The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About95-01525 1]ropoonl Pago No, of Pagos 1st Cla7s7g Building & Remodeling 1 ... Mechanlcsburg, PA 'We make commllmenls not promises' . PROPOS'lSU~OTO, ..-....--....- / ---;..::r--..--..P,;QN.--------['-OAtt------------.. .-.-,.. ^" , ea!JJ,U1:-_..h e i-L_z-__,__ _2t.?t.~_o_1B..f.:......, __....rJ.-.ll,,,:::,,?,s--. STREET /'1Q/__flv- C!. tN...)k__g.{....._....___.:N."~..___....... .. " CITY,STATEANDZlPCOOE /J JOOlOCATlON 5 'te.c.-L_j:'~_ IJ.P~ _.______.1t!J~ --,--...'-.....--. - ------'-..-'-.-.. AACHITECT CAfE OF PLANS JOO PUONE w. tIIl'by lubrM apodIlClliont.oo .,bmalet lor; fl c,;:t OJ:t OM.d. V'e..plA-C-e.- A-f~b~, ~38 /)f1JJdo;.Jbnc.(c.... '-!1Jer;u.,A, ou+-.1V'o.ut 1},t:Jd.. '(~li.t SI&- rff hvu>o- cI~ b(j ~ rl,u~S, " ,. C c;;t ou:t aM. c:L Ire- d t? b yo ~C Ie.. j "I L9--tS ,rt .pvovd- lU,) d. r.~trt ~'l ~ of hOlA~ / po;ptu..P-/ I~ f't I.UOrl~I"A'" Ilk MIt~}../e.x- f\'ccordl'JJJ -ro .sf4.,JdAV"'d. pV'"Pc:h ce... . A~IJ. u..9J1-s.L ~v-o~ .4-.0d... S(~ b~l~ It. W~ l\ 1 deA-~i~ o h c..k 11.5 ~e-k..d. .. C.l~" ~ Jvb 6'Tt~ f()).) l!oM.p Ie:\l"'-L offV'oJe.zt" · ~\"L'c..k.5 re.p(A-c..e.. IP ~U MA-+c..~ A-s c.\Os.\?1/t-S pos>>-ibk-, p,Jc.d b(j ()uJ.uL'r :t1t llropooc horoby 10 fumish material and labor - compleleln accordanco with above spocilications, lor tho lum 01: - - ~4L~, < f:jjj/:i'7b<:'-' (s_._L4J_~a..e~ P'~Sii'~':zJ~.__~2:'7;__ .,', .___~k-H~__.._..n.___'______ "~t~~~w~~d~t~~~,;.;,;,;,;;;- --A~I;O~;.<l--~" -. __nd_.._.. .-......_-~.-- ~. .~.. ... . -... < ~~I~rd pl'actlUl. My alt""ahon 1)1 demllOt'llrom aboV' lpeclatlon. II\YOI . 'dfa COlli WIt be '.lICUled OIlty upon wntlan orders, and WlI becomrt an ._tra chiI OVII ~ Slgnalure -- ~ - . -X:. - -~ "'- aboYt th, '1IImAI.. An agte.mlln" conhngllnl upon Iln~lIl. aCCldllntl 0' dlla,1 ~'ond OUI N I 'Th I be ..:3 ~ ".-- contrtll. Owne, 10 calty bra,lomado and ol1\ef necelsary IOIYIIOCIl Out WQt1IlIfI IIa lull, covared bO e, . 15 proposa ay -:"'\ by Wor\men', ~tlon ",,,,,'Inct! wIlhdrawn V US It nol accepted wllhln V. days ~lmplDnrr of llropoonl - Th. abo,o pl~", spcc"~ahon. and corllMions 810 sahslaclOfY Rnd lUO hereby accepled You are aulholllOd 10 do Ihe WOOl AI SPOClfIOd. Paymonl Will he mndo ns oulllnod nbo\le. S.gnatulO 001001 Acceplnnce; SignnlulO DlAItJ1lfFS E.'l' llropoonl Pogo No, of Pagos 1st Cla7g7g Building & Remodeling .. Mechanlcsburg, PA 'We make commitments not promises' PROPOSAl.SU~OlO ----- / - r-t' ---.. '",QNE--- .. I DA1.---j------:- --,- - eQ.r..9-1_fJ:___._~ L..._____ ,_1t:....t.~t;J 7.t3_{.__ ___rQ- b-_.?..s_..._ _' SlREEl Li.j..D_L.~flv:..C! O.u.&_gd._____:'~A:~_______. ____..._____________ ' CllY, SlA1E AND liP CDOE /J JOOLOCAlKlN ..5irJJ~ rt~Ct9: '2r2~ ARCHITECT DATE OF PLANS F---..-----'.- JOB PHONe W. hereby lubmIt IpeC/flc.IIIM$ Ind e'lltY\I.t..lot: ~ CJ:t oJi: aM.d. l(\e.plA-c-e..... 4f~by..- 538 I1qJJdo;J bnc.{L --rheJ)U,,"\ ou;-r, -tV'o.ut .qJJcl '(~lj;t side- of hoUVL cI~ bJ ~'('oIP~5, . ,. C~ ou::t aM.,J. I,re..dv hrt~lc.. jOI19-tS M .pV>fld- o.vd. \---jlrt ~'l L- 01 heLo{ Sa-a- I fo;p-h~1 ,''' fr 1.U0 rl~,"A~ It k M/H)}.Je.Jr" f\'ccord'}.)ji '"to .s+APdAv-cL p'("'pC:hce... · A~IJ. lL9A-sL -Pro;;t fr.0d.. S(~ br-l~ 1"- W,4l\ ,(!'\eA-"'\~ o h c..k A 5 ~e.-k..d. .. C.le.~~ er 01)6 5'tt~ urtJJ.) C!oM.rl~lOX offV'oJ~zt · ~l"ic..k.5 re-p(A-c.e.. lP~U M.A-+c:.~ A-s c..\Os.\Qi- ;r5 pt><;.,>-lbk.-, p1c.lc.eJ ba ouJ.LI(..r- ~ ~c ~ropooe hereby to furnish malorlalond labOr - complotoln aCCOlllanco wilh ebove speci1""Uons, lot tho sum 01: Po,_~.... -'. ~nL~~ ,< .. 1jjj~-.n ($~J.9~e.~ 5!?~:ZJ~____c9..5_~ , ,_ . '/Jk-.MCd __u_,___ -~'I1~_ea-""'- 4/e...-b.~____ AI mill rMlMd 10 be .1 1peaf..7.u wortIlO be compIetod In . ~~. mannel Itcordlng '~ndltd p'1C\JC". My ./I.rallOn Of d.WlbOn lrom abovt apocl1allOnl invotvlnO ..11. co.'l WIll be ..ew\tld My upon llrntlen ordera, and WIll bealrnt an II"" tharoe oye, lna _boY. the "lIma'.. An tgr..menll coollng.nl upon .In...., aCCldenta Of dellY' beyond our conltOl Owne, to CArry 11f', tarnal>> and other f'IlICosury Il'lluranc.. OUt wort..e,. 11"Uft)' (:O'o'ored try WOl\men', ~nutlor1ln"lI.r<< .,... ~~~~l~~~--~Ol:---~~~;J?L_ __ NOI~~ 4~~C? wllhdrBwnby US" nol acceptodwllhln .__ V-~_. _.._'!J:2..~' ~lcctplnnCt of 1Jcopoonl- Tho nhove proces, spec"""t..n. end condlllOO$ Bre uhslilclory and are hereby accopted, You BIO authOrlzod Ie do lho work 8S speciliod Payment will bo mado as outlined abovo. SlgnlllUlO Dale 01 AcceplnncQ: , Slgnaturo D~AI wnn=s {;.')( u .... I ~' n~ ~ ~ , P< JI o I') ~ . ~~tio ~ I r 2 to t;" ~8~ffi <( ~- ~ !I ~ ti x it z ~ ' . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~~ ~ :> ~ ~ ~ s <( 111 ~ " 6 ~ ~. ~ u&l U"'> en . ~~~ hi ~.~ :., :,1 . ~~,~~;.',', ......,,'-,. t 1_.,;.1 .= "'- lJ) .... N .'1' : :~:I: . co -. = -, , .,. ::1 'l~t';' ". ~ '., " GEORGIA L. LENTZ, Plaintiff v, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW JONES MASONRY RESTORATION CORP" Defendant NO. 1525-1995 REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM AND NOW, comes Plaintiff, GEORGIA L. LENTZ, by and through her attorney, Paul Bradford Orr, Esquire, with the following Reply to Defendant's Counterclaim: 1. Admitted, 2, Admitted, 3, Admitted. 4, Admitted in part and denied in parI. It is admitted only that on or about June 28, 1994, Defendant eommenccd work on the project. All remaining aspects of this averment arc denied, To the contrary, Defendant failed to comply with the terms of the contract in that windows and doors were not properly scaled, nor were flower beds and shrubs properly protected, nor was the front porch roof properly protected as Dcfendant eommcneed work. 5, Admitted, 6, Admitted, 7. Admitted, By way of furthcr answer, howcver, Plaintiff requcsted that Defendant leave the work site duc 10 thc significant damagc that Defendant was continuing to cause to Plaintiffs brick farm house, 3, Admitted in part and dcnied in part, It is admitted that on September 21, 1994, Defcndant sent a ICller to Plaintiff offering to repaint mortar on Plaintiffs brick house, All remaining aspcets of this averment arc dcnicd. To the contrary, Dcfendant's liability is clearly implied by the Ictter dated Septembcr 21, 1994, and thc subsequent actions of Defcndant's employecs, 9, Admitted, '. VERIFICATION I verify that the stntements made in this document arc true and correct. I understand that false statements herein arc mnde subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. e.s. Section fi 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. ~reL,~k GEORGIA L. LENTZ, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : CIVIL ACTION. LAW : NO. 1525-1995 v. JONES MASONRY RESTORATION CORP., Defendant CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, PAUL BRADFORD ORR, ESQUIRE, do hereby certify that on the N.\-l day of SUL ~ , 1995, I caused a true and correct copy of Plaintiffs Reply to Defendant's Counterclaim to be served upon the following counsel of record by first-class U.S. Mail by depositing the same in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, as follows: llropoool Paga No. of Pagas 1st Cla7g7s Building & Remodeling .'V Mechanlcsburg, PA 'We mIke commitments not promises' PROPOSAl. SUJ"'""ED TO,. I -r- bJ4J2Jm-1-11 ^~_'- "2. STnEET . I VA /J / f.tJ...L-,":rX:t:!t:?~&:--A_d.( CITY,STATEANDIIPC<jDE ^ 'r-" T J~ r'JL 0 u_ ARCHITECT PHO"26 b - () 7 g"J5 - /6 - ~i~==_~ JOO NAME JODlOCA"OPl _~/I{~ I JOB PHONE w. hereby'ubmi1 apeoesI'lUllOf'll and "tamll.slot: @I1Move..AtJd r-ef(.4Ce... ;ftc.ill- IIi" -JroA-ItJ.J:d- i'"'~~ s,~ ~,hol.l;~ dl}-~A?-d 6r:J 8r/J..,clv- dtA.l"V"'IV bHc..1:- reo - to'*+I~C1 .' ~i<eM.O~ A-iJd. r'1l~~ AIt.tM,I.vUM lPludo~ -t-r-:M. a+~1/ l.Ul~dot.U.7 AJ..?d dOO'rSJf}(.pro..o-+I1J.Jd I"'lgl.v"-t .5lk of hQ4.>R- I A-Il dA-J.<.~J bcJ'~ ...,'J~ 106 \s @I?~rj'\r- (tJJ J ~a...4-t ,"00+ -P 1,9cS-~'L7) A- t -fr-oEt- fOvw~ ftJJd. V'L~lloo-ffoV'c...k dA-MA-~ ~(f dvo1iJJe.y-I..s c;> ~ LC.l \(. ftJPJ ~,Q..l A\^ou..p J A- It uH.JdDu!)~ flJj J dlOo r 5 I (!.le~1J Lf: f job ;/te... fA. fO.1J C.OM.f lcl"o 0 , 'J:,u 5 -f,4- it jJe..r.v A I t.t M', JJ Lt fo'L 6/t'rV1' I flrl)>L: 0.. It- o!v B \..\ c.. k dooV"'" .41 r" ')J ~ce- - b' ~e 11 opo e hereby 10 lurnl meterial and labor - cample" In acconlanca th abova I ..Ior .hBlum 01: 8~ '~(s-J_~b~ P'''''''i1~u,~ /J/ A 1/~:1~z.pe) ./ ----=:ffI. ~ 1#MC.i'" L:.-J)-~ '1e.n~ -t2.s.-.$_'7o-'Pc.v~C.~~P-A-jIlM;.,IJu _-,-f)VQd~__/E. Jc:f~-jl-~--~_"_ ... __ AI "",,,tIaI .. QIJA'antH(j 10 be II speofled All ~ 10 be COfT"Cl&eled In . 1fII'Of1r.InaNl. tN;;J; AUlhonled ac.con:Jlng 10 ,r.ndard pt'CIlceI My ,nll,bon Of' devwloon lrom abov. &peClllclllonJ invotvv1o Slnnalure . 'lltll COIlS "'" be 'IKUted onty I4JOn llOnnltn OftSen, and WI. become an 'In d\I owr and ''If - _ - _ - ~. .boY. th, ..llml.l, An 'gr,.""nll conllnoenl upon link", .ccldentl Of delays't.,ond QU' Nolo' This pr I ma:r, be :J]J control Owner 10 caffy hUl, lOINoo And (!the, necedlry lnSuranc. Our \IWOfl.,. at.1uGy covlfcd thd b II no' e led Ihl d by Wor\m.,", COn1pen$IIlon tnlufanc. 'I'll lawn y us a p n ___ _ __ _ _ ayl. ~.ccrplnnce of lIropoonl- The Dboya pr~a.. .peclficatlon. and Coodllior1l are lahsladory and ruo hOloby accopted You ara aulhOfilOd 10 do tho wolk as lpocllied. Pavmonl Will be mado 8S oulllned abovQ, SlgnlllulO . __ ___ _ . OaloofAccoplilrw:e: _ ____-. Slgnnluro I PLA/".nl~l=s ~ en' ~.)' ~.. ,~;.~ -- ~.: r' ", . '-. , >:") c., " ;- -i _'''.,! . .. ".t.J ',' '~ ",.:::J ; -, . .. . . RIlIIIN;,IlN\N I) (i EH,\I./)() CEFlllrJED TFlIJE ,.\.." "''''''''. ,,,,, ( '1" 'N" 11 0'" fl'\R" Gl N A LAND COI1RECT COpy p,o, BIJX ".\.'n. 11^1t1t1~IIlJIHj. PI'N"~"'I\~ 711 I ".; (717) ~;I~.lI!,:!!i GEORGIA L. LENTZ IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA vs. Plaintiff, JONES MASONRY RESTORATION CORP., : No. 1525-1995 Defendant. CIVIL ACTION - LAW ANSWER TO COMPLAINT CONTAINING COUNTERCLAIM AND NOW, comes Defendant, JONES MASONRY RESTORATION CORP., by and through its attorney, Robert L. Buzzendore, Esquire, and in support of its Answer to Complaint avers as follows: 1. Admitted. 2. Admitted. 3. Admitted. 4. Admitted. 5. Admitted, 6. Admitted. 7. Admitted in part, denied in part. It is admitted that one of Defendant's employees may have indicated acceptance of the agreement. It is specifically denied that the person had authority as an agent to accept the agreement. B. Admitted. 9. Admitted. 10. Admitted. 11. Admitted in part, denied in part. It is specifically denied that certain items as identified in Plaintiff's allegations were agreed upon as part of the contract. a. Denied. Defendant did not agree to cover and seal all windows and doors. To the contrary, Defendant only agreed to cover the windows with tape, but this was not for the protection against dust. b. Denied. It is denied that Defendant agreed to cover the flower beds and shrubs. To the contrary, although Defendant did not agree to this provision, Defendant did cover the shrubs and some tomato plants as a courtesy to Plaintiff. c. Admitted. 12. Denied. It is specifically denied that Plaintiff discussed the provisions mentioned in Paragraph 11 directly with Defendant's representative. 13. Admitted. 14. Admitted in part, denied in part. It is admitted that Plaintiff's Agent paid $1,500.00 to Defendant's representative, but it is specifically denied that the agreement was sealed by a handshake. 15. Admitted. 16. Denied. It is denied that Defendant failed to seal the windows or protect the flower beds. To the contrary, the Defendant sealed the windows with plastic to protect them from the chemicals used in the restoration process. The plastic will not ensure protection from dust but Defendant cleaned and rinsed the dust away afterwards. 17. Denied. It is specifically denied that Defendant's daughter arrived due to the complaints of Plaintiff's Agent. To the contrary, the plastic was en route prior to the complaints. 18. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the averment and therefore, strict proof thereof is demanded. 19. Denied. It is denied that 538 bricks were damaged by Defendant. To the contrary, Defendant may have damaged approximately 15 bricks during the course of work. However, Defendant repaired approximately 20 bricks. 20. Denied. After reasonable investigation, Defendant is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the averment and therefore, strict proof thereof is demanded. 21. Admitted in part, denied in part. It is denied that Plaintiff's Agent discussed concerns with Defendant's workers at the job. Rather, Plaintiff's Agent harassed Defendant's workers and refused to comply with Defendant's instructions to confer with the office. 22. Admitted. 23. Admitted. 24. Admitted in part, denied in part. It is specifically denied that Defendant completed the work in an unworkmanlike manner. To the contrary, Defendant completed the work in a professional manner. It is admitted that Plaintiff directed Dafendant to leave the premises. 25. Denied. It is denied that Defendant caused damages as alleged in Paragraph 18 or that he caused irreparable damage as detailed in this paragraph. a. Admitted in part, denied in part. It is denied that Defendant caused irreparable damage to the front and right side flashing. It is admitted that Defendant caused an 1/16 inch nick in the flashing. b. Denied. It is denied that Defendant caused damages to the aluminum trim in the windows and doors. c. Denied. It is denied that Defendant caused damages to the roof flashing on the porch. d. Denied. It is denied that Defendant caused damages to the aluminum carriage door. 26. Admitted. 27. Admitted. 28. Admitted. COUNT I BREACH OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 29. Paragraphs one through twenty-eight are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 30. Paragraph thirty is a legal conclusion to which no responsive pleading is required. To the extent any facts are averred, they are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded. 31. Denied. It is specifically denied that Defendant directly or indirectly caused damages to the premises. To the contrary, Defendant completed the work in a professional manner. Strict proof thereof is demanded. WHEREFORE, Defendant requests this Honorable Court to enter judgment in its favor and against Plaintiff. COUNT II BREACH OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT UNWORKMANLIKE PERFORMANCE--FAILURE TO COMPLETE v ~ it : 32. Paragraphs one through thirty-one are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 33. Denied. It is denied that the Defendant failed to perform items which were required by the contract. To the contrary, Defendant performed its services in a workmanlike manner. a. Denied. It is denied that protection of the flower beds and shrubs existed as part of the agreement. b. Denied. It is denied that Defendant failed to properly clean the work area. To the contrary, Defendant cleaned the area as work progressed on the project. 34. Paragraph thirty-four is a legal conclusion to which no responsive pleading is required. To the extent any facts are averred, they are specifically denied and proof thereof is demanded. 35. Denied. It is specifically denied that Defendant breached the agreement and therefore, failed to cure any breach. To the contrary, in an effort to satisfy the customer's concern, Defendant offered to perform additional work at no charge to Plaintiff. WHEREFORE, Defendant requests this Honorable Court to enter judgment in its favor and against Plaintiff. COUNTERCLAIM Defendant further asserts that it has a cause of action against the Plaintiff of the following nature and character: 1. On or about June 28, 1994, Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a contract for the restoration of masonry. 2. The Plaintiff and Defendant agreed to a fee of $7,892.00 for services to be performed in connection with the contract. 3. On or about June 28, 1994, Plaintiff paid $1,500.00 as a down payment on the contract. 4. On or about June 28, 1994, Defendant commenced work on the project in accordance with the terms of the contract. 5. On or about August 19, 1994, Plaintiff paid $1,964.00 toward the balance of the contract price. 6. On or about September 6, 1994, Plaintiff paid $1,964.00 toward the balance of the contract price. 7. On or about September 21, 1994, Plaintiff requested that Defendant leave the work location. " '! Ii il ; I I, I 8. On or about September 21, 1994, Defendant sent a letter to Plaintiff offering to repoint the mortar at no additional cost. Defendant admitted no liability by this proposal and he offered it as means of resolving the customer's concerns. 9. On or about September 26, 1994, Defendant submitted an invoice to Plaintiff in the amount of $2,464.00 for the final balance of the contract. 10. On or about October 13, 1994, Defendant sent a letter to Plaintiff requesting payment of the balance and explaining the moisture problem. 11. Defendant complied with the applicable terms of the contract and performed the work in a workmanlike manner. VERIFICATION I verify that the statements made in the foregoing Answer to Complaint and Counterclaim are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. (). &. '- Reamus E. Jones, Pr sent Jones Masonry Restoration Corp. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Robert L. Buzzendore, Esquire, do hereby certify that on the 9th day of May, 1995, I caused a true and correct copy of Defendant's Answer to Complaint and Counterclaim to be served upon the following counsel of record by first class mail by depositing same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania: Paul Bradford Orr, Esquire 78 West Pomfret Street Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013 ROBINSON & GERALDO, By Ro e L. uzzen or. ROBINSON & GERALDO 4407 North Front P.O. Box 5320 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110 Attorney 1.0. No. 55977 Attorney for Defendant GEORGIA L. LENTZ, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. NO. 1525 CIVIL 1995 JONES MASONTY RESTORATION CORP., Defendant NOTICE OF HEARING BY BOARD OF ARBITRATORS YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the Board of Arbitrators appointed by the Court in the above captioned case will sit for the purpose of their appointment in the above captioned action, on Monday December 4, 1995, at 10 a.m., in the Second Floor Hearing Room of the Old Cumberland County Court House, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, BOARD OF ARBITRATION Dated: November 1995 By: William A. Duncan, Chairman U'1> ~ :";"~ = .- c_ ,~r' ..! ~. ~,; .", ,~. " " ~ ~M <-t . ,. . .: - ~;: ;~ .._....J ,_.f. . ~ I:~~ [)~ .... ~i .... I 'r! .~ ~ .~ . P: .2: ~ ~ , I o l') I~ [)~I ~ ~ ~ 0 ~I!' . ~ ~ .., ti" ...:l <( e:- ::i . ~ ti d :> ~~ z ~ . ~ ~ ~ P=l~~~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ u ~ , . \ . . GEORGIA L. LENTZ, Plaintiff v. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION - LAW JONES MASONRY RESTORATION CORP., Defendant NO. 1525.1995 COMPLAINT AND NOW, eomcs Plaintiff, GEORGIA L. LENTZ, by and through hcr allorney, Paul Bradford Orr, Esquirc, with the following Complaint: 1. GEORGIA L. LENTZ (hcreinafter refcrred to as Plaintift) is an individual and citizcn of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with an address located at 1401 Arcona Road, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 17055. 2. JONES MASONRY RESTORATION CORP. (hcrcinaftcr rcfcrrcd to as Dcfendant) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of thc Commonwealth of Pcnnsylvania, with a principal place of business located at 1370 Howard Strcet, Harrisburg, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, 17105. 3. Bruce Shuey (hereinaftcr refcrred to as Plaintiffs "Agent) is an adult individual also residing at 1401 Areona Road, Meehaniesburg, Pennsylvania, 17055. 4. Venue is proper in eumbcrland County as Dcfendant regularly conducts business hcre and as transactions and oeeurrcnces upon which Plaintiffs claims are based took place in Cumberland County, Pcnnsylvania. 5. On or about Junc 28, 1994, pursuant to a wrlllcn proposal offercd by Dcfcndant, the rcstoration of Plaintiffs masonry work, was cntcred into by the partics. (Sec Plaintiffs Exhibit A.) 6. Tbc agrecmcnt entered into on Junc 28, 1994, providcd: "Restoration of masonry, c1can brick by chemical proecss, rcpoint restoration arca 100%, replaec damaged brick with brick to match cxisting as c10sc as possible, repoint and rebuild chimney as necessary to makc structurally sound." 0;" \1 s Vb ~. oJJ? \'10 heJ.- 7. On June 28, 1994, Plaintiffs Agent acecptcd thc agrccment via a telephonc authorization by Plaintiff. At that tlmc, Defendant's reprcscntative verbally aeknowlcdged aeecptanee of thc offer by Plaintiff in thc same phone conversation. 8. On June 28, 1994, Plaintirl's Agcnt submitted $1,500.00 cash as a downpaymentto Defcndant's representativc, Ricardo TIlOmpson. (See Plaintiffs Exhibit A) 9. Although the original cstimate given by Dcfcndanttl Plaintiff was $6,892.00, the agreemcnt entcred into 011 Junc 28, 1994, was for $7,892.00. 10. Thc additional $1,000.00, according to Defendant, was to reconstruct a chimney If necdcd. 11. Plaintiffs Agcnt and Dcfcndant's company representativc did a walk-through of the propcrty on Junc 28,1994, and the following Items were agreed upon as part of the contract: A. All windows and doors would be covcred, taped and seal cd so as to prevent dust and othcr dirt resulting from the grinding of the mortar joists from cntcring the housc. B. AlIl10wer beds and shrubs wcre to bc covcred to proteetthcm from dirt and dust. e. Thc front porch roof would also bc eovcrcd to keep dust and mortar mix from affecting thc one-ycar-old shingles. 12. In addition to the Plaintiffs Agent and thc Defcndant's rcpresentativc discussing the itcms as sct forth in thc preecding paragraphs, thcy wcre also discussed dircetly bctween Plaintiff and Dcfendant's rcprcsentative. 13. On June 28, 1994, a discussion bctwecn Defendant's rcpresentativc and Plaintiff occurred whereby the Dcfendant's represcntative agreed to verbally accept Plaintiffs signature on thc proposal by way of Plaintiffs Agent's executing Plaintiffs signaturc on said contract. 14. Plaintiffs Agent further scaled the deal with a handshakc and tendcrcd a downpaymcnt of $1,500.00 cash to Defendant's agent. 15. On or about June 29, 1994, two employces from Defendant's Company arrived on the prcmises and began IVork. 16. Employees of Defendnnt fniled to scnlnny windows or doors, fuiled to protect flower beds, and failcd to protect other property in thc surrounding area. 17. After Plnintiffs Agcnt pcrsistently eomplnined, Defendant's daughter arrived at 1401 Areona Road, Meehaniesburg, Pennsylvania, with plastic and duct tapc, and bcgan covering up thc prcviously agrced upon areas. 18. A~ work continued on the project, Plaintiffs Agent noticed numerous, unsightly grinder marks on the old bricks. 19. Before the job was eomplcted, approximatcly 538 bricks wcre severely damagcd by Dcfcndant's employccs. 20. Although Plaintiffs Agent allemptcd to monitor the work of Defendant's employces, hc was unablc to bc constantly on thc job sitc. 21. Each and cvery time Plaintiffs Agent was on thc job site, howcvcr, he voiecd conccrns to Defendant's cmployces regarding the poor job thcy were doing. 22. Many timcs throughoutthc masonry rcstoration process, Plaintiffs agent contaetcd Dcfendant's reprcscntative, Rick Thompson, with concerns. Each and cvery time Defcndant's rcprescntativc assurcd Plnintiffs agent that the job will "look good whcn it is finished." 22. On or about August 19, 1994, Plaintiff puid $1,964.00 as first paymcnt on rcstoration contract to Dcfendnnt's rcpresentativc, Kathlecn L. Joncs. (See Plaintiffs Exhibit B.) 23. On or about Scptcmber 6, 1994, Plaintiff submillcd an additional payment of $1,964.00 to Defcndant's represcntativc, Ricardo Thompson. (See Plaintiffs Exhibit C.) 24. Due to continued shoddy and unworkmanlike performance, Plaintiff finally direetcd DcfendantlO rcmovc himsclf and his employecs and matcrials from the job site. This oceurrcd on or about September 21, 1994. 25. In addition to the significant damagc to thc older bricks rcferred to in paragraphs 18 and 19, supra, Dcfendant's employees did irreparable damage to the following: A. Front and right side flashing housej B. Aluminum window trim in all windows und doorsj e. Roof tlashing on front porch and right roof porch; D. Aluminum carriage door at right entranec of house. 26. Complaints and cross-complaints were tiled bcfore District Justice Ronald E. Klair and a hearing was held on or about February 24, 1995. 27. The Complaint and cross-complaint rcfcrred to immediately above was dismissed without prcjudiec by District Justice Klair. 28. A timely appeal was then filed in the Prothonotary's Office of the Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas by Plaintiff. COUNT I BREACH OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 29. Plaintiff incorporates by rcference paragraphs 1 through 28 in their entirety. 30. Thc actions of Dcfendant as aforesaid arc wilful and constitute a material breach of the agreement cntered into bctween Plaintiff and Defcndant. 31. As a direct and proximatc rcsult of thc actions of the Dcfendant as aforesaid, Plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer serious injury, including but notlimlted to the loss of significant valuc of her circa 1860 brick farm housc, which was thc sight of thc work pcrformed by Dcfcndant, in an amount which has yet to bc detcrmincd. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands that this Court enter judgment in her favor and against Defendant in the amount of $16,488.00 togethcr with costs and interest and attorney's fees. COUNT II BREACH OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACf UNWORKMANLIKE PERFORMANCE. FAILURE TO COMPLETE 32. Plaintiff incorporates hy reference paragraphs 1 through 31 in their cntirety. 33. Dcfendant has wholly ncglectcd to do and pcrform certain things which wcre expressly or by necessary implication requircd to bc done and performed by the agrecment, as follows: ~ I " " , " A. Prcparation and protection 01' all windows and doors and flower bcds and shrubs prior to bcglnning masonry restoration: B. Total failurc by Defcndant's cmployees to c1can up job sitc in a proper fashion as work was completed. 34. Dcfendant bas performed in a poor, impropcr and unworkmanlike manner. 35. Defendant has failed, refused, and continues to rcfuse to cure the aforesaid breaches, despite Plaintiffs repcaled demand. TIle reasonable cost of remedying the aforcsaid breaches Is in excess of $16,000.00. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully demands judgment against Defcndant in an amount of not less than $16,488.00, togcther with costs and interest and attorney's fees. R"~'~Jm~J~ (l Paul Bradl r rr, Esq. Counsel for Gcorgia L. Lcntz 78 Wcst Pomfret Strcct Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 258.8558 Supremc eourtlD No. 71786 P.lljtl NIJ r.:t P,1{JI15 HARRISBURG 1717) 233.8323 lJrl1pLHi~tl Jones Masonry Restoration Corp, t 370 Howard Slm~t PO, Bo' 2313 H~Hf!bbUlg. PA 17105 FAX (7171 23J.8153 "lOlIlif 766-0786 CARLISLE 17171249.0669 LEBANON 1717)274'1140 I: I /: CHAMBERSBURG 1717) 267-3309 PAOPI:SAL :';Vll'-1I"ED fO 5HllET .CII 'j,\t,lf 1401 Meania Road elf)' <;~,,'c At.D :11 (cot f~hanicsbu ,PA 17045 ,en lQC,lT!r:t1 SlllOO Anel.jller [,,\rE Of' "'-AI.', JIJ[! I'llQIlE '1'.'",1'1'" C i '(11'1"',1 ..r..... 1":,ltolYl\ .1",1..,,,,,~\,..5 '~I Restoration of masonry Clean brlck by chemical process Repolnt restoration area 100\ Replace damaged brick with brick to match existing as close as possible (approximately 15) Repoint and rebuild chimney as necessary to make structurally sound All IoOrk pertains to facade (south) and east walls only PLEASE OOrEl Water and electric furnished by """er COntractor not responsible for damage to interior, landscaping or any painted surface Please sign and return yellOool copy. llh'l.IntpullI' hereby 10 furnish matenal and labor - complete In accorrtance WIth above specilicalions. lor the sum 01: ,___SeV,en_thousand,eight _hundred.ninety~tw:I..__-.__.-. dollars IS _-7,892.00______ ), ",I.m..""'}I...!n."''',I'!''';'lA~ $1,500.00 d""" payment, 3 invoices at $1,964.00 @, ...' . . _" __$~QQ,!l!L~l.a!!C'L!lpon-sanpletion. ___...__.. ..__. . __._.".'. ._________ J,...!i.Linterest.....dcj!!9.. to.Gov__unpaid J)Ulance_______ ,-- ~ --':.-------,--:' ,......,.."'.,.. 'l....'''._l..''~.''>l~~ .If-<1 IoJ ...'...... Lt... ,,,..,1......,,1,'.,\ ..~,...-.,.'.'......k~"~' "ul1'C/llt'.1 r\ 1.#:' _ -:::--:-' . 10-,'....'11"1 t., "'_1' :1.<........ ...... -"', 4""1.~'" ," ,10',""'"'' '",,,, ..t.,." "I"" ~,'.",,,,, '..n.' 'I S,ytnIL!tt .. ... .-.-..: ." , . "'~4 "''''.I~ ... t.. ..... ...., ~"'I ~l'''' "","',.., "",..., .... I .... 1_ ,'''''' I"" ,II..., t,...,~.. "..'f . '.1 01"......., ....,....... Ad ..,1"..',......, '","""'''''''''1'.' ,1' ..~ ~ ""." " yo,',. r...... ,j..... - '.' ~,nt( TI',~ l-lH'I~:..at ""~'. M ""lI"~I':t'^'" Ilf';.' "._ ,)..,.... '.- I .1", t,p '_ ..~.,_:_: ,., ,l....~. "'H' ""'. "",' I." ,. \ ;,~ ..",..... ~,.., J"" .' "',n, If.'.,....n' <.; "'"1'.....,.-..''''....., ,I ...,;! .l'~.;I'r;t"ll 'III It"'l _.. d"'r~ ..-'~ Arn'l'lillln' III 1.11'11111111;11- T'">tn," "",", '"'_"',,',>t,.,, ,\11'1 cC",1:l~)I'S. .1'1' ",,It.\!.llliH, ;tn., ;\'" r.....t1y .l,~n'llh"l '1".1'1 m.. lU!"""!1'<1 ~:~ ':'llb. .....''::'10,;1$ ~p,.... ",1 f;\''r'''+'Ill ""..j t,.. Ill,HI" l~, '1\>11''''''1 ;.1.",,' /J. '1~~ r;/~v l'll!~P';.r.~ql!,V'r'...'::;/..L/':i.:l tY:}, /" ' ~ . "~' . '>-1 ..' _J ..J ....t X_.....t- II.... , ,-..... --it'.....-. -;t- II. , ........ ....,,,.. .- :,~j"l!,,'" be. I~:-O'l r ~,:-:f -/;, -. "';" r . :'/~?r'l ~"J""j."... .... . . ,. .' ..- ./ /' ," ,"-'..' ~(d'u"';:-/"~~"'r-"""--- 100 I IDI'!' ^ GEORGIA L. LENTZ, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. NO. 1525 CIVIL 1995 JONES MASONRY RESTORATION CORP., Defendant NOTICE OF HEARING BY BOARD OF ARBITRATORS YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the Board of Arbitrators appointed by the Court in the above captioned case will sit for the purpose of their appointment in the above captioned action, on Monday December 4, 1995, at 10 a.m., in the Second Floor Hearing Room of the Old Cumberland County Court House, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. Dated: BO~:: oF' JBI;~t~ ~ cA--^- .Willi~ Duncan, Chairman . November 14, 1995 Robert Mulderig, Esq., Arbitrator George Douglas III, Esq., Arbitrator COPIES TO Paul Orr, Esq. Attorney for the Plaintiff 78 West Pomfret St. Carlisle, PA 17013 Robert L. Buzzendore Esq. Attorney for the Defendant 4407 N. Front St. P.O. Box 5320 Harrisburg, PA 17110-5320 GEORGIA L. LENTZ, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. NO. 1525 CIVIL 1995 JONES MASONRY RESTORATION CORP., Defendant NOTICE OF HEARING BY BOARD OF ARBITRATORS YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the Board of Arbitrators appointed by the Court in the above captioned case will sit for the purpose of their appointment in the above captioned action, on Monday December 4, 1995, at 10 a.m., in the Second Floor Hearing Room of the Old Cumberland County Court House, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. Datedl November 14, 1995 BOARD oF' By: . Willi' U\A ~ cA...A-- Robert Mulderig, Esq., Arbitrator George Douglas III, Esq., Arbitrator COPIES TO Paul Orr, Esq. Attorney for the Plaintiff 78 West Pomfret St. Carlisle, PA 17013 Robert L. Buzzendore Esq. Attorney for the Defendant 4407 N. Front St. P.O, Box 5320 Harrisburg, PA 17110-5320 GEORGIA L. LENTZ, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : CIVIL ACTION - LAW : NO. 1525-1995 Plaintiff v. JONES MASONRY RESTORATION CORP., Defendant CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this date, April 13, 1995, I mailed a true copy of Plaintiffs Complaint to captioned Defendant by U.S. Mail, Certified mail, postage prepaid, as follows: AND :I:T wAS Re.('.~J <1\" I ~ APR I~q r- as nrl-I!J. 0')\ CdVP Att4e.k.O ~ Jones Masonry Restoration Corp. 1370 Howard Street H,m,b'"" PA 17105 W Y t " ~: J.,) Ii il i1 .2 '&1 .. 8. Addrosseo', AddroBs (Only If requested .llC . and loe la pDldl , ~ ~~\;>;7gi-:-;~::\r . \:i~S,~..P~~I~';"2f."ddl"'1n"..rvIC"'; ", I'aliawlah ID recelvolhti ~_: ~'Comp1et.lt.m.3. and .'_ 6b.:. _ -: ., _ _ _:, ,.' ___ -- following "aervlcol '(far. an, extra 1(. .,~~~~1::H:;.:=~d::: :~:: ::,::':c:;~~:;7: ::C;~,' ::.~n 'OD~~, 0 Addroa~eo'l Addrel~' &:,' G ';~CMW:',;-.r;:'~-R~"elPt R.qutll~" ~ thlI ma/lpitc. b.iow the Irtld. number 2~ 0 Restricted Oollvery - 1-,-5t.-~TtMRI1um".ctlPlwl",howlowhori\'he.rtlc"w"d.u....,.dJndth.d.t. Consult 081m8110r for fee.- r 5. deWy.rld,'." ;,' '-. )li~gtZl:~:::'D~I~r~tion co~. ::..~~~:~~t31 ;'ii.1370..HC7ilard street:. ~Reglalered Dlnaurad l B ' ; Harrisburg; . PAi'l7105 CertlflDd 0 coo . "/' 0 EXDrola Mill 0 Ralurn Recelpl for Ij [';; r andl 0 t.4 7. o.'~Ha'tl_ , Docombor 1991 ~u,. QPQ: 'm-352'714 DOMESTIC RETURN REC;;EIPT._. ," G V> ,-eeO/aC 'e 'DOM / C1SJrCJ (.;l4::,-17CJ 0 ) \ \ ~ W.I-JI{jh S1 :t.-'"'C(-;y \ IS\J.' J fA- n 0\::' ~~~ ;U(s;,.8tJ:Sr; L1:Ro~("\:; 111u.ld-tnA'3(;;lL(S-Cj(.p6S) ~ g.. 'i3~clfoyc.t ~t J . ~y~mv\ISll) PA no\3 .5J.urzd. -~. ;;2~: J \ LP '? . 51f 1~lJ.1 OV'~(;)6~:~C;S3) ~' .qJ < 1'6 W. VbI1,y~.et~"\: (/ t 0 Q.o-Y'lISlJ J p,o,. no\':, ~ J~~' ~ ~~ cu..b.rrr(l;l1JY 7 /..{JLl\.(/.. -.- C<.,X:: ~ '{\'~ . . 0 C -#" 1/1,;z '3-0 \ftJ \ , hJ~> 1(. \"V{ t L, 15lA.? un at o,.-.</. 'l\' S,< · \J.J\~ ~ \,W( rJ. Hb)'\J S-\-, ~., eo. 100"- c; 3d 0 . ! _u..~ .l.-l~v( (? A \'l \ \ Q::::n.)S ~d-() 1f~' , . - tnOtJCh ~ ~ ~ ~. 9!:J').-COc,J-S (J.{(0f.rf(I..X pLl , )...I'::s ,'a ~tl, ' t~::~,.cUz.b1r cdit?/1 Ii-e t'u_t/~ Dc..e (I !U e..8l.(/(C-l 17J-tc-ce. /0 (( ,f'/'1. fl'/th) U J{IU,Jj) rI ({){)I!{..i (J (/ , , . " .. , , ....... - - . -- . ,""~' ..> .' . . -_. -- :.-": Duncan & otto, P.C. Attorneys at law One Irvine Row Carlisle, Pennsylvnaia 17013 (717) 249.7780 FAX (717) 249.7800 WilIiam A. Duncan Susan J. Otto DATE: ,IJOVe.I'Ylh\'.r IY) \q~~") TO: 12 ohY..\-t FROM: \VILAI cA~ ~'ir- 2>\\\ "U1A,nCO,f") . ~ y hrty CAti 0 n \-\.e (A,Y I Y\3 D(~ l' Y RE: Number of Pages to follow this transmittal page: -1-- IF yOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES OR IF COPIES ARE NOT LEG~BLE, PLEASE TELEPHONE: (717) 249-7780 FAX: (717) 249-7800 . l--lo.VcA. tOrY 'it fi, \ \ DvJ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in and with this facsimile message ia legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the receiver of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or distribution of copy of this telecopy is strictly prohibited. If you have received this telecopy in error, please immediately notify us by telephone and return the original message to us at the addrcss above via the United States postal Servicc. Thank you. Duncan & otto, p.e. Attomeys at law One Irvine Row Carlisle, Pennsylvnaia 17013 William A. Duncan Susan J. Otto (717) 249.7780 FAX (717) 249.7800 DATE: ..bl L) V ~ I'y'd~ {I_r TO: 'PCAIA \ Ov V IY\ IqqL:) , FROM: '2->\\\ D 1lI1") (.0..11, - , RE: Ay b l-tyCl. t \ on \-\-e ~Y" i V1J 'D.le. LI Number of Pages to follow this transmittal page: ~ IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES OR IF COPIES ARE NOT LEG~BLE. PLEASE TELEPHONE: (717) 249-7780 FAX: (717) 249-7800 \~\cur01 Co f'j to .Pu \) l1 W CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in and with this facsimile message is legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the receiver of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or distribution of copy of this telecopy is strictly prohibited. If you have received this telecopy in error, please immediately notify us by telephone and return the original message to us at the address above via the United States postal Service. Thank you. LI'O en - (717) 2:1'l-ll52.~ "" :IC C>- o IV> C'..I >-,.. "'>- ;!:r. "",o:::t~ 0'%3% u.:o ~ .~-:-:o::- nl'.~.':.~ ;~: ~':~ iJ ~ '.''-':~;~J ~. .,,- (. ;.1 ~~ \.~. ....., <'J ..., => - '.' ~ \ ~ ~&; Si~ 1-\ ~ --+ 'X ~ '\--<. \:J ~ ,I'{ .~ , , , . 1',1) 1{11lIli-J~i()N .-\NI_' (it H,\IIII I ArllJlfhl "'; V":IJ (f':frtN..,,''(IIII(''I ,\, IA\\ 1111\ " t.'H 11-\llltl',IH JIH I. p, NNSYI "ANI" I 711l1~ '.'11 CERTIFIED TRUE MJD CORnErr COpy Y1!oI < \ -, t GEORGIA L. LENTZ, Plaintiff IN TIlE COURT OF Cm~ION PLEAS OF CUl-IBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 1525, CIVIL 1995 v. JONES 11ASONRY RESTORATION CORP., Defendant RULE l3l2~l, The Petition for Appointment of Arbitrators shall be substantially in the following form: PETITION FOR APPOnmtENT OF ARBITRATORS TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: Mr. Robert Buzzendore , counsel for the plaintiff/defendant in the abOVe! 1. 2. action (or actions), respectfully re!prosents that: The above-captioned action (or actions) is (are) at i~sue. The claim of the plaintiff in the action is $ 16. -IRR. 00 TIle counterclaim of the defendant in the action is $ 2.464.00 The follolJing attorneys are interested in the case(s) us counselor are othar- wise disqualified to sit as arbitrators: Hr. Paul Bradford Orr WHEREFORE, your petitioner prays your Honoruble Court to appoint three (3) arbitrators to whom the casa shall be submitted, iovt ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, <C. l'f}. ,y,/) 1.,('. /; . 19 c; Jj, in consideration of the foregoing petition, 1.-",' /~'nn) 7Jl/ll/tIl/l/ Esq., 'CtoIL(,t_))Ou {,~s.,IJJ: Esq., and K.()h cA__i- /NI.l/clc,c,'c ,Esq. /are appointed arbitrators in thel above-captioned action (or actions) as prayed for. P. J. Pate of Hearing: :Jate of Award: r. t~ t ~OTIC~ OF ~y OF AWARD LIt \ \ 1\ . I, ' - ~ow, the day or ,,1.)X.c..Q,\,~(, lC.t/\., 191-/(-, at~, ~.:t., the above award was entere upon the docket and ~otice :hereof given by ~il to the ?arties or their at:o~eys. Ar~itrators' cocpensation :0 be paid upon appeal: $ cll.D.oV "';;:ll'l~..t._ ;:1 It /(11)(4... ).. Protl{onotarv !Iv: l. I" {,: 11(;(';', -' . . , I Pt!puty ~. ''1:;] 'W{j" .1.7.."./.......,) ~ ~ ~~ ...J ~. ~J \.3 -lY fa: ~ ~ .~ ..:r r;; '" ~~ o. t- ~ ";>-=J; (J:.,. EE~ ::t: u-':..... n.. ". ~R ~J~~ - -:...~.:: o. I ..1., ...-LJt r.:. (j'.;io f'..: l" l:,l(iJ Cj ~I:!U. ". lJ. In ::; CJ I:, u (5'( 6"16'1 W ,~~'"'l n"~1"1 _ "--"11f. ~l.." 'l11f(J PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF APPEAL AND RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT (This prool 01 service MUST OE FILED W/T/flN TEN 110) DA YS AF lE/ll//f119 III1l ""'/CO 01 ilppeill. C'lUck ilppl/cablo bDxeS) COM140NWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF CU>IBERLAND ;.. AFFIDAVIT: I horeby swonr or affirm Ihnll served l!9 a copy of thD Nolico 01 Appool, Commonlj~as No,_25::l525 . IIpon tho District Jllslice designated therein on (dalD DI so,vice) Mt.RGH '2- 'l . 19 . 0 by porsonat sorvice Kl by (certllled) (rDgistered) moll. sendor's - . receipt attached herotD. a~uMn the nppellee, (name)-.Jon"" M""am:y-RestoraHnn "0'1' . on ,.-tI1Al/c.H 2'7 . 19 c by personol serl'ice ~ by (costllifd) (registered) moll. sondor's rocolpt nUnched horatD, \-ll~ and further thatlservad Ihe Rulo to File 0 CDmplaintllccompanyingthoahove NoliceDI Appeal upon thD nppDlloe(s) towhDm ~ the Rule wns nddressDd on , 19~ by porsonnl servi 0 (certllied) (registered) mnil, sender's receipt DUached hereto, SWORN (AFFIRMED) AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME - 7-u. THIS 0/ DAY OF '7?l,,<rA .19--95 SignBturo olatli.nt ?/3.......,d~ .,Y~<, /'.~ SiUfliJtUtfl 01 ollicial betOIlJ whom all/dartl was mado Paul Bradford rr, Esq. Tirle 0' off,cia' . EAL IWNOA l. BIU:H14. NOrMY f'UBUC CAAusu: BORG G\ll4-1!fIll.NiO COU~lY PInES JANUARY 6, IIl96 " "" ='" .~ '" t:'a My commission expires on w .... W -0 ::s: - {l .., , ,',:. .,' :.. - c.D c.n . . I l p 1113 5h3 317 -,~ ~ Receipt for Certified Mall -....: No Insurance Covorago Provldod ~W'.l=U Do not use for Intornatlonal Mail 1508 Revorse) Senllo 'tJ'f(j' 'l'Ioward Street p..o, 51". '~GP Cnde Harr~sO rg, Pottalle PA 17104 $ ,3;) /./0 C"lll..<t 't'. SpeC...l Oall'ol'. he fl""IC'ed Dei....",!, re. en 1I,lu'n Ii.. wlI'Ig en 10 \\ 0.,. red - 1./0 G C , -, o o Ql M E o ... ~ $ .:2.S;;J. 7J Q bO " ~ F .. t:t. -I:.. '" I..J a. J.: ., , ,....., L~ 0 .".\ W W '-'1 <..w III C, () U .c. (>:> -<J 0 0 ~'\ t:; L.:\ ". \!,' 1i. K; Ii .... "'':::,:'" .t:.. P ;- E1 ,.. -" - :J;; jf l' ~~. ~ - CD -- PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF APPEAL AND RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT (Th,s p,ool DI sorvlco MUST BE FILED WITHIN TEN (10) DA YS AFTER 'IImg Ilia /lol'co 01 appoal, Chock appllcablo box os) COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF ; II AFFIDAVIT: I heroby SWDDr or o'IIrm Ihnl I served o n CDPY ollho NDlico of Appeal, Common Plens No, , IIpon Iho Dlslrlcl Jusllce deslgnnled Ihereln on (data 01 so,v;co) , 19_, 0 by pDrsonalservlce 0 by (certllled) (reglslerDd) mDII, sendor's recelpl allached herolo. and upon Iho Dppellee, (name) ,on . 19 n by personal service 0 by (certilled) (reglslOred) mall, sonder's recelpl Dllached herelo, o ond furlher that I sorvod tho RulD 10 FilD a Complainl accompanying IhD abDvo NDlico D' AppDa' upDn Iho appDlloe(s) 10 whDm Iho Rulo was oddressod on . 19_ 0 by personnl sorvlco 0 by (corllllod) (reglstored) mall. sonder's recelpl Dllached horelo, SWORN (AFFIRMED) AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF , 19_ Signatulo 01 altiao, SlgnatUfD of ott,Cla' bololO *',om a",da~lt I"dS madcJ Title of ott,ci., My commission O)cplres on ,19_. ~~ ~ >- C) , ~ n; -, e:> I':: c...... '"" IU>2 . - ?," <;:) (Jo, ' , ..:' -' ~.) ft-'" J:2- t: '.,- . . 0;; , " ~ 6" , . C"l I'll '-0 ~-~<., " J ; I: ns Ci..:t" -0 , f" ~; If ~~l~ ~ '. J "- \0 ~~ j CS Cl 0 '0 M '- l""'-'-D lr.T M :l\: M ~-lt J "'~ '" Oz " " '" " ~~ ..... ..... ~ ..... ..... ~>l <1J " '" '" 0 C'l "'''' '" '" ~ ~ cIi z~ < < 6l 0 -... -... 01>.1 .... ... < ~ 1'0 Si'" .... . c ~ ~ .... . '" ~ o .~ ...'" 0..'0 ~~j H C '" C r.. ~ ~ x z... o " 0 z ~ j l>l '" >'u.... II: o I ......... ~z~ tl P=l o ~ 0 0.. ~ co HUZ 00 .... ~ '" 0 .... Ill'" ~ ,.. t:>~.... . ;}~ < :> z 8:s!:; .... ~ '-' III 0 1>.1",< '" 1>.11-< ~1>.I::1 0 z'" l>l ~g;j z~~o '-' .....uuz ~ . v. : IN THE COURT or COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : CIVIL ACTION - LAW GEORGIA L. LENTZ, Plaintiffl Appellant JONES MASONRY RESTORATION CORP., Defendal)tl Appellce : NO. 1525-1995 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this date, January , 1996, I mailed a true copy of Plaintiffs Notice of Appeal to counsel of record for captioned Defendant by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Robert L. Buzzendore, Esquire Robinson & Geraldo PO Box 5320 Harrisburg, PA 17110-5320 ~j)R Paul Bradford Orr, Esquire Attorney for Plaintiff