HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-3876
./C
a ,7' .PI/
w
0 z
0
CORNELL SMITH
Plaintiff
CUMBERLAND COUNTY COMMON
PLEAS COURT
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 3876 CIVIL 2002
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2002, the Cumberland County Court of
Common Pleas hereby relinquishes jurisdiction over this matter due to a conflict of interest.
The matter shall be addressed by the Honorable Keith B. Quigley of the Forty-first Judicial
District, Perry County branch.
By the Court,
George E. Hoffer, President Judge
CC:
Cornell Smith
David M. Donaldson, Esq.
CORNELL SMITH
V.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
COMMON PLEAS COURT
:IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
:OF PENNSYLVANIA -
:CUMBERLAND COUNTY BRANCH
:
:NO. 3876 CIVIL 2002
ORDER
AND NOW, August 30, 2002, in accordance with the within Memorandum, the
within action be and is hereby dismissed.
cc: /4qaintiff
/President Judge
File
BY THE COURT,
.~iGLEY,
41~t Judicial District
Specially Presiding
P.Jo
~ORNELL SMITH
V.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
COMMON PLEAS COURT
:IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
:OF PENNSYLVANIA -
:CUMBERLAND COUNTY BRANCH
:
:NO. 3876 CIVIL 2002
MEMORANDUM
This action by Cornell Smith against the Cumberland County Common Pleas
~ourt was referred to the undersigned through administrative unit number 4.
This is an action by a person apparently charged with criminal offenses in
~umberland County. He styles the action one of mandamus.
Attempts by the undersigned to read Mr. Smith's submission after two (2) copies
were forwarded, have been somewhat unsuccessful. In short, I find the writing somewhat
illegible but also am able to read enough, if nothing more than by reference to the caption,
that the plaintiff attempts to sue the Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas in
connection with legal proceedings against him.
While it cannot be said with certainty that what Mr. Smith attempted to say might
make some sense, it can certainly be said with certainty that the Doctrine of Immunity is
absolute defense to this proceeding. Further more, to the extent that the Court can discern
what Mr. Smith is attempting to say, his allegations are clearly frivolous.
Therefore, we will dispose of this matter by dismissal without the necessity of a
motion for same being made.
August 30, 2002
cc: Plaintiff
President Judge
File
~UIi GLEY, P.J.
strict
Specially Presiding