HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-05252
.
Q..
~
Ci
J1
. I
-?
~
1
~
1;
li
"
, ,
, ,
"
,
\ '
~,.
il ,I
"
"
"
~'
p
j
"
<0
l()
~
l'
, i
-::r- I
a- I
~
'I
01
<
, ,
I
/
t
~
d:
J
-7 "
1
~ I
I
~ I
, I'
I
"
1
~
~ ,
, '
)
J
"'Ilo,
. .,
,
,
(0
l(1
rc
L()
.,.' ,~..,.
"1>1'''' ,..',..:
I
::::r-
a-
~
'-
3. Appellant is the equitable owner ot real property known
as 801 Upland street, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055 and
situate in Lower Allen Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania
and consisting ot an improved parcel ot land located at the
southeast corner of Linden Avenue and Upland street, having
frontage of 120 feet along Linden Avenue and 225 feet along Upland
Street (hereinafter called "the Property").
4. Appellant is the equitable owner of the Property as the
purchaser thereof under an executory written agreement for the sale
and purchase of real estate entered by Appellant on March 15, 1994
with the legal fee simple owner of the Property, Robert H. Barkley.
5. Appellant filed with Appellee a Land Development
Application concerning the Property on June 21, 1994, in the form
cf a Preliminary/Final Land Development Plan, which was docketed by
Appellee in its records of proceedings to SD/LD 94-09 (hereinafter
called the "Application").
6. The Application proposes no subdivision of the Property,
but provides for demolition of the small, single family home on the
Property and construction of nine (9) residential units on the
Property.
7. The Application's proposed nine (9) residential units
consist of two (2) groups of two (2) story town house type units,
with one (1) group of five units in one separate building and one
(1) group of four units in another separate building, with party
walls between the units, and with a detached garage for each unit.
2
Appellant intended to submit the Property to the condominium torm
of ownership or some other form of common ownership of all or
portions of the land and buildings, after which the units would be
capable ot eale or rental.
B. section 1115.02 of the Lower Allen Township Zoning
Ordinance (herelnafter called the "Zoning Ordinance"), entitled
"Permitted Uses", specifically permits "single family semi-detached
dwellings" (subsection b) and "garden apartments" (subsection c),
but does not specifically permit or prohibit the grouped dwelling
units proposed in the Application.
9. The property is located in the zoning district designated
as "R-2 Residence District (Multi-Family Dwellings)" in the Zoning
Ordinance.
10. On May 19, 1994, the Zoning Hearing Board of Lower Allen
Township rendered a determination that Appellant's proposed use of
the Property would be permitted in the R-2 Zoning District. The
Zoning Hearing Board's said determination is presently the subject
of a separate Land Use Appeal filed by Appellee herein and docketed
to No. 94-3267 in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania. Appellant is a party to said Appeal by intervention.
11. The Lower Allen Township Board of Commissioners
considered the Application and took action thereon at a public
meeting held on August B, 1994.
12. On August 15, 1994, the Board of Commissioners of Lower
Allen Township issued a written notice of it's decision
3
disapproving the Application, and served such decision on Appellant
by mailing same on August 15, 1994. A copy of said written notice
of decision (hereinafter called the "Decision") is attached hereto,
marked Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof.
13. The action of Appellee in rendering the Decision
disapproving and denying the Application is invalid and is contrary
to law in the followir,g particul:lrs I
A. Items 1 and 2 of the Decision refer to instances of
alleged non-compliance with the Lower Allen Township subdivision
and Land Development Ordinance (hereinafter called the "Land
Development Ordinance") which concern only the form of the
Application. Appellant does not object to compliance with such
items, upon approval of the Application, or upon remand to
Appellee.
B. The "sewage facilities planning module" referred to in
Item 3 of the Decision was submitted by Appellant to Appellee for
transmission to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Resources, as contemplated by Section 1173.05(b) of the Land
Development Ordinance. The "completed module" referred to by the
Land Development Ordinance requires action by said state Agency.
Such action had not yet occurred, purely as a matter of timing,
when the Application was considered by Appellee.
C. Item 4 of the Decision refers to Section 1181.09 of the
Land Development Ordinance. The Application indicates that such
sidewalks do not exist in the immediate area of the property and
4
have not in the past been constructed or provided for other
properties or developments in the immediate area of the property.
section 1181.09 of the Land Development ordinance also provides
that the Board of commissioners may waive the requirement for
sidewalks unless, in any circumstances, they are necessary for
public safety, Appellant would apply for such a waiver if this
portion of the Application is remanded by the Court to Appellee.
D. Item 5 of the Decision refers to Section 1177.10(B) of
the Land Development Ordinance. By the terms of the Land
Development ordinance, the property is eligible for exemption from
the land dedication requirements. The Land Development Ordinance
actually speaks in terms of "provision" of land for recreation, and
actual dedication of land for this purpose is only optional to the
parties. In addition, Appellee may not lawfully require dedication
of land to the public by Appellant without compensation as a
condition to approval of development. Appellant does not object to
payment of the fee in lieu of dedication provided in section
1177.10(e) of the Land Development ordinance, upon approval of the
Application or upon remand to Appellee.
E. Item 6 of the Decision refers to Section 1177.07 of the
Land Development Ordinance and further refers to "TWp. Engineer's
comments dated July 28, 1994". Said comments, at number 5 thereot,
state: "All storm water discharges shall be made to an exist.ing
channel or storm drainage system. This would require a discharge
from the pond to be conveyed under Upland Street and in a westerly
5
direotion to the stream ohannel behind the homes on the west side
of Upland.lI. Neither the Zoning Ordinance, the Land Development
ordinance, nor any other applicable ordinance of the Township
requires discharge to an existing system or may lawfully require
disoharge to an existing system if an existing system is not
available. The IIstream channel II referred to in the Decisiol\ is
apparently not located in close proximity to the Property.
Appellant cannot lawfully be required to acquire right-of-way to
reaoh said system or channel. Appellant cannot lawfully be
required to remedy an overall deficiency in Appellee's storm water
facilities which may exist in the entire general area of the
Property's location. The remainder of said comments are technical
requirements capable of resolution, upon approval of the
Application or upon remand to Appellee or otherwise.
F. Item 7 of the Decision refers to Sections 1177.02(a)(8)
and 1177.02(c) (4) of the Land Development Ordinance. The
Application shows Upland Street as an existing TownShip street
having a right-of-way width of forty (40) feet. The Application
depicts the required forty (40) feet right-of-way width and the
Application depicts the required cartway width of thirty (30) feet
as proposed. The Land Development Ordinance's requirement for
dedication of additional right-of-way is not applicable, as the
required street right-of-way exists. In addition, Appellee may not
lawfully condition approval of the Application upon dedication of
such right-of-way by Appellant without compensation. The
II
Application shows that Appellant is willing to provide "fill in
paving", as referred to in section 1177.02 (a)( 8) of the Land
Development Ordinance. The street in question is neither a new
street nor an internal street in a new subdivision, and it is not
a "new half or partial street", as referred to in section
1177.02(a)(6) of the Land Development Ordinance. Appellant must
assume that Appellee is objecting to the notation on the
Application that the paving on the opposite side of the center line
of Upland Street from the Property is to be "fifteen feet wide
future construction by others". The "fill in paving" offered by
Appellant is all that the Land Development Ordinance requires of
Appellant, and Appellee may not lawfully require Appellant to
provide additional paving, under the Ordinance or otherwise other
applicable law.
G. Item 8 of the Decision states that Appellant "has not
constructed required public improvements or provided developers
agreement and financial security, as required by 1173.06(c)",
referring to Section ll73.06(c) of the Land Development Ordinance.
The extent of public improvements, if any, which may lawfully be
required and which Appellant may agree to provide remains at issue,
and Appellant cannot possibly provide the agreement and security
referred to until the identity and level of such improvements is
determined.
H. As stated at paragraph 10 above, the said Zoning Hearing
Board decision described at Item 9 of Appellee'S Decis.ton as
7
"docket 94-02" is already the subject of an appeal by Appellee
herein to this Court. A copy of said decision is attached hereto
as Exhibit "B". The findings of the zoning Hearing Board therein
state the dimensions and acre ago of the Property (finding of Fact
No.7), the proposed construction of nine (9) town house style
units with detached garages in two (2) buildings or groups of four
(4) and five (5) units, respectively (finding of Fact No. 10), the
likelihood that the land or improvements would be held in common
ownership in the nature of a homeowners' or condominium association
(finding of Fact No. 13)1 and that the proposed use of the Property
is similar to or compatible with other mUlti-family dwelling uses
permitted and located in the zoning district (ConClusion of Law
Nos. 4, 5 and 6 and Decision). Notwithstanding Appellee'S appeal
of said Zoning Hearing Board decision, Appellee cannot lawfully
reject the Application based on an issue of alleged non-compliance
with the Zoning Ordinance which has already been determined in
Appellant's favor by the Zoning Hearing Board. Alternatively, the
Zoning Hearing Board considered the density of the proposed
development, as indicated by its findings noted above, in rendering
its decision. Alternatively, Appellee's Decision lists non-
compliance with density standards as a reason for disapproval and
then states that such density standards are not contained in the
Zoning Ordinance. Appellee may not lawfully reject the Application
for any reason not based upon provisions of the applicable
ordinances. Restrictive provisions of the Zoning Ordinance must be
8
striotly oonstrued so as to allow Appellant the least restrictive
use of his property, and Appellee has instead construed the zoning
Ordinance in a manner most prohibitive of potential uses of the
property. Item 9 of the Decision also refers to section
1173.07(a) (1) (R) of the Land Development Ordinance. The
information required by said ordinance provision is inherent in the
information already included in the Application, and Appellant is
willing to represent it on the Application in any form lawfully
required by Appellee, upon approval of the Application or upon
remand to Appellee. Item 9 of the Decision also refers to Section
1173.05(a) (10) of the Land Development Ordinance. The Application
includes a statement of the Property's zoning district, and
Appellant is willing to provide additional "zoning data" which may
be lawfully required by Appellee, upon approval of the Application
or upon remand to Appellee.
WHEREFORE, Appellant, Herbert C. Fenstermacher, Jr., prays
your honorable Court to find that the Decil!lion of the Board of
Commissioners of Lower Allen Township unlawfully prevents or
restricts the development proposed by Appellant and to reversa said
decision, or, alternatively, to order Appellant's proposed
development be approved as to certain elements and to remand the
.,
...
6. The subject prollerty Is 011 Improved parcel of land situate In on R-2
DIstrict, 4t the sout.heastern corner of the IntersectIon between Llnden Avenue
4nd Uplond Street.
7. The subject prollerty hee 120 feet of frontage along Linden Avenue and
225 feet along Upland Stroet, and contains ,62 acres of area.
g, 'fhe subject Ilroperty apparantly couslste of nine (9) small lots, as
shown upon on old subdivIsion for 1I0rrlsburg Hanor.
g. The subjec t prollerty 1e 1lnl,roved wi th a s Ingl e famlly de tached
dwelllng, whlch applicant proposes to demolish and remove from the B1 te,
10. Applicant proposes to construct on the subjel"t property nhe (9)
townhouse style dwelllng unl ts, wi th detached garages. The dwelllng unl ts are
proposed to be constructed ln two separote bnLldlngs, one havIng flve unlts, and
the other haVing four,
II. The plen attached to Appl1cant's lnltlal eppl1catlon reflected access
to the property from Upland S tree t. Tho plan attached to the amended
appLLcatlon shows sccass from Linden Avenue, and also contalns a dlfferent
layout of tha dwelllng unIts and garages. Slnce the plan submitted With the
amended appllcatlon supercedes the original plan, the orlglnal plan will not be
considered In the deCision.
12. Applicant prop;lses to provide a thirty feet "Ilde setback along Linden
Avenue and along Upland Street, a fifteen feet wide setbeck along the southern
boundary, and approximately twenty feet wide setback along the eastern boundary.
13, Applicant proposes to sell the Individual dwellLng units and garages,
and to create an association, which would own title to common areas,
14, The R-2 Dletrlct In which the subject property is B1tuate has a
substantial number of mUltl-faml1y dwellings of varloun types, configurations
end numbers of units.
'.
.. ."....,"',,,,
15. Four lndividullh who reside 1n the vidn1ty of sllbject property testlf1ed
lit the hellrins in opposition to the application. Concerns were expressed about
II vllriety of factors, including access, safety and traffic.
16. Rlchard Dl:ul>y, attorney wlth Het~ger, IIlckersham, KnllllBS & Erb,
townshlp sOL1cltor, appellred on behalf of the township IInd partlclpated In the
hearlng.
ConC1Us!01l1l of 1.11101
1. Sectlon 1141.01(j) of the Zonlng Ordlnllnce provides that when II
spec1tic use ls nel ther llerml tted nor denled, the Zonlng Hear Ing Board shall
make a determlnlltlon as to the similarity or compatlblL1ty of the use In
questlon to permltted uaes ln the dlstrlct,
2, Appllcant's proposed use as lndlvldual, separately owned dwelling
units, together With commou areas, ls neither permltted nor denled ln the R-2
Distrlct,
3, The Utltl of the R-2 Distrlct ls "R-2 Residence District (Hultl-famlly
Dwell1ngs), "
4. A multi-family dwelllng Is defined In Sectlon 1101,41(h) as "a building
used by three or more famll1es lIvlng Independently of each other and doing
their own cooking including apartment houses, row houses or town houses."
5, The proposed use Is II mllltl-famlly dwell1ng use and is slm11ar to or
compatible with all of the residential uses permitted under Section 1115,02 of
the Zoning Ordinance, namely 1115,02(a)-(d),
6, The proposed use is slmllar to or compatlble with the multi-family
dwelling uses located Within the R-2 District In the vicinity of the subject
property.
............. ,.'1. II ..._........ .,.............
"
1. For purpole5 of the yart! relllll reOlellts of 1115.06, tha proposed use 115
couslderet! by tho Dourd to bu mo~e oklu to a ouo-fumlly detached and one-feOllly
sollll-detuched dwelllulI U511 than It ls to a Ilarlleu npu~tmllllt use, and, therefore,
the Bonrd concludes that the ya~d ~equlroments set forth os ll15.06(a)-(c) are
appUcable.
8, The AppUcnnt' 5 p roposu,1, doos no t v lo Into the ynrd re'lu lrements as
de..mad appllcable to the AppUcallt's proposal,
9, 11\ vlew of thu forellolnll deturmlnntlons, the Appllcant ls not In need
of a vorlnnce, and slnco Applicant's alternotlve request for a varlance ls 1II00t,
the Board m3kes no determlnotlon os to whether or not Appllcont would otherwlse
lIIeet the roqulremellts for a vur1311ce.
Dlle IS ION
[n cOllslderotlon of the forellolng Elndlngs alld concluslons, and In vlew of
the testlmony and evldence presented at tho he3rlng, the Ooard hereby determlne,
that the Appllcant's use ls slmllar to or compatible wlth uses permltted In the
R-2 Dlstrlct, and that the yard requlromonts appllc3ble to a one-fomlly detached
and one-family seml-det3ched dwellIng sh31l bo appllcoble to AppUcant's
proposed use, It Is a condltlon of the relief hereln granted that the Applicant
malntain strict conformance With the testimony. pions and speclflcatlons
submitted to tho Board,
LOWER ALLEN TOWNSHIP
ZONING HEARING BOARD
;:t&~,~<->~
~L_J);~. ~.t1X
( C"
DATE: 5-/9-r.;
,'LT:,';"
~jp.I..J'1 t ,
, .............~ .
-......l..........J...I,. ,I '
,'. ,. ..,I,.~.., ,....iHtI..~- ..~I.' ,I '
, ' -..",-.,...;., ',' "
_,lJ.....t,..
.,;1 ~"'- ;~d"U( .'
..........1-....
PI7
@
,
,
,\
Sf' 1'1
I UJ PH '9~
'f','I'/
"itl,',,-
',:l :,'0 ',Af')
, 'I, j.l i, ~
"
I:
,
''I I
,
,
,
"
I.',
':11'"
"~I I.,,"
.'
\'J
$
LftJ
,
50
5,Ou
/Jt!'~
(,
I
,I
I
"
"
-
1./ 5". ') cJ
t,
v
I ,,~
I'
I ~
[ ,~
I",:
I, /1'
I ,.,
1',/
I'r
! .iJ
I :'{
I
1'1,',
I
,'I
,
I
I ,
I,
'I
,I
,.J
I
,"
..',
:'
',I
"
I rrf~ 55'iD
Rcpf~ !:;9lfl(
"'; ".~ Vrl'l"'''/~'- '~,~i,"_ ,j ;,.,'.c,i,
'" . -',~-"
,..
i;
,~;-cMV'_, _,"
~(""'!)" ,'\",.'1
~""j;,;:J
",;<1;.(-"
;:,:\;'.L;:,y,\,
" -j-'- j
11' .,
" :~ I'
I .
I'
I,:
~''''r~
"
.
;
,
.' .
.,'
,
I,
oJ
'..t
..........-
"
LOWER AlLEN
'ound~ 1150
Admlnl6frallon (71 '1173/8681
Building &. Zoning (711) /635618
Emergencv Medical Servlca6(117) 737-3n6
POlica(717) 7637382
rromurar (717) 737,5671
October 4, 1994
HAND DBLoIVBRBD
Julie M. Orris, Deputy Prothonotary
Cumberland County courthouse
Carlisle, pa 11013
REI Case No. 94-5252 Civil Term
Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas
Dear Ms. orris I
On behalf of the I,ower Allen Township Board of Commissioners and
Lower Allen Township, I am transmitting herewith a copy of the writ
of Certiorari. a copy of the record in the above-referenced matter
and a table of contents for that record. Please be advised that in
Case No. 94-3267, civIl Term,. Lower Allen Township vs Zoning
Hearing Board of Lower Allen Township, items also pertaining to
this case were transmitted as part of that particular Writ of
Certiorari
Sincerely,
I.. 9.~\ ;1;..:
JOhn'M. Eby, COd~dministrator/zoning
Officer
I hereby certify that the documents transmitted herewith are true
and correct copies of the record in this matter.
_ 11-2 A:hM.u
Richard A. Grove, Acting Township Manager/Secretary
October 4, 1994
Receipt is hereby acknowledged this_~~ day of dLGt , 1994 by the
Office of the prothonotary, Cumberland County. Pennsylvania
"gj" c~f '1 6'.. ,12,4. "
(Deputll7) Prothdhotary
1993 HUMMEL AVENUE · CAMP HILL. PENNSYLVANIA 17011'5938
"
,,.
,
"
OCT II
I lf8 PH '9~
,
,
,
11'( ,'I
1~lj ~I P 1- f. I
fir h'i'
1111,1,
I !;!I,I,IM',Y
'"J ';I'il II V
II,', t
I,
"
,
I
!
"
"
"
'f"
T'
!,
, ,
"
, !
! '
!
!
"
"
"
I,
"~I
.,-,1.-,;,,1
(,'
r~jJ ,_.,'
"'\
"''1'
"......-.'-
"
t~,...
1
"
n
"
.
'-,I.
,
,'j "
"
-
-..-"
TABLE OF CONTEN'l'S
RESPONSE 'ro WR ['1' OF Cf:R'rtORARI
NO. 94 ,5252 CIVIL 'l'f:RM
CUMBERLAND COUN'l'Y COUR'l' Of' COMMON PLEAS
1. APplication for Development for approval of land development
plan
2. Agenda for July 19. 1994 planning commission Meeting
3, Minutes of July 19. 1994 planning commission Meeting
4. Township staff comments. SD/LD 94-09, preliminary/Final Land
Development Plan for Herbert Fenstermacher. Jr.
5. cumberland County planning commission comments for Herbert
Fenstermacher, Jr,
6. Township Engineer (Robert D, Rowland) comments on
Fenstermacher Land Development Plan, dated July 19. 1994
7. Drainage and Stormwater Calculations for Herbert
Fenstermacher, Jr,
8. Township Engineer comments on Fenstermacher Storm Drainage,
dated July 28. 1994
9. Additional Township Engineer comments on Fenstermacher Storm
Drainage, dated August 8. 1994
10. Letter from Residents of HarriSburg Manor to the Lower Allen
Township planning Commission. dated JUly 19. 1994
11. Notice of Special planning conroission Meeting to be held July
28. 1994
12. Minutes of July 28. 1994 planning commission Meeting
13, preliminary/Final Land Development Plan for Herbert
Fenstermacher, Jr" dated June 10, 1994. Cover sheet plus
Sheets 1 through 8
14. Preliminary/Final Land Development Plan for Herbert
Fenstermacher, Jr, revised. Cover sheet plus Sheets 1
through 8
~!!n!!!L~
PLANNING COHHISSION
REGULAR HEETING
LOWER ALLEN TOWNSHIP
JULY L9, L994
The Regular Meeting of the Lower Allen TCMnBhip Planning Commission WBB called to
order at 8:02 p.m. by James Utley with the following in ATTEND~:
PLANNING COMMISSION
TOWNSHIP PERSONNEL
Geir MegnusBon
JameB B. Utley, Jr.
Albert Wright~tone, CodeB Department
Robert D. Rcwland. Township Engineer
James Szymborsk, Tt'i-Ccunty Planning
CornmislOion
~onna V, Sprowls, Secretary
Mr. Utley announced there "''Bsn' t
heard but no formal action taken.
requesting will be notified.
a quorum for the meeting. Presentation would be
A new meeting date will be set and those so
NEW BUSINESS
SD/LD 93-l7: PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN: WINDSOR PARK SHOPPING CENTER
Chris Hoover, Hartman and AssociatelO was pl'elOent to represent the PreliJninary Land
Development Plan for Windsor Park Shopping Center. Simpson Ferry Read, Mr, Hoover noted
this plan was presented at the last meeting of the Collll1l.1.ssion and tabled to address
Staff and Engineering comments. They have submitted revised plans. He asked to
highlight a couple of items that were discussed at the previous meeting that were
questionable about the plan and explain how they "''ere addressed.
Mr. Hoover explained one of the big issues was the traffic situation around the axisting
center. When the Food Lion store was constructed, a forty foet access easement 'lmS
provided around the existing eastern side of the center for tractor trailer traffic.
With the new expansion to the eastern lOection they had to eliminate this access
easement. Therefore, to accommodate truck traffic for any future vendor into the
grocery store area, they have provided two means of access to the site. Continue along
the southern portion of the tract eastward to Wesley Drive where they wuld then make a
right turn and southbound to Rt. l5. The second method would be along the rear of the
center and to the east of the proposed expansion where, at one time, there had been a
proposed drive through. This drive through has now been eliJninated which has provided
them with a 44 foot area to come through. They also have widened the driving alley in
front of the existing center 32 feet from the 30 feet provided for previously. Tractor
trailers will now be able to swing around the eastern end of the center and continue
along the front of the store and turn right to Simpson Ferry Read and exit east or
westbound.
Mr. Hoover said another issue discussed was the proposed extensions of the par~ing area
shown on Lot 1 into the Mobile Gas Station site, There was some confusion why they were
Planning Commission
Page One
July 19, 1994
..
th,u:e 1 whether they '.lIre needed, It i~ now the developer' OJ poOJition to eliminate thelle
extensions and leave the parking c~ntiguration as currently shown.
The rest ot the r,:omments \o'ere additional intormation type Io'hich they feel they have
responded to and waiting for Staff and Engineering review,
Mr. Rowland reported the remaining engineering issue is the traf fic study. Last IIIOnth a
traffic report was received. Atter thill meeting he met with the developllr regarding
this study and revie"''lld itemll that needed to be conllidered in detail. About five weeks
ago he did recllive a resubrniOJsion of the traffic: study. The most important point ill
thill report wall not prepared by a profellllional traHic engineer all required by the
regulations, There are. in addition. a number of items that have been commented on in a
(three page) engineering report. Most of thelle are technical or deal with the traffic
study and it will be necesllary to meet with them and continue dialogue to resolve some
of the problelllB.
Additionally, Mr. Rowland said they have received a new plan (at this meeting) which he
has not had an opportunity to review,
Mr. Wright stone said there were no additional Staff conuuents.
chance to review the revised plan.
Staff has not had a
Mr. Szymborski reported ther,e "''llre no additional comments for the County PlaMing
Commission,
Mr, Utley questioned the lot behind the Mobile Station that is seperated from the bank.
Is this going to be retained under seperate ownership or included with the bank? Mr.
Hoover explained at one point the developer was discussing with Mobile Oil Corp. to
convey the lot to them. those negotiations have not been terminated completely. What
the developer is proposing at this time is to provide for employee parking on that lot
and retain it as part of the shopping center. If the negotiations with Mobile ever come
to fruition, the lot will be conveyed to Mobile Oil.
Mr. Utley asked if the parking meets the capacit)" of the shopping center and including
the bank? Mr. 1Io0ver said the center, as well as the bank, meet and exceed the required
amount of parking spaces per the Township ordinance. With the loss of these spaces they
would still have an excess of about 60 spacell.
~D/LD 94-071 PRELIMINARY/FINAL LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN: P & L FLUID COMPONENTS
Chris Hoover, Hartman and Associates was the representative for the Preliminary/Final
Land Development Plan for F & L Fluid Components, 1825 Hummel Avenue,
Mr. lIoover commented they had prepared and submitted a revised plan to the Township.
The plan is for the expansion of the existing facility. They intend to add a second
story to the existing warehouse facility that is located there.
Mr. Rowland reported he had not had an opportunity to review the revised resubmission.
Hr. Wrightstone stated Staff had not reviewed the resubmission.
Mr. SZ)"lllborski said he also had not had a chance to review the revised resubmission.
Planning Commission
Page Two
July 19, 1994
NEW BUSINESS
SOILO 94-06t LAN.o DEVELOPMENT PLANt STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Representing the Land Development Plan ror the State CorrectiQnal Inutitution at CI)/IlP
Hill was Rick Holeu or L. Robert Kimball and AasQciates.
Mr. Holes vutlined the devdopment histvry Qr the State Correctional Institution over
the past five }'ears, The Deportment or Correctionu has had "free will" over the SCIC
CI)/IlP Hill facility and made several improvements and changes in the last foul.' to five
years at the racility with little or nQ involvement of the To~nuhip, There ~~re a few
planning mc.dules submitted to the To~nship ~1.thin the last two-three years that were not
acted upon by the Township in IIn effort to have the Department or Corrections begin to
adhere to the T"",nship' s ordinances, In March there was a meeting between
representatives or the rvwnship I the Department of Corrections; the Department of
General Services and Mr. Holes firm to "kick oft" the proouction of the land development
plan ror the SCIC facility,
Mr. Holes said on April 4 a letter ~GU issued by his orrice addreusing numerous requests
for waivers of the requirements of the subiivision and land development and the zoning
ordinance in that the scrc racility has existed for over fifty years and it "''Quld be
very dirficult to bring it up to meet the codes.
On April L3 a meeting was held with Massrs. Holes and Eby and the Solicitor to go over
the requests for the "'Givars of the April 4 letter, At that time it was requested they
prepare the land development plan and resubmit a further letter to the To",nuhip with the
final request for waivers. This submission was made on June L5. ae received comments
(7/15) from Mr. Wrightstone, from the Cumberland County Planning Commission (7/18) and
Mr. Rowland (at the meeting). The comments appear to be ver}' minor in nature with the
exception of a traffic study concern ",'hich was addressed at the meeting with Mr. Eby.
Mr. Eby suggested after the plans were submitted, a meeting be established with Mr.
Rowland to discuss what t}-pes of traffic improvements could be proposed or whether a
study would be necessary. One of Mr. Rowland's comments is that a traffic study should
be completed. It has not yet been started.
Mr. Holes said one of the problems they have, that was discussed at the April L3
maeting, was potentially turning over property to PennDOT and the Township f<)r
dedication around the pond and stream within the facility. The Department of General
Services informed him this would require an act of legislation to be approved by both
the Senate and House.
Mr. Rowland submitted five engineering comments for the record and pointed out the main
concern is the traffic study. The second concern is the Storm Water Management Plan.
The engineering narrative submitted did include a short Storm Water Management Plan
which is being reviewed. However, they do agree with the basic premise that because of
the close proximity to the "iellQw Breeches and Cedar Run, detention would not be a
requirement at this location.
Mr, Holes said additionally two of Mr, Rowland's comments, the curbing and sidewalk
waivers, were included in the June 15 letter to Mr. Eby.
Mr. Wrightstone submitted comments for Staff, one through fourteen. They are included
with the record.
Planning Commission
Page Three
July L9, 1994
Mr. Sz}~bor~ki ~ubmitted cemmentG fer the C0unty Planning Cemm1~s1on, one through nine.
The~e cemment~ are attached.
SDILD 94-09r PRELIMINARY/FINAL LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN. HERBERT FENSTERMACHER. Jlh
Present tQ repre~ent the Preliminary/Ftnal Land Development Plan for Ite':bert
Fenstermacher. Jr,. southeast cerner of Linden Avenue and Upland Street was Ron Sechary.
Hartman and AasGciate~,
Mr. Solchary explained the plan has been before the Zoning Hearing Board as to the
compatibility and ~imilarity of use in the zone and received a favorable decision. The
Township has appealed this decision, However, being granted ZHB approval, they are
proceeding with the land development plan and w~uld ask the Planning Commission consider
it for compliance with the ordinances, Comments have been received from Staff, the
Engineer and the County.
Mr. Rowland submitted Engineering comments, one through seven and called attention to
Comment No.2. Ccnfcrmation is required on the olxistence of the 40 foot wide right of
WdY for Upland Street. If this information is not available, they would be required to
dedicate additional right of way,
Mr, Rowland also commented there is a need to provide access to the front doors of the
building without having to go through 1 parking space (Coment No.3) and a full cartwy
width of thirty feet w~uld be required for the remaining short section of Linden Avenue
and the full length of Upland Street. As proposed, they are showing 15 foot wide
construction with curbing on the left side. The regulations require when there is a
substandard pavement, the developer is required to pave the full width. He is not
required to install the curb on the other side however.
Hr. Wrightstone submitted Staff comments, one through sixteen. The comments are
attached. He added he included the four points of the Township Commissioner's appeal of
the decision. Also received by the Conmission was a copy of the Zoning Hearing Board
decision. When the ZIIB makes a decision and someone wants to apply for a building
permit there is a 30-<lay appeal process. If a building permit and zoning permit is
obtained within the 30 days. based on the ZHB decision, it could be appealed, and the
developers would be proceeding at their own risk.
Hr, Sechary asked for an interpretation of Comment No. 11. Hr, Wrightstone has stated
their 1JIIprovement of Upland Street \WOuld be their half of the street. Hr. Rowland had
indicated a desire to 1JIIprove the entire 30 foot width other than the OPposing curb. Is
there a consensus between the two?
With discussion, Hr, Rowland clarified it falls under the substandard street category
por the regulations cited in his comments.
Hr. Szymborski submitted County Planning comments, one through eighteen. He asked if
the addition of the handicap parking reduces the availability of two spaces per unit.
The two handicap spaces should be in addition to the required two spaces per unit.
Hr. Sechary explained the handicap parking is a percentage of the fractional number per
the total required. Handicap parking spaces are not mutually exclusive or do not count
in the total.
Planning Commission
Page Four
Jul}' 19, 1994
Mr. SZ)1Dbor!lki said ene of the unit~ loIOuld not be ablll to have total acceSll. Their
position if! every unit sheuld have acce!lllibility to two parking spaces as opposed tCl
commercial and office. ",'here employeell are not required to have a parking space. Two
9paces per d.u. must be dedicated and the handicap space 9hould be prOVided in excess.
Mr. Utley asked if there "'~re any commentf! trcm the publiC on this plan?
JeH Straley, 4708 Linden Avenue. spoke on behalf of residents of Harrisburg Manor. he
di9tributed copies of a memo to the Planning Cemmi9sion frem the residents. !hi9 memo,
li9ting twelve coment9 covering all of their cencern9. i9 attached a9 part of the
record. Mr. Straley highlighted points under each ef thege comments.
Mr. SecMry questiened Mr, Straley' 9 comment about off-atreet parking. Mr, Straley
explained they feel emergency v~hicle acce9S ",~uld be re9tricted if vehicles are parked
in all spaces per the .!I1Ieunt ef parking allecated per unit and the con9ideration of
additional parking for visitors, Linden Avenue i9 only 40 feet wide and parking on both
sides of the fltreet '.~uld re9trict emergency vehicle access to the back end of the
neighborhood.
Doris ConW&y. 708 Upland Street. expresaed concerns as follows: The availability of an
ambulance and a finl truck and peeple parking on her drivewa)' which they do now. She
said she had a lot of concern abeut water runoff and people moving into the townhouses
that are not as ccmmunity ccnscicus as those ",'ho have single family dw~llings. The
original intent of this development "''as for single family homes and the fact the zoning
was changed to R-2 to acccmmodate someone else years ago doe9n' t make it right to
continue to allow multi-family dw~llings to be built. While the Zoning Hearing Board
determined nine units was ccrnpatible she did not think this was accurate. The other
multi-family apartment ccmplexes are five units to a row built on the same .!I1Iount of
space this particular development is going to be on.
Marcia Welsh, 708 Belmont Avenue, stated her main concern was from Belmont to Upland and
from Florence to Maple. The majority are single family homes with the exception of two
duplexes. If this big ccmplex is built in the middle of all the single family homes it
will ruin the neighborhood.
Marcia Coleman, 4701 Maple Avenue stated opposition to the construction per this
proposal. The street conditions in the development are bad as it is now. The parking
and the traffic will increase and make IoIOrse a very bad situation.
Mr. Utley reiterated because there wasn't a quorum at the meeting. they could take
testimony and have it recorded but there would be no votes.
Mr. Utley further explained the Planning Commission is an advisory board to the Board of
Collllllissioners and recomends approval or disapproval of plans to them. The Board of
Commissioners can either accept the recommendation or overrule. An appeal of the Zoning
Hearing Board decision has been filed by the Board of Commissioners. Until a decision
is made by the court, this application is on hold.
Following Mr. Utley's explanation, lengthy discussion followed on the particulars to be
followed with the appeal action and the necessary steps. It was agreed many of the
questions would need the Solicitor's interpretation.
Planning Commission
Page Five
July 19, 1994
Agenda Item No.~~
SUBDIVISION/LAND DEVELOPMBNT PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
LOWZR ALLIN TOWNSHIP PLANNING STAPP
Plan Title: preliminary/Final Land Development Plan for
Herbert Fenstermacher, Jr. Upland St. & Linden Ave,
Plan Date: 6-10-94
Reviewed By: ANW. Jr,
Zoning District: R.2
File No,
SD/LD 94-09
.~,~
1- r /-
( I
Checked By:
'.
For Meeting Of (X) Planning Commission Meeting Date 7'19-94
( ) Board of commissioners
prepared by Hartman & Associates. Inc, for the purpose of
constructing nine (9) single family dwelling units on a 225' x 120'
tract of land at the southeast corner of Upland Street and Linden
Avenue. in Harrisburg Manor, This plan was the subject of Zoning
Hearing Board (ZHB) Docket 94'02. with a finding by the ZHB that
the proposed use is similar to or compatible with uses permitted in'
the R-2 District. and that the yard requirements applicable to a
one. family detached and one-family semi-detached dwelling shall be
applicable to Applicant's proposed use, The Board of Commissioners
subsequently appealed the decision of the ZHB to Cumberland County
Court. Said points of the appeal are:
1. The title of the R.2 District (MUlti-Family Dwellings)
does not create any permitted use in the R-2 District;
2. The proposed use is not akin to a one-family detached
dwelling since none of the proposed units have two side
yard~ as required by Section 1104.41 (c);
3. The proposed use is not akin to a one-family semi-
detached dwelling since five of the proposed units
do not have one side yard as required by
Section 1104.41 (d); and
4. 'rhe proposed units are townhouses, Townhouses are
not a use permitted in a district zoned R-2 Residence
District, Therefore. the proposed use is not similar
to uses permitted in an R-2 Residence District, as
required by Section 1141.01 (j),
The Planning Commission can do its normal review while the
adjudication of tho zoning issue is pending before the Court. If
the Planning Commission would recommend approval of the project,
1173,07 (a) (1) A.
1173,07 (a) (1 ) C,
1173.07 (a) (1 ) E,
1173,07 (a) (1 ) Q.
rocks (limestone) ,
placed on plan,
1173,07 (a) (1 ) R.
on plan,
7. 1173,07 (a) (1) U, Addresses for each unit to be assigned by
Town~hip and marked on plan.
8. PA One Call should be utilized within the final design process
and during actual construction as required by Act 172 of 1986,
Location should be specified as "Lower Allen Township",
9, 1173,05 (a) (10) Plan note #6 should be changed to reference
ZHB Docket 94-02 decision,
10. 1173,05 (b) Planning Module required and shall accompany the
Preliminary Plan ~ubmission,
11. 1177 ,02 (a) The current paved cartway of Upland Street,
besides being of substandard width. is not centered within
the dedicated right-of-way. It would not be the responsbility
of the developer to correct the current roadway conditions.
Developer'S portion of improvements could be the basis for
correction of the substandard conditions.
It should be noted that the Township Comprehensive Plan
calls for street construction in Harrisburg Manor to be
completed, Several streets or portions thereof within
HarriSburg Manor currently have substandard cartway widths.
Coordination of TownShip work and developer'S paving
or a modi f ication of the f ill- in paving requi rement would
No. 94-19,1
Cumberland
COUNTY SUBDIVISION/LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REl'OI\'r
Municipality
Plat Title
Lower Allen Townsh1o
Herbert Fen.ter~acher
Surveyor
Hartlnan Assoc ,
Zoning District
R-2 Residential
Engineer
Land Use
Multi-Familv Pes,
Preliminary ___ Final ~ Final (Minor Subdivision)
Regulations: Municipal
County
Date Received 7-5-94
x
Zoning -X-- Acreage: Subdivided
iO&LD X Nwnber of Lots 1
Staff Review 7-8-9~ Official
Total ,61
Dwelling Units 9
County Review 7-21-94
Plat appears to comply with applicable regulations,
X Plat appears to generally comply with applicable regulations; revision. may be
required. as indicated.
Plat appears to need substantial revision, as indicated,
Reviewed by CEF Checked by JRZ
Review comments with cited ordinance provisions are based on municipal regulations on file
with the County Planning Commission,
1, When applicable, streets, sewer, water, storm drainage, and other infrastructure
elements to be verified as adequate by municipal staff/engineer,
2. When applicable, zoning compliance to be verified by Municipal Zoning Officer.
3, Appropriate sewage module component should ~e processed prior to final plat
approval.
4, Final plats must be recorded within 90 days of approval,
5, The parking calculations may be incorrect. One of the future townhouse tennants who
may have two vehicles does not have a parking space, The Township may decide the
handicap parking spaces should be one additional space added to the parking standard
required. However there is no regulation dictating whether handicap spaces can be
calculated in with proposed parking.
6, Is there any planned overflow parking for visitors?
7, The plan notes a 15' wide fut'Jre construction by others located on Upland Street,
When would this construction take place? This statement is vague and does not shew
any specific intent,
8, Note #5 should be altered to sayan approved sewage planning module is necessary
prior construction,
9, Permanent monuments should be set and noted on the plan, Section 1181,01,
10, The set of townhouses on the east side of the property show the garages in front of
the homes just off the access road, This may not be desirabo to the potential heme
buyer,
11, A street name will be necessary for recording purposes,
12. Easements for proposed underground utilities are not shown or noted on the plan,
Section 1177,03,
13, A street typical is not shown on the plan,
11, Recreation lands have not been addressed, The property must desiqnate lands for
recreation or pay a fee in-leau-of to the Township. Section 1177.10
15. The owner must sign and have the plan notarized before recording,
Pl4c Specit1cBilOns: . , NOI
. Yes, No Ann, ..
1. Name Cl(~sed subdlvblon/land develonmenc 3hown V "
2. Owner/dcvelo"er name &: leleDhone number shown -.,/'
3, MunlcllllllIrv name shown v
4. North noint sbown V
5. Mansco.1e sbown ./'
6. Dille ofill4n MeDIlr:ulon sbown ".........
7. Certificlltion bv survevor/enllineer shown \,./'
8. Locl1don aIllllsbown ./
9. Pro"""" aIlln lhe:lrinllS. dlsmnces. ill'Cl1. control noint) shown ,/
10, Names of adlacent IllJIdownc:r3 shown v
11, Names of adlw::ent subdivisions shown I '.'-
1~ Lotl1wnb~sbown
13. Lot dimensions sbown V
14. Lot:l%'l:l1S shown VI ...--
15, Perml1Ilcnt monumentS :md markers shown I 1/
16. Buildin17 setbl1cks sbown 1/
17. E:tis!ina nlltur:1l fel11UI'Cs sbown 1//
18. ContOurs llC required inr.ervlll sbown ./
19, EllSCmentS shown llJId identified I I
20, E:dstinll man.m.ade fe:uures sbown . Buildin.zs -
Storm Dr:1inl1lle Facil, ~,
Sewer Lines ./,
W3.~ Lines ,/
21. Existiii streetS shown - Name ----
R/W Width .....--'
Pl1viIiiz Width ./
Dedicl1ted R/W 1/ -
22. Pronosed streetS shown . Name ./
RIW Width ./
Pl1vinll Width '''',/' I 1/
Profiles I ,\ /
23. Curbs 1/ /
24, Sidewalks I /
~, Rc:cre3don:l%'l:a shown/fee in-ileu-ofnmvided . .-<./ I
26, Erosion:md sedimenCldon control nll1Il shown r/ VI
27. Storm dr.1inl111C DIllJ1 omvided. / 1./ 1
28, W3.~ suoolv shown: DubUc ( /) well ( ) /'
29. tvn-e of SCWl117C disnoso.1 shown: nubilc ( ) on-lot ( ) ./ ,
30. Sewer-lIze modulc submitted I ./1
31. Stllemenl of ownmhi" shown \.'
3~ Dedic"'''''' statemenl shown 1/ /1
33. Owner's si llnature :md notlriz:1rlon shown J
34. ADtlmval blocks shown ./ v
35, vemenc tees lVlSted ,/
36. PADOT Hillhw3.11 ancv Permit sl:ltl:tJlent shown Iv 1/
37. Wetland:u'C:1S deline:ued ,/ l-
38, F100dnl:1in identified ,/
- ~.'..-
.f I.,'.
,,"'l
HRG
Herbert, Rowland & Grublc, Inc
369 East Park Drive. Harrisburg. PA 17111
FAX (717) 564-1158 (717) 564-1121
July 19, 1994
John Eby, Zoning Officer
Lower Allen Township Plannin9 Commission
1993 Hummel Avenue
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011
Re: Fenstermacher Land Development Plan
Dear John:
We have reviewed the subject plan which consists of eight sheets dated 6/10/94
and offer the following comments:
I, The existing curbing along Linden Avenue must be sawcut or removed
to the next joint for the new driveway,
2, The developer needs to confirm that the actual right-of-way width
for Upland Street is forty feet in the field, If a 40' -width is not
available, additional dedication could be required. (1177.02(c)(4))
3. Parking spaces 3, 4, 5, and 6 should be widened to provide a 3'
walkway from the driveway to the residence units.
4. Provide limestone note. (1173,07(a)(I)(Q))
5. Information should be provided on the type of residential units and
the number of stories, (1173,07(a)(I)(R))
6, Developer is required to provide full cartway width of thirty feet
for the short remaining section of Linden Avenue and for the full
abutting length of Upland Street, (l177.02(a)(8) and 1177,02(c)(4))
7, Storm drainage comments will be provided separately,
Very truly yours,
HERBERT, ROWLAND & GRUBIC, INC.
~//~
RDR/cs
1-243.002(PHI124)
PINSTU_ C:I
Robert 0, Rowland, P.E,
cc: Ron Mull
Engineers . Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects
Lancaster Regional Office . 1846 Charter Lone . Lancaster, PA 17601
State College Roglonol Office . 366 Walker Drive . State College. PA 16801
Gettysburg Regional Otllce . 32 West Middle Street . Gettvsburg. PA 17325
PittsburQh Regional Ollice . 215 Executive Drive, SUite 202 . Cranberrv Township. PA 16066
/
/-
-
-
0.' ,
.:..:
-
" ,,-,/" .
'..- /~. "-'.,. /,
""'~ . ...... - . -...:' /;.
,~/' '-V/~" --,.'/_~
" .. '/ ,,/ ';;",-, , ..,.--p(L'
"-,.,, "., ..... .
,\ //" ',- ,. '. /. " ...
.. ",'" " - ,_. /.., ,
." /, ..,. /,','." '
/ - .. "'", /",:.,<' .'
. " ,.,........
. /~
/ c/
" '-.-, '1
./ .' I
,_R ;':::!A ~L'L '
.-
,
.-
,/
~~.~
.;;..
',.4.,"',,'
. t~_\ "':.
t ,.........."
\
>
~<:-.;"
- -' -------
. ~.,.. -:,- -: - )t~t\l.'" ell'
,,-.--\ .
"!..---
. ""
'1~"""'~/ -'
,j.
~: -
", ..-
>
l.",'
,
"'of
, -'
~ ......,,""'.
','
o
'''- "
~ :_ ~~;-~~~.~, ( :,'" :1'
.-/ IJ " / -....,..... ....'/ _,.' .;...,:.
--- _-z..~/ - _ :-"'''-.--~'''''f:-';''''';~
'~- "~ ' ,-,.,.',- . .', ,', -'
....... __ ,- ',I~'-!, """ '0.~--:'=-':"'-
. .-" - .-J-- . ,--,,"- -
__~ "!..-J'w'Srl...~"'lf" ~... .-' - .
~,,' .~ l .
',"\
L.
, -
J.' 'r
\ - ...(,- '\
. "'\.. ,'\.
-~ .....
:..,'" I 7,11' '"
-,----.1~~
.-: 't
-
r.
.^
, "
. ','''..
...,~(
,..
.
"- I'
~ 1';""
\:,
__"..:!.:.-I" I
\ ~ I ""'. . I 0,' ~
'-Il-..j",(;
I
I
I
":'~..:=I==:r--:,,-:;-'-'-
Ie""~
~'C--::
.. -, , I'''~' ,'"
j" . t. ~[L
.... /('1\' rEf'
."f"-J
,"
, . ,: 'I ..: I ~, .' >- :',.\ .7'l I=' I~ ,: 1"
'.1 , ',.l,._\-, J\ I.C,r.,-
I ,..
........-: ..",,'"
',0'
.r .' ',...t
-
~
j
j
.., n~
, j
U8
-'"
1 ;!;~
"':''':'''':'
,,"'N
...."
"'1 ~!
' . ~
,...,
...l
-,
I
...J
J
J
"~'1
....
J
J
I"
,
....
,
....
, ,
... .
;1
..
,
I
...
I ':'::.-.' ~I ,.'''' t:.,:
: ~ '" "T!" I"
, '- j. ".' . ..." ,--,f'.,;_
~..- ~--~---_.----_._- -.
, ~C Iltr.I - ;'::. ,'" "I '. .. :.-,~
! 1_''''1''' _i<.../" ,.~ I- 1';...
. -"-
"SITE _D '<.,A:r--.!I. S;'
DE.:'IGt.\
r ....-::;,.". t.
,-r_.1 _ ~ ",
I
IN ~':...i.,:,'~f.'t,\,'t:: 'iI'llT"-t l.CWi:.r'. ~'UJ~t-\1
T'),::,:::,' ,: .'.Jt :"1 :/, rl':?..:2 ~ YA ~r~'" I
!:t:"~'lo' ~/("r-, if-'.. ';.:., c.f-IF~i<, Ie. i
o
t-...A"A.-(I~'.JU f.'.,t'"-t:~-"',r C',:"!..I/,.,:''',!::. ~
.._____._ _~.n.""'" _...." -_
F" ,...'. ^I ' · . L I" - 'I ,- 'f -" '" '
.... Oil. ""',_,.,....I.I.r~ '/.,-,.\_ "" :. 4-.,\.....f'_r:'. I...,,\LI:::...,
U:J, ':"",1'''''1'\1\1" !':'. J/'"'' tl: '':;';' c. ''I,,A
.::, ~
.... ..,
~, '1:
, ",
, ", ,..1 /',," -,.f- (,- L, '
_ .. ~ " . _ ,,'-..l""'"'... J
r.... ,"..-',.- "-1 .J' I
, ,-(" ,
.. . -
(.~
'::'.) 1"~ _.".- (." r:::)'
. ,,~. .
1',-
("'; G t ":, ,'" 'r'-~ "'I- '_L .,.-,.., f.,~
,j.:..-,,; t. i..L'>' r"':"...,It \ ':-.. .....":...t-)
i r; i. ....t , , , .
r , 'r' :-1 t II u, )
-., I " .' i...f
,
.. I . , j. .. .t..:
''11 .' ~: I ", /. . ,'1 \ --/- _Or ~--
, I , ,~.. "-r . ~,
.. ..
,_ t.! I" '. ;,,'r.,,' " r: r \ \' ,. )'
.. ~ f" ~
[,
I I ...." ,'" '
,'I' ,.,1:-, ';1,.1
,0 '-I:""'~
,I" , -
..- ',.:. ~ \
~
f-'
.1'_. r
.i-
,,' .~'.
, "
, "
.1 I.
,r..
.,
, ..
- I'"
'-1_
I..' ,.
-. I
... .'
.-
1;\ <~ - ' ~, =- '"
'=J --;. ..;I~_.-.:...-,_-;!""~r.~~j.~l.:.~. '
-~("(1 ..:.....'.,1 ,....." '_,..\, '-:.,' , -_'(':n:..t'.I':.
'\' t"..,..~ '/ ""':', .-..:, I " ,\
. ,..,. - I ,.
-.
..' <::.:-":1 ~.." _..! /,'" _ r '
~ -----. -----..-.,,-
_ :::.,~ ':J. ..
....r -."""
'..jot :"
I \"i r..)
-,1< '-.:',' ~ ,,' f' , L... I "~:- )1; ,', ';', ~ ' oJ ... . · ~ .,.....
_ , t'" r::;..1~1 t ".' . ~ I"~_
,,',", . I .' .'", -,' '. .. L' " -:;:1..,-,...\
. - ., - '- ~ ,,..,,....,,'. ',C, "c _ '.'-
(~)(1);
-...i\:.
'.-.':
--
~. ,
~_I"
." "',' ) t' ~ ..,',',", -~ . , ~ ':: '-' ' II
f If',." I ; '.,.t'"_,. . I', ",'.1' l...i'_lr~.~rlr- .
. 1 r:., - "I '=. i.. ,r': :::.-..? I' I /' v.../ i -i.-.f ./.
\ ~. ~:'''''';-~''' ::. .,'1 /-._t::;~.'"
~
:J I.!J
v
J <.
,I :f
4-
rJ r)
Cl
j t'
9
,"
J "-
"2:
'T
.:.,
(..,
J <(
~-
J ,
,
J
j
:J
.J "
J " .
:J
J "
J
J
J
I
..I
-~
~
J
J
., "'S'::
\j.h~
U3
., ,~::
(l :!:!!
nnri
",or.
"
,j tCl
'-,
,
Itl4
'1
.,j
J
:J
J
J
J
, ,
I
~
, ,
I
....
, I
....
, ,
...
, ,
1
..
PA/t~IN(~
I
I
I ",-;, ~,' r ;-'''''6.''-
C I~ '-C.'JI.I\ ...... ~: 1< ::..
-......=.. ~I \ ' , . ,
_~ 1:C r'.I~ , -,... f:'.1 '_.
Le'T DiZ.f\ '''I I-(-rf..
MAXI"-' JM E.~PC:.:'1'E....c DI':'CH.HLC-e, (~c.,.Y~Ar()
~r~t." 1<1-"-'1;,.,1/-,\_ t-~~!-..J::lD c...'",: C.I,;J.
NeTt
c.~ .I N .f -r t- - 1 :
Tl .:.:'t', ' 1'''' Q ':;,vtvr'
C r.:~ INM. i:. ~';~,A ;: 15') \3 sf. "" 0. 114 + ).<:i'..:...'1
\,(' .',~f'\'"
t-, r:: 1(., I I 1 ;-;.., (.
rh,;f-.~"::r' ;...
.- "('
':.'...\.J\~ !~.. '_
:~f:;':~
<0 i'2.:: ~f , r '4 )- i.. :)
"
\ '2 :"J - r) .......--r- /,.. "
~,t" ...' ~ '.::
I z.., 0 ~ f- C), C G ,~ 2.- .A<:. J.
'.
r \ r.. ,-.
..J _.. ~...,.
r..; 1~4 ,1
vI€.. 'I (;;"1 '''04' ,,_
': \ ~...
~",,' r
-~.'tr-~:
..
, <:. .~~ c:
)~.. .
~
, ..'
"
..
.f-
"'.., " ;t - .),' ,
.J _. '_, ~ -
.- ,".1 'I ..
,.,,' -
,... ~ ....
'_ '1 ,
_~:..'::.i:::-: _~f.I".;::'.::,...,( .. :;,.,.~.:.., f
" - .}.'
. - ...-.--
~~""
--- ....
, .. .
'.
O.So
O-'J ')
':J. ?;l)
Ct~,_
-
i_lC t.
',01"2,1,,<,
,",,,-A'
= V. .,J_...:~
, O. 0(" I ~)
O I C.? "
. -'-':
~ ,\0", ,h' .:' .- ,... .
.. .---- ..:-:~;:...
~ _.~,~J,:' '-I'; ,...-rr;.',
\. t'.',-L'.J U- -' c~.:.
1- - , ",.,...,' /' ~ · ' 'l , I' ..'
--=,,~' 1 ''-l',-I'.l-r'1.:.''''
~ INL~"" p.. 2.
'T'<~. ",. INLf:..T ~ os. ;r-Af
DR A IN).(,t f\.r'L{.,r\. -I \'1 ~ '<i:.,~. .. 0,1(,., 4- e ;. ~I~::"
,..
I
, I
J
I,
lIIII ..,...,..-,.
, j ie~
:,~
U~
.,.
1 .,..,
......
. --
ntH':'
"",.
'"1 ,.1
' ~
:J
,]
'J
I'"
J
'1
..,j
"',
, I
...
'"
...
",
I
...
;' ,
...
I
..,j
, ,
...
I I
I
..
\. '1'.\ '..,........,', 'r ,.
V'If:- l';'1 T:" _ '-
~. ~.
-'/-,\E-,v ~~-
!:.'J \lJlIN c:., S
G rt";' s. ~~
24(., 0 Sf. . O. C; 5(" S A~
;.;ee 'Sf,~ CI,('_,o2.".:.~~
II =,3 3f, t 0, O'2.c" ':) ,..
"c:' C.,.A I
" 0.'10 < O,O'5(,~
~ 0,",0 : 0.0'4 I
? 0.':00 .o.o,ne
0,' '3"2.f:.
"'Ii-, (, ,..lor,', ::.
C I~.,;.~ ~
r:: I (;4- '::;
: :. ':. \
I\~ (z.:.. ",4.~j',J.,:,,)
- ..,
:;. ~
\" f-'/ - Iw, .
,".. -n.+~ .)'.1,...
\14,-/'-.\
ClI" c.. 'I, '~'.
(. ~
. .
p .... .., '\ (..., A
.. ,-" - 1(,;; ';
...., J
1 f.., ,: '"
'"" -.or"'~ _ _.
- .-..-.... =.:.
... I ,...: \...If.:.~ r: ,....f ~f:' . -r \ "
-, I~.'. :' 1 roo r' ", )... 'r" ::.A -. t.,.'_.,.,-_-_.,..,.,_...','".,,:J~'..
_... ..;..___~..__.~....,.._,:_,..._',~t:_ _ '--
'.
d~
~
.....
~
'S-
T
"
f-
-.
J
'"
....
'5
-
'-
j
..t
o
'Z
"-
.'
,
~
J
.~
~"
.:..."
J
>
":';"
-
J
~
~'
\
J
J
J
J
J
1"'1
J
'"I
...
I~ 1
ow
,. ,
J
I
...
, I
I
W
I
----
"'2-rJI,~,..1 ';. . /.. "::"..
'le, C,II ~-..,...\'
........r-_......V_I' ., _
I :::-E~~~-'.:c :,/,-,.,A~;"lel'
I
I. ' A . ^ ' .
I' ~-".,., ',,:.J.-T"f.tL ~I t.t I....(-.f..~.",t::."'!i rr"""'l,.'!~';"',
TI-ltE. --, '.JI!:.:'n,.(" :.'~. \ -" l'rJ ....:;,L (.1'.1 .,...,....f
I -
I
"""... \;"T'Wc;': ~'T
(J.:II t 1,:.1..
:.,:-
u~ ';:1-.1 ~\If.:1
'.".
,
"...t _
U:......Ar-lJ:: ::Or',,:,{:1
II'I
~..,t:..
"
U....C
I . I' . . . - .,
.....,~' .,,~: \ ':':"'-..'1....'...
I. 'I"" I~ "',~.' ','/i' ".'"
, I _.... . ..,-,_ ~ _t~
-'0.' If.
'.-'fel' C.
,':-
,~
.A "':'.,f'../ )...\ t. ~.::..~,.. ':Jt-'~..t"
_\/..1:1';"..1 ).','C-_N.'JL (H'(,'.~"
';1.,) FU.':'\') 'T',-,,,," I .)..,~ T'JI" I...\, '.( 1.J(:.l.::Jt (.f Tl-IL
I:' ;"k": (:'T ~_-,:
,... - - "'. . - c.""" - ~ . ..'
':"" ~.:o . .i-:1t-'V!::..l. ''''r'' =I'.t ; ~'';'" ,.;v ~
A.~t. ~'.)1<~4.
0"
, I
"".'-..
~e.
':":':"U_k. C"-':'.~,
t:... Ii
TY.l:'t':
~ "
'r I' t~ 1 ":
-
Pl...t-~i.:l'
,,,I ~I'A,':'
~ t'. .. :';1 r: /L.~~ ....... 0 ~ r ,-.. f ~, 21'. \ - .. ,
.' .,'l:",.l t- . r,. "
" . ... "
o- r:.. r~ '. ~ :., 0' . , "0.. .
. I , -' - .. .-
-;-'E. - ", -0" " f.: t 0 ~ '; ,- ,. "'f':
I , " I
~- ,. , J ..' I '.' '."
- . -
: I' t ,
~. I .. ; I" I ,I'
./ .~.
,..
, ,
,1 t: l...
:.
-:..~.
.,.... ,.
.-1....
"
.-
~
"
~;
..'
" '~'. 'r ~..: t ,/
r-. ~..,
I" ~ . ,
_ "r..
&;. ':.' "':~'.' ~~_f'.'-.
. ':"'.::.~,.'
.. ""I!
'~'" ..
"I'.e..,'t ,-,.t'..t:./..\'''''1''..I:' '"':.',(.. "\'~.lt':, .......,;\~.\t'~t:-r_ ~~:...J(.~.~A (A
._ ... "l,'t:.~'r
- ....
, ~,t ~,~\/ et .....
.
,
..
"'t'..
....1'.. ~ ,,.: ~t< '~.\ ).
'PCN[;
:: '# -';..' ......: ,
" fo. --. ;...t.:-_::':-
,........
,.... :--
r _ .
-
'- '..~-
~_l.,:..t'-'
.....~ f-
~'-.,;; '_ ~+.~~,.(~_ :.~c :;-:r-,,,r ;':...._~...- (::_.... .....f,. ''"":.'" f( ~ ,.,~. I r:__ 1, l',) ,. ". (t:.l;. ,r. 'S.-,)I~_t.>1.
I
-
,
- fl..,' ,r. Ii..,
...
...
I
.,
..
,
..,
j
~
., ~t:.::
I,j i~~
~;\
U'j
""I - .
j ;t;;
~I"'t('t
.........
1 t1:1
j
,.,
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
I
...
J
J
I
..
.
J
I
I -L""-' '\/ A.-","
,_.1"" ,r-r::..~. r=1:::,".,~.\~/.
!.t.,'-,p -..,.-.-t,' _r'._~I~"~
'- r "'.\r.... '. _ .
!-~-----_.._. ~--,",---" -
:.j...J t:.r_
,,",'(. I'A~'rr),':, P"..\Uet-.~, IN ~;r.':-),: ~,"I'/~''T"f:..,~ /'A ~.t.\A...:"E.Mf-..N'"
F.'
-,
"-.",; "::..'~ I':. T1-'~~ I..r.r I,t ,. ,: I:.r::;e..f-,t'-I( \: r,.,~~ 'I'I.P-(
,:,.~ I 'I -,..., 1,,-1 C.f~,.._,e. r-:(.';'t'l('/ ,I",' '.-.) "--'..1':'. ::.:,'I-E... \..)F~_~~'':
...~ - I I' I'~' 1 ", 'F ,.;1.-,1. \ I ',4 I \ c:., .,' ; t':' (. " '
1,1 II' (.... ',,-t=.t:.
C.,;.,f,-'')
C"'I'~,~ ...-,.;. 'T1-Jf.. L!-(Il. Ct-. r;."~I"\"',I.~('.-(~ F-~(,\UT'G..S. WITHIN
I.....
,
,....\...1.
~f.:.. :.1':' 1_r'I...M:'C
I . .' ,,.
t'II.~':'''. '.
" r.' T'~,I r.;, ::,. r" :..' -(.;;.
':':,.-':. ,-
.. . ..,..:t _
/. t. '.':':"" --:) "-...I+:... ~-:. :'....' ,( . "t.- ....'~.l r'.
c:: ,
--
\
f.", I:.
-, ,.,.,(:,
~I....l.-
..-1.... " 'I.L.-.," ,,'
"....,...... ~ :-- .'~ I' 1:;;. , . _ -t::. ~.,
il'\ CI..(;,'~ '.' 1''', :'.
'-:, \.. ,-,.- , ...(
-. -....) -
IN
(, ,:.:,::., ~'r::-. ...., I {. ...
.\ ':.1'; t, i ':;' ,;
,. -,
,,.A .....'':'\... !~I! ." I~. \).":",
~, ~ - J' \( I'~" _f~
"'::-.' -'-'~('I.,
\. '.~. : ,f!: t' I~.':...".- ~,:: r-'~, ~:::
-.,-:.:. ~ ,:... j.. "P....~......;_l '1',' "'..1 .
, '
," ( r
.... . t-.' ..,- I"r~
+::.. ':.' .::e of-::r
I I _,.
,.. .. .. .
,
....'
;).:'" ~-. '...;I'r:.l'
~:'" , t,_. ,;::. Jr
I or:-
,. " f .. ,L,,: f.: ;. I ' ,;' _r-.. c: , "1" J'-' -,
.. I.. l'" ,- I .~, =
.I~~' r., ,.. , ..., I , '.
, -
=;-.."
,1" ". .~
',-";::,,".-,.'
;. '::..' c - 0:- \ t....~
":'..t=-_.... ...Jr.-,.... ,-,
.
.
" '
.1 .\ . , L ~.,..." '. l L
'..)1', "-' _~_ I;..r ' r- ~ ..l::,.
"
Jf.
"Tt T:-i'"
_ 0;.
Ii I-r".:~-
U....,t',........,' ...
", r;; _ t ,t.:..
~IL
""'r";r'': _ Y I ...: I t \ -- .11:' l't r ~"'t....:-I
, "
." I r :._~.... .
;: .\
_r
, "
,I"
'-~.I (,
:)t
~. L - , f~
...h~.,-(.', "",",' '_
'.
:.;; ......fo-: ':.:.
"'r',)
'fJ..;. ~ <:':1-:-'-',,)/,.\ :"1 ::"-.(-",1 F~,,'_jf7IJ: T CZll'-',"r:",)I_ F-(.'~~H
":"'W.;, :'::'+,:n,:"'\~ql ';;,Hl'::", .J. C,!'::("',Jl.I\cl.
-'-.J'TlJ:." "'J,l V CT1J II.€..
1'/'~'.1 .J.. '.:.:".('..... .' ~1:~t'.'.:-,t.(/~ .,~.l,}.... ~'\
:: f- ,_I f~.
.....,_r:...:..-. l" -:"'IC: ......." .":"'~.: .~Ac\t.' \j,~- ~f"f'o.'b_L ~~./,l~:).:t'::
.
I 'r."
-~
,
1
J
"'" Iii
j
U1
1 ~,
:; t; ::
~~ -
r:.rt.....
t'tn,'"
"1
I tCl
I
"'j
,oJ
:J
J
l
J
J
J
J
J
t
J
I
..
r
..J
_1,"0,"_
~, .. -, I
....:; I ~.I I, .. "~...... 'I r=..:= "'" .,.. -';:,' ""i -',* t.
" ; _., L; _6 ""-'"
. A, , \,' '.'-, " ~, . -
',,:. '-' '_ '-\-''-'"' , f ''.,-\ ~,_._l_
"-'
P.A-TH -;. 'r:'J (1_,-':rC.. ~(",!'I~,' IT"'{ 0?- "-'r-lt. :'::."1"-6.. ,
~.ee.
11-\l~
()1J1"'.'k. i
':\:,"\-f~(., ....,-."_,,,CnJ/l.c, c.f.::.:':'\()~,,\
'P:J,t1'r,.r-',
':"'::" ......,.1 '.
r.t. (...( -. ,(."
-:"';-), .11 ',.. ':"-r:,:" t.,. ':.t ,: )...;,r~1 ,'OJ"!'
F~,. ~'>"':"-'.
t: ~ .'" o'ft.,"i-,
F V rt.:. t-.-J C. ';,:, ~.I'.J,:'..c
w~ 1-( (~ C,:,.~I_I"':,,"') W!....~(
..A- r..~,.P.T1Vt::.I_.( ::)'...I.~l. It! "::'6-\':"f- If" ~~-I{",..A ..I'~.t.
- c. '
',:.'.......~., ':'r'r
( )-~.l"\/ .1\,1 (.1' ,'. "1::- I... {
1'2..;:; ..:.r::)
~-.
'-r' ,".
1"', '
",,1:':_
~:.....').,.J~, .
I , . ..
,-1 ~ li_~' ,
~ -r::
...~\-I_.
.
....
.._(':'I.A'~_;.',:,
,
"
~".
-c""
t...'!' ~'.-:"I-- ...J'..',(.
1-4 ~..:; i'.:
-I - ':r , - , " ,'- r::. \, t" 'f'
,-,. . ,- '. . I I , I , . - , ; ...).. - ., ,.
,. " i,. , I' I. i' - " r, .-
", I -'- ,., '. ,. , o' -
- -- .'
:J ',..j =-' -...~.~ .~ "~'''~
'.1
.
,...:.., , - " , <; \. ", .,
" .. " ,. - - ~
- ., --
'-...... ~ ,_I ~
'. '.
_....-.
'r:'
.., ,~ .:;,.
,
.,
~-
':"1'.," '.
-- . .
, :. -
. _.
.':~
.' )
.. ,
-0
~-: ..:"! ~',..I =
, -'
.~ ..
.. ...
t:;".; '''~:
- .
- .
-~".'.
:'J" '-..:.'~"
.'.'.:,..
-'
'\-\:'~ . .'H ''J' \'1
~,
....'-
~.t...~,.,.:.~.:
,J' .--
...... '....
, -
r:.:.. -.~:~
.'
,I
,
..,
"'.':';" ,_~ .... '~.:..' ""..' I,
HI
_\--:'\ '",". ...,r: ::;,--' \ . '..........-. ".. A ('2~,.:..'~ :J....J'" '. '...... ~
'S"'\\' I~'
t I~
., . ...
If.:
r ..
'-..I'.,' ~ =~~'....;l...':'" SI'.,-,-:,:,. \-~'I"',,:!-I"':;'
-',~-,:
~...~.
.~.
-. I" .
-' - .. ~
s..~ ,'-
'\ ._I"~'
,'h
.-
~...I'
-.,....
)' -
-
,-
'.,.. "
...,.
," ~ ::~.~...
'.'..'':.
-.
,"'-
-'
\-:,'.::..,-":.r,;,-: -.(.
.'
-
-':".
~, .' \ "
-.','.-
.J'
. -
.
,~
,~
__'>,J..
- ,',I
~
'_ "'hJ"'~':.. -',_.,,1'''..:\- '-'. '-0:: ~'~ ,.;...
7~' ... _)'_,
C:;""""~C;",.J ....~-~ "".0::..
,
" "\00" "
...J I.....
" .......
'_ '.J~ ~
'-I
I -
-j,
,
1
J
, Ui
j
1 5tU
~"
~...
......
-~~
NN~
...."
t ''1
, 41
"J
w<1
.J
'"1
,..
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
I
11II
~JiL~ ',....: ,..,.,=..L I Fr:: f\...1. ':l"""E..~A ~(.I-If:-,~,
,-t- "C"L?""OI'~
'!:rU.- Dt.~~I...t:,I"'Mt:.N"\ ..-r~c._GF iJl'I u:,,\,ItATlol\l :
- s'HE E:, FLOI;oJ:
') 00; (JJ.. L)" ~
T. ( P, ) ~ '" so.'-"
[ ..,? ~
~ ~-,('Cl (!J,I'S)(I ~ -)..j
~ (, '=)) o~ (':1..:,40- )~ '
: ,,:), \..., H (1. ~
':-,_'" _:" " . ..~...~,... ......... I
I' ..' . 1__.. .:..._'_.;.r:2~_..'::!.~ ....!9' ~.'"
T'~
- ,....
-. . '" \'
_ ,.J ~ -... .~
:-" ~' I .' ,~ . , ,. I' I.. ,~
..,-..,'t::...
,- , \j
'..,,:e-;1 "='
\,1
,
~I' ~,
';,
-_.-"- ~.-.. ... .
= ... 1-"
,'" ""... "
= G, ,:., \ l: ~I.' ~
- (.r,:...1... ~-, 1'/ _~
...u... ~ 0, I ~ Fa.:.. (.,1(> :.'~
'P'l. ~ '2. ,<=, II'l<-i-ILS. (c.l.JlAef:".LA-ND)
I' ~
- .:..11
~I
." .....
...,'"
. -
I' ,', , .. ')
\.." f\.' '~t..I._
'l7.:r'H' I,. '"" ,,'" f.. ':)," '... <::I.::J Ii..:, = 0, \ t:. <.:. ~ 0 \J(~'
- -
= \ l. '2.. t-.A.IN~
--....-........-:-=
-r
,
~
,
. I
j
"1 Ul
,
,
i'
US
1 ~.'..
-,..
....
- ~.
":'~N
... ''''
,-.
I 41
' ;
,..,
HfJ
".
..J
J
J
J
J
J
. I
J
I
...
J
I
J
, 1
I
,.,
~--.,.,~-, J-
''"":\ ..' ,'.' /"".. ,,.Il. r-E,,:'::,.T€rLM,A-O..ltS/l
(.;, 'c.. ',Jj. -r (I,', .:._ .
r~O~T - 'D?-VE..LOP~;t~'T TJ.t~t'E:
I - os ---c..e:'!'" +:LC,\,..) :
I
T~
...." "
o (.J (;~ (.u. L. J .. ~
(I', )1' 'S 0 ...
r~ (-, [t,- 1'- ')(,,,,'l''''
: v 'w " ..,... ....:_. f~. _
(~ . 'I ,~ ( ,- " ~ (" '\ ",:T
I'- ...., -... ., .
: 0, 0::' + 1-' r-:':'
OF UN c..f':N'11'U-ii(;)N
_I,.....' 0 \ '5 ~iL C,,('....,A.:..s
P:.. ' 2 C) INc.H~S.
.. :::~, c ~... "'H,I,. '" ~~ lV' : I' i.....
____w._.__.._._._....__....
. . ... ,r'\,
I r"__ "".':: I'/.J.
,. . . .... . ..._-. -.-
i' i !\, ~ A t.: -'f: I
...... r f'. _. . I.
......... '
~, ..,,! '2.
'. "
" ,
S""'I' ;
, '
-.i .... -, ..
,
.-
-, ...
, ,
~ -
-, ..
9,
I"' .
I, 'r_,
,
',) .. ,-
-""'.;,..,\
, .v
\J -:. ..!-..
.,.JJ..,
.":, ~. I 7, _.
" '0-.
.. ~,..f ;:'
. ..
tOO -,',.-",' " ,
0-' '," ,',
(0.1';.::>'<;'''',1'_1':'' 11..""~I'~s..)
rJ. .4. ", '\. ,'" . , ;:.
"\..001:")\":;'''2'5)' I,'J..-)) 0
T..-It:..N. "
T'"
L
-.----.,-. ".
";;),('..' (\/)
..., .. ........
/o~
2, "(..( I ' I
.....l~.. '. "... 1 ..
- -r:j~' '- T1 M ~
4 ':)4 +-t'~
=
C;, OD, +..-\r?_~
n-'-r-L Tl,....It.. = ,::",(,":..4. U- :,i'-' = 00+[ Hr ~- .., 5 'AI \
_ _ _.J ( . :.:...:.. 1"'\",
.J./.' ',' _ -
, ~;-..~--_..._~~_: -:; ~/.- .~~I:~.T.~:
,
Quick TR-55 Ver,5.44
1Kecuted: 12:00:37
SIN: 1,31':>400147
01:>-01:>-1994
...
POST-DEVELOPMENT FLOWS
HERBERT FENSTERMACHER
~OWER ALLEN TOWNSHIP
..,
I
1.1
**** Modified Rational Hydrogreph *****
W~iQht~d C . 0.676 Ar~g. 0,620 acres Te '" 5.00 minutes
Adjusted C '" 0.676
Td- 39.00 min.
I'" 2.33 in/hr
Qp"
0.98 cfs
...
,...
RETURN FREQUENCY: ~O year storm
Output file: POST10 .HYD
HYDROGRAPH FOR MAXIMUM STORAGE
For the 10 Year Storm
AdJ,faetor . 1.00
,,~, Timo
" Hours
--------
'" 0,000
"j 0.117
0,233
" 0.350
I 0,';67
," 0.5133
0,700
,...."1
I
~
'1
I
....
,.,
I
..,j
,t."I
I
....
'1
.....
"
-
"
-
Time increment'" 0.017 Hou~s
Time on Lert repre~ents time for first Q in each row.
_0._____-------..---------------------------..----------__________
0,00 0,20 0,39 0,59 0.78 0,98 0.98
0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
0.Q8 0.913 0,98 0,98 0.98 0.913 0.98
0.98 0,98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.913 0.98
0.98 0,913 0.98 0,913 0.98 0.913 0.98
0.98' 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.78 0.S9
0,39 0,20 0.00
.J
...
- \~-
-
-,
j
1
J
~ r"
j I::~
li
.., U3
~...
I ~"..
" ......
~ --
"......
"""
._,
, Itl
,.,
,.J
,-,
,J
''"1
,
....
'...,
I
-'
.-.\
...J
-
.....
I',
..J
-
,.j
l 'S;"J('.."" '1'l.!""~L F- --'::J M ^ I L'
c..~ V:. vI... I' ,.., c"'-' S. -1 el'J:::. -1<- ,..-...~r:;..i '.
- PO"ID \lCJLuM E
('!l.f.) (CF,)
EU:..\j" p..'Z.cF- k~ A(', ~:..I:. yo i.:.J t ~ f. J "..4J ~ VOL\J~€:.
4'14':;') '3c:.:.1
'5~~ ":1 ~ ~ c.~ ':l:. B 0 c..~,
4') 5 c;o 115
C)2.1,'5 <:,'21 CF, \ +~'5,'5 c.,f-,
4'1(., 0', 114'0
- '2.e(:J U 1(~eD PIJ~ lCi \/c..I.\J ,,;( F..
- F,":'..( ~..., ~-P (r::,,'A (:-1 -..~.:;...-
.:: /"1'" ~ '3..f+
-- ~ - .\
..." ~~,'" '-:;:
...' ...... "- -,
_ --.. ='::-t.-..
-?2..-;\/ICf:,') 1='.1/>.IC \)':;'_'Jt'.'( :
_____.n ... j '..
'. .... I" /- 'I:'" ~ : i_ ---",~.=..t"
-+. . ~ -- ,. ...
_.._~.;_."" ....~,.~.
..
It
,
'.
.
CHAPTER 4 APRIL, 1990
RBCO~ED ENGINEERING METHODS , PROCEDURES
...
rIGORt 4.12 Apron Design, Minimum Tailwater Condition
..,
I
,-'.
1980
l.;~ 'IllS 4tJdlij asp
I
- --'",'
O~
...
..
M
...
.
-
...
:5
..
'i
!
..
...-
..
~~
;;:i
I~
CO
!:a
....-
'!!
EE
i!
..'"
'"
!:;~
~1
e=
c
~...
d
:::;.
l!li
. I.. . _..
, '
D.".!"" _ ~ ,.~
:~. ,>,..'
~<'...~-:-'~ [_._~~ t r -::
. '.\_'.'-- r~'X"""I.,
,',- ---'.c ~- -'----T-.~~
I '-~.:.. ~........ ;); . - :-~
~~~, ,,"~'-- <::- '.- _. + .. -'. ~-:~"'--~--'-
I ; "p,'\.>,', """'\.. ' "'" '( ......... ;."
" "'')0,~-'-~--'~~ '...
I ";' "~., '.. ; ,,"'~"', '\. \.
___. ___.::~.-.._....___.. ~--- --''"'"'l'' ~
. .\ " '\,., -, "...: '\ '
. ", \, '...' . ", :-.. ' \
'h}~:CC~ ~\---
~_~~ I, .' --y-;-~-:- I,' --;-_ :$~
o:r ~. .. ' ,- . -=- ,- -" "\
,..,To":t.-_-! .~__. 4~.T"",;':' -,: '. \,
,. ., ...""''''', ,~~ ~ .
:'-:=-E.::-.; '.:: :". ,:. :,,:' . C""""\.;..~:~ ; ..: - ..........> ".
~'L"" t. "'''''.-','Ji-.'7T'-~--
;.~ _.:, _. . _ 'r' - --~ ...\-.tt~=-._-- - t.. ..- u_'
\ 't~: ":'.~':;~J~-i~+~ - ~\". .
~;t ~:.':_,-:-:~.::.::-=:,.\\\'~': ~.;-,:.. '\
~ .'
....0 ~ - ~--_.-~ -~-"'~--.:.-::...:':- ,\\..~'\..~....:..: -...:.... - -~ . '---". : ~
""" --"--'-'- --------- -..,
ct ---=:.=='::- . - .
~ ~ . ----..-l!"-4
"' ~~ r----:-.1
..... . II
'';. ~ ..o...-;~~~~'~ ~
i- -,.:.-:'--~--'---
:..'--:..:-~
~
""1
J
,."
I
,J
:
"1
,J
.3
...
"1
,.J
~
s '.
"
~
~
....
~,
..
-
.
..
~e-
2
"
~
-=
"~;
....
,t._
....
".1
....
"
...
-'
.
..
.
8
<l
::
~'..=
_L_ .
.,
"'
- - -,.: ,.,
--
~
..
.. ..
~..~
.. Q..
60:0
"
...
::
"
-
Sou r'ce:
U5DA.5C5
"
....
~
-
.;,
j
'.
W
J ,
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
"
J
"~I
...
',I
I
...
J
J
u
-1--
1
..,
I
1
... .."..,,,
I ~H
j ~ ~
~;;l
.... ~..
......,
.. ~ ,
~ -,
,:.;i...
,..,.. ,~
,
ttli
~1
, j
"-,
~j
J
J
,
I
,
...
.,
...
-
-
....
-
-
-
-...~ ' I, " I> ~~_f..'
_. -,~~.I' , I T~.t_
'':''~I_'-I..J'_I\ - (:1:,::;'
I
_J FE,...: ". ;-:=:::'M /'>Cf-J~. '"
- 0U'"~T Ul",r""~:ll..... ':S.1f'. \.j <.:'-JI'_L.l;E:~ 1("""" :
- =-;.~C o~' \ Pet2.t--"i,;.t'.,:\(,.IT'( ,:,~ G~e..'cN':. ')","-0 ~~
C'V~_f:l ,~t ""'."'- s.~ J __""Je'I.:'" It'-i T..lt:
L..'\:":":,ll c(~ ~: I ""'*-.r--:-u l t:,.A::J/':,:'''
-.J.. (,':1("'1' .:'f. ....--.0:.1
(o?"f..>"( ,I
,
\r< ,':1_'..)::; r'o, I) ,
.. t.of-,::,I(tl.s~,I~:_:;~!~~_~,-=~,~ l:".,.:,~~,~~,~,c.L; I A :
-T-'f.: A,,-,.,,':I~I) :....'.1; .i/,I "Kt'~,,"'- ~\...L.:.'...!~. "jl.I,G1\",:;d
\.. ~~-I r ::l::.""I'!. c~, ..,;.",_1'."'.... '--;1/.' ,):~ '..J'-,,:.t.-;c
..... .,'~ "..." I ,'( (. ' ~'" ,? . , I' ,- ,I'" ...' . 1 ...,.. ~
" ......:...,_ .... ~'.:.... "" \.:..._. - ,...; ._ l..:'l., ",'" ,. C':f'.). -N \JC..._f',~,'
"r') ':::'t.-;)"::'J~L I",,:..' '-', /-'..:.. ',t -:_'..1: 1,.1... rJ_t."- -,.-i,..,-c-
_Ir.\ 1'::' ....' t:.. "....~, ~_ - F~,: ,,' ,'_,:.. ''l'' ~~\ E.."\,J,ll- ~(;,,~ ~~I '-
-,_t--.lf"'~L I:~;."'( ~'r:f~ .....'.. I.t. ':."'.::. I?:..C""),
- c.p, ~""" ~'~,"r'
, ,-.~" ,
~ .' ...r:' - ~f.:' '~,
..'
,~I t
p',.. -....I~ '~'..~, "'j ,"
(,\
"
'. ':'
~ :.
>
~
-
.~ ;-1
..;
.; :.. \
J
/..._{
I '" I
,. ..
i' ~ wi
~
".;""(_0""
0" ,
"\ .! :". ~
'..
'-- . ,.',
f
,- ...
I , , " , ~:;.+ ~ -::> I ? \,42- \
." -, f..... i I " - r
- '-
,. . ~ ';!
, .
.', , -- - '"
~~,':"\...Vt~:(. r=~I". :<
1- L- ( )'if"]
f'- = C. ro'.... I - \
~ 0,2.1'5
~' ,
i"'; ;-.
- .
- -'-;) "
~'",,'-
: ,~/ 1-1,. ~
~ - '
,_.
"' ,....-
==. -' J 1\ -.. f.
',"C,!-Iv'-::..C.I f-
~ :
~
\... 1-\1,," l
:)2.!SLL"~'"
- (
,
1
PER.\CEABrtITY OF O,-\3[01'.'S l'S:::D AS or~'TLET COt-.'TROL
STRl'CTURES rN THE DESIGN OF DETENTION BASrNS
.,
j
Charles Mdntyre
InStl"J,::or IJf CLvil Engineering
Research Engineer, Housing Research Center at Penn St.:lte
,
",J
Gert Aron
Professor, Depanment of CLvil Engineering
The Pennsylvanla St.:lte UniversLty
Introduction ~',''';. of...:; -'3:'''(/
..... . " ... ,
~I.... of.'f,:,...,..,
l",..... ~ ~ _ I
The sco~ of this re~earch er';crt is foc~sed IJn the flow wough la.:ie
si:: porous media. This media is a...;g'J!ar Um.:S:IJne rock, typically used in
gabion :am S~Jctures, A pbion is b:l.\k:illy a 'basket of rocks": Typical
applicatllJos or gabions U1c;uce: us.: in :r,e const:'\Jcc:on of dL"'es .lr.d dams,
un.::er.l,ater ,ccur pre'ler,c.:crr lr?un,J bricge piers, and as erosion st.:lbilizers
along river ban:-:s and cO:l.\ilines, Wirhin the pa.st few years, innovative
eng:neers h;l:,': e~i'er:mer,tec: ',I,::h glbien -i.:'.ms as they rela.te to stor.n water
management. Th~ tC~ is ~o '~~.: :~~~~ s~""~..:'X~e5 to ~~~n and re~~e scorm
'J. .:.:~: ~Jr:of:. T:~~ ccn"::::;H is :0 ~~~~~~ tht: glol0n ":.:1::1 in $:';";:' J. ');'J..'j :h::.t tb~
r.. ~'),. .-.....tf,-:~ ~\..,,. -::.""'~"""'" .",,;'1 ............, .1...1> .-.Jo'~:r-;,..)t.! ~":"'1~. r.a'~"'~ ~~~.;. ~....,it.....lly
.1..1 w...'... ...=d ...... .................. .. ,,,..... ..,... .t-............ --...="". ................... .oJ.....""1 "',,'t"...iJJJ.
pr:~~"'e~op~~:-:t runor':" r:\~e:i.
~
i
"J
l
-
....,
.>-.,
,j
:]
-..1 -~; ~r Hr: ~~...., 'L :.1.0 ,h... IJ" ~ "'t" .'bt' ....., 1..: 01,.1...,. "or:-o' S.-'C~'''DS
. .... ........ \~ I.,.l,; ..........~ .... ....1 ...... . ~... i",; .::J"" '-,;.."" ~ ......10.. I.,.: ,.... L \..... ......... ,
is ~~J.t ::.~~ ..i~$~gn is ~J.$~L! 'J;C1 ;:'"'Jc::;J.l ~xt=<:-:~::..;~ u:.d sc~r.ti ~::~tn~e:-ir:g
:.;~~;~.- '::-::. T:~e hyc:"'J.utk r1o'J..' :.h:G'~~h ~r-:::~. ~~$ vc. ,gJ.olcr.:i :~;l''-~ n~'l';;::- ~~~n
..t..' .. ... L'n .1 '..'... ....,''''Ir' s ",.....;....1 'T""...:. "'.';:~1"-h ...:.:.....r: '....-....rs '0 l) ......I".,..a.
_ ................. ,oJ...I""jI.....l.:: c..,..:;:. L ;,.::t ........................ .....101 . ...........;".. ..... ...:.........1,;,
~._a ..... .t.....,...... '..~.,.. ...... ........1'. r-~':J.lr.l "') ..-'.,.~:~OJ. ""bl...t~ ~e';3'"
...... ..\.... ...h-....,:,.. ,~=.. :),_;.. .....l..;......::t.II...' .~ _ I,.......r..:. .::J":' v..... :S~=-d
..t''':,','_'1:~I''''''(')' '~,.',''-'.~ .,..\,., .\.,... 3.'........-:' r',..~ 0" ,l-.... ""'.....:"11 ,~ ..".....' ..Jo,..,~,,; ~r.
...- -.... ~ - -_-:-..I.........:7.........:.J. ......... ......,...t'.....................' ..................
"1
..J
"1
!
,,j
B.ld":J;ljuoJ,
J
T:1~ ~e:'7:1 glbicn ,;m be tn~:.:d 0.1"::, to ~~~ :i:7:~$ or. L\.ol~ Ro~.:;.n E:::t'ire.
D~:-:...~,! from :..,~ L1~:1 ',I,'()r:, fer ':a.!~, l noien ',1,.1:> .lc~~all'l a hoUow baskec
, - .
fr"':7:~, con,~~.;:.;:d vf rr.e~ St."':lp?lroJ or ',I,U'~ m~sh .lr.d rilled W:~l ~-::h or
stone, Orig:nally, glbicns W~~~ 'ls~d .1:> 'J;L '7ica,d~s vr r..mp:u-~ d~si~C1ed to
protect solcters or :l.\ dde:lsi',~ fortirk:tions, Fig'lre. l illustr:ltes :r.e st.ln6rd
g:lb((;n conr:g'jr:lrion in us~ tC~J~/.
....
....
GJblCn ~'T:$ hJ.'.'t: :i~'''Cr:tl Jd\':l:.~g~'i o....er :.:J....!itionJl dikes and outlet
st:'"l..::ar"':$ u~..:d in :icor:n WJ.~~r m~;lg'~:~-::-H thJ.t mJ..~': th~m J. vi~btc: Jlt~r:1:J.tive
appcolch: th~l: b;l:~ ',I, :Jth is mu.;h sm:J.!ler, the:; lr~ vir:tJall, m:J.!rlt~nance
t"re~, and some WQuld sa., that they lrC ac:;theu.;ally rr.er~ pl~asing,
....
....
StCt':n'I"':lt0~ :\1..1r.;.l..{'~r::IJr.t, 'r""~tl~nd:Jl rltJ,)dpL.un S':!Op,),'jium - Pl~:-'.n St.J.ta. Sept. 1991
-
"/ -,,2 . ~
..
~, .r_,. 'r' . 3
~ ,..... I.: \;
III
,
,,'
~
I
I
...
",I
..
l,j
...,
l
.-,
,..1
..
"
~.. I . .....
l ". J. ?~,~;,~~:,;
I,
, ~,.;
\
c..-
.oJ.;
.,
'.'
'.".
--'..a '~
.:'.....:"'"' ~. ~-'"
.. ~ ....::..
,".".~t-~
'......v~.,.,.~'--..
... '" ,,-,~,.'..
'-' 1 ~~....
_. ,,,.J'.......
.......t ..~...
.rI'-." ,
,..., ~.. ',,"
. ,. t1..~ '-~..
._-.-.\ I ,~l\~'
I .,. I
.. '.",
...,:":,..~~~~"
,~ -,.' .. '-'..,. ,
: ;,.........,. ... :....-.. ;'. ' ...
~,-' ~.-',~," ..
- ;:'\.~- ,"-"'h
.._ "', ": .. l:-';"'~-.~
"
\ .-
I'
, .
-.
".
"
. --.-
,~
.
,.
-"':--
'.
.'
"
.::. .~
-,
-
,
~?
,.~.
.,,4'..,
to. ~~.
~
"'-:-.,"":...:; "
\
I..
"
i
....
StOt'mWl'
>"2.
Sapt, 199\
,-
-
~
j
1
1
.....
.J
J
]
]
]
]
'1
..J
,",
i
...J
'''I
-'
.,\
.....
Mcrntyre . 4
Where:
It [s the Incremenl:ll flow length.
11 [s the upstream he:ul.
c Is a constant, proportional to K (the hydrauUc conductivity).
,
Since this (onn exists as a first order differential eqWltion, the variables
can be 5epll.1'ated. Integration yields:
,,(mol) . (m~L)cqml.
U)
L Ls the flow path length
Solving (or It yields:
,,(1 ol/m)
q .
c(.".L)llmL11m
(3)
Re:illzing that !'rom Darcy's L1w: q =' K dh/dL
,,(1 . 11m)
q . K
LLlm
(4)
K . [c(m.L)lIml-1
(S) .
In order to use the log,log regression equations, an empiric:1llog
ec;.uaticn must be est:J.biished in ter:r,s of, h, the .y. a:tis on the log-log plots.
log" . Lo~rc(m.l)LI 0 m Log
Cn...~) (m.L) q
(6)
-
,
Udng the ~egression equations as shown in Figure 4, an attempt [s
made to (ormulate a flow equation.
-
-
Storlllwater ~1:J.n3gl;llllent/W.H13nds/FlooJdpl:.lln SymposlulII - Penn State. 'Sept. 1!J9t
-
--z ~-
..
.~
"
:
j
:1
0
.
"J
J
....
,
,-J
e,
'J
'"
~J
]
]
""
J
J
J
1
I
....
"
I
-
, I -
...
1"1
,
IIol
,
!
w
McIntyre. ,
lOG U.S1il!.lt'l Hf)>C VS, LOcl ~L<N
V~~IC(JS SIl!S
.'
0.2
~ 00
-0.2
~ -<),04
~ -06
~ -0,15
-1.0
-1.2 I
-J
Ill, LOG H I !.JoRGE
. LOcl H I MEDIUM
. LC4 HI SMAI.L
L
M
S
y .0:5117 .06~SIIK R'2-0,9ge
I
y . 0,Je291 . O,716'i~K R'2. 0,992
I
Y . 0 4~Jee .o,6eCS'iK' R'2. 0,999
I
o
-2 .
-I
LeG 1
F[Z'.lre 4', Regression An31ysis
Using the large size stone where the flow path eq\l.1ls one foot (L- L). ,
The reifession equation [s: (Note: log h = Y and log q, .. ;It)
y = 0,251 + 0,635 :t
Thus :
\
,
'( 'I) 0"-
rt"..:-";'\- = .,:,::)
a....c m = L i':
lcg~.:(r.t+l)J/(r.t'H) = 0,151
log(c(:n+I)] = O,251:c: 2,i~ = 0,633
c(:n+ l) = 4033
S"lving' for K: .
"
K . [e en - t ) 11m I -1 . 0,40
, The flow equation for the'la.rge size rock media is:
(hl.51)
q . 0,40 'i:TI"
(7)
Stormwtl:er l\lanag~cnent/Wetlunds/l:hNdpLa.ln Symposium - P,enn State, So!pt. l~'J:
--"7
/ -
,
,
,
I
J
1
Return Allowable .. Ponding Ga.blon
PeriO<! Discharge Depth Discharge
(yrs) (cfs) (ft) (<:fs)
., 18,6 1.0 2.6
-
10 24,6 2,S 10.S
25 33,1 3,0 104.4
SO 3S,S 4,0 22.6
lOJ 38.4 S,O 32.1
"Predevelopment t:1rget rates as computed by the design en&ineer
..,
, )
Summary and Conclusions
The gab ion design flow equation was formulated from labor:ltot"1 flow
teSt5 and using regression analysis, The large size stone equation (Equation i)
was deemed to be the most practical since it '...'as based on a stone size of
t:>-;:lc:ll ~:1bicn gradation (6" to S"),
~.,
Tne design equation was used to size gabion control and re!~se
$L-lC:'~:~S :cr a C:l.';e sr~dy site. Tne actual engineering design pa..-:lI:1e~rs
were OJs~d to size the proposed gablon strJc:'Ures, The result5 of this analysis
, L-,~;c:!.:ed that properly sized ar.d ccnrlg'Jred pblon dJ!':lS can store sign1fic:uu
amounts of storm water runoff and rele.a.se it at or below predevelopment
"t:1rge:" rele.a.se rates,
"
_J
R~f~renceo
l.
...J
,
~'
~
'-1 3,
.....
i
I
.....
"
-
-
....
F:e~::e, R. A., a...~c Che:7"/, I. A., Grr;t:~{~'.\'"!~e~, P:~r~c:.:;:: HJlt,
E-"I." "CU,:. '" J 1"-9
.. :J.... "" C4....... . ~ oJ t ~.,. . I ;.t I '.
Gene:-al Projec: ,:'o.";:''7.ltlve, K.l:'.liO<,x IT Subdivision, H;u-r:s Township,
Febrlar'/~. 1987,
A:on, G" Mdnc::re, C" Willenbrod., J, H" "A.,alysis of che Policies
and ?ro<:erlures of Storm W:1ter Management", NAHB/NRC Designated
Housing Resarch Center at Penn StJte ' HRC Resarch Series Report
~oJ, 7, May 19'i;,
StoJr::!',V'\t~r ~:.I;:'I';'lr.:t!ntl'.Vt!t~and:i/Ft<l'Jdplcl.in S:rmp<lsiutIJ - P~nn St::l.:e. Sept. 199t
...
...
-~~-
,j
-1
.
.
~
I '.
'\ ' -- .
..,
"
REGION 4
:'0 I 1 I I I f I '11 , , I It j
a I
I
6
4
5:
-
.....
:i: 2,_ I I
';0. I
l- I I , I
V1,
z 1.0
\.IJ , , , ,
I- e.s
z
e.6, ,
..J I I
:i E-
- c . I I I I
~ 1 i I I I I I
I I 'I I I
0,2 I I I I I I
0,( I I I I I I
I I .
I I , , I " " ,I , I , , I , I I I ,
:5 , 10 2:J 30 6,J 2 3 6 12 2';'
,J,1/NUT=:S HOURS
R.l.INF.l.LL 'cup,:, lieN
.-,
I:
."
I~j
""I
1-)
1-]
nJ
,
L
lJ
,;,
I,l
~
i'
, .
r~a:'..n'a s. Sr...J:-:". L:-.:o!n:3~':::"'!'.J:'.1~~<.:ln....~:',!'1':'!~':: O:'.J.:-fe~ f~t" Ro!';~~H'\ 4.
"'t..
I:'
I '
\ i
..c.
- '" -
-;"'- -;, ,"~ -
-.'
~'~
..J.,
,',
~ ,-
, ;t'i:
/:~
,'1 4..1.9'
""
1 ':,I-
'~
.... ,./I.
~, Oa:l NO ... '" ... aI ........
"{ .. ....... .....QI ..... C\ N ... ...QI
"" , . . . , . . . , .
~ 00 00 0 0 00 00
.., ..,
~:
I ,f: ... C\'" N QI, '" - - .... '" '"
... "'a:l .....a:l .... '" N N a:l '"
" = I . . . " . . . . .
l ro 00 00 0 0 0 0 00
",
~~
.~ .. C\'" NQI ... C\ '" N "''''
, N "'... ........ ........ - N a:lC\
. I . . . . . . , . , .
',. 0 00 00 00 00 00
',~~
C\ .... NO '" C\ .... N .... ....
.. "'... ....QI ..... ... N ... a:: Q\
- "" ' . , . . , . . . .
... 00 00 0 0 00 00
.',
.......'
". .' Q\'" NQ\ ... '" ....... "''''
" -.: >C a:l .....a:l ..... a:l _N a:lCl
'1. u , , . . , , , , .
N 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 Cl
,. III '"
,,' '" 0
:.. '" III
r ., ... '" N Q\ N .... N ... VI '" Cl
I' N "" a:l .....'" .... a: - - ex: CI >- '"
;;. I . . . . . . . 0
" 0 c 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 VI
.. N III
.;'( '"
= '"
,', ~ Cl
, ~ '" "" N Q\ .... .... "'''' ........ ;: >-
.. '" '" ..... co ..... = - N a:lQ\
~ "'.. .. . . . . . . . '"
.-.;::. ... 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 III N
- III
,...." U .....
- 0
~ ..' 00 '" N CI N N .., Q\ '" '"
... '" = ..... co .... = - - a:: Q\ III III
.. , '" I . . . . . . . - -
N 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 r: "
'. > e
'Ai.: ..
,.: -;- " Cl
. .~.'." .. ""'" .... CI .... 0 =.... VI '" ... ...
N >C 00 ..... co ..... "" 0_ a:l CI = =
-, : :',-~ I . . , . , . ,~ '..
,,;,\:, 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0
., " ..
~.~ u u
'-~ = =
...,. .. Cl
...;~ a:l "" NOI N C\ ....0 .... ..... l- I-
.. '" "" ........ ..... ..... _N a:l Q\ l- I-
:~~~ .. . . . . , , . . . . ::l ::l
I'!._ ~ ... 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 u u
,.,~ Cl e
'"
-"~4;.: .. 00 '" ....... .... ..... 0'" "'''' e e
< ... '" "" ....... .... .... -- a:lQ\
, . , . . . , . . 0 0 "
' '. .... 00 00 0 = == 0= ... ...
III III
'" '"
.. ..... VI .... ... = '" '" .... III III 0 0 ,
N '" "" .... a:l .... ..... 0 .... 00 CI .... ....
, . . . . ,
-- 0 = Q =0 = = == = 0 III III
." ... ...
. = c
.
= Cl U
... ,... ....
.. u u
.... ....
:; .... ....
. ..... ....
.... - " ..
.... Cl 0 0
.... '" rt U u U
I '... .... ..
" '" U III 0:. ... .... ....
... '" ... III = ... ....
. '" .. .. ,~ 0 0
... ::l :i .. = ... = =
'" ~ '" " .. ::l '::l
~ = 0 ... c.. .. '" '"
- U III 0 c... .. '"
-32 '. ,.
. ,'~
"A1"'Al.~ ---;r
'HH "SI?Y OI$(j,A~(
l'O~d
ACRES · _A~~!..S t _~I"~. -~~- ~!!:.f" .",
---T '--" ~- '--
f-- 1- -t+---E' .----b- - ,
. - r=,- - -. - ~--'T~~~, -, -~ -- ,- ---=1.. - '~'L-~=1
INLET A-j , , . _ 'f a. ,ll41-~ 9B~t9~_?;S :"_.__ ~,4 5 -1_._ + 3.Z t---=-i
INLf:r ,A-D~A-2., j... '. ;, .0.15:5. j 4. 5 ~ :;:2. L9,~.9!
.. --- ----,- ; Q:.!}l8..9,,8 L;_9,I07cp,_ ,~~ 5 ,!.. __ ~,~,2. ~__ . I
IN ~ A"2 TO F:ll'IO ().~':. \ I 4. 5' '3', l. o.01
. ._--. -----------......",._-~_.._-. ....... - ..-...
I
"r------r--__. ...-. - - .. - - "".-- ,_ "r--- __ '. _ ~ .__~~..~~
----~-----'~- : ~ r----~ "h_ -i - - --~,. --~~-
;--1 L-f.l i .-- !1~
-..-.-- --,--~ -.--,- ----.- ---'-- +---.. 4----?f_
_.~---~- ! ~ --t I
J.
J
Q · O'.e/loro,
C - Coe",el,nt 0' Run '011
I -/toll'oll 'n"nllt,
A · 0,0;1100' A,"
..
'i
,
STRUCTURE
D"AlHAG(
A~(A
STATION
LOCATION
4 A
c
4CA
J,d
"CPf.~
-~,--
.,
..J
"
.,
....
J
\
, l
-..,
i
,
I..,
,
N~T A-2
POND
..J
----.
--.---- - ".
,
...-.-. ..-.. -.-..
,.J
I I
~,--- ,-- ~--"-T---';'
.. '- ,... -... -- r'----'.
I
" ~
,..,
.-.
~_...._-- .
-_. .
,
. ! I '
-, - L ,- + _ _._ '0" ..----_1. .,.
L I I
. --. ,-- -~--,--, -.'
-L, !'
+---~
-'-r i
-.
--
~
,
-.... .
,
.. - - --- ~'-
-
-
..
.
I
,
...
...
STOR~~
'r-" IIN(
II CA
4 t
.,
.. - ... - . -. '1'
~-- T
r
.., "'~r-
r'-
L_
,---J--_ - _ --'-__ l.___ _ --L. '____n ~
I ! I !
- -, - - ;---""- +.-,..- -t---;,
- ..~.. - . - - - .~---_....
, ,
i j
1.._..,...__ t _.._ L
--r-'-
,--.-1
~
I
" ~- -
.....,.
,
"- -...-. - ....' .- ---J~-'
, I II
.- -.i-----r-
>---~-~L,
, d
- : - -"-r-'~r
! ---r-- F
I --
--.--... -,I- '''-_
I I I
~- '---
~ ~I
SEW E R'
C .A Leu
--..
Chalr,[1 '''A.L.l
id 'L~f:
1, %
-
" .
CONe",,, AMD 0It V"'tI"ro
~ MIAIl MUN JUS T ,
0/1 " 'UI.L
~'" DrI'TH c.,.. c,-
'Y. "" It, ..,'.
CLl'
S,*&I.I
DUlr
1'"
CAI'IC
GilA"
c f .
r:;u
C
....~
c I .
SlZI
Of
M'l
LIIlff'TH M.....,,-
0' :.,...
1""1 C:Cl('"
,
--'- -
-it-n ...
-,~ -,.
---..
,
----l~-, "'__ _,,,_
... I I ,
'9 !" -, t.., -.. 1 '_
d ~-~t-;...:.--t-'--, II
~( ~-- i -- F-- ; I~_t.,~_ =- );~i C~J --rt~~--:=
- "-1r-' ;. __40 -,. _. _. , ._ ._.____ _ .--.j,...___,_._ __..... __.. __. ___. _ ..._____._~_
' , '.,. .. I
-,-lL. . ~ "--".. ,,- i
II ,w Ji.. ~t.. c..: r-~:'f,,: I~ r-'/lO. I
----lL-_ ' '. ... ,
, :"'::~''''''''i-(pl''. ~ ~"'"
,
I ro"(.M P
83
.012. OJ~
I
~
--t--....---~_
'I
--'... ., 0:.',',,0"',,_) _ ('
I --r,r, _ ..
'" JL -- L.". - t- _ ,
, I ,
II ' ,
--..-, -.. t ,...._,- '..,.. , ,
1/', ,
-r- - , r -~ -- t ----.,
~r--' t---r- '
~~_. 1-- i
, ,
. - +. - ,-..-.-
_."~..... . -.. -.' .. ,.... .. ~..
'I '
-1.._, .. _L .
-t~
I: i
-'if' ! I
, ,
-1 - ~_.____ . _..
-,--
I
---~--I'-t--=t' ~-~_l=~""
I '~
-- --.- ". ,I--
I, : I ~I
--r---- .
f --
-~ -~~~.. -,,' -----_..~-
I
'.. --
I
1
-r~'"
I
,
-.. ..-+
I
-
~ --'- ----..... -- ----+-
:
-
.,-
-
: I
. ~ ~ ..
,
I
. ,
-
I
'---
HRG
Herbert, Rowland & Grublc, Inc
369 East Park Drive. Harrisburg. PA 17111
FAX (717) 564-1158 (717) 564-1121
July 2B, 1994
John Eby, Zoning Officer
Lower Allen Township
1993 Hummel Avenue
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011
Re: Fenstermacher Storm Drainage Review
Dear John:
We have reviewed the drainage calculations and plans for the subject project and
offer the following comments:
1. Instead of assuming that weir flow occurs at depths less than 0,3
feet and orifice flow occurs at depths greater than 0.3 feet,
capacities must be computed using both equations and the lesser of
the two capacities will control. (Page 2A)
2. Use the actual time of concentration if it is less than twenty
minutes instead of always using twenty minutes, (Page 1)
3. The inlets must be checked for inlet control to ensure that the'
required head will not exceed the top of grate elevations.
4. Regarding the detention pond, the required storage and allowable
discharge occur at a depth of two feet (elevation 496) for the 10-
year design storm. However, the top of the pond embankment is at
elevation 496, according to the plan. The spillway structure must
be designed to safely pass the 100 year storm while providing one
foot of freeboard between the maximum pool el evat ion and the top of
embankment.
5. All stormwater di scharges shall be made to an exi st i ng channel or
storm drainage system, This would require a discharge from the pond
to be conveyed under Upland Street and in a westerly direction to
the stream channel behind the homes on the west side of Upland.
Very truly yours,
HERBERT, ROWLAND & GRUBIC, INC.
p.q//~
Robert D, Rowland, P,E,
RDR/cs
1-243 .002( 1142)
c1,nhnU CI
cc: Ron Mull
Eng,neers . Surveyors' P'onners . Landscape Architects
Lancaster Regional Ottlce . 1846 Charter Lane . Lancaster, PA 17601
State College Regional Ottlce . 366 Walker Drive . Slate College, PA 16801
Gettysburg Regional Ottlce . 32 West Middle Street . Gettysburg, PA 17325
Pittsburgh Regional Ottlce . 215 Executive Drive, SUite 202 . Cranberry Township, PA 16066
TOI
~'roml
Oatel
supjectl
planning commission ~Itlmbers of Lower Allen Township
Residents of Harrisburg Manor
July 19, 1994
SO/LO 94'09 - Prellminary/Finul Land Oevelopment Planl
Herpert Fenstermacher, Jr" southeast Corner of Linden
Avenutl and Upland St nlet
Ladies and gtlntlemen of the Plllnning commission, we, the residents of
Harrispurg Manor, would llke to take this opportunity to inform you
of our concerns with regard to SD/LD 94-09,
As you are probaply aware, we testified before the Zoning Hearing
Board in opposition to this plan, The ZHB did not rule against the
plan, put instead, ruled that the proposed nine townhouse project is
similar and compatible with single family and single family semi-
detached dwellings, Also, as you are probably already aware, this
decision is peing appealed Py the Township Commissioners in Common
Pleas court. A ruling by the court has yet to pe made.
In addition to our co~nents at tonight's meeting, we decided to also
give you this written documentatlo~ stating our concerns and reasons
for opposing this plan, We urge you to evaluate these concerns
during your discussion of whether to recommend or not recommend
approval of this plan to the Township Commissioners,
Our concerns and reasons for opposing this plan are as follows:
1. Placement of Upland Street - There is some dispute as to whether
or not Upland Street is laid in the correct location, No survey was
done prior to applying the tar and chip, It appears as if the road
is too far west and laid on resident's private property.
2. Drainage/Storm Water Run-off There are current drainage
problems on Upland Street and Linden Avenue, These problems will
only be exacerbated if this plan is recommended for approval. The
Koti residence on Upland Street will be impacted the most. They have
a septic system in place today that may be overwhelmed by the
increase in water run-off. They also experience pasement flooding,
3, Minimum Lot Size - According to the ZHB decision, the proposed
use is similar and compatiple to single family and single family
semi-detached dwellings. According to Mr. Fenstermacher's plan
(sheet 1 of 8), the minimum lot:. size is 2,600 square feet per
dwelling, This is the minimum lot size for garden style apartments
according to ordinance 1115,04, Further, according to ordinance
1115,04, the minimum lot size for single family detached dwellings is
9,000 square feet and for a single family semi-detached dwelling, the
minimum lot size is 7,500 square feet per dwelling. How can a
minimum lot size of 2,600 square feet pe applicable when the ZHB
ruled these proposed struct.tlres to be similar and compat.ible with
single family and single family semi-det.ached dwellings? The
arithmetic will show t.hat there is only enough room for 3,6 units
assuming 7,500 square feet. per unit and 27,000 total square feet. of
land,
6. TUUic
additional 18
visitors. This
I f nine townhouses /Ire bui 1 t, there may be an
vehicles coming into the neighborhood not including
causes great concern for the safety of our children,
IS, Pa1"kin" Ac<.:ording to ordinllnce 1115,07 off-Street Parkingl
"off-street parking shall be provided as required in Article 1147,"
According to the plan, only two spaces are allocated per unit, Is
this enough? If 130, the potential for on-street parking exists and
will probably occur. This again causes concern for the safety of our
children and other family members.
II. llIIIe1""ency Vehicle Acceas Because of the parking issue and
condition of Upland Street, emergency vehicle access could be
restricted, This con<.:ern is of utmost importance to our conununity's
safety, \1ith sllch congestion and density, we all shudder to think
that the life of one of our loved ones could be jeopardized in the
event of an emergency,
7, Utility Rights of Way - Will the utility rights of way of any of
the current residents be compromised by the construction of these
nine townhouses?
8. Sewe1"a"e - The addition of nine families
can cause a problem with the sewerage system,
close look at the sewerage plan. What is
township if sewerage problems occur?
in
We
the
an area this small
urge you to take a
added cost to the
9. Road Conditions . According to Sheet 2 of 8 of the plan, the
township is requiring half-width construction of Upland Street along
Mr, Fenstermacher's property line I the remaining port ion to be
constructed by others, If only half the road is constructed, the
middle edge of the road will need to be fixed because of cars running
along the edge. This will add to the township's maintenance costs,
Is the township willing to allocate additional funds to cover
increased maintenance costs? Further, it will appear strange to
future residents that only half the road has been constructed, In
our opinion, it would make more sense to have the developer construct
all of the road, This will ease the township maintenance costs and
provide better access to and from the manor for all residents, Other
developers in our neighborhood have been required to constt'lJct the
entire road,
10. Proper U.e of Land Is construction of nine townhouse units
really proper use of land zoned R2? We do not believe this is proper
use of the land, The physical size and shape of the lot does not
cause unnecessary hardship. The property can be developed in strict
conformance with the provisions of the Township Zoning Ordinances,
One and possibly two single family homes could be built on this lot.
11. Landscapin" According to sheet 6 of 8 of the plan, all
existing trees and hedgerows are to be removed, With so much concern
for the environment today, is it necessary to remove all trees? It
is a well known fact that tree removal harms the environment.
Article 1177,08 - Street Trees refers to the removal of street trees,
Is this plan in compliance with this article?
12. Property Value - The close proximity of the proposed townhouses
has a potential to devalue the single family homes in the area, This
.
~!!Y!.!L~
PLANNING C()tKISSI<lf
REGULAR HBB'l'lNG
LOWER ALLEN TOWNSHIP
JULY 28, L994
The "rescheduled" Regular meeting ot the LQwer Allen Tc.wnship Planning Commission
was called to order at 7t33 p.m. by Brett McCreary with the tollowing in ATTENDANCEc
PLANNING COMMISSION
TOWNSHIP PERSONNEL
M. Ann Evertta
Geir Magnusson
Brett McCreary
James B. Utley, Jr.
Albert Wrightstone. Codes Department
Robert D. Rowland. Township Engineer
Richard F. Schin. Commissioner
APPROVAL OF JUNE 21, 1994 MEETING MINUTES
tIr;, ""p'''son IIlOved to approve the Minutes of the June 21, 1994 lIeetiD8 as written.
This IIlOtion was seconded by He, Evertte, The IIlOtion carried unan:lJllously.
OLD BUSINESS
SD/LD 93-17: PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN: WINDSOR PARK SHOPPING CENTER
Present to represent the Preliminary Land Development Plan for the Wind~or Park Shopping
Center 1ol8re Attorney Hank Johnson and Chris Hoover, Hartman and Associates,
Mr. Hoover noted again for the record they are proposing an expansion of the existing
Windsor Park Shopping Center located along the southwest corner of the intersection of
Wesley Drive and Simpson Ferry Road, They have prepared a a resubmiseion following the
tabling of the plan to address comments of the Staff and the Zngineer. There are still
some traffic impact study comments that will have to be addressed. At this time they
feel they will be willing to address them and work with the Engineer and Staff to do so.
Mr. Hoover added, as part of the renovations to the center, they are proposing new
handicap parking, new curb cuts and w-orking with TOWIIship Staff in the location of those
accesses and parking spaces.
Mr, Wright stone listed Staff comments. one through eleven in reference to the revised
plans. They are attached to the record.
Mr, Rowland noted he had submitted comments at the earlier July meeting which 1ol8re
primarily on the traffic condition. Since the June meeting a meeting was held with
their traffic consultant and the developer to go over the needs in the traffic study.
They did make a resubm!ssion with a very extensive report but still have not addressed a
number of the Township I s concerns. In addition, Mr. Rowland previously drew to their
attention there was no indication the study was prepared by a traffic engineer, Thoy
offered the assurance this 1oIOuld be taken care of. However, the resublllission WIIS made
without an indication it was being submitted by an engineer, This issue has been
Planning Commission
Page One
July 28, 1994
referred to the Tewn~hip ~l.ilic Iter tor review and darit lcation. Hr. Rowland ~aid they
anticipate they will either meet with the tratfic con~ultants or receive another
submission. At thi~ pl.iint, he 9aid he "''ll~ not in a pI.i~ltlon to recommend any action.
Mr. Johnson commented there are ~everal area~ ",nere there ls disagreement in opinion and
he would hope their engineers would meet with the Tewnship engineers to satisfy the
issues.
With discussion on the traHic ir:lsue, Hr. Mallnusson questioned if the lssue is a
disagreement between two experts and can be handled by compromise or is the issue the
nature of the traftic itself that no expert can ",'Ork out?
Mr, Johnson sl1id he "''Quld hope It can be cl.impremised because development will not be
stopped totally in this area.
Mr. Rowland pointed out there are some area/,! ",nere there is a difference of opinion and
other areas ",nere th~ plans and report are not in agreement.
Continuing discussion, Ma. Evertts asked what the status was of the internal truck
traffic Circulation? Mr. Hoover said this w11s discussed at the previous (Planning
Commission) meeting. Mr. Hoover follo",-ed with an explanation. (This information is
included in the Minutes of July 19.)
In response to the quer:ltion of status "'~th PennDOT permitting, Mr. Hoover said no formal
submission has been made because it is their feeling before they approach PennDOT the)'
want to come to an agreement at the local level that will be satisfactory to everyone.
,
Mr. Magnusson expressed concern he was not sure the traffic lIllltter wi~l be able to be
taken care of with just talking.
Ifr. Utley IIOved to rec~nd approval of the Pr.1f..inllry Land Develo!a8nt Plan for the
V1ndaor Park SboPPin8 Center contingent upon the satisfaction of the Rngln..oering, Staff
aDd CllllberlaDd County phnni"g eo-1ssion c~nts, approval of the _r lIOciule and the
PeunIlOT H1gbway PerII1t. This IIOtion WIlS seconded by He. Evertts. '1be ~tion carried
'.l'UIni'MnU81y.
SD/LD 94-07: PRELIMINARY/FINAL LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN: F & L FLUID COMPONENTS
Present to represent the Preliminary/Final Land Development Plan for F & L Fluid
Components wre Galen Brewbaker, President of F & L and Chris Hoover of Hartman and
Associates.
Mr. Hoover announced this plan 1NiIS submitted to the Planning Colllll1ssion a couple of
months ago and tabled to allow for addressing Staff and Engineering cOllllllents. The plan
is for the expansion of the existing building to add a second story. The footprint of
the building is not being changed except to add a small portion for an entranceway to
the front of the building, The entire fr.ont of the building may be removed and
reconstructed from the ground up. A revised plan was submitted addressing Staff and
Enginsering comments.
Mr. Wrightstone listed Staff comments, one through fourtsen. This report was
with the Minutes of the 6/21 meeting and is attached as part of this record.
the Building Code requirements of exterior walls should be fire rated if less
included
He added
than six
Planning Commission
Page Two
July 28. 1994
.
feet from a lot line,
Mr. Rowland reported hill comments ...ere on the previous submission of thill plan dealing
with clarifications on the plan, requirements of curbing and ccntinuations of curbing
along Kummel Avenue.
Lengthy general discusllion and questions followed.
Mr. Keover noted all Staff comments have been addressed and shown on the revised plan.
Mr. Brewbaker pointed our. the driveway access easement with Karbold.
Arthus Kouvelis was authorized to add l2 l/2' to the r.estaurant.
Ke also noted
Mr. Magnusson asked for clarification on the right of way to ~nich Mr. Rowland explained
the PennOOT right of way follows along the front of the property to the end of the
curbing. At that point, the PennDOT right of ~~y begin~ to pull away on a curve toward
the north. There is a thin ~~dge on the Township street. The portion of the frontage
that is not curbed is Township right of wa)'.
Mr. Magnusson said it is confUSing who has the authority over the property. In regard
to the front, Mr. Rowland said the TO~'T\ship has the right. as on any state highway, to
require curbing, In this case it is already existing. It is only the portion abutting
the TOloo'T\ship street where it is to be installed. There shouldn't be any question on
that requirement.
Mr. Rowland added the Township has established they have no future interest in Short
Street. Prom his records it shows it was dedicated or given to the TO~'T\ship lJ1 1907.
The Solicitor was requested to review the road docket and determine whefher the Township
1o'Culd want to abandon it or give it back to the abutting property owner. The Township
therefore is looking into this matter as there is no interest or value in doing anything
with the street,
Hr. ""1""lIeon IIOved to rec~nd approval of the PreH"'h"'ry/Pinal Land Develo~nt Plan
for P & L Fluid CoIIponents contingent upon _ting the Staff, the R...g:I....er and
CUllberLmd County pbnnh'g Coaa1.ssion c~nts and a rec~ndat1on for granting of
~1cat10ne if so requested, This IIOtion was seconded by !fa. Evertts. Tbe IIOtion
carried unanilllously,
NEW BUSINESS
SO/LO 94-08: LANO DEVElOPMEN'r PLAN: STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT CAMP HILL
Present to represent the Land Development Plan for the State Correctional Institution at
Camp liill was Richard Holes of L, Robert Kimball and Associates,
Mr, !toles outlined historical background on the SCIC facility. (This information was
recorded at the previous meeting of 7/19.)
Mr. Wrightstone listed coaments for Staff. one through fourteen. They are attached to
the record of this meeting.
Mr. Rowland noted engineering comments had been sllbrn.itted at the previous July meeting.
Planning Commission
Page 'Three
July 28, 1994
..
There are three maj or Ilr~1l9 of concern Ln these cemments Lncluding I (l) the
consideration of curbing, (2) the need for a traffic study for ingress and egress to the
site. Since last week's meeting, a teleconference was held with Mr. Holes. Areas of
concern which need to be studied were reviljlo1ld.. They indicated they would undertake
this study and Lt would be submitted Ln the near future. The major concern is the need
of an eastbOUnd left turn lane and westbound right turn lane. The third area of concern
is the drllinage facility. The engineering narrative submitted did include storm
drainage calculations. Sinc~ this time Mr. Rowland said they have cempleted the review.
While they agree with SCIC's concepts, a quick discharge frem this detention is probably
in their best interest. To confirm this ~arly conclusion, there are scme other items
required.
Ms. Evertts asked abeut exceptiens contained Ln the June 15 letter. Mr. Holes a~plained
these Io1lre the exceptions the)' felt ceuld be addressed by the TOlo-nship and had been
agreed to with the Township (Mr. Eby) and the consultant. He reviewed the exceptions
and discussed the traffic situation and improvements. During review and subsequent
drawing of the plan, the actual traffic VOlUllle was noted.
Mr. Holes said at present they are working with a local traffic engineer, Grove Miller
Associates, who will be doing traffic engineering analysis. Messrs. Holes and Rowland
agreed on what procedures should be followed to complete the study. If the traffic
study suggests turning lanes are required, Mr. Rowland has suggested thl! length qf the
turning lane be calculated. TI-.e COllllBonwealth is proposing three construction projects
ands he suggested tholY might put money in escrow to construct these improvements as
approved by PennDOT.
Mr. Holes said it was agreed no financial security would be necessary if there is no
pubHc improvements required. I
Mr. Holes said the reason there wasn't a traffic study issued is because it was
determined if the vehicular traffic was less than 1,000 vehicles per day it would not be
necessary. During review and subsequent creation of the plans it was found there are
800 plus employees or l,600 vehicular trips with deliveries and visitors, Thus. the
estimated traffic is about 2,000 vehicles per day. Mr. Rowland suggested counting the
existing traffic on Lisburn Road and the turning lllOvements into each of the three
driveways.
Discussion continued.
In regard to whether there is to be a request for modifications, Mr. Wrightstone noted
there is no need for sidewalks and any needed roadway improvements would be determined
by the results of the traffic study.
Hr. Holes noted the planning module applicat.ion has been preViously submitted for the
Phase IV improvements which included the lllOdular housing units. Hr. Holes asked Mr.
Wrightstone if the Township still has it? Mr. Wright stone will check this with Messrs,
Eby and Brown,
Ifr . "'-p'lI111on IIOved to rec~1ld approval of the Land DsV81o~nt Plan for the State
Correetiooal Institution at Caap Hill cont1ngent upon c~nts of tile Staff. the
.nIP_r IIDd CUllberland County Planning ec-1s8ion. 'Ibis !lOtion 1M8 88Cooded by !fe.
!vertt8. The IIOtion carried unanaously,
Planning Commission
Page Four
July 2B, 1994
SO/LO 94-09: PRELIMINARY/FINAL LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN: HERBERT FENSTERMACHER, JR.
Present to represent the Preliminary/Final Land Development Plan for Herbert
Fenstermacher, Jr., southeast corner of Linden Avenue and Upland Street wre Jim Spade,
(attorney) of Connelly, Reid & Spade and Re"n Sechary of Hartman and Associates. Mr.
Spade represented Mr. FensteL1Uacher (applic.:)nt) and Robert Bartley (the property owner-
current) ,
Mr. McCreary stepped down trom the Chair for this discussion. Mr. Utley chaired the
discussion and asked that the record retlect the Chairman \;ould not discuss or vote on
the application. There Iollre man, people present in the audience for this agenda item.
(This list is attached as part of the record.) Mr. Schin requested use of the
microphone to assist the people in the audience to hear.
Mr. Sechary noted prior to submitting these plana they appeared before the Zoning
Hearing Board for a determination of compatibility of use with uses allowed in this
zone. At that time, they received a favorable decision and it is understood the
Township is appealing that decision. At this meeting they will discuss the merits of
the plan itsdf and their compliance with the ordinances. They realiz.e it is the duty
of the Planning Co~nission to anal,ze their efforts as to compliance and take the plan
at face value realizing the other issue is separate and on going.
Mr. Utley asked Mr. Spade if he had any comments. Mr. Spade stated he was completely in
agreement with Mr. Sechary's statement that the Zoning Hearing Board appeal does not.
under the Municipalitiell Planning Code, affect the Township's obligation to accept and
review the plan within the 90 day period.
Mr. Wrightstone submitted Staff comments for the record, one through si~teen.
Mr. Rowland noted his original Engineering comments were submitted at the previous July
meeting. The major areas of concern on that comment sheet regard walkway access to the
front door of the building, clarification of curbing and paving of Upland Street. In
addition, since that time they have completed their review of the Storm Drainage
Management Plan. These comments are dated July 28. one through five. He also submitted
comments on the land development plan, one through seven. Both reviews are attached for
the record.
In regard to Mr. Rowland's storm water Comment No, 5, Mr. Sechary said this is quite a
considerable distance and would traverse, not only public right of way but, a lot of
private owned land not controlled by the applicant. As Mr. Wrightstone pointed out
there are no existing storm water facilities to tie into. The topography surrounding
that area is extremely flat and not conducive to creating this. To comply with Mr.
Rowland's cOllllllent, it would require they build an underground system through other
people's property for the very small amount of additional runoff created by the site.
Actually their discr.arge is in compliance with the ordinance in that they do not
discharge at a greater rate than what was pre-existing their development. Therefore,
they would submit this is an unreasonable request, cost wise, for the developer to bear.
Ms. Evertts asked that is a minor amount of drainage? It WIlS noted Shaet 4 of 8, on the
plan, shows the storm water plan. Members gathered to review and discuss this aspect of
the plan,
With lengthy discussion continuing on the above engineering cOllllllent and Mr. Sechary's
Planning Commission
Page Five
July 28, 1994
.
question lIbout the desired width at paving ot Upland Street. Mr. Utley explained these
wre engineering concerns and the engineera should me"t on this. TiJDe should not be
spent on technical discuallionll all the Planning Commission goell by the engineer's
direction. He added man)' in the general public, in attendance, did not understand the
discussion.
Hr. Wrightstone added. ballea (m the StaH meet ing (at this date), it WIlS clarified he
wall leaking at 1177 .02 (a) (8) '.i.th curbing ilnd till in paving required. The EngiMer
ill looking at 1177. 02 (c) (4) to mean they must provide a 30 toot wide cartway.
Hr. Utley asked it there Ions anyone present in the audience wno wished to comment on the
plan?
Jef f Straley, 4708 Linden AvenuE. noted at the previous July meeting (7719) he had read
from a memorandum the residents prepared and distributed. He touched on some of the
points as follows: Ccmment No. 3 regarding the minimum lot size. According to the
Zoning Hearing Board decision, "the proposed use is similar and compatible to single
family and single family semi-detached dw-ellings." According to Mr. Fenstermacher's
plan, Sheet 1 of 8, the minimum lot is 2,600 sq. tt. per dwelling. Th1s is the minimum
lot size for garden style apartments according to Ordinance 1115.04. Further, according
to the same Ordinance 1115.04, the minimum lot size for single family detached dw-ellings
is 9,000 sq. tt. and tor a single famil)' sem-detached dw-elling it is 7,500 sq. ft.
Their concern is how can the miniJDum lot size at 2.600 sq, ft. be applicable in this
situation when the zoning board has ruled these units are similar and compatible to
single family or single family detached dw-ellings?
The clarification from Hr. Wrightstone was that even though the ZHB found the ~oposal
compatible to R-2 usage, it is not really a single famil)' detacheo,. dw-elling. The
similarity and compatibility is based on the zoning district plus what is already in the
neighborhood in the area zoned R-2.
Mr, Sechary said it is iJDportant to note the ZHB WIlS not trying to designate what the
use WIlS but that they type of use intended is compatible with what the zoning all01ol8 and
what exists. It most closely resembles attached dwellings such as garden apartments and
this was the basis of the developer's use of this cal~ulation.
It was further noted by Mr. Spade this is not a subdivision. Lots are not being created
within the .62 acres. it is possible. whHe not likely, these units could be sold as
condominiums. This is not a parceling out of the lot. In this case no lots will be
created. He added, they are not saying it is the same use but that it is compatible.
Mr. Straley said he did not believe the intent of the ordinance was to say it is a
garden style apartment for minimum lot sbe purposes and a townhouse or unit similar to
a single family or single family semi-detached unit for the purpose of setback
requirements.
In regard to Comment No.9, Hr. Straley noted it is understood there will be discussion
betwen the engineers on Upland Street; for a half width construction or full width
curbing. The residents concern with half way construction is this leaves the middle
section of the road exposed to wear and tear. It seems the Township is concerned about
installing country lanes wnich is without curbing because of people running off and
breaking the asphalt, etc., thus incurring more maintenance costs. The same WDuld apply
in this case with a half width construction.
Planning Commission
Page S Lx
July 28, 1994
On Comment No. ll, Mr, Straley soid with the removal of street trees, the residentl"j
would want the plan to be in cQmpliance with this section of the ordinance,
Marcia Welsh, 708 Belmont Avenue. asked that the Engineer take into consideration the
drainage and sew~rage. It seel1lB the water ~~uld empty out onto the residents properties
lit Upland and Florence, This could cause extreme hardship on them and problems in the
future.
Bill Wade. 4717 Maple Avenue, concurred with all the items covered (at this meeting) and
asked to go on the record as stating the Harrisburg Hanor citizens have taken a lot of
effort and done a lot of homework in regard to this. Hle said he hoped the discussion.
at this meeting, is not falling of deaf ears. They are concerned about the future of
the development and there are a lot of issues with merit.
Doris Conway, 708 Upland Street. said it is of vital importance to examine the 1esue of
the lot size. Initially, the developer and the Zoning Hearing Board were not sure what
kind of unit was being proposed. Mrs. Conway said she felt this plan is unfair to
existing residents.
Mr. Magnusson noted he disagreed with Mr. Utley in that the 9torTn water drainage is
important. not just to the engineers but to the present residents of the area. The
Planning Commission i9 responsible for looking out for the health, welfare and safety of
the citizens and he couldn't see how. through hair splitting, a development can be
allowed that is a detriment to the are and devastating to long term residents.
Mr, Sechary noted they comply with the storm water ordinance through the construction of
a storm wat~r detention plan. Therefore, he said he did not see how they would:have an
adverse detrimental affect if they adhere to the ordinances concerniF8 the design of
their storm water system.
HI'. Utley stated he felt a lengthy discussion between two engineers is unwarranted.
These are facts and figures that should be discussed between the engineers because the
average person does not understand these concerns.
Mr. 1fa8JlU8SOD IIlOved to d1IIapprove the Pre Ii ahu.ry IPinal Land developlent Plan for
Herbert Pensteraacber. jP:. 'lbis 1IlOt10D was seconded by !fa. Bvertts. 'lbe 1IOt10D carried
llnaniunuely.
HI'. McCreary returned to Chair the meeting.
O'mER BUSINESS
HI'. Wrightstone noted upcoming plans for next month's meeting, Also, there will be a
zoning amendment from the Board of Commissioners.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:23 p.m..
Donna V. Sprowls
Secretary
Planning Commission
Page Seven
July 28. 1994
PI G'-r\l'\; n J
Thu rs~lo.,~/ '
C()MM;S~"Ot'\..
.J u \ '( ). (3 I I -:( C( y
..-.-.---
I '
C (.1' ,e71 . I
~ ~.:.... "-- LL,..... 'I
~ ~ ---'
l~ ,r-
~, ~ ~ '-;J"Ju~0
~t~ /~H:z -
.~raci
" l'"
t(7r!f;. ~r'L\6J .4v~,
J/7t'l j'},l# )}/:::.- 17 tl-::' ' f)?Y:tt-,j;,,:J!;.
\.., R.~"O~II. )("I'\'ou.\\'~ A.,~~(.:/J.'re.~ I'lL..'
I
lj I'? ~IO"" ~;')VI\W'\ ~J\!;,
ctel\~)~"'''") I pp, \'S9'l,\
'-17/1 MrJ!.pR (~ ~~~\ (:L
t/?()( ,:[,~cJl"",,--) ~oe., n~ A
- 'nEI1-;E P!<.IIJT
- .. . .--..
,'~<< 7/,4c~(
;rr~//;;' ti C!I'.",~A..-"
Qiv~l>l~ \-' r\D\t?..:l '
. 9jJ L, ,/1I2~J00,.
~. () J r3..(,(I-r4"W t- Q.....l Y'NcA 9 CA-
[/7 J~l~/t),l(e,JI ,~,
.'f!l~1li;;;;t~ ?c.s
'70 P .t3c..(.;~~ )1~LI'1--
(101';
76~ eE:~6N-I A C/~ ~ec.1' fi
174 r.f
"iYltl<,N~ liJ~
-"----' ~--- ..... --.. -.-
_. _..._,___..._.__.___...__..__..._.._.__u___.
, __.. __.u_._.__ ____._._._~__.
. .__._.__....._._...__.__ ....._._....... _'..__n
,------ .--,-..-.-.-..--.-.---...-..-----.-.-..".
_........_._,.._._._.n._.~._. _ .......-.-.-.------..
llar4 [Ane
bpa1n .1IlI
Kl1nt.nanc. S.cur1ty
Zon1nc Amondlll.nt
lIoquoot .
Un1tod MothClll1.t
110,.. for Childnn
SPAll Gr,.nt
1Ioqu1r_nt. to
!xocut. Acc.pt.nc.
Thlty'hi'lVIf 'Jr::mlt pltnd1.nJl cond1t1.ones ,111 flit oilS ., r:lty1tted
,je'll',lopltr'lt :ucr.!lItmltnc .1nd :sr:me pl1rlUnll 1'1t1)1" l03yr::l1tIJ. [f
they I:lfllol.", ,)1.t ~.hli!tJI! LIJf~nJlltJ betfJrf! Mor.do1Y, the 3to1ff '-lilt
bet C'IIccrrm.nt1in" ,tppr~vlll 'J1.t.h <:ond1.tl..;n6 "" .tn .1KIltr.dl) t.tem.
Hr, 'leulf!: ncct!d the r;nly cencern h. rn.1l1ht M'I. 1.11 1.n
rll~lJrrt to t'lfCrItBt1.Gn f3cil1.t :'tJIJ. He fllt they could chance
hU1.1dt.~". tn r:'''pt)nlle to .]. question trr::1Il Iir. Bucher ,JS to
'"nether: tll_ nr'l9l!nt prr.:pt!rti~ o\olT\ertJ haVIt " r:1iht to expect
., !2 '1011: bl!ttfi1n~1 :1r. 'letter: ,o.1.d then tJhould !)It no
prcbl\tl'll '.nth r:.h1./J.
Mr. ;;;by nor;ed chit l3o<lrd hAd o1uthoriz.d the Staff to
'oir~tt to thit ftr.t1nC1.1l 1.m't1.tut1.on .:sr.d .)lIk r:hot the funde
11, ,:urned <)yltr 1;.0 thlt TC\,.Tlf,h1p to Ei:( the road. ~ th.y
......rll .jIBUn" '.nth t:he paper '..'Ork. the road IJilS t'i;ced and
liRO hall ';l!rt~f 1.~d t.r. WIJ t"epl11rao r:crrlfctly. The ta-month
fJJ!c'Jr:t'f pert<.d ~:J IJp. 'nlt!r'!rr.;r., tn ..:onjunction '.n.th
:Jtar.riBrd prccedur'i. .1 'noticn '.r1.11 be t'l!que~tlld .1ft .1n u:enda
.hE.!!! to ,1uthcr~~e StatE to rlJbtlue the tn41nter\4lnCII
,ecurur.
Mr, Eby rqpQrtfd the GommltJtll0nerO reclti'/ed, a.
intot:mlltion. ,1n .,ppl~c3tion f.rcm the 'Jn1ted I1ethodist HOID8
for r;h1ldrltn. They .1re requestinlil .1 chan'le from 'A-O ,'md R-
2. to r;ommerc:.al 'iener.tl tor thtt 3trip of lo1nd bour,dtld on
the 1J1!9t by the Skrl.uk ~el1dcw8 trOGt and Qn the ....lSt by
',Je1.9 :inrket. [n .1ccordBnce '.or1.tn 't.:tndard procedurlt. there
normally '.would be -1 reeolut1on directin; Suff to f0['94rd
t.his plan to t.ha .1ppropri.1tt! planninlll "lJenc:ies. Aaend.
.ll.!!! to .1uthorize .1istr1butlNJ the plan.
Hr. Eby announced the Township rece1'/ed 3n 8wrd of
$5.l00 fot the SPAG Gt.nt: 57,500 h.d boon t.quoot.d. A
match of $7 t ~OO '49 3grlted to. Apparently. therl! '~re l'DCre :
municipalities gr3nted money this jq8r, Therefore I the
Townah1p Will have to eOllle up -.nth tho I!lIItch of $;,'00,
wh1ch hod bo.n pl.nnod, plUS n. OGO. Th. $2.000 e.n be
deterred to next :;ear I!I budget.
Secondly, Hr. Eby reported o1S 1.nformation, there 1.11 a
verbal reservation for Phal!l. 2. [f the township decide. to
go .head 'l1th the subdivision ordinanco, tho door i. open
for . $5.000 gr3nt for fi3c3l yoar 1995-Q~. nus will
d.por.d on the TOIo'Tlohip'. .uccess with ~ho.. l .nd th.ir
.uce... 'l1th the fUnd1.nJl. Then.n no guountoo.'
Third, Mr. Eby reported for information, the Soard
Will bo ..ked for twO .c t1on. .s u.nd. ll!!!!. .t tho
Regul.r Moot1ng i (l) to .uthor1z' the ~roo1d.nt to "".cut.
tho contuct 'ori.th OCA for the <fI'3nt .nd (2) to authorize
the prellident:: to execute a contra.ct 'I1l;h KRG a. the
TOWftIhip', subcontractor.
Ther. '<rioll have to be .1 review colllDitt.. cons1stina of
tho Boord of Conmi.o1oners. tho Plonn1113 COIIIl1..10n .rn
St.ff to lIlO.t periodically to l1IOn1tor tho progre...
Me. !by will .nnounce tentative d.t.. am .uCgootod .n
!-IIlaU to all the Conal..donees. nus initial ,...tinc will
have to bo oo...t1me in tho n....1nder of Ausu.t to IIlak. our.
all part100 .re in ....tu.l undent.nd1113 of the ocope of the
projoct,
Add1t10nally, th.ro needs to be . publ1c ,...t1nc. ..
roquirod by tho lJ1'.nt, Th. purpooo of tho publ1c ,...tinc
Will bo to 1n.form tho public of tho proj.ct .Ild to C.t
1d..., nus ....t1113 n.ods to be don. by tho IIll.ddl. of
S.ptelllbor.
, 4 .
Aucuot L. L 994
\lac, Boud \laport
Coao1as10nsr YOUng
run rort - Status laport
Coaa1ss10nsr ~
~
IIarr1sburl !Iancr -
lasWlnt . s la'l\l..t
n,.r., '.-1.LL be .l~ht Intorn4tlon4l .~part. ',,"0 Ire
'/rJ luntllltr:l. They U'tf psy1n" the 1.r <:vn exptlntl.tJ 1:0 be
hllr', nllt 'JI;.1I:'I '41.a ~qt. lnYI')L'Iltfi '1\0",t,1[11y, hO"""'I.r
,tt.O< t.h. .~th.n~e h.u "uk.n pluc.. Th.y 'J1.11 be here
frr~ns S"Pt',mb"r: L 7 r.o ~). ~r. Sellin Jho ~lJbm1ttl!d ~cm.
Ut.ot"t.uro t.o St..tt t.h.t po..lbly !1U~ht holp t.hem Hnd
,l'Iell.blo hndln~. Thu pr"~r.'m 'J1.11 not co.t the
In1l'Hdu.l loc.l ~un1c,p.lltle. ,'nyth1n~ t.o be Invol'/ed In
t:h1.tJ e:cch/u'Ullt. nley .1tll Ittlk.1nil ~tjr oJ!; te4t.lt f'Jne
r:,prlttlllncJt1.'" (rGIft oJllch municipality to ,Itt.rod .1 Local
Ilovernmunt ~Or'JlD (:5l1ptlll\b.r 2(J).
Hr. :)t;hln <1l:jl') 'Jubm1tted .1 retjoll.ltlon for: t'Q'lte'" by
:)t;,J,ff .trod I:he Sol1c!.tcr that 4uthcr~;:eH the Towntlh1p'lJ
!:IlJPport of t:he Ixc:han",. Th1lJ ;ftCUP l.tt JJlIHh1n.c hard for
"teri mun1c1.pal1.tl to pa6tf thili t'1t8olut1on.
:ir, P.uldln~ .sked :ir. Schln If he '.'Ould ,'~ree to
ctntinue to b. the repretiftnt3ti'l. frr.lll. the Board of
f~.;nn1tUlicner3 ':0 ,:h.sl !11...t:.nSCB 1 Kr. 5chin !laid he ',.lIQuId,
provtdtn~ h1" ''Or~ "ch.dule permic..
[c ..... nocod _'1111. It ts goln~ to be a county 'J1.de
'itudy, Lvwlr /Ulen dO'1I not have thae much opln ~P.CI to
protoct, but should however lend thetr support to ths
proJ.ct,
:-Ir, YOUI1ll reported the Lewer Allen lac. Boerd I1lIt
(:r..corday) at t.he OOlllllunlty pork. They '...lked che nature
trall .nd '/tulted .11 of the .11< Town.nip porke,
Soml g.neral obtJer'/8cionsl they d.tected bicycle
tr.tckB en the nature tr1l11. ~otor bikes had been observed
on t.he ~r.11 ..dier, The Rec, Board requested :-tr. "foulII
-iec.rmine I.f t.here .... .nyth1ng t.hat could be don. by the
Board ot CC.lt'llll1ssion.r, relat:!."e to this par':icular ti~ of
'/ehlcle r
11r, Young .poke wtth the Township btke patrol. They
have not ofl1cl.lly been on tho tr.ll s1nce July 4,
however thlY .re tn ths proc... of crstn1ng r.SO'. to
utill.s the btk.., HI: , YOUI14 sdd he d1d not have a
proble.. '.nth th1s type of b1ke on the tta11, L... a non-
l1lotor1.ed 'JOh1cle. All motorized vehicl.. should be
excluded from the trall however.
11r, ltlll potnted out th1s la "lnedy covered In tha
ordinance. [t is not pem.1tted and is a rut:.r of how to
enforce tt,
[n co""lu.ton Mr. Youl14 .aid tne ~en.rel conaeMU. of
the I1lImbers of the Rac, Boord '... tne Township parka .n
1n relot1'JOly load IllIlnt.nanc., Tha only th1nl the bo.rd
I1lIlDber. ,",uld like to ... 10ne I. the br..k11lll up of ths
..phalt .t the K1lhland Pork volleybell area, Tha
cOlllllun1ty would lIkl to put In . sand pit,
11r, Pauldilll questioned :ir, '{oUIII on ths financ1al
.tatus of the Fun Fort. Mr, YouIII ...ponded. at the
pr..ent t1mB. thlY are approxilllllt.ly $20,000-$22,000
short. na. cnalrun, HE's. Benton, is look.1nc at varlou.
way. for potent1al fund nisers. Dauphin Deposit aakad
for a part1cular type of docwuent .nd thin w1ll be 1IlIk1111
3 ,izable contribution.
he.ldent Pauldilll rece..ed the ,...tlng .t 9:46 p,m,
Thl maetil14 Wla rlconvelned at 9.57 p....
he.ld.nt P.uldln. offered tho.e pre.ent. in thl
audience, an opportunity to sp'ak.
- 7 '
A1JlIU.t L. 1994
ll.l1l1~ 'lOtH f)r.~ob.r II, l'IQ~,
mil mIIlSION
PllLIHIIIAIlY
LAIID DIlYILllPllllllT
I'LAIl
Il'IBiiIloIl PAllt
SIIlPPDlCl CI!IftU
';onm1..1oMr S~h1n nor..,j 1n r.~ord to SD/LD Otlckllt
91- l 7, ~h. ~r.Llrn1Mr'l l.nd Oovolopm.nt Pl.n of tho
'.lnd.or P"rk Shonp1n~ ';.ntor. tho oppUcont h.. .ubll11ttocl
" l.tter (,jot.d Au~u.~ \) Il1'nntinll .n ."t.nslon of
1.e~tJ1an time limit 110CU Iktcb.r l'. L?94,
DISAPI'RllVI!
PllLIHIIWlY I PIJlAL
LAIID DIlYILll\iiii!ift l'LAII
=r~. JI.
(:oat..1oner: !!m!!!! lIIOvod to d18spp-cov. 3D/LD Doeat
94-<)9, the Pn11m1nllrylPlnlIl Lam DevelolDSnt Plsn for
HertMirt rerwcermacMr I Jr. ,
.ubaitted bJ Rarcaon
MISOCUUtt for the purpolJe of conatroctin& nine townJx)u.ee
unit. ot the soutt!woost corner of Lind.n Avenu. nnd Upland
Str.et. The follovl.l1Jl ".""nB ..... cited os perl; of the
lDOtionr
l. The plon sul:a1tted 1. l....g.r then 18" " 24" li1I1t
contained I.n Section Lln.07 (.) (I).
2, The plon 18 not signed .nd notarized. per 1173.07 (.)
..
(1) R.
3. the Sewp V.cillti.s PlalD11nC ttocIul. d1cI lIOt acc.-IIT
subo1adon, "" required by 1173.05 (b).
4, SlcIewlk.a. required aloOS Lindon A"".... lUld Uplaal
Str..t by 1181.09, ..... not d.picted on tb. plaD.
5. Tbe .ppUcan~ bas IlDt .bcwn rec.....tion ar... or
requ.oted s>ar-m: of fee I.n li.u of land ded1cation. par
1177.10 (b).
6, Tbe .ppllcant' s stora watar ......_1Il: aula1aaion
requ1r.. rav1a10M to c_ly witb tho Tawab1p ~r'a
c.-nu elated July 28, 1994 befo.... cOllp11anr.a with
1177.07 call be vu1fied.
7, 1ha plal1 clo.. lIOt cI.plct full cutWy widtb of 30 f..t
aloOS tlplaal Str..t. .a required bJ 1177.02 (.) (8) aIId
1177.02 (c) (4).
8. Tbe .ppllc.nt baa !lOt COlllltructed required pubUc
1IIpro_ota or provided . d.velopera ....._l1t aIId
f1Jlano:1al MCurUy, .a requlJ:ed bJ 1173,06 (c).
- ) -
r\UsU.t 8, 1994
~~
r.prltflltnt~ the ru1.ntllnanCI' port:1Qn ftJr:" thl perk w1th1n
PhAtte tV "t Sh...pt fJrrt ':rotu, Ln.c. Th.1tJ '.. maintenance
$.e~r1t). lor pubL Le LmprcY.IIl.nt. oee.pted Oetob.r L2,
l'J92 , It .ho~Ld hoy. bo.n r.lf..od nn or .bo~t AprU L2,
L994 "eeordln, '.e thl proYl.Lon. of ,.et1en LL73,Q~ (0) of
'.hl ordlnone., Mr, Hert He..r, 0 r.pr...ntot1Y. of
Sh..p~ord f:orp" '.;'0 requeuttd the tele""., fj1d not
r.aLl:e thl~. Thuu, he L9 now r,qu..t1"4 the rel,.u..
r.oa1..1oner SCIUll ..ved to .~thoru. tho ral.... of
lIIoIinuna"". .""~r1ty for st_pford CorponUon, .~bjec:t to
tho TOVIlIIhip Iln&in..r'. concurr.nc.. nu. IIlOt10n ...
.""onded b)' Coo.1..1oner '!IlUIIG.
Mr. itlll upLa1ned typ1eally '.h. Town.hip '",,~ld
reClt1ve ,1 [,qUill!: tetter :luch as this 1n advance "Jf the
11,..ti",! and the Town.hip E"'!ln..r '"",uLd hov. tho
opportunity to r.vi.", the public l.mprov.lIl.nta ond .ubnUt .
L.tter reeo....ndin' tho r.l.... of fund., 'Jlth the tiJlle
of r.c.ipt of thio l.tt.r. It ha. not bo.n poIB1bl. for
chi. .etion to toke plae.. !hi. provioo .hould bo port of
tho I1IOtion. S.conaLy, It do.. not IlllIU mention of
lnura.t .nd ho .aid ho did not bltl1.v. tho Town.hip
prov1d.. lnt.rIBt poJlUnt. in tho r.lo... of fin.nc1al
..cur1ty or maint....nc. ..cur1ty. The l.tt.r ,poc1f1eally
r.f.ra to thi.. Th.r.for., Mr. Mull 'U'I..ted the IIlCt10n
bot .ubjoct to r.ca1pt of tho Town.hip E",!in....'. l.tt.r
.nd Ln accord.ne. with Township poLicy ana procedur..
\11th Mr. Mull'. .t.t....nt. !'r..id.nt Pauldinc
qu..tioned why Lt ..... ""e....ry to oct on thi. it... (It
this ...tine)1
('---<-10..... ~ _ to tabl. tbe IIOtioO 00 tbe
rel.... of MiDUa&ac. HCUrtty for Sbeeptord CrCII'~
UIltU tbe Towehip ID&1DHr'. r.pen: 10 r""liwd. Tb1.e
..,tloo we _onded by ec-iaaioner:!!1!!!!!. tbe ..t:1oo
clll'l'1ed uaalUaouely.
- 7 -
A1JJIu.t a. L994
AImIOUZI
~t1l
CllIIIlIII/IALt1l or
PA. - 5IIJW .
lCl C11A1.~
c...i...lon.. ~ IIO.-.d to .lItllor1&1 tbo execIIUOO
ot thl o\jp:~_nt boo:w.n tho c.,..,nwoo!th ot PIMlI.,lvoD1o
alii t.wor W.n TovnohJ.p to tll11\1uh .now .11I le. cl..ronc.
for c.rtdo .totl 111llm.,. dllr1"3 th.o IIt.nt.. ....0118 1994
tbroullh 1996. TbJ..ro ..tion .... .ecollled by eo.w.o1ollOr
~. Thl IIIOtlon curled 1'lI8n1J1oll.ly.
APPIOYI
RISOLUTI~ 94-1t-48
C.-J...lon.. RllTII !IO.-.d to opprOIl1l Rolollltloo 94-1t-
48. I ~..olut1on grqntilul exoneration of per capita taxes
tor 69 Indlv1d...b (W.t 12 of 1994). Th1. IIOtiOO ....
.econded by COIa1..10rter :!Q!!!!!1.
IIIlOn1.aloII.ly.
!be !IOtlon carrled
APPIlOVI
RISOLUTl~ 94-1l-46
c.-t..lun.r .!Q!!!!!!!IOvod to opprovo Rooolutioo 94-R-
46. . RoltOllltlon oppointinJI Chorlo. 8. Snyd.r, Jr. to th.o
ronJr. ot Li.ut.lI8nt in tho t.owor W.n Tovnob1p PoUc.
Dopor_nt,
Th1s !lOtion WIIS .""onded by c.-ts.lollOr
~. !be IIOtloo carried IIIlOn1lIlllllllly.
APPIlOVI
1IIlSOLIlTI~ 94-11.-47
c.-t.s1ollOr .!!1!!!!! - to approve Rooollltloo 94-R-
47, a Rooolllt1on .ppointinJI Frsnk \It 11 "-on, Jr. to tIM
reak ot Corporol 1ft tM t.owor W.o T01IIllIh1p PoUcs
Doport:lllOnt,
Th1s IIDtion WIIS .econded by ec-tao1oner
!!Z!'!!. !be IIIOtloo carrled unon1lllllll11y.
APPIlOVI
IIIlSOLIlTIIII 94-1.-49
I~i ..-toner .!!!J!!! IIOYed to approw Rnolut1on 94-1-
49, a Rosollltion tor 8llbo14.100 to tho CollOQ' of
CUIIbor laDd rllqlJ..tiDc tho T""""b1p 1994 Coont;y Aid. Th18
IIOUon w. seconded by c.-ta.loll81'~. n. IIIOUoo
can:ied v1tb ~"..loDlJ;'!!3!!! ........l'Ih'l..
lC'AIrDar
1IlACV1U.~-
JULY 1994
ec-teaJ.ooor .!l!!I:!!!!! - to accopt tho IloIlUQOlll;
r.poru, (Mbllo""., eo""'"1 ODd ZoDiDl. ~. nr.
(Lialluro) aDII PoUe.) tor tho oooth of July... oubdtted,
Th18 IIOtinO W. BOCoDded by c.-t..loner ~ n. 001:100
carried UIII_ly.
Copi.. ot tho report. for tho IIIClnth ot Jul., 1994 .re
In tho Townahip tl1. tor rlt.r.nc..
. 8 .
Aucu.t 8, 1994
I",
II ...-1__....1
,',
, ,
.
l'
'I
Iii
'I
"
'I'
".
/J
~:
,
",
.,
"
"
"
1"1
"
"'-
, ",'
, ,
'If! I
counsel for the zoning Hearing Board of Lower Allen Township and John
Fenstermacher and Intervenor Owner, Robert J, Barkley.
". The parties reached an administrative settlement and
prepa~ed a Stipulation. A copy of the Stipulation is attached hereto
as Exhibit "A".
5. This Stipulation was presented to the Prothonotary for
presentation to the Court on July 8, 1998. At that time, the counsel
for Lower Allen Township was informed that the cases had been
administratively dismissed on June 11, 1998, for lack of good cause.
6. Contrary to the determination of the lack of good cause,
counsel for the parties had negotiated a settlement during this time
and had actively pursued settlement negotiations.
7. It would be unjust and against judicial economy to
administratively purge these matters when a stipulation of counsel has
been reached.
WHEREFORE, counsel for Lower Allen Township respectfully requests
this Honorable Court to reopen these captioned matters to permit the
entry of the Stipulation and Order to discontinue.
METZGER WICKERSHAM KNAUSS & ERB, P.C.
~/1~
Steven ~. Miner, Esquire
3211 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5300
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0300
Solicitors for Lower Allen Township
Dated. July I -::; ,
Document No. 125511
1998.
VERIFICATION
I, STEVEN P. MINER, hereby certify that the facts set forth In the foregoing Pet~lon
to Reopen are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, Information and belief, and
that false statements herein are made subJect to the penalties of 18 Pa, C,S.A. S4904
relating to unsworn falsification to authorities,
~
S~ven p, Miner
----
Dated: July 17, 1998
.
counsel tor the Zoning Hearing Board of Lower Allo!m Township and John
Fenstermacher and Intervenor Owner, Robert J. Barkley,
4. The parties reached an administrative settlement and
prepared a Stipulation, A copy of the Stipulation is attached hereto
as Exhibit "A",
5. This Stipulation was presented to the Prothonotary for
presentation to the Court on July 8, 1998. At that time, the counsel
for Lower Allen Township was informed that the cases had been
administratively dismissed on June II, 1998, for lack of good cause.
6, contrary to the determination of the lack of good cause,
counsel for the parties had negotiated a settlement during this time
and had actively pursued settlement negotiations.
7, It would be unjust and against judicial economy to
administratively purge these matters when a stipulation of counsel has
been reached.
WHEREFORE, counsel for Lower Allen Township respectfully requests
this Honorable Court to reopen these captioned matters to permit the
entry of the Stipulation and Order to discontinue.
Dated, July I :t ,
Document No. 1~5611
METZGER WICKERSHAM KNAUSS & ERB, P,C.
~./2~/
Steven ~, Miner, Esquire
3211 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5300
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0300
Solicitors for Lower Allen Township
1998,
" "
I , r
,
r
It'l , IJ ,,'
'1 i ~ "
,
I",
l,l,l,\ ,
"
,I
"
,
I
"
:,'
" ,
"
"
"
"
;,' _;c,
"
f.'
.
i
t"
\.
~'j
. ~ j ,
"
\'
~._..~
r
,."
r ",'"
(
M'
\ '
fJ
," i ~ "II
',j.
"
~':
"
,
.,
,
,
,
"
"
II
I
'I
I
"
fll
.1
"
r.J I, f'l
, "
~ ' II
FI,
I'
"
,I,"
., '
',d .\ ,.,.".-.",
',! iJ
I',~)
"
1
;
I,'; "
'. "
..
_. \'
....
..~~ _l~...
.
<1"'.".'...1
I "'1:':
I ~,:;:i
;1 t.) 1 Iii I
'jJ' ',' ,'-,
It " .'
.'\f,""':/"'-,,!, ,
I,', "
:I; .
1,',--.
I~r.
I'
I
, 'I
.
, ,
, ,
"I
<.i
m !
III ::
~
~ ~
~li i
~ s .
trngE'
:&'C~j
< e lC 'E
::c II. ~ "
~ € .:z:
~~~
0::
[il:!
t
"
,
ffi
~
:E
~.'
,r
.
~
.'
, ...
,
'-
VERIFICATION
I, STEVEN p, MINER, hereby certify thai the facts sel forth In the foregoing Pelltlon
10 Reopen are Irue and correct 10 the belli of my knowledge, Informallon and belief, and
Ihat false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa, C,S,A, 54904
relating to unsworn falsification 10 authorllles.
~
S6!ven p, Miner
--
Dated: July 17, 1998