HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-02057
Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
NUMBER 'l )'-1(1 S7 ('t ltl~ {JtLI"'--'
.
ROBERT D. SMITH AND,
ANN M. SMITH,
vs.
CHERIE A. MIDDLETON,
Defendant
CUSTODY
ORDER
AND NOW, this l',
day of ", n ", 1995, upon consideration of
the within Motion, Stiplllation, and Complaint, it is hereby
Ordered as follows:
1. That full legal and physical custody of DERICK JEFFREY
SMITH, born October 19, 1979, shall be and remain in his
custodial parents, ROBERT D. SMITH and ANN M. SMITH.
2. That said Custodial Parents shall have the right to
secure a public education for the minor child, as well as
authorize medical, dental, orthodontic, psychological and
psychiatric treatment for the minor child. The Custodial Parents
shall have all other rights and duties with respect to the minor
child as if they were his natural parents.
3. That the mother of the minor child, CHERIE A. MIDDLETON,
shall have such rights of temporary physical custody of the minor
child as the parties shall from time to time agree.
BY THE COURT:
56, IIJ I' (' . :\ .;1
'I:' Ii '- rt( / c_.-
I
J.
March, 1995, with Defendant in Boston, Kentucky; from March,
1995, until the present, with Plaintiffs at 10 Poplar Street,
Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania.
The mother of the child is CHERIE A. MIDDLETON, who
currently resides at the Budget Inn, Room 224, 6850 East 21st
Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. She is married.
The father of the child is unknown.
4. The relationship of the Plaintiffs to the child is that
of aunt and uncle. The Plaintiffs currently reside with the
child and with their two daughters, Candice Smith, age 15, and
Jennifer Smith, age 13.
5. The relationship of the Defendant to the child is that
of mother. She currently resides with her husband, GARY
MIDDLETON.
6. The Plaintiffs have not participated as parties or
witnesses, or in another capacity, in other litigation concerning
the custody of the child in this or in another court.
The Plaintiffs have no information of a custody proceeding
concerning the custody of the child in this or in another court.
Plaintiffs do not know of a person not a party to these
proceedings who has physical custody of the child or who claims
to have custody or visitation rights with respect to the child.
7. The best interest and permanent welfare of the child
will be served by confirming custody in Plaintiffs because the
I~ Q..
~ \~ ~1
..g
,--' I 'v, r(
'-'''I
~ ~ c:- -
If") "-- (' ';I-
en ~ '-!;
- tn ,1
- "
0:: "'" ~
m ~
"'-' ~
'~ '\.
(^ ~J ~ ~) '1:i ~
.'1':
"
_.'.1
~ ~
-
-
-
...
-
~ Iii ~
. ~~U) _
; lel~ ~
~ ~~ci ;::
~ ~~
::: on III
U .., fa
~
.
CHARLES E. PETRIE
AnOfl~IiY AT tAw
.
.
. I
352M nRISnAN SlllEET
HARRISBURG. PENNSYLVANIA 17111
.
!
~ '.