HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-01316
-~
<:'l
d
,
C?(~- ')
-,1"'"
i
\
LUCREATIA PERRY
Plaintiff
v.
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND S.
MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS
MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID M.
MYERS FUNERAL HOME and MYERS
FURNITURE
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION. LAW
NO. 95-1316 CIVIL TERM
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
NOTICE OF MEETING
OF ARBITRATORS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Arbitrators appointed In the above-captioned action will sit
for the purpose of their appointment on Tuesday. November 25. 1997, at 1:00 o'clock P.M. In the Old
Court House, Second Floor Hearing Room, Cumberland County Court House, Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
Date:
'1_75"""77
Taylor P. Andrews, Esquire
Anthony DeLuca, Esquire
Robert G. Frey, Esquir
By:
TO: Jefferson J. Shipman, Esquire
320 - Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Brooks R. Foland, Esquire
Thomas, Thomas & Hafer
305 North Front Street, Sixth Floor
POB 999
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0999
David M. Myers
David M. Myers Funeral Home &
Myers Furniture
64 2nd Street
Newport, PA, 17074
P. Andrews, Chalnnan
Anthony L. DeLuca
P.O. Box 358
113 Front Street
Bolling Springs, PA 17007-0358
Robert G. Frey
Frey & Tiley
5 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Desmond S. Mactavish and
Sally Myers Mactavish
60 2nd Street
Newport, PA 17074
I ~. ,."_,,,-,,",",....,< ,,,, . '" .~.;~ .' ':..::;..L~ - ~ ,..;. -
. I.. '.
. '
Lucreatia Perry
c/o Jefferson J. Shipman, Esquire
320 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Courl Administrator's Office
Cumberland County Courl House
I Courthouse Square
Carlisle, PA 17013
Bulletin Board
Prothonotary's Office
Cumberland County Court House
Carlisle, PA 17013
Lucreatia Perry
v.
Desmond S. MacTavish, Daivd M. Myers
Funeral Home and Myers Furniture
IN TIlE COURT OF CO~lMON PLSAS OF
CLlIBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
11
I
I
I
NO. 95-1316
CIVIL
19
RULE 1312-1. The Petition for Appointment of Arbitrators shall be substantially
in the following form:
PETITION FOR APPOUlTI1ENT OF ARBITRATORS
TO THE KONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:
Jefferson J. Shipman, Eaquire
. counsel for the~aintif~ in
the above
1.
action (or actions), respectfully represents that:
The above-captioned action ~~~XX~~S~KK~ is ~K~~~ at issue.
The claim of the plaintiff in the action is S 25.000
The counterclaim of the defendant in the action is _0_
2.
The following attorneys are interested in the
wise disqualified to sit as arbitrators:
cnse(s) us counselor are other-
Brooks R. Foland. Esquire
WHEREfORE. your petitioner prays your Honorable Court to appoint three (3)
arbitrators to whom the case shall be submitted.
Wt~
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, S'r.?t..,..... /'r/Z. IS, 19:i.Z. in consideration of the
foregoing pe~ion, I A Ylalt. ANt/lll.,,- .JS I Esq.. dl!)"f),I1"Y lJ,.Lu "~..1
Esq., and ,,(J~t.d'b. Mt..'I .Esq., are appointed arbitrators in the
above-captioned action (or actions) as prayed for.
. --'\
By
,,1
'...
. I',
(, \ ~.,) j.-'
i ~..,J
...., ."
tJV'.I
:.J
P. J.
}~~!;,:,_.',<, ) "",1
'A
~ .....l (.- l-; ~
.,,' .." ;-:
1-' .. ~~) "'....
llJ(~ <'1 ~ ?;.>; , ~ "-
c.;lt) - - ~ t;;
"
H::1. 0_ '~m~ r2r
~~-
C. ....:t.
(: I
l~ 1.'-.--- ~
[tIU 0-, ',"'['J
I!:: lJ-I '~)C_
en f"::
u. r- ":1 ~ lL ~
0 C' U
~
-
.
,
. ,
.
LUCREATIA PERRY
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. q~'. jJJ~ C;VL,/' I.i.,..~
v.
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND
S. MACTAVISH and SALLY
MYERS MACTAVISH, his wife,
DAVID M. MYERS FUNERAL HOME
and MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendants
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
TO: Prothonotary
Please issue a Writ of Summons on behalf of the Plaintiff
against the Defendants in the above-captioned action.
HANDLER AND WIENER
----;
'"
By
~,j" ) ,-
Datel_ ,j!I.>/"\
'. ~-)
I,.'
Carolyn Anner, Esquire
Attorne .0.# 62636
319'MarKet Street
P.O. Box 1177
Harrisburg, PA 17108
(717) 234-S031
Attorneys for Plaintiff
~a,..:..( IH. 'J.......
j ,.)J ......-'-
~j\...v-c-~C Ih. '~u., ..Lt............'" t1'l~"--
)'\.41 V.J -J A.--4.L,\.I.. G:"'u........
l! .., J) I }{)'/'I
(, '4 :J .........A 'sr:.uJ., (lL""!",,,,;, t..
"
'0 ..
t':'h"I'r.,J.1 .t,/n,\c.I',,~.'~.J1
.)A 11'( J~I Vf'r' III Ih'..1/h/d/'j
~ ~,\' I. ( r, Nl"l'/.I..~', J '.J.
~cJ .:J"",I .)r..
I 1u -,'/
..
"
I
i
,I
,
"
1
~
'1:'-'
"
=-=
,~
;0
~!,
,-' I ,-;. ~
-
.1"'_
,
.
. -'
C3
W
N
~-
,::J;:
~
. -....':1 "
"- '., ~> ..."
-' ,;;,..';:.
_' i;~ ;:.~
-~;:
...
-u;
c.n
~~
{9
'tl
"\
~ ..
t. !>. ~
:..\ t; t..-
v <:. d
~
f
-,
("
"'""
.,
INSTRUCTIONS TO SHERIFF
Please serve, by deputized service, the Defendants, David M.
Myers, David M. Myers Funeral Home and Myers Furniture at 64 2nd
Street, Newport, Perry County, Pennsylvania, by leaving a copy of
the enclosed Writ with the person in charge at the time.
By
~--~
..----/
:>
carolyn M. rfer,
Attorney .0. #62636
319 Ma et Street
P.O. Box 1177
Harrisburg, PA 17108
(717) 238-2000
Attorney for plaintiff
Date: 'J /11!i ('
i
::~1
r
"
INSTRUCTIONS TO SHERIFF
Please serve, by deputized service, the Defendants, Desmond S.
MacTavish and Sally Myers MacTavish at their residence located at
60 2nd Street, Newport, Perry County, Pennsylvania, by leaving a
copy of the enclosed Writ with the person in charge at the time.
By
" /
/~/
c/'-
"
)
Carolyn Mer,
Attorne <0. #62636
319 M et street
P . 0 . Box 11 77
Harrisburg, PA 17108
(717) 238-2000
Attorney for Plaintiff
Datel".1/P~t
.:_:
,..
;,";
.
co
..,..\
\';': ,
or: ~:
"\,:\"
J'
;";.:
. _. ,~l ~:\
;.;J:...",
'.'-
.~-J~. ...,
~., . ,..,
l_ ,-:-i
";-)1
,.. -<
~
~
f:;'
-<:
i
I
1
I
I
I
=
,~
,.,
-
.r-
c
.....
l-'
=-
=
.
~
"
r
[
i
1
I
!
,
I
.
..,~.;C:::
....#i
I
i
I
.
. I
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
County of Cumberland
Lucreatia Perry
VB
David M. Myers
David M. Myers Funeral Hane and
Myers Furniture
64 2nd Street, Newport, Pa, 17074
and
Desmond S. MacTavish and
Sally Myers MacTavish, his wife
60 2nd Street, Newport, Pa, 17074
Court 01 Commoll Plea.s
No. ...~~:J_~!~.~!VI1L-~~-..._-...... 19....
III .__s:iviJl~ctjJ)o=~...._.....-...-.-.-...
To ..~yj._q.~~..MYenh-tlsl.'l.:I.o.M..-~.ers-.F.uoeral Hane and Myers Furniture and
Desmond S. MacTavish and Sally Myers MacTavish
You are hereby notified that
....._..IdU:te.utla-P~....-.--.-.......----._-"-'----.--"----..----.-.-.--.-...............
the PlaintiH ha s commenced an aetion In ----..(;::l....:l.~.!,aw_.-.-.-_.----.-.---..-...-..--.....-.....
again.t you which you are required to defend or a delault judgment may be entered again.t you.
(SEAL)
Ilate .__~1!~gD..l1____...._..._.... 195t~_
..__.~~~QC~-.~._ji~!~~_~_..__.__.___._.._...._
Prothonotary
By __.~ly!Jw_C2.._~;;~~~.._.__._..._.___._..
. '
" .
~:I:W~ ~(f[[ ~
3~,;~
~
NI""~ r ftn~~~
f ~ IV:J: . ~~
I . rt. ~&~~~- rt
~...,l/lg ( !i:'
W~~
~. ~ ~~&( j
~ rt-
-.I- Ei'
~...,Jn1
~pl [.& :I:
. ~
~ ~ a i
~
~
-.I
-.I
"-{i'-- ,
.-.' .
.
.
.......
.
" )
OFFICE OF PROTHONOTARY
Cumberland County
CARLISLE. PA 17013
Date J!2:;h/-.2, I 99/,
This Is to notify you thai
/.,.d>E-JJ,,,, Pf:.JLJcl vs.~ulcL pI /?('1"rL\', 0.,jfl
No, 9.c; _ /UI.:.-J I , ; d,~Lt:JJ-J):\ . has been
Listed for Argument on ~/_.29 .19'2"'-
Cumberland County Argument Court Rules 210,l1hrough 210,14 shall be strictly
enforced,
.
.
AI .,.k?"".,. ..' P./, ).;>(JQ. ..J
~. PROTHONOTARY '4/>7
/. ,
,.,~_.."'~'.'
"
,
......
.
- ~~....... .-'.~ .. '- ~ . -.--
-"-'
."
"
.
"
)\\"H~lyr
rO 0
'HNjlfjf
Forward/ng Orj;-'Exp/rvd
1
,
.
~~~\jl"
/"..)\. :i."
Hf:lG,PA 170 21'oi,iS$\i2"O~
\ II ~
10
, ,
~-
- ,
, ./
...
Wer ati Perry
2648 Le 'ngton Street
l~rri5bu g, PA 17110
,J Jr"' vflJ
':J-
. ,,1 [}. if ,j C\ 0
". 1'1
~L\ ..-
J,-
'36 I,
..
,~
. -
..-:-....-...
-. .'~'." -,_.
- . -.
,--
I
I
'.- ..
SHERIFF'S RETURN
CASE NOI 1995-01316 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA I
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
PERRY LUCREATIA
VS.
MYERS DAVID M ET AL
. Sheriff, who being duly aworn according
diligent search and inquiry for the within
MYERS FURNITURE
R. Thomas Kline
to law, saya, that he made
named defendant, to witl
but was unable to locate
deputized the sheriff of
to serve the within
Them
in his bailiwick. He therefore
PERRY
WRIT OF SUMMONS
County, Pennsylvania.
On March 28th. 1995
the attached return from PERRY
this office was in receipt of
County, Pennsylvania.
Sheriff's Costsl
Docketing
Out of County
Surcharge
So answers! . .
~~-'- .//
, ~ .-;"/
./ .,...:.-~~"""I"r'/ ~~-:.;:,;
. omas Kline, Sheriff
6.00
.00
2.00
$6.00 CAROLYN M. ANNER
03/28/1995
subscribed to
day of Cf..,P
A. D.
before me
Sworn and
this -:J,.{
19 I'j(
~/u- C', )ltddt-J 1~6
t'rothonot<lrY
I
I
I
I
I
d
'! :IH-:"f' ' 1)1 ,,)
\
\
SHERIFF'S RETURN
CASE NOI 1995-01316 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
PERRY LUCREATIA
VS.
MYERS DAVID M ET AL
R. Thomas Kline
to law, says, that he made
named defendant, to wit:
. Sheriff, who being duly sworn according
diligent search and inquiry for the within
MYERS DAVID M FUNERAL HOME
but was unable to locate
deputized the sheriff of
to serve the within
Him in his bailiwick. He therefore
PERRY
WRIT OF SUMMONS
County, Pennsylvania.
On March 28th, 1995
the attached return from PERRY
this office was in receipt of
County, Pennsylvania.
Sheriff's CostSI
Docketing
Out of County
Surcharge
6.00
.00
2.00
So answer~l _
~.... ).".,.-:,/
~. // ~~..
. ~ '"""-"
r _,?:I,~ ,/;:;.e~
R. Thomas Kline, Sheri!!
~6.00 CAROLYN M. ANNER
03/28/1995
Sworn and subscribed to before me
this J,l.-{ day of (]l,-,.:J
,
19 9~~ A. D.
CJ,u- D. ))LLL'L ~t!i'
v Prothonota y
....._~. t
SHERIFF'S RETURN
CASE NOI 1995-01316 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA I
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
PERRY LUCREATIA
VS.
MYERS DAVID M ET AL
..
R. Thomas Kline
to law, says, that he made
named defendant, to witl
. Sheriff, who being duly sworn according
diligent search and inquiry for the within
MACTAVISH SALLY MYERS
but was unable to locate
deputized the sheriff of
to serve the within
Her
in his bailiwick. He therefore
PERRY
WRIT OF SUMMONS
County, Pennsylvania.
On March 28th. 1995
the attached return from
, this office was in receipt of
PERRY County, Pennsylvania.
Sheriff's Costsl
Docketing
Out of County
Surcharge
6.00
.00
2.00
So answers I
_.-/~'/-'/
- # "~ .../
f Y~'~~;('/,/..,;-.>
R. Thomas Kline, Sheri!!
58.00 CAROLYN M. ANNER
03/28/1995
Sworn and subscribed to before me
this ,3 <.oL day of ot,,j)
19 'i{ A.D.
(h~~ 9 ~~t'e.,-, x4 ~
ro onota y
SHERIFF'S RETURN
CASE NOI 1995-01316 P
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA I
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
PERRY LUCREATIA
VS.
MYERS DAVID M ET AL
R. Thomas Kline
to law, says, that he made
named defendant, to witl
. Sheriff, who being duly sworn according
diligent search and inquiry for the within
MACTAVISH DESMOND S
but was unable to locate
deputized the eheriff of
to serve the within
Him in his bailiwick.
He therefore
Pennsylvania.
PERRY
WRIT OF SUMMONS
County,
On March 28th. 1995
the attached return from
, this office was in receipt of
PERRY County, Pennsylvania.
Sheriff's Costs:
Docketing
Dut of County
Surcharge
6.00
.00
2.00
So a~we~,:
-/-' )/ ..:/;.,
....( .v.~~,,;t'~ <"f:;'--;";"
H, Thomas Kline, Sheri~f
~8.00 CAROLYN M. ANNER
03/28/1995
Sworn and subscribed to before me
this ,;..t day of 01,:(1
19 'I" A.D.
~..,u.... C, )L.cl...... ~"tj,
, Prothonotar'y
SHERIFF'S RETURN
CASE NO: 1995-01316 P
,
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND
PERRY LUCREATIA
VS.
MYERS DAVID M ET AL
R. Thomas Klin...
to law, says, that he made
named defendant, to wit:
. Sheriff, who being duly sworn according
diligent search and inquiry for the within
MYERS DAVID M
but was unable to locate Him in his bailiwick. He therefore
deputized the sheriff of PERRY County, Pennsylvania.
to serve the wi thin WRIT OF SUMMONS
On March 28th. 1995 . this office was in receipt of
the attached return from PERRY County, Pennsylvania.
Sheriff's Costs:
Docketing
Out of County
Surcharge
PERRY COUNTY
18.00
9.00
2.00
70.00
$99.00
So answers I / ..., ,.
/t~{:;/,'~~/ /,/:;j//
.-FJ .7'/c('//in.;.r- .. "'.
H. Thomas K11.ne, 5her1ff
CAROLYN M. ANNER
03128/1995
Sworn
this
19
and subscribed to
,'!t,\.. day of QIH.'P
g
before me
qo{
A. D.
C)-.J u,; Q. '>>4it....,.... AltJ-r.;
I"rothonota~y I
\n Tn!!! Court cr C.:mmO:1 P!e:::s cr C:Jr.::'::.:It'1=nd C.::u:-:-:y, Psnrlsyl'lc:r:io
Lucreatia Perry
'is.
sally Myers MacTavish
:'1'0.
95-1316 civil Term
-
':1
----t .. ---
~ow,
March 15. 1995
~9---. !. S~~~ 0:::' C':nt3::?..!..A.'ID COL~':'~, ?A-, co
h=--by d..::u= th= Sb.:=S oi
Perry
C .. 'V'
.:lu:ty to =.,,::::-.:t:: =u I :::,
... ... .. d '.1. ..
::::.s e....--::u:.:cu. ::-..,0' -.....- :It == :::rud:: :"'.....1& or.
. --., .
::: :!:ili:~.
r~~;~~
She,....l~ ot C:::::::u'.:u:d C~u:t1. :':1.
.
"'~d 't ~ ~ .
_~ aV1 or _e:'"71~
:Sow,
March 24
!9 95
lOl30
o'dea. ,1\
~L s::-.-d
-.
. -.
::: ~,~:" writ of Summons
~FCa
Sallv Mvers MacTavish
~t
60 2nd St., Newport, Newport Boro, perrv Cou~ty, PA
bybJ:cll:q:o
Sallv Mvers MacTavish
'"
true and attested
<:::py ot ::: o..~ -,I Writ of Summons
,.
:md -,,:. !cawa :0
her
. ...
== '::::1t:::s :.-:::::1.
So :=we:,
/Z/ {' ~,,-d'
Deputy Shc::1 af Perry
CoWlll'. ~..
5WO::1 :md sub=-.J:ed be:'= '
:: :::s ~ 6yai I\L},
.(., dO' ^u'f
COSTS
::.c..~'n:cz
~au.-\.G:C:
A.:7lDAv"IT
s
10 ;.1("-
-.----
"
-------.
s
t_ ..__
I -, c . c -\ . ... I d ...
or 1 .,....\1-.:'1.\...., I .,........"'1
n ,I n\!J our! or .:mmO:i t e:s '.........-".. -. .............. II
Psnnsyl'lc:ni::
Lucreatia Perry
'is.
Myers F\lrn i ture
:'to.
95-1316 Civil..,Tenn
.---,
:?..--
:-;ow, March 15, 1995
'9 T S--.--:':>T-:'- 0- ,........G""""T """ CO.....,~v ::I" "'0
... -..... ___;:. ~ ...w... ":)__,,.,..,*-1 "".,. '"'. ........... ~
h=-..by ci:;:UC::: th:: Sn::S oi
Perrv
C .. 'V'
-:JU::ty :0 =::-.1t': =.u , :::.,
lo.. ., . 'lo ci '.1. .
:.::s ::::u:::.cu :.'''0' -"'..- 3,t :-= :-:::u=t:::. :"~ Ot
. --:l .
:he ?!:l!:::.:I'.
r~~
She.."Iif at C"-"er'.;u:d CJW:t1. ?:l.
.
Afiida.vit or Se:'"7i~
:iowt
March 20
!995
..
. .-
9:17
,. o'':!ea ,A ~c. 1:,.-d
. ..0
:.:~ wn.::n
Writ of Summons
l.1poa
David M. Mvers
~t 64 2nd st.. Newport. Newport Bore. perrv Co~ntv, PA
by::u:~:o
David M. Mvers
3.
true and attested
CPT ci :::= :2rl;:::U
Writ of Summons
...
:I.llci -,,:. !c:awu :0
him
:e :::::te::3 :.h::=i.
So =-Vc:3,
Deputy
t2J ~ j?:v<l' ,
.shda' .f Perry
.
CollAtT. l':s.
5wor- me! r.li::sc:-J:d bdcrc
==~~Q,!oi /11..,1.
/{.,. ti. -/.~\}
! !?..u::..
CCSTI
5,,-~vlC::
~m.ZAGZ
.~:lJJA"'Tr
s
__J...--__
S
1_ .-a
In Tna Court OT C~mmO;l F!e:::::; or C:Jr.::.-:~!t'l=nd c.:.:ll.::-:','Y, Psnnsyl'lc:ni::
Lucreatia Perry
'IS.
David M. Myers l'\.1neral !lane
"
:-roo
q~-1316 Civ,i1 T~nn __
---.
:~..-
:iow,
March 15. 1995
~9_ !. SE:Z?.!::::- 0::0' C~G:::?..!.A."ID COt.il':'Y, ?o\.., co
h=-..b)r d...::u== = S~E oi
Perrv
C:Jl1:t'f :0 :::::::'".1t: =.is ',V:!:,
== =::u:::cn. =Q.; -.,~- ~t :::: ~ ::d ::.!k oi :.:: ?!:r!::~.
:r"fA~.~~
She..~ a! c;::::,er!..u:d CJW1t1. :'3-
.
Affida.vit Or Sem=
~OYl,
March 20
.0 95
J .-
-.
. ...
9:17
ft'
o":.!ca n
~r. :::-.-d
. .,.
:.:= ~t:::n
Writ of Summons
~t
David Myers Funeral Home
64 2nd st., Newport, Newport Boro, perr~ County, PA
'.Ipaa
. . ..
:;y.::u:c::1.t:a
David M. Myers
3.
true and attested
C::t:J"I' of :e :::s,,:~-.,I writ of SummonR
00 ..::
.~
:I.Ild -,,:. bowu :D
him
::.: '::::1t:::s ~L::::::i.
So :r=w~
~~I ~ ~e.
Deputy 5hc::a' 0/
Perry
CoWlIT. ::1.
Swot:: :uld rJi::sc:-J:cll:d=
:= :!:!s ~ 6., oi ""._1
19~
COSTS
::&,..~ V1CZ
~a:r..;:."'GZ
A.::wAYIT
.s
..c. /). - ./...., f;'
"
--~-_.
s
r_ ....-4
T' c: . c -! . - I cl ,0, pl'
In, ne ourt Of :mmO:1 r =::5 or \,.:Jr.::':::.:!t'l::n ,-:,)w,;;":y, anr:sY'lc:r:IO
Lucreatia Perry
'is.
David M. Myers
~o.
95-1316 Civil Term
.~
---, .....--
~ow.
March 15, 1995
~9_!,
S~-::"':I'r-="::'
----
O:F C~G::::?.1.,A."l'D COt.~'l''!'. ?A.. co
h=-..:,y d-;:ut!::: t!:: S~5 oi
Perry
C"u::.t"f :0 :::::::-.1te .:";c 'tV=!:,
'0' ., . .' . .. ...
:::.s e...~u=:cn :...,(1' -"'...- 3.t ':.::.: :-:::u=t ::C1 :-~ ot =:
. --:l .
?!:ili::S'.
..//;:/ 'i/!'.#
r~~..<<:. ~
S4e..'1:l at S"-"er'..:u:d c~u:tY. ::1.
Affidavit or Sem~
,..
~ow, March 20 l!? 95 ... 9:17 o'dea .A ~L l::-o':'i
J ...-
. .., \~rit of Summons
=~ ~r.::.:.n
'.1FCtI David M. Mv'ers
~t 64 2nd St. , Newport. Newport Boro. perrv CO!lnty, PA
by::u:clli1;:o
David Mvers
3.
true and attested
c::py ct :e
-":~~"I
.....:::
Writ of Summons
2nd -,do !c::owlI :0
him
::.e :::u::::s :.~:.-=i.
So =w=.
/Z/ (' :'/~~~tJ
Deputy Shd.:i af Perry
CoWlrr. ::1.
--:.:ls ,,! i M .J-v oi
-- -~.
" /
,<to ~. .
1Q vof--
,,--
CO51'S
::r-.-<.VlCE
~Ol..E..-\GE
.-\:::l.lJA"y!!
s
5WCr:1 :md sai:sc-J:d bdcr.:
"': ~ " " ~---
r_'~
"
__.L.-___.
$
, \., rn!:J Court or C.::mmon ple::s or. C:.Jr.::.:::!lt'i::nd C,::w:-;~'YI Psrmsylvc:r:io
Lucreatia Perry
Desmond S. MacTavish
'IS.
::-fo.
q5-1316 Civ.i1 Tpnn.
---.
:?..-
:-low,
MArch 15, 19Q5
~9---. !. SEZ?~~ 0:::' C~r3:=:'='..!'A.'fD COt,~,!"? ?-\.., co
. . . . . ... .- .
==-...:ry c-:::uc: ~ .;:c=.:x or
Perrv
C-'\1:t"f :0 =::'".1= ::is 'tV:!:,
.., .. . ., d !.t_ .. ....,. '-
:.:::.:s =u=::cn :~..,,,, -!'j"- ~t == :::::u=t:.: :-~ at ::e :'.::J.:.:::.::t.
. --:l ,
_ r:~rl!<:~
SlIe.."1if at C:=!ler'.3.Cd CJl1:rr. ?:l.
.
Aiiida:vit or Se:--ri=
:-;0"',
March 24
!9 95
..
. ....
10:30
o'':!cc!; . A
~r. l::","ci
. . to
== ~t:::n
Writ of Summons
'Jpoa
Desmond S. MacTavish
60 2nd st. " Newport, Nel/port Boro, Perry cou!1ty, PA
~t
=r ~~ ~ Sally Mvers MacTavish
:L
true and attested
r;:F! at
,
=
:Jrl~'-.,I
Writ of Summons
"
md -~,.:. bawn :0
her
:h.: .:::t:::s :.L::::::i.
So :L::.SW<=',
Deputy
evzF (":; ?~-<'t"
Shda' of Perry
CoWley. ?..
Swot: :md 1'.l~J:,d bd= .
== ~ -1.i:!!.. 6y at ,t/. " /
1~~
COST.5
sn'''1CZ
~crU,AGE
.-\::: llJA yrr
s
11',,-
d,. /""..p,
--""'--'"---.
s
,_ ---a
-
LUCREA TlA PERRY,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
: NO. 95-1316 Civil Term
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND :
S. MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS :
MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID M.
MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE, : CIVIL ACTION - LAW
Defendants : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
TO THE PROTIlONOTARY:
Please enter the appearance of David A. Fitzsimons, Esquire and Mette, Evans
& Woodside on behalf of Defendants.
METrE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
BY~~~~
DA VlD A. FITZSIMONS, ESQUIRE
Supreme Court J.D. #41722
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
(717) 232-5000
Attorneys for Defendants
DATED: 02/08/96
56899. t
~
..
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, DAVID A. FITZSIMONS, hereby certify that on the -B.lli.. day of
FEBRUARY, 1995, I served a copy of the foregoing document upon the person(s)
and in the manner indicated below, which service satisfies the requirements of the
Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, by depositing a copy of same in the U.S.
mail, First-class postage prepaid, as folIows:
Carolyn M. Anner, Esquire
HANDLER AND WffiNER
319 Market Street
P.O. Box 1177
Harrisburg, PA 17108
METrE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
BY:
'\ ~~ --~
DAVID A. FITZSIMONS, ESQUIRE
Supreme Court J.D. #41722
3401 North Front Street
P. O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
(717) 232.5000
Attorneys for Defendants
'.
.
-
-.
.'
n '.'"') r)
I \,.;., 'n
",'~ ~ ..., "I
:.-t1 1~ ':T1
. ,,, \ "'I .l,__
:.';1 I .....n'
L; . ", ',>]';--)
to: ..~O
....;1 ' "-'J
.-' po-'"
: t~< ...." ~~C)
,( I (;~ ~'n1
. ' ~?
~ -.;
:...) c' -,
~IJ
. ro,) -.
'.
I
.
LUCREA TIA PERRY,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYL VANIA
v.
.
.
: NO. 95-1316 Civil Term
i'
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND :
S. MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS :
MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID M.
MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendants
.
.
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRAECIPE FOlJ RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
PLEASE enter a Rule upon Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry, to file a Complaint
within twenty (20) days after service of the Rule, or suffer judgment of non pros.
METTE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
By~3 ~~1
DAVID A. FITZSIMONS, ESQUIRE
Supreme Court I.D. #41722
3401 North Front Street
P. O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
(717) 232-5000
--~
Attorneys for Defendants
DATED: 02108/96
56899.1
"
'.
""
QERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, DAVID A. FITZSIMONS, hereby certify that on the..B.th.. day of
FEBRUARY, 1995, I served a copy of the foregoing document upon the person(s)
and in the manner indicated below, which service satisfies the requirements of the
Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, by depositing a copy of same in the U.S.
mail, First-class postage prepaid, as follows:
Carolyn M. Anner, Esquire
HANDLER AND WIENER
319 Market Street
P.O. Box 1177
Harrisburg, PA 17108
METrE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
~ '0, (~-. f",
BY: \\--~ ,--;:~ -
DAVID A. FITZSIMONS, ESQUIRE
Supreme Court I,D. #41722
3401 North Front Street
P. O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
(717) 232-5000
Attorneys for Defendants
.
...
,
C'; \.'") ,,~
, ~. ~~ ) 'd
; "'1 .
..,,! ;'q ,
(i. I l~' ,i:--r}
I i I .~..tr
.. \j,,) "?
>~O
" ""'1
, ;'''r
. " , .!tl
, to, '--I'f1
.- ~ - I .. ~:'~I
:~l '-~ ~'.i
J'..l ...;
LUCREA TIA PERRY,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
: NO. 95-1316 Civil Term
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND
S. MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS :
MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID M.
MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
RULE
TO: Lucreatia Perry, Plaintiff
c/o Carolyn M. Anner, Esquire
HANDLER AND WIENER
319 Market Street
P.O. Box 1177
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Attorneys for Plaintiff
You are Ruled to file a Complaint within twenty (20) days after service
hereof, or suffer judgment of non pros.
DATED: ,~. 1 ~ t/I!
. . ", 1 , '.,' ,~'l':'\.-"lr:.' ''''''','';-; ~.JC,;:,"'~Ji( d~:'1. l.l",--" '/"'-'.,il."'7',l "'t,'!;. ". '., "
. ,', ,/0', J. ~ ",;_,'!'".;,.\t,!;Y}l;,/\\(,i!,~:.t',"p~I.r.~::,I,t;~,~i!-'(~:f;\l'-;!';";"!i~'n:"r}-' ",;"'. \"<1 "'. J
. ' ,. '_...~ ._. "_I.'_...n.:i,.1#-"".:'-.:.,t"~q,~,,"Jtl..- .\,.~'.....tJ.,1.~1l.~;).:"h,,,..a_.g.;'..""-,.l~.\l.....:j,..,,:..::.l,."........."!;,.~": <, ,.'
r-,
:-~
"'+J
r,.i,.
"".
-,:'
~:'
t':)
r'~'J
I
I
~
'.'J
L,~ ')
-"
"d
'J
,
I.(J
n
-I',
~, I
j"
'.1 :rJ
r-
. ?CJ
-~'~6
,.. I
i::
-.,.)
j-i(r,
f~l
~;
.::r'
-.,.
<'
... >. -....
..,_.. t.
I
.
.
'. I
,
I
I'
I
'w~ij
-.".,'.,,'.
EDGAR B. BAYLEY
JUDGE
I COURTHOUSE SQUARE
CARLISLE. PENNSYLVANIA 17013.3387
"
I 'l~~~;;.~"~~.
.:J. U'j~" l..i}
UN \--.
OElMAA.nlr I.". """l~; '-"-~n
ronV'JA"OlfJf; (.." '-' , '. .
i1;1
.
.
.
.
.
:032: :
.
.
.
U.s. P09TA I! :
. "
.,'
",' ,.
~l'
Lucreatla Perry
2648 Lexington Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
....-...~..-........~-..... ~
--"--'--_T"'~"'''''---''''''MI'\J.i,:;-;.~..j.;''''.4i".~_t..1..4&~:~lii~w;... -~",.-
'..c ~ -,"
,
"
. .
, .
.
t
'~,
.- ....---
LUCREA TIA PERRY,
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND S.
MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS
MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID
M. MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
DEFENDANTS
.
.
: 95.1316 CIVIL TERM
BEFORE BAYLEY. J.
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 1996, the preliminary objections of
defendants, Saliy Myers Mactavish and David M. Myers to plaintiff's complaint, ARE
SUSTAINED. Counts In the complaint agaInst Sally Myers Mactavish and DavId M.
Myers, ARE DISMISSED.
Edgar B. Bayley, J.
\
Lucreatla Perry, Pro se
2648 Lexington Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
David A. Fitzsimons, Esquire
For Defendants
:saa
,
\
LUCREA TIA PERRY,
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND S.
MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS
MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID
M. MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
DEFENDANTS
.,
.
.
: 95-1316 CIVIL TERM
BEFORE BAYLEY. J.
ORDER OF COUlD'
AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 1996, the preliminary objections of
defendants, Sally Myers Mactavish and David M. Myers to plaintiff's complaint, ARE
SUSTAINED. Counts In the complaint against Sally Myers Mactavish and David M.
Myers, ARE DISMISSED.
Edgar B. Bayley, J.
\
Lucreatla Perry, Pro se
2648 Lexington Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
David A. Fitzsimons, Esquire
For Defendants
(.
_ ~.". n~.llD/lo/r,("..
....3' 'f.
j
:saa
, _', +,~ .....:. '. . < ~ ,....~_. tWO
, ,
!
I
~ c::I Co
M
.. :j~
r -
- ()=~
-~ - '-):a.:
--:: .~~:.-..
C I- "S~
U'. I ~~~
\lJ 5
F -,
~ \D :,)
0' u
~
r
LUCREATlA PERRY
Plaintiff
IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUHBERLANO COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION . LAW
vs.
OAVID H. HYERS. DESHOND
S. HACTAVISIl and SALLY HYERS.
HACTAVISIl. hIs wire. DAVID H. HYERS
FUNERAL 1l0HE AND HYERS FURNITURE
Defendants
NO. 95.1316
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
YOU HAVE BEEN SUED IN COURT. If you wish to defend ogDlnstthe clDlms set forth In the following pDges,
you must tDke action within twenty (20) days Dfter this Complaint and Notice Is served, by entering a written
appearDnc. personally or by attorney .nd filing In writing with th. Court your d.fcns' or objections to the
clDlms ..t forth DgDlnst you. You Dro warned that If you f.ll to d. so th. CDS' may proceed without you and
D Judgment may b. entered DgDlnst you by the Court without furth.r notlc. for Dny money clDlmed In th. complDlnt
or for Dny other clDlm or r.ll.f requ..ted by the PIDlntlff. You may 10.. money or property or other rights
ImportDnt to you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE nus PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE.
GO TO OR TElEPHONE TilE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FINO OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
NOTICIA
Lo hon d~ndDdo Q ustcd en La corte. SI ustcd quloro dcfendcrsQ do cstoa demandos Q~puestDI
cn lDS pDglnas .Ignulentes. usted tlene vlentD (20) diD. de plDzo Dl pDrtlr de Dl fechD de lD demandD Y lD
notlflcaclon. Ustcd debo present Dr una oportenclo aserttD 0 en persona 0 por obogodo y orchlvor en la corte
en forma Dlertto sus dolonlas 0 sus obJectlone~ 0 los demandos en contro de au persona. Seo Bylsoda que st
ustcd nO so 'allende, la corte tomaro medldos y puede una orden contra usted sin previa Dvfso 0 nottflcatlon
y por cualquler queJD 0 Dkuvul quo es pedldo en ID peilclon de demDndD. Usted puedo pDrder dlnero 0 su.
proplcdodcs 0 atras derochas Importantes para usted.
LLEVE ESTA DEMANDA A UN ABODAGO IHHEDIATAHENTE. SI NO TIENE ABDGAOO 0 SI NO TIENE EL DINERD
SUFICIENTE DE PAGAn TAL SERVICIO. VAYA EN PERSONA 0 LLAHE POR TELEPDNO A LA OFICINA CUYA DIRECCIDN SE EHCUENTRA
ESCRITA ABAJO PARA AVERIGUAR DONDE SE PUEDE CONSSGUIA ASISTENCIA LEr.AL,
OAUPHIN COUNTY LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE ~
213 North Front Street /"
HDrrlsburg, PennsylvanlD l7l01
17108.1177
.
Ifgfcomplalnl
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
LUCREATIA PERRY,
v. CIVIL ACTION - LAW
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND NO. 95-1316
S. MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS
MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID
M. MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendants JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT
AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff, LUCREATIA PERRY, by and through her
attorneys, HANDLER & WIENER, and makes the within Complaint against the
Defendants as follows:
1. Plaintiff, Lucreatla Perry Is an adult individual currently residing at 2648
Lexington Street, Harrisburg, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania 17110.
2. Defendant, David M. Myers, is an adult Individual currently residing at 64
2nd Street, Newport, Perry County, Pennsylvania 17074.
3. Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, Is an adult Individual currently residing
at 60 2nd Street, Newport, Perry County, Pennsylvania 17074.
4. Defendant, Sally Myers MacTavish, Is an adult individual currently residing
at 60 2nd Street, Newport, Perry County, Pennsylvania 17074.
5. Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish Funeral Home, is a sole proprietorship
established under the law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with It's principle place
of business at 64 2nd Street, Newport, Perry County, Pennsylvania 17074.
6. Defendant, Myers Furniture, Is a sole proprietorship established under the
law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with It's principle place of business located
at 64 2nd Street, Newport, Perry County Pennsylvania 17074.
7. At all times material to this action, Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry was the owner
and operator of a 1982 Gray Buick Skylark with Pennsylvania Registration Number
ZGA506.
8. At all times material to this action, Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, was
., the operator of a 1979 Lincoln, owned by David M. Myers, with Pennsylvania
Registration Number M 200.
9. At all times material to this action, Defendant, David M. Myers, was the
owner of a motor vehicle operated by Desmond S. MacTavish, with Pennsylvania
Registration Number M 200.
10. On or about March 19, 1993, at approximately 10:00 A.M., Plaintiff was
traveling west on Trlndle Road, In Mechanlcsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania,
when she activated her turn signal and came to a stop to walt for oncoming traffic to
pass before making a left turn.
2
r
11. On or about March 19, 1993, at approximately 10:00 A.M., Defendant's
vehicle, was traveling west on Trlndle Road, In Mechanlcsburg, Cumberland County,
Pennsylvania.
12. On or about March 19, 1993, at approximately 10 A.M., Defendant
suddenly, and without warning, struck the rear of Plaintiffs vehicle.
13. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendants, Desmond
S. MacTavish, David M. Myers, Sally Myers MacTavish, David M. Myers Funeral Home
and Myers Furniture, Plaintiff, Lucreatla Perry, has suffered serious bodily Injury as set
forth In full hereinafter.
COUNT I
LUCREATIA PERRY v. DESMOND S. MACTAVISH
14. The occurrence of the aforesaid events and the Injuries to Plaintiff,
Lucreatla Perry, resulting therefrom were caused directly and proximately by the
negligence of the Defendant. David M. Myers, either solely or In conjunction with the
other named Defendants, Desmond S. MacTavish, Sally Myers MacTavish, David M.
Myers Funeral Home and Myers Furniture, generally and more specifically as set forth
below:
(a) In failing to be reasonably vigilant to observe the vehicle In which the
Plaintiff was driving;
3
(b) In failing to operate his vehicle at a speed that would allow him to apply
his brakes and stop before striking the Plaintiffs' vehicle;
(c) In failing to operate said vehicle at a speed In which he could stop
within the assured clear distance, In violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. 9 3361;
(d) In failing to maintain proper and adequate observation of the traffic
conditions then and there existing;
(e) In failing to exercise reasonable care In the operation and control of his
vehicle, and;
(f) Furthermore, under the facts and circumstances presented herein,
Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, had the last clear chance to
avoid this collision, and In failing to do so, Defendant Is guilty of gross
negligence.
15. As a result of the negligence of Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, Plaintiff
has sustained severe InJuries, humiliation, embarrassment, and as a result thereof, he
has suffered, and will continue to suffer In the future, pain and agony to her, great
detriment and loss.
16. As a result of the negligence of Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, Plaintiff
has been, and probably will In the future, hindered from attending to his usual occupation
and dally duties to his great detriment, loss, humiliation and embarrassment.
4
17. As a result of the negligence of Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, Plaintiff
has suffered a loss of life's pleasures, and probably will continue to suffer the same In
the future to her great detriment and loss.
1 B. As a result of the negligence of the Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish,
Plaintiff has undergone great physical pain, discomfort, humiliation, and mental anguish,
and he will continue to endure the same for an Indefinite period of time In the future,
causing him great physical, emotional and financial detriment and loss.
19. Plaintiff believes, and therefore avers that his Injuries are permanent In nature.
20. As a result of the negligence of the Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish,
Plaintiff has been compelled, In order to effect a cure for the aforesaid Injuries, to expend
large sums of money for medicine and medical attention.
21. As a result of the negligence of the Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish,
Plaintiff sustained a loss of wages and may continue to sustain such losses in the future.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Lucreatla Perry, seeks damages from Defendant,
Desmond S. MacTavish , In an amount In excess of Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars
($35,000.00).
5
COUNT II
LUCREATIA PERRY v. DAVID M. MYERS
22. Plaintiff, Lucreatla Perry, Incorporates by reference as part of this Count
paragraphs 1 through 19 of this Complaint as If fully set forth.
23. The occurrence of the aforesaid events and the Injury resulting therefrom
to Plaintiff, Lucreatla Perry, was caused directly and proximately by the negligence of
Defendant, David M. Myers, solely and/or In conjunction with the other named
Defendants, Desmond S. MacTavish, Sally Myers MacTavish, David M. Myers Funeral
Home and Myers Furniture, generally and more specifically as set forth below:
(a) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, to operate said
vehicle without being reasonably vigilant and observing the vehicle In
which the Plaintiff was driving;
(b) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, to operate said
vehicle at a speed which was unsafe and that would not allow him to
apply his brakes and stop before striking the Plaintiffs' vehicle;
(c) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, to operate said vehicle
at a speed that was not safe for existing conditions, in violation 75
Pa.C.S.A. 9 3361; and
6
(d) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, to operate said vehicle
without maintaining proper and adequate observation of the traffic
conditions then and there existing.
(e) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, to operate said vehicle
without exercising reasonable care In the operation and control of said
24. As a result of the negligence of Defendant, David M. Myers, Plaintiff has
sustained severe Injuries, humiliation, embarrassment, and as a result thereof, he has
suffered, and will continue to suffer In the future, pain and agony to her great detriment
and loss.
25. As a result of the negligence of Defendant, David M. Myers, Plaintiff has been,
and probably will in the future, hindered from attending to his usual occupation and daily
duties to his great detriment, loss, humiliation and embarrassment.
26. As a result of the negligence of Defendant, David M. Myers, Plaintiff has
suffered a loss of life's pleasures, and probably will continue to suffer the same In the
future to her great detriment and loss.
27. As a result of the negligence of the Defendant, David M. Myers, Plaintiff has
undergone great physical pain, discomfort. humiliation, and mental anguish, and he will
continue to endure the same for an Indefinite period of time In the future, causing him
great physical. emotional and financial detriment and loss.
28. Plaintiff believes, and therefore avers that his Injuries are permanent In nature.
7
\
\
29. As a result of the negligence of the Defendant, David M. Myers, Plaintiff has
been compelled, In order to effect a cure for the aforesaid Injuries, to expend large sums
of money for medicine and medical attention.
30. As a result of the negligence of the Defendant, David M. Myers, Plaintiff
sustained a loss of wages and may continue to sustain such losses In the future.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Lucreatla Perry,. seeks damages from Defendant, David
M. Myers, In an amount In excess of Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars ($35,000.00).
COUNT III
LUCREATIA PERRY v. DAVID M. MYERS FUNERAL HOME
31. Plaintiff Incorporates 1 through 13 of this Complaint as If fully set forth.
32. At all times material hereto, Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, was an
agent, servant and/or employee of Defendant, David M. Myers Funeral Home, and was
acting In and upon the business of Defendant, David M. Myers Funeral Home, and while
In the course and scope of his employment with said Defendant.
33. The occurrence of the aforesaid accident and the Injuries to Plaintiff resulting
therefrom was caused dlrectiy and proximately by the negligence of Defendant, David
M. Myers Funeral Homa. its agents, servants and/or employees, generally and more
specifically as set forth below:
8
(a) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as its agent, servant
and/or employee, to operate said vehicle without being reasonably
vigilant and observing the vehicle In which the Plaintiff wa!\ driving;
(b) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as Its agent, servant
and/or employee, to operate said vehicle at a speed In which he could
not apply his brakes and stop before striking the Plaintiffs' vehicle;
(c) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as Its agent, servant
and lor employee, to operate said vehicle at a speed In which he could
not stop within the assured clear distance. In violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A.
93361;
(d) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as Its agent, servant
and/or employee, to operate said vehicle without maintaining proper and
adequate observation of the traffic conditions then and there existing;
(e) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as Its agent, servant
and/or employee, to operate said vehicle without exercising reasonable
care In the operation and control of said vehicle, and;
34. As a result of the negligence of Defendant, David M. Myers Funeral Home,
Plaintiff has sustained severe InJuries, humiliation, embarrassment, and as a result
thereof, he has suffered, and will continue to suffer In the future, pain and agony to her
great detriment and loss,
.,
9
35. As a result of the negligence of Defendant, David M. Myers Funeral Home,
Plaintiff has been, and probably will In the future, hindered from attending to his usual
occupation and daily duties to his great detriment, loss, humiliation and embarrassment.
36. As a result of the negligence of Defendant, David M. Myers Funeral Home,
Plaintiff has suffered a loss of life's pleasures, and probably will continue to suffer the
same in the future to her great detriment and loss.
38. As a result of the negligence of the Defendant, David M. Myers, Plaintiff has
undergone great physical pain, discomfort, humiliation, and mental anguish, and he will
continue to endure the same for an Indefinite period of time in the future, causing him
great physical, emotional and financial detriment and loss.
39. Plaintiff believes, and therefore avers that his injuries are permanent In nature.
40. As a result of the negligence of the Defendant, David M. Myers Funeral Home,
Plaintiff has been compelled, In order to effect a cure for the aforesaid injuries, to expend
large sums of money for medicine and medical attention.
41. As a result of the negligence of the Defendant, David M. Myers Funeral Home,
Plaintiff sustained a loss of wages and may continue to sustain such losses In the future.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry, seeks damages from Defendant, David
M. Myers Funeral Home In the an amount In excess of Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars
($ 35,000.00), and demand a trial by jury.
10
COUNT IV
LUCREATIA PERRY v. MYERS FURNITURE
42. Plaintiff Incorporates 1 through 13 of this Complaint as If fully set forth.
43. At all times material hereto, Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, was an
agent, servant and/or employee of Defendant, Myers Furniture, and was acting In and
upon the business of Defendant, Myers Furniture, and while In the course and scope of
his employment with said Defendant.
44. The occurrence of the aforesaid accident and the injuries to Plaintiff resulting
therefrom was caused directly and proximately by the negligence of Defendant, Myers
Furniture, its agents, servants and/or employees, generally and more specifically as set
forth below:
(a) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as its agent, servant
and/or employee, to operate said vehicle without being reasonably
vigilant and observing the vehicle in which the Plaintiff was driving:
(b) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as Its agent, servant
and/or employee, to operate said vehicle at a speed in which he could
not apply his brakes and stop before striking the Plaintiffs' vehicle;
(c) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as Its agent, servant
and lor employee, to operate said vehicle at a speed in which he could
11
not stop within the assured clear distance, In violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A.
93361;
(d) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as Its agent, servant
and/or employee, to operate said vehicle without maintaining proper and
adequate observation of the traffic conditions then and there existing;
(e) In allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as Its agent, servant
and/or employee, to operate said vehicle without exercising reasonable
care In the operation and control of said vehicle, and;
45. As a result of the negligence of Defendant, Myers Furniture, Plaintiff has
sustained severe Injuries, humiliation, embarrassment, and as a result thereof, he has
suffered, and will continue to suffer In the future, pain and agony to her great detriment
and loss.
46. As a result of the negligence of Defendant, Myers Furniture, Plaintiff has been,
, and probably will In the future, hindered from attending to his usual occupation and dally
duties to his great detriment, loss, humiliation and embarrassment.
47. As a result of the negligence of Defendant, Myers Furniture, Plaintiff has
suffered a loss of life's pleasures, and probably will continue to suffer the same in the
future to her great detriment and loss.
48. As a result of the negligence of the Defendant, Myers Furniture, Plaintiff has
undergone great physical pain, discomfort, humiliation, and mental anguish, and he will
12
continue to endure the same for an Indefinite period of time In the future, causing him
great physical, emotional and financial detriment and loss.
49. Plaintiff believes, and therefore avers that his Injuries are permanent In nature.
50. As a resuit of the negligence of the Defendant,Myers Furniture, Plaintiff has
been compelled, In order to effect a cure for the aforesaid injuries, to expend large sums
of money for medicine and medical attention.
51. As a result of the negligence of the Defendant, Myers Furniture, Plaintiff
sustained a loss of wages and may continue to sustain such losses in the future.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Lucreatla Perry, seeks damages from Defendant, Myers
Furniture in the an amount In excess of Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars
($ 35,000.00), and demand a trial by jury.
Respectfully submitted,
HANDLER AND WIENER
Date: 1/; S/f r
By:
Carolyn ..,n~r:squlre
1.0. No.t:#62636
319 Market Street
P.O. Box 1177
Harrisburg, PA 17108
(717) 238-2000
Attorney for Claimant
13
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this 29th day of February 1996, I hereby certify
that I have, on this date, served the within Complaint by sending a true and correct copy
of same to his attorney of record via first class United States mail, postage pre-paid and
addressed as follows:
David A. Fitzsimons, Esquire
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
HANDLER AND WIENER
14
VERIFICATION
PURSUANT TO PA R.C.P. NO. 1024 fc)
CAROLYN M. ANNER, ESQUIRE, states that she is the attorney for
the party filing the foregoing document; that she makes this
affidavit as an attorney, because the party she represents lacks
sufficient knowledge or information upon which to make a
verification and/or because she has greater personal knowledge of
the Information and belief than that of the party for whom she makes
this affidavit; and that she has sufficient knowledge or Information
and belief, based upon her investigation of the matters averred or
denied in the foregoing document; and that this statement Is made
subject to the penalties of 18 Pa e.s. ~4904 relating to unsworn
falsification to authorities.
Date: .,'7;/;; ?/J.f
~-;..""
,".,"_ .'-'.....o",;,~. .',.0';
n 1,') 0
, l;"l ...
.~, ~ -" '.:1
PI , i7!
r,:: ."
.. {~,) :"l!)
i . uJ ~ f
- "~1
I '"T:'
...,
.- ~ -: r. )
", r:? ')1\1
..-;!
Ul ~::,
I'" -'.
...
LUCREA TIA PERRY,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v,
: NO, 95-1316 Civil Term
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND
S. MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS :
MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID M.
MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION. LAW
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
!'lOTICE TO PLEAD
TO: Carolyn M. Anner, Esquire
HANDLER AND wmNER
319 Market Street
P.O. Box 1177
Harrisburg, PA 17108
(Attorneys for PlaintifO
You are hereby notified to file a written response to the enclosed Preliminary
Objections within twenty (20) days from service hereof or a judgment may be
entered against you.
METTE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
BY~\~
DAVID A. FITZSIMONS, ESQUIRE
Sup. Ct. 1. D. #41722
3401 North Front Street
P,O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
(717) 232-5000
-
"
Attorneys for Defendants
DATED: 03/20/96
60976.\
.
LUCREA TIA PERRY,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
: NO. 95-1316 Civil Term
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND
S. MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS :
MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID M.
MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendants
: CIVIL ACTION. LAW
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF
DEfEND~S TO PlAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
AND NOW, come the Defendants, David M. Myers, Desmond S. MacTavish
and Sally Myers MacTavish, his wife, David M. Myers Funeral Home and Myers
Furniture ("Defendants"), by and through their attorneys METTE, EVANS &
WOODSIDE, and makes the following preliminary objections.
1. Plaintiff Lucreatia Perry ("Plaintill") commenced this action by Writ
dated March 13, 1995.
2. In response to Defendant's Rule to File Complaint, Plaintiff liled a
Complaint against Defendants,
3. The Complaint alleges, inter nlia, that Plnintiffwas injured on
March 19, 1993 when her vehicle was struck from behind by a vehicle operated by
Defendant Desmond MacTavish.
.
, ,
MOTIQK.'J'O STRIKE(
4, The Complaint contains no allegations or counts against Sally Myers
MacTavish and, accordingly, the action should be stricken as to her.
WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Honorable Court dismiss
Plaintill's Complaint as captioned against Sally Myers MacTavish.
DEMURRERJPa R.C.P. 1028(8)(4)]
6. Pa, R.C.P 1019(a) requires a plaintiff to state the material facts on
which a cause of action is based.
6. In Count II against Defendant David M. Myers, Plaintiff makes no
material allegation other than Myers was the owner of the vehicle driven by
Defendant Desmond S. MacTavish.
7. Plaintiffs have failed to allege material facts to state a cause of action
for which the requested relief against Defendant David Myers can be granted.
WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Honorable Court dismiss
Count II of Plaintifrs Complaint.
.2-
DEMURRER [Pa. R.C.P. l028(a)(4)] OR, IN THE
M-TEIlN{\TJVE. MOTIOl'i TO STRLKE-IPa. R.C.P. l028(aH3ll
8. Plaintiff alleges in Counts III and IV of her Complaint, respectively,
that Defendant Desmond S. MacTavish was at the time of the accident in the
course of his employment with Myers Funeral Home or Myers Furniture.
9. Plaintiffs Counts III and IV arc impermissibly inconsistent and do
not represent appropriate alternative theories of recovery or may represent an
inadvertent duplication of a single cause of action.
WHEREFORE, Defendants request that this Honorable Court dismiss
Counts 1II and IV of Plaintiffs' Complaint or, in the alternative, strike the
repetitive Count.
""METrE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
BY: ~~\\~ ----.
DAVID A, FITZSIMONS, ESQUIRE
Sup. Ct. LD. #41722
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
(717) 232-5000
Attorneys for Defendants
DATED: 03/20/96
.
, I
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I served a copy of the foregoing document upon the
person(s) and in the manner indicated below, which service satisfies the
requirements of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, by depositing a copy of
same in the U,S, mail, First-class postage prepaid, as follows:
Carolyn M. Anner, Esquire
HANDLER AND WIENER
319 Market Street
P.O. Box 1177
Harrisburg, PA 17108
METTE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
B~~
DAVID A. FITZSIMONS, ESQUIRE
Sup. Ct. LD. #41722
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
(717) 232-5000
-::>
DATED: 03/20/96
60976.1
Attorneys for Defendants
, .
,"."'.
I')
<,II
:.)
I
!
,"1,
! :~.
':.lJ
l,J)
1.')
,:!
" {
. [f
)
I
:,;
.',
.,.
/,
:-...
:'.J
!
"
, ,
I ,
- "
e1
..
.';4
1'.)
".
LUCREATIA PERRY,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v.
.
.
: CIVIL ACTION. LAW
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
DEFENDANTS' BRIEF IN SUPPORT
C
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff, Lucreatla Perry, has filed this lawsuit against Defendants, David M.
Myers, Desmond S, MacTavish, Sally Myers MacTavish, David M. Myers Funeral Home
and Myers Furniture. Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a Praecipe for Writ of
Summons, After being ruled to do so, Plaintiff filed the Complaint on or about
February 29, 1996,1 On or about March 21, 1996, Defendants filed Preliminary
Objections to Plaintiffs Complaint. 2
1 Plaintiff was represented by Handler and Weiner at the time she filed her
Complaint. However, on or about April 9, 1996, Plaintiffs counsel was granted
permission by the Court to withdraw from the representation. As far as counsel
for Defendants Is aware, Plaintiff Is now proceeding pro sa.
2 Attached to Defendants' Preliminary Objections was a Notice to Plead
requiring Plaintiff to file a written response to the Preliminary Objections
within twenty (20) days. To-date, Plaintiff has failed to file any response
to Defendants' Preliminary Objections.
I,
According to the Complaint, Plaintiff was Injured In an automobile accident which
occurred on or about March 19, 1993, at approximately 10:00 a.m. Plaintiff alleges that
her injuries occurred when the vehicle driven by Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish,
struck her vehicle In the rear, Specifically, the Complaint alleges that Plaintiff was
traveling west on Trindle Road when she activated her turn signal and came to a stop to
walt for oncoming traffic to pass before making a left turn. (S9 Complaint, ~1 0).
Plaintiff alleges that before she could complete her left turn, the Defendant's vehicle
rear-ended her car. Defendant now files this Brief In support of its Preliminary
Objections to Plaintiffs Complaint.
- 2 .
'.
II. STATEMENT OF QUESTIONS PR~SI;;NTEQ
A.
WITH REGARD TO THE LEGAL SUFFICIENCY OF THE COMPLAINT:
1. WHETHER p~rJFaCOMP AINSr/
DEFENDANT SALLY MYERS MACTAVISH ~ BE
DISMISSED, WHERE PLAINTIFF PLAINT IS
ENTIRELY DEVOID OF ANY COUNTS OR ALLEGATIONS
OF NEGLIGENCE AGAINST SALLY MYERS MACTAVISH.
~
\buA-.
\ Y\ ~ 'I(t-
Suggested answer In the affirmative.
2. WHETHER COUNT II OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT MUST BE
DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, WHERE IT FAILS TO STATE
ANY MATERIAL FACTS UPON WHICH A CAUSE OF ACTION /
MAY BE BASED AGAINST DEFENDANT DAVID M. MYERS. V
Suggested answer in the affirmative. L~
~~
~. ,rY-
l^J.l.. 1-
~.
'.
III. ARGUMI;Nl
A. Legallnsufflclency (Demurrer) - Introduction:
"A preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer is an assertion that a
pleading does not set forth the cause of action or claim on which relief can be granted."
Binswanoer v. Levy, 311 Pa. Super. 41, 43, 457 A.2d 103, 104 (1983)(citatlon omitted).
Standards for a demurrer are well established. A demurrer to a Complaint must be
granted where the court is certain that, as a matter of law, there can be no recovery
upon the facts alleged. Wurth v. ~blladelphla, 136 Pa. Commw, 629, 584 A.2d 403
(1990). In determining a demurrer, all SUfficiently pleaded relevant facts and inferences
fairly deducible therefrom must be accepted as true. J.Q. Conclusions of law, however,
which are contained In the Complaint are not to be considered In reviewing a demurrer.
Callsen v. Temcle University HoscUal, 539 Pa. 377, 652 A.2d 824 (1995),
Here, even when the allegations of Plaintifrs Complaint are viewed In the light
most favorable to Plaintiff, it is certain that as a matter of law, Plaintiff cannot prevail on
her allegations against Defendant Sally Myers MacTavish and against David M. Myers.
I. Plaintiffs Complaint Against Defendant Sally Myers MacTavish
Must Be Dismissed Because the Complaint Is Entirely Devoid of
Any Counts or Allegations of Negligence Against Sally Myers
MacTavish.
Plaintiff, in her Complaint, has Included Sally Myers MacTavish as a Defendant.
However, Plaintifrs Complaint contains absolutely no allegations or counts against Sally
- 4 -
'.
Myers MacTavish and, accordingly, Sally Myers MacTavish should be dismissed from
this action. It Is well established under Pennsylvania law that If a Plaintiff sues multiple
Defendants, the Complaint must plead the appropriate elements of negligence as to
each Defendant, separately and Independently. 4 Stan. Pa. Prac. 923:28 at p. 350;
Cummins v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co., 344 Pa. Super, 9, 495 A.2d 963 (1985),
Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant Sally Myers MacTavish Is legally Insufficient
because It contains no allegations of negligence on the part of Sally Myers MacTavish,
nor does it contain any counts or theories of liability against Sally Myers MacTavish,
Therefore, because Plaintiff has alleged no wrongful or negligent conduct on the part of
Defendant Sally Myers MacTavish, this Court should dismiss Defendant Sally Myer
MacTavish from this action.
II. Count II of Plaintiffs Complaint Should Be Dismissed Because It
Falls to State Any Material Facts Upon WhIch A Cause of Action
May Be Based Against Defendant David M. Myers.
In Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint, she alleges that Defendant David M, Myers Is
liable for her Injuries solely because he was the owner of the vehicle driven by
Defendant Desmond S. MacTavish. Pa, R.C.P, 1 019(a) requires a plaintiff to state the
.
material facts on which a cause of action Is based, Count II of Plaintiffs Complaint,
however, contains no facts, material or otherwise, to support a theory of liability against
Defendant David M, Myers,
.5.
,
The basic elements of a cause of action founded upon negligence are:
1. A duty or obligation recognized by the law
requiring defendant to conform to a certain
standard of conduct for the protection of others
agalr:st unreasonable risks;
2, The defendant's failure to conform to the standard
required;
3,
A reasonably close causal connection between the
conduct and the resulting Injury; and
4. Actual loss or damage resulting to the plaintiff.
d
4 Stan. Pa. Prac. 923:19, at p. 341; Casey v. Geiqer, 346 Pa, Super, 279, 499 A.2d 606
(1985).
Count II of Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant David M. Myers is insufficient
as a matter of law because It falls to allege that David M. Myers owed a duty of care to
Plaintiff, It Is a fundamental rule of tort law that a negligence claim must fall If It is based
on circumstances for which the law imposes no duty of care on Defendant. 4 Stan, Pa.
Prac, 923:20, at p. 341; Linde Enterorises. Inc. v. Hazelton City Authorit!, 412 Pa.
Super. 67, 602 A.2d 897 (1992). As noted, Count II of Plaintiffs Complaint makes no
material allegation other than that Defendant David M, Myers was the owner of the
vehicle driven by Defendant Desmond S. Ma.cTavlsh, Thus, Count II of Plaintiffs
Complaint Is legally Insufficient because it fails to allege that Defendant David M. Myers
breached some duty of care owed to Plaintiff.
- 6 -
.
According to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court:
A duty, In any given situation, Is predicated on the relationship
existing between the parties at the relevant time, Dumanskl v. City
oLErle, 348 Pa. 505, 34 A,2d 508 (1943); and necessarily
requires some degree of knowledge. Porreca v, Atlaptic Refining
Company, 403 Pa, 171, 168 A.2d 564 (1961),
~ W, a.r.adAhaw v. Rawlin9s, 612 F.2d 135, 138 (3rd Cir, 1979) cerl. denied, 446
U.S. 909, 100 S. Ct. 1836, 64 L.Ed.2d 261 (1980) (negligence claim must fail if based
on circumstances for which law Imposes no duty of care on defendant); Boyce v. United
States StlUll Corp., 446 Pa. 226, 285 A.2d 459, 461 (1971) (no negligence claim can be
based upon facts on which law does not Impose duty on defendant In favor of plaintiff).
,
I
Plaintiff has failed to allege any material facts which would establish that
Defendant David M. Myers owed a duty of care to Plaintiff, Defendant David M. Myers'
ij
,
status as the owner of the vehicle which was Involved in the alleged accident, absent
..,
more, does not give rise to any legally cognizable duty of care owed to Plaintiff.
Therefore, Count II of Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant David M, Myers should be
dismissed.
- 7 .
~' " .
.
IV. CONCLUSION
For all the foregoing reasons, Defendants respectfully request this Court to Issue
an Order dismissing Count II of Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant David M, Myers
and dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant Sally Myers MacTavish.
Respectfully submitted,
METTE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
BY: D~O'NSI ESQUIRE
Sup. Ct.I.D, #41722
ANTHONY T. LUCIDO, ESQUIRE
Sup, Ct. I,D, #76563
3401 North Front Street
P.O, Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
(717) 232.5000
Attorneys for Defendants
DATED: 5/17/96
66536-1
.
CERTIFICATE OF SI;R.Y.ICE
I hereby certify that I served a copy of the foregoing document upon the
person(s) and In the manner Indicated below, which service satisfies the requirements
of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, by depositing a copy of same in the U,S.
mail, First-class postage prepaid, as well as a copy via Certified Mail- Return Receipt
Requested addressed as follows:
Lucreatia Perry
2648 Lexington Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
METTE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
BY:
~'
DAVID A. FITZSIMONS, ESQUIRE
Sup. Ct. 1.0. #41722
ANTHONY T, LUCIDO, ESQUIRE
Sup. Ct. I.D, #76583
3401 North Front Street
P.O. Box 5950
Harril[lburg, PA 17110-0950
(717) 232-5000
DATED: 5/17/96
66536-1
Attorneys for Defendants
LUCREATIA PERRY,
(Plaintim
" , 1
..,
L , : ; ,
( I " , "
.;-;
, ; ,; , .j,)
L" , '\
~i
. , ) )
, - n
" -'
.. I
:.,) . ,
"'.
PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT
(Must be typewritten and submilled in duplicate)
TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY:
Please list the within matter for the next Argument Court.
-------------------------------.-.--------.-------------------------.-.---------------------------------------------
CAPTION OF CASE
(enUre capUon must be stated In fu\\)
VS.
DAVID M, MYERS, DESMOND S. MACTAVISH and
SALLY MYERS MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID M. MYERS
FUNERAL HOME and MYERS FURNITURE,
(Defendants)
Ne, 95-1316 Civil Term
19_
1, Slate maller to be argued (Le" plaintif1's metion fer new trial, defendant's
demurrer to cemplalnt, ele.):
Defendant's Preliminary Objectiens
2, Identify ceunsel whe will argue case:
(a) for Plaintiff: Carolyn M, Anner, Esquire
Address: HANDLER AND WIENER
319 Market Street
P.O. Box 1177
Harrisburg, P A 17108
(b) for Defendant: David A. Fitzsimons, Esquire
Address: METI'E, EVANS & WOODSIDE
3401 North Front Street
P,O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110.0950
3, I wl11 nellfy all parties in writing within two days that this case has been listed fer
argument.
4,
Argument Court Date:
AprlU7, 1996
'~~~~~;M~~
Allerney for Defendant
I
i
i
i
i
,
I
d
"
i
Dated: 03128/96
0\7S\.\
PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT
(Must be typewritten and submitted in duplicate)
TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY;
Pleose list the within moUer fer the next Arb'llment Court.
.---.--.-.------..--..---.-----...---...--------..-.-...............----........--.-...--..-........----------------
,
CAPTION OF CASE I, .,
(ontlro coptlon must bo stated In fulll ,
,)
, ,
!-: 1
LUCREATIA PERRY, .,1
,::.'
{PloinUm ' ,
, iil
vs. ..
c:
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND S. MACTAVISH and
SALLY MYERS MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID M. MYERS
FUNERAL HOME and MYERS FURNITURE,
(Defendants)
Ne. 95-1316 Civil Term
19_
1, Slate matter to be argued (i.e., plainUfi's moUon for now trial, defondant's
demurrer to complaint, etc.):
Defendant's Preliminary Objections
2, Idontify counsel who will arguo cose:
(a) for Plaintiff: Unrepresented
Address:
(b) for Defendant: David A, Fitzsimons, Esquire
Address: METTE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
3401 North Front Street
P,O. Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
3. I wlll notify all parties in writing within two days that this cose hos been listed for
argument.
4.
Argumont Ceurt Dat.c:
May 29, 1996
,
"
\~ \\).~.
Attorney fer Defendant
- ---
Doted: 4/16/96
61781.1
.
[;: '" .~
,~ C'? r:: :i
,.- "
LU0 ..
t'1 -') ... -
u-.' -
R3'. f,I ~....
:.::: '..):~~ --!t
~~: 0-
'l ;:1 ~
r;'. 0:' :,-; (ri '1
to:.
ft'!: . l;;'"
:> ' .'--.
T 'i~li;J
1-' Cl
II. :,: :!!U-
tn ..,~
0 ::)
0\ u
4
~
I.
~
~ t;
~~ w ..
'"
0- 0
III 0\ E
~ ... 0- 0\ ~
a z 0\
0
- '" ~ ..
Q f ... 0 '"
~ ~ ., :>
ci .,
,s '" ..
0 0: it
cO ~ z ~
~ ..
0 %
PI
Q
~
.
.
J
..
Nf1V 1 9 199'~. tf
.
.'
,
LUCREATIA PERRY, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
VS. CIVIL ACTION - LAW
DESMOND S. MACTAVISH, DAVID NO, 95-1316
M. MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendants JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER
AND NOW, this
day of
, 1996, Defendants' Motion for
Judgment of Non Pros is hereby GRANTED and it is ORDERED that Plaintifrs case be
J,
dismissed with prejudice,
By the Court:
II
,
~_ J2,v1(~.
A.(h~JL ~ vJ()A)J
tMJ+- ~
~ \vu,~
1'~
l?--t t IA/-L 7"
~~
jY\2 J2f7 -Jr &/
Cl ilL{jl-'\ ywv /
( ') ///A
l W/fvv(
J
l J r)1)' ~ LO, r q q"J.,
,
V;~.N/\1^~:'~:\:::d
II' .,' f \ ~~ f:"'" ~ " ". ""'1)
.."', :1,.,1'.
1(; :11 ;:
tt ,; livli ~. ~I
^Hdl,\~;i,.',., ., J
38L1~'J-Uii:J
.'
.-----...--
,~
_.-.;:,......_~-'.-...-....... '~~ '0
I
LUeREATIA PERRY,
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 95-1316
vs.
DESMOND S. MACTAVISH, DAVID
M, MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendants
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF NON PROS
AND NOW, come Defendants, Desmond S. MacTavish, David M. Myers Funeral Home
and Myers Furniture, by and through their attorneys, Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, and requests
this Court to grant his Motion for Judgment of Non Pros, In support of his Motion, Defendants
aver as follows:
1. On February 29, 1996, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the above matter.
2. On November 20, 1996, Defendants filed Preliminary Objections to Plaintiffs
Complaint.
3, On March 28, 1996, Defendants' Preliminary Objections were listed for Argument
April 17, 1996.
4. On March 29, 1996, Plaintiffs counsel filed a Petition for Leave to Withdraw her
representation of Plaintiff. On April 9, 1996, this Honorable Court granted Petition.
5. On April 18, 1996, Defendants' Preliminary Objections were re-listed for May
29, 1996,
6. On May 17, 1996, Defendants served their Brief in Support of Preliminary
Objections on Plaintiff via first class and certified mall at her last known address of 2648
Lexington Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110. Both envelopes were returned marked "forwarding
order expired" and "moved, left no address." A copy of said envelopes are attached hereto as
Exhibit "A."
7. On June 7, 1996, this Honorable Court sustained the Preliminary Objections of
Defendants, thereby dismissing the counts in Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendants Sally
Myers Mactavish and David M. Myers.
8. On July 16, 1996, Defendants filed and served on Plaintiff via first class and
certified mail an Answer and New Matter to the Complaint. The certified mail envelope was
returned and marked "forwarding order expired," See a copy attached hereto as Exhibit "B,"
The whereabouts of the first class mail envelope is unknown.
9. On October 3D, 1996, Defendants served upon Plaintiff via certified mail a 10 day
default notice. The envelope was retumed marked "forwarding order expired." See a copy
attached hereto as Exhibit "C."
WHEREFORE. Defendants. Desmond S. MacTavish. David M. Myers Funeral Home
and Myers Furniture. respectfully requests this Honorable Court to enter an order granting its
Motion for Judgment of Non Pros and dismissing this case with prejudice.
Respectfully submitted.
THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFER
By: V. ~ _-.-9
Brooks R. Foland, Esq.
I.D, No. 70102
305 North Front Street
Sixth Floor
POB 999
Harrisburg. PA 17108-0999
(717) 255-7626
Attorneys for Defendants
3
Exhibit A
i",,;::i,':'~~'~,r.'7,': ~,,~'~:~;'i; ~~~j.;":" .,.
,.._.....,l,tjo>,..?f..t '''' .t)~f\,..\...I. "
:.".;~,.:.":g"i'::,'~:f:~(:.,,::'.; ',","'" ' , ' ,:, .., . '.' " .,
liltI.l~~i\.iJ~~~~!i'h"'Y...:~,~1i..!'~'L'l'~~.\i!;"'i;'v~'U~"I:;i~)fi,\I~,)j;Y ',. :"~r~~~~'.il),\~t(.~'..tJ.1{~~""~1
~~~~\S~~.li'i(';'f,tlf,1'!iCMl,~W"'llttlC~.~.".~"~\(~~,..;~}~f~J:~'l1'I('r':1.~rM :r~'t;,,",~~~n~~~J~'f~.J't:,~t;~.
. .._~..._-. .-~"...
",
_..
i.,.
/
/
-.:;.
o.t!
.,)
Vi
,\1
<lJ
N
I
I~
..
..
I"
..
K
C
. z
Z 0
C ~
0 .
0 .
0
~ .
.
. 0
V
Z J
.
~ Z
-. 0
~ ~
'"
K ...
"
Ii 0
.
~ .
~ .
K
To
",-.
'~.-
., ~ 1
'. ... &D
~/:;'.:); .$
I. ,,.,.-:-' ;.'
.tJ./.....\'"'r _
)') . l...: ~"'":
.. J .,
,......' 'fJ
r'
F-
oe.
.. 0
... '"
... .
it . 9
. ..
.. '" 0 Q
.. "
.. t III ;;
. 0 "
'" . . .
.. . .
... I 0
t m 0
. .. .
0 . 0 ,
.. 0 . m
.. z '"
. .; ii
. .
" .
I
.....~..... .. ...".'".
., :.t~ ....t~.. ."!.. .i..~ "'~:"''''~,"
____ -_...._~ 0_- ~.._ ..__..__,.... .._
'.~
--
-... ,
'~"N..: I
'. . -.
L::' :- \.,,~,; .
.. L "-
..... l~
-
I' -:0'. ,',.,..:,....,
""......'".. .
I
I
,\
liio
w...
>-~t:
~ZC(
~oa. ,
~I-(!) I
c((!)~ l
Z:J
IT' ~~fg
Tn ,"
:T ~-I~ (.;,
g~~ L~l
00 ('1
:T -IN '"
0 N
I
:T , III
...
Tn '\- ...
f1J I~
...
a.
~
~
. z
% 0 0
~ ;; .
... '"
= . ... ~
= . ~ . 0
0 .
~ . . III 0 9
~
. . '"
0 . z ~ ~
. u . 0 '"
% ~ III . . .
. . .. 0 .
r. ...
z z , = "
.. 0 . . .
~ iii 0 . 0 ~
III . 0 . =
~ ... . Z <II
.. . 0 ii
~ 0 .
. . .
~ . n :
~ .
~
.
..
Exhibit B
~
..
,..,
U'':'','''':~!..!!
,l1i"
;ii':'.
',.,.
"
,I"
!it.:: ....'
-
.-
eu
:!
o
tn
eu
-
o
",-..--
'I~ 'f ~;
~[~I
l-" .
-, '
" :
".
\'!~'
':'j.. ~ ..
, ,
....
I!!
.-
u.
Iii!!
,.~E
ffi~::
.....u
<~P: __
~~~
u.,'"
3 ~ ~ "-,.
'.f;,.......~
--'i , ..",
.,-,." ,I.... "'J.'I
It'/; '::/:
h., ,/,'
-.;......'. '
..~..~'
.t'
..
. m
..
....
"
"
..
J1l
....
N
':'.f,)
i".~'''..
.,/1.' r-.l...J._~
. ,-,,' ,f'
. ~.'.'
. q
II 0"
(........, ..~
.,' AI
~'
'~
,'-
teal IlqWao IllDCWJO.:fSd
X I'
(1~'1IOH"tJPIJV}:'N'Ql\.Clrs'D 1
iJ (P/Odf/H/PW I
j ""'-'oWoI"._.,__" ~_NI"",,)~.""''''~''
l1: if IJoAnI(J '" 'l
. m ~ l OCXlC 0 .._""~~ 0
= ~ I -1,;;1 .......--.0 OIlLI VdDllnOS/HUVII
~ ~::;: E f ""'''0:> J'I. poJ"IjGo~ 0 ~9911~S NO~ONIX91 8t9t I
< Id.(i_ .Qt AlI1I9,1 VILV911:lnl
o 0 ~ I Eb ~ ~ '.......,""". 'C
~- ~ 0
..1= " """'l'_ood""""O_ .
OIl "'_!l> f.!_ J t,..._........._u 0"' '"....pw~.....~N~Ol.........,.."~IIU.. II-
~ < a\ -. N_'!f"'\.I__......... .*J,lnI~...-.q~..l.O~,.,.fl6WWtf~. I
~ 8 d c:I ~ ""PPV',,",,~ O'l lDU"IOtOI"~IIl4UOjlll'--"''''IOJ.IOlItIl4lOl~:-~. i
~ r= 0.._ ~ :(HtWI ....lW\lIWun..liNoelWOl...'O-.....UOMe.ClPtpuel\llN.-.04~. i
- t-- U11Ot1.",^,"~ 'qtJW'r"fllllolllll'~,
.. . ~-,--, --..-'.,.-. !,
......
~','t'
Exhibit C
,. ,. u
. ,.. . .....M ..... ~. " .
,.
~.il( :,/../:-,~.l.l:~'.'
~,".l~' {",. ~,.
'".f-
," .
'.,
: I,' ";Z.~;""
" .... ... ,.I\,J". . t :" ..\t,
'''''.~':' ". '\'I.S' . ,\.l'~~~.\
,'I ". . ! . .
. . .:.. .".~" .." "i. , - ...., '.' . ... . ...... ..
:~H-~.r;..;...tJ:t~' h~~'r~i'1\1~Vi~tt~it\.~~_j~J~4~..:.~:..;-'4~:';~.~~I~ '.',-'....f,'\ ,;'.(
'.-. ".__," ".__~I'..~,,'.~':,~'::-, ." . l . "',,"
" ,_,. ....p. ,1,.....,..l........Irj't ? ,"
~.'>.,::~::t:;"':,.'t.'J:1.~."i"~$;::~I'
~~'i"If,. .. t. 1
~~' .. .,........ ",f ,,'.1"':1
~. ,...
",,'," L"
"."I"II"i'''::'-'
~
.j..., ;~.f.' ~,J,
..
I:;" ~ ~ " .
.............
.,.-.-.--
.
~o
(",I
J ,,' , J
r" ..-.-...-...-;-..
I" h'
r:; a1
...-..... ;:: ,
.-"'t ... ~ \;. i
,.., .. '> -
/f.:- ~ ~
!~:". 0,
\',\~
~'
". ,.
'"~'''
7]/
.---'
Eo!
Me
~~
:><Ulri
glZ~ ~
M~~
Pd!l
....ZCl
...Hf5
~t::f:i1Il
..:IUl
H
t:l~gj
..:IN!ii
UI
:r
""
oC
IT!
or
...
~
~ 9 I;j
tb~ '" ~
i= ~
.. ... '" 0: ~
... 0 ~
~ ~ z 0
0 -' >< Ii
0: .. 0
Q :,... .. ~ III 0:
"
~ E ~ 0 III
... iii .. '"
0: it
" 0 0:
. ::: z ~
~~ ~ ~
Q
~
.
/
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
.,
AND NOW, this
day of
, 199_, I, Coleen M,
Hartman, of the law finn of Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, hereby certify that I sent a true and
correct copy of the foregoing document by placing a copy of the same in the United States Mail,
first class, postage prepaid, to the following:
Lucreatia Perry
2648 Lexington Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Coleen M. Hartman
;;: en
t> '\} :
IHr'! .. i
"- -,-
CI..- I I
1': ! i..; , ,
16/,i .....'.
~ n 1"
~l " .;;
~I;' ~'" ,
I ,I;;;
ltl' . ro.; , I
l' n.;
"
" -
1.1, , .rJ ',:.)
c,J '.1 :,
ll:
W
Z
W Il
0
~ ~ - ~
w " "
C ~ " -
0 '" - . N
U - . .
;; Z ~ . ~ ~
"
0 <t ~ g g -
J J: '. h
j ll: o . _
m a.: .. "
W - .-
-J 1'1 ~
0 %
Z
<t
J:
..' ....
.
'\., .,
tcll'l'nIO~
~SI~to<1'01~O~~UW2W:)
)N":)UId...
,
,,"l
"J q trl9aff'
"
'.
.
....
"
"
. .
J
\
~
~
l;)
-s.
~
.]
j
.
.
v.
I
Plaintiff I
I
I
I
I
I
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
LUCREATIA PERRY,
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND
S. MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS
MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID
M. MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
NO. 95-1316
I
I
Defendantsl
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
AND NOW, this
Cf~
ORDER
day of
~
,19~,
upon consideration of the verified Petition of Plaintiff's Counsel
For Leave to Withdraw, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that said
petition is GRANTED and that Petitioner, carolyn M. Anner, Esquire,
be permitted to withdraw her appearance of record
\ \ ~
J.
in the above matter.
)
(.
"
"
1'1' '/
'\"!.,,---:,,.,,,.,...
'''lr'
;
, ..
. ,
,-
,
. .
LUCREATIA PERRY,
:
Plaintiff :
:
:
:
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v.
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND NO. 95-1316
S. MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS
MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID
M. MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FlIRNITURE, :
Defendants: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PETITION OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW
The petition of Carolyn M. Anner, Esquire, respectfully
represents:
1, The action arose out of a motor vehicle collision
occurring on March 19, 1993 and petitioner was shortly thereafter
retained by Plaintiff to repreeent her in the matter.
2. On February 29, 1996, after consultation with the
Plaintiff, petitioner filed a Complaint on Plaintiff's behalf.
3. It has, however, come to the attention of petitioner that
Plaintiff is uncooperative regarding her repreeentation.
As a
result, it has become extremely difficult to render effective an
professional represention.
4. Therefore, petitioner's continued represenation of
Plaintiff has been precluded and prohibited by Rule 1.16 of the
Pennsylvania Rules of professional Conduct and good cause exists
for Petitioner's withdrawal of appearance in this case and
termination of represenation of Plaintiff.
'.
"
J,
, .
WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that this Court grant
Petitioner leave to withdraw her appearance and terminate
representation of Plaintiff in this action.
Respectfully submitted,
Date:
:ht(tff.;
f
By:
ENER
, Esquire
62636
319 Ma et Street
P , 0 . Box 11 77
Harrisburg, PA 17108
(717) 238-2000
Petitioner and Attorney for
Plaintiff
. ... ~"",'"......,~_. t ....~...-..,.. ~ - ,. ,~_.. "
."
'.
"
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 1996, I hereby certify
that I have, on this date, served the Petition for Leave to
Withdraw upon the Defendants by sending a true and correct copy of
same to their attorney of record via first class United States
mail, poatage prepaid and addressed as follows:
David A. Fitzsimons, Esq.
METTE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
P.O. Bolt 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
HANDLER AND WIENER
, ...
\
LUCREATIA PERRY,
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
i
;
v.
.
,
: NO. 95-1316 Civil Term
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND
S. MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS
MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID M.
MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendants
.
.
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
PLEASE WITHDRAW our appearance on behalf of all Defendants in the above-
captioned action,
,
"
",
~\
l\ \
---
\J <':0--., ----:::>
DATED: JUL - 3 19Sr;
\ ..""-
DAVID A. FITZSIMONS, ESQUIRE
Supreme Court I. 0, #41722
METTE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
3401 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
(717) 232-5000
PLEASE ENTER our appearance on behalf of Defendants in the above-
captioned action.
DATED: -;I"(I(~
~~C?
JAMES K. THOMAS, II, ESQUIRE
Supreme Court I,D. #15613
THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFER
305 North Front Street
P.O. Box 999
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0999
(717) 237.7100
-
"
\.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I served a copy of the foregoing document upon the person(s)
and In the manner Indicated below, which service satisfies the requirements of the
Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, by depositing a copy of same In the U.S. mail,
First-class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
LucreaUa Perry
2648 Lexington Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
METTE, EVANS & WOODSIDE
'-.,
BY:'~~~h~~ ~
DAVID A. FITZSIMONS, ESQUIRE
Supreme Court 1.0. 1141722
3401 North Front Street
P.O, Box 5950
Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950
(717) 232-5000
DATED: 1/S)1(o
70<499-1
Attorneys for Defendants
.,
'-.
0 ,t> !?,
C tH
"11','-' ~--. -f
'r
~~!~"~- 1-":; ii:r1
~.. I I n~
C'i ,<> .,
"'"'1-.- "
"-'1 :J:fj
." -n
,'. ~. .,
l.~; t" '.?C)
~:;: Co'? ,~jrn
'.1
:.", r-
.. ~.q
.. ():l -',
;.....
<.:"
--- .---
- -;- ......-.~...:'"
.-..-.....-,.... .~
~ -' L::
.:J
,1.;., r;, ~;I t':(
~~) .',.)ry
C' .,- I.,) :.'
~r~: i:i~ --
.-~::J
I'i' ro' ~.' U1
\'."
ll. - ;,::.!
fi:'} ! "..1 \!'l(,1
"" _J i~1 0.-
-,
\1. lO ,
0 0' D
"
~
~ t;
~ 9 ... CD
~ a: 0
i t; .. is
"a !Z .. !
..
!l. !il " ",'
.. 0 a:
~ E :I: CD :J
l< d CD
Ul
,s 0 0: ir
.. ~ z a:
OIl ..
~ 0 :I:
...
~
" .
. . , "I
.
ii
.'
.
.
LUCREATIA PERRY, IN THE COURT or COMMON PLEAS
Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
VS, CIVIL ACTION - LAW
DESMOND S. MACTAVISH, DAVID NO. 95-1316
M. MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendants
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
NOTICE TO PLEAD
You are hereby notified to plc.1d to the enclosed Answer with New Matter within twenty
(20) days from service hereof or a default jUdgment may be entered against you,
THOMAS, TlIOMAS & HAFER
/(7.... /' 2
By: lI.f~ ~
Brooks R. Foland, Esquire
1.0. No. 70102
305 North Front Street
Sixth Floor
POD 999
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0999
(717) 255-7626
Attorneys for Defendants
..~-~- ....
, , . . ...,.,.,. ',~. - '..'.' - " .' ,
~
.
LUCREATIA PERRY,
Plaintiff
vs.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO, 95-1316
DESMOND S. MACTAVISH, DAVID
M. MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendants
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ANSWER AND NEW MATTER
AND NOW come Defendants, Desmond S, MacTavish, David M. Myers Funeral Home
and Myers Fumiture, by and through their cOllnsel, Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, and files lI~e
following Answer and New Maller to Plaintifrs Complaint as follows:
1. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are withollt
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the averments in this
paragraph, and, therefore, deny the same and demand strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
2. Admilled based upon information and belief.
3. Admilled based upon information and belief.
4. Admilled based upon information and belief.
5. Admitted based upon information and belief.
6. Ad milled based upon information and belief,
.
7. Denied. Aftcr reasonablc Investigation, Answering Defendants are without
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the averments in this
paragraph, and, therefore, deny the same and demand strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
8. It is admitted only that on or about March 19, 1993, Defendant, Desmond S.
MacTavish, was the operator of the 1979 Lincoln owned by David M. Myers. Any and all
other allegations contained in paragraph 8 are specifically denied and strict proof thereof is
demanded at time of trial.
9. It is admitted only that the 1979 Lincoln operated by Desmond S. MacTavish was
owned by David H. Myers. Any and all other allegations contained in paragmph 9 are
specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at time of trial,
10. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are without
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the averments in this
paragmph, and, therefore, deny the same and demand strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
To the extent that an answer is deemed to be required, it is specifically denied that Plaintiff
activated her tum signal and came to a complele stop before the alleged incident on or about
March 19, 1993.
11. Admitted based upon information and belief.
12. Denied. It is specifically denied that Dcfendant Desmond S, MacTavish suddenly
and without waming struck the rear of Plalntifrs vehicle. Any and all other allegations
2
contained in paragraph 12 are also specifically denied and strict proof thereof is demanded at
time of trial.
13. The averments contained in paragraph 13 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the event a response is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny each and every allegation of ncgllgence and deny that the aforesaid accident
and injuries allegedly suffered by Plaintiff were caused by any negligence on the part of
Answering Defendants.
COUNT I
LI/creatia Perry v. Desmol/d S. MacTal'isll
14. The averments in paragraph 14 constitute conclusions of law to which no response
is required. In the event a response is deemed to be required. Answcring Defendants deny that
they or Defendant Desmond S, MacTavish were negligent and deny the following acts and
omissions alleged by the Plaintiff:
a. Failing to be reasonably vigilant to observe the vehicle in which the
Plaintiff was driving;
b. Failing to operate his vehicle at a speed thai would allow him to apply his
brakes and stop before striking the Plaintiff's vehicle;
c. Failing to operate said vehicle at a speed in which he could SlOp within the
assured cleared distance, in violation of 75 Pa.C.S,A. ~ 3361;
3
d. Failing to maintain proper and adequate observation of the traffic
conditions then and there existing;
e. Failing to exercise reasonable care in the operation and control of his
vehicle; and
f. Under the facls and circumstances presented herein, Defendant, Desmond
S, MacTavish, had the last clear chance to avoid this collision, and in
failing to do so, Defendant is guilty of gross negligence.
15. The averments contained in paragraph 15 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In lhe evenl a response is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendanls deny lhatthey were negligent and deny lhat Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry, suffered any
injuries or damages as a direct and proximate resull of any negligence on the part of Answering
Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the averments of this paragraph and demand
slrict proof thereof at the time of trial.
16. The avermenls contained in paragraph 16 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In lhe event a response is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny thai Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry, suffered any
injuries or damages as a direcl and proximate resull of any negligence on the part of Answering
Defendants, As such, Answering Defendants deny the averments of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thereof at the ti me of trial.
4
"~"'"'''''~_ ~w'._'~-;,''''-', .
17. The averments contained in paragraph 17 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response Is required. In the event a response Is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they or Defendant Des'mond S. MacTavish were negligent and deny that
Plalntlff, Lucrcatla Perry, suffered any injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of
any negligence on the part of Answering Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the
averments of this paragraph and demand strict proof thereof at the time of triai.
18. The averments contained in paragraph 18 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the event a response Is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny that Plaintiff, Lucreatla Perry, suffered any
injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of any negligence on the part of Answering
Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the averments of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thereof at the time of trial,
19. Denied. After reasonable Investigation, Answering Defendants are without
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the averments in this paragraph
and, therefore, deny the same and demand strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
20. The averments contained In paragraph 20 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the event a response is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny that Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry, suffered any
injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of any negligence on the part of Answering
5
Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the averments of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
21. The averments contained in paragraph 21 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the event a response is deemed to be required, Answering
.J
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny that Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry, suffered any
injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of any negligence on the part of Answering
Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the averments of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
WHEREFORE, Answering Defendants, Desmond S. MacTavish, David M. Myers
Funeral Home and Myers Furniture, respectfully request this Court to dismiss Plaintiff's..
Complaint.
COUNT II
Lllcrealia Perry v. DaI'itI M. Myers
22. Answering Defendants incorporate paragraphs 1 through 21 of this Answer as
slated above as if fully set forth herein.
23.-30. No answer is required for these paragraphs as the Court, by Order dated June
7, 1996, dismissed all counts In the Complaint against David M. Myers and Sally Myers
MacTavish.
6
WHEREFORE, Answering Defendants, Desmond S. MacTavish. David M. Myers
Funeral Home and Myers Furniture. respectfully request this Court to dismiss Plaintifrs
Complaint and that judgment be entered In favor of Answering Defendants.
COUNT III
LI/creatia Perry v. David M. Myers FI/Ilera/ /Iome
31. Answering Defendants incorporate paragraphs I through 30 of this Answer as
stated above as if fully set forth herein.
32. The averments cont.1ined in paragraph 32 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required.
33. The averments contained in paragraph 33 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the event a response is deemed to be required. Answering
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny the following acts and omissions alleged by
the Plaintiff:
a. Allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as its agent. servant and/or
employee to operate said vehicle without being reasonably vigilant in
observing the vehicle in which Plaintiff was driving;
b. Allowing Defendant. Desmond S. MacTavish, as its agent, servant and/or
employee to operate said vehicle at a speed at which he could not apply
his brakes and stop before striking the Plaintiff's vehicle;
7
c. Allowing Dcfendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as its agent, servant and/or
employec, to operatc said vchiclc at a speed at which hc could not stop
within the assured clcar distance, in violation of 75 Pa,C.S.A. ~ 3361;
d. Allowing Defcndant, Dcsmond S. MacTavish, as its agcnt, servant and/or
cmployee, to operate said vehicle without maintaining propcr and adequate
observation of the traffic conditions then and there existing; and
e. Allowing Defendant, Dcsmond S. MacTavish, as its agent, scrvant and/or
employce, to operate said vchicle without exercising reasonable care in the
operation and control of said vchicle.
34. The avcrments contained in paragraph 34 constitutc conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the event a response is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they were ncgligcnt and deny that Plaintiff, Lucreatia Pcrry, suffcred any
injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of any negllgencc on the part of Answering
Defendants. As such, Answcring Defcndants deny the avcrmcnts of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thercof at the time of trial.
35. The averments contained in paragraph 35 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the event a response is deemed to bc required, Answcring
Defendants deny that they werc negligent and deny that Plaintiff, LUCrc.1tia Pcrry, suffered any
injurics or damages as a direct and proximate result of any negligence on the part of Answering
8
Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the averments of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
36. The averments contained in paragraph 36 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the event a response is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they or Defendant Desmond S. MacTavish were negligent and deny that
Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry, suffered any injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of
any negligence on the part of Answering Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the
averments of this paragraph and demand strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
38. The averments contained in paragraph 38 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the event a response is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny that Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry, suffered any
injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of any negligence on the part of Answering
Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the averments of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
39. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are without
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the averments in this paragraph
and, therefore, deny the same and demand strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
40. The averments contained in paragraph 40 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. fn the event a response is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny that Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry, suffered any
9
injuries or damages as a dircct and proximate result of any ncgligence on the part of Answering
Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the avermcnts of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
41. The averments contained in paragraph 41 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. [n the event a response is deemcd to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny that Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry, suffered any
injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of any negligence on the part of Answering
Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the avermcnts of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
WHEREFORE, Answering Defendants, Desmond S. MacTavish, David M, Myers
Funeral Home and Myers Furniture, respectfully rcqucst this Court to dismiss Plaintifrs
Complaint and that judgment be entered in favor of Answering Defendants.
COUNT IV
Lllcrealia Perry v. Myers FIll'llillll'e
42. Answering Defendants incorporate paragraphs 1 through 41 of this Answer as
stated above as if fully set forth herein.
43. The averments contained in paragraph 43 constitute conclusions of law 10 which
no response is required.
44. The averments conlained in paragraph 44 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. [n the event a response is deem cd to bc rcquired, Answering
10
_'" 't ,.,._A . ',. \,,__ _~_.
..-.~..." .,".,.;."~-~""'.""" ',""';"'~
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny the following acts and omissions alleged by
the Plaintiff:
a. Allowing Defendant, Dcsmond S. MacTavish, as its agent, servant and/or
employee, to operate said vehicle without being reasonably vigilant in
Observing the vehicle in which the Plaintirr was driving;
b. Allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as its agent, servant and/or
employee to operate said vehicle at a speed at which he could not apply
his brakes and stop before striking the Plaintiff's vehicle;
c. Allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as its agent, servant and/or
employee, to operate said vehicle at a speed at which he could not stop
within the assured clear distance, in violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. ~ 3361;
d. Allowing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, as its agent, servant and/or
employee, to operate said vehicle without maintaining proper and adequate
observation of the traffic conditions then and there existing; and
e. Allowing Defendant, Desmond S, MacTavish, as its agent, servant and/or
employee, to operate said vehicle without exercising reasonable care in the
operation and control of said vehicle,
45. The averments contained in paragraph 45 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the evcnt a response is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny that Plaintiff, LlIcreatia Perry, suffered any
II
injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of any negligence on the part of Answering
Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the averments of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
46. The averments contained in paragraph 46 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the event a response is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny that Plaintiff, Lucreatla Perry, suffered any
injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of any negligence on the part of Answering
Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the averments of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
47. The averments contained in paragraph 47 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the event a response is deemed to be rcquired, Answering
Defendants deny that they or Defendant Desmond S. MacTavish were negligent and deny that
Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry, suffered any injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of
any negligence on the part of Answering Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the
averments of this paragraph and demand strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
48. The averments contained in paragraph 48 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. fn the event a response is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny that Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry, suffered any
injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of any negligence on the part of Answering
49. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Answering Defendants are without
Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the averments of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
information surticient to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the averments in this paragraph
and, therefore, deny the same and demand strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
50. The averments contained in paragraph 50 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the event a response is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny that Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry, suffered any
injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of any negligence on the part of Answering
Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the averments of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thereof at the time of trial.
51. The averments contained in paragraph 51 constitute conclusions of law to which
no response is required. In the event a response Is deemed to be required, Answering
Defendants deny that they were negligent and deny that Plaintiff, Lucreatla Perry, suffered any
injuries or damages as a direct and proximate result of any negligence on the part of Answering
Defendants. As such, Answering Defendants deny the averments of this paragraph and demand
strict proof thereof at the ti me of trial.
WHEREFORE, Answering Defendants, Desmond S. MacTavish, David M. Myers
Funeral Home and Myers Furniture, respectfu1\y requcst this COllrt to dismiss Plaintifrs.
Complaint and that judgment be entered in favor of Answering Defendants.
13
.'
,
. ,
I
I
I
i
NEW MA TIER
52. Some or all of Plalntifrs claims may be barred by the applicable statute of
limitations.
53. Some or all of Plaintifrs claims may be barred or reduced by Plaintifrs
comparative and/or contributory negligence.
54. Some or all of Plaintifrs claims may be barred or reduced by Plaintifrs
assumption of a known risk.
55. Plaintifrs injuries and damages, if any, were not caused by any acts, omissions,
or breaches of duty of Answering Defendants that were caused in whole or in part by the
negligence or faull or want of care of persons other than Answering Defendants.
56. Plaintiff has failed to state a cause of claim upon which relief can be granted.
57. On or about March 19, 1993, Defendant, Desmond S, MacTavish, was traveling
west on Trindle Road in a 1979 Lincoln.
58. As Defendant, Defendant. Desmond S. MacTavish, was traveling west bound on
Trindle Road on or about March 19, 1993, the automobile driven by Plaintiff. Lucreatia Perry,
stopped suddenly, forcing Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, to apply his brakes.
59. Just before Defendant, Desmond S. MacTavish, brought his vehicle to a complete
stop, Plaintiff, Lucreatia Perry. pulled her automobile forward approximately 6to 12 inches and
slammed on the brakes, causing her vehicle to buck violently,
14
. . .. I
60. At the time of the incident, the two automobiles never came into contact with one
another.
61. Officer Sidney Deyo of the Hampden Township Police Department came to the
scene, examined the vehicles, and reported that there was no evidence of any impact,
WHEREFORE, Answering Defendants, Desmond S. MacTavish, David M. Myers
Funeral Home and Myers Furniture, respectfully request this Court to dismiss Plaintifrs
Complaint and that judgment be entered in favor of Answering Defendants.
Respectfully submitted,
"9~
Brooks R. Foland, Esq.
1.0. No. 70102
305 North Front Street
Sixth Floor
POB 999
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0999
(717) 255-7626
Attorneys for Defendants
'i,
15
. .
. .
VERIFICATION
The undersigned, having read the attached Answer and New Matter, hereby verifies that
the attached pleading is based on information which has been gathered by counsel in the course
of this lawsuit. The language of the pleading is that of counsel. Furthermore, the matters
contained in this pleading are of a procedural nature only among counsel and the court, The
undersigned verifies that he has read the attached pleading and that it is true and correct to the
best of his information and belief. This Verification is made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.
C.S. ~ 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
~ool. (L< ~
Brooks R. Foland, Esquire
.'
. f. ..
, .. .,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
AND NOW, this 1(, t1Jay of ~ ' 19~ I, Coleen M.
Hartman, of the law firm of Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, hereby certify that I sent a true and
correct copy of the foregoing document by placing a copy of the same in the United States Mail,
first class, and certified, postage prepaid, to the following:
Lucreatia Perry
2648 Lexington Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
~
Coleen M. Hartman
~ 11) ~
0
.... .. ,..
uJQ ~ ::l...t.
~z n-'
~~ :c o:'i
u.. p::e
- c;~
M .:l~
~ t; r,nm
0 ~a..
~ U) ::5
{J'\ u
l.,
~
~ ti
~~ .. ..
a: 0
Iii .. E
~ ... !Z .. f
Q ~ ..
- " oJ
Q ,.. ... 0 a:
~ E x .. :>
Ii: d ..
VI
o.S 0 0: ii
.. ~ z ~
VI
~ 0 X
M
Q
~
~
..
.
..\
..
-,
v.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 95-1316
LUCREATIA PERRY,
Plaintiff
DESMOND S. MACTAVISH, DAVID
M. MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendants
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
IMPORTANT NOTICE
YOU ARE IN DEFAULT BECAUSE YOU HAVE FAILED TO RESPOND TO AN
ANSWER AND NEW MATTER IN THIS CASE. UNLESS YOU ACT WITHIN TEN DAYS
FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A JUDGMENT MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST YOU
WITHOUT A HEARING AND YOU MAY LOSE YOUR RIGHT TO SUE THE DEFENDANTS
AND THEREBY LOSE PROPERTY OR OTHER IMPORTANT RIGHTS. YOU SHOULD
TAKE THIS NOTICE TO A LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER
OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE FOLLOWING OFFICE TO
FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP:
Cumberland County Court Administrator
Cumberland County Courthouse
1 Courthouse Square
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 240-6200
THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFER
By 73.RT~-
Brooks R. Foland, Eequire
Attorneys for Defendants
305 North Front Street
P.O. Box 999
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0999
(717) 255-7626
Supreme Court I.D. No.: 70102
NOTED: SERVE ON UNREPRESENTED PLAINTIFF OR ON PLAINTIFF'S
ATTORNEY)
DATED: loh6/'1v
(
'-
w
.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Brooks R. Foland, Esquire, of the law firm of Thomas,
Thomas & Hafer, attorneys for Defendants, do hereby certify that on
this date I served the foregoing Default Notice by placing a true
and correct copy of the same in the United States mail, postage
prepaid, at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, addressed to:
Lucreatia Perry
2648 Lexington Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFER
DATED: /ohol9L>
By (?.{t, -=r~
Brooks R. Foland, Esquire
Attorneys for Defendants
305 North Front Street
P.O. Box 999
Harrisburg, PA 17108-0999
.. '
. , ,
" . ". .
"-j;,~r,'W. 'E~1~\- "'1JtffJ
' ~(j~!h[;!.~~it!~~;~~: ,if!
. . . ",:")1titI,:"w.,,\,\~{,,,,:';"~i~".11J'I'';!':i''.!,:\'''J. "."_~.
.. r''''' k~t,",'1'~~"'''M~.1o')'!)n''~,,;' IT~~"'" - )..
~yi Vflli"'!!Jg/f'J-G"';~t:;'~~;';jf~/<'! ,"' ;~\;~~-
rl!:l;A';f~"-~- ~; ,J.'~}';:.,\$:,-,~~~,ii;!!:t;-~l/.,~,j:
l: ~'\{j{.itJftS'~""""'<t, _._"_t;t;fr-.,;,.""-' ~.s--;,'r"-"-""lf....:.,i1J.-
",'301 HORTH fRONT ITAIETA~t~~*~.~...t;.;~~';--i~~
t'tP~'ttl'~~,,! 4.",~. ,;,!t ,'>1.\,,'11 1" "',....c!f...J '~l~'
. ::'\\~~/p' n'B"O'X' ftll"':~4zf ~ t.t ~!.;tl~-;IJ-'l' ...":"'1:' ':ti 1'.'
t , '~'k~' ':-.:\ .. i'!-~I"'l"",'""i?,.. ~.~~'"'
7' ...: ~ 'r."" ("'-''';;)'''j 'n -f/V..t " ~ ~>'-' {~,~, "." ') (.,~ ~'-... ~
'. " '.' '"I ,r, 0" ~ ~ , ,." " j.. .. ,- "" _ ,,,.... ->' ,
t<",l~J~ ,. "f~'\l ~:' 1:-0, '~Li .~:::~::~ HARRI~BUAO#'_PA.1710~:\;'.",::...,;" '. :.~' ; ,~" ~~::' :1}~~
t:.""t.t~~~,'n";.t,.,f1:,'1t:;"~~,,,,,,,,;,~, '__ "f. ". _'-,~ ~_,.. - I -,
LUCRETIA PERRY
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 95-1316
vs
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
DESMOND S. MACTAVISH, DAVID
M. MYERS FUNERAL HOME and
MYERS FURNITURE '
JURY TRIAL PRAYED
Defendants
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies thil.t_ on ~!;his ,'3C..;<,,'~day of
June, 1997, the original document of t~~~reg~ngL~s forwarded,
via United States Postal service, first class to the attorney for
Plaintiff as shown below:
Jefferson Shipman, Esquire
GOLDBERG, KATZMAN AND SHIPMAN, p.e.
320 Market Street
P.O. Box 1268
Harrisburg, PA 17108
/' 0 r
Dtt.ui 11./ {.. . ('::A:_.{2f...iVl:"i
Barbara A. Onorato
7
Defendant" Production Raqunt to rlalntltf ~ ra~e 7
() ~-~ 0
~:;~ --J 'n
'- "J
,,-; c;: :1.~
r'l- , id'"
::"';1- 'fl 11
" "'6
':~t
,. ..,1 TO']
" ' )::)'
(~'l N ;?~~
, ~;: " ~
:~j :11 'to
~
-. I,) ...
j.:
i
t',!I'
" ,.
I, ;
..
( ,
J'.
, .
"
~j
-:::-'\
'1
~
,,-
Ir'!
-.
. '
','.
.'
l'
(
'-
I.
c.'
,
".,J
z
o
CJl~j
~jlll~::l
9.~11<<?
olllaEtJ,.!.ll
CJl ... ~ oJ' '"
~~~~6
~<~
. .
LUCREATIA PERRY,
Plaintiff
IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
,/
v,
CIVIL ACTION. LAW
DAVID M, MYERS, DESMOND S.
MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS
MACTAVISH, his wife,
DAVID M. MYERS FUNERAL HOME
and MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendant
NO. 95-1316 CIVIL TERM
AND NOW, this
ORDER OF COURT
t)" tft". day of November, 1997, in consideration of the allached
Motion, the Order of September IS, 1997, appointing arbitrators in the above-referenced case is
hereby vacated. Taylor p, Andrews, Esquire, shall be paid $50,00 for his services as Chainnan
of the Board of Arbitration,
BY THE COURT:
f!~1 e- J~
./
/. J.
9U 1'1 l-ld S- liON L6
^lN1CHO..UC:.:!d ~:ll :10
301:1:lO-031!~
V'.N'.'i\l.'::~a'i:1d
JJ.rlno..') '':H(:lI:~;:'8rt)
LUCREATIA PERRY,
PlaintilT
IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v,
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
DAVID M, MYERS, DESMOND S.
MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS
MACTAVISH, his wife,
DAVID M. MYERS FUNERAL I-IOME
and MYERS FURNITURE,
Defendant
NO. 95-1316 CIVIL TERM
MOTION TO VACATE APPOINTMENT or ARBITRATORS
PETITIONER, Taylor 1'. Andrews, Esquire, Chairman ofa Board of Arbitration hereby
moves the court as follows:
I, Arbitrators for the above referenced case were appointed by the Honorable Harold
E. Sheely on September 15, 1997 and Taylor 1'. Andrews, Esquire was appointed Chairman of
the Board of Arbitration. The other arbitrators were Anthony L,DeLuca, Esquire, and Robert G.
Frey, Esquire,
2. Petitioner took the time and eITort to coordinate scheduling and to provide notices
for an arbitration hearing to be conducted November 25, 1997, at I :00 o'clock P,M. in the Fourth
Floor Conference Room, Cumberland County Court House, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. A eopy of
the Arbitration Notice is aUached hereto as Exhibit I.
3, By leUer dated October 16, 1997, Petitioner was informed by I'laintiITs counsel that
the action was discontinued, Leller and Praecipe for Discontinuance are allached hereto as
Exhibit 2,
4. Petitioner has expended approximately one hour in the review of documents,
coordination and providing notices of the scheduled arbitration date, and preparation of this
Motion.
5. Petitioner asks the Court to vacate the appointment of arbitrators.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner prays Your Honorable Court to vacate the order of September
15,1997, appointing arbitrators in the above-referenced case, and further requests the Court to
direct payment of$50.00 to the Petitioner for his services as Chairman of this arbitration,
Respectfully submilled,
Date:
(~ -",5c - 1'7
;
,
I
I
I
I
\
\
LUCREATIA PERRY
Plahlllff
v.
DAVID M. MYERS, DESMOND S.
MACTAVISH and SALLY MYERS
MACTAVISH, his wife, DAVID M.
MYERS FUNERAL HOME and MYERS
FURNITURE
Defendant
IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. 95-1316 CIVIl. TERM
JURY TRIAl. DEMANDED
NOTICE OF MEETING
OF ARBITRATORS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Arbitrators appointed in the above-captioned action will sit
for the purpose of their appointment on Tuesday, November 25, 1997, at 1:00 o'clock P,M. in the Old
Court House, Second Floor Hearing Room, Cumberland County Court House, Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
Date:
?_ -zS-..JI7
Taylor 1', Andrews, Esquire
Anthony DeLuca, Esquire
Robert G, Frey, Esqulr
By:
TO:
Jefferson J, Shipman, Esquire
320 - Market Street
Harrlsburg,PA 17101
Anthony L, Del.uca
1',0, Box 358
113 Front Street
Boiling Springs, PA 17007-0358
Robert G. Frey
Frey & Tiley
5 South Hanover Street
Carllsle,PA 17013
Desmond S, Mactavish amI
Sally Myers Mactavish
60 2nd Street
Newport, PA 17074
Brooks R. Foland, Esquire
Thomas, Thomas & Hafer
305 North Front Street, Sixth Floor
POB 999
Harrisburg,PA 17108.0999
David M, Myers
David M. Myers Funeral Hume &
Myers Furniture
64 2nd Street
Newport, PA, 17074
Luerealla Perry
e/o Jefferson J. Shlpmnn, Esquire
320 Markel Slreet
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Court Administrator's Offiee
Cumberland County Court House
I Courthouse Square
Carlisle, PA 17013
Bulletin Board
Prothonolary's Office
Cumberland County Court House
Carlisle, PA 17013
.......-...,--.,.....,"'.,....;
..i.
JOS(l'It p, tWEn
JAlM.S K. "tOMAS, II
Jml1EY 0, nETTIG
I'mnJC\JI1It(
" mJv<[ Mcl[MOOr. JR
W....AIIlJ It JVtUiAt.. Jil
C. KENf miCE
_0 GAlE
OAVIO L, SCHWAlM
I'mn J S/'UoKEn
OOUOLAS 0 MARCELLO
PAUl.. J OElLASEGA
DANIEL J GAll..AGtttn
n06(nf A.. fAYlon
SIoIWt W AIlOS[LL
EUGENE N. MctlUQlt
AJOWlD C. SENECA
SfEPttEN E. OEOUlOIO
KAllEN S, COA1ES
0AI1Y 1 LATH/lOP
1000 0 IW1YOL
KEViN C' IoAcWoIoW1A
onooKS n fOLANO
JOHN fLOUNLACKEn
'J~o",a8, 'JllOmU8 & Jfa/e,.
7111o,."e'l8 ul .f',W
305 NORTH FRONT SmEET
mt:otJN!.tl
JAUr5" tIl0UAti
m~TII HOOR
1', 0 IJO~ 999
\Mlllfll'.lllIlIrIIIlAI'II''''1111I
HARRlSOURO, PA. 17108
17111131.1100
(717) 266-7626
fAM 11111 i'37.1tOS
October 16, 1997
Taylor P. Andrews, Esq.
78 W. Pomfret Streat
Carlisle, PA 17013
Anthony L. DeLuca, Esq.
POB 358
113 Front Street
Boiling Springs, PA 17007-0368
Robert G. Frey, Esq.
Frey & Tiley
6 South Hanover Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
re: perrv v, McTavish Cumberland County No. 96-1316 Civil Term
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that Plaintiff has withdrawn the above matter and has had
the case marked settled, discontinued and ended with the Cumberland County Court
of Common Pleas. Therefore, please remove the matter from the arbitration list for
November 26, 1997.
Very truly yours,
THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFER
By: -B- t, ::1==' I--(:'~
Brooks R, Foland
BRF:cmh
cc: Jefferson J. Shipman, Esq.