Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-01971 BRIAN E. NOLL, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiff v, NO, TRACEY J. NOLL, Defendant CIVIL ACTION - CUSTODY PETITION FOR SPECIAL RBLIBI plaintiff by his attorney, Thomas H, Kutz, Esquire, seek special relief under pennsylvania Rule of Civil procedure 1915,13 and avers as follows: 1. plaintiff Father has a permanent residence of 444 sioux Drive, Mechanicsburg, cumberland county, Pennsylvania. 2. Defendant Mother has a permanent residence of 444 sioux Drive, Mechanicsburg, cumberland county, pennsylvania. 3, The parties are the parents of Brandon E. Noll, born April 28, 1992. 4, plaintiff and Defendant have resided together with their son from the time of his birth until the time of the filing of this petition. 5. Plaintiff and Defendant have been equal caretakers and nurturing parents for their son. 6. on various occasions during the past several months Plaintiff and Defendant have experienced marital difficulties. 7, on various occasions during the past several months Defendant has repeatedly threatened to remove herself and parties' son from the marital home at 444 souix Drive, Hechanicsburg to an undisclosed location. ----- ~ - <::::: --, , , .::J -"" --' \ -.J , -----, .... {-- - ,-- . '. .. " (' ~ ('. 1.'-" " ~. ~_: :' . ~\~L ~ :: ~_ '-.. r( " r \..... . " ( .r-- ,- '---- ' \ u:> ...., ~ :::--- .- (~ ,- , . '. >.. (1'- ~ .' (2) from october, 1994 to present, at 444 sioux Drive, Hechanicsburg, cumbsrland county, pennsylvania, with Plaintiff and Defendant. The mother of the child is the Defendant, TRACEY J, NOLL whose current address is 444 sioux Drive. Hechanicsburg, cumberland County, Pennsylvania, She is presently married to plaintiff, The father of the child is the Plaintiff, BRIAN E. NOLL, whose current address 444 Sioux Drive, Hechanicsburg, Cumberland county, Pennsylvania, He is presently married to Defendant. 4, The relationship of Plaintiff to the child is that father. The Plaintiff currently resides with his of biological child. 5, The relationship of Defendant to the child is that of biological mother, The Defendant currentlY resides at the marital home with her daughter, 6. plaintiff has not participated as a party or witness, or in another capacity, in other litigation concerning the custody of the child in this or another court. Plaintiff has no information of a custody proceeding concerning the child pending in a court of this comulonwealth. plaintiff does not know of a person not a party to the proceedings who has physical custody of the child or claims to have custody or visitation rights with respect to the child. 7, child will be The best interest and permanent welfare of the served by granting the relief requested because: - \\ ~ .--, ::"> ~ " ':l . ~ \\ \.-, ~ \\ l .. ~ ~ U-' WI ~ ~, 1--J ~ r , '- r ~ ~ 1\