Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-03005 ~ ~ ~ ~ >- ~ :< I 8 f'Y) : ,; ~ I RICHARD R. NEY and CAROL A. NEV, his wife, Plaintiffs IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSVLVANIA NO. 95-3005 civil vs. JEFFREY M. NEY, Defendant CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED JUN 30 1995 l,..- ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, thisf< ( day of ), l 1995 on ',' 'il " Petition of Defendant, Jeffrey M. Ney, a RUle is issued upon the Plaintiffs/Respondents, Richard R. Ney and Carol A. Ney, his wife, to show cause why the Confession of JUdgment above captioned should not be opened or in the alternative stricken. All further proceedings on the above captioned jUdgment be and are hereby stayed pending resolution of this Petition. Rule returnable ,T. days after service. By the Court, ,'/ . ), Ii ,,' I ( ~: ) ...<'. ". ., , ., "..h , J l~_ . R. Scott Cramer, Esq. P. O. Drawer 159 Duncannon, PA 17020 Attorney for Plaintiffs Dale F. Shughrt, Jr'I Esq. 20 South Pitt Street P. O. BOll 200 Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for nefendant "'{fr"" / -: lrUlj~ RICHARD R. NEll and CAROL A. NEll, his wife, Plaintiffs IN TilE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTlI, PENNSlILVANIA NO. 95-3005 civil CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT ~ . ! ~ i i , vs. JEFFRElI M. NEll, nefendant JURlI TRIAL DEMANDED PETITION TO OPEN AND/OR STRIKE CONFESS En JUDGMENT ANn NOW, comes the Defendant/Petitioner, Jeffrey M. Ney, by his attorneys, Fowler, Addams, shughart & Rundle and respectfully represents as follows: 1. Your Petitioner, Defendant above captioned I is Jeffrey M. Ney, an adult individual who resides at 100 clay Road, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013. 2. The Plaintiffs/Respondents, Richard R. Ney and Carol A. Ney, husband and wife, are adult individuals who reside at R. D. 2, Box 276-A, Newport, Pennsylvania 17074. J. The Plaintiffs are the parents of the Defendant. 4. On March 15, 1994, Plaintiff Richard R. Ney and Defendant Jeffrey M. Ney purchased real property and personal property located in Walker Township, Juniata county, Pennsylvania, then known as "Juniata Bowling Center", for a total consideration of $157,000. True and correct copies of the Deed and Bill of Sale which are attached hereto, made a part hereof and marked Exhibits "A" and "B", respectively. 5. Plaintiff Richard Ney and Defendant Jeffrey Ney acquired title to real and personal property as tenants in common and commenced operation of the Bowling Alley under the name of "Ney Bowling Center" as a partnership. Although a Partnership Agreement was prepared, it was never executed. Richard and Jeffrey Ney therefore operated under the general partnership law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 6. In order to complete purchase of the real and personal property necessary to operate the Bowling Alley, the Plaintiffs borrowed the sum of $40,000 which was secured upon their home and loaned it to Richard and Jeffrey Ney. 7. At the time of purchase aforesaid, March 15, 1994, the parties agreed that $40,000 borrowed by the Plaintiffs in order for Richard Ney and Jeffrey Ney to acquire the bowling alley would be repaid from moneys earned in the operation of the business. 8. As additional security for repayment of the $40,000 from Richard and Jeffrey Ney to Richard and Carol Ney, the Defendant Jeffrey Ney executed the Judgment Note dated March 15, 1994 upon which the above captioned judgment by confession was entered. 9. The agreement of the parties was and is that the bowling alley business and tenant in common property interests of Richard and Jeffrey Ney would be responsible for rnpayment of the $40,000. Therefore the obligation was and is a joint one of Richard Ney individually, and Jeffrey Ney individually, and as tenants in partnership, and/or as tenants in common. The -2- obligation owed to Plaintiffs was agreed to be secured upon the bowling alley real and personal property in Juniata county. 10. On or about October 1994, the Plaintiff Carol Ney became actively involved in the operation of the business known as "Ney's Bowling Center" and prevented Jeffrey Ney from continuing to be actively involved in the operation of the Bowling center. 11. Despite repeated requests from Jeffrey Ney to Richard Ney since october, 1994, Jeffrey Ney has not been allowed to actively participate in the operation of the business and has not been provided any payment for his share of the profits of the business. 12. For the foregoing reasons, it is the obligation of the business known as "Ney's Bowling Center" which is now being operated solely by Richard Ney in conjunction with his wife, Plaintiff, Carol Ney, to repay the $40,000 obligation to Richard Ney and Jeffrey Ney. 13. The Note executed by Jeffrey Ney, which forms the confessed judgment in this matter, was executed only as an Accommodation Note. It was expressly agreed it would be collectable only in the event that Ney's Bowling Center, Richard Ney and Jeffrey Ney were all in default of repayment of that obligation. 14. The Agreement of the parties was and is that if the $40,000 Note were to be entered as a judgment it would be entered -3- only in Juniata county against Jeffrey Ney's interests in the bowling alley property. 15. Jeffrey Ney believes and therefore avers that the entry of jUdgment in this matter is an action taken solely by Plaintiff Carol Ney in an attempt to force Jeffrey Ney to grant and convey his interest in the bowling alley real property to Richard and carol Ney without any consideration whatsoever and to deprive him of all property interests. 16. In fact on January 23, 1995, R. Scott Cramer, attorney for the Plaintiffs in this matter, sent Defendant Jeffrey Ney a Deed of conveyance to convey the real property to his said parents for no consideration and requested he execute and return the deed for recording, which conveyance Jeffrey Ney refuses to make. 17. Based upon the foregoing (contrary to the statements contained in the Note executed by Jeffrey Ney), the agreement of the parties was and is that this judgment would not be entered as a lien against Jeffrey Ney's real property in Cumberland County except upon default by Ney Bowling Center and Richard and Jeffrey Ney, individually, to make payments on the obligation from the profits of the bowling alley and/or an inability to collect the debt from the assets in Juniata county. lB. Jeffrey Ney has been precluded from actively participating in the operation of the Bowling Alley and has been deprived of his share of profits from the operation of the -4- Bowling center and/or rents due and owing to him as owner of the property since October of 1994. 19. The first obligation of the business of Ney's BOWling Center is to pay its creditors, which include Plaintiffs in this action. 20. Defendant/Petitioner believes and therefore avers that Ney's BOWling Center has earned sufficient money to make fair monthly payments from the profits of the business to the Plaintiffs in this action and has in fact made such payments to the Plaintiffs as agreed. 21. For all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs breached the agreement of the parties by entering judgment on the Note when there has been no default. Therefore, the judgment should be stricken. 22. For all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs breached the agreement of the parties to the extent that they have not made monthly payments to the Plaintiffs from the profits of the bOWling alley business and/or rents paid by the bOWling alley business to Richard Ney and Jeffrey Ney as owners of the real and personal property. Thorefore, the judgment should be opened or stricken. 23. For all of the foregoing reasons, Plointiffs breached the agreement of the parties by entering judgment In cumberland county, Pennsylvania as a lien against the real property of Jeffrey Hey at 100 Clay Road, carllele, Pennsylvania instead of -5- entering it as a judgment in Juniata county against the bowling alley property. It is believed and therefore averred that this action was maliciously taken solely by Carol Ney in an effort to acquire the Defendant's ownership interest in the bowling alley business and the property. Therefore, the judgment should be stricken. 24. For all of the foregoing reasons, the judgment should be opened to provide the Defendant Jeffrey Ney an opportunity to defend the obligation to the plaintiffs. 25. For all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs owe to the Defendant the duty of an accounting to him of all profits of the bowling alley business from October 1994 to the time the accounting is filed. 26. For all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs owe to the Defendant an obligation to make payments from the operation of the bowling alley business on a monthly basis to repay the $40,000 owed to Richard and carol Ney for moneys loaned to Richard and Jeffrey Ney to purchase the bowling alley property and business. WHEREFORE, for aU of the foregoing reasons, Defendant/Petitioner Jeffrey Ney prays Your Honorabls Court to: A. strike the above captioned Judgment; n. open the above captioned Judgment and list the matter for a jury trial; -6- C. Order and direct that Plaintiffs provide Defendant Jeffrey M. Ney a full accounting of all receipts and disbursements by the business known as Ney's Bowling center from October, 1994 until the time of such accounting, including all payments made to Richard Ney and/or Carol Ney on the $40,000 obligation; D. Order and direct that Richard R. Ney and Carol A. Ney, as tho individuals operating the Bowling Center, to mako all payments due and owing from the receipts of the Bowling Center to repay the remaining balance of the $40,000 owed to Richard R. Ney and Carol A. Ney, husband and wife; and/or E. Order and direct Richard and Carol Ney to provide proper credit against the outstanding balance owed to them on the $40,000 Note based upon all payments which have been made or reasonably should have been made against the obligation since October, 1994. Respectfully submitted, FOWLER, & (' By: F. S ugha Supreme ct. I 28 South pitt P. o. Box 20B carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 249-B300 -7- BOOK 184 FACE 714 ENTERED FOR RECOllD , It-4 JUNIATA COUN1'ty4 \ 7l/rJ-fv), /7 19 :L- ed }.;21 fM - Idr;;.~.dO 'axes & Fees S /.~dO' 00 1:1.5"U (".35 Cj<!.o SPECIAl, WARRAN'l'Y DEE!] MADE the 9th day of March, in the year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety-Four (1994), between: / Sillqlultlilll, PIERRE GERVAIS,/ an adult individual, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, GRANTOR, AND ,/ ,/ JEFFREY M. NEY and HICHARD R. NEY, as tenants in common, each to an undiv ided one-hal f interest, of Juniata County, Pennsy I vania, GRANTEES, WITNESSETH, that in consideration of One Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($100,000.00), in hand paid, the receipt whereof io hereby acknowledged, the said Grantor does hereby grant and convey to the said Grantees: ALL THA'l' CERTAIN lot of ground, with the improvements thereon erected, situate in Walker Townohip, Juniata County, Pennsylvania, bounded and described as follows, to wit: DEGINNING at a point at the southwest corner of the lot hereby conveyed where the same corners with lands now or formerly of Calvin D. Zimmerman and Alma L. Zimmerman, husband and wife, and William Penn Highway, U. S. Route No. 22, which point is North forty-six (46) degrees forty (40) minutes West seven hundred thirty (730) feet from the lands of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, thence along said Highway North forty-six (46) degrees forty (40) minutes West one hundred twenty (120) feet to a point; thence at right angle to said Highway in a northeasterly direction along lands now or formerly of Calvin D. Zimmerman and Alma I,. Zimmerman, husband and wife, two hundred fifty (250) feet to a stake; thence along lands now or formerly of Moist Heirs South forty-six (46) degrees forty (40) minutes East one hundred twenty (120) feet to a stake; and thence along lands now or formerly of calvin D. Zimmerman and Alma IJ. Zimmerman, husband and wife, in 11 southwesterly dit-eetion at right angle to the said Highway, two hundred fifty (250) feet to tho place of BEGINNING. UNDER AND SUBJECT, nevertheless, that the hereby granted lot of ground and the improvements thereon erected, and any which may hereafter be erected, shall he and remain oubject to the following conditions and rentrictionu: l....:lllllit "N1 " BboK 184 FACE 715 1. That no building on uaid lot or any hereafter orected, shall be erected for or uoed or occupied as a service station, garage or for the oale of fuel for motor vehicles. IlEING the uame premioeu wl1iC'.b Pierre ';prvalo and 1I0ng Gervais, hiB wife, by their deed dated fe,^,IU~.3 'l , 1994 and intended to be recorded i~nediately prior hereto In the Office of the Recorder of DeedB of and for Juniata County, at Mifflintown, Pennsylvania, granted and conveyed unto pierre Gervaiu, Grantor herein. NO HAZARDOUS WASTE is presently being diupoued of 01" has ever been diuposed of by the Grantor or to the Grantor'u actual knowledge on the promiues hereby conveyed. This utatement is made in accordance with the proviBionu of the Solid Waste Management Act 97 of 1980, H,B. 1840. UNDER AND SUBJECT to any and all easementu, restrictionu and other matters of record and which a physical inspection of the premiseB would disclose. AND the said GRANTOR will SPECIALLY warrant and forever defend the property hereby conveyed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF oaid Grantor haB hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and year first above written. Sealed and delivered in the preoence of WITNESS: ~'\fV\Al\ ~\C\)~^,V.O/Y\ t;,~ Pierre Gervais ... ," )I!.tiln~ : ..~.'. ... t I ~ I ,Il.""!!t ... ':';! .. ) r " ~: ~ t. ; I I. .. '\ . ,"'u, ~','~' :,'/1 I' .,...'....'..1 I I , '/, ~ I" .....',. ~:f" 11 .~ _h_~-., , ., t'l ; " " " .1 1.. Cctj i J',: . ~;. 1I^~'11l ll~n:rVb:lJ tile ""01 oI~!:~l'..,~i; ll!.oaa i-tx IJoLl.AJ18 '" p.YIIll1lll 01 lWaJ f.!llaJe Tl'lllwer T... JUNIATA OJUH'I'Y 8CIhXIL LJI~T1I1C" ...",q(Jwt1.lr...l;{rw(" u , ,1/p" tit ....... II IIMIo f I ill')' . , " h .....,.."............. ."........, ".,." ~ .,,,,,.. ne~1 i,.,,:i 'r.on =,. , .. . '. - . . r'IVf"lll/~,( ron JlIrllltl f)(\TI'. I :l~16-9~\ CWF! c" ' ,.-.,.. ;-Roi~'i"i,'O(lBY"~'- ...... 'j'_'U' l"WOODI!N nF.!',I( .." ,1110rIlY.,C(\nIJ~ET..."", ...".:, '. 2-PILE CAOINrrs 4-BALL RACKS , I'HoNe WITH NmmRHlll W,CIUNI! , (,5-HOVSl! fJAI.L9 (IH~IH~) , l"CHAIB ... i ._, ,...'.. _ ..'_' _,._..".._.... _ .,_I\.Q::~.QrlS..r.J.~I)..._."". .,.__..,,____~_. , 2-UUO\)~t~ SrU\T!5 ""wtH DE\\IC , ?-CUF. STICK$ . T,V-F,I'I.'A.M.-~,Tf'r<I!(J nF.C[dVEI1. ... '" . ,." ,,'. "l~C\JIi,MCI\..,. .:, . .,..,"....., l"CIIA lit 1'001. T ABUi (UU~5ED) r,O-r'A) R (>I" ~"(\r.~, (1MI' MLl. r-nu ~JtEn l"AL)DlN(j"lt(\CIiIIIf~ .... .... _"'_ ..._,_..._...._ .._._~._.J;.~mr.:..J:rf..J1f\CtJ.IN.rL.._.._..~,__ '~CA!.\H IlI!GIST~n (E:CR-:)I,O) . "'-CANDY MAI:IIINelS (l.UASe:O) ?"'$/)EAllfA5 r ,V ./SAYIILL nil BANI! HMt1 AIR HOel(r~Y Mlt-1r: WATER fOUNTAIN ." ,. - .. .". .......-- .----'"7.~, COrrEII. ~IACIUNF. 2MCQKF. /1ACIIt tlE (l F:I\SED ) 5"PIN BALL OAM~B ,(L~ASED) ," ,. . >i' .. ,...., . .' .. ,'. ., . ~ '. , , nOWLING AR~A lO~5ETn OF sa(lTIN~' "..-'_ _t:t.:M;rJr1!i.._T,lIal..e.fi....~, ._._____, l,.~eALI. RP.'TVIlN!~ ,.".." ..'... (~I)UIPI~nH l.AN!! 11AC.IUNf.~r,!!'HLJRY,.1(1(L LANE HACHIN~-CBNIU~Y 300 Et.F:CmOl.l.lX VAeIH'IN r;U,ANF.rI CLARK~ FLOOR MAINTAINER :i(-oUr'rER 'llU/1N:n I,"!\HOP vile " JPl)L,I;Atq~1! ViQO).':>.. . _. AlA CO~IPREr!~~OIl 1~I!I.DEII""~).~, (mlN[)I::I~-,~IlMrl , 'N'" .".....;.".:.... '1.2:fli~tl~~Ti!rRS .(A~i'$,.--'." i'4-SETS Or PIN!1 "._ ___..:__.._,._ .__...___1.?.:J.,A,J::IF.1i._...________._ _.~ I,' . t'uttl!!; HI! S T ROOl1 . "" ""'j"" .,. ..,w~.tI'lI,k.F,t.:~~ll~I\H"t}.lI'''' ...... " ,.~..._...,...,... I.I'IOIES RE')TR00l1 .. " ,____,__._.,..,___~O-1,:9!;MJllL._.__~",......--.---. " ~ . , , I.., . . ,. . ,." . ..... .... \ t...._...__.......... ..'" .,." _ ...... ....... '. ....,.u ,-._ 1:140 REPORT ...,. .... . ......_.._ ...._ ___.~ ~___._._.__..........._._..*____........____..._-.____r~. . " II' . , , " , '... ..... ..'., ..... ~.__ ,,~..~.._:, ..."........,....,....,I.:..."......L...._'.,..,. ...,.,.... ....... ....... .... .'.. "..~ ..----..---- ... , .-r~~--_:_:.~_._--.,...-7."-~~._-_.~- ~.__:_;-.. --:--..... . '., f..' ........ ., ,._..... .,'..........,......._ ~"-' _ ....-._......_._... ........1.'... ,..__~.._""'_., . ........, , , ...... -.!----.'.--." _..,..._--~~...............,....-,.~,.,.......,~~~.. t--..-........--. .-.- . .' ~ " . ' " 1\ ,- . .. .~. . -.. !",. '" .OJ ..~._ "...__ ...... _.... I ~ ..... '" ......... . .. -.' ._'...-..,..~ ......................--.. I I I "1\ 111 . r 1\ ' IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IUCHARD R. NEY and CAROL A. NEY, his wlfc. CIVIL ACTION NO. 95 . 3005 PIIIIIl\ln's CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED I , JEFFREY M. NEY, Dcfcndant ,. ANSWER TO PETITION TO OPEN AND/OR STRIKE CONJiESSED JUDGMENT (~{l U' AND NOW, comes the PlaintilTlRespondent, Carol A. Ney, who by and through her attorney, Scott M. Stallcr, Esquire, files this her following An~wer: I. Admilled. 2. Denied. Carol A. Ney has vacated the marital residence und is currently residing at R.D. #I 2, Box 905, New Bloomfield, PA 17068. Richard R Ney's current address is R.D, #12, Dox 1710, Newport, PA 17074. 3. Admilled. 4. Admillcd. 5. It is admitted that Richard Ney and Jcffrey Ney acquired title 10 real and personal property as tenants in common and con\lncnccd operation of the Dowling Allcy under the name of "Ney Dowlin!! Ccnler" liS a parlnershlp As to a partnership agrccment bcing prcpared and never executed, Curol A. Ney, uncr rcusonable mvcs\lga\lon, is wl\hout sufficient knowledge or information to form a behefas to the truth of the averment, and stricl proof thereof is demanded at timc of trial. As to opclUtlllgllndcr thc gcncral pllrtncrshlplaw of the Commonwealth of . Pennsylvania, this part of the averment is demed as a conclusion of law. 6. Admilled in part and denied in part. It IS ad milled that Plaintiffs borrowed the $40,000, but it is dellled that the money wus louned JOllltly to Richard and Jefi'rey Ney. To the contrary, the money was loaned solely to Jefi'rey Ney. 7. Denied. There was no allreementthullhe $40,000 would be repaid from moneys earned in the operation of the busllless. On the contrary, Jefi'rey Ney was solely liable to repay the $40,000, 8. Admilled. 9. Denied. There was no agreement that Richurd and Jeffrey Ney would be responsible . for repayment of the $40.000. On the conlrary, Jeffrey Ney was solely liable to repay the $40,000, and no formal partnership agreement was ever executed. The judgment note, which speaks for ilself, "empower the Prothonotary or any allorney or nay court of record within the United States or elsewhere to appear for the undersigned and, with or withoul complaintliled, confess judgment, or a series of judgments, allainstthe Undersigned in favor of any holder hereof. for the unpaid balance of the principal debt. . .". 10. Admilled in part and denied in part. Ii is admilled that Carol Ney beeame actively involved in the operation of the business known as "Ney's Bowling Center" after Richard Ney precluded Jeffrey Ney from continuing to be actively involved in the business. Ii is denied that Carol A. Ney ever prevented Jeffrey from continuing to be actively involved in the operation of the Bowhng Center. In October, 1994, Richard Ney prevented Jeffrey Ney from continuing to be actively mvolved in the operation of the Bowhng Center due to a disagreement over how to successfully run the business. 11. Wllh respcctto Jcffrey Ney's actlvc IIlvolvclllenl inlhe Bowlinll Cenler, it is admilled that Richard Ney has prevented JelTrey Ney from beinll actively involved in the operation of the business. As far as pro iii sharinll is concerncd, aOer reasonable invest illation, Carol A. Ney is wilhout suffiCient knuwledlle or IIlfurmaliunlo form a belief as 10 the trulh of the avermenl, and strict proof thereof is demanded at time oftnal. 12. Denied as a conclusion of law. If somehow an answer IS deemed necessary, the avermenl is denied as illS the oblillation of Jell'rey Ney 10 repay the $40,000 oblillation to Richard Ney and Carol A. Ney. There is no obligation to pay $40,000 to Richard Ney and 1effrey Ney, Furthermore, Carol A. Ney did help to operale the business from October, 1994 to June, 1995 aOer her son,1effrey Ney, was precluded by Richard Ney from continuing to be actively involved in the operation of the business. It is denied thai Carol A. Ney continues to have any connection whatsoever with the operation of the business known as "Ney's Bowlinll Center". 13, Denied. The Nole execuled by 1ell'rey Ney was not an Accommodation Note, There was no allreement that the Note would only be collectible in the event that Ney's Bowling Center, Richard Ney and Jeffrey Ney were all in defaull of repaymenl. The Note speaks for itself and expressly states Ihat il is colleclible upon the sole failure of JeOrey Ney 10 repay Ihe oblillation with or without default. 14. Demed. The Nole specllically empowers "the Prothonolary or any allorney or nay court of record wlllunlhe United States or elsewhere 10 appear for the undersillned and, with or withoul complaint filed, confess Judllment. or a series of judgments, allainstthe Undersigned in favor of any holder hereof, for the unpaid balance of the prinCipal debt. . ." I S, Denied. Carol A. Ney is simply attcmpllnllto pro lee I her interesl in Ihe repaymenl of Ihe $40,000 obligalion. 16. After reasonable mvcsllllallon, Calol A. Ncy is without suOlcienl knowlcdgc or information 10 form a belicfas 10 the Irulh of the avermcnt, and slricl prooflhereofis demanded allime of Irial. 17. Denied. There was no agrecmenl for repaymenl olher than what is contained in the judgmenl note, which speaks for itself. 18. It is admitted thaI Richard Ney has precluded JefTrcy Ney from aClively participatinll in the operalion of the Bowlinll Center since October, 1994. however, aner reasonable . investillalion, Carol A. Ney is withoul sufficienl knowledlle or information 10 form a belief al to the Irulh of the remaininll part of Ihe avermcnt, and suict proof thereof is demanded at lime of lrial. 19. Denied as a conclusion of law. 20. Aner a reasonable investigation, Carol A. Ney IS without sufficient knowledllo or information to form a beliefas to Iho Irulh of the averment, and slrict proof thereof is demanded at time oflrial. 21. Denied as a conclusion of law. 22. Denied as a conclusion of law. 23. Denied as a conclusion of law. It is further denied that Carol Ney malicioUlly took this action to acquire Defendant's ownership mlcrcst, and on the contrary, it IS averred thaI Carol A. Ney is simply prolectinll her inlerest 11\ the repayment of Ihe oblillation 24. Denicd as a conclusion of law. 25. Denl\'d. ills delllcd Ihat Curol ^ Ncy owes un uccountllllllo JelTrey Ney when she is nol involved in Ihe opernllon of the business 26. Denied Cnrol A Ney docs not owe un oblillntionlo repay Ihe $40,000 10 Richnrd Ney nnd herself. II is Richurd Ney und Jetl'rey Ney who owe IIn oblilllllionlo repay lhe $40,000 10 Richard Ney nnd herself. WIIEREliORE, for 1111 oflhe above reasons, i'llIintilT, Cnrol A. Ney, requests thatlhis Honorable Court dismiss Defendant's, JelTrey Ney's, i'etitionlo Open and/or Strike Confessed Judgment, and affirm the judgment filed by PlaintilT, Carol A. Ney, against Defendant, Jeffrey Ney. Respectfully submilled, _.j@1,tt~ Allorney for PlaintilT Scoll M. Slaller, Esquire P.O. Box 264 Rle. 34, Cupp Office Bldg. New Dloomlleld, PA 17068 (717) 582.7574 Allorney I. D. Ii 62066 VEIUJlICATlON 1 verify Ihallhe slalemenls made mlhls Answer 10 l'elitionlo Open and/or Slrike Confessed Judllmenl are Irue and correct. I undersland Ihal false slalements herein are made subject 10 Ihe penalties of 181'a.C.S. ti 4904 relalinlllo unsworn falsification to aulhorilies. at ~ I (;' ~:L- Plaintiff, Carol A. Ney (j IN THE COURT OF COl\lMON PLEAS OF ClJl\l1lERLAND COUNTY RICHARD R, NEY and CAROL A NEY,llIs wife, PI a 111\1 tTs CIVIL ACTION NO, 95 - 3005 CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT v, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED JEFFREY M, NEY, Defendnnt CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I am this day serving a certified copy of Respondent's Answer to Petition to Open and/or Strike Confessed Judgment by hand delivering the same to the person and address listed below, which service satisfies the requirements ofP, R,C, p, 440: Michael R, Rundle, Esq, 28 SPill Streel Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Petitioner Dated: Seplember 25, 1995 , . , .~/r~:. ~>'4-o'" ._._.._L>-_~_...........______.__._. _____.._____.___" Scoll M, Staller, Esquire p, 0, Box 264 New Bloomfield, PA 17068 Telephone: (717) 582-7574 Attorney for Respondent - JUDGMENT NOTE WILLIAM R, BUNT AIlORNlV Al lAW 10910uth Ca,lIIlelllle' New 8loomlleld, Po 17061 lei. (717) 612.1195 fAX (717) 612-7521 - .,) ) I). I {. (1ij!J \) , 1'# Jj (. t/Ul { C d, (,. /Ioli; ) . yr ) 11 t ( ~ ( ,'/ 4J;~' j~/ll ;) ~ n? .;'"~~.- -.,.~~. , I. t:) Ii ) h ) L II R. s.cOTl CRAM[R Attorney 01 Low P. O. Orawe, 119 Duncannon, flA 17020 RICHARD R. NEY and CAROL A. NEY, his wife, plaintiffs, v. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEFFREY M. NEY, CIVIL ACTION - LAW 1 ,1 J Defendant. NO. ,'1'; <(0'- I, !', i ' .' "11'_" : : : I : : : : I : : : : : : : : : : I : : : : : : : : : : : : , : : : : : : : :i: : : : : : : : : : : : : : I : : I : : PRAECIPB TO ENTER JUDGMENT BY CONFESSION To the prothonotary: Enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant by confession on the attached judgment note with provisions for costs of suit, and without stay of execution. Assess plaintiff'S damages as follows: Amount of note (or penal sum): Interest from March 15, 1994 Total amount due: $40,000.00 560.00 $40,560.00 /-~--) I , / ,I ( / t( ./,;,. R. Scott Cramer ~ Attorney for PlaintiffS , AND NOW, June' , 1995, judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, and damages are assessed as above, in the sum of $40,560.00. , ' I 1 .)b,t /i ')}llIl , prothonotary , ~ i,) I I ,. 11 (j A F F I D A V I T COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ss COUNTY OF PERRY The undersigned, being duly sworn according to law, deposes and says that he is the signer of a Note dated March 15, 1994 in the amount of $40,000.00 payable to Richard R, Ney and Carol A. Ney, his wife, which he has signed simultaneously herewith and that his total annual income from all sources is in eKcess of $10,000.00 as of the date hereof. And further the undersigned do authorize the immediate entry of said Note as a judgment in the Office of the Prothonotary in and for Perry County, Pennsylvania. ili. '!J 'jhc\ * ,e re M. Ne . Sworn and subscribed to before me this 15th day of March, 1994. j ) ':.J2 (,( .' (,/0 ((")f ..,,1-=>..(\'"'- - A. M1IIIOfl,IIOfAIIY PUalC ""'" 1 rJ,-.... M ('Inll . . .lr ..'&.: i4 1195 WILLIAM .. BUNT ATTDltHI't' AT LAW 101 .. CAIllLlnl IT Naw .LOOIr"IILD, fl., 170" '7'71 111.,1"15 1'7171 .1.-71111 $40,000.00 JUDGMENT NOTE March 15, 1994 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, JEFFREY M. NEY, (the Undersigned), promises to pay to the order of RICHARD R. NEY and CAROL A. NEY, his wife, their heirs and assigns, (the Payee), the sum of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000.00), together with interest on the unpaid portion thereof at the rate of Nine (9%) per cent per annum, which shall be paid on demand. Should the Undersigned default in said payment when due, the whole of the principal sum and interest thereon shall immediately become due and payable at the option of the Payee, and one or more executions for collection of said principal sum with interest, and other sums due by Undersigned according to the terms hereof, together with costs of suit and a fifteen (15%) per cent of the total indebtedness (but not less than $500) reasonable attorney's fee for collection, may issue forthwith on any judgment or jUdgments obtained by the holder hereof against the Undersigned. The Undersigned shall have the right to prepay the principal balance in whole or in part at any time without fee, fine or WIU lAM " .UtH ""OIlNI'!' n Law 10' .. COlli" .. Nnw II,DOIll"I' b. ". 170', 1'1"1 ",,,,,, ."." .t. 7." penalty. Payment hereunder shall be made to Richard R. Ney and Carol A, Ney, his wife, R.R, 12 Box 276-A, Newport, Pennsylvania 17074 or at such other place as may be designated by Payee in writing, With or without default the Undersigned hereby empower the Prothonotary or any attorney of any court of record within the United states or elsewhere to appear for the Undersigned and, with or without complaint filed, confess judgment, or a series of judgments, against the Undersigned in favor of any holder hereof, for the unpaid balance of the principal debt, any other sums paid by the holders hereof to or on behalf of the Undersigned pursuant to the terms of this Note, together with unpaid interest thereon, WILLIAM R BUNT AnD""" At LAW tal e. CUllin. It NIW ILOONPlIlD. ,." 170e. 171'1 "1-1"1 17171 ...-71ll! costs of suit and a fifteen (15\) per cent of the total indebtedness (but not less than $500) reasonable attorney's fee for collection, or which judgment or judgments one or more executions may issue forthwith. The Undersigned waives and releases all errors in any proceeding that may be brought on this Note, and hereby consents that execution or executions may issue immediately on such judgment or judgments, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney may do by virtue hereof, and further hereby waives inquisition and condemnation of any property levied upon by virtue of any such execution or executions, and also waives all exemption from levy and sale of any property that now is or that hereafter may be exempted under any act of Assembly. No single exercise of the foregoing warrant and power to confess judgment shall be deemed to exhaust the power but the power shall continue undiminished and may be exercised from time to time as the holder hereof shall elect until all sums due hereunder have been paid in full. A copy of this warrant shall be as effective as the RICIIARD R. NEY and CAROL A. NEY, his wife, Plaintiffs IN TilE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 95-3005 civil vs. JEFFREY M. NEY, Defendant CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED JUN 3 0 19Y:i .I " ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this ~ day of , 1995, on Petition of Defendant, Jeffrey M. Ney, a Rule is issued upon the Plaintiffs/Respondents, Richard R. Ney and Carol A. Ney, his wife, to show cause why the Confession of JUdgment above captioned should not be opened or in the alternative stricken. All further proceedings on ths above captioned judgment be and are hersby stayed pending resolution of this Petition, Rule returnable ~C) days after service. By the Court, d' td.1200-t /. J. R. Scott Cramer, Esq. P. o. Drawer 159 Duncannon, PA 17020 Attorney for Plaintiffs Dale F. Shugl~t, Jr., Esq. 28 South Pit~street P. O. Box 20B Carlisle, PA 17013 Attorney for Defendant e,j.t~;"f. ..hlct,,(....{ '1lr/'" .1. 7' RICHARD R. NEY and CAROL A. NEY, his wife, Plaintiffs IN TilE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 95-3005 civil vs. CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT JEFFREY M. NEY, Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PETITION TO OPEN AND/OR STRIKE CONFESSED JUDGMENT AND NOW, comes the Defendant/Petitioner, Jeffrey M. Ney, by his attorneys, Fowler, Addams, Shughart & Rundle and respectfully represents as follows: 1. Your Petitioner, Defendant above captioned, is Jeffrey M. Ney, an adult individual who resides at 100 Clay Road, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013. 2. The Plaintiffs/Respondents, Richard R. Ney and Carol A. Ney, husband and wife, are adult individualA who reside at R. D. 2, Box 276-A, Newport, Pennsylvania 17074. 3. The Plaintiffs are the parents of the Defendant. 4. On March 15, 1994, Plaintiff Richard R. Ney and Defendant Jeffrey M. Ney purchased real property and personal property located in Walker Township, Juniata county, Penneylvania, then known as "Juniata Bowling Center", for a total consideration of $157,000. True and correct copies of the Deed and Bill of Sale which are attached hereto, made a part hereof and marked Exhibits "A" and "B", respectively. 5. Plaintiff Richard Ney and Defendant Jeffrey Ney acquired title to real and personal property as tenants in common and commenced operation of the Bowling Alley under the name of "Ney Bowling center" as a partnership. Although a partnership Agreement was prepared, it was never executed. Richard and Jeffrey Ney therefore operated under the general partnership law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 6. In order to complete purchase of the real and personal property necessary to operate the BOWling Alley, the Plaintiffs borrowed the sum of $40,000 which was secured upon their home and loaned it to Richard and Jeffrey Ney. 7. At the time of purchase aforesaid, March 15, 1994, the parties agreed that $40,000 borrowed by the Plaintiffs in order for Richard Ney and Jeffrey Ney to acquire the bOWling alley would be repaid from moneys earned in the operation of the business. 8. As additional security for repayment of the $40,000 from Richard and Jeffrey Ney to Richard and Carol Ney, the Defendant Jeffrey Ney executed the Judgment Note dated March 15, 1994 upon which the above captioned judgment by confession was entered. 9. The agreement of the parties was and is that the bowling alley business and tenant in common property interests of Richard and Jeffrey Ney would be responsible for repayment of the $40,000. Therefore the obligation was and is a joint one of Richard Ney individually, and Jeffrey Ney individually, and as tenants in partnership, and/or as tenants in common. The -2- obligation owed to Plaintiffs was agreed to be secured upon ths bowling alley real and personal property in Juniata county. 10. On or about october 1994, the Plaintiff carol Ney became actively involved in the operation of the business known as "Ney's Bowling center" and prevented Jeffrey Ney from continuing to be actively involved in the operation of the Bowling Center. 11. Despite repeated requests from Jeffrey Ney to Richard Ney since October, 1994, Jeffrey Ney has not been allowed to aotively participate in the operation of the business and has not been provided any payment for his share of the profits of the business. 12. For the foregoing reasons, it is the obligation of the business known as "Ney's Bowling Center" which is now being operated solely by Richard Ney in conjunction with his wife, Plaintiff, Carol Ney, to repay the $40,000 obligation to Richard N.y and Jeffrey Ney. 13. The Note executed by Jeffrey Ney, which forms the confessed judgment in this matter, was executed only as an Accommodation Note. It was expressly agreed it would be colleotable only in the event that Ney's Bowling Center, Richard Hey and Jeffrey Ney were all in dsfault of repayment of that obliqation. 14. The Agreement of the parties was and is that if the $40,000 Note were to be entered as a judgment it would be entered -)- only in Juniata county against Jeffrey Ney's interests in the bowling alley property. 15. Jeffrey Ney believes and therefore avers that the entry of judgment in this matter is an action taken solely by Plaintiff Carol Ney in an attempt to force Jeffrey Ney to grant and convey his interest in the bOWling alley real property to Richard and Carol Ney without any consideration whatsoever and to deprive him of all property interests. 16. In fact on January 23, 1995, R, Scott cramer, attorney for the Plaintiffs in this matter, sent Defendant Jeffrey Ney a Deed of conveyance to convey the real property to his said parents for no consideration and requested he execute and return the deed for recording, which conveyance Jeffrey Ney refuses to make. 17. Based upon the foregoing (contrary to the statements contained in the Note eXecuted by Jeffrey Ney), the agreement of the parties was and is that this judgment would not be entered as a lien against Jeffrey Ney's real property in Cumberland county except upon default by Ney BOWling Center and Richard and Jeffrey Ney, individually, to make payments on the obligation from the prOfits of the bowling alley and/or an inability to collect the debt from the assets in Juniata County. 18. Jeffrey Ney has been precluded from actively participating in the operation of the BOWling Alley and has been deprived of his share of profits from the operation of the t i t -4- Bowling Center and/or rents due and owing to him as owner of the property since October of 1994. 19. The first obligation of the business of Ney's Bowling Center is to pay its creditors, which include Plaintiffs in this action. 20. Defendant/Petitioner believes and therefore avers that Ney's BOWling Center has earned sufficient money to make fair monthly payments from the prOfits of the business to the Plaintiffs in this action and has in fact made such payments to the Plaintiffs as agreed. 21. For all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs breached the agreement of the parties by entering jUdgment on the Note when there has been no default. Thersfore, the judgment should be stricken. 22. For all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs breached the agreement of the parties to the extent that they have not made monthly payments to the Plaintiffs from the profits of the bowling alley business and/or rents paid by the bowling alley business to Richard Ney and Jeffrey Ney as owners of the real and personal property. Therefore, the judgment should be opened or stricken. 23. For all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs breached the agreement of the parties by entering judgment in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania as a lien against the real property of Jeffrey Ney at 100 Clay Road, CarliSle, Pennsylvania instead of -5- entering it as a judgment in Juniata county against the bowling alley property. It is believed and therefore averred that this action was maliciously taken solely by Carol Ney in an effort to acquire the Defendant's ownership interest in the bowling alley business and the property. Therefore, the judgment should be stricken. 24. For all of the foregoing reasons, the judgment should be opened to provide the Defendant Jeffrey Ney an opportunity to defend the obligation to the Plaintiffs. 25. For all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs owe to the Defendant the duty of an accounting to him of all prOfits of the bowling alley business from October 1994 to the time the accounting is filed. 26. For all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs owe to the Defendant an obligation to make payments from the operation of the bOWling alley business on a monthly basis to repay the $40,000 owed to Richard and carol Ney for moneys loaned to Richard and Jeffrey Ney to purchase the bowling alley property and business. WHEREFORE, for all of the foregoing reasons, Defendant/Petitioner Jeffrey Ney prays Your Honorable Court to: A. strike the above captioned Judgment; B. open the above captioned Judgment and list the matter for a jury trial; -6- C. Order and direct that Plaintiffs provide Defendnnt Jeffrey M, Ney a full accounting o~ all receipts and disbursements by the business known as Ney's Bowling center from October, 1994 until the time of such accounting, including all payments made to Richard Ney and/or Carol Ney on the $40,000 obligation; D. Order and direct that Richard R, Ney and Carol A. Ney, as the individuals operating the Bowling Center, to make all payments due and owing from the receipts of the Bowling Center to repay the remaining balance of the $40,000 owed to Richard R. Ney and Carol A. Ney, husband and wife; and/or E. Order and direct Richard and Carol Ney to provide proper credit against the outstanding balance owed to them on the $40,000 Note based upon all payments which have been made or reasonably should have been made against the obligation since October, 1994. Respectfully submitted, FOWLER, ADDAMS, SHUGHART & RUNDLE BY'~ fit/to\ Dale F, nugh r , Jr. I Supreme ct. I.D. 19373 2B South Pitt Street P. O. Box 208 Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 249-B300 -7- 800K 184 PACE 714 ENTERED FOR RECClRP I lH JUNIATA COON1\' \ 7l/~1vh 17 19 9 yl at '}.;2./ I'M 100... dO folte' & Feel S 'ndO' 00 /J..6'u (".35 Cj<!.o SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED MADE the 9th day of March, in the year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety-Four (1994), between: / singleman, PIERRE GERVAIS,/ an adult individual, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, GRANTOR, AND .' ".. JEFFREY M. NEY and RICHARD R, NEY, as tenants in common, each to an undivided one-half interest, of Juniata County, Pennsylvania, GRANTEES, WITNESSETH, that in consideration of One Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($100,000,00), in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the said Grantor does hereby grant and convey to the said Grantees: ALL THAT CERTAIN lot of ground, with the improvements thereon erected, situate in Walker Township, Juniata County, Pennsylvania, bounded and described as follows, to wit: BEGINNING at a point at the southwest corner of the lot hereby conveyed where the same corners with lands now or formerly of Calvin D, Zimmerman and Alma L, Zimmerman, husband and wife, and William Penn Highway, U, S, Route No, 22, which poi nt is North forty-six (46) degrees forty (40) minutes West seven hundred thirty (730) feet from the lands of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, thence along said Highway North forty-six (46) degrees forty (40) minutes West one hundred twenty (120) feet to a point; thence at right angle to said Highway in a northeasterly direction along lands now or formerly of Calvin D. Zimmerman and Alma L. Zimmerman, husband and wife, two hundred fifty (250) feet to a stake; thence along lands now or formerly of Moist Heirs South forty-nix (46) degrees forty (40) minutes East one hundred twenty (120) feet to a stake; and thence along lands now or formerly of Calvin D, Zimmerman and Alma L. Zimmerman, husband and wife, in a southwesterly direction at right angle to the said Highway, two hundred fifty (250) feet to the place of BEGINNING. UNDER AND SUBJECT I nevertheless, that the hereby granted lot of ground and the improvements thereon erected, and any which may hereafter be erected, shall be and remain subject to the following conditions and restrictions: I:xll i Id' "(\" 800K 184 FAG[ 715 1, That no building on said lot or any hereafter erected, shall be erected for or used or occupied as a service station, garage or for the sale of fuel for motor vehicles, BEING the same premises whi<;b Pierre G;rvais and Hong Gervais, his wife, by their deed dated ~~~~ ~~ , 1994 and intended to be recorded immediately prior hereto in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds of and for Juniata County, at Mifflintown, Pennsylvania, granted and conveyed unto pierre Gervais, Grantor herein. NO HAZARDOUS WASTE is presently being disposed of or has ever been disposed of by the Grantor or to the Grantor's actual knowledge on the premises hereby conveyed. This statement is made in accordance with the provisions of the Solid Waste Management Act 97 of 1980, H,B. 1840. UNDER AND SUBJECT to any and all easements, restrictions and other matters of record and which a physical inspection of the premises would disclose, AND the said GRANTOR will SPECIALLY warrant and forever defend the property hereby conveyed, IN WITNESS WHEREOF said Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and year first above written, Sealed and delivered in the presence of WITNESS: ~"^^!\ (r\C\l~CIIVV.Q/V\ t~~ pierre Gervais ,n ".'H".t^!-,~;',.!~:. "jl -j' ;1 I ,u'!.'/ .., 1\ .. "'\1,1 ".'~' '-,l,'1 .. ", t ,')r ' ".' ',.\ .. " . '_",' 1 'L' " I:,,' " ; : ~ . . " ", '0'--'--'-1. ' " '"I l';J/ i .. ~:t "A-III Rf:lT.1VIW 111. ,um oI~!.~~, ,1,/.000 IlOLLAlL'l w p.y'ncnl 0/ KnBl r.lUlle Tro:,sJ., 'I", .ruNIATA ooomv IIl:IIUOL lJISIllK'I' ....&<t.t/Il. ,?1:, 4.~~,f.f:(j, ,4,,4- __&. II IlMio I dJ ~r '" -, " ., I'. BILL OF SALE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Juniata Bowling, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, (hereinafter the "Seller"), for and in consideration of Fifty-Seven Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($57,000.00) and other good and valuable consideration paId by Jeffery M, Ney and Richard R. Ney, as tenants in common, each to an undivided one-half interest (hereinafter the "Buyer"), the receipt of which the Seller hereby acknowledges, does hereby bargain, sell, transfer, assign and deliver to the Buyer, its successors and assigns, all of the following goods, chattels and property: The goods, chattels, property, equipment and inventory, a list of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said personal property unto the Buyer, its successors and assigns, to and for its own proper use and benefit forever. AND the Seller vouches that it has full right and lawful authority to eel I and dispose of the said personal property, and, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant unto the Buyer, his heirs, successors and assigns, to defend the said personal property against the lawful claims of all other persons. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Seller has caused this Bill of Sale to be executed and its corporate seal to be affixed on this q day of March, 1994, r~7Ur JUNIATA BOWLING, INC. By /dJv#t~) President l:xliiiJil "II" r lJI~ '( .. . t 1.1 I II , I I : . 'I .,.......". ~......'.I' II,. ..~~......~":I.....rec::~1 ;t!",,:i '~" an . rtNErnor\'( F'l)l1 JUrH 111 . ... - . DATT:: 12-16-9.\ 01'1'11::" . . ..... ";' ..-.-.... ....----.., . -"-"-'FRO'N'i"T,'ooi3Y''' .-. .... ~.,... .j'-,... l"WOOOr;:N OF.!;,I( .'. ..." ,T(WPHy..eAIH,NET ..... " . '.. .......:. ., ;?,r:1'.E r..AOIW'T'~ . . .-j-8I\LL ~I\CKS' , PHtlN~ WITH l\/mmR HILI ~lflCHlNI! (/5 -HOVSH fJAI..LS (6-NIrI~) . l"CHAl~ . .,. . ~" ,..,. ..._.,..: .._. _._......._...._..._<l.Q::\...OPS,t.B,S"._...". ..,__..,,______.. . . 2-\-IOOI)IrN Sr~AT$ flHtlNT DESIC , 'i-CUI: STICKS .. T,V-",,"l.-A.M.-~,TERe(J R!':I;l:lVEll .. ". ... .... ........l;;C\!~.R~CK.." .:. '" "",_......" l"CHA I I~ POOl. T AaL([ (l.T~(~5ED) t;O-I"AI R Or- "Il(l~~ AMF MLl: f.'Ol.ISIIEll l"Al)DINll"MACHHlr! , ...' . _"'_ '''_'_H_''''_ .,_....._,_.J;,.tGmr~J:l./U1t\CtJ.IN./L__,,_..:",__ 1-CASH R~GXST~R (~CR-3~O). . ~-CANDY MACHINES (LnASEO) iHWEAI<f'll!'i' T . V ./SA rELLI lit .., , . .' ... " ......, , .. . t_, "0' i 't. '.. , Ml./LING flRt:A IO-SETB OF 5~AT1N~' '__h._6.:.~.!lF1E_TN~l..~:L.~. ._._ . f)-IML!. RF.TVAN!; I3A~,r: RMr1 AIR HOl~l(r~Y IMHf; l-JATER fOUNTAIN..., .. _...., _...... .___....., COr-rEI!. MACIlIN!: ;t-COKI! 11ACIIT/lE (LF:A$F.D) 5"PTN BALL gAH~5 .(L~ASED) . ..'.11 .... . , IAuE~ . .. "....... .........;...-.,. "1'2"~il/'~ETi~R$' .( ~~i'~S.-"" 24-SETS Or PINS ." -.--...:-..---...__...__l;~[l.~F..f?,_.___..____._ I , , . 1(I~UIPHI:Nl' l.AN!! 11A~.IUNE-r,:ENT,LJRY...1.0Q. (,ANI:: MACHf.NIH~t::NTURY :)00 ~1.F.CmOt.I.I)( VAeIH'IN r;1.E.ANEn c.LARKr! rlLool\ /'lAINTAINEI~ .' 2- GUf'rER 'BUI1r.>tn 1 "'$Hl)J) Vf\C " J9l)1...CAIl~~1! VTOO.I.~... _........___,__._.._.__. AIR COMPRt.rj~jOfl . . , '. 1~r::I.DEft"T';.!;ae, (mlNClIt~..~IZMr) l'IEW:, HI!.$TR()OI~ ..,-, . . L "'_I "l'I'l:"'~ . ........... "I ..,........1, ..,/i..I....'tI,. ,.. ".,........, ...... I, ......_......, l.ADIES RESTRDor~ M-!,:Qt;K,ER$ ''" '-'--"''--- , , ,.,. . .. " . I-I, . '.'" .... \ ......._....__........., .... ,.." _ ."..................", ..._ ~ND REPORT "'" I 'I ~ . - "..-..., ..,..-... ...... .-.--..--..---.-....--...-- ..--.--.-...------..-.. Ii! . "'." . 0., . .,..... ._. .. ..... __........... "'0 .... _ ..~.,...., I"" .._...... ....'1.... ....... ... .....+. _.'_'~.. .______ . , ~----:-~..--::---:- ----- ~-::-:-. -'--' . . , '. "'.., ...' ........ ., ..--.... ,.......-..'.,......- .....- _ .--.- -~_.. ............ .._-,~..-........ . .......f , , .. . -':-- "--..-__.....__.Jo.__~_..._._) I' . . ( . , . II -- _..~.- f-......-..--. -.-. Of" . ,.,1...... ,........,.--...................... ............ ... ". '_'"_'~''' ....__..f.n.._. I. I I ''If!H'' IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYI,VANIA CIVIL ACTION NO. 95-3005 CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT 'l'qTJlT. n".... 'iI- I. ...... ~ J ,) I" I,j '95 RICHARD R, NEY and CAROL A, NEY, his wife, Plaintiffs ,':,) , , v. TEFFREY M, NEY, Defendant ANSWER TO PETITION TO OPEN AND/OR STRIKE CONFESSED JUDGMENT SCarf M, STALl.lm Attorney At Law 1'.0, Box 264 New D1oomneld, I'A 1700H Tel. (7171582-7574 Fnx (717) 582-4056 ~.: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA RICHARD R. NEY und CAROL A. NEY, his wife, CIVIL ACTION NO. 95. 3005 IJlainliffs CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED JEFFREY M. NEY, Defendant ANSWER TO PETITION TO ot'EN AND/OR STRIKE CONFESSED JUDGMENT AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff/Respondent, Carol A. Ney, who by and Ihrough her allomey, Scoll M. Staller, Esquire, files this her following Answer: I. Admitted. 2. Denied. Carol A. Ney has vacated the marital residence and is currently residing at RD, # 2, Box 905, New Bloomfield, I'A 17068. Richard R Ney's current address is RD. # 2, Box 1710. Newport, PA 17074. 3. Admitted. 4. Admitled. 5. Ii is admilled that Richard Ney and Jeffrey Ney acquired title to real and personal properly as tenants in common and commenced operation of the Bowling Alley under the name of "Ney Dowling Center" as a partnership. As to a partnership ugreement being prepared and never executed, Carol A. Ney, aOer reasonuble investigation, is without sumcient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the uverment, !lnd strict proof thereof is demanded allime of trial. As to operutinllllnder the general purtnership laIV of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, this pllrt of the averment is denied as a conclusion of law, 6, Admitted in part and denied in part. It is admitted that Plaintiffs borrowed the $40,000, but il is demed Ihat the money was loaned jointly to Richard IInd JelTrey Ney. To the contrary, the money was loaned solely to Jefl'rey Ney, 7, Denied, There was no agreement thatlhe $40,000 would be repaid from moneys earned in the operation of the business On the contrary, Jefi'rey Ney was solely liable to repay the $40,000, 8, Admitted, 9, Denied, There was no agreement that Richard and Jeffrey Ney would be responsible for repayment of the $40,000, On the contrary, Jeffrey Ney was solely liable to repay the $40,000, and no formal partnership agreement was ever eKecuted, The judgment note, which speaks for itseU; "empower the I'rothonotary or any attorney or nay courl of record within the Uniled States or elsewhere to appear for the undersigned and, with or without complaint liIOO, confess judgmenl, or a series of judgments, against the Undersigned in favor of any holder hereof, for the unpaid balance of the principal debt., " 10, Admitted in paltllnd denied in part, It is admitted that Carol Ney become actively involved in the operation of the business known as "Ney's Bowling Center" after I{ichard Ney precluded Jelliey Ney liom eontlnumg to be actively IIIvolved in the business, It is denied that Carol A Ney ever prevented Jelliey from contllluing to be actively involved inlhe operation of the Bowling ('enter, In October, 11)<)4, Richard Ney prevenled JefTrey Ney from continuing to be actively IIIvolved III the operation of the 1I0wlllll! Center due 10 II disagreement over how to successfully lunthe huslness II. Wilh respeclto Jellfey Ney's IICtl\'C lII\'ol\'elllent III the Buwhng ('enter, It IS IIdnntled thnt Richnrd Ney hns prevented Jellrey Ney Irolll helllgllcli\'c1y lII\'ol\'ed III tlw Opelllllon of Ihll business. As fllr 115 proHt sharing is concellled, IIller rellsonable IIIvesllglltlon, Cnrol A Ney IS without sufficient knowledge or inlimnlltion to forlllll behefns tolhe trulh nflhe IIvermenl,nnd strict proof thereof is delllllnded nt tillle of trillL 12. Denied as II conclusionofluw. Ifsomehow un unswer is deellled lIecessury, lhe avennenl is denied as it is the obligulion of Jellfey Ney 10 repuy Ihe $40,000 obhllllllon III I{ichun! Ney nnd Carol A. Ney. There is no obligation 10 pay $40,000 to Richard Ne)' and Jetlrey Ney. Furthermore, Carol A. Ney did help to operute Ihe busilless IiUln OClober, 11)1)4 to June, II)I)~ after her SOli, Jeffrey Ney, was precluded by Richard Ney Irmll colltinuillllto be nCllvely involved in the operation of Ihe business. It is denied Ihat Cnrol A. Ney cOlltmues to hllve nil)' conneclion whatsoever with Ihe operalion oflhe business known os "Ney's 1I0wlinll ('elller". 13, Denied. The Nole executed by Jemey Ne)' was not 011 Accommodalioll Note. Therll was 110 allreel11entlhatlhe Note would ollly be collectible illlhe evenllhal Ncy's lIowlillg Cellter, Richard Ney and Jemey Ney werll 011 in defuuh of repaYlllellt The Nolll spcuks lilr Itslllf olld expressly stoles that il is collectible upolllhe sole fnilure of Jetlrey Ney tOlepllY Ihe ohhlllllloll with or without del' au I!. 14. Denied. The Note speclHcally empowers "the I'rolhollotlllY nr III1Y ntllllney ur IIny court of record withilllhe Ulllted Stntes or elsewhere lonppenr lilr the ullllerslllned nnd, with or without complallltliled, cOllfessJudgmelll, nr n senes ofJudglllenls, nlllllllsllhe lJlIllerslglled III fovor of any holder hereof; for the unpllld hnlallce (If the prlllcl11111 deht. .. 15. Denied. Carol A. Ney is simply allel11pting to protect her interest in the repayment of the S40,OOO obligation. 16. After reasonable investigation, Carol A. Ney is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to Ihe truth of the averment, and strict proof thereof is demanded at time of trial. 17. Denied. There was no agreement for repayment other than what is contained in the judgment note, which speaks for itself. 18. It is admitted that Richard Ney has precluded Jeffrey Ney from aClively participating in the operation of the Dowling Center since October, 1994, however, after reasonable invesligation, Carol A, Ney is wilhout sufficient knowledge or information 10 form a belief as 10 the truth of the remaining part of the averment, and strict proof thereof is demanded at time of trial. 19, Denied as a conclusion of law. 20. After a reasonable investigation, Carol A. Ney is without sufficient knowledge or informalion to form a belief as to the Iruth of the averment, and strict proof thereof is demanded at lime of trial. 21. Denied as a conclusion oflaw. 22. Denied as a conclusion of law. 23. Denied as a conclusion of law. Ii is further denied that Carol Ney maliciously took this action to acquire Defendant's ownership interest, and on the contrary, it is averred that Carol A. Ney is simply protecting her interesl in the repayment of the obligation. 24. Denied as a conclusion of law. 25. Denied, It is denied Ihut ('lIrol A Ney owes UIIuccounlinll10 Jel1'rl.!Y Ney whell she .5 nol involved inlhe operuliou oflhe huslness 26, Denied, Curol A, Ney docs 1101 owe IInohlrllllllUn 10 repuy Ih" $40,00010 I{ichunl Ney and herself, 11 is Itichllrd Ney und Jelliey Ney who oIVlluuohhllllllolllO Il.!puy Ihl.! $40,000 10 Richard Ney and herself, WIIEREI<'ORE, for all oflhe IIbove II.!1ISUnS, I'ltllnlllr, ('11101 A NI.!Y, requesls lhullhis Honorable Courl dismiss Defendanl's, Jen'rey Ney's, 1'I.!II11nlllll Openullll/ol Hlllkc Conl'essed Judgmenl, und affirmlhe judllmenlliled by l'luinlilr, ('urol A NI.!Y, UlllllllsI l)elclldRnl, Jcllrey Ney. Itl.!spl.!cll'ully 8uhnulled, .k~-ft 1)), Jt:A Allorney lill 1'11I11I\lfr SCOII M SllIlIl.!r, I!sllulle 1',0, lIox 2M Rle 34, CUPII Ol1ice 1I1111l New IIloomf1l.!ld, I'A 170M (717) 5K2-7574 Allorney I I> II h20(,(, IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERI.AND COUNTY RICHARD It NEY and CAROL A. NEY,llIs wife, Plumtlffs CIVIl. ACTION NO 95 - 3005 CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT \'. JlJltY TRIAL DEMANDED JEFFREY M. NEY, Delendunt CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I omlhis day serving 0 certified copy of Respondent's Answer to PClition to Open and/or Strike Confessed Judgment by hand delivering the some to Ihe person and address listed below, which service satisfies Ihe Icqlllremcnts ofl)RC' I' 440: Michael R Rundle, Esq 28 S Pill Street Curlisle, PA 17013 Allomey for Petitioner Dated: Seplember 25, 1995 I Scoll M. Staller, Esquire I) 0 Box 264 New 1I100mfICld, IIA 17068 Telcphone (717)51l2-7574 Allorney lilr Respondent RICHARD R. NEY and CAROL A. NEY, his wife, Plaintiffs v. JEFFREY M. NEY, Defendant IN TilE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 95-3005 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 17tt. day of October, 1995, upon consideration of Defendant's Petition To open and/or strike Confessed Judgment and Plaintiffs' Answer To Petition To Open and/or strike Confessed Judgment, the parties are directed to proceed with depositions under Pennsylvania Rule of civil Procedure 209 for the purpose of making a record upon which the Petition can be decided. R. SCOTT CRAMER, ESQUIRE P.O. Drawer 159 Duncannon, PA 17020 For the Plaintiffs DALE F. SIlUGIlART, JR" ESQUIRE 28 South Pitt Street P,O. Box 20B Carlisle, PA 17013 For the Defendant wcy By the Court, (V.',Q'-'- ",.<,.(,(l 10/1 ~/ 'i~' '-'~ .. /-:'.6'. IN TilE COURT OF COMMON PLEA~ OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYT.VANIA CIVIL ACTION No, 95-3005 CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v, Ocr',o j 29 tN '95 ;'1/ "0'0 - Ii, iit( r fr/~F cUIHJcr(r:JD/ON~' ~h~ ~fIiN~YLVAC~:~Hn RICHARD R. NEY and CAROL A, NEY, his wife, PLAINTrFI'S JEFFREY M. NEY, DEFENDANT PRAECIPE scarr M, STALLEI~ Attorney At Law 1',0, OOK 264 New D1oomOeld. I'A 1706B Tel, (717) 5B2-7574 Fax (717) 5B2-4056 RICHARD R. NEY and CAROL A NEY, his Wife Plaintiffs IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. No. 95-3005 Civil JEFFREY M NEY, Defendant CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT PRAECIPE TO THE PROTHONOTARY Please mark Ihe Judgment in Ihe above referenced matter as salisfied. ;; Ild'!l , r} iIr.;1IJ ~~ I '!I . Scott Staller, Esquire Attorney for Plaintiffs Oil.