HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-02299
~
,;,
~
,;,
~
~
8
~
,;,
~
~~***-*-~,~-~~,~,,~,~,~~,~,~,'~*~*'~'~*'~*~
----,-----,._--:..- .:.:.'. :.:..... :.: .:". :', .,.,:: '. . '" _.: .., .. ...-..,.. ", -, \:
M
.'
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY
!':'t.
STATE OF 't~~! PENNA,
~
~
,;,
~
SADIE A. BAIR,
PLAINTIFF
i\ ll. 2299
CIVIL (l)95
~
~
\' 1'1'..; 1I~;
.r:rp
41' :-'6 ro
tue {~l/ I\~I
w
...
~
'.'
WILLIAM A. BAIR,
DEFENDANT
,;,
~
i
'.'
DECREE IN
ANNULMENT
,;,
~
~
~l
~
"
iii
,
~
~
~
~
~
!!l
~
,;,
~
AND NOW, ' . . Ui't'. ((./.11. .l,;. . , . :~? . . " 19 :/,~.~ ., it is ordered and
-h SADIE A. BAIR /
decreed that .<!-~......................,............,..",... , plaintiff,
WILLIAM A. BAIR,
and. , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . , . . , , . , . ' , , . . ' . ' , . ' " defendant,
At-JtJUL.L.Ei),
an 1I1l':er€s& frs"" the bonds of matrimony. All.(
The court retains jurisdiction of the following claims which have
been raised of record in this action for which a final order has not yet
been entered;
NONE
.. ..............,.,...,.
. . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . , . . , . , . ,
~
~
~
"
..,..,..",... .
.",.,..,' "...,
" .C;J/L
^IIt"I'~;tl J"','tr:!.( f' 1u!'tf6~ /.~,4?j(.'~"'?::;~'
lI..1t/.'/,',l'( r .x;A::I. ~'?' :7
. / I Jl'1I111llflliH\'
~
!!l
iii
"
~
-.
~ ------,,'.--......" '
.~:. ~.<<. ~:. .>>:. .:.:. .:.:. .:.:. .>>:. .:.:. .:.:. .:.:. .:.;. .:.;.
:~
.~~.~"~..~,~,.~.~..:.:"~~.:.:"~.~:.~:.~:.~
~
'.'
~
'.'
..
~
~
$
*
..
~
i!.
~
"',
~
','
:.;:
",.
~
~
'.'
*
i..
w.
'.'
w
",.
~
l~
i'
!~
(~
i:
~
~
i~
h~
!.:.
I~
~8
:'~
, .
, ,
~
~
~
~
*
:~
~
~~
:~
() ':-J n
F; Co!} ."
~~:~ f ',~ -, ~'J
'"
.-:'!; '," :i"(.Q
/' '" ('0,) 'n~
C) '. 0 "1
,')
r.~~.'t :-,. ~~
",
~ r", ~ U:d
:";f~ S:) 'p
.~- n
" ~
:':J I:" ~
...... CJ1
1I0\\' 8UI>PUt:D
MONNHUATI SOO'UM IHJICTIOH a.
NDCMI69a)3.{1I :JOm1 multipl. UN vial.
STORACE
Stol'l t.low ofO d",,", C. illM drcrftll .'.) p~rf'r8bl)' in Il
,.(o,.,.&or, or betw"n 1~ dt'11l'f'I C, 16!)~ df1lrt'ft ".I.
Ro,. July 19110\
SJwU.'II ill PnldlKf M,tttl!inJhlllt riuldt. ~ .122
VOCON<!J
(,)'d'.o"l
(bnnd of yohimbine hydrochlorldel
DIllCIIIPTlON
Yohimbine II . 3a.t&1.20tJ.1711.h)'drol)' Yohimbine.I6a.
carbll)'lIc acid melbyl esler. The alkaloid iI lound In Ruba.
CMI and related t~. Alto In RAuwolfia Ser~ntlnll ILl
Bonth,
Yohimbine II an lndolalkylamln. alkaloid with ch.mical
.imUarity to reeerplne. It LI a cl")'Il4lline powder, odorlt'U.
F.achcompnuea lAbl'lcon14inaII/1211',11I-4 mill orVohlm.
blnellydrochloridr.
ACTION
Yohimbine blocu pmynaptlc alpha.2 ndf'fnrryic: I'1"('fplofl.
Ita .ctlon on periph':-III blrxxl ve.r1J I'Nf mblN that or 1'1'lIf'"
pin..thouah It II w,aker and or.hart duration. Yohimbine',
p.riphual auklnomlc nervuUl ')'Item errect lito IncrrUf
~ruympalhfllc: Icholin'rvie:1 .nd d<<rrut .ympetheUe
IId~net'lie:1 act.ivlty, Ills to be nolrd Ih.t In m.l, .nUlI
plrformanc~.. ,redlon II IinkN to cholincr)ie: activity .nd to
alpha.2 adrwn.l'Jie blockad. which m.y Iheorttlc:ally mutt
In int'ftued penll. innow. dt'Cnutd pt'nll. outno. or buth.
Yohlmbln. u.m ..tlmul.tinl action on the mood .nd m.y
ine,... "nli.ty. Such .ctioRl have not bren adequately
.tudlN or rtl,c.d todoup .llhoujh they .ppe.r 10 l'f(Iulre
hlah dOlel or th, drua. Yohlmbin. hu . mild .nll-diurrtie
action, probably vi. .t1mul.Uon or hypolhalmlc: renten .nd
rei.... or pm.terior pituitary hormon..
Reportedly, Yohimbine tutU no .lanincant Innuene. on
tanilae .tlmulilUon and other .rrec:tt mNI.ted by ,:I.adrtn.r.
pc receptorw. 111 errect on blood prflllure, If any, would be to
lOW'll' It; howevn. no .dequlte .tudl.. are It hand 10 quanll.
tate thll effect In terml 0( Yohimbln. dOlll"
INDICATIONS
YOCON II Indicated u a Iymplthlcolytlc: and mydriltlc. Il
may have arttYily u an .phrodWac.
CONTRAINDlCATlONS
Ren.1 dlw.... and paU.n"'"Rlltlvelo th, dl'\li. In vl,w (If
the Ilmllai and Inadequate Informlllon at hand, no Pl"f'CiM
tabul.tlon cln be offlred of tddltlonll rontralndic:atlonl.
WARNINC
Gen.rally. thie druc II not. pro~ (or UN In Cemal.. and
cem!nl, mUlt not be u.d durin. pl'f'lll.ncy. Nllth.r tllhit
drua propl*d for ute In pedl.tric. priatne: or c:ardil:~renal
patlen'" wilh I"'rlc: or duod.n.1 ulcrr hilwry. Nor .hould It
be UIed in conjunction with mood.mudiCyinar dl'Ull .uch 1\1
,nlidep..-anll. or In paychlttric pallent. In Ken,1'I1.
ADVERSE REACTIONS
Yohimbine nadlly ptn.tntftllhe lCNSlllnd pmdUC'ft II ~"Om.
pl.. pattern or mpon... in lowrr dOlt'l than .....I\lin J 10
produce perlpht'ral (I..dren.ralc bhd.ad.. ThIN Indude,
antl.cJlumil, . pneral plnure (If (fnlr.1 ..cltAtlon Indud.
In,.lev'llon of bllkd prHlure And heart rate InclTlIM'd mI)-
loI' activity, IrritAbility and lremor. Sw,atlng, naUlt'1I nnd
vomlllRl art' common aftAlr parent.rlladmlnl1tm1ion of the
dru., I.J AIJO diuinf'll, h.,dlcht', Ikln nwhlnK n'pllr11'd
wh.n UIfd orallyl.3
IlOSACE AND ADMINISTRATION
EllM'rim,ntal dOUll' reportfrd In trealment ur'rmtl. imp).
tenc:e:I.J.. llabl,t 1&,. filii J 11m... dllY, to adult m.les tak'n
orally. Occ.ulonallide dTK'tll'1'plIrtl"l1 wllh 1hi. dllla(t' ano
nlUM", dluin_ or n'n'OUlnKl. In Ih'l!Vl'nt oC Itdtll'lTrda
doup it to be reductd to -'J t.bld;1 limN a day, follow" by
Ilradulllnc~...lo I tabl.t3 tim~ a d.y. Itrportrd therapy
not more than 10 w"hJ.
1I0\\, 8UPPUt:D
Oral tablell oC YlX"'On'.1 11I2ll"r tH mil In btllllrt (If 11I1.1'1
NOC a3160.o:1I.n1. UO)'I NOC ~:)IMHXII.IO, nnd blilh'r.
pau nf :JO'I NOC 5.11S0~"1I.30
hEFERENCDI
I. A. MOrlllN 'I Ill., Nt'w E"ll:land JOllrnal ur M....licln.: 1:121.
Novembtr 12. 19HI.
J ll00dmnn.llilman -Th, l'hormlll'llhltrwallwl.1l1' nwrll'
ptotic. 61h td ,p 176-IHH, Mc~hlllln
,I Wt'Pkly Uf\llotll~'all"linlcallt,tlt'r. ~1.;!. .July," lU8:1
, A, Moml...rl "I. Th..,JlIllrnl1ll'II'rulllj(~ I;!.~ -I,'\,"7.1!IH2
ItI'Y ,hltlunry IHt\.~
,'ih"UII ''1/'M_/lul fd"'111/J"III' 'I ';,,1<:,' I'h'.' I!.!
Par Pharmaceutlcel, Inc,
ONE RAM R'OGE ROAO
SPRING VALLIY, NY 10877
~lllU!!l!l !If e!!I P~ODUCTS
11111' Phalm4crulicnl, Inc. mllloC"cturN tabllL'u .nll c'plul..
with an idlL'ntificlllion .y.llL'm Ihll rnn.ilt.I orthu I.tl.n I'AII
.nd Ihl" NUr prOllul.'t numbrn ur pnJducl .l",nllh im,
prinlt'd or I"mbtllVol'd un Ih. .urfaCt' To ..prdilet 11flJdUCt
Id.ntinculion, nn alphabetical liJIlnlf 0' 1'.1'" prudUC1I II
providrd htlow FAch pnJducl com... in a varif'ty of packfti.
inlf Ipt'(iflciltlun.. with Ih. mlMll common twlnl IlllI, 6011'1
.nd !tor..
Imprint nombrn .ame III NUC numbrn .,,'ept wh.l? indl'
calfOtl olhf'rwiN
B
HOC #
u....
tlH
1116
44"
....!.
150
llH
1&
1,16
21.
010
113
115
110
lH3
0113
0Ill
0&
066
087
129
m
210
219
220
22\
m
061
062
076
0Ill
193
IIU
:!2J
22"
~
m
221
020
027
O;!fl
121
113
'44
115
t02
10:1
:!Ilt
'~'4
lk'.'\
OM
067
IlM
O,'ll
021
0'1'1
~~J
0.1-1
o:IS
tilt',
:!H!J
:!90
:I({j
:lIil
;:,~H
.!."I"
~
AlIopuimol Tabl"t.I 100 mK
Allol'urinlll Tablru 300 mac
AlprllUlI.m Tabl," 025 IT1tI
AlprDzulam Tablt'u n 6 mil'
Alpnuolam Tablt't.l1 nit(
Ot'nrlroplne MNyl.Ul Tllbltla 0& mlf
lltonl1flJplne MNyllt. Table" I ana
l\enJlrllplnt ~r..,:'lale Tabht.t :! .111
CanlOprudol.ntJ Attpirin l'ablela
200 miC/3~ mg
ChlonolaJOne Table" 2W tniC
flonidin. UCland Chlorthalidon, Tablr'"
0.1 mll/lamll"
Clonidine IICland Chlorthalidone Tablrll
02 11lI1I6 ma:
Clonidin, lIel .nd Chlorthahdone Tablru
03 mIJ/16 ma
l)prohrpl4dine 1IC1 Tablru . rt\lI
DuamelhlllOne Tabl,,,, 0 2S ma
Duamethuon. T.blrtl 0 & ma
Drlllmelhuon. T.bl,1.I 0,7a me
0e1llm'lh8lOne Tabl,t.lI.a mll
Ol'lamethuon. T.blet.l . mil
Oellm'lh8lOne T.bl'l6 6 tniC
Do'l.'pin lIel Caplull'll 10 mg
OIlupin 1IC1 Caplulet 2& It\lI
Coupin IICI CaPlUIN 60 mil
1AI11'pin lIel Captul.. 7a mil
Doupin IIl1 CaPluJ.. 100 m.
Doupin lIel Caplulet 150 mar
nuphenllline IIll Tableu l ffiI'
nuph,nA1in.IlCl Telru 2.5 ma
F1uph'nu.Jn. lIel T.blru ^ mar
~1uph'n4Jlfte Ill' T.blru 10 ma
F1uraupam Ill' CaplUIN 15 m.
.1unuepam lIel a.plulell 30 mil
1I110peridol T.blru 0 a mil
IIllopendol Tablrl.l I ml
lIalo~ridol T.blell 2 ma
Ullopt'ridol Tabl,u & mil'
Ilaloperidol Tahl..la 10 mil
lIydr.liWnlllll' Tlblt'Lt 10 IIltC
liydraladn.lIl' Tableu 25 ma
IhdrahulR' Ill' Tablru M ma
Hydf811l1lne Ill' Tnbltlt 100 mil
Ihdra.Zlde Illydralllin.lll1 and Ilydrocnloro.
Ihiruidel Clplull'l 2S mll/2S ma:
lIydl'll.Zide llhdralllin.IICI and II)-dm.'hloro-
IhialldltllAP.oll'l 6() mg/60 mil'
II)'dra.lid...,ll)'dral41ine Ilel Gnd Ilydfl)Chloro.
Ihilllilll'll'aPlull'llll)mIlIMma:
IlJuprnrI'IlTllblrll.I'WlIllM
IbullroCl'n Tabll'1a 600 mil
IbupfllCrn Tubll'1a IW)) ml(
Imlprnmin, lIel Tlbl,u 10 mlf
Imipramm, 1Il'1 T.blru 2S mlf
Imlprnnllnr Itcl T.blrll tIO ma
Indom...thncin l'a~ull'l 25 mil
Indtlmrthlldn ('al_ults 50 mil
16IlIIlrbidr Dinllrate T.blru a mil
bO'llrbid. Oinllral. Tlbl...l& 10 mil
I_lrhitle Uinllrate Tablru 2U mac
Ilo.urbldl! Oinitralt' Tablru Jll n~
MKIiJintl lIel Tabltu 12 ^ ml(
Mt'diltn' IICI Tablrll ~ mll"
Ml'\'luinttlll"lTablt'tltIOmac
Mrt:l'ltrul ArrlAlt' Tllblrll ~'il mac
Mt'~t'llrul Ar...lntl! TDblrll40 mil
M.'luprllll'trnul SulC.llI InhlllatillR 8tllulwnl
II ~,~
~1..t.lpr'jll'rl'nl)1 Sulrah! Inhlll411,m ~lluti,Ul'
IlW-;
~II'I,lpruh'rl'nlll S\llfllh' T,lhll'lA II] 1111{
\lH;ll'f"I,'ro'n,.l :-iOlIl.lll' r,lld,'h ~~111l11
PROOUCT INFORMATION/l.13
2..9 M,thor.rhamol .nd Aaptrin T.bletl
"lk)m,/3::'~ mll"
1tl6 Mrlh)'ldoJlll and II)"drochlonJlhlll1id. T.bletl
2M m.1I6 rug
187 Melhyldopa and lIydrochlorothilJidll Tablf'u
Z5l:)mjl~~ m.
IKIt Mrlhyldopll and lI)llrochlorolhluid. T.bll'lI
600 mll/JO lniC
189 Ml'lhyldol"' and lI)"drochloro'hilJidl' T.bl.u
lW):)m,IWmil
00& Metronidalole C(lmpl'f'llt'd T.blttl
:!.\Om.
11" M,tmnldlllOII' f'tJmpff'Uf'd Tabl'lI
&O:Jm.
2M Mlno.ldil Tabll'u 26mII'
257 Minf.aidil TabltU 10 ml
110 Ny.talin T.blru 5l):},IX)1 Vnila
..2 Pindolol Tlbl.u 15 me
."3 I'indolol T.blf'1.I10 mj
."0 Pirolic.m CapaulH 10 mj
...1 I'iflllic.m Copaull'l 20 m,
1It1 Pmpanlhrlln. Oromide Tablrll IS IllIJ
a21 Silnr Sutradiuin, Crfl&m/l 'l-
240 T.mDuopam CaIMUII'l 115 mlJ
241 Trmaupam C.paull'l30 mar
279 Triamlf>r.n, .nd lIydn<:hlorlllhilUid. Tnblru
7a lnllao ml
..a3 TrllWllam T.bl,u .125 InI
4504 Triuol.m T.bll'lI .25 rt\lI
Perke.Davls
Dlvlalon of Warn.r.Lambtrt Company
201 TA80R ROAO
MORRIS PLAINS. NEW JIRSEV 078&0
PARCODIII
IP'rk.OI"i. Aceur," Recognition Codtl
Cod.
Number Produc1 N,m'
oot.
006
001
UnlWiRnN
DU.ntln,.' Inf.tabe-!'
Each lablrl rontaint ao rt\lI ph,n)10In lUdium,
U511.
1I..u...,..J
ErwOltal'.' Hublln,u.1 T.blete
Each tablrt cuntain. 2 m, .rgolamine lartrale.
-
110
III
112-
1M
tee
UlLlWl/lIttd
Mandel.mlne'.' T.blell
Each tablrl conlAlnl 0 a ItDm melh,namln, man.
d,l.te, US('.
Mandel.mlne ~, T.blete
Each 14bll'l {olltain. Ill"r.m m.th.namine mau-
d.I.It', USII
U"aul/lltl'll
Pyridlum.' T.bl,"
Each" bll'l ro:ltaln. If,() tT\iI' pkl'nll1Qpyridine
h)'dmchloridr, U51'.
Pyridlum,i'T.blrll
Each lAblt'1 l'Ontllin. ~I(XI mK ph,nlUOpyrldine
h)'drochlorid., US,,
U"n.Lull"nJ
"runn." HR T.bl,u, 500 m.
.:arh ,ullaini"Ct-rrll.'llIlt lablet NnlalM rMX) mil
rrucllill.mlde h)'drochlllridl'
'roc.n'.' HIl T.bl,la. 7&0 ml
.:ach IUllainl"l1.rrlrll.ll!' IAblrt rontain. 760 mil
pnll.'lIlnDmldr h)drlll'hlurldl'
l1"ILUIK'II'lI
Pror.n'l Nil Tablel., 1000 m.
~:'lch .u.lrllnrd-r,II.'.... labll't conl,inl Iln,) Inll
l'n"'i1lnamldl' h)'dnl('hlurld,
1/P1I1Mlll"n'
Chlll,d)'I.' T.lllrll
~:al'h IAhl,1 runlain. IlX) mil' ollrillhylUnl'. USI'
Com/nuN on n..r ".g.
rhl. ProducI II1form.rKHI w.. p,.".rtd/n Au","" ",., On
IhH' .nd IlIh" P.rA.O..". Producr.. InforrNrlOll m.t' N
obt.'n.d by .dd,..,mg PARKE OAYtS. OI"i./on of
W.m., t.mN" Comp.ny, Moma PI,ml. N,w J""t'
01950
181
1118-
ITS
,80
IAI
'8:1-
20.1
20l
205
200
207
:lOll-
:lOll
110
r:,,,,,,,ll!'1'l'l '"I'll''''''''''' ."', '.,' " ....,',"."1.. '.'10"'",
HOW HUPI'UEIl
MOftftHUATlIOOIUM 'NJICTlON I_
N0063159..<<:Q3.Ql 30ml multiple u. vlull
STORAGE ,
Store below 40 drcreel c. 110.& d~1'ftf f.l prefer.bly in a
I"Ifria.rllDf. or betW"" 15...lOdl'l~ C. (5g..s(jd~n.w ~',l,
lit.. July 111M
SIwu'" .,1 Pmdud Id'''''fil'Ofltl" Ciuldt. Pitt 322
VOCON'.!"I
1Jd"onJ
Ibllnd af yohlmbln. hydlochlorld.1
DESCRIPTION
Yohimbln. ta . 3o.15a.2011.171J.hydroIY \'ohimbln~1611'
carbo.ylic acid melhyl nlcr. The .I~.h)jd 1s found in Ruba.
OIH and rel.t.td treel. Aba in Rauwolfia SerpenLlna ILl
BeRth.
Yohimbine 1I an Indol.lkyll1mine alkaloid with chemical
limU.nly to I'ftItrpinl!. It i.a . cr)'It411in. powd,r. odorl~.
Eachtomp~_14blrtconLII.inaIIJI2rr.'~'" maul Yuhlm.
bln, Hydrochloride,
AanON
Yohimbln. bloch pm)'nllpllc .lpl...2ll1i~nrrtic n'CfptOI'l.
III action on prnphf':..1 blood "...,1. fI... mblrs I hl&l of ffMl'o
pin.. thoulilh,' 11 .,.kef and ur.hutt duratlun. Yuhimbln" I
peripheral autonomic ner'VOUI a)'lltm eff~d II to lncreue
plrU1mpathehc Icholinel1(td and df'C'~'" ,ympalhehc
18dnn'fI1c1 activit)'. It lito be noled thll in mll~ InuII
~rforman~. ertCtlon it linked to choltncl'lic activit)' and to
aJphl.:Z adren.nric bloc:bde which ma)' theoretically lTIult
In Incruaed pendelnnow, dtc~Ufd ptnlle outno. or both.
Yohimbine ..,IU a.tirouleUna action on the mood and may
inert... anliety. Such Ictions have not brfn adequately
atudled or relllld to dOl&llalthoulh they appear to ~uif'l!
hlah d,- or lhe drua. Yohimbin. hu I mild lati>tl.iurtlic
action, probably via .timulaUon or hypothalmlc crntel'l and
releaN or potllrinr pituitary honnone. .
Rtpor1lldly. Yohimbine uelU no 11I1\lncant Influenc, on
urdiac ltimulaUon .nd other elTrctJ mediait'd by jJ'ldrtner.
fa'C I1lCt!pbl,., itl.rrert on blood PrrMure.lr any, would be to
ower It; howe'ttr, no.dequalf studi.. Ire at hand toqullntl.
tale lhb ,ffec1ln lenna or Yohimbine dcaa(f.
IlIDICATIONS
YOCON it lndlcated u a Iympalhicolytlc a.nd mydriatic. It
ma)' haw aclhit)' u an ephrodil,-c.
CONTRAINDlCATIONS
Renal dilt..... and pati,nuNnsitiv. bl the dNI.ln view or
the limited and inadequate Inrormation at hand. no pr<<:iN
tabulation can be ofTef'f'd or additional contnundications.
W"RNIlIG
Generally, \hit dnzc it not propo.rd ror UN In remaJet an,d
t'trUinl)' mUlt not be u.IId dunnl Prrcnancy. Neither II thll
druc proJll*d ror u.eln pedlatnc..entlnC or cardll>rtnll
patlenll with ...tric or duodenal ulcer hiatol')'. Nor ,hould il
t. uaed in ton Junction With mood.modir)'lnl drup .uch III
Inttdepresaan... or In plyrhlatrtc palienta tn Imeral.
ADVt:RSE REAanONS
Vohimbln. ~adily I"nelra,,", IhetCNStnnd pmduCrlll""lIm.
pin patwm or f\"1IllIIlIllH In lowrr dlJ5t'l than rt'IlumJ II)
produ.... prripherllll ,.'adrrnpl'llC bllxhdt'. Thttl Inrlud~,
llnti-diutf1lJ, U Rennal plrture uf cenlrllll'lClll:l1l0n includ.
In.elention orblocxt prHlure and hurt ratt' Incn'Uf!d 1n0'
tor activit)', ImlAbillty Imil tremor, S,,'uttnr, Rlllllt'll nnd
vomitinaarecommon Ontr parrntenllldminlltraUon of the
drua U Allo dWlnt1ll. htldllche. .kln nwhlnl rtporttd
when u.ed orall)'l..1
POSAUE AND "DMINI!ITRATION
ElptMmen141 d~. reported In ueatmrntllr erKule lmpl)'
It!nt1t:11.tllabletI6.4 mJlI;)limnad3y,toaduhmale-.Lak.n
urlllly. Ol"tAlionallide .lrK.. r.portrd wnh Ihlll doaqr lll1!
nau.ea. diwnEII or nenOUlnrM. In the .vrnt III lilli, "lfKU
dOlAlle II W be ,-.ducrd to 11, tabld;1 Umrllll day, follllWtd by
IlrllduallncrnM'llo I tabltt:J Um~ aday, Rtporttd thl'rlllpy I
nut mo~ than III "'ftUI
1I0W HUPI'UED I
Orllllllblt'u nf YDCtln,il III:! h'l' H mil In holtl", or It):)', :
,.DC lS3169UJl.{)1. lOon', ,.DC ~:II~!)flIIJ.10. and !lIUiIN'1
~ka uf 30'. NOC 6J1590H.JII
III:FERE1>lnll I
I, A. Mornl", tt nt., ~.w EnlClandJuurnl1 'II ~1...h(1I1P I:!:!I
NovpmtJtr 12. lUlU I
l U'It~tmlln. tillmlln -'flit' Philrmllt"1lh1tlI~'nl 1I1\.11t ull1wfll'
Pf'ullC.I hlh tod. II 17r~IH~, ~lrMltllm ,I lIit
I W,...kh tJruIO"Il';li c'linl\,11 Jl'Ih'r. ~~:!. ,hlh I 1!'~.1
I ,\ ~1\lf;lh~rtlll. n\l',JIHlfn;lll'll'r'Ii,~\ i;:,~ I~H: I"":!
111'\ .J .IIIUM\' I ~'-".'1
.../" 'II" r, I"" I ," r /. {. ., Ill., <l ~ I 'I ,,,,,.', ' OJ .., ' .' ~'
Par Pharmacautlcal, Inc.
ONt RAM RIDGt ROAD
SPRING VALLfY, NY 10.77
COM.IITI LJn!!!g !l! m P~OOUCTI
Par Ph.rml~utic41.lnc. manuractUrtt tableta and Clplul..
with on identification Iy.ltrn that tolUlIu or thelell,n rAR
and the NOC product numben or product Itf'l!nllh 1m.
pnnh,j or .mboNt'd on the IUrl.ct. To npedlta product
idtnhncation. on nlphabtUcal IlIlln, or par'a prodUctl II
pruvldtd btluw. Each product COrnN in a variety o(~ckq.
ln6r 1pt'("lnc4t1onl. WIth thl mOIl common beinlloo.. 600',
and IOIXl'I.
Imprint numbel"llAm. u NOC numben ncept where Indi.
catrd othefWtM.
8
NOC #
"1184-
IIH
Io.~
UK
449
450
1&1
I~
l,l6
:!46
016
\13
II~
116
ou
0Il3
0Sl
08.\
0116
087
12!l
217
21K
219
:!20
221
2"...2
061
062
076
064
193
194
m
:.!24
225
226
227
O~~
027
OUt
1:!1
IIJ
144
II~
162
16:1
'.!ltl
"'-I
0"
"16
067
Ot)H
0'.'0
O:.!I
0'1"
(l1)'J
0"'-
ll:IS
tll5
'.!~!J
;':'..10
,Uin
,:',~
.::",
Pifuct
A opurinol TlblelA 100 m.
Allopurinol r.ble.. 300 RlI
Alpnuolam Tableta 0.25 RlI
AlprllUllam Table" 08 me
Alpnuolam Tabletll me
Bennropln. Met)'la.. Table.. 0,5 RlI
8ennropine MNyl.lf Tabl... 1 ma
Ben'lr,'plnl M....:'I... Tabl.!tA 2 .".
c.'lflauprudol and Alplnn TabletA
200 m1l/3~ IRI
l.'hlurtOu:on. Tabl... 2M) TnlI
Clonldanr 1tC! and <..'hlorthalidone Table..
0.1 mglla m.
Clonldtne IIC! and Chlorthalidone Tablell
0.2 m,/15 ma
Clonidin. IIC! and Chlorth.Udon. Table..
0.3 m,"~ "!II
C)'prohepl4dine lIet T.bl... .. ma:
Deum.ttuuon. Table" 0.2!I ma
Duamethuon. rabltf.l 0.& IUI
Deumethuon. Tabl.la 0.75 fill
Draamethaaone Tabl.tl1.5 m,
Drnmtlhuona Tabletl 4 me
Drumethuon. T.bl,.. 6 me
Do..plR IICI ea.-uIeo 10 ...
DoJlfPIh Itet c.~w. 2.5 ma
Doltpin lIet c.~ul. 60 PII
Do..pln IICI ea.-.I. 75 ...
DoJlfplR Itet C.~ul. 100 ml
Ooupin lIet Ca~uI. 180 me
Fluphenuine lIet Tabl.1I 1 ma
Fluphenuine IICI Tabl... 2.5 ml
Fluphenuin. IICI Tah1eU & me
FluphellAline IICl Tabl,UIO me
FlurllU'patn IICl Caplul. 1& m,
Fluraupam IICI C.plules 30 mar
Haloperidol Tabl... 0.& RlI
IbJopendol TIbI... 1 all
Haloperidol Tabl... 2 me
Halllpt'ndol Talde.. 5 me
lIalllpendol Table" 10 rD'
lIydrall1ine 110 Tablela 10 mg
lIydr.laune 110 Tabl.lI 2a ml
lIydralwne 110 Tabl.tA 60 ffii
J:ydrllhwne ,lei Tabl.ta 100 mOl
11)'dra.Zide IllydraiaunellCl and Il)'druc:nloN-
thtlUldfl Cas-ulrt 2.5 rnt:/25 ma
Hydru.Zlde IlhdraluinellO and Ilydrochloru-
thiaudel Cas-ulN 60 mc/80 m.
Ilydrll.Zlde Ill)'drawlRIllCI and Ilydrochloru-
thllludt'l Cas-ul. 100 ffiIr'ro ma
Ibuprofen Table.. 400 IRI
Ibuproftn Tableta 600 ""
Ibuprort'n Tuble.. 800 me
Imipramine 1It'1 Table.. 10 mr
Imipramine lIel Tablell ~ mIC
Imlprununr Ilel Table" 60 mI(
Indllmelhaclh e'plulft 25 m,
Indomtlhllcin Capeul. &0 ma:
l:klliOrbld. Dinitralf Tablela 6 mal:
tlO6Orbide U1R1tra'- Tabl,1a 10 mil
IM.lIIOrblde Oinitrate Tablt'la :.!O flij(
1",)60rbid~ Oimtrate Tablell ao mM
Mt'Clillnlt Ill' rlblela 12,!\ m.
Mrl"!Ulnt' lIel Tlblela O!.!i m.
Ml'\'hzlRt' IICI T .blt'1a 60 Il\IC
Mf'1tl"ltrlll A'ttate T.tlltla 20 inK
~frl:"'trul ""..tati' T.bl.LI ~II mil
~tl'IOlvrlllt'nnul Sulf.tt InhllllltlOn :iolutlonl
01'1
\t.'I.lllrllll'rl'nol Sulrall.' Inhal.ltl'," Solutlunl
lItj'-:
",.t.lprllll.tl'nul Sulfall" T.lhlt.tJI 10 till(
\llt,II",lt"ft'I",j ;-:',111.111' r.Lld,.t~ ~n mlt
PRODUCT INFORMATION/1113
2411 M.thoarbamol and Alplrin Table..
400 nul132.1 ... .
1M M.lhyldopa .nd IIrdrochlorolhlwd. T.bl...
2M ma/18 m,
181 M.lhyldopa nnd Ihdrochlorolhlwd. Tobl...
2M m,/~ ml .
188 Methyldopa and lIydrochlorothluid. Tabl.1I
GOO ml'ao m.
189 M'thyldopa Ilnd lI)'drochll1rothlllJid' TlblC!t.I
&00 ml/l'X> me
095 Metronldllol. ComprttlfCi T.bleta
2.IOm,
114 MelronidllOlC! Compretlfd Tabl,"
100 m.
2M Mlnolidil Tlblela 2_5 me
~7 Mlnolidil Tablela 10 m,
119 Nyttatin Tabl,.. 6OO.tm Unila
..42 Pindolol Table.. & m,
443 P1ndolol T.bl... 10 m,
440 Plro1iam c.peuln 10 m6r
..41 Pirolicam Capeuln 20 m,
liB PropantheUne Bromide Table.. I!\ mK
821 SUnr Sulradiazine Cr'am'l~
240 T.maupam Ca~ulet 1& ml
241 Temuepam Caplul.. 30 mil
!i9 Triamttnne and lI)'dn(hlllrtlthlallde Tabr~1I
76 m./60 ml
4~ Triuollm rablell .1~ mal
4M Triuolam Tablela .25 I1\IC'
Parke.oilYls
Olvl,lan of Warn.r.umbtn Company
201 T AIDR ROAD
MORRIS PLAINS. NEW JERSEY 07910
'ARCOOE~I
IP.,k.Davla Accurl" Recognition Cod.)
Cod.
Number
Product Nam.
001.
001
0CIl
u.......,..J
Dllanlln~) Inratabe\i)
Each tablet conwRI &0 ma phen)1oin aodium,
USP,
U...;...,..J
l'.rloetatl!l Sublln,ual Tabl."
Eacb tablet cunLlinl 2 ml eflotamine tartrate,
Uruwl",M
Mandelamine@ Tabl."
Each 14bletcontains085ttDm methenamlnf! man.
dal.... USP,
Mand.laminal!! Tabl."
Each tablet ctInLalnl Irnm methenllminr man.
delate. USf.
UIUW"'""'
P)'ridlum ~, Tlble..
Each t.I bitt co!\wm. HAl me phl'nlUOp)'f1dinl'
hydrochlorIde. USI'.
Pyridlum\~) Tableta
Each Labl.t containl 200 ml phemuop)'ridine
hydrochlorid.. USP,
UnOlolIJlflffl
Prot.n\lil SR T.ble.... 500 ml
t:Och ,Ultained.rrl.... Lablrt contaua 500 ml
prucamamlde hrdroc:hlonde.
Procan'~' sn T.bl..... 7!\O m,
Each 'Ult.lInt'd.rel.ut' Lablel contain, 750 mil
pm:4lnlmlde hydroc:hlonli.,
Uncwlll"rd
Proc:anl" tin T.blell. 1000 ml
Eact- 'Ultlllned.rel.Ut' Lablrt C'Onulnl 1000 mlC
pnxnlnlmlde hydrochlonde
Urw.allf'U'l
Choledyl',.,) T.ble"
Each tabltt contalll.1 100 mM oltrlphylllnt', USI'
Cont/nuN on "'oU paD'
DOl-
110
III
11:1-
1110
III
117
111-
m
.00
III
11:1-
2O.l
2lll
2Il.I
206
'll11
:lOll-
:lOll
210
rll;' pnJducr Informlllon VII" P"~rN In Augu.t ",... On
","' .nd ort..r P,r".Oa~j' producr.. I"'ormatlon m,y b.
obr'lnld by .dd,",lng PARICEOAVIS. OI.,,,lon 0'
W.,n'rLlmbf',r Camp. ny, Moma PI'ln,. N,w J.r..y
01950.
r."".,ll I""', , ,I' ",'~'''~'' , '
.,,,.\,........'"
..
IPI:r~S R"lfsE:~"Ir?:!lIr'" t%l
o'li! Ii 1'1 ~ n 1 ~. ='~ ~ n. ~ g' ~ ~
- Ii g 't:l ,~'" b' II Jl ~.. \to Er \to.. '" t'1
~ i g ~ ~ ~ f. ~ ;. ~. [11 ~ ~:I: ~ !1 ~, f. .:::
. .""'=il!C"'~~~ 5l!;o ogSC'.,
~-~ =lgll~_' /1...= ,=lo
~ ;.l!: S r fi :;; g, 5 ~ ~ 'g, 5' 5l ?: ~ ~ ~
, Q,,,I;;,,it "!l~Sle_o""'~~=" a
t: eEl' i:J""", H"""~8~ ." If
g ~ 8' ! ~ f a. ~ ~ t. it f U !l -... ~ [ ;:,
i1 e 11 if 0 ~.. l! e ,,' !l g- ~ ~' ':'I ::: 18 ",,, :-
j ~. ~: R"1! 't:l~ 2, ~ 0,'" ~ - ~. " ~ ~:- R- ~ ;S;
11 "q'!l " "'0:' g '. 00 5' ~ S I;l
g .It!;. _ ~tr:2.[~~f.~t'1=~ I
R- Qll! ;. ~:; ~ If ~i 5' /I ~ !}. .~'t 8 2-
~J ;- [ s I fa, f~ .g ~ R: r r ~ ~ e ~
R"re..f~~ ~~~!~Er"~f~
!;os~!;o ~"a:t .cll.1i'6.a:Q.
:fi /I" '" Ii = Il. " !l.. 0=' Il. iL go =l ..
",~.a!r~ E::~;'~"J!.R"!:t~S
~~~r~a ~t!::~ij~~[.i '~i
"'slfe.!lS ~a\1ii~.~r,,~. "=
la g ~ ~~ p:lt~" lR"t~glt;;
; [ fa, f'" ~: ~ ~. 0' ~ ~ il i ~ ~ ii
i:. >-l" !;o all!'!." If .." ;. . '<
'~~;_!l fi.~~ii!rl= 2:.~ ""
-
Z
::a
r!1
't:l
o ~
... t'1
:z (")
o ~
Z t'1
>&,>cg
z 0' z=
e il Z 0-1
o t%l c::::::
'" ~ ~t'1
~ !:! t'1 t'1
~ ~ ~ ~
"l' -<
n 0
o ..,
c::: >
~ tl
Ii
=
t'1
t'1
Z
~ ~ ~ :e
o qJ
~ V }r if' ~ ~ ~
!l .(,. l~ 'i n ffi !:l
~ j~f I it: n~ ~ ~ ~
ti II, I\.Il, ~ _ ~ 'Q[~. ~ ~ po:
~ Ht r~: {t~ ~ ~ : ~
~ i';;' nr ~'1~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~a ~ tl if~ ~ ~ ~ ~
! l~i- J~ hi ~ g j I
5l JEr R.t tR ~ ~ i-l
'" J". z~ jij I: i:;
r t t~ II f 0 Z
~ 1: il~ ~i :Jl n
. . h -r~ ~. ~ ~
nhH
j' l:8 t~
r[~ ~11 ~~l~~~J ~[~=ll~j~~t~ [f ; l~ ~
~~~~f.~f~ ~~ ltI~l~ f~ ~f~~rt.r.J-!tri( ~ ;'=r...t; ~~~ ~
lldil~~d ~!!.d:e a.o lI~,s:s !l=~~~ E;- ~~ i~5 -
.. ll! e a. 0' iL g Ot s:: ~ a. g:. Il ... .., g Il ')' s ~ e.. It ~!l Il. B .!!. . . ~ I ~ t'1
~ ~ t R ~ r. ~ i R f 8: f 1;;' ~ .Il ~ ~ r ~ I ~ ~ ~ B- ~ if f 11 ~ ~ E r [. [ ~ ~
11 0'11 a.... 1 n iL~ Ei] l il ~~. '- I:l 0'" r a ~ 2, S a ~'I t l! a r s a if a ~
.. t ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ t l E '0 : ~ ~ 11 j a. ~ r i..; f t i a, ~. r. i ! !i l. ~ ~ ~
fEij~ ;'ail a-~atgoSl.l~~r.~~i:Jtllr~~.8 ~~~:! e:;~
" if,ij' a. ~ ~ ~ f .g ~ ~ l! ~ a ~ g !L ~ ~ a. ,d Il' ii S.., c' ~ [:1" j.~ R";:: 0=
'1il"S !joil r Q't:l"., i!.-~..Q.;- g ~li "O'"lt!l ga
i [8: ~ = ~ rEI;;' ~, r I ~ ~ 11.. f e ~ 'i1 11 ~ ~ E:! ~ & ~ 11' [; ~ - ~
tl! [If ~ ~~. r r t t ~ g ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ j- r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ go t ~ ;
!r~ s r e, = it ~~ l""'!!: C;' ~ rr =t VI .. 't:l Q 1l ~ '< .. !I '1 Il. ij i' !Z
.",,"=~ c.,so !f. ""= "e, a 0",,0'"e, p.O;!:r_ .c.. n
;r l5..!l:l. ~ g e 2, /.1' ~ 'if<#. " at!, d 5: :;:. a, ;; a d ~ 3. ~ ~ n 0
"o=~ Sr-'" """",,::I" ,,-..,...;; ~~= a n
~. [ g, " ,,;. 3' a: 'E.., a g if ;; w ii ~ e, if!l g " ~ 1 5' c ~
Q. ..."" c.,,,,, :l.o~ ~ .., w 0" ..,,~~~ r,,= =
Q. ~ Q. 5. . ~ ~ ~ -, = - . 0 j;l 0 ~ n = ::r :r" ~ a-
rt....::J cic~, =c..'-(l e - ";:\=0.. =-
c... - 0 ~ .... ~ s ... ::s l:' f,.:l ~ 't.... e:..' ~~. c' to ~ ru E:i C'
_ '" ., _ c.., _ . Co..... n .,::: c.. S "': 0- '.... = C f1 CJ ~ a ., ffi
ROlf IUPPUm
. MORRHUATlIOOIUM ,NJICTlON..
~14~1 30m! llluJUpl."", VIall
STllr:AGE
s..... below 40 d..... C. 110. d_ r.1 p,.(.rahly lO I
rwfri(l..IOr, 0' balWH. l~d_C.14_d..,... r.1.
RoI, July 19&1 '
.5010<.... ..l\txIutl (dtoll/fta.... au&dt. _ 322
VOCONt!'
[)Ol'IOll/
UNwnd af YOhimbln, hydrochlolid.1
DESClUPnON
YoJUmbln. iI I .l4'U..20P,ll.,hyd",.y Yohilllbin..liI<I.
carbol)'lIc IC.d m.thyl....,. Th. oJbJoid it fDuod 10 Hubo.
CMI aad nlated t,.., A1a.o in R.1uwoll1a SlrpeDUDI ILl
Booth.
Yohllllbln. la IA lndolalkylamio. oJbJoid ,,"h ch'Ill'w
Iinu.lanlY to I"IItrpln.. It iI . crysta.Uin. powder. odorl~
Eac:h camp_ ...bl.. can"'''"11112 JI'.' 4,1 01( o( Yohim,
biDe Hydroc:hlond..
ACI10N
Yohimbine blocb prwynlptic: alpha.2 adf'ln.I'l1C ""pLan.
ILI.rUon OD penpft.:,aJ blood v_l.I... mbl.thar ,of ""'1"
pln..lhoulh it ia .....r and or.horl dUration. Yohimbln..
plnph.raI autonomic nenoWl l)'ltem .lrKI LI to lnCR'"
puM1IDpllheuc IchoHn'fI1cl and dtcrU.N IflIIpath.tac:
Ildrtn'rt1cJ Kllvlty, It II to be nCKld that in mat, ...uaJ
perfOrm&DCII. 'NCUon it ILaked tocholincl1lc amy", and to
aJpha.2 -rric bloc:kId. which mar ,bao,.UcalIy...w1 I
I.lnmuod pomI.lnflo.., d_..... ptll1l. ..,no.. or bo'b.
Yohlmbl..........Umulallnrac:U..o.lhtmood lAd may I
iDcrnM uaiI'Cy. Such anlonl haw not t.a adequauly
INdltd 0' ..ta.... .. d..... althoulh 'h.y Ippnr to nqu,.. I
b1rh d_ o( lho dN,. YolWnbln.lw. mdd 1A"..uu,."c I
IChon, probably V\a aUDlullUon ofhrpothalmlc ....otln U1d
...1... of paltenor pituitary honnon., .
Rtpol1ldJ,. YohimbiD' fUIU no IlfIUncanl Inlluence on
cardiac 'U.:suJalion and oth.r .trecu mtciilttd by 1l..dRn.,. :
lie rwt'IpC.on. itl,ff'tct on blood PrHlUrt.I(UY, would be to
lower it; hOftftr. no adequltlltudJet.,. It hand to quanu.
tala lId. .<<ICI in &..rmI or Yohimbln' dOla("
INDICATIONS .
YOOON Ia lndlca.... u ")'lDp.'hlcalyUc lAd mydmllc. II
IDa, have KtlvalY U I.D .phrudi.a1&C.
OONTItAINIIICAT/ONI .
IlnaI d.lINMI. ~ palienuMnaitivt to th. druC. In vtfW or
the IUnited and lnadIquace In(oataldon It hand. no p~
I&bull&ion can be off.red or addibon.1 toDtraladicauona.
Ilf~G ,
a...roIIy, thla dr\If II .ot p"'potod (0' UfO .. (.maI.. and
CftUlDI, mUll nOl be"," dunn, Pl't'(nln17. N'llh,,' \I ttuJ
dnIr propotod (or _In padil"',., IlIm"'c or can!i....noJ
plli.nu WIth IUU1Cor duodtnaJ ulctr hiIulry. NorlhouJd it
be UIId lD COftJWln.io.n wllh mood.modil'ymr drup luch u
IllnhdtP..-uta. or in ~1C'bil,"c pan.au In Itn,ra!.
,.\OVERlIE IlEACI'/ONS
IYohimbln. ......Ur penltntll'l th.ICNSlllnd pmdUtft. com.
pin patttm of ",pollNl In low., d_ thAn rrqulnJ 14
produce p'nph..... ".adr.n'me blockAde. n,.. Includ.,
tnll-diurftll. 8 ,,".ra! PlctUr. o( cwnlraJ tlCIt.1llon lndud.
~I"nadon o(blond prnrurt and hlln nlt IncnAJld mo-
or ac1IY1I" Imta.bUity and tttmor, 5....lInl. nlu." and
'omlllnc are common aller pannteral admmll1l"l1uon oftht
'Ea,l'" Aba dllzJn.... h..dacht. Jk.ln IlwlUnl rrporud
h,n UIId oraJl,I~
OSAGE AND ADMINIST/lA T/ON
~Plnm'nLaJ d~, r.porud In Ifr,lm.nl o( .rft'tllllmpo.
"c.:..111 LabI.115,e mclJ Ilmnlri.tY,toldullmaJeswen
DJI, Oa::LalonaJ .Id. .,freU ttporwd wlIh thLl de.... ~
'lata. LJi.U:JR_ or ntrvownl!U, In the 'nnl of 'Id, .fTKtI
"-.r.1I LO t. nducfd to I,: labllt J limN' diy, followl'd by
lduall.ncrt...1O I Ubl.1 J hm~ I day. ",penN thtrlPY
: mo,. than 10 W"UJ.
Ill' SUPPUED ,
'II 1Ab1.t.1 o( YlX"Iln'_!' III:! (f ~ 4 m.. In banI" Q( 100.
C .5.1159001.01. HW', NOC ~3IS!HXJI.IO, J.nd bhlltr. 1
',o( :JO', NOC ",31.5!l~XlI.JO I
!-mENCES I
'. .\for.IN'loJ.. .'1.."" t:nclandJoumaJ uf ,\lNieln,' IZ:!I,
o~.mDfr 12. 1981. I
lIOdm.1.ft, Oilmln -Th. Phll.tmaroJOIOc31 bULl 01 Tht'r:l'
UI'Q t1lh .-d. P 1~&lot( ,\ldldl.1ll
l"t'lI,lv (!mI06nC31 ,'linu:.11 irU,.r ~:~, ,lllh I l~olJ
\lomh.,rlJi, fh,.,hhHnJI\'ll'rfll"""'.:.:J l~...j~ I.I..!
. :,llUhltv I ~...~
~ '1' .,," .t /....1;..: f " '11.' ; ': '1 ,.., r" '/., _.
s,
NOC ::
4111..
10.
10.1
44lI
4019
~
161
16.\
1.16
24.
016
IIJ
114
116
043
063
lJ8.I
063
086
087
129
:!lj
218
219
220
221
222
061
062
a76
064
193
194
22J
224
22-'
2:Ul
227
029
on
028
121
14J
114
lC4
162
163
~16
tJ.I.l
O.I~
O.\r.
067
0611
<no
OZl
02~
001
0.11
fl.1~
tJU
~!j
~)
.IM
.\61
~~iO
"
Par PharmaceutIcal, Inc,
aNI RAM RIDal ROAD
IPR'Na VALLIV. NV 10177
COMPllTllJ!I!!tg!2! m P~OOUCTl
PAl' Phann&cluUca1,lnc. DWIulactul'lIlabl.Cllad tlPluJ.
wllh an Id.nuJ1cauon l)1"m IhatcolWNolthe lINn PAR i
&ad th. NOC prodUC1 DUDlben or product Itnnl1h Un.
pnnced or 'mbowd on the IUrflCt, To uptdj.. produ~ I
Id.nufication. .1ft ~lph.abfticaJ IlIun, of Par'. prcducu II I'
proY1ded bilow, f'.Ich produn cum. In. Tan.t, o(pttkq.
Ul,lprcllic.1uORl, wnh Ih. mOlt common btUlllOO'.. ~"I
and I(XX)'.,
Impnnt numbtn urn. u NDC numbtn .."pt wh.rI inlii,
catfd olh.l"WUI.
~rUCl
opunaol TaIllttal00 mr
Allop~nnol T.bl... 300 ml
Alp....,l.., Tabl... 0.24 IllI
AlplAlOlam Tabl... 0.4 IllI
Alp,...I"", Tabl... I mr
Bennroplne M.yl... Tabl.u o,~ me
Btnnroplne M.yll" Tabltu I Iq
Btnl1n1plnl M-:,llte To1bha.a ~ '''lI
Caruoprodol and Alplnn fabl.LI
200 rD1/325 rq
ChlonDUJOn. Tabl.u 2M ""
Cloaldin. HCI and Ch.Ion.halJdoa. Tabltta
O.IIll1/I'm,
Clonldla. HCl lAd ChIonholidon. Tabl.1I
0.2 millS me
Clonulln. HCl lAd ChIonhalidon. Tab/...
0.3 m,/15 IDI
Cyp",b.,wIlne HCl Tabl... 4 IllI
Drtum.thuone TabI... 0.2.5 me
Dtlam.dwonl Tabltta 0,5 me
Ouamtdwon. Tahlete 0.75 IDI
lltlWllllhuon. Tobie... 1.4 m,
Drtumtttwone Tablete e 11I1
lltUlll.lhuo.. Tobielo 6 mr
OoIlP" HCl Capoulao '0 IllI
Ilollpin HCl Ca~ ;!.S1llI
0011". HCl Ca~ 60 IllI
Oollpul HCl CapouIao 7' IllI
Oollp,n /ICl Capoulao UIO IllI
OollplO HCl CapouIao UlO Ill(
lluph.lWin. HCl Toblou L III(
lluph.lIUUl. HCI T....... 2ll m,
Iluph.n..... HCI TobJo.. 6 IllI
Iluph....... HCI T.....1o 10 IllI
' Ilurou_ /IC1 ~. 14 m,
Ilu"",,,... 1IC1 CaPfUl. JO IllI
lloIoPlnd,1 Toblalo o.a ..,
HaloPlndol Tabl.1o 1 ..,
/IaloPlndol T........ 2 III(
HoJoPlndol Tobloll6 '"'
/IoJ'Plndol Tobl.1o 10 ..,
H,citaJ...n. HCI TUI.1o 10 me
H,dnU&IU1. Ill.'! Tobia.. ;!.S me
1I"nU...nt Ill.'! Toblou 60 Ill(
'-hara.lwn. dC1 TUltla 100 m.1
H)dro,Zid,"lIydnUuul.lICl...lI,dnlc,~,,,,.
thWld.1 Caplulel 25 IDC/25 me
H)dro.ZldIlHydnU.uano HCland III-dnxhl,,,,.
Ihl&l.ldll ColPluJ. 50 me/60 me
Hyd,.,Zid.llIydnUuul.lIClIDd lIydn><hJ,....
thWldll CaPlul" 100 ,..'60 IllI
Ibuprofen Ta.bltta 400 m,
lbupru(,n To1bltll 600 me
[bupro(tn rlbl,tI 800 ml
(mlpranune IICI rlbl.LI 10 mil"
ImlprOlnune UCI Tabl.1I ~ me
lmlprllaun. ItCl Tabl.LI 60 me
lndIJmtltu.clD CapruJ. :.!.5 m.
fndllmllh.acln C,plul. 60 me
lM.orbld. Dinllrata Tahl.t.1 4 me
l1ll6Orbld. Dinltratl Tabl.u ID me
u..orbldt Oinm.te Tabl.u ~ ~
oo.orbld. Oinllntl Tablru JO m.
~It(lwn. Hel Tabl't.Il2.~ m.
MtrlLUnt IICf T,bl.L1 ~ mlf
~f~lwn' 110 Tahhu.l 60 me
~11'l:"tml '\UUlUI fibl.u .:0 mc
~tl'l:f1lml .\cr'Jll' f.tbl.u 40 mil
~I"uprtlll'rrnol SLllflt.t lnh.1J4uon $olullonl
OF':
\fl'l.Hlr'll,'r,nol ~ul(;ue rnhollolllon ~lullonl
lti.-;
\flUrrl'lo'"',,q! ~t1i(Jtl" r.lbll'l.! I.) me
'.',' I, ."'..,,.~ . -';11.11.' r ,Ill,.!, _'.\ .""':
PRODUCT INFORMATIOI
2411 1I11h_llAd AI..... T.....1o
COO 1IlI/3~..,'
1M IIl1hyldopa Olld lIydruc1lJollllhlaad.
2M1ll(/14111(
117 Mllhyld,pa Olld lIydrocllJolOlhlaad. .
2M Ill"~'" ,
III Mllhyldopa and lIydruchlo",'hluld. :
6OO1ll(/301ll(
119 Mllhyld,pa and IIrdruchlo",.hJIoIId. 7
600 m,/40 IIlI
094 MII",..clawl. Comp.-d T.bl...
2M Ill(
114 MII",..clawl. Comp.-d Tabl...
600..,
2.16 Min,odU Tobl... 24 Ill(
2.\7 MlaolldU Tabl.1o 10 Ill'
119 N"""ln Tobl.... 600,000 Uni..
442 PIodolol Tob/... 4 m,
44.1 PIodolol Tob/.Io 10 Ill'
4010 pj"'lIC1Dl CopouJ" 10 m,
441 PiroIlClDl Co...I,,:O Ill(
III ""'pIII'h.U.. S",mld. Tobl.1I14 m,
.521 SUur Sul(adiwn. Crum/l~
210 T.IO:UO_ Copoul.. 14 IllI
2el T.mutpam C'.~u1" JO m,
::'9 Tri.unttrtn' and lI)'drc(blorolhl,uld, :-.
7& fU,/SO m,
e&3 TrillOllm rlbl.la .12.5 me
4$l Triuolam T.bl...24 IllI
Parke.Cavil
Dlvilian af W.rn.r.Lambtrt Camplny
201 TABOR ROAD
MORRIS PLA'NS, NIW JERSEY 07950
'ARCODE'~
IP.rll.OavlI Accurll. Atcoonlllon Cod.,
C...
NUmber
'roducl Namt
001,
llOS
00'7
U.".._
DiIIJlt1n\!/ latltabll!\
I'Ach tabl.t canwa.a M me ph,nytoln .o(h~
USP.
U......,.,.a
Er,OIla'l!l Sublin",.. T.b/.Io
Eacb !.Ibltt C'OnWnt :t me 'rrownlne ~nr~l,
U""",.,d
IlaDdelamtnel.!l T.bllt.a
Each Ubl'l conLllN o,a IDm mtth,nlUJ1Ult m3
.1..., USP.
Ma.adelamt.ae..!l Tablt"
Each Llbl., tonllUl. I cram m.thtnlumn. ml~
d.I..., USP,
U....._
Pyndlu.~' T.bl,t.a
Each lJ bl.1 cunlalna ICO me ph'nuop)'rldl:':
hydroc:hlond.. USP,
Pyndiuml!' T.bl.LI
F.ach ubl.1 contlln, ~ m, phtn:u.op)Tldir.r
hrdroc:hlorad., USP
U.....1.flUd
Procan~ SR Tablet&, 500 ml
Each 'UlUlnrd.r.leue Llbl.1 cont.\u\.l 500 m.
pl'Ol"alna~ld. h)"drochlond.,
PrOC'UI',!1 SR TlbltLl. 130 11I1
Each JUlt:unrd.rrl.UC! Llbl.1 conL:llns :SO m.
pl'tlC01lnamld. h~1rochlondt
U.....1.flUd
PrOUQ~!I SR T.bl.1.Io 1000 m,
F~cn IWI4IMrd,r.ltut Ubl.t conL:llnt lOOt) ""I:'
P~lnlmld, h~drochlond.
II....~
Choltd)'I.~' Tabl,...
Earn L3bt.1 conUllU 100 mlC oUnph~lIin' L'SP
ConrlnlJfti an nur DIV'
rhl' PfDdurr mtorm",on wu O"P'"""" AU9ulf , JJoC 0"
"''''' _"a Off", P.tl..O.~" Protlll~fI. IIl/olm.rlon m.... b.
oO"m~ 0", 'ddtrll'''9 PAR1rEOAIIIS. D'il'..,on dr
w"",,, l.mo," Cllmnll"~ \fll,,,, "''''"' \"w
111'50 ."Ih
oos.
110
III
11:1-
lIS
111I
117
1M-
1711
,eo
III
11:1-
lO:I
204
:04
206
:la7
lOA.
m
110
.'
748 Pu.
~89 ATI,,\NTIC IlF.PORTER. 2d SERIES
J
LARSEN, Justice, dissentlnl(.
I dissent hased upon my dissentinl( opin,
ion in COIIIIIIOlllt'eolth v. Slorr. ~86 Pa.
530, ~06 A.2d1017 (1070), and would there-
lore rHerse the order 01 the Superior
Court.
j'
i\. ~:
" ....:
. '
" :.t
, -:::.,.
'r. "I'
......to,.
~; 1;0' '~
. ;I,'
"ii~
,,- ,
~
w
o illY.VIiIIII""'M
Norman C. MANBECK
y.
Shirley R. ~IANDECK. Appellant.
Superior Court 01 Pennsyl,'ania.
Argued Feb. 22. 1084.
Filed Feb. 6, 1985.
Reargument Denied April 11, 1085,
Husband filed a complaint lor a di,
vorce or an annulment. and wiCe (fled a
counterclaim Cor a divorce, '1110 Court oC
Common Pleas, Ciyil Division, Schwplkill
County, No. 8-673-1080, Dolbin, J.. entered
an order grnnting husband an annulmont
and denyinl( wiCe's reljuost Cor counsel Cees
and c05lB, and wile appealed. The Superi,
or Court, No. 2263 Philadelphia 1082, Wick.
ersham, J., held that: (I) psychological or
emotional disorder Crom which wile suC.
lered, relerred to by physicians as a sexual
disCunction and described us rendering her
incapable 01 participating in normal sexual
intercourse, was sufficient evidence on
which lO base u flndinl( oC "impotence"
and. hence, to warrnnt an unnulment 01
marriage given sufficient additional eyi.
dence lo Wllrra,a "n inlerence lhat Impo.
lence was Incurable. and (2) propriely 01 "
portion 01 Ihe equit.,hle distribution plan
worked oUI by lhe lrial court with respect
to the di\'Ision n( proJlert)' in divorce pro.
Cf.'llllinJ{ WIlS not Kuhject to beinK reviewed
when HOIIW Ilf the mnritnlllroPLlrty hut! us
)'I'l lo he .Ji_ided hy lhe t rill I eourt.
EXIIIIlIT n
AWrmed In part and remanded Cor Cur-
ther proceedings.
Montemuro, J., concurred in part and
dissented in part and filed opinion,
I, ~Iarrlage lI=o58(2)
Annulment oC a marriage on the
grounds oC Impotency is not warrnnted un.
less there Is prooC that the Impotency iI
natuml und Incurnble, 23 P.S. g 205(a)(4).
2. Marriage lI=o60(2)
Delay on part oC husband in seeking an
annulment oC marriage on ground oC wiCe's
impotency went only to husband's eredlbili,
ty and to weight oC his evidence, but did
not othenvise create an absolute bar to
husband's cause oC action. 23 P,S,
g 205(a)(4).
3. ~larrialO lI=o5812, 3)
The definition oC "Impolence" II .
cause Cor obtaining an annulment of IIW'
ringe includos incapacity not only reaultin,
Crom physical malCunction or impairment of
the sexual organs, but also includes Inca.
paclty based upon emotional or psycholoci'
cal lactors, 23 P.S, g 205(a)(4).
See publication Word. and Phrase.
lor other Judicial con.trucllon. and
den nit Ion..
~, Mania,e lI=o60(7)
Psychological or emotional dilorder
Irom which wiCe BuCCered, reCerred to b1
physicians as a sexual dlsCunctJon and d.
scribed as rendering her Incapable of pII'
ticipating in nonnal sexuallntercoul'le, wu
sufficient eYldence on which to bUB . find-
Ing oC "impotence" and. hence. to wamn'
an IInnulment oC marriago on husband'.
request given su((lcient additional evide...
to warrant an InCerence that ImpotenCll _
incumble. :!3 1'.8. g 205(aK4),
5. ~Iarrlale lI=o60l71
'I11Ore are cases In which incurable ..
potency warrnntinll' an annulment CIII be
inlerred Irom Cacts und cin:umstanC'H. .
P.li. ! ~05(ull~).
,.
, .~.
'.,
Pa,
~1.l~IIE(,K ", ~IA:'\IIE('J\
[II... ""'I t\.lJ HA lP.SUI1U, 191m
11..(",,' \\'1('1\ J-:H~ 11.\ ~1.
and .\IOST(jlnIJ.:HY, .1.1,
6. ~1urrluKl' ~tj(h j I
Adnll:;sioll till part of wlfl' thaI. ".'sl"'"
her hUl'ihand's n~lll'all!d altl'rnpls, lit) sl'xual
intL'rcnUl1lll hatl takl'l1 plill'I' hl't \\'1'I'n tlll'11\
thrnug'hnul :'!.I )'t-ar.; of fT1arrla~I' was :;uffi.
l'il'lIt .'\'illt!~l'L' to inr'l'r that Wlf,'s impo.
tl'I1l'(~ wus mcurahll' \\'urrantl/IJ.:' an ;\1111I:1.
men I. ~:l P,~. q ~O;'iall.ll.
7. IlI\'Urt'e ~2Sr,I:J, II
Orth'rs rt~J.;arcfin~ alimony and l'uUllsl,1
((It's in .Iivorl'tl :\I'tions :ihuultl bt. rt'Vil'WI'd
Imly for an abust' of dist'rt'1I0ll,
~, Uh'orre ~~:J9
J)etl'rminatlun that. whilt, rlilati\'j'
l'nrnings tJf partlt!s Wert' unellua!. l~an1ill~
l'apa,cltillS of eadl \\o'Prt\ sillular, thus prL'-
dudll1g' an nrdt!r rI~quirin~ hu:;hal1d to par
alimony, givt'n wifl"s ability to mailll.1i;1
hl'rsl'lf hy \'irtlw o( a IJlIt grolJrnin~ husi,
lIess, was sUJlJHlrh!d hy te:HlI1lOfI\' anti .<\'i.
dL'lIl'e tlf recurd. :!:J P,~. ~~ ~O;'(.al('U, :WI.
,,()lIali~l.
~. UtHJfee ~:!:.!6
Rl.t:ommendatinn o( ma:ilt'r in annul-
rnlmt proceedin~ that l!nch purt)' hl.'nr his
or her l}wn costs and l'ounsel fel'~ wus
bn:wd on findin.~ th:ll end1 pnrty Wus l:upa.
hie o( ,upporlln!: him,el( <lr hersel( and
that t~ach could provitll! (or his or her r~".
~oll"bll' needg and wns supported br I!\'i.
IIt~n~l' in record, .
I O. .\Iurrlu~e ""ti6
, Proprl",)' o( a portion <I( Ihe etluit.1hle
,h,tnhullun plan worked tlut h)' the trial
1'f1Urt with respl'ctto till' di\'lsion uf proper.
t~' In annulmentllrllCl'l'clinJ::' wus not subject
Itl 1ll'1tI~ re\'iewf~tf when SOml! o( tht' marl'
1;,1 prllpf~rty hnd as yettn he dinlt.'d II\' thll
trlal~llurt. .
, (lol"'rt Zun.., ~c1l1ll'lklil, (or apl,,'lIant,
, 'l"lIrf'I'1l E. lflll;an. Pot(;-;\'IIIt" for :l1'llt'l.
I'l'
hI ,,' \Ilrll .:'!, 19~1) 1'1. td ~Ol :tl, ~ ,'01. :)
1'') ~ :OIlJHf'd ' . ,
I ,hi 'd\rril ;!. 1<.j.~I) I I
I, " :011.,,,,, " ..,' .';" ",,~ :n' :J
,_ <1 _,
7019
~1OS1'EmJ/lO
\\'It'J\I':H~Il.\~1. .Iudl:":
StlrnUHl and ~hirh'y 'Iullllt'l'k WI!re mar.
rit'd till ~t'l)h'rntlt'r :.!~. t U:ili. PI:untifC,ap'
fll'lIt!t' :-':llrman ~tanbl'l'k fih!t1 a l'nrnplaint
III di.."r..e "n ~11l1' I~, lV~(J. T1U' e"llIplllllll
alll'Ul'd a ('aU~t! tlf actlun untlllr 3ectinn
:!OHa)(ti) of tlw Dh'l)rce (~tJ.Jl,1 11l1di~n1tit.!sl,
~ulli a l~atl~C of al'tiltlt under section
~O:i(aJ(.J) 1)( tht} Divnrcl' C()tll': (impotency
of Ihe defendllnl'llpln'"l1nt Shirley ~llIn'
beekl. Shirle)' ~llIlIh....k (i1ed an an.wer
containinJ::' a counterdnim for iJ1lJi~nitil'~
under seetion ~Olilllim. She ulso filed
elailll' (or alimony un' I eouusel fee. und
requested thut the partit'rt' rnari~1 property
be ..quiUlhl)' ,U..rihuted.
A master Was ill1Puilltl'd anti ht!nrin~9
Wl're held. The ma.ster fl'curnmendctJ that
the court grant an nnnulment on the
ground Ihat appellallt WII" and i. impolenl.
The mllSter (ound thlll ,.neh part). wa.' ca.
puhle o( .upportinl( him.ol( or tlersel! and
thllt ..uch ,ould pro..ido ror his or her rea-
sonable needs. Thus, he recommended
thul no IIlimon)' he I(rantt,d. He al.o (ound
thut the purties ,hou"l !,Il)' their own COUll-
.e! (ee. and co,ts. Euch part). Willi h'l'ant-
cd a otw-haJf (II.:) interl'Ht in the maribl
honw and, with Ime 11)C1'L'ption, the other
marl~ll property was t.!llllltably tii\'ided.
Appellllnt filed timely nxceplions to the
mastl'r's report, 'Vith tilt! \.-xeeption of the
iSHUl! of aJl(lt~lIl,tis (It!l1Hlu", the !owt1r l:ourt
Cool'urreu in the fintJinu,ll nnd rt'commcnua'
liun:; of tht! mash'r. 111111 llismisscd all 1)(
apllt'llant's l'xTeptinnH, 1'"Cllpt thO~t.1 rclat.
in~ to tllll distrluutiun or lIppl'lIet"~ lwnslon
pJan,J In an III"III'HI :1tlll tlrcler dnh'd .July
lU. lU~~, It1l' "",,,'rahlo' lI,malol O. Onlhm
J.;'rantt'd :-':onnan ~lanlu'I'k an annulment
pllr~uant to St'l'tlllll ~tJ:iIIlH.1) uf Llw Di\'orL't!
~ I
I'
,I.
I
I
I,
I
I
I
,
.1, In Ill!> llrdt'r of lul\ IV. I "Il!, Judj:C' 01)111111
ICnl.lndcd .1 pnrlllln \II tllr ...1)(" In the 111~ltr
hI' ,h(' rurp.l\t' ul IJklllt.! It,.1I11101l\. nn the I~UC'
01 lilt' dl\I"I\lllllll III ,1111".IIt'.. \ p('n\hlll I'I,HI.
~ ~ -~
750 Po.
~89 ATLANTIC REPORTER, 2d SERIES
I
Code. Shirley Manbeck's requests for 011.
man)' and counsel fees were denied. This
appeal timely followed.
Appellant presents 0 number of issues
for our consideration.' The flrllt issue is
lllllted os follows:
Did the lower Court err in recommend.
ing that on annulment be granted on the
grounds that wife was naturally and in.
curably impotent at the time of the mer.
riage?
Brief for Appellant at 3,
11 1 To justify the grant of nn annul.
ment on the grounds of impotA!ncy it must
be proven that the impotA!ncy ia naturalnnd
incurable, 23 P.S, g 205(a)(4). Appellant
concedes that the parties never completed
vaginal Intercourse during the marriage.
She argues, however, that appellee failed
to meet his burden of proving that she was
"impotent" and that thia impotence was
"incurable," She also avers that appellee's
claim with regard to her alleged impotency
ia barred by the doctriDe of laches.
We will address the laches question first.
Generolly, mere delay iD briDging a divorce
action ia not a ground for denial of the
reliet sought. Regan v. Regan, 227 Pa.su.
per. 552, 322' A,2d 711 (1974). The Regan
case noted. however, that long delay in
bringing 0 divorce action after a'parotion.
although not grounds for denialiD nnd ot
itself, casts doubts on the good faith at the
plaintiff. We Dote that in the case sub
judice. plaintiff.appellee filed his complaint
in divorce on ~ay 14, 1980, almost one
month beJor, the parties separated in early
June at 1980. Thus. there was no delay in
filing the complaint atter separotion.
[21 [n another ClIlIe discussing the cf.
feet of delay In bringing a divorce action.
this court stated:
Although it is true that long delay in
bringing a divorce action cuts doubt on
4. Oh'cn our disposition o( Ihls appeal. \Ve find h
unnecf.u.u)' 10 .uMrcu Jppcllilnt's firth IUUC
which ,he !lU.les .u rullo,",,'I:
Old Ihe lo",er CQun CrT In nOI gJilnllnJC wl(e
a diomrcc on the GTDunds or Indlll0lllcS.1
One:( ror '\Pr<lI.1nl 011 .l.
0, ,
the good taith of the plaintlU, it does not
bar 0 decree where the right to a divorce
is otherwise clearly eSlllbllshed, Gillen
v. Gil/en, 195 Pa.Super, 60, 169 A,2d 340
(1961). It only affects the credibility at
the plalntift in the consideration of the
finder at the tacts.
Campbell v. Campbell, 205 Pa.Super, 207,
211, 208 A,2d 36, 38 (1965). We find that
the delay in the Inslllnt case goes only to
the credibility of the appellee and the
weight to be given the evidence; the delay
does not create an absolute bar to appel.
lee's cause ot action.
Pursuant to the Campbell case, supra,
the question then beeomes: was appellee's
right to an annulment otherwise clearly
established. Appellant argues that appel.
lee failed to meet his burden at proving
that she WRS incurobly Impotent. As previ.
ously sllItA!d, both parties admit that they
never completed vaginal intercourse dUring
the marriage, At the master's hearing on
November 10, 1981, appellant precented the
teatimony ot Doctor Harold B. Cooper.
The teatimony of Dr. Cooper and the writ.
teD report of Doctor Richard Kleppinger
entered into the record indicated that while
appellant ia physically Cllpable of sexual
intercoune, she suffers from a psychologi.
eaI or emotional diaorder referred to aa a
"sexual diafUDction." Dr, Cooper further
tA!stlfied that a person diagnosed as hlLving
a sexual diatunctfon "would be SOmeone
that cannot participate with normal sexual
intercoune." N,T" 11-10-111, at 32,
C3. ~ ) We must fIrSt deeide whether 1Lp-
pellant's "sexual distunction" is suftlcient
evidence on which to base a finding of
impotence, As the trial court noted there
is little appellate ClIlIe law in Penns;lvania
dealing with the subject of male impotence
and even less with female impotence, I~
Wilson v, Wilson, 126 Pa.Super, 423, 191
II is lrue thai neilher the mailer nor the lower
'Dun diSC~d or ruled on appellanfs counter.
claim. While We do nOI condone this, omlulon
we (eel thai given our afflrmallon or the gran;
of the annulmenl. ills unnrcesSOlry 10 hne .he
CDun conSider appellant', cOUnlerclOllm.
MMmECli v, ~IMi/lECI\
CU..U 4IS9 .-\..:..t 7"" IPiI_IrtuflC'r. 191t~1
A. 661; (19:17), this court held Ulat impo.
tcncll as a C3UlW for dh'orcc S mt~nns the
incap:,city (or sexual intercourse. IVI'
aR'r(~l! with the lower COUrt that this dciini.
tion includes "incapacity not only resulting
(rom physical mal(unction or impairment of
the sexual organs, but also incapacity
based up..n emotional or psychological fac.
tors." Lo,\o'cr ct. IIp. at !"Hi. SL't', Ri(..'kard.~
I'. Rick" r<is, :1 Storey 13.1. ,j3 Dt'1. t:l4, 166
A.~d .125 1191;0): lIit'bink I'. lIicbink, ,16
:oJ. Y.S,~d :WI, aff", ~69 App.Div. 781;, ,j6
:oJ.Y.S.~d :197 119~5). Inst.,ntly, appellant's
own witness testified that a person din~.
nosed a.~ hal'ing a sexual ,lis function would
be someone that cannot participate with
normal sexual intercourse. IVe find thai
appellant's sexual disiunction makes her
incapable of normal sexual intercourse and
thus is a \'nlid h"Tound for annulment of the
parties' marriage.
Appellant next claims thai appellee failed
to prove that she is "Incurably" impntent.
[t is tnw that no doctor testified that appel.
lant's condilion was incurable. It is also
troe, however, that there was no testimony
that nppellanl's sexual disfunction was cur.
able.' OC course, appellee bore the burden
oC proving his wi(o's "incurability." Since
no medical testimony est.'lblished whether
appellant's condition wns incurahle or not,
we must look at the other e\'idence present.
ed in order to tjeterminu \....hethur appellee
met his burden 'IC proof.
5. Prior 10 the promull1iJuon IIf Ih~ Di\orce Cude
of 1980, Impolent)' was tlToumh for .!uorc:e.
SeclIon 205(a)(4) of Ihe Divorce Lude alluw~ ,m
indi\'lllual 10 ~ecurc an utululml'nt If the III her
'pome:, .lIthe lIme: of ,"3rflaG~, wal Olnd 0,1111 i,
n:lluralh' and incur;ablv ImpOlent, We: do 1101
belie:\'e: lhal the (,1'1 thoU the: Oi\nrcc c()U~
changed Ihe l~pe l)( rrhd t;rOll1tl'd from J .ll'
\'oree 10 .In ,lnnlllrnenl dfl'(t.. t:'flnr ':.l\C !.1\\
wuh regard 10 Ihe: JcllI1ll1UI1 of lUlpnle:ll'\
6, When Jsked how he wIlIIIJ Ircal ,lppcllJ.nt ')
problem, Dr. LUUP<"f rrp!u'J 'Tilt' p.1lll~nt .Inti
panncr ..hnuJd 11t' relerrrd fC]r prompl r '1' I pH
eholut<fIC.11 ,lnd l'mUll01l.lJ ,Inll ..e\ll.Ill.our1\l'ilrw
,H1d H:uld.lncc'" S,T., Il-ll}..il. .11 ~~, fill)
JOC) nUlllh..lI~'JIt', taml'\c'r, Ih.ll "Uth ,OUI1..~'lltl..:
\ltuuhJ IltU~""Jllh dur ,lPI'l'H,1l1l
7, ,-\\ lht.' 11~\H'r UJUrt ,lplt\ \l.lh'd
Pa. 75]
The majority of aplJl'lIl't!'S I!\'idt!ncc on
the annulmt'l\I ~round had to do with the
partil's' failurll to ~onsummat.c the mar.
ri3~(! .}\'t~r :1 tWt1ntr.iour (:!,1) y~ar period.
Appellet' testifh'" that he ha.l altcmpwl to
ha\'e intercllu,-sp wilh his wiit! I)n innurnt?r.
nhlt~ ilccasil,)ns. Each attt'rnpt wa.') uhi.
mate I)' rehu(f,'d wh"1l "pp"llant tol<l 11I'r
husband that sIll' Was li..'d or didn't Ccd
wloJL' Appellallt adnll~; thai 00 vah~nal
intercourse had, jn fact, occurred Ulrough,
out the marriaJtll.
[5, iiI At this point, We find it appropri,
ate to note that there i~ no appell3tc case
law in Pennsylvallia that holds that a 1'1'\'-
sumption of impotence arises whe'..e no in.
tercourse has taken place Cor a h~ven
length oC time. Some ~ew ,Ierse)' caSI'S.
on tiw other hand. have adopted the rule of
triennial cohahit.'ltion. This rulc prol'idl'S
that a presumption oC impotence ma)' arise
(rom the wife's remaining a virgin for
three (3) years, dunng which time the par.
ties cohabit. Sec Bisscll I'. Bi.~vr/l, 93
N,J.Eq. .,37, 117 A. ~52 (1922): Tompki,lS
I', Tompkin.v. 92 :oJ.J.Eq. 113, 111 A, 599
(19201. See II/sO lIeller t'. lIeller, 116
N,J.Eq. ,';4:1. 174 A. .'i73 ll9:141 (st.'lting that
although incurability ma)' be presumed
Crom the est.'lblishmcnt of nppropriate
Cacts, :;uch as continued cohabitatioll where
the wift! is apt yet remains a virgin, a
period oC two 12) months WIlS wholl)' inadl~
qualC to cause a presumption to arisel.
TIle se,u.ll prohlems. In Ihis. unhilPP~' unIOn
commenced IIn Ihe hone\'mOCln and have per.
sisted for the loUt I"enl\"lour years, When
husband trlell 10 ~onfulc JII~ deslrrs 10 hi..
brliJt' ,llhuu!lnd Ilr 51) IUnt's, lhe nbJfi:t (If hi"
Iou quest InJtJ him 10 "~nuck II ufr or Ihal
dIe wa.. lIfed ,lnd didn't lee! t>:oot.1, ffO\H\'tr,
h(ll'(' resldell "bundanl III taub,lneJ', t.'mollnn.
.111 e~cn cllr ant..l hf! pt'f\IIIt.'d thruul(hllllt IWen.
ly,t~1\lr \t.ln, nr mu hundred r.1!ihtv'C1tlI1l
nUHllh, II> ,IIIClnl11 10 l:cmtnl Ihelr IInton HI J
connele rTlJnlll'r, \'o1ln JI\LllnJlIIt~$' \l,.'tre IllS
Jllempl\ Illr hi,) \\lk!t rel\JI:lance: ur '..cluJI
,hnr!\.If(UIl ,uuhJ 11111 he Ol\t'fromc .1I1d \he
rern.\lIlt"IJ In\Ilr/1HHllllabll' .lnd It} hlfn, btr
prllt'!I~'Ill" IIl1rl.tll'lr,lblr' .In\J 1I1\.:nIlJhle II Ii
,m 1ll\I,HhC III ille 'plfll 1\ \lnwlillllj~ IhnLJ.;h
the dl'~n t'e 'unn..;'
..u\\t'r ,I "p ,.1 I"
.'
752 Po,
489 ATLANTIC REPORTER, 2d SERIES
While we .10 not specifically adopt the rule
of triennial cohabitation, we feel that the
reasoning giVing rise to the rule iI valid.
There are CBSes In which incurable impoten.
C). con be inferred from the facta and cir.
cumstances. TIlis Is such 0 cue. Instant.
Iy, appellant has been dial{1lo.ed lIS haVing
o "sexual .lisfunction." Appellant admits
that, despite her husband's repeated at-
tempts, no intercourse had taken place
throughout the twenty. four (24) )'ear mar.
riage. We find that, given the facts of this
ellSe. there WBll sufficient evidence to Infer
that appellant Is incurobly impotent. Thus,
we aUirm the lower court's gront of an
annulment bllSed on seetian 205(0)(4) of the
Dh'orce Code.
Appellant's next two (2) issues are stated
lIS follows:
Did the lower Court err in den)ing the
low income wife any alimony despite the
much higher income of husband and the
existence of a twenty.four (24) year mar.
riage?
Did the lower Court err in denying
wife any counsel fees or costa whatsoev.
er?
Brief for Appellant at 3,
(71 Our scope of review lIS to essential-
ly monetary judgments in divorce actions is
limited, Orders regnrding alimony and
counsel fees should be reviewed only (or an
abuse of discretion. Remick v, Remick.
310 Pa.Super. 23, 456 A.2d 163 (1983). Un.
der this standard. we are not to usurp the
trial court's duly as the finder of (act.
Ruth v. Ruth. 316 Pa.Super, 282, 462 A.2d
1351 (1983),
In the case sub judice, the master (ound
that appellant has (ailed to meet the statu.
tory requirements to justify an award of
alimon)'. Initially, the mnster found that
appellant is able 10 support herself through
her present self..,mplo)'Tnent as a dog
s. ~C1 of Apnl 2. 1980. P,L 6J. No. 26. ~ ~Ol. ~J
P.S. ~ lOIl.1(21.
9. We bcllc\'c this 10 he the biUis or .he mUler s
an31\'11I gl\cn his ,"ommenll ftKilrdinlllhc dl,"
Inbullon uf mi1r1lo1l propen'.: "(51111cl: rappel.
lanll i. \clrot.'mplu~'ccJ. {appcll.1n11 is able' It} ol
'~'; ~ . _ ;. ,', .!, f::J. ,".
....,.1\.' ,~,
.......
groomer. See section 501(0)(2).' Appellant
testified that during her marriage to Nor-
man she worked only part time at her doll'
grooming business and that her income
during that time was between $2.500.00
and $3,000.00 per year, (N.T" ll-lG-8I, Ilt
56-57). The master obviously believed that
appellant could increase her income by ex-
panding her business and working longer
hours.' That the lower court agreed with
the mllSter's finding is apparent from its
statement: "It is clear from the record thllt
[appellant] by virtue of her pet grooming
business is quite capable of mllintalning
herself," Lower ct. op. at 9, We find no
abuse of discretion In that concluaion,
Appellllnt points to the unequal income
of the parties as support for her lU'gtlment
thllt Illlmony should have been awarded.
The master slAted:
[Appellant], while not earning the same
amount of yelll'ly income as [appellee],
has an eSlAblished lrIlde Ilnd Is employed
aa a dog groomer, Given the fact that
both parties are regularly employed at
admittedly satisfactory jobs, no particu-
lar significance could be plaCed on the
relative eaminga and earning capacity of
the parties.
MaslA!r's Report, R.R. for Appellee at 223,
Thus, the master appanmtiy decided that
while the relative eamlnga of the parties
are unequal at the present time, the esm.
ing capacitiu of the parties are similar,
We believe that the record sufficiently sup-
ports this conclusion.
(81 We hold that the findings and con.
elusions reached by the master and Ildopted
by the lower court are supported by the
testimony and evidence of record, The
maslA!r considered each of the facton set
forth in section 501 of the Divorce Code
and set forth his reasons for denying an
award of alimony. The lower COUrt
ccnain CJUe"1 10 conlrol her Income depending
on how much ttme (Ippcllanl) deSires to
work.... (Appell.o'l h.. ,he poleo",1 10 10.
crr:uc her Income in her sclr~mploymenl."
Muter', Rcpon. R.R. ror Appellre .11 JOil..]lO,
'.,
... '. . ~i.
.- "
..j'...
adullted lht' lIla~t~r's rt~ptlrt.
ahuse u( dhil:rctiulI,
MANln:c" v, ~1,\NIn:('Ji
CII... 411' I\.lJ 701' lr._'jupu. 1911!\1
W" find nil ACfirnwd in pari and rI'mand..d for pro,
r('I'dil1~s nut mcunsistl'llt with this opiniun,
JuriscHclinn is rl'linqul:1lwti,
{OJ TIll' fJ1IHitl'r also rl'I'ornml'ncfl.t1 that
t!uch party IJIlar Ills or tll'r own cost..'i and
cuunsel rel's. Thl.' l'Hurt adopted this rec,
ornrn(!IHlatinn, (jivl'n tht' "l'lHlUrnic cons ill,
l'nlliollS lllrt':uJy disl'USM'd, WI' a~ain (ind
no allllsP of disl'rt'tiufl,
Appell:IIII'" fOllrth iaall.. ,h'al" wllh ell IIi.
t.ahle lfistrihulilln:
Did ttlt! 111\\'f~r CtlUl't t!rr in dividing- the
marit.al homl.' ~qllally tlll'rcfllr fnrcin~
wife to \'ncatl' the I)rt'mist':; unci her place
of ..mployment'!
Brief for Appellant at :I.
(10) At this point, we must reitl!r:lte
that the 10wI" court remanded the issue uf
the di\'ision lIf appelll'c's p~nsion plan to
thl' muster (or further h~aring-s und recum.
mendations. Thus, it is dear thai we do
not ha\'e the entirc equit.lhle di'1tnbution
pllln hefore us. IVo aro of tho opinion that
we should not considt!r the propriet)' of a
pOrlion of tho elJuiu,hle liistributioo plnn
whon some uf the mnriu.1 proporlY has nut
yet beon di\'ideli.
In his order uf July 19, 191'2, Judge Dol.
hin dismissed nppellant's exceptions to the
Master's Report; however, :iincc he (ound
it nocessary to remand Iho pension plnn
issuo to till! maHler, Judge Oolbin liid not
enter a (innl order as to the t.!quitable dig.
trihution uf lIIariUlI proport).. Sinco there
is no finnl order uf oljuiu.hh, ,tistrihntion,
we willnol address nn)' "llnimblo IiL.tribu.
tion issues. .Ifllrpily I'. Drollg, :121 Pa.Su.
por. 340, 468 A.21i 509 t19o:lllper curiam I
(order dismissing' exceptions is not a final
urder und, therefore. not Ullpel1lablt~I,
ThlH;, we mu:it remund tlw ~n51! to tJw
lowt.!r court so thut the tii\'isiun 1)( aPl'l!l.
lee':i pension plan may Iw dl'cltied, TIle
court :ihouhl alsf) cOIHHlJl'r the I~ffect, i(
any, 1)( tlw di\'islOn IIf the IWltSlon plan nn
the dh'ision Ilf the litheI' IIHlrltal property,
I, ,\pprllcC' \ l."UnlI'IJI/l1 pr;I\l'd fur dl\'Url-e Ulllhl"
Hrllund, III 1I11Jq,{II1IlI'~, .u. \H'II ,1'1 annullllt'1Il of
.1 \lllllablc marn"~t' unJrr 13 "S, tt :O~laH.s1
The' 1II.1lo11'r IIIHml Ih:1I ,IPI't'llt-e had 1.1 I ll'll II)
C~I,lhh~h .:rnulhh IHI ,t ill\urn' ha\l'd UI1 Indll-!'
. ,-
..' "'-f'~' .,."j ...',
Pa,
71i:!
~1O:-iTE~U:H(), .f., file" a "ulll,"rring '"111
dis~wntinl-t opinioll,
MO:-iTr.m,'!W, ,Jlld~l', O'lIncllrring and
dis:H.'ntin~:
Whih, ( a~rl'e with tilt' majority's dl~l'j,
sinn that reVIl'W o( the l!qlli~1hll' distrihu,
tinn plan is prematurl' at thi~ tinw. ( tlh;a.
gri'l' with the rr.ajority's conclusiuns that:
(I) lacheo io inappropria'" Ill're, and 121 the
trial court did nol abuse iL't discretion no..
KardinK tho denial of alimony to IIppollanl.
Tho majority rejec", app!!lIant's laches
an~~ument by relyinJ.{ on UlI! often rt!lleatcd
prinCIple Ihal lIlero delay in hrin~~ng a di,
vorce action a(lA!r separation is not hTJ'Ouml
for denial of relief sou~ht, Regan I'. H,.',
gn", :!27 Pa,SuJler, 5!i2. :J2~ A,:!d 711
(1!174). In applyinK this Ilrinciplo, tho ma'
jorilY noteo that tho appoll!!e filed his com.
plaint "In di\'orce" hofore "eparntion, "0
tlwre wns no lfelay after separation at all;
and, in any ,!vent, do lay would only affoct
the credihility of appolleo in the conoider".
lion of the finder of fact. Campbell ".
Campbell, ~05 Pa.Super. 207, 208 .l.2d 36
(lDUii).
Although ( acknnwll'd~l' the soundness
of this principlo, it MUnns from actions in
di\'orco hao!!d on fault ~.,.ound9. My re-
search hus nut re\'ealed any l'll..'il'S wherein
this prinL'iple W:L'i applil'd to the annulment
o( J \'oitlnble rnurriaJ.:'e. and, in rn)' \'iew,
oueh a prlllclplo ohould not :lpply to actiuu"
o( annuhnl!Ot II( a \'oitlahlp mnrrin~l'. as is
lhl' ('ll.'it' bl'iorl' mL I
In actiuns IIf di\'orcl' hmwd un (ault
~r()und:;, ttll' prlllciph! thnt. delay I-:Ol'S Iml)'
to crL'dibility l!t'rl\'l'!i frorn concerns o( tilt!
alllhenlicilY of II", all,.~..d faull ~",oullds,
:such l'orH't!rn:; arhill~ at a timl' (lrinr to the
llI11r\. hUI 11ll1dudrd lhal ,In ,1IH1Ulmenl \lias
prnpt'r fht' !rlal ,oun dial tWI ,h.ldre~'1 Ihe
l'rtJprll~I\' \If lhl' HhJI~lIl1lt~S dalll1, hut ":011.
\IJell'\! Illlh tilt' .1I111uhncl1l \ 1~lIm, ,lIld .:r;llllt'aJ
lht' ,IIlIlUhllt'lll
"~l, .'~:_'._~"f',
754 Po.
489 ATLANTIC REPORTER. 2d SERIES
Implemen14tion of no-fault divorce. I(
there was 0 long delay after the alleged
fault grounds accrued ond before the dl.
vorce action was brought, the delay raised
the question o( whether the divorce was
brought in sincerity ond truth (or those
grounds, or whether the divorce had been
brought for the mere purpose o( being
freed ond separated from a spouse. GlIr.
rouoay t'. Gurrou'ay, 361 Po. 464, 65 A.2d
414 (1949).'
Here. ~owever, we do not have the issue
of delay raised In the context o( an action
(or divorce brought on (ault grounds. In.
'stead, the question of delay before US
arises In an action for annulment of a void.
able marriage. which is significantly diUer.
ent from a divorco on fault grounds. A
voidable marriage is valid and subsisting
unless and until challenged by either party,
In lntert'st of .\filler, 301 Pa Super. 511,
448 A.2d 25 (1982); but contains an impedi.
ment or defect at ita Inception which per-
mits the marriago to be nulllfied. N.
PERLBERGER. PENNSYLVANIA DI.
VORCE CODE ~ 3.2.1 (1980). Most impor.
tantly, the defect enn be ratified or con.
doned. thereby barring any attack on the
validity of such voidable marriage. ld.; 23
P.S. ~ 205(b).'
Thus, while delay in an oct/on in divorce
based on fault grounds goes only to credi.
bllity, delay in on action o( annulment of a
voidable marriage enn be 0 type of ratifica.
tion which will act lIB a complete defense.'
In an action of annulment o( 0 voidable
2. tn G.lrroWdY, the husband commenced an nc.
lion (or divorce b...d un lndlanlti.. which had
allegedly occurred over seventeen years previ.
olUly. Th. coun held lhallhe hlUband had nOI
brOuBht the Dellon on .he grounds of IndllT1illcl
In Hood (allh. and inllmated lhal hll motive
miRhl have been 10 lennlnalc OlD existing CDun
order (or his wife's suppa".
l. 2J r.s.! 205(b) provides: ",.. The vaJldlly o(
such \'oidable man-bit ~hall nOI be subjecl 10
AI1DCk or question by any penon If II IS subse.
quenlly coniirrntd by Ihe panics IherelD ,."
(emphasis odded).
4. Estoppel bcc:1we of delav is nDI new 10 Ole.
lions of \-oid.able marnages. Ie annulmenl ",c.
1I0nl bUC'd on cen.1ln types of voidable defeels
"." ..... . :'\.:.4.,1' ." ",,~l"'.... ,':.....,...\.,. ',', '. ..
'. ",:".-.' .,.......
marriage. the factor o( delay does not
merely require us to consider whether the
asserted defect is 0 trumped.up guise, but
whether. anuming the validity of the de.
feet, the complainant has ratified that de-
fect.
Other jurisdictions hve held that laches
Is applicable to bar an action o( annulment
bosed on Impotency where the complaining
spouse continues to live with the oUending
spouse (or an unreasonable length o( time
afwr learning of the impotency. See cases
discussed in Annot., 52 A.L.R.3d 589 ~ 22
(1973); Annot., 28 A.L.R.2d 499 ~ 7 (1953).
Appellant specifically points to Kinchb.
aum v. Kinchbaum, 92 N.J.Eq. 7, IliA.
697 (1920), where a wife. having lived with
her husband (or eleven years, brought an
action for annulment based upon his impo-
tence. The court held that where the wire
hod accepted and enjoyed the benefita,
such lIB they were, o( a merely platonic
marriage (or more than eleven years, she
could not be permitted to repudiate the
contract but was held to have ratified It by
conduct which she in no way explained.
The court noted that In the absence o(
explanation, they would not meddle with
what the complaining party's conduct
showed, though a considerable number of
years, to be no grievance.
Our research hllB not (ound any Pennsyl.
vania clllIes addressing this issue, however,
in Wilson v. Wilson. 126 Pll.Super. 423, 191
A. 666 (1937), this court approvingly re-
(erred to Kinchbaum in dJc14. The Wil.
are nOI commenced within lillY days after th.
ml1niaae ceremony, lhe maniqe Is no lonser
deemed 10 be voldabl.. 23 P.s. ~ 205(a)(2. l).
In actions allelllnll voldabl. de(ectl based on
fraud. duren. coercion. or rorce. Ir. afler dls.
covery of Ihe unlawrul conducl, the complain.
ant voluntarily conllnues cohabhallon. an ac.
lion of Ihll llTOund will be barred. N. PERL.
DERGER. supra.' J.2.J(d). Even In annulment
actions where Ihe mamaae was void rather
than merely voidable, Ilmellness hu been reo
sponslble for bamnll the aCIlon. Diamond v.
Diamond. ~Ol Pa. 418. 461 A.2d 1227 (l98J):
IV'Utrop \'. W'Utcup. 190 ra.super. J84. 154 A.2d
JJ2 (1959).
MANBECK v. ~IA:-;IIECI{
ClI......."A.1dHI1Pa.SullI'r.I'''!\)
IW" Cuurt llt'alt with till' isslIe of whettwr
natural and inL't1rahh~ impotency mt'ant
sterility or the inahility to ropulate. After
derlllinl( that the wife's sterllit)' did not
amount to natural and incurable imlllJtenc)';
Ihe court pointed out that. althlllll(h they
tlid 1101 decitJl! wlwtfll'r (nlUd11lenl conet'a).
mt'nt uf known and permanl'flt :Ht..'rility
would he a ~rullnci for annulml'lIt in Pt'lln.
sylvunia, tlw husband had l'ontinuctl to l'O'
hahit with the wife (or two ami lln".half
>'l~ars after he knew of Iwr true phYf1kal
condition, and l'iled h~ir.'ichb(lllm.
I would tlR'ree with lhl! reasollin~ 1)(
',irschbaulII and hold that laches is appli.
t'uble to an action in unnulm(!nt bused un
impotency. In a suit (or nullity of a mar.
rial{l!, when', as here, the (aclS nod circum-
sUlnces so ploinly imply that the romplain-
ing ~pouse recognized Ule l~xistcnce and
I'alidity of the marrial(e and accepted the
s(.uus of hushand or wife, it would be most
ine'luiUlble and eontrnry to public policy
that he or she should be permitted to treat
the marriage relation as if it never existed,
Set Donati t.. Clwrrh. 13 ~.J.Super. 45t
80 .\.~d 1;33 1195H.' Thus, I would find
that ap(lellee's twentl'.four year delay in
challenging the I'alidity uf the marrial(e
exhibited his ratification of appellant's im.
porency, and so he is barred from assertinl(
ap(lellant's impotency now as a basis for
annulment,
I am ulso in ,lisab.,.eement with the ma.
jority eoncerninl( the issue of alimony. TIle
majority finds no obuse of discretion in the
trial court's denial of alimony, which was
based on the master's recommendation.
The lower court's reasoning for the denial
of alimony wos enca(lsulated in its sU~e'
5. or coune, where the complaining pan~"s de.
la)' in rno\'lng ror annulmenl on lhe baSIS u(
impOIcncy is c-,plained h~' bona (ide hopes Ilf
improHd t,;onditiun, Ihe l:omplaininK 'pou)e
wuuld nOI IUl\'C rallfied Ihe marTlall'c, SU Sil/~'
U \', Sing,,., 9 ~J,Super. 397, i.a A,2d t'l21
(19~O), In Ihc l'ase JI bar, Jppellce leuified lh.u
he made 01lC,"p15 10 ha\'c \c., wllh his wl(e until
1912 or 'i). Jnd Jflcr th.u hc ~a\'e up, ~,T,
AUKuSI II. 1981. JI ~7, \\'llhuut Jccldin~
Whclher mlermlllCI11 ;lltempu to h.ne ~euJJl
imen:nune wnuld l..'on!llllUle bona fide hopcs uf
.In lfnpn1\t'd lOllLhlltln. Jppcllcc'\ l:OIlIlIlUl'lI,C...
Pa. 71i,i
m,'utthut "It is dear from tt", record that
the [a(lpellalllJ hy ,."tue of '...r (let I(room.
inl{ hUliilws!i is 'Iuite l'aJlahle I)f mainl:linin~
twrself," LO\\'(tr Cuurt Opinion at U. To
the t~ontrar:'. it is far from dear that "ppl'l.
Inrll ~an maint.ain hen-wlf on till! income
from lwr pet h~()nminl{ husiness,
The evidence prestll1tt.'d at thC' muster's
hearing' re\'lluled that appellant's do~
groumin~ hllSine:is took in $:J130!J,tiO }.;'rmHi
income in 19801 ur $2,iGU,:!6 net incornll,
This income tiJturn wus not disfJuted; how.
ever1 it rl:'pre~entcd appellunt's efforts IInly
in the l!\'lminJ.: and on Saturdays, The mns-
ter's lindinl( thul appellant was able to
sU(lport herself throul(h dog h'l'Ooming ap-
parently reneclOd a conclusion that if al"
pellant pursued dOl( h.,.oominl( on a full.
time has is. she would hal'l' the !'opacity to
support herself. TIlis hypothetical "nrninl(
potential of appellant WllS belied hy the
rncord. however,
Appellant testified that since the separa.
tion. she hod been available for full.time
employment, but that her workload hod not
increased. N .T. November 10, 1981, at 65.
She loter explained that most of her cus.
tomers worked and, consequently, the only
time that they brought their pets for
groominJi wa.s in the evening, {d. at 7.&-i5,
She further testified that it WIIB rnre that a
Saturdal' groomiul( WIl8 requested ld.
When questioned by th" master llS to
whether she would be prevented from pur.
suing her dog grooming business dUring
the do,., appellant responded that she hod
problems with her hands.' and that she
would need money to advertise in order to
build the buslDess up. /d. at 7:>-76.
idencc \\.lIh appellJnt ahcr 1912 or '7]. WM not
uplallled,
b. ,"ppdl.WI IC1t1!ied lI10lt !lhc hOld dc\'cloped ol
nuh on hcr hands whit.:h rcuncted hcr wadlilltl
o! the dOj}'" 1d..11 ~S~S6, fler mother tcstificd
Jnd lo:on!lfIncd 1 hal ,he had to help appell.WI
Wl&!lh the dL1~s hc:lo:au~ of Ihe condillun tlf Jppd.
lant's hand~. 1d..1I SO, Dr, lIarnhi IJ, Cotlper.
.1ppdlanl '\ IJmilv ph\5lctJn, tc\ll11cU Ihat JppcI.
IJlll hOld 1Il1'cLled Jcrmlllla. Ill. .11 H.
756 Po.
489 ATI.,\NTIC REPOIlTER. 2d SERIES
From this evidence, the mllllter blithely
concluded that the dog grooming business
could be expanded to enable appellant to
support herself. While it is true that 0
COUrt hllB the pOWer to look beyond actual
earning to consider earning capacity, Com.
mOl/wealth e:r roL Hargral'e I'. Hargral'e,
275 Pa.Super. 198, 418 A.2d 680 (1980);
such extrapolation must have 0 realistic
basis. Thus, if the psrty's prior work expe-
rience or educational background denotes
that the port}. is not earning up to his or
her proven or assured ability, a court may
substitute capacity to earn for actual earn.
ing in the determination of income.
Here, however, there are no indices that
appellant has the capacity to suPPOrt her.
self by virtue of her dog l(rooming busi.
ness. By her undisputed testimony, she
hllll held hersel( out for (ull.time operation,
but her workload has not increased. Fur.
ther. there is no evidence that the Pine
Grove area, where appellant resides, could
ever supply enough dog grooming bUsiness
in order to double or triple the size of
appellant's present operation. Finally, the
master ignored the practical problem o(
where appellant would conduct the busi.
ness once the mnrl141 home was sold. Ap.
pellant testified that she Willi currently op.
erating out of the basement of the house.
ld. at 37. Since the property was equally
divided between the parties in equi14ble
distribution, appellant will be forced to re-
locate her residence and at t.he same time
find 0 facility which would accommodate
the "expanded" dog grooming enterprise.
Thus, the finding that appellant is able to
support herself lIB a dog groomer, rather
than being "clear", was clearly erroneous.
After the dh'orce WIIB filed, appellant
realized that she could not sUpport herself
by dog grooming and the $47.00 per week
COUrt-ordered support payment by appellee.
ld. at 76. Appellant enrolled at Reading
Area Community College and pursued a
computer science/management proh'l'llm so
7. In her Prc.heanng Memorandum. o1pprllanl
lIaltd ch.u ,he \Y.u enrol/ed (or a (our.year
eollcsc program 10 Gain cmplo~'ablc lkills, and
that she would be able to support hers,
ld. at 54-55. She discontinued the p
grom after one semester because o( lock
(unding and problems with her nerves.
light of the limited, rehabilitative purpo
o( alimony, a temporary order of allmol
to allow appellant time to build.up her de
grooming business and/or re-eduC8te he
sel( for the job market would seem to be t
order.'
Correcting the lower court's finding rc
garding appellant's ability to sUpport her
self through employment, the guideline,
for determining alimony set forth in 23 P.S.
~ 501(b) indicate that an award of alimony
would be appropriate. That s14tute pro-
vides:
(b) In determining whether alimony II
necessary, and in determining the nature,
amount, duration, and manner of pay.
ment of alimony, the court shall consider
all relevant (actors inclUding: ',.. ":",
(1) The relative earnings and earn"
ing capacities of the parties. . '. )...11:,
(2) The ages, and the ph)'llcal, men!"
141 and emotional conditions of the '~'.
ties. .:. . .... ~;
(8) The SOurces o( income of both'
parties including but not lbolled bi"
medical, retirement, insurance or other' .:
benefits. " '- .~, ....:..' j~\r
(4) The expec14ncies and InheritaJio.~
es of the parties. :::" r, ::t~t
(5) The duration of the marria... :*
i-"
(6) The contribution by one party' iii. ~
the eduentlon, training or Incre.......... {
earniag power of the other party. .~.
(7) The extent to whIch it would .bi;~
Inappropriate for 0 party, because ~.~
party will be custodian of a ~.t.;
child, to see employment oulaide 11II.",:
home. .1" -r ~;~., ~
..':\~
(8) The s14ndnrd of living of the ~.
ties eS14blished dUring the 1lI.IIriIP,;,"
(9) The relative education of tha.~
ties and the time necessary tll ~"
sufficient education or tralnIn. tll,
. ,..',
MANBECK v. ~IANIU;CK
CII'..~9A..JJ1""lr..sup'r. 19M)
able the party seekinl( alimol1)' to find
appropriut<! employment.
(10) TIw relotive ussel., ond Iiahili.
licK of the partieE.
(11) The property broul(ht to the
marrial(e by either part)..
(12) The contribution of a 51HHlSC as
homemaker.
(\3) TIw relotil'e needs of the par.
ties.
(14) The mariwl misconduct of ei.
ther of the parties durin!: the mar.
ringe; howc\'cr. the mariw.J miscon.
duct of either of the parties durin!:
separation subsequent to the filin!: of
a dil'orce complaint shal1 not be con.
sidered by the court in il.'l determina.
tions relative to alimony.
A !:Iorinl( inequity is immediately per.
cei,'ed from the fiJ'llt factor. relative earn.
101:5 and earning capacities. At the time of
Ihe muster's hearing, appel1ee WaS em.
ployed as 0 laborer for Garden S14te Tan.
nery and earned $18,000.00 per year I,"ross
IOcome. or $13,000.00 per year net income.
See I ncome and Expense S14tement of Ap.
pellee. In contrast, appellant's yearl)' in.
come was about $3,300.00 gross or
12.710,00 net. Neither port)" hod an exhib.
Ited capacity to increase these earninl(s.'
,Is 10 the seeond factor, appellont wn.,
I'''n in 1936, and appellee in 1935. TIle
master attributed no significance ta this
r.ctor since he found the ages. physical,
01"111.,1, and emotional conditions to be
"'lu.1 for both parties. Although appellant
..lIu.led to 0 problem with her nen'es, and
h,., doctor testified to her infected dermiti.
I", Ih..e problems did not seem to be
'l'nous,
'in"lar/y, the master found no si!:n,fi.
I'Jllrl~ In the third (actor: income from
1n"da'aJ, retirl!m~nt. or other bendiL'\. The
..nl)- major source 1)( income in lhill l'atp.~o-
ry Was appl'IIl!I~'s Jl(ltHHon. Sinct~ the mas.
h'r rtlC'llmmended that the pensiun IwnefiL'i
t... dl\"lfh'd '!'1ually, he att.:\chetl no ;;i~m(i.
'.lnrl' to thiS factor. Althullg'h tlll' 10\\'I'r
l hrn II It
'" .I~pr ilnl Ilu,ldmplC'd ht'r dOl; grolll11
nil 'li\Hlt.\\. Ihl'le \\Iluld '1111 hl' ,I \l~nl"~,llll
Po. 757
court remanded Ow pension issue to the
mn.st~r ror rurther heurings, its concern
se,'med to he with the method of distribu.
tion mtller thon with the relative division.
TIle rourth ractor iO\'nlves the l'xpl'ct:m-
citHJ and inher1tn"CI~9 ur the parties, which
were not applicable in this case,
The master found that the fifth factor,
dumtion of the marriage, appeared to fa.
!'Or the b't':lnting of alimony. Howe\'er, the
master then went on Ul SUit<! thot since the
parties Wcre on an equal bllBis financially,
the effect of this factor faVOring alimony
was counter balanced. Because I would
find that the parties Were not on un equal
basis financially, the effect of this factor
favoring alimon)' would not be mitigated.
The sixth and seventh factoJ'll are not
pertinent to the situations of the parties
hero, und the master so specified.
The eighth factor concerns the standard
of Ii'.;ng established by the parties during
the marriage. Th. mllBter described the
sulOdnrd of living achieved as "adequate",
and concluded that both parties would b.
able to mainwin such .tnndnrd of living. [
dlsagrt'e with this conclusion. While the
appellee is able to mainUlin an adequate
st.,ndard of living on $13,000.00 per year,
appellant's income of onll' $2,770.00 per
)'enr could not ensure t!ven a subsistence
swndnrd of living. I feel that this factor
would stron!:l)' mili14te in f,,'nr of nn ali.
many award.
The mn._tor nffordcd no weight to the
ninth factor. the relative education of the
partie!i anti the timo necessary for further
t!ducation or training to lmnblt! the part)'
scekinl( alimony Ul find appropriate em.
plorment. The masler determined that
there wus no disparity in Lhu relati\.'c edu-
cation of the parth's. and that appellant
would not rl''Iuin1 additional t!ducntion ur
trnining to .'nahle her to find appropriate
employrnt'llt. Sinl'fl I would not find that
:1(lJlt'lIant's do~ ~rnnmll1l{ hUSlnllSS l'onsti.
d,lfl'rrnl't' bt'I\~I'rn hrr I'Ml1l1lH\ ,and lhn~ nl
JpPl'JII'{',
758 Pa.
489 ATLANTIC REPORTER, 2d SERIES
luted appropriate employment, and since
she would have difficulty entering the gen.
eral job market without additional educa-
tion or training, this (actor would also sug-
Kest 0 temporary grant of alimony.
The master (ound no significant variance
between the parties as to lWets and liabili-
ties, the tenth factor. The maritel home
was the major consideration in this catego-
ry, and upon sale would provide roughly
$32,000.00 to each party. I note that this
uset to appellant will be offset by her
increased living costs. Furthermore, appel.
Iant should not be expected to completely
dissipate her assets. Sie Kuhn v. Kuhn,
25 D & C 3d 234 (1982). Thus, this asset is
not so substantial as to enable appellant to
provide (or her reasonable needs.
No property was brought to the mar-
riage by either party, and so the eleventh
(actor is inapplicable.
The twelfth factor, the contribution of a
spouse as homemaker, was reaolved by the
muter in fllvor of appellant. It wu not
disputed that appellant wu fully reapan.
aible for the care of the home. The muter
(elt that appellant'a homemaldDg contribu.
tion was reflected by the equitable d1etribu.
tion of the marital reeldent, IIIId apparently
(ound that, conaequently, It need not be
conaidered in' a determination of alimony.
I dispute this analyala-many of the (ae.
to"' considered in equitable d1etributlon
aJeo pertain to a consideration o( alimony.
This doea not mean that conalderation of
such a (actor under one award precludes
Ita consideration under a different award.
Thus, appellant's C\lntributlon as homemak-
er should welKholn favor of alimony.
The master found that the relative needs
of the partiea, factor thirteen, were gener-
ally well.balanced. We note that neither
party had inordinate expenses.
The final factor, morital misconduct prior
to separntion. was discounted by the mas.
ter who stated that the testimony in this
regard was not sufficient to affect the d...
termination of alimony. The appellee ad.
mitted, however, that he was seeing anoth.
er woman prior to the filing of the com.
plaint and separation. N.T. AUKUat 11,
1981, at 36. (Appellee testified that Kathe-
rine Eichert had been his "iirl(riend" since
February 27, 1980. The complaint wu
filed on May 14, 1980, and the parties sepa-
rated therea(ter.) This testimony certainly
Indicates appellee'a marital misconduct, IIIId
should weiKh In favor of appellant'a claim
(or alimony.
On the whole, therefore, many o( the 23
t 501(b) facto", stronKly slgni(y that reha-
bilitative alimony to appellant is appropri-
ate. None of the remaining (acto", detract
from this Indication. Accordingly, I would
hold that the trial court abused Ita dlecre-
tion in denying appellant's claim (or alimo-
ny.
.
o tllUl/IIlIUnnM
COMMONWEAL111 01 Penneylyanla
Y.
Henry KELLUM, Appellant.
Superior Court of Pennaylvanla.
Submitted Aug. I, 1984.
Filed Feb. 6, 1985.
Reargument Denied April 11, 1985.
Defendant was convicted in the Court
01 Common Pie.., Philadelphia County,
Criminal Division No. 81-16-999, McCrud-
den, J., of robb.ry aud related charges.
Defendant appealed. The Superior Court,
No. 912 Philadelphia, 1983, Cercone, J.,
held that: (1) defendant'a reason (or re-
questing nonjury trial was to attempt to
avoid prosecution under career criminal
program and constituted "judge-ahopping";
thus, trial court did not abuse ita discretion
in denying defendant's request; (2) allow-
ing defendant to appear before jury panel
in prison garb constitutes error warranting
new trial; (3) there was no reasonable pas-
Ol
-' ~'I i I, ~ ~ f~. f.f r f f. ~ ~ ~ ~
6 ~ "<:l _ 3. "'" Ji;:! ::! e-:::;. El-oll '" t'rl
13 !gii ifa,~' ~;'~;.lltp.~~alq.~
., ~.lt~ila~' ~~..~!lIi"a.Oga~,
~ Q,lf~1i r l ~g,~' if~l S' ~ ~ ~~ ~
't; 0 Ii a ~ 2 .. 0. i Ie ~ .. ., -;! ~ g. e-"<:l If
S Ii"~' if ~ l'! 2. ~ i' .;? (1. E !l ~.. "a [ ~
!l oij i'Q~" Ii 0 ,gj!f~ :l..,j:::~:II" :-
J ~. ~., i'il "O~ 0 ~ 0:0, ~ ~ g.~ ~ ~:- t t':! 12
ij .." ~ . i''' "''j:!' ~ ~ ", QO 5' =- 3 ~
~ ~ r ~ E; Q ~ t i it [ ~ t f: il ;: r I
~ 0 .. ~ ~ ~ lfi i S' kI ~ . !!, a :I.
~J;-[Sll ~'f .~~~r~lf~~~
Ii" r e. f ~ :.: ~ sr.~3 m ;. ~ g> ~. C!
!;.3 :l.c:;. !7'-..o:l =Il."s-a.!!.
~II.. ';;li "tl."~ 't=.~it5"~..
""Iii';?' 0 &:il g,c:;.~a jt!;.~t~ s
Ii "'''s r;li'"3 811 ~3
~~Rg~a o.!1::s.!l~~.,~a '~l
'" If,,r;S ~~:;:l. ;r"~.~,,
,,3 '""0. a:.,,1.I.J! C;~2.cn"-
i! ~ R ~ i . 0. ~ Vci · Ii" " 0 if if g
~1 ~ ti' ~: l I. ~ ~ f. il ~. ~ ~ t~
. ~ ~ ~ t r; l~ ~ If gJ i'! ~ Leo
a
iii
t-l
o-i
n
-
Z
:II
r,1
'"
o ~
~ Q
o '"
Z t'rl
> ~ > d
Z 0' Z:II
C il Zo-l
o Cl c::::
El ~ k t'rl
!:l S t'rlt'rl
O.:-~~
"l' 0<
8 ~
c: >
~ C
~
~
t'rl
t'rl
-
Z
bpi" Iff ~I ;
~ tli W Ii( ~ i ~
~ p'l~ ~ [f ~ h g ~ ~
t:l ~!t r~~ {tC: ~ z ~ ~
~ ~ n &"It f;r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ III r ~ ~~f e:l: ~:::
~ i rl "1' f k: g ~ ! ~
~ lU I!bt~i ~~
., lit P.f t i ~ e i:;
I It rr f[ ~ z
. h ~~ ta i ~
nhn
;, !;g e:~
~ ~ ~ a"
t [ g. S'l ~ ~ 1r ~~ ~ e;g ~ e. 1r g, 2 "a ~ 1l [ij l 5 t ~ W Ii' l ~ g,
alfe. i'a.8 ~ct. 8-<",,5' t=.lfrs "e,gli"1i- llEl -. ..,2 ~
~~~if~J.~ ~~ ~tI~~[ f~ ~~~~rlr.J!~i[ ~ i.ert; lJ' ~
i~R9a.~"1l ,,~!ll.lie:e a.a ila:9:S3~~i'!t.ffio ~~ i[" -
II ll! e a. 0' i1.. a ~ s:. i !!. ~ II OIl ... ~ a ~. 3 ~ e. It i !l !-II. ~ .!!. . . ~ I" ~ t'rl
~ If ~ ~ ; f. Eo 1 R r 8, r C;' ~ .11 ~ r r ~ 1 r ~ - Go ~ a' r II 1. ~ ~ !. t t 1r ~ ~
il 0'11 a.~ p !."<:l 5] ~. il ~ -. ~ c- r a C1 e, Sl3 e' a- l! ~ If 51. ct. a ~
~ i ~ ! ~ 1 f ~ f ~ l ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ r 1 ~ ~ t iJ' ~ r. ~! 11 ~ i ~
rli~lf .~il ~W~rlf~lt~~l;l'e:ieglt it.C;~;'!i o:~~"< e,f~
.. if Ji' a. 1 tLf ~ '" "<:l .. l! - a ~ g II ~ !l a. "S' ~ a" !f s'" 3' !'I Pl3 .. J. ~ i' - ~
"il,,3 !joil r. S'''O''''eL~!i:llo.j "~i cr2.~ ~o
1 r t ~ t f ~ l ~ 1 !! ~t ~ ~ E: t I. ~! I Jill 11 ~ t f - ~
t'rl~ !<:r cr Ii! ~ ft It C" .,!;- 3 if" ., O'l . r;; 11 3 - 0... ~ r:r. :l:
3 '1 3 "e:- a - - '< t ~ C;' e: "Eo '" .. "0 S' 9- ,,'< e: It 3 Q. ij [ ~
"<:l ;r , e: ~ ~ 20 0 !;- f~ a.;l. a ~ e: ~ I"!. a c-a .,' "3 !::r - . (")
rr 5.. t;::t. ",,:: ...,~. (1 c:.~ n C'. d ~. ;:r 0 0 (I -. ~ a n R
c;o'o\: -~ ~ <1.""" 0 <1. n......~;j o\:..~
~'St"g." ~~O' .. il0.3!;if ;; ~ 11 II e:f!llh "'"8.. a:>,,:
Q.;'''''"tt ~n3 c... ::l.~3C:~ ... ~ 0 - "1""~ !LSis ~
c...... c.. .. '" f,l 3 ..... C"'... =' ~ 0 n::l ... Cl ~ 0..
'1 ,~ ::I 0 C =. m c.. y' ... fll C - ., t:. Co. " :.:. _ liil
c.. c.. C tJ c:."'= C = = ...)"Q W rt -. g f;' 0 c.c .., II t:i ~
_ u .., = .:: , Co. = of ... = c.. r; ,0 :.... = C ,., w ~::. !2 to
, <J'
.
() tn
(;;' '-1 ;'")
.,
i:r,; '-' "
f' '" 'I .cj
._'j -,
. . Ii:!..'
i J.": :'.) "11/';
Q ,'CJ
, .\.' .l.~
,\;..) - ,I,
".'/
. {J -. p
-'C: -:.. t")
=j l.:-' I~.] 11,
.:.,- .'.
:1.
-, r", ~
~ , ,
~ ", "')
I
& ~
~ :
; , :.,
'\ - -
CJ , ..'
W ..",-J
LA,) :c>
, '/
,~ ",
S':- r-.~i . \...'
.....-,
ihi'f,
-< ;f! ,; ~ I
~ V: ..:.
:Sl
,
~
~