HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-3852CUMBERLAND COUNTY
ADULT PROBATION
VS.
Jaime Lee MeElhattan
513 N. Enola Dr.
Enola, PA 17025
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTy
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NO. ~)~ '~_~ff.5'o,D CIVIL TERM
Defendant
RE: NO. 02-807 CRIMINAL TERM
PRAE~
TO THE PROTHONOTARY:
Enterjudgment in favor of plaintiff, Cumberland County Adult Probation, and against
Defendant in the amount of $ 2,627.89 pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. Section 9728 as set forth in the
attached statement of certified case costs and fines.
Dennis E. Lebo, Clerk of Court
Date: August 13, 2002
AND NOW, this .~ _~ day of _~_~/~
in favor of the Plaintiffan~ ---: - -, - .... - ~ --' ~Q°°'~,judgment is entered
,., agmnst me tJerenaant in the amount set forth above~
Attachment
cc: Defendant
Probation
Clerk of Court
Curtis R. Long~)~
u~u~3072302
CCS746
Case No. 2002-00807
*STATEMENT OF COSTs*
To: Dennis E. Lebo
Cumberland County - Clerk
1 Courthouse SqU~re
Carlisle, Pa I7013
Paqe 3
7?23/2002
of Courts
MCELHATTAN JAIME LEE
513 NORTH ENOLA DRIVE
ENOLA, PA 17025
~ 46.35 46.35
46.35
06/24/02 SHERIFFS COST
Totals
3.95
~ 3.95 3.95
3.95
07/02/02 COURT COSTS
Totals 21.47
~ 21.47 21.47
21.47
07/02/02 SHERIFFs COST
Totals 1.50
-- -- 1.50 1.50
1.50
07/02/02 OFF F.E. ACT158
Totals 5.00
5.00 5.00
5.00
07/02/02 CCC ACT 139
Totals
25.00
25.00 25.00
25.00
07/02/02 CVC ACT 139
Totals 15.00
15.00 15.00
15.00
07/02/02 DVC - ACT 44
Totals 10.00
10.00 10.00
10.00
07/02/02 STATE COST A
Totals
9.81
9.81 9.81
9.81
07/02/02 STATE COST B
Totals
14.72
14.72 14.72
14.72
07/02/02 JCP FEE
Totals 5.00
07/02/02
DISTRICT ATTY
5.00 5.00
5.00
15.00
15.00
UH1023072302
~CS746
Case No. 2002-00807
*STATEMENT OF COSTS*
Paqe 4
7?23/2002
To: Dennis E. Lebo
Cumberland County - Clerk of Courts
1 Courthouse Square
Carlisle, Pa I7013
MCELHATTAN JAIME LEE
513 NORTH ENOLA DRIVE
ENOLA, PA 17025
Totals
15.00
15.00
07/02/02 PLEA
Totals 125.00
~ 125.00
125.00
125.00
07/02/02 AUTOMATION FEE
Totals 5.00
~ 5.00
5.00
5.00
07/02/02 NON-DUI CP COST
Totals 200.00
~ 200.00
200.00
200.00
07/02/02 ADMIN. FEE
07/19/02 PYMT/CASH 40.00
40.00
~ 34.72 5.28
Totals 40.00 34.72 5.28
07/12/02
07/19/02
J/S RESTITUTION
PYMT/CASH
Totals
2129.53
2129.53
59.72 2069.81
2129.53 59.72 2069.81
07/12/02 ST - O.S.F.
07/19/02 PYMT/CASH 37.50
12.5o o
Totals 37.50 12.50 25.00
07/12/02 CO - O.S.F.
07/19/02 PYMT/CASH 37.50
37.50
12.50 25.00
Totals 37.50 12.50 25.00
Case Totals 2747.33 119.44 2627.89
You are liable for the above costs
Pursuant to Title 4
PA CSA 9728, the 2 of Judiciar an
un a' Prothonotar Y . d Judzcial r
P zd costs a ' ¥ is author P ocedure 4
the Sheriff fo~d~s~,~n 9~ecution an~Z~_~O confgss judgment 2n
~ ~..= uua±ec=lon. -~ m~=u~ same in the hands ~ all
We trust you will give the above account your prompt attention.
MARGARET C. BOGOVIC
Plaintiff
vs. · 03-3852
BRIAN L. BOGOVIC ·
Defendant · IN CUSTODY
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION LAW
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this~^~t~~'x' day of'~'~'~'~'~~J"'~"'-- 't ., 2004, upon
consideration of the attached Custody Conciliation Report, it is ordered and directed as follows:
1. The prior Order of this Court dated August 24, 2004 shall, continue in effect as modified by
this Order.
2. In the event either party intends to remove the Child from his or her residence for an
overnight period or longer, that party shall notify the other party in advance of the address and
telephone number where the Child can be contacted. Unless otherwise agreed between the parties,
notice under this provision shall be given at least 24 hours in advance by e-mail.
3. Each party shall notify the other party of the address and telephone number of third parties
who are providing care for the Child, other than individuals who are residing in the same household.
4. The parties shall continue to abide by Paragraph 5 of the .August 24, 2004 Order requiring
the parties to obtain an assessment from a counselor. However, as agreed between the parties, the
parties shall select a different counselor and contact the newly selected counselor by January 15, 2005
to schedule the first session.
5. The parties shall communicate directly with each other, without the direct involvement of
third parties, concerning major issues affecting the Child.
6. This Order is entered pursuant to an agreement of the parties at a custody conciliation
conference. The parties may modify the provisions of this Order by mutual consent. In the absence of
mutual consent, the terms of this Order shall control.
Edward E. Guido J.
cc: ffWilliam A. Comell, Esquire- Counsel for Mothe .~,g3 \
,/Edward J. Mimnagh, Esquire - Counsel for Fathe
i,,k.3
MARGARET C. BOGOVIC
Plaintiff
vs. · 03-3852
BRIAN L. BOGOVIC ·
Defendant · IN CUSTODY
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION LAW
Prior Judge: Edward E. Guido
CUSTODY CONCILIATION SUMMARY REPORT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CUMBERLAND COUNTY RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 1915.3-8, the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following report:
1. The pertinent information concerning the Child who is the subject of this litigation is as
follows:
NAME
DATE OF BIRTH
CURRENTLY IN CUSTODY OF
Brian Lee Bogovic, Jr.
August23,2000
Mother/Father
2. A conciliation conference was held on December 21,201)4, with the following individuals in
attendance: The Mother, Margaret Bogovic, with her counsel, William A. Cornell, Esquire, and the
Father, Brian L. Bogovic, with his counsel, Edward J. Mimnagh, Esquire.
3. This Court previously entered an Order in this matter on August 24, 2004 under which the
Father has custody of the Child on alternating weekends from Saturday through Tuesday and every
Monday and Wednesday overnight, and the Mother has custody at all other times. The Father filed
this Petition for Contempt alleging, among other things, that the Mother had violated an obligation to
the Father to notify him before removing the Child from Pennsylv~raia during her periods of custody.
4. The parties agreed to entry of an Order in the form as attached resolving the Contempt
Petition which was the subject of the conference.
5. It should be noted that at the conference the parties agreed that on Mondays and Wednesdays
when the Child does not have school, the parties will cooperate in scheduling custodial time in a shared
Date
Dawn S. Sunday, Esquire
Custody Conciliator