HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-05507
~
.
I
~ 1
cr.!
\
j!
i
!
;
..3:
!
i
.
I} i
7 \
i
,
!
rJ I
~
'-
tV
-;z::
,1
J
t"-
c;
Vi
\
~
~
.~
~
~
~
~J
j:{.
~.1
~1
~~
('...
~
lD
,
.~~
~
.,...
,
,
,
.
'1:1
V1
'''-.J
tt: ~
..,.
U'1l .- ~ II) '1
- " ~
:r:: -
l' In
:> ~\ 0 ..sl
.:. ri -.
,"! .
<;) ~ :1l 1:+
G) ,'~j -;.
0... 1!f. ~ ~
...
u.
t.,"" Q
~~~ Z
<
~ '"
o-~~ rIl -
< I-~f;l
. UJ - r
, '" ::!: ~U,J .'"
i~~ ,. UJ ..: <( .;,
:t V "'I-Z"
... 52' _~x",zr.
4-1 I u.. -
i)~ 4-1 ~. ~ ~! u.. og:I:UJI'-
.... o Q .2":[
. ~, 'E
~.~ '" QJ ~ -O:I:::Jw
t2 c- ~~ 1-14-1 <( ~ ,_,,,,z
~8 -l ~o-~-o
8~" "'c2:I:
fJ) ~ . '" <( 0-
~ I.) ul rIl V
H . -
~ > ~ Q
l'J~ -
<
rIl
FRANCIS HEISSE,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
94 -6- 5 C '1
CIVIL TERM
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant
NOT!CE
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend agalnst
the claims set forth in the followlng pages, you must take action
wlthln twenty (20) days after thls Complaint and Notice are
served, by enterlng a written appearance personally or by
attorney and flllng ln writlng wlth the court your defenses or
objectlons to the clalms set forth against you. You are warned
that if you fail to do so the case may proceed wlthout you and a
judgment may be entered against you by the court without further
not lee for any money claimed ln the Complaint or for any other
clalm or relief requested by the Plaintlff. You may lose money
or property or other rlghts lmportant to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU
DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Lawyer Referral Servlce
Court Admlnistrator
Cumberland County Courthouse
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 240-6200
, Esqulre
, SHUFF &
Street
lisle, PA l70l3
(717) 243-6222
Attorney for the Plaintiff
SAIDIS, GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 W. Uigh Slreet
Cllfli~le. fA
FRANCIS HEISSE,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
94-
.5Sc rl
CIVIL TERM
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant
COMPLAINT
AND NOW, comes the Plalntiff Francls Heisse by and through
his attorneys Saldls, Guido, Shuff & Masland and respectfully
avers the followlng:
1. The Plalntlff ls Francls Heisse, an adult indivldual
residing at 423 North progress Avenue, Harrisburg, Dauphln
County, Pennsylvania 17110.
2. The Defendant is Lobar Assoclates, Inc., a
Pennsylvania corporation dolng buslness at 1 Old Mill Road,
Dillsburg, York County, Pennsylvanla 17019.
3. On or about August 3, 1993, the Plalntiff Francis
Helsse, hereinafter "subcontraetor," contraeted with the
Defendant Lobar Associates, Ine., herelnafter "contractor," to
perform work known and described as a New Bathhouse and Pool
Construction for the West Shore Country Club ln Camp Hill,
I
II
Pennsylvanla; a copy of sald contract ("contract") ls attached
hereto and made a part hereof marked as Exhlbit "A".
4 .
Pursuant to sald eontract, the subcontractor was to
perform varlous items of work as more fully deseribed under
Article II of said contract.
5. Also pursuant to said contract, provlded all this work
was to be done, Artlcle IV of said contraet provlded for a
payment to the subcontractor of One Hundred Slxty Four Thousand
Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 ($7,~00.00) Dollars;
e. As nelther a wooden wall nor dlrtwall was provided by
the contractor at the shallow end of the pool,
subcontractor was asked to construct a plywood wall
against which the gunite could be shot, at a cost to the
subcontractor of Two Thousand Nine Hundred and 00/100
($2,900.00) Dollars; and
f. The contractor requested subcontractor to run a sewer
line for a cost to the subcontractor of Three Hundred
Flfty and 00/100 ($350.00) Dollars.
9. Subcontractor completed all work under sald written
contract as well as the additional work per oral contract by
April 11, 1994.
COUNT I
BREECH OF CONTRACT
10. Paragraphs 1 through 9 are incorporated herein by
reference as if fully set forth at length.
11. Pursuant to the wrltten contract, the change order,
and the additlonal work performed by the oral contract, the
contractor was to pay the subcontractor One Hundred Ninety
Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty Nine and 00/100
($197,769.00) Dollars.
SAIDIS, GUIDO,
snUFF &
MASLAND
26 w. High 5(II:el
ClU"lisle.PA
12. The contraetor paid to the subcontractor a total of
One Hundred Thirty Four Thousand and 00/100 ($134,000.00)
Dollars, leaving a balance due of Sixty Three Thousand Seven
Hundred Slxty Nine and 00/100 ($63,769.00) Dollars.
13. Despite repeated demands, contractor has paid neither
3
SAIDIS, GUIDO,
SHUFF &
l\IASLAND
26 W Hijh SUect
Cl1llidc. fA
ii
!!
:1
I' the Thirty Three Thousand Nlne Hundred Nlneteen ($33,919.00)
,I
!I
II
I
!
I
Dollars remalnlng under the wrltten contract, nor the Twenty
Nlne Thousand Elght Hundred Flfty and 00/100 ($29,850.00)
Dollars under the oral agreement ln request for additional
work, for a total unpald of Slxty Three Thousand Seven Hundred
Sixty Nlne and 00/100 ($63,769.00) Dollars.
l4. Contraetor breached both the oral and written eontraet
by falllng to perform lts end of the agreement by final
payment, despite the fact that subeontractor completed its work
and fulfllled all of its obligatlons under the agreement.
WHEREFORE, the subcontractor/Plaintiff demands judgment ln
favor of the Plaintlff and agalnst the contractor/Defendant ln
the amount of Slxty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Slxty Nine and
00/100 ($63,769.00) Dollars, plus lnterest and costs of this
sult.
COUNT II
UNJUST ENRICHMENT/QUANTUM MERUIT
15. Paragraphs 1 through 14 are incorporated herein by
reference as lf fully set forth at length.
16. The addltlonal work as completed by the subeontractor
was not part of the orlginal contract but was an oral agreement
made by both partles after the wrltten agreement was entered
lnto.
17. The subcontractor completed the work pursuant to all
requests by the Defendant, as outllned previously in paragraph
8 a through f.
18. The eontraetor was pald for the entire origlnal
4
ASSOCIATES
S1lJ1.C.QNJJ.!,
AGREEMENT BEnVEEN CONTRACTOR & SUBCONTRACTOR
sunCONTRACT #3081-13152-0510
AGREIWENT MADE AS OF TIlE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST IN TIlE )'Ejl! OF NlNETUN HUNDRED AND 93.
BETWEEN TIlE CONT1lACTOR: WBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
I OLD MILL ROAD
P.O. BOX 432
DllLSBURG, PA 17019-0432
AND TIlE SUBCONT1lACTOR: FRANCIS IIEISSE
423 N. PROGRESS AVE.
IIARRISBURG, PA 17109
TEI.EPlIONE: (717) 545.3427
IVITNESSETII, 17UT TIlE SUBCONT1lACTOR AND COtmtiCTOR FOR TIlE CONSIDE:RA170N I/EJlEJNAFTER NAMED AGRE( AS
FOU.OWS:
ARTICLE I. TIlE SUBCONT1lACTOR AGREES TO FURNlSII AU. MATERlA.L AND PERFORM AU. WOR/C AS DESC1lJBED IN AR71CU!
1I11I:RE0F FOR:
NEW BATII1IOUSE & POOL CONSTRUCTION
WEST SIIORE COUNTRY CLUB
CAMP II1U, PA
FOR LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC. IN ACCORDANCE W/TI/ 17I1S AGREEMENT'. TIlE AGREEMENT BE7WEEN TIlE OWMJI ..
CONT1lACTOR, " IN ACCORDANCE WI77I TIlE GENERAL CONDmONS Of TIlE CONT1lACT. SUPPLEMENTARY GENERAL
CONDmONS, TIlE DRAW/NGS, SPEClFlCl710NS, AND ADDENDA PREPARED BY II. EDWARD BUCK & ASSOCIATES
HEREINAFTER ClUED TIIEARCHmCT OR OWNER 'SA rmlORlZED AGENT. AU. OF WII/CII DOCUMENTS. SIGNED BYT1/E PAR71ES
TIIERETO OR ID.ImFIED BY TIlE ARCllmCT OR OWNUI'S AUT//ORlZED AGENT. FORM A PA./lTOF A CONT1lACT BETWEEN T1IE
CONT1lACTOR AND TIIEOIVNERDATED 16 JULY 1993." III:REBY BECOME A PARTOFTIIISCONT1lACT," I/EJlEJNIlEFERRED
TO AS TIlE CON/RACT DOCUMENTS. " SIIAIL BE MADE A VAIUBLE TO TIlE SUBCONT1lACTOR UPON HlS REQUEST PRIOR TO AND
ANYTTME SUBSEQUENT TO SIGNING 17I1S SUBCONT1lACT.
ARTICLE II. TIlE SUBCONT1lACTOR" TIlE CONI7lACTOR AGREE TllA.T TIlE MATER/AU AND EQUIPMENT TO BE I'lJRN/SHED
" WOR/C TO BE PERFORMED ARE COMPlETE AS REQUIRED AND IN Sl7UCT ACCORDANCE WI77I PUNS, SPECIFICl710NS,
AMENDMENTS, AND/OR ADDENDA" AS FOllOWS:
A. APPUCABLE SECTIONS OF DIVISION J . GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
B. CONSTRUCTION OF SWIM.IfING AND WADING POOLS COMPLETE AS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE
WITII PENNSYLVANItl STATE REGUUTIONS AND ACCORDING TO PUNS & SPECIFICATIONS
PROVIDED, AS AMENDED IN YOUR LEITER OF 29 APRIL 1993 AND UTER DELETION OF TIlE
IIEATERS ON TilE ORIGINAL SPECIFICATIONS WllICII DECREASED TilE PRICE FROM TIIAT
SIIOWN DN YOUR LEITER DATED 29 APRIL 199] INCLUDING TilE FOLLOWING:
I. TilE SWIMMING AND WADING POOLS WIll BE CONSTRUCTED EXACTLY AS SIIOWN ON
BLUEPRINT.
E.'JIfIHT "A"
~J!J I ()fj) .111/1. IWtlJ 1'0 /lOX ./.12
"_:)'" /JI/I.l'm '/II; NS,\',"I 170Wn,f12
, "
IF! /-,-/.: i' l)-:"'~-
.'- I \" J -, ", .! l' 'J I~:'
(-
r
1.
2. TIlE EQUIPMENT SPECIFIED II'IU BE C//ANGED AS FOUOIVS: SFV 78.78" //YRATE SAND
FILTER II'ITIIOlTT AlTTOMATIC BACKWAS//. m'o (2) C//EMODATA MODEL 400 CONTROUERS
AND FOUR (4) STENNER PUMPS FOR AUTOMATIC C//EMICAL CONTROL OF BOT// POOU.
AUTOMATIC FlU FEATURE //AS BEEN DELETED FROM ORIGINAL BID.
J. nVELVE (/2) STAINLESS STEEL RECESSED IVAU STEPS //A VE BEEN DELETED. T//EY IVIU
BE REPUCED BY BUILT.IN CERAMIC TILE STEPS.
4. FWIV CONTROL VALVES //AVE BEEN DELETED.
S. IV//EN SITE WORK I.E. EXCAVATION, UNDER.DRAINS, AND STONE ARE COMPLETE, YOUR
FIRM WIU INSTALL AND TEST AU PIPES W/1/C//IVIU BE PVC SC//EDULE 40 'AND SIZED IN
ACCORDANCE WIT// BLUEPRINTS. EST/.IfATED TIME ONE (I) IVEEK. -
6. 1V1/1LE T//E WOOD FORMS FOR T//E POOL WAUS ARE BEIliu 7N.HAUED BY OT//ERS, YOUR
FlR,1 II'IU OMMENCE INSTAlliNG REBAR, URODSo.VI2" CENTERs, B I :US, OVER
WAILS AND FLOOR OF T//E SW/.II,IfING POOL: GRADE 60 STEEL IVIU BE USED. IV//EN
STEEL INSTALLATION IS CO.lfPLETE, T//E POOL FLOOR IVIU BE INSTAUED . EST/.IIATED
T/.IIE TIIREE (1) WEEKS.
7. SIIOTCRETE-GUNITE SW/.IIMING POOL II'AUS AND GurrER IVIU BE INSTAUED .
EST/.IIATED '(IME nvo (2!''!yEEKS-
8. WADING POOL ROUG// StRUCTURE WIU BE INSTAUED . ESTIMATED T/.IIE ONE (llIVEEK.
9. TILE WIU BE INSTAlLED AND POOLS PLASTERED. EST/.IIATED TIME nvo (2)1VEEKS,
-
SPECIAl. REOUIREMENTS:
1. DUE TO POSSIBLE COMMUNICATION CONFUCTS, T//E OWNER & LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
REQUIRE TIIAT AU CORRESPONDENCE, IVRITTEN & VERBAL, FROM SUBCONTRACTORS &
MATERIAL SUPPUERS BE DIRECTED T//ROUG// LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC. IN UEU OF DIRECT
CORRESPONDENCE WITIl T//E OWNER & PROJECT ENGINEERSIARCl11TECT. IN ADDITION, ALL
CLARIFICATIONS SIIOULD BE FORWARDED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC. VIA FAX OR MAIL IN
UEU OF VERBAL COMMUNICATION.
2. FIELD MEASUREMENTS & VERIFICATION ARE T//E RESPONS1BIUTY OF T1/1S SUBCONTRACTOR.
REVlEIV OF SITE AND FOUNDATION CONDITIONS IS A REQUIREMENT FOR T/1/S CONTRACT.
J. //A VE MATERIAl.S DEUVERED W//EN REQUIRED. NO STORAGE IS A VA/LABLE ON JOBSITE .IF
DEUVERY IS MANDATORY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, TI//S SUBCONTRACTOR IVIU I/AVE TO
PROVIDE REQUIRED STORAGE FACIliTIES. PJ/ASED PROJECTS SIIOULD I/A VE MATERIALS
S/1/PPED 1M PI/ASES UNLESS STORAGE IS PROVIDED.
4. PROTECTION OF MATERIAl.S UNTIL OIl'NER.ARC//ITECT ACCEPTANCE.
S. MATERIAL SAFETY DATA S//EETS ARE A REQUIREMENT FOR TI//S PROJECT & MUST BE
SUBMITTED WIT/1/N FOURTEEN (14) DArs OF T/JE SUBCONTRACT DATE AND PRIOR TO
MATERIAU ARRIVING ON TIlE JOBSITE.
6. SUBMISSION OF OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUALS TO BE MADE WITI/ INITIAL
SUBMI1TAl.S.
7. BY EXECUTION OF TI//S SUBCONTRACT AGREEMENT, YOUR FIRM AGREES T/JAT IT IVIU
STRICTLY COMPLr IV/T/I ALL OSI/A REGUUTIONS AND MSDS REQUIREMENTS ON T1/1S PROJECT.
IT IS ALSO T//E RESPONSIBIUTY OF YOUR PERSONNEL TO FOUOIV ANY INSTRUCTIONS OR
DIRECflVES GIVEN BY OUR PROJECf SUPERINTENDENT, STEVE DlUER, REGARDING SAFETY ON
T/JE PROJECf. ANY FINES ISSUED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC. AS A RESULT OF }'OUR FIRM'S
NEGUGENCE OR NON.COMPUANCE II'IU BE T//E RESPONSIBIUTY OF rOUR FIRM. T/JE
SUBCONTRACfOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AU OSI/A REGUUTIONS INCLUDING VERIFIED SAFETY
COND/T/ONS OF OT/1ER TRADES.
8. Tll1S PROJECf UAS A FIRM COMPLETION DATE OF.AS PER A1TACI/ED SCI/EDULE WIT/J NO TIME
EXTENSIONS PERMlITED. ALL MATERIAl.S AND IVORK SCI/EDULES MUST BE COORDINATED
VERY CLOSELY 1I'/T/1 OUR PROJECf SUPERINTENDENT, STEVE DIllER, AT TIlE SITE TO MEET
TIlE REQUIRED CO,IfPLET/ON D,11E. DAY TO DAY SCI/EDULE ADJUSTMENTS BY T1/1S
I~
(
r
J.
SUBCONTRACTOR ARE A REQUIREMENT BY TIllS SUBCONTRACTOR TOACCO.lf.lfODATE VARIOUS
PROJECT INTANGIBLES (WEATIlER, ETC.) TO MAINTAIN TilE FINM. COMPLETION DATE.
MULTIPLE S1I1FTS & OVERTIME ARE A REQUIREMENT OFT1I1S PROJECT AS NECESSARY TOMEET
SCIlEDULE REQUIREMENTS AND/OR LOBAR ASSOCIATES' SUPERINTENDENT'S INSTRUCTIONS.
9. DAILY REMOVAL & DISPOSAL OF RELATED DEBRIS OFF SrrE.
10. PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SUPERVISION & MANPOWER FOR SCIlEDUUNG, RECEIVING, UNLOADING,
& DISTRIBUTION OF AU MATERIAL DEUVERlES.
11. ALL TESTING AND SUBMISSION OF REPORTS ARE A REQUIREMENT OF T111S SUBCONTRACT TO
ASSURE QUAUTY OF INSTAIL4TIONS.
12. ALL LAYOUT & COORDINATION COSTS ASSOCIATED wrrll T1I1S SUBCONTRACT A.RE A
SUBCONTRACT REQUIREMENT.
13. ALL SUBCONTRACTORS MUST PARTICIPATE IN A 1-1l0UR WEEKLY JOBSrrE CLEAN. UP EACIl
FRIDA Y.
ARTICLE Ill. TIME IS OF mE ESSENCE AND mE SUBCONrRACTOR AGREES TO COMMENCE AND TO COMPu:n; mE WOR/(
AS DESCRIBED IN ARTICLE II AS FOUOWS:
A. All WOR/( TO BE PERFORMED IN :muCT ACCORDANCE wml LOBAR ASSOC1A7!"S. INC. PROGRESS SCHEDI1lE &
DlREC170NS. NON-COMPlJANCE wrm LOBAR ASSOQA7!"S.INC. PROGRESS SCHEDULE AND/OR INITIWC170NS /JA YRESULT
IN TERMINATION OF 11I1S AGREEMENT AND/OR BACIt CHARGES. ANV PENALTIES OR DAMAGES ASSESSED TO LOBAR
ASSOQA7!"S.INC. AS A RESULT OF mls SUBCONrRACTOR WIll BE 11/E RESPONSIBIUTY OF 11/IS SUBCONrRACTOR.
B. COMPl.ET10N DATTi FOR mls PROJECT IS 'AS PER ATTACIlED SCIlEDULE wml UQUIDATED DAMAGES OF ..
PER CAlENDAR DAY. ANV UQUIDATED DAMAGES ASSESSED TO LOBAR ASSOC1A7!"S. INC. AS A RESULT OF 110S
SUBCONrRACTOR II7IL BE 11/E RESPONSIBIUTY OF 11/IS SUBCONT1lACTOR.
"AS ASSESSED.
NO TIME EXTENSION OF mls CONT1lACT WIll BE RECOGMZED wrmOUTT1IE WRlTT'EN CONSENT OF TTlE CON11lACTOR WlIICH
CONSENT SIIAU. NOT BE wmlllELD UN1lEASONABLY CONSISTTiNT wrm ARTICLE X-4 OF mls CONrRACT. SUBJECT TO TTlE
ARB/11/ATlON PROVISIONS HEREIN PROVIDED.
ARTICLE rv. mE CONT1lACTOR AGREES TO PAY mE SUBCONT1lACTOR FOR 11/E PERFORMANCE OF THIS WOR/( TTlE
FOlLOIVlNG SU/J: ONE IlUNDRED SIXTY.FOUR TIl0USAND, FOUR IlUNDRED, NINETEEN DOLLARS
($164,419.00) ,INCURRENT FUNDS. SUBJECT TO ADDmONS AND DEDUcnONS FOR ClIANGES AS /JAY BE AGREED UPON IN
WRJT1NG. & TO MAKE MONT1lLY PAYMENr.I ON ACCOUNT mEREOF IN ACCORDANCE wrm ARTla.E X. SEC170NS 2(}.2J
INUUSlVE.
A. MONTIILY PROGRESS PAYMENT CONDmONS - TWO (1) COPlES TO LOBAR ASSOC1A7!"S. INC. OFFICE BY 2011/ OF EACH
MONT1l. PA YMENT OF 11/1S INVOICE TO BE AS FOlLOWS:
NET lESS JO~ IlETAlNAGE WIlL BE PAID JO/41 DA YS SUBJECT TO ARCI/JT1iCT-ENGlNEERlOWNER APPROVAL & RECEJPT OF
PAYMENT BY LOBAR ASSOClATEr.INC. FOR WOR/( CO/JPlETTiD ON T1IlS SUBCON11lACT. NO OT1lER CIlARGES SUCH AS
1NTF:JlEST. CARRY/NG ClIARGES. TAXES, ETC. WIll BE HONORED UMESS JNDIClTED 011/ERII7SE OR AS AGREED TO BY
B011/ PARTIES IN WRi11NG. IlETAlNAGE TO BE 1lELE.ASED UPON APPROVAL FROM ARCHfTTiCT AND OWNER. AND RECEJPT
OF MA'TERLlL & LABOR PROOF OF PAYMENT' 1lELE.ASES. /JONT1l PAYMENT APPUClTlONS TO BE SUBMl77ED ON ALl
DOCUME~ Gm & G70J OR EQUAL FORM SHOWING PERCENT COMPlETTiD EACH /JONT1l.
NO PARTLIL OR FINAL PAYME~ WIll BE /JADE wrmOUT PROOF OF /JAT/iRL{L PAYME~ UNlESS SPEQAL
ARRANGEME~ ARE MADE W/T1/ LOBAR ASSOC1A7!"S. INC.
IF SUBCONrRACTOR FAILS TO /JEET11/E SUBCONrRACT REQUlRE/JENT'S.1lU. PAYlJE~ DUE INUUDING OUTSTANDING
SEPARATTi ORDERS /JAY BE HELD UNTIL CORRECTTVE: AC710NS ARE TAKEN.
ARTICLE V. F/Ioill. PAYMENT SIIAlL BE DUE WHEN WOR/( DESCJlJBED IN 11/IS CONrRACT JS FUllY COMPlETTiD AND
PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE W/T1/ 11/E CONrRACT DOCUME~. & PAYMENT TO BE CONSISTENT wrm ARTICLE N & AR11CLE
X. SEC710NS 1&, 20-21 INa.USlVF: OF 11/IS CONT1lACT.
BEFORE ISSUANCE OF ANV PAYMENT. mE SUBCONrRACTOR. IF REQUIRED, SIUlL SUBMrr EVIDENCE SA11SFACTORY TO 11/E
CONTRACTOR TTtiT All PAmous, MATERIAL BIlLS. & All KNOWNINDEBTEDNESS CON~E= IVIT1I11/E SUBCONrRACTOR'S
,r....-
r
~
WORK ILl VE BEEN SA nsnED.
ARTICLE W. PE/lFOR.I/ANCE d. PAYMENT BONDS.
(N/A) SUBMIT A PAYMENT & PERFORMANCE BOND.
ARTICLE Vl1. TEMPORARY SITE F.laUT/ES.
A. n/ls SUBCOtmlACroR SIUU. PROVIDE AU. TEMfIORARY SITE FAaUT/ES AS RE(JU1RED OR AS NECESSARY ro PERFORM
HIS WORK.
B. DEBRfS RE.UTUJ TO mE WORK fNaUDED IN mlS SUBCONTllACT SIUU. BE REMOVED d. D1SPOSED OF BY n/ls
SUBCONTllAcroR. BACK CllA/WES SlUU BE MADE FOR NON.COMPUANCE.
ARTICLE W11. fNSURANCE
UNI.ESS omERWlSE PROV1DED HEREfN. mE SUBCOtmlACTOR SlUU IfAVE A D1RECT UAB1U1Y FOR mE Am OF HIS
EMPLOYEES d. AGENTS Fon WflfCff ffE lS LEGAUY RESPONSIBLE. AND mE SUBCOtmlAcroR SIUU. NOT BE RE(JU1RED ro
ASSUME mE UABIUTY FOR mE Am OF ANY omENS.
PRfOR ro STAR17/IG WORK. mE lNSURANCE RE(JU1RED TO BE FURNfSffED SIfAU BE OBTAfNED FROM A RESPONSIBLE COMPANY
OR COMPAMES TO PROVIDE PROPER d. ADE(JUATE COVERAGE & SA 17SFAcroRY EVIDENCE WlU BE FURMSHED ro mE
CON1RACTOR 71/AT mE SUBCOtmlAcroR HAS COMPUED Wlm mE REQU1REMENTS AS STATUJ IN n/ls SECflON.
A. PROVIDE nvo (2) INSURANCE CERTIF/CATES IN ACCORDANCE WIT1l PROJECT INSURANCE
REQUIREMENTS. CERTIFICA TES MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITI/ ANY WORK.
ARTICLE IX. JOB CONDmONS
( X ) A COMPLETE UST OF ALL MATER/AL SUPPUERS & SECOND TIER SUBCONTRACTORS WITII
TI/EIR ADDRESSES AND TELEPI/ONE NUMBERS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO LOBAR
ASSOCIATES, INC. WIT1lIN FIFTEEN (IS) DAYS FROM DATE OF SIGNING OF AGREEMENT BY
SUBCONTRACTOR.
( X ) COST BREAKDOWN FOR LABOR & MATER/AL MUST BE SUBMmED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES.
INC. WIT11IN FIFTEEN (IS) DAYS FROM DATE OF SIGNING OF AGREEMENT BY
SUBCONTRACTOR.
() SUBMIT PAYROU. REPORTS WIT11IN SEVEN (1) DAYS WEEK.ENDING TO T11IS OFF/CE.
MONT//LY PAYMENT ESTIMATES CANNOT BE APPROVED WITI/Om PAYROU. REPORTS BEING
SUBMmED.
( X ) PROWDE TEN (10) COPIES OF AU.. SUBMmAL DATA EXACTLY AS REQU/RE.'D IN
SPECIFICATIONS NO LATER T//AN 10 AUGUST 1993. YOUR FIRM MAY BE IIELD UABLE FOR
DELAY COSTS IF SUBMmALS ARE NOT MADE AS REQUIRED AND WIT11IN TilE REQUESTED
TIME FRAME.
( X ) E.E.O. & AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ARE A PART OF T11IS SUBCONTRACT. EXECmE AND
RETURN CERTIFICATION WITII CONTRACT.
( X ) AU.. WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITll LOBAR ASSOCIATES. INC.
SAFETY PROGRAM.
() USE OF FOREIGN STEEL & ALUMINUM PRODUCTS IS PR011lBITED ON T11IS PROJECT.
ARTICLE X. fN ADDmON ro mE FOREGOING PROVISIONS Tf/E PAR17ES ALSO AGREE 71/AT mE SUBCOh71lAcroR SIfAll:
J. BE BOUND ro 17/E COtmlAcroR BymE TERMS OF mE CONTllACT DOCUMENTS d. T1IIS AGREEJJENT, d. ASSUME roWARD
mE COtmlAcroR AU mE OBUGA170NS d. RESfIONSIBIUT/ES THAT mE COtmlAcroR, BY mOSE DOCUMENTS ASSUMES
TOWARD mE OWNER, AS APPUCABLE TO T1IIS SUBCOtmlACT.
2. SUB.l/fTTO mE COtmlAcroR AflPUCA170NS FOR PAYMENT AT SUCH 17MES S17PUUTUJ lNAfl17CU: tv SOAS ro ENABLE
mE CONTllAcrofl TO APPLY FOR PAYMENT. lF PAYMENTS ARE MADE ON VALUA170NS OF WORfC DONE, TIlE
SUBCOtmlAcroR SHAU, BEFORE Tf/E FIRST APPUCA170N, SUB.l/fT TO mE COtmlACTOR A SCHEDULE OF VALUES OF
(.
r
~
Tm: V.IRlOUS PARTS Of mE WORK. AGGREGA77Nfi mE TOTAL AS REQUIRED BY mE OWNER, AhV. If REQUIRED.
SUNORTED BY SUCI/ EVIDENCE.iS TO ITS CORRECTNESS AS mE COIVTRACTrJR ~/.iY DIRECT. 17/1.1 SCI/EDUlE. WI/EN
APPROI'ED BY mE CONT1l.ICTOR. .II/AU BE USED AS A BASIS fOR CERl1f1CATES fOR PAYMENT, UMLSS" BE fOUND TO
BE IN ERROR. IN APPLYlhn fOR PAYMENT. mE SUBCOIVTRACTOR SI/.IU SUBM" A STATEME/{/' BASED UPON 17/1.1
SCI/EDUlE. If PAYME/VTS ARE M.WE ON ACCOU/{/' Of MATER/.US NOT INCORPORATED IN T71E WORK BIIT DWVERED
AhV Sll/TABLY STORED ATT7IE SITE. OR AT SOMEomER WCA770N AGREED UPON IN WRl17NG, SUCI/ PAYMENTS SIIAU
BE IN ACCORDANCE \VIT7I T71E n:RAIS & COhvmONS Of mE CONI'R.ICT DOCUMENTS.
J. PAY fOR AU MATER/ALS & UBOR USED IN. OR INCONNEcnON wml. T71E PERFORMANCE Of 171/.1 COtmlACT. TllROUGI/
T71E PERIOD COVERED BY I'REVlOUS I'AYMENTS RECElVF.D fROM mE COtmlACTOR & FURNlSII SA 77SfA CTORY EVIDENCE
WI/EN REQUESTED BY T71E COIVTRACTOR. TO VERIfY COMPUANCE \VIT7I mE ABOVE REQUIREMEf{f'S.
4" MAKE AU CUIMS fOR EX11l.iS, fOR EX'TENSIONS Of 17ME. & fOR DAMAGE fOR DELAYS OR OT71ER\VISE, PROMPTLY TO
mE COIVTRACTOR CONSISTENT "rol mE COIVTRACT DOCUMENTS.
J. TAKE NECESSARY PREC,lUTWN 10 I'ROPERLY PROTECT mE flh7SI/ED WORK Of omER TRADES.
6. KEEP mE BUIUJING & PREMISES CLEAN AT AU 77MES Of DEBRIS ARISING 01lT Of T71E OPERA770N Of T71IS
SUBCOIVTRACT. mE SUBCOIVTRACTOR SILIU NOTBE I/EU> RESPONSIBLL fOR UNCLEAN CONDmONS CAUSED BYOmER
COIVTRACTORS OR SUBCONT1l.ICTORS. UNlESS o mER WISE PROVIDED fOR.
7. COMPLY WIT7I AU STATUTORY AhV/OR COIVTRAC7IJAL SAfETY REQUlREMEf{f'S APPLYING TO /liS WORK AND/OR I,VITIA TED
BY T71E COtmlACTOR, AhV SIIAU REI'ORT IVlmlN mREE IJ) DAYS TO mE COtmlACTOR ANY INJURY TO mE
SUBCOIVTRACTOR'S EAIPLOYEES AT T71E SITE Of mE pROJE(T.
BA. NOT ASSIGN 17/1.1 SUBCONT1l.lCT OR ANY AMOUNTS DUE OR TO BECOME DUE mEREUNDER \VImOIlT mE WRITTEN
CONSENT Of mE COIVTRA CTOR.
BB. NOR SUBCONT1lACT mE WI/OlE Of 171/.1 SUBCOtmlACT WIT7IOI1T mE WRITTEN CONSE/{/' Of T71E COtmlACTOR.
8C. NOR fURT7IER SUBCOIVTRACT I'OR770NS Of 17/1.1 SUBCOtmlACT WIT7IOI1T WRITTEN N077f1CA770N TO T71E COIVTRACTOR
WilEN SUCII /l011f1CA770N IS REQUESTED BY mE COtmlACTOR.
9" GUAR.INTEE /liS WORK AGAINST AU DEFECTS Of MATERIALS AND/OR WORKMANS/IIp AS CAUED fOR IN T71E PUNS.
SPECIf/CA770NS, & ADDEhVA, OR If NO GUARANTEE IS CAUED fOR. T71EN fOR A pER/OD Of ONE II) YfAR fROM T71E
DATES Of pARl1AL OR TOTAL ACCEPTANCE Of mE SUBCOtmlACTOR'S WORK BY mE OWNER.
)0.1. NO SEPARA'TE UNDERSTANDI/lG OR AGREEMENTS Of ANY KIND \VIU BE ENTERED )/{/'O BY T71E SUBCOIVTRACTOR & T71E
OWNER AND/OR /liS ARC/IITECT Of AGENTS RELmVE TO ANY ORIGINAL OR EXTRA WORK CONm.IPUTED BY 171/.1
AGREEMENT UMLSS T71E SAME IS fiRST APPROVED IN WRITING BY COIVTRACTOR.
JOB. SUBCONTRACTOR SIIAU INSURE 17IAT AU SUBCONT1l.ICTORS. EAIPWYEES. & SUPPUERS. AT AU 77MES. ARE PAID AU
AMOU/VTS DUE IN CONNEcnON W/T11 T71E PERFORMANCE Of 1711.1 SUBCONTRACT. AFTER T71E fiRST pA~IE/{/,
IIEREUhVER. CONTRACTOR SIIAU IIAVE T71E RIG/IT TO IVIT7/110UJ ANY SUBSEQUENT 1'.1 1~IENTS UNlIL SUBCONTRACTOR
SUBMITS EVIDENCE SA 77SfA CTORY TO COIVTRACTOR 17IAT AUAMOU/VTS OWEDINCONNEcnON W/T11 PERFORMANCE Of
171/.1 SUBCOlmlACT IIAVE BEEN PAID. fURT7IER. SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES 77IAT COtmlACTOR MAY PAY AU PERSONS
W/IICI/IIA VE NOT BEEN PAID T71E MOh7ES DUE mEM INCONNEcnON \VIT7I 17/1.1 SUBCOtmlACT WIIET/IER OR NOT A UEN
lIAS BEEN fiLED. & SUBCONTRACTOR SIIAU. TO mE EXTE/{/' 17LIT CONTRACTOR lIAS /lOT RECOVERED SAID AMOUNTS
PURSUANT TO W/TI/IIOLDING. PAY SAID AMOU/VTS TO CONTRACTOR UPON DE.IIAND. SUBCOtmlACTOR SIIAU. ALSO
IMMEDIATELY REIMBURSE COIVTRACTOR fOR ANY AMOUNTS PAID UNDER CONT1lACTOR'S PAYMENT BOND IN CONNEC170N
\VIm 171/.1 SUBCONTRACT & INDEMh7f1ED BY CONT1l.lCTOR. IN T71E EVE/{/' CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PAY OR
IhVEAIh7fY ANY PERSONS HEREUNDER. SUBCONTRACTOR SIIAU IMMEDIATELY REIMBURSE mE CONT1lACTOR fOR T71E
fUU COST T71EREOf. INUUDING ATTORNEY'S fEES.
10C. SI/OULD SUBCONT1lACTOR AT ANY 77ME fAIL TO SUPPLY A SUffiClE/{/' NUMBER Of SKlUED WORKMEN OR A SUffiCIENT
QUANlITY OF MATER/ALS OF PROPER QUAUTY. OR FAIL IN ANY RESPECT TO PROSECIJ'TE mE WORK COVERED BY m)s
SUBCONTRACTOR W/T11 PROMl'TNESS & DIUGENCE. OR FAIL IN T71E PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF T71E AGREEMENTS HEREiN
CONTA)NED. OR SI/OULD ANY WORKMEN PERFORMING WORK COVERED BY 17/1.1 SUBCONT1lACT ENGAGE IN A ST7llKE OR
OT71ER WORK STOPPAGE. OR CEASE TO WORK DUE TO P1CKE77NG OR OT71ER SUCI/ AC17V/TY. CONT1lACTOR MAY IN ANY
OF SUCI/ EVENTS. A TITS Op770N. W/T11011T PREJUDICE TO ANY OT71ER REMEDIES" MA Y IIAVE. AFTE/l FORTY-ElGIIT (48)
IIOURS WRITTEN /1077CE TO SUBCONTRACTOR, PROVIDE ANY SUCI/ UBOR AND MATER/ALS AND DEDUCT T71E COST
T71EREOF FROM ANY MOh7ES T71EN DUE OR T71EREAFTE/l TO BECOME DUE SUBCONTRACTOR; AhV roRT7IER. IN ANY Of
SUCII EVENTS. CONTRACTOR MAY AT ITS omON. W/T11011T PREJUDICE TO ANY OT71ER REMEDIES" MAY IIAVE.
TERMINATE T71E EAIPLOYMENT OF SUBCONTRACTOR'S fiRM FOR T71E WORK UNDER 171/.1 SUBCOtmlACT & SI/ALLIlAVE
T71E RlGIIT TO EtrTER UPON T71E PREMISES AND TAKE POSSESSION, fOR T71E PURPOSE OF COMPlETING T71E WORK
HEREUNDER, Of AU T71E MATERIALS, TOOLS. & EQUlPME/{/' T71EREON. & TO flN/SI/ T71E WORK & PROVIDE T71E
MATER/ALS T71EREFORE ElmER W/T111TS OWN EMPLOYEES OR OT71ER SUBCONTRACTORS; AND IN CASE OF SUCI/
DISCONllNUANCE OF T71E EAlpWYMENT BY COtmlACTOR. SUBCOtmlACTOR SIIAU NOT BE ElVT11l.E.D TO RECEIVE ANY
FURT7IER PAYMENTS UNDER T71E SUBCONTRACT OR OT71ERWISE. BIIT SIIAU. NEVERT7IEU:SS REMAIN lJABlE FOR ANY
DAMAGES WII/CII CONTRACTOR INCURS; IF mE EXPENSES INCURRED BY mE CONT1l.ICTOR IN COMPlETING T71E WORK
SILIU EXCEED T71E UNPAID BAUNCE. SUBCONTRACTOR .II/AU PA Y T71E DIFfERE/lCE TO T71E COtmlACTOR ALONG \VIT7I
ANYOT71ER DAMAGES INCURRED BY CONT1l.1CTOR AS T71E RESULT OF SUBCONT1lACTOR'S DEFAULT. COtmlACTOR SIIAU
ILl VE A UEN UPON AU MATER/ALS. TOOLS. & APPUANCES TAKEN POSSESSION Of TO SECURE mE PAY/lIE/{/, T71ENEOF.
SUBCONTRACTOR SIWL BE UABLE 10 COlflR.ICTOR DUE 10 mE fAILURE Of SUBCOlflR.ICTOR'S pERFOR.\IANCE.
6.
SUBCONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO KEEP TIlE PROaRESS OF m WORK up TO 11/AT OF CONTRACT OF OTIIER TRADES, OR
TIlE FAILURE TO EXECUTE ITS WORK AS DIRECTED BY CONT/tI'70R.
/DD. SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES 11UT wI/EN 11/E CONTRACT DOCUME:NTS, SPEOFlCA110NS, OR DRAWINGS REQUIRE.
SUBCONTRACTOR WIlL COMPLY WTT11 ANY APfUCABIL STAn: OR FEDEIlAL PREVAIUNG WAGE LAW AS WEU. AS ANY
RUILS OR REGULA110NS PROMUWA7'E:D 71IEREUNDER. 11/E SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES TO COMPLY W/71/ AlL SUCH
7C:/U/S" CONDmONS WI/ICI/ ARE APfUCABLE TO 77I1S SUBCONTRACT AND TO INDEMhTFY" HOW T1IE CONTRACTOR
IlARMlLSS FOR ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY WTTI/ SUCH CONOmoNS.
10E. SUBCONTRACTOR WlILIlAV/1 AC7VAL RESPONSIBIU1Y FOR COMPLYING W/71/ 1IIE STANDARDS sa FOR1II IN1IIE RULES
"REGULA110NS PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO T1IE CONS11lurnON S.IFETY ACT/<<J U.S"C. 127)" 01llER OSIIA RELA7'E:D
PROVISIONS TO 11/E EXTliNT APPUCABIL TO 77IE SUBCONTRACTOR'S POR770N OF 77IE WORK" SUBCONTRACTOR SIIAU.
INDEMhTFY AND SAVE 11/E CONTltICTOR I/ARMLESS INCONNErnON 11/EREW/71/ FROM ANY AND AlL DAMAGE INCLUDING
ATTORNEY'S FEES, COST OF CORRECTTVE ArnON, FINES, E:TC.
n. AND DOES I/EREBY AGREE 77UT11/E CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT WIlL BE AVAILABIL TO 71IE SUBCONTRACTOR OM-YAT
77IE CONTRACTOR'S DISCRmON" ON MU7VAILY SA 11SFACTORY TUMS.
12. FURNISI/ PER/ODIC PROGRESS REPORTS OF 11/E: WOR)( AS ~f[rroAILY AGREED INCLUDING 11/E PROGRESS OFMAT1:RJAUi
OR EQUIPME:NT UNDER 77I1S AGREDIE:NT 77UT MAY BE: IN 11/E COURSE: OF PREPARA110N OR MANUFAC7VRE.
IJ. MAKE ANY" AIL C/LINGE:S OR DEVlA110NS FROM 11/E ORIGINAL PLANS" SPE:OFlCA110NS WTTI/OUT NUWFYlNG 77IE
ORlGlN-IL CONTRACT WI/EN SPEOFlCAILY ORDE:RED TO DO SO IN WRmNG BY 77IE: CONTRACTOR. 77IE: SUBCONTRA'70R
PRIOR TO 77IE COMME:NaME:NT OF 77I1S REVlSE:D WORK. SIUIL SUBMIT PROMP7l.Y TO 77IE CONTRACTOR W/l/TTE:N
COPIES OF 77IE COST OR CREDIT PROPOS.IL FOR SUCI/ REVlSE:D WORK IN A MANNER CONSISTF.NT WITII T1IE CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS.
U. COOPEIlATE W/71/ 77IE CONTRACTOR" 077lER SUBCONTRACTORS WI/OSE WORK MIGIIT IIlTliRFE.RE WTTI/ T1IE
SUBCONTRACTOR'S WORK" TO PAR110PAn: IN 77IE PREPARA110N OF COORDIN-lTED DRAWINGS IN AREAS OF
CONGES110N AS REQUIRED BY 77IE: CONTRACT DOCUME:NTS. SPE:CIFIGlILY N011NG " ADVISING 77IE CONTRACTOR OF
ANY SUCI/ IIlTliRFE.RENCE.
IS. COOPEIlA TE W/711771E CONTRACTOR IN SCI/E:DUUNG HIS WORK SO AS NOT TO CONfUCT OR IIlTliRFE.RE W/71/77IE WORK
OF o 77IERS. TO PROMP7l.Y SUBMIT SIIOP DRA WINGS, DRA WINGS, " W/PlLS. AS REQUIRED IN ORDER TO CARRY ON SAID
WORK EFFICIENTLY AND AT SPEED T1lAT WIlL NOT CAUSE DE:LAY IN 11/E PROGRESS OF 77IE CONTRACTOR'S WORK OR
077lER BRANCI/ES OF 77IE WORK CARRlW ON BY 077lER SUBCONTRACTrJRS.
16. COMPLY WTTI/ AIL FWEIlAL, STATE, "WelL LAWS.l ORDINANCES APPLYING TO 77IE BUIWING OR STRUC7VRE AND TO
COMPLY AND G/V/1 ADEQUATE N011CES RELA11NG TO 71/E WORK TO PROPER AU71IORl71ES AND TO SECURE AND PAY FOR
AIL NECESSARY UCENSES OR pE/lMm TO CARRY ON T1IE WORK AS DESCRlBW IN T1IE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS
APPUelBIL TO 77IIS SUBCONTRACT.
17. COMPLY W/71/ FE:DEl/AL, STATE, "WCAL TAX LAWS. SOOAL SECURITY LAWS. UNEMPWYMENT CO!JPENSA110N LAWS"
WORKMEN'S COMPENSA110N LAWS INSOFAR AS APPUCABIL TO T1IE PERFORMANCE OF T1/JS SUBCONTRACT.
18. AND DOES I/EREBY AGREE 77UT AU WORK SIIAU. BE DONE SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL OF 77I1S ARCHITECT OR
OWNER'S AUT/IORlZED AGENT, " HIS DEOSION IN MAmRS RELA11NO TO AR11STIC EFFECT SIIAU. BE FINAL. IF W/71/IN
77IE 7C:/U/S OF 77IE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
19. 77IE SUBCONTltICTOR SIIAIL BEAR t1!Y. RESPONSIBIU1Y FOR & WORK TO BE PERFORME:D UNDER HIS SUBCONTRACT.
INCLUDING AIL ROOF PENF:T/lA110NS, curnNG, PATCHING. ac. 77IE SUBCOI'ml.ICTOR AGREES T1lATT1IE COST OF AlL
curnNG.l PATCIIING lIAS BEENINCLUDW AS PART OF SUBCONTRACTOR'S WORK. 77IE SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES T1lAT
liE SIIAU. EMPWY AR11SANS AND TRADESMEN OF 77IE TRADE NORMAlLY RESPONSIBIL FOR 1IIE ROOF. OR FOR FlhTSI/
WORK INVOLVED TO CUT AND PATCII AROUND 11/E WORK OF SUBCONTRACTOR'S TRADE.
20. 11/E SUBCONTRACTOR SIIAU. MAKE AU APPUGl110NS FOR PAY/./ENT TO WBAR ASSOaATES, INC. AS AGENT FOR 77/E
OWNER. WBAR ASSOCIATES SIIAU. SUBMIT SAID APPUel110NS TO 77IE ARCHITECT AND OWNER FOR PAYMENT. UPON
APPROVAL OF PAYMENT BY 77IE ARC1IITECT AND OWNER, AND PAYMENT BY 11/E OWNER TO WBAR ASSOaATES, INC. AS
AGENT FOR 77IE OWNER, TO SUBCONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WTTI/ 77IE: TERMS OF T1/JS SUBCONTRACT. 77IE
SUBCONTRACTOR FUR77IER ACKNOWlLDGES AND AGREES T1lAT LOBAR ASSOaAn:s, INC. S/L~IL HAVE NO UIBIU1Y TO
SUBCONTRACTOR FOR 77IE OWNER'S FAILURE TO PAY FOR WORK PERFOItI/W BY SUBCONTRACTOR, AND SUBCONTRACTOR
AGREES TO HOW WBAR ASSOaATES, INC. /lAJWU:SS FROM ANY CLl/M FOR PAY/./ENT FOR WORK PERFORME:D BY
SUBCONTRACTOR. AND TO INDEMhTFY WBAR ASSOClATES, INC. FROM ANY SUCH CLAIMS MADE BY SUBCONTRACTOR'S
SUBCONTRACTORS, EMPWYEES. AGENTS, AND MATERIAL SUPPUEJlS.
11UT 77IE CONTRACTOR" SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE:
21. 77UT IN T1IE MATTU/ OF ARBITRA110N. 77IEJR RlG/ITS AND OBUGA110NS, AND AlL PROCEDURE S/LiLL BE ANALOGOUS
TO 77IOSE sa FOR77IIN 77/E CONTRACT DOCUMENTS PROVlDW, 1I0Vt'EVER, T1lAT A DEOSION BY 77IE ARCHITECT OR
OWNER'S AUT/IORlZED AGENT. SIIAU NOT BE A CGNDmON PRECEDENT TO ARBITRA110N.
ARTICLE XI, n:RMINA110N CUUSE
LOBAR ASSOO.ln:s.INC. SIUIL HAVE 77IE RlGIIT TO TERMINAn: 77I1S CONTRACT AND TO HIRE AN077lER CO/'o7R.ICTOR TO
I'IIAECII'E t'OR LISTING CASE FOR 'I'RIAL
------.--.------
(Must be typewritten ilnd sul:lTIittcd in duplicdtc)
TO '1'I1E PlUl'IiOl'OTAHY OF CUMBERLAND COUN'fV
Please list the following case.
(Check one) for JURY trial at the next term of civil court.
X) for trial witoout a jury.
-----------------------------------------
CAPTION OF CASE
(entire caption ITIJst be stated in full)
(check one)
( X) Civil Action - Law
Appeal from Arbitration
Francis Heisse,
(other)
(Plaintiff)
vs.
The trlal list will be ealled on
and
Oetober 17. 1995
Lobar Associates, Inc.,
(Defendant)
Trials ccmnence on~l1!.~er 13. 1995
Pretrials will be held on 10 /25 /95
(Briefs are due 5 days before pretrials.)
vs.
Liberty Excavators, Inc.,
(The party listing this case for trial shall
provlde forthwith a copy of the praecipe to
all counsel, pursuant to local Rule 214.1.)
(Additional Defendant)
No.
5507 Civil
19 94
Indicate the attorney who will try case for the party who files this praecipe.
Seott D. Moore. ESQuire
Indicate trial counsel for other parties if known. T.""li" R H"ndl"r, E"'qllir",
r-nlln<,:::pl fnr r.ihprt-y F.'!l(~~vrl.t-nr~: i=1nn nrlvin F'lnrpQJ RQqll;rp.. r.nlJnRPl for
l.ob3.r 1\hhQ~iiltgi;. IR~
/
,/
Signed.
/ .
, -.,
,--j,.(-. ;'-'1''-(
.--.
---
This ease is ready for trial.
.;./~{
.>"
Print Narre. Scott D. Moor". Esquire
Date:
('.
(". ,
'., -
., ~
Attorney for: P]"inti ff Fr"nei", !lei",,,,,,
o.n:IA -
aJ- >- .n-
. ~........'~
:c:= -;'\~- _I
..... di" """'1f ,.
o l:r:l;.~
o q:L.1,1..'~1
,~ M-. '..::":.
. ,I ~. ,.
~ "
- ".
-or N
"" L'
c.. =>
=> _-:t
_:-...
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaintif f
vs.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I am this day serving a true
and correct copy of the Praecipe To Enter Appearance upon the
persons and in the manner indicated below, which service
satisfies the requirement of Pa. R.C.P. 440:
Service by First Class Mail
Addressed as Follows:
Johnna J. Deily, Esquire
SAlOIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MAS LAND
26 West High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Dated: /0/'07'
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
2306 Columbia Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 291-2236
By: ~)./ '~ n.-
J H. Frymyer, ;Ir., 1.0.* 53007
Attorney for Defendant
Lobar Associates, Inc.
JlARMll'i & 1),\\'11 S, PT.
>\111111'1\'..,\1-1 \w
nUn 1011'\1111\\\1 '1'1
1,\'1.\'111 It 1'\ llN11
"':J'"
CTl .~- >+
~
=
L._
....,1
.~
c, J
0-
'-,
<..:>
SHERIFF'S RETURN
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
In the Cour.t of Common Pleas of
Cumberland County, Pennsylvnaia
No. 94 - 5507 Civil
Notice and Complaint
Francis Heisse
VS
Lobar Associates Inc.
R. THOMAS KLINE, Sherlff. who belng duly sworn accordlng to law,
says, tha t he made d iligen t search and inqulry for the within named
defendant, tc wit.
Lobar Associates Inc.
but was unable to loeate
them
in his bailiwick. He therefore
deputized the sheriff of
York
County, Pennsylvania.
to serve the within
Notiee and Complaint
On
Oetober 13. 1994
, this office was in recelpt of
the attaehed return from
York
County, Pennsylvania.
Sheriff's Costs.
Docketing
Out of. County
Surcharge
York County
So answers:
14.00
5.00
2.00
28.88
49.88 pd. by
to before me
/'
-,' ,'/' I'.;<"'>~)
'f )'-,c" "". '-r/
R. THOMAS KLINE, Sherlff
atty 10-l3-94
$
Sworn and subscribed
this
Jo t:b-
day of Cil(r:i.~
19 eN. A. D.
"~) ~, Q ~6', ~ ..Jf,lZ,.
~ .,
Prothonotary
.1., Tn:: Court CT C.::mm=:--i
:.:to:--- ~r. t.t. . _u~__...1 (. 4>",'-,.,,,,
I .__..;,) __ ,-...,;...~..":'::'._.J_ ....__...,'
:l-:....r:"'y 1,,-- i-
. -.. .~ -."...
I.'rant: is lie isse
'is.
Lobar Associates Ir,c.
~o. q4-~~(}7
C i Y1L-.---. :?.__.
:-low,
~nptpmh(\r JR
:9--2.1 !. S:~:?~::' O? C:"~Gz:'..!.A..'f!) CO't.;'{":-'?, ?-\-, :'0
:==::JY ci~c= t!:..:: S~E oi
York
C"u:t"f :;) :-~::"..1:': ::is 'tV:::,
:=.s :':::U::Cll :~ -.,..:- 1t
.:..--.-
_ ...~__Io
::.:d ~.sk ~i
?!.:ili:d.
:.:::
./.' /
/
,,' ,..~...,.
,
,
She."'l:! ;l ~;'::::er'..u:d C~u:rr. :'3..
.
ASdavit or Sem~
;10W, October 6
~~ 94
11:50
'it 1:"'.-d.
o'.:!cc::; A
:.:= wi":":!"'I
Notice & Complaint
'JF"l1 Lobar Associates. inc.
UlOid MIll Road. Dillsbura, YorkCountv. PA
"y :.:u:6;:.c Lee E. Eichelberaer. President
1 true and attested
c-=py et == o::~ No t i ce & Comp I a i ll.L...
,-
~d -~,.;.. Cowt1 :0
him
:=.: .:::.t:::S :..~:::-:t..
-or
en
-
Sa ~=.
c;.
u'
.-
.--
'-
....
....
......
-
,-
0":"
"\-''''~ ~... ...'--- ~-----.~~~~'>--.
:;~--:; Qi ~ork Cou.nrr. ?:..
U"
(...:1'-
~.,..
o:=.L."
'"'/"
("'"') . .~,...~... /, ,.1 \
Dep~~Y Sheriff Joe Anderson
- .
<.>
=
'-
1-
~.
5wc:-::. :me! S".:b:sc::-J:.ed beer:
~~h6Yoi, OC~Oberrj ..
//k;( /:".~ /; C':"
! Notary
COSTS
:::"-~ "-lIe::
),m.:::.>..GZ
3l4.00
12.88
2.00
,~ .2.i.
-.."...
--.
, NOTARIAl. SEAL
YlAUIS IV RHt'IE" No""y p.;lJl 0
~ York Counry, ?00r!1,I'JJ.,q
~ CwvnIssk>n €Jp'rO'J .v..l:C~~ 7":. l',,'~d ;
528.88
:_ .--1
-:r
m
~
:-r::
~'l
N
(Y)
'"-..j
.-
<J
c.:.::.>
,~
o
'"
'"
I
~
'"
1>0<
OH
~~ '" U
~ w
a.: :J l'l
,...l;..:J: H ;: Z 0
p.."';S .... lJ t;
.... ., ui j w III
"'ffi .... . 111 Ul W :> ,...
o I ... U 'tl ., <(
~p..Z C ~ C I<l :;; ... ~
.... " 0 <( <( <( <(
0 -0 111 .... iii a-
U;"H .... - " ~ 0 Ul ~
...... p.. '" I'l >- Ii
'~S U >o.l ctl W :J W
o < '" ~ ~ Z ...J ...
0 Ul Z 0: 0 Ul
HU,", Ul :.: 0 0 u <(
gl f~ H . U H ~ U
gj '" 0 ,...l ~ III Z
o H :> Ul i:l It <( 0 j
u U ~ l'l
Ul p.. <( N
"'''' H ::c
;I:~ U ~
Hf9 ~
z~ I<l
HU :3
.
o
'"
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaintiff
vs.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
NOW COMES the Defendant, Lobar Associates, Inc., by
and through its attorney, John H. Frymyer, Jr. of the law firm
of Harmon & Davies, P.C., and preliminarily objects to
Plaintiff's Complaint as follows:
Demurrer
l. Pa. R.C.P. No. 1028(a)(4) permits preliminary
objections based upon the legal insufflciency of a pleading
(demurrer) .
2. Plaintiff, in paragraph 16 of Count II of his
Complaint, avers that there was an oral agreement made between
the parties for the additional work allegedly performed by
Plaintiff.
3. Plaintiff, in paragraph 20 of Count II of his
Complaint, avers that Lobar Associates, Inc. was unjustly
enriched.
1I"'(\1O~ &. )),\\'II'S, 1'(',
\IIIlW"".-\I.I,''''
!\l."t tlll'MIll.' ..\\1 \11
1"1 -"" H 1'\ 1l'~11
1
r
4. The principle of unjust enrichment is not
applicable to a case in which the relationship of the parties
is based on an express contract.
5. Because Plaintiff has alleged an express oral
contract, his claim, in the same Count of his Complaint, and
not in the alternative, based also upon unjust enrichment,
fails to state a cause of action for which relief can be
granted under the law.
WHEREFORE,
Defendant
Lobar
Associates,
Inc.
respectfully requests this Honorable Court to dismiss Count II
of Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a cause of action
upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. No.
1028(a) (4).
Respectfully submitted,
Dated:
I 0 /1 dr'/
, ,
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
2306 Columbia Avenue
Lancaster, PA l7603
(717) 291-2236
By: ~-I'r j).~. -;:~P'~y']. 9
~hn H. Frymyer, Jr., I.D.' 53007
Attorney for Defendant
Lobar Associates, Inc.
PL\Lab.r\Hei....PO
t1\R\111'\ &'1l.,\'wlfS, Pf
\1I0M'1 '....\11 o\'oN
~\1Il\( 011 "Hll\\~I..n.
1 \,(',,'''" It I', I'NII
2
-=z-
S" !';~
:1:= .,. 0-
c..= ..... r~< "':...
~ ~~(~
. '.....:;
p.o.
....
....
=
, , J-
" ,~,..
,UJ
I. "'0"-
CJ
~~
~~
0.>1
~~
~ .~
~~~
~8"'
8;5
~ ~
z I
H ~
...
~,
OM
~']
~o.
UJ
~ ~
.
~
~'I
H~
~~
~
~
~
3
e
~
Q
Z
<
..;l ..,
CIJ -
< t;j~a
lfl ~~~<;5:
U -,,"'I-Z"
- ..,. X"'z N
Olt oo:cw~
a:lOo.-
::; Q ._ .t:.
..: s~~~w
..J c.;0.::;:!l6
",..J:c
NO<:
..:0.
U
cri
-
Q
-
<
CIJ
.
FRANCIS HEISSE,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant
NOTICE
You have been sued ln court. If you wlsh to defend against
the elaims set forth in the followlng pages, you must take actlon
within twenty (20) days after this Complalnt and Notice are
served, by entering a written appearance personally or by
attorney and filing in writing with the eourt your defenses or
objections to the claims set forth agalnst you. You are warned
that if you fail to do so the ease may proceed without you and a
judgment may be entered against you by the court without further
notice for any money claimed in the Complalnt or for any other
claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose money
or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU
DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
Dated:
ID-t1"qL-1
LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE
COURT ADMINISTRATOR
CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE
CARLISLE, PA 17013
('717) 240-6200
SAlOIS, G_~_I~O:~/".HuJ~./t~.." 0
0:::::.- / '---,. ,
By: j-,. "--:. )@-
Johnna .J .~ Deily, Es uir
26 ~e~t High Street
Carl~le, PA 17013
(717) 243-6222
Attorney for Plaintiff
SAIDlS, GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 W. High Slreet
Carhsle. PA
'i
"
'I
:j
I
:i
"
:1 FRANCIS HEISSE,
! Plalntiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND NOW, comes the Plaintlff Francls Helsse by and through
hls attorneys Saidis, Guido, Shuff & Masland and respectfully
avers the followlng:
1. The Plaintlff ls Francis Helsse, an adult lndividual
residing at 423 North Progress Avenue, Harrlsburg, Dauphin
County, pennsylvanla 17110.
2. The Defendant is Lobar Associates, Inc" a Pennsylvanla
corporatlon doing buslness at 1 Old Mill Road, Dillsburg, York
County, Pennsylvania, 17019.
3. On or about August 3, 1993, the Plalntlff Francis
Helssee, hereinafter "subcontractor," contracted with the
Defendant Lobar Assoclates, Ine., herelnafter "contractor," to
perform work known and descrlbed as a New Bathhouse and Pool
Constructlon for the West Shore Country Club in Camp Hill,
Pennsylvania; a copy of said eontract ("contraet") ls attached
hereto and made a part hereof marked as Exhiblt "A".
4. Pursuant to said contract, the subcontractor was to
perform various items of work as more fully described under
Article II of sald contract.
5. Also pursuant to said contract, provided all thls work
was to be done, Artlcle 1V of sald eontract provlded for a
payment to the subcontractor of One Hundred Slxty Four Thousand
Four Hundred and 00/100 ($164,419.00) Dollars.
6. In additlon to thls contract, there was also a wrltten
change order for a pool light to be installed by subcontractor
for the payment of Three Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100
($3,500,00) Dollars.
7. In addition to the written contract, the subcontractor
completed additional work on the same job.
8, Speciflcally, the subcontractor performed the following:
a. In accordance wlth the contract, the
contractor was to lnstall wooden forms around
the entire pool to facilltate installation of gunite.
Since contractor did not erect the wooden walls,
subcontractor had to revlse lts work schedule and
install the gunlte at a cost of $18,000.00 more than
anticipated;
b, Subcontraetor put in a new dlvidlng jig at the
request of the contractor, as contractor's men went
over and destroyed the orlginal divlng jlg, at a cost
to the subcontractor of One Hundred Fifty and 00/100
($150.00) Dollars;
c. Contractor requested subeontractor to cut the bond
beam at a cost to subcontractor of One Hundred Fifty
and 00/100 ($150.00) Dollars;
SAID IS, GUIDO,
SHUFF &
I\IASLAND
26 w. Uigh SIIce1
Carli~lc. VA
d. Contractor requested subcontractor to install three
(3) 11ieguard stands at a cost to subcontractor of
Seven Thousand Flve Hundred and 00/100 ($7,500.00)
Dollars;
e. As nelther a wooden wall nor dirt wall was
I
1!
provided by the contractor at the shallow end of the
pool, subcontraetor was asked to construct a plywood
wall against whlch the gunlte could be shot, at a eost
to the subcontractor of Two Thousand Nine Hundred and
00/100 ($2,900.00) Dollars; and
f. The contractor requested subcontractor to run a
sewer llne for a cost to the subcontractor of Three
Hundred Flfty and 00/100 ($350.00) Dollars.
9. Subcontractor completed all of the work under the
origlnal written contraet as well as the addltlonal work as
described above by Aprl1 11, 1994.
COUNT I
BREACH OF CONTRACT
10. Paragraphs 1 through 9 are lncorporated hereln by
reference as if fully set forth at length.
11. In addltlon to the written contraet, and the change
order, the addltlonal work as descrlbed in paragraph 8 was
performed by the subcontractor pursuant to an express oral
contract, which was completed by the subcontractor.
12. Pursuant to the wrltten contract, the change order and
the additlonal work performed by the oral contract, the
contractor was to pay the subcontractor One Hundred Ninety Seven
SAlOIS, GUIDO,
SIIUt'F &
MAS LAND
26 W High SIrCcl
C.ulhlc. PA.
Thousand Seven Hundred Slxty-nine and OO/lOO ($197,769.00)
Dollars.
13. The eontractor paid to the subeontractor a total of One
Hundred Thlrty Four Thousand and 00/100 ($134,000.00) Dollars,
leavlng a balanee due of Slxty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Slxty
SAIDIS. GUIDO.
SHUFF &
l\IASLAND
26 w. Uill,h Stn:'ct
Carlnlc. PA
Nine and 00/100 ($63,769.00) Dollars.
14. Despite repeated demands, contractor has paid neither
the Thirty Three Thousand Nine Hundred Nineteen ($33,919.00)
Dollars remaining under the written contract, nor the Twenty Nine
Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty and 00/100 ($29,850.00) Dollars
under the oral agreement in request for additional work, for a
total unpaid of Sixty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty Nine and
00/100 ($63,769.00) Dollars.
15. Contractor breached both the oral and written contract
by failing to perform its end of the agreement by final payment,
despite the fact that subcontractor completed its work and
fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreement.
WHEREFORE, the subcontractor/Plaintiff demands judgment in
favor of the Plaintiff and against the contractor/Defendant in
the amount of Sixty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty Nine and
00/100 ($63,769.00) Dollars, plus interest and costs of this
suit.
COUNT I I
UNJUST ENRICHMENT/QUANTUM MERUIT
16. Paragraphs 1 through 9 are incorporated herein by
reference as if fully Bet forth at length.
17. The additional work as completed by the subcontractor
was performed by the subcontractor on the contractor's behalf to
assist him in completing the job.
18. The subcontractor completed all work as previously set
forth in paragraph 8, subparagraphs a through f.
19. The contractor was paid for the entire original
'"
(
(00
ASSOCIATES
"
SllBCONTRACT
AGREEMENT BEllVEEN CONTRACTOR & SUBCONTRACTOR
SJ!J.1f:.ONTRACT #3081-131.'i2.S10
ACREEA/IiNT MADE AS OF TIlE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST IN TIlE !'CAR OF NINETEEN HUNDIIED AND 93.
BETWEEN TTIE CONT7lACTOR: LOBAR ASSOCIA rES, INC.
I OLD MIlL ROAD
P.O. BOX 432
DILUiBURG. PA 17019.()4J2
AND TIlE SUBCONT1/.iCTOR: FlUNCIS HEISSE
423 N. PROGRESS AVE.
IURRISBURG, PA 17109
TELEPHONE: (717) 545-3427
WITNESSETTI, 'TIIAT TIlE SUBCONmACTOR AND CONT7lACTOR FOR TT1E CONSIDERATION 1/ERElNAFn:R NAMED AGREE AS
FOUOWS:
ARTICLE I. TT1E SUBCONT7lACTOR AGREES TO FURMSIl AU. /oIAT!:RIAL AND PERFORM AU. WORICAS DESCRIBED IN AR1IaL
Ill1ERE0F FOR:
NEW BATII/IOUSE & POOL CONSTRUCTION
IVEST SHORE COUNTRY CLUB
CAMP HIll., PA
FOR LOBAR ASSOaATES, INe. IN ACCORDANCE wrm TWS AGIlEEMIiNT, TT1E AGREENIiNT BETWEEN TT1E OWM:R 4
CONmACTOR, " IrY ACCORDANCE WITIl TT1E GENERAL CONDmONS Of TT1E CON1lUCT. SUPPLENIiNTARY GENEIW.
CONDmONS, TTIE DRAW/NGS, SPEaFlCmONS, AND ADDENDA PREPARED'Y II. EDWARD BUCK & ASSOCJA.TES
1/ERElNAFn:R CAUEJ TTIE ARClllTECT OR OWM:R 'SA 1/TH0/lIZED AGENT, AU. OF WIUCIl DOClJNENTS, SIGNED BYTT1E PARTIES
T11ERETO Of. IDEN1IFlED BY TTIE ARartTECT OR OWNER'S A/I11/0/lIZED AGIiNT, FORM A PART OF A CONmACT BETWEEN TT1E
CONmACTOR AND TIlE OWNER DATFD 16 JULY 1993.4 HEREBY BECOME A PART OF TTUS CONT7lACT, 411ERE1N REFE/IJJEJ)
TO AS TT1E CONT7lA CT DOCUMENTS, 4 SRAU.'E MADE A VAIl.ABU: TO TT1E SUBCON1lU CTOR UPON iUS REC!UEST PRIOR TO AND
ANYTWE SUBSEC!UENTTO SIGN/NG TfUS SUBCON1lUCT.
ARTICLE II. TTIE S~'BCONT7lACTOR 4 TT1E CON1lUCTOR AGREE 'TIIAT TT1E MArouALS AND EC!UlPMIiNT TO 'E FURMSIlED
" WORIC TO 'E PERFORMED ARE COMPlETE AS REQUlIIED AND IN STlUCT ACCORDANCE WITIl PUNS, SPEOFlCA1I0NS.
A/JENDNlNTS. AND/OR ADDENDA" AS FOUOWS:
A. APPUCABLE SECTIONS OF DIVISION 1- GENElUL REQUIREMENTS.
B. CONSTRUCTION OF SMMMING AND WADING POOLS COMPLETE AS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE
IITTH PENNSYLVANIA STATE REGUUTIONS AND ACCORDING TO PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
PROVIDED, AS AMENDED IN fOUR LETTER OF 29 APRIL 1993 AND LATER DELETION OF TilE
IIEATERS ON TIlE ORIGINAL SPECIFICATIONS \l'II/CII DECREASED TIlE PRICE FROM TIIAT
SlIOWN ON roUR LETTER DATED 29 APRIL 199J INCLUDING TilE FOlLOWING:
I, TIlE SII'I,II,III.\'G Asn W\N.\'G POOlS 11'111. BE COSS1RUCTEIJ E.I'AClLI' AS SI/OII'N OS
BLUEPRI,\7.
EXHIBIT "/\"
/.....,:.-:7 ,'~~I.n ;1.:/11. 1\l.!.'J to nux .n:
'.
r,
("
1.
2. TIlE EQUIPMENT SfECIFIED II'IIL Of: CIIANGf:D AS FOU-OII'S: SFV 78-78" IIYRATE SAND
FILTER II'IT/IOUT AUTOMATIC BACKII'ASII, nl'0 (2) CIIEMOD,ITA MODEL 400 CONTROLLERS
AND FOUR (4) STENNER PUMPS FOR AUTOMATIC CIIEMICAL CONTROL OF BOTII POOLS.
AUTOMATIC FlU FEATURE liAS BEEN DELETED FROM ORIGINAL BID.
3. nl'ELVE (12) STAINLESS STEEL RECESSED WAU STEfS 1M VI; BEEN DELETED. TIlEY II'llL
BE REPLACED BY BUILT.IN CERAMIC TILE STEPS,
4. nolV CONTROL VALVES IIA VE BEEN DELETED.
S. WilEN SITEIVORK I,E. EXC4 VAT/ON, UNDER.DRAlNS, AND STONE ARE COMPLETE, YOUR
FIRM WIU INSTALL AND TEST AU fifES WIIICIIWIU BE rvc SCIIEDULE 401.ND SIZED IN
ACCORDANCE IVIT/I BLUEPRINTS. ESTIMATED TIME ONE (I) WEEK. .--
6, II'IIILE TIlE II'OOD FORMS FOR TIlE POOL WAU.s ARE DEI,vU7,vSTAUED BYOTnERS, }'OUR
FIRM II'IU' O,IIMENCE INSTAUlNG REBAR, U RoMaNn' CENr1'iiS, B 1/, ~US, OVER
WAlLS AND FWOR OF TIlE SIVI,IfMING POOL: GRADE 60 STEEL WIlL BE USED. 1I'1If.'N
STEEL INSTAlL4TION IS COMPLETE, TIlE POOL noOR II'IIL BE INSTAlLED. ESTIMATED
TIME TIIREf: (3) IVEEKS, '
7. SIIOTCRETE.GUNITE SWIMMING POOL WAlLS AND GUTTER II'IU BE INSTAlLED .
ESTIMATED WE nvo (2) IVEEKS.
8. WADING POOL ROUGII TRUCTURE WIU BE INSTAlLED _ ESTIMATED TIME ONE (I) WEEK.
9. TILE WIU BE INSTA.U..ED AND POOLS PUSTERED _ ESTIMATED TIME nvo f2nVEEKS,
-
SPECiAl. RF.OlllREMF.NTS:
I~
I. DUE TO POSSIBLE COMMUNICATION CONFUCTS, TIlE OIVNER & WBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
REQUIRE TIIAT ALL CORRESPONDENCE, II'K17TEN & VERBtIL, FROM SUBCONTRACTORS &
MATERIAL SUPPUERS BE DIRECTED TIIROUGII WBAR ASSOCIATES, INC. IN UEU OF DIRECT
CORRESPONDENCE IVIT/I TIlE OIVNER & PROJECT ENGINEERS/ARCI/ITECT. IN ADDITION, AIL
CLAJUf'ICATIONS snoULD BE FORIVARDED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC. VIA FAX OR MAIL IN
UEU OF VERBAL COMMUNICATION.
2. FIELD MEASUREMENTS & VERIFICATION ARE TIlE RESPONSIBIUTY OF TillS SUBCONTRACTOR.
REVIEW OF SITE AND FOUNDATION CONDITIONS IS A REQUIREMENT FOR TUlS CONTRACT.
3. IIA VE MATERIALS DELIVERED IVIIEN REQUIRED. NO STORAGE IS A VMUOLE ON JOBSITE -IF,
DELIVERY IS MANDATORY PRIOR TO INSTAlLATION, TillS SUBCONTRACTOR IV1LL RAVE TO
PROVIDE REQUIRED STORAGE FACILITIES. PIIASED PROJECTS SIIOULD HAVE MATERIALS
SIIIPPED IN PIIASES UNLESS STORA.GE IS PROVIDED.
~. PROTECTION OF MATERIALS UNTiL OIYNER-ARCI/ITECT ACCEPTANCE.
5, MATERIAL SAFETY DATA snEETS ARE A REQUIREMENT FOR TII1S PROJECT & MUST BE
SUBMmED IVITIIIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF TIlE SUBCONTRACT DATE AND PRIOR TO
MATERIALS ARRIVING ON THE JOBSITE,
6. SUBMISSION OF OPERA.TlON & MAINTENANCE MANUALS TO BE MADE WITII /NITL4L
SUBMmALS,
7. BY EXECUTION OF TRlS SUBCONTRA.CT AGREEMENT, YOUR FIRM AGREES TIIAT IT IVIlL
STRICTLY COMPLY WITH ALL OSIIA REGUUTIONS AND MSDS REQUIREMENTS ON TillS PROJECT.
IT IS ALSO THE RESPONSIB/UTY OF YOUR PERSONNEL TO FOlLOW ANY INSTRUCTIONS OR
DIRECTIVES GIVEN BYOUR PROJECT SUPERINTENDENT, STEVE DIUER. REGARDING SAFETY ON
TilE PROJECT. ANY FINES ISSUED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC. AS A RESULT OF YOUR FIRM'S
NEGUGENCE OR NON-COMPUANCE IVllL BE TilE RESPONSIB/UTY OF YOUR FIlIAl, TilE
SUBCONTRA.CTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AIL OSIIA REGULATIONS INCLUDING VERIFIED SAFETY
CONDITIONS OF OTHER TRADES. ,
8. TillS PROJECT liAS A FIRM COMPLETION DA TE OF'AS PER A TTACIIED SCIIEDULE \l7T1I NO TIME
E>.7ENSIONS PERMmED. AIL AfATERIMS AND II'ORK SCIIEDULES MUST BE COORDINATED
I7:RI' CLOSF.I.!' II'ITII OUR I'RO}f:C"(, SI/I'ERI.\7ENlJI;'.\T, STErr: mlJ.ER, AT TilE SITE TO MEET
TIIF. REQUIRED CO,III'I.J:TlON D,tf/.:, /)..11' TO DJ!' SCIII.'[JUI.r: ADJUSTMENTS 81' TillS
"
(\
f'
1.
SUBCONTRACTOR ARE A REQUIREME,\T 01' TillS SUBCONTRACTOR TO ACCOMMODATE VARIOUS
PROJECT INTANGIBLES (II'EAT/lER. ETC,) TO MAINTAIN TIlE FINAL COMPLETION DATE,
MULTIPLE SllIFTS.{ OI'ERT/.IfE ARE A REQUIREMENT OFTIIIS PROJECT AS NECESSARY TOMEET
SCI/EDULE REQUIRE.IfE,\TS AND/OR LOB,IR ASSOCIATES' SUPERINTENDENT'S INSTRUCTIONS,
9. DMLI'REAIOVAL'{ DISPOSAL OF REUTED DEBRIS OFF SrrE.
10. PROVIDE SUFfiCIENT SUPERVISION & MANfOlVER FOR SCIIEDUUNG, RECEIVlNG, UNUJADlNG,
& DISTRIBUTION OF AIL MATERIAL DEUVERlES.
11. ,(lL TESTING AND SUBMISSION OF REPORTS ARE A REQUIREMENT OF TillS SUBCONTRACT TO
ASSURE QUAUTY OF INSTALLATIONS.
12. AU UYOUT & COORDINATION COSTS ASSOCLlTED wrrl/ TillS SUBCONTRACT i\.RE A
SUBCONTRACT REQUIREMENT,
1J. AU. SUBCONTRACTORS MUST PARTICIPATE IN A I-IIOUR IVEEKLY JOBSrrE CLEAN-UP EACI/
FRIDA Y.
ARTICLE 11/. lIME IS OF TIlE ESSENCE AND TIlE SUBCOt.7lUCTOR AGREES TO COMMENCE AND ro COMPlETE TTIE WORJ;
AS DESCI/1BED IN ARTlaL II AS FOUOWS:
A, AU. WOR/C TO 'E PERFORMED IN STlUCT ACCORDANCE WITIl LOBAR ASSOCIATES. INe. PROGRESSSCIIEDUlE "
DIREC1IONS, /ION-COMPlJANCE P<TTI/ LOB.iR ASSOCIATES,INe. PROGRESS SCIIEDUU: AND/OR INSTRUC1/0NS MAYRESULT
IN '1eJW1N.JlION OF TTIIS AGRWlIiNT AND/OR B.iCK CIIARGES, ANY PENALTIES OR DAMAGES ASSESSED TO LOBAR
ASSOQiTES, INC, AS A RESULT OF TIllS SUBCONmACTOR WlU BE TIlE RESPONSIBIU1Y OF TIllS SUBCONT7lACTOR.
" COMPIET10N DAn; FOR TIllS PROJECT IS 'AS PER ATTACI/ED SCI/EDULE Wl71f UQUfDATW DAMAGES OF U
PER CAu:NDAR DAY, ANY UQUIDATFD DAMAGES ASSESSED TO LOBAR ASSOaATES. INC. AS A RESULT OF TTUS
SUBCON1lUCTOR P<7U BE TT1E RESPONSIBIU1Y OF TTUS SUBCONmACTOR.
UAS ASSESSED.
"
NO lI,I/E EX'n:NSIONOF TTUS CON1lUCT WIlL'E REax;MZED Wl71fOUTTT1E WRITTEN CONSIiNTOF TIlE CONT7lALTOR WlUCH
CONSENT SffAU /lOT 'E Wl71111EUJ UM/EASONAlLY CONSIsn:NT WITIl AR1IaL X-4 OF TTUS CONmACT, SUBJECT TO 771E
AR/Il7RAlION PROVISIONS IIEREIN PROVIDED,
ARTICLE IY. TT1E CON1lUCTOR AGREES TO PAY TT1E SUBCONT7lACTVR FOR TTIE PERFORMANCE OF TfUS WOR/C 77IE
FOUOW/NG SUM: ONE I/UNDRED SIXTY.FOUR TI/OUSAND, FOUR I/UNDRED, NINETEEN DOILARS
($16-1,419.00) .INClfR//ENT FUNDS. SUBJECT TOADDmONS AND DEDUC1IONS FOR CJWoIGES AS MAY'E AGREED UPON IN
WRI71NG, " ro MAKE MON1lIl.Y PAYMlNTS ON ACCOUNT T1lEREOF IN ACCORDANCE wrm AR1IaL X. SEC1IONS 20-2J
INQUSIYE.
A, MONTIILY PROGMSS PAYMIiNT CONDmONS. TWO (2J COPIES TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC, OffiCE BY 20m OF EACH
MON1l/. PAYMENT OF TfUS INVOICE TO BE AS 10UOWS:
N1:r lESS 10J. RETAlNAGE WIlL BE PAID J014J DA I'S SUBJECT TO ARatm:CT-ENGINEEIlfOWM:R APPROVAL" RECEIPT OF
PAYMIiNT'Y LOW ASSOCIATES.INe. FOR ,,"OR/C COMPlETED ON TfUS SU'CON1lUCT. /10 01TlER CHARGES SUCH AS
INn:JIEST, CARRYING CHARGES. Toio.\:EI', ETC. WTU.'E RO/lOIIED UNUSS INDICATW OTTlERW/SE OR AS AGREED TO BY
BOTll PAR1/ES INWR/1/NG. RETAlNAGE TO'E REl.EASED UPON APPROVAL nOM AR=CT AND OWM:R, AND RECEIPT
OF MAn:RLU. 4 WOR PROGF OF PAYMIiNT REl.EASES, /oION1l/ PAYMIiNT APPUCA1l0NS TO 'E SUBMfTTUJ ON AlA
DOCUMlNTS G7rJ2" G70J OR EQUAL FORM SROW/NG PERCENT COMPlLTFD EACH MON1l/,
NO PARTIAL OR nHAL PAYMENTS WIlL 'E MADE Wl11fOUT PROOF OF MAn:RLU. PAYMENTS UNlESS SPECUL
ARRANGEIoIlNTS ARE MADE wrm LOBAR ASSOaATES, 1Ne.
IF SU'CONT7lACTOR FAIIS TO MEETTTrE SU'CON1lUCT REQIflRENEIm. AU. PAYMlNTS DUE INQWING OUln'ANDING
SEPARAn; ORDERS MAY'E I1EUJ UNTIL CORREC1IVf: AC1/0NS ARE TAKEN.
A.RTICLJ; V. nHAL PAYMENT SffAU 'E Drn: W1lEH ,,"OR/C DESCRI'ED IN TfUS CON1lUCT IS FUUY COMPu:n:D AND
PERFORMED INACCORD,iNCE WlTTI mE CONT7lACTDOCU.llENrS, 4 PAYMENT TO BE CONSlsreNTp<rm AR1ICU: IV" ARTlCU:
X. SEC1IONS 18, 2{}.2J INQUSIVE OF TTIIS CONTR.iCT.
F..~:F(]RE IS.H!,t\'l...r: OF A.\'}' f,j 111f:.\T. n!.C: snsCo.....'Pi(71)g. IF PErlr:,;:::r..?, S!f.l!L SUB.\(fT E\7DESCE s,-tnSFACTORY TO nlE
O},\7r:i(70R nl.iT AILP.i)t:,){lS, MiTr:::'!,iL B!l1S, &. ,ill. }:....I)H'.'Il~.:)E8r:.JJ,\::'iS CO,\':tcc.7E.D "'ml nfESUBCOI\7R.iCTO/?'S
"
('\
{1
i
WORK IIAVE BUN SATlSFlW,
ARTICLE 1'/, PERFORMANCE" PAYMENT 'ONDS,
(N/A) SUBMIT A PAI'MENT & PERFORMANCE BOND.
ARTICLE VII. 1l:.!JPORARY sm: FAOUTlES,
A, 77IIS SUBCON1lUCTOR SlIAIL PROVIDE AU. TF/oIPORARY Sm: FAOUT1ES AS ItE(!UIIIED OR AS NECESSARY TO PERFORM
illS WORK:
B. DEBRIS l/EUTFD TO 77IE WOR/C INa.UDW IN nus SUBCONmACT SRAU. BE 1/ElJ0VED " DISPOSED OF BY TTUS
SUBCONT7lACTOR, B.iCK CltARGES SIWJ. BE MADE FOR NON,COIJPIJANCE.
ARTICLE VIII, INSURANCE
UNlLSS OTIIERII7SE PROVIDED IIEI/EJN. TIlE SUBCOl(TRACTOR SIWJ. IIAVE A DIRECT UABIU7Y FOR TTIE Aen OF illS
EMPLOYEES" AGlNTS FOR WIIIClI I/E IS LEGAUY RESPONSIBLE, AND TIlE SUBCONT7lACTOR SIWJ. NOT BE RE(!UIRUJ TO
ASSUME TIlE UABIU1Y FOR 77IE Aen OF ANY 01llEl/S,
PRIOR TOSTARlING WORK. 77IE INSURANCE REQUIRED TO BE FURMSI/ED SIIAll. BE OBTAINED FROM A RESPONSIBLE COMPANY
OR COMPANIES TO PROVIDE PROPER" ADE(!UATE COVERAGE" SA1ISFACTrJRY EVIDENCE W/U 'E FUI/MSIIED TO TT1E
CONTRACTOR ntAT TT1E SUBCONTRACTOR lIAS COMPUED 117171 TIlE RE(!UlREJ/ENTS AS STAn:D IN nus SEC1/0N.
A. PROVIDE nvo (2) INSURANCE CERTIFICATES IN ACCORDANCE WITII PROJECT INSURANCE
REQUIREMENTS. CERTIFICATES MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITIl ANY WORK.
ARTICLE IX. 10' CONDmoNS
"
( x ) A COMPLETE UST OF ALL MATERIAL SUPPUERS & SECOND TIER SUBCONTRA.CTORS WITIl
TIlEIR ADDRESSES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO LOBAR
ASSOCIATES, INC. WIT/IIN FlF/'EEN (IS) DAYS FROM DATE OF SIGNING O/o'AGREEMENT BY
SUBCONTRACTOR.
( X ) COST BREAKDOWN FOR LABOR & MATERIAL MUST BE SUBMITTED TO LOBAR ASSOCJA.TES,
INC, WITIIIN FIFTEEN (IS) DAYS FROM DATE OF SIGNING OF AGREEMENT BY
SUBCONTRA.CTOR.
( ) SUBMIT PAYROU REPORTS IVITIIIN SEVEN (I) DAYS WEEK-ENDING TO THIS OFFICE.
MONTIlLY PAYMENT ESTIMATES CANNOT BE APPROVED WITIlOUT PAYROU REPORTS BEING
SUBMmED,
( X ) PROVIDE TEN (10) COPIES OF ALL SUBMITTAL DATA EXAC7Z.Y AS REQUIRED IN
SPECIFICATIONS NO UTER TIlAN 10 AUGUST 1993, YOUR FIRM MAY BE lIELD UABLE FOR
DEUY COSTS IF SUB!ti'J'lTALS ARE NOT MADE AS REQUIRED AND IVTrll/N TIlE REQUESTED
TIME FRAME,
(X) E,E, 0, & AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ARE A PART OF TIllS SUBCONTRA.CT. EXECUTE AND
RETURN CERTIFICATION WITH CONTRACT.
( X ) ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE IITTIl LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
SAFETY PROGRAM.
( ) USE OF FOREIGN STEEL & ALUMINUM PRODUCTS IS PROIIIBITED ON TillS PROJECT,
ARTICLE X. IN ADDmON TO TTIE FOREGOING PROVISIONS TTIE PARlIES ALrO AGREE 'TIIAT TTIE SUBCONTRACTOR SIUIJ.:
I, BE BOUND TO 77IE CON1lUCTOR UTIlE TERMs OF TIlE CON1lUCT DOCUMENTS & TTUS AGREEMENT, "ASSUlolE TOWARD
77IE CONmACTOR AIL 77IE OBUG,mONS & RESPONSIBIUT1ES TTlAT1IlE CONmACTOR, 'Y TIIOSEDOClJ/ollNTS ASSUMES
TOWARD TIlE OWNER, AS APPUCABLE TO TIllS SUPCONT7lACT.
1, SUB,\fITTO TIlE CONT1/.iCTOR A/'/'UCAlIONS FOR PAnlf./ooT AT SUCI/11.1If.S.m/'UUn:D IN ARnaL II' SOAS TO EN.iBU:
TIle: CO,\7R.iCTOII TO A/'PLY ,<011 P.II:1fE,',T. IF PA1~IE/ooTS AU I/,WE ON V,iW,mONS OF II'ORK DO,.,.E, TIlE
SURCO,\7R.iCTtJR Sl/.iU., BlIORE mE FIRST AfPUCmON, SVB,\/IT TO TIlE' CO,\7R.iCTOR A SCIIEDUU: OF VALUES OF
'.
r
rl
~
17IE VARIOUS PARTS OF TIll; WORK, AGGREG.m,"'; TIlE TOT-iL AS REQUIRED BY TIlE OWNeR, AI.V, IF REQUIRED.
SUrrORTUJ BY SUCII EVIDENCE AS TO ITS CORJI.ECTNf.SS AS TIlE CON/R.i(7VR Iol.iY DIRECT, TlUS SCIlEDULE. WilEN
ArrROVED BY T1IE COh7R.lCTOR, S/LllL,e USf.D AS A B,WS FOR aRnFlClTES fOR P.iYMIiNT, Uh1LSS IT BE FOUND TO
BE IN ERROR. IN ArPLn/lfj fOR PAYMeNT, TIlE SUBCONTRACTOR SIWL SUBMIT A STAIEMENT BASED UpON TIllS
SCIIEDUU:. IF PAYMEhTS AU M.iDE ON ACCOUNT OF M.HERLiLf NOT INCORPOl/,iTED IN TIlE WORK BlIT DWVERED
AhV SUITABLY STOIIED AT TIlE SrrE, OR AT SO.llEOTlIER LOCi nON AGREED UPON IN WRITING, SUCII PAYMENTS SIIALL
BE IN ACCORDANCE W/TII TIlE 1UtI/S" CONDmONS OF TIlE CONIR.lCT DOCUMENTS,
], rA Y fOR AU. M.JT!:RIALS " UBOR USED IN. OR IN CONNEC1/0N "TT1I, TIlE PEllFOI/,IIANCE OF TIllS CONmACT. TT/ROUGII
TT1E PERIOD COVUlED BY PREVIOUS PAYMENTS RECEIVED FROM T/IE CONl1lACTOR" FURMSII s,mSfAClORYEVlDENCE
WilEN REQUESTED BY TIlE CONT1/.iCTOR, TO VERIFY COMPU.f/lCE W/TIllIIE ABOVE REQUIRE-IIENTS,
4. MAKE AIL CUlMS FOR EXntlS, FOR EXTENSIONS OF lI.11E, " FOR O,iM,lGe FOR DEU YS OR OTlIERWlSE, PROMPTLY TO
TT1E CONTRACTOR CONSISTENT IIml TIlE COh7R.iCT DOCUMENTS,
S. TAKE NECESSoiRY PRECiUTION TO PROPfJ/LY PROTECT mE F1h1SIIED WORK OF OT/IER TR.WES,
6. KEEP 17IE BUIl.DING " rRE-IIISE.\" aLiN AT AU nllES OF DURIS AlUSING OllT OF ntE OPERAlION OF TTIIS
SUBCONTRACT TIlE SUBCONlR.iCTOR SIW.L NOT Be IIElD RESPONSIBU: fOR UNaEAN CONDmONS CAUSED BYOntER
CONTRACTORS OR SUBCOh7R.iCTOR.\", Uh1LSS OT1lERII7SE PROVIDED FOR,
7, COMPLY WITII AU STA TlfTOR I' AhV/OR CONlR.iCTUAL SoIFE1Y REQ/JIRE.lIENI'S ArnnNG TO 11I5 WORK AND/OR IN11lATUJ
BY 17IE CONIRACTOR, AhV S/LiU UPORT "mllN TllREE. (1) D.H'S TO T1IE CONmACTOR ANY INJURY TO TTIE
SUBCONTRACTOR'S E.lIPLOYUS AT 17IE sm OF T1IE PROJECT
804, NOT ASSIGN ntlS SUBCONT1/.iCT OR ANY AMOUNTS DUE OR TO BECOME DUE TI/EREUNDER W/TIIOllT TTIE WIUTTl:N
CONSENT OF 17IE CONT7lA CTOR,
8B, NOR SUBCONT7lACT TIlE WIIOIL OF T'US SUBCOh7R.iCT IImlOllT T1IE WR/7TEN CONSeNT OF TIlE CONT7lACTOR,
BC, NOR FUR17IER SUBCONT1/.JCT PORTTONS OF TIllS SUBCONIR.iCT "mlOlIT WR/7TEN NOnnCiT/ON TO TIlE CONmACTOR
WilEN SUCII NOT/nCAT/ON IS REQUES1F.D BY T1IE CONT1/.JCTOR.
9, GUAR.iNTEE illS WORK AGAINST AU DEFECTS OF M,iTER.W.s AhV/OR WORJ(}.I,iNSIUP AS CAUEJ FOR IN TIlE PUNS,
SPEOFlCAlIONS, "ADDEloVA, OR IF NO GUARANTEE IS CAULD FOR, TIIEN FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (I) !'EAR nOM TTIE
DAns OF PARTUL OR TOTAL ACCEPT.iNCE OF T1IE SUBCONT7lACTOR'S WORK'Y T/IE OWNER.
1004. NO SEPARATE UNDEJlSTANDING OR AGR.EEMENI'S OF ANY KlND 117U BE ENTERED INTO BY TIlE SUBCONT7lACTOR 4 TTIE
OIVNER AND/OR /liS ARCllrrECT OF AGENTS REUT/VE TO ANY ORIGINAL OR EXlRA WOR/C CONTE.IIPUTED 'Y TillS
AGREEMENT UNl.ESS TIlE SoWE IS FIRST APPROVED IN IVRI7ING BY CONl1lACTOR.
lOB, SUBCONTRACTOR SIIAUINSURE TlLiT AU. SUBCONmACTORS. EMPLOYUS, " SUPPUEllS. AT AU. lIMES. ARE PAID AU.
AMOUNTS DUE IN CONNEC1/0N WTm TIlE PEllFOI/,IIANCE OF TIllS SUBCONmACT. AFTEIl TIlE FlRST PAYMENT
IIEREUhVER, CONT7lACTOR SIIAIL IIAVE TIlE RlGIITTO "mIllOl.D ANY SUBSEQUENTPAYMENTS UNTTLSUBCONT7lACTOR
SUBMITS EVIDENCE SAT/SFACTORY TO CONmACTOR TlLJT AU. AMOUNTS OWED INCONNEC1/0N WITH PERFOR/olANCE OF
TTUS SUBCONT7lACT IlAVE BEEN PAID. FUR TIlER, SUBCONmACTOR AGREES TlIAT CONmACTOR MAY PAY AU. PERSONS
WIUCH IIA VE NOT BEEN PAID TT1E MONIES DUE TIIEM IN CONNeC1/0N WITII TlUS SUBCONmACT WIlETIIER OR N<1T A UEN
lIAS BEEN FllLD, " SUBCONT7lACTOR SIWl.. TO TT1E EXTENT 'TIIAT CONmACTOR lIAS NOT RECOVUlED SAID AMOUNTS
PURSUANT TO WlTHIIOl.DING, PAY WD AMOUNTS TO CONT7lACTOR UPON DEMAND, SUBCONT7lACTOR SIWl. ALSO
IMMEDIATELY REIMBURSE CON1lUCTOR FOR ANY A.IIOUNTS PAID UNDER CONmACTOR'S PAYMIiNT 'OND INCONNEC1/0N
117T1l TTUS SUBCONT7lACT" INDEMh1F1ED BY CONT7lACTOR. IN TIlE EVENT CONmACTOR IS REQUlIIED TO PAY OR
INDEMh1FY ANY PERSOh'S HEREUhVER. SUBCONmACTOR SIIALL IMMEDUTfLY RElMBURSE TT1E CONT7lACTOR FOR TIlE
FUlL COST TTlEREOF, lNaUOING ATTORNEY'S FUS,
IOC. SIIOUW SUBCONT7lACTOR AT ANY TIME FAIL TO SUPPLY A sumoliNT NU/J'ER OF SfJlllD WORKMIiN OR A SumOENT
QUANTTTY OF MAT!:RIALS OF PROPER QUAIJTY, OR FAIL IN ANY RESPECT TO PROSECUTE TT1E WOR/C COVEllED 'Y TTUS
SUBCON1lUCTOR WITIl PROMPTNESS" DIUGENCE, OR FAIL IN TIlE PEllFOR.'4ANCE OF ANYOFTT1E AGIlEEJIENTS I1EREIN
CONTAINED, OR SIIOUl.D ANY WORKMEN PEllFORMING WOR/C COIUED 'Y 1/US SUBCONmACT ENGAGE IN A S1/lJKE OR
OTTlER WOR/C STOPPAGE, OR CEASE TO WOR/C DUE TO PICKETING OR OT1lEN SUCH AC1/V/7l', CONT7lACTOR NAY IN ANY
OF SUCIl E:VE:tmi. AT ITS OP1l0N. PIITT/OllT PREJUDICE TO ANY OTIIER REMEDIES IT NAY llA VE, AFTEIl FOR1Y-E1GIIT (48)
HOURS WRI7TEN NOT/CE TO SUBCONTRACTOR, PROVIDE ANY SUCH UBOR AND /olAT!:RIALS AND DEDUCT TT1E COST
TTIEREOF FROM ANY MOh1ES TT1EN DUE OR TIIEREAFTER TO 'ECOME DUE SUBCONmACTOIlo AND FURTIIER, IN ANY OF
SUCIl E:VE:tmi, CONT7lACTOR MAY AT ITS OPTION. W/TIIOllT PRElUDICE TO ANY OTIIER REMEDIES IT MAY HAVE,
TERMINATE TT1E EMPLOYMENT OF SUBCONmACTOR'S FlI/," FOR TIlE WORK UNDER TfUS SUBCDN1IUCT '" SIWl. /lAVE
11IE R1GIIT TO ENTER UPON TT1E PREMISES AND TAKE POSSESSION, FOR T/IE PURPOSE OF COMPlL1ING TT1E WOR/C
HEREUNDER, OF AU. TTIE MATEJ/JALS. TOOLS. " C(!UlPMIiNT 'l1IEREON, " TO FlN'SII TTIE WOR/C" PROVIDE TT1E
MATEJ/JALS 11lEREFORE EIT1IER wrm ITS OWN E.IIPLOYUS OR OT/IER SUBCONTfIACTORS: AND IN CASE OF SUCH
DISCON/1NUANCE OF TIlE EMPLOYMIiNT BY CONmACTOR. SUBCO,vIIUCTOR SRAU. NOT'E EN1I7T.ED TO RECElYE ANY
FUR111ER PAYMENTS UNDER TTIE SU'CONlR.iCT OR OTIIERII7SE, BlIT SII.U.L /l'EVf:RT/lElLSS RE-1IA1N UiBU: FOR ANY
DAMAGES II'IIICII CO,~7R.JCTOR INCURS; IF T1IE E.YPc.~'SE.S !SCUI'.RllJ BY 1I1E CON/R.lCTOR IN COMPU:TTNG TIlE WORK
SlI.ilL EXCEED TIlE UNPAID B,iUNCE, S/JBCO.~7R.jCTOR SIUU p,iY TTlE DIfffJ'LNCE TO TIlE CONT1/.iCTOR ALONG IIml
ANYOnv:.R D,-t.\(.if;!SSI,','CURP,-,e_'D erco,';'lP.iLiO,f.? A5 n/.r:: F.S.H'l.TOF SUBl-/J,'.7F.fCTOR'S DUAULT. CO....7R..CTOR SIl.UL
II.H'E A lJE,.... uros All. MiTT_PI.itS. T()()L~. .{ Al'i'Uf,',tTS T.iFf:.... FtiS~.E.).';{LI....(lf TO SECURE nlE P,i)'ME.\T nIEREOF.
suno.J,\7R.tCTOR snit). BE /lUIlE TO cO,'.7,lI.i(70."- DUE TO 111[: FitU''''!'. 0,': SUBCO,\7R.iCTOl?'S PE/lfO/?\f,tSCE.
'.
f
r.
6.
SUBCONT1/.iCTOR'S FAILURE TO KEEP TIlE PROGRESS OF ITS WORK UP ro 1IIAT OF CON1lUCT OF OTIIER TIlADES, OR
TIlE FAILURE TO EXECUTf: ITS WORK AS DIREctED BY CONT7lACT(lR.
10D. SUBCONT7lACTOR AGREES TlLiT WilEN TIlE CONT7lACT DOCUMENT'S, SPEOFICAlIONS. OR DRAW/NGS RE(!UIRE.
SUBCONT7lACTOR II7U. COMPLY IIml ANY AI'PUCABU: STATE OR fEDEIl.iL rREVAIUNG WAGE UW AS WElL AS ANY
RULES OR REGUUlIONS PROMUWATED TIIEREUNDER, TIlE SUBCONmACTOR AGREES ro COMPLY WlTTI AU. SUCII
TERMS" CONDmONS W/IICII ARE AprUCABU: TO TIllS SUBCONT7lACT AND TO INDEMMFY" HOW TTIE CONmACTOR
IIARMLESS FOR ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY WTTII SUCII CONDmONS.
IDE. SUBCONT7lACTOR W/U IW'l.' ACTUAL RESPONSI'IUTY FOR COMPLYING WlTTI TIlE STANDARDS SET FORT1IIN 1IIE RULES
"REGUUlIONS PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO TIlE CONS71WC1/0N SAFETY A CT (40 U.S,e. J27)" OTTIER OSIIA RELATED
PROVISIONS TO mE E.rrENT APPUCABU: TO mE SUBCONT1/.ICTOR'S pORT10NOF TIlE WORIC '" SUBCONT7lACTOR S/tAU
INDE1IfMFY AND SAVE TIlE CONT7lACTOR /l.iR,lfLESS INCONNEC1/0NTIIEREWmI fROIo{ ANY AND AlL DAMAGE INa.UOING
ATTORM:Y'S "D, COST OF CORllECllYE AC1/0N, FINES. Ere,
/I, AND DOES IIEREBY AGREE TlLiT1IIE CONT7lACTOR'S EQUI/'1o{1iNT 1171L BE AVAIUBU: TO mE SUBCONT7lACTOR OM.Y AT
mE CONl11ACTOR'S DISC/!E1/0N" ON MUlVAUY s.mSFACTORY TElWS.
/2, FURMSlIpERlODIC PROGRESS REPORTS OF TIlE WORK AS MUlVAILY AGREED INUUDING mE PROGRESS OF MATERIALS
OR EQUIPMENT UNDER TIllS AGREEMENT 1/LiT MAY BE IN TIlE COURSE OF PREPARAlION OR MANUFACTURE,
J], MAKE ANY" AIL CltiNGES OR DEV/AlIONS FROM TIlE ORlGIN.iL Pl.iNS " SPEOFICAlIONS WlT/IOUT NUWFYlNG TIlE
ORlGIN.iL COIm/ACT WilEN SPEOFICAUY ORDERED TO DO SO IN WRI71NG BY TIlE CONT7lACTOR, TIlE SUBCONmACTOR
PRIOR TO TIlE COMMENa:AIENT OF TIllS REVISED WORK, SltAU SUBMfT PROMP'T1.Y TO T11E CON1lUCTOR WRITTEN
COPIES OF TIlE COST OR =fT PROPOS-iL FOR SUCII REV1SED WORK IN A MANNEIl CONSI~ WlT/I l7IE CONmACT
DOCUMENT'S,
U. COOPERATE IIml TIlE CONT7lACTOR " 01llER SUBCONT7lACTORS IVIIOSE WORK MlGlfT INTERFERE WlTTI TIlE
SUBCON1lUCTOR'S WORK" TO PART1aPATE IN TIlE PREPARAlION OF CooRDlN.fTED DRAW/NOS IN AREAS OF
CONGESTTON AS RE(!UIIIED BY TIlE CONT1/.iCT DOCUMlNTS. SPEOFlCAUY NOT1NG " ADVISING TIlE CON1lUCTOR OF
ANY SUCIIINTEIlFERENCE,
IS. COOPEltiTE WlTTI71IE CONT1/.iCTOR IN SC/IEDUUNG /liS WORIC SO AS NOT ro CONFUcr OR INTE/!FERE WlTTI71IE WORK
OF OTIIENS. TO PRoMmy SUB.llfT mop DRAW/NGS, DRAWINGS, " SAMPLES, AS REQUIRED IN ORDER TO CARRY ONWD
WORK EFFIOENltY AND AT SPEED TltAT W/U NOT CAUSE DElAY IN TIlE PROGRESS OF TTIE CONT7lACTOR'S WORIC OR
OTlIER BRANCIIES OF TIlE WORIC CARRIED ON BY 01llER"SUBCONT7lACTORS.
16, COMPLY WlTTI AU. FEDERAL. STATE, " LOCAL LA WS" ORDINANCES APPLYING TO TTIE 'UlWING OR S71WCTURE AND TO
COMPLY AND GIVE ADEQUATE NOllCES REUlING TO TTIE WORIC TO PROPER A/I11/0RmES AND TO SECURE AND PAY FOR
AU. NEr.ESSARY UCENSES OR PERMITS TO CARRY ON TTIE WORIC AS DESauBED IN TT1E CONT7lACT DOCUMENTS AS
APPUCABU: TO TTUS SUBCON1lUCT.
17. COMPLY WlTTI FEDERAL. STATE. "LOCAL TAX LAWS. SOaAI. SECURITI UWS. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSAlION UWS"
WORKMEN'S CO/JPENSAlION LAWS INSOFAR AS AI'PUCABU: TO TTIE PERFOIWANCE OF T1I1S SUBCON1lUCT.
18, AND DOES I1EREBY AGREE TT/AT AU. WORIC SRAU. BE DONE SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL OF TTUS ARCfUTECT OR
OWM:R'S A/I11/0/lIZED AGENT, '" iUS DEOSION IN MATTERS REUlING TO ARlIS1/C EFFECT SfIAIL'E FINAL. IF W/TTUN
TT1E TERMS OF TT1E CONT7lACT DOCUMENTS,
19, TT1E SUBCONT7lACTOR SfIAIL BEAR f1!1l. RESPONSIBIUTY FOR d1k WORIC TO 'E PERFORMED UNDER iUS SUBCONmACT,
INUUDING AU. ROOF PENE71IAlIONS. CIITT1NG. PATr:fIING, ETC. TIlE SU'CONmACTOR AGREES 'TIIAT TTIE COST OF AU.
CIITT1NG" PATClUNG lIAS 'EENINUUOED AS PARTOFSUBCONT7lACTOR'S WORIC. TTIE SUBCON1lUCTOR AOREES TflAT
HE SfIAIL EMPLOY ARTTSANS AND '11lADESMEN OF TTIE TIrADE NORMAU.Y RESPONSIBU: FOR T1IE ROOF, OR FOR FINISH
WORIC INVOLVED TO CUT AND PATr:I/ AROUND TTIE WORIC OF SUBCONmACTrJR'S TIrADE.
20, TT1E SU'CONT7lACTOR SRAU.MAKE AU. APPUCAlIONS FOR PAYMIiNT TO LOIWI ASSOCIATE:S, 1Ne. AS AeJliNT FOR TT1E
OWNER. LOBAR ASSOCIATES SfIAIL SUlNfT SAID APPUCA110NS TO TIlE ARartTECT AND OWNER FOR PAYMENT. UPON
APPROVAL OF PAYMIiNT BY TT1E ARClllTECT AND OWM:R, AND PAYMIiNT'Y mE OWNER TO LOBAR ASSOCIATE:S. me. AS
AGIiNT FOR TTIE OWM:R. TO SUBCON1lUCTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITIl TT1E n:JWS OF TTUS SU'CON1lUCT. TT1E
SU'CON1lUCTOR FlIRT1IER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES 71/AT LOIWI ASSOCIATE:S. 1Ne. SfIAIL IIAVE NO UABIUTY TO
SUBCONT7lACTOR FOR TIIEOWM:R'S FAILURE TOPAYFOR WORIC PERFORMED 'YSU'CON1lUCTOR. AND SUBCONT1lACTOR
AGREES TO HOW LOBAR ASSOCIATES, 1Ne. flARMLESS fROM ANY CUJ/J FOR PAYMIiNT FOR WORIC PERFORMED 'Y
SU'CON1lUCTOR. AND TO INDEMN/FY LOBAR ASSOCIATES,INe. fROM ANY SUCH CLiJMS MADE BY SUBCON1lUCTOR'S
SUBCONT7lACTORS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS. AND MAT!:RIAL SUPPUERS,
lItAT mE CON1lUCTOI/ '" SUBCON1lUCTOR AGI1EE:
21. TTtAT IN TT1E MATTFR OF ARBI1//A710N, 7l/EIR RlGIITS AND OBUGAlIONS. AND AU. PROCEDURE SfIAIL'E AJIALOGOUS
TO mOSE SET FORTI/IN TT1E CONT7lACT DOCUMENT'S PROVTDED, 1101l'EVEII, TTtAT A DEOSION'Y mE ARCIU7E:CT OR
OWl>U'S AUT/IORIZED AGIiNT. S/WL NOT BE: A CO^DmON rRECEDE:NT TO ARBf1/ti1l0N.
.'.RTICLE XI. TU..IIIN.iT10N CLAUSE:
lOa,fR ASSOCl,fTES,lNC, SIWL IW'!': TIlE PJGlfT ro T'EJI.\/IN,iTE TIllS CO.\7R.iCT A.\ll TO IIIRE AN01llER CO.\7R.iCTlJR '[0
"
, ,
('
r,
z
PERFORM TTlE INCOMrr~ POR1ION OF TTIE WORIC SIIOIfLD TTlE CONT7lACTOR FAIL TO PERFORM iTS OBUGAlIONS UNDEJI
TTUS CON1lUCT. LOBAR ASSDaiTES. INC. SIUU ALSO IW'l: TIlE RlG/rr TO RECOvrR ANY AND AU. LOSSES OR DAMAGE,
INa.UDINO ATTORNEY'S FUS,llESUl.lING FROM lIIE CON1lUCTOR'S BREACII OF CON1lUCT.
ANY AMOUNT DETEJIJoIlNED TO ,F: DUE LOBAR ASSOaATEr. /He. BY ANY ARBl71IAlION. ARBl71IAnON PANU. COURT. OR
TTtROUGH ANY OTTIER DISPll11: /1ESOLunON n:CIINI(!UE SIUU.'EAR INTtREST FROM TTIE DAn: TIlE 'REACIl 0CCIJ/lJIED AT
TIlE MAXlMII/J RAn: PElWITTFD BY TTlE USURY UWS OF TTIE APPUCABu: JURlSDIC1ION.
ARTICLE XlI. IN WT1NE.SS W1/E.RE()F TTIE PARTIES IlEJJETO /LiVE EXEcun:D TTUS AGI1EEMIiNT UNDEJI SEAL, TT1E DAY AND
!'CAR FIRST WIlf1TEN ABOVE. 11' TfUS SUBCCN1lUCT IS NOT EXEcun:D WlTTUN FOURn:EN (/4) CIu:NDAR DAn Am/!
RECEIPT. LOBAR ASSOCUTES, INC. IlESERVES TT1E RlG/rr TO VOID TTUS AGI1EEMENT AND O'TAlN TllESE SERVICES FROM
ANOTTlER FIlIAl. ,
TillS SUBCONTRA.CTOR CERTIFIES TlIAT "
MAINTAINS A NON-SEGREGATED PUCE OF
BUSINESS AND IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNrrY
EMPLOYER.
ATTEST:
FRANCIS HEISSE
SUBCONTRACTOR
(SEAL)
~~~,
BY ,
OWner
(I'm.E)
"
ATTEST:
LOBAR ASSOC1ATES. lNC.
CONTRA.CTOR
,
~.~<<-
LEE E. EICIlELBERGER, PRESIDENTù
fTREla.'1.
-
.
....
o
U"I
U"I
,
'"
'"
1'-<
0'" ..
~~ .... ..
.... "
.... OS (j
~>= .. 'tl ~ W
" " a.: :J l'l
,,"en .... Qj
~:.: OS .... ~ z 0
~t:i:5 ..... . Qj 0<: ui j w lD
"" u "" 101 W '" r--
"", z ~~ > <( -
... ... <(
0 . <( <( <(
U~~ . in 11.
en ~~ 0 Ul ~
I'- H Iol ,. Ii
o !-o Iol ~ ctl W :J W
OU en , Z .J ...
!-oU< en .. Iol Z a: 0 Ul
gl~~ ... ;.. U ~~ 0 0 U <(
Iol 5l t: u
o H ::c ::E lD Z
u > ~ :':0 a:: <( 0 <(
H en U l'l
1ol000U ... ; <( N ..J
"'''l U ~ J:
E-<~ ~ en
z~ 9 :ij
....u
Q
Z
.. ..
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaintiff
v.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER AND COUNTERCLAIM
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
, ,
5. Admitted.
6. Admitted.
7. Denied. Defendant specifically denies that in
addition to the written contract, the subcontractor completed
additional work on the same job. Rather, all work performed by
the subcontractor was pursuant to the plans and specifications
incorporated into Plaintiff's subcontract. By way of further
answer, any "additional work" performed by Plaintiff was
required as a result of Plaintiff's own failure to properly
liAR MUN " UA VIES, P,C.
AIIUkNHs.AT.I.AW
2lOtll"tUIIMH", AVfNlJF.
IA'KASIHll""17601
preform its work under the contract.
1
..-
HA.RMON" DAVIES. P_c.
ArlllIPHY\-A(-I.AW
l:lo6( UIlJM81A ^Vf~l'E
1"~'KASlf1t Pr\ 111ll))
8. Defendant specifically responds to the following
averments:
a.
Denied.
Defendant
denies
that
in
accordance with the contract, the contractor was to install
wooden forms around the entire pool to facilitate installation
of gunite.
Defendant denies that since contractor did not
erect the wooden walls, subcontractor had to revise its work
schedule to install the gunite at a cost of $18,000 more than
anticipated. By way of further answer, in accordance with the
contract, the contractor had the option to install wooden forms
around the entire pool area to facilitate installation of
gunite in case unsuitable soil was encountered that would not
provide a suitable vertical plane for gunite installation. All
parties agreed, including Plaintiff, that natural earth walls
formed during the excavation process provided a sufficient
shell to allow Plaintiff to install the gunite, and this
approach was accepted by
Plaintiff
prior
to gunite
installation. Further, Defendant believes and therefore avers
that the $18,000 in costs which Plaintiff alleges it incurred
in additional expense was partially the result of the decision
by Plaintiff's own superintendent to enlarge the shell of the
pool which therefore required the use of additional gunite.
b.
Denied.
Defendant
denies
that
subcontractor put in a new diving jig at the request of the
contractor, as contractor's men went over and destroyed the
original diving jig at cost to the subcontractor of $150.00.
2
,.
By way of further answer, the subcontractor was required to
provide a new diving board, thereby requiring a diving jig, as
a result of a direct request by the owner. This item was not
part of the subcontract between the Plaintiff and Defendant.
Contractor Defendant was at no time aware
or told that
subcontractor plaintiff would require the old diving jig at the
job site. Therefore, contractor's demolition crew did destroy
the old property, including the diving jig, pursuant to the
contract specifications.
c. Denied. Defendant denies that contractor
requested subcontractor to cut the bond beam at a cost to
subcontractor of $150.00. By way of further answer, Defendant,
after reasonable investigation, is unaware as to the existence
of a bond beam on the project.
d. Denied. Defendant denies that contractor
requested subcontractor to install three (3) lifeguard stands
at a cost to subcontractor of $7,500.00.
By way of further
answer, subcontractor was required to install three (3)
lifeguard stands pursuant to the plans and specifications
incorporated into its contract and was paid for such
installation pursuant to the agreed upon contract price.
e. Denied. Defendant denies that as neither
a wooden wall nor dirt wall was provided by the contractor at
the shallow end of the pool, subcontractor was asked to
construct a plywood wall against which the gunite could be
shot, at a cost to the subcontractor of $2,900.00. By way of
"ARMON AllAVIF.S. p,c.
AnORNI:YS-AT-I.AW
ll01ll"OIIJMBIA AVENUE
1",..rASIt'R. to^ I1lJlll
3
.-
further answer, Plaintif f spec if ically requested that a plywood
wall be put up in order to give it room to install piping
behind the wall area.
f. Denied. Defendant denies that it requested
subcontractor to run a sewer line for a cost to the
subcontractor of $350.00.
By way of further answer,
subcontractor was required to run a sewer line pursuant to the
plans and specifications incorporated into Plaintiff's
subcontract and pursuant to the contract price stated therein.
9. Denied.
Defendant denies that subcontractor
completed all of the work under the original contract as well
as additional work as described above by April 11, 1994. By
way of further answer, Plaintiff substantially completed its
work required by its contract on or about April 13, 1994 which
is evidenced by the substantial completion certificate issued
on that date.
Certificate of substantial completion is
attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated as though fully set
forth herein.
COUNT I
BREACH OF CONTRACT
10. Answers
to paragraphs
9 are
through
1
incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.
11. Denied.
Defendant denies that in addition to
the written contract and the change order, the additional work
as described in paragraph 3 was performed by the subcontractor
pursuant to an express oral contract, which was completed by
ItARMON A1JAVIES. P.C.
^ nOkStYS-A '-I"'"
ZJOfd.UllJ\tall\ AVENUE
1"'CASltR PAI1Ml
4
..-
the subcontractor. Rather, all work performed by the plaintiff
was performed pursuant to the written subcontract and the plans
and specifications incorporated therein.
By way of further
answer, any "additional work" performed by Plaintiff was
required only as a result of Plaintiff's failure to properly
perform its work under the contract.
12. Denied. Defendant denies that pursuant to the
written contract, the change order and the additional work
performed by the oral contract, the contractor was to pay the
subcontractor One Hundred Ninety-Seven Thousand Seven Hundred
Sixty-Nine ($197,769.00) Dollars.
By way of further answer,
pursuant to the contract and change order, Defendant was
required to pay Plaintiff $167,919.00, provided that all work
under the subcontract was satisfactorily completed.
13. Admitted in part.
Denied in part. Defendant
admits that it paid the subcontractor a total of One Hundred
Thirty-Four Thousand and 00/100
($134,000.00)
Dollars.
Defendant denies that a balance of Sixty-Three Thousand Seven
Hundred Sixty-Nine and 00/100 ($63,769.00) Dollars is due and
owing to the Plaintiff subcontractor.
By way of furthet'
answer, as a result of additional costs already incurred by
Defendant as a result of Plaintiff's
inadequate and
unsatisfactory performance; as well as costs not yet
ascertained by Defendant as a result of Plaintiff's inadequate
and unsatisfactory performance, no balance is due and owing to
Plaintiff.
HARMON Ii nAVIES. P.c,
AtroMNfYS.Af.I.AW
~lQtInJl_UMH1^ AVf.NUE
I "."CASU;R "A PI!lOJ
5
II
"
14 . Admi t ted in part.
Denied in part.
It is
admitted that despite repeated demands, Defendant has not paid
Plaintiff subcontractor an amount of $63,769.00 in addition to
the $134,000.00 paid to Plaintiff pursuant to the written
contract.
Defendant denies that a balance of $33,919.00 is
remaining under the written contract and a balance of
$29,550.00 pursuant to the oral contract. By way of further
answer, Defendant incorporates herein its answer stated in
paragraph 13 above.
15. Denied.
Plaintiff's
averment
states
a
conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required
and said averment is therefore denied. To the extent an answer
is required, Defendant denies that it "breached both the oral
and written contract by failing to perform its end of the
agreement by final payment, despite the fact that subcontractor
completed its work and fulfilled all of its obligations under
the agreement."
By way of further answer, no oral contract
existed.
Further, contractor Defendant fully performed all
responsibilities it had pursuant to the contractual agreement
between the parties, including, but not limited to, making
payment to subcontractor Plaintiff.
WHEREFORE,
Defendant
Lobar
Associates,
Inc.
respectfully requests that this Honorable Court dismiss
Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice with Defendant's costs to
be paid by Plaintiff.
III\RMON. HAVIES. P.c.
"nuRNfys.I\J.1-AW
H06lUl.tJMBII\ AVfNUE
!.AM'ASHeR. PA !7t1il)
6
paid.
As for subcontractor' B averment that "it paid for'
materials from its own funds as averred in paragraph 8 a
through f for the total amount of $29,850.00," Defendant denies
this
averment
on
the
basis
that,
after
reasonable
investigation, Defendant is without sufficient information as
to affirm or deny said averment and it is therefore denied.
21. Denied.
Defendant's
averment
states
a
conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required.
To the extent an answer is required, Defendant denies that the
contractor was therefore unjustly enriched by the receipt of
the funds from the owner of the West Shore Country club for
work and materials that were actually provided by the
subcontractor because Plaintiff was fully paid in accordance
with the terms of the subcontract for all work performed on the
project.
WHEREFORE, Defendant Lobar Associates, Inc. requests
that this Honorable Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with
prejudice with Defendant's costs to be paid by Plaintiff.
NEW MATTER
22. Defendant answering averments of paragraphs 1
through 21 are incorporated by reference as though fully set
forth herein.
23. Under Defendant's contract with the owner, all
of Defendant's work, which included all of Plaintiff's work
under the subcontract, was to be completed on or before January
If^RMON il OA\lIES. P.c.
"nUR~t,\'S.AT.I.^W
2k16 [OI\lMhl^ ""VENUE
Lo\!'tco\\U'R 1'" mlIJ 8
1, 1994. A true and correct copy of said contract is attached
I.
"
hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference.
24. The requirement for Defendant's work and
therefore Plaintiff's work, to be complete before January 1,
1994 was clearly specified in the plans, specifications, and
documents.
25. Plaintiff knew, or should reasonably have known,
of the requirement that all work on the project be completed on
or before January 1, 1994.
26. Defendant, as general contractor, prepared a Job
Progress Schedule for the project. A true and correct copy of
said schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and
incorporated herein by reference.
27. Defendant provided a copy of said schedule co
Plaintiff.
28. Plaintiff did not object to this schedule or
take exception to it.
29. From the beginning of its work on the project,
Plaintiff failed to provide an adequate number of properly
trained and qualified employees to perform its work on the
project.
30. From the beginning of its work on the project,
Plaintiff failed to provide an adequate quantity of proper
equipment to perform its work on the project.
31. In a letter dated November 19, 1993, Defendant
notified Plaintiff of its failure to meet the schedule
requirements on the project. A true and correct copy of said
UAMMON 4: UAVIES, P.c.
,....nuJt'~Ys."f.lAW
1_'tfJ6 nil 1~\tBIA "VE~tJE
I ,"P,\HR PA 11f11U 9
tlARMoN A lJAVIES. P.C.
^rTUR!\IHS.^T.IA'"
2106nJl.IIMIII\ ^"'F~UE
1^,"l"A'"R. PI\ I7flO)
letter is attached hereto as Exhibit "D".
32. Throughout the course of the project, Plaintiff
consistently and persistently failed to meet the required
schedule.
33. As a direct and proximate result of Plaintiff's
failure to properly perform its work on the project in a good
and workmanlike manner, in accordance with its proposal, the
subcontract, applicable project plans, specifications, and
schedules, completion of the project was delayed from January
1, 1994 to April 15, 1994.
34. As a direct and proximate result of said three
and one-half month delay, the work of Defendant and of other
subcontractors on the project was similarly delayed.
35. Under Defendant's contract with the owner,
Plaintiff was to complete its work in accordance with the plans
and specifications incorporated into its subcontract.
36. At the completion of Plaintiff's work, the
architect noted that the water level of the pool was uneven,
which Defendant believes and therefore avers is a direct and
proximate result of Plaintiff's failure to properly perform its
work in a good and workmanlike manner.
37. Plaintiff's claims, which are specifically
denied by Defendant, are barred as a result of Plaintiff's
failure to timely raise said claims in accordance with the
contract requirements.
10
COUNTERCLAIM
COUNT I
38. Defendant's averments of paragraphs 1-37 are
incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
39. The total value of the subcontract, including
all approved change orders, is $167,919.00.
40. To date, Defendant has paid Plaintiff the sum of
$134,000.00.
41. As a direct and proximate result of Plaintiff's
failure to perform its work in a good workmanlike manner, in
accordance wi th its proposal, the subcontract, appl icable
plans, specifications and schedules, Lobar Associates, Inc. was
forced to incur the following costs:
(1) 4-100 lb. Bottles of Gas
(2) 1 Roll Polyethylene - 20 x 100
$ 120.00
$ 60.00
(3) Snow Removal At Site And Pool Area Due
To Time Of Year That Work Was Being
Performed
Liberty Excavators - $557.56 +$1,584.70 =
(4) Cost For Water Fill-Up Of Pool &
Removal Of Sewer (Water - $368.00,
Sewer - $423.08)
$ 2,142.00
$ 791. 00
"ARMON A UAVIES. p_c.
An()Il:~H'i.A'.L'W
2JO&un ('MBIA AVE~UE
1.""'t"'HIl .." 1160)
(5) Miscellaneous Items Related To Pool
Work And Proper Function of Pool
(Note: Gutter Off Level By 1/2" In
80;) :
(A) Aqua Specialists Pump Out Surge Tank
(B) Aqua Specialists Install Control
Valve, Gutter System, Clean Off
Stickers, & Repair One (1) Light
(C) Aqua Specialists - Line Striping
Required By DER
$
228.60
$
685.00
$
535.50
11
__ _.1
HARMON A DAVIES. P.C.
^ rIOM~t.YS.^ f.lAW
110U'lIUJlO'1\ AVENUE
IANC:I\'iItM f'.o\ PMJ
(D) Kilgore Signs - Capacity 180 Sign
Required By DER $ 26.50
(E) Procedures For Operating And
Winterizing Pool $ 70.00
(F) Adjust & Install Screws In All
Pool Returns, Pool Light Work,
Secure In Niche, Install Screw
Lids In Wading Pool Skimmer Bits S 178.00
TOTAL $ 4,836.60
42. Further, Defendant in the future may incur
additional costs in excess of $20,000.00 as a result of
Plaintiff's failure to properly construct the pool so the water
level was even.
43. As a result of Defendant I s existing costs as
well as those costs which they may incur in the future,
Plaintiff may be indebted to Defendant in excess of $20,000.00.
WHEREFORE,
Lobar Associates,
respect fully
Inc.
requests this Honorable Court to enter judgment upon Count I of
its Counterclaim in its favor and against Plaintiff in an
amount in excess of $24,836.60, together with costs and
interest as allowed by law.
44. Defendant
incorporates
its
averments
of
paragraphs 1 through 43 by reference as though fully set forth
herein.
45. As a direct and proximate result of the three
and one-half month delay caused by Plaintiff, Defendant's
12
period of performance on the project was extended by three and
one-half months.
46. This three and one-half month extension caused
Defendant to expend a sum of $14,056.00 which is recoverable by
Defendant under the subcontract for extended project overhead,
project
management,
project
superintendence,
job
site
facilities, job site utilities, and to negotiate a contract
extension with the owner, and to perform its work during winter
months, during cold weather, among other things, as follows:
(1) Six (6) Weeks @ $1500.00/Week=
$ 9,000.00
(2) Additional Labor Due To Weather & Time
Of Year That Work Was Being Completed
48 Hrs. @ $22.44 =
$ 1,077.00
(3) Additional Materials Due To Weather &
Time of Year That Work Was Being
Performed - Stones - Hempt Bros. =
$
703.00
(4) Additional Equipment Required Due To
Weather & Time Of Year Work Was Being
Completed
$ 1,500.00
(5) General Superintendent Additional
Supervision - 60 Hrs. @ $29.60 =
(6) Overtime Associated With The Project
Order To Meet Revised Completion Date
Of 15 April 1994.
$ 1,776.00
TOTAL
S 4.050.00
$18,106.00
WHEREFORE,
Defendant
Lobar
Associates,
Inc.
IIARMON a. DAVIES. P.c.
ArlllRNI'YS.AT-I.AW
2\of1nJl UMBI..\ ""ESUE
'ASl"J\sIER PA 1J1lO1
respectfully requests this Honorable Court to enter judgment in
its favor and against Plaintiff in the amount of $18,106.00,
together with costs and interest as allowed by law.
13
COUNTERCLAIM
COUNT III
47. Defendant
incorporates
its
averments
paragraphs 1 through 46 by reference as though fully set forth
herein.
48. Liberty Excavators,
Inc.
("Liberty") ,
the
excavation and demolition subcontractor on the proj ect, has
alleged that it is owed the sum of $35,789.63 plus interest,
for its work on the projp.ct as a result of delays in completion
of the project, and work improperly done by Plaintiff.
49. The delays in the completion were caused by
Plaintiff.
50. While Defendant denies liability to Liberty for
said sum, to the extent that Defendant is found liable to
Liberty, Plaintiff is liable to Defendant.
WHEREFORE,
Defendant
Lobar
Associates,
Inc.
respectfully requests this Honorable Court to enter judgment
upon Count III of its Counterclaim in its favor and against
Plaintiff in the amount of Thirty-Five Thousand Seven Hundred
Eighty-Nine and 63/100 ($35,789.63) Dollars, or such other sum
as Defendant may be found liable to Liberty Excavators, Inc.
Respectfully submitted,
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
By:
I
. '- , . '. ;:_..:.1 ({\ .
Corrie L.LFi/schel, I~.D. #65289
Attorney for Defendant
Lobar Associates, Inc.
UARMOS" U^VIES. P.C
A 11t1MN~'I'S.^ (.tAW
l1tlflUHl;MBI~ ","'FSI!f.
I"SC'\1I R PA I1NIl
14
of
"
,:
EXHIBIT "A"
CERTlflCA TE!j
'SUBSTANTIA
COMPlETIO
AlA DOCUMENT C70~
OI~IHbLJIIOn 10:
OWNER 0
ARCHITECT 0
CONTRACTOR 0
fiELD 0
OTHER 0
PROJECT:
(name. addreH)
pool/Bathhouse Construction
West Shore Country Club
100 Brentwater Road
Camp Hill, PA 17011
TO (Owner),
rwest Shore Country Club I
100 Brentwater Road
Camp Hill, PA 17011
L J
ARCHITECT:
H. Edward Black & Associates
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER:
CONTRACTOR: LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONTRACT FOR: General Construction
CONTRACT DATE: 16 July 199q
13 April 19911
PROJECT OR DESIGNATED PORTION SHAll INCLUDE: Pool/Bathhouse ConstrucHon
DATE Of ISSU..\~CE
The Work performed under this Conlract has been reviewed and found 10 be subslanti.lly com pie Ie. The Dale of Subs'lanlial
Completion of the Project or portion thereof designaled above is hereby eSlablished as
which is also the date of commencement of applicable warranlies required by ihe Contract Documenll. except as staled below,
DEFINITION OF DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION
\
The Dale of Subllan:ial Completion of Ihe Work or designaled porI ion thereof is the Date certified by Ihe Archilect when
construction is sufficiently complete. in accordance with the Contract Documents. so the Owner CJn occupy or utilize the
Work or desi&!lolted panion th'ereof for the use for which it is intended. as expressed in the Contrar:t Documents,
A li.1 of ilems to be compleled or corrected. prepared by lhe Contractor and verified and amended by the Archilect, is
attached herelo, The failure 10 include any items on such list doe. nol alter the responsibilil of the Conlractor 10 complete all
Work" in accordance with the Conlract Documents. The date of commencement of warranlie. if S on the allached list will
oe the date of final payment unle.. otherwise agreed to in ilin~
H. Edward Black E Associates t ~ ~ r DA~T'!('5(.,J
ARCHITECT r:- r '
The Conlraclor wdl complete or correct Ihe Work on the list of ilem. ."ached herelo wilhin
from the above Dale of Substantial Completion.
day.
LOBAR ASSOCIATES. INC.
CONTRACTOR
~.""".. ,'L;f'" t .k"'^~L'\.-
BY
'fJit1c;r
The Owner Jccepts lhe \-\'ork or designated portIon thereof as substantially complete Jnd will J!l5Ume iull possession thereof
at Wmel o~n ; ^ (dale).
IV.." <;hnr.. Cnllntry Clllh ~'d4-, tfpwi.. ~~d":' - Lf!f/;~
OWNER /.'"'d. 9 DATE '
The respon"bililies of the Owner and the Contractor for security, maintenance, heat, utililles, damage to the Work
and in.urance shall be.s follows:
{NOI~Owne"s Jnd (onlfJCCOr'J leg~1 dnd ;nsurJnce counsel Jhoufd delermine .1nd review insur.lIlce reQuiremenlS and coverage; Conlraclor
)hdll Jccur~ comen! 0# JUrely company, il .1ny.)
AlA DOCUMENT G704 . CERTIFIC^TE OF SUaSTANT1Al COMI'LETlO~ . APRil 11)75 (OITlQ;-..I . AlA.
S) 1978 . THE AM[RIC/\N I;\ISTI rUTE OF ^RCHITECTS, 171i Mw YORK ^\'[. N.W., WASHINGTO:-.:, 0 C, 2000{,
,_. ,.....,.... ~ ,., "....".., '-' '. " " ,.,.. ....... .,.. ,
G704 - 1978
EXHIBIT "B"
..
~~~
~p
~
AGREEMENT BEnVEEN CONTRACTOR &: SUBCONTRACTOR
SUBCONTRACT #3081-13152-510
AGREEMENT MADE ,13 01' THE lRD DAY OF AUGUST IN THE rE.<R 0' N1NF:TUN HUNDIlED AND 9J.
BETWEEN THE COImlACTOR: LOBAR ASSOCIATES. INC.
J OLD MIll ROAD
1'.0. BOX 411
DIUSBURG, PA 170/94111
AND THE SUBCOImlACTOR: FRANCIS HEISSE
4lJ N. PROGRESS AVE.
HARRlSBURG, I'A 17109
TELEPHONE: mn 545-3417
WITNESS6nr. TllAT THE SUBCONTRACTOR AND CONT7IACTOR FOR THE CONSJDEJlA1l0N l/ERJ!JNAFTfR NAM!D AGREE AS
'OUDW~
ARTICLE I. THE SUBCON/1!ACTOR AGREES ro 11/RMSH AU. MATUIAL AMJ fOUOIW ALL WORIC ,13 DESClUB!D IN Aif77a.E
U HEREOF 'OR:
NEW BATHHOUSE & POOL CONSTRUCTION
WEST SHORE COUNTRY CLUB
CAMP HIll, I' A
'OR LOBA/l ASSOC7Al'El'. INC. IN ACCORDANCE WTTR T1US AGIlEEMENT. THE AGRI:E.MENT B/ITWEE}/ TIlE OWNER 01
COImlACTOR. 01 IN ACCORDANCE wrm TIlE G!NE.RAL CONDmOI<S 0' THE COImlACT. SUPPLEMENTARY GENERAL
CONDmONS. TIlE DRAWINGS. SpEanCA1l0NS. AN/) ADDENDA f~ARED'Y H. EDWARD BLACK .t ASSOCIATES
l/ERJ!JNAFTfR CALLLD TIlE ARCHmCTOR OWNW'SAVTlIORIZED AGOff'. AU. 0' WHICH DOCUM~. SIGNED 'YTIIE fAR71ES
THE/lETD OR IDENTTFI!D BY TIlE ARCHmCT OR OWNEll'S AVTlIOR/ZED AGENT. FOIIN A PART 0' A CONTIIACT 'E7WEEN TIlE
COImlACTOR AND THE OWNER DArED 16 JUl.Y 1991.01 HEIlUY BECOME A fARTO'T1USCONTIIACT. olllE/lEJNREFEIlRED
ro AS TIlE CONTRICT DOCUMENrs. " SHALL BE MADE A VAlUBll! ro TIlE SUBCONTIIACTOR UPON IUS REQUEST fRJOR TO AN/)
ANYTTME SUBSEQUENT ro SIGMNG TIllS SUBCONTIIACT.
ARTICLE 11. TIlE SUBCO,VT7tICTOR 01 TIlE CONT7IACTOR AGREE TllATTl/E MATUllALS AND EQUII'MfNT TO BE FURMSHED
01 WORIC ro BE pOUORMED ARE COMpLETF; AS RLQUIIlED AN/) IN ST1fJCT ACCORDANCE wrm PUNS. SpEanCA1l0NS.
AJo/ENDM~. AND/OR ADDENDA 01 AS FOUDWS.-
A. APPUCABLE SECTIONS OF DIVISION I . GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
B. CONSTRUCTION OF SWIMMING AND WADING POOLS COMPLETE AS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH PENNSYLVANIA STATE REGULATIONS AND ACCORDING TO PUNS .t SPECIFICATIONS
PROVIDED, AS AMENDED IN YOUR LEITER OF 19 APRIL 1993 AND LATER DELETION OF THE
HEATERS ON THE ORIGINAL SPECIFICATIONS WHICH DECREASED THE PRICE FROM TIVoT
SHOWN ON YOUR LEITER DATED 19 APRIL 199J INCLUDING THE FOllOWING:
1. THE SWIMMING AND WADING POOLS WIll BE CONSTRUCTED EXACTLY AS SHOWN ON
BLUEI'RlNT.
... I OW MIll ROAD P.O. BOX 412
... DIUSBURG, PENNA /7019-0412
TEL: (717) 432.9728 FAX: (717) 412.9162
2
'l. THE EQUIPMENT SPECIFIED WIll. BE CHANGED AS FOUlJWS: SFV 18-18' HYItATII SAND
FILTER WrrHOUT AUTOMATIC BACKWASH. nvo OJ CHEMODATA MODEL 400 CONTROu;ERS
AND FOUR (4' STENNER PUMPS FOR AUTOMATIC CHEMICAL CONTROL OF BOTH POOLS.
AUTOMATIC FIll. FEATURE HAS BEEN DELETED FROM ORIGINAL BID.
J. nvELVli' (I'l' STAINLESS STEEL RECESSED WAIL STEPS HAVli' BEEN DELETED. THEY WIll.
BE REPLACED BY BUILT.IN CERAMIC TILE STEPS.
4. now CONTROL VALVES /lAVE BEEN DELETED.
S. WHEN SrrEWORK I.E. EXCAVATION, UNDER-DWNS, AND STONE ARE COMPLETE, YOUR
FIRM WIll. INS TAIL AND TEST ALL I'IPES WHICH WIll. BE PVC SC/lEDULE 40 AND SIZED IN
ACCORDANCE wml BLUEfRINTS - ESTI.ItATED TIME ONE (J) WEEK.
6. W/llLE THE WOOD FORMS FOR TIlE fOOL WALLS ARE BEING INSTAUED BY OT/lERS. YOUR
FIRM WIll. COMMENCE INSTALL/NG REBAR. U RODS ON 12" CENTERS, BOTII WAYS, OVER
WALLS AND nOOR OF TIlE SWI.ItMING fOOL. GRADE 60 STEEL WIll. BE USED. WilEN
STEEL INST..u..u.TION IS COMfLETE. TIlE fOOl. nOOR WIll. BE INSTAlLED'-ESTI.ItATED
T1.IIE TIIREE (1) WEEKS.
1. S/lOTCRETE-GUNlTE S\I'/.II.I/lNO fOOL WALLS AND GurrER WIll. BE INSTAUED -
ESTIMATED TIME roo (.1) WEEKS.
8. WADING fOOL ROUGII STRUCTURE WIll. BE INSTAlLED - ESTIMATED T1.IIE ONE (/) WEEK.
9. TILE WIll. BE INSTAlLED AND POOLS fUSTERED - ESTl.IfATED T1.IfE nvo OJ WEEKS.
SfECIAL REOUIREMENTS:
J. DUE TO fOSSIBLE COMMUNICATION CONFUCTS, THE OWNER 4< LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
REQUIRE THAT AU.. CORRESPONDENCE, WRmEN 4< VERBAL, FROM SUBCONTRACTORS 4<
MATERIAL SUfPUERS BE DIRECTED T/lROUGH LOBAR ASSOCIATES. INC. IN UEU OF DIRECT
CORRESfONDENCE wrrll TIlE OWNER & fROJECT ENGINEERS/ARCII/TECT. IN ADDrrION, AU..
ClARIFICATIONS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC. VIA FAX OR MAIL IN
UEU OF Vli'RBAL COMMUNICATION.
2. FIELD MEASUREMENTS 01 Vli'RlFICATION ARE TIlE RESfONSIBIUTY OF TlUS SUBCONTRACTOR.
REVIEW OF srrE AND FOUNDATION CONDITIONS IS A REQUIRE.\fENT FOR TillS CONTRACT.
J. HA Vli' MATERIALS DEUVERED WHEN REQUIRED. NO STORAGE IS A VAlLABLE ON JOBsrrE - IF
DEUVERY IS MANDATORY PRIOR TO INSTALL.ATION, THIS SUBCONTRACTOR WIll. HAVli' TO
PROVIDE REQUIRED STORAGE FACIliTIES. fHASED fROJECTS SIIOULD HAVli' MATERIALS
SHInED IN PHASES UNLESS STORAGE IS fROVlDED.
4. PROTECTION OF MATERIALS UNTIL OWNER.ARCHrrECT ACCErTANCE.
S. MATERIAL SAFETY DATA S/lEETS ARE A REQUIREMENT FOR TillS fROJECT 01 MUST BE
SUBMmED wrrHlN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF TIlE SUBCONTRACT DATE AND PRIOR TO
MATERlA1...S ARRIVING ON TIlE JOBsrrE.
6. SUBMISSION OF OfERATION 01 MAINTENANCE MANUALS TO BE MADE wrrH INrrlAL
SUBMmALS.
1. BY EXECUTION OF Tms SUBCONTRACT AGREE.lfENT. l'OUR FlR.lf AGREES T/lAT rr WIll.
STRICTLY COMfLY WITH AU. OSIIA REGULATIONS AND MSDS REQUIREMENTS ON THIS PROJECT.
rr IS A1...S0 TIlE RESfONSIBIUTY OF YOUR PERSONNEL TO FOUOW ANY INSTRUCTIONS OR
DIRECTIVES GIVli'N BY OUR PROJECT SUPERINTENDENT. STEVE DIlLER, REGARDING SAFETY ON
THE fROJECT. ANY FINES ISSUED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC. AS A RESULT OF YOUR FlR.WS
NEGUGENCE OR NON-COMfUANCE WIll. BE T/lE RESfONSIBIUTY OF YOUR FIRM. THE
SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESfONSIBLE FOR AIL OSHA REGULATIONS INCLUDING Vli'RlFIED SAFETY
CONDmONS OF OTHER TRADES.
8. THIS fROJECT /lAS A FIRM COMfLETION DATE OF 'AS fER ATTACHED SC/lEDULE wrrH NO TIME
EXTENSIONS PER.lfmED. AU. MATER/A1...S AND WORK SCHEDULES MUST BE COORDINATED
VERY CLOSELY wrrH OUR PROJECT SUfERI"'I'ENDENT, STEVE DlUER, AT THE SITE TO MEET
THE REQUIRED COMfLETION DATE. DAY TO DAY SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENTS BY THIS
J
SUBCONTRACTOR MUl A REQUIREMENT BY THIS SUBCONTRACTOR TOACCOMMODATB VAlUOUS
PROJECT INTANG/BLES (WEATHER. ETC.) TO tMlNTAlN THB nNAL COMPLETION lMl'E.
MULTIPLE SHIFTS" OVERTIME ARE A REQUIREMENT OF THIS PROJECT AS NECESSA./lY TO MEET
SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS AND/OR WSAR ASSOCIATES' SUPER/NTENDENT'S /NSTRUCT/ONS.
9. DAlLY REMOVAL .. DISPOSAL OF REUTED DEBR/S OFF SITE.
/0. PROVIDE SUFFIC/ENT SUPERVISION" MANPOWER FOR SCHEDUUNG, RECElVING, UNWIdJ/NG.
.. DISTRIBUTION OF AJ.L MATER/AL DEUVER/ES.
//. IJL TESTING AND SUBMISS/ON OF REPORTS ARE A REQUIREMENT OF THIS SUBCONTRACT TO
ASSURE QUALITY OF INSTA1../.ATIONS.
/2. IJL UYOUT .. COORD/NATION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SUBCONTRACT ARE A
SUBCONTRACT REQUIRE.HENT.
13. IJL SUBCONTRACTORS MUST PARTlCIPATE IN A I-1I0UR WEEKLY JOBSITE CLEAN-UP EACH
FRlDAY.
ART/CLE /1/. TIME IS OF TIlE ESSENCE ,i,'V mE SUBCONTIUCTOIl ACREES TV COMMENCE ANiJ TO COMPlETE TIlE WOIl/(
AS OESell/BED IN ARTICLE /I AS FOLLOWS..
A. ALL WOflK ro BE PERFOIlMED IN STlUCT .lCCORDANCE WITH LOB.<R ASSOCIATES. INC PIlOG/lESS SCHEDUIL "
DI/lECTlONS. NOMCOMPUANCE WITH LOllAR ASsoai TES.INC. PIlOG/lESS SCHEDUIL AloVI01lINS71WCTlONS MA Y /lESULT
IN TEIlMINATlON OF TlUS AC/lELltENT ANDiOIl BACIC CHAlICES. ANY PENALTIES Oil DAMACES ASSESSED ro LOllAR
ASSOOATES. INC, AS A /lESULT OF nl/S SUBCO/"mtiCTOIl WILL BE TIlE Il<;SPONSIBIUTY OF TlUS SUBCONTIIACTOR.
.. COMPLETION DATE FOil TlUS PROJECT IS .AS PER ATTACHED SCHEDULE WITH UQUIDATED DAMAGES OF ..
PER CALENDAR DAY. ANY UQUIDATED DAMACES ASSESSED TO LOllAR AssoaiTES. INC. AS A /lESULT OF TlUS
SUBCONTIIACTOR WILL BE TIlE /lESPONSIBIUTY OF TlUS SUBCO/"mtiCTOIl.
"AS ASSESSED.
NO 7TNE EXTENSION OF TlUS CONTIIACT WILL BE /lECOGNTZED WTTIIOIIT TIlE 1l7U7TEN CONSENT OF TIlE CONTIUCTOR WHICH
CONSENT SHALL NOT BE WTTllHELD UNIlEASONABLY CONSISTENT WITH ARTlaE X-4 OF TlUS CONTIIACT. SUBJECT ro TIlE
AR8J77fATlON PROVISIONS /IElIEIN PROVIDED,
ARTICLE lV. TIlE CONTIIACTOIl ACREES TV PAY TIlE SUBCONTIUCTOR FOR TIlE PE/lFORNANCE OF TlUS WOflK TIlE
FOUDW/NO SUM: ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-FOUR THOUSAND, FOUR HUNDRED, NINETEEN OOILUlS
(1/64,4/9.00) .IN CUIlRENT FUNDS. SUBJECT ro ADDmONS AND DEDUCTIONS FOR CHANOES AS MAY BE AC/lEED UPON IN
W/lITING, .. ro MAKE MONTHLY PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT mEllEOF IN ACCORDANCE WTT1l AR7IaE X. SECTIONS W-U
INCLUSIVE.
A. MON/7/LY PROGRESS PAYMENT CONDmONS . TWO (l) COPIES TV LOllAR ASSOCIATES. INC. OfflCE BY 2am 01' EACH
MOIfl1/. PA YMENT OF TlUS INVOICE ro BE AS FOUOWS:
NET LESS IDS /lETAlNACE WILL BE PAID JOI4J DA rs SUBJECT TV ARCHlTECT.ENGINEEJlJOWNER APPROVAL" /lECElPT 01'
PAYMENT BY LOllAR ASSOClATES.INC FOil WOIl/( COMPlETW ON TlUS SUBCONTIIACT. NO 0T1lEJ! C.'lA/ICES SUCH AS
INTEREST. CAJUlYlNO CHAlICES. TAXES. ITC, WILL BE HONOIlED UNILSS INDICHW OT1lEJ!WlSE Oil AS AG/lEED TV BY
Born PARTIES IN W/lITINO, /lETAlNAGE TV BE llElLiSED UPON APPROVAL FIlOM ARCHITECT A.VD OWNER. AND /lELTJPT
OF MATEIUAL " LABOR PIlOOF OF P,il""E""T llElLiSES, .ltOIflH P.iY.",ENT APPUCATlONS ro BE SUBMfTTED ON AlA
DOCUMENTS G7rJ2" G7lJJ Oil EQUAL FOIlM SHOWING pEJ/CEf{/' COMPLETED EACH MONTll.
NO PARTIAL OR FINAL PAYMENT"S WILL BE MADE WI71IOIIT PIlOOF OF MATEIUAL PAYMENTS UNILSS SPECLIL
ARllANOEMENTS AIlE MADE WTTII LOllAR ,iSSOClATES.INC.
IF SUBCONTllACTOIl FAILS TV MEET TIlE SUBCONTIUCT/lEQUlIlEMENTS. ALL PAYMENTS DUE lNaUDINO OUTSTANDING
SEPARATE ORDERS MAY BE HELD UNTIL CORREC71VE ACTIONS AIlE TAKEN.
ARTICLE V. FINAL PAYMENT SHALL BE DUE WHEN WOIl/( DESCRIBED IN TlUS CONTllACTIS FULLY COMPLETED AND
PE/lFOIWED IN ACCORDANCZ WITH mE CONTIUCT DOCUMENTS. " PAYMENT ro BE CONS/STEM WTT1l ARTlaE IV" AR7IaE
X. SECTIONS lB. 20.U lNauSlVE OF TlUS CONTIIAC7.
BEFORE ISSUANCE 01' ANY PAYMENT. TIlE SUBCONTIUCTOR. IF /lEQUIIIED. SHALL SUBMIT EVlDENCP: 5Al1S1'ACTORY ro TIlE
COIfl1YCTOR mAT ALL PA YROUS. MA TEIUAL BIUS. "ALL ICNOWNINDEBTEDNESS CONNECTED WTT1l TI/E SUBCOIfl1YCTOR'S
~
wove R.l VIr IUN SA 77miD.
ARTICLB VI. plIlFOIIMAIICF:.. PAYItI!lIT lOIlDS.
(NIA) SUBMIT A PAYMENT" PERFORMANCE BOND.
ARTICLB VII. TVoinJlWfY sm 'AaU1lU.
A. TR/S SUICONmlCTOIf S/UU. PIfOVlD!.tJ.L TVoiPOIWfY SfT! 'AClUT/L$ ASIlEQUIlllD Olf ASlI'!CESSAIIY TO plIlFOIIM
IUS WO/IIC.
I. DU~S /l!UT!D TO TIlE WO/IX /lICWDED III 77/lS SUICONTIUCT SH.UJ. " /lENOVED .. DISPOSED 0' IY 1IUS
SUICONmlc:rolf. BACK CHAIlGlS SH.UJ. IE M,wE FOIf IION-COMpWl/Ct.
ARTICLE VIII. INWlI.ilICE
U"U:SS OT1/EllWlSE PROV/DED HEllE/N. mE SUBCONmlLTOR SIl.tLL R.lVE A DIRECT WBIUTY FOR TIIF: ACTS OF HIS
EJJPWYEES "AGENTS FOR WHICH HE IS LEG.tJ.LY RESPONSIBLE. .illD mE SUBCONTRAL70R SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO
ASSUME TIlE WBIUTY FOR TIlE ACTS 0' ANY OTHERS.
PRlOII TO ST.tII77NG WORK. mE /oYSUR.tNa REQUIRED TO BE FURNISHED SH.UJ. BE OBT.tINED FROM A RESpONSIBU: COMPANY
Olf COMPANllS TO PROl7DE PIfOPER " ,wEQUATE COVERAGE" SA 17SFAc:roRY EVlDENa WILL BE FVIlMSHED TO TIlE
CONTIUc:roll TllAT TIlE SUBCONTIUCTOR HAS COMPUED WTTI/ mE REQUIREMENTS AS STAT!D IN nus SECTlOII.
A. PROVIDE TWO (1) INSURANCE CERTIFICATES IN ACCORDANCE WITII PROJECT INSURANCE
REQUIREMENTS. CERTIFIC-ITES MUST BE SUBMI7TED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITII ANY WORJt
ARTICLE IX. JOB co"vmONS
(X) A COMPLETE UST OF AU. MATERIAL SUPPUERS & SECOND TIER SUBCOlITRACTORS WlTII
TIIEIR ADDRESSES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO LOBAR
ASSOCIATES, INC. WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS FROM DATE OF SIGNING OF AGREEMENT Br
SUBCOlITRACTOR.
( X) COST BREAJWOWN FOR LABOR" MATERIAL MUST BE SUBMI7TED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES,
INC. WITIIIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS FROM DATE OF SIGNING OF AGREEMENT Br
SUBCONTRACTOR.
() SUBMIT PAYROLL REPORTS WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS WEEK-ENDING TO TillS OFFICE.
MOlITHLY PAYMElIT ESTIMATES CANNOT BEAPPROVED WITHOUT PAYROLL REPORTS BEING
SUBMI7TED.
(X) PROVIDE TEN (10) COPIES OF ALL SUBMITTAL DATA EXAcn.r AS REQUIRED IN
SPECIFICATIONS NO lATER TIIAN 10 AUGUST 1993. YOUR FIRM MAY BE IIELD UABLE FOR
DElAY COSTS IF SUBMlTHLS ARE NOT .lfADE AS REQUIRED AND WITIlIN TilE REQUESTED
TIME FRAME.
( X ) E.E.O." AFFlRJfATIVE ACTION ARE A PART OF TillS SUBCOlITRACT. EXECUTE AND
RETURN CERTIFICATION WITII CONTRACT.
( X ) ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
SAFETY PROGRAM.
() USE OF FOREIGN STEEL" ALUMINUM PRODUCTS IS PROHIBITED ON TillS PROJECT.
ARTICLE X. IN ,wDmON TO TIlE FOREGOING PROv/SIONS TIlE P.tII77lS ALSO AGREE TllAT TIlE SUBCON17l.tCTOII SIlA./L'
J. BE BOUIID TO TIlE CONTRACTOII BY TIlE TE/lAIS 01' TIlE CONmlCT DOCUMENTS" 77/lS AGREEMENT. "ASSUME TOW.tI/D
TIIF: CONmlc:roll AlL TIlE OBUGA770NS" IlESPONSIBIU1IlS TllAT TIlE CONTRAc:roll. IY TIIOSE DOCUMENTS A$SUMlS
TOW.tI/D TIlE OWNER. AS APPUCAIU: TO 77/lS SUBCONmlCT.
2. SUBM"TO TIlE CONTIUCTOII.tPPUCA770NS FOR PAYItI!lIT AT SUCH 77MlS S17PIJUTED INARTlCU: IV SO AS TO ENABLE
TIIF: CONTIUc:roll TO APPLY 1'011 PAYItIENT. IF PAYItIENTS .tIlE M,wE 011 V.tLUA770NS OF WOIlK DOli'!. TIlE
SUICONTIUc:roll S/UU.. BUORE TIIF: FIIIST APPUCA770N. SUBM" TO TIlE CONTIUCTOIIA SCHEDUlZ OF V.tLUlS 01'
1
TIUt VAJlJOUS 1'.tIlT'S 01' TIUt WORX. AGGIlLC;,mNO mE TVTAL AS REQUIIlLD IY mE OWNfJf. AND. IfIIlLQUIJILD.
SUl'rotrT!D IY SUCR EVIDENa AS TV as CXJ/lIlECTM:JS AS TIUt CONTllACTOR MAY DIIlLc:T. OOS SClUDUU. WIlEN
Al'I'ROVl/) IY TIUt CONTllACTOR. Slf.<ll. II! USED AS A &WS FOR crJC7lFICA n:s FOR 1',1 YN1!NT. UNUSS fT U FOUI<D ro
U IN I!RROR. IN AI'I'LYlNO FOR I'AYNENT. TIUt SUICOtmlACTOR SHAlL SUlNfT A STAreN1!NT lAUD UroN OOS
SCNLDUU. II' I'AYN1!NTS AJlI! MADI! ON ACCOUNT 01' loLl TEJUALS NOT INCO/f1'OItA TUJ IN TIUt WORX .m DI!lJV!JlLD
AND SUfTA.L!' STOIlLD ATTIUt sm. OR AT SOME OTl/l!Jl WCATlON AGREED uroN IN W1lfTINO. SUCH I'AYNt!NTS SHAlL
U IN ACCOIlDANCZ WT11/ TIUt TUJlS.. CONDmQNS OF TIUt COtmlAc:T DOCUM1!NTS,
J. I'AY 'OR AU. MA TEJUALS .. UIOR USI!D IN. OR IN CONNEC770N WT11/. mE PERFOIWANCZ 01' OOS CONTllAc:T. T7lIlOUGH
TIUt I'WOD COVEJ/LD IY p/lEV10US 1',1 YNENTS IlLCI!lVED FIlOM T1/I! CO.V11lACTOR .. rollMSH SATISFACTORY I!V/DI!NCI!
WIlEN IlLQU= IY TIlE COtmlACTOR. TV VUUFY COMPll.INa: WT11/ ml! .<l0Yl: REQUIIlLII1!NTS.
'!J MAIO! AU. CUlMS FOR eXT/f.1S. FOR tXTWSIONS OF TIME. "FOR OM/AGe FOR Dt:.UYS OR omuWlsl!. PROMmy TO
TIUt CONTIlACTCJR CONSlmNT wrT1/ TIle COtmlAL7 DOCUM1!NTS,
1. TAKE NeC1!SSA/lY PRECAIJT10N TO PROPuu.y PROn:CT neE FlNlSHI!D WORK OF oneu T1<<DE.S,
6. 1CEE/' mE BUILDING .. PRLWISE.S ClLlN AT AU. TlME.S OF DeBRJS AlUSING om OF nee OPCJlATlON OF nus
SUBCOtmlACT. nee SUBCONTllACTOR Slilll. NOT Be HUD RLSI'ONSIBU FOR UNC/LIN CONDmONS CAUSW BromEII
CONTllACTORS OR SUBCOtmlACTORS. UN/.LSS oTl/l!JlWlse PROVlDI!D FOR. - .
1. COMPLYWT11/ AU STATUTORY AND/OR COtmlACTlJAL $AFrrY REQUIREMeNTS .IPfLYlNG TO HIS WORXAND/OR INTT1ATW
BY Tl/E CONTllACTOR. .I,'V SIi.ll. RE.PORT wmllN mRLE (1) 0,1 YS Tel me COImCACTOR ANY INJURY TO me
SUBCOtmlAl.70R'S EMPWtu:s A T me SIn: OF me PROJec:T.
IA. NOT ASSIGN OOS SUBCOtm<.lc:T OR ..NY AMOU/fTS Due OR TV BeCOMe Due mCREUNDEII wrT1/0m TIle WRfm,Y
CONSeNT OF TIle COImCACTOR.
61. NOR SUBCONTllAc:T nee WHOU OF TIllS SUBCONTRAc:T wrT1/0m TIle WIlITTf:.Y CONseNT OF Tl/E COImCACTOIf.
,C. NOR FURT1lER SUBCONTRACT I'ORTlONS 0' OOS SUBCONTllAc:T wrT1/0m WR.JTn:N NOTlFlCA TlON TV Tl/E COtmlAc:TOR
WHEN SUCH NOTlFICA TlON IS RE.QUESTED BY TIUt COImCACTOIt
9. GUARANT'CE HIS WORK AGAINST AU. DUCC7S 0' MATEJUALS AND/Olf WORXNANSHlp AS CtULD FOIf IN mE PUNS.
speaFlCATlONS. .. ADOCNDA. OR IF NO GUARANT'CE IS CtULD FOIf. T7II!N FOR A PWOD 0' ONe (I) YUR FROM THE
DAn:s OF p.tRT1AL OR TVTAL ACCE:PTANCE: OF TIUt SUBCOtmlACTOR'S WORK BY me OWNF.Jl.
lOA. NO SEPARAn: UNDEJlSTANDING OR AGREEM1!NTS 0' ANY IC1ND WIll. Be f.NTUEJ) INTO BY Tl/E SUBCOImCACTOR .. THE
OWNER AND/OR HIS .tRCIUTf:c:T OF AGENTS 1lCU1M TV ANY ORIGINAL Olf U1RA WORX CONTr.WPUTUJ BY nus
AGREEMCNT UNlLSS TIlE SANe IS FIRST APfROVW IN W1lfTING IY CONTRACTOR,
lOB. SUBCONTRAC1OR SHAlL INSURE T1IAT AU. SUBCOImCACTORS. EMPWYUS. .. SUPfUEJlS. AT AU. TTME.S. AJlI! PAJD AU.
ANOU/fTS DUE IN CONNEC770N wrT1/ TIUt PERFOIfNAN(% 01' OOS SUBCXJtmlACT. ,(fTDl mE FIRST 'AYNENT
HEREUNDCR. CONTRA CTOR SHAlL If.< I'! TIUt RlG/fT TV wrT1/HOLD ANY SUBSEQUENT PA YN1!NTS UNTIL SUBCOtmlA CTOR
SUBMas EVIDI!NCE: SA TlSFAC7lJRY TV COImCACTOR T1IAT AU.ANOUNTS OWW INCONNE:CTlON wrT1/ PERFOItWANCt: 0'
OOS SUBCONTTlAc:T //AI'! BCEH PAID. FVRTHER. SUBCXJtmlAC7lJR AGREES T1IAT CONTRACTOR MAY 'AY AU. PDlSONS
WHICH I/A VE NOT SCEH PAID TIle MOME.S Due T/IEAIIN CONNECTION wrT1/ OOS SUBCONTRACT WI/ETl/E11 Olf NOT A W:'Y
//AS BCEH FlI.ED. .. SUBCONTllACTOR SI/AU.. TV TIUt fXT!NT T1IAT CONTRACTOR //AS NOT RECOVEJ/LD SAID AMOU/fTS
I'URSUANT TO wrT1/HOWINO. PAY SAID AMOU/fTS TV CXJtmlACTOR UI'ON ODlAND. SUBCONTllAC7lJR SHAlL ALSO
lNMI!DLlTCLY REJMBURSe COtmlACTOR FOIf ANY AMOUNTS rAID UNDCR CONT1l.1CTOR'S p,l YNENT BOND IN CONNECTION
WT11/ OOS SUBCOfofTRACT .. INDDlNlFlI!D BY CONTRACTOIt IN TIll! f:Vt:NT CONTllACTOIf IS REaUl1lLD TV 'AY DR
INDEMNIFY ANY pDlSONS HEREUNDCR. SUBCONTRACTOR SHAlLINMI!DIATUY mMBURSe mE COtmlAC7lJR FOR THE
rou COST THEREOF. maUDINO A T10RNrrS FEES.
IOC. SHOUW SUBCOfofTRACTOR AT ANY TTME FAIL TV SUPPLY A SUTTIC1I!NT N1JMBER OF SIC1Lll:D WORXNCN OR A sumaENT
QUANTTTY OF illAn:RLtLS 0' pROpCR aUAUTY. OR I'AlL IN ANY /fESI'Ec:T TV PRosecun: Tl/E WORX COVEJ/LD BY T1/IS
SUBCOfofTRAC7lJ1f WT11/ PROMPTM:SS .. DIUGCNCZ. OR I'AlL IN T1lZ PUCFOIWANCE: 0' ANY 0' T1IE AGREEM1!NTS IlEJ/EJN
CONTAINED. Olf SHOUW ANY WORXNf.N PERFOIWING WORX COVEJ/LD 'Y OOS .lUBCOtmlAc:T ENGAGe IN A ST1IJXE Olf
OTl/l!Jl WOlf}( STOPPAGE:, Olf crASE TO WORX DUE: TV flC/fETING OR omCR SUCH AC77VTTY. CONTRACTOIf MAY IN ANY
0' SUCH EVE:NTS. A T as OroON. ...mlOtrr PREJUDICE TO ANY omER RLWWIE.S IT .11,1 Y //A VE:, ,(fTDl FOIf7Y.EJG/fT (..)
HOURS WRJTTf:N NOTlCC TO SUBCO!mtttTOR, PROVIDE ANY SUCH 1.<l01f ,.~V MATEJUALS AND DI!DUL7 T1IE COST
THE/lE0l' FROM ANY MOME.S T7II!N DUE OR net:REA17EJl TO BECOME Due SUBCOfofTRACTOIf; AND FVIfTl/l!Jl. IN ANY OF
SUCH Evum;. COfofTRACTOIf MAY AT as 0/'710,'01. wlT1Iom PREJUDICE TO ANY OTIIER REMI!DIE.S IT MAY HAI'l:.
TERMINAn: T1lZ EMPWYMCNT OF SUBCONTRACTOR'S FlIW FOR T1IE WORK U,'VCR OOS SUBCONTRAc:T" SHAlL HAYl:
Tl/E RIGHT TO ENTCR UPON T1IE PRLWISE.S AND TAKE I'OSSESSlON. FOR mE PURPOSE 0' COMPu:T7NG TIUt WORK
HEREUNDCR. OF AU. T1IE MA1E:JlJALS. TOOLS, .. EaUIfMCNT THE/lEON. .. TO FlMSH TIlE WORK" PlfOVlDe T1IE
MATEJUALS 771E/1EFORE ElT1/ER wrT1/ as OWN EMPWYUS OR OTl/EJ! SUBCOtmlACTORS: AND IN CASE 0' SUCH
DISCONTINUANCE OF neE EMPWYMENT BY CONT1l..CTOIf. SUBCDfofTRACTOIf SHAlL NOT BE ENT/1tE.D TO RE.CElVl: ANY
fIllRTHER pA YM1!NTS UNDCR neE SUBCONTRACT OR oneCRWlSE. Bm S//AU NE:VCRT1/ElLSS REMAIN UABU FOR ANY
DANAGE.S WHICH CONTRAC7lJ1f INCURS: IF neE EXl'CNSE.S INCUR/lLD BY T1IE COfofTRAC7lJR III COMpu:T7NG TIlE WORX
SHALL EXCEED mE UNPAID &lUNCE, SUBCOfofTRACTOR SHAlL 1',1 Y TIlE DII'FEJlI!NCZ TV T1IE COfofTRACTOR ALONG wrT1/
ANYOTl/l!Jl DANAGE.S INCUR/lLD BY CONTRACTOR AS T1IE RLSULT 0' SUBCOtmlACTOR'S DeFAULT. COtmlAC7VII SHAlL
//AVlr A UEN UI'ON AU. MA 1E:JlJALS. TOOLS. .. Al'I'UANC1!S TAKE!ll'OSSE.SSION OF TV secullL mE I'AYNENT T1fEIfZO'.
SUBCON17fAC7lJ1f SHAlL BE UABU TO CONTRACTOR Due TO mE FAlLUIIE 01' SU'COfofTRACTOR'S I'ElUOIWANCZ.
4
SU'CON11lACTOII'S I' AlLUM TO /CUI' THll nOG/lLSS Of rrs WOM UI'TO THAT Of CONTIIACT Of Orrwt TlfADLJ. Oil
THll fAlLUII./! TO EXE= rrs WOM AS DIII./!C1W 'Y CONTIIACTOII.
100. SUICON11lACTOII AG/lU.S THAT WIlEN THll CONTIIACT DOCUNfHTS. SI'EC/17CmO/'lS. Oil DIlAWlNOS IIZQUlII./!.
SUICON11lACTOII wru. CONI'LY wm/ ANY AJ'I'UCUU rrATI! Oil nDEIlAL I'/lEVAlUNO WAGE UW AS WUL AS ANY
IIUlLS Oil IIZGUU710/'lS 1'1I0NULGA7l.D THEII.I!UNDEJI. THll SUICONTIIACTOII AG/lU.S TO CONI'LY wm/ ALL SUCH
TERMS 01< CONDmo/'lS WHICH AM: AI'I'UCI6LZ TO 71/lS SUBCO.VI7lACT AND TO INDEMNJIY.. HOLD THll CONTIIACTOII
IWlMUSS fOil ANY fAlLUII./! TO CON PLY wm/ SUCH CONDmo/'lS.
IOL SUBCON11lACTOII WlU. HA VE AC7V,tL /lEJI'ONSlBIUTY fOil COMPLYlNO wm/ THll rrANDARDS SET FO/lTH IN THll IIULES
.. IIZGUUTlONS PRONULGA7l.D PU/lSUANTTO THll CONl7IWcnON SAFETY ACTI<<JU,S.C, J27}" Drrwt OSHA /lEI.A7l.D
1'1I0VlSIONS TO THll EXTI!NT AI'I'UCABLE TO THE SUBCO/fl'l!ACTf}R'S PORTION Of THll WOM" SUBCONTIIACTOII SIIAU.
INDEMNITY AND SA VE THE CONTIIACTOII //AIl.IlLESS IN CON/o'EcnON THEREW171/ FIION ANY AND ALL DANAGE INa.UDlNO
A TTO/lN1:Y'S FEES, corr OF COIUlECT/VE AenON. n~, ETC,
/I. AND DOES HEJlE.BY AGRLE THAT THE CON11UCTDII'S EQUIPMENT WlU BE AVAILABLE TO THE SUBCONTIIACTOII ONLY AT
T7/t: CON11lACTOR'S DISC1IET70N" ON MrrTUALLY SA 71STACTORY TEJl.IIS,
/2. ro/IMSH I'EIUODIC PIIOG/lEJS REPOIITS OF THE WORIC AS MrrTUAUY AGIlEED INa.UDINO TIlE PROG/lEJS OF MATI!IUALS
Oil EQU/I'MENT UNDEII THIS AGREEMENT THAT MAY BE IN THE COURSE Of I'REI'AJlATlON Oil MANUFAplI/lE. '
/J. NAKL ANY" ALL ClLiNGES Oil DEVIATIONS FROM THE ORiGINAL PLANS" SI'EC117CATlONS W/TI/OUT NUWFYlNO TIlE
ORiGINAL COtmltCT WHEN SPEClnCAUY ORDE./lED TO DO SO IN WR/77NG BY THE CONTRACTOII, THE SUBCONTllACTOII
I'NOII TO THE COMMENCE..\IE,VT OF THIS REVISED WORK. SHAU SUBMIT PROMPTLY TO THE CONTRACTOR WRiITEN
COPIES OF TIlE carr Oil CREDfT PROPOSAL TOll SUCH REVISED WORX IN A MANNEII CONSlmNT wm/ THE CONTllACT
DOCUMENTS.
14. COOPEIlATE WITH THE CONTRACTOR do OTIiER SUBCOtmlKTORS WHOSE WORX MIGIfT 1NTUF'E./lE W/TI/ TIlE
SUBCON11lACTOR'S WORIC do TO P,<IlTlC1P,HE IN THE PREP,iIlATlON OF COORDINA7l.D ORAWlNOS IN AIlEAS OF
CONOESTTON AS REQUIRE.O BY THE COtmliCT DOCUMENTS. SPECIFICALLY NOTlNO do ADVISING TIlE CONTRACTOII OF
ANY SUCH 1NTUF'E./lENCE,
/J. COOPEIlATE wm/ T11E CON11UCTOIIIN SCHEDUUNO IUS WORX SO AS NOT TO CO/ffUCT Oil IN1EIl1'EIIE wm/ TIlE WORIC
OfOT1lEJlS. TO PROMPTLY SUBMfTSHOP DRAWINGS. DRAWINGS. do SAMPLES. ASREQUIRE.O INORDEII TO CAJUlYONSAlD
WOM EFFICIENTLY AND AT SPEED THAT WlU NOT CAUSE DElAY IN THE PROG/lLSS OF THE CONr'llACTOII'S WORIC Oil
orrwt IIIlANCHES OF TIlE WORK Ct//J/JED ON BY OTIiER SUBCON11UCTOIIS,
16. COM/'f.Y wm/ ALL FEDEIlAL. rrA TE. do LOCAL LA WS " ORDINANCES APPLYING TO TIlE BUlLOING Oil ST1lUC7VI/E AND TO
CONI'LY AND GlVE ADEQUATE NOTICES IlEUTlNG TO TIlE WORX TO PROPEII AUT1/0R/77ES AND TO SECURE AND PAY FOil
ALL NECE.SSAJlY UCENSES Oil PElWrrs ro C<IlRY ON TIlE WOM AS DESClIJBED IN TIlE CONTllACT DOCUMfHTS AS
AI'I'UClBU TO 71/lS SUBCONTIIACT.
17. COM/'f.Y wm/ FEDEIlAL. rrATE. do LOCAL TAX LAWS. SOCW. SECURITY LAWS. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATlONLAWS.l
WO/IXNEN'S COMPENSATION LAWS INSOFAR AS APPUCABU TO TIlE PERFOI/.\IANCE OF 71/lS SUBCONTRACT.
lB. AND DOES HEJlE.BY AGREE THAT ALL WOIIK SHAU BE DONE SUBJECT TO nNAL APPROVAL OF Tl/JS ARCHITECT Oil
DWNEll'S AUT1/01llZED AGENT. dolUS DECISION IN MATTU/S IlEUTlNO TO ARTISTIC Uf'ECT SIIAU. BE 17NAL. U WT71/IN
T7/t: TERMS Of TIlE CONTIIACT DOCUMENTS.
19. THll SUBCONTIIACTOII SIIAU. BEAll BL!J. /lEJPONSIBIUTY FOR dIJ. WO/lJ{ TO BE PERFORMED UNDEllIUS SUBCONTllACT.
INCLUlJINO ALL ROOF PEM:T1U TlO/'lS. CUTTING. PA TCHlNG. ETC. TIlE SUBCONTRACTOII AG/lU.S THATTIIE corrOf ALL
CUTTINO" PATCIUNO HAS BEEN INCLUDED AS PART OF SUBCO/fl'l!ACTOR'S WORiC. TIlE SUBCONTllACTOII AG/lU.S THAT
HZ SR.4LL EMPLOY AIlTlSANS AND TlfADESMEN OF TIlE TlfADE IIO/lMALLY /lEJPO/'lSIBLE FOil TIlE ROOf. Oil 1'011 17N1SH
WO/IIC INVOLVED TO an AND PATCH AROUND TIlE WOM OF SUBCONTllACTOR'S T1fAOE.
;ltl. THll SU'CON11UCTOII SIIAU. MAKL ALL AI'I'UCATlONS FOil P,iYMENT TO LOIWl ASSOctA1l!S. INe. AS AGENT FOil TIlE
O\IfNE/I. LOIWl ASSOctA1l!S SIIAU. SUBMfT SAID APPucmoNS TO THE ARCHITECT AND OWNEll FOil PAYMENT. UPON
AJ'PIIOVAL Of PAYMENT BY TIlE .tRCI/T1l!CT AND OWNEJl. AND PAYMENT BY TIlE vWNEJl TO LOIWl ASSOctA1l!S.INC, AS
AGENT FOil TIlE OWNEJl. TO SUBCONTIIAL7011 IN ACCORDANCE ....TT1/ THE TEJWS OF THIS SUBCONTllACT. TIlE
SUBCONTIIACTOII FURTIiER ACKNOWlLDGES A,\D ,iGREES TIIA T LOB-iR ASSOCLi 1l!S, INC. SHAlL HA VE NO UABIUTY TO
SUBCONTIIAcroR FOil TIlE OWNEJl'S FAILURE TO P,H FOR WORK PERFOIl.IIED BY SUBCONTRACTOR, ANDSUBCONTllACTOII
AG/lU.S TO HOLO LOIWl ASSOCU1l!S. INC. //AIl.\IILSS FROM ANY CUlM FOil PAYMENT FOR WO/llC PERFORMED BY
SU'CONTIIACTOII. .iND TO INDEMNIFY LOIWl ASSOCUlES, INC, FROM ANY SUCH CUlMS MADE BY SUBCONTllACTOII'S
SU'CONTIIACTOIIS. EMPLOYEES, AGENTS. Al>D MATERLiL SUPPUERS,
THA T TIlE CONTIIA CTOII .l SUBCONTRA croll AGRLE:
2/. THAT IN TIlE MATTER OF ARBl11/ATlON. T1/ElII RiGHTS AND OBUGAlIONS. AND ALL PIIOCEDURE SIIAU. BE ANALOGOUS
TO THOSE SET FOIITH IN TIlE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS PROVIDED. HOWEVEJl. THAT A DECISION BY TIlE ARCHITECT Oil
OWNEJl'S AUT1/01llZED AGENT. SIIAU. NOT BE A CONDmON PRECEDENT TO AIlBl11/AlION.
ARTICLE Xl. TEJWINAlION CUUSE
LOBA/f ASSOClA1l!S. INe. SIIAU. HAVE TIlE NGHT TO TEJWINATE THIS CONTllACT AND TO HIli./! ANOT1IEJl CONTRACTOII TO
,0 ,.
2
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY CERTIFICA TION & AGREEMENT
During 71re Performance Of 17/ls Agreement, 71re Contractor, Seller, Or Suppller (Hereinafter
Referred To As 'Contractor") Agrees As Follows.'
A. CERTIFICATION
The Contractor Certifies 17lOt It Does Not And Will Not Maintain Or Provide For
Its Employees Any Segregated Facilities At Any Of Its Establishments, And That
It Does Not And Will Not Permit Its Employees To Perform 71relr Services At Any
Location, Under Contractor's Control. Wi/ere Segregated Facilities, Are
Maintained. 17le COllfractor Understands 17lOt 17le Phrase 'Segregated
Facilities' Includes Facilities Which Are In Fact Segregated On A Basis Of Race,
Color, Religion, Or National Origin, Because of Habit, Local Custom, Or
Otherwise. The Contractor Understands And Agrees 71rat Maintaining Or
Providing Segregated Facilities For Its Employees Or Permitting Its Employees
To Perform 71reir Services At Any Location, Under Its Control, WI/ere Segregated
Facilities Are Maintained Is A Violation Of 17le Equal Opportunity Clause
Required By Executive Order 1/246 Of September 24, 1965, As Amended By
11375.
The Contractor Further Understands And Agrees 17IOJ A Breach Of71re Assurance
Herein Contained Is A Breacl/ Of 71ris Agreement And Subjects It To The Rules
And Regulations Promulgated By 71re Secretary Of Labor Under Executive Order
11246 Of September 24, 1965. As Amended By 1/375.
B. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM
If This Controct Is In 71re Amount Of $10.000.00 Or More, The Contractor
Agrees 71rat It Shall.' (a) Develop And Maintain A Wrinen Affirmative Action
Compllam:e Program For Each Of Its Establishments In Accordance With
Regulations Issued Under Executive Order 1/246 Of September 24, 1965, As
Amended By 11375 W1lIch Derails Specific Steps To Guarantee Equal Employment
OppOrTUnity, And (b) Include 17le Requirement Of Part (a) Of This Part B In Any
Subcoruract Or Purchase Order For SIO,OOO.OO Or More Which It Lets Under
his Contract.
'..,
.... J~
.
C. REPORTS
The Contractor Agrees 17lOt, 1/ They Ha~'e A Subcontract Or Purchase Order
Amounting to $10,000.00 Or More, They Will File Monthly, On Or Before The
5th Of Each Month Complete And Accurate Reports On Standard Form 100
(EEO-7), Promulgated Jointly By 17le Office Of Federal Contract Compliam:e,
The Equal Employment OPPOrTUnity Commission And Plans For Progress, Or
.'
J
Such Othcr Form As May Bc Hercafter Promulgated In Its Placc, With Thc Joint
RcporTing Commillec In Washington, D. C.
D. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY CLAUSE
During Thc Perfonnancc Of This Cantracr. The Contracror Agrees As Follows.'
I. n,c Contractor Will Not Discriminare Against Any Employee Or Applicant
Because Of Race. Religion, Color, Sex, Or Narional Origin. Such Action
Shall Include, But Nor Be Limited To The Following.' Employment,
Upgrading, Demotion Or Transfer, RecruitmcfIJ Or. Recruitment
Adverrising, Layoff Or Termination, Rates Of Pay Or Other Forms Of
Compensation, And Selection For Training, Incllu/ing Apprenticeship. The
Contractor Agrees To Post In Conspicuous Places, Available To
Employees And Applicants Far Employment, Notices To Be Posred By The
Contracting Officer Sming For The Provisions Of This Non-
Discrimination Clause.
2. The ConTractor Will, In All Solicirations, Or tldvenisements For
Employees Placed By Or On Behalf Of The Conrractor, Slate That All
Qualified Applicants Will Receive Considerations For Employment Withour
Regard To Race. Religion, Color, Sa, Or Narional Origin.
J. The Contractor Will Send To Each Labor Union Or RepreseflJative Of
Worker:r Which It Has A Collective Bargaining Agrl'emefIJ Or Other
Contract Or Undemanding, A Notice To Be Provided !Jy The Agency
CoflJracting Officer, Advising The Labor Union Or Worker:r'
Representative Of The Contractor's Commitments Under Section 202 Of
Exccutive Order 11246 Of September 24, 1965, As Amended By 1/]75
And Shall Post Copies Of The Notice In Conspicuous Places Available To
Employees And Applicants For Employment.
4.
The Contractor Will Comply With AU Provisions Of Eucutive Order
/1246 As Amended By /1375 And Of The Rules, Regularions. and
Relevant Order:r Of The Secretary Of Labor.
OJ,;
- '.:
5. The Contractor Will Furnish All Information And Repons Required By
Executive Order /1246 Of September 24, 1965, As Amended By /1375
And By The Rules, Regulations, & Order:r Of The Secretary Of Labor, Or
Pur:ruont Thereto, And Will Permir Access To lIS Books, Records, And
Accounts By The Contracting Agency And The Secretary Of Labor For
Purposes Of Investigation To Ascl'nain Compliancc Wirh Such Rules,
Regularions, And Order:r.
"
4
6. In '171e Event 0/ '171e Contractor's Non-Compliance Mth '171e Non-
Discrimination Clauses 0/ '171is Contract Or Mth Any Such Rules,
Regulations, Or Orc/en, '171ls Contract May Be Cancelled, Tennlnated Or
Suspended, In Whole Or In Parr, And 11le Contractor May Be Declared
Ineligible For Furrher Government Contracts In Accordance With
Procedures AI/lhorized In E.ucl/live Orders 112460/ September 24, 1965,
As Amended By 11375 Or By Rule, Regulation, Or Order O/11/e
Secretary 0/ Labor. Or As Othenvlse Provided By Law.
7. The Contract WIii Ineiude The Provisions 0/ Paragraphs I Throllgh 7 In
Every Subcontract Or Purchase Order Unless Exempre4. By I?u/es,
Regulations, Or Orders O/11le Secretary 0/ Labor Issued Pursuant To
Section 204 0/ E:cecl/lh'e Order 112016 0/ September 24, 1965. As
Amended By 1/375 So 11lat11/e Provisions Will Be Binding Upon Each
Subcontractor Or Vendor. The Contractor Will Take Such Action With
Respect To Any Subcontract Or Purchase Order As The Conlractlng
Agency May Direct As A Means 0/ En/orclng Such Provisions Including
Sanctions For Non-Compliance. Provided, However, That In The EI'ent
11le Contractor Becomes Involved In. Or Is Threatened With, Lillgalion
With A Subcontractor Or Vendor As A Result 0/ Such Direction By '171e
Contracting Agency, The Contractor May Request '171e Unired States To
Enter Such Litigotion To Protect 11/e Interest O/The United States.
E. EMPLOYMENT OF VETERANS-LISTING OF EMPLOYMENT OPENINGS
Pursuant To Executive Order No 11701 With Respect To All Contracts Or
Purchase Orders For $2.500.00 Or More, '171e Undersigned (Re/erred To In The
Following Clause As The Contractor) Shall Be Bound By and Agru To The
Following Provisions As Set Forrh In Section 50-250.2 O/1itle 41 O/The Code
0/ Federal Regulations.
J.
As Provided In E.O. 11701 & 41 CFR 50-250, The Contractor Agrees
That Ail Employment Openings O/The Contractor Which Exist At The
Time 0/ E.ucution O/77lls Contract And 11lOse Which Occur During '171e
Perfonnance O/11/is Corltract. Including 11lOse Not Generated By The
Controct And Including 11lOse Occurring Al An Establishment 0/ The
Contractor Orher Than The One Wherein The Contract Is Being Perfonned
But Excluding Those Independently Operated Corporate Affiliates, Shall,
To 111e MaJ:imum Extent Feasible, Be Offered For Listing At An
Appropriate Local Office 0/111e Federal-State Employment Service System
Wherein The Opening Occurs And To Provide Such Periodic Reporrs To
Such Local Office Regarding Employment Opening And Hires As May Be
Required.' Provided. 11,at 11/is provision Shall Not Apply To Openings
Which The Contractor Fliis From Within The Contractor's Organization
.'J.
... ~
. ~ ..'
j
Or Are Filled Pursuant To A Customary And Traditional employer-Union
Hiring Arrangement And Thai The Listing Of Employment Openings Shall
Involve Only The Normal Obligations Which Attach To The Placing Of Job
Orders.
2. The Contractor Agrees Funher To Place The Above Provision In Any
Subcontract Directly Under This Contract.
3. As Provided In Section 2012 Of The Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Act
Of 1974, With Respect To All Contracts In The Amount Of SI 0, 000. DO Or
More, The Contractor Shall Take Affirmative Action To Employ, And
Advance In Employment Qualified Disobled Veterans And Veterans Of The
Vietnam Era.
F. MINORITY BUSINESS CERTIFICATION
Under E:cecutlve Order //625, 77le l.OBAR ASSOCIATES, INC. Construction
Company Is Required To Identify 77lose Contractors And Subcontractors Thai Are
Minority Business Enterprises tis Defined Under This Executive Order As.'
"A Business Enrerprise Thai Is Owned Or Controlled By One Or More Socially
Or Economically Disadvantaged Persons. Such Disadvantage May Arise From
Cultural, Racial, Chronic Economic Circumstances. Or Background. Or Similar
Cause. Such Persons Include. But Are Not l.imited To.' Negroes. Pueno Ricans,
Spanish-Speaking Americans, American Indians, Eskimos, And Aleuts'
r) We Are A Minority Business Enterprise.
r) We Are Not A Minority Business Enterprise.
G. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION FOR HANDICAPPED WORKERS
I.
The Contractor Will Not Discriminale Against Any Employee Or AppllcQ/ll
For Employment Because Of Physical Or Mental Handicap In Regard To
Any Position For Which The Employee Or ApplicallJ For Employment Is
Qualified. 77le Contractor Agrees To Take Affirmative Action To Employ,
Advance In Employment. And Othenvise Treal Qualified Handicapped
Individuals Without Discrimination Based Upon Their Physical Or Mental
Handicap In All Employment Practices Such As The Following.'
Employment, Upgrading, Demotion Or Transfer, Recruitment Or
Recruitment Advenisir.g, l.ayoff Or Termination. Rales Of Pay. Or Other
Forms Of CompensaJion, And Selection For Training, Including
Apprenticeship.O
. 'J~
....~
. .
6
2. 11Ie Contractor Agrees That, If He Has Established An Internal Review
Procedure And A Handicapped Individual Flies A Complaint With The
Contractor Under That Procedure That He Is Not Complying With The
RequiremenlS O/The Act, He Will (lJ Investigate The ComplalnJ And Take
Appropriate Action Consistent With The Requirements Of20 CFR 741.27,
And (2J Mail/tain On File For Three (3) Years, The Record Regarding The
Complaint And The Acti,n Taken.
]. 771e Contractor Agrees That, If A Handicapped Individual Files A
Complaint With TIle Deparrment Of Labor That He Has Not Complied
With The Requirements Of The Act, (1) He Wiil Cooperate With The
Deparrment In Its Inwstigation Of The Complaint, And (2J He WU/
Provide All Peninent In/onnation Regarding His Employment Practices
With Respect To Handicapped Individuals.
4. 771e Contractor Agrees To Comply With 77le Rules And Regulations Of77le
Secretary Of Labor In 20 CFR Ch, Vl, Parr 741.
5. In The Event Of The Contractor's Non-Compliance With 77/C Requirements
0/ This Clause. The Contractor May Be Declared In Default And
SancTions May Be Imposed In Accordance With 20 CFR Ch. Vl, Pan 741.
6. 771ls Clause Shall Be Included In All Subcontracts Over $2,500.00.
7. 771e Contractor Agrees To Pennit The E.ramination By Appropriate
Comracting Agency Officials Or The Assistant Secretary For Employment
Standards Or His Designee, Of Peninem Books. Documems, Papers, And
Records Concerning His Employment And Advancement Of Handicapped
. Individuals.
8.
771e Contractor Agrees To Post In Conspicuous Places. Available To
Employees And Applicants For Employmem. NoTices In A Fonn To Be
Prescribed By The Assistant Secretary For Employment Standards.
Provided By the Contractor Officer. Stating Contractor's Obligation UruJer
771e Law To Take Affinnative AcTion To Employ And Advance In
Employment. Qualified Handicapped Employees And Applicants For
Employment And The Rights And Remedies A vaUable.
:.;.11<#
.
9. The Comractor Will Notifj Each Labor Union Or Representative Of
Worker:\' With Which He Has A CollecTive Bargaining AgreemenJ Or Other
Comract Undemanding 7710t TIle Contractor Is Bound By The Terms Of
Section 50] 0/ TIle Rehabilitation Act, And Is Committed To Take
AJ!innative Action To Employ And Advance In EmploymenJ Physically And
MenJally Handicapped Individuals.
'1
EXHIBIT "C"
,
~
5
,
~
"
,
. ~
"' ....
c .!n
~ i~
;~ ~!
II... I )
ii ::it.
,~ .
~ . i ~
l! MB
....,!I!:I
ii p,e
Il'uiiim
, '
, -
= :c =
i if
...
11 ...
"
11
" 'I
0 'i'
III '"
d r
0: 0
...
d
" 0(
0 0-
le d
-I IX
-' :J
~ "'
V1
'" -'
-' -'
0 a
~
'"
..
..~
~ "
...
~..
.. .
u.
R ~
n
t
0
a.
GI
II:
0
(I)
(I) ~
UI ~
n
n: w
x
LJ
c.:J ~
>
0 "
D: .
7.
Po :;
:1
m UI
<<
~
0
.,
GI
"5
11
z:
u
en
B
n
,
u
,
.
,
,
" ,
" n
"
.
n ;
,
,.
n
. ,
. "
il U
,
" , 1,
" " "
I' u, " ':I
J .,
" " ,
Q " "
" " .. Il
.--------------------------------
.~--
'~
------
--------------
------
-------------
.- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -
------------------------------
---------
- - - - - - - - - .. - - - - - - - - -
------------------------------
------------------------------
----------
--------------------
-----------------------------
------------------------------
--------~-----------------------
-------!-----------------------
~ -
~
..
t D
9 ..
2 ~
o
~
~
..
';: . ..
. ..
n
~ ~
,
n .
'-
~:
t. -.
11-= -I
u .
o -
..
~
t":: -
n D
e ..
.-
~ ~
"'-
~
..
- ..
. - -
~ ~
,- -
. ~
) ~ n
i --:' \J
~ Ii
~ +I j
j ~,
_ n
"
,
~
, ;
" '"
I. ,;
i " "
. ~ ,
, ,
II .,
. u
" "
. {}
? ii
;;
u
.
n
~
..
, --I
I
- -i"
I'
~.
.
~
M
! 1
"
,e
:0 c
'{ a
:i~ ~
.
... t... c..
;; i ~
'" c "=
"~ ~ Ji =
~:!ii J
'.: .: ~ fi
o jj 3t A
f/ jLl u
. "
"
. l
~ I
, .
n 1
,
.
,
" -
.
u
r
n
.=~=======================
..
-----------------------
.-------------------------
..
:::I:.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~ IIh~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~
..
,..
"
---------------------
"
.---------------------
,
.-----.----------------
'"
.---------------------
----. ---------------------
---------------------
-------------
-,-
- - -, ,/1- - - --
H"W ~ 'f C
W iii t \.Q C I
n U .i! 0 ;),,, ~
:; ~ Ii \t' ..,; ~:iF. :J
JJ ~ ~. ~ u h =' r~ .~
u ~ I ca. ~ -0 u
C .. II t (.:: - JJ Jj
g IL "P ::\i .. 3. iC
~ "I fd U ~ u ~ ~
:. ~~ .. 9. r ~ C1 ; j
... U :I t"~ ,; -\. C'it: R
~ l~ ~ :: ~ u.. 0 ~';' :) g
U o. ': Iii!!, 1= l~ 0 'C
J u" -~, I: ..
C .. ..8 .~ e,[ ! 3 f tt t u-~
cr;;...;1- Vi:JI Vir.;; 7.
'" ;;
, u-
a
o .
. f:
n
c .
.1 ,r
,
.
o .
~ c
o ~
" ~
: ~
, n
o S
~ C
.
g- ({
i ::
'" .
t
e.
. .
, "
. .
n "
,
. .'
~ o;u
!: tJ
E C.
~ 3r
m .\
. u
., ~:
.,'n
~
~
;;
~
~
.
"
,
;;
.
~1
" .
. ~
0 ~
, -
u
j ,
t
- 0
'"
,
3
,
.1 fi
.
~
=
.
.
.
r
.
.
.
.
r
~
--.. -. ,.--- - -
,
EXHIBIT "D"
,
November 19, 1993
Francis Heiss.
423 N. Progress Ave.
Harrisburg, PA 17109
Ref.' Swimming Pool Project
West SOOre COunJry Club
Camp Hill, PA
Dear Francis:
AI the current dale the pool construction is approxinuuely four (4) weeks behind schedule. As
you know, LOBAR ASSOCIATES has a contract completion dOle of 31 December 1993 for the
project to be 100% complete except for landscape work.
I strongly suggest you expedite your phase of the project by adiJitioTUlI manpower or working
oveTTime as required to meet LOBAR ASSOCIATES scheduled time frame for the project, as per
your contract.
Note.' Pool construction work is behind schedule and holding up other phases of the projectfrom
being completed (concrete deck,fencing. grading, etc.). All)' liquidaJed damages, backi:harges.
etc. to LOBAR ASSOCIATES due to pool construction cklays will be deducted ollyour contract
amounJ 01 the end of the project.
Your cooperaJion in expediting this project to meet LOBAR ASSOCIATES' timeframe would be
greaJly appredaJed.
Very truly yours,
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
~k'-!!l:i:.r::! ~tfJ
General Superintendent
BMS.'nms
Copy: Lee E. Eichelberger, Presicknt
.. 1 OW MlU ROAD P.O. BOX 4J2
DIUSBURG. I'ENNA /7019-04J2
TEL (717) 4J1.9728 FAX: (717J 4J1-9162
.'
. ,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaintiff
v.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I am this day serving a true
and correct copy of the Answer With New Matter And Counterclaim
upon the persons and in the manner indicated below, which
service satisfies the requirement of Pa, R.C.P. 440:
Service by First Class Mail
Addressed as Follows:
Johnna J. Deily, Esquire
SAIDIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MASLAND
26 West High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
Dated: 4(/)(( I
(
\
t~J- )
ischel, I.D. #65289
By:
Ref: Cor\Lobar\He1S8e,CS
HARMON A O.o\VIES. P.e.
t\n()II.~t\'s."l.l.AW
J:\l.lfl n.lUH.tBlA. "VENUE
,,,!'tl.'^'IHt. PA 11M)
;~ Q
Z
<
~~ ...;l ....
. rJ1 i-O~
, < ~~..
h ~ '" ::e~~ .."
~ "'< .
U '" i- ...
"" ."" !E ~X"'~;.';
i~r ..... ~fil 00 ~-
.'.-j o CQ5~~
~.~ ~~ ~ Q ._ .t::.
_o:cww
Hill ~8 <;J..(jjZ
!;JC;: ...J "'~~:JO
4~ Ul ~ ."",:c
H rJ1 N<~
~ . ~ - U
z .\. :> Q
-
H '" <
rJ1
v.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
F'RANCIS HEISSE,
Plaintiff
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant
PLAINTIFF'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION TO
DEFENDANT'S ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER AND COUNTERCLAIM
AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff Frances Heisse by and through
his attorneys Saidis, Guido, Shuff & Masland, who preliminarily
objects to Defendant's Answer, New Matter and counterclaim
pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule Civil Procedure 1028 as follows:
I. PRELIMINARY OBJECTION RAISING INSUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY
OF PARAGRAPH'S 42 & 43 OF DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM
1. Paragraphs 42 and 43 of Count I of Defendant's
Counterclaim alleges that the Defendant, "in the future may
incur additional costs."
2. The aforementioned paragraphs of the Counterclaim fail
to set forth with sufficient specificity what costs or damages,
if any, the Defendant would incur as a result of its
allegations.
SAID IS, GUIDO.
SHUFF &
MASLAND
3. Defendant's Counterclaim lacks sufficient specificity
26 W. High Sln:...1
Carlhkl'A
to apprise Plaintiff of the issues to be litigated, to allow
him to adequately prepare and assert defenses to Defendant's
allegations and/or to identify and join any potentially
responsible party as Additional Defendants.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests this
Honorable Court order Defendant to more specifically plead the
averments of paragraphs 42 and 43 of the Complaint,
II. DEMURRER TO COUNT OF DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM
1. Defendant's counterclaim alleges that Defendant "in
the future HAY incur additional costs" as a result of
Plaintiff's conduct.
2. The allegations fail to state a claim upon which
relief may be granted.
3.
As such, Count I of Defendant's Counterclaim is
,
,
"
~ legally insufficient and should be stricken.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests Your Honorable
r Court to sustain Plaintiff's Preliminary Objections by way of
~ demurrer and strike Count I of Defendant's Answer and New
Ii
"
L
~ Matter with Counterclaim.
i!
III. DEMURRER TO PARAGRAPHS COUNT III OF DEFENDANT'S
COUNTERCLAIM
it
] 1. Count III in Defendant's Counterclaim alleges that
Liberty Excavator's, Inc. has alleged that it is owed the sum
26 W H1l!h SlrC'(1
Carlhh:, PA
of Thirty Five Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty Nine and 63/100
($35,789.63) plus interest from the Defendant.
2. Def~ndant also alleges that the delays and the
completion were caused by the Plaintiff.
3. Liberty Excavator's, Inc. is not a party to this
action.
SAlOIS, GUIOO,
SHUFF &
MASLANU
4. Count III of Defendant's Counterclaim fails to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted.
2
5. As such, Count III of Defondant's Counterclaim is
legally insufficient and should be stricken.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests This Honorable
,
[ Court to sustain Plaintiff's Preliminary Objection by way of
i!
demurrer and strike Count III of Defendant's Counterclaim.
Respectfully submitted,
II
I'
ii
,I
!i
Ii
I'
II Dated:
,
I
I
/7
/7 . Cfl-I
I
SAIDIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MAS LAND
-'-.,i
. ..t2/
Johnna,a. D~ y, Esqui e
26 We~t HiglVStreet
Carrisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-6222
Attorney for the Plaintiff
I
,
I
il
I'
I
I
I
I
II
"
!I
I
I!
ii
SAlOIS. GUIDO.
SHUFF &
I\IASLAND
:(1 W, thilh Sln:cl
Culi\k',""A
3
v.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
FRANCIS HEISSE,
Plaintiff
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant
CERTIFICATE or SERVICE
I, Johnna J. Deily, Esquire, certify that on the 13th day
of December, 1994, I served a true and correct copy of the
within Plaintiff's Preliminary Objection to Defendant's Answer
with New Matter and Counterclaim upon counsel for the Defendant
in this matter by depositing same in the United States mail,
first class, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
Corrie L. Fischel, Esquire
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
2306 Columbia Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
)
Dated:
1"2../i.'I'/
/"-.
.n ---~:I\. ( ..~ ~
Johnna ~. Deily, Esquire
SAIDIS, GUID6, SHUFF & MASLAND
26-West High Street
Carlisle, PA l7013
(717) 243-6222
Attorney for the Plaintiff
SAlOIS, GUIDO.
SHU.... &
MASI.AND
211 W 1li11h Street
C;ull..k,l':\
_,".1
"
, ,
....
o
'"
'"
I
"
0'>
"-<
0....
z
~~ .... ... ti
.... ~ w
.... ~
.. 'tl a.: :J 1'1
III UJ ~ ;l <: ~ z 0
~ffi Ql vi w <0
C1l , .... ~~ j > "
..... U Ql W <t -
~"" '" ~ .:l :> I- ot
ot ot
o 'Z <t jjj Cl.
U~O . Cl Ul ~
"-~~ '" >- Ii
~ ~~ ctl W :J W
OO~ f<l Z .J I-
tn Z 0: 0 Ul
I-<U III 0 U ot
gj~l:l H U 0 I: u
!;j . 0 1-<0 ::E <0 Z
o > ;> III ~U <t 0
u .... ~ a: 1'1 j
U III ~!il <l: N
!;j 'ol .... :r:
U ~
H~ ~ ~I
z :3
....U
j
.
o
z
- - -"
.
.
. .
.
.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
plaintiff
v.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
NOTICE TO PLEAD
You are hereby notified to file a written response to
the enclosed Answer With New Matter And Amended Counterclaim
within twenty (20) days from service hereof or a judgment may
be entered against you.
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
2306 Columbia Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 291-2236
Dated:
\...
By: (
Corrie Fischel, I.D. #65289
Attorney for Defendant
Lobar Associates, Inc.
Rl!f: Pl\Lobar\lIei888.NTP
UAR\toN .l1l,\VU:S, P.c.
"f1(IR~lys."r.I.AW
2YJfllOllIMIII" """NUE
1.\~P.~lflt"" I1N1J
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaintiff
v.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER AND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM
1- Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
5 . Admitted.
6 . Admitted.
7. Denied. Defendant specifically denies that in
addition to the written contract, the subcontractor completed
additional work on the same job. Rather, all work performed by
the subcontractor was pursuant to the plans and specifications
incorporated into Plaintiff's subcontract. By way of further
answer, any "additional work" performed by Plaintiff was
required as a result of Plaintiff's own failure to properly
IlMt'-iO"''' IlAVlfS, PC
.\lIolt_'t"\.A1IAW
:W.ltIl11!I.'.UU" ^'i('~tf
l.-\'L\\U'R '" PHil
preform its work under the contract.
1
8. Defendant spec if ically responds to the following
averments:
a.
Denied.
Defendant
denies
that
in
accordance with the contract, the contractor was to install
wooden forms around the entire pool to facilitate installation
of gunite.
Defendant denies that since contractor did not
erect the wooden walls, subcontractor had to revise its work
schedule to install the gunite at a cost of $18,000 more than
anticipated. By way of further answer, in accordance with the
contract, the contractor had the option to install wooden forms
around the entire pool area to facilitate installation of
gunite in case unsuitable soil was encountered that would not
provide a suitable vertical plane for gunite installation. All
parties agreed, including Plaintiff, that natural earth walls
formed during the excavation process provided a sufficient
shell to allow Plaintiff to install the gunite, and this
approach was
acc.:epted by Plaintiff prior to gunite
installation. Further, Defendant believes and therefore aver.s
that the $18,000 in costs which Plaintiff alleges it incurred
in additional expense was partially the result of the decision
by Plaintiff's own superintendent to enlarge the shell of the
pool which therefore required the use of additional gunite.
b.
Denied.
Defendant
denies
that
subcontractor put in a new diving jig at the request of the
contractor, as contractor's men went over and deRtroyed the
original diving jig at cost to the subcontractor of $150.00.
1I!\K"()~ oll>AVIPi, P ('.
c\rlo'l:'d\"."f.IAt,W
l\i"ltJ\n,41U" At,....Wf
'''l\''1I1t ".\ PHI'
2
,
i
By way of further answer, the subcontractor was required to
provide a new diving board, thereby requiring a diving jig, as
a result of a direct request by the owner. This item was not
part of the subcontract between the Plaintiff and Defendant.
Contractor Defendant was at no time aware
or told that
subcontractor Plaintiff would require the old diving jig at the
job site. Therefore, contractor's demolition crew did destroy
the old property, including the diving jig, pursuant to the
contract specifications.
c. Denied. Defendant denies that contractor
requested subcontractor to cut the bond beam at a cost to
subcontractor of $150.00. By way of further answer, Defendant,
after reasonable investigation, is unaware as to the existence
of a bond beam on the project.
d. Denied. Defendant denies that contractor
requested subcontractor to install three (3) lifeguard stands
at a cost to subcontractor of $7,500.00.
By way of further
answer, subcontractor was required to install three (3)
lifeguard stands pursuant to the plans and specifications
incorporated into its contract and was paid for such
installation pursuant to the agreed upon contract price.
e. Denied. Defendant denies that as neither
a wooden wall nor dirt wall was provided by the contractor at
the shallow end of the pool, subcontractor was asked to
construct a plywood wall against which the gunite could be
shot, at a cost to the subcontractor of $2,900.00. By way of
IlARMU~ A DAVIES, PT.
AnIlM~H'i."J.lA.W
11Oflt()II'MHI""vt~ln
I M.L"'iIHt "^ PN'l1
3
further answer, Plaintiff specifically requested that a plywood
wall be put up in order to give it room to install piping
behind the wall area.
f. Denied. Defendant denies that it requested
subcontractor to run a sewer line for a cost to the
subcontractor of $350.00.
By way of further answer,
subcontractor was required to run a sewer line pursuant to the
plans and specif ications incorporated into Plaint iff's
subcontract and pursuant to the contract price stated therein.
9. Denied.
Defendant denies that subcontractor
completed all of the work under the original contract as well
as additional work as described above by April 11, 1994. By
way of further answer, Plaintiff substantially completed its
work required by its contract on or about April 13, 1994 which
is evidenced by the substantial completion certificate issued
on that date.
Certificate of substantial completion is
attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated as though fully set
forth herein.
COUNT I
BREACH OF CONTRACT
10. Answers
to paragraphs
1 through 9 are
incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.
11. Denied.
Defendant denies that in addition to
the written contract and the change order, the additional work
as described in paragraph 3 was performed by the subcontractor
pursuant to an express oral contract, which was completed by
Il"RMa~" DAVIES, PC
,\r1tlR,'litY....."'.I.AW
tlOt!(0I1'\t8IA ","''''\iCE.
I ,"('''~dHI'''' 111'101
4
II
1\
I,
'I
Ii
I
I
I
i
I
I
f1^,~MON" UI\\'IES, P,C i
"r!OM;'H',S-"I.I.AW
l'OflUJI 1''tHI'' "'o'f'liI'E
lA'll "'ff-M P" i1tl1J1
the subcontractor. Rather, all work performed by the Plaintiff
was performed pursuant to the written subcontract and the plans
and specifications incorporated therein.
By way of further
answer, any "additional work" performed by plaintiff was
required only as a result of Plaintiff's failure to properly
perform its work under the contract.
12. Denied. Defendant denies that pursuant to the
written contract, the change order and the additional work
performed by the oral contract, the contractor was to pay the
subcontractor One Hundred Ninety-Seven Thousand Seven Hundred
Sixty-Nine ($197,769.00) Dollars. By way of further answer,
pursuant to the contract and change order, De fendant was
required to pay Plaintiff $167,919.00, provided that all work
under the subcontract was satisfactorily completed.
13. Admitted in part. Denied in part.
Defendant
admits that it paid the subcontractor a total of One Hundred
Thirty-Four Thousand and 00/100
($134,000.00)
Dollars.
Defendant denies that a balance of Sixty-Three Thousand Seven
Hundred Sixty-Nine and 00/100 ($63,769.00) Dollars is due and
owing to the Plaintiff subcontractor.
By way of further
answer, as a result of additional costs already incurred by
Defendant
as a result of
Plaintiff's
inadequate
and
unsatisfactory performance;
as well as costs not yet
ascertained by Defendant as a result of Plaintiff's inadequate
and unsatisfactory performance, no balance is due and owing to
Plaintiff.
5
- '
. .. - __.0.
,. .
14. Admitted in part.
Denied in part.
It is
admitted that despite repeated demands, Defendant has not paid
Plaintiff subcontractor an amount of $63,769.00 in addition to
the $134,000.00 paid to plaintiff pursuant to the written
contract.
Defendant denies that a balance of $33,919.00 is
remaining under the written contract and a balance of
$29,550.00 pursuant to the oral contract. By way of further
answer, Defendant incorporates herein its answer stated in
paragraph 13 above.
15. Denied.
Plaintiff's
averment
states
conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required
and said averment is therefore denied. To the extent an answer
is required, Defendant denies Lhat it "breached both the oral
and written contract by failing to perform its end of the
agreement by final payment, despite the fact that subcontractor
completed its work and fulfilled all of its obligations under
the agreement." By way of further answer, no oral contract
existed.
Further, contractor Defendant fully performed all
responsibilities it had pursuant to the contractual agreement
between the parties, including, but not limited to, making
payment to subcontractor Plaintiff.
WHEREFORE,
Defendant
Lobar
Associates,
Inc.
respectfully requests that this Honorable Court dismiss
Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice with Defendant's costs to
be paid by Plaintiff.
UARMON a. (It\VIFS, P,t".
"111lil.~l-Y:'i,,,r.lAW
1\Ottnlll:\lIlL.........'f-.WE
1.o\"r\"lHIt I'A I7NH
6
a
COUNT I I
UNJUST ENRICHMENT/QUANTUM MERUIT
16. Answers to paragraphs 1 through 15 are
incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth at
length.
17. Denied. Defendant denies that additional work
as completed by the subcontractor was performed by the
subcontractor on the contractor's behalf to assist him in
completing the job.
By way of further answer, all work
performed by Plaintiff was pursuant to the plans and
specifications incorporated into the contract between the
parties.
18. Denied.
Contractor
denies
that
the
subcontractor completed all work as previously set forth in
paragraph 8, subparagraphs a-f.
By way of further answer,
Defendant incorporates herein its answers set forth in
paragraphs 8. a-f.
19. Admitted. By way of further answer, all monies
received by contractor by the owner for which subcontractor was
entitled to was paid in full to subcontractor.
20. Denied. Defendant specifically denies that the
subcontractor performed all the additional work for a total
amount of $29,850.00 on the basis that no additional work
occurred on the proj ect .
Rather, all work performed by
Plaintiff on the project was pursuant to the contractual
agreement between the parties for which Plaintiff was fully
II..\MM()~" lM'ilfS. P l"
"noM."'iI'l''i '-t.I!\W
Htlfll 01 1'\IIt1Ao ""'1'1:".
'o\'t._""'''R P^ IIHIl
7
paid.
As for subcontractor's averment that "it paid for
materials from its own funds as averred in paragraph 8 a
through f for the total amount of $29,850.00," Defendant denies
this
averment
the
basis
that,
after
reasonable
on
investigation, Defendant is without sufficient information as
to affirm or deny said averment and it is therefore denied.
21. Denied.
Defendant's
averment
states
conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required.
To the extent an answer is required, Defendant denies that the
contractor was therefore unjustly enriched by the receipt of
the funds from the owner of the West Shore Country Club for
work and materials that were actually provided by the
subcontractor because Plaintiff was fully paid in accordance
with the terms of the subcontract for all work performed on the
project.
WHEREFORE, Defendant Lobar Associates, Inc. requests
that this Honorable Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with
prejudice with Defendant's costs to be paid by Plaintiff.
NEW MATTER
22. Defendant answering averments of paragraphs 1
through 21 are incorporated by reference as though fully set
forth herein.
23. Under Defendant's contract with the owner, all
of Defendant's work, which included all of Plaintiff's work
under the subcontract, was to be completed on or before January
IlARMO;o.j" (l:\,"'"-S. PC
.\nOM'Ii'''''' 4flAW
~ \ot! t c Ill' \4 tll 4 _-\ V F"'" F
L"l '" It II. 1''' PHil
8
a
1, 1994. A true and correct copy or said contract is attached
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference.
24. The requirement for Defendant's work and
therefore Plaintiff's work, to be complete before January 1,
1994 was clearly specified in the plans, specifications, and
documents.
25. plaintiff knew, or should reasonably have known,
of the requirement that all work on the project be completed on
or before January 1, 1994.
26. Defendant, as general contractor, prepared a Job
Progress Schedule for the project. A true and correct copy of
said schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit
tiC" and
incorporated herein by reference.
27. Defendant provided a copy of said schedule to
Plaintiff.
28. Plaintiff did not obj ect to this schedule or
take exception to it.
29. From the beginning of its work on the project,
Plaintiff failed to provide an adequate number of properly
trained and qualified employees to perform its work on the
project.
30. From the beginning of its work on the project,
Plaintiff failed to provide an adequate quantity of proper
equipment to perform its work on the project.
31. In a letter dated November 19, 1993, Defendant
notified Plaintiff of its failure to meet the schedule
HAM.\tOS'" D^\'I~S. Pt'
AI'IllN.'I't... AflAW
1\01'11 01 L\UII,\ \H'IOt'F_
I "'l-"'''tlt "" l1fljJl
9
UARMON a. IlAVlf.S, P C.
"r!OIl....Hs."r.I"W
llorll.UI\.'\ttU,\""F~l'E
1"'(..\'011'11. .." PfllH
requirements on the project. A true and correct copy of said
letter is attached hereto as Exhibit "D".
32. Throughout the course of the project, plaintiff
consistently and persistently failed to meet the required
schedule.
33. As a direct and proximate result of Plaintiff's
failure to properly perform ita work on the project in a good
and workman I ike manner, in accordance ~li th its proposal, the
subcontract, applicable project plans, specifications, and
schedules, completion of the project was delayed from January
1, 1994 to April 15, 1994.
34. As a direct and proximate result of said three
and one-half month delay, the work of Defendant and of other
subcontractors on the project was similarly delayed.
35. Under Defendant's contract with the owner,
Plaintiff was to complete its work in accordance with the plans
and specifications incorporated into its subcontract.
36. At the completion of Plaintiff's work, the
architect noted that the water level of the pool was uneven,
which Defendant believes and therefore avers is a direct and
proximate result of Plaintiff's failure to properly perform its
work in a good and workmanlike manner.
37. Plaintiff's claims, which are specifically
denied by Defendant, are barred as a result of Plaintiff's
failure to timely raise said claims in accordance with the
contract requirements.
10
COUNTERCLAIM
COUNT I
38. Defendant's averments of paragraphs 1-37 are
incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
39. The total value of the subcontract, including
all approved change orders, is $167,919.00.
40. To date, Defendant has paid Plaintiff the sum of
$134,000.00.
41. As a direct and proximate result of Plaintiff's
failure to perform its work in a good workmanlike manner, in
accordance with its proposal, the subcontract, applicable
plans, specifications and schedules, Lobar Associates, Inc. was
forced to incur the following costs:
(1) 4-100 lb. Bottles of Gas
(2) 1 Roll Polyethylene - 20 x 100
(3) Snow Removal At Site And Pool Area Due
To Time Of Year That work Was Being
Performed
Liberty Excavators - $557.56 +$1,584.70 =
(4) Cost For Water Fill-Up Of Pool &
Removal Of Sewer (Water - $368.00,
Sewer - $423.08)
(5) Miscellaneous Items Related To Pool
Work And Proper Function Of Pool
(Note: Gutter Off Level By 1/2" In
80;) :
(A) Aqua SpecialistA Pump Out Surge Tank
(B) Aqua Specialists Install Control
Valve, Gutter System, Clean Off
Stickers, & Repair One (1) Light
UAKMON 4. I>AVlfS, Pc.
AflO"".'f'''i.''I.I.",W
~'OrII.U1\JMHIA .\\It.:'H1E
1,\!I;L',\:-.ltM PA Pfltll
(C) Aqua Specialists - Line Striping
Required By DER
11
$ 120.00
$ 60.00
$ 2,142.00
$ 791.00
$
228.60
$
685.00
$
535.50
(D) Kilgore Signs - Capacity 180 Sign
Required By DER $ 26.50
(E) Procedures For Operating And
Winterizing Pool $ 70.00
(F) Adjust & Install Screws In All
Pool Returns, Pool Light Work,
Secure In Niche, Install Screw
Lids In Wading Pool Skimmer Bits S 178.00
TOTAL $ 4,836.60
WHEREFORE, Lobar Associates,
Inc. respectfully
requests this Honorable Court to enter judgment upon Count I of
its Counterclaim in its favor and against Plaintiff in an
amount in excess of $4,836.60, together with costs and interest
as allowed by law.
COUNTERCLAIM
COUNT II
42. Defendant
incorporates
its
averments
of
paragraphs 1 through 41 by reference as though fully set forth
herein.
43. As a direct and proximate result of the three
and one-half month delay caused by Plaintiff, Defendant's
period of performance on the project was extended by three and
one-half months.
44. This three and one-half month extension caused
Defendant to expend a sum of $14,056.00 which is recoverable by
Defendant under the subcontract for extended project overhead,
project
management,
project
superintendence,
job site
tf,\RMO:'ll A nAVIES, P C
"nlHl"~'t... Ar.L\W
~ IOro l Olt: \481.\ "'Yt."'l:E
I ""'l ,''''1 fll: I'~\ 11,.n
facilities, job site utilities, and to negotiate a contract
12
HARMON tlIM\llES. P.C. I
I\IIUR!'II['rS...\f.IAW I
2\ot11 fJU'MHI" "H:NIJE I
''''("'',UR VA I1NII
I
Ii
I
I
extension with the owner, and to perform its work during winter
months, during cold weather, among other things, as follows:
(1) six (6) Weeks @ $1500.00/Week~
$ 9,000.00
(2) Additional Labor Due To Weather & Time
Of Year That Work Was Being Completed
48 Hrs. @ $22.44 ~
$ 1,077.00
(3) Additional Materials Due To Weather &
Time Of Year That Work Was Being
Performed - Stones - Hempt Bros. =
$
703.00
(4) Additional Equipment Required Due To
Weather & Time Of Year Work Was Being
Completed
(5) General Superintendent Additional
Supervision - 60 Hrs. @ $29.60 =
$ 1,500.00
$ 1,776.00
(6) Overtime Associated With The Project
Order To Meet Revised Completion Date
Of 15 April 1994.
S 4.050.00
$18,106.00
TOTAL
WHEREFORE,
Defendant
Associates,
Inc.
Lobar
respectfully requests this Honorable Court to enter judgment in
its favor and against Plaintiff in the amount of $18,106.00,
together with costs and interest as allowed by law.
Respectfully submitted,
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
By:
CDlA't/)L 'l~!if-~~
corrieilr... Fischel, I.D. 1165289
Attorney for Defendant
Lobar Associates, Inc.
Ref: Pl\Lobar\lIel..e,A4
13
.
,".,.
j
I
I
'i
;....
EXHIBIT "A"
I
I
1
,
I
I
i1
1
'~~~:1~~~~~ lot
OOMPLETIO~
AlA DOCUMENT G704
Pool/ Bathhouse Construction
West Shore Country Club
100 Brentwater Road
Ca'ilp Hill, PA 17011
Dillribulion 10:
OWNER a
ARCHITECT 0
CONTRACTOR 0
FIELD 0
OTHER 0
.'-
'-
ARCHITECT:
H. Edward Black & Associates
PROJECT:
(name, address)
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER:
CONTRACTOR': LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
TO (Owner):
,Iwest Shore Country Club -,
100 Brentwater Road
Camp Hili, PA 17011
L J
DATE OF ISSUANCE: 13 April 1994
PROJECT O~ DESIGNATED PORTION SHALL INCLUDE: Pool/Bathhouse Constructton'
CONTRACT FOR: General Construction
CONTRACT DATE: 16 July 1994
The Work performed under Ihis Contr.ct has been reviewed .nd (ound to be subsl.nli.lly complete. The D.te of Sub'l.nti.1
Completion of the Projecl or porlion Ihereof design.ted .bove is hereby established as
which is .Iso Ihe dale of commencemenl of .pplicable w.rr.nlies required by ihe Conllact Documents. except as suted below,
DEFINITION OF DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION
\
The Ciale of SubSlanlial Complelion of the Work or design.ted portion Ihereof is Ihe Dale certified by Ihe Arch;lecl when
conuruclion Is sufficiently complele. in olccordance with the Conlract Documents, so the Owner can occupy or utilize the
Work or dui&!,ated porlion th'ereof fa, Ihe use fa, which it is intended. as expresserl in the Contract Documenn.
A liSl of ilems 10 be completed 0' correcled. prepared by Ihe (onllaclO' and verified and amended by the Archilect, is
.!lached herelo. The fai/ure 10 include .ny ;Iems on such IiSl does nOI.lle, Ihe responsibilil of Ihe Conllacto, 10 complete .11
Work' in accordance with Ihe Conlract Documenn, The d.le of commencement of w.rrantie. r il S on the .!lathed list will
be the d,'e of lin.1 paymenl unless othe/W;se .greed 10 in \ itin~
H. Edward Black E Associates ( '::...- ~ (
ARCHITECT
The Conlractor will complele or correclthe Work on the Iisl of ;Iems .!l.ched herelo within
'rom Ihe above Dale of SubSlanti.1 Completion.
d.ys
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONTRACTOR
"'- ~
..-:g,~.., t.,,,,\ _ ~""A~L'\.--
BY
tf{f/7.:J-
The Owner Jcccp15 the \Vork or desisn.1ICd portlcn the~eof as ~:..;bnJr.liJlly complete Jnd ",111 JHUrne iull pOHeHlon \rereof
al It;mel on /'1' ~ (d.te).
Wp,,1 Shnrp r.nllntry r.lllh ~t"":;~ ,~.i';' Lf/':/'-rtr
OWNER /# ,DATE '
The responsibilities of the Owner and the Contractor for securily, maintenance, heal, uti/ilies, damage to Ihe Work
and insurance shall be as follows:
INo,e-Ownet's ~nd COnU.1CIO,'J leB~' .nd imuf.nce counsel should delermine ltnd review ;nsU(,1I1(e requ;remenls .nd coverage; Conrr.ctor
sh.1I secure (omenl of surely (omp.ny. it Any.)
,..
\,
AlA DOCUME.NT C704 . ClRTIFICATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMI'lETION . AI'RIL 197B (DillON . AlA-
C 1978 . THE AM[RICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHIHCTS, 17)5 N[W VORIC ^\'(.. N.W.. WASHINGTON, D.C, :!0006
C704 - 1978
I
.~
.,'
'\
EXHIBIT "B"
:'i ~',t':
~l. ,
~, ..,. i.
~; , fl
,':
,,'
1.
,.
,~.',
;
,-
~~
.0_.
SllE.Qfi.IRAcr
AGREEMENT BEnVEEN CONTRACTOR & SUBCONTRACTOR
SUBCONTRACT #3081-13152-S10
AGREEAIElIT MADE AS OF THE 3RD O.iY OF A UGUST IN THE rt.AR OF NlNOTUN HUNDRED AND 93.
, .'
."
BETWEElI TIlE COIVT'RACTOR: LOBAR ASSOCIA TES, INC.
1 OLD .I/ILL ROAD
P.O. BOX 4n
DIUSBURG, PA 17019-M32
AND TIlE SUBCOIVT'RACTOR: FRANCIS IIEISSE
421 N. PROGRESS AVE.
HARRISBURG, n, 17109
TELEPHONE: (7m 54S-3421
IVITNESSEnI, TIlAT TIlE SUBCOIVT'RACTOR AND CO/mI.ACTOR FOR THE CONSlDEJlA710N /lERE/NAFTEII /Wo/ED AGREE AS
ForLOWS.'
ARTICLE 1. THE SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES TO F1I1WSH AU.!.iATEJUAL AMJ PERFORM AU. WORK AS DESC1UBED IN A/maL
U HEJlEOF FOR:
NEW BATHHOUSE &: POOL CONSTRUCTION
WEST SHORE COUtvTRY CLUB
CAMP HIlL, PA
FOR LO&iR ASSOCUn:s. INC. IN ACCORD,(/(CE wrm T1l1S AGRED/tNT. T1C1: AGREEJJtNT BE:TWEEN TIlE OWlo'fR .r.
COIVT'RACTOR. .r. IN ACCORDANCE wrTl/ THE GEJ/ERAL CONDmONS 01' T1C1: COIVT'RACT. SUnUNE:NTAl/Y GENEII.AL
CONDmONS, THE DRAWINGS, sn:QF/CmoNS. AND ADDENDA P1UAMD IY H. EDWARD BUCK &: ASSOCIATES
HEIlEINAFTEII CAULD TIlE Al/CHrffCT OR OWNUl'S A 1IT7/01UZED AGENT. AU. Of WTl1CH DOCU/JENrS. SIGNED BY TIlE PAI/17ES
THERETO OR rDENrTFrED BY THE Al/CHIrECT DR OWNUl'S AurRORJICD AGENT. fORM A PART Of A COIVT'RACTBE1WEEN THE
COIVT'RACTOR AND THE OWNU/ DATED 16 JULY 1993 . .I ffERUY BECOME A PART Of TTUS COIVT'RACT, .r./lERE/N REFEJ/JlED
TO AS THE COIVT'RACT DOCllMF.Nr!. " SIULL BE MADE .lVAlUBLE IV THE SUBCOIVT'RACTOR UPON ms REQUEST PRIOR TO AIoD
ANmME SUBSEQUENT IV SIG.\7NG T7/1S SUBCO/mI.ACT.
ARTICLE 11. THE SUBCO.\71l.iCTOR ., mE CO.\71UC70R ,fGIlLE miT THE 1olATUU.<LS A"D EQUIPME:NT ro BE fUR.\7SHllJ
or. WORK TO BE PERFORMED ARE COMPlETE AS RLQUfRED AND IN rrruCT ACCORDANCE wrm PUNS. SPEaflCA710NS.
M1ENDMENrS, AND/OR ADOE.\DA .r. AS fOLLOWS:
A. APPUCABLE SECTIONS OF DIVISION I . GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
B. CONSTRUCTION OF SWiMMING AND WADING POOLS COMPLETE AS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH PENNSYLVANIA STATE REGUUTIONS AND ACCORDING TO PUNS &: SPECIFICATIONS
PROVIDED, AS AMENDED IN YOUR LEITER OF 29 APRIL 1993 AND LATER DELiiTION OF THE
HEATERS ON T/lE ORIGINAL SPECIFlCATIONS II'111Cl1 DECREASED T/lE PRICE FROM TIlAT
SHOWN ON YOUR LEITER DATED 29 APRIL 1993 INCLUDING THE FOUDWiNG:
1. THE SWiMMING AND WADING POOLS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED EXACTLY AS S/lOWN ON
BLUEPRINT. '
.. I OLD MILL ROAD P.O. BOX 432
DIUSBURG. PENNA /7019-iJ432
TEL: (717) 432-9728 FAX: (717) 432.9162
,.
...
't:,
",
I,.
!;
rt!' .
,.
r
~
2. THE EQUIPMENT SPECIFIED MLL BE CHANGED AS FOlLOWS, SFV 71-78" HYRATE SAND
FILTER wrrHOur AUTOMATIC BACKWASH. TWO (J) CHEMODATA MODEL 400 CONTROlLERS
AND FOUR (01) STENNER pUMpS FOR AUTO!M.TIC CHEMICAL CONTROL OF BOTH I'OOLS.
AUTOMATIC FILL FEATURE HAS BEEN DELETED FROM ORiGINAL BID.
J. TWELVE (12) STAINLESS STEEL RECESSED WAU. STEI'S HAVE BEEN DELETED. THEY W1U.
BE REPLACED BY BUILT.IN CERAMIC TILE STEPS.
4. FLOW CONTROL VALVES HAVE BEEN DELETED.
S. WHEN SrrEWORK I.E. EXCAVATION, UNDER. DRAINS, AND STONE ARE COMPLETE, fOUR
FIR.M WILL INSTAlL AND TEST ALL PIPES WHICH WILL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 AND SIZED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH BLUEPRINTS. ESTI.IfATED TIME ONE (1) WEEK.
6. WHILE THE WOOD FORMS FOR THE POOL WAllS ARE BEING INSTAlLED BY OTHERS, YOUR
FlR.M WILL COMMENCE INSTAlLlNG REBAR, 14 RODS ON 12" CElVTERS, BOTIl WAYS. OVER
WAUS AND FLOOR OF TIlE SWI,II.I/lNG POOL. GRADE 60 STF.'EL WILL BE USED. WHEN
STEEL INSTAlL'.TlON IS CO,I/PLETE, TIlE POOL FLOOR WILL BE INSTALLED .' ESTmATED
TI.IIE TIlREE (3) WEEKS.
7. SHOTCRETE-GUNITE S\\'/.II.II/.\'G 1'001. WAllS AND GlITTER WILL BE /.YSTAlLED .
ESTI.IfATED TIME nl'O (2) WEEKS.
8. WADING POOL ROUGIl STRUCTURE WILL BE INSTAlLED. ESTI.I/ATED TI.IIE ONE (I) WEEK.
9. TIU WILL BE INSTALLED AND POOLS PLtSTERED . EST/.IIATED TI.lIE nl'O (2) WEEKS.
:j
~
!L
f
J'
!:
SPECIAL REOUrREMENTS:
1. DUE TO POSSIBLE COMMUNICATION CONFUCTS, THE OWNER & LOBAR ASSOCIATES. rNC.
REQUIRE THAT ALL CORRESPONDENCE, IVRlTTEN & VERBAL, FRO.l( SUBCONTRACTORS &
ltlATERIAL SUI'PUERS BE DrRECTED TIIROUGH WBAR ASSOCrATES. INC. IN UEU OF DTRECT
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE OWNER & PROJECT ENGINEERS/ARCHITECT. IN ADDITION, ALL
CUJUFlCi.TIONS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO WBAR ASSOCrATES, rNC. VIA FAX OR .lWl. IN
UEU OF VERBAL COMMUNICATION.
2. FIELD MEASUREMENTS & VERiFICATION ARE TIlE RESPONSIBIUTY OF TIllS SUBCONTRACTOR.
REV1EW OF SITE AND FOUNDATION CONDITIONS IS A REQUrRE.I/E.\T FOR TIllS CO,\T1U.CT.
J. HA VB .llATERlALS DEUYERED WHEN REQUrRED. NO STORAGE IS A VAJUBU ON JOBSITE . IF
DEUVERf IS MANDATORY PRiOR TO INSTAJL.ITION. TillS SUBCONTRACTOR WrLL HA VE TO
PROV1DE REQUIRED STORAGE FACTurrES. PHASED PROJECTS SIlOL'l.D /1,1 \;E MATERiALS
SR/l'I'ED IN PHASES UNLESS STORAGE IS PROV1DED.
.t. pROTECTTON OF !M.TERlALS UNTIL OIl'NER-ARCHITECT ACCEPTAI>'CE.
S. MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEErs ARE A REQUIREMENT FOR TillS PROJECT .t MUST BE
SUBMfTTED wrrHlN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF THE SUBCONTRACT DATE AND PRIOR TO
MATERiALS MUUYlNG ON TIlE JOBSITE.
6. SUB.IflSSION OF OPERATION J< .I(A/,VTENANCE .IIANU.US TO BE ,I(ADE WITH INIT1AL
SUB,lIfTTALS.
7. BY EXEClITlON OF T/lIS SUBCOSTRACT AGREE,IIEST. l'OL'R FIR.!( ,IGREES TIIAT IT WILL
STRICTLY COMPLY WIT/l AlL OS/lA REGUUTIONS AND MSDS REQUIRE.IIENTS ON THIS PROJECT.
rr IS ALSO TilE RESI'ONSIBIUTY OF YOUR PERSONNEL TO FOLLOW ANY INSTRUCTIONS OR
DIRECTIVES GIVEN BY OUR PROJECT SUPERINTENDENT. STEVE DIlLER. REGARDING SAFETY ON
THE PROJECT. ANY FINES ISSUED TO WBAR ASSOCIATES, INC. AS A RESULT OF fOUR FlR.It'S
NEGUGENCE OR NON-COMPUANCE WILL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF YOUR FlR.U. THE
SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL OSHA REGULATIONS INCLUDING VERIFlED SAFETY
CONDITIONS OF OTHER TRADES.
8. THIS PROJECT HAS A FlRM COMpJ.ETION DATE OF "AS PER ATTACHED SCHEDULE WITH NO T1ME
EXTENSIONS PERMfTTED. AlL MATERlALS AND WORK SCHEDULES MUST BE COORDINATED
VERY CWSELY WITH OUR pROJECT SUPERiNTENDENr, STEVE DIlLER, AT THE SITE TO MEET
THE REQUIRED COMpJ.ETION DATE. DAY TO DAY SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENTS BY THIS
.
"
,.
.'-
J.
SUBCONTRACTOR ,UlB A REQUIREMENT Bf THIS SUBCONTR).CTOR TO ACCOMMODATE VARlOUS
PROJECT INTANGIBLES (WEATHER, ETC.) TO ltWNTAlN THE FINAL COMPLETION DATE.
MVLTIPLE SHIFTS eI OVERTmE A1lE A REQUIREMENT OFTHlS PROJECT AS NECESSAllY TO MEET
SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS AND/OR LOBAR ASSOCIATES' SUPERlNTENDENT'S INSTRUCTIONS.
9. DAILY REMOVAL eI DISPOSA./. OF REUTED DEBR/S OFF SrrE.
10. PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SUPERVISION eI MANPOWER FOR SCHEDVUNG, RECENlNG, UNLOADING,
eI DISTRlBUTION OF AU MATER/A./. DEUVERlES.
11. AU TESTING AND SUBMISSION OF REPORTS ,UlB A REQUIREMENT OF THIS SUBCONTRACT TO
ASSURE QUAUTl' OF INSTAlLtTIONS.
11. AU UYOUT & COORDINATIO,y COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SUBCONTRACT ARE A
SUBCONTRACT REQUIREMENT.
13. AU SUBCONTRALfORS ,IIUST PARTICIPATE IN A f.lIOUR WEEKLY JOBSrrE CLEAN-UP EACH
FRlDAr.
.'
ARTICLE 111. 17ME IS Of mE ESSEScr .t.'V mE SUBCONTI/.iCTOR AG/lEES 10 COMME/'ICE AND TO COMPlETE TIlE WORK
AS DESCTUBED IN All 17 CU: II .is fOUOWS..
A. ..rL WOR/( TO BE P<MOR.I/ED I,V :muCT .tCCORD.i/'lCE WTT1/ !.OllAR .lSSOClATES. I/'IC. PROGRLSS SCHEDULE do
DIREC770NS. NON-CO.llPU'NCE "ml LOalR .iSSOClATES. INC. PROGRLSS SCHEDULEAJ,VIOR INS11lUC770IlS MA YRLSULT
IN TU!.\(INA170N OF mls AGREE..I/E.'T .'NDIOR aleX CI/AIlGES, .iNY PENAL17ES OR DAMAGES ASSESSED TO LOllAR
ASSOCIATES. INC. .is A RLSULT Of TIllS SUBco.\'mICTVR "7U BE T1iF. RESPOIISIBIU1Y OF TIllS SUBCOtmUCTOR,
.. COMPu:T!OIl DATE fOR TIllS PROJECT IS 'AS PER ATTACHED SCHEDULE WTT1/ UQUlDATED DAMAGES Of ..
PER CAL.E;\VAIl DAY. .{NY UQUID.,TED DA.\(,'GES ASSESSED TO LOllAR .iSSOCLiTES. IIIC. AS A RLSULT OF TIllS
SUBCOtmUCTOR "7U BE 17/E RLSPONSIBIU1Y Of TIllS SUBCONTI/.iCTOR.
"AS ASSESSED.
NO TTIoIE EXTENSIOII OF TIllS CONmiCT "7U BE RECOG,'7ZED "7T1/0llT T1iF. WRITTEN COIISENT OF TflE COtmUCTVR W/uCH
roNSENT SIIALL /'lOT BE wrrnHEUJ UNTIE.iSON-IBLY COIISISTENT wrrn AIl71ClE X4 OF T1US COtmUCT. SUBJECT TO T1iF.
AIUfTIlATTOII PROVlSIOIIS HEIlElN PROVIDED.
ARTICLE IV. T1iF. CON11UCTVR .lG/lEES TO PAY T1iF. SUBCONTR.iCTVR fOR 11/E PEllFORMANCE OF TIllS WOM TflE
FOUOWlNG SUM: ONE llUNDRED SIXTY-FOUR THOUSAND, FOUR HUNDRED, NINETEEN DOUA1IS
(1164,419.00) . III CURRENT FUbDS. SUBJECT TO ADDmONS A/oV DEDUCT/ONS fOR CHANGES AS MAY BE AGREED UPOIIIII
W/llTING. .1 TO M.iKE MONTHLY P,O'!JE.'TS ON ACCOUNT 11/EREOF III ACCORDAllCE WTT1/ AltTTa.E X. SECT/OIlS lD-21
IIICWS(YE.
A. IJONT/U.Y PROGRESS P.H'ME.NT CObvmONS . nvo r1! COP/E.S TO I.DlIAR ASSOaATES. 11Ie:. OfflCE BY 2U11/ OF EACH
IJONTI/. P.i Y'!JENT OF TIllS Ib'YOICE TO BE AS fOUOWS:
/IF:T LESS 10~ RETAlNAGE WlU BE P,i/D JOI41 DA l'3' SUBJECT TO AIlCHmCT.ENGINUil/OWNER APPROVAL do RECEIPT OF
PAYIoIENT BY 1.D/IAl! ASSOCLlTES. INC. fOR WOM COMPlETED Oil TIllS SUBCOtmUCT. NO OT1lER CI/AIlGES SUCH AS
IHTEIlEST. CARRYING CI/AIlGES, T.iXES. ac, "lU BE HONORED UNl.ESS IbVICiTED OT1lERWlSE OR AS AGREED TO BY
B011/ P,lR71ES IN WRJ71NG, RET.i/.'I.IGE TO BE RElLiSED UPOII APPROVAL FROM AIlCIUTECT AND OWNER. AND RECEIPT
OF MATE/lI.<L .. lABOR PROOf Of P,01lE.'7 P.E1L.'SES, MO.\711 P.ll':\lE.'7 APPUCi170NS TO BE SUBMfTTW ON .dA
DOCUME.VTS G702 do G70J OR EQUAl. FORM SHO"l/IG PERCENT COMP/ETW EACH MOtml.
liD PAIlTIAL OR FIlIAL P.H'MENTS WlU BE MADE wrrnOUT PROOF OF MATEllJAL PAYIoIEJmI UNl.ESS SPEaAL
AIlJlA/lGEMEJmI AIlE MADE W/11/ WlIAR .lSSOaATES. INC.
IT SUBCOH71UCTOR FAlI.S TO MEETT1iF. SUBCO/mlACT REQUIR.EJ4EJm1...rL PAYMEJmI DUE IIICLUDING OVTrrANDI/IG
SEtAllATE ORDEIlS MAY IE HElD UNTIL COIUlECTTYE AC77011S AIlE TA/I'.EN.
ARTICLE V. FIlIAL PAYMENT SIIALL BE DUE W/IEH WORK DESCTUIED III TIllS COtmUCT IS FUU.Y ro!JPlETED AND
PERfOIJlJE/J III ACCORDAIICJ! W/11/ T1iF. COtmUCT DOCUMENTS. ot PAYMENT TO BE CO/lSlSTENT WTT1/ AJC11a.P: IV ot AltTTClE
X. SECT/OIlS 11.20.21 INaUSIYE OF T1US COtmUCT.
1U0/lllISSUANC1! 0' ANY PAYIoIE.NT. T1iF. SUBCOtmUCTVR. IT REQUIRED. SIWL SUBIJ" EYTDENCJ! SATTSFACTVRY TO THE
roHT7UCTVR THAT ALL FA Y/lOILS./JATUIAL BIlLS. "..rL1CN01VN INDE'TEDNESS CO/I/IECTED WT11/ THE SUlrotmUCTOR'S
. .
, "
" .
,
)
,
"
:.
~
~
\'
WOM IlA VIr IlUN SA 77!nED.
ARTICLB V1. Pt:RFOIlMANC!" PAYMENT BONDS.
(N/A) SUBMIT A PAYMENT .. PERFORMANCE BOND.
ARTICLB V11. 'lENPOIWlY sm fAC1U11ES.
A. TRJS SUBCONTRACTOR SHAlL PROVIDE AlL 'lENI'OIWlY sm fAC1U77E.S AS REQUUlEn OR AS NECESSAJlY TO PEIlFOIlM
RlS WOR./C.
B. DUIUS RELHE/) TO TIlE WORK INCLUDED IN mlS SUBCONTTlACT SHAlL BE /lEN0l'ED .. DISPOSED Of BY nus
SUBCONTTlACTOR. /lACK CJWlGES SHAU. BE MADE fOR NON-COMPUANCE.
ARTICLE V1/1. INSURANCE
.,'
UMLSS omERWlSE PROVIDED IIERElN. TIlE SUBCO.\71UCTOR SIW.1. IW'E A DIRECT UACIUTY fOR TIlE ACTS Of IUS
EJIPWYW .. .WENT! fOR w/uCH HE IS U:GALLY RESPONSIBLE. ,ISO mE SUBCONTltlCTOR SHAU. NOT BE REQUIRED TO
ASSUME T1/E UABlUTY fOR TIlE Am OF ANY OTl/EllS,
PIUOR TOSTAR77NG WORK. mE INSUIlANCE REQUIRED TO BE F11RMSI/ED SHAlL BE OBWNED F7/0M A RESI'ONSIBU: COMPANY
OR COMPAMES TO PROl7DE PROPER .. .lDEQU.I11: COVER.1GE .. SAT7Sf.1CTORY EVIDENCE WILL BE F11M7SHED TO mE
CO/mIACTOR TIIAT TIlE SUBCONTTlACTOR //AS COMPUED \I'TTI/ mE REQUIRE.'JENTS AS STATED IN nus SEmON.
A. PROVIDE TWO (1) INSURANCE CERTIFICATES IN ACCORDANCE WrrH PROJECT INSURANCE
REQUIREMENTS. CERTIFICATES MUST BE SUB.IUTTED PRIOR TO COJ/MENCING wrrH ANY WORK.
ARTICLE IX. JOB COlovmONS
(X) A COMPLETE UST OF ALL MATERIAL SUfPUERS .r. SECOND TIER SUBCONTRACTORS WITH
THEIR ADDRESSES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS MUST BE SUBMITIED TO LOBAR
ASSOCIATES, INC. WrrHlN FIFTEEN (/5) DAYS FROM DATE OF SIGNING OF AGREEMENT BY
SUBCONTRACTOR.
( X ) COST BREAKDOWN FOR UlJOR .r. .11,1 TERlAL MUST BE SUBM1T1ED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES,
INC. WrrHlN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS FROM DATE OF SIGNING OF AGREEMENT BY
SUBCONTRACTOR.
() SUBMIT PAYROll REPORTS IVrrlllN SEVEN (7) DAYS WEEK-ENDING TO THIS OFFICE.
MONTHLY PAYMENT ESTIMATES CANNOT BE APPROVED wrrHOUT PA YROU REPORTS BEING
SUBMITIED.
(X) PROVIDE TEN (10) COPIES OF ALL SUBM1T1AL DATA EXACTLY AS REQUIRED IN
SPECIFICATIONS NO LATER THAN 10 AUGUST 1993. YOUR FIRM MAY BE HEW LIABLE FOR
DELAY COSTS IF SUBMITTALS ARE NOT .IIADE AS REQUIRED AND wrrlllN mE REQUESTED
TIME FRAME.
(X) E.E.O..r. AFFlR.I/ATlVE ACTION ARE A NRT OF TIllS SUBCONTRACT. EXECUTE AND
RETURN CERTIFICATION WITH CO.\TRACT.
( X ) ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE wrrH LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
SAFETY PROGRAM.
( ) USE OF FOREIGN STEEL or. ALUMINUM PRODUCTS IS PROHlBrrED ON THIS PROJECT.
ARTICLE X. IN ADDmON TV T1/E FOREGOING PROVISIONS TIlE PARnES ALSO AGREE T1lAT TIlE SUBCONTRACTOR SlULL.'
I. BE BOUND TV TRE CO/mIACTOR BYTRE TUNS OF THE CONTTlACTOOCUMEHTS .l TRJSAG/lEEMENI'. .lASSUMETVWAIlD
TRE CO/mIACTOR AlL TIlE OBUGA770NS.. RESI'ONSIBIU11ES T//ATT1lE CONTRACTOR. BY mOSE DOCUMENTS ASSUMES
TVWAIlD T1IE OWNER. AS APPUClBLE TV nus SUBCO/mIACT.
2. SUSN"TV T1IE CONTRACTOR APPUClnONS FOR PAYMENT ATSUCH 77MES STIPUlATED INAKTlCU: IV SOAS TV ENABLE
TRE CO/mIACTOR TV APPLY fOR PAYMENT. IF PAYMENTS ARE MADE ON VALUA770NS OF WORIC DONE. TRE
SUlCONTIIACTOR SHAU.. IUOU TRE Fl/fS1' APPUCl770N. SUSN" TV TIlE CONTTlACTOR A SCHEDUU; OF VALUES OF
..
. ,
.'
I'
~..
)
"
s.
77Uf VAJUOUS fAKn Of TH8 WO/lX. AGGUGATlM1 TH8 TOTAL AS UQ,1JlRED IY T1ll!. OW~, AJID. "/lZQ,IJlRED.
SUfPO/fTU) IY SUCR EY/DWCZ AS ro m CO/lllZCTM:SS AS 77Uf COtmlACTOII MAY DIUCT. TTUS SCREDUU. WRJ:H
APfllOVED IY T1ll!. COtmlACTOII. sHAlL BE USED AS A BASIS FOil cvmnCAn:s FOil fA YMUtT. UNUSS 17 BE FOUND ro
BE IN lJ/J/01f. IN AfPLYlNO FOil fAYMUtT. TH8 SUBCOtmlACTOII SHAlL SUBNI7 A STATFNUtT BASED UPON T1/JS
SCIlZDUlL If fA YMENTS A.IlE MADE ON ACCOUNT OF MATEJUALS NOT INCORPOIlATW IN Tl/E WO/lX BUT DEJ./VEMD
AJID SUI7AilLY STOllED ATTl/E sm. 011 AT SOME 071lER LOCATION AGIIUD UfON IN W/lJ71NO. SUCH fAYMENTS SHAlL
BE IN ACCO/lDANCE wrTH Tl/E TUNS .. CONDmoNS Of Tl/E COtmlACT DOCUlJENTS.
J. fAYFOIlALLIo/ATEJUALS" UBOII USEDIH. OlllHCONNEenOH wrTH. Tl/E PUlTO/lMANCEOfT1/JSCOtmlACT. TRl/OUGR
TH8 PWOD COVUIED BY pUV/OUS PAYMENTS UCLIYE.D fIIOlo/ Tl/E COtmlACTOII" FU/lMSH SATlSFACTOIlY EVlDWCZ
WHEN UQUESTW BY T1/E CONTltICTOR. ro VUUFY CO.YPUINCE Ivml mE .IBOVE /lEQUIRE}'(ENTS.
(9 MAKE AU. CUlMS FOR EX1ll.<S. FOR txTrNSIONS OF TIME. 01 FOil OM/AGE FOil DElAYS 011 OmEIIWlSE. PROMmy ro
T1/E CONTllACTOR CONSlrrLVT W/711 mE CONTltlCT DOCUMENTS,
S. TAKE NECESSAIlY PUCHfTlON ro PROPE/1.LY PROTECT mE FlMSHED WORK OF OTI/ER TlUDES.
6. /I:EF.P mE BUILOINO 01 PlW.(ISES cu:AN AT AU. TIMES OF DEBRIS AJUSINO OUT OF mE OPEIlATlOH OF T1iIS
SUBCONTltlCT. T1/E SUBCO/mt.CTOR SIi<LJ. NOT BE IILLO RESPONSIBlE FOil UNClL.N co...vmONS CAUSED DY omEII
CO...71l.ICTORS OR SUBCO...71l.H70RS. US1LSS OT1/EJlWlSE PROVIDED FOIf.
7. COMPLY "7T7I.1LL STATVTORY.....VIOR CONT1l.lCTV.lL SAFETY /lEQUIRE.YE.\TS .."Lll/.JG TO HIS WORJ(:'~V;OIlI.'mHED
BY T1/E CO.'71l..CTOR. A"'V SI/..U Rl.PORT "rrwN mREE (J) D,IYS TO TIlE CO...71l.ICTOR ANY INJURY 10 mE
SUBCO,'71l..C1OIl'S E.l/PWIUS.IT TIlE sm: OF TIlE PROJECT.
BA. NOT .ISSIGN T1iIS SUBCONTltlCT OR .INY A.l/OU,'TS DUE OR ro BECOME DUE T/IEI/EU,'VER "7T7IOUT TIlE WR/TT'-Y
CONSE.'T OF mE CO,VTRACTOR.
as. NOR SUBCON71lACT mE WHOU: OF nus SUBCO,''Tlt.CT "171iOUT mE WR/TT'-" CONSE..VT OF T1/E CO,''Tlt.CTOR,
Be. NOR FUR TIlER SUBCONTlt.CT PORTlO,''S OF T1iIS SUBCO.'71l.ICT WTTHOUT WRJ7TE.Y SOTlFlC. TlO," TO TIlE CO,\71l.KTOR
WHEN SUCH NOTIFICATION IS UQUESTW BY mE co/mt.CTOR.
9. GUAltINTEE HIS WORK .WAl,YST AU. DEFECTS OF .YAT!RW-S ANDIOIl WORXMANSHlP AS CIlLED FOIlI.Y TIlE PI-'.''S,
SPECIFICATIONS. &. ADDE..VD.I. OR IF.YO GUAlUNTEE IS CAULD FOR. mE.." FOR A PERlOD OF O....E ill YE.<R FlI.OM mE
DATES OF P.tRTUL OR roTA/. ACCEPTANCE OF mE SUBCON17/.ACTOIl'S WORK BY T1/E OW"''ER.
1~. NO SEPAlt. TE U...VEllSTAJoVI/IG Oil AGRELYE..VTS OF ......Y KIND WILL BE E..VTU/ED I,\TO BY TIlE SUBCOtmtlCTOR " T1/E
OW/'o'ER ...'VIOIl HIS AJ1CI/fTECT OF AGE..VTS RELH1YE 10 AJo'Y ORlGI/W. OR EXTlU WORK CO/ffE.l/PL.TED BY nus
AGRELYE..'T u...u.ss T1/E S.WE IS FI~ APfROI'EIJ IN WRfT!.'.u BY CO.VT7tlCTOR.
lOB. SUBCONTlt.CTOIl SIiILL INSUU T1!AT AU. SUBCOtmtlCTORS. E..YPWl"EES. 01 SUPfUEJ/S. ..T AU. TlJJES. ARE P.<lD ,ILL
M/OUI>TS DUE IH CONNEenOH wrTH T1/E PEJ/FOR.IJANCE OF T1iIS SUBCu...71l.ICT. AFTER T1/E FIRST PAI)o/E..'T
'l/EREU"'VEII. CON17/.ACroll SHAlL HAVE T1/E RlGlfTro WTT/iHOLOANY SUBSEQUENT PA YMENT! UNTIL SUBCO.\71l..CTOR
SUBNTTS EY1DENCE SA TlSFA CTOIlY 10 COtmtlCTOR T1!A T.<LJ. M/OUI>TS O"W IN CONI....EenON wrTH PUlTORMANa: OF
T1/JS SUBCONTlt.CT HAVE BEEN PAlO. FVR11/EJ/. SUBCOlmUCTOR AGUES m'T CON17/.ACTOR MAY PAY.ILL PERSONS
WRIeH HA VE NOT BEL" PAlD T1/E MOMES DUE TliE.\II." CO""I,EenON WTTIi T/lJS ~UBCOW/l.ICT WIiET/iEJl OR SOT,. UE..Y
IlAS BELY Flu:D. " SUBCONTlUCTOIl sllALL. ro TIlE EXTENT T1!AT COtmtlCTOR HAS NOT RECOVE.RED WD ANOU"'TS
PURSUANY ro WTTIiROLOI/IG. fAY SAID ANOUI>TS ro CON17/.ACTOIl UfON DE..\LUoV. SUBCON17/.ACTOIl SHALL ALSO
lMIo/EDLITELY REiMBURSE CONTRACTOR FOil ANY ANOUI>TS PAiD UNDER COtmtlCTOR'S PA YMENT BO"'V INCON"'EenON
WTT1l T/lJS SUBCONTlt.CT.t 1,\VE.YMFlED BY COlmUCTOIf. IN T1/E F:YE..VT CONTItICTOR IS REQUIRED ro p,.y OR
INDEN...1FY ANY PERSONS HEREUNDER. SUBCO....T1lACTOR SI/.ILL lMMEDLlTELY REi.YBURSE TIlE CONTlUCTOR fOR mE
FTJU COST T/iEIIEOF. INa.UDINO ATTORNEY'S FUS.
IDC. SROULO SUBCON17/.ACTOIl AT ANYTlJJE FAlL ro SUPPLY A sumC1E.NTNIlIJIJER OF SfIJUE) WORKNE.." Oil A SUmClE..'T
QUAN1l1Y OF M..TEJUA/..S OF PROPEIl QUALITY. OR FAlL IN ANY RESPECT ro PROSECUTE T1/E WORK COVEREJ) BY T1iIS
SUBCONTIt.CTOR WTT1/ PROMPT/'lESS 01 DIUGENCE. OR FAlL IN71lE PUlTO/lMANa: OF ANY OF 71lE AGRELYE..'TS REREJN
CO,VTAJ"'W. OR SIIOULD ANY WORXNE.." PEJ/FOR.III11G WORK COVE.RED BY T1/JS SUBCO...71lACT ENGAGE IN ,I ST1lJJf:E OR
OTIIU WORK STOPP"CE. OR IT..ISE 10 WORX DUE 10 PlCJf:ET1,Y(} OR OT/iER SUCH ,IC7TV/1Y. CONTltlCTOR ,l/.IY I'" ,I.W
OF SUCH E\'E....,T~;. .1 r IT! OPTW.Y, "TT1iOl./T ppnCD,'CE TO ........-Y oniE./? KE.\1F.DIES IT J(,1 Y H..i ',:E. .trrr-J FORTY.EJG1fT 4.,i)
HOURS "1UTTE..'I .'lanCE. TO 5UBCO....TR.iCTOR. fROHDE ,is)' SUCH LiBOR .i."'V .\f.1TUU.iLS .1....D DE.DUt7 niL LDj7
T/IEI/EOF FlWIJ ANY .lI0MES THEN DUE OR 'TIiEJ/EAFTER 10 BECOME DUE SUBCON17/.ACTOR.' A"'V FVRT/iER, IN,u,'Y OF
sueH E'o'E..\TS. CONTRACTOR MAY AT m ornON. WTT1/0UT P/lEJUDIa: ro ANY 071lER REMEDIES fT .lIAY HAl'!'.
TERMIHATE T1/E E..I./PWY/oIE/'oT OF SUBCO...71lACTOR'S FTlW FOR Tl/E WORK U"'VER T1lJS SUBCONTRACT &. SHAlL HA I.
TIlE RlGJrT 10 E..VTER UPON T1/E PRE.l/ISES A.VD TAJf:E poSSESSJON. FOR T1/E PUYOSE OF COMPIET111G T1/E WORX
l/EREU...VEII. OF ALL T1/E M.'T'EJUALS. 1OOLS. 01 EQUIPIoIE..VT T/IEI/EON. &. ro FlMSH T1/E WORK &. PROVIDE T1/E
MATERlAlS TIIEREFORE EJ11/ER "TTIi fTS OWN E.l/PLOl"EES OR 071lER SUBCON17/.ACTORS: AJID IN CASE OF SUCH
DISeONTI...VANCE OF T1/E E.YPLOYMENT BY COtmtlCTOIl. SUBCOtmtlCTOR SHALL NOT BE ENTTTUD ro RECEIVE ANY
nnrT/lER PA YM ENT'S U.VDEIl T1/E SU BCOtmtl CT OR 0T/iEll WISE. BUT SHALL NEVERTHEILSS RENAlN WBU! FOR ANY
OM/AGES WHiCH COtmtlCTOR mcuRS: IF T1/E EXl'ENSES INCURllED BY TIlE CONTRACTOR INCOMPIET1Nli T1/E WOR!C
SRAU. EXCEED T1/E U.YI'AlD SALINa:. SUBCOtmtlCTOIl SHALL PAY 71lE OIFFEllEHCE TO mE CON17/.ACTOIl ALO/IG wrTH
ANY071lER DANAGES mcu/IJfED BYCOtmlACTOR AS T1/E RESULT OF SUBCOtmtlCTO/l'S DEFAULT. COtmlACTO/l SHALL
IlAI-% A UEN UfON AU. MATEJUALS. TOOLS. .. APPIJANCES TAKEN POSSESSJON Of ro SECU/lE TIlE PAYMUtT T1fEJ/EDf.
SUBeON17/.ACTOR SHAlL BE WBIE ro CON17/.ACTO/l DUE ro T/iJS FA/LUU OF SUBCON17/.ACTOII'S PUlTOIWANCZ.
,
~~,
.
"
--
,
,
"
SU.CONT/fACTOR'S FAlLUM ro /IZU ~ PJOGU$S Of m WORX UP ro TRATOF CONT/fACT OF 0l1lU TIUD!S. OR
, ~ FAlLUM ro EXECU7! m woRX AS DIMCTED JY CONT/lACTO/l.
JOD. SU.CONT/fACTOR ACillELS TRAT WIlEN ~ CONT/lACT DOCUMENTS. SPEaFlCl7l0N1. OR DIlAIV1NGS REQIRM.
SU.CONT/fACTOR WIlL COMPLY WT11I ANY UPUCI.LZ rrAn; OR fEIJEllAL p/l8VAIUNO WAG! LAW AS WUL AS ANY
JULES OR REGULA7ION1 PJOMl/LGATlD T1lEJlEUNDE/l. m! SUBCONT/lACTOR AGIIELS ro COMPLY WT11l AlL SUCH
TUMS" CONDmONJ WIUCH All! "'PuCIBU 10 T1llS SUBCONT/fACT,(/{DID INDENN1FY" HOW 71l! CO/fTllACTOR
lWlMLESS fOR ANY fAlLURE ro COMPLY wrm SUCH CONDmONJ.
IOL SUBCONT/fACTOR WIlL //AY!' AC1VAL IlESI'OIISIBlUTY fOJ COMPLYING wrm 71l! ST,(/{DAllDS SET fOKT1l IN 71l! JULES
.. MGULA7IONS PROMULGATlD PURSUANTro mE CONS17/ucnON SAFETY ACT (40 U.S.C. J27)" OTREJl OS1L4 REL4TlD
PROVISIONS TO TIlE EXTfNI' APPUClBLZ 10 mE SUBCONT/lACTOR'S PORTION OF T1IE WORX" SUBCO/fTllACTOR SRALL
loVDENNlFY AND SA Y!' T1IE CONT1/ACTOR IWWWSINCONIo'EcnONT1JEREWT17i fIlOM ANY AND AlL DAMAGE INa.UDING
ATTORNF:Y'S fUS. corr Of CORRECTTvt AcnON. FI/o'E.!. ETC.
ll. AJ{fJ DO!S HEREBY AGREE T/lAT T1IE CONT1lACTOR'S EQUIPMENT V.1I1. BE AVAlLABLZ 10 T1IE SUBCONT1/ACTOR ONLY AT
m! CONT1/ACTOR'S DISCRETION 40 ON MUTUAlLY J:ATlSf,lCTORY T'EJ/.\/S.
12. fVAJ(lSH PElUODIC PROGIlLSS REPORTS on1/E WORJ( AS MUTVAI1.Y AGREED INa.UDING T1IE PROGIlLSS OF MATEJUALS
OR EQUIPMENT UNDER mls .1GREE.\/ENT T/lAT MAY BE IN mE COURSE Of PREPARA7ION OR MANlIF~C1VRE.. '
/J. MAKE ANY 40 ALL CIW,G!S OR DCVU TlONS fIlO,.., mE ORiGIN.1L pr..u,s 40 SPEaFlCl TlONS wrmortr NlIwrnNG T1IE
ORiGIN.1L CONTTUCT WHEN SPEaFlClI1.Y ORDEMD TO DtJ SO IN W/UT1NG BY mE CONT1/ACTOR. mE SUBCONT1/ACTOR
PRiOR 10 mE COMMF.NCE."EI-rr Of TI/JS REVISED WORK, SIL1I1. SUBMIT PRoMmy TO TIlE CONT1/ACTOR WR/TT'EN
COP/!S Of THE corr OR CREDIT PROPOJ:AL fOR SUCH RE\lSW WORK IN A MANNER CONSISTENT wrm T1IE CONT1/ACT
DOCUMENTS,
U. COOPEilArE wrm mE CONT1/ACTOR 40 omER SUBCO.'71l.IcroRS WI/OSE wORK M1GIIT II/TERFERE wrm T1IE
SUBCONT1/ACTOR'S WORK 40 TO p'umap.HE IN TIlE PREP.1RAnON Of COORDINATlD DRAWINGS IN AREAS Of
CONGESTION AS REQUIRED BY mE CONTR.ICT DOCUMEXrs. SPELlnClll.Y NOTING 40 ADVISING mE CONT/fACTOR Of
ANY SUCH INT'ERFEllENCE.
IS. COOPEilArE WTTH mE CONTR.4CTOR IN SCHWuu:;a HiS WORK SO ,lS NOTTO CONfUCT OR INlEJlFERE W1TR T1IE WORK
OFOT1lEJ!S. TO PROMmy SUBMITSI/OPDR.IV.7NGS. DR.lv.ll;as. 40 s.~\/PLES. AS REQUIRED IN ORDER TO C{RJ/YONS.UD
WORK una'!NTLY,J/oV AT SPEED T/lAT WIll. NOT CWSE DELAY IN TIlE PROGRESS OF T1IE CONT1/ACTOR'S WORK OR
OTI/ER Bl/ANCHES Of mE WORK CIRRIW ON BY OTl/Ell SUBCO,'71l.KTORS,
16. COMPLY wrm ALL FEDEJl.IL. rrArE. 40 LOCAL r..lWS 40 O/WIS.',\'C!S ,lPfm,\'G TO T1IE BV/Wlfo/G OR snwCTURE AND TO
COMPLY AJ{fJ GIVE ADEQUA rE NonCES RELmllG ro TIlE WORK TO PROPER A 1ITI/0/UT1!S A/OV TO SECURE AND PA Y fOR
AlL NECESSARY UCENS!S OR pEJU/m ro ClRR Y ON TIlE WORK .lS DESCRl BW IN TIlE CONT1/ACT DOCUMENTS AS
AfPUClBLZ TO TI/IS SUBCONT1/ACT.
17. COMPLY W1TR FEDEllAL. rrArE. 40 LOCAL TAX !.lWS. soalL SECURITY r..lWS. U/oVIPLOYMENT COMPEllSAT10N LAWS 40
WO/l1OlEN'S COMPF.NJ:AnoN!.l WS INSOfAR AS APfUClBU TO TIlE PEllfOR.\/ANCE OF TI/IS SUBCONT1/ACT.
18. AJ{fJ DO!S f/EIlEBY AGREE TlLlT AlL WORK SIHI1. BE DO"'E SUBJECT ro fiNAL APPROVAL OF TI/IS AllCRTTECT OR
OW1/ER'S A UT1/0RlZED AGEI>T. '" HiS DEaSION IN M,l TTUlS RELl n,w; TO Allnmc EFFECT SRALL BE fiNAL. IF WITRlN
TIC! TUMS OF TIlE CONT1lA CT DOCU/J ENrs.
19. TRZ SUBCONTTUCTOR SIw.L BE'.iR [J!Y, RESPO,\'SIBIUTY fOR d!l. WORt( TO BE PEllFORJJW UNDER RlS SUBCONT1/ACT.
INC1.UDlfo/G ALL ROOF pEI>'ET/UnONS. curn.va. p,IreH/.va. ac. TIlE SUBCONTRACTOR AGIIELS TIlAT71IE COST OF AlL
CU11INO 40 PATCIUNG //AS BEEJoIINa.UDW .lS P,lIIT Of SUBCO....11l~CTOR'S WO/UC. T1IE SUBCO/fTllACTOR AGIIELS TRAT
HZ SRALL ENPWY AllTlJ:ANJ A/oV T1WJ!SMEH Of TIlE 711.WE NOR.\IAl1.Y RESPONJIBLE FOR 71IE ROOF. OR fOR fiNISH
WORK lfo/VOLVUJ TO CVT A/oV PATCH AllOU/OV TIlE wORJ( Of SUBCoNTll.lCTOR'S Tl/ADE.
zo. 71IZ SUBCONTTUCTOR S/IAI1. MAKE AlL APfUCm%'S fOR P,lYMEI>T ro LOBAJl ASSOCUrES. me. AS AGENT FOR 71IE
oWNER. LOBAJl ASSOClArES SRALL SUBMIT SAID APfUCmONJ TO TIlE ARCRTTECT AJ{fJ 0W1/ER fOR PAYMENT. UI'ON
"'PROVAL OF PA YMENT BY TIlE AIICI/JTECT .1/0'0 OW....f.R. A.'V PA YME.'T BY TIlE OWNER ro LOBAJl ASSOCUrES. I/lC. AS
AGENT fOR TIfE OW.''Ell. 10 SUBCONTll.lCTOR IN .KCORD,lNa: v.m/ TIlE TERMS OF T1/IS SUBCONT/fACT. TIlE
SUBCONTll.lCTOR flJRTIIER"CKSOWu;oGES ,l.'D ,iGF.LLS TILl l' WB,iR "ssoalrES. INC. SIHI1.ltlY!' NO UABIUTY TO
SUBCONT1/ACTOR fOR TIlE oW/o'Ell'S f,UWRE ro P,IY fOR ",ORK PEllFOIU/W BY SUBCONTRACTOR. AND SUBCONT1/ACTOR
AGIIELS ro HOLD LOBAJl ASSOC1ArES. INC. ItUI.\/LESS FROM ANY Q..UM fOR PAYMENT fOR WORK PEllFORNW BY
SUBCONT1/ACTOR. A.'V TO I/oVE'.\/MFY LOB.iR AssoalrES. INC. FROM ANY SUCH Q..UMS MADE BY SUBCONT/fACTOR'S
SUBCONT/fACTORS. EMPLOrELS. AGENTS.,(/{D t.l.1TEJlW. SUPfUERS,
TRAT 71IE CONT/fACTOR 40 SUBCONT1/ACTOR AGREE:
U. TRAT IN T1IE MA 1TEJl OF AllBf1RA TlON. TI/EIR RiGtm A~V OBUGA no~'S. AND AlL PROCEDUM SRALL BE ANALOGOUS
TO mOSE SET FORm IN TIlE CONT1lACT DOCUMENT! PROVIDED. HOWfYEll. TIlAT A DEaSIO/l BY TIlE AllCRTTECT OR
OW1/ER'S AUT1/0RlZED AGENT. S/IAI1. NOT BE A CONDmON PRECEDENT ro AllBf1RA110N.
ARTICLE Xl. TERMlNA110/l CIAUSE
.
,
.
f
.'
,
WBAlf ASSOCLtT'ES. INe. SRALL //A Y!' TIlE IUGIIT 10 TERMINArE TI/IS cONT1lACT AND ro RI1lZ ANOTI/ER CONT/fACTOR ro
l.
, ~
.'-
.
.
z
1mom 17m lHCO""lE11lO/fl10N 0' 71llf 'NoM SROrn.o 17m COHT7/AC1'Olt,AlL TO 1tMONJ m OWGAlION$ U/'iDlJt
11US COHT7/ACT. LOJAII.woa,I1U. lHe. SRAlL ALSO IUVIr 71llf /llGH'T TO IllCOVU AH'I AJID ALL LOSSES Olt DAMilG6.
lNalJTJlNO ATTO/lNF:f'S nD. lllSut.lINO nOM T1lZ COHT7/AC1Olt.S JIllACR 0' COlmlACT.
AH'I AMOUNT DE1!/llt/lN!D TO U D1/6 LOJAII ASSOa.t7!J'. lHe. Jr AH'I AJUl17/AlIOH. AJUl17/AlIOH 1ANEL. COIJltT, Olt
T1C/lOUGR ANY OTlWl DlS1VT1! /llSOLU1ION T!CR}I/Q1/6 SHAlL ~ lHlUEST nOM 71llf DAT! T1lZ B1lEACR OCCl/RJlED AT
17m IJAXINI/M /tAT! 1UMrTTrD Jr 17m USUltr LAWS 0' T1lZ AP1UCUlZ JU/llSDlCTIOH.
ARTICLE XII. IH wmt!JS WREJlE(J' 71lE 1AR11ES I/!RETO IUI'! EXEcrm:D 11US AGIllEJoIEHT U/lDElf SEAL. 71lE Dol rAND
I'!AR FUIST WRf1T!H olBO~ ,,11US SUBCOHT7/ACf' IS HOT EXEcrm:D wrTlOH FOUR7UN (H) CALEMJAlt Dol l'S A.F7U
IlECEJPT. LOIWI ASSOClA7!J'. IHe. /lESEIl\l!S 71lE /llGH'T ro VOID T7{JS AGIllEJoIEHT AJID OBTAlH THESE SEIlV/CES FROM
ANOTRElf mw.
THIS SUBCONTRACTOR CERT1F1ES THAT IT
MMNTMNS A NON-SEGREG,4TED PUCE OF
BUSINESS AND IS AN EQUAL QPPORTUNITY
EMPWYER. '
FRANCIS HEISSE
SUBCONTRACTOR
ATTEST:
7..... 4f~
Owner
(rrTl~
(S EA.L)
BY
WBAR ASSOCIATES. INC.
CONTRACTOR
ATTEST:
'L-~I~ 1~ \
J ' ICE K. FLEMING, CORP. SEC'(JAS.
~.~ ~
LEE E. EICRE ERGER, PRESIDENT
~
,~
;r
f.
If
(tj'
i
t
,. ,...
,
,.-.
."--
ASSOCIATES
SUBCONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER:
LOBAR ASSOCIATES. INC., Gtnual ContraClor, Is A Govemment Contraclor And As Such,
Is Subject To nil! Rel/lllrements Of EUCUllw! Order 1/246 As Amended, Relarlng To Eqllol
Employment Opporruniry And Non-Segregated Facilllles.' Execulive Orders 11458 And 11625
-.," .'
Relating To n,e Ulil/lIllion Of Mlnoriry BI/siness Enterprises.' 17Ie Vietnam Eta Readjustment
Assistance ACIS Of 197./, And ErtCUIII'e Order 1/701 Relating To 17Ie Employment Of
Handicapped PmollS. Suppliers Of Malerial And/Or Services In Excess OfSlO,()(X}.OOOr More
Must Agree To n,e Sel'en Point EI/ual Opporrllniry Clause And Cerrifj 17Iat They Do Not
MaintaIn Any Segregaled FaciIIlies. In Addition, Suppliers Must Cerrifj Thar They Hal'e A
Written AjJfnnatlve AClfon Program On File And In Use At A// Localions. 17Iose Suppliers Of
Mareriol And/Or Services In Excess Of $1.500.00 Must Also Agree To The Affinnarive AClion
Clause As Rel/uired In Se'-tion 50J Of The /97J Rehabilitation Act. Please Execute And Return
7'h, Attach,d Agrltmmt And Cff1ification As Soon As Possible. If You Believe 17Iar You Are
Exempl From Any Of 17Iese Rel/I/iremenu As Mentioned Above, Please Send Us A Wriuen
Statement Explaining The Basis For Your Claim Of Exemption.
d;; e:rsru~;z
Lit E. Eich,lb'rgtr ~ @
President
Lee:jkf
.. / OU) MIlL ROAD P.O. BOX 4J2
DIUSBURG. PENNA /70/9-<)4J2
TEL: (7/7) 4J2-9nS FAX: (717) 4J2.9162
, .
.
.'-
.~_.
~:'
=,\."
,','"
.
,
I ~,
EOUAL OPPORTUNITY CERTIFICATTON & AGREEMENT
During The Performance Of This Agreement, The Contractor, Seller, Or Supplier (Hereinafter
Referred To As "Contractor") AgreeS As Follows:
A. CERTIFICATION
The Contractor Cenifies 711at It Does Not And Wiil Not Mointain Or Provide For
Its Employees Any Segregated Facilities At Any Of Its Establishments, And That
It Does Not And \Viii Not Permit Its Employees To Perform Their Services At Any
Location, Under Contractor's Controi, Where Segregated F(1{:jffties., Are
Mailllained. ' 71le Contractor Understands 71lai 71le Phrase 'segregated
Facilities' Includes Facilities Which Are In Fact Segregated On A Basis Of Race,
Color, Religion, Or National Origin, Because of Habit, Locai Custom. Or
Otherwise. The Contractor Understands And Agrees That Maintaining Or
Providing Segregated Facilities For Its Empioyees Or Permitting Its Empioyees
To Perform Their Services At Any Location, Under Its Control, Where Segregated
Facilities Are Maintained Is A Violation Of The Equal opporrunity Clause
Required By Executive Order 11246 Of September 24, 1965, As Amended By
/1375.
The Contractor Furrher Understands And Agrees 7110/ A Breach Of The Assurance
Herein Contained Is A Breach Of This Agreement And Subjects It To The Ruies
And Regulations promulgared By The Secretary Of Labor Under Executive Order
/1246 Of September 24, 1965, As Amended By JJ375.
B. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM
If Thls ConrrlUl Is In The Amount Of $10,000.00 Or More, The Conrractor
Agrees ThaI It Shall.' (a) Develop And Mainrain A Written Affirmative Action
Compliance Program For Each Of Its Establishments In Accordance With
Regulations l$Sued Under Execwive Order /1246 Of September 24, 1965, As
Amended By 11375 Which Details Specific Steps To Guarantee Equal Empioymenr
Opporrunity. And (bJ Include 71le Requirement Of Parr (a) Of71lis Parr B In Any
Subconrract Or Purchase Order For $10,000.00 Or More Which It LetS Under
his Contract.
C.
REPORTS
)
.'
,
.::.,;
..
~:
"
'I7Ie Contractor Agrees 711at, If They Have A Subcontract Or Purchase Order
Amounting to $10,000.00 Or More. They Will Fife Monthly, On Or Before The
5th Of Each Month Complete And Accurate Repons On Standard Form 100
(EE0-7), Promulgated Jointly By The Office Of Federal Conrract Compliam:e,
The Equal Employment Opponunity Commission And Plans For Progress, Or
2
.,;-
'''''..
,. ..
., . .
."-
"
.~
J
Such Olher Form As May Be Hereafter Pramulgaud In lis Place, Wilh The Joint
Reporring Commiaee In Washinglan, D. C. '
D. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY CLAUSE
During The Pelfarmance Of This Contract, The ContraClor Agrees As Follows.'
I. The Contractor Will Not Discriminate Against Any Employee Or Applicant
Becal/se Of Race. Religion. Color, Sex. Or Narional Origin. Such Action
Shall Include. But Not Be Limited To The Following.' Employment,
Upgrading. Demotion Or Transfer. Recruirment Or.. Recruitment
Ad~'errising. Layoff Or Termination. Rates Of Pay Or Other Forms Of
Compensation. And Selection For Training. Including Apprenriceship. The
Contractor Agrees To POSI In Conspicuolls Places, Available To
Employees And Applicants For Employment, Notices To Be Pasted By The
Contracting Officer Setting For The Provisions Of This Non"
Discrimination Clallse.
2. The Contractor IViIl. III All Solicitations, Or Advenisements For
Employees Placed By Or On Behalf Of The Contractor. State That All
Qualijit!d .4pplicClnts IV/II Receive Considerations For Employment IV/thom
Regard To Race, Religion, Colur, Sex, Or Narional Origin.
J. The Contractor Will Send To Each Labor Union Or Representative Of
Workers IVl1ich It Has A Collective Bargaining Agrremenr Or Other
Contract Or Understanding. A Notice To Be Provided fly The Agency
Contracting Officer, Advising The Labor Union Or Workers'
Representative Of The Contracror's Commirments Under Section 202 Of
Executive Order JJ246 Of September 24, 1965, As Amended By !l375
And Shall Post Copies Of The Notice In Conspicuous Places Available To
Employees And Applicants For Employment.
4. The Contractor Will Comply With All provisions Of E.ucuti~'e Order
JJ2.J6 .H Amended By II 375 And Of The Rules. Regularions. and
Relevant Orders Of The Secretary Of Labor.
5. The Contractor Will Furnish All Information And Repons Required By
Executive Order JJ246 Of September 24, 1965, As Amended By !l375
And By The Rules, Regulations, & Orders Of The Secretary Of Labor, Or
Punuant Thereto, And Will Pennil Access To Its Books, Records, And
Accounts By The Contracling Agency And The Secrelary Of Labor For
Purposes Of Investigation To Ascmain Compliance With Such Rules,
Regulations. And Orden.
" .
:':~.
.~ .
6.
.'-
4
In The EvenJ Of The Contractor's Non-Compliance With The Non-
Discrimination Ciauses Of This Contract Or With Any Such RuitS,
Reguiarions, Or Orders, This Contract May Be Canceiied, Tenninated Or
Suspended, In Whoie Or In Parr, And The Contractor May Be Declared
Ineligible For Furrher Government ContractS In Accordance With
Procedures AU/harized In Execlllive Orders I I 246 Of September 24. 1965,
As Amended By /1375 Or By Ruie. Regulation. Or Order Of The
Secretary Of Labor. Or As Othenvise Provided By Law.
7,
The Contract Will Include The Provisions Of Paragraphs 1 Through 7 In
Every Subcontract Or purchase Order Unless Exempterj.. By ~ules.
Regulations, Or Orders Of 71le Secretary Of Labor Isslied punu'ant To
Section 204 Of Execlllive Order /1246 Of September 24, 1965. As
Amended By /1375 So That The Provisions Wiii Be Binding Upon Each
Subcontractor Or Vendor. The Contractor Wilf Take Such Action WIth
Respect To Any Subcontract Or Purchase Order As The Contracting
Agency May Direct As A Means Of Enforcing Such Provisions Including
Sanctions For Non-Compliance. Provided. However, That In The E~'ent
The Contractor Becomes Inmil'ec1 In, Or Is Threatened With, Litigation
WIth A Subcontractor Or Vendor As A Resuit Of Such Direction By The
Contracting Agency, The Contractor May Request The United States To
Enter Such Litigation To Protect 71le Interest Of The United StattS.
E. EMPLOYMENT OF VETERANS-LISTING OF EMPLOY,'rfENT OPENINGS
Purs{J(llll To Executive Order No /1701 WIth Respect To AIf Contracts Or
purchase Orders For $2.500.00 Or More. The Undersigned (Referred To In The
Foiiowing Clause As The Contractor) Shalf Be Bound By and Agree To The
Following Provisions As Set Forrh In Section 50-250.2 Of Titie 41 Of The Code
0/ Federal Regulations.
1.
As Provided In E.O. /170l & 41 CFR 50-250, The Connactor Agrees
That All Empioyment Openings Of The Contractor Which Exist At The
Time Of EUClllion Of T71is Contract And Those Which Occur During The
perfonnance Of This Contract, Including Those Not Genuared By The
Contract And Including Those Occurring At An Establishment Of The
COnJractor Other Than The One Wherein The CO/uractls Being Perfonned
But Excluding Those Independently Operated Corporate AffiiiattS, Shalf.
To 71le Maximum Extent Feasible, Be Offereu For Listing At An
Appropriate Local Office O/11le Federai-State EmpioymeTll Service System
Wherein The Opening Occurs And To Provide Such Periodic Reporrs To
Such Local Office Regarding Empioyment Opening And Hires As May Be
Required: Provided, That 71lis Provision Shall Not Appiy To Openings
Which The Contractor Filis From WIthin The Contractor's Organization
li
~. .
I:'
.. .
~-
,~ .
'.
j
Or Are Fi/led pursuant To A Customary And Traditional employer-Union
HIring Arrangement And Thai The Listing Of Employment Openings Shall
Involve Only The Normal ObI/gat/oIlS Which Attach To The Placing Of Job
Orders.
2. The Contractor Agrees Funher To Place The Above Provision In Any
Subcontract Directly Under This Contract.
3. As provided In Section 20/2 Of The Vietnam Veterans Readjusrmenr Act
Of /974, With Respect To All Contracts /n The Amount Of $10,000.00 Or
More, The Contractor Sha/l Take AJJirmati~'e Action To, Employ, And
Advance In Employment Qualified Disabled Veterans And Vererans Of TIle
Vietnam Era.
F.
MINORITY BUSINESS CERT/F/CATlON
Under Execuri~'e Order /1625, TIle LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC. Construction
Company Is Required To Identifj TIlose Contractors And Subcontractors Thar ArC"
Minority Business EnJerprises As Defined Under This Execmive Order As.'
"Il Business EnJerprise Thar Is Owned Or Controlled By One Or Mor~ Socially
Or Economically Disadvantaged Persons. Such Dlsodvantage May Arise From
Cultural, Racial, Chronic Economic Circumstances, Or Background, Or Similar
Cause. Such Persons Include, But Are Nor Limited To.' Negroes, Pueno Ricans,
Spanish-Speaking Americans, American IndlallS, Eskimos. And Aleuts'
r) We Are A Minority Business Enterprise.
r) We Are Not A Minority Business Enterprise.
G. AFFIRMATIVE ACfTON FOR HANDICAPPED WORKERS
1.
The Conrractor Will Not Discriminare Against Any Employee Or Appl/Canl
For Employmenr Because Of Physical Or Mental Handicap In Regard To
Any Position For Which The Employee Or Applicanr For Employment Is
Qualified. The Contractor Agrees To Take Affirmative Acr/on To Employ,
Advance In Employment, And Orhenvise Trear Qualified Handicapped
Individuals Without Discriminarion Based Upon Their Physical Or MenJal
Handicap In All Employment Practices Such As The Following.'
Employment, Upgrading, Demorlon Or Transfer, Recruirmenr Or
RecruiTment Advenising, Layoff Or Termination, Rares Of Pay, Or Orher
Forms Of Compensation, And Selection For Training, Including
Apprenticeship.
:.......,;
,
i
1-
:;
'.
t
AI
~
t
"'1
.N.;'- ,
'.~.
Of ....~ ~
," ,":
,;-:
;.J:t{.,~',. .
'. .",
'-"t. ":,:'::~'~" "
::.-'..,!,"
. ~'.7-.:' :
The Contractor Agrees That, if He Has Establlshed An Internal Review
procedu" And A Handicapped Individual Fi1~ A Complaint With 11Ie
Contractor Under That Procedure Thar He Is Not Complying With 11Ie
Requl"ments Of The Act, He Will (I) Investigate The Complaint And Take
Appropriare Acrlon Conslslent Wllh The Requirements Of20 CFR 741.27,
And (2) Maintain On File For Three (3) Years, The Record Regarding 11Ie
Complaint And The Action Taken.
J. The Contractor Agrus That, if A Handicapped Individual Files A
Complaint Wllh J'he Deparrment Of Labor 11IaJ He Has Not Complied
With The Requirements Of The Act, (l) He Will Coope.rale With The
Deparrment In liS Inwtigation Of The Complaint, And (2) He \Vill
Provide All pertinent Information Regarding His Emplo)'ment Practices
With Respect To Handicapped Individuals.
~,>~.~:.'
2.
4. The Contractor Agrees To Comply Wilh 111e Rules And Regulations Of The
Secretary Of Labor In 20 CFR Ch, Vi, Part 741.
S. In The El'ent Of The Contractor's Non.Compliance With The RequiremeTlls
Of This Clause. The ContraClor May Be Declared In Default And
Sancrions May Be Imposed In Accordance Wllh 20 CFR Ch. Vi. Pan 74 J.
6. This Clause Shall Be Included In All SubcontractS Over $1,500.00.
7. The Contraclor AgreeS To Permit The Examination By Appropriate
Contracting Agency Officials Or The Assislant Secretary For Employment
Standards Or His Designee, Of Peninent Books, Documents, Papers, And
Records Concerning His Employment And Advancement Of Ficuuiicapped
. Individuals.
8.
The Contractor Agrus To Port In Conspicuous Places. Available To
Emplo)'ees And Applicants For Employment, Notices In A Form To Be
Prescribed By The Assistant Secrelary For Employment Stcuuiards.
Provided By :he CuntraC:ur Officer. Stating Contractor's ObligaIion Under
The Law To Toke Affirmative Acrion To Employ And Advance In
Employment, QUfllijied Handicapped Employees And Applicants For
Employment And The RightS And Remedies Available.
The Contractor Will Norify Each Labor Union Or Representarive Of
Workers Wilh Which He Fias A Collective Bargaining Agreement Or Other
Contract Understanding That The Contractor Is Bound By The Terms Of
Secrion 503 Of The Rehabilitation Act, And Is Commllled To Take
Affirmative Acrion To Employ And Advance In Employmelll Physically And
Melllally Handicapped IndividUflls.
9.
6
:;J
. '- j',.. .'
..... .,; .... .
.
. ,
, "
..... .~~.. t,..
..
,-
., .1;;\ ~.
,ro .
f'"
" NOTE:
BY:
l~ ~<~,
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
1:'Da.~("TC:=: J.lJ:'TC:C:P
FIRM
Annust 31. 1993
DATE
OWner
TITLE
.'
..
't-.'
~
a
,
l "
~ ~~
r ~"
. B B
~ I!
~E i I
.:;:: ~
'.L . 8
i ~lP m
lI\!(~ ~ J
jP'::
crJiiiGl
, .
. ..
i ii
N
11
" N
)( M
o "
Ill'i'
.en
o ~
0: ~
ci
" "
o ll.
a: d
..J a:
:! ;:J
~ III
'Ill
'" ..J
..J ..J
05
;e,
'0,
~ I' "
rd tl ~
" . I ~
.... II 1\ J u
"
(I)
U)~
LL1g
ct!:!
<.:J~
o~
~;.
0.3
.,
al~
0"
.,
.
,
u
h
c
,
n :
"
,
.
~ :r
t: ~
, .
!1 U
1~~--1-
----
.-,- - -,- - - - -,- -
------
------------1-----
----1- - ----
----
-----
-----------
----------
---
--------------======- ----------
------------ --------~---
---------- --------~------
---
-------
------------- ---------- ~
-1------------1- -
----
----------------
-----
------
-------~--
-----1------1- '
- --r-
---
----
- - - - - - - -I- - -
'"
-------
1:
o
a.
GI
II:
o
~~---=I. =~-===-------------- -
!:;---- .._~--- ------------====-
~-~--- . ----
'" ------------
.. -....----
----
----
----
-----
-- -
---
----
----
----
1--- \, ---------- ----
___. --l~ .' -----
- - . .. . - - 'I' - - - - .
-_. -- -------------
~. ' - - - -.
-------
- --
- - ---
-------- ------
--------------
--------------
-----
----
----------
':: ~ ::
i:----
... ---
::
:<:
. -
. -
.
~ -: _.
o -
';
~
. ..
,- -
o a
. ..
,- -
ii ..
,
1/"1_ .-
-
v
..
~
::J
'tl
GI
.t;
U
III
S
"
---
- - - -
:: ...
- - - -
..
- .. ,
. - - - -
,
u :! "
, - -
. .
-----
----
---
-- --------- ---------
--------
---- ----
----
------
- - --
---
----
....
-~ - Ii
.=~:I~I------- -------------
~- --- --------
~u ----------
-. ------
~ ~ _ _ :-;____ ..Ji------ ------
! ~ i . ~ ~~" ! ~~ ~, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
t ~ 40 C .~ C :;, o.:u '::.,... c:
n ,0 :I ._ . 1 R II ..... L il C
E~lIuc2.ru'J'=:=' E.. -
U to. U III ".! .. I:I"U S "
~ j~ ~ c U __" .~ r ~ ~r "~5 u ~ ~
u" "":': 0.1 eo ~"C .!:.JJ r. a. ..
, ; _ !.. ~.. ~ ~ ~ .~. . ~. oil ii ..
" m ~ J U ~ , ;: "" ,,~ u u . - 2.l
I, ~ ~ ." ~ ~ - . ~i u. ~ ol: ~ ~ l Z'
C' ~~ r.u .. .. J\. : ~ u ~ (...R .Ie:: 'j; 9 ~ J 'i ~
. :: If _ , 0 ~ u ::' A uO,""\. L"I:: Ii " :J -
.. 0 0 .. - III OIl 0'"" 0
r. c ~ . L < U 0 , jjj. ..',..
" 11 0 0 C u _ U J~:.... ,;;~ ~ " 0 'c EO l
. u ~ J ~. .:! g . 8 .:~ ~~, ." , . · J
~ " ~ ~ ,~uo. _ . :;.~ in - _"..!I .~,
~ 0.... '\ -" ,- 7. U 7. ~l
o~-l -
ii il. .
~ e : 1 i ~
CE a. f j: i
,
.
.
f
.
. .
. c
c .
. .
" ; ~
: l.I1 =
, - .
o C ;:
_ c
. ~ -
- ,
f: [ :
't- .. .
. -
. .
" - ..
_ :J
I g . .. II"
.. tI. " ..
o ..
o ' ~ -
. ~ 0
U .. c
, L . .~
~ If :: "
'I,: ....
;'. .
" .
f..;
r'
. ;
! ~
, .
.
. I
\
,'-
.
.
ASSOCIATES
November 19, 1993
Francis Heiss.
423 N, Progress Ave.
Harrisburg, PA 17109
Ref.' Swimming Pool Project
West Shore CounJry Club
Camp Hill, PA
, .'
.'
Dear Francis.'
AI lhe cumnt diue Ihe pool conslnulion is opproximaJely four (4) weeks behind schedule. As
you know, LOBAR ASSOCIATES has a contract completion diue of 31 December 1993 for Ihe
projecllo be 100% complele exceplfor landscapa work.
I Slrongly suggest you expedile your phase of lhe project by additioMI manpower or working
,ovenime as required 10 meet LOBAR ASSOCIATES scheduled timeframefor lhe project, as per
your contract.
Note.' Pool conslruction ....wk is behind schedule and holding up olher phases oflhe projectfrom
being compleled (concrele d.eck,fencing. grading, elc.). Any /iquidiued domages. backi:harges,
elc. 10 LOBAR ASSOCIATES due 10 pool conslruction delays will be deducled off your contracl
amoU1ll allhe end of Ihe project. .'
Your cooperOlion in expediling Ihis projecllo meet LOBAR ASSOCIATES' timeframe would be
greOlIy appreciOled.
Very lruly yours,
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
,
ctJ ~Iwl ~tf)
B. Michael Samples
General Superintendent
BMS:nms
Copy: Lee E. Eichelberger, President
.. 1 OW MIU ROAD P.O. BOX 4J2
DTlLSBURG, PENNA J70I9-MJ2
TEL; (717] 4J2.9721J FAX: (717] 4J2.9162
. .
. .
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaint if f
v.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I am this day serving a true
and correct copy of the Answer With New Matter And Amended
Counterclaim upon the persons and in the manner indicated
below, which service satisfies the requirement of Pa, R.C.P.
440:
Service by First Class Mail
Addressed as Follows:
Johnna J. Deily, Esquire
SAIDIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MASLAND
26 West High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
Dated:
(l),r u J /t'J~!/J)
Corrie L.t Fischel, I.D. #65289
Attorney for Defendant
Lobar Associates, Inc.
By:
IIAR...,toN ol UAVlf.S. fI,C
"ntlMS~Y'i."I.L'W
11011l01 U...VI" "....Sl'f.
1""( A'"1t P.... Pt,lJl
Ref: Cor\Lobdr\U~iSlfe.CS
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaintiff
v.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
CERTIFICATF OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I am this day serving a true
and correct copy of the Praecipe to issue a Writ of Summons to
join Liberty Excavators, Inc. as an Additional Defendant upon
the persons and in the manner indicated below, which service
satisfies the requirement of Pa, R.C.P. 440:
Service by First Class Mail
Addressed as Follows:
Johnna J. Deily, Esquire
SAIDIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MASLAND
26 West High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
,
Dated: J'J('J.C6 (C{-I
By:
(lilt
#65289
U^,U.toN a. IMVlrs, PT,
^ nIlM~I_'l'S-^I-1 A'Ii
l\utl nlll'MHIA ^\-I~111
I ^~l'''''" R I'A. 11f~ll
Ref i Cor\Lob.u\lIe18se.CS
Cumberland County, SS:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to Liberty ElCcavators, Inc.
(Name of Addidonal Defendant\
_110~_ Fernwood ~~~,--~J!!T1IU!nLJ'2.L...l1011
You arc notified that Lobar Jl.ssocia~li,.J.[l~
(Name (01 or Derendanr (o)
has (have) joined you as an additional defendant in this action, which YOll are re-
quired to defend.
Datc__..December-29 ~9A.._
r rlWT~n""e E:
We~
l1rolhonotary
,-)
By _~ f~J'" () hL' <'C ,~
Deputy
(SEAL)
I I) I- t
.a ~~ i
~ -
!!! -<
t . il
u' OZ
~ c: I';l .
.... "-1"-1 C'
....1 III ~~ Z'" U~IllM
..... 2 -< ...."-1 . :>0
> ~ 00 ~ .. C IJJ
..... ~ ....~r-
U ........l o1! .-t
1 ~ 0< [{l u.o: .
I f-<Z !> .:!l.:H~
1 ~o i:3 ~ ~ .
.--1 . I-<
~ ~6 ..a~rlQ)
~ ~ i'~ 8 ~
~ ..,. ~o
0 ~ '" u
.... Q
.... og ~
ci I < UN
Z
SIIERIF'F'S REWRN
CCM-lCr<WEAL'llI OF PENNSYLVANIA:
CaJNTY OF ClMBERLAND
In The Court of Common Pleas of
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania
No. 94-5507 Civil Term
Writ to Joined An Additional
Defendant
Francis lIeisse
VS
Lobar Assoriates, Inc.
VS
Liberty Excavators, Inc:.,
additional defendant
Timothy Reitz
, 5K~~ Deputy Sheriff of
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, who being duly sworn according to law, says,
that he served the within Writ to Joined An Additional Defendant
Upon Liberty Excavators, Inc. , The defendant at 12;35 o'clock
P .M. EST / ~ on the 06 day of January , 19 95 at
4410 Gettysburg Rd. , Camp lIill ,Cunberland County,
Pennsylvania, by handing to Rick Kalbach, President and adult in charge at
Liberty Excavators, Inc.
a true and attested copy of the Writ to Joined Additional D~fendant
and at the sane time directing
his attention to the contents thereof and
the "Notice to Plead" endorsed thereon.
Sheriff's Costs;
Docketing
Service
Affidavit
Surcharge
14.00
7.84
So answers:
../- ",,/-,';'
........,.r~ '" >',
;;'~- ;;~:~~~ l
2.00
23.84 Pd. by Atty.
1-09-95
R. Thomas Kline,
by
Sworn and subscribed to before me
- /)
.. l'~ (
this I I day of ~,;.. ",...
I I
19~_ A.D.
/)
{ ., - '"
" ""t L_ {., /11-<.(<<.-
. I
Prothonotary
^-~'
IJ-')
l)-)
"
~
Q
Z
< 1
...l ...
CIJ i-O~
< w!:::,..
CIl ~~w .'"
w ~<,.;
U "'li;Z"
tE ~x z~
oo::cWl'
0 lXloc..-
~ Q ._ ..C
-o::c~w
<( ;;J . 'VJZ
...I ~c..~JO
. "'t>:::C
CIJ N<(c..
- u
Q
-
<
CIJ
" .
. ,
. " -;-
-, .
SAIDIS, GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 W_ High StIttt
Carlide. PA
'I
I.
Ii
'I
Ii
ii
Ii
!I FRANCIS HEISSE,
~ plaintiff
I
I
I'
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
v.
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC"
Defendant
PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO NEW HATTER
AND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM
I
'I
II
I,
I
~ that the original contract called for completion of Defendant's
I,
'I
'I
II
II
",
d
22.
No response is required.
23.
Admitted in Part and Denied in Part.
It is admitted
work by January 1, 1994.
It is denied that the contract
attached as Exhibit "B" is a true and correct copy of
Defendant's contract with the owner.
To the contrary, it is a
~ true and correct copy of the subcontract between Plaintiff and
d
II
Ii
I'
,I
"
ji
II
'i
11
11
1
i!
Defendant.
It is further denied that owner required all work
to be competed by January 1, 1994.
To the contrary, as a
result of delays caused by other subcontractors, as well as
inclement weather, owner granted Defendant an extension until
:i April 15, 1994.
'i
24. Admitted in Part and Denied in Part. It is admitted
that the original contract and related documents between the
Defendant and owner required completion on or before January 1,
1994. It is specifically denied that owner required all work
to be completed by said date. To the contrary, as a result of
delays caused by other subcontractors, as well as inclement
weather, owner granted Defendant an extension until April 15, 1994
SAID IS. GUIDO.
SHm'F &
MASLAND
26 W Hiah Str<<1
Carlisle, PA
"
,I
~ conclusions of law to which no response is necessary.
I
,
i
I
il
I
25.
Denied.
Some of the averments contained cherein are
" -__ ........ ~l
. '
To the
extent that a response is required, it is denied that Plaintiff
knew that all work 0n th~ p~oJect hdd to be completed on or
before January 1, 1994.
To the contrary, Plaintiff was
actually aware of the extension gIanted by owner to Defendant.
,I
II
Ii
I
:1
'I
li
~ that the Plaintiff did not object in writing to the attached
II
11
"
"
"
Ii
"
II
26.
Admitted,
27.
Admitted.
28.
Admitted in Part and Denied in Part.
It is admitted
schedule.
It is specifically denied that no exception was
taken.
On the contrary, Defendant was well aware that
Plaintiff could not complete its work on schedule as a result
"
~ of delays caused by other contractors. By way of further
II
'I answer, Plaintiff was delayed in the commencement of its work
by approximately 4 weeks as a result of Defendant's failure (or
" the failure of other subcontractors) to properly prepare the
;!
site for Plaintiff's work. All furthsr delays were occasioned
by inclement weather.
29. Denied. It is specifically denied that Plaintiff
failed to provide an adequate number of properly trained and
qualified employees. To the contrary, Plaintiff at all times
provided an adequate number of properly treined and qualified
employees to perform its work on the project.
30. Denied. It is specifically denied that Plaintiff
failed to provide an adequate quantity of proper equipment to
2
SAIDIS, GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 w. Hijh SUcci
Caslisle. PA
perform its work.
'i
I,
j!
Ii
'I
:1
II
II
I'
II
11
ii
II
To the contrary, at all times Plaintiff
provided an adequate quantity of proper equipment to perform
its work on the project.
31.
Admitted.
32.
Denied.
It is specifically denied that plaintiff
failed to meet the required schedule.
To the contrary,
Plaintiff completed the work within the extension period
granted by the owner.
I
I
,I
~ conclusions of law to which no response is necessary.
i'
II
!i
i'
,I
:1
II
II
Ii
Ii
it
!I
Ii
33.
Denied.
The averments contained therein are
To the
extent that a response is required, the averments are
specifically denied.
To the contrary, the plaintiff did
properly perform its work on the project in a good and
workmanlike manner and completed its part of the project on
or
before April 11, 1994, which was within the extension of time
granted by the owner.
By way of further answer, any delays
were caused by other subcontractors and inclement weather.
i'
ii
ii
'i
34.
Denied.
The averments contained therein are
conclusions of law to which no response is necessary. To the
"
'I extent that a response is required, the allegations contained
i
, therein are specifically denied. To the contrary, Plaintiff
did properly perform its work on the project in a good and
workmanlike manner and successfully completed its part of the
project on or before April 11, 1994, which was within the
extension of time granted by the owners. By way of further
answer, any delays were caused by the other subcontractors and
3
inclement weather.
35. Denied. The contract speaks for itself. By way of
further answer, Plaintiff incorporates the averments contained
in paragraphs 22 through 34 above.
36. Denied. After reasonable investigation, the
Plaintiff is without knowledge or information sufficient to
form a belief as to the truth of the averments set forth
therein and strict proof thereof is demanded at tr.ial.
37. Denied. The averments contained therein are
conclusions of law to which no response is required. To the
extent a response is required, it is specifically denied that
I Plaintiff's claim is barred under the terms of the contract.
II
II
,I
II
II
II
II
II
:1
II
'I
i'
,I
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment in his favor and
against the Defendant in the amount of Sixty Three Thousand
Seven Hundred Sixty Nine and 00/100 ($63,769.00) Dollars plus
interest and costs of this sult.
COUNTERCLAIM
COUNT I
38.
No response is required.
39.
Denied.
The total value of the contract is
$197,769.00, including the $167,919.00 value of the contract as
SAIDIS, GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 W. High SUed
Carli_\le. PA
ii
"
~ written plus $29,850.00 in changes requested by Defendant.
ij Plaintiff also should be reimbursed for the other sums as paid
:1 by the Plaintiff pursuant to the original complaint.
40. Admitted.
41. Denied. It is specifically denied that Plaintiff
4
SAIDIS, GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 W. lligh Street
CllIlislc:.PA.
failed to perform its work in a good and workmanlike manner in
accordance with its proposal, the subcontract, applicable
plans, specifications and schedules. To the contrary, all of
Plaintiff's work was performed is a good and workmanlike
manner, and in accordance with its proposal, the subcontract,
applicable plans, specifications and schedules, as the same may
have been amended by agreement of the owner and Defendant. The
remaining averments contained therein are denied. After
reasonable investigation, the plaintiff is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments set forth therein and strict proof thereof is
demanded at trial.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests this
Honorable Court to enter judgment in favor of the Plaintiff and
against the Defendant in the amount of the original claim, and
to dismiss Count I of the Counterclaim.
COUNTERCLAIM
COUNT II
42. No response is required.
43. Admitted in Part and Denied in Part. It is admitted
I that Defendants period of performance on the project was
II
II
il
!I
II
I!
Ii
extended by owner until April of 1994.
It is denied that any
delay was caused by the Plaintiff.
To the contrary, any delay
was caused by the untimely performance of Defendant's other
subcontractors and the brutally harsh weather.
44.
Denied.
To the extent that the averments infer that
5
--
. . . . . .
------- -' "
SAlOIS, GUIDO, I,
SHUFF & ii
"
MASLAND 'i
:1
II
"
"
"
;1
!I
26 W. Hi"h SIred
Cull.slc:. PA
i
! Plaintiff iu respon8Jble for the Lhree and one-half month
i
I
I
'I
II
I
I,
I'
,I
Ii
Ii
'I
II
II
II
I'
extension, they are specifically denied.
To the contrary, any
delay was caused by the untimely performance of Defendant's
other subcontraGtors and the brutally harsh weather.
The
remaining averments contained therein are also denied.
After
reasonable investigation, the Plaintiff is without knowledge or
information sufflcient to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments set forth therein and strict proof thereof is
demanded at trial.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff specifically requests your
Honorable Court to enter a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff
and against the Defendant in the original amount of the claim,
and dismiss Count II of the Counterclaim.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated:
/-l3CJS
SAIDIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MASLAND
.<--/.--, /'---C' (
,_ lor:--,
, ;....,. -., "'./ "2 . Q, A /,
- I' ~ \ - __ ../. f{
Johnna /J. Deily, Esquire "'-J
26 We~t High ~treet
Carlisle, PA17013
(717) 243-6222
I
!
I
'I
I!
Attorney for the Plaintiff
6
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in this Complaint are
true and correct. I understand that false statements herein
are made s~bject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904,
relating to unsworn falsification to the authorities.
,
DATED:--.llmj:t~1
,?Q . ,qq')
;..-
,
-::.......-.......-.
'Francis
l./" r
:......
-- / a. --{ "'"
Heisse, Pla~ntiff
u
SAlOIS, GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 W. Wgh SUecl
Culisle,PA
I
I
II
II
il
il
II
"
;!
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaintiff
v.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
v.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Additional
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I am this day serving a true
and correct
copy of the Defendant's
First Set of
Interrogatories Addressed to Plaintiff and Request for
Production of Documents Addressed to Plaintiff upon the persons
and in the manner indicated below, which service satisfies the
requirement of Pa, R.C.P. 440:
Service by First Class Mail
Addressed as Follows:
Scott D. Moore, Esquire
SAIDIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MASLAND
26 West High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
John A. Gill, Esquire
75 Utley Drive
Camp Hill, PA 17011
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
t1ARMON A IMVII.S, P.t'.
>\lltHt'H"'-AI.'AV.
l11Wllllll MIUA "....'11
I ""l"A'i1l M I'" 17f.ul
(. ,II ~;j(i6
. I
/ /; )
I /fl , '1 / "~I " f
- /1 l. ,_ F I;"'. L ,
Corrie Ii. Fische , I.D.
1165289
/
Dated:
By:
.~
en
::x::
n_
',>
,"
, ',I
C':')
,^\.J
'"
"
,
U
~< .... ~
OH .... ... ~::J
~ .... l:: .
.... m o m ~~ U
~~ '" '" ....'" w
<= <= ... l:: ZO n: ::I <'l
.... >lJ .... >lJ 0""
p..Vl;J: nl .... . "'.... H< ;: z 0
~~ $a ;:j .... >lJ U :'i!~ 1::~ ~ j w <0
p.. ,~ ~ > r-
ow u .=> <t
~p..1 Z ~[j :; f- ot
H - <t ot ot
0 -z Vl iii 11.
" u~o . <>:: ~~ 0 Ul ~
0 ;:;~E Vl '::1 >- ci
VI W ~ ~~ ctl W ::I W
VI W !;! Z ..J f-
I 0< Vl ~ Z ll: 0 Ul
<r HU Vl H UH 0 U ot
'" ~ ~ H U <~ 0 I: u
o~~ fil 0 f:i ::E <0 z
. . Vl , ~~ !I: <t 0 j
0 U H Ul ~ Ul 1'1
Z U Vl " " ~ <t N
41 I'd H :S~ :r
:r:w u ~
HE9 ~ 41 ~l::l
z=:; '" ""
:3 H OL<.l
HU ... U~
. ., ,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaint if f
v.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
D<!fendant
v.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Additional
Defendant
NOTICE
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend
against the claims set forth in the following pages, you must
take action within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and
Notice, are served, by entering a written appearance personally
or by attorney and filing in writing with the court your
defense or objections to the claims set forth against you. You
are warned that if you fail to do so the :::ase may proceed
without you and a judgment may be entered against you by the
court without further notice for any money claimed in the
Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the
Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights
important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE.
IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR
TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN
GET LEGAL HELP.
1f.\R\to!li.t. ()AVas, PC
... rJt)II'~~ ~..-^ 11 AW
2 lilt> (Ill L\tIUA ~~I."\'I-
I \'l-\:-dIM "-\I'Wl
Court Administrator
Cumberland County Courthouse, 4th Floor
South Hanover and High Streets
Carlisle, PA 17013
Telephone: (717) 240-6200
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
2306 Columbia Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 291-2236
l\
By: L;i:11!J !:./f. " !)
Corrie LJ Fischel, I.D.#65289
Attorney for Defendant
. .
.
II
I:
3 .
Addi tional Defendant Liberty Excavators, Inc.
("Liberty") is a Pennsylvania corporation with a principal
place of business located at 1104 Fernwood Avenue, Camp Hill,
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17011.
4. On or about October 31, 1994, Plaintiff served
its Amended Complaint on Defendant Lobar. A true and correct
copy of the Amended Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"
and incorporated as though fully set forth herein.
5. Lobar denied any liability to Plaintiff and
filed an Answer with New Matter and Amended Counterclaim
expressly denying any and all liability. A true and correct
copy of Lobar's Answer is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and
incorporated as though fully set forth herein.
6. Plaintiff filed a Response to Defendant's New
Matter and Counterclaim on or about January 23, 1995. A true
and correct copy of Plaintiff's Response is attached hereto as
Exhibit "C" and incorporated as though fully set forth herein.
7. In its Amended Complaint, Plaintiff contends
that Lobar is liable for breach of a certain construction
subcontract dated August 3, 1993 to perform work for the New
Bathhouse and Pool Construction for the West Shore Country Club
in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania.
8. Plaintiff further contends that Lobar breached
an oral contract to have Plaintiff perform additional work.
9. Plaintiff contends that Lobar breached the
alleged oral and written contracts by failing to remit final
1t^I(\HJ~ A'M'oIl-S."c.:
"111l1l'f-l"l.'\II."YI
!\l1f'lC III t \4"1\ \\1 'l f-
I "" '''lilt.., I 'lItH
2
HARMON A nAVIES, ll.c.l
....no!l...ns.....r.l....w
l\llflnll,lJMHI" ""H'l!f-. I
''''''''. '^ '''''' II
"
Ii
II
'I
Ii
.
payment, despite the fact that plaintiff allegedly completed
his work and fulfilled all of his obligations.
10. Plaintiff further contends that Lobar is liable
to him for unjust enrichment.
11. Lobar, however, correctly and properly performed
all its obligations pursuant to its subcontract with Plaintiff.
12. Additional Defendant Liberty Excavators, Inc.
and Lobar Associates, Inc. entered into a Subcontract for
excavation work on the West Shore Country Club project. Said
Subcontract is attached as Exhibit "D" and incorporated as
though fully set forth herein.
13 . As part of said Subcontract between Liberty
Excavators, Inc. and Lobar Associates, Lobar Associates has the
right to recover any and all losses or damages including
attorney's fees, resulting from Liberty's breach of contract.
14. Said subcontract was tendered to Additional
Defendant and was never rejected or objected to.
15. After receipt of said subcontract, Additional
Defendant began performance of its work under said subcontract.
16. Under Lobar Associates' contract with the owner,
all of Defendant's work, which included all of Additional
Defendant's work under the subcontract, was to be completed on
or before January 1, 1994. Said Contract is attached hereto as
Exhibit "E" and incorporated as though fully set forth herein.
3
17. The requirement for Lobar's work, and therefore
Additional Defendant's work, to be complete before January 1,
1994 was clearly specified in the plans, specifications, and
documents which were incorporated into Liberty's subcontract.
18. Additional Defendant knew, or should reasonably
have known, of the requirement that all work on the project be
completed on or before January 1, 1994.
19. Lobar, as general contractor, prepared a Job
Progress Schedule for the project.
20. Lobar provided a copy of said schedule to
Additional Defendant.
21. Additional Defendant did not object to this
schedule or take exception to it.
22. From the beginning of its work on the project,
Additional Defendant failed to provide an adequate number of
properly trained and qualified employees to perform its work on
the project.
23. From the beginning of its work on the project,
Additional Defendant failed to provide an adequate quantity of
proper equipment to perform its work on the project.
24. Throughout the course of the project, Additional
Defendant consistently and persistently failed to meet the
required schedule.
25. As a direct and proximate result of Additional
Defendant's failure to properly perform its work on the project
in a good and workmanlike manner, in accordance with its
HARMON a. ()AVII::S, p,c
...rrURSJ-Y\.At.I.AW
2l0b{OI t',",BI" "'\'I~n
I ,\~{'...snR I'" JlNl.l
4
.
'L\ItMO'A 1),\\1"',.11('
... II UIt" ~...-, r -I .\'4
;lllftt.IJII\UlI\ \\1'\ 1
I \" ..... r lit .., r ',~)l
.
proposal,
the
subcontract,
applicable
project
plans,
i:
specifications and schedules, completion of the project was
delayed from January 1, 1994 to April 15, 1994.
i:
1:
I'
:!
'I
"
:i
II
I
I',
I
'I
It
II
II
'I
II
II
II
I
26. As a direct and proximate result of said three
and one-half month delay, the work of Defendant and of other
subcontractors on the project was similarly delayed.
27. If the averments contained in Heisse's Amended
Complaint are found to be true and Lobar Associates is found
liable to Plaintiff (which Lobar Associates denies), then
Additional Defendant Liberty Excavators, Inc. is alone liable
to Plaintiff, or is liable over to Defendant Lobar, or is
I
i
I
I
I,
ii
II
II
II
"
II
"
,I
,I
I:
il
!
jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff, or is liable
directly to Lobar upon all matters complained of by plaintiff
or Lobar.
Associates,
Inc.
WHEREFORE,
Defendant
Lobar
respectfully requests this Honorable Court to enter judgment in
its favor and against Additional Defendant Liberty Excavators,
Inc. for all sums for \~hich Lobar Associates, Inc. may be found
liable to Plaintiff, together with interest, costs, and
attorney's fees.
Respectfully submitted,
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
~~ ~-j'" ./ J:
. \. , .... t/,t-<r. -' L.
Corrie L. ischel, .D. 1165289
Attorney or Defendant
Lobar Associates, Inc.
By:
Ref; Pl\Lcb4r\Hetsse.C
5
v.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
FRANCIS HEISSE,
Plaintiff
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant
NOTICE
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against
the claims set forth in the following pages, you must take action
within twenty (20) days after this Complaint and Notice are
served, by entering a written appearance personally' "or by
attorney and filing in writing with the court your defenses or
objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned
that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you and a
judgment may be entered against you by the court without further
notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other
claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You may los~ money
or property or other rights important to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU
DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE
COURT ADMINISTRATOR
CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE
CARLISLE, PA 17013
(717) 240-6200
!lAIDIS,
ND
Dated:
ID-7:1-q (
By:
John
26 e
Car '
(717) 243-6222
Attorney for Plaintiff
Tn'"I I;: COl:"'{ r:~rF,J c:t':t'.0,~D
...'.. I f '-,l_.n .........._..
In T"-tl'~""y'~ ,,,,,.1 I h"" ll~') ~"I,'\'j '1""""
l -.:.. J ; 1."',1. ~" .;. ,...:. ,', ; ..'., \:'. .'~_ ,.., ilJ
\~::i ~i:~ 'i.:..~t Jt~_:,tJ tll~l!:t "j'" i,ol'Jnl.":~!",\ P"l.
TiT!LJ.J-=..Cj::/3Y OI~t.J.....- 1:L'11~
..' '-'- G. /k.llL_, . 1....11'7-
Prothon~l:ry
FRANCIS HEISSE,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND NOW, comes t~e Plaintiff Francis Heisse by and through
his attorneys Saidis, Guido, Shuff & Masland and respectfully
avers the following:
1. The plaintiff is Francis Heisse, an adult individual
residing at 423 North Progress Avenue, Harrisburg, Dauphin
County, Pennsylvania 17110.
2. The Defendant is Lobar Associates, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation doing business at 1 Old Mill Road, Dillsburg, York
County, Pennsylvania, 17019\
3. On or about August 3, 1993, the Plaintiff Francis
Heissee, hereinafter "subcontractor," contracted with the
Defendant Lobar Associates, Inc., hereinafter "contractor," to
perform work known and described as a New Bathhouse and Pool
Construction for the West Shore Country Club in Camp Hill,
Pennsylvania; a copy of said contract ("contract") is attached
hereto and made a part hereof marked as Exhibit "A".
4. Pursuant to said contract, the subcontractor was to
,AID/S, GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 W, High SlrCc:t
C.ulisle, PA
perform various items of work as more fully described under
Article II of said contract.
5. A160 pur6uant to 6aid contract, provided all thi6 work
was to be done, Article IV of said contract provided for a
payment to the subcontractor of One Hundred Sixty Four Thousand
Four Hundred and 00/100 ($164,419.00) Dollars.
, .
6. In addition to this contract, there was also a written
change order for a pool light to be installed by subcontractor
for the payment of Three Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100
($3,500.00) Dollars.
7. In addition to the written contract, the subcontractor
completed additional work on the same job.
8. Specifically, the subcontractor performed the following:
a. ~In accordance with the contract, the
contractor was' to install wooden forms around
the entire pool to facilitate installation ~f gunite.
Since contractor did not erect the wooden walls,
subcontractor had to revise its work schedule and
install the gunite at a cost of $18,000.00 more than
"
anticipated;
b. Subcontractor put in a new dividing jig at the
request of the contractor, as contractor's men went
over and destroyed the original diving jig, at a cost
to the subcontractor of One Hundred Fifty and 00/100
($150.00) Dollars;
c. Contractor requested subcontractor to cut the bond
beam at a cost to subcontractor of One Hundred Fifty
SAlDlS. GUIDO,
I SHUFF &
MAS LAND
26 W. High SI~CI
Carlisle, PA
and 001100 ($150.00) Dollars;
d. Contractor requested subcontractor to install three
(3) lifeguard stands at a cost to subcontractor of
Seven Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 ($7,500.00)
Dollars;
e. AD neither a wooden wall nor dirt wall was
I
I
IAlDlS, GUIDO.
I
I SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 W, lIiih Street
C;ulisle. fA
provided by the contractor at the shallow end of the
pool, subcontractor was asked to construct a plywood
wall against which the gunite could be shot, at a cost
to the subcontractor of Two Thousand Nine Hundred and
00/100 ($2,900.00) Dollars; and
f. The contractor requested subcontractor to run a
sewer line for a cost to the subcontractor af Three
Hundred Fifty and 00/100 ($350.00) Dollars.
9. Subcontractor completed all of the work under the
original written contract as well as the additional work as
described above by April 11, 1994.
COUNT I
BREACH OF CONTRACT
10. Paragraphs 1 through 9 are incorporated herein by
reference as if fully set forth at length.
11. In addition to the written contract, and the change
order, the additional work as described in paragraph 8 was
performed by the subcontractor pursuant to an express oral
contract, which was completed by the subcontractor.
12. Pursuant to the written contract, the change order and
the additional work performed by the oral contract, the
contractor was to pay the subcontractor One Hundred Ninety Seven
Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty-nine and 00/100 ($197,769.00)
Dollars.
13. The contractor paid to the subcontractor a total of One
Hundred Thirty Four Thousand and 00/100 ($134,000.00) Dollars,
leaving a balancA d~~ of Sixty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty
,AIDlS, GUIDO.
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 W. Hiah SIIeC'
Carlisle, fA
Nine and 00/100 ($63,769.00) Dollars.
14. Despite repeated demands, contractor has paid neither
the Thirty Three Thousand Nine Hundred Nineteen ($33,919.00)
Dollars remaining under the written contract, nor the Twenty Nine
Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty and 00/100 ($29,850.00) Dollars
under the oral agreement in request for additional work, for a
total unpaid of Sixty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty Nine and
OO/lOO ($63,769.00) Dollars.
15. Contractor breachec\ both the oral and written contract
by failing to perform its end of the agreement by final payment,
despite the fact that subcontractor completed its work and
fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreement.
WHEREFORE, the subcontractor/Plaintiff demands judgment in
"
favor of the Plaintiff and against the contractor/Defendant in
the amount of Sixty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty Nine and
00/100 ($63,769.00) Dollars, plus interest and costs of this
suit.
COUNT II
UNJUST ENRICHMENT/OUANTUM HER~IT
16. Paragraphs 1 through 9 are incorporated herein by
reference as if fully set forth at length.
17. The additional work as completed by the subcontractor
was performed by the subcontractor on the contractor's behalf to
assist him in completing the job.
18. The subcontractor completed all work as previously set
forth in paragraph 8, subparagraphs a through f.
I
f:
19. The contractor was paid for the entire original
Ii
:1
Ii
i'
,!
,I
AlDIS, GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MAS LAND
26 W, lIiSh SIrec,
eMlisle, PA
, I
, .
contract by the owner of the West Shore Country club for all
work that was completed on the New Bathouse and Pool Construction
job, including that work which was performed by the subcontractor
as stated above.
20. The subcontractor performed all the additional work and
paid for materials from its own funds as averred in paragraph 8 a
through f, for the total amount of Twenty Nine Thousand Eight
Hundred Fifty and 00/100 ($29,850.00) Dollars.
21. The contractor was therefore unjustly enriched by the
receipt of the funds from the owner of the West Shore Country
Club for work and materials that were actually provided by the
subcontractor.
WHEREFORE, the subcontractor/Plaintiff requests your
.
Honorable Court to enter an Order in favor of the Plaintiff and
against the Defendant for unju~t enrichment in the amount of
Twenty Nine Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty and 00/100 ($29,850.00)
Dollars, plus interest and costs of this suit.
Respectfully submitted,
SAIDIS,
Date:
/D - n.qLj
Johnna . Dei y Esquire
26 West High Street
CarlUle, PA 17013
(717) 243-6222
Attorney for the Plaintiff
(
(-.
ASSOCIATES
,
"
SUBCONTRACT
AGREEMENT BEl1VEEN CONTRACTOR & SUBCONTRACTOR
sunCONTRACT #3081-1.H.'i2-S10
AGREEMENT MADE AS Of TIlE 3RD DAY Of A UGUST IN TIlE n:.tR Of MNETEEN nUNDRED AND 93,
DEnl'F.EN TIlE CONT7/.fCTOR: LOBAR ASSOCI/IrES, INC.
, I OLD Af!U ROAD
P.", BOX 432
.D1ILSBURG, J'A 17019~4J2
A^1J TIlE SUBCONT7/.ICTOR: FRANCIS /lEISSE
42J N. PROGRESS A \IE',
IWlR/SBURG, J'A 17109
TEUPlIONE: (117) 545-3427
.
lI'/TNESSEm, TlUT TIlE SUBCON/7UCTOR AND CONT7/.1CTOR FOR TIlE CONSIDER.I110N //EREIN.fF1f:R NAMED AGREE AS
FOlLOWS:
ARTICLE I. TIlE SUBCONT7/.fCTOR AGREES TO FURNlS/i ALL MATERLlLAND PERFORM ALL WORK AS DE.'iCl/lBED IN AR11az
11 /lEREOf FOR:
NEil' BATH/lOUSE & POOL CONSTRUCTION
IVEST S/lORE COUNTRY CWB
CAAfP /llU., PA
FOR LOIW! ASSOC1,fTES, lNe IN ACCO/lDANCE wmi 11US AGREENENT, T1lE AGllEE.VENT IlE1WEEN T1lE OWNER '"
CONTRACTOR. '" IN ACCORDANCE wrm TIlE GENERAL CONDmOllS Of T1lE CON17<<CT, SUPPlEMENTARY GENERA!.
CONDmONS, TIlE DRAMIIGS. SPEanCfTlONS. AND ADDENDA PWAIlED BY l/. EDWARD BLACK & ASSOCIATES
1lEI1EIN.fF1f:R Cf1ll:D 111E ARC1l1Tl:CT OR OWNEl/'S A UT/IO/llZED AGENT, ALL OF wmcn DOCT/1/EIm. SiGNED BYTIIE PAKTlES
11iERETO OR lDENllFTED BY TIlE ARC1l1Tl:CT OR OWNER'S AUT/IORIIED AGENT, FOIW A PAKT OF A CONTRACT BETWEEN TIlE
CONTRACTOR AND TIlE OWNER DA mJ 16 JULY 1993 . '" HEJ/EBY BECOME A PART OF TmS CON17<<CT, '" IlEI1EIN l/EFERRED
TO AS TIlE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. "SIWJ. BE ALWE AVAlUBlE TO TIlE SUBCON17<<CTOR UPON ms REQUEST F//lOR ro AND
ANI71JJE SUBSEQUENT TO SIGMNG rms SUBCONTRACT.
ARTICLE II. 111E SUBCONTRACTOR" TIlE CONTRACTOR AGREE 71/ATTIIE MATEI/LlLS AND EQUIPMENT TO BE FURNlSRED
" WORK TO BE PERFORMED ARE COMPu:n; AS REQUIRED AND IN STRlCT ACCO/lDANCE W/m PUNS. SPEQFTCf'nONS.
M/ENDMENTS, ANDIOR ADDENDA" AS FOlLOWS:
A. APPUCABl.E SECTIONS OF DlV/SION 1 _ GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
B, CONSTRUCTION OF SIY/AiM/NG AND WADING POOLS COMPLETE AS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE
\VITH PENNSYLVANIA STATE REGULATIONS AND ACCORDING TO PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
PROVIDED, AS AMENDED IN YOUR LETTER OF 19 APRIL 1993 AND LATER DELETION OF THE
/lEATERS ON TTlE ORIGINAL S/'ECIFICATIONS lI'/1/C/l DECREASED T//E PRICE FROM T//AT
S(/OII'N ON !'OUR LEITER D,ITED 29 APRIL /99J INCLUDING T//E FOlLOII'ING:
I. TflE SII'/.\/,\I/.\'G ,\sn II'.I/!/....G /'OOlS 11'111. /IE CO....SIRUCTED E.I:,ICTI.l' /IS Sf/OIl'N ON
/if.lJE/'RI.\T,
EXlIIIJfT "II"
r:::---.7 1 ()'!) .'."r I' ).r, 1',\ I' ,.
'.
,
I
r'o
2
1. TlfE EQUlPME!([' SPECIF/ED II'IU. BE C/lANGED AS FOlLOH'S: SFY 78.78" I/YRATE S.WD
FILTER WIT/lOUT AUTOMATIC B.U'KH'.IS/l. nro (1) C/lEMOD,tTA MODEL 400 CONTROllERS
AND FOUR (.f) STENNER PUMPS FOK AUTO.IHTIC C/lE.IflCAL CONTROL OF BOTll POOLS.
AUTOMATIC FlU FEATURE /lAS BEEN DELETED FROM OKIGINAL BID.
J. nVEL VE (11) STAINLESS STEEL RECESSED II)UL STEPS IIA I'E BEEN DELETED. TIlEY IVIU
BE REP~CED BY BUlLT.IN CERAMIC TILE STEPS.
4. FLOIV CONTROL VALVES RA VE BEEN DELETED.
S. lVI/EN SITE WORK I.E, EXCAVATION, ONDER.DRAINS, AND STONE ARE COMPLETE, YOUR
FIRM MU INSTAlL AND TEST All.l'lPES U711CIlWIU BE PI'C SCIlEDULE 40 i.ND SIZED IN
ACCORDANCE IVTTIl BLUEPRINTS. EST/.lfATED TI.lfE ONE (I) WEEK. -:-
6.Y WlllLE TIlE WOOD FORMS FO!I TIlE POOL WAU-S' ARE BEIsri lSSlMLED BY OTHERS\ YOUR
\- fiRM wiif:7:o.1/.IIENCE lNSTAUlNG REMR, liliOlis-o;vi1" CENTl:.'Rs, BOTl/WAYS, OVER
WAlLS AND FLOOR OF TIlE SlI'/.lf.lf/SG POOL: GKADE 60 STEEL U7U BE USED. WilEN
STEEL INSTALV.TlON IS CO.lfPLETE, T/lE POOL FLOOK II'lU BE INSTAllED. ESTIMATED
TIME TIlREE (J) WEEKS. '
7. SIIOTCRETE.GUNlTE SlIl.lf.lflNG fOOL WAlLS AND GUTTER WIU BE INSTAlLED .
,
ESTI.lfATED '[lME nYO (2L!YEEK.\', ,
8. WADING POOL ROUG/l'STRUCfURE II'IU BE INSTAlLED. ESTIMATED TIME ONE (l) WEEli.
9. TILE WIU BE INSTAlLED AND POOLS PUSTERED . EST!.If,ITED T!.IfE mv l2nVEEKS.
~
SPECl.4L REOmREMEm-5,
I~
I. DUE TO POSSIBLE CO,lfMUNlCATION CONrur::rs, TlfE OWNER & LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
REQUIRE TIlAT All. CORRESPONDENCE, WRITTEN & VERBAL, FROM SUBCONTRACTORS &
MATERIAL SUPPUERS BE DlRECfED TIlROUGIl LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC. IN UEU OF DIRECT
CORRESPONDENCE IYlTIl THE OWNER & PROJECT ENGINEERS/ARCHITECT. IN ADDITION, All.
CUR/FlCATIONS SIlOULD BE FORWARDED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES. /NC. WA FAX OR MAIL IN
UEU OF VERBAL COM.lfUNlCATION.
1. FIELD MEASUREMENTS & VERIFICATION ARE TIlE RESPONSIB1I./TY OF Tll/S SUBCONTRACTOR.
REI7EW OF SITE AND FOUNDATION CONDITIONS IS A REQUIREMENT FOR Tll/S CONTRACT.
J. HA VE MATERIALS DEUYERED MIEN REQUIRED. NO STORAGE IS A VAlUBLE ON JOBSITE . IF,
DEliVERY IS MANDATORY PRIOR TO INSTALV.TION, TlllS SUBCONTRACTOR WIZL HAVE TO
PROI7DE REQUIRED STORAGE FAOUTJES. PllASED PROJECTS SIlOULD HA VE &IATERIALS
SIllPPED IN l'lIASES UNLESS STORAGE IS PROWDED.
4. PROTECT/ON OF AfATERlAI.S UNTIL OIYNER.ARCIlITECT ACCEPTANCE.
s. MATERIAL SAFETY DATA snEETS ARE A REQUIREMENT FOR TIllS PROJECT & MUST BE
SUBMmED WlTlllN FOURTEEN (l.f) DAYS OF TIlE SUBCONTRACT DATE AND PRIOR TO
MATERlAU ARRI'IlNG ON mE JOBSITE.
6. SUBMISSION OF OPERAT10N & JfAlNTENANCE MANUALS TO BE MADE WITH INITIAL
SUBMmALS.
7. BY EXECUTION OF TlllS SUBCO!(['RACT AGREEMENT, YOUR FIRM A.GREES THAT IT IVIU
STRlL7LY COMPLY WITH All. OSllA. REGUUTIONS AND MSDS REQUIREMENTS ON Tll/S PROJECT.
IT IS AUO TIlE RESPONSIBlL/TY OF YOUR PERSONNEL TO FOUOIV ANY INSTRUCTIONS OR
DIRECTIVES GIVEN BY OUR PROJECf SUPERINTENDENT, STEVE DlUER, REGARDING SA.FE1T ON
THE PROJECT. ANY FINES ISSUED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES. INC. AS A RESULT OF YOUR FIRM'S
NEGUGENCE OR NON.(;O.lfPUANCE MU BE TIlE RESPONSIB/UTY OF YOUR FIRM. TilE
SUBCONTRACfOR IS RESPONSIBU FOR All. OS/fA REGUUTIONS INCLUDING VERIFIED SAFETY
CONDmONS OF omER TRADES. ,
8. TlllS PROJECf [[AS A FIlW CO.lfPLEnOS D.ITE OF '.IS PEl? A ntclfED SCIlEDULE 117T1l NO Tl.IIE
E,\TESSlOSS fER.llmED. All. M,TH'IIIS ASD II'ORK SCfIED('[1'S ,llUST BE COOlWI.\'ATED
ITn" Ct.osr:r.r WITIf Dr.','.' l'.'.',)}!c'C{ S('ff,',"r,',Ii:,';firST. sniT [)[Il,n.'. AT TlfE SITE TO .lfEET
WI,' f:U.!1'ISE!J CO\.'I'u:u,r; [J,I If, 11.1 r TO Ii.I r SCIfEln'U: A/JJUST.Iff:.\TS Br TlflS
"
)
r,
J.
SUBCONTRACTOR ....RE.... REQUIREMENT OYTllIS SUBCONT~ICTOR TO....CCOMMOD....TE VARIOUS
PROJECT INTANGIBLES (IVEAT/lER. ETC.) TO MAINTAIN TIlE FINAL COMPLETION DATE.
MULTIPLE sllIrn.{ OVERTI.IfE ARE.... REQUIREMENT OFTllIS PROJECT AS NECESSARY TO MEET
SClIEDULE REQUIREMENTS AND/OR WB....R ....SSOCIATES. SUPERINTENDENT'S INSTRUCTIONS.
P. DtIILY REMOV....L .{ DISPOSAL OF RElATED DEBRIS OFF SITE.
10. PROVIDE SUFfiCIENT SUPERVlSION.{ MANPOIVER FOR SCIlEDUUNG, RECEIVING, UNLOADING.
.{ DISTRlBUTllIN OF AU. M....TERIAL DEUVERIES.
ll. ....U TESTING AND SUBMISSION OF REPORTS ARE .... REQUIREMENT OF Tl/IS SUBCONTJV.CT TO
ASSURE QUAUTY OF INSTALV.TIONS.
12. AU. lAYOUT .{ COORDINATION COSTS ASSOCLlTED IVITII TllIS SUBCONTJV.CT ARE ....
SUBCONTRACT REQUIREMENT.
13. ....U SUBCONTRACTORS MUST PARTICIPATE IN .... J./IOUR II'EEKLI' JOBSITE CLEAN-UI' EACll
FRIDAY.
ARTICLE Ill. 71.11E IS OF 77/E ESSENCE A^V 71tE SUBCONTR.lCTOR AGREES ro COMMENCE A^V ro COMPlE7F. 71tE WORK
AS DESCRIBED IN ARTIaE II AS FOILOR'S: .
I
A. AU. WORK ro BE PERFORMED IN STTIlCT ACCORDANCE wml LOB.UI ASSOCZfTES. INe. PROGRESS' SCIlEDUU; &
DltlEC710NS. NON-CO.llPUANCE R771I LOB.lRASSOCUTES. INe. PROGtIESS SCttEDUlEA^V/OR INSTRUC710NS AlAYRESULT
IN TEl/Att/U710N OF TTUS AGREE.IIENT AND/OR ruCK CtLUlGES. ANY PENAL71ES OR DA.ltAGES ASSESSED ro LOB.UI
ASSOCU7ES. INe. AS A RESULT OF 71US SUBCONrtUCTOR R7LL BE 71tE RESPONSIBIU7Y OF 71US SUBCONrtUCTOR.
B. CO.llPLE110N DATE FOR 7111S PROJECT IS oAS l'ER ....TTAClIED SClIEDULE wml UQUtDATED DI.AIAGES OF 00
PER CAUNDAR DAY. ANY UQUtD.H'ED DA.ltAGES ASSESSED ro LOB.UI ASSOCU7ES. INC. AS A RESULT OF 71US
SUBCONTR.lCTOR R7LL BE mE RESPO/lSIBIU7Y OF 7111S SUBCONtRACTOR.
OOAS ASSESSED.
.
I,
NO 71.\IE EXTENSION OF TTUS CONrtUCT 1l7U BE RECOGNIZED wmIOUT71tE WRITTEN CONSENTOF71tE CONrtUCTOR W1t1Ctt
CONSENT SRA:l. NOT BE \1711lttEllJ UNREASOIWJLY CONSISTENT WlTTI ARTICIE X-4 OF TTUS CONrtUCT. SUBJECT ro 71tE
ARlItT1IA710N PROVISIONS ttERE/N PROvtD'ED.
....RTICLE Iv. 71tE CONtRACTOR AGREES ro PAY 71tE SUBCONrtUCTrJR FOR 71tE PERFORJJANCE OF TTUS WORK 71tE
FOILOIvtNG SUM.. ONE HUNDRED SlX7T-FOUR THOUSAND, FOUR HUNDRED. NINETEEN DOlLARS
(1164.419.00) . IN ClJRRENT FUNDS. SUBJECTro ADDmONS ,u,v DEDUcnoNS FOR CTUNGES AS AUY BE AGREED UPON IN
I\7/t11NG. & ro MAKE MOItT1lI.Y PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT '111EREOF IN ACCORDANCE 'M77/ ARTtaE X. SEC710NS 2{)'2J
INCZUStvE.
A. MOItT1lI.Y PROGtIESS PAYMENT CONDmONS - TWO (2) COPtES ro LOBAR ASSOCUTES. INe. OFF7CE BY 20m OF EACH
MONT1L PAYMENT OF TTUS INVOICE ro BE AS FOLLOWS..
NETLESS 10% RETAlNAGE MIL BE PAID JO/4J DAn SUBJECTro AlU~1T1ECT-ENGlNEERlOWNER APPROVAL & RECEI" OF
PAYMENT BY LOBAR ASSOCUTES.INC. FOR WORK COMPlETED ON71l1S SUBCONrtUCT. NO OTHER aUIlGES SUCH AS
INTEREST, CARRYING CHARGES, TAXES. ETC. MIL BE RONORED UNIESS INDIClTED O71IERWlSE OR AS AGREED ro BY
Born PAR1rES INI\7/t11NO. M:TAlNAGE ro BE RElEASED UPON APPROVAL nOM ARC1t1TECT AND OWNER. AND RECEIPT
OF MATERIAL & UBOR PROOF OF PAYMENT REILASES. MONm PAYMENT APPUCl110NS ro BE SUBM11TED ON AlA
DOCUlJENTS G70l & G70J OR EQUAl. FOfU! snOWING PERCENT COMPlETED EACH MONm.
NO PAImAI. OR flNAL PAYMENTS 1l7U BE MADE WlTTIOUT PROOF OF AUTERlAL PAYMENTS UNlESS SPEaAL
ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE WlT1I LOBAR ASSOCUTES. INe.
11' SUBCONtRACTrJIl FAIU ro MEET71tE SUBCONrtUCT REQUUlEMENTS. AU. PAYMENTS DUE INa.UOING OUTrrANDING
SEPARATE ORDERS MAY BE ttEllJ UNTrl. CORREC71VE: AC710NS ARE TAKEN.
ARTICLE V. mill. PAYMENT Stu.LL BE DUE WIlEN WORK DESCRlB'ED IN TTUS CONrtUCT IS FULLY COMPlETED AND
PERFO/l.lfED IN ACCORD.lNCE Rml 71fE CON/1'..fCr DOCU.It!:NTS. " P.l I~IE.\T ro BE CONSISTENT lIml ARTIaE IV & ARTlaE
X. S':C710SS U. 2{}'ZJ rsa.USIl'E OF 71US CON/1'..fCT.
r.":.F. JP.C: ISH/.t'.\-T: (IF ,('.1' /'" rl,!f:,':r. TIlE S!';l;..~",'.'IJ.:H.-7tJ.r:. IF FF.Qr,'lp!:,>. SHU1. SUOMIT E\7DESCE s'-f71SF.-fcrORl' TO 17iE
CIJ,',,]-::"icTU.'.' 71l.tT,~tJ. r,i),t:'I/J4\" ).f.tn:'I.','ff. lI!Le;,.( ..U.I::..,Jw....,.'.7JF.[!]f..[);.,7-:.'iS cO,...,';E;Crr.D WI71l11IE SUOCO,\77-:-fcrOR'S
"
(\
rl
WORK ILH'!: BUN s.mSf/ED.
1.
ARTICLE 1'1. PEllFOR.II.INCE" P,IYMENT' BONDS,
(NIA) SUBMIT A PA.YMENT & PERFORMANCE BOND.
ARTICLE 1'11. TE.IIPOR,fIl,Y sm: FAatmES.
A. TlUS SUBCON77UCTOR SILllJ.I'II,OI7DE AlL TE.V1'011.fl1Y SfTE FAaIlTTES AS RE(}UlI!ED Oil, AS NECESS.fIIY ro PERFOR.v
IUS WOIU:.
B. DEBll/S llELATED TO TTlE WORK INalJDED IN T1US SUDCONl/I.fCT SIUlL BE REMOVED" DISPOSED:OF BY TlUS
SUBCONT/I.ICTOR. B.ICK CILfRGES SIUlL BE: M.WE 1'011, NON,CO.VPUfHCE.
ARTICLE VIII, INSUR.iNCE
UMESS 0T7/E1W1SE PROVIDED lIERElN. TTlE SUBCO!,l/tICTOR SIWJ. IUI'E A DIRECT U/BIU7Y FOR T7/E Am OF /US
EMPLO~ " AGENTS 1'011, W/uClIlIE IS LEGAllY REsPONSIBLE. AND 771E SUBCO^71I.JCTOR SIUlL NOT BE M(}UIRED ro
ASSUME mE UABIU7Y FOR T7/E Am OF ANY 077/ERS.
PlUOR TO STIJ/77NG WORK. TlIE INSUR.iNCE RE(}IIIRED ro BE: FUR.VlSIIED SILflJ.BE OBT-flNED FROM A REsPONSIBLE COMPANY
OR COMPAMES TO PROVIDE: PROPER" ADE:(}UA1f: COI'fR.IGE " s.mSfACTORY EVIDENCE I17ll BE FURNTSllED TO mE
CON77UCTOR TlLIT mE SUBCONT/I.ICTOR /!IS CO.llPUED IIml TTlE RE(}UlRE.IIENT'S AS STATED IN 77US SEcnON.
A. PROVIDE nro (1) INSURANCE CERTIFICATES IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROJECT INSURANCE
REQUIREMENTS. CERTIFICATeS MUST BE SUBMmED PRIOR TO COMMENCING IYITII ANY WORK.
ARTICLE IX. lOB CONDmoNS
.
,
( X ) A COMPLETE UST OF AU MATERIAL SUPPUERS & SECOND TIER SUBCONTRACT08S WITII
THEIR ADDRESSES AND TELEPnONE NUMBERS IfUST BE SUBMmED TO WBAR
ASSOCI.4TES. INC. IYITIIlN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS FROM DATE OF SIGNING OF AGREEMENT BY
SUBCONTRACTOR.
( X ) COST BREAKDOWN FOR UBOR & MATERIAL AfUST BE SUBMmED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES,
INC. IYITIIlN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS FROM DATE OF SIGNING OF AGREEMENT BY
SUBCONTRACTOR.
( ) SUBMIT PAYROU REPORTS WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS WEEK-ENDING TO TRlS OFFICE.
MONTHLY PAYMENT ESTmATES CANNOT BE APPROVED WITHOUT PAYROU REPORTS BEING
SUBMmED.
( X) PROVIDE TEN (10) COPIES OF AU SUBMmAL DATA EXACTLY AS REQUIRED IN
SPECIFlCATIONS NO LATER THAN 10 AUGUST 1991. YOUR FIRM &UY BE HELD UABLE FOR
DELAY COSTS IF SUBMfrrALS ARE NOT MADE AS REQUIRED AND IY/TRlN TIlE REQUESTED
TIME FRAME.
( X) E.E.O. & ,{FFlRMATlVE ACTION ARE A PART OF THIS SUBCONTRACT. EXECUTE AND
RETVRN CERTIFICATION WITH CONTRACT.
( X) AU WORK TO BE PERFORAtED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
SAFETY PROGRAM.
( ) USE OF FO!lEIGN STEEL .{ ALUMINUM PRODUCTS IS PROR/BITED ON TR/S PROJECT.
ARTICLE X. INADDmoN TO TTlE FOREGOING PROVISIONS mE PAIt1TES ALrOAGREE T1lATT1/E SUBCOh71/ACTOR SIW.l.:
I. BE BOUND TO T1IE CON77U CTOR IY T1IE 7Ell.llS OF T1IE CONT/I.J CT DOctn/E:NTS " T1US AGREE.lIE!IT, "ASS/J.I/E roWIJ/D
TlIE CONl7?ACTOR All. TTlE OBUG,mONS" REsPONSIBlimES 17!ITTIIE CO.\71I.JCTOR. BY TTlOSE DOCU.\IENTS ASSUMES
TO\I'.IIW T7/f: O\l'.\;:R. AS ArrUCIBLE TO 77US SUSCO.\71I.fCT.
2. SUB.\frrro n(E CO,\7F..(CTO,~ ArrUCino....'S FOR F'.fnf.r:,\T AT SfICf{ r..~([S,mf'r;Liir.:J 1.....-4..t:r:(7~~. n' SO.U Ta ES.f.9!..E
ni.E. CO.',7;.'.E7dp TI) .J.....,t:.r FO.:J. P,IPf':::,'.;-. /.;. r.o.\!E,'t'j-:; APE .tfW:: 0.... ~'.fU.!.fno..,.s OF WORK DO,'te:. nlE
5L'JC'I).'.7;-:fC7IJR snf:J... B:.h)FE 1UE Flf.'J7 ArrUc,iji,J..... SeE,V!r Tl) TUE CO,'.7?.tCTiJl;.i SCIiF...DUU: OF '~tLUES OF
. '
( ,
~
TIlE V.WOUS P.IRTS OF TIlE WORK. AGGRE:G.11!1IG 71/E: roW. AS RE:(!WIIED BY TIlE OWNE:Jl. AND. IF RE:(!UIRED,
SUPPORTE:D BY SUCII EVIDENCE AS ro rrs COIUlE:CT'NUS AS 71IE CONT1l.ICTOR M.IY lJIRE:CT. 71I/S SCIIEDULE. WilEN
APPROI'ED BY 71IE CONT1l.ICTOR. SIWL BE USED AS A B.ISIS FOR CER71F1Cm:S FOR p.m.wrr. UMDS IT BE FOUND TO
BE IN ERROR. IN ArrLYlNG FOR P.IYMENT, 71/E: SUBCONT1l.lcroR SllIU SUB.llfT A STA7EIIENT /LISED Ul'ON 71I/S
SCIIE:DULE, IF P.IYMENr.i ARE: M.IDE ON ACCOUNT OF M.ITERLII-r NOT INCORl'OR.ITE:D IN 71/E: WORK BUT DE1JVERED
AND SUITABLY STOIIED AT71/E: SITE, OR AT SOME 071fER LOCATION AGRE:E:D UPON IN IVRl71NO, SUCII PAYIolENTS SIUll.
BE IN ACCORDANCE Ivml71lE TE:R.\IS'{ CONDmoNS OF 71IE CONT1l.fCT DOCUMENTS,
J. PA Y FOR AU MATE:RLfL'j ,{ UBOR USED IN. OR INCONIo'E:C110N 1VTT11. 711E PWOR.II.WCE OF71IIS CONT1l.fCT, TTlROU011
711E PWOD COVE:RE:D BY PRE:YlOUS P.IYMENTS RE:CElVE:D FIIOM TIlE CON/1UCTOR ,{ FURJ.TSII SATlSFACT'ORY E:VIDWCE
WIlEN REQUE:STE:D BY TIlE CONT1l.fcroR, ro I'E:RIFY CO.IIPUfNCE IVTT1I TIlE ABOVE: RE:QUIRE.IIENTS.
4. M.fKE: AU a.uMS FOR EX17I.fS. FOR EXTrNSIONS OF TIME, ,{ FOR D.W.WE FOR DEUYS OR OTl/ERIVlSE, PRONP1tY TO
TIlE CONT1l.fcroR CONSISTENT IVTT1I 11/E CONTIUCT DOCUMENTS.
J. TAKE: NECESS,fRY PRE:CAU770N ro PROPE:RLY PROTECT TIlE FIMS11E:D WORK OF OTlfER mIDES.
6. KEEP TIlE BUIWINO ,{ PRE:.II/SES aLlN AT AU TIMES OF DEORlS ,wSIIIG OUT OF 71IE On:/lATlON OF TIllS
SUBCONTIUCT. 71IE SUBCONT1I.ICTOR SILIU NOTBE 11E:llJ RESPONSIBlE: FOR UNaLfN CONDmONS CAUSED BYOTl1Ell
CONT1l.ICTORS OR SUBCONT1l.ICTORS, U^lF..rS 071lE:lmTSE PROVlOED FOR.
7. COMPLYllmlAUSTATUTORY A^V/OR CONTR.ICTU.IL S,IFE:TY RE(!UlRE.\IENTS APPUING TO /liS \l'ORKAND/ORIN171ArrD
B)' TIlE CONTR.ICTOR. A^V SILIU RE:PORT IVTT1I/N TllRE.E: (3) DAl:\' TO 11/E CONTR.ICTOR ANY INJURY TO TIlE
SUBCONl1/.fcroR'S /:.\IPLOYEES AT 71IE SITE: OF TI/E: PROJECT. ,
8.1. NOT ASSIGN TlI/S SUBCONl1/.ICT OR A/rY AMOUNTS DUE OR TO BECOME DUE 71IfREUNDER 1VTT110UT TI/E: I\'1/lTn:N
CONSENT OF TIlE CONT1l.fCTOR.
BB. NOR SUBCONTR.ICT 71IE WI/OLE OF TI/lS SUBCONl1/.fCT \lmlOUT 71IE I\'RI1TE:N CONSENT OF 71IE CONTIUcroR.
BC. NOR FURTIIER SUBCONT1l.fCT PORTIONS OF TI/lS SUBCONT1l.fCT \lmlOUT \I'RlTTE:N NOTlFlCmONTO TIlE CON/1UCTOR
WilEN SUCII N071FICH1ON IS RE(!UESTE:D BY 71IE CONT1l.fCTOR.
9. GUARANTEE I1IS WORK AGAINST AU DUECTS OF MA7ERl.ILS A^V/OR WORK.\I.fNS/IIP AS ClLLED FOR IN TIlE PUNS,
SPEaFle/TlONS, ,{ ADDENDA, OR IF NO GUAIUNTEE IS ClllLD FOR. 11/EN FOR A PWOD OF O^'E: (I) YEAR FROM TILE
D.fTES OF PARTW. OR TOT-fL ACCEl'TANCE: OF 71IE SUBCONl1/.ICTOR'S WORK BY TIlE O~J/.
JOA. NO SEPARATE: U^VE:RSTANDING OR AGREE.l/ENTS OF ANj' K/^V \lTU BE E:NTE:RE:D mro BYTI/E: SUBCONT1l.fcroR ,{ 'i1LE
OIVNER AIoV/OR II/S ARClIlTECT OF AGENTS REUT1I'E: TO ANY OR/GIN.It OR t:X'TR.1 WORK CONTEMPUTE:JJ BY TIllS
AGREE.\IENT UNlLSS TIlE SAME IS FIRST APPROVED IN II'RI11NG BY CON/1UCTOR.
JOB. SUBCONTIUCT'OR SILfU INSURE: TlLIT AlL SUBCONl1/.fCTORS. E:.IIPLOYEES. ,{ SUPPUE:l/S, AT All. TIMES. AIlE PAlD AU
AMOUNTS DUE IN CONNE:C110N IIml 7l1E PE:RFOR.\IANCE OF TIllS SUBCONT1l.ICT. AFTER TIlE FIRST PAYloIENT
lIE:l1EU^VER, CONT1l.fCT'OR SllIU IW'E: 7lIERlGllTro IIml1/0LDANY SUBSE(!UE:NTPAYIolENTS UNlTL SUBCONl1/.fCT'OR
SUBMITS EVIDENCE: SA 71SFACTORYTO COlfTlUcroR TllIT All.MIOUNTS O\lWINCONlo'E:C110N 1VTT1/ PERFORM.fNCE OF
TIllS SUBCONT1l.fCT /LfVE: BEEN PAlD. FUR11/ER, SClBCONT1l.ICT'OR AGREES 71LfT CONT1l.tCTOR MAY PAY All. PERSONS
WlIICI/I/AVE: NOT BEEN PAlD TIlE MOMES DUE: TI/EM IN CONNE:CI10N 1VTT1/ TI/lS SUBCONl1/.fCT WllETTfER OR NOTA UW
IllS BEEN FILED. ,{ SUBCONT1l.fCTOR SILflL. TO TT/E EXTENT TlUT CONT1l.tcroR illS NOT RE:COI'E:RED SAID AMOUNTS
PURSUANT TO II'mIROLDINO. PAY SAlD AMOUNTS ro CONT1l.fcroR UPON DEMAND. SUBCONTIUCT'OR SIIAlL ALrO
J.I1ME:DLfTE:LY RE:l.IJBURSE CONT1l.fCT'OR FORANY AMOUNTS PAID UIoVER CONT1l.fCTOR'S P.fYlolENT BOND INCONNECI10N
nml nus SUBCONTIUCT,{ IND/:.IIMFIED BY CONl1/.fCT'OR. IN TIlE E.YE:NT CONTIUcroR IS REQUIRED ro PAY OR
IND/:.IIMFY ANY PE:l/SONS lIEREUNDER. SUBCONTIUCT'OR SILfIL IMMEDLfTEl.Y REIMBURSE: nu: CONT1l.fCT'OR FOR TIlE
FUU COSTTlIEREOF.INa.lJD11IG ATlVRNErS FEES.
Joe. SI/OULD SUBCON/1UCT'OR AT ANY 7TME F.fJ1. In SUPPLY A sumaENT NUMBER OF SFJULD WORKMEN ORA SUFflaE:NT
QU.fNT1TY OF M.fTE:RLlLr OF PROPER (2UAUTY. OR FAlL IN ANY RESPECT ro PROSEClITE: TIlE WORK COVEllE:D BY T/US
SUBCONTIUCT'OR Il7T11 PROMPTNESS,{ D/IlGE:NCE. OR FAlL IN TIlE PEP.FOJ1.lJ,fNCE OF ANYOFTT/E AGREDJENTS HE:J/EJN
CONTAlNED. OR SHOULD ANY WORKMEN PWORNING WORK COI'E:RED BY T1/IS SUBCONTIUCT E:lI'G.fGE IN A S11U1CE OR
OTlfER WORK STOPPAGE. OR CElSE TO WORKDUE: ro PlCXET1NO OR OT1lER sum Acmm. CONT1LfCT'OR M./r IN ANY
OF SUCR EVENTS. AT ITS OPTION, WTTIIOUT PREJUDICE TO ANY OTlfER RENEDIES rr NAY ILfYr:. AF7D! FORTY.f:1GITT (44)
IIOURS II'RI1TE:N NOTICE TO SUBCONl1/.fCTOR. PROVIDE ANY sum UBOR AND MATE:RLILr AND DE:DUCT nu: COST
TI/EREOF FROM ANY MOMES TlIE:N DUE OR TlIEJ/LIFTER ro BECOME DUE SUBCONl1/.fcroR; AND FURT/IER. IN ANY OF
SUCR EVENTS. CONTIUCT'OR MAY AT ITS OPTTON, 1VTT110UT PREJUDICE: ro ANY OT1lER RENEDIE:S IT M./Y /LIVE.
TERMINATE: TIlE ENPLOYIolENT OF SUBCOlmUcroR'S FIRM FOR TI/E: WORK UNDER TlI1S SUBCONTTI.fCT,{ SIw.J. /LIVE
TIlE R101TT TO ENIER UPON TIlE PRDJISE:.S AND TAICE POSSESSION. FOR TIlE PURPOSE OF COMPlE11NG TT/E WORK
IIEREUNDER, OF All. TIlE MATE:RLfL'j, TOOLS, ,{ EQlnPMENT TlIEREON, ,{ In FIMSH TIlE WORK ,{ PROVIDE TILE
MATERLfLS T/1EJIE}'ORE: ElTJfER IV1T/I rrs OWN /:.IIPLOYEI:.S OR OTlfER SUBCONl1/.lcroRS: AND IN CASE OF SUCH
DISCONITNlJANCE OF TI/E: EMPLOYMENT BY CON/1UCT'OR. SUBCONl1/.fcroR SILlJ.L NOT BE ENTmLD ro Rl.CEIVE ANY
FURT1IER PAYMENTS U,\VER T1IE SUBCOI{I11.ICT OR OT1lE:l1IV1SE. BUT SIWL ^'E:lER71/E:LESS RE:.IWN mBLE FOR ANY
DAM.fGES \l'II/CII CONTR.ICTOR INCURS; IF 71IE /:.tPENSF..'i INCUF.FJJJ BY 11/E CO,\'TR.lcroR IN CO.\IPlDlNG 71/E WORK
SIWL EXCF.E:D 71IE U,\T.UD B,IU\'a:. SClBCO.\'TR.ILTOR SI/.IIJ. P.I r 71/E DIFFERESa: m 71IE CO,\'TR.ICTOR AWNG \l7T11
A,'.1'OT1I.r:".R D.t\(,H;[''l'.','Ct..'f,'RFtJ {lrCo,':1t'.f1.7/JR ,0' n(.'~ p.':::r.'LTorSU!.'('il,';i;-:H.7dP'S DrY.HI!.T. CiJ.',','KfLTl)R SIl.i1L
Itt r,r: .1 ll.':.'.' ('i'l).',' ,ill. HtlI}'/.tl5. 't)dLL ,t ,il'i'lJ.f,','iTS T.t,I:F,',' /'i)SS.c~IS;'1 I.... or TI) SECt/PI: 711!: /'.1 ):\{E,\"[ n/r.REVF.
sunt.'j),"7r:.fcrl)A' SHal. tf: (Jl!.'U: Tr) CIl:.7,~:H.7(H~ (WE: n' 71/.": f.UU:f'.r: of SUi1CO""I'~'.(CrcJ,t:.s rL~.'F1Jf:V,U.'Cl-:.
{
(\
5.
SUOCONT1I.icroR'S F,i1WU: 7lJ KU.p mE PROO/lfS.r OF Wi \l'ORK UP 7lJ 77LiT OF COh'T1l.ICT OF omF./! Tl!ADES. OR
TIlE F.i1LURE 7lJ EXEC1/7t. Wi \l'ORK AS D1REcn:D BY CONl1l.fCTOR.
100, SUBCOlml.lcroR AGREES TlLIT WilEN mE COh7R.fCT DOCUMENTS, SPEQFlCAnoNS. OR DJl.IWlNGS REQUIRE,
SUOCONTRAcroR WIll. COMPLY IIml ANT APfUClBU: nlYE OR ffDER.fL PREYA/UNG \VAGF. UW AS WElL AS ANY
RUlES OR REGUl.mONS PROMULG,ITED nIEREUNDER. mE SU8CO/rTIUcroR AGREES TO COMPLY II7T1I AlL SUCII
n:R.\/S" CONDmONS \l'IIICIf ARE APPUCi8U: 7lJ nus SUBCONTII.ICT AND 10 IhVF..VNlFY" flOID 71lE COHTIUCTOR
IWWlESS FOR oiNT F.i1LURE 10 COMPLY IIml SUCIf CONDmo.vs.
IDE. SUOCOlml.fcroR 11711.lLm: ACTU,fL RESPONS/8fUTY FOR CO.VPLYlNG IIml nlE STANDARDS SE:T FORm IN 71lE RUlES
"REGUUnONS PROMULG.ITED PUR.SU,iNT1O mECON:rTRUCTlON s.1Jf:TY ACT{40 U.S,e. J27)" 071tER OS/lA IlELfTED
PROVISIONS TO mE EXTENT APPUCiOU: 10 mE SUBCONTII.lcroR'S PORnONOF mE WO"lK" SUBCOHTIUCTOR SILlIL
INDF..\/N1FY AhV S.IVE 11/F. CONTII.fCTOR 1LiR.lllESS IN CONM:CTlONn/EJ1EWTT/1 FIIOM ANY AND,lIL DA.ItAGE /NaUD/NO
A1TORNf:Y'S ras. COST OF CORRECTTVE ACTION, F1m:s, ETC.
I I. AIm DOES IIEREBY AGREE TlLIT mF. CONTII.iCTOR'S EQUIPMF.NT1I711. BF. AV-llLABI';; TO mE SUBCoNTR.iCTOR ONLY AT
TIlE COlml.lcroR'S DISau:nON" ON MIfTU.mY s.mSF.ICTORY Tf.R.IIS.
12. F'VAA7SIf PWODle PROGRESS REPORTS OF mE II'ORI> AS /JUTU.Ill.Y AGREED IIIa.UDING mE PROGRESS OF MATF:I/lA.LS
OR EQUIPME/{f UhVF./! nus AGREE.\IE.VT 77LfT MAY 8F. IN 11/E COUIW: OF PREPAR.lnON OR M,INUFACTURE.
IJ, M.lKE ANY" All. CIW!GES OR DF.\Il710NS FRO.ll mE ORlGII':'fL PlANS" SPEQFlCAnONS II7T1/OUT NUUlmNG 71lE
ORIGIN.IL CONTII.fCT WilEN SPEQnclU.Y ORDfJU:D 10 DO SO INlI7IJTING BY T1lE COlml.iCTOR. mE SUBCOHTIUCTOR
PRIOR TO 11/E COMMENCE.\IE,VT OF T1US RE\7SED II'ORK. SlLlll. SU8.lIrr PROMPTLY TO TTIE COlml.iCTOR WRl7nN
COPIES OF 11/E COST OR =rr PROPOS.ff. FOR sum RE\7SED II'ORK IN A MANNF./l CONSISTENT II7T1I tilE COlml.iCT
DOCUMENTS.
U. COOPEJUn: lIml mE COIml.ICTOR " On/F.Il SUBCO.\7R.ICTOIU II'/lOSE WORK AIIGlfT /NTF.IlFERE 1I7T1f 71lE
SUOCOh7R.lcroR'S WORK" 10 p,fRnap.IYE IN mE pREpAR.iTTON OF COORD/N.ITED DJl.iIl7NGS IN AREAS DF
CONGESTION AS REQUIRED BY mE CO.\7/l.ICT DOeUMEI\TS. SPEQFlCIlLY h'onNG" ADVISING 71lE COHTIUCTOR OF
ANY SUClf INTF.IlFF.IlWa:.
JJ. COOPER.1 n: II7T1I T1lE CONTII.icroR IN SC/lEDUUNG IUS II'ORK SO AS NOT TO CONFUCT OR INTERFERE IIml TTfE WORK
OF OntEIIS, TO PROMPTLY SUBMITSI/OP DIWI7NGS. DJl.ill7NGS. "S.WPlES. ASREQUIRED /NORDER TO CARRY ONSAJD
WORK EFFIQENTLY A^V AT SPEED 71LIT 117ll NOT CWSE DELIY III T1lE PROGRESS OF 71/E COHTIUCTOR'S WORK OR
OntU BR.iNCI/ES OF mE WORK CIRRIED ON BY OnlER'SUBCONTII.ICTOIU.
16, COMPLY lIml AIL ffDER.ff.. STAn:. " LOCIL l.l II'S " ORDINANCES APPLYING 10 T1lE BUTWING OR STRUCTURE AND TO
COMPLY A^V GII'l:AlJEQUAYE NonCES REUmlG 7lJ T1fE lI'ORK1O PROPF.Il AUTTIORlT1ES AND TO SECUREAND PAY FOR
All. NECE.sS.IRY UC1:NSES OR PER.llWi 10 CIRRY ON T1fE WORK AS DESCRIBED IN 71/E CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS
APPUCABU: TO T1US SUBCOIml.ICT.
17. CO.lIPLY IIml FEDEIW.. STAn:, "LOCIL T.tr UII'S. SOa.ff. SECURITY UII'S, UNE.VPLOYMENT COMPENSAT10N UWS"
WORKMEN'S COMPENS.iTTON UWS INSOFAR AS APpucau: TO T1lE PERFOR.ItANCE OF 71IJS SUBCONTRACT.
/8. AhV DOES 1fEREBY AGREE T1LIT AIL WORK S/lm BE DONE SUBJECT 10 FlI/.IL APPROVAL OF TTUS ARcmn:CT OR
OWNER'S AIITTIORrlED AGF..VT. "IUS DEQS/ON IN IoLlmRS RELlnNG 7lJ AR11snc EFFECT SlLlIL BE flN./L, IF WTT1IJN
71/E n:R.V S OF T1fE COHTIU CT DOCUMENTS.
19. mE SUBCOHTIUcroR SlLl/L BF..iR nlTI. RESPONS/8fUTY FOR~ II'ORK1O BE PERFOJl.VED UNDER IUS SUBCOHTIUCT.
lNaUDING AIL ROOF PENE17I.1T10NS, Cl/171NG. P.ITC/UNG. ETC. T1lE SUBCONTII.ICTOR AGREES 71L1T71/E COST OF All.
CU171NG " PATClUNG /liS BW{ INaWED AS PART OF SUBCOIml.ICTOR'S WORK. TIlE SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES 77lAT
HE SILIlL EMPLOY AR11s.tNS AND TR./DES.IIEN OF T1lE 17I.WE NORMAlLY RESPONSlBU: FOR 71/E ROOF. OR FOR flNTSlf
II'ORK INVOLVED 10 cur AND PATCJ/ AROUND T1fE 'WORK OF SUBCONTII./CTOR'S TR./DF..
20. 71/E SUBCOHTIUCTOR SIlAlJ. MAKE AIL APPUClnONS FOR PAYlJF.NT 10 LOBAR ASSOCUn:s. me. AS AGENT FOR 11IE
01VNF.ll. LOBAR ASSOctln:.r S1LIU. SUB.vrr SAID APPUClT10NS TO TTfE ARatlTECT AND OIVNER FOR PAYMENT. UPON
APPROVAL OF PA YlJF.NT BY TTfE ARC1U1f:CT AND onu, AND PA YlJF.NT BY mE OWNE.R TO LOBAR ASSOctln:.r, INe. AS
AGENT FOR 71lE OWNER. 10 SUBCOlml.fCTOR IN ACt:ORDANa: 1\7111 T1fE TOWS OF TTUS SUBCOHTIUCT. 11IE
SUBCONTRACTOR FlJRT/fER AClJVOwu:IJGES AND AGREES TTUT LOB.IR ASSOctln:.r. me. S1LIU./lAVl: NO UAlJ/UTY ro
SUBCONTRAcroR FOR TTfE OWNE.R'S FAILURE 10 PAYFOR WORK PERFOJl.IIED BYSUBCONTRACTOR. AND SUBCOHTIUCf'OR
AGREES TO ROID LOBAR ASSOCUn:.r. INC fLlRNLESS FIIOM ANY CLIJM FOR PAYMENT FOR WORK PERFORMED BY
SUBCONTRACTOR. AND TO INDEMNT/l'LOB.1R ASSOctlTES.INC. FIIO.V ANY SUCR CLlLVS MADE: BY SUBCONTRACTOR'S
SUBCONTRACTOIU. EMPLOYEES. AGENTS. AND ll.iTERLIL SUPPUF.IlS.
T1LIT 71/E COHTIUCTOR " SUBCOHTIUCTOR AGRll:
21, 71!l T m 71/E M.ITTER OF ARBTT1I.iT10N. 711EJR RlGms A....D OBUG,1170NS, AND AIL PROCEDURE SlLlIL BE AN.ILOGOUS
TO 71I0SE SET Forn/IN mE COlml.fCT DOCU.IIF..\TS PROVIDED. J/Ol\n'!:~, T1LIT A DEQSION BY TT/E ARCllmCT OR
Ol\','.,./I'S Al/77IO."RED AGENT. SlLlU NJT 6:: A CQ,\vma.v PREa:DF..\T TO AIlBTT1I.iTTON,
ART/CI.r: XI, 'TC.'Y/..:m').... (7,H.'S!:
(,1,',' U-' ,<f ';,',-_)(','t T;-.). I',',' sU.t!!. If I n: 7l!!: F:, ;.'[;- Tr) :~'.:'Jfi::fT~: TWS (\I,',";'::1l7 .~.'.7) TlJ IW'!: ,4 ,','dTlIER CO.\7r~icrOF: T,J
I
\
l
I
i
!
i
,
i
. .
I
(
z
PERFORM mE INCO.IfPlEIE /'ORT10N OF' l1lE WORK SIIOUUJ l1lE CONT/!.lC1'OR F'IJI. ro PERFORM rrs OBUOAT10NS UNDER
TlUS CONT1/AC1'. LOB.lR ASSOQ.HFS, INC SIWL ALSO /LiVE TIlE RlGIfT ro RECOVER ANY AND AU. LOSSES OR DAMAGE.
INa.UOING ATroRNErS FEES. RESULTING mOM TIlE CONTI/AC1'OR'~ BREACII OF' CONTI/ACT.
ANY AMOUNT DETEll.ll/NfD ro BE DUE LOIWl Assoa.m:s. INC BY ANY ARBfT//AT10N, ARilITRAT10N PANEL, COUIIT, OR
TlfROUGH ANY 011/ER DISPUTE RESOLU110NTEC1IN1(!UE SIWL BE:AR INTEREST FROM TTlE DATE TTlE BREACH OCCllRJIED AT
TTlE MAXIMUM RATE PWlfTTED BYTTlE USURY LAWS OF TTlE APPUClBlE JURlSDICTlON.
ARTIa.E XII. IN WITNESS ll'I1EJlEOF' T1lE PAR71ES HERErO JLj VE EXECUTED TTUS AGllEE.ltENr UNDER SEAL. TTlE DA Y AND
n:JR FTRST WRITTEN ABOVE. IF 11DS SUBCONTRACT IS NOT EXECUTED WTTTUN FOUll1UN (14) CAlENDAR DAY.\' AFTER
RECEIPT. LOIWl ASSOC1ATES. 1He. /lESER1'ES TTlE RlGIfT ro VOID TTUS AGREE.ltENr AND OBWN TTlESE SERVTCES FROM
AN017lER n/W. , _, '
TillS SUBCONTRACTOR CERTIFIES TIlAT IT
MAINTAINS A. NON-SEGREGATED PLACE OF
BUSINESS AND IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
EMPWYER.
A.rrEST:
FRANCIS HEISSE
SUBCONTRACTOR
(SEAL)
J?~ ~j
BY . ,
/;
Owner
(TITLE)
ArrEST:
IJJBAR ASSOCIATES. lNC.
CONTRACTOR
ITREAS.
~,~
LEE E. EIClIELBERGER, PRESIDENT
-
. .
VERIFICATION
I verify that the statements made in this Complaint are
true and correct. I understand that false statements herein
are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904,
relating to unsworn
OAT"D, ~/.(oJl'r
falsification to the authorities,
g~~~,;. C ;p~
Frances Heisse, Plaintiff
.:'
\IDIS, GUIDO,
SIWFF 8<
MASLAND
!6 W, Hilb Slr<cl
c.ru.!.. PA
. .
EXHIBIT liB"
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaintiff
v.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
;.-; ~ .
...,
Defendant
-,'
r
NOTICE TO PLEAD
z
You are hereby notified to file a written response to
the enclosed Answer With New Matter And Amended Counterclaim
within twenty (20) days from service hereof or a judgment may
be entered against you.
By:
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
2306 Columbia Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 291-2236
cf,~,~~" I.D.
Attorney for Defendant
Lobar Associates, Inc.
#65289
Dated:
Ret, Pl\Lobar\Hei..e.NTP
Il^RMON" DAVIES. P,C.
ATTORNEYS-AT.LAW
B06 COLUIotBIA AVENUE
LANCASTU. rA 1760)
REeEl H U DEe 3 0 1994
-
- -----., _ _ .l
IIARMOS" DAVIES. P.C.
"nORNE\'5."T.LAW
l\otCOlIJMII"""'ENlJl
l".''K''SUl. r" 1160J
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaintiff
v.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER AND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM
1. Admitted.
2 . Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
5. Admitted.
6. Admitted.
,
7. Denied. Defendant specifically denies that in
addition to the written contract, the subcontractor completed
additional work on the same job. Rather, all work performed by
the subcontractor was pursuant to the plans and specifications
incorporated into Plaintiff's subcontract. By way of further
answer, any "additional work" performed by Plaintiff was
required as a result of Plaintiff's own failure to properly
preform its work under the contract.
1
. '
.' . . -- __~t
8. Defendant specifically responds to the following
averments:
a.
Denied.
Defendant
denies
that
in
accordance with the contract, the contractor was to install
wooden forms around the entire pool to facilitate installation
of gunite.
Defendant denies that since contractor did not
erect the wooden walls, subcontractor had to revise its work
schedule to install the gunite at a cost of $18,0~0 more than
anticipated. By way of further answer, in accordance with the
contract, the contractor had the option to install wooden forms
around the entire pool area to facilitate installation of
gunite in case unsuitable soil was encountered that would not
provide a suitable vertical plane for gunite installation. All
parties agreed, including Plaintiff, that natural earth walls
formed during the excavation process provided a sufficient
shell to allow Plaintiff to install the gunite, and this
approach was
accepted by Plaintiff
prior
to gunite
installation. Further, Defendant believes and therefore avers
that the $18,000 in costs which Plaintiff alleges i~ incurred
in additional expense was partially the result of the decision
by Plaintiff's own superintendent to enlarge the shell of the
pool which therefore required the use of additional gunite.
b.
Denied.
Defendant
denies
that
subcontractor put in a new diving jig at the request of the
contractor, as contractor's men went over and destroyed the
original diving jig at cost to the subcontractor of $150.00.
IMtMON & DAVIES, P.C.
^nORsEYS..\T.L\W
~\06 COllJ"lBIA AVENUE
I...."'C"STER,'A 11601
2
By way of further answer, the subcontractor was required to
provide a new diving board, thereby requiring a diving jig, as
a result of a direct request by the owner. This item was not
part of the subcontract between the plaintiff and Defendant.
Contractor Defendant was at no time aware
or told that
subcontractor plaintiff would require the old diving jig at the
job site. Therefore, contractor's demolition crew did destroy
the old property, including the diving jig, pursl,lant. to the
contract specifications.
c. Denied. Defendant denies that contractor
requested subcontractor to cut the bond beam at a cost to
subcontractor of $150.00. By way of further answer, Defendant,
after reasonable investigation, is unaware as to the existence
of a bond beam on the project.
d. Denied. Defendant denies that contractor
requested subcontractor to install three (3) lifeguard stands
at a cost to subcontractor of $7,500.00.
By way of further
answer, subcontractor was required to install three (3)
lifeguard stands pursuant to the plans and spec,fications
incorporated into its contract and was paid for such
installation pursuant to the agreed upon contract price.
e. Denied. Defendant denies that as neither
a wooden wall nor dirt wall was provided by the contractor at
the shallow end of the pool, subcontractor was asked to
construct a plywood wall against which the gunite could be
shot, at a cost to the subcontractor of $2,900.00. By way of
tARMON A DAVIES, P,C.
AnORNEYs.AT.LAW
2)06COlU~B1A "VENUE
LANC....STER_ P.... 1160)
3
further answer, Plaintif f specifically requested that a plywood
wall be put up in order to give it room to install piping
behind the wall area.
f. Denied. Defendant denies that it requested
subcontractor to run a sewer line for a cost to the
subcontractor of $350.00.
By way of further answer,
subcontractor was required to run a sewer line pursuant to the
plans and specifications incorporated into Plaintiff's
subcontract and pursuant to the contract price stated therein.
9. Denied.
Defendant denies that subcontractor
completed all of the work under the original contract as well
as additional work as described above by April 11, 1994. By
way of further answer, Plaintiff substantially completed its
work required by its contract on or about April 13, 1994 which
is evidenced by the substantial completion certificate issued
on that date.
Certificate of substantial completion is
attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated as though fully set
forth herein.
COUNT I
BREACH OF CONTRACT
10. Answers
to paragraphs
1
through 9 are
incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.
11 . Denied.
Defendant denies that in addition to
the written contract and the change order, the additional work
as described in paragraph 3 was perfonned by the subcontractor
pursuant to an express oral contract, which was completed by
Ht\RMON.I. DAVIES, P.C.
ArrOIlNEYS.AT.LAW
2306 COLUMBIA A"ENUI!
LANCASTER.'" 1760)
4
lARMOS.t. DAVIES, P.C.
"nURSE'iS.,H.LAW
2.\0bCOLl.]~BI~ AVENUE
LA"CASTER. PA 1160)
the subcontractor. Rather, all work performed by the Plaintiff
was performed pursuant to the written subcontract and the plans
and specifications incorporated therein.
By way of further
answer, any "additional work" performed by Plaintiff was
required only as a result of Plaintiff's failure to properly
perform its work lmder the contract.
12. Denied. Defendant denies that pursuant to the
written contract, the change order and the addi,tional work
performed by the oral contract, the contractor was to pay the
subcontractor One Hundred Ninety-Seven Thousand Seven Hundred
Sixty-Nine ($197,769.00) Dollars. By way of further answer,
pursuant to the contract and change order, Defendant was
required to pay Plaintiff $167,919.00, provided that all work
under the subcontract was satisfactorily completed.
13. Admitted in part. Denied in part. Defendant
admits that it paid the subcontractor a total of One Hundred
Thirty-Four Thousand and 00/100
($134,000.00)
Dollars.
Defendant denies that a balance of Sixty-Three Thousand Seven
Hundred Sixty-Nine and 00/100 ($63,769.00) Dollars ts due and
owing to the Plaintiff subcontractor.
By way of further
answer, as a result of additional costs already incurred by
Defendant as a result of Plaintiff's
inadequate and
unsatisfactory performance; as well as costs not yet
ascertained by Defendant as a result of Plaintiff's inadequate
and unsatisfactory performance, no balance is due and owing to
Plaintiff.
5
IlARMON. DAVIES. P,C,
"nORNEY5-AT.LAW
2J06COlUMBIA AVENUE
LANCASTER.'" 1160)
14. Admitted in part.
Denied in part.
It is
admitted that despite repeated demands, Defendant has not paid
Plaintiff subcontractor an amount of $63,769.00 in addition to
the $134,000.00 paid to Plaintiff pursuant to the written
contract.
Defendant denies that a balance of $33,919.00 is
remaining under the written contract and a balance of
$29,550.00 pursuant to the oral contract. By way of further
answer, Defendant incorporates herein its answer stated in
paragraph 13 above.
15. Denied.
Plaintiff's
states
averment
a
conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading is required
and aaid averment is therefore denied. To the extent an answer
is required, Defendant denies that it "breached both the oral
and written contract by failing to perform its end of the
agreement by final payment, despite the fact that subcontractor
completed its work and fulfilled all of its obligations under
the agreement. II
By way of further answer, no oral contract
existed.
Further, contractor Defendant fully performed all
responsibilities it had pursuant to the contractua~ agreement
between the parties, including, but not limited to, making
payment to subcontractor Plaintiff.
WHEREFORE,
Defendant
Lobar
Associates,
Inc.
respectfully requests that this Honorable Court dismiss
Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice with Defendant's costs to
be paid by Plaintiff.
6
HARMON A DAVIES. P.C.
AnO.~EYS.AT.LAW
l)(J6 COLL-MIIA A"ENUl.
lA"'CASTEIl.'A 1760)
.'
COUNT I I
UNJUST ENRICHMENT/OUANTUM MERUIT
16. Answers to paragraphs 1 through 15 are
incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth at
length.
17. Denied. Defendant denies that additional work
as completed by the subcontractor was performed by the
subcontractor on the contractor's behalf to assist him in
completing the job.
By way of further answer, all work
performed by Plaintiff was pursuant to the plans and
specifications incorporated into the contract between the
parties.
18. Denied.
Contractor
denies
that
the
subcontractor completed all work as previously set forth in
paragraph 8, subparagraphs a-f.
By way of further answer,
Defendant incorporates herein its answers set forth in
paragraphs 8. a-f.
19. Admitted. By way of further answer, all monies
received by contractor by the owner for which subcontjractor was
entitled to was paid in full to subcontractor.
20. Denied. Defendant specifically denies that the
subcontractor performed all the additional work for a total
amount of $29,850.00 on the basis that no additional work
occurred on the proj ect .
Rather, all work performed by
Plaintiff on the project was pursuant to the contractual
agreement between the parties for which Plaintiff was fully
7
.'
paid.
As for subcontractor's averment that "it paid for
materials from its own funds as averred in paragraph 8 a
through f for the total amount of $29, B50. 00," Defendant denies
this
averment
on
the
basis
that,
after
reasonable
investigation, Defendant is witr.out sufficient information as
to affirm or deny said averment and it is therefore denied.
21. Denied.
Defendant's
averment
states
a
conclusion of law to which no responsive pleading ~s required.
To the extent an answer is required, Defendant denies that the
contractor was therefore unjustly enriched by the receipt of
the funds from the owner of the West Shore Country Club for
work and materials that were actually provided by the
subcontractor because Plaintiff was fully paid in accordance
with the terms of the subcontract for all work performed on the
project.
WHEREFORE, Defendant Lobar Associates, Inc. requests
that this Honorable Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with
prejudice with Defendant's costs to be paid by Plaintiff.
NEW MATTER
22. Defendant answering averments of paragraphs 1
through 21 are incorporated by reference as though fully set
forth herein.
23. Under Defendant's contract with the owner, all
of Defendant's work, which included all of Plaintiff's work
under the subcontract, was to be completed on or before January
HA.RMOS A DA.VIES, P.C.
"nORNEYS-At.UW
1:106 COLUMBIA "VENUE
LA~CASTE". PA 116(J)
B
, .
1, 1994. A true and correct copy of said contract is attached
hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference.
24. The requir.ement for Defendant's work and
therefore plaintiff's work, to be complete before January 1,
1994 was clearly specified in the plans, specifications, and
documents.
25. plaintiff knew, or should reasonably have known,
of the requirement that all work on the project be completed on
or before January 1, 1994.
26. Defendant, as general contractor, prepared a Job
Progress Schedule for the project. A true and correct copy of
said schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit
tiC" and
incorporated herein by reference.
27. Defendant provided a copy of said schedule to
Plaintiff.
28. plaintiff did not object to this schedule or
take exception to it.
29. From the beginning of its work on the project,
Plaintiff failed to provide an adequate number o~ properly
trained and qualified employees to perform its work on the
project.
30. From the beginning of its work on the project,
plaintiff failed to provide an adequate quantity of proper
equipment to perform its work on the project.
31. In a letter dated November 19, 1993, Defendant
notified Plaintiff of its failure to meet the schedule
I^RMO~ &; D^VIES. P.C.
.\nOR'EYS-AT.LAW
:\l~COL\.iMBIA AVENUE
'-...'C....STEll fA 1160)
9
requirements on the project. A true and correct copy of said
letter is attached hereto as Exhibit "D".
32. Throughout the course of the project, Plaintiff
consistently and persistently failed to meet the required
schedule.
33. As a direct and proximate result of Plaintiff's
failure to properly perform its work on the project in a good
and workmanlike manner, in accordance with its proposal, the
subcontract, applicable project plans, specifications, and
schedules, completion of the project was delayed from January
1, 1994 to April 15, 1994.
34. As ~direct and proximate result of said three
and one-half month delay, the work of Defendant and of other
subcontractors on the project was similarly delayed.
35. Under Defendant's contract with the owner,
Plaintiff was to complete its work in accordance with the plans
and specifications incorporated into its subcontract.
36. At the completion of plaintiff's work, the
architect noted that the water level of the pool w~s uneven,
which Defendant believes and therefore avers is a direct and
proximate result of Plaintiff's failure to properly perform its
work in a good and workmanlike manner.
37. Plaintiff's claims, which are specifically
denied by Defendant, are barred as a result of Plaintiff's
failure to timely raise said claims in accordance with the
contract requirements.
H^RMON & O^VIES. p,c,
....nORNEYs.AT.LAW
2.\06 COLUMBIA AVENUE
lA"C..\STER.'A 1760]
10
(D) Kilgore Signs - capac~ty 180 sign
Required By DER $ 26.50
(E) Procedures For operating And
Winterizing Pool $ 70.00
(F) Adjust & Install Screws In All
pool Returns, Pool Light work,
Secure In Niche, Install Screw
Lids In Wading Pool Skimmer Bits S 178.00
TOTAL $ 4,836.60
WHEREFORE,
Lobar Associates,
Inc.
respectfully
requests this Honorable Court to enter judgment upon Count I of
its Counterclaim in its favor and against Plaintiff in an
amount in excess of $4,836.60, together with costs and interest
as allowed by law.
COUNTERCLAIM
COUNT I I
42. Defendant
incorporates
its
averments
of
paragraphs 1 through 41 by reference as though fully set forth
herein.
43. As a direct and proximate result of the three
I
and one-half month delay caused by plaintiff, Defendant's
period of performance on the project was extended by three and
one-half months.
44. This three and one-half month extension caused
Defendant to expend a sum of $14,056.00 which is recoverable by
Defendant under the subcontract for extended project overhead,
project
management,
project
superintendence,
job
site
IARMON Ii DAVIES, P.C.
"nURSEys-....T.LAW
2\0& COLUMBIA AVENUE
I "~C"STER. PA m.O)
facilities. job site utilities, and to negotiate a contract
12
,I 'I
.~_.
t.,'
EXHIBIT "A"
;.
f
.'
,<
'J
;'tERTIFICAlt!)
.~UBSTANTJA
(OMPLETJO
,A,I,A, DOCUMENT G704
Pool I Bathhouse Construction
West Shore Country Club
100 Brentwater Road
Camp Hill, PA 17011
OWNER " 0
ARCHITECT 0
CONTRACTOR 0
FIELD 0
OTHER 0
,"-
,--"
ARCHITECT:
H. Edward Black & Assoclat
PROJECT:
(name, addrell)
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER:
CONTRACTOR': LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONTRACT FOR: General Construction
TO (Owner):
,'West Shore Country Club -,
100 Brentwater Road
Camp HIli, PA 17011
L J
DATE OF ISSUANCE: 13 April 199q
PROJECT OR DESICNA TED PORTION SHALL INCLUDE:
CONTRACT DATE: 16 July 199q
pool/Bathhouse Construction'
The Work p.rform.d under Ihis ContrlC! hIS b..n revi.w.d ,nd (ound to be substlntillly compl'le, The Olle 01 Sub'lln
Compl.tion o( the Projecl or porlion thereol design, led Ibov. is hereby estlblished IS
which is Ilso Ihe dlle 01 commencement 01 IppliClble wamnli.s required by ihe ConlrlC! Documents. exc.pt J\ SlJled b.l,
DEFINITION Of DATE Of SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION
,
The Dlte 01 Substan:ill Complelion of Ihe Work or design'l.d pOll ion Ihereo( is Ihe :JJle celli lied by the Archilecl w
cons,lruclion is sufficiently complete, in olccordolnce with the Conltac! Documents. so the Owner can occupy or ulilize
Work or desi&!,olled portion thOereol for the use for which it is intended. as expressed in the ConHar.t Documents.
A list 01 ilems 10 be completed or corrected. pr,pJled by the ConlllClor and verified Ind amended by the Archilect
allached herelo. The (ailure 10 include any ilemS on such lis I does not alter the responsibilil 01 the ContraClor to complele
work';n accordonce with lhe Contracl Documenls, The date o( commencement o( wa"anlie,' il son the allached lisl \
be the date o( final paymenl unlell olherwise agreed to in \ ilingr"\
H. Edward Black E Associates ( ~ ~,
ARCHITECT 0
The Conlnctor will complete or correctlhe Work on Ihe list 01 ilems atIached herelo within
from Ihe above Dale of Subslantial Complelion,
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONTRACTOR
~ ~
r-t?~.., [,,,,, _ .k,"'^~L'\.-'
BY
,"
The Owner JCCCPIS the \\'ork or desisnaled porllcn :~e~eof H n.:bIJ!'",lially complete Jnd will HH.:r:".e i:..:i1 ~o~~e~~lC:"'\ :!-e~
at l'imeAI on 1'-1.. A 1f41J A 1/, , = ~ _ Lf I" Ida
I'{p<t C;hnrp f:nllntry f:'"h 6iu",,,,, ~,. ,-,~ 11
OWNER Il't'" J DATE
The responsibilities o( the Owner and the Conlractor (or security, maintenance, heal, utili lies, damage to the W
and insurance shall be as (ollows:
lNole--Owntr's ~nd Conlfacto,', Itl,1 .nd lnruunc, counsel should delermine ;tnd tevicw insur.ll1ce requ;rrmrnu .nd cover'et; Conlfolc
sh.1I Jecura COnJtt1( 01 JU'~'r comp.ny, if ,lny.J
\"
AI~ DOCUMENT C704 . ClRTlflCATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMI1lETION . APRIL 197a (OITION . AlA-
~ 1978' THE AM(R',CAN 'NSTlTUT( Of ARtHIT(CTS, 17lS N(W YOU ^\'t. N,W,. W^SHINCTON. O,C. ~Door.
, .
J
. ", ~ . ..'
"
EXHIBIT "B"
)
,
""
"
'. r
\',
:il.r ,',
.-
~_' .1
i':'
~.
t
,"-';' "
. ,"
: >"<;:
. - "
a.:
~
, .
~~
--
ASSOCIATES
SllBCONTRACT
AGREEMENT BEnVEEN CONTRACTOR & SUBCONTRACTOR
SUBCONTRACT 113081-13152-S10
ACREEMEJ;T MADE AS OF TNE JRD DAY OF ACGUST I"~ THE YE.IR OF .~7~uu.V HUNDRED AND 9J.
......
BETWEEN THE CONTI/ACTOR,' LOBAR ASSOCH rES. /SC.
I OLD .ifIll ROAD
1'.0. BOX 4J2
DIU5BURG, PA 17019.(}.1J2
AND THE SUBCONTR.lCTOR: FRANCIS /lEISSE
421 N. I'ROGRESS Ave.
flAlUUSBURG, 1',1 17109
TELEI'HONE: (7/n S-IS-J.f27
W1TNESSEnJ, Tl/AT THE SUBCO.VT1UCTOR AND co~mCTOIf FOIf 11/E CONSmERAT70H flERlJHAFTEIl HM/ED AGREE AS
FOf.r.oWS:
ARTICLE I. THE SUBCO,YTR.1 CTOR .l GREES TO f7/R. \lSl/ IJJ.IJA 7DlUL A}O l'E1lFom AU. WOM AS OESClU BED IN .lRT7CU
a llEIlEf)F FOR:
NEW BATHHGUSE dl POOL CONSTRUCTION
WEST SHORE COUNTRY CLUB
CMII'RlLL, I'A
FOR LCILU/ ASSOQATES. I-"C, IN ,tCCORDANCZ ~TTIl TIiIS AGRCDJ!J{1', TTlE AGREEMENT BE:TWEEH THE O\'o'l>U &.
CONTRACTOR. &. ".. .iCCORD,LVCZ \'oml mE CE.VER.tJ. coloDmoNS Of' TTlE COHT7UCT. SUl'I'lLlJENT.lRY GENERAL
CONDmoNS. THE DRAp'7NGS. SI'EGnCmoNS. AJ,D ADO!MJ.i I'KU.IRED.T H. EDWARD BUCK dl ASSOCIATES
lIEWHAFTEIl CALlLD TNE .lRCHInCT OR 0 W1>U'S A IIT1IO/llZED AGENT.IJJ. OF W1DClI DOCUN ENTS. SIGHED B T mE I' AKTlES
11IERETO OR fDENTTFTED BY THE .lRCFlTrrCT OR OW/.EA'S AIIT1IORIZEIJ AGENT. FOIlM A I'AKT OF A CONTllACT BEnI'EEH THE
COHT7UCTOR AND THE OW~U DATED /6 JULY 1991. d HERUY BECONEA I'AKTOFTH/S CO~77lACT, & flERlJNREFERRllJ
10 AS THE CONTllACT DOCUMENTS. " SFUU CE /.lADE A YAlLlBLE TO T7'lE SUBCOHT7l.lCTOR UI'ON filS REQ,lJEST I'RlOR TO AJ,D
ANYT7'\(E SUBSEQUEbr TO S/G.\7,vO T/ilS SUBCONf'R.'CT,
ARTICLE 11. mE SUB CO,',7R.i CTOll .~ THE CO:.Tit~C70R .teFa i1l.iT nlE )J.4TV'.LtLS ,.{.'.1J E.Q1.lInlF...\7 TO BE. fL'It'.7SR!:J
4c WORK TO BE I'E1lFORMED .IRE COMl'lLTE AS REQVI7<ED AND IN ST7UCT ACCORD,<NCZ IlTTllI'Ub'S. SI'EC1F7ClT70.vS.
M/ENDMEM'S. AND/OR ADDEI>DA &. AS FOlLOWS:
A. Al'I'UCABLE SECTIONS OF DIVISION I. GENERAL REQUIREJfENTS.
B. CONSTRUCTION OF SWIMMING AND WADING I'OOLS COJfI'LETE AS REQUiRED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH I'ENNSnVANIA STATE REGULATIONS AND ACCORDING TO I'UNS dl SI'ECIF1CATIONS
PROVIDED, AS AMENDED IN YOUR LEITER OF 29 Al'RiL 1991 AND UTER DELETION OF THE
HEATERS ON THE ORiGINAL SI'ECIFlCATlONS WHICH DECREASED THE I'RiCE FROM TRAT
SHOWN ON YOUR LEITER DATED 29 M'RiL /991 INCLUDING THE FOUOWTNG:
1. THE SWIMMING AND WADING I'OOLS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED EXACTLY AS SHOWN ON
&~m~ '
... I OLD MIll ROAD P.O. BOX 4J2
__ DIWBURG. I'ENNA 17019-04J2
=T. r7111 412-9nfl FA'(, (7/71 4J2.9Jfi2
,
','
"
',;: .
..
"
;~
:1
~
~
;,::.
~:
2
J. THE EQUIPMENT SPECIF1ED WILL BB CIUNGED AS roUOWS.. SFV 18-1&" HTRATB SAND
FILTER wrrHOUT AUTOMATIC BACKWASH. TWO OJ CHEMODATtt MODEL 400 CONTROllERS
AND FOUR (4) STENNER PUMI'S FOR tturOMATlC CHEMICAL CONTROL OF BOTH POOLS.
AurOMttTIC FILL FEATURE JW BEEN DELETED FROM ORIGINAL BID.
J. TWELVE (11) STAiNLESS STEEL RECESSED WAlL STEPS HAVE BEEN DELETED. THEY WUL
BE REI'U.CED BY BUILT-IN CERAMIC TILE STEI'S.
4. FlOW CONTROL VALVES EtA 'IE BEEN DELETED.
S. WHEN SITE WORK I.E. EXCAVATION, UNDER.DWNS, AND STONE ARE COMI'LETE, YOUR
FIR,\( Will INSTALL AND TEST ALL 1'I1'ES WHICH WILL BE I'VC SCHEDULE 40 AND SIZED I,V
ACCORDANCE wml BLUEl'RI.m . ESTI.IfATED TI.lfE ONE (l) WEEK.
6. WHILE TlfE WOOD FOR.IIS FOR Tf/E I'OOL wALlS ARE BEING INSTAlLED BY OTHERS. YOUR
FIR.1f Will CO.lf.IIESCE INST.WJNG UBAll. 14 RODS O.V 12. CENTERS, BOTlf WAYS. OVER
WALlS AND FlOOR OF THE S\\'/J/JIISG I'OOL GR.,WE 60 STEEL Will BE USED. WHEN
STEEL r.vSTAlLHIO.V IS COJ/fLETE. TlfE fOOL FlOOR 11'/ll BE I.'ISTALLED.'ESTWATED
T/.IIE Tl/REE (3) !\'EEKS, ' '
1. SHOTCRETE-CUSITE SI\'/,\IJIISG fOOL w.vJ.S ,~SD GtnTER WIU BE INSTAU.ED .
EST/.IIA TED nilE T',\'O OJ \\'EE!iS,
&. WADING POOL RO~'GII STR~'CnRE WILL BE INST.tiLED - ESTI.\/ATED T/J/E ONE (1) WEEK.
9. TILE WILL BE INSTAlLED ASD fOOLS fL-lSTERED - ESTI.IIATED TI.IIE nl'O m WEEKS.
SfECIAL REOUIRE,I/E,WS:
J. DUE TO fOSSIBLE CO,I/JIUSICATIO.V CONFUCTS, TFlE OWNER & LOBAR ASSOCIATES, ISC.
REQUIRE THAT ALL CORRESfONDESCE. WRmEN.l: ~'ERB.-lL, FRO,II SUBCONTRACTORS &
ltlATERIAL SUffUERS BE DIRECTED TIIROCGIl LOBAR ASSOCIA TES. ISC. 1.'1 UEU OF DIRECT
CORRESI'ONDENCE WITH TIlE OI\'SE.~ .l: fROJECT ESGINEERS/ARCI/ITECT. IN ADDITION, ALL
CUJUFlCATIONS SHOULD BE FOR\\'.JJWED TO LOBAR ASSOCI.HES, ISC. VIA FAX OR AWL IN
UEU OF VERBAL COJ/JIUNlCA TlON.
2. FIELD MEASUREMENTS & VERIFICATION ARE TFlE RESI'ONSIBIUTY OF TliIS SUBCONTFUCTOR.
REVIEW OF SITE AND FOUND.UION CONDITlOSS IS A REQUIRE.IIE.\T FOR TFIIS CO.\T1UCT.
J. HA VE ltlATERIALS DEUYERED II'F/E,V REQUIRED. NO STOR.~GE IS A VAiU!JLE ON JOBSITE . IF
DEUYERY IS MANDATORY fRIOR TO INSTAlLUION, TlfIS SUBCO.\T1UCTOR wru HAVE TO
/'ROVIDE REQUIRED STORAGE FACIUTIES. fHASED /'ROJECTS SF/OULD HA VE JlATERIALS
SR1I'l'ED IN I'IWES usLESS STOR.~GE IS /'R0~7DED.
4. I'ROTECTlON OF MATERIALS UNTIL OIVNER-ARCHITECT ACCEPTANCE.
S. MATERIAL SAnrrT DATA SHEETS ..vIE A REQUIRE.lfE.\T FOR TFIIS /'ROJEd & .IfUST BE
SUBMmED wrrHIN FOURTEEN (U) D.4YS OF THE SUBCONTRACT DATE AND fRIOR TO
MATERIALS AlUUVlNG ON TlfE JOBSITE.
6. SUBMISSION OF OfERATIO.'l .l: ,I/Al,\TEN.....'.CE J/....."UALS TO BE .IIADE .....ITH IN/TlAL
SUBJ/m,ill.
1. BY EXECUTIO.'l OF TIllS S~'BCOSTRACT ,~GREEJ/E.'T, )'OUR FIR-II AGREES THAT IT \nu
STRICTLY COMPLY WITII ALL OSIIA REGULA TIONS AND .liS OS REQUIRE.IIENTS ON THIS I'ROJECT.
IT IS ALSO THE RESI'ONSIBIUTY OF rOUR PERSONNEL TO FOUDW ANY INSTRUCTIONS OR
DlREC17YES GIVEN BY OUR fROJECT SUPERINTENDENT, STEVE DfILER, REGARDING SAFETY ON
THE I'ROJECT. IL\'Y FINES ISSUED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES. INC. AS A RESULT OF YOUR FIRM'S
NEGUGENCE O~ NON-CO.\II'UANCE WIlL BE THE RESI'ONSIBIUTY OF YOUR FIRM. THE
SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESI'ONSIBLE FOR ALL OSHA REGlJUTIONS INCLUDING VERIFIED SAFETY
CONDITIONS OF OTHER TRADES.
8. THIS /'ROJECT HAS A FIRM COMI'LETION DATE OF.AS I'ER ATtACHED SCHEDULE WITH NO TIME
Ex:tENSIONS l'ERMmED. ALL MATERlALS AND WORK SCHEDULES MUST BE COORDINATED
VERY aosELr WITH OUR I'ROJECT SUI'ERINTENDENT, STEVE DlUER, ttT THE SITE TO !tIEET
THE REQUIRED COMI'LETION DATE. DAY TO Dttr SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENTS Bf THIS
'.
,.
,'-
J.
SUBCONTRACTOR ARE A REQUIREMENT BYTHlS SUBCONTRACTOR TOACCOMMODATS V..uuOUS
PROJECT INTANGIBLES (WEATHER, ETC.) TO &WNTAlN THE nNAL COMPLETION DATE.
MULTII'LE SHIFTS" OVERT1ME ARE A REQUIREMENT OFTR/S PROJECT AS NECESSARY TO MEET
SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS AND/OR LOBAR ASSOCIATES' SUI'ERlNTENDENT'S INSTRUCTIONS.
9. DAlLY REMOVAL .. DISfOSAL OF REUTED DEBRIS OFF S"E.
10. fRO VIDE SUFFICIENT SUfERVlSION Jc MANPOWER FOR SCHEDUUNG. RECEIV1NG, UNLOADING.
" DISTRiBUTION OF ALL MATERlAL DEUVERlES.
11. ALL TESTING AND SUBMISSION OF REfORTS ARE A REQUlRE.lIENT OF THIS SUBCONTRACT TO
ASSURE QUALITY OF INSTAlLITIOSS.
J1. ALL UYOUT Jc COORDINATION COSTS ASSOCIATED wrrll THIS SUBCONTRACT ARE A
SUBCONTRACT REQUlRE.l/n7.
JJ. ALL SUBCONTRACTORS .IfUST p,aT/CIP.HE IN A J.II0UR WEEKLY JOBSrrE CLEAN. UP EACff
FRlDM.
ARTICLE /II. 7:,1/1: IS Of mE !SSI:SCI: ,t'.v T:i! !t'BCO,'711.iCTOR .jCREES TO COJ/J/ESCE A.'D TO COJ/PLEn: mE 'N01lX
.U O!SCRJBD 1,0; ,unCLE 1/ ,is fOUOWS:
A. ALl. WO!!X TO SE PE-VOR.IIUJ IS S77UCT .tCCCRIJ.i,W::E ~1T/f LO!.lR ,iSSOClA n:s. ISC, PROGRESS SCI/EDUU ~
DI/lEC110SS, NON.COMPUlNCE "TT1/ LO!.U,iSSOa..T!S.INC, PROGRESS SCI/EDULE.L'DIOR INS71WCTlONS J/,j Y RESULT
IN n:Jl.'1I.'iAno.'J OF mJS .jC/lED/E-'T ,..'D,O,~ 5.1C.( CI/.UCES, .INY PE}W,TlES OR DAl.IACES ,USESSED TO L05.U
MSOClA n:s. INC. AS A RESULT OF THIS SI:KO,'7ltlcroR "7U Sf: T1iE RESPONSISIUTY OF T1iJS SUSCO,'TR.lCTOR,
B. COMPU710N O.H~ fOR T1iJS PROJECT IS '.-lS PER ,~TTACHED SCHEDULE "TT1/ UQUIO,lTW OAl.LlCES OF ..
PElI O.LESD,U O,j r. .I.W UQUID,lTW Ot'l,ICES ,iSS!SSD TO LOBAlI .ISSOC1.l1!S. ISC, .jS A RESULT OF THIS
SUBCO"7ltlCTOR 1l1U SI: mE RESPO."SISIUTY OF TIiIS SC/SCO,'T:/..CTOR.
"AS ASSESSED.
NO TINE EXn:SSION OF T1iJS COSntl CT 1l7ll. BE !/ECOCSfUD 1lTT1/0UT T1iE ..Io1vmN CONSENT OF mE CO~TR.j CTOR \loWCH
CONSENT SI/.jll. HOT BE "TT1/J/Ell) U.'7/E.HO.'l.lSLY CONSISTE.'T ~TT1/ ARncu: .Y-IOF rms CONTRACT. SUBJECT TO mE
AJIMTIfAT10N PROVISIONS I/EJ1EJN PRO HOD,
ARTICLE N. mE CO~71UCTOR ,jCRLES TO P,IY T1iE SUBCONI1UCTOR FOR mE PEllFORMANCE OF TfUS wo/uc TIlE
FOUO\lo1NG SUM: ONE HUNDRED SIXTY. FOUR TII0USAND, FOUR HUNDRED. NINETEEN DOlL-tRS
($J64,419.00) . IN CURRE-'T ro,\DS, SU&1ECT TO .womo,'s AND Dt:DUCTlONS FOR CHANGES AS MAY BE ACIlLED UPON IN
\lo7llT1NG. ~ TO JUKE MONTIILY P,IIME-'7S ON .ICCOU,'T rHE/lLOF IN ACCORDANCE Vorm AIl71CU: .Y. SEC110NS :w.2J
INCLUSIVE.
"
... MONTI/LY PROGRESS P,HME.'T co.\DmO,\S. r..o c1) COP/E.S ro LOBAR ASSOClATEr. IHe. OfflCE fy:am OF EACH
MOImI, PAIME.'T OF T1iJS 1",,'OICE ro BE ,IS fOlLOWS:
NETUSS ID'I IlETAlN.WE \lo1U Be I'.l1D JD/4S O,lIS SU&1ECT TOARCmn:CT.E.'lGINUJlJOWNEJl APPROVAL 4. /lECEJPT OF
I'AYME/oT BY LOBAR ASSOClAn:s. INC. fOR WOIlX COMPlETED ON T1iJS SUBCONTIUCT. .YO 0TTlEJ/ C/LUlGES SUCH AS
1Nn:llLST. C'JUl17NG CHAlICES. 7:1.=. ITC, ~7ll. BE HONO/lED UI>USS INDICATED OTTlEJ/\lo1SE OR AS AG/lEllJ TO SY
BOnt 1'.{lH7E.S /.V "'F./TTSG. R-ry,lJS.~CE TO BE F..ll...Z.-tS!IJ t'PO,VAPPROV,iL FROM .tRClUTEL7.-L"V OWl't'Ut. .t,\V p,ECEJPT
OF MATEJU.-tL .i L.fBOR PROOF OF P.1f"C.7 F:' '"1S!S. ,J,JO....Trl P.O"J,f!"\7 ,iPfUCinOb-S TO BE SL'B.\IfTiT....D O,Y.ili
OOCUME-'7S G7U2 4. C7DJ OR EQUAL fOR.'1 SHO~7SG PEIlcrl>T COMPU:TW EACH MONm.
NO PARTLtL OR f1NAL PAYME-1fT! ....1ll. BE 1.U.De ~TT1/0UT PROOF OF .II.H'UlLU- l'.jYMENTS UNLESS SPEalL
ARIIANGE.'1ENTS AilE MADe Vom/ LOBAR ,lssocun:s.INC.
;:
IF SUBCONTRACTOR FAlLS TO IoIE...'7 TIlE SUBCO~71UCT /lEQUIREMENTS..tLL PAYMENTS DUE INaUOINO OUTrrANDING
SEPARAn: ORDERS MAY BE HELD UNTl!. CORlUC11YE ACTlO,"S ARE TAJr:EN.
ARTICLE V. f1NAL I'AYMENT S/lAU BE DUE ll'/iEN WOIlX OESC1lIBW IN T1iJS COImfACT IS FUllY COMI'u:n:D AND
PERFO/WW INACCORDANCE....7TH TIlE COifTllACT DOCUM~. 4. I'AYMENTTO BI:: CONSlSTENTVfTT1lAR11aJ! N 4.AR11CU:
X. SEC110NS 18. 2/}'2J INa.USlVE OF TfUS CONTRACT.
BUOIl4 ISSUANCE OF ANY PAYMENT. mE SUBCO/o71lACTOR. IF /lEQr/IRED, S/lAU SU8M" EY/DENCI! .tH7SFAcroRY TO THE
COlmfAcroR Tl/AT.tLL I'A rxous. MATERlAL BIUS. "ALl. JOKJ>VH I~DUTEDN!SS CO~CTED WTT1l THE SU'CONTRAcroR'S
"
.
1
. .
"
~
PloU RA\II' ILLY.tl17SFlED.
ARTICU Y7. pERFOlllJ.llo'C!.i PAI7J!NT 10/0'01.
(NI"') SUBMrr A PAYMENT .i PERFORMANCE BOND.
ARTICU Y71. n:JJPOIWIY srrE FACUJT1ES.
.l. 11/11 I/JBCONTR.lCTOIl S/LILL nOV/DE.lLL Tl.IJPOIWIY srrE FACTUTlES.lS /!EQUlRED 01l.lS lo1:ClSS.lIIY ro PERFOIlJJ
HlI PlOU
I. OURlS IlELHUJ TO PI.> WOfU( l,vaUOED I.Y T1i1S SUBCONTR.lCT SII.lLL BE /lEMOVED Jo DISPOSED OF BY mls
SUBCONTR.lCTOIl, /lICK C/LlllGES S/LlLL BE M,11)! FOil SO,V.CO.llPUiNCE.
.~RTICLE VIII. I-"St'Il'SC!
U.'USS OTHEJlI\7S! PR0I7DED HE.W.'I. mE SUBCOYlR.'L70,~ S/LlLL /LiVE ,. OIIlLCT UUI/rrt FOR mE .im OF IUS
E-VPUJYE.!S " .iG!.\TS fOil I4'HICH .l.f1:.' IS UG.t1.Ly .P.LSI'G....5IEL!, .t....D mE SUBCO/,,77ttCTOR SH.A.LL. ....OT BE UQI.JIRLD TO
.HSU/oIE mE UUIUTY FOR mE ,.m OF ,'.W OTH!J!S,
PRiOR roST.urn.'t'G ....ORK. mE !SSl',r1...tSC! R..EQf;/R.!1J irJ BE Ft'R..'.1SHllJ SH.t11. BE OBTA.JbW FROM.f R..!JPO....SIBL! CO.l"JP........y
all COMP...\7ES TO fRO\;;:E nOfi:'~ ., ,tD!Qt".11: CO\~~tC! .. .tWSF.tCTORY E:YIO!l>'C! 1\7LL B! FUIlMSI/LD ro TIlE
Co...77ttCTOR mtT rr:..5 st'SCO."i~1'..H..7VR !l.tS CO.\lPUW a.rm TH.E UQU1!tE.'JElwTS.U STATW /,,,/ nus SECTION.
,I. PROVIDE nro m /....SUR..I.\'CE CERT/FlCHES /N ACCORDANCE wa/{ PROJECT J.YSURANCE
REQV1RE.lfE.\TS. CERTlFlC.~ TES ,lfUST BE Sl'B,lImED PRiOR TO COJ/.I/ENC/....G Iva/{ ANY WORK.
ARTICLE IX. JOB Co,'.vr,;OSS
(X) ,I CO.lfPLETE UST OF ,~U .1/.HERi.-lL SUffUERS &. SECOND TIER SUBCONTRACTOR.S IYTT/{
THEIR ADDRESSES ..!ND TELEPHOSE SUMBERS MUST BE SUBMmED TO WBAR
ASSOCIATES. /SC. WITFl/N FIFTEEN (/5) D,\I'S FROM DATE OF SIGNING OF AGREEMENT BY
SUBCONTRACTOR.
(X) COST BREAKDOWN FOR L-lBOR &. .1f.HERHI. .lfUST BE SUBJ(fTTED TO WBAR ASSOClATES.
INC. WITHI.V FIFTEEN (IS) OMS FROJ( DATE OF SIGNING OF ACREEJ(Etvr BY
SUBCONTRACTOR.
() SUBJ/rr P.HROU REPORTS WITHIN Sn'EN (7) DAYS WEEK.EIVDISG TO TH/S OFFICE.
JIONTHLY PAI'.IfE.\7 EST/.I/.UES C'u\'SOT BEMPROVED WIT/{OUT PAYROUREPORTS BE/NG
SUBMfTTED. I
(.'{) PROHDE TEN (10) COPlES OF ,IU SUB.I(fTT.-lL DATA EXACTLY AS REQUIRED I,'{
SPEC/FlCATIONS NO LUER T/{AN 10 AUGUST 1991. YOUR FIRM MAY Bb.' flEW UABLE FOR
DEUY COSTS IF SUBMITTALS ,IRE SOT .HADE AS REQUIRED AND WITmN TlfE REQUESTED
TWE FR.-lHE.
(X) E.E.O. ~ AFFIRJI.Hl\'E ACTIO'" ,IRE ,~ I'.J.RT OF TiffS SUBCO....7RACT, EXECUTE ,~SO
REn'R.V CERTIFiCATION Il'/TIf COSTlUCT,
(X) ALL WORK TO BE PERFOR.\(ED IN STRiCT ACCORDANCE WITH WBAR ASSOClATES. /NC.
SAFETY PROGRA.lI.
( ) USE OF FOREIGN STEEl. &. A.LU.lflSU.\( PRODUCTS IS PROHIBITED ON TmS PROJECT.
ARTICLE X. IN .<DOmON ro mE FO/!EGOI.YO PROm/ONS TIlE p.lllnES ALSO AG!ll:E T1l.l T mE SUBCONTIUCTOR S/LILL'
I. IE BOUND ro 71/E COhTRACTOR BY71/E TEJWSOF mE CO.YTl!.lCTOOCUMENTS Jo11/lSAGIlEEMENT. "ASSUME TOW.lJU)
71/E CONTIUCTOR.lLL TIlE OBUG.lnONS Jo/lESPO/'o'S/BIImES T1l.lTTIlE COlflT<<CTOR. IY mOSE OOClJM!I>TS ASSUMES
TOWARD mE OWh'!JI..lS .lPPUCABLE. ro T1IJI SUBCOlflT<<CT.
1. SVBJJrrTO THE CO.YTl!.lCTOIl.lP/'UCAnoNS FOil PAYM!NTATSUCR nMES m/'lIU TED IN.lll17CU N SO.lS TO ENABLE
71/E CONTIUCTOR ro .lPny FOil PAY!JE.M'. IF PAYMENTS .lJlE /JADI! ON V.lLUAnONS OF WOU DONE. 71/E
SUICONTIUCTOR SII.lLL. BUOIlE 71/E FIRST .lPPUCmON. SVBJJrrro T7/I! CON11lACTOIf A SCHEDULE OF VALUES OF
:' .
)
,~.
('
!,
I
'.
:~ .
"
~~.
.'
;
. .
','
,'-
I
17lZ V,wOUS I'AIfn Of THE WO/lX. AGGUCUnW TIlE TOW. AS IlE(JUlRED BY THE OWNER. AND. II' IlE(JUlIlED.
SVPfOlITED BY SUCR EVIDeNCE AS TO m roWCTloW AS THE CONT1lACTOIlIolAY DWCT. mIS SCREDIIU. R'HEN
gpr.OVED BY TIlE CONT1lACTOIl. SRALL U USLDASA "ISIS fOil CZK1UICATES FOil PAYMENT. UMLSS rr BE FOUMJ TO
U IN WOII. II/ AI'1LYlHO FOIlI'AYMEJff. THE SUsCO"TR.ICTOIl S/W.L SUBNrr A rrATENEJff lIASW UPON T1/JS
SCREDUIL 11' I'AYMENTS ARE .lJAD! ONACCOU!{'(OF!JArotlALS HOT INCOlll'OllATED II/THE WO/lX BIIT DElIVEJ!ED
AND surrAsLY STORED AT THE sm. OR AT SO!,,! OT//!J/ LaCmON AGREED UI'ON IN R'RlTIHO. SUCH PAYMENTS SRALL
U IN ACCORDAJlCE wrm THE n:JWS " co"vmoNS OF THE CO.'fl7l.lCT DOCUMENTS.
J. PAY FOR ALL MA TU/LiLS " LISOR USED III, OR III CONlorC710N 'oITT1{. THE PEJ1FORMlJlCE OF 11US CONT1lACT. T1lROUGR
77/l: PWOO COVERED BY PW70US 1'.1l?J!STS RECUoW fROM THE CON1Tl.tCTOR "FVRMSH SA nSFACTORY EYTDeNCE
'111lEH UQtlt:STrD SY TIlE COI.TR.fCTOR. ro IV1JFr CO'\"ULYCE 'oITT1{ THE .IBO\'!: REQUI/lE.\IENTS.
(9 !JAKE ALL CL<I.IIS fOR fXI7l,lS. fOR D;n:MIO.\S Of ;1,IIE. " FOR D.W.'G! FOR DU.. rs OR OTIIUW/SE. PROMmy TO
77/l: CO"'TR..CTOR CONSIsn:.vr \lml nIE CO.\TR..cr DOc-V,IIE.'oTS.
J. TAKE ,\rass..IIY I'REClU11011 TO PROPEllLY PRon:cr nIE F1MSl/ED WORK OF 0T/iEJ! l7UDt:S.
6. mP nI! SUIWING " PRE.\IISt:S aL.N ..T ,<11. nllES OF DUIIIS ,lIUSING OIlT OF THE OP!II.lnOtl OF TIiIS
SUSCO,\T.l.lCT. nIE SL'SCO.\TR..CTOR SIl<l1. NOT EE IiUD =PONSISLE FOR UNaLlN co...vmONS CAUSED SYOTllEJ!
CO...77I..crORS OR St'SCON1Tl..C7CJRJ. U,'.lLSS OmE.l\llU fROl7DED FOil. , ' -' '
1. COMny HTT1{ ..ll ST.. TV71JRY ,'.\VIOR CO.\T.l.KTTl,tL lvrrY REQUIRE.\IE.\7S ..PfLll.'IG TO HIS WORX.."V/OR 1,\mHW
SY mE CO.\T.l..crOR. ,.,\'0 SIl<lL F.I:PORT 'oITTltI.~ T1iM.!: Ii) D,.rs ,0 mE CO,\T.l.f070R ......Y INJURY ro THE
SUSCO-'T.l.<CTOR'S E.IIPLOlUS ,. T nlE SIn: OF THE P.lOJ!07.
1IA. NOT ,lSSIG.Y TIiIS SU5CO...77I..07 OR ,.NY ,cIIOU,\71 DL'E OR ro 8ECOME DU! TIiE/lEU,\VU \lTT1{OUT mE \I=Y
CONSE.\T OF mE CO.\TR..CTO.'1.
8B. NOR SU3CO.\TR.'cr m! WHOLE OF nus SUSCO,\711.fcr 'oImlOUT nIE \I=Y CONSE.\T OF nI! CO,\77I.'070R,
8C. I/OR FURnIEJl SU8CO...77I..cr l'<JImo.\S OF nllS SUBCO,\711.'cr \lmlOu7 \l1UITES sonF1C<Tl0,YTO THE CO.\TR..c"';'OR
W/lE.'/ SL'CII SOnF1CA nON IS UQUf.STT..D BY THE co,\n. croll.
9. GUAIt.NTU IUS wO/lX ,'G.l/SST.<I1. DUEm OF ,II,' TE.U<IJ ...\VIOR WORXM.<NSIUP .<S C<11LD FOR IN nIE 1'L..\s.
sp!QF1CmONS, ".<DDE.\VA. OR IF ,W) CU.LU\7EE IS C<UllJ FOR. nlE.Y FOR ,. I'U/JOD OF 0...1: iI) l!.tII fROIo/ THE
DATES OF I',tllnu. OR TOT.<1. .<ccrn:L\'CE OF mE SU8COHTR,fC7CJR'S \I'ORX SY mE 0'01''''1:1/,
lOA. W S!P.tll.f n: UbVEIIST...\VING OR AGREE.IIE.\71 OF .1.\1' Kl.\V 'oIlll BE E.\= 1.\1'0 SY THE SUSCO.\77I..070R " TPoE
OW"'1:R .....VIOR IUS .tIICIlfTE07 OF ,.GE.\71 uv.mr ro ,1.\1' OIllGIIW. OR E:\77I.' WO/lX CO.\TE.III'L'TED BY TPJS
AGREE.IIE.\T UM.ESS ilIE S.LIIE IS nRST .<I'nOIU IS '.,r.;,',t,; BY CO.\77I.'C7CJ1l.
JOB. SUSCON/7/..CTOR S/l.tLL INSURE m.T ALL SUBCO-'711.lcroRS. E.\II'LOIUS. " sunULU. .tT.tLL IDIt:S..<P.E 1',<1:) ,tLL
AMOUh7S DUE IN com.1:rnON \lTT1{ mE I'EnOR.II.LYCE OF T1f}S SU8CO...77I.KT. .<F7EJ! mE F1RST I'Al'.\IE.\T
. /lEJI.EU.\VEJ/. COIf17lAC71J1I SR.tLL IUY!: mE IUGIfT ro 'TT1/HOLD...\'Y SUBJ.E.QUEbT I'.<YME.'oTS UlmL SUBCO...TR.'C71JR
SUSNm E\7DENCE SA T1SFACTOIIY ro co...n'CTOII m.T A1.L.LIIOU.\7S 0\11:0 IN CO.\.,.rC710N "'7TH PEJ/FOIl.\I.<Na: OF
T1/JS SUSCOIfl1tlO7I/.< I'!: BELY 1'.<lD. F!JIm{E.'l. SUBCO,\TR..CTOR AGREES mlT CON1Tl..crOR .II..y p,<y ,tLL I'EJ1JOSS
'PffllCH /1.<11: NOT BELY I'.<lD TIlE 1o/0,\1ES Dt'E TP.LII IVCO,\'IorC71011 'oIml T1iJS SUSCO.\TR.I07 Il'IIl:T1IEJl OR NOT.. UE.Y
I/.<S 8U'/ F1t.ED, " SUSCONTltlCTOR SR.<LL. ro mE =\1' mtT CO.\TR..C71JR IL'S SOT UCOVERED S.<lD .WOUbTS
PURSU.<bT ro 'oITT1/HOLDIW. I'AY S.<lD ,WOUb71 ro CO.\TR.'CTOR UPON OE.lJ.lbV. SU8CO...11t<C71JR S/!.fU..<LSO
INNEDL.TELY REJ.IISURSE co.\11t<CTOR FGR .1.\1' .wOU"'71 P,IJ[) U.\VU CON1Tl..C71JR'S P.' 110lENT SO,\V INCONnrrnON
WTl7l T1iJS SU8CO.\TR.1'7 " 1,\VE.IIMF1ED BY CO.Y71lKroll. IN mE ETE.\T cONnucroR IS REQUIRllJ TO I',<y OR
I"VDJI>1Fr.''''Y fEJ1JONS /lEJl.EU,'VEJ/. sUBco-'nICTOR SIL<I1. /NIo/EDUTELY REJ.II8URJE mE co,\n'070R FOR mE
fl/U COSTT1IE.'lEf)F.lNaUOII.o .ITTORSIT'S r= I
Joe. SHOUUJ SUBco...n.CTOR .IT.U.'Y IDlE F,<lL ro SUpI'LY.' stm=\7,\V/oIBll/ OF S1:IUED 1l'01l.0IE.YORA SUmaE.\T
(JUANTTT'I OF M..rotlALS OF PIIOPEA QU.<LITY. 011 FAlL I,Y.<b1' RES.n07 TO PIIOSECUT1: mE WO/lX COVERllJ SY TIiIS
SUSCO.'TR.'C71J1I WTT1I PIIOIo//'Th'ESS" DIUGE.YCE. OR FAlL IN 17lE I'EJ1FOIl.'/ANCE OF A:vY OF 17lE AGREE.\lI:/o7S IlL'WN
CO...T.<l...W. OR SIIOUUJ.u.'Y WORJ::.IIE.Y FEJ/FOR.IIING 1l'0/lX CO\V.ED SY T1US SUSCObTR.lcr !:JIGAGE)N A S11UIJ: OR
OT1iLR WORK STOfP.~CE. OR a.HE TO '\i'CR.( DUE ro flCFI77."K1 OR OT7iill SUCH .-'lC7THn'. CO."TR...C70R M,a J,Y ,'4,\'Y
OF SVCJ/ !TE-',jj, ,iT m orne..... ',io7;::'Ct:r Ff..J:';;:C! ~J.~ ',)' o-:::r.s f:!.~/r.:JlES IT \/.i r }{i~'E. .t.trr'J? rORIT.!}Ch7 /4.')
HOURS "1lJTTE..'Y ,'r'onCE. TO JU5CO.'.TI\.H..---;'Ci? fKOi7:! .\."1' Sl.:CU LiSCR ,...'.V .H.iT:.F.L{JJ ....'rD DEDUCT THE COST
T1/El1E0, fROM A"''Y .\I0Mt:S T1lLY DUE OR nIEJlE.<FTE.~ ro 8E:C0!lE DUE SUSCO...T1U070R: A"'V FVRTIIEJ!. IN.u.'Y OF
SUCH EVE.\7S. COIfl1tlC71JR IolAY AT m 01'710N. "TT1/0UT I'/lEJUDICE TO ANY OTllEJ! /lE.\IEDIt:S rr IolAY I/.<Y!:.
TEJ/MIN.<TE THE E.lIpLOl?lI:/oT OF SU8CO,\n.CTOR'S nR.\I FOR THE WORX U,\VEJ/ T11JS SUSCONT1lA07" SHALL 1/.<\1:
THE IIIGIfT ro ENTEJl UPON mE fRE.IIISES ,'.\'0 r.11I POSSESSION. FOR THE PUll/'OSE OF COMPlETIHO THE WO/lX
HE/lEU"'VEJ/. OF.tLL mE !JA TERl..IS. TOOlS. " EQtqF.IIt:.\T TIiE/lEOII. .r. TO F1MSH THE WO/lX " PROVIDE mE
MATE/I1Al.S T/IEJlUOIlE EJTTIEJ/ \lTT1{ m OIl'N E.\lI'WIUS 011 0T/iEJ! SU8COhT1UC71JRS: .<bOO IN CASE OF SUCR
DISCONTl,\VANCE OF THE E.IIPLOllolI:/oT SY CO,\TR.fcroR. SUSCON1Tl.tCTOR SIUU. NOT BE!:NTT1l.ED ro RECEIVE: ANY
FTJTIT1{EJl fA 110lENTS U.\VEJ/ THE SUSCo...11t<cr OR 0T//!J/'oI1SE. SlIT SIUU. NEVEK11lEUSS REMAIN UlBU: fOil ANY
DAMAGt:S WHICH CON1Tl..CTOIIINCURS: IF mE D:l'ESSES INCUIUIED BY T1lE CONTTlACTOR IN COIo/PlETING TRE IVO/lX
S/W.L EXCEED THE UN1'.<lD BAL<NCE. SUSCO,\11t<croR SIWl. PA Y mE DIFF1:IIENCE ro THE CONT1lAC71JR ALOW wrm
ANfOT/iEJ! DMtAGt:S INCUIll1ED BY CONT1lACTOR.<S TIlE RESULTOF SUBCONT1lACTOR'S DUAULT. CONT1lACTOIl SIUU.
RAYIr A UOI UPON ALL MArotlALS. TOOlS. "Al'PUAlICES TAICEN POSSESSION OF ro SECURE THE I'AYMOIT THE/lEOf.
SUBCONT1lACTOII SRALL HE Ul8U: TO COIf17lACTOII DU! TO THE fAILURE OF SUBCONT1lA'WR'S PEJ1FOIWAJlCE.
.'
. .
. .
, .
"
"
.
'.
l.
SU'COfolT/lACTOR'S FAlLURE ro aLl' l7lE fRoaM.SS OF m WORK UI' ro 71lAT 0' COfolT/lACT 0' 017Wf T1UDl:S. OR
. l7lE FAlLURE ro EXECU71: m WORK AS DlRECTW 'Y CONTTIACTOR.
lDO. SU'COfolT/lACTOR AGREES 71lAT WREN l1Il: COfolT/lACT DOCllNENTS. SI'EaFlCmOJolS, OR DRAWINGS RE(}.U1RE.
SU'COfolT/lACTOR \l7lL COMPLY WT77l ANY ""fUCIBLE .!TAT!: OR FEDERAL PREVAJUNG WAGE LAW AS WUL AS ANY
RUlLS OR REGUUTlOJolS PROMULGATED mEREUfoIDEJ/. l7lE SUBCONTTIACTOR AGREES ro COMPLY wrm ALL SUCll
1UMS do CONTJmoJolS WIUCR AM .iPPUCUU ro TIOS SUBCOfolT/lACT AND ro INTJEMMFY do ROLD TIll: CONTTIACTOR
fl,W./LESS FOR ANY FA/WIlE ro COMPLY \lTTR SUCH CONTJmoJolS.
lOE. .fU'COfolT/lACTOR \l7LL IW1: AC11IAL RESpONSIBIlITY FOR COMPLYING WT77lmE .!TANDARDS SET FORTR IN mE RUlLS
.. REGUl.mONS PROMULGATED PURSUANTro mE CONST1/UCT10N SAFf:TY ACT(40 U,S.C. Jl7} do OTRER OSHA RELlTW
PROVISIONS TO mE EXTf,Xy,.PfUCABc:E ro mE SUBCONTlt.CTOR'S PORTION OF mE WORK do SUBCONTRACTOR SHAU
IfoIDEN MFY A"V .tH?: mE CONTlt. CTOR HAR!JWS IN CONl<'E CT10N 11/EREWTT1f FROM ANY AND ALL DA.IIAGE INa.UOING
A ITOR.'n"S fUS. CO.!T OF comCTT\1: A enol'. f1N'ES. ETC.
II. AND OOU HEREBY AGRE.'E m.T mE CONTlt,CTOR'S EQU/PME.'T \l7LL BE ..VAlLlBc:E ro mE SUBCONTllACTOR O"tY.tT
mE CO,\TRACTOR'S OISCRETlON.i ON M/JTl/ALLY SATlSF.iC70RY T'EJ/.l/S.
11. f1/RMSH PWODIC PROGRESS REPORTS OF 11IE WO/lX AS MU7V,tUY ,<GREED INa.UDINO mE PROGRESS OF MAT'ERlALS
OR EQUIPM!1oT U"VEl! mls ,.GRELl/EsT m<TM,'Y BE IN 11/E COURSE OF PREPAJlATlON OR MAJoVF1qtJRE. ,
JJ. MAKE ANY.i ALL CH..NGU OR D'ElHTlONS fROM 11IE OIUGIN,<L PI..NS .i SPEC/FlcmONS \l7T1l0liT .,vwn7NO T1iE
OIUGIN,</. CO,\n..CT WHES SPEClFlC<LLY 01Wf.RED TO DVSO IN WRf71NG BY THE CONT1lACTOR. mE SUBCONTIUCTOR
PIUOR TO THE COMME."CE.I/E,\T Of 11IlS RE\7SUJ "ORK. SH.<LL SUBMIT PROMPTtY TO mE co"n.CTOR '7UTT'!,Y
COP/U Of mE COST OR CREDIT PROPOS.<L fOR SUCH P.E\7SED WORK IN A M,'Nl<"ER CO"'S/ST'ENT WITH mE CO"7il..CT
OOCUMEST!.
14. COOPEJI..T'E IHm mE co/,n'c/OR .~ oT7'.L~ SUSCO,\m<CTORS II'HOSE WORK MIGIIT I.\TE./'JVI.E IITTH T7'.E
SUBCObn,CTOR'S WORK .~ TO p.,Jmc1P,'T'E IH mE N.EP,<P.t';70,Y Of COORDIN,H'ED DIt.1I7....GS IN ,<RE.H Of
CONGESTION AS REQUlf.ED sr mE co.\m,(;7 DO,"',I/E.\TS. SPEClflC<LLY SOn.'Kl.i AD\7SINO mE CO.\7il..CTOR Of
ANY SUCH INT'ERFEP.ESCE.
IS. COOPElUT'E 1ITT1f mE cO.\n.(;70R IHSCI/EIJUUNG I'JS WORX SO.<SSOT TO CONFUCT OR 1NT'E/1FE.RE 1ITT1f mE WORX
OFOmE/lS. TO PRO.llPTtY SUB.\IIT SIIOP DIt.1I7SGS. DIt<1I7.YGS. .i S.<.l/PLES. AS REQUIRED IN 01WEl! TO CA/UlY ON s.<J0
WOIlX unC/'EI>nY .<"V ,<T SPEED m.T 117U SOT ClUSE DUlY IH THE PROGRESS OF 11/E CObT1lACTOR'S WORX OR
0T1lER BlUNCIIES Of mE wORK C<IUlJElJ OH BY OT1lEll Susco,\n<CTORS.
16. COMKY IITTH.tU fElJEJI.</.. rr.'T'E..i LOC</. 1.t ,'S & ORIJI,''<Scrs ,tfPL17SG TO mE BWW/.W1 OR S71lUCT1/l'.E .<.'V TO
COMPLY.<"V Gn?: ADEQW T'E sonC"..s RELmNO TO mE WORX ro PROPEl! AUTRORJ7TES AFD TO SECURE A/oV PAY fO,q
ALL N'Ecrss.AJlY UC'ESSES OR pEJl.1/1TS TO C<.UY ON THE II'ORK AS DUOUBED IN 11/E CONTIUCT DOCUMENTS AS
APPUCUJLE TO T/US SUBCO.\TRACT,
11. COMKY wrm F'EDERAJ.. sr.<T'E. .i LOC<L r.<.r l.'II'S. SOa.</. SECURITY 1.'II'S. Ub1:J./PLOYM'EI>T COMPENSAnON I.<WS &
WO/llfNE.'I"S COMPE."s.<nON 1.,WS ISSOF.<It ..S ..PPUCiBLE TO 11/E PEIlFOltl/ANCE OF T/US SUBCONTllACT.
18. AND OOU I/EIlEBY ..GRE.'E 11!.<T ,'LL II'ORK SIL'U BE 00.'1: SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL Of T/US .<ltCFUTECT O,q
OW/o"ER'S AUTRORIZED ,WE.'T. ,~ HIS DEDSION IN ,I/,<TTJIS" RELmNG TO .<ltTlS77C EFFECT SHAU BE f1N.<L. U' '.ITI'UN
TTiE T'EJ/.IJS OF 11/E cO.,n<CT OOCU.llE.'oTS.
19. rm SUBCOfolT/lACTOR SJ/.<1.L SE.<It fUU IlESPOSSIBIUTY fOR J1l. II'ORK TO BE PERFOIt\lElJ U.'VEl! HlS SUBCONT1UCT.
lNCl.lIDl.'KlALL ROOf p'EI>"Eill.mOHS. ClffT7NG. P.,TCHJ,'Kl. ac. T7'.E SUBCONT1l..CTOR AGREES 11lATmE CO.!TOF ALL
ClffT7NO.i PATCHlNO lIAS BEE.YINa.UDElJ,l$ P,<ltTOf SUBco.\n.CTOR'S WORK. mE SUBCOIml..CTOR AGREES 11lAT
llE SRALL E.IJPLOY AlmSAS! A"V T1l.WU.lIE.\' Of 11lE T/lAJ)E ,'IOltI/.olUY RESPON!/Bc:E fOR mE ROOf- OR FOJ/. FI"7SR
WORK INVOLV'ED TO CUT A"V P..TCII .<ltOU"V THE WOIlX OF SUBCObn.CTOR'S 1RADE.
2ll. rm SUBCOfolT/lACTOR SFIALL M,'KE.<1.L APfUCmOb! fOR P,H1JE/oT TO LOllAR ASSOCIAn:.l'./NC AS AGENT FOR mE
OW/oU LOllAR ASSOCIAn:.l' SJI.<LL SUB.lIIT s.UO .<PPucmONS TO mE ARCFUTECT A/oV 0wr."ER FOR PAIMENT. UpON
APPROVAL Of p.<l'ME.\T BY 11/E.<RCIIIT'ECT.....V OWb'Ell......'O PAYMENT BY 11/E 0wr."ER TO LOllAR ASSOCUn:.l'.INC. ,is
AGE.\T fOR mE 01l'SD1. ro SUSCO.'TRACTOR IN ACCORD,.NC'E IITTH 11/E T"ERMS Of T1iIS SUBCObn..CT. TP.E
SUBCO.\TR.tC70R n'RniL~ .tCX:.'OWUDGE.S ......:;:1 .1Cf..E.!S i7i.1T L03.'..if .tSSoaH'ES./Sc. SIt-iLL n.O"'E NO LJ..-t81tn1'-;0
SUBCOb77l..CTOR fOR 11/E o W,''EIl'SfAlL/-'RE TOP.HfOR IIORX PE.>JOltI/ElJ BY SUBCO,\77l..CTOR. .<.,vsusCO.\n'CTCR
AGREES TO 1I0W LOllAR ASSOCLiT'ES. INC. IlARJ/WS FROM A/o'Y CUlM fOR PAYMENT fOR WOIlX PERFORMED BY
SUBCObTRACTOR. A"V ro '''VE.I/MFY LOllAR ASSOa<T'!S. INC. FRO.\l ANY SUCR CUlMS .\lADE BY SUBCO"T1IACTOR'S
SUBCObn.CTORS. EMPLOI'US. AGENTS. .iJ>V M..TERL</. SUPPUEI1S.
71lAT mE CO....T1lACTOR .r. SUBCONTIUCTOR AGREE:
U. 11lAT IN 11/E MATT'ER OF AJIl/fTll.mON. l1iEl/lIUGlITS AbV OBUGATlONS. AND ALL PROCEDURE SHAU BE AJo/ALOGOUS
ro TROSE SET FORTRIN mE CONTRACT DOCUME/oTS PROVIDED, ROWF:'o"ER. 11lAT A DEDSION BY mE AIlCFUTECT OJ/.
OWN'Ell'S AU11/0RIZED AGENT'. SFWL NOT BE A CObvmON PRECEDENT' TO AJIl/lTIlATlON.
::
>-
~
.!I.
'f
!:!;
.'
~
"
ARTICLE Xl. T'ElWINAT10N CLlUSE
LOllAR ASSOCUn:.l'. mc SFIALL flAY'! mE RJGHT TO T'ElWINAT!: T1lIS COfolT/lACT ANTJ ro HI1lE ANOTfIER CONT1lACTOR ro "
,
~ , ,..'
'~' ..
x.. "
~,
to'
"
J'
)('
<.
~' ,
,'-
1mom ma INCOM1um 1OKTI0N 0' 11lI "'OM SROUUJ 11lI COHTXAarJlt TAlL TO 1UTom Tn OJUG.41JO/'l:1 UNDlA
17111 COH11UCT. LO&UC ,cSS(XUJU. INC. SHALL ALSO 1U1'I11lIliGHT 70 IlECOVEJI AN'I AND,w. LOSS!'.I Olt OMlAGI.
IHalJ/)INO ATTOItlirt'I nv. WUUlNO TKOM 11lI CONT7IAarJ~'1 UEACR 0' CON17lACT.
AN'I mOUNT oETUMIN!D TO 1& oUlt LOwt .cSSOCU1U. INC. .r AN'I AANT/U1JON. .cumuTlON 1.cJIU. COI/IfT. Olt
T7l1IOUOR AN'I 071lT..It DIS1//T1 USCLU1JON T!CJWQUIt SIULL WIt INTUUT nOM TRl! D.c11: TH1!: JilEACR OCCUllAED.cT
ma /lAXDJUIi /tA11: 1UMmrD .r ma USVIfY t.cWI OT 11lI U1UCULI JVlUSDIC110/l.
ARTlCUl XlI. IN WT11If,SS 'KIIUZO' TH1!: 1AJrTU,1 RL/lETO /tI1'I EXECUTED 17l1S AGItEEMENT WOER SE:.cL. TRE o.c Y AND
fUIt rorsr ~ .c.01'!. ,,17l1S SV'CON~CT IS NOT EXECUTED wrT10N FOV/rTUH (14) C.cLENCWI D.cl'3' AFTEA
1lECE/PT. /.iJwt .cSSOCLI1U. INC. WEAVU 71lZ liGHT 70 VOID 1JUS AGItEEMENT.eND OBTAIN T7lES1! SERVICES nOM
.cNOTTlEIl mw.
THIS SUBCONTRACTOR CERTlFlES THAT IT
MAJNTAJNS A NON-SEGREGATED PUCE OF
BUSINESS AND IS AN EQUAL QPfORTVNfTY
E.I/PUJYER. . . .
FRANCIS HEISSE
SUBCONTRACTOR
ATTEST:
;7~ 4 r~
Owner
(fITLE)
(SEAL)
Br
UJ8AR ASSOC!A rES. INC,
CONTRACTOR
ATTEST:
"e.- .,~ 1~'
J ' ICE K. FLEMING. COR/'. SEC.GAS.
~.<~ ~
UE E. EICRE ERGER. PRESIDENT
R
:,.
a-
~,
f.
:t-
~.:
j(
r,
,
z
,. I"
, . ,",
'-,
I
.3
!-.
I:
r
,
1"
SUBCONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER:
.'-
LOBAR ASSOCIATES. INe.. General Cantractor, Is A Government Contractor And As Such,
Is Subjecr To The Requirements Of E.ucutil'e Order 11246 As Amended, Relating To Equal
Employment OpPortunity And Non-Segregated Facilities: Executive Orders 11458 And 11625
. . ,. .
Relating To 77le Utilization' Of Minority Business Enterprises: The Vietnam Eta' Readjl~rment
Assistance Acts Of 1974, And Executil'e Order 11701 Relating To The Employment Of
Handicapped Persons. Suppliers Of Material And/Or Services In E.rcess Of510, 000. 00 Or More
Must Agree To The Sel'ell Point Equal Opportunity Clause And Cenifl That 771ey Do Not
Maintain Any Segregaud Faciliti~. In Addition, Suppliers Must Cenifl That 77Jey Hal'e A
Written AffirmaTive Acrion Program On File And III Use At All Locations. Those Suppliers Of
Material AntllC?r Serdas III Excess Of S2.500.00 Must Also Agree To The Affirmative AClion
Clause As Required In Section 503 Of The 1973 Rehabililation Ael. Please Execule And Return
The Attached Agreement And Certification As Saon As Possible. if You Believe That You Are
Exempt From Any Of These Requirements As Mentioned Above. Please Send Us A Written
Stalement Explaining The Basis For Your Claim Of Exemprian.
d:f,rs~~~
Lee E. Eie/lelberger ~ @
President
Lee:jkf
.. / OLD MlU ROAD P.O. BOX 4J2
DllLSBURG. PENNA /70/9-MJZ
~,. /'7''7\ Jl?O."R "....r. (7/71 4J2.9162
. .
, I'.
.
,-
'--'
!~... "
'p,"',
:.'
,
if.
2
EOUAL OPPORTUNITY CERT1F1CATlON & AGREEMENT
During The Performance Of 17lis Agreemenr, The ContraClor, Seller, Or Supplier (Hereinafter
Referred To As .Contracror.) Agrees As Follows:
A. CERTfF1CATION
The Contraclor Ccrrifies T71ar II Daes NOI And Will Nor Main/ain Or Proyide For
lIs Employus Any Segregaled Facililies AI Any Of lIS Eslablishmen/s, And Thal
II Does Nor And lViIl NOI Permir lIS Employees To Perform T7leir Serrices AI Any
Locarion, Under COn/raclor's Control, Where Segregoled. ,E:(1(:i1iries" Are
Mailllained. ' T7le COn/raclor Underslands T7IDi 17le Phrase .Segregaled
Facililies. Includes Facilities IVilich Are In FOCI Segregated On A Basis Of Race,
Color, Religion. Or Norional Origin, Because 0/ Habir, Local Cusrom. Or
Olhenvise. The ContraClor Understands And Agrees ThaI Mainlaining Or
Proyiding Segregaled Facililies For lIS Employees Or Permilring lIS Employees
To Perform Their Services AI Any Locarion, Under lIS COn/rol. lVilere Segregaled
Faeililies Are Main/ained Is A Violalion 0/ The Equal Opponuniry Clause
Required By Execuri\'e Order /1246 0/ Seplember 24. 1965. As Amended By
/1375.
The Con/raclor Funher Underslands And Agrees Thal A Breach O/The Assurance
Hen:in Conrained Is A Breach 0/ This Agreemenr And Subjects Ir To The Rules
And RegulaJions Promulgated By The Secretary 0/ Labor Under Executiye Order
112460/ Seplember 24, 1965, As Amended By /1375.
B. AFFlRMATTVE ACTION PROGRAM
If This COlllract Is In The AmounJ 0/510,000.00 Or More. The COlllractor
Agrees Thal II Shall: (a) Del'elop And Maintain .4 Written Ajfirfnatiye Action
Compliance Program For Each Of lIS Eslablishmenrs In Accordance Mlh
Regulations Issued Under Eucuril'e Order /1246 0/ Seplember 24, 1965. As
Amended By 11375 Which Delails Specific Sleps To Guoranlee Equal Employmenr
Oppommiry. .-ind (b) Include T7:e Requimnent 0/ Pan (0) O/This Pan B In Any
Subcontract Or Purchase Order For 510,000.00 Or More Which It leIS Under
his Contract.
C.
REPORTS
~
.
0.::.;
",
~.:
The Conrractor Agrees T7lar, If Th~ Have A Subcon/ract Or Purchase Order
Amounring 10 $10,000.00 Or More, Th~ Will Fife Monthly. On Or Before The
Slh Of Each Month Complere And Accurare Repons On Srandard Form 100
(EE0-7), Promulgared Jalnrly By The Office Of Federal Conrracl Compliance,
The Equal Employment Opponuniry Commission And Plans For Progress, Or
"
.
. I. ...
l'
]
Such Other Fonn As May Be Hereafter Promulgaud In Its Piau, With 1he Joint
Reporting Committee In Washington, D. C. '
D. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY CLAUSE
During The perfonnance O/This Contract. The Contractor Agrees As Follows:
I. The Contractor Will Not Discriminate Against Any Employee Or Applicant
Because 0/ Race. Religion, Color, Sex, Or NO/lonal Origin. Such Action
Shall Include, But Not Be Limi/ed To 1711! Following: Employment,
Upgrading, Demotion Or Transfer, Recruirment Or. Recruirment
Adl'errising, Layoff Or Termination, Rates Of Pay Or either 'Forms Of
compensation, .~nd Selection For Training. Including Apprenticeship. The
Contractor Agrees To Post In Conspicuous Places, Available To
Employees And Applicants For Employment. Norices Tn Be Posted By The
Contracting Officer Serring For 17le Provisions O[ This Non-
Discrimination Claust!,
2. The Contractor 1\71l, In ,~Il Solicirations. Or Adl'errisemenrs For
Employees Placed By Or On Behalf Of The Contracror. Sto/e That All
Qualifit!d .~pplie(jnrs 1\711 ReedlfJ Considerations For Employment lVirhallI
Regard To Race. Religion, Colvr. Sex. Or NO/ional Origin.
J. The COn/ractor lViIl Send To Each Labor Union Or Representaril'e 0/
Worker! Which It Has A Callt!ctile Bargaining Agreement Or Other
Contraer Or Undemanding. ,1 Notice To Be provided by The Agency
Contraering Officer, Advising 17le Labor Union Or Worker!'
Representadle Of The Contractor's Commirments Under Section 202 0/
E.ucutil'e Order 1/240 0/ September 24. 1965, As Amended By 1/375
And Shall post Copies O[The Notia In Conspicuous Places Available To
Employees And Applicants For Employment.
4. The Contractor lViIi Comply lVirh All prolisians Of Eueurile Order
1/246 .H Ar.:c~jd B-j 1/j;'5 ,~r.d Of Tile .'?ules. Rcgulaions, ad
Relevant Order! Of ne Secretary 0/ Labor.
5. The Contractor Mil Furnish All Information And ReporTS Required By
Executive Order 1/246 Of September 24, 1965, As .J.mended By 1/375
And By The Rules, Regulations. << Orden Of71le Secretary 0/ Labor, Or
pursuant Thereto, And Will Permit Access To Irs Books, Records, And
AccountS By The Contrac/iJrg Agency And The Secretary 0/ Labor For
Purposes O/Investigation To Ascrrrain Compliance Wirh Such Rules.
RegulaJions, And Orden.
,.'
.~.
6.
4
In The EI'ent Of The Contractor's Non-Compliance With The Non-
Discrimination Clauses Of 111is Contract Or With Any Such Rules,
Regulations, Or Oniers, TIlis Contract May Be Cancelled, Tenninated Or
Suspended, In Whole Or In Part, And The Contractor May Be Declared
Ineligible For Further GOI'ernment ContraCts In Accordance With
Procedures Awhorized In Execwiw Orders 11246 Of September 24, 1965,
As Amended By 11375 Or By Rille, Reg/dation. Or Order Of 11le
Secretary Of l.abor. Or As OtllenviSt! Provided By Law.
7.
TIle Contract Willlnelude The Prol'isioll! Of Paragraphs I Through 7 In
EI'ery Subcontract Or purchase Order Unless Exempter}. By Rules,
Regulations, Or Orders Of n,e Secretary Of Labor Isslied Pursllane To
Section '204 Of E(ec/llire Order 11246 Of September 24, 1965, As
Amended By 11375 So nw nle Prodsions lVill Be Binding Upon Each
Subcontractor Or Vendor. n,e contraClOr lVill Take Such Action lVitll
Respect To Any Subcontract Or purchase Order As The CONracting
Agency May Direct As A .\feans Of Enforcing Such Provisions Including
Sanctions For Non.Compliance. PTOI'ided, However. Tharln The EI'ent
TIle Contractor Becomes In\'oll'ed In, Or Is 11lTeatened \Vith, Litigation
lVith A SlIbcontraeror Or Vendor As A Result Of Such Direerion By TIle
Contracting AgenC'j. The CantraClOr May Request The United States To
Enter Such Litigation To Protect 7111: INcrest Of The United Slates.
E. EMPLOYMENT OF VETERANS-LISTING OF EMPLOYMENT OPENINGS
PursU(JJl! To Eteculive Order No 11701 lVilh Respect To All Contracts Or
purchase Orders For S2.500.00 Or More, 71le Undersigned (Referred To In The
Following Clause As The Contraclor) Shall Be Bound By and Agree To The
Following Provisions As Set Forth In Seclion 50-250.2 Of TIlle 41 Of The Code
Of Federal Regulations. I
1. As Provided In E, O. /liOI J: 41 CFR 50-250. 11le Contractor Agrees
Thor All Employment Openings Of The Contractor Ily7lich Exist At 11le
Time Of E[cC/lrion Of '[iris Conrrccr .Ir.d n:ose \\7:ich Occur During TI:e
Perfonnance Of n,is COnlract. Including 11lOse Nor GenullJed By TIle
Contract And Including nlOse Occurring At An Establishment Of The
Conrractor Olher Than The One Wherein 711e Contracrls Being Perfonned
But Excluding 1110se Independently Operared Corporate Affiliares. Shall,
To 71le M(J);imum Extent Feasible. Be Offered For Listing At An
Appropriate Local Office Of71le Federal.Stare Employment Sentice System
lVherein 11le Opening Occurs And To Provide Such Periodic Reports To
Such Local Office Regarding Employment Opening And Hires As May Be
RequIred: Provided. 7110f 11lis Provision Shall Not Apply To Openings
IVhlch The contraClar Fills From lVithin 11le Contractor's Organiwrion
. '.0.
. '
~-
\~; ..
~.: .
r-
'.
5
Or Are F/IIed pursuant To A CUJtomary ~nd TraditlO!lal Employer-Union
Hiring Arrangement And Thai The Listing Of Employment Openings Shall
Involve Only The Normal Obligations Which Attach To 11Ie Placing Of Job
Orders.
"
2. The Contractor Agrees Funher To Place The Above Provision In Any
Subcontract Directly Under 11lis Contract.
J. As Prol'ided In Section 2012 Of The Viemam Veterans ReadjUJrmeru Act.
Of 1974. With Respect To All Contracts In The Amount Of $/0,000.00 Or
More. The Contractor Shall Take Affirmative Action To, Employ, And
Advance In Employment Qualified Disabled Veterans And Vi!/erans Of The
Vie/nam Era.
F. MINORITY BUSINESS CERTIFICATION
Under E:ucutil'c Order 11625, 111e LOBAR ASSOCIATES, me. Coru/ruc/ion
CompfUTY Is Required To Identify 11loS/! Contractors And Subcontractors Thal Are
Minority BUJiness Eruerprise.s As Defined Under Ihis &ecu/il'/: Order As:
.A BUJiness Enlerprise Thal Is Owned Or Controlled By One Or More Socially
Or Economically Disadl'an/aged Persons. Such Disadvantage May Arise From
Cultural, Racial. Chronic Economic Circumstances. Or Background. Or Similar
Cause. Such Persons Include. Bur Are Nor Limited To: Negroes, Pumo Ricans,
Spanish-Speaking Americans. Amcrican Indions. EsI.dmos. And .~/eu/s.
() We Are A Minority Business Eruerprise.
( ) We Are Not A Minority Business Enurprise.
G. AFFIRMATIVE AcrION FOR HANDICAPPED WORKERS
I.
11Ie Corurac/or Will Not Discriminale Against Any Employee Or Applicanl
For Employment Because Of Physical Or Mental Handicap In Regard To
Any Position For Which The Employee Or .~pplicanr For Employment Is
Qualified. The Contractor Agrees To Take Affirmative Action To Employ,
Advance In Employment. And O/henvise Treat Qualified Handicapped
Individuais Without Discrimination Based Upon Their Physical Or Menral
Handicap In All Employmenr Practices Such As The Following:
Employment, Upgrading, Demotion Or Transfer, Recruirmeru Or
Recruirment Advertising, Layoff Or Termination, Rale.s Of Pay. Or Other
Forms Of Compensation, And Selection For Training, Including
Apprenticeship.
.
; .
"
.fi
.~.
t:
~.,
"
{.
i.
I
7. The Conrraclor Agrees To Permil The Examination By AppropriaJe
Conrracring Agency Officials Or The Assislant Secretary For Employmenr
Standards Or His Designee. Of peninenr Books. Documenrs. Papers. And
Records Concerning His Employmenr And Advancemenr Of Handicapped
. Individuals. I
8. The Contraclor Agrees To Post In Conspicuous Plcues. Available To
Employees And Applicants For Employmenr. Norices In A Form To Be
Prescribed By The AssiSlanl Secrelary For Employmenr Standards.
Provided By Ihe Conm!c:or Officer. Slating Contraclor's ObligaIion Under
The Law To Take Affirmarive Acrion To Employ And Advance In
Employment. Qualified Handicapped Employees And Applicanls For
Employment And The Righls And Remedies Available.
The Conrractor Will Norifj Each Labor Union Or Represenrarive Of
Workers Mth Which He Has A. Collective Bargaining Agreemenr Or Other
Conrract Undemanding That The Contractor Is Bound By The Tenns Of
Seerion 503 Of The Rehabilitation Act. And Is Committed To Take
Affirmative Action To Employ And Advance In Employmetll Physically And
Menrally Handicapped Individuals.
"\
...., .\"'~ I
,.,..\.. .
. . "''''~.:
. ..';'". .
I(';:~ i'; .' .
"l!i";" .
- ...., . ~ .
'. I ~. r'l . ..., . .
n' '.. ~." " t'
...J.,'..'t~~:"l":""',
"'~. "a"J,. .' '.'
.' '
, .
'J/~.t::' :
......,." .
t~~l'.')~'::i,,:: . 2~'~~'
:.:':"," ....4.. .
3.
4.
5.
6.
9.
.. .'
. : .", ~, ~ .
.', '.
:;~~~~?t.>~. .
" ~. -:-~....:: .::
~ .,'.. ...... . .
, '
,'-
6
The Cotllractor Agrees That. if He Has Established An Internal Review
Procedure And A Handicapped Individual Files A Complaint With The
Contractor Under That Procedure Thai He Is Not Complying With The
Requirements Of The Act. He Will (I) Investigate The Comp{aitll And Take
Appropriale Action Consistent Wilh The Requiremenls Of20 CFR 741.27.
And (2) Maintain On File For Three (3) Yean. The Record Regarding The
Complaint And The Action Taken.
The Contraclor Agrees That, If rl Handicapped Individual Files A
Complaint Wilh The Depamnent Of Labor Thai He Has Not Complied
With The Requiremenls Of The Act, (1) He Will Cooperale With' The
Depamnent In lIS lnwligalion Of 77le Complaint. And (2) He Will
Provide All Peninent Inj'ormation Regarding His Employmenl Praclices
Mlh Respect To Handicapped Individuals.
The Conlraclor .~grees To Comply Wilh The Rules And Regularions Of The
Secrelary OJ'Labor In 20 CFR Ch. VI. Pan 741.
In The Erent OJ'The Conrraclor's Non-Compliance With The Requiremerus
OJ' This Clause, The Conrraclor May Be Declared In Dej'ault And
Sancrions May Be Imposed In Accordance IVilh 20 CFR Ch. VI, Parr 741.
This Clause Shall Be Included In All Subcontracts Over $2,500.00.
.......;.
......
:.-. "":."l' .~ . '. . ., .
, ,r:~ .....,
I.',.':
;. ': 1t1;."
~-~ ~~:\:~.: '. .. .
. .' ~J':!.":':. :.
... '.
.\:'f:'::~" :
. .i'~i\~~.", '..,.'.',.....:..,.
'.' \.,:'':':-:....... ". .
. . . I~':~'t..,.; .
..,' J '
".,;" .
:,' "..-."-: ~
~- '
.
.... .
....,... ..
.... .
. ': .....,.
'-f.-.I...
. '
,-: ,'iloiEi
. ..' '~'.' 7
;.~ '0;. . .'..:..;,,"::...l;'~;' . ..'
_;.1 ';',t:,:!,,:':' .
.;'...i'.j1';'::' .' .
1711 P,na1Jy For MaJdng FalsI StaJtmtnts In Ollm Is Pmcribtd
bds U.S.C. 1001. .
If'Q3.M,.....c:: U;'TC::C::'J:'
FIRM
l~ tf~
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
BY:
!l.uaust 31. 1993
DATE
OWner
TITLE
.....1
:
. .
....
, - .
.<':~."
......
'.1~:;;
. , ....~ .. .
..!.....
. '. - .. ~. '::.
.'
"... ..-..,....
I,
, .
.
."-
"
:'.
0" ~...,
EXHIBIT "C"
~I ,
t ~ '
~.
.
~~
.
.!!
5
.
il '
... .
. -
.. -.
c .!'Q.
ji "'.
'i ~u
" -
- 5
:N i I
UN,' ~
. - .
n::::;):
lOt. I 8
'~'~'i i '~1'
~i'i'~ ~ ~
.,-
81;;;;
'U ,
, '
- -
= ""
1 ii
N
11
~ "
M
X "
0 0
ro ,
'"
ci ~
.: 0
r-
ei
.. ..
0 ..
a: Ii
oJ a:
oJ :J
~ lU
II>
r.\ oJ
oJ oJ
0 0
(I)
(J)~
LUg
n:~
<.:J~
o~
<
0: ~
0..'
~,
w~
.
o
.,
~
'"
.....
1-
1:
o
a.
QI
II:
o
:;
,- -
,
n Q
E N
. --
~ ::
o
':
t ::
.
! ::
>
"
7. -
~
,--
, -
o -
0_
~ -
o -
=
N
, "
, --
o 0
, "
, -
D "
. -
"'-
-
~
:l
'tl
QI
..t:
U
VI
13
N
"
. - -
~ ~
, -
< -
~ .
>
0 i ~ u
,
U i ~
~
t ~ " l
C i ,
.'
, .
n <
l' .. V
C
. ~
,
0 :i ;
, ,
.n " m
.. (, ..
. , , , U
, . r u r
,. u ~
" . c
'.
t. n
. . u
" " " -
u Ii . 0
'. li i:J ~ ii
r: ~
ii il ~ ;
. to .' V
II .. .1 U .
" "
-...
---,-
~--,-----
r
--------------------------
--------------------------
I
----
-------1--------------------
------ -----~------~~----------
-------~-I-- --------------
-------------~------------
-----~-~-~--~-------------
--------------------------
-----------~--------------
-====~=~===~~=--==========
~
------------- ----------
-~-------------------
--- ,. -~------ ------------
-.---- ------------
---, ,-~-------------------
-
----------------
r.
---,,, ---,,-
-------------
---~=1]=========
I ==, -~=~- =- ] === ======= =
::
-------
::
,I -~
"
---------------------
-- --- ---------------------
,
--- ---------------------
~
-- ------------------
------------------
Ii
I~I=_-====-================
, --- ,,~ --------------
.1; U\,W!'!'. .
III ..... I~ o. .. 0
,; ..'I~ W -.... I .cc
.0 ( .. c . 1JM 0" .;t.;; LeO -
, E ~ B v '_~ f.. w? ~ r.:~ ~ .. ! i ~
,0'" wC.- 'u'~! gee roC, u" t.'-~ .. V' =
'2, u c I COt"O "...
,I", c !!..' 't;: -.JJ Ji _ " 6 f1 ;
"" t... t ,2 ., : '" "ei :;\- II 3. \. LL i.' _'"!.!
.. j "_~ ~ ~ .I!ci G:J ~ ~ ~ .. l;~ C "
;;; I; 1'1= U l.'C to :5 .. 'c::s.. ::I ... ~ r i. III
.j ! ~L : c ~ 11 ~~.t il~ S ~5 ~ ~ ~~! 'Y.""
~O~Df'O~-U'l-. ri'..:,,_J ~..;
:.: .... ,u 0 ,I:.. ~ ~~ r ..... 0 't crI Jl VI" ~
o '0 . C !! -0 v -8 vI;: '," "-: J ot: Ir I : '.. - ..I
.9 J ~ .!: II' ~.. _ "0.... f#
C ~ jJ iJ rf ~ Go :;:~: ~:\r .." .: 7. 0 7. ,il ,. E' ..
r ,. i '\:.: '0 La. j ..
r-i: - - Rt-f
liP i i ~~~~
_..:
I;~
I.
/';:
('
'J',.I."
'1'1. I
l.',
I,.J
I
.'
,
"
;
"
I
. .
. .
..
,'-
" ~~ ., .
EXHIBIT "0"
.
:'
.~~
!;.
E
, " .\
I " &
\.
~-
,"- .
ASSOCIATES
November 19, 1993
Francis Heisse
423 N. Progress Ave.
Harrisburg, PA 17109
Ref: Swimming Pool Projecl
Rt'est SluJre Coulllry Club
Camp Hill, PA
, .'
'. . ~ , .
Dear Francis:
AI the curren/ we the pool construcrion Is approxlmaJeJy four (4) weeks behind schedule. As
you know, LOBAR ASSOCIA TES has a con/ract completion dare of 31 December 1993 for the
project to be 100% complete acept for landscape work.
I strongly suggest you apedlte your phase of the project by additional manpower or wor~ing
'overrime as required to meet LOBAR ASSOCIATES scheduled time frame for the project, as per
your COn/ract.
Note: Pool construcrion ....,ork is behind schedule and holding up other phases of the projectfrom
being completed (concrete dtck,fencing, grading, etc.). All)' IIquJdaJed damages, backcJuuges,
etc. to LOBAR ASSOCIATES due to pool construction delays will be deducted off your COn/ract
amoUJI/ althe end of the project. ..
Your cooperarion in apediring thls project to meet LOBAR ASSOCIATES' rimeframd would be
greaJfy apprecialed.
Very truly)'ours,
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
~ ~Iwi JamfJP-w~
B. Michael Samples
General Superintendent
BMS.'nms
Copy: Lee E. Eichelberger, Preslden/
.. lOWMllLROAD P.O. BOX4J2
DlUSBURG. PENNA 170I9-04J2
4J2-9728 FAX: (ll7J 4J1-9162
. .
. .
VERIFICATION
I, LEE E. EICHELBERGER, hereby verify t~at I, am the
President of Lobar Associates, Inc., that I am authorized to
make this Verification, and that the statements contained in
the herein pleading are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge, information, and belief.
I understand that false
statements therein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.
C. S. A. !l 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Dated:
/1''%4 -?#
~~
Lee E. Eichelberger
\
IlARMON'" DAVIES, p,c.
AITORNEYS.AT.L\W
B06 COLUMBIA AVENUE
lM.CASTER. PA I160J
, .
EXHIBIT "C"
. .
v.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
FRANCIS HEISSE,
plaintiff
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant
PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO NEW MATTER
AND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM
22. No response is required.
23. Admitted in Part and Denied in Part. It is admitted
that the original contract called for completion of Defendant's
work by January 1, 1994. It is denied that the contract
attached as Exhibit "B" is a true and correct copy of
Defendant's contract with the owner. To the contrary, it is a
true and correct copy of the subcontract between plaintiff and
Defendant. It is further denied that owner required all work
to be competed by January 1, 1994. To the contrary, as a
result of delays caused by other subcontractors, as well as
inclement weather, owner granted Defendant an extension until
April 15, 1994.
24. Admitted in Part and Denied in Part. It is admitted
SAlDIS. GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 w. High Su<c1
Cnllisle,PA
that the original contract and related documents between the
Defendant and owner required completion on or before January 1,
1994. It is specifically denied that owner required all work
to be completed by said date. To the contrary, as a result of
delays caused by other subcontractors, as well as inclement
,
. .
weather, owner granted Defendant an extension until April 15, 1994
25. Denied. S~me of tho averments contained Lherein are
conclusions of law to which no response is necessary. To the
extent that a response is required, it is denied that Plaintiff
knew that all work on the pr.oject had to be completed on or
before January 1, 1994. To the contrary, Plaintiff was
actually aware of the extension granted by owner to Defendant.
26. Admitted.
27. Admitted.
28. Admitted in Part and Denied ,in Part. It is admitted
that the Plaintiff did not object in writing to the attached
schedule. It is specifically denied that no exception was
taken. On the contrary, Defendant was well aware that
plaintiff could not complete its work on schedule as a result
of delays caused by other contractors. By way uf further
answer, plaintiff was delayed in the commencement of its work
by approximately 4 weeks as a result of Defendant's failure (or
the failure of other subcontractors) to properly prepare the
site for Plaintiff's work. All further delays were occasioned
by inclement weather.
SAlOIS, GUIDO,
SnUFF &
MAS LAND
26 w. IIiGh Strrcl
C.ulisle. VA
29. Denied. It is specifically denied that Plaintiff
failed to provide an adequate number of properly trained and
qualified employees. To the contrary, Plaintiff at all times
provided an adequate number of properly trained and qualified
employees to perform its work on the project.
30. Denied. It is specifically denied that Plaintiff
failed to provide an adequate quantity of proper equipment to
2
perform its work. To the contrary, at all times Plaintiff
provided an adequate quantity of proper equipment to perform
its work on the project.
31. Admitted.
32. Denied. It is specifically denied that Plaintiff
failed to meet the required schedule. To the contrary,
Plaintiff completed the work within the extension period
granted by the owner.
33. Denied. The averments contained therein are
conclusions of law to which no response is necessary. To the
extent that a response is required, the averments are
specifically denied. To the contrary, the Plaintiff did
properly perform its work on the project in a good and
workmanlike manner and completed its part of the project on or
before April 11, 1994, which was within the extension of time
granted by the owner. By way of further answer, any delays
were caused by other subcontractors and inclement weather.
34. Denied. The averments contained therein are
conclusions of law to which no response is necessary. To the
SAlOIS. GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MAS LAND
26 W. High Sluel
Coulisle,PA
extent that a response is required, the allegations contained
, therein are specifically denied. To the contrary, Plaintiff
did properly perform its work on the project in a good and
workmanlike manner and successfully completed its part of the
project on or before April 11, 1994, which was within the
extension of time granted by the owners. By w?y of further
answer, any delays were caused by the other subcontractors and
,
3
inclement weather.
35. Denied. The contract speaks for itself. By way of
further answer, Plaintiff incorporates the averments contained
in paragraphs 22 through 34 above.
36. Denied. After reasonable investigation, the
Plaintiff is without knowledge or information sufficient to
form a belief as to the truth of the averments set forth
therein and strict proof thereof is demanded at trial.
37. Denied. The averments contained therein are
conclusions of law to which no response is required. To the
extent a response is required, it is specifically denied that
Plaintiff's claim is barred under the terms of the contract.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment in his favor and
against the Defendant in the amount of Sixty Three Thousand
Seven Hundred Sixty Nine and 00/100 ($63,769.00) Dollars plus
interest and costs of this suit.
COUNTERCLAIM
COUNT I
38. No response is required.
39. Denied. The total value of the contract is
$197,769.00, including the $167,919.00 value of the contract as
written plus $29,850.00 in changes requested by Defendant.
SAIDIS, GUIDO.
SHUFF & plaintiff also should be reimbursed for the other sums as paid
MASLAND
26W HighS,,",,' by the Plaintiff pursuant to the original complaint.
CiU'lule. PA
40. Admitted.
41. Denied. It is specifically denied that Plaintiff
,
4
SAIDIS, GUIUO.
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 w. Iligh Slrrcl
Carlisle. PA
failed to per-form itB work in a qood iJnd workIlldnlike manner in
accordance with itB proposal, the subcontract, applicable
;i
:1 plans, specifications and schedules.
II
!I
II
I,
Ii
!
Ii
il
To the contrar-y, all of
Plaintiff's work was perfor-med is a good and wor-kmanlike
manner, and in accor-dance with its proposal, the subcontr-act,
applicable plans, specifications and schedules, as the same may
The
have been amended by agreement of the owner and Defendant.
~ averments set forth ther-ein and strict proof thereof is
i'
!I
:1 demanded at trial.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests this
Honorable Court to enter judgment in favor of the Plaintiff and
against the Defendant in the amount of the original claim, and
to dismiss Count I of the Counterclaim.
COUNTERCLAIM
COUNT II
42. No response is r-equired.
43. Admitted in Part and Denied in Part. It is admitted
that Defendants period of performance on the project was
extended by owner until April of 1994. It is denied that any
delay was caused by the Plaintiff. To the contrar-y, any delay
was caused by the untimely performance of Defendant's other
subcontractors and the brutally harsh weather.
j 44. Denied. To the extent that the averments infer that
II '
Ii
:1 5
.,
Ii
Ii
. '
Plaintiff io responsiole for the lhree and one-half month
extension, they are specifically denip.d. To the contrary, any
delay was caused by the untimely performance of Defendant's
other subcontractors and the brutally harsh weather. The
remaining averments contained therein are also denied. After
reasonable investigation, the Plaintiff is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
averments set forth therein and strict proof thereof is
pemanded at trial.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff specifically requests your
Honorable Court to enter a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff
and against the Defendant in the original amount of the claim,
and dismiss Count II of the Counterclaim.
Respectfully submitted,
SAIDIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MAS LAND
Dated:
l~l3.q.s-
I
Johnna/J. Deil , Esquire
26 We~t High J. reet
CarlYsle, pA 17013
(717) 243-6222
Attorney for the Plaintiff
SAIDIS. GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MAS LAND
26 w, High 5'='
C.ulislc,PA
'.
6
.' il
Ii
i
I
I
I FRANCIS HEISSE,
j Plaintiff
I,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Edward E. Guido, Esquire, certify that on January 23,
1995, I served a true and correct copy of the within
Plaintiff's Answer to New Matter and Amended Counterclaim upon
I
the below-named parties, by depositing same in the United
States mail, first class, postage prepaid addressed as follows:
Corrie L. Fischel, Esquire
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
2306 Columbia Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
Liberty Excavators, Inc.
1104 Fernwood Avenue
Camp Hill, PA 170i1
,- ,
./<,' /~,)
c:--- /' -' /'
. ,
, .
-....,." -.
Johnna .' Deily, Esquire
SAIDIS, GUIDO,. SHUFF & MA
26 West High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-6222
Dated:
January 23, 1995
SAIDIS. GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 w. High SU1~el
C.ulisle. PA
I(FIr L.
.
ASSOCIATES
,
SUBCONTRACI.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CONTRACTOR &: SUBCONTRACTOR
SUBCONTRACT 1/3081-02200-51
ACREIi.llIi,Vr '\/,<DE.<S OF niE 28TH O,lY OF JULr IS mE l:,:.R OF .'7SE7U/'I HII.VDIlED A,'on 9J.
BETWUN T1iE CO/on.ICTOR: WBAR .uSOCf,\ TES. /SC.
I OLD .II/U ROAlJ
P.O. BOX 4J2
D/USBURG. fA /70/94112
AM) T1iE SUBCONTRACTOR: UBERTY EXCA VA TORS. /SC.
//04 FERNWOOD AVE.
CA.lfP Hill. PA 17011
TELEPHONE: (717) 761-8461
WlTNESSETII. m.r T1iE SUBCOtm/.lcrOR A,'on COtm/.ICTOR fOR T1lE CONSIDt.tlnON HE!IEJ.'lAFrEJl NAMED AGRU; AS
FOUOWS:
.ulTICLE I. T1iE SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES ro fVRMSH.lLJ. .\lAn:JlL1L ,l/>n PE/lFOR1J.lLJ. WORK AS DESCRIBED IHART1a.E
a HEIlEOF FOR:
NEW BATHHOUSE .J< POOl. CONSTRUCTION
WEST SHORE COUNTRY Cl.UB
CUfP Hill. PA
FOR LDBAll ASSOCUn:s. I/'Ie. 1/'1 ACCORDANCE "7TH T1iJS AGREE.\/t.vr. mE AGREE.\lEHr BE:TVoUV mE 0wr.'Ul oi
CONTRACTOR. oi IN .lCCORDANCE "'7TH T1iE ct.'Ul.1L CO,'ovmONS OF T1iE COlflRACT. SUnLLIlENrARY GElo'Ul.<L
CONDmo/<S. mE DRAW/NGS. SPEancmo/<S. Al>n ADOENDA PIlll'Al/LD BY H. EDWARD BUCK .J< ASSOCIATES
1lE!lElNAFT/:!l CILLED T1iE ARCHITECT OR OIVNEll'S A umOIUZED A Gt. vr. .ILL OF WHiCH DOCUMt. vr:r. SIGNED BY mE PAKT!ES
TREJlETO OR TDt.VT1F1ED BY T1lEARCrun:cr OR OWSU1'S AU71/01UZED .IGt.vr. FOR-Il ,I P.lITT OF A COtm/.lCT BETWEEN mE
CONTRACTOR AI>V mE OW,'o'Elf DAn:o 16 Jl!l.Y 1991." IIL/lUY BECOME,' P.lITTOFT11!S CONTRACT. "HEIlDHIlEFV.RED
roAST1iECO/on.ICTDOCl/lolENrS. oi SRA.U.BE.\lADEAVAlLlBU: ro mE SUBCOtm/..CTOR UPONIUS/lEQU'ESTPRJOR roAM)
ANYITNE SUBSEQUE.vr ro SIG,'o7i'G TTlIS SUBCOtm/..cr.
ARTICLE If. PiE SL'SCQ."'7JtH..70R << THE CO....T1tfC7'CR ..CKE...! m. T nlE M.H~~iLS .1....V EQUlP.',U:.'YT TO BE ftiR,....1S1lE.D
" WO.'L( TO IE PU,FORJtED AJI.E COMPLETE .i5 li.QCIu..D ,..'D IN n7\}C.7 .iCCO/WtL..'a: y,rm PLt",'S, SPE.OflCH70NS.
ANEbV/oiE.'fT!. AtoVIOR ADDE.'TJA "AS fOUOWS:
A. APfUCV1LE SECTIONS OF DlVISJON I. GENERAL REQU/RE.lfE'vTS.
B. STTEWORK COMPLETE AS REQUIRED fER fU,'1S. SPECIFICATIONS. AND AlJDENDA INCLUDING
BUT NOT U.lfrrED TO D1VJSION 1 - STTEWC'RK .J< DfvJSION J. CONCRETE CURBING AND THE
FOUOWING:
I. DEMOUTION INCLUDING RE.lfOVAL OF EXiSTING CONCRETE PADS AND BITUMINOUS
PA VE.I/ENTS. WOOD AND .\fET AL BOLUJU)S, GUIDERAil., AND EXiSTING STOR.I( SEWER
UNES.
.. I OLD .\flU RO,w P.O. BOX 412
D/USBURG. PE.VNA /7019-04J2
TEL' (7/7) 412.9728 F.H: (7/7) 412-9162
1
1. SOIL EROSION CONTROL INCLUDING SILT FENCE. STONE OUTUT FILTERS. W,tTERB.tRS.
/NLET PROTECTION, MID TE.IIPORAllY DNERSE SW.tUS.
J. CLE.tJU,VG & GR(IBBING.
4. STRIP & STOCK TOPSOIL.
S. SPREAD TOPSOIL ON NEW U WN AREAS.
I. SULK EXC.~ V,UION ON AN UNClASSIFIED BASIS BASED UPON EUV,tTING THE POOL AND
S,tTHHOUSE AREAS INCLUDING RE.IfOVAL OF ORGANIC !tATE/lLU.S. IMPORTATION OF
SORJIOW .lfATERlAL FOR POOL ""VD BATHHOUSE AREAS. EXPORTATION OF EXCESS
JtATER/ALS AT EXISTING POOL AREA.
1. EXCA VA TlON FOR POOL ""VD BACKFIU POOL wALL\'.
8. INST~TlON OF 6. UNDERDWN SYSTE.lf TO FACIUTATE BELf)W GRADE DRAlNM;E.
COJfPLETE \VITIl HCA V.UIO.V. PIPISG, IB BEDDING, ""VD EARTH BACKFIll.
9. ,lPrROrll/A TF.I,Y 110 I.F OF COS(RF.TF. CURB TO BE ISSTMLF.D A T TilE: PARKING ,tREA BY
TIlE EXI5T/.\G PUOL
JO. FOOTISG EXCA V.UION ""VD BACKFILL
11. WALL BACKFlU FOR EXPOSED WALL ATNEW BATIlIIOUSE.
/l. FlSE GRADE FOR BUILDISG PAD. SIDEWALK, AND .lflSCEUANEOUS CONCRETE PADS
mCLVDISG CRUSIIED STOSE BASE.
JJ. B/TU,lflSOl.;S P,~ 1'E,IfE,~T ISCLUDISG CRUSHED STONE BASE AND PAINTED PA VE.lfENT
MARXlSGS. BU,lfPER BLOCIi5. ""VD HA.VDICAP SIGNS.
J.I. SrTE STOR.lf SEWER SYSTE.lf ISCLUDING PIPING, PRECAS1 STRUCTllRES. EXCA VATION ON
""" USCLUSIFlED B,UIS, STONE BEDDISG .It BACKFILL. AND EARTH SACKFlU.
JS. SrTE S""v/TARY SEWER ISCLVDISG PIPING, HOLDING TANK. AND PUMP ST,tTION,
CONNECTION TO EX/STISG UNE. EXCWATION ON AN UNCLASSIFIED BASIS. STONE
BEDDISG .It BACKFILL. E.UlTH BACKFILL
16. JflSCELLJ,NEOUS Cl/TTISG .It PATCHING AS REQUIRED FOR YOUR PRASES OF WORK.
11. LAYOUT.It TESTISG FOR YOUR PHASES OF WOU
18. SITE GRID UYOUT .It ELEVATIOSS COMPLETE (LOBAR ASSOCIATES TO ESTABUSH
CORNERS).
19. GEOTECHNICAL TESTI/'iG.
20. ROCK EXCA VAT/ON (UNClASSIFIED).
21. EROSIO.v CONTROL .IfEASU1IES ISCLUDISG RE.lfOVAL
22. DAILY CLEAN. UP OF STREETS/ROADS.
lJ. PUMP/SG OF WATER (ASSOCIATED WrTH SrTEIVORK).
U. NECESSARY SHORING OR HCWATION TO INSURE SAFE WORlClNG CONDITIONS AND
COMPUA,vCE WrTII OSHA 1IEGL'UT/ONS.
2S. DEMOUTION OF STRUCTL'1IES ""VD LEGAL DISPOSAL
26. REMOV,U OF TREES .i STU.IfPS.
21. CLEAR &. GRUB SrTE.
28. STRlP.1< REPLKE TOPSOIL
29. RE.lfOl'U &. DISPOSAL OF Bm'JflSOL'S P,~ 17SG AT Al'PROI'ED LANDFill.
]0. RE.lfOV.U OF .IfISCELLt.VEOL'S SrTE IJfPROI'E.IIE'vrs (CL'1UIS. WALKS. ETC.).
Jl. SITE GR.WING - CUT/FIll.
J2. HAL'LlNG AWAY EXCESS JfATERlALS (EARTH OR TOPSOIL).
JJ. SUfPLYISG BORJIOW .IfATERlALS (EARTH OR TOPSOIL).
J4. SUPPLYISG CONTROLLED ESGINEERED Fill. ','
JS. FOUNDATION EXCAVATION .It BACKFIll.
J6. STONES U.vDER SUBS.
J1. STONES UNDER WALKS.
J8. CURlJ EXCA VA TION .It BACKFIll.
J9. MISCEUA,VEOUS EXCAVATION .It BACKFILL (PADS. THICICENED SLUlS. ETC.).
40. BlTUJII.vOUS PA VlNG wrTII FINE G1U.DING '" STONE BASE.
4/. UNE PAlNTING/MARlUNGS/SY.lfBOLS.
.n. YERICLE BUMPER BWCICS.
4J. STOR.lf WATER DWNAGE SYSTEM WrTH MMlHOLES. INLETS. & RlI'-RAJ".
.u. HEAD OR END WAlLS.
3
45. ALL UNSUITABLE SOIL IS TO BE RE.\I0~'ED AND REI'UCED WITH CONTROL fiLL ON AN
UNClASSIFIED BASIS.
46. TESTING.
47. 1'001. ExeA VATION.
48. ALTERNATES 4, S. 4< 1.
49. SUBCONTRACTOR ACKNOIVLEDGES RECEII'T OF ALL PUNS. SI'ECIF/CATIONS. ADDEND'\.
ETC. DIRECT1.Y FRO.\( OWNER.
SI'ECI'\l. UOUIRE,lfENTS:
I. DUE TO 1'0SSIBl.E CO.lf.lfUNICATION COSFUCTS, TIlE OWSER '" LOBAR ASSOCIATE:S. loVe.
REQUIRE THAT ALL CORRESI'OSDENCE, WRITTE:N 4< ~'ERBAL, FRO.\1 SUBCONTRACTORS '"
.\IATER/,II. suprUEHS BE: D1UCTE:D TJ/ROL'CII LOI1.\R ASSOCl.ITES. I.\'C. IN UF.U OF DIREC7
CORRESrOSDE:SCE \l'ml TIlE O\l'NE:R '" I'/WJE:CT E:NCINURS/ARCIIITECT. IN .!VDITION, ill.
CURlflC,\ TIONS SHOUW BE: FORWARDE:D TO LOB,\R ASSOCIATES. I,\'C. VIA fAX OR .I/All. IN
UEU Of ~'ERBAL CO.lf.lIUNIC.UION.
1. flEW .\IE.-\5URE.\fENTS '" VERiFICATION ARE TIlE RESI'ONSIBIUTY OF TIllS SUBCO/VTlIACTOR.
REVlE:W Of STTE AND fOUND,\TIOS COSDITiOSS IS A REQUIRE.\(ENT fOR TillS Co.VTlIACT.
J. HAVE ,\f,\TE:RJALS DEUVERED WilEN REQUIRED. SO STOllAGE IS ,\VAlUBl.E ON JOBSITE .IF
DEUVE:RY IS JfAND,\TORY PRIOR TO INSTALLUIOS, TIllS SUBCO,VTlIACTOR WILL 11,1 VE TO
PROVIDE REQUIRED STOllAGE fAClUTIES. PHASED PROJECTS SHOUW HA VE .IfATERiALS
SHII'PED IN PHASES UNLESS STOllAGE IS PROVIDED.
4. PROTECTION OF JfATERi,-ILS UNTIL OWSER.ARCHTTECT ACCEI'TANCE.
S. .IfATERiAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS ARE ,\ REQUIRE.ItE,VT fOR TillS PROJECT '" .\(UST BE
SUBMmED WTTHIN fOURTEEN (14) DAYS Of THE SUBCO.vrJUCT DATE AND PRiOR TO
MATERiALS AlUUVING ON TIlE JOBSTTE.
6. SUBMISSION OF OI'ElIAT/O.v '" .IfAl,VTENA}!CE .IfANUALS TO BE .\(ADE WTTH INITIAL
SUBMmALS.
7. BY EXECIJ710N OF TillS SUBCO,vrJUCT '\CREEJfE,\T. l'OUR FIR.\{ ,\GREES TlLAT IT IV/LL
snuCT1.Y COMPLY WITH AlL OSHA RECUUTIOSS AND ,\(SDS REQUlRE.\(ENTS ON THIS PROJECT.
TT IS ALSO THE RESI'ONSIBIUTY Of 1'0UR I'ERSOSNEl. TO fOLLOW ANY INSTRUCTIONS OR
DIRECTIVES GTVE.V BY OUR PROJECT SUI'E:Ri,VTENDE.\T. STEVE DILLER, REGARDING SAFETY ON
THE PROJECT. "'VY fiNES ISSUED TO LOBAR ,lSSOCIATES. loVe. AS A RESULT Of YOUR flR.WS
NEGUCE,\'CE OR NOS-eOMpUANCE WILL BE THE RESI'OSSIBIUTY OF YOUR flR.lf. THE
SUBCO.\Ttl.ICTOR IS RESPONSIBLE fOR ALL OSHA RECL'LU/OSS ISCLUDIoVG VERifiED SAFETY
CONDITIONS OF OTHER TRADES.
8. THIS PROJECT liAS A fiR.\( CO.ItI'LETIVS D,\TE OF ',-\5 PER ATTACHED SCHEDUl.E WITH NO Tl.lfE
EXTENSIONS I'ER.ltmED. ALL MATERiALS AND WORK SCHEDULES .IIUST BE COORIJIN,\TED
VERY CLOSELY WTTH OUR PROJECT SUI'ERi,VTENDE,VT. STEVE DILLER. .IT THE SITE TO ME:ET
THE REQCIRED CO,\(I'l.ETION DA TE. DA Y TO D,\ Y SCHEDULE ADJUSnfE.VTS BY THIS
SUBCO,\TRACTOR ,~RE A REQL'IRE.\fE.\7 BY TFIIS SUBCONTRACTOR TO ,~CCO.l{,IfOD'\ TE V,\RiOCS
I'ROJE:CT 1.\7,4SGIBLES (WE.UIIER. ETC.) TO ,lfAl.\7AlN TIlE fiNAL CO.l/pLET/ON D'\TE.
.lfULTIPLE SHIFTS Jc OVERTI.IIE ARE A REQUIRE.lfE.VT OF THIS PROJECT,IS ,VECESSARY TO .IIEET
SCHEDL'l.E REQUlRE.I/E.VTS AND/OR LOBAR ,lSSOCIATES' SUI'ERi,VTENDE,VT'S I,VSTRUCTlONS.
9. DAlLY RE.\fOVAL Jc DISPOS,\l. OF RELUED DEBRiS OfF SITE.
10. PROVIDE SUFF/CIE.VT SUPERVISION Jc .lfANI'OIVER fOR SCHEDUUSG, RECENlNG. UNWAIJING.
Jc DISTRiBUTION OF ALL M.~TERlAL DEUVERlES. ',-
II. ALL TESTING "''1D SUB.IfISSION OF REPORTS ARE A REQUIRE.lfENT OF THIS SUBCO.vrJUCT TO
ASSURE QUALITY OF ""ST~TIONS.
12. ALL UYOUT .r. COORIJINATIOS COSTS ,lSSOC/ATED WITH UIIS SUBCO,vrJUCT ARE A
SUBCO,vrJUCT REQUIREME.VT.
13. ALL SUBCONTRACTORS .IIUST PARTICIPATE IN A I-HOUR WEEKLY JOBSTTE Cl.EAN-UP EACH
FRlDAY.
ARTICLE III. n'\#E IS OF mE ESSEJoICE .....tl THE SUBCONTll..C701f ACIlEES TO COMMEJoICE A...tl 70 COIJ/'lETE THE WOIUC
AS DESal/Bt:D IN unClE /I AS FOlLOWS,
. .
./
A. AU. WOIlJ( TO IE PE./lFO/IMW IN rrTUCT ACCOIl.OANCE wrm WBAIl ASSOCLlTrS. INC. nOGuss SCHEDUU "
DIMCTlONS. NON-COMPWNCE wrm LOBAll A.lSOCLlTV. INe. P~OGIlLSJ' SCHEDUU ANDIOIf 1/o';rllUC'nONS NAY M.SULT
IN T'&JIMINA T10N Of' nus AGRELlltNT ANDIO~ BACK CIWI.Cts. AllY PENALl1ts Olf DAMAGts ASSUSW TO WBAIl
ASSOCUn:s. INC. AS A M.SULT Of nus SUICOH11lACTO~ WILL IE T1/t: /lL!I'ONSIIIUTY Of' THJS SUICOH11lACTOIt
.. CONfLET10N DATE FOIf THIS P~OJECT IS 'AS PER ATTACHED SCHEDULE WTTH UQUIDATED DANACts Of' ..
PER CALEJo'D~ DAY. AllY UQUIDATED DANACts A.lSESSW TO WBAIl .USOaATV. INC. AS A M.SULT Of' nus
SUICOJmlACTOIf WILL BE T1/t: WPO/'lSIIIUTY Of nus SUICOH11lACTOIt
"AS ASSESSED.
/10 TIME ~SION Of' nus CONT1tlCT WILL BE RECOC~= wmlOVT TIlE ~'R/TTE.Y CONSENT Of' T1/t: COH11lACTOIf WHICH
coNStNT SHALL /'lOT IE WlTIIHELD UNllE..SONAILY CONSISTl.'IT wrm Alfl1aJ: X" Of' nus COJmlACT. SU&JECT TO T1iE
AIUfT1lAT1ON no VISIONS I/E.IlEJN PROVlDW,
ART/ClJ. IV. n/E: CO,'.7:HC70R ,'CRUS TO P,,y mE SL','CO,\7l'.'CT'" rN n!,~ ruro,-'",.W:! f"r T"H 1I'(l,.g m,~
FOLUJWI,W:; SUM: nro IiUSDRED FIFTY.Fln: Tl/OUS,IND, nro IIUNDRED DOLLVli ($255,100.00) .I.V
CUAAEJo'T FU~'DS. SUBJECT TO ADOmONS A~'D OEDUC710/o-r F01l. CHANGCS AS MA Y IE A GREll) UPO.Y m Wll/11/IG. " TO M.,;X
MOHfHLY P.' YMENT'! ON..CCOUNT mEllEOf' IN ..CCOIl.OANCE wmI...mcu: X. SEC710NS lo.U INCLUSf1Il:.
A. MONT1/LY PROG/lL!S P.lYME.'IT c%pmONS . lWO (1J COPICS TO W&<A ,lSSOCLlTV. I"'e. omCE IY lam Of' E.<CH
MOIm/. P.'l7oIE.VT OF nus INYOlCE TO IE AS FOLUJWS,'
/oFT lLSS 10'{, IlET.tJNAGE "'7LL BE PMD JOI4S OAY! SU&J!C1 10 AACRmCT.E.YG/~UJUOW/oVl .,nROYAl. " RECEJI'T OF
p.'YME.VT IY WBAJlMSOCLln:s. INe. fOR WO!lX COMP= ON THIS SUICO.vI1I.ACT. NO OrnER CIWI.CCS SUCH ,.S
IHTEREST. CAJUlY1/'IG CIL<ACCS. TAXIS. = WILL IE HONORED UMLSS I"'DIC,rED OT7/EJtWlSE OR AS A CREED 10 BY
Born J'.<A11E.S IN W1lIT1/'IG, REWNAGE TO BE RElLUW UI'ONUP1I.0YAl. FllOM AACJun:CT ,'.''0 OW/o'EJl. AND REcrII'T
Of'MAT'EJfL<L oX IAIOIf nOOf Of P..YME.VT RElLuts. 1l0HTR PAYME.VT UPUCA110NS 10 BE SUBMfTTED ON AI.<
DOCUMENTS G71Tl " G70J OR EQU.<L FOR..., SHO~7.W:; Pa.a.VT COIlP= EACH .110,\7'11,
/10 J'AJl'T1AL OR nNAl. P,'YME.'fTS WILL B! ...t<DE "'711l0VT PROOF OF .lIAT'EJfL<1. P,'l7oIE.'fTS UM.ESS SPEQ.<1.
AJUIA/'IGE.IIE.VT'! ARE .'IAJ)E "'711/ WBAJI Assoa, TV. me.
IF SUICOJmlACTOIf F.utS 10 .IIEEr T1/t: SUBCO.vT1l.ICT REQUlRE.IIENTS..t1.L P.<l?o/E.'fTS DUE I/olaUDING ornrrA.,pl/'IG
SEJ'.<RATE ORDERS MAY BE HELD U/fl1L CORREC71YE .'C110NS.<AE r.ux.y,
ARTICLE V. noVA/. P..YME.VT SII.<LL BE OUE WHE,Y WO!lX OtsCJIJBED IN nus CO.\71IACT IS FULLY COIlPlE1'ED .<loP
fE./lFOIUo/ED IN ACCORDANCE W1T1l TIlE COIo'T1L<CT DOctno/E.'fTS. " PA YlJE.VT 10 BE CONSJsn:.VT "'TT1I AK11a.E {Y" AK11a.E
X. SECTIONS 18. 2o.U INa.USJYf: Of' THIS COJmlACT.
BEFORE ISSUANCE OF ANY P,'l7oIE.VT. TIlE SUBCON11l"CTO~. IF REQUIRED. SIL<1.I. SUBJo/rr EVlDE.'<CE SA l1SFACT01I.Y 10 T1/t:
COJmlAC1OIf T1lA T.<1.I. P.. Y1l0US. .IIA TUUAL BIUS. " AU. K,VOIIIIONDUTUJ/o= COH/o'ECTUJ W1TR T1iE SUBCOH11lACTOR'S
PlOIUC HA YE BUY SA l1snED.
ARTICLE VT. pE.JlFORJol.....CE" P.IYIJE.VT BO~pS.
(N/A) SUB.lfrT A P.H.I(E.~7 J. PERFOR.If.{,\'CE BOND.
ARTICLE VII. TF.IIJ'OR.<AY SITE F"almES,
.f. T1l1S SUICONT1/.ACTOR SRAU. PROVlD!': .t1.L TE.<lPOR.<AY SITE F..aum:.s AS REQUIRED OR AS .''ECESSAJlY TO PE./lFOR.W
/US WOI!X.
.. DURIS RELATED 10 T1iE WO!lX INCLUDED 'N 11lIS SUBCOH11lACT SH.AU. IE RE.WOVED " DISI'OSED Of' BY TRJS
SUICOJmlACTOR. BACK CJWlGts SH.AU. BE MADE FO~ NON-CO"'PWNa:
ARTlCLE VTI1. INSUJ/.<NCE
UMLSS OT7/EJtWlSE PROVlDW I/EJlE1N. T1!E SUBCONT1t.CTO~ SIL<LL HAYE A DIRECT WBIUTY FOIf TIlE ACT'! OF HIS
t:MJ'r.orus " AGENTS FOIf W/uCH HE IS UGAU.Y Wf'ONS/BLE. AND T1/t: SUICOJmlACTOIf SHALL /lOT BE MQUlRED 10
ASnlNE T1!E UU/IUTY FOIf T1!E ACT'! OF ANY 0T1lEJlS.
J'1lJ01f TO STAA71/o'G "'01UC. TRE INSURANCE /lLQUIRED TO IE FVR.o;rSHED SH.AU. BE OIT.tJM:D F1IOM A JlLSf'ONS/BU CONJ'ANY
Olf CONJ'AME.S 10 PROVIDE: nopa. " ADEQUATE COY'EJlAGE " SA l1SFACTOIIY EVIDENCE WILL IE FlJ1lMSHED 10 T1/t:
COJmlACTOII T1lAT T1!E srJBCOH11lACTOII II.<S COIlPUED wrm TIlE REQUIRE.\iE.'fTS AS ;rATED IN TRJS SEC110H.
.-. .
S
A. PROVIDE TWO OJ INSURANCE CERTIFlC.HES IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROJECT INSURANCE
REQUlREME'vTS. CERTIFICATES MUST BE SUB.lImED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH ANY WORK.
ARTICLE 1.'(. JOB cor.cmO,YS
(X) A COMPLETE UST OF AlL MATERIAL SUPfUERS .i SECOND TIER SUBCONTRACTORS WITH
TIlEIR AlJDRESSES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS .ltUST. BE SUBMmED TO LOBAR
ASSOCIATES, INC. WIT/IIN FIFTEEN (IS) DAYS FROM DATE OF SIGNING OF AGREE-IIENT BY
SUBCONTRACTOR.
(X) COST BREAfW()WN FOR UlJOR ~ .\f.HERlAL .ltUST BE SUB.llmED TO LOBAR ASSOCIATES,
I"'C. WITHIN FIFTEEN (lS) DAYS FRO.!( DATE Of SIG,V/NG OF AGREE.lIENT BY
SUBCO,~7RACTOR,
() SUI/lilT PA rROU REPORTS WIT/IIN SF.I'F.N (7) DHS II'EEK.ESDISG TO TillS OFFICE,
.1I0ST III. l' 1''\ ),,11 EST ES nll,\ ns CA.\SO T BE .V'fRO \'1:"D IIUIIOUT ".UROU RErOnS BEISG
SUB.\flrTED.
(X) PROVIDE TES (/0) COPIES OF .~u S!:B.I/lrT'\L D.HA EXACTLY AS REQUIRED IN
\ SPECIFICA TIONS SO L.I TER TIIAS 10 ACGUST 199J. YOUR FIR-II .IIA Y BE HELD UAJJLE FOR
DELH COSTS IF SUB.II/TTALS ARE SOT .\fADE AS REQUIRED AND WITHIN THE REQUESTED
TI.IIE FRA.\fE.
(.'() E.E.O. J. AFFlR-IIA Tr;r: ACTION ARE .~ PART OF THIS SUBCONTRACT. UECUTE AND
/lETUR.V CERTIFlCA TION WTTII CONTR-~CT.
(X) AlL WORK TO BE PERFOR-IIED IN STRlCT .4CCORDASCE WITH LOBAR ASSOCIATES, ISC.
SAFETY PROGR-....II.
( ) USE Of FOREIGN STEEL J. ALU.lIISU.1I PRODL'CTS IS PROHIBrrED ON THIS PROJECT.
ARTICLE X. I.'" ,womo,'" TO mE FOREG<JI,YG no,wONS mE p"Km:s .<LSO ...GUE T.'lAT THE SUBCOI'm/ACTOII Sll.tiL,
/. BE 10 UNa ro mE CONrn..crOIl BY TTlE n:JI.lIS OF mE CO/'o'T7l.<CT COCUMEHTS.I TRJS AGI/EE.IIENT. oi .<SSUME row.<JlO
mE cormlACTOII.<11. mE OBUGAnONS .IllLSPONSlB1U7TES m'TmE Co.vrn.,CTOII. BY 17/0SE DOCUMENTS ASSUMES
TOWARD mE Ol>W~. .tS APfUC<BLL ro TRJS SUBCONrn.tCT.
2. SUB/olrT ro mE CO/'o71l.tCTOII .,"UC' no/'o's FOil p" YME.VI'.' T SUCR nllES ST1PULHUJ IN AKT1aE rv SOAS ro E.'<<BI.E
mE COI'm/ACTOR TO APPLY FOil P,'YME.'T. IF P,O'ME.'TS ,tJ!E .1I,wE 0.'" VALUA7IONS OF WOIUC OONE. mE
SUBCO/'o71l...CTOII SILtll.. BUOIIE THE FTT/ST.tPpucmo,Y. SUB-lIrTro mE CO,YT1l.tC7DR.I SCJ/E./JlfU!. OF VALUES OF
mE VAJUOUS MATS OF mE ",01UC. "CCREe.'71NO THE TOT.tL .,S REQUlIIED BY mE OW/'o'EJ!. ANO. IF IlEQUIIIED.
SUPPO/l'TUJ BY SUCH E>1DE...,a: AS ro rrs COIlREC71>~ .tS mE CO/'oTII...C7DII .IIAY DIRECT. TlfJS SCHEDUlE. WHEN
,unoVUJ BY mE CO,'TII.,CTOII, SILtll. BE USED AS.' BASIS FOil CEI/7'1T1ClTES FOil P,H'ME.VI'. U,YIE.S$ rT BE FOU/'oD TO
BE I/{ EJ/l/OII. IN APfU7/'o'G FOil p" YME.VI'. mE SUBCO:077t.,CTOR SHAlJ. SUB-lIrT,' STATE.IIENT BA.lED UPON TlfJS
SCl/EDUlL IF p" l?JE.'07S AIlE .1I,wE ON ACCOU.VI' OF ,IIATE.RL<LS NOT '''CO/ll'O/U TED IN mE WOIUC lIfT DElJVFJlED
ANO SUrTA.LT STORED ,.,. mE SITE. Oil AT SOME OmER wcmON ,..0= UPOH /,'/ ~7lJ71/'o'G. SUCJI P.'YIoIE.'07S SHAlJ.
BE IN ACCOIlDA,'/a; I>ml mE TEJl.IIS.I CO/'oDmo.'IS OF mE cormt..CT Docr:!JE.'07S.
J. PAY FOII,tLL /oiA TE.RL<LS .11..'8011 USED 1,'1. Oil I.'" COHI.EC710N I>T17/. mE PEllFOIIJLt,'/CE OF T1IJS COrmt.CT. TlUlOUGH
mE PWOO CO',VllJ BY P/lEY10US P.'l?JE.'07S 1lECEl>'ED Fl/O/oi mE CO/'oTII...C7DII.I FTJII."1SH s.mSF..C7DIIY EYlDE...,a;
WIlLy IlEQ= BY mE CO.'TII.,CTOII. ro l'EiUn CO/oiPU'Na: ~T17/ mE ,tBCV'E .<EQUlJILIIE.'07S,
4. ,IrLU:':Z A1.1. L::.-il,I"fS FOR DiltiS. fOR !:XTF....."S/O....-s OF :T!JE. ~ F('1f D,{.Iw/....CE fOR OELt rs OR OT7iZJl\HSE. PRO.lJPTtY 1'0
T1lE CO...,77ttc:t)R ....OSSIS7T-\T ',l,ml nlE CONl1tiC.7 Doct'ME.Sr.J.
S. TAn: I'>'Ec:E5s.<J/Y PREcwnON TO PROPEJI.LY PIIOTECT mE fl/'o1SHED WOIUC OF OTRE.R TltWES,
6. KEZl' mE BUIUJlr;G .I P/lEi,USES aLiN AT ,tll. n/oiES OF VURiS A1lJSJ.YG 01fT OF mE OPE.JI.HION OF TlfJS
SUBCO/'o71l.tCT. mE SU8COtmlACTOII SILtLL .O;OT BE HELD llLS/'OHSIBLL FOil U,~QL..."'CO/'oDmo/'o'S CAUSED BY o mER
COI'm/ACTOII.f Oil SUBcor07/UCTOIlS. UHlLSS OT/lE.JlWlSE PRovroED FOil.
7. COMPLY wrm,tLL STATUTDIIY ANO/OII CO/'o71l.tC77.JAL SAfl:TY IlEQUI/lLIIE.'07S APfLrI/'o'G ro R1S WOIUCANO/OII IHmATED
IY mE CONTll.' crOll, A"C SILtll. I/EPOIIT WT17/JN mREE (ll'DAYS TO mE COtmlAC7DR ANY I/'UUIIY ro mE
SUBCO/'o71l.tCTOII'S E.IIPWru:s AT TIlE ~ OF mE PIIOJECT.
.u. NOT ASSIGN TRJS SUBCOI'm/ACT OR ANY ANOU/'oTS DUE Oil ro BECOME DUE 17/UEUNDER wm/01fT mE WIlJTTEl{
CONSE. VI' OF mE COrmt.. CTOII.
.& NOll SUBCOtmlACT mE W1I0LL OF TTIIS SUBCOI'm/ACT wrmOIfT mE W7UTTE.'" CONSEHT OF mE COI'm/ACTOII.
Ie, NOli FVI/TI/EA SlJ8COI'm/ACT /'01IT70NS OF T1IJS SU8COtmlACTwrmOIfT W7f1TTE.'( NOnnClT70N TO TIlE CONT'/lACTOII
WIIL'( SUCR ,000TTnCl TlON IS IlEQUESTED IY mE CONT'/lACTOIl.
9. GUAIUN1U IUS \IIOIUC AGAlNST,tLL DEFECTS OF /oiATEllJALS ANOIOIl WO/IJiNANS/Ul' AS ClLUD FOR IN THE PUNS.
SPEaFlClTlONS. ",wDE.'IOA. Oil IF NO GUAIUN1U IS CULW FOil. 17/L'" FOil A PWOD OF ONt: [/) YUJl nOM mE
DATES OJ' P,tJl71AL Oil roT-tL ACCEPTAJoIC1! OF mE SUICO/'o71l.tCTOII'S WOIUC IY mE OWNa
/004. NO SEl'.UUTP: UHDEIlSTA/'o'l)/HG Oil AOIlEEJolENTS OJ' ANY 131'0'0 WILL IE t:NIERLD INTO IY mE SUICONT'/lACTOIl oi mE
OWHUl AHO/Oll IUS AllCIUTT;CT Of' AO~ IlEI-m\y; ro ANY ORiG/HAL Oil emu \IIOIUC CO/flD/l'UTED BY TlfJS
---..
6
AGULllE-VT usUSS nlE lIME IS fiRST AfPROV!!J IN WRI71NG IY CO/mLfCTOR.
101. SUICOlml.iC70R SHALl.INSUU. 1I/..T AU. SUIC0NTR..C70RS. E.IIPLOrus. "SUI'I'UEIlS. AT AU. TlME.S..<IlL '.<10 AU.
ANOU~ DUE IN CONS1:C7l0N wmt nlE 'EUOR.IIANCt: Of T//IS SUICOHT1lACT. AFT'EJI mE nRST '.f'tlolE-VT
HLJUUSOl./f. COHT1lACllJR SIW,L H.fYl.' TH.! RIGHT TO ....mtHOLD ANY SUBSEQUE-VT 'A YUENTS UlmL SUICO/o77UCTOR
sUtwm E~10l"'CE .Ll TlSf.t CTORY TO COtml..C70R 1I/.f T AU. MlOU~ OWED IN CONNEC710N wrm 'EUO/lJo(MiCt: Of
nus SUICO/o77UC7 11.' Yl.' lEEJI ',<10. TlJRTI/lIl. SUICONTl'ACTOR AG/lUS TlIAT COHT1lACTOIf MA Y '.fY AU. 'EIlSONS
WIUCH ILf Yl.' NOT IELY ',liD TH.! IOOMES DUE TllLlilN COf'll>'EC710N wrm 7lUS SUBCO/o77UC7 WHET1/EJl OR NOTA UE-Y
IUS IELY f7UD. " SUICONTllAC70R SIW.L. TO mE =VT 1I/..T CO/mLfC701f HAS NOT U.COYl.'RLO WO MlOU~
't/lUUA.VT TO wrmHOUJINO. '.fY lliO A.llOU~ TO CONI1l..C70R UI'ON OE.\lAI'D. SUBCO/o77UCTOR SIIALL ALSO
WME.DLi rlLY REJMIURSE COtml.tL70R fOR.LvY.LllOUNT! '.<10 UNDl./f CO/mLfCTOIf'S ,..YUENT IOI'D INCONNEC710N
wrTH T1US SUICO.VTR..C7" 1.'OE.liMf7E.D BY COlo'l1l.tC70R. IN nIE EVE.VT COHT1lACTOR IS RlQUI/lED TO ,..y OR
INOl.lJSlFY "SY 'E-UO.'l HCMU.'OE.f. SUBCOI,l1l.tC70R SIL<U. LlllOE.DlArlLY REJMBURSE nIE CO/o77UCTOR fOR TH.!
I1IU COj7 mEllEOf. 1.'aUOINO .iTTORSEY'S fUJ,
lOCo SHOULD SVBCONI1l.,CTOR ,'T A,'Y nilE f,liL TO Sr;PfLY,i SUff7C1E-VT.\VMBE-f Of SKJULl) WOIlK!>/E.YOR.. SUmClE-'T
QU,L'71TY CF ,\/" Tf,RL.U CF nOP[.f CU,tUTY. OR f,liL IN ,tW RL5P!CT TO nOSEClITE nlE WORX COIVUD BY nlls
SV5CI.'..,.;....~.c;c" h;:d ".'O~(i'j7'.DS.' D:~PCE.."C:'. CA' f.tJL ,.... nu: n:..FJ"OF..~(.t...." OF ,tS}'(;"- 71IE .HJr'.I:DfE.vrs H!..:..!1.l'
CONr.I1,\W, OR Sllln'UJ ,','.y ....OR...:\iL~ P[.VOR.I//..'" WO.V: COVL'll) BY TlUS SUBCOtm/.fC7lSG,iGE IN f ST1lJa. OR
OTI/U wo.v: STOfP,'CE. OR cr.t!E TO ....ORX DUE TO f/CKL71NG OR OTilEll SUCH AC71~m. cosniC70R .ll.n INASY
~f SUCII r>L''TS. AT m omo.Y. ....7TH0l!T PRDUD/CE TO ...vY OTilEll RE.IlE.DIES rr .\I" Y IIA "E. ifTE.f fOR rt, l:JGHT /4J1
HOURS ....7/JT7T..Y SOTla: TO SU.CONTR.ICTOR. fROI1DE ,flo')' SUCH L.tBOR .,SO M.i TE1Uu.s .f"O DE.DUCT mE COST
T1/EJlEOf fROll ,f.vY .\IOMES TIlLY DUE OR TilEll.!.<FTE.f ro BECO.liE DUE SUBCONri'-iC70R: ANO flJRTI/lIl. IN A.W Of
SUCH EH:''TS, CO....I1l.ICTCR .Ii,'Y ,iT m omOH. ....mtOllT PRDUDIa: TO AM' omEll RL'o/WIE.S rr .IlAY ILfl'/:.
n:R.ll/,Y.iI'E mE E.I/PUJYML'T Of SUlCo.,n, CTOR 'S f7R.ll fOR mE wORX USOE.' TTUS SUBCOSntC7" SIL<U. 11.. I'/:
mE RlCIfT TO E.'n:Jl UfO,y TH.! PRE.I/ISES A.'O r.ta. POSSESSION. fOR nlE PURl'OSE Of CO.\lPu:T1NO mE WO/lX
HLJUU.'nE.f, Of ,<U. nlE /oI.aVu.tLS. TOOLS. ~ EQL'IP,I/E.VT TiIL'lEON. " TO f7MSH nlE WORK ~ PROV7TJl TH.!
MA1VU'LS mEJlllORl EmiL. ....7TH m OW.Y LI/PWrrrs OR OTIILf SUBCONTR.fC70R.S: A.'n IN CiS. Of SUCH
DISCOlmSV"SCE Of mE [.IlPLOYME-VT IT CO....T1/.tCTOR. SUBCONT1lAC70R SIIALL SOT BE E.VTTTU!J TO RlCEIYE ANY
fl/IlT1lEJl P" YME.'ors U.'OEll TH.! SUBCO....T1/.IC7 OR OTIIL.....,SE. BlIT SIIALL .''EYERnu:uss RLliAlN WBLL fOR A.'o'Y
DAMAGE.S ""/{JCH CO....I1l..CTOR 1."crJltS..1f TH.! EXPE.'!E.S l....crJRJ/El) BY mE COHT1lAC70R IN CO/olPI-."71NG mE WO/lX
SHAll. EXCEED nIE USPMD 8.u......a. SUBCOSI1l..CTOR SILtLL I'.i Y mE DlfTERLYCE TO mE COtml.lCTOR Al.f)NG ....ml
ANYonlE1l DA.Il..GE.S I'yCL'RJ/El) BYCOIo'T1tICTOR.iS TH.! RESULT Of SUBCOtml.,CTOR'S DUAULT. CO.VI1l.iCTOR SIIALL
1UYl.'.f UE.Y UPON AU. ,li.I1VUtLS. TOOLS. ~ ..PPW....crs T.v:z.y POSSESSION Of ro SECURE nIE P..YME.VT TIlEllEOf.
SUBCOSTR.'CTOR SI/ALL BE /.LULL TO cosn'CTOR DUE ro mE F.<1WRE Of SUBCOtml.fCTOR'S PE1IFOlWANa.
SUBCO....I1l.'C70R.S F.ULL'Rl ro KUJ' TH.! fROC/fESS Of m WORX UI' TO TlLfT Of CONT1lACT Of OTI/U T1/.WE.S. OR
mE F.<1WRl ro EXECUTE m wORX.<S DIRlC7'EJJ BY CO....l1l.fCTOR.
100. SUICOtm/.'CTOR AG/lUS Ti/.17 WHE.Y TH.! co.,n.C7 DOCU.\JE.V71. SI'ECf7Cl7l0NS. OR DR.f ....7NGS RlQUIRl.
SUBCO.'TR.fCTOR ....7LL COMPLY wmt ,i.W .ifPUC'BLL S7.tTE OR FEDE1/.tl. PREYAlUSO WAGE L..w AS WELL AS ,LV'(
RULES OR RlGUL.mOSl fRO/olUI.CA1UJ mE.'lEUSDEJI. mE SUBCOtml..CTOR AGREES TO COMPLY wrm AU. SUCH
TEJWS" co.'nmos'S WlUCH ..RE .fffUC.BLL ro T1l1S SUBCOtml.fC7..sn TO IsnE.liMFY" HOLD mE COtml..CTOR
IlAJtIolI..ESS fOR .LVY F.<1LL'RE ro CO/olPLY ~mt SUCH co,'nmosl.
IDE. SUBCO.'n'C70R "'1LL H.i IE "cn'.tJ. RESPO.'!/BlUTY FOR COlOPLn.'lG ....mt THE S7.u.nAlWS SET fORnI IN mE RUI..ES
"REGUZ., TlO,'o'S PROMULGA TUJ PL'RSU,L'T ro mE COSrrRUC710N 1<fETY,'C7 (.vJ U,S. C J27)" OTl/lll OSIIA REL.TUJ
PRO\1SIO,''S ro mE ='T AffUCULL ro TH.! SUBCONnlAC70R'S PORTION Of mE WORK" SUBCOtml.fCTOR SII.<U.
INOE.IoIMFY,'Sn.Ll IE THE CO,VI1l.iCTOR 1LtR.IlILSS INCOf'll>'EC710N T1lEJlEWTT1I f~OM ANY A.'on .<U.DA.liAG.lNaJJDING
AT7UR.''ErS fUS. COST OF COIUlECTT'oE ,.rnON. ns1:S. =
II, AND OOE.S HEllEAY "GREE 11/.17 TH.! CO....T7I.tCTOR.S EQL7PME.VT ....7LL BE A VAlL.t,LL TV mE SUBCO....T7lACTOR ONLY AT
T1lZ CO."TR.H70R'S DJScru:;;O,Y" O,V ,lJU1t',tUY !.~l1SF.iC70Rr TE..fl.\fS.
J:' ft'/(,"1!U n:.PJOOIC P.fl~""l_;^E.SS RL,r't~NT! ()f mE ',l,'ORX.fS ,l.Il/Tt'A11.Y .iCIU:.E!) '.....aUDI.W; THE I'ROCIt!SS OF .".ar..".J.tLS
OR EQl.IPl.lc....T l.,'.\plJl nus .iCR..!..E..I./l....T nti T .\l.i r SE /."1 TJ-I.E CQI.':RSE OF fRLP.t.R..i 110N OR ...1.i,...~.F'.H7L'RL.
/J. MoLtE ANY ~ AU. ClLfNGES OR DEYLfT10S! f1/0M THE ORlGINAl. fL.L''S ~ SI'ECf7CA nONS WlmOllT .'oVwn7,YG THE
ORlGlNAL COtmlAC7 WHr.Y SPECf7CAUY ORDE1IEJ) TO DO SO IN WRI71NG BY nlE CONTR.'CTOR. mE SUBCO/mLfCTOR
'RlOR TO nlE COMME-'oCF..llE-VT Of nus RE\7SW WOM, SHALl. SUBMrr PROMPTLY TV mE COtmlACTOR WllJTTE.Y
COI'IE.S OF mE COST OR =rr PROf01U. fOR SUCH REVlSW WORK IN A .liAf{/>'E./I CO/o'SISTE.VT wrm mE CONT1lACT
f)()CUN E. VTS,
/4. COOI'EJI.,T'E WTT1/ nlE CO.VI1l.fCTOR ~ 0T7iE1/ SUBCOIml..CTORS WROSE WORJC MIGHT 1NTE1lFE1!E wrm THE
SUBCONT1lACTOR'S wORX ~ TO P,tJlTlClP,'T'E IN TH.! PREl'"jI.tTlON Of COORDINAT'EIJ DRAWINGS IN ARL.s Of
CONOCSTlON AS RlQUI/lED 'Y mE COIo'T1t.C7 DOcrJ.IlE.VTS. SPlCf7CAll.Y NOnNG &. AD\1SINO mE CO/mLfCTOR OF
ANY SUCH INT'EJlFEIlENCE.
IS. CDOI'EllA T'E wrm mE COtml.'CTOR IN SCIfll)UU,YG HIS WOM SO AS NOT TO CONfUcr OR INTEJ/f7JlE wrm mE WORX
0,0T1IE1lS, TO 1'lf0/olPTLY sUlMrr SHOP DIt.WlNGS. DItf WINGS. &. SMll'lLS. AS RlQUIRED INORDEIl TV CAll/fY ON WO
WO/fIC EFF7CE.'o7LY AI'D AT SPUD TlLfT WILL NOT C'USE DI:LfY IN T1lE PROCRE.S$ OF mE COtml.fC7lJR'S WORJC OR
0T1lVf BItfNCIIE.S OF TIlE WOM CfJIJI/l:JJ ON BY OTl/lll SUICO/o77UCTORS.
14. COM'LY WTT1/AU. FEDERAL. STATE. "LOCtl. L.fWS" ORDINANQ'S AfI'LnNG TV mE BUIWING 01fS71WCTVRE Asn TO
COM,LY Asn GlVE ADlQUA T'E NOTlCLS RELtTlNG TO THE WOM TO 'ROI'ElI A umO/lJ7TES AI'D TV SECURE AI'D 'A Y fOR
AU. /'o"Ea.ss.LU UCF..YSES OR PEJlNfTS TO Cw<Y ON T1iE WOM AS OESC1UBW IN mE COHT1lAC7 DOCUMENTS AS
AfI'UCtBLE TV nus SUICO~cr.
---
1
11. COI"'LY wm/ fUJEJIAL. STAn'. " LOCAL TAX lAWS. SOau. SECUM7Y I.IWS. U/o'E.IlfLOYME/o'T COMfl:HSA710N lAWS"
WO~Oi'S COMfENSA710N UWS INSO'AIlAS A""UCWZ 10 mE ftn'OIW.lI'ct: 0' nus SUICOlfT7UCT.
I'. AND DOts HUUY AGI(ZZ nlAT AlL WOf<< SHAlL 'I! DOlo'/! SUIJECT 10 nNAL A""ROVAL Of T1US AACHlTt:CT OR
OWNEJl.'S A VTIIO/llZED AGE/o'T. " /US Dl!aSION IN Mol TTlM Rl:U 71NO 10 .ummc EFfECT SHAlL 'I! nHAL. If WTT1UN
T7lI! TEJWS 0' T7lI! CONT1fACT DOCTIMENn.
19. T7lZ SUICON71/.tCTOIl SIULL II!.IIl tJlIJ. RESfONSlIlUTY fOR dU. WORK 10 'I! fl:llFOR.llED U/o'Dl:J! /US SUICOlfT7UCT.
INa.UDINO AlL 1100' fl:N1:T7lA710NS. CVTTING. fATC/UNO. ETC mE SUICON71/.tCTOIl AGRUS nlAT mE COSTO' ALL
CVTTINO" fA TCIUNG HAS 'UNIHa.WEDAS fAIITO' SUICOlfT7UCTOR'S WO/UC. ml! SUICON71/.fCTOIlAGRUS 71lAT
1/6 SHAlL l:.llfLOY AA71SAN$ A/o'D TR.WESMEN 0' T1IE TR.WE IIOIWAlLY RESI'ONSIBLE fOR T1IE ROO'. 011 fOil nMSH
WOf<< INVOLVED 10 cvr AND fATCR AIlOUND T1/E Waf<< 0' SUBCOlfT7UCTOII'S TR.Wl:.
Ul. mE SUBCOlfT7UCTOIl Sll.lLL MAKE AlL AI'PUCmONS fOil fAYME/o'T 10 LOB.1Il ASSOCUn:s. IHe. AS AGE/o'T fall mE
OWNU/. LOB.IIlASSOCUn:s SH.iU SUBIo/fT!UlD AI'PUCHTONS 10 T1/E AIlCI/J'TtCT .INV OW/o'UI fOR f,IYMOIT. UI'ON
AI'PROVAL Of f.IYME/o'T BY T1/E .IIlCI/J'TtCT AND OWHl:J!. AloV fAYMC.vr BY T1/E OWI-'Ul TO LOBAIl ASSOCUn:s.IHe. AS
AGENT fall T1/E OW){EJI. 10 SUBCOlfT7UCTOR IN ACCO/lD.u;ct: 1\7T11 nil! TU!.\'/S Of nus SUBCOImlACT. mE
SUBCONT1/ACTOR FURT1/f.R ,ICKNO~UDGts .~NV AGRUS mfTLOIHl/ ASSOCUTrS. ISC, SIL,U ILH'r NO UiBl/JTY TO
SUBCO.\TI'.lCrOR fOR 11iE O""fR'Sf.ULl:KE TV i',l rfOR kOM fOifOI<.I/W BY SU8LU,\"X,,'/t'H. ,.,',1) SL'BCO....7i/.1CTO,~
AGRUS TO HOUJ WB,{J/ ASSOCT.tTrS. INC. H.lIl.\JILSS fRO/ol ANY CLUM fOR f,O)'/E.\1' rOR "-OM fU1FOR.lIW BY
SUpCOIm/.ICrOR. ANV TO II-VI!.\(NlfY LOIW/ .1SS0CT.tTrS.IHe. f/iOM A....Y SUCII CLU,lIS MADE BY SUBCOImlACTOR'S
SU'sCOImlACTOI/S. l:.\'/fLOYUS. AGENn. A/o'D M.HFJUAL SunuC/l.5.
mlT mE COImlACTOR " SUBCOIm/..croR AGREE:
21. m1T IN T1/E MATTFJI Of AllJ/mr.mON. TllEJR R1G/fT! A/o'D OBUGA710NS. AloV AlL fROCCDU/lL SIfALL BI! AJ<<l.O(;()US
10 mOSE SE:T' fO/lTH IN mE COtml.ICT DOCUMC.= fROVlDW. HOwnvr. T1/A T A DEaSJO'" BY THE AIlCHlTt:CT OR
OWNEJI'S AVTIIORIZED AGC.vr. S/LiU /o'OT BI! A CONvmON fRLCZDC.vr 10 AJUIrTIl.~710N,
ARTICLE Xl. TU!.\,/INAT10N CLiUSE
LOBAR ASSOCUn:s.INe. SHAlL HAl'!: T1/E /UGHT ro TU!.IlINATE T/US COlfT7UCT AloV 10 IURf. .<NOTRD/ CDImlACTOR 10
1'fllF0R." mE INCOMl'LETE I'O/lTTOH Of T11E WOIUC SHOUUJ mE CO/oTRACTOR fAlL 10 l'ERfOR.\I m OBllGAT10NS U/o'DE:ll
TTUS CO/oTRA CT. LOBAR ASSOCU n:s. IHe. SHALL.<LSO //A I'!: mE IUGHT 10 /lECO VE:ll ANY A.'V AlL LOSSES OR DAMAGE.
INa.WINOATTOR.w:rS FUS. RESULm<G f/iOM T11E CONTRACTOR'S BJlE.ICli Of CON171ACT.
ANY mOUNT DE:TC1/.11//o'W ro BE DUE LOIW/ ASSOCUTrS. IHe. BY ANY AIlNTTlA710N. AlUITR.H70N l',1NF:1.. COURT. OR
TRROUGR ANY 0T1lE:ll DISl'UTf: RESOLUTION TECHMQUE Sll.lLL IlI!.lIlIHTEJtEST f/iOM T1/E Dol TE mE BJlE.ICli OCClJI/J/f.D .~ T
mE JJAX1MUM RATE l'E:ll.l,(fTTFD BY T1/E USURY I.lWS Of T1/E AI'PUCfBLE JURlSDICTTON,
ARTICLE XlI. IN WTTNE.SS WRFJlf.Of mE l'.lIlT1ES Rf.JlE1O //AI'!: =CVTW TTUS AGRLLlIC.vr UI-Vl:J! SE.lL. T11E DAY AloV
IZAR f11lST IVRJTTEH ABOI'Z. If nus SUBCO/oTRACT IS NOT EXECUTED WTT/UN fOU/rrFLY 1/4) ClLL'VAIl DA~ AFTE:ll
/lECE1/"T. LOIIAll ASSDaAn:s. INe. l/ESEJ/I'!:S mE /UGHT 10 VOID T/US AG/lLE.lIE/o'T AloV OBT.UN = SE:llVla:s f/iOM
ANOTHER nR.".
THIS SUBCONTRACTOR CERTIFIES TRAT TT
JWNTAlNS A NON-SEGREGATED I'UCE OF
BUSINESS AND IS AN EQU.u. OI'I'ORTUNTTY
EMI'LOYER.
SUBCONTRACTOR
ArrEST:
(SEAL)
BY
(T/TI.E)
LOBAR ASSOCIATES. INC.
CONTRACTOR
ATTEST:
JANICE K. FLEMING. CORI'. SEC.lTREAS.
LEE E. EICI/ELBERGER. I'RESIDENT
_._~_..
T ~ t
A~ERICA~
I .:'1 S T' I T U
(,
ARCHt1'!.G1
\I
AlA Document AIOI
Standard Form of Agreement Between
Owner and Contractor
u'bere tbe basis of payment is a
STIPULATED SWrf
1987 EDITION
----
THIS DOCUMENT HAS I.I/PORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH
AN A TTOR.VEY IS ENCOI.'RAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR .I/ODIFlCA TION.
Tb, /987 Edition 0/ AlA Documrnt AJOt. C","ol CondillOIU o/Ib, Contra,,, lor CDTUlruction. is tJdoplfd
in Ibis dccumrrtt l1y rtfrrTTlCt'. Do 110t us, u:llb ,olbrr 8tnrTaJ COnditIOns unless tbis documml is modl/i,d.
Thi> documenl Iw bcm 'ppro\'<<1 :lI1d cndor=1 b~ The .....oc::llC:d Gc:ncnJ Con=o" o( Amc:riC1
AGREEMENT
m:ldcasofthc 16th
Nincteen Hundred and
d.:1yof
July
in thc y= of
x2lll:tbl:
93
x~
BETWEEN thc Owner:
(."'CUM and add~J
West Shore Countrl Club
100 Brentwater Rood
Camp Hill, PA 17011
and thc CoOtr:lcror:
(Nam, tVld addrnsl
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
1 Old Mill Road
P.O. Box 432
Dlllsburg. PA 17019-0432
Thc Project is:
(."'am, (Jnd loc.Jtlon)
PoolI Bathhouse Construction
West Shore Country Club
Camp Hill, PA
Thc Architect is: H. Edward Black & Assodates
(,Vam,aN/add,"" 2403 N. Front 51. .','
Harrisburg, PA 17110
*Note: The term "Architect" as referenced herein shall mean "Landscape
ArChitect/Engineer".
The Owner and Comr.aclor agree as sct forth below.
",
....<t~;:...
....-......
~.~
CopynshI19.,. 1918. 191'. 19H. 19". 19'8. 1961. 1961. 196'. 19'~. 19~. ~198' by The Amc:nnn I""INII o( AICh~ ,
IC'CtI. 17J' New York AyCt1ue. ~.V1.. Wuhinllon. D.C. 20006. RC"productlOf\ o( the malab& herein 0' Jubsunlbl quo12uon
o( III provisions ....UhOU1 wrlllC11 perm1ulon of Ihe AlA Ylol~IO Ihe CUP)'"stu la"l vi Ihe l.onUcd Stala and Wid be subject 10
Icpt proK'CUllun. . .
"
AlA ooc::uM2HT "101 . OWNU<OHTRACTOJ AGItL"'tffT . TYn1Tlt lelnON . u,,- . 'C I"''':'
ntl A.WVUCAl't lNSTrTt.n 0' .UCHmcn. I1n:"!["W 'Yoal( I,VD'il't. ~..... ....uHINGTO~. 0 C. :r1.1f\
Al01-1987 1
WARNING: UnUc..'.,.d photoc:opyt"9 ~.. u.s. ~t I.... .",., '. aue+.ct ID '-V.. PtDMcudott.
- ---------:--...
.- --..-.......--
.--.---.....---
.. - '.:~. .,'. :'
"
ARTlCl.E t
THe CONl'RACT DOQJMENTS
The 1:.,nrrJ(r Ou(umenl.:l (olbbl o(rhb AStccmenr. ConUlII!)", o('he CUnrt:l(1 tCenet:ll. Supp/emenarr:ln<.l orher Con<.llllo"",.
Ot:l"'IrIJl:l. "PC\.'ilk~lIu"". JlI<.Ienlb bluC\l prior ro c''lI:CUllun o( this "~enr. olher lloc:umenl.:llbrC\l In Ihb '\~menr :In<.l
.llullllk~llU", l...ue<.l ~Iler e,'Cl."lIon o('hb .\~emenr: th""e (arm Ihe CunulIet.:aniJ ~:IS NU)' 1I p:ut o(rhe Conrt:lel:lS 1(~lathC\l
113 rhl. .INteemenr or Iqlc::Iled hen:ln. The Conrlll~l rqltc>enlllhe enrin::lnd InrCjlt:lled 'Bm:menl bel"'ccn rhe pllnfc:s hen:lO
:In<.l "U;:ell'e\J.. prlllt nCllOII:llJOns, ~n:scntlliu"" 0"~<TIlJ. cith<flVrillal orul'.ll. M enumellll/un u(rhe CUnrt:l~l OocumenL1.
ulher ,h,n .IIOllin~';II/U"". JPpc:llS In Anlcle!l. .
ARTlCU: 2
THe WORK OF THIS CONTRACT
The CunllllClOt .h>ll e~CC\jre Ihe enlite Wor1c da<nbcd In the Cunlt:lCl oOcumcnll. "",CcpIIO Ihe =enl'l'CC1/loUy InUle,C\l in
lhe C~nlt:lCl Documenu 10 be the tcsponslb,UIY o( othen. Ot:u (oUo...., '
As Per Contract DOcuments Listed In Article 9 And Attached LOBAR ASSOCIATES'
Rev's.'on Letter Dated 26 June 1993 And General Contract/pool ~!lrstruct1on
CombIned, Contract. Lel~,. \J- tf. LI:Oj{'~ ca~{..'",~J
L. t:f,tJ.
ARTlCU: 3
DATE OF COMMENCEMENT AND SUBST AHT1A1. COMpu;; ,,__ , .
3. t The wre o( commenecmcnlis Ihe Wle from ...hJehlhe ConlnCt TIme o( I':t:Ignph 3.1 Is mc::uurcd. :lnd >luJ1 "" 'he cUle or
llIls A&m:m<TIl.:U 11m ","nen ,boye. W1Jc::ss, dJm:mll dale is .clod ~o.. at proVision Is m:ldc rOt the dale 10 be ftxed In. no<lce
10 proceed blued by Ihe O...n....
u""'" ,...." 01 .v...._""~,. 'I" .'llm lOT>.. ,.. ""', 01"" ............., , .~........ ...",_ ,.. """ ...u .. l<noi,. . ""',eo ,. pn""",
6 July 1993 /(,j'J..i. ta
l:n1c::ss Ihe dlle ur commencemenl) esablished by . nOdee 10 proceed Wucd by Ihe O","er. the Conlt:lClOt 'lull nOI/~' Ihe
O"'n... in "'nllng norlc::ss lIun /lye cUr> be(ore eomm<TIeing the Wur1c 10 ,,",,",lthe Ilmdy tiling of monlPges. m""Iun'e', liens
>nd oth... SC'CUriry InlCl'<:lu.
3...2 The C"ntr.lClor.1ull ,c!tieve Sub'=ll:lJ Compleuon of Ihe enun: Wor1c nOI ,"Ier lh>n
u...., '.. ,..........., '" ....- 01 -_. ...... ."...,.. ""', of "'~-""~" ...... '''''''' ~,' ............""'10. non,... ,""'....,,'" CO"p'n"., uf.....
'IUIf /1'''''''''' ''i ,,,. II"n,... 'I nOl1l4lrd rt,..",,,,,", ,,, IH GJltlracr /)r1Cll"'",U./
31 December 1993
'. -
'.-
"1= 10 'dlwunenu of this Conlr.l<t Tune :u provided In the Co"'''Cl Coc\J,;,ents.
. '"-'1111I"4 "''''.1''./,,, IIq14uJ.MJrrI."",.Itn 1TUu1".IlI/~/fI" to n""p''''.'Nt IIMfr./
lUbject to liquidat6d damages as defined in
tions Section of the Specifications at the
'nd every calendar day beyond December 31,
Item 7
sum of
1993.
of the Supplementary
SlOO.OO per day for
r "'0' . OWHU.cOf'rf'TI.ACTO. ACIUMI:NT' TYnrTH EDmOH. AlA- . CI9117
'NSnTVrl 0' ,uouncn. 17)1 NIW YOII( 4vtMJr. H.W. .OUHu.cro..... 0 C.':0006
WARNING: UnAc___ "'"'-. r,t.""...w.tHUS. ~1-. _.. _. .... _.
A10l-1987 2
. '., ....,~. I ..
..:,:",:,'1.,.
;: 'of.',' ~,.~,'t' .: ',"
'-\,' "
~ "'.
.
..' .
, , ,
\
.....-...
"
':;:'. "
.....
.......
,:,:",:'
...--.......,...
, "
, . ., ,~
. "
" ',,',
...,.....
"ARTlCU!4.,
, . '. "~.. .. . ..._,
' "', ." . , ,...., CONTRACl'SUM,
,. . ,;. .', '-,'. ..:: ,4'_-:;":":~:'-;:;""-"'.:.r~"",_"r.....~{..t'.~.',..:... ..'
.4. r.\ The O"'n<1' 1/ulJ Il2Y lhe cQnll:clOt 1n,=I, ~<b lot, uie'ContnaOr'~omunce of lhe Con....ct lhe Con~ Sum of
"~J:;~tIC:flUtIttt.>>.lO<<~~~~~~~lf~,~~li /l&J1lo ~d ..:...nxxxxxxx:U ilolbn
(,XllJC!lOI;lC%XOO< 5877,)56,.00..:::,,,,;,.,,,,;,, '.,~/CctIO~.,ru:ll1 u<ouuCIJoruuProvldcdlnlheCon.
1~}1'j(iiiiiCnu. Eight Hundred Sev:entY-Seven Thousand, Three Hundred FiftY-Six
4.2" The Conrnct Sum Is based upon lhc (oUowlnS :aJicnutc:s. if .or. "'11Im :ItC dcscnbcd In lhe Coml:lct Documcnu :ll1d :lie
hc:rcby :u:ceplcd by me Ownc:t:' ",
(S,"'"bt .....-., .,- ......../1"""'. ./-.pl'" """""'If. 1/-.,..,...._ .,;"...", .,.,. bt....,. j,y.... 0...... ,oJn",.....". ,0, 'new'...i
11111 A,,,",,,,,,,, tUWUI" "~u/,, of IwJJ OIbwfJUWJ1I4ln Uow.It, '" PIOIUtI/~ l"dd IUt4lbtt diU, ,.,,,,, u'II.a ,btJI.......o,,'" U fw/1It.J. 2
A. Base Contract Amount ";18 3,824.00
B. Accepted Alternates:
Alternate ~l: "Masonite-a" Siding a~ Detailed on Plan A-9
Alternate ~2: Concrete Stairs @ ~orth Parking Lot
Alternate #4: Storm Sewer CB-51, CB-52 and CB-52A
Alternate #5: Storm Sewer CB-52 to Outlet S-l
Alternate ~6: Dumpster Pad, Enclosure Gate & Stairs
Al terna te ~7: Use 36" Concrete Storm Pipe from Inlet-l
I to Outlet-l Deduct
C. Add Two (2) "0" Parking Lot Fixtures
D. Add Three (3) "OJ" Parking Lot Fixtures
E. Add Masonry Walls @ ~~IJcr Area
F. Add Concrete Curbing @ Entrance
Dol
4,000.00
3,000.00
10,000.00
22,000.00
3,000.00
4.3 Uni. ;"''-es. if :ny, 2l'C 2.S toUows:
(2,000.00)
3,725.00
5, 000 . 00 V"
1,150.00 ,
175' Straight & 35' Radius 3.657.00
TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: 5877,356.00
':'. )
-:-~.::';4';, ~
21'012':1. -
6:::,500, +
I
I
'.-
....
"
:::2:;::3:.~4. T
-. ---.- . -.~- __ ___ _.l
. '. t
, ~L:i:~:i~;~~t\~~iD~:~l,i~;t~:,::' ~:f'::>ji}~;:;':, ::" ",
.: '.. ;..'. \~. ,.
, ,', . \ ,\, ../.,~\::.).:~;~~~t~;~7~
. '.' ,. "",,', ~'''' .,'\1
".. '::..-.;::'.,:;.,':;.~:~'~~:
?If A1a1 . OWND..c.oH1"aA.CTcI ACUE.'.fEHT,. rwn.rnt' IDmQH. AlA-,. GI917
"fINSTTTVn 0' "AaUT!CTS. 1131 Nor You AVlM.."!. ."f....... YA.1HC'tCTOtc. D.C.:OOQlS
, A101.1987, 3 " . .'-
WA.ItNrPQ u....~~ pt
. ..' ~u.s.~,--"",,,_,-,,-,,,,-_,,
ART1ClE 5
PROGRESS PAYMENTS
5.1 8",.<1 uplln .\ppIlC-JIIUII> (ut ?,\,menl ,ubmillo<J 10 Ihe .\rchiICCI by Ihe Cunl~elut w<l C.m,tC:lld (Ot PJrmenl i>suC\l by Ihe
.\tehiICCI. Ihe Ol\'net ,h:lll m::l<e ,,,,~<)j pJrm~u un >ccounl u( Ihe Cunlr:le! ~wn 10 Ihe CUnlt:lC1ut :u pl\lvillC\l belu... :&Il<l
~bc,,'hcrc in Ihe C;\u\lrJL:t OoCo.:::':i;:":L1.
5.2 Th. P'IIU.! ell\'cro<J hy "JC~ .1,plle>!lun (ut ~'ymcnl ,h~ be one e>JencUt mUOlh enlllng un Ihel"'l d,)' u(lh. mUOIh. Ut:lS
(uUUI\'S:
5.3 P'I" ,,;.<I.lI1 ,\pplicJlIun :'.., ?!"menl i:l t"""'\'o:d b!,' Ih. .\tchIlCCI nul blet Ihon ,h. 25th
d:ly ur, month. Ihe Ownet .hJ1l m:llc. p.!"menllo Ih. CUnlr.lClUt nul bIer ltun
lhe 15th d:ly ur Ihe Next munlh. I( on .\ppIlOliun (Ot P'rmenl i:l recavo:d by the
...(chllc:,:1 J"'C( rhe Jpplh....lIIun c.;:: :';."C'\J :abu\'C'. p::Iymmc )tuJl be m:acJe b~' lhe: O\\"n(r noe UIC( (J\:1n
15 \1.Iy.'4 Jncr lhe .\:':;~;;cxc r<<C'1\'O the "'pplic:uun (ur P::aymenc.
5.4 E:.n.11 ."PI'Ii,::Ulll" fur P:J~.r::C'~: ':~:JJI he h:.u<tJ upon Ih~ xhC'\.lulc lJr' \'JIUd :suhmiltctJ br the ClJnlrJC'tor in :.lccurc.1:Jncc: ";Ih
lhe C,"\lr.:d C\h,:Ulnf:l\b. The ...:.:.;".,11.: ui" \-:.Ilun :'Ih~1 JlkJl.."'JIC (he: cnlltC Cl.lnlrJCI Sum :Jmung Ihe \-:.lriUWi ponlun:ii uflhc \'\hrk
:.Jnu he prcp:JtC'u 11\ ."u\,h fIHlIlJr:~ 'i..:~punt'd hr )uL.h UJtI hJ jUb~c.mli:lll: iu :,u:curJt;o' J.:Ilhc: .o\rchilI:C1 m:Jr require. Thi:s schedule:.
unla."l lIhlC'L'tCIJ It) by Iht' ,\rc~If(''::. ~h:lll be WoC"tJ J.S J bJ.SLj ier rr:\'i~'ing Ihe <':unlrJClor"s .-\ppIiOliUn:i (or PJymenr.
5.5 .\ppIiCJlllJr\:i lor PJymC':'1C :~ :...,diL~'C lhe: pc1'CC1lc;curcomplctiOn or(':Jch portion o(lhc \\'ori< :1.Sorthe: cndorlhc period
c,"'O\'c:1'N by lhe: .-\pplic:llion lor P..~"':":1ef\l.
5.6 Subie:cr IU the pro\'i.siOru 01' ~"":(' CiJncr:1C1 DocumentS, me mounr o( C"'Jd'l prog.rc::s.s p:2iymenr sh.:1U be compuled;1S (oUo"",:
5.6.1. T.ke IhOl potllun O(lhe Ccr.:::!Cl Sum properly :llloc:>ble 10 complelo:d \X'ork:1S deletmlned by muhiplying lhe percencge
complellon o(C':leh po"iun O(I!:e .t:,rk by Ih.,h",e U(lheloc! Conlr.lCI Sum :llIOC:>led 10 thOl pomun o(lhe IX"ork in Ihe schedul.
o( I~Ud. 10' rccin'~. o( xj1JN.e< Ten percenl
! 10 lOX '!(,).l'l:ndin3lir.2l.Jaemlln:lUOno(cOlI10 the OI\'n<'1'o(ch.ngdIn ,he IX"ork. ornou",' nOlln Ihe dispUlC rmr be
incluueu '" p,ol'ided in :;ubp.t:I;z:-..;h -,~. ~ ofthe Ccner.U Conditioru O'o'en though Ihe Conlr:let Sum h:l.l nOI ret been .dlwled
by Ch.n~e Order:
5.6.2 ,\ud IhOl p',",un u( Ihe Cor.lr:let :;wn propc:rtr :ll'ooble 10 lTUIcri:lll md equipmenl dcli\'<'1'C\l wd .uiubly 1I0ro:d '" Ihe
she ror :-ub:<oe.."Quenr incurpon.tiun i.n the complC1ed coNlruc:tion (ur. if 2ppnJved In :ad'nl1CC by the Q90"f1Cr. suiubly scored orr lhe
,ire 31 , I"<-",,,n ,~r"''<l upon in 1\'""n81. I... =8e u( X~'(i<K~.tX Ten Per c e n t:
percenl I 10 :€X ."."
5.6.3 :'iuhlf"'JCI the :JWCiPte: IJI ;:l:\'IUUS p3ymenU mdc by the Ooomer: :ll1d
5.6.4 Suhlr:lCC ..lJ1lnUnu, II' :Jny. :.;r t\.hlch Ihe ,vchit~ tw 'Q,'ilhhcJd or nullitlcd:a Certilic:ne (or PJymcnr:1S provided In P'1r:l-
gnrh ~). ~ Il( Ihe: Ge:nC'f'J1 Cllnt::I:,-r_-.
5.7 Thl: pru~r~s p:Jyment JlT.1I1.:.."':( uC'lcrmU1C't.1 in 3ccurc.!:nCl:' t,.nh P~gnph S.U)tull be further mnc.lificd under (he loUowing
...'rcurn"I~"""''':'I.
5.7.1 ,..\Jt.l. upon Sub!ltu.tl.:J C\J~;::IC1l\.m or lhe \l,'Cr1<. 1 swn $UlfkIC1U 10 ;.ncrO$<C the IOt:L! p4Yrr.crIlS 10
X:Qt)t!(~>>MX Ninet:y pacenl! 90 XKro.'( %)o(lheCOnlr.l,et
Swn. 1= .uch :lJ1\uunlJ :u lhe ,vctulO'Cl .tull de":nn,,,e rOt incomp,ae Worll wd unscttJo:d d:wnS: wd
5.7.2 ,\.!J, i( Iin:ll ellmpleliun ..: :.~e Worll (j Ihcn::>/l<'1' nulcn:llJr dd2ro:d through nu f.lull o( Ihe COnlr.lClOt. my .lldlllon:>l
:unuun", pJy.ble in .ccord:lnce ,mh Subp:u:>llt:Iph 9,IO,~ o( the CcnCt:ll Cundi'ioru.
5.8 Rct!UCliun or lImlC~uon o( rt:::.in:J~c. i( 2I1V, sh3lJ be: :IS (oUo...s: '."
.' .
tllll U ,,",'0/11,"1', I'''''' III ,\/I,,,,uIII,.,' ,-.."/rlfl'''''' ,''''' ~If"'" """"., ,"I"1"d.,,~ "' "",~;,,,,, mUll"'''' ,"ldlUl~/,n,.. II. ~~"'tlltrr "u,nnll" )l'''(k.nlo
Jl"'ftI" t fI 1 ,"It I t " ~ ,"."",'. "Ill' ;1',,:, .,.01 ",\'1"11"'"' 1.,...U~.".,'1f II. t,i,"""," u..",.",""". '11Im brnt /"'jf"tJUtllJ I'" a/..,l'ftJurUlHf'" "IfI",llln" 1
N/A
ALA DOCV"!.HT AIOI . l1..a":\i...c:l/"~'I."TI1. A,~.lL"L"fT . r&"tU'Tl4 lDIT10:ol . U~. . .0"",,1
nu: .,,\It.MIl .\., .,...TlT! Tf. o. ,.CHI;:":':'''l. I.," :'>ll" "f'11.. A\ [."\Ill.;oI..... "4-)HI~C;Tn:"l, DC. .!t'I.....
Al01.1987 4
.....o:a..,..ro. I'~ ohotoc.o....... .........1_ us. coaontq", '-- It'd II .ubtK11a I~" proMCUll~,
.~"
, .,' -... -~ _._-~,._. ..:.....- - -..
'.
o#t'
. ~~~..
-
),
.
ARTICLE 8
FINAL PAYMENT
F1ruI paymel". cons~rullns the cnllle unpall.l bolancc a(the Contml Swn. s/UIl be mode by lIlC Owner 10 the Conlnclor: ",hcn (I)
the Conll2Cl1uI bcCn l\llly pcrlonncd bj' the Contnc:cor c.'ICCPl (or the Con=(s rcponslbWry 10 correa nonco.nlOnnlllS
Worle as provlr:led In Subpm.,.ph U.~,~ o( the Qcncro.l Condldons ~r:l10 udsty other requl"l:mcntS.l(~y. ...hlcll neccssarily
suMve t\tl2I paymcnll ~r:I (Z) a t\tl2I CerUilC:lIe (or l':IymClllluI been IsSued by the ...,aulca; sucll /Inol paymcnlshall be mode by
the Owner nOI more th~ '0 r:\aj'S after the lsnlanCC o( the NcIIIICCI'S t\tl2I Ccttlft= ror l':Iymcnl, or :IS (OUO':"I '
.
ARTICLE 7
MISCEllANEOUS PROVISIONS
7.1 Where re(crcllCC Is mar:\c In this AsrconCllllO a provision o( the Gcncr.1l Condldons or SlIother Conuoa Oocumcnl, the rd.
cmlCC refers 10 cha' provision as amended or supplcmClllcd by other provisions o( the Conrraa DocumentS.
7.2 I':IymClllS due SlId unpalr:l under che ContnCl slulI b<:u In'crcll!rom the dare paymcnr Is clue :II the r.ue SQled belo...., or In
che :lb5cnce thercof. :II the legal ralC pn:vailln8 !rom time 10 time :II the pl>cc ..hen: the Projca Is Ioc:u.cd.
(Iff#rl nJ/_ 01 i"""" 4'rY'f'd UPO"- if4lf1.)
0.5'1; Monthly
6.0'1; Annually
t.t3,!T
(U""'" 1II.... IUUl t?qW,,.,,,.,,,,u """'" 1M FrdfY'Gl T"". j" l"ntdJit, Aa. .,MJI4I JlIIU tutA bcAI =~crrdJI _1' fMId (iI.birr"l~ III tbrI 0""""" WId
CQtUrouo,', pn,.,ptIl pIMa 01 bWlNU. ," locaJIDII ol'N ProJra""" ~ '"67 fl/lra,. rGlUUI'! of*' p~ l.IfaI *'"" 1bouU" *~
If'f~ rap<<::6 la """,,OIU 0" fftOdl/iCIIJ,QrU, IUtd a/.I.O ",,,",VI' t"I'lf'U'T"'nuI ,ucJt lU wnnm ~ D'...,...,rS.J
7.3 OthCT provisions:
.~
.....
ARTla.E 8
" TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION ,;:,; " '"
> . _ . :..a~1 :~, . '...... ',I't>;/ ,,'.'
8.1::The Conll:lCl may beiCimInalCd by the 0';"'" or the ConlnClor asprovidcd In Mldc 14 otche Qcncnl dmiltiion,;::':.;,',
8.2, Tbe Worle may be su.ipcndcd ~y the owner as provided In Anlclc. 14 or the GcneraI CondIlIOns..' ,,',
",. .
. ........,
AlA 00CIIr.-'ff At01 . OW':'llU<O~. "Gar.I)W'fT' T"WYlTT1i mrnOH . AlA. . .e19l1'
ntl AJ.4WCAl'f I~STTT\.'TI O. .uauTtCTS. l:H NI'W '"?" AVlNVI!. :t.W'. W,uHu..cTOH, DC. lOD06
A101-1987 5
. '.'__"_~''''_'_II'' ~~wwt..~ta__~.
~>r.:i~~j~4I.'t!'4r,~<-':..', " . "",'
. ';:;~; ::,;;,~r:~t. '~t",:1 .:c.,,:,-.' . " , ~~
1.~.,,1:.11"':""":':-'!"1! ..r....;":~. .
'Il.V"-:.l.t"'1.'. t1J.~ "'~'..'~~ '. I' l\::(.' .'
.:. ".\ t~ G.'... ,," .;4"';,\'" .. )"'"
. "~~".,,j,t,'l.';,"'''.;\'';: t., ' ".'
. .y",,~;;rti:!lU'it. . .t~~::;I,J~~."'./' ...-', 1 . .
~. . _ ~''''1'- . -..-'::!.. i'l.~"~' :.,.'... .
~.., . ./ "..lot"''':.:.. _.~..:.tll,\..'f .,'.l,Ml.o..=."'- .,",' ,,' -
.' " . "'" . . -I, lot' "r.......~.I..';;->' " ." ...... ~. .
;:;i~.,~f!.'u.""J"',"i,,.J'r........... " ...."" .
1t..~.:"..,'JJ~rrf:'.~~~1\.trft.ti') ~oIt"t"Ci\:'" '\' ~. ...
o . .__", ..;.: .:.:.;..~::;:!.~......=~~._.~..":'r.:5....'1.~-".t'':.:f.... ARTlC1.J! 9 ,',
,~. ::::,,f;~;IJi';:'::;::j:"I~.;.;::''''i":';'::;~,,:~ ""'UMERATlON OF CO..- ACT OQCtJMENTS
" ',~.:':~'''\'''''~~:j''~~''_'':'~.~4;''h'~-:+~ r;.n.. ' .... >c,' J~Irv:'r' . .,
....;t;~:J:1\,,~,~~~r'~t~..':....II':- ~y...~~~.:$I4'~.J',,\O",t.,.'.,. .', .r_:, " .,'
. 9. h :Q!e..~~~,':;."i"~~r~:it~'6~~~~~~~l"!'.~~ ~cr ~,~o! ~Is, ^sr=n~l. ~ ~wnmled U rouo..."
9.1.1; TIle',\~.n11s this e~CCUled SCII1d:lrd Form or ^grecm~l BetwCCl ownet:lr\d ContnClor. AlA eocumenl AIOI 1987
Edl~?~:,;;:"~;,::.:~:':;~:::;1';;;:~'-:,:.:s.;:~~\: ,.:'~'~ ',,:': ,': ,,'
9.1.2: TIle Oc:ner:ll CondltiolU "'" the Oenc:nl Condltlons or lhe ContnCt (ot ColUll\lccJon. AlA eocum~l AlOI. 1987 Edldon
, .' ,. . . .._ R ,'. .. - ...... .
9.1.3 TIle ;~ppleinc:nciY':lr\d'';ule;' CondldolU or lhe ContnCt :lrC thooe concln~ In lhe Prolecl ~bnwl doled .
. Uld = :lJ roUo"': .
nile
POlld
DocwDeI11
1. Project Plans As Listed On H. Edward Black t Associates Title Sheet
Dated 3/19/93.
2. Specifications Prepared By H. Edward Black t Associates Dated
3/19/93.
3. 'Addendum #1 Dated 3/25/93.
q. LOBAR ASSOCIATES' Revision LeUer Dated 26 June 1993.
9.1.4 Tlie Sp<<!IIodOlU :ere thO$e conClined In lhc Projc:d M:>nwl dola1 os In Subpangroph 9.1.'. Uld ale os rouo....'
(EII/wr' ilJllt.ll~~fI"fU';'''' brrY t#' nt",,,, rut ~.., fl/',.;J:MI III UHI AA","","'.J
SectIon :r: '., ,. .""" ' ' . nele: PaId
Please Refer to Page GA and GA.l
'.-
......
.. ..
. . --
, ::<.1:1.~~W:~;:",;~,':>:,:::i:~ ~:::'~~'~.1#i~;,::',-i:;~)t:i:.;.;.-.,:;\:i::,.: ;'.:,:, .,
.~( ~;"~...~~Sl~: ~'i~:,'~:~;;'M~"-~~l!_tY.. .~:-'t~_'~'~I-\' /::\~;:.:..~::.!;.:.;t.~'~';~.fii.~;;.. . ....>
,I.. ,''<P,~... .._"';__' -t';.:J.... ("..."""r.'1::e.;t;..~ ,..,._..L-r-::-.....__ ,...., , ,"
::;; .,' ..r- <; J....~ I;!';.~....:\.:;-..: ..t.... I ~ ~.l ..:. ,,'1;:. :;.o..::'~.::..:' '.;:" :"~'.. ~.
"r;~1.1'~~~f.Jr?~~i1,.~,;~ ,.~,~ ,~. r..:h: ." ~t- !\f-:;,;,j;::~i'<.:(.::.,',.'. ,.:, .
....-.-,."'......'1~'..;A.".'.. '-' ~.J...~.. 4L:.~-..._.-r"_"\lI~,'''.'''.-r-'~'''' .
J! .li".lf1':<~ ~{~~~'~:~;i.~.'t'l}"}~~~"1~f';l.~~~,:~.~.~t,\~;,~,:~~J:'i~--:'~";::'::- :.~;.'.: :~ '.-..
, ~ .~"_:1',"'.:'" ~'~..:~'I.:...j;'":,,, ':, .I~,"".';\"Z':- " '.-::~.,. .
. ..
. ...'.
.....:/.-~: <':~'2:.:
:::..... ::::!}::~:
:'-.:~: .
"
.AiA ooc:u~.A10',. n..~...cn/'fT'I.Ar.TO" AGUL'ILvr. ,"WnJT11 r:orno."4. .A!Ae .o()l'i1M1'
ml .\.'-'Pl.(:..,:-~~:;:'T1T\,jTln' ,uutlT1CT:'. 1~,)4 "'1" vOle Avt:'t\JL :c....,. ...uHt"AGTQ.~.l) Co:f'IO'ltI
A101-1987
8
:-' Section 9.IA Continued ,':' ' ; ,.'."'"':',',
. ' .' ',."
-.,. ',"," '-.-"
,'j,';" ...;
, . ~: :',' :':" ',6:, "
"': . ~~..~'..~:.:.'~
TiUe
Paga
'7
6
2
..-
Sectlon . "" ~""..",,,
SUPPLEMENTARY CONDmO~s;.:~~.
DMSION 0 "~,"i'~" GENERAL REQUffiEMENI'S
. ',D[Vl.510N I ,-.: ~"';';':^LTER1'.JATE5
, D[Vl.510N 2 .; .;,. ~.... SITEWORJ<
SECTION 02110 Site Cluring
SECTION 02200 .. Earthwork
SECTION IT'...221 Trenching. Backfilling and Compact4tg
SECTION 1l2S11 Bituminous Paving
SECTION 1l2S20 portland Cement Concn:te Pav4'g
SECTION 02601 Manhol.s
SECTION 02610 Sanitary Sewer Pipe
SECTION 02615 Water ~1.tin5
SECTION 026-W Waler Valves
SECTION 026::3 Testing .11ld DisWecting Water Mains
SECTION 02700 Sile !mprovements
SECTION 021':0 Stann Sewerage
SECTION 02730 Subdr;un.ge Sy1tem
SECTION 02900 l...andSCJpe Work
SECTION 02950 S..ding
SEC.110N 0:999 Erosion .nd Sediment Control
D[Vl.510N 3 CONGL"TE
SECTION 03300 Con=~e
DMSION -l MASOI'iRY
SECTION ~oo Ma5onr:'
D[Vl.510N 5 METALS
SECTION 05100 Slruc:runl Steel
SECTION 05700 Ornamental and MlsceUaneou, Metal Work
D[Vl.510N 6 WOOD
SECTION 06000 Carpentry .11ld Millwork
SECTION 06200 Pla5tic .11ld Plastic Luninates
DMSION 7 TIiER.\I.-\L AND M01S111RE PRO'TEC110N
SECTION 07000 Roofing and Shffi Mt't1I Work
SECTION 07100 Dampprtlofing and Watetproofing
SECTION 07900 CtulJcing
D[Vl.510N 8 DOORS. WINDOWS, AND GLASS
SECTION 08000 Doo~
SECTION 08100 Fuilih H.utlware
SECTION 08500 WllIdows
SECTION 08800 Glass and Glazing
D[Vl.510N 9 FINISHES
SECTION 09000 Drywall and Dryvit
SECTION 09650 Resilient Flooring
SECTION 09900 Painling .11ld Finishing
D[Vl.510N 10 SPEOALl1ES
SECTION 10100 ToUet Compartment
SECTION 10110 ToUel Room AcctSSories
SECTION 10200 Specialties
D[Vl.510N II EQU!l'~
SECTION 11900 !<ltchen C.1binets and Equipment
DIVISION 15 MEaiANICAL
SECTION 15000 HVAC Ceneral 19
SECTION 15010 HV AC Electrical Equipment &. Wlring.R~ents, .,. ," S,'"
SECTION 15030 " .. ,'o,'.".i' HVAC Piping. Materials, Equipmmt &. MctliOd,c:':',':;"'.:" ":.' 8 ':.2~'d-
SEcnON 15100 ":_~,,.::,:<,.".>.,.'..:.~;.,..;~.-.'.:,~.: HV^C Specialties ".~;~",~;f;~~.~~ti~~!~#iti~'~~"6.~';~:~~~'~
SECTION 15625, ....' Refriger>tion and ReLated Equipmmt ""::''-::'.<~:",,::,'iz',~,:r~,~'3~<X:-;J~;
SECTION 15700 ' ..:'. "C HVAC Terminal Equipment'" .;,,':'~.::,' ~'1..,,, 2,-." :";.."
SECTION 158:5 Ductwork Insulation. Unets and Enclosures " ~. / .::' ',' 6 "::::.",,.
6
10
&
7'
14
10
6
5
3
5
12
8
4
19 ,
7
18
6
6
3
2
6
1
3
2
2
3
4
2
2
3
3
5
2
2
2
3
, .
AlOl-i9s7 6A '
, . ,', l_~. I. .
~....~.-_.,...-~'. ::'~""_:'-'_""
"
..
"
.'~..,...""
... II
, ';",\',:: "
...,....,.
,,',.::~ "I
.-.;........... .
.:..::rt.1-}i~~
r",,,,- ,.': .
':~;;:)~..;. TIU. . ' .
. ~;:it,~,1i powe"d lnd Non-Powered Ventlliltors,' ,
";-'F;;~r Ductworl<. Accessories. ShNlInctal SpCdi.ltlc; .
"::~'A~iAlr [nIet 3J\d Outlets :-:.:-' . .
, ' "':;';::HYAC Tuling. Adjusting. Oillil/\dng "
. ", '.:, PLUMBING ",
. '; Plumbing GenmJ RrquJrements
Plumbing Piping Syslem
Plumbing f!JclUleS. Equipment &c Accessoriu
Fuel Gu Systell\.S
Willer Huling Equipment
POOL RECIRCULA nON sySTEM
General Requirements
Pool Recimdilling Piping SystnJU
Pool Recimdilting SyslmlS Site Worle
Pool Wlter TrulInent
Pool Huting Equipment
ELECTIUCAL
General Requi"mmts
Excavation iIl\d Oackfil!
Concrele
Conduit
BuJldlng Wire 3J\d Dble
Boxrs
WIring Devices iIl\d Wall Platrs
Grounding iIl\d Bonding
Equipment W~ SystemS
Supporting Devices
Safety Switches
Dry Type T=rormers
, p3J\elbo.uUs
Orcui t 0 reaker Enclosures
fusrs
Enclosed Motor ControUen
Conlactors
Ughting
Emetl;ency Ughting
Security and fire Signaling
Ughting Control Equipment
'. PillIU'
5"
11
4.
5
.'
, .
.
: "I:
Section 9,U Continued
. ,.' '-' ,-
Section
SEcnON 15870
SEcnON 15890
SEcnON 15936
. SEcnON 15~90
, DMSION 158
SEcnON 150-1
SEcnON 15B.Z
SEcnON 158.3
SEcnON 158.5
SEcnON 158.12
DMSION 15C
SEcnON 15C.I
SEcnON 15C.Z
SEcnON 15C-l
SEcnON 15C-8
SEcnON 15C.12
D[V1,510N 16
SEcnON 16010
SEcnON 16012
SEcnON 16013
SEcnON 16111
SEcnON 16123
SEcnON 16130
SEcnON 16141
SEcnON 16170
SEcnON 16180
SEcnON 16190
SEcnoN 16440
SEcnON 16461
SEcnON 16470
SEcnON 16475
SEcnON 16477
SEcnON 16431
SEcnON 16485
SEcnON 16510
SEcnON 1653S
SEcnON 16721
SEcnON 16901
'.-
',-
20
17
7
4.
6
17
14
12
8
6
11
4
2
6
S
5
S
4
S
S
2
S
6
4
2
3
2
8
2
3
2
.,:,';';',-:::.
.:{~~t~j~
",,~"'''~I.
...... ~~.."',....
h.'.... ..............
':. .-...... .......'~.. . ..-.....
"{:;'f~&J~~j~1;;'~I~~tW{1~~~f1E'
. ..... ,-.,;:..........,......,. .."i.... .w~,~~~~t.~:"~.
, "
. .........
:.~t":"J.,_.--.!~....
" -..
~ :~~.~T~'.t....:~:;:: ~
~~~~~,:;.'~::~;~ .:1:1' ..!r,~-:.::~~ .~~ ;~.
AlI11-1987 6A.1
'\-'~ ,'. ......., ',,' ,.,,"r." 1"
:~.~ .:
. _I',.,
'". .. .:....:;\..,-..';" .
,"0 ';,1-:.,\'\.,
'.. . (!'""liC. ':'''''~ "
~~'~ .~~~~~~..
.",\t,>tIJN~'
,,,.;-.;~".~i'"
'7,'~~1
Section 9.1.5 Continued.. ,
'.' _..~..:.',:~' '"~''' Ii ::.;'~'I~._~.l,:,
';.~~;~t(!fr..~'u.I?~~: T'Ue
",' "," :,:'""" ,l;.~~\t~~~;;~r 1
. ':'~,l;-..~~tit,:..~/~t~1'J:l!.~I\~ Covet Sheet
. -' .....-.............'.....
".', :,' ..;...::;~.~i:...;'.,~ir.'''~ Demolition Plan
'. .:. :::~.:,~.: ~~~.:.:~.t.~:.::-:~., La PI
, ' .... . '''',--,'''' , yOUl an
, ..,', Grading Plan
Planting Plan
Site Details
SIl. Details
profiles
Erosion Control Plan
Pa.r\cin g La t
Erosion Conb1J1 Plan
Pa.r\cing Lot Planting Plan
Temporary ConslIUc:tlon Entrance
Swimming Pool
Tol Pool and Trellis
SI~ Details
Foundation PI.1ll
Floor Plan
Elevations
Elevations
Cross Section
Wall SectiolU
Interior ElevatiolU
Interior ElevatiolU
Alternate Siding
Plwnbing Plan
Details
EnI31'8"ment Plan
HV AC Schell\atic
~, Details
", Building Plwnbing Plan
Floor Ughling Plan
Ughtlng and Power Plan
Sl~ Ughling and Details
Details
....'.
. '
"..
,:, Number
, CS-l
. CD-I
CD-2
CD-3
CD-4
CD-S
CD~
CD-7
CD'"
CD-9
CD-IO
CD.ll
CD-\2
CD-13
CD-14
CD.IS
A-I
A-2
A.3
A-4
A-S
A~
A-7
A'"
A-9
P-t
P-2
P-3
P-4
p.S
p~
E-t
E-2
E-3
E-4
:.'
I'. .
.."".'
.... ,.
",... . ~;.
~\
<:;..':
'. "
Dai. .
March 19; 1993
~. .
~-
'.'
.....~d..:. ._.:~~-::.:.;.....
. ~', J
, .. ;!!.,...'j
.'. ~:~:j/, ::< ~.~:~:!.:!~~~~:\/
"r.I..,~l'.,. + ,'. ..~~t!N"
"'.~;i.;;...~F:.~\~. '~:j:;~.~i:,,' \~..:~
A101-198'17A'~'-", . ,
. ~ '~"'" t:.. :.>..~:7t~.>':. ';: .
'/.):..
.' ~>~~.:'
".-'
..:....,...
.j;
A,' ~~J
. ~. ':;-r ~-,...,~,i.~;.:.-... .:'~'.' ;....~
.... :>:\' :~,~t\.~i"..~.0'~f'~':':~~'
. :.J......'~~;.ltl..4.,r..,{;.. ~r-...!!.~t:,...
. .~ ...........~.. ;~:~.. :- .r, f ....4.
C,';,h,'.";' ',.
. .. ~~_ ".1 ~
.' r..':'" \
;: ".1"\',; ,.~t 14.. ,',
.~. ~...., ..' ,'''''', ,,', . .
< ,,~~J:.~L'4~'~;~;:_: ,', " ',':h;;~':":.'~" ;;. ~;: I: ...:' ,I, ' ,.:~:-~ <;,
.. '1~1....,~ ~""J'I'."'''''''' . .' ......
:~~ ",~"~..,, l~~....~'... '.t.l:' . .. " ' . . .
.. ~'A._.\.'Q~\_\l;..;~~lJi!il!~.I.., " ..~_. ,.' .. .-..J."i-..j.........: .;.-~.. ~. . . .~" ~
,.t\7::0.t~'.r~~~'(oiminip;uioiiil.c..n~oOcWn.;,is't;;~(0tki.....'::: ' , ,_.::~._".
'..~ ~.,~~....~..__~tt~,.....:. '," ,". " . ~ .....'...oi:MfJ~..J.1"l'I,. . . ,- ~~.. '. ..., .. .
tLlll",,".,rfIMMMI-- ~ .....,.,ItI.fIfIiIfIIO/Ql'llf".,.r{..,~,.,~ ""~(,J".Jl,,.,.,.pn~" "''''''aiIIJ",~"".
..., ",,"~'''';Utnl~,.W:I''''''''fIJIIU''' .~. """/~tIIt4"~" ...,.,.,.4""'1 ,btrC.l.-.,"&1 Dt~~ ~ ~
,.,...........,,;,.~-........,..,"'n1....~..ql._....po1I!t...Q,olnaI!"~~~I, j, ' : , ' , ". - . . .
.....:.;._l.:J:\..:. ~. .~~C~~:....~. . .. . ....~. ,". .' .~;:.:~;;:,;,:,:,:....1.'::."'." ..
" :."~"l',, j.-,;;.:'I.'.,;.'...........\1-..."' . .~...,,'-:"
. ._ .-...._...'..........--.r\-+;1\~')"_.. ." __...'Jo......_...
t-., ..t>.:::'.t'.;~:'~,;"'::"->' ;:; :' - , .
June i6Y"'f?rg'j;-Te'tterfrom Lobar AssociateS 'to' West Shore Country Club,
clo H. Edward Black and Associates, p.c.,'Ref: Pool, Bathhouse,' and'
Parking Lot "Final" Revisions (as amended in it~m 13. Electrical, D.l~).
".:', ...~ I.
,
','
"
Thls AgrecITIClllls enlcredlnlO :IS ot ilia d.:Iy and yet I\ISC ",rlllen :abo.e and Is cxcci....s In :u Ic::asc tlIm: ortpul roplcs ot",1Ilch
one Is 10 be deli.credlO lIIe ConltXlor. one co lIIe Alt:/Iilca (or use In lIIe~ otllle Con= :Illd lIIe n:m:alndcr 10 lIIe
0"",,"',
CONTRACTOR LOBAR ,AiSSOCIATES. INC.
~~~~~
( ~ ((SI"...,,;;ri Lee E. ii~~berger, President
~1iJ!:;'-~/1f:'1,;{fd:~:;:;~?~ ...... ........
,in mm~" '~'~*~~~f[~J~' 's'h~-~itf;~';::~)'~~gfn~f--AJ~('';~~~~~~;;/h~~~6'~;;~~~~~i{i~' ~~d:
~ ,,'~~"""'-:-_"_'I"f1"'" -..' ~ _._... . -... .~__.___A. 1'__ (oJ r 1I._.....\.tt_...&o.__1...~....._1O(JooIl'r-.~....~
'.: An origln.1 .lIure, !h.1 ch.ng.. will nol be ob.cuijd at mey occur when dc:ic:umenl' ,re'reproduced;
.. ~-..'_71t.,...~.t~~.:.',,,,, _ , ' ~ '.' - - .: 'I .... _....~~-~' .... ...Io''''~......-~--,.- ........ .
....,..._.,."......~,....I'.1.:,,:.:ia.""'.,.Vl-t......~...,'\-..,..-.},. .,t.. ,,' . )_.'.".olt:'i:-'u"),l'o<rf:-'- . ~",.' ,-' .'-,'-. ....:J_....,...:......,~oJ..- .
. ,'.'_.......Il'.~..:....~--'.~~~~~..;r.-..J~\..~ ,',' ...~::". ..'~. .~~.:.~_.._~I.:]'.'-T-.J::L-.'U.' .;c'.' ...~....1o".;.~.:..~;~..,~..,."'I..1..".__,!._:;t:.:'.~.jt-,~.:,...~~ .'~:: .
_ .. I,. ...:J...... ....",~\..,...,...._.. ,. _. ,-I . . - . . ;.. ...,~....t:'~..-t-,~,~cw.. - ...r'...f~';~~_r ...-::_lr. _io',lo;t...: '.<.I.~~:.s~ r"/.":. ..,'........
. ~ ooc..-vf ""01.. OWl'fD..coHTI-ACTC. AGUDlun" . f'W'IU'T1't ~ . AlA- . 0191'7
.:..' ntl ~UICAl" L"'CSnn:T1O' AAOtmcn. I":t.... YOU Avt7'f\J1. "...~ ".uH~ OC. ~
.. ",: ~,--;~....-8);.V:~p..;.-; ...___.:::.~~~___:..'~::.:;~~\~~~...i...'
,
Al01-1987. 8
.;,,;t.....
')
'1
.~:~~r~~:. '.~;'~}'.'
~. ':. .'i-)
<,~.: .:.>~:.~_.'.
"'I '. .,..~~.
.'''''' ::',,'i.li'
.: : ~1~~""'.~;:
, '.':f'I~
.,:,~,b:l:
.;.....;....~..':"
, '. . :,~;...~".
. 0: :~....t7i;.:J
. ,~.:~. :j,....:.. G
. ., ""'-" .
.. ---.......
" :; : ,;;,. ~;;..,
,7:1.:... PVC DownspoUl Boots In Lieu Of Cast Iron.
8.',' Add Louvered Doors At Locker Room Areas. .
9. Re-Use570' 0/ E.risring Fence. v..... Vjl/o+ r.., Sol "'/ L...~ ~. G.~1 (. ~f.s ""'i
10. De/ere Pump Room Ceiling. .
11. PVC /n Lieu O/Ducrile Iron Piping A1 Drain Backwash Sysrem AJId OtMr Areas O/Poo/
Systun & Site Piping.
Srtutdard Fonnica Cahinets In Lieu Of Custom Formica Cabinets.
EkcrricaI:
2
Alter Oven Location. Engineer To Provid4 New Layout Drawings.
W(!.'N1'l.W-
t:,dJ
12.
13.
A. Qulllge GFl Receptacle,
B. Qulllg e H andlUJ I es To S IIWJard.
C. Provide Individual Conduit For CoTTlJ7lUTlicariolU (Delete 4. Conduir).
D. Delete LighI Fi:aures (Provide CoruWits To Ligluing Areas To ElimiJUJJe My
Funher Concrere/Biruminous Pavemelll Removals With Furure lnstaIlariolU
Including Pull Lines):
)////FlqrPfI& ;!,of- Three (3) OJ Fi.trures.a=e co be added bac!t in co the pre
2. Post Mounw:J Fi.:aures - Seven (7) 014150.
3. Landscaping Fixrures . Nineteen (19) 00-150 &: Four (4) OC-lOO.
4. 1Wo (2) OK Fwures Are To Be Added Back llllo The Projecr.
14. ," Various Pool System/CoIUITUCrion Changes As Per MadIed Heme Pool Projecr
SfMdficariolU (See Machmelll).
15. Original Project Bid Alrernate.S Accepted:
A. Alrenulle 111 - Uu Masonire In Lieu 0/ Concrtte Black.
B. Alrenulle 112 - Add Concrete Stairs 112.
C. Alrenulle 114 - Add Stonn Sewa CB-SI. CB-S2. CB-S2A.
D. Alrenulle 115 - Add Stonn S~r CB-S2 To 01JJ/e1 S-l.
E. Alrenulle 116 - Add Dumpsrer Pad Eni:lasure. Gare. &: Stairs.
F. Alrenulle 117 - Use Of Concrete Stonn S~r Pipe 1.s Acceptable.
16. Gas Service Costs For Project Are Not Inclu.ded.
17. Ceiling To Be Vented GrateS In LUu Of Gypsum Wallboard.
18. No Vinyl Soffits Are Required.
,
, rrr,1iZ. .
p ?tI'f'.
',-
TOTAL REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT v
FOR CONTRACTS #1 &: 112 BASED UPON
THE ABOVE REVISIONS.
: (S,ee'.Article 4, Subparagraph 4.1
,::,~~';.'-iF.g~<. Total Concract }.mounts)
: ~?..{?~~'~~~."
.'(~::::;'.l:':<'
, '
"
ASSOClAl'ES
~
". .
'.
, '
TO:
H. Edward BI4dc " ..usa,".
2403 North FlTJnt SInd
Harrisburg, PA 17110
DATE: 7110/93
JOB NO.: 3081
A7TENIlON: Craig Bachik
REF: West Slum Country CWJ
Camp HiD., PA
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ..x.. A7TACHED _ SEP. COVER VLt -
11IE FOlLOWING ITEMS:
ORIGlNAL
DATEl:!Jl..
D~rRlP770N
E7-r-td Contrad
1
1~ ARE 'TRttNSMl7TED AS FOlLOWS:
Fat' YOUI' Filu
COMMENTS:
BY:
.....
.....
u. Eo EkhdlJugu, PraidInt
COPY: 1TU
. .':C.7Ei~:yg-;;>";*:;jt!';~:"{"~l~~;f~l~
.. J OUJMl1.LROAD:1!O. SO%4n ,., ,-. '
: Dl1.LSBURG. ,ENNA JiOl94C2
TEL: (117),412.9728 FAX: (717) 412-9ItSZ
. .'~ ... .,
-_..._-_.~ ,-~,::p"",_:'.,.
. .~. ...'~
H. EDWARi:l BLACI\ '\
AND ASSOCIATES
2403 North Front Street
HARRISBURG. PENNSYLVANIA 11110
QJ~1T11'[;.~ @[?' 'iT[R1&l~~fll)Oll.1T~
1
g..u
TO
(117) 233-1026
e ~ I..J;~
.c ~ < ~J.6.':
J ~= ';!A~;i
~~~\..;~ I~' 'l'~:ll'7" D4
"nl",,"ON
.,
>
wE ARE SENDING YOU ~Att3Ched C Undor sopa"'I' eo,,, via
a Shop d",winls ~PrinlS 0 Plan~
a Copy of lotlor a Chan-. order - ~
. 1"'-
,
o Samples
r"~
DUCJUn"OH
CArr
HO,
-
. I
, ,
--,
--
-""""""-- - . ..:;--:-....:.-
--.. .:' .
- ..... "',.
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as ehecked
,"'1
. . 1"'-"" ,
f ""'~ I i
belOW: ,- :-"" I /
o Approved as SUb~~~C:OPiOS for approval
o Approved as noled 0 Sub~ c:opies lor distribution
a Returned (or corrections a Return_col'1'1!cted prints
o
>
o For approval
a For your u..
a As requested
o For review and comment
a FOR BIDS DUE
RE~ARKS~ \
19
a PRINTS REnJRNED AFT!R LOAN TO US
COPY TO
----
SIGNED~ ~"...
~~lk
.........
" ."c,._rw, .... ".. " """.... .....", ","fy w. ~ -..
'-, r
...
AMENDMENT TO CONSTRUcnON CONTRACT
THIS AMENDMENT TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT made this day of 1anuary, 1994, by a
between WE.ST SHORE COUNTRY CLUB, a Pennsylvania No'n-Protit rorporatlon (hereafter 'Owner'), a
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation (hereafter .Contractor.);
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS. Owner and Contractor entered imo a Contract dated 1uly'16. 1993 (hereafter .Contract.) for l
ronstruction of a new pool and bathhouse facilities which required rompletion by December 31. 1993; and
.
WHEREAS, Contractor has requested that th~ Contract be extend to change the date of rompletlon to Ap
IS, 1994 and Owner is willing to do so in exchange for modification of the liquidated damages provisions of (
Contract; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to reduce their understanding to writing;
.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto, with intent to be legally bound hereby. in consideration of the mutu
promises and covenants set forth herein, agree as follows:
I. Recitals. The recitals are incorporated herein.
2. Amendment of Article m. Swion 2. Article m. Section 2 of the Contract is amended to provid
The Contractor shall achieve Subswtial Completion of the entire Work not later than April 15, 1994, without furth
adjustments of this Contract Time as provided in the .Contract Documents., and subject to the liquidated damages .
defined in Item 7 of the Supplementary Conditions section of.t!1eSpecitications at the rate of One Hundred (SIOO.O
Dollars per day for each and every calendar day beyond December 31, 1993 until April IS, 1994; Two Hundn
($200.00) Dollars per day for each and every calendar day beyond April IS, 1994; provided that should Contr3ctl
entire
achieve Substantial Completion by April IS, 1994, the fm_D_:Hg provision for liquidated damages shall not apply.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaint if f
v.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
v.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Additional
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I am this day serving a true
and correct copy of the Complaint Against Additional Defendant
Liberty Excavators, Inc. upon the persons and in the manner
indicated below, which service satisfies the requirement of Pa.
R.C.P. 440:
service by First Class Mail
Addressed as Follows:
Scott D. Moore, Esquire
SAIDIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MASLAND
26 West High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Leslie B. Handler, Esquire
HANDLER AND WIENER
319 Market Street
P.O. Box 1177
Harrisburg, PA 17108
&
Dated:
1165289
By:
HAk\.1(J~ I; IlA'rlfS, P C
'HIIJR.\t'i~."'.I"'W
~.....( IIllj~UU.\ -\"'t.,Lf.
I ""'("..HIl p'PHJ\
"
<
....
~~
~~
CI.~ ~
~'" I
~ .;~
~~~Q
~ ~..J
a~J.~
~~2
~~
'-
'--
....
....
~c:
~ .~
-....
:::c...
.
.
~
.~
~ ~
. ~~
> ~
9
<Il
....
~
~J
~
.
gJ'$
12 1:5
<....
;>...
~:o
~~
. ~
> ~
....
..J
~
~
~. ~
~!!. ~
..J~ 0
, 1J
a<12~
~6 ..J
~~ ~
....
.....
~
a:
III
Z
. III ..
!l - t- 0
tlJ 3:::: ;:
..o~~..&"i
1..::: U'I = Q. 0
ilJ , Z .. a .,. :
.... 0 <( ~ cD II ::}
]!a:i~~~
.... III...J ~ :-
. M'
a:l 0 x
ilJ Z
;.:: <(
III J:
~
0-0 ..
....
~
.
F1lANCIS HEISSE,
Plalntiff
IN TIlE COURT Or COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
NO. 94-5507 CIVIL
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.,
Additional Defendant
ANSWER Or LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
TO ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT COMPLAINT
1. to 10.
Admi t ted.
11. Nei ther admitted nor denied and, if relevant, proof
thereof is demanded.
12.
Denied.
Additional Defendant Liberty E)(cavators, Inc.
did not sign the Subcontract attached as E)(hibit "D" and, in fact,
refused to sign same, and an e)(aminetion of the said Subcontract
indicates that not only did Liberty E)(cavators, Inc. not sign same, but
neither did Lobar ASEociates, Inc.
13.
Denied as stated.
Although the purported Subcontract
provided Lobar Associates, Inc. the right to recover certain losses or
damages, the unsigned contract is not binding on Additional Defendant
Liberty E)(cavators, Inc. because it e)(pressly refused to sign same and
never agreed to same.
i4.
Denied.
The Subcontract vas tendered to Additional
Defendant Liberty E)(cavators, Inc., and it refused to agree to same.
15.
Denied.
Additionsl Defendant Liberty E)(cavators, Inc.
started performance on the project invoived vhich related to a nev bath
house and pool construction for West Shore Country Club at the oral
request of Defendant Lobar Associates, Inc., prior to being tendered any
contract. When the purported Subcontract attached aEl Ellhibit D was
tendered to Additional Defendant Liberty Excavators. Inc.. it rejected
same because the said propoaed Subcontract was beyond the scope of the
work that Additional Defendant Liberty Excavators. Inc. had agreed to
perform fur Defendant Lobar Asaociates, Inc., and included terms and
conditions that Additional Defendant Liberty Ellcavators. Inc. never
agreed to.
lb. Neithe,' admitted nor denied and. if relevant, proof
thereof is demanded.
17. Denied and, if relevant, proof thereof is demanded.
Additionally, Additionai Defendant Liberty Ellcavators, Inc. believes and
therefor avera that there was a change in the arrangements between West
Shore Country Club and Defendant Lobar Associates, Inc., postponing the
January i. 1994 date.
18. Denied. Additionally, if there is any relevance to same,
proof thereof is demanded. Additional Defendant Liberty Ellcsvators,
Inc. notes that it never bound itself to abide by terms and conditions
appearing in the contract between Defendant Lobar Associates, Inc. and
the West Shore Country Club.
19. Admitted.
20. Admitted.
21. Admitted with the qualification that Defendant Lobar
Associatea, Inc. did not abide by it and also that Additional Defendant
Liberty Excavatora. Inc. always timely performed its work when the
project was ready for its work. Also, Lester Gouffer of Additional
Defendant advised Defendant, on the job site, that its project schedule
was wrong.
22. Denied. It is denied that Additional Defendant Liberty
Ellcavatora, Inc. failed to provide an adequate number of properly
trained and qualified employees to perform its work on this project.
23. Denied. It ia denied that Additional Defendant Liberty
Ex<:avators, Inc. failed to provide an adequate quantity of property
equipment to perform its work on the project.
24. Neither admitted nor denied for the reason that
Additional Defendant Liberty Excavators, Inc. did timely perform its
work when the project required ita work. Additional Defendant Liberty
Excavators, Inc. notes that it was required to do work at the beginning
of the project, which it did, and it was required to do work at the end
of the project, but not thrcughout the project.
25. Denied. I t is denied that Liberty Excavators, Inc.
failed to properly perform its work on the project in a good and
workmanlike manner, It is denied that the said Subcontract for project
plans, apecificationa and schedules were delayed from January 1, 1994 to
April 15, 1994, by action of Additional Defendant Liberty Excavators,
Inc. To the contrary, Additional Defendant LIberty Ellcavatora, Inc.
believes and therefor avers that the delays in the completion of the
contract were the fault, primarily, and probably solely, because of
actions taken and not taken by Defendant Lobar Associates, Inc.
26. Neither ad",i t ted nor denied except to the extent that
Defendant Lobar Associates, Inc. is attempting to shift blame for its
own failures to Additional Defendant Liberty Excavators, Inc. In
response, Additional Defendant Liberty Excavators, Inc. avers that the
delays on the project were not caused by it but were caused, either
solely or primarily, by Defendant Lobar Associates, Ino.
27.
Denied.
It is denied thst Additional Defendant Liberty
EXl:avators, Ino. ia in any way responaible for the failure of Defendant
Lobar Associatea, Inc. to pay Plaintiff.
It ia denied that Additional
Defendant L.iberty Excavatora, Inc. is liable in any capacity, be it
alOlle, jointly or otherwiae, either to Plaintiff, Francia Heisae, or to
Defendant Lobar Aasociates, Inc.
WHEREFORE, Additional Defendant Liberty Excavators, Inc. aska
that judgment be entered in its favor and against both Defendant Lobar
Associates, Inc. and Plaintiff, Francis Heisse, snd that the action
~rought by Defendant Lobsr Associates, Inc. against Additional Defendant
Liberty Excsvators, Inc. be dismissed snd that Additional Defendant
HANDLER AND WIENER /
i' /
By : . ... ~ . ~ '.
Lealie B; Hartdler - (07190)
Atty. for Additional Defendant
Liberty Excavatora, Inc.
319 Market St. - P.O. Ball 1177
Harrisburg, Pa. 17108-1177
(717) 238-2000
fe.e~~
. 7
/I
Liberty Ellcavators,
Inc. be awarded its costa and attorney
VERIFICATION
The foregoing is made aubject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.
Section 4904, relatiog to unaworn falsification to authorities, and is
true and correct to the best of the knowledge, information d belief of
the undersigned.
;fa
/.A~ /
Richard C. Kalbach, President
Liberty Excavators, Inc.,
Additional Defendant
of
Dated: July 5, 1995
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaintiff
v.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
v.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Additional
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I am this day serving a true
,> and correct copy of the Notices of Taking Deposition upon the
J
persons and in the manner indicated below, which service
satisfies the requirement of Pa. R.C,P. 440:
Service by First Class Mail
Addressed as Follows:
Scott D. Moore, Esquire
SAIDIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MASLAND
26 West High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Leslie B. Handler, Esquire
HANDLER AND WIENER
319 Market Street
P.O. Box 1177
Harrisburg, PA 17108
HAR/10N & DAVIES, P.C.
Dated:
r)
~~~/
By:
J
I / !
(/ . t I (' It {;
Corrie 4. FIschel, I.D.
Attorney for Defendant
Lobar Associates, Inc.
'\
#65289
H\R\lIJ'" 11:\'011"1,1'(
\111I1l....1_... \I I''''
1"'" 1011\1111\ \\1 'I i
I \'Ol\"oIUII'\I'flIjl
Ref: Pl\Lob.r\Liberty.CS
If,
",
--
,~ "'.
f1
'")
,.
,-
.,
C_.J
....
......: ~
0....
~~ ..: U
<Xl 0 W
.... 1"- a: :l l'1
- o-l><S .... ;: Z 0
'" "'Ul .... .... .~.... ..... '-'
I ~~I .... <: U = U.... ~ ui j w III
'" ..... . '" z 0'" z .... . W > I"
'" .... U'O .........'0 H.... U 5 <(
iEo..z <: z <: .... <: <: z ;; I- <
. .... H <IJ ...... <IJ ..... H ~ <( < <
0 0 .0 '" .... Ul'O.... Ul '" iii D..
Z '..I ~.... .... . <IJ "::'ij<IJ ..:.... . Cl UI ::<
.... tJ '" Ule:l o I'l 0<>< Ul U ,. Ii
'tl ~ !;; !;; <<l Ul ~ w :l w
<: o ..: <<l H Z .J l-
e> 0 Ul :;; ::- <( 0 Z a: 0 Ul
HUo-l Ul H c3 .... H 0 g u <
.... ~ .... 1-1 'u 'u 'u u
0 o~~ !:l 000 ~ij r.l 000 Ul ::; III Z
'" >Ul >Ul z 0:: <( 0 j
'" U U ~ ::J 0 l'1
I Ul ~ ~ .... <( N
'" ~r:l H tJ 1:
'" U ~ ~
He:! ~ ~
. z=:; <Xl <Xl <Xl
0 9 .... H S
Z ....u o-l o-l 0
'I
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaintiff
vs.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
vs.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Additional
Defendant
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Plaintiff
VEl.
No. 94-4178
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
OBJECTIONS TO SCHEDULING FOR TRIAL
I. The above-captioned cases have been listed for
I!.-\RMON" IMVIIS,l',l'
,\1 111M" ~'..-" 1.1 .\\10
2\1W\lIJlI'\UU\ H-1'l'1
1""('.\\11 K 1'\ lIwl
trial, commencing in the November lJ, 1995 term. In the case
of Liberty Excavators, Inc. v. Lobar Associates, Inc., it is a
re-listing.
1
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaintiff
vs.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
vs.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Additional
Defendant
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Plaintiff
vs.
No. 94-4178
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I am this day serving a true
and correct copy of Lobar Associates, Inc.' s Objections To
Scheduling For Trial upon the persons and in the manner
indicated below, which service satisfies the requirement of Pa.
R.C.P. 440:
1I.\R\toS41""lIs.II('
"IIUIt'l\'i." I'"
HUH III I \1It1\ \'01" t
1.",,"C\'dIH 1'\IN'lIll
.
1 & 16
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
VS
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
FRANCIS HEISSE
VS
NO. 94.4178
94.5507 <
/'
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
VS
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, October 18, 1995, having determined that Judge Oler has just
issued an opinion whereby the Defendant, Lobar Associates, Inc:., may file a complaint
joining Francis Heisse as an additional defendant within 20 days. It is hereby ordered
and directed that this case be continued to the January 1996 trial term. The Prothonotary
is directed to rellstthis case for the January 1996 trial term.
By the Court,
_~j c~tE VL_
Harold E. Sheely, ~ent Judge
Leslie B. Handler. Esq.
For Liberty Excavators, Inc.
Corrie L. Fischel, Esq.
David Flores, Esq.
For Lobar Associat6s, Inc.
ut' CC)~\'C."
1''''-'
Ic.;l,?n<?
Scott D. Moore, Esq.
For Francis Helsse
Court Administrator
:br
C"\'l t, t,__,- .l._t
., .
FRANCIS HEISSE,
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PL.EAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
DEFENDANT
V.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.,
ADDITIONAL
DEFENDANT
.
:/
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
....-..-.............................................-..................................--.......-....-........-..........................----........--..---.......-..-
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.,
PLAINTIFF
V.
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
DEFENDANT
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 17th day of October, 1995, a Rule Is entered against plaintiff,
Francis Heisse, and additional defendant Liberty Excavators, Inc., to show cause why
the motion of Lobar Associates, Inc., for consolidation should not be granted. Rule
returnable by plaintiff and additional defendant within ten (10) ~ys of sarvlce.
By the Court,
I .
"\-~ll . tJ/
Edgar B. Bayley, J.
/
Scott D. Moore, Esquire
For Plaintiff, Francis Helsse
Leslie B. Handler, Esquire
For Plaintiff, Liberty Excavators, Inc.
David A. Flores, Esquire
For Defendant, Lobar Associates, Inc.
:saa
e . ./.." ,..<'" I to/ ,sIfTS.
,'\.J'" .I ( ",'
..'.J .
-2-
I r,
"
"'< 'tl Z
OH r:: ~3
",:i! OJ
'"
'" ~::i OJ ~~ ti
.... I') "'
.... ~~j 0.: :J M
~ ..... . "'0<: ;: Z 0
1 zil1 '" " ~ ~ u'" " - 0 iii "' \C
~ '" . r:: z'" . r:: .", j :> ,...
a- 0"'1 ... U" H 0 ...... U " U W <(
~I>-Z " Z'tl .... ... Z'tl Z'"
. r:: H r:: ." . r:: .... r:: H'" :> ... <( <(
0 0 .0 ... OJ "'..... ~-a OJ .;~ <( <( iii II.
Z U~H " .", "''''' .", C Ul
'" t; .... '" Ql ~~ 0.... '" OJ ). ~ i
'tl ",I>- "'I') ~I>- "'I') '" ~ "' :J
r:: o < ~ ~ ~~ Z .J "'
" 0 '" :> ~ ...
E-<Uo-l '" H j H 1-1'0.< Z ll: 0 UJ
.... !5 H H U U UI') 0 0 U <(
0 O~~ !::l 0 .t;l i:l 0 OH ~ ~ \C U
'" .", .", "'o-l Z
'" U U "'''' '" ~~ ~5l II: <( 0 j
I '" >< >~ 5 <( M
~ !::lei H z N
a- u ~ ei ~ ~8 J:
~~ ~ '"
<Q '" <Q
0 8 H H 8 8~
z HU o-l o-l
OCI 1 v ,~~b~
1. Defendant Lobar Associates, Inc. was general
contractor on a project ~nvolving construction of a new pool at
the West Shore Country Club.
2. Both Francis Heisse and Liberty Excavators, Inc.
were subcontractors to Lobar Associates; Liberty the excavating
and site work contractor, and Heisse the contractor responsible
for constructing the pool and appurtenant equipment.
J. Heisse's claim against Movant in Case No. 94-
5507 with this Court is for alleged contract balances and
payments for alleged extra work due.
Lobar Associates has
defended said claims, counterclaimed for delays by Heisse and
amounts due Movant due to Heisse'~ deficient work, and
impleaded Liberty as Addi lional Defendant.
To the extent
Heisse suffered any damage on this project attributable to
anything Lobar Associates did, said damages and Movant's
liability being denied, Liberty's delays and poor workmanship
caused Heisse's damages.
4. Liberty's claim against Movant in Case No. 94-
4178 is for alleged contract balances and payments for alleged
elltra work due. Lobar Associates has defended said claims and
I
Ii
il
I
I
!
H'\W\lll~.,Il\"II~.f'C i
\I111M"IP,-\11 \W :
!IlIl'lUlll "'"1\ Hi-'ll i
1'''1\'''111( 1'\P"J1
counterclaimed for delays and deficient work done by Liberty.
Lobar Associates has moved for leave to implead Helsse as
Additional Defendant in said case to indemnify Movant in the
event Lobar Associates is found liable for any portion of
Liberty's claim. Said Motion is now pending.
5. The two cases involve numerous common questions
of law and fact, including the following:
2
a. Whether Liberty deldyed Lobar Associates
and/or did def icient work and thereby caused it damages,
including any damages for which Lobar Associates may be found
liable to Plaintiff. Specifically:
Did Liberty so delay its excavation
work as to cause Lobar Associates to complete its work on the
pool in the wintertime, thereby causing Lobar Associates extra
costs?
Did Liberty do its ellcavation in so
dilatory and deficient a manner as to cause Heisse extra work
or costs, for which Heisse claims?
b. Whether the payments for allegedly extra
work for which Heisse claims were necessitated, if at all, by
deficient work by Liberty?
c. Whether delays by Liberty and/or Heisse
caused Lobar Associates damages, including, but not Hmi ted to,
the extension of time necessary for Lobar Associates to manage
the project and extra labor and materials costs paid by Lobar
Associates because of the necessity of extending the work into
the wintertime due to Heisse's and Liberty's delays?
6. These common questions of law and fact should be
tried in one consolidated trial because to address them
separately might lend to inconsistent verdicts. For example,
Heisse will no doubt defend Lobar Associates' delay claims
against it by contending Liberty delayed it. Thus, the Court
in one case could possibly find Liberty delayed Lobar
1(\1(\10'" 1I'\II~, "l"
\ 111111:'1 ~..., I I \ \III
1111111 01 "'Uti \ ,\''''
1"'1"1111: 1'\ 1",..11
Associates and another Court could find it did not.
3
U \It,,",.t. Il\\ It..., 1'(
\1 !IIM'l~'" \1 1\'"
~""'Iljl' \UII\ \H," t
l \" \""11 It 1'\ I 'Nil
7. As a practical matter, consolidation would
provide economies of judicial time, and is therefore to be
favored. The common issues would be tried only once and much
of the background on the project and contracts would need only
be heard once.
9. If both cases are to be tried on or soon after
November 13, they will have to be consolidated, since the
undersigned is trial counsel for Lobar Associates on both
cases.
9. No practical reason exists why the cases should
not be consolidated. Liberty would have to attend two trials
and Heisse would have to if Lobar Associates' pending Motion is
granted. Liberty and Heisse can show no prejudice to them by
consolidation, indeed their costs will be reduced by having to
try only one case rather than two.
Consolidation will not
delay trial.
WHEREFORE,
Defendant
Lobar
Associates,
Inc.
respectfully requests that the above-captioned cases be
consolidated for trial.
Respectfully submitted,
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
2306 Columbia Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 29t-2236
By: r'LNJu - 1j-4d
~id A. Fldres, I.D. , 37829
Attorney for Defendant
Lobar Associates, Inc.
PL\Lob.r\H.l....HCC
4
U ,\K \10' .\ 11.\\ II s. I' C
"IIIM'I'.....II-\'o\
}\j",1 01 I'''HU\ \\1'"
1 "'I \..... H 1'\ I'NII
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
FRANCIS HEISSE
plaintiff
VB.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
vs.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Additional
Defendant
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Plaintiff
vs.
No. 94-4178
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I am this day serving a true
and correct copy of Lobar Associates, Inc.'s Motion To
Consolidate Cases For Trial upon the persons and in the manner
indicated below, which service satisfies the requirement of Pa.
R.C.P. 440:
Service by First Class Mail
Addressed as Follows:
Attorney for Plaintiff, Francis Heisse:
Scott D. Moore, Esquire
SAIDIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MASLAND
26 West High Street
P. O. Box 560
Carlisle, PA 17013
Attorney for Plaintiff, Liberty Excavators, Inc.:
Leslie B. Handler, Esquire
HANDLER AND WIENER
319 Market Street
P. O. Box 1177
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Dated:
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
2306 Columbia Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 291-2236
~ BY:__~~' Pf~
David A. Flores, I.D. .
Attorney for Defendant
Lobar Associates, Inc.
37829
tHR\to'.t 1),\\011 S. I' C
\lllHt:"o1 ~...-" 1.1_,\""
llill'llull'\tKI.\ \~I "'I
1.-.,(\,11 It "\ I'Hll
HANDLER
&.WIENER
1'1 .,,-,
Ii; , .' 11, \I,
Il,lw II IIII,,!I.I
I-II' I \\If-r"l'
\\ """,ft Ikllllll'L:
/1,11111111.(",1111,,1''':''
.1"1\1,;',' "I""
1111.111 II'uli.lI.1 'I
1,11111111 \1 \!lllll'"
\l.lllhn,.... (1".1,,"
J'11 I;,,> Ii..
....II.,,,.III,""ll,-,;I":"! ;lIJ
II" ,1",1' j'\ \,1",
Ilj.~;Hi.:!llOll
iI7.:,n:I-;W:!H I. I'
,i"'_1l1""II...ll"""..I_,,,j'
\1... \,j"lillnlli'<I it! ,"
,.." It...., I ..nl,...11' \....\..~
\1"'..\.jlllll1l'lI'l;n.I'.I"I....
November 1, 1995
The Honorable Edgar B. Bayley
Cunberland County Courthouse
One Courthouse Square
Carlisle, Pa 17013
Re: Francis Heisse v. Lobar Associates, Inc.
v. Liberty Excavators, Inc. - No. 94-5507
Re: [,iberty Ellcavators, Inc. v. Lobar Associates, Inc.
V. Francis Heisse - No. 94-4178
Dear Judge Bayley:
I am in receipt of a
advising that Francis Heisse
referenced cases.
copy of a letter to you fran Scott D. M:>ore, Esq.,
is "unopposed" to the consolidation of the above
Please be advised that Liberty Excavators, Inc. is no longer opposed to the
consolidation of the above referenced cases.
Very truly yours,
LBH/b
cc: Scott D. Moore, Esq.
cc: David A. Flores, Esq.
cc: Richard C. Kalbach, President
Liberty Excavators, Inc.
HANDLER AND WIENER
~/
./d ..
By. , .
. L~ie B./ Hand er
.))
"
//
('L{/
-
L.w Oltke,
SAIDIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MASLAND
^ "Mo'-f' ~'iI(JNM. ('tIMl'OM,\(IClN
John E. Silkc
Rohert C. Sailiis
EJWJllJ E. Guido
Geuffrey S. Shuff
Alhcrl fI Ma.,lan~
JuhnnJ 1. Deily
Timolhy M. Ansline
S..:nlt D, Moore
26 We'l High SlreCl . ""'I Olliee lIu. S60
Carlisi.. ".nll5yhanla 170L1
Telephune: (717) 243-6222 . ".e';lIIil.: (717) 243-C>l86
West Shore (lllla!:
211J'l Markel SUcci
C..np filII, PA 11U11
releph.ne: (717) 7JL14(j~
F"""mlle: (717) 7)7.3407
Reply To Carlisle
October 30, 1995
Tha Honorable Edgar B. Baylp.y
Cumberland County Courthouse
One Courthouse Square
Carlisle, PA 17013
Re: Francis Heisse v. Lobar Associates I Inc. v. Liberty
Excavators, Inc. -- No. 94-5507
Liberty Excavators, Inc. v. Lobar Associates, Inc. --
No. 94-4178
Dear ,Judge Bayley:
Francis Heisse is unopposed to the consolidation of the above-
referenced cases.
Sincerely,
/"
SAlOIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MASLAND
(~-;-;n' ;-- - IJ/ ~
"rtt O. Moore ( ../ "C. <.- . ('
SDM/sp
ee: Lesiie B. Handler, Esquire
David Flores, Esquire
t
,
FRANCIS HEISSE,
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC..
DEFENDANT
V.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.,
ADDITIONAL
DEFENDANT
: ~~5507 CIVIL TERM
./:
-..---..----..----....-------
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.,
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
DEFENDANT
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 2nd day of November, 1995, there being no opposition from
plaintiff Francis Heisse, and additional defendant Uberty Excavators, Inc., to the Rule
entered against them to show cause why the motion of defendant Lobar Associates,
Inc., for consolidation should not be granted. the Rule is made absolute. The above-
captioned cases are consolidated.
By the Court,
_ J.J vv'
Edgar B. BaYley~
No~ Z 4 lOj PH '55
.:l r.H;;'r
,;r . ,E ,i' ',~ . r ~'"
cU"'t;:Y _ O'"'U.iJI1!-t~'
p,-Jtt;~ J l~' ,\.. ·
Scott D. Moore, Esquire
For Plaintiff, Francis Heisse .~ ,i/ 1)
l,t .\)' ,
Leslie B. Handler, Esquire / r' I ~ I
For Plaintiff, Liberty Excavators, Inc. \'p
.,~_t-"
.
David A. Flores, Esquire
For Defendant, Lobar Associates, Inc.
:saa
-2-
i h t- .,' '1 ; (r ^ V f\ i ii I~ .
,J j I)' t 1 f f
PI T"" ,.n,,.lf i)' ;.,F~.~,i~1 "
r iJ;t;~~.-~ ;.IVI ", r nij'J:, .l~ \' ",'
,,- n ,-
'1(1/~ r A
i I~~ I
v
(IliA.) A';(;n; ~ ,~-;r~,":
'j r. fill! 1 ("! !
r: IV'; AnI Ii\ - 1 Ai;
.,;
,.
,.
r:r>f\ 'J: 'J 'd: r ~,'" r:
A,'(:l' :li~ill" ~~,~:p'f{lunt
NO ':]1.-11178 CIV;
~ ,.: ;) '{.
. ,
;: .:; f.. '\j r :"~ . , ,.. ."~ r: ,
?In:r:Tiff
IN f{le. (OIJ~T I), ili.<\1(],', Pi FA" r;F
CljMIJr:'lLII.~i) (O,,\f". ~;:-l\\.~'(, VM,;[A
v
I n~A~ A~sn(TAT;S T~(
!lp .pr'(;(!'''!-:-
CTVTI. AnION - I A,I
V
Tf\fRU drAVATO
Aorl I': Orlll
'; i:\[,
f}p~pn(jant
fO R"'1
v--
NO 94-5507 CIVIi
ORD.flLOECOI.JRT
A"] NOW, this 22nd doy af February, J996. this trial
15 contlnuea to reconvene at 12:30 P m. on Frlrlny, March 1.
19%
Lp'i l:e i'r;"'~G: ~l~' :::,c;!] ;"P.
FOI' Pin ":;" 'VI" :,r](','iona1 Defpnrfllnt
." " ; f:'Jn tnI' " . ;" C
DnVl" FIll";''>. t<;u,J:'"
For npfpr'(;f!n) ; I1n,'. '", .,"( intes. Inc.
Ser,tt f) ~":{'I"I'P r:C(:;~~.~'
For P:()Ir1tlff "'f. "':'::':on(11 Defellrin'1t Frllnel'; .""~f'
:prs
(""
r~ ..,
I"
(".',
,
"
'",..:
.-
,
: -,
"
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.,
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
DEFENDANT
V.
FRANCIS HEISSE,
ADDITIONAL
DEFENDANT
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
-- -----
FRANCIS HEISSE,
PLAINTIFF
V.
LOBAR Jl.sSOCIATES, INC.,
DEFENDANT
V.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.,
ADDITIONAL
DEFENDANT
9j>B5cl7 CIVIL TERM
CONSOLIDATED VERDICT
AND NOW, this '2S- day of April, 1996, the following verdict is entered:
(1) I find in favor of Liberty Excavators, Inc., against Lobar Associates, Inc.,
and award damages in the amount of $27,281 plus six percent legal interest from
April 16, 1994.
(2) I find in favor of Francis Heisse against Lobar Associates, Inc., and award
damages in the amount of $38,743 plus six percent legal interest from April 16, 1994.
Leslie B. Handler, Esquire
For Liberty Excavators, Inc.
David A. Flores, Esquire
For Lobar Associates, Inc.
By the Court,
Scott D. Moore, Esquire
For Francis Heisse
:saa
{!-<..pu.... "..,,:"Ct.{ '-II:J.':i I q".
.J. 'f-
1
,
'j
it
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.,
PLAINTIFF
V.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
DEFENDANT
V.
FRANCIS HEISSE,
ADDITIONAL
DEFENDANT
FRANCIS HEISSE,
PLAINTIFF
. ,
-
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
IN THF. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC"
DEFENDANT
V.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.,
ADDITIONAL
DEFENDANT
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
OPINION AND VERDICT
BAYLEY, J., April 25, 1996:-
This complex construction contract dispute was bench tried on February 21
and 22, and March 1, 1996. The credibility of the witnesses is for the court.
Crawford v. Crawford, 429 Pa. Super. 540 (1993). This verdict is entered pursuant
to Pa. Rule of Civil Procedure 1038. Lobar Associates, Inc., was the general
contractor for the construction of an olympic size swimming pool, twelve feet at the
deep end, a bath house and related facilities at the West Shore Country Club in East
Pennsboro Township. Lobar subcontracted site excCivation and related work to
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
Liberty Excavators, Inc. It subcontracted pool construction and related work to
Francis Haisse. The general contract required completion by December 31, 1993.
The West Shore Country Club extended the completion date to April 15, 1994. The
project was completed by that date. The West Shore Country Club released Lobar
and paid It in full. Liberty and Heisse sued Lobar in separate suits. Lobar joined
Heisse In the Liberty suit and Liberty in the Heisse suit. The cases were consolidated
for trial.
Liberty submitted a written base bid to Lobar of $226,600 with alternates. After
a meeting of representatives of Lobar and Liberty at the job site, Liberty, with Lobar's
approval, commenced work without a written contract. Lobar subsequently forwarded
a written contract to Liberty which significantly altered the terms of Liberty's written
bid. Liberty would not execute the document but remained on the job. Liberty's
administrator sent invoices to Lobar as the job progressed, using as a reference the
number of the unsigned contract. The president of Lobar testified that he assumed
the written contract had been signed and therefore paid the invoices. The project
manager of Liberty testified that the terms of the unsigned contract were
unacceptable, and that his company started the job and remained there with the
understanding that Liberty would perform pursuant to its base bid with accepted
alternates for a total price of $255,200 as agreed to by the parties Immediately before
work was commenced.
The contract Lobar sent to Liberty set a two week schedule for Liberty to
-2-
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
complete all site work necessary to begin forming the sides of the pool. Liberty
claims it did not sign the document because, among other reasons, it told Lobar that
only the bulk dirt excavation would take two weeks. Lobar claims that Liberty delayed
the job by not completing in two weeks the work it said it would do. That position is
not supported by the credible evidence, and is totally unrealistic. The landscape
architect and project manager for the owner, West Shore Country Club, testified that
Liberty performed in a timely manner. Liberty was justified In not signing the contract
sent by Lobar because the preliminary schedule set forth in that document was never
agreed to by Liberty and could not have been reasonably met. Liberty is not
estopped from claiming that it is not bound by the terms of the unsigned contract
forwarded by Lobar. Lobar's assumption that there was a signed contract because
Uberty's administrator, who had never seen the document, used the contract number
as a reference on Invoices is invalid. That document does not legally bind Liberty to
terms upon which there was never a meeting of the minds by the parties.
Liberty's bid to Lobar Included under the heading "SCOPE OF WORK."
Demolition Including removal of existing concrete pads and bituminous
pavements, wood and metal bollards, guardrail, and existing storm
sewer lines. (Emphasis added).
* * *
Excavation for pool and back fill pool walls. (Emphasis added).
Liberty's site exca'lation bid did not include demolishing the existing bath
house and disposing of the material. The written contract Lobar subsequently sent to
-3-
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
Liberty included such demolition and disposal, with no increase in Liberty's bid price
to cover that work. That was another reason Liberty was justified In not executing the
document. When Liberty did not demolish the bath house and dispose of the
material during the course of the project, Lobar had it done and billed Liberty $6,242.
Liberty is not responsible for the charge.
Liberty bid the project to excavate the site and form an earthen pool shell.
Lobar was to construct wooden forms around the perimeter of the pool excavation
against which Heisse would blow shotcrete mix (gunite) to form the rough pool walls.
Lobar's contract with Heisse specified that "wood forms would be installed by others."
Liberty was then to back fill those walls. During the project Lobar decided not to
construct the wooden forms, and required Liberty to sculpt earthen pool walls against
which Heisse blew gunite. Sculpting the walls was time-consuming work. Lobar
maintains that Liberty and Heisse agreed to the change in the field. We find as a fact
that Liberty and Heisse were forced by Lobar to perform as per Lobar's unilateral
change in the construction method. The delay that Lobar attributes to Liberty and
Heisse, for which It seeks damages, is in fact mostly attributable to its change in
construction method forced upon Liberty and Heisse. Neither Heisse, who was
unable to start 11is work as scheduled and whose work was more involved as a result
of the change in construction method, nor Liberty, significantly delayed the project.
The fact that the project was otherwise delayed is attributable to a severe winter, and
causes for which neither Liberty nor Heisse are responsible.
-4-
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
Liberty's claim against Lobar Is:
Base bid
$255,200
$4,170
$4,625
$400
Alternate
Alternate
Addition
Cost plus work orders totalling
Total
$15.020
$279,415
$246.047
$33,368
Paid
Balance
The cost plus work orders include $754 to repair a damaged water line. We
find that Liberty damaged this line. That amount Is not owed by Lobar, thus reducing
the balance to $32,614.
We find that Lobar Is entitled to recover the following damages from Liberty:
Replacement of sidewalk damaged by Liberty
Repair trap damaged by Liberty
$587
$207
$215
$1,364
$2.960
$5,333
Pump tanks due to improper work by Liberty
Reinstallation of guardrail Liberty removed
Credit for deleted Interior footing excavation
Total
Lobar's other claims against Liberty are not supported by the credible evidence.
Accordingly, the balance due Liberty from Lobar is $27,281.
-5.
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
Heisse seeks payment from Lobar of $7,500 for lifeguard stands it supplied.
Heisse testified that the lifeguard stands were on the deck and were not part of hii:l
contract. He stated that after he had completed the pool he was asked by a
representative of Lobar to supply and install the lifeguard chairs and that Lobar would
pay the cost of $7,500. Lobar maintains that the lifeguard stands were part of
Heisse's contract. The general contract between Lobar and the West Shore Country
Club provided for site Improvement to include:
Pre-cast retaining wall, site signage, wooden picket fence, wooden
trellis, 25 meter swimming pool, wading pool, wooden gates and fence
for trash compactor, ornamental block wall, wooden stair at compactor,
handrail, lifeguard chairs, diving board removal and reinstallation, guide
rail, clean up. (Emphasis added).
The written $164,419 subcontract between Lobar and Heisse provides that
Heisse will be responsible for:
Construction of swimming and wading pools complete as
required In accordance with Pennsylvania State regulations
and according to plans & specifications provided, as amended
In your letter of 29 April 1993 and later deletion of the heaters
on the original specifications which decreased the price from
that shown on your letter dated 29 April 1993 including the
following:
1. The swimming and wading pools will be constructed exactly
as shown on blueprint.
2. The equipment specified will be changed as follows: SFV 78-
78" hyrate sand filter without automatic backwash. Two (2)
chemodata model 400 controllers and four (4) stenner pumps for
automatic chemical control of both pools. Automatic fill feature
has been deleted from original bid.
3. Twelve (12) stainless steel recessed wall steps have been
deleted. They will be replaced by built-in ceramic tile steps.
,6,
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
4. Flow control valves have been deleted.
5. When sltework i.e. excavation, under-dralns, and stone are
complete, your firm will Install and test all pipes which will be PVC
schedule 40 and sized in accordance with blueprints - estimated
time one (1) week.
6. While the wood forms for the pool wails are being installed by
others, your firm will commence installing rebar, #4 rods on 12"
centers, both ways, over walls and floor of the swimming pool.
Grade 60 steel will be used. When steel installation is complete,
the pool floor will be installed - estimated time three (3) weeks.
7. Shotcrete-gunite swimming pool walls and gutter wlil be
Installed - estimated time two (2) weeks.
8. Wading pool rough structure will be installed - estimated time
one (1) week.
9. Tile will be Installed and pools plastered - estimated time two
(2) weeks. (Emphasis added).
Lobar Installed the pool deck. The April 29, 1993 letter, which was part of the
subcontract, required Heisse only to construct the "swimming and wading pools," with
equipment specified to operate the pool. Heisse was not responsible for providing
lifeguard chairs any more than he was responsible for numerous other site
improvements set forth in Lobar's general contract with the West Shore Country Club
such as the pre-cast retaining wall, wood picket fence, wood trellis, and under drain
for the pool, which indisputably were the responsibility of others.
As the pool shell Vias excavated by Liberty, the shallow end was kept open for
ingress and egress of equipment. If Lobar had enclosed the earthen shell with
wooden walls, as It was supposed to do, Liberty would have back filled around the
entire perimeter including that end. When Lobar did not construct the wooden wails,
it authorized Heisse to construct a wall across the open end in order to have a
-7.
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
surface upon which to blow gunite. Heisse Is entitled to damages against Lobar for
that cost of that construction In the amount of $2,900.
Heisse estimates he is entitled to $18,800 for extra gunite because Lobar
changed the method of construction. This claim was not asserted until a claim was
made against Heisse for allegedly delaying the project. Lobar challenges the claim,
and also maintains that any significant need for extra gunite was caused by Liberty
over-excavating the pool shell. The credible evidence supports awarding Heisse
$2,500 against Lobar on this claim.' Heisse is also entitled to $150 for replacing a
diving jig damaged by a Lobar employee. The credible evidence does not support
awarding Heisse damages on his other claims against Lobar. We find that Lobar is
entitled to recover the following damages from Heisse:
Bottled gas
Polyethylene
$120
$ 60
$368
$178
$726
Cost of water to fill pool
Screws
TOTAL
Lobar's other claims against Heisse are not supported by the credible evidence.
Heisse's contract with Lobar Is for $164,419. Lobar acknowledges a contract
1. Damages need not be proven by mathematical precision, but only a
reasonable degree of certainty. Standard Pipeline Coating Co., Inc. v. Soloman &
Teslovlch, Inc., 344 Pa. Super. 367 (1985).
-8-
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
extra for $3,500 making the total $167,919. Lobar paid Heisse $134,000 leaving a
balance of $33,919. Adding the $2,900 owed Heisse for construction of the wooden
forms, $2,500 for extra gunite, and $150 to replace the damaged diving jig, brings the
total to $39,469. Reduced by $726 which Heisse owes Lobar, the balance due
Heisse from Lobar is $38,743.
CONSOLIDATED VERDICT
AND NOW, this '25 day of April, 1996, the following verdict is entered:
(1) I find in favor of Liberty Excavators, Inc., against Lobar Associates, Inc.,
and award damages in the amount of $27,281 plus six percent legal interest from
April 16, 1994.
(2) I find in favor of Francis Heisse against Lobar Associates, Inc., and award
damages in the amount of $38,743 plus six percent legal interest from April 16, 1994.
By the cou~ /
. ~"/
Leslie B. Handler, Esquire
For Liberty Excavators, Inc.
David A. Flores, Esquire
For Lobar Associates, Inc.
Scott D. Moore, Esquire
For Francis Heisse
.
:saa
-9-
;1
,,;
.:u"'l
....
-
""
-
It)
~
..."
'1.
4
tt
F
.
Q
Z
:s ..,
r.rJ -
~ !;:i ~~l
!fl )1~~"j
U ",,"'1-"'"
- .....,~tn~-,..I
It o~. z_
O :CUlt-
0"'-
. ~ t-
:$....- .-
..; 5~~~~
...J (J '" ~!!l ~
",...J:c
.. N~o..
r.rJ <.
Q U
-
~
r.rJ
.
SAIDIS, GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 W. High Street
Carlisle. PA
.,
,I
,l
'I
H
II
II
3. As part of his claim, Plaintiff Heisse sought payment
from Lobar for $7,500.00 for lifeguard stands that Lobar asked
Heisse to install.
I
II
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
4. Lobar contended that the lifeguard stands were part of
the contract.
5. The Court concluded in the Opinion:
Heisse was not responsible for providing lifeguard
chairs any more than he was responsible for numerous
other site improvements set forth in Lobar's general
contract with West Shore Country Club . . .
Opinion, page 7.
6. The $7,500.00 was omitted from the eventual Verdict.
Opinion, page 9.
7. Plaintiff Francis Heisse requests the Court to modify
the Verdict and add the additional $7,500.00 that was awarded in
the Opinion but not indicated in the Verdict.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Francis Heisse respectfully requests
the Court to modify the Consolidated Verdict by adding $7,500.00
to the $38,743.00 plus interest already awarded for a total
amount of $46,243.00 plus six percent legal interest from April
l6, 1994.
Date: fI-17 - '1 (.
Respectively submitted,
SAIDIS, GUIDO, S~UFF & MASLAND
,
By: _y._-~/)?
_Scott O. Moore, Esquire
Supreme Ct. I.D. # 55694
26 West High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-6222
Attorney for Plaintiff
2
Ii
"
II
,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Scott D. Moore, Esquire, certify that on the 3rd day of
May, 1996, I served a true and correct copy of the within Post-
Trial Motion upun counsel in this matter by depositing same in
the United States mail, firot class, postage prepaid, addressed
as follows:
David A. Flores, Esquire
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
2306 Columbia Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
Leslie B. Handler, Esquire
HANDLER AND WIENER
319 Market Street
P.O. Box 1177
Harrisburg, PA 17108
SAIDIS, GUIDO, S~UFF & MASLAND
By' r-; ~ 2)2 H~
~6~~00re, Esquire
SAID/S, GUIDO, !
snUFF & I
MAS LAND il
26 w. Hiih SIn:el '
C.,Ii.I,.PA I
I
Ii
:i
II
I'
"
;1
Ii
II
Ii
11
"
"
Leslie B. Handler, Esquire
For Liberty Excavators, Inc.
By the Court;
David A. Flores, Esquire
For Lobar Associates, Inc.
Scott D. Moore, Esquire
For Francis Helsse
:saa
-
. I . ... . ~- - ',-- -.-
,
LIBERTY fJ<CAVATORS, INC..
PLAINTIFF
V.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
DEFENDANT
V.
FRANCIS HEISSE,
ADDITIONAL
DEFENDANT
FRANCIS HEISSE,
PLAINTIFF
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
V.
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
DEFENDANT
V.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.,
ADDITIONAL
DEFENDANT
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
OPINION AND VERDICT
BAYLEY, J., April 25, 1996:--
This complex construction contract dispute was bench tried on February 21
and 22, and March 1, 1996. The credibility of the witnesses is for the court.
Crawford v. Crawford, 429 Pa. Super. 540 (1993). This verdict is entered pursuant
to Pa. Rule of Civil Procedure 1038. Lobar Associates, Inc., was the general
contractor for the construction of an olympic size swimming pool, twelve feet at the
deep end, a bath house and related facilities at the West Shore Country Club in East
Pennsboro Township. Lobar subcontracted site excavation and related work to
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
Liberty Excavators, Inc. It subcontracted pool construction and related work to
Francis Heisse. The general contract required completion by December 31, 1993.
The West Shore Country Club extended the completion date to April 15, 1994. The
project was completed by that date. The West Shore Country Club released Lobar
and paid it in full. Liberty and Heisse sued Lobar in separate suits. Lobar joined
Heisse in the Liberty suit and Uberty in the Heisse suit. The cases were consolidated
for trial.
Liberty submitted a written base bid to Lobar of $226,600 with altemates. After
a meeting of representatives of Lobar and Liberty at the job site, Uberty, with Lobar's
approval, commenced work without a written contract. Lobar subsequently forwarded
a written contract to Liberty which significantly altered the terms of Liberty's written
bid. Liberty would not execute the document but remained on the job. Liberty's
administrator sent invoices to Lobar as the job progressed, using as a reference the
number of the unsigned contract. The president of Lobar testified that he assumed
the written contract had been signed and therefore paid the invoices. The project
manager of Liberty tastified that the terms of the unsigned contract were
unacceptable, and that his company started the job and remained there with the
understanding that Liberty would perform pursuant to its base bid with accepted
alternates for a total price of $255,200 as agreed to by the parties immediately before
work was commenced.
The contract Lobar sent to Liberty set a two week schedule for Liberty to
-2-
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
complete all site work necessary to begin forming the sides of the pool. Uberty
claims it did not sign the document because, among other reasons, it told Lobar that
only the bulk dirt excavation would take two weeks. Lobar claims that Uberty delayed
the job by not completing in two weeks the work it said it would do. That position is
not supported by the credible evidence, and is totally unrealistic. The landscape
architect and project manager for the owner, West Shore Country Club, testified that
Liberty performed in a timely manner. Liberty was justified in not signing the contract
sent by Lobar because the preliminary schedule set forth in that document was never
agreed te by Liberty and could not have been reasonably met. Liberty is not
estopped from claiming that it is not bound by the terms of the unsigned contract
forwarded by Lobar. Lobar's assumption that there was a signed contract because
Liberty's administrator, who had never seen the document, used the contract number
as a reference on invoices is invalid. That document does not legally bind Liberty to
terms upon which there was never a meeting of the minds by the parties.
Liberty's bid to Lobar included under the heading "SCOPE OF WORK."
Demolition Including removal of existing concrete pads and bituminous
pavements. wood and metal bollards, guardrail, and existing storm
sewer lines. (Emphasis added).
* * *
Excavation for pool and back fill pool walls. (Emphasis added).
Liberty's site excavation bid did not include demolishing the existing bath
house and disposing of the material. The written contract Lobar subsequently sent to
-3,
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
Liberty Included such demolition and disposal, with no increase in Liberty's bid price
to cover that work. That was another reason Liberty was justified In not executing the
d.:>cument. When Liberty did not demolish the bath house and dispose of the
material during the course of the project, Lobar had It done and billed Liberty $6,242.
Liberty Is not responsible for the charge.
Liberty bid the project to excavate the site and form an earthen pool shell.
Lobar was to construct wooden forms around the perimeter of the pool excavation
against which Heisse would blow shotcrete mix (gunite) to form the rough pool walls.
Lobar's contract with Heisse specified that 'wood forms would be Installed by others.'
Liberty was then to back fill those walls. During the project Lobar decided not to
construct the wooden forms, and required Liberty to sculpt earthen pool walls against
which Helsse blew gunite. Sculpting the walls was time-consuming work. Lobar
maintains that Liberty and Heisse agreed to the change in the field. We find as a fact
that Liberty and Heisse were forced by Lobar to pertorm as per Lobar's unilateral
change in the construction method. The delay that Lobar attributes to Liberty and
Heisse, for which It seeks damages, is in fact mostly attributable to its change in
construction method forced upon Liberty and Heisse. Neither Heisse, who was
unable to start his work as scheduled and whose work was more Involved as a result
of the change In construction method, nor Liberty, significantly delayed the project.
The fact that the project was otherwise delayed is attributable to a severe winter, and
causes for which neither Liberty nor Heisse are responsible.
-4-
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
Liberty's claim against Lobar is:
Base bid
$255,200
$4,170
$4,625
$400
Alternate
Alternate
Addition
Cost plus work orders totalling
Total
$15.020
$279,415
$246.047
$33,368
Paid
Balance
The cost plus work orders include $754 to repair a damaged water line. We
find that Liberty damaged this line. That amount is not owed by Lobar, thus reducing
the balance to $32,614.
We find that Lobar is entitled to recover the following damages from Liberty:
Replacement of sidewalk damaged by Liberty
Repair trap damaged by Liberty
$587
$207
$215
$1,364
Pump tanks due to improper work by Liberty
Reinstallation of guardrail Liberty removed
Credit for deleted interior footing excavation
$2.960
$5,333
Total
Lobar's other claims against Liberty are not supported by the credible evidence.
Accordingly, the balance due Liberty from Lobar is $27,281.
-5-
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
Helsse seeks payment from Lobar of $7,500 for lifeguard stands it supplied.
Helsse testified that the lifeguard stands were on the deck and were not part of his
contract. He stated that after he had completed the pool he was asked by a
representative of Lobar to supply and Install the lifeguard chairs and that Lobar would
pay the cost of $7,500. Lobar maintains that the lifeguard stands were part of
Heisse's contract. The general contract between Lobar and the West Shore Country
Club provided for site Improvement to include:
Pre-r..ast retaining wall, site signage, wooden picket fence, wooden
trellis, 25 meter swimming pool, wading pool, wooden gates and fence
for trash compactor, omamental block wall, wooden stair at compactor,
handrail, lifeguard chairs, diving board removal and reinstallation, guide
rail, clean up. (Emphasis added).
The written $164,419 subcontract between Lobar and Heisse provides that
Heisse will be responsible for:
Construction of swimming and wading pools complete as
required In accordance with Pennsylvania State regulations
and according to plans & specifications provided, as amended
In your letter of 29 April 1993 and later deletion of the heaters
on the original specifications which decreased the price from
that shown on your letter dated 29 April 1993 including the
following:
1. The swimming and wading pools wili be constructed exactly
as shown on blueprint.
2. The equipment specified will be changed as follows: SFV 78-
78" hyrate sand filter without automatic backwash. Two (2)
chemodata model 400 controllers and four (4) stenner pumps for
automatic chemical control of both pools. Automatic fill feature
has been deleted from original bid.
3. Twelve (12) stainless steel recessed wall steps have been
deleted. They will be replaced by built,in ceramic tile steps.
-6-
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
4. Flow control valves have been deleted.
5. When sitework I.e. excavatIon, under-drains, and stone are
complete, your firm will install and test all pipes which will be PVC
schedule 40 and sized in accordance with blueprints. estimated
time one (1) week.
6. While the wood forms for the pool walls are being installed by
others, your firm will commence installing rebar, #4 rods on 12"
centers, both ways, over walls and floor of the swimming pool.
Grade 60 steel will be used. When steel Installation is complete,
the pool floor will be installed - estimated time three (3) weeks.
7. Shotcrete-gunlte swimming pool walls and gutter will be
installed - estimated time two (2) weeks.
8. Wading pool rough structure will be installed. estimated time
one (1) week.
9. Tile will be installed and pools plastered - estimated time two
(2) weeks. (Emphasis added).
Lobar Installed the pool deck. The April 29, 1993 letter, which was part of the
subcontract, required Heisse only to construct the "swimming and wading pools," with
equipment specified to operate the pool. Helsse was not responsible for providing
lifeguard chairs any more than he was responsible for numerous other site
improvements set forth in Lobar's general contract with the West Shore Country Club
such as the pre-cast retaining wall, wood picket fence, wood trellis, and under drain
for the pool, which indisputably were the responsibility of others.
As the pool shell was excavated by Liberty, the shallow end was kept open for
ingress and egress of equipment. If Lobar had enclosed the earthen shell with
wooden walls, as it was supposed to do, Liberty would have back filled around the
entire perimeter including that end, When Lobar did not construct the wooden walls,
it authorized Heisse to construct a wall across the open end in order to have a
-7-
94-4178 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
surface upon which to blow gunite. Helsse Is entitled to damages against Lobar for
that cost of that construction In the amount of $2,900.
Heisse estimates he is entitled to $18,800 for extra gunite because Lobar
changed the method of construction. This claim was not asserted until a claim was
made against Helsse for allegedly delaying the project. Lobar challenges the claim,
and also maintains that any significant need for extra gunlte was caused by Liberty
over-excavating the pool shell. The credible evidence supports awarding Heisse
$2,500 against Lobar on this claim.' Heisse Is also entitled to $150 for replacing a
diving jig damaged by a Lobar employee. The credible evidence does not support
awarding Heisse damages on his other claims against Lobar. We find that Lobar is
entitled to recover the following damages from Helsse:
Bottled gas
$120
$ 60
$368
$178
$726
Polyethylene
Cost of water to fill pool
Screws
TOTAL
Lobar's other claims against Heisse are not supported by the credible evidence.
Heisse's contract with Lobar is for $164,419. Lobar acknowledges a contract
1. Damages need not be proven by mathematical precision, but only a
reasonable degree of certainty. Standard Pipeline Coating Co., Inc. v. Soloman &
Teslovlch, Inc., 344 Pa. Super. 367 (1985).
-8-
94-4176 CIVIL TERM
94-5507 CIVIL TERM
extra for $3,500 making the total $167,919. Lobar paid Helsse $134,000 leaving a
balance of $33,919. Adding the $2,900 owed Heisse for construction of the wooden
forms, $2,500 for extra gunlte, and $150 to replace the damaged diving jig, brings the
total to $39,469. Reduced by $726 which Helsse owes Lobar, the balance due
Heisse from Lobar Is $36,743.
CONSOLIDATED VERDICT
AND NOW, this tJ..S day of April, 1996, th& following verdict Is entered:
(1) I find in favor of Liberty Excavators, Inc., against Lobar Associates, Inc.,
and award damages In the amount of $27,261 plus six percent legal Interest from
April 16, 1994.
(2) I find in favor of Francis Heisse against Lobar Associates, Inc., and award
damages In the amount of $36,743 plus six percent legal interest from April 16, 1994.
By the cOj?/
~ . /'
/;..
v
Leslie B. Handler, Esquire
For Liberty Excavators, Inc.
David A. Flores, Esquire
For Lobar Associates, Inc.
Scott D. Moore, Esquire
For Francis Heisse
.
:saa
-9-
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Plaintiff
VB.
No. 94-4178 Civil Term
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
VB.
FRANCIS HEISSE
Additional
Defendant
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaintiff
/
VB.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
VB.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Additional
Defendant
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.'S MOTION FOR POST-TRIAL RELIEF
AND ANSWER TO FRANCIS HEISSE'S POST-TRIAL MOTION
I\H\tO~' IM\III., p('
\IIOM'I' W\ "'I.\\Il
".,.tlltllo4l1l""\I"'11
1 '''I ".,UN .." 1 'Nil
1
'~
) I {I (l (,
I J(J 'I
VI~ (') ". ( ,I ,J " /
tJ, 1'i7l,
t,
~< g~~
OH
.... :;j "'~H
0 ~> U
on ,..It;l,,, j! ~ ""
on Vl~~ a.: :J C'I
, "'!"j . . ;: z f6
<t z5a U U . ~ Vl vi ""
'" Z . . ~ . 0 j > ,..
0"" H U U U~p., W <(
. ~ "', Z ~ Z'" -
0 . 7- . H . HHVl ;. I- <(
Z 0 .0 Vl Vl ,..l- <( <( <(
U:><H 0< . . ~ . '" '" 0 Ul iii Q.
'" ~~t; 0 Vl Vl 0 VlO<Vl >- ::!: Ii
" ~ ~ ~ !;( ~~~ ~ "" :J
I1l o ...: '" '" Z ..J ""
0 Vl Vl :'( Z a: 0 Iii
co E-oU,..l H Vl Vl H
.... [je~ U H H U U UO< 0 0 U <(
.... >< '0 .;!:l '" . 0 . ij OE-oVl ~ to U
<t O~H "'UlVl :c Ul Vl Ul Vl , H ::; 0 Z
I U U ~:>~ :>Vl :>~ :> ~E-oU 0: <(
<t Vl C'I ..J
'" ....0< H H ~ ~~~g <( N
:C'" ~ ~ U U ~ f:l J:
. E-oe3 ~ 2
0 z~ o:l o:l 0< ...
Z H 9 0 H O~OO
HU ,..l ,..l ,..l ,..l E-o:>:
- / I
.. .'
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Plaintiff
VB.
/
No. 94-4178 Civil Term ~
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
VB.
FRANCIS HEISSE
Additional
Defendant
FRANCIS HEISSE
Plaint if f
VB.
No. 94-5507
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant
VB.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC.
Additional
Defendant
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.'S MOTION FOR POST-TRIAL RELIEF
AND ANSWER TO FRANCIS HEISSE'S POST-TRIAL MOTION
II/\RMON A IlI\\'IUi, P.l'.
,-\llllM...I\...~H"W
l_llltlnll.lJMDIA.A.\'ISliI:
I "'l""'Tl-R "" 1711111
1
AND NOW, comes Lobar Associates, Inc., by and through
its attorneys, Harmon & Davies, P.C., and files this Answer to
Francis Heisse's Post-Trial Motion and represents as follows:
1. Admi t ted.
2. Admitted.
3.
Admitted in part.
Denied in part.
It is
admitted that as part of his claim Plaintiff Heisse sought
payment from Lobar for certain lifeguard stands that Lobar
asked Heisse to install. It is denied that Heisse proved that
the amount owed was $7,500.00.
4. Admitted.
5. The Court's Opinion speaks for itself and is the
best evidence of its contents. It is respectfully submitted,
however, that the Court made no findings of fact that Heisse
was entitled to any damages on account of any claim for
lifeguard chairs.
6.
Denied.
It is denied that any amounts were
omitted from the "eventual Verdict.
It is respectfully
submitted that Plaintiff failed to meet its burden with regard
to introducing evidence of damages on account of any lifeguard
chair claim.
In fact, Plaintiff's Motion is devoid of
references to record evidence of any damages. In the absence
of such evidence, said Motion must be denied.
7. Lobar Associates requests that this Court deny
Heisse's Motion to modify any amounts to the Verdict.
Il.-'R\I()~ 411AVH.S, rc
..\IIOM'H'l-\I.I\....
!Ult>lllIIMHI""\i-""'11
I "'l "..tilt "\ J'NI!
2
WHEREFORE,
Lobar Associates,
Inc.
respectfully
requests that this Court deny Heisse's Motion to modify the
Consolidated Verdict.
LOBAR ASSOCIATES. INC.'S MOTION FOR POST-TRIAL RELIEF
1. In its case in chief and as defense to claims by
Liberty and Francis Heisse, Lobar Associates contended that
Liberty and Heisse, without cause, delayed the proj ect, thereby
causing Lobar Associates damage.
2. It is undisputed that completion of the project
was delayed beyond its originally scheduled completion date of
December 21, 1993.
3. In its Opinion and Verdict, the Court rejected
Lobar Associates' delay claims, finding that:
. The delay that Lobar attributes to
Liberty and Heisse, for which it seeks damages,
is in fact mostly attributable to its change in
construction method forced upon Liberty and
Heisse. Neither Heisse, who was unable to
start his work as scheduled and whose work was
more involved as a result of the change in
construction method, nor Liberty, significantly
delayed the project. The fact that the project
was otherwise delayed is attributable to a
severe winter, and causes for which neither
Liberty nor Heisse are responsible.
4. It is respectfully submitted that said finding
is contrary to the great weight of the evidence, and to law.
First, it is undisputed that the change in construction method
fl.\R\IO~ &: lJ.\\!II:S, 11,C
"I IOK'IIIPi.\H\\lo
]\hl\ l OU'Ilr.IIII\ "q'n
1.\\l"..!Ik I'\PWJ
from wood forms to earth forms led to no contemporaneous
request for change orders. Had it involved more work, there
3
"AK\to"ll' IJA\'lIS, PC
'I WIt''''' "II "..
~ll"'lllll\llll" 'H" I
1.\'( "...1111 '" 1~"'I'
would have been requests for change orders, as there were for
other items of extra work, or the subcontractors would have
refused to do it, as Liberty refused to do the bathhouse. Nor
did it lend to any request by either subcontractor for extra
time to complete their contracts.
such a request.
There was no evidence of
Second, as to the winter, there was no evidence
that the severe winter impeded either contractor's progress
until the end of the year, when the project was already delayed
beyond possible recovery within the original timeframe. The
severe winter weather did not begin until late December, 1993,
when it was reasonable to assume that adverse weather would
occur. The problem was that the project was not near complete
at that point.
Third, Heisse's inability to start work as
scheduled is the gravamen of our claim against Liberty, who, it
is undisputed, was the contractor responsible for preparing the
pool shell for work by Heisse.
Finally, to the extent the subcontractors'
delays ~aused work to proceed unnecessarily into the severe
winter, the damages Lobar Associates sustained thereby are
compensable. Hedin construction Co. v. United States, 347 F.2d
235, 254 (Ct. Cl. 1965) (except for delays attributable to
government, contractor would have completed project, so that it
could recover for delay damages due to weather delays
experienced after government-caused delays) .
4
-
- -~j'
5. For the above reasons, pursuant to Rule 227.1,
Pa.R.Civ.P., it is respectfully requested that this Court
reconsider its Verdict on Lobar Associates' delay claims, and
award Lobar Associates damages for said claims or grant a new
trial.
WHEREFORE, Lobar Associates, Inc. respectfully moves
that this Court grant Lobar Associates, Inc.'s Motion for Post-
Trial Relief, and modify its Verdict to award Lobar Associates,
Inc. delay damages, or grant a new trial.
Respectfully submitted,
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
2306 Columbia Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
~:~7)n 2~S~~ rll~
~~id A. Flores, I.D. # 37829
Attorney for Defendant
Lobar Associates, Inc.
PL\Lobar\Liberty.APM
1I..\H..\-tuS &. 1J,\VlI'S, PC
.\n{)M....I~'....I,UYio
~lIlt>nlll"'HI... ...~...;Iit-,
I,\'l "'11M. ,.... 11hlJl
5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I am this day serving a true
and correct copy of Lobar Associates, Inc.'s Motion For Post-
Trial Relief and Answer to Francis Heisse's Post-Trial Motion
upon the persons and in the manner indicated below, which
service satisfies the requirement of Pa. R.C.P. 440:
Service by First Class Mail
Addressed as Follows:
Scott D. Moore, Esquire
SAIDIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MAS LAND
26 West High Street
P. O. Box 560
CarliSle, PA 17013
Leslie B. Handler, Esquire
HANDLER AND WIENER
319 Market Street
P. O. Box 1177
Harlisburg, PA 17108
Dated:
.t::; \ \ t) \C\ I,
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
2306 Columbia Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 291-2236___
By:_Dr''\~ O. \<~
David A. Flores, I.D. # 37829
Attorney for Defendant
Lobar Associates, Inc.
1 ~ .
:e
\.-
~
\ _ ...s
-..:::;~
~.I"-
;...'; -...,1:: r'\,\
........ ----
~
. .""
. .
~
-
.~
C'.J
'~l'-",
~-..:....- \
.,0,
'~
~
g
"'-:~
~
Q
Z
:s '"
~ t;j~fl
lfl ::e~~..:~
u ..", on f- Z'"
- ~XCllZt'"
!t og:tu.Jr::'
o Q . Q ~E
~ -O:t~u.J
:5 ~c.:::i!a~
'W oo..J:t
.. MCll::c..
CIl ..:
_ u
Q
-
<(
CIl
"
. .
CBRTIFICATB OF SBRVICB
-? 'n...
I, Scott D. Moore, Esquire, hereby certify that on the )0
day of May, 1996, I served a trua and correct copy of the
foregoing Praecipe to Enter Judgment upon counsel for all parties
of record via United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as
follows:
Leslie B. Handler, Esquire
HANDLER AND WIENER
319 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1177
David A. Flores, Esquire
HARMON & DAVIES, P.C.
2306 Columbia Avenua
Lancaster, PA 17603
DATED: )- J'- '7(,
SAIDIS, GUIDO, SHUFF & MASLAND ,
// ':) '>
By: ~C'cxNt 1..- .:--~-~~.~(
~Scott D. Moore, Esquire
SAlOIS, GUIDO,
SHUFF &
MASLAND
26 W. High Street
Carli\le, PA
I
,
,
I
I
I
it
'I
.,
"
:1
iI
I'
,
I
I
,
FRANCIS HEISSE,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
LOBAR ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant
No. 94-5507
v.
LIBERTY EXCAVATORS, INC., :
Additional Defendant:
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
i
I,
II
'i
II
:1
I,
il
II TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
I
I
PRAECIPE TO SATISFY JUDGMENT
Please mark the judgment entered in the above referenced
case as satisfied.
Respectfully submitted,
II
II
!
, SHUFF & MASLAND
Dated: G-Ifr"
~
Scott D. Moore, Esquire
26 West High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-6222
Attorney for the Plaintiff
>; '.'"
C, t::
r~ .
11.,'. '~
<;2i :'-~ ~' ;'~
f" .
o'e "', ~;j
0: Cl .;....
.. ~,}
'"i' - I,.",
Ea:1: .. 'iil
I :J..
.. - . ,
lJ. '.'" :j
u r.i+\ ()
Ii