Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-04105 LOIlI!;NE LI\NPIS, Plaintitt IN '1'IW: COUll'!' oW CQ\\MON 1'1,/':1\13 O~' cUMlmll./lN1l COUN'I'Y / P~~NSYLV/lNII\ Vlh NO. 95~410li CIVIl. 'I'ERM LI\MON'I' (a111'C1l) WILBON, Petendant CIVIL 1\C'I'ION ~ LI\W CUS'l'OPY atOI!lR Of' CXlJR'1' I\ND HCM, this 1.'7 tt. day of ~,.;t; ...,I.;c) , 1995/ upon considel:'ation of the attached CUlltody COllci lfstion Repol:'t/ it is hereby ol:'del:'ed and dil:'ected as fol10wst 1. 'l'his Court's 'l'elllpoJ:aJ:Y Custody Ordel:' entel:'ed on I\ugust 6, 1995 is vacated. 2. Eithel:' pal:'ty l11ay Petition the COUl:'t within thil:'ty (30) days to have this I118ttel:' relisted with the custody Conciliator. BY '1'11E COUR'I'/ 001 Brian J. Puhalo, 131:'., Esquil:'& Lamont (Butch) Wilson c..:..,~I>"" 0"" .l,1... 'I/inlfts ..\,p, J. ...... t~l ~-...' (I."' r. .:. ,'I ." p; . , " .. ., .. ~ l.OIl~-;N~; I,ANlll~, Plaintiff IN '1'1 Wi L'OlJIl'I' U~' (:tlMM(tj 1'1.IW:l U~' CUMUlr.fll.ANIl COlJN'l'Y, 1'1':NNSYI.V/lNIA V". NO. 911-4105 Cl V ll. '1'!';IlM l.AMON'I' (I3111'C11) WII.I3OO, Defendant CIVIl, AC'l'ION - l.AW ClJS'I'Ol lY PRIOR JUIlGSI Wl".Bl.l'lY ,}. Ol.m, ,m. CU8'IOOY CXJ<<:Il. I^'I'I~ Bl.l'lWlY IWJ'U~r IN AO:nUlANCL~ WI'I" lUIIll'lIU.l\Nll CXXN1'Y IUlI.ll Ol' CIVIl, L'IlOCBDIJRS 1915.3-8, the llndel:"signed CUBtody conciliatol:" BUIJllli tB the following I:"epol:"t I L 'rho pel:"tinont infol:"miltion pOl:"tainin'.l to tho Child who is the subject of this Htigllt1.on iB IlS fQUOWBI N/lMIr. Pallis 13. WilBon fl IH'I'IIDA'I'I:; ClJIlHl,N'I'l. Y IN ClJS'I'OO'i OF Novombel:" 1, 19B? Plaintiff/Mothel:" 2. A Conciliation Conference waB held on Septembol:" 5, 1995, with the Mothel:" I Lorone Landis, in attendanco. Although the Custody Complsint was filed on the Mothel:"'B bohalf by Bdan ,J. PUhaln, 51:"., Esquire, the Mothel:" was not reprosented at the Confol:"once. '1'ho l'nthel:", Lamont WilBon did not appear at the Confel:"ence. 3. After doterlllining thl:"ough Mr. l'uhala'a office that the ~'athol:" had been sel:"vcd with notice of the Conference, the Conc1.liatol:" pl:"oceeded to obtain infol:"mation fl:"om the Mothet:", who waa soeking conf irlllation of pdl11ary custody. 4. 'I'he Mothet:"'s position on cuntody is as foUows: Accol:"ding to the Mother., prior to July 1995, tho li'athet:" t:"at:"ely and only spol:"adlcally took advantage of his dght to pal:"tial custody of his Child. On ,July 30, 1995, the Father had pat:"tial custody of the Child whilo the Mothel:" was on hel:" Wedding trip. lJpon het:" t:"otum, the ~lothel:" attenlpted to contact the Ch ild snd WIlS advised by the li'athet:"'s wife that tho Child would not be I:"etumed to hel:" custody, '1'he Mothet:" filed a petition fot:" Emergency Relief on August I, 1995 to regain custody of hel:" son. '1'his Cout:"t entered a '1'empol:"al:"Y Custody Ol:"del:" on August 8, 1995 in I:"esponse to the i')l1el:"gency Petition snd gl:"anted shfll:"ed legal custody to both parties Ilnd pdl11at:"y custody to the Mathel:". 'rhe Mothel:" stated that the li'athel:" lnade no offol:"t to contact the chi Id Ilftel:" entl:"Y of the 'l'ell1pot:"aI:"Y Ot:"del:" although he was gl:"anted pedods of partial custody thp.l:"ein. Accot:"ding to the Mothet:", tho pal:"ties have nevet:" been IMl:"ded and the Child has I:"esided wJ.th hel:" sineo his bit:"t:h. At the conclusion of the Confet:"ence, the Mothel:" mentioned t.hat she intended to move to Albuqllet:"que, New Mexico with the Child within two weeks following the Conciliation. Accol:"ding to the Mothet:", she and hel:" husband have pUt:"chaaed a home \Ii th tl1t:"ee (3) bedt:"oOl11a in A Ibllquel:"que and al:"e mov ing " . . . " I',.\'I'RI(,I< t', l."\m:lt. ,IR "\lInrnc) Mt I.M" 2 HIH M.,~d Slt.:ltl "'h'~ Ihllhlllllt ~'lIl1lp IIlIlP,\ I ','rd t 11111 U".I~tl.) . i:t ., c:l , <l \.Il ;.J j t! ~I ,- ,:;; a ;c j .. ~ ..: " ;:j . S 0- '". ~ ~.J. ell ..0 " .. ,... E ~ 'I :I: :lIl " ,... U 0 ~ " '" .. <- S ,-. - .. i:t of. r, '" !- u of, Q., '1 i " v.. IN 'l'IIS COUll'l' OE' COMMON PLSAS OF CUMBSRLAND COUN'VY, PSNNSYLVANIA No, 95"4105 CIVIL LORBNIll L~NOIS I Plaintiff LAMONT (BUTCHI WILSON, oehndant C I V II, AC'I'!ON - I.AW IN CUB'I'ODY {;!)H1>J.A I H'I'-!':QUY!!.'l'9!lX AND NOW, oomea tho Plaintif.t, by and through hor attorney., The Law Officea of Patrick F. Lauer, Jr., and files thia Complaint for Cuatody againBt the Defendant and, in BUDPort thereof, aver. a~ fol.lowa I 1. Plaintiff, Loreno Landia, ia an adult individual. who currently reaidea at 497 Lexington Avenuu, Moohanioaburg, Cumberland County, Pennaylvania 17055. 2. Defendant, Lamont WilBon, aka Butch Wilaon, iB an adult individual who ourrently reBideB at 2680 Ellendale Road, Dauphin, Dauphin County, PennBylvania. 3. Plaintiff aeekB Primary Phyaioal custody of the following childl Dallia B. Wilson, preaent resident iB 497 Lexington Avenue, Mechanioaburg, Cumberland County, pennaylvania 17055. The minor child ia 7 1/2 yeara old and waa born on November 1, \987. 4. The minor child, Dallia B. Wilaon waa born out of wedlock. 5. Throughout the child' a life he haa reaided with the fOllowing peraona and at the following Ilddreaaea I Juno 1990 through September 1990 at Sunguild Apartmenta, Lanoaster Avenue, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, Cumberland County with Michael B. Mikula and Lorene Landia, from Septamber 1990 through september 1991, at Eighth Street, New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, Cumberland County with Miohael U. Mikula and hia daughtoro Lauron L. Mikula And Brooko A. Mikula, from Iloptombor 1991 until Auguot 1992 tho ohild hoo rooLded at 497 Lexington Avonue, Meohaniooburg, P~nnBylvania, Cumberland County with Lorene Landia and Miohael D. Mikula and Id.o ohildren Morgan M. Mikula "nd Miohael J. (Mikie) Mikula, from Auguot 1992 until July 1994 the ohild had lived at 497 Lexington Avenue with Lorene Landia, Miohael B. Mikula, Lauren L. Mikula, Brooke A. Mikula, Mor'1an M. Mikula and Miohael J. (Mikie) Mikula, from July 1994 throllgh Juno 1995 the ohild haa reaidud at 497 Lexington with Lorene Landia, Miohael 13. Mikula, arooke A. Mikula, Morgan M. Mikula and Miohael J. (Mikiel Mikula, Sinoe June of 1995 until the preaunt, the ohild haa reaided at 497 Lexington Avenue with Lorene Landia, Miohael 13. Mikula, arooke A. Mikula, and Miohael J. (Mikiel Mikula, 6. The mother of the ohild ia Loreno Landie, who ie ourrently residing at the addrees aet forth in Paragraph 81. She La ourrent.ly married to Miohael J. Mikula. 7. The father of the ohild ia Lamont (Butoh) Wileon who ia . ourrently reeiding at the addreee eet forth in Parasraph 82 above. He ia ourrently married to Sally Varner Wilaon. B. The relationahip of the Plaintiff to the child ia that of natural mother. 'rhe Plaintiff currently reaidea with the following peraonal Huaband, Michael B. Mikula, atep-daughter, Brooke A. Mikula and atep-eon, Michael J. (Mikiel Mikula. 9. The relationahip of the Defendant to the child ie that of natural father. Defendant currently reaidea with the following peraonal hie wife, Sally Varner Wilaon. 10. ~h~ parties hereto are the n~tural parents of the minor child, DAllis n. Wilson, age aeven, who was born November 1, 19B7. 11. 'he ohild currently reaidos with Plaintiff, and Defendant has exerailled IJporadio vilJitation rightll. 'I'here ill a 'I'emparary ! custody Order entered AugUllt U, 1995 in roaponae to a Petition for ~mergency Reliof filed Augu~t I, 1995 and hoard before Judgo Ohler on August U, 1995 granting llhared legal cuatody of the minor ohild to both parti.oa and prJ.mary physioal cuatady to I'laintiff with perioda of temporary physical oustody to Defendant. 12. PluintHf and Defendant have beon unable to resolve aonfliots oonoerning custody of Dallis B. Wilson. 13. Plaintiff has provided all the neoessary elements for the eduoational, physioal and emotional welfare of the child. 14. The best interollts and pormanent welfare of the ohild will be lIerved by a Court Order giving primary phYfJioal aUlltody to Plaintiff because I A. Tho child has always lived with his mother. B. 'he defendant has never shown any concern for his ahild. C. the child has always had n closo bond with his mother. D. The plaintiff has all Qf the child's clothing. B. The defendant does not have a bod for the child. F. The child hall a clase ancl loving relationllhip with plaintiff and hie step brothers and sister. In H In " ~. 1,1) ~- II H' .>.,.... .: ' ) --","'1'-- ?J .') ) ~ '~v r,.,,,,l ...-::) , l'" ' -- \ "~ t....., ... . ...~ I",'" '" """'l '~ ';;.J, , , '-, ,,' '. ,/ , '-. - . . PATMI('K .', I.Am:lI. Jlt AIIUrne) MI I,M~ 2111M ~hlhl Slh'l'l ,\'h'~ 1111 II ,It tl II (1\11111 11111 I" I ,'flll t "/1,' \ I" I l~' "I . . llC ., i . E ~ j t: if ,,,= il -<...",~~<>5 .1 .., 6 a.. r~ ~t'..:at~...ct1_~ E " ::II! . '..I :I: ,... U 0 " -::: ... ~ ::: :: 0( e <..:. ~ -f. rl ~ -< CI, , .. LORIBNIll LANDIS t Pl/lj,ntiff IN TUB COURT OF COMMON PLBAS OF CUMBIllRLANP COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA No. '( \ - (~/I / . -' (I" \' ~ I.. Vii. LAMONT (BUTCH) WILBON, Pefondllnt CIVIL ACTION - LAW IN CUS'l'OPY AND NOW, thia 911il!UUJ.f~mIJIT , dllY of ..JL..:.~, 1995, it ill hereby ordered that a hearing on thl! Plaintiff'li Petition for Illmerqenoy Relief Bhall be held on the ~/~ 1995, at :::...: ..J..!...m., at- the Cumberland County Pennliylvania. N, ,', -'1'1 ')1, day of (lit ,'}" .Jt- , () Courthouli8, Carlisle tJl J" ,f) ," / / ,'\ ' 'if ,1 J. I I: . I 'y ~ ,', I) It ,\ I I"~ ~ J, .Y I " . (\ t.J I) I , J I '; ) )\. {" ( ii' j' (, I ,t, ! LORlBNlB lIANPUI t I IN TU~ COURT OF COMMON Pll~AS OF . P 4ineitt I CI)MBl!:RLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA I VII. I No. I lIAMON'l' (BU'l'Cll) WILSON, I CIVIL AC'l'ION - LAW Defendant I IN CUS'l'OD'i gjt..DBJL9Ji'-illillllT ANP NOW / this , day of . , 1995/ baud upon the Plaintiff/a Petition for l!:mergenoy Relief the Defendant i ill hereby ordered tl) return ouatody of the ohild to the Plaintiff, lIorene Landis, until further order of this oourt. J. " LOJ\BNlB LANDIS I Pl/1int:lff IN '1'1l!! courlT Oli' COMMON PLBAS Oli' CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA VlI. No. LMtON'l' (13U'l'Clll WILSON, Defendant CIVIL ACTION - LAW IN CUS'l'ODY I' JJ\ I Jf1'.ll"Jf / II l'll'!'.l'.I1.lQNJ"QIUIllillilllN.cLJlllLllL AND NOW, oomes tho Plaintiff, by and through her attorney., The LlIW Offioes of Patriok P. Lauer, Jr., and files this Petition for Emergenoy Relief against the Defendant and, in support thereat, avers as folloWSl 1. Plaintiff, Lorene Landis, is an adult individual who ourrently resides at 497 Lell ington Avenue / Meohaniosburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17055. The minor ohild, Pallis 13. Wilson, would oontinue to attend school the Mechanicsburg School District if the child were returned to this address. 2. Pefendant, Lamont Wilson, aka Dutoh Wilson, is an adult individual who currently resides at 2600 Ellendale Road, Pauphin, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania. If the minor child, palHs 13. Wilson, attended school whilll Hving at this address, he would attend the Central Pauphin School Piatrict. 3. Plaintiff seeks telnporary custody of the following child I Dallis B. Wilson, present resident is 497 Lexington Avenue/ Meohanicsburg, Cumberland County/ Pennsylvania 17055. The minor ohild is 7 1/2 yoars old and was born on November 1/ 1987. 4. The minor child, Pallis B. Wilson was born out of wedlook. 5. '1'h., millor uhild ill prllllunt ly ill thu lJUlltody ot th., tllthllr, who l:'e IIidl!l II Ilt 2600 In lUlldll1u HOlld, Dlluphill, Dllurhin county, PBnnllylvanill. 6. '1'hroughout thll uhlld'll UtI! hll hllli rritlidl!cl with the following parllOIlU Ilnd lit thll fo !lowing nddrauual.ll .Julle 1990 through Soptambur 1990 lit Sungul1d Apartmuntll, Lllnoautor Avenuo, Mechaniollburq, 1'0nnllY 1 vunia, Cumberland County with Mioha!!l 13. Mikula and Loruno Landill/ from Sartumber 1990 through Soptember 1991, at Eighth Streot, NoW Cumberland, Pennsylvania, Cumber.land county with Miohael 13, Mikula and hh dau<jhtaI'u Lauren L. Mikul.a and Brooke A. Mikula/ from September 1991 until August 1992 the ohild has ral.lided at 497 Lexington Avenue, Meohanicllburg, PennllylvanJ,a, Cumberland County with Lorene Landis and Michael B. Mikula and his children Morgan M. Mikula and Michael J. (Mikie) MikUla, from August 1992 until July 1994 the child had lived at 497 Lexington Avenue with Lorene Landis, Miohael 13. Mikula, Lauren L. Mikula, Brooke A. Mikula, Morgan M. Mikula and Michuel J. (Mikie) Mikula, from July 1994 through June 1995 the child hall resided at 497 Lexington with Lorene Landis, Michael B. Mikula, Brooke A. Mikula, Morgan M. Mikula and Miohael J. (Mikie) Mikula, Since June of 1995 until the preBont, the child haB resided at 497 Lexington Avenue with Lorene LandJ.B, Miohael B. Mikula, Brooke A. MikUla, and Michael J. (Mikie) Mikula, 7. Tho mother of the ohild io Lorene Landia, who ia currantly rBdding at the addrllJ.lJ.l J.lat forth in l'aragrltpll H 1. ahe ill oUrr~ntly m~rricd to Michnal J. Mikula. 8. 'l'ha fathur of. \',he ohild iJ.l falllcml. (Uutchl Wihon who io currently ruaidin<J at thu nddroJ.lJ.l J.lut forth !.n l'lIrogrl1ph *2 above. He iJ.l ourrently nmrriod to Sally Vurner wilJ.lon. The relationship of the 1'1l1int.!.ff to the child iJ.l thl1t of natural mothur. 'l'he Plaintiff currently reJ.licleo with thu followin~l perJ.lons I Husband, Michael B. Mikula, J.ltep-daughter, nraoke A. Mlkula and J.ltep-J.lon, Miohaal J. (Mikiel Mikula. 9. The relationship of the Def.endant to the child is that of natural fllther. Defendant currently re9idos with the following personal hiB wife, fJaJ.ly Varnor \~iloon. 10. '1'he partiea hen-to are the naturl11 pl1renta of the minor ohild, Oallis n. Wtlaon, age sevon, who was born November 1, 1987. 11. The child currently reJ.lideJ.l with 1'1oLntiff, and Oefendl1nt has exercised s~oradic visitation rights. Thsre is no existing oustody order. 12. On .July 21, 1995, Plaintiff and her fiance, Miohl1el B. Mikula, left for Delaware for the!.r lIIacriage and honeymoon. Mr. I Mikula's children were left with their natural mother, while Plaintiff's child, Dallis Wiluon, was left with her Aunt, Elizabeth Bohitz of 841 Hummel Avenue in Lemoyne. Both babysicten were left with instructions to expect the newlywed9' return on Thursday, July 27,1995. L3. On JUly 211, 1~~5, !lllll.IIUtt OIlUOU hor Aunt to I18Y they would not l1\/Iku it b/lok thllt dllY, but would axtllnrl their: honeymoon and be baok IIIJlIlOl'.lI1\U 1.1I tho lIuxt fow dllYIl. !llllilltitf offurod threll time II to hllviJ II L) 11\ 0 0110 pl.ul~u[l thll uld.ld, IJnllia, but hor 1\IIIIt offered to uonl'.l nUll U/lI.'lIlIJ for hl.,". 14. On July 2g, 1~g5, the !llllilltLff'a /IUllt wLuhed to go to the theatllr, and ao 'lIlVU thu uhl.ld to the l'lainti H' a u iatar. 'rhe Plaintiff'a ~I.ater. dr.ova DII1ILa to hia fllthor'a hOl1\a that evening. 15. When Pl/lLlltif'f returllou IIO/lr nOOIl tho next day, July 30, 1995, IJhe waa J.llfOrll1od that lIhu Willi "1I0t 'lottinq DallilJ." 16. Defendant hall rofullod to purmit plaintiff to speak with D~llis over the phono, and oontinuoa to rofuse to allow her to see her ohild. 17. PlainU.ff alld Defendant have boon unable t.O rOlJolve conflJ,otlJ oonoQrning oUlJtody of PallilJ B. willJon. 18. Plaintiff hall p~ovided all the neoeelJary elementlJ for the eduoational, physioal and emotional welfare of the ohild. 19. The belJt interests and p~rmanent welfare of the ohild will I be served by a Court Order giving immediate primary physical custody to Plaintiff beoausel II I' I' 1\. The ohild has always lived with his mother. B. 'rhe defendant has never shown any oonoern for his child. c. the child has always had a close bond with his mother. P. The plaintiff has all of the child's clothing. E. The defendant does not have a bed for the child. i'/ HI Rl!: I 'l'~MPOI~MV CUS'l'oDV ORDER QJ3UEILQ.l':..S.Q.!JJ~r , .', AND NOW, thia 8th day of August, 1995, upon oonlliderotion of plaintiff'a Petition for Emergenoy ReUef, and following a hearing at whioh the Defendant did not appellr, notwithstanding that he reoeived notioe of the hearing aooording to Plaintiff's oounsel, I3rian pUhala, Esquire, it is ORDERED and DIRECTED as followsl 1. Legal custody of the parties' child, Dallis a. Wilson, born November 1, 19B7, shall be shared by the parties. 2. primary physical custody of the child shall be in the plainitff, Lorene Landis (Mother). Temporary or partial physioal custody of the child shall be in the Defendant, Lamont (Butch) Wilson (Father) on alternating weekends from 7:~0 p.m. on Friday until 7100 p.m, on sunday, commencing with the date of Friday, August 11, 1995, ), It appearing that the contents of the Plaintiff's Petition for Emergency Relief include the requisite allegations for a custody complaint, but it appearing further that the petition i~ not styled a oomplaint, the terms of oustody provided for herein shall not take effeot until a pleading denominated custody complaint has boen filed with this COUl."t. 4. This ardor is a Tomporal."Y custody order and shall continu~ in effoct pending a custody oonciliation conference betweon the parties scheduled pUI."BUant to the complaint to bo filed or any fUl."ther Ol."del." of court. :;;;~'/J a /J I J.uweBley Ol~"~' ariall puhala, Esquire For the plaintiff - e~d~'-Io,j' d,,,.\..i sid/'ll .S.,\' , Lamont WilBon 2680 Ellendale Road Dauphin, PA 17018 , wcy