rUles, it is subjeot to a
preliminary objection.
Pennsylvania Rule of civil Prooedure
1028(a)(2).
In the pr.esent oase, paragraphs 30, 31 and 32 of
Defendant'e new matter olearly are not in conformity with rule of
oourt and Plaintiff's preliminary objection ae to them will be
sustained.
Generally, a motion to strike will not be permitted to serve
as a subetitute for a motion for a more specific pleading. 2
Goodrioh-1\mram 2d Sl017 (b) 112, at 256 (1991). For this reason,
Defendant's counterclaim will not be stricken on grounds of laok of
speoificity.
· A motion to withdraw had been filed by Defendant's oounsel
prior t.o argument.
4
NO. 94-4453 CIVIL TERM
Motion for a morJ-lpeaifia pleadinQ. It ha. been laid that a
motion for a more speoifio pleading 11 duigned "to insure that an
adverse party's right and ability to an.wer and defend will. not be
unduly impaired by a pleader" vaguene.. in IItating the grounds of
his or her lIuit." 5 Standard Pennsylvania Praotioe 525157, at 167
(1993). "In genllra1, when Il party states a oase in a manner that
fully advises an opponent of the nature of th~ case and of the
m~tters with whioh the opponent will be oonfronted at trial, there
is no need for a motion for It more specific pleading, the opponent
should seek disoovery if he or she needs more information ...." 2
Goodrich-Amram 2d S1017(bI124, at 266 (1991).
Under pennsyl.vania Rule of civil Procedure 1019 (f),
"[a]verments of time, place Ilnd items of special damage [are to] be
specifically stated." A olaim should, of course, be sufficiently
specific wit.h regard to time ae to allow a determination of whether
a statute of limitations may be implicated. 2 Goodrich-Amram 2d
SlOl9(f)12, at 341 (1991).
In the present caso, a review of Defendant'e new matter and
counterclaJ.m leads the Court to conclude that the pleading is
sufficiently specific with respeot to time, damages and other
averment. therein to permit an adequate reply on the part of
Plaintiff and to advise Plaintiff of the issues to be met. It is
believed that an ascertainment of further specifics may be properly
relegated to the discovery process.
5
NO. 94-4453 CIVIL TERM
Demurrer. with respect to a demurrer, it has been .aid that
"[a] demurrer admits all well-pleaded material faoh in the
pleading which it attllcks, as well as all infer.ences which may
reaBonably be deduced therefrom." International AaBooiatlon of
Flretightera v. Loftus, 60 Pat Cornrow. 329, 333, 471 A.2d 605, 607
(1984). "preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer ...
will be sustaJ.ned only when it appears with certainty that the law
permits no recovery under the facts pled, and any doubts in the
determination should be resolved by overruling the objections."
Paone v. City of Soranton, 9 Pat D. & c.4th 115, 117 (Montgomery
Co. 1991), Bee Department of Transportation V. Bethlehem steel
Corp., 33 Pat Cornrow. 1, 11, 380 A.2d 1308, 1313 (1977). "[A]
demurrer will not be sustained on the ground that a pleading is not
sufficiently specific ...." 2 Goodrich-Amram 2d Sl017(b)127, at
272 (1991). And, "[i]f any part of a pleading states a sufficient
cause of action, the demurrer to the pleading must be overruled."
2 Anderson, Pennsylvania Civil Practice S1017.180, at 579 (19761.
On the other hand, "[ t] he want of definite allegations essential to
a cause of action renders a complaint subject to demurrer." 29
P.L.E. Pleading S123, at 433 (1960).
In the present case, Defendant's three hundred dollar
counterclaim alleges damages in the form of lost wages as a result
of Plaintiff's breach of an obligation to keep roadways within its
mobile home park passable. Although it may be that Defendant will
6
NO. 94-4453 CIVIL TBRM
be unable to p1:'ove that he WAl owed luah a duty, or that the
damage. claimed were reasonably foreleeable, inter alia, it can not
be said at this stage with certainty that as a matter of law no
recovery is possible.
For these reasons, the following Order will be enteredl
AND NOW,
gRDER OF COYJIT
.J'lt-
thiB I day of February, 1995, upon consideration of
plaintiff'S Preliminary Objeotions to New Matter and counterclaim,
and for the r~asons stated in the acoompanying opinion, paragraphB
30, 31 and 32 of Defendant's new matter are strioken for failure to
conform to rule of oourt, and Defendant is given 20 day. within
In all other respeots, the
which to replead these items.
preliminary objections are DENIED.
BY THE COURT,
sf J. Weslev aler. Jr.
J. Wesley Oler, Jr., J.
Andrew c. Sheely, Esq.
1 West Main street
Shiremanstown, PA 17011
Attorney for plaintiff
Floyd M. Baturin, Esq.
Madelaine N. Baturin, Esq.
717 North Second Street
Harrisburg, PA 17102
Atto1:'neys for Defendant
7
-t: ij
Z
~Ff
.... g
~r' )'; ~ a
p:~ ~ ~ -
..... "
..... ..J ~ a: ~ ~ ~
~ah ,~ ~ '" e ~ 0( ~
..J i
lO.-t: 'I" 't:l ~ !:c. D
. -' ~3 .~ ~ c .. 0(
'-' ' ' .~ ~ z g ,::
~~.. ..... I- ~ ~lD 0 ~
-t:lO. <:5 -r u t
,- III w o iii III
cc~ ~ ~ ~ III Z IiJ
~ ~ "" ~ z ~ ffi Z
l-LJI- ~ Co. ::l it
P' v: ~ ~ "'" - Il. "
c~r- ''1 f1.J <..; ~ IX r
In . ~ 0 Ii Il.
'-':;,:~ .,. iX <.:: ... z g g
~m: .,. "
I - ;.- lO. lD III
.,. "" ~ " III
$ir- a- ~ it
zrt:~ <.::
. ~ IX
"";uu ~ 0(
~ r
"
,.,
.
,
KINGSBURY ASSOCIATES, , IN THE COURTS OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff 1 CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
I CIVIL ACTION - LAW
1
v. , 94 - 44 5 3 CIVIl. 'rEIl1>I
I
GREGORY G. ANDERSON, , IN EJECTMENT
Defendant I
"1'.U'llILf!JJL~j)1J81'- QBD liB u'fgT.RAHJtI"IlR__'f.X.7.'M'
plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates, by and through counsel of
Andrew C. Sheely, Esquire, hereby tiles this Petition and
respectfully statos as followsl
1. On or about June 17, 1995, plaintiff and Defendant agreed
to resolve the above-captioned dispute pursuant to spel~if.lc terms
set forth in a Stipulation and Agreement which were incorporated
in an Order of Court dated June 20, 1995. A copy of the
Stipulation and Agreement and Order: of June 20, 1995 are attached
hereto as Exhibit "A".
2. Pursuant to paragr.aph 2 of the stipulation and Agreement,
Defendant Gregory G. Anderson agreed to immed.lately transfer his
complete interest and title to the mobile home presently located
on Lot No. 35 of the K.lngsbury Mobile Home Park to Kingsbury
Associates.
3. While Defendant, Gregory G. Anderson, provided title to
the m0bile home located on said lot, the title to the mobile home
was never transferr.ed to Pla.lntiff.
". while title to the mobile home was not transferred,
Defendant Oregory G. Anderson provided the originnl title 1:0 the
1962 Skyline Mobile 1I0me, Vehicle Identificntion Number 555366)(8,
Title Number 3974'10621l03 WI to Petitioner, 11 copy of which is
attilched hereto as Exhibit "B".
5. Defendant Gregory G. Anderson was assigned the title to
the above-referenced mobile home on or about February 20, 1992 as
indicated on Exhibit "B".
6. In order to obtain a new certificate of title in the name
of Kingsbury Associates, petitioner is required to obtain a Court
Ot'der directing the Penn6ylvania Department of 'rransportation to
accept the Order as evidence of ownership in lieu of certHicate
of title.
7. Defendant Gregory G. Anderson has not been provided with
a copy of this Petition and attached Order because he has already
agreed to transfer title to the mobile home as indicated by
paragraph 2 of the Stipulation and Agreement as incorporated in
the June 20, 1995 order of Court.
s. Petitioner /plaintif f will assume all costs associated with
transfer of the title from Defendant to Plaintiff/Petitioner.
9. paragraph 12 of the Stipulation and Agreement allows
either party to sElek a 6ubsequent order to obtain compliance with
the prior Order of Court.
10. The Department of Transportation, by form MV-217, will
2
l<INOSaURlI AI:lSOCIA'I'ES, I IN 'I'IIE COUR'I'S 01" COMMON PLI!:AS Of'
Plltintitt I CUM13EHLANP COUN'I'Y, PENNSYLVANIA
/ I CIVIL ACTION - LAW
I
V. I 1/4 - all;) CIVrr., 'l'l::l'U>l
I
OREGORlI O. ,\NOERSON I IN EJEC'l'm:N'l'
Dlilf'mdl1l1t I
~fY~TION AND ~GREE~EN~
Plaintiff, Kingsbury As~o~iut~s, a Pennsylvania general
partnership with its principal pluc~ of bU6in~ss loouted at 2920
Diokinson Avenu~, Camp Hill, P~nnsylvania, and, Defendant, Gregory a.
Anderson, an adult individual residing at Lot No. 35, Kingsbury Mobile
Home Park, 5169 East Trindle Road, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania desire
to enter this Stipulation and Agreement in order to resolve litigation
pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland county.
Plaintiff and Oefendant, desiring to resolve amicably all
litigation among them raised in the above-captioned matter, inclUding
all causes of action or claims raised tho rein, hereby Stipulate and
Agree as followsl
1. Plaintiff and Defendant agree that all funds pr~sently held by
the Prothonotary of Cumberland county shall be roleased to Defendant
Gregory Anderson upon signing of this Agreement and Stipulation and
upon transfer of title to his mobile hom~ located at Lot No. 35 of the
Kingsbury Mobile Home Park to Plaintiff, Kingsbury Associates; and
I
./
,I
/
,.......,j,
:I. Dllttendllnt Grl;\l/ory G. Anderson aI/reelS to il1lmlidiatillly tt'unllfut'
hill comp~.t. int.rullt unJ titlli to the mobile hom~ pr~w~ntly lQoutud on
Lot No. 31:\ of tho} Kin\j~l.Jul'y MQbilu Homu l'ul-k to Kin'Jl:IlJury AIHlouiul:uu,
3. Pl~intitf, Kin\jIlIJury Allllouiutol:l IIhull pu~mit DufunJunt, Uru\jury
a. Andlilrson" to roillll3in in tho 1119blle homo until Sopteltlber 15, 1\195, unJ
De/fendl1nt aroyory G. An~lliIrl3on IIpllci rioully agreos to t-13moVtl hillll:luH linct
perllonal pt'opllloty /frolll thu lIIobile home I1nd tho l<in<;JslJury MolJlltl HOlllu
Park on or lJutoru SoiIptolllbor 16, 199bl and
4. Plaintift Kin\jl3bury AUl:lociattls shull p~y Dufundant Grugury U.
Anderl30n an amount ot $1,000.00 upon Andlilrl3on'l3 moving frolll tho
Kingsbury Mobilo Homo Park, providod tho mobilll hOllllil remains in 11:s
pl:"esent oondition and Andorson, is cunont on ~ull t'ont in the .lInoLlnt
of $220.00 tor the months at July 1995, August 1995 and n portion ot
SeptembQr 1995, or as long as he rllt'lidol:l witllin thll mobile hOlllur and
5. Defendant Grogory G. Andoruon shall continue maintuinin9 tll...
mobile home in its prel3ent condition until he permanently vacates th~
mobile home on or before September 15, 1995 in accordunce with this
Agreement and Stipulation and Order at Court.
6. Counsel for Kingsbury As~ociates shull hold title of the mobile
home in escrow after it has been transferred to Kingsbury AssociatulI
until September 15, 1995 or when Defendant moves from the Kingl3bury
Mobile Home Park, Wl1ich eVllr first OCCUL'S.
J
/
I
7. 1I1llintit t shall In'opaL.1iI U l'rlh,oipl! to Sl!tthll Diu.;:ontinuu .:111<.1
Dismiss the above-at:ated aut Ion upon Defendunt Oregory 0, ^ndQ~tlonftl
moving trom tho Mobilo Home Parkl
B. In tho evont OQ tomlant Grlilgo~y G. An.,!lilt'INn hua not movl;ld
himself and pot"tlonul p~oporty f~om the mobillil homo und tho Kinqtlbury
Mobile Homa Park prior to Septembar 15, 1995, Defendant Grlilgory G.
Andertlon ugruotl that thu COUJ:t of COhUIIOn PiE/uS of Cumberland County
shall istluO un O~dlilr directing the immediate ejection of Plaintiff f~om
the Kingsbury Mobila Homo Park and from the mobile home I
9. N~ing in thiu Stipulation /lnd Agt'eemenl.: shall be construed as
II sale or Qxchange of atlsota.
10. plaintiff Kingsbury Atltlociatetl and Oefondant Grugory G.
Anderson agroo that KingSbury Associatetl shall have complete control
and possossion of tho mobile home after Defendant oregory a. Andertlon
vacates the mobile home prior to Saptamber 15, 1995.
11. Bi' exocuting this Agreement, Plaintiff Kingsbury Associutes
here~y releases, acquits and forevar discharges Anderson from any and
all Claims, demandtl, charges, penalties and causes of action which were
raised or could have been raised in the above-cuptionad matter,
LIkewise, Oefendunt Gregory G. AndeJ:son hereby releases, acquittl and
forever discharges Kingsbury from any and all Claims, demands, charges,
penalties and causes of action which were raised or could have been
raised in the abova-captionod matter.
<l
MV-217 (7-92) ,1~\
"HH'VLV~H" DIP~H'N'HI ,)/ '''~H"P')/II.''').'' '/
!OftUO 01' lIO/OfI vmClU /
.0 Ill."" ,
~ft"'..OIlG.'~ III"
APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE
OF TITLE AFTER
DEFAULT BY OWNER
. 'Oft IU.IAU UII ONLY .
NOTEI When delaull occurs. Ihl! 101loWll1O Ihrl!l! opllolls nrl! available lor obtaining 0 cllrtlflcale 01 II lie , Form MV~l flIJlSt
be pruperfy complelod and accolllpnny Ihlb appllcnllonln 011 ceBOB,
CHECK APPROPRIATE BLOCK below Indicating which option you art proceeding und.rl
o 1, Judgment and execullon
o 3, Courl Ordor
o 2, Non-judlclal sale or repos88sslon and retention
(U,C,C,)
FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW FOR THE APPROPRIATE BLOCK CHECKED ABOVE AND THE
APPLICANT LISTED ON FORM MV-1 MUST SIGN THE APPLICATION BELOW.
OPTION 1 - JUDGMENT AND EXECUTION
The purchaser at the shorlff's solo may oblaln corllfl~f.llo 01 title upon presentation 01 all the following Items:
· Certllled copy 01 tho judgmonl and writ of oxecullon, or the court order 01 sale,
· Bill 01 sale Irom tho shorlll or duly authorlzod olllcor showing the date of sale, name of purchaser, make
and VIN 01 vehlclo,
. Documentation that any oXlstlng lion is satlsflod.
OPTION 2 - NON-JUDICIAL SALE OR REPOSSESSION & RETENTION (Uniform Commercial Code)
Certificate of title will bo IsslJod In tho name of tho purchaser at the sale (who may be the lienholder) upon
receipt of the following:
. The original or an accoptable copy olll1e agreement which Is the bWlls of the right to rep088ess.
. The original or an acceptable copy of the lIIed flna'lclng statement.
. The original or an acceptable copy of the nollco ollntontlon to ISell, mailed to the debtor,
(I) II a public solo, tho notlco must sot forth tho tlmo and place of the sale.
(II) II a private sale, tho notlco must sot forth tl10 tlmo after which the sale Is to be made,
. Bill of sale shOWing tile date of sale, name of purchaser, make and VIN of vehicle, II the purchaser
Is not the lienholder.
OPTION 3 - COURT ORDER
Certificate of title will be Issued upon receipt of tho lollowlng Items:
. A certlfiad copy of an ordor of a Courl Qf Common Pleas listing tho make and VIN of the vehicle and
naming the porson 10 whom the court awarded ownership of the vehicle and proof that notice of the
Court 01 Common Ploas procoodlng was glvon to the prior owner and any other person who had an
Interest In the vehicle.
. lithe original cerllflcate of tlllo Is available, II must bo attached to your application and court order,
If the titls Is not available, documontallon must be Included explaining why the tllle Is not attached,
NOTE: fn questionable C,lS0S, the Department may ItlqlJlflJ nppllcal)l for csrtKlcate 01 title 10 sxecule sn IndermlflCi8liCln
agreement, or olher fo ms as nocessary.
IIWe hersby mske sppllcallon for a certlflcale 0111110 and
certify under penally 01 law thall/Wo have complied With
Ihe approprlato Instructions listed on this form and have X
aeled In seeordance with the law
Applicant Signature
Date