Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-04750 ," ! , " " " 'f 1 VJ 1 " " ,) . ~ i . " ;1 -;1 c \ I \ " "11 "I [, J:: J .- --' ,~ ~ o ), ), ",j, ':/J "~ ;~ 'II,J) I \; ','if j F;~ ! /' " I,J " , , , ' ~ J ;'r " 0 \,() r ::r , ,l, , .. Jetter.on J. Sbipman, I.quire I.D. IU785 GOLDBIRO, KATZMAN I; SHIPMAN, P.C. 320 Harket Street P. O. Box 1268 Harriaburg, PA 17108-1268 (717) 234-4161 Attorney. tor Plaintitt. ANN R. DEVLIN and STEPHEN J. DEVLIN, Plaintiffs IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW vs. JAMES HOCKENSMITH, Defendant NO. 94-4750 CIVIL JURY TRIAL DEMANDED POINTS FOR CHARGE SUBMITT.D ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFFS. ANN R. AND ST.PRE" J. DEVLIN 1. Under all the evidence and the law, you are directed to enter a verdict in favor of Plaintiffs, Ann and Stephen DeVlin, and against Defendant, James Hockensmith. Given: Modified: Refused: -L . . 4. L.9.1 O.U... In order for the Devlin. to recover in this ca.., the Defendant's negligent conduct must have been a substantial factor in bringing about the accident. This is what the law recognizes as legal cause. A substantial factor is an actual, real factor, although the result may be unusual or unexpected, but it is not an imaginary or fanciful factor or a factor having no connection or only an insignificant connection with the accident. Pa.SSJI (Civ) 3.25 Given: v Modified: Refused: 4 , IS. Burden of Proof. In civil cases such as this one, the plaintiffs/Devlins have the burden of proving those contentions which entitle them to recover. When a party has the burden of proof on a particular issue, his contention on that issue must be established by a fair preponderance of the evidence. The evid$nce establishes a contention by a fair preponderance of the evidence if you are persuaded that it is more probably accurate and true than not. To put this another way, think, if you will, of an ordinary balance scale, with a pan on each side. onto one side of the scale, place all of the evidence favorable to the Devlins, onto the other, place all of the evidence favorable to the Defendant. If, after considering the comparable weight of the evidence, you feel that the scales favor the Devlins, your verdict must be for the Devlins. If the scales tip in favor of the Defendant, or are equally balanced, your verdict should be for the Defendant. In this case, the Devlins have the burden of proving the following propositions: That the Defendant was negligent, and that the negligence was a substantial factor in bringing about the accident. If, after considering all of the evidence, you feel persuaded that these propositions are more probably true than not true, your verdict must be for the Devlins. Otherwise, your verdict must be for the Defendant. 5 8. Ixpert Testiaony -- credibility oenerally. There were several witness, Dr. George Harhigh, Dr. Jay Ho, and Dr. Perry Eagle that gave testimony to their qualifications as experts in the field of medicine. A witness who has special knowledge, skill, experience, training or education in a particular science, profession or occupation may give his opinion as an expert as to any matter in which he is skilled. In determining the weight to be given to his opinion, you should consider the qualifications and reliability of the expert and the reasons given for his opinion. You are not bound by an expert's opinion merely because he is an expert; you may accept or reject it, as in the case of the other witnesses. Give it the weight, if any to which you deem it entitled. Pa.SSJI (civ) 5.30 Given: Modified: Refused: 9 9. .elqblnq GonfllotlDq expert te.tlaony. In resolving any conflict that may exist in the testimony of expert witnesses, you are entitled to weigh the opinion of any expert against that of another. In doing this, you should consider the relative qualifications and reliability of the expert witnesses, as well as the reasons for each opinion and the facts and other matters upon which it is baeed. Pa.SSJI (eivl 5.33 , . Given: Modified: Refused: 10 . . . . . 15. Lo.. of COD.ortlua. Mr. Devlin is also entitled to be oompensated for the 10.. of hi. wifels services to him and the loss of companionship. Pa.SSJI (Civ) 6.01L. I Given: Modified: /' Refused: P.C. DATE: 9/1 Z /9(P By Je I P.O. Box 1268 Harrisburg, PA 17108 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Telephone: (717) 234-4161 16 The left front portion of Defendant's vehicle impacted with the right rear portion of the Devlin'. vehicle. The collision caused severe damage to the Devlin vehicle. The collision caused Mrs. Devlin to be thrust violently against her seatbelt harness. Shortly after the accident, a friend, Gregory Thomas who the Devlins were enroute to visit, transported the Devlins to Holy Spirit Hospital for an evaluation of Mrs. Devlin's condition. It was determined that Mrs. Devlin suffered injuries as a result of the collision. Mrs. Devlin was diagnosed as having a severe muscle ligament strain in the cervical spine. This has caused Mrs. Devlin to suffer severe pain and irritation. Mrs. Devlin was forced to miss work after the collision as a result of the injuries she sustained. Mrs. Devlin's pain and stiffness continue to the present day. Consequently, Mrs. Devlin has been forced to forego participating in activities she normally participated in prior to the collision such as gardening and housecleaning. Additionally, at the time of collision the Devlins were attempting to start a family. Mrs. Devlin's injuries to her neck and back severely impacted en the couple's marital relations. Mr. Devlin was not physically injured in the collision, but he has lost his wife's comfort, guidance, companionship, and consortium as a result of the collision. The loss suffered by Mr. Devlin appears to continue into the foreseeable future. 2 Ae a result ot the collision and above mentioned injuries, Mr. and Mrs. D.vlin have commenced the instant suit again.t Mr. Hockensmith. Mr. and Mrs. Devlin respecttully submit this Briet in preparation tor the upcoming trial scheduled bet ore this Court on september 16, 1996. II. Witn..... Mr. and Mrs. Devlin anticipate calling the following individuals at trial: 1. Plaintitf, Mr. stephen J. Devlin 2. Plaintiff, Mrs. Ann R. Devlin 3. Defendant, James Hockensmith 4. Greg Thomas 5. Police Officer James Sadler 6. Dr. George Harhigh, M.D. (by deposition) 7. Dr. Jay J. Cho, M.D. (by deposition) 8. Scott Meck, Occupational Therapist 9. Rick Baer, Therapist 10. Joy Cleveland, Occupdtional Therapist III. Li.t ot Exhibit. Mr. and Mrs. Devlin anticipate using the following exhibits: 1. medical records and reports 2. photographs of the Devlin vehicle 3. list of dates of each doctor visit 3 IV. DiaoueeioD Generally, in civil actions, the burden is upon the Plaintiff to ~rove his case by the weight or preponderance of evidence. Manone v. CUID, 350 Pa. 319, 39 A.2d 1 (1944). Therefore, Mr. and Mrs. Devlin have the burden of proving their case by the preponderance of evidence. Mr. and Mrs. Devlin anticipate that the evidence will show that Defendant violated 75 Pa.C.S.A. 53310(a) (following too closely). This section gives rise to the "assured clear distance rule which requires that a driver must control his vehicle such that he can always stop within the distance which he can see. Bohner v. stine, 316 Pa, super. 426, 463 A.2d 438 (1983). "The rule in Pennsylvania is that violation of a statute is negligence per se." Garcia V. Banq, 375 Pa. Super. 356,358, 544 A.2d 509,510 (1988), allocatur denied, 520 Pa. 617, 554 A.2d 509 (1989). Defendant's violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. 53310(a) constitutes negligence per se. Therefore, to be successful in the present matter, the Devlins must demonstrate that Defendant's negligence caused them some injury. The Devlins anticipate that the preponderance of evidence will demonstrate that Mr. and Mrs. Davlin have suffered injuries as a result of Defendant's negligence. Mrs. Devlin suffered a severe muscle ligament strain of the cervical spine. This has forced her to miss work and to curtail activities she normally pursued prior to the collision. Mrs. Devlin has pain and 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certity that a copy ot the toregoing has been duly served on the tollowing counsel of record, by depositing the same in the United states Mail, postage prepaid, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, on September 12, 1996: Richard Wix, Esquire WIX, WENGER , WEIDNER 4705 Duke street Harrisburg, PA 17109-3099 GOLDBERG, KATZMAN' SHIPMAN, P.C. B~ ~t ~:O: Box 1268 Harrisburg, PA 17108 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Telephone: (717) 234-4161 n, Esqu re , , The left front portion of Defendant's vehicle impacted with the right rear portion of the Devlin's vehicle. The collision caused severe damage to the Devlin vehicle. The collision caused Mrs. Devlin to be thrust violently against her seatbelt harness. Shortly after the accident, a friend, Gregory Thomas who the Devlins were en route to visit, transported the Devlins to Holy spirit Hospital for an evaluation of Mrs. Devlin's condition. It was determined that Mrs. Devlin suffered injuries as a result of the collision. Mrs. Devlin was diagnosed as having a severe muscle ligament strain in the cervical spine. This has caused Mrs. Devlin to suffer severe pain and irritation. Mrs. Devlin was forced to miss work after the collision as a result of the injuries she sustained. Mrs. Devlin's pain and stiffness continue to the present day. Consequently, Mrs. Devlin has been forced to forego participating in activities she normally participated in prior to the collision such as gardening and housecleaning. Additionally, at the time of collision the Devlins were attempting to start a family. Mrs. Devlin's injuries to her neck and back severely impacted on the couple's marital relations. .. Mr. Devlin was not physically injured in the collision, but he has lost his wife's comfort, guidance, ~ompanionship, and consortium as a result of the collision. The loss suffered by Mr. Devlin appears to continue into the foreseeable future. 2 As a result of the collision and above mentioned injuries, Mr. and Mrs. Devlin have commenced the instant suit against Mr. Hockensmith. Mr. and Mrs. Devlin respectfully submit this Brief in preparation tor the upcoming trial scheduled before this Court on September 16, 1996. II. .itn..... Mr. and Mrs. Devlin anticipate calling the following individuals at trial: 1. Plaintiff, Mr. stephen J. Devlin 2. Plaintiff, Mrs. Ann R. Devlin 3. Defendant, James Hockensmith 4. Greg Thomas 5. Police Officer James Sadler 6. Dr. George Harhigh, M.D. (by deposition) 7. Dr. Jay J. Cho, M.D. (by deposition) 8. Scott Meek, occupational Therapist 9. Rick Baer, Therapist 10. Joy Cleveland, Occupational Therapist . ... III. List of Bxhibits Mr. and Mr.s. Devlin anticipate using the following exhibits: 1. medical records and reports 2. photographs of the Devlin vehicle 3. list of dates of each doctor visit 3 IV. Disoussion Generally, in civil actions, the burden is upon the Plaintiff to prove his case by the weight or preponderance of evidence. Manone v. CUID, 350 Pa. 319, 39 A.2d 1 (1944). Therefore, Mr. and Mrs. Devlin have the burden of proving their case by the preponderance of evidence. Mr. and Mrs. Devlin anticipate that the evidence will show that Defendant violated 75 Pa.C.S.A. S3310(a) (following to~ closely). This section gives rise to the "assured clear distance rule which requires that a driver must control his vehicle such that he can always stop within the distance which he can see. Bohner v. Stine, 316 Pa, Super. 426, 463 A.2d 438 (1983). "The rule in Pennsylvania is that violation of a statute is negligence per se." Garcia v. Bana, 375 Pa, Super. 356,358, 544 A.2d 509,510 (1988), allocatur denied, 520 Pa. 617, 554 A.2d 509 (1989). Defendant's violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. S3310(a) constitutes negligence per se. Therefore, to be successful in the present matter, the Devlins must demonstrate that Defendant's negligence caused them some injury. The Devlins anticipate that the preponderance of evidence _ will demonstrate that Mr. and Mrs. Devlin have suffered injuries as a result of Defendant's negligence. Mrs. Devlin suffered a severe muscle ligament strain of the cervical spine. This has forced her to miss work and to curtail activities she normally pursued prior to the collision. Mrs. Devlin has pain and 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been duly served on the following counsel of record, by depositing the same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, in Harrisburg, . Pennsylvania, on September 12, 1996: Richard Wix, Esquire WIX, WENGER & WEIDNER 4705 Duke Street Harrisburg, PA 17109-3099 GOLDBERG, KATZMAN & SHIPMAN, P.C. f r on J. Sh P . #: 51785 .0. Box 1268 Harrisburg, PA 17108 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Telephone: (7l7) 234-4161 ~ ORIGINAL ~ 1 ANNE R. DEVLIN AND STEPHEN J. DEVLIN, 2 PLAINTIFFS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 3 VB. I I I I I I I I NO. 94-4750 , ' ,~ n " . " If' I "' '., 'j " ' .,11 , U ...:', ~ ,I) .q . ~ ~. ) 1'1\ ..- ",:'1 " ,. 'n :.c.! , J --, 4 JAMBS HOCKENSMITH, DEFENDANT JURY TRIAL DEMANDBD ~ 5 6 7 8 9 lO 11 12 13 14 l5 16 17 APPBARANCES I VIDEOTAPE DEPOSITION OFI TAKEN BYI JAY JUNGHO CHO, M.D. PLAINTIFFS BEFORE: DENISE SAMPSON, REPORTER NOTARY PUBLIC JULY 26, 1996, 4108 P.M. REHAB MEDICINE ASSOCIATES 5124 TRINDLE ROAD MBCHANICSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA DATE: PLACE: 19 20 21 22 23 24 .~ 25 18 GOLDBERG, KATZMAN & SHIPMAN, P.C. BY: JEFFERSON J. SHIPMAN, ESQUIRE FOR - PLAINTIFFS WIX, WENGER & WEIDNER BY: RICHARD H. WIX, ESQUIRE FOR - DEFENDANT ALSO PRESENT: R. WAYNE HOWELL, VIDEO IMAGES Hups, 7llbrigli, 'Foltz ir JVaf4le :Reporting Serlia, 8nc. 115 PINE STREET. HARRISBURG. PA 17101 Harrisburg 717-232.5844 Fax 717-232.9637 Lancaster 717.393.5101 () , 1 (Curriculum vitae produced and marked 2 Deposition Exhibit No. l.) 3 THE VIDEOTAPE SPECIALIST I My name is R. Wayne 4 Howell. I represent video Images, 3004 Black Oak Drive, 5 Red Lion, Pennsylvania 17356. Today's date is July 26th, 6 1996. The time of day is 4:08 p.m. This deposition was 7 videotaped at Rehabilitation Medical Associates, 5124 8 Trindle Road, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. 9 The caption of the case is Anne R. Devlin and 10 Steven J. Devlin, Plaintiffs, versus James Hockensmith, 11 Defendant, Case No. 94-4750. The name of the witness is l2 Jay Jungho Cho, M.D. This deposition is being videotaped (~ l3 on behalf of the Defendant. Counsel will now ir.troduce 14 themselves. 15 16 MR. SHIPMAN: Jeff Ohipman for the Plaintiffs. MR. WIX: Dick wix for Jim Hockensmith. 17 THE VIDEOTAPE SPECIALIST: The court reporter l8 will now please identify herself and swear in the witness. 19 JAY JUNGHO CHO, M.D., called as a witness, 20 being duly sworn, testified as follows: 21 DIRECT EXAMINATION 22 BY MR. SHIPMAN: 23 Doctor, good afternoon. My name is Jeff Q . ~ 24 Shipman and I represent Anne and Steve Devlin in a lawsuit 25 that is pending in Cumberland County. The purpose for our L. 3 (") 1 and wing bone area. And patient state this pain was start 2 after involved motor vehicle accident on September 22nd, 3 1992. 4 Patient state on September 22nd, 1992 while 5 patient riding at the front seat passenger seat and she 6 wear a seat belt her car was hit from the rear. And her 7 neck and had to -- were injured with jerking movement but 8 she did not lose consciousness. She was able to get out 9 of the car by herself. 10 However, that day she started to get pain in 11 the neck and she went to Holy Spirit Hospital and had 12 x-ray and released. And symptom getting worse next day <;) 13 and seen by family physician and receive some of 14 outpatient physical therapy and medication which were l5 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication and muscle 16 relaxant and pain pill which is Vicodin. 17 But symptoms did not improve too much at all 18 and suffered a lot of pain so the patient was referred to 19 my office by family physician, Dr. Harhigh, and I examined 20 her on November 11, 1992. 21 Q And what did your physioal examination of her 22 indicate, Doctor? 23 A Yes, I performed a physical examination and I 24 found patient had marked, limited any movement in the , -.;.I 25 neck. And also there are muscle spasm present in the both 5 t'") 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 'J 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ..;;.,) 6 side of the neck and upper shoulder muscles. But neurologic exam did not show any kind of pinched nerve or any nerve damage sign at that time. So that after examining the patient my diaqnosiB waB muscle ligamentous strain in her neck. a And, Doctor, do you have an opinion based upon a reasonable degree of medical certainty as to the cause of that injury? A Yes, the reason was I asked to her if she have any similar problem in the neck or the shoulder before. She said .he never had any kind of pain in the neck or shoulder prior to involved in the car accident September 22nd, 1992. S, that based on her history and also based on the physical exam, this muscle ligamentous strain in the neck is as a result of a car accident on September 22 nd, 1992. a Now, Doctor, what course of treatment did Anne then undergo and that you prescribed for her? A I ordered outpatient physical therapy to relieve muscle spasm and also gradually try to strengthening the neck and shoulder muscles. a And did she attend physical therapy? A Yes, sir. a And for what period of time -- can you describe for us what that therapy -- how long that therapy went on, n o ~ 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 l2 l3 14 l5 l6 17 l8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Doctor1 A You mean the each visit you're talking about or Q The number of months that she attended therapy. A Okay. I saw her November II, 1992. And I followed her about monthly basis and she received the therapy in the November to December and December to January. And also therapy was stopped in February 1993. Q Okay. When did you next see Anne Devlin after the initial visit of November ll? Did you next see her in December of 1992? A Yes, December 14, 1992. Q And what were your findings of her on that date, Doctor? A That date in the physical exam still there are limitation of range of motion of the neck and also muscle spasm and tenderness mostly worse on the right side. And then when I do so-called Addison's test, this test evaluate for nerve and circulation problem in the neck. That test come out positive on the right side, which meaning is this patient have a lot of muscle spasm in the muscle in the neck. It's meaning is muscle spasm present in the muscle near spine column. That is what we call medically thoracic outlet syndrome. So the thoracic outlet syndrome is cut the 8 n , 1 circulation and some pinching nerve while muscle traveling 2 from the neck down to the arm by sustained muscle spasm. 3 So it indicatss she still suffering with a lot of muscle 4 spasm in the muscle near the cervical spine. 5 So I recommend at that time on December 14, 6 1992 she needs more outpatient treatment to stretching of 7 this tightness in the muscle around the spine. 8 Q Was Anne -- 80 she was to continue the therapy 9 then. Was Anne also working, Doctor? 10 A Yes, she never missed work. She working more 11 in a office work as a coordinator at Blue Shield. So she l2 never missed any work after injury. t:) l3 14 15 Q When did you next see her then, Doctor? January l3, 1993. And briefly can you explain for us what your A Q 16 findings were of Mrs. Devlin on that date? 17 A She start to show improvement but whatever 18 reason she said somewhat increased -- start to get pain in 19 the low-back area, but when I examined the low back there '-...) 20 are some more like muscular type of pain without any 21 neurologic problem. 22 Regarding neck-wise, there are limitation of 23 motion in the neck, more particularly on the right side of 24 the neck. But left side is a lot better, and her muscle 25 spasm is more localized on the right side of the neck and 11 .1') " 1 A Neck motion was almost full now. There are 2 some muscle spasm developed in the right neck muscle, but 3 Addison's tests I did evaluate for presence of a muscle 4 spasm in the muscle which was completely gone. That is a 5 really good sign. So cervical, neck-wise, she is 6 remarkably improved. 7 But she had occasional flare-up of the muscle 8 spasm, particularly in the right side neck shoulder 9 muscle, but that is all limited in the very superficial. lO It's meaning is just near the skin area and not a deep 11 muscle. So I can say she's a well progressive recover 12 from the cervical strain from the September 1992. () 13 o Okay. Doctor, is she scheduled to visit with 14 you in the future? 15 A Yes, I told her she can call me whenever she 16 recur any muscle spasm. Otherwise, she will call me to 17 see me about middle or later of September 1996. The l8 reason is a lot of our patient who suffer with any kind of 19 muscle ligamentous problem or joint problem or a neural 20 problem when weather changing, coldness or dampness, could 21 make recur of a muscle spasm problem. 22 So she will call me middle or late September to 23 see me how she's doing with after summer i. over muscle .....J 24 strain and spasm might reoccur or not. If she will do 25 well at that time, I can say this patient i. now almost ,----') 13 . , 1 point in time she had had some additional physical therapy 2 and she reported to you that with that outpatient therapy 3 her pain was markedly better? 4 5 A That's correct. Q And at that January 13th, '93 visit as a part 6 of your testing you had her walk on her heels and her 7 toes? 8 9 10 11 12 A That's correct. Q And she could do that? A Right. Q And what's the significance of that, Dr. Cho? A Because when she came to me for I think -- yeah , ." U l3 January l3, 1993 she complained of start pain in the low l4 back. So I examined her low back at that time to get her l5 if she had any kind of pinched nerve or any problem in the 16 low back. So I did that muscle strength testing in the l7 leg to find out if she had any pinched nerve in the neck 18 -- in the low back to reach out any back problem. 19 And that finding showed neurologically, 20 nerve-wise, in the low back was perfectly okay. Regarding 21 for walk, ambulate with the toe or heel was not tested for 22 the neck. That test was for the low back. 23 Q Okay. Sure. All right. In the visit of March 24 22nd of '93 she indicated and your notes indicate that she 25 was doing low-impact exercise program three times a week. -' 14 ,_. . ') I Doetor, what is a low-impact exercise program? 2 A Because Blue Shield has a program for all 3 employees so-called well-being program. There are two 4 kind of aerobic classes there. One is real dynamic high 5 level of aerobic exercise, in the lunch hour, in the 6 morning they do. And then another exercise is low impact, 7 it's meaning is without any kind of a jumping or the step 8 exercise, more flexible stretching exercise. They do it 9 and she asked me if she can do that exercise, I go, yes, 10 she can start, not a high impact, not a step exercise, not II a high jump exercise. So I said, yes, flexible stretching 12 exercise with the low impact she can participate in the ~ 13 job program. 14 Q Okay. And then that was in March of '93. And 15 October 28th of '93 then she talked about doing aerobic 16 exercises two times a week and aquatic exercises. Were l7 those aerobic exercises or is that something different 18 than the low impact? 19 A That is -- aerobic exercise, there are two 20 kinds of aerobic exercise, one is a high impact and one is 21 a low impact in the aerobic exercises. And the aquatic 22 exercise is swimming pool exercise. Job is providing only 23 for aerobic exercise. So I say she can go in the aerobic 24 exercise, and then a water exercise, swimming exercise at ....) 25 the Y or any place is really making fast recovery for a 'I( \ o ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 l4 l5 l6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 15 muscle ligamont strain. So that I told her she can join the Y to do some swimming exercise. Q And at that visit you indicated that she was doing great, she's had some residual aching and neck pain, but she'. able to manage it and without taking any medication? A That's correct. Q And then as time progressed she was telling you that she would only have difficulties on an occasional basis, it wouldn't be everyday, would it? A That's correct. Q Then I believe in July of '94 she apparently had reinjured herself playing some volleyball and developed pain and therefore you saw her. And one of the things you did then was to have an MRI of her neck; is that correct? A That's correct. Q Okay. And an MRI, it's a more sophisticated computer-generated type of test? A That's correct. Q And that was normal? A Yes. MR. WIX: I have no other questions. MR. SHIPMAN: Doctor, thank you. THE VIDEOTAPE SPECIALIST: The video deposition l7 (, , I 1 COUNTY OF LEBANON I SS 2 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA I 3 I, Denise A. Sampson, a Notary Public, authorized 4 to administer oaths within and for the Commonwealth of 5 Pennsylvania, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the 6 testimony of Jay Jungho Cho, M.D. 7 I further certify that before the taking of said 8 deposition, the witness was duly sworn, that the questions 9 and answers were taken down stenographically by the said 10 Reporter-Notary Public, and afterwards reduced to 11 typewriting under the direction of the said Reporter. 12 I further certif.y that the said deposition was (;) 13 taken at the time and place specified in the caption sheet 14 hereof. 15 I further certify that I am not a relative or 16 employee or attorney or counsel to any of the parties, or 17 a relative or employee of such attorney or counsel, or 18 financially interested dire~tly or indirectly in this 19 action. 20 I further certify that the said deposition 21 constitutes a true record of the testimony given by the 22 said witness. , V 23 24 25 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of August, 1996. (,J De~~~~r=Notary \, ,. '..~ ., . , . ~ - ADDRESS: CURRICULlJl VITAE Jay J. cho. M.D. 6124 Eo Trindle Road, Mechahicsburg, PA 17011 (717) 796-7943 120 N. 7th street, Suite 102, Chambersburg. PA 17201 (717) 267-7735 Physiatry--Board Certified in Physical Medicine a Rehabfl itation. Premedical School: Yonsei University March 1962 - February 1964 Seoul, korea Medical School: Graduate Yonsei UniVersity March 1964 - February 1968 Seoul, korea/Received the degree of Medical Doctor Served as Army Surgeon, korea March 1968 - June 1971 SPECIALTY: EDUCA TI ON: General practicing physician in Center, Seoul. Korea July 1971 - June 1972 Publfc Hea Hh Intet'nship: Trumbull Memorial Warren, Ohio July 1972 - June 1973 Residency: Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation - Columbia Presbyterian Medical Cehter New York, NY June 1973 - July 1976 Hospital Training: Columbia Presbyterian University Hospital New York. NY Helen Hayes Hospital New York State Rehabfl Hat ion and Research Hospital West Haverstraw, NY Blythdale Children's Hospital Vahalla. NY Harlem Hospital, New York, NY Fellowship: Department of PhYSical Medicine and Rehabfl Hation - Columbia University New York, NY 1973 - 1976 .1 .~ .- " . . . Page Iwo EXPERllNCE: 1. Pradldng Medicine as specialty of Physical Med I cine/Rehab I I t ta t I on Mechanlcsbul'g, PA 1976 - Present 2, President, Rehab Medicine Associates, P.C. Mechanfcsburg, PA 19711. - Presen t 3. Senior Medical Ob'ector, Rehab 1I0spl tal fot' Special Services, Mechanlcsburg, PA 1976 - 1990 ~. Active Slarr, ltatTlsburg Itosptlal IIM'I'lsburg, PA 1977 - Present 5. Chief Section of Physical Medicine & Rehabl I Itatton, Itarrlsburg Itospltal Itarrl sburg, PA 1979 - Present 6. Consulting Staff, Itoly Splt'lt 1I0spltal Calllp Itl J 1, PA 1977 - Present 7. Consulting Stoff, Comlllunlty General Osteopathfc Itospltal, Harrisburg, PA 1977 - Present 8. Chief, Amputee/Orthotic Clinic, Rehab 1I0splta I for Speci a 1 Serv fees, Mechanfcsburg, PA (OVR Approved) 1977 - Pr'esent 9. Member of Governing Board of Mechanfesbut'g Rr.hob Itospltal Mechan I csburg, PA 1985 - 1990 10. ~Ir.dfcal Executive Advisor, Rehab Itospftal for Special Services, Notional Medical F.nterpr'lses 11. Medical Executive Committee Mechanlcsburg Rehab Itosp Ita 1 Mechonfcsburg, PA 1908 - 1990 -. ,.-., Page Ttwee 12. Senior Medical Director, Renova Center (Subacute Facility), Mechanicsbury, PA 1989 - 19Y2 13. Member of Governing Iloard of Subacute Mechanicsburg Rehab System, Mechanlcsbury, PA 1989 - 1992 14. Director, Renaissance IIealthcare Corp. Mechanfcsburg, PA June 1989 - Present 15. Medical Staff, Active Chambcrsburg IIospf ta I, Chambersbul'g, PA 1990 - Present 16. Consultfng MedIcal Staff, Carlisle 1I0spltal Carl fsle, PA 1991 - Present 17. Medical Director/Active Medical Staff Seldle Memorial lIospftal. Capftal flealth Systems Mechanicsburg, PA 1992 - 1995 MEMUERSIIIPS: Pennsylvania Medical Society Dauphin County Medical Society American Academy of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation American Associatfon of Electromyography and Electrodlagnosls American Academy of Evoked Potential Society American Medfcal Associatfon QUALIFICATIONS: licensed: State of Pennsylvania, M.D. Certified, American Iloard of Physical Medicine & Rehabflitatfon -. ORIGINAL r'1 ANN R. DBVLIN AND STRPHBN J. DBVLIN, PLAINTIFFS v 1 IN THE COURT OF COMMON 1 PLBAS, CUMBBRLAND COUNTY, 1 PBNNSYLVANIA 1 J('}Su 1 NO. 94-~ 1 1 1 JURY TRIAL DBMANDBD JAMBS HOCKBNSMITH, DBFBNDANT DRPOSITION 011'1 GBORGB HARHIGH, M.D. TAKBN BYI PLAINTIFFS BBFORBI DONNA B. RICHARDS, RPR NOTARY PUBLIC DATBI JULY 18, 1996, 2112 P.M. ..... PLACB 1 25 SOUTH 35TH STRBBT CAMP HILL, PENNSYLVANIA . APPEARANCBS: GOLDBBRG, KATZMAN & SHIPMAN, P.C. BY' JEFFERSON J. SHIPMAN, ESQUIRE FOR - PLAINTIFFS r t7' .., . " ," ...., n , , I <l , ." , i. ~ , I ,:I 1',) <:, ~.~~ ;th ,. " .. :j . -. , --. .:-.{ " \~) . ~!1 I :":'J hJ -, WIX, WENGER & WEIDNER BY, RICHARD H. WIX, ESQUIRE FOR - DEFENDANT -~ '-" ~ 7l1brigM, 'hlh Ir'Jll1f41t ~&rlia, 8"" 11~ PINE STREET. HAAAISsuRG, PA 17101 H.rrllburg 717.232.1l&-W Fax 717.232.ge37 l,nell'" 717,39:J.~101 ''- 1 WITNBSS 2 !!M!! DIRBCT CROSS 3 GBORGB HARHIGH, M.D. 4 BY MR. SHIPMAN 3 -- 5 BY MR. WIX -- 12 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 , V 25 2 -- 1 'l 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 () ...;.,) 3 STIPULATION It is hereby stipulated by and between counsel for the respective parties that reading, signing, sealing, certification and filinq are hereby waived. GEORGB HARHIGH, M.D., called as a witness, being duly sworn, testified as followsl DIRECT BXAMINATION 8Y MR. SHIPMAN: o Good afternoon, Dr. Harhigh. My name is Jeff Shipman. I'm an attorney from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. And I represent Mr. and Mrs. Ann and Steve Devlin in a case that is pending in Cumberland County. The case arises out of an automobile accident that happened on September 22nd, 1992. And the purpose for our meeting here today is for me to have an opportunity to ask you some questions about your treatment of Mrs. Devlin following that automobile accident, and to use that deposition at the trial of this caBe. First, doctor, could you please explain for the record what your educational and madical training background has been? A I got my Osteopathic Medical Degree from The Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine in June of A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 'J ..:....,; 4 1964. I did a year's internship at Bayview Hospital in Cleveland. And I've been in active family practice for in this area for 31 years. I'm an active staff member at Holy Spirit Hospital, consulting etaff at Health South Rehab Center, and I have a degree of fellow with the American Academy of Family Physicians. o Okay. Doctor, did there come a time in September of 1992 when you learned that Mrs. Devlin had been involved in an automobile accident? A Yes. o Can you tell us on what date you learned that, doctor? A I had first seen her on September 25th, and she gave a hietory of having been involved in an auto accident on the 22nd. She was a paBsenger in a front seat and was seat belted. And the driver of her car waB negotiating a left turn. He was stopped negotiating a left turn and was rear-ended by another automobile. Her head was whipped forward, and shortly after the accident she was taken to the emergency room at Holy Spirit Hospital and x-rayed. Apparently the x-rays were normal. When I had initially seen her ehe didn't have any radicular symptoms that would indicate a diBC -- cervical disc problem. But -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 C) -;J 5 she had a marked limited range of motion in her cervical spine and very tightly apastic trapeziea on both side.. She was given, at that time, a diagnosis of flexion/extension, injury and was treated with muscle relaxant and given an anti-inflammatory agent which was Prednisone in this case. And I don't normally use that, but hers was fairly bad. The starting dose of 80 milligrams a day and tapered down to O. We also, at that time, put the Metco Sontilater on the two trapeziea muscles and ultrasound to her cervical spine. And I asked her to come back in a week. o Can you explain to me what the device is you refer to placing on her trapezius muscles? A The Metco Sontilater is kind of like an electric stimulator. It grabs the muscle and holds it for a while, and then it releases it. And the objective is that the machine's not going to get tired, but the muscle will. And when the muscle gets tired, it relaxes. So its ultimate purpose is to relax the muscle. o Where is that muscle? A The trapeziea are right up on top of the shoulders. They go from -- they're continuous actually with the muscles along the sides of the neck. But the bulk of them is right here on top of the shoulder. " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 o ".;.,J 6 o Okay. And that was done on September 25, 1992? A Yes. o Okay. when did you next see Mrs. Devlin, doctor? A She was seen the second time on October the 2nd. And on the Prednisone tapering to 0 and the Soma, she really didn't improve much. She still had no radicular symptoms, but her range of motion was still very much limited. I increased her -- I changed her muscle relaxant to a different -- different one, put her on Vicodin ES, which is equivalent to a grain of codeine, for her pain. And I referred her to local physiotherapist, Eric McCuen, for some outpatient physical therapy. o And did she attend physical therapy at McCuen? A Yes, yes. o And did you receive and review a report from the physical therapist? A Yes. I received two reports, as a matter of fact. Did you want the first one? o Yes, please. The report that's dated October 8, 1992, doctor. A Okay. Well, I'll quote directly from his letter. He just says. Ann Devlin is a 33 year old female who was seen for initial evaluation at our Camp Hill " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 o ,--,' 7 office on October 7 following your referral. She gives a current history of being involved in a motor vehicle accident on September 22nd at which time her car, which was at a complete stop, was hit from behind. She waB in a passenger seat and was wearing her seat belt. She was taken to Holy Spirit where she was given Advil, and x-rays were taken, reported as negative. Over the next few days her pain got worse, and she was seen by you. She's been taking Vicodin, which is that codeine preparation, which helps. And stated that the TENS unit, which is kind of a -- it's a portable Metco Sontilater. It's run on a nine volt battery. But it stimulates the muscle the same way that the Metco Sontilater would, only for a longer period of time. And down further he just says that her -- he kind of agrees with my findings that her she had marked limited range of motion and a lot of muscle spasm. Then he goes on to say what his treatment was going to consist of. o And do you -- did you then get a report later from McCuen? A Yee, I got another letter dated November 6th. o And what did -- is that the report authored by - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 o ~ 8 Physical Therapist Basim? A Yes. o Stuart Basim. Okay. And aocording to that report, how many physical therapy sessions did Mrs. Devlin attend? A 13. o Okay. Now, did you also see Ann Devlin on -- doctor, referring back to your notes. Did you a180 see her on October the 14th of 1992? A Yes. o And what findings did you make on that date, doctor? A Well, by this time she had already had three treatments at McCuen'., and she said she felt a little better, but was still having substantial pain. And at that time, and this is new, she had noticed the decr~a.ed strength in her right arm, which she hadn't complained about before. And she -- also on my exam she still had a very limited rotational motion. As a matter of fact, to right rotation it was limited to 50 percent of normal. o When you say limited range of motion, what do you mean? You mean the head turning from side to side? A Yes, like right rotation you should have from here to the shoulder. That should be 45 degrees. And if . o J 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 she lost 50 percent, than that means that she could turn it just 45 degrees. Q Okay. A And left rotation she was limited to 75 percent of normaL Q Okay. That's on October 14 of 1992? A Yes. Q And what did you prescribe for her? Was she to continue the therapy? A Well, yes, we wanted her to continue with McCuen. And I added to his therapy. I told him that I wanted him to add ultrasound to the cervical spine. And I also changed her medication to Feldene, which is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent. Q And what is ultrasound? A Ultrasound is high frequency sound waves that basically you don't feel anything. But what it does is, by vibrating deep tissue, it encourages the local circulat;'.on to come in and reduce inflammatory response. o Okay. So you added the ultrasound and the -- A Feldene. o -- Feldene to her treatment plan? A Yes. o Okay. And did you then next see her O~ OCtober 26th, doctor? - <') ~ 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 A Yes. Q Okay. Can you explain for us what your findings were on that date? A Well, she was tolerating the Feldene, and she was still in therapy. I still found that the left and right rotation -- rotational motions were limited. So I told her that I wanted her to continue with the Feldsne and the therapy, and I wanted to recheck her again two weeks after that. Q And did she -- did she attend that next visit with you? A Yes. That was the la8t time I saw her for the accident, November the 9th, 1992. Q And what findings did you make on that date? A Well, by this time she had already had 13 treatments from McCuen, and I didn't feel like she was well enough to discharge. She still had a marked limitation of motion, a lot of muscle spasm. And it was then that I decided to refer her to Dr. Cho, who'. a physiotrist, a specialist in physical medicine. Q Okay. And did she go to see Dr. Cho? A Yes. Q And did you -- did Dr. Cho write to you to provide you with a report of his findings? A Yes, I had gotten two letters, three letters. .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 o '-'" 11 o Looking at his letter to you of November the 11th, 1992, doctor. A Yes. o Can you explain for us what Dr. Cho's findings were? A Well, he started the letter by relating the mechanism of the accident and his examination. fie said, and I'm quoting from hie letter, today's physical examination indicates that the patient is suffering with a severe muscle ligamontous strain of the cervical spine. I cannot pick up any neurologic or any other significant orthopedic impairment at this time. And then he gave a list of what he wanted her to do. He kept her on the muscle relaxant and the anti-inflammatory that I had put her on, but he added Darvocet, which is strictly a pain killer. It doesn't reduce inflammation. And he advised outpatient treatment three times a week, the purpose of which was to relax the cervical muscles. o And did she continue to treat with Dr. Cho then? A Yes. o Now, Dr. Harhigh, I'm going to ask you a question that calls for an opinion, a medical opinion, and I would like you to please state your answer to my 13 . 1 A Yes. 2 Q -- other reasons? 3 A Yes. 4 Q And when Wll6 the last time that you had leen 5 her? 6 A March of '94. 7 0 And what wa6 her complaint at that time? 8 A She had a acute maxillary sinulitis. 9 Q And did she offer any other complaints other 10 than those to her sinus? 11 A No. She wa6 too ill to, as a matter of fact. 12 MR. WIX: That's all I have. 0 13 MR. SHIPMAN: Okay. We're finished. 14 (Whereupon, the deposition was concluded at 15 2:29 p.m.) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 , 25 .~' ~ ('\1 .. .. , ,. " Lf; ~:, .. "'7 ~~: .' ..".., -: l".l... ".i ~I '~>1 C' \.~J " 1 lli... I ::.; rr! I.J n. ,"11\) WI ".ID.. r' <;) I.t.. .n ,I " , (J CJ\ I..) " , , , , " ,j" , , (;: .:"1 ',. ~ \1: i? .. 'l..~ ~p - ! .,oJ ).'. J : i~ , , ~~' t'.. i L' \(J .;'fl , IJ" I " . , ,~ [I"" 0.. "lr,fJ ".1. u..: ,':.l- I. v~ II. ,I') ,.1 0 tn () " ',I .' by her family physician, George Harhigh. She had marked limited range of motion in her cervical spine and spasms in her trapezius muscles. Dr. Harhigh diagnosed a flexion-extension injury. He prescribed muscle relaxants and anti-inflammatory medications. He also prescribed a regimen of physical therapy. Ann continued to be very painful and Dr. Harhigh referred her to Jay Cho, M.D., of Mechanicsburg Rehab Hospital. She continues to treat with Dr. Cho up to the present time. At the same time of this accident, Mrs. Devlin was actively pursuing treatment for infertility with Virginia Hall, M.D. Dr. Hall will be called as a l~itness to testify that the automobile accident, with its attendant aftermath, delayed Ann's gynecologic treatment. III. Statement of PrinciDal Issues of Liabilitv and Damaaes. a. Whether James Hockensmith was negligent. b. Whether James Hockensmith's negligence was a substantial factor in causing the accident and the injuries to Ann Devlin. c. The full amount of damages sustained by the Plaintiffs, Ann and Stephen Devlin. 2 f I . IV. Summarv of Laaal I..ua. Raaarding ~dmia.ibilitv of Te.timonv. Exhibit. or oth~r matta[a. The Plaintiff. do not anticipate any difficult or novel legal i..ue. ragarding admi.sibility of te.timony, exhibit. or any other matt.r. V. witn..... to be called. Ann Devlin St.phen Devlin Jam.s Hock.memith Gr.g Thomas Polic. Officer Jam.. Sadler Georg. Harhigh, M.D. Jay Cho, M.D. Virginia Hall, M.D. Scott M.ck, Occupational Th.rapi.t Joy Cleveland, Occupational Therapi.t Rick Saer, Therapist The Plaintiff. respectfully ra.erve the right to .upplamant this lilt. VI. Lilt of Exhibits. a. M.dical recorde and r.port., Photograph. of the D.vlin vehicle, and b. 3 PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR T~JA~ (Must be typewrlllen and submitted In duplicate) TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY " ,') ., Please list the following case: ~.' .' . -, J ,,\ ',ll) . "\ . . '~., : l.) ( ) f~r trial without a jury. '~:: '" _\" I .un........................................................................................................................................................~........,~......'I (:oJ :, t.;", (Check one) ( xx) for JURY trlBI at the neMtterm of civil court. - r' 1-> CAPTION OF CASE (enllre caption must be stated In lull) (check one) ANN R. DEVLIN and STEPHF.N J. DEVLIN, Assumpsit Trespass (xlll Trespass (Motor Vehicle) (Plaintiff) (other) vs. JAMES HOCKENSMITH, The trial list will be called on August 2..Q.,_l996 and Trials commence on September 16. 1991i (Defendant) Pretrials will be held on__~Jlqust 28. 1996. (Briefs are due 5 days before pretrials.) (The party listing this case for trial shall provide forthwith a copy of the praecipe to all counsel, pursuant to local Rule 214.1.) vs. NO'94-4750 Civil ______, _"__"'n"_ 19 , Indicate the attorney who will try case ror the party who files this praeclpe:Att.o.!:n.e,'i_f.o~ Plaintiffs, Jefferson J. ShiEman, Es~, 320 Market St., Harrisburg, PA --------- -_._- ----------- ....-...-... --.- .'---"----- --. Indicate trial counsel for other parties II known: AttorneJl~_f_o_r)),efendant, ,Ric:h.ar.4, H. wix. ESQ.. 4705 D_~ke_S~ree~L Harrisburg, PA This case is ready for trial. ----Signed: ,....l!l&t-IYVV .Z;;J:I{<<~ p,,,, .,Z' Joffmo" J. Shipm," Dale 6/21/96 Plaintiffs A tlorney for ANN R. DEVLIN and STEPHEN J. : DEVLIN, : plaintiffs : : v. I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW NO. 94-4750 CIVIL TERM JURY TRIAL DEMANDED JAMES HOCKENSMITH, Defendant DBJ'BIrDDT' B ANB"BR WITH In", HATTaR 1. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 1. Therefore, each and every averment of Paragraph 1 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial. 2. Admitted. 3. Admitted. 4. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 4. Therefore, each and every averment of Paragraph 4 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial. 5. Admitted in part and denied in part. Admi tted that Defendant, James Hockensmith at about the same time was operating his vehicle westbound on S.R. 114 when his vehicle impacted the rear of an another automobile. After reasonable investigation, the Defendant is without sufficient knowledge and belief as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 5. Therefore, the remaining averments of Paragraph 5 are specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial. 6. The averments of Paragraph 6 constitute a conclusion of law to which no response is required. To the extent that a response is deemed required, each and every averment of Paragraph 6 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial. 7. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 7. Therefore, each and every averment of Paragraph 7 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial. 8. After reasonable investigation, Defendant. is without sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to tho truth of the averments of Paragraph 8. Therefore, each and every averment of Paragraph 8 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial. 9. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 9. Therefore, each and every averment of Paragraph 9 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial. 10. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 10. Therefore, each and every averment of Paragraph 10 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial. WHEREFORE, Defendant, James Hockensmith respectfully requests your Honorable Court to dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice. 11. Defendant, Hockensmith incorporates herein by reference, Paragraphs 1 through 10 of the Defendant's Answer with New Matter. 12. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without sufficient knowledge to:> form a belief as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 12. Therefore, each and every averment of Paragraph 12 is specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at the time of trial. WHEREFORE, Defendant, James Hockensmith respectfully requests your HonQrable Court to dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice. Nn KATTIIR 13. Defendant believes and therefore avers that Discovery may reveal the Plaintiff's claims for non-pecuniary damages are limited pursuant to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act. 14. Defendant believes and therefore avers that some or all of the plaintiff's cl~ims for medical expenses and wage loss may be barred pursuant to the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act. WHEREFORE, Defendant, James Hockensmith respectfully requests your Honorable Court to dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice. COUNT I Ann R. D.vlin v. J.... Hock.n..ith 3. That this complaint arises out of an automobile accident which occurred on September 22, 1992 on S.R. 0114 in silver Spring Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 4. That at the time of the accident, the Plaintiff Ann R. Devlin was a passenger in an automobile being operated by the Plaintiff Stephen J. Devlin and which was lawfully being operated in the westbound lane of S.R. 0114 and stopped, intending to turn left with the left turn signal activated. 5. That the Defendant James Hockensmith, at or about the same time and loc~tion, was operating a vehicle westbound on S.R. 0114 when he caused his vehicle to violently collide with the rear of the Plaintiffs' automobile. 6. That the aforesaid accident and the violent collision that occurred was a dirRct and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of the Defendant James Hockensmith in the following particulars: 2 a. failing to have his vehicle under proper and adequate control so as to avoid cOlliding with the Plaintiffs' vehicle; b. failing to keep alert and maintain a proper lookout while operating his vehicle; c. failing to observe the position of the Plaintiffs' vehicle; d. failing to stop his vehicle within the assured clear distance ahead; e. failing to operate his vehicle at a safe and appropriate speed; and f. failing to operate his vehicle at a safe and appropriate speed when approaching an intersection. 7. That as a direct and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of Defendant James Hockensmith and the violent collision that occurred, the Plaintiff Ann R. DeVlin sustained severe, permanent, painful and grievous physical injuries over her entire body, including, without limitation the following: severe cervical sprain and strain; severe muscle injury; severe ligament injury; severe pain in her head, neck, shoulders, arms, back; weakness and limitation of cervical motion; mUBcle spasms and other painful and serious injuries, all of which have caused her to be 3 .' . hospitalized; permanent disability; severe emotional trauma; and, conscious pain and suffering. 8. That as a further direct and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of Defendant James Hockensmith, the Plaintiff Ann R. Devlin has incurred and will continue to incur medical and related expenses which have and/or will exceed the sums recoverable under the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law. 9. That as a further direct and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of Defendant James Hockensmith, Ann R. DeVlin has suffered a loss of earnings and loss of earning power. 10. That as a further direct and proximate result of the negligence and carelessness of Defendant James Hockensmith, Ann R. Devlin has been unable to attend her usual daily activities and has suffered, and will continue to suffer in the future, severe emotional distress, anxiety, loss of life's pleasures and inconvenience. WHERErORE, the Plaintiff Ann R. Devlin respectfully requests that judgment be entered in her favor and against 4 . ~,. Defendant James Hockensmith in an amount in excess of $30,000.00. Respectfully submitted, GOLDBIRG, KATZMAN , SHIPMAN, P.C. . 320 Market street Strawberry Square P.O. Box 1268 Harrisburg, PA 17108-1268 (717) 234-4161 ':)/"7 dlo c.- Attorneys for Plaintiffs DATED: ~ -,- 1-J IW......,.lI1 6 i , t" , , . CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document upon all counsel of record by depositing the same in the united states Mail, first class, postage prepaid, at HarriSburg, pennsylvania, on the ~3,t'~ day of f)'kti? ( 11 , 1995, addressed as follows: Richard wix, Esquire WIX, WINGER , WEIDNER 4705 Duke street Harrisburg, PA 17109-3099 GOLDBERG, KATZMAN & SHIPMAN, P.C. ~) By 17108-1268 Counsel for Plaintiffs .,. ,. en - .. ~ -.... .", ..... 0") .....- '" n.: -. ::a= lA , ~ ~ ,," E ..," .... i" :~.:', \, "., lQ _ .7! . J" ~ I.J'~J., ~ I... .~.:.~ \.":'1 ''0 :r, >,," .JII'I '-0 U:";.a ..1'./.1,: 1 '"If.... J! ~~', 111.. '- ::> ~;~ ~ ,~ a; -~ -.::J~ I..r) . ~ ~.- .~ :c , .., ~ oJ, 0... .'. ~ '..1 J" . l' rn <:> :. ~.: "1 .. '"'4 II> , c ~ 0:- f'(') ~ ~ ... .... ,..., ~ -\ ~ ..... ... " ~ => <::\~ ~(~ . ~" .... @ I I I J ~ :. i ::l 'tl~ .S 10 ~ ~.... .j.I ..:l 10.... '... > e J . . I ~ Q) - U) ~~fj .... Q ~ ~ .... Q) 0 ~j~~ > . ~ .... Q),..., 0 ~I Q 0 ~ :r:: . Q) - ~~ U) .... J~Jg Co Q) .... ~ Q) e > ;a~ 10 .... . ,..., u ANN R, DEVLIN and STEPHEN J, DEVLIN, Plaintiffs IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA VI'. 94.4750 CIVIL TERM CIVIL ACfION . LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED JAMES HOCKENSMITH, Dcfenda.lI VERDlCf L Was the defendant, James Hockensmith, negligent'1 Yes L No 2, Wa.~ the defendant's negligence a substantial factor in causing injury to the plaintiff, Ann Devlin'l Yes.X- No 3. What damages do you award to the plaintiff, Ann Devlin'l $ \~OC. 00 4, What damages do you award to thc plaintiff, Stcphen J. Dcvlin, on account of his claim for loss of consortium'l $ c J~ /' Datc: f; --.-