Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-04166 t J . -7 t/1 Q 'I J I' I " " I. . " " " , , I ;,j . I , ,,' ~\, i . II] "'''\',1". r'.:'l~::{i~ c; l;"jt.!~; !i':}'tle ", '(!'~4 ' , ;r,!:\ill'~ ':'I""';~J. , '. .', '_~ 'r' \', "\l,f'~V' ",.h,.., I::,~~ ,,' .~ '. I '. I\)~~~ 'l~<t.j '\:.'.\~\t '1 ,.-,-q~, ""ld;r IV ; , ';:( :i~ '- '11,; I I ~::;i III l'/';~;~ .......'\ (,t;'t~, l::i'~ , ~,j:;;,:, 'M'l "I " , ! '1 ,I I .~ " " f.!' J I'" I I '" l \ - '. !~ :.' ,..-" " ...~~.. ':'20 .,-' , ~ ~ ( \ \ /1' I I I" ." " , , , , , , ., /1 '--"biVL ('>1. '- ~il/w , , .ll 1,,"-"( ~ ,~ Ld... i' ,II, ,;' , "" I , '.. 'i " ;'1 ' ,I ,,' ;'-', " ~JA..' e~'G- I-II (~) ~J.;t~ -~e~ P;l.tll~~u.; ~ ~ .J.~<..dPU'~~'I!~ tl!, '~R .... d ~ ." Qi iU . ,-" ':\ . !~. ,\. '",' I~ ~,; ',ii .1' \ " ; . " 110 ,> t'I if! lit >- ...... 'j& i;:u ~ ,x 0( -r14' ~ .i -!....:- r, (J 0:; :,'; II ~;i r wZ 10:0 .. - ~ .II ;i" ,,' >, ) , I \ I i, ( " ' , , CERTI t'lCATE AND TRANSMITTAl, Ot' RECORD UNDt:R PENNSYI.YANIA RULE m' APP~;LI,ATE PROCEDURE 1931 lEl ._----_.-._._._-~---------'-_.._------------- To the Prothonotary of the Appellate Court to which the within matter has beon appealed: COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE UNDERSIGNED, Prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas of CUMBERLAND County, the said eDurt being a court of r.ecord, do hereby certify that annexed hereto is a true and correct copy of the whole and entire record, including an opinion of the court as required by PA R.A. P. 1925, the original papers and exhibits, if any on file. the transcript of the proceedings, if any. and the docket entries in the following matter: Case No. 95-4166 Civil Term: No. 3357 C.D. 1995 JOHN H. BROUJOS. LOUISE BROUJOS, HAROLD KRETZING, JEAN KRETZING, AND ROBERT LEE JACOBS VS. CARLISLE BOROUGH COUNCIL The documents comprisiag the record have been numbered from No. I to No. 278. and attached hereto as Exhibit A is a list of the documents correspondingly numbered and identified with reasonable definiteness, including with respect to each document. the number of pages comprising the document. The date on which the record has been transmitted to the appellate court is January 5, 1996 (Seal of Court) ;(~ (,*ib- 1l... f'l!L Protholl~~.r"y '7 'LtoANv...U. W~,jQ,~ An additional copy of this certificate is enclosed. Please sign and date copy, theroby acknowledging receipt of this record. RECORD RECEIVED: Date: (signature' title) Commonwealth or l)ennK~I\'ania ('<lUnIY 01' ('umb~rl.nd } '" I. Prothonotary . Prothonolary of the Courl of Common Plea. in and for .aid ('ounly. do hereby eerlify that Ihe foreKoinll i. a full. true and eorrecl copy oflhe whole record oflhe case therein stated. wherein and Jean Kretz ing So RohPrt I.., Plainliff. and Carlisle BorouQh Council Defendant __, as Ihe .ame remains of record before the .aid Courl at ~o, 95-4166 of Civil Term. A,D, 19__, have hereunto ,el my hand and affixed the seal of .aid Court day of Januarv A. 0.. 19-2i., L~ t'.)V~ &, :C~~tltLa )v..1.<<~ P,,"honOI.ry I. Harold E. Sheelv Pre.ident Judge of the Ninth Judicial Oi.triet. composed of Ihe County of Cumberland. do certify that Lawrence E. Welker, Prothonotary . by whom the annexed record. certificate and allestalion were made and given.. and who. in hi. own proper handwriting. lhereunlo .ubscribed hi. name and affixed the seal of the Court of Comnlon Plea. of .aid County. wa'.at the time ohodoinll. and nowi. Prolhonolary in and for ,aid County of Cunmr1an<l in the Commonweahh of Penn.ylvania. duly commissioned and qualified loall ofwho.e ael. aosueh full faith and eredil are and ought 10 be given a. well in Courl. of ju iealure as el.ewhere. and thaI the .aid rc<:ord. eertifieale and allestalion are in due form of law an~ e by the pro er Jffi.eer, Case No. 3357 C.D. 1995 In TESTIMONY WHEREOf'. this Fifth Commonweahh of Penn.ylvania County of Cumberland } ss: I. Lawrence E. Welker , Prothonotary of the Court of Common Plea. in and for the .aid County. do certify Ihalthe Honorable H.,ro1d E. ShPply by whom Ihe foregoing all.,lallon was made. and who has Ihereunlo .ub.eribed hi. name. was. allhelime of makinlllhereof. and still" Pre,idenl Judie oflhe ('ourt of Common Plea.. Orphan' Courland Courlof Quarter Session. of the rea.. In and for .aid County. duly Commissioned and qualified, 10 all who.e ael. a. .uch full failh and credu arr and oughl 10 be liven. a. well in Courts of judicature a. el.ewhere, IN TESTIMONY WIIFREO!', I have heTeunlo .et my hand and affixed lhe ,eal 01' .aid Courl lhis 5th day of January A.D. 19~. X'au!'1.t';U(- l,__lli~ ",;a~<4!d..d >v.zltf~ 1)~~""hOn"''''' d i a' ~ ." :z m g i I c... ~ I :I ~ ~ '" !"l U1 ~ :c I II . ... il. ~. ~ i '" ~ ~ II'> a> c... a> :n "I ~ 2' [ ~ c... n :;; < i ....' ... 11 - 3 ~. < [ !"l ~ ....' c Ii ~ :Ill ~ ~ !"l .. .., ~. i .. Q i :Ill ~ I r I"l c III i " 8. r: ;' " ~ r' '< PHZ Nl. 1 - 16 17 18 19 - 21 22 23 - 24 25 - 26 27 - 137 138 - 222 224 - 228 229 - 238 239 - 241 " " Amcmg tho Rocord. and Proceeding, enrolled in the court of Common Pleu in and for the counlY of ____ cunbe~land No. 3357 CD 1995 10 No. 95-4166 Civil in ,he Commonwealth of Ponnsylvania Term, 19__ i. containod Ihe following: COPY OF Aooear-ance DOCKET ENTRY JOHN H. BROUJOS. LOUISE BROUJOS. HAROLD KRETZING, JEAN KRETZING, AND ROBERT I,BE JACOBS VS. CARLISI.E BOROUG:i COUNCIL Aug. 3. 1995. Notice of Land Use Appeal. filed. Aug. 3, 1995, Writ of Certiorari, issued. Aug. 4, 1995. Certificate of Service. filed. IIl.Ig. 4, 1995. Motion for a Stay. HIed. Aug. 8, 1995. Order of Court. filed. AND foO'I, this 8th day of August, 1995, a Rule is entered against the Borough of Carlisle to show cause why the motion for a stay soould not be granted. Rule returnable at a rearing to be held at 2: 30 p.m., Monday, August 14, 1995, in Courtroom Number 2. Appellants shall provide notice to appellee, the owner of tre property, the developer and the attomey for the developer. By the Court, Fdgar B. Bayley, J. Aug. 8. 1995, Certificate of Service, filed. Aug. 9, 1995. Notice of Intervention, filed. (by Roger M. Morgenthal. Esq.) Aug. 11. 1995, Stipulation, filed. Aug. 15, 1995, Order, filed. AND foO'I, this 15th day of August, 1995, upon ITOtion for a stay of the action by the Carlisle Borough Council on the application of Norman EI511, TA Windsor Building Corp., for developnent of the Cemetery Avenue pllln, it is ordered and decreed that the action by the Carlisle Borough Council is stayed. Carlisle Borough Council will take no furtter action on final approval or issuance of a building permi t and the landowner Mary Lou Robbins and the developer NoI1Tliln EIClll, trading as Windsor Building Corp., shall not proceed any further to develop, constnlct, or excavate the land until final dispositIon of the appeal has been made. By the Court, Fdqar B. Bayley. J. 1995. Notice of Filing of Record (with enclosures), filed. 1995, Transcript of Public Heari.ng before Carlisle Borouqh Coundl, 223 Aug. 18, Aug. 28, filed. Sept. I, 1995, Praecipe for Listing Case for Argument, filed. By: Roger M. Morgenthal, Esq. for Interve Oct. 10, 1995. Notice of Filing of SupplL~ntal Record. filed. Oct. 31, 1995. Opinion and Order of Court, filed. AND U:kI, th is 31st day of Oc~ober, 1995, the with in appeal, IS DISMISSE By the Court, F.dgar B. Bayley, J. 1>Vv. 28, 1995. Notice of Appeal, filed. Not ir.e is hereby given that John H. Broujos, et a!, Appellants above naned, hereby appeal. to the Cc:mnonwealth Court of pennsylvania fran the order entered in this Il'atter on the 31st day of October. l.995. This order has been entered In the docket as eviclenred hy the attached By: John H. HrouloB, Enq. rs PIlGB N>~ 242 - 246 Dec. n, 1995, CoomonwcilLth Court (If Pennsylvania Notice of Apneal [bcketing Number ))57 C.O. 1995, filed. 247 - 276 Dec. 22, 1995, Petition to Require Posting of Appe'll Bond, filed. By: Roger M. MorqcnthaL, Esq. 277 - 276 Dec. 27, 1995, Order of Court, filed. AND Na'I, this 27th day of December, 1995, the Petition to Require Posting of Appeal Bond, IS DENIED. To obtain a bond under 5] P.S. S 11003-A(dl, the appeal must be frivolous. The issue of whether Borough Council properly granted the two modification of requirements for the preliminary subdivision and land developnent plan is not frivolous; there- fore, there is no need for a hearing and there is no basis for requiring the posting of a bond. By the Court, Edgar B. Bayley, J. . t On March 14, 1995, Windsor tiled an application with the Borough tor approval ot a preliminary plan to .ubdivide Interv.nor.' 1.26-acre tract and to con.truct tour duplex.. with .ight .ingl.-tamily, ..mi-detached dW.lling.. Each dupl.x i. to have a .eparate garaqa and ill intended to b. 80ld tor up to $140,000. Int.rv.nor.' property tront. on C.m.t.ry Avenue to the north and abut. a middle .chool to the .outh. Cem.t.ry Av.nu. il ....ntially an all.y and ia un.venly pav.d. Th. .ubject .it. con.i.t. ot an op.n ar.a with .om. dilapidat.d .tructur.. that w.re u..d wh.n it was a cOIlllD.rcial tlow.r budn.... Th. prop.rty ie locat.d in an R-2 m.diUlll-d.ndty r..idential di.trict, in which dnql.-tamily .emi-d.tach.d dwellinq. are .p.citically permitt.d a. ot right. In it. pr.liminary plan, Wind.or requ..t.d a moditication ot requirem.nt. pur.uant to Section 226-14 (A) ot the Borough'. Subdivi.ion and t.nd Dev.lopm.nt OrcHnanc.' to allow a l....r right-ot-way width tor Ce.etery Av.nu.2 and al.o to d.l.t. curbinq 'Thi. ..ction provide. that the Council: 6.::i:l-:'. 'J~..~~t ;: mcditic:)t:.icn :)! 't!!O r"}q.~t::'~!"~ntf! ot on. (1) or more provi.ion. if the literal entorc...nt will .xact undue hard.hip b.cau.e ot p.culiar condition. pertaining to the land in qu..tion, provided that .uch .oditication will not be contrary to the public int.re.t and lbat the purpo.. and intent ot this chapt.r ar. ob.erv.d. &rh. right-ot-way width tor C..et.ry Avenu. i. 34 t..t, which 1M 16 teet le.. than the required 50 t.et. In 1971, when t:he property wa. d..d.d tro. Int.rv.nor Robbin.' pr.d.c...or-in-titl. 2 -- and .idewalk. on the north .ide of Cemetery Avenue.s The preliminary plan was initially approved by the Borough's planning Co..i..ion. Following a public hearing, the council approved the plan with the two reque.ted modification.. Without taking any additional te.timony, the trial court upheld the council'. approval of the plan. Protestants, neighboring homeowner., appeal.4 prote.tants first argue that Cemetery Avenue i. an alley intend..d only to be used for access to the rear side ot propttrti.. otherwise abutting a street f they aver that when they purchased their home. on Ea.t Ridge Street they assumed that they had the unimpeded u.e ot the alley to .ervice their propertie.. To support their position, Protestant. note thllt section 226-23 (C) of the Subdivi.ion and Land Developlllenr Orlli.nance require. a minimUII '50- foot right-ot-way, and they ~on~~nd that a waiver of this to prote.tant Kretzing, a right 'ot 'w;).y ot 34 feet was re.erved, which wa. the requirement for a local street at that time. S A. reco..ended by tho Bv~~ugh'. engineer, the deletion of curbing and sidewalk requirements on the north side of Cemetery Avenue will allow rainwater to collect in a drain .y.tem without being 1:'".trir;t:"<l hy " .....!:'b "!'I~ !:id~l!~l~~. ~':' ..1:....:.. l..u.t .l.....~...ll III ourb and .ide~alk on the .outh .id. ~f Cemetery Avenue where the duplexes will be built. 41n a land use appeal, where the trial court ~oe. not take any additional evidence, this Court'. scope of review i. U.ited to determining whether the local g~verning uody committed an error of law or an abu.e of disoretion. BIIr v. Lancaster Countv PlanninG COIIIII'n, 625 A.2eS 164 (pa. CIIIwlth. 1993), aODeal denied, 538 Pa. 677, 649 A.2d 677 (1994). "[T]tlo governing boc:ly abu.es ite disoretion when its finding. of fact are not .upported by substantial evieSence." ~. at 167 3 . require..nt .hould have been the .ubject of a variance before the Borough'. Zoning Hearing Board. In AlIlIsal of Flori, 635 A.3d '43 (pa. CBIwlth. 1993), aanaal dani.d ~ ~ piori v. Ban..i.. Town~hiD, 538 Pa. 638, 641 A.3d 513 (1994), thi. Court reaffirmed the well-e.tabli.hed rule that where a .unicipaUty ha. enacted a .ubdivi.lon and land develop.ent ordinance, the "municipality" qoverninq body ha. exclue1ve juri.dicticm to hear and render final adj'ldication. in application. for approval ot .ubdivi.ion. or land development.." 14. at '45. In the pre.ent ca.e, Section 336-3 ot the Subc1ivi.ion and Land Development Ordinance de.ignate. the Borouqh'. Council, not the zoninq Hearinq Board, a. the authority to review, .ake reco..endation. and approve or d1aapprove all preliminary and final .ubc1ivi.ion plat application.. In view ot Alllleal at Fiori, the trial COUl't correctly concluded that becau... the plan .et all zoninq require.ent., the .tandard. tor granting variance. to lon1n9 regulation. do not apply to grantinq modification. ot require.ent. under the Subc1ivi.ion and Land Develop.ent Ordinance. A. noted by the tr:l,al court, a 34-toot right-ot-way wa. re.erved by the predece..or-in-title to the legal owner at the .ubject property when it wa. .ubdivided in 1971. Under the .ubc1ivi.ion and land develop.ent ordinance in ettect at that ti.e, 34 feet wa. the exl.ting requir..ent for a local .treet. Henoe, there i. evidence ot record to indicate that Ce.etery Avenue "'.. intended to be a local .treet. In any event, reqardle.. of the 4 width of the right-of-way, the plan require. Wind.or to pave the cartwaY' of Ce.etery Av.nue to a width of 22 feet, which aeet. the current .in:l.aUII pave.ent width require.ent. of Section 226-23(C) (1) of the Subdivieion and Land Developmlllnt Ordinance for a local .treet. Accordingly, thi. Court conclude. that the Council did not err or Abu.. it. di.cr.tion in modifying the right-of-way width require.ent.. prote.tant. contend that the Council erred in approvinq the plan becau.e the propo.ed development do.. not provide for orderly expan.ion or fol:' compatibility with exi.ting hou.e. a. required by Section 255-21 of the 80rough'. Zoning Ordinance, e general provieion de.cribinq the intent of the R-2 Dietrict. Specifically, prote.tent. arque that the four duplex hou.e. on Ce.etery Avenue are not compatible with exi.ting hou.ing, which i. predominantly .inql.-family, and that in approving the duplexe. the Council failed to con.ider the exiDting .ingle-fa.ily character of the area a. required by Section 255-2(8) of the Zoninq Ordinance. A. noted by the trial cuurt, Section 255-22(8) of the Zoning ordinance .pecifically provide. that .ingle-family, .emi- detached dwellingll are a u.e penit'Ced by right in any R-2 Dietrict. "It ie well .ettled that .pecific providon. in on ordinance control over qen.ral provi.ion.." ADDilal of parr.ll, .11 'Section 226-' of the Subdivi.ion and Land Develop.ent ordinance define. "CARTWAY or ROADWAY" a.: "That portion of . .treet wbicb i. i.proved, de.ignated or intended for vehicular u.e, including paved area. for any on-.~~eet parking." 5 . . A.2d 986, 989 (pa. cmwlth. 1984). Therefore, the .peoific provi.ion in Section 2!5!5-22 (8) IDU.t take precedence over any general "intent" requirement. .et forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Further, becau.e .ingle-family, .emi-detached dwelling. are peZ'lllittea on the .ubject property a. of right, they lDay not be conddered incompatible with the general intent of the Zoning Ordinance. In any event, becau.e of change. in the neighborhood, the area i. no longer cOlDpri.ed exclu.ively of .ingle-family dwelling.. In addition, Section 603.1 of the Penn.ylvanil Municipalitie. Planning Code (MPC), Act of July 31, 1968, P.L. 805, 1.1 amended, added by Section 48 of the Act of December 21, .1988, 53 P.S. 110603.1, provide.: In interpreting the lanquage of zoning ordinance. to determine the extent of the re.triction upon the u.e of the property, the lanquage .hall be interpreted, where doubt exi.t. a. to the intended .eaning of the lanquage written arid enacted by the qoverning body, in favor of the property owner and aqainat any implied exten.ion of the re.triction. In 1995, when the plan va. .ubmitted, the area had been rezoned to R-2 for at lea.t five year., and ba.ed upon the evolving nature of the area, thia Court conclude. that the Council did not err or abu.e it. di.cretion 1n approving the preliminary plan. prote.tant. next contend that the approved plan doe. not .eet the intent and Objective. a. .et forth in Section 25!5-2(C) (1) of the Zoning Ordinance in that it will not proDlote, protect and 6 facilitate the public health, eafety and qeneral welfare of the area. Specifically, Protestanta a..ert that the development will create danqerou. conditions for elderly residents walkinq or children playinq in the alley when it is turned into a street. The record indicates that these satety concerns were considered by the Council. The approved plan provide. for a sidewalk and a curb on the south Ride ot.' cemet.ry Avenue in front of the proposed duplexes in order to accommodate pedestrian traffic. Further, the tire chief opined that the proposed use would generate less automobile traffic than the previous commercial use and that fire apparatu. would have adequate acce.s to the properties. In short, there i. substantial evidence ot record to indicate that there i8 no need tor a sidewalk and a curb on the north side of the street. Moreover, the absence ot ill sidewalk and curbinq on that side of the street will protect it trom storm water runoff. Finally, prote.tant. contend that the Council (1) failed to make findinq. as to whether Cemetery Avenue is a designated .treet, (2) failed to Ust the ten conditions to which the developer aqre~d and (3) permitted hearsay te.timony trom the tire chief, who claimed that there would be no problem for truck. respondinq to that area.' Pursuant to Section 508(2) of the MPC, 'Protestants did not raise the question of ce.etery Avenue's designation as a .treet either before the Councilor on appeal to the trial court. Accordingly, it 18 waived. Pa. R.A.P. 302(.). , 7 53 P.8. 110508(2), when a preli.inary .ubdivi.ion plan i. approved, the governing body need not make finding. of fact or conclu.ion. of law to .upport it. deci.ion. It i. only where a plan i. not approved that the deciaion denyin9 approval mu.t .pecify the plan'. defect. and cite to .pecific provi.ion. of the ordinance that were violated. Verr v. L80ca.ter Countv Plannina comm'n, 625 A.2d 164 (pa. CIIIwlth. 1S/93), aDDeal denied, 538 Pa, 677, 649 A.2d 677 (1994). In aummary, it i. well e.tabli.hed that the approval of a .ubdivi.ion plan may not be withheld where the plein cOlllplie. with all applicable reCJUlation.. Akin v. Sou1:h Middl.~on Town.hiD Zonina Hearina Board, 547 A.2d 883 (Pa. CIIIwlth. 1988). Al.O, a .ubdivi.ion plan may not be required to .eet .tandard. that are not contained in the .wxUvi.ion ordinance. 14. In the pre.ent ca.e, the council properly determined that wind.or'. preliminary plan .et all reqUirement. of the Borou9h'. zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the council did not err or abu.e it. di.cretion in 9ranting the modification. from the require.ent. of the Borou9h'. Subdivi.ion and Land Development Ordinance for Cemetery Avenue'. right-of-way Thia Court'. review of the record indicat.. that the council did li.t the ten condition. a9reed to by Wind.or, the developer. IU certified Record, council'. July 5, 1995 special Meeting Minute., Con.ent to SubcUviaion/Land Devalopment Plan .Popproval with Condition.. rred Bean, the Borough ManBger, t..tified that he a.ked the tire chief whether, given the width of the .tr.et, he could get a truck into thi. are. and the fire chief felt comfortable that he could. -- 8 . I width and aidawalka and curbing_ The order of the trial court i. aUined. J.~~ IS A. S IT , Judge President Judge Colins dissents. , ' , IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT or PENNSYLVANIA JOHN H. BROUJOS, LOUISE BROUJOS, HAROLD KRETZING, JEAN KRETZ lNG, and ROBlar LEE JACOBS, Appellant. NO. 3357 C.D. 1995 v. CARLISLE BOROUGH COUNCIL ORDRR AND NOW, thb 14th day of November , 1996, the order of the court of Common PIe.. of cumberland County 1. hereby affined. ~ SMITH, II: I 1,1 " . 1'1 ',.\ ~. ,,: '" L .... (-I I:': -'I , ,... .. J.1'" " " .,-0 , , (_"I .. I': . ,: '- t. ' ~. i " - ,-"1 , j ~ , I , I... -, , , . ., " (, . .J RE: BROUJOS, KRE'rZING & JACOBS v CARLS, COUNCL ,- . c , , Lower Court No: 95-4166 CIV Appealed Date: October 31, 1995 County: Cumberland Commonwealth Docket #: 3357 C.D. 1995 1-: i III' , , , ("-" , ( C "' ' L:! : , I' <. .. , - IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ~-. . 1 CERTIFICATE OF CONTENTS OF REMANDED RECORD .". AND NOTICE OF REMAND UNDER P~~NSY~VANIA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 2571 AND 2572(e) THE UNDERSIGNED, Prothonotary or Deputy Prothonotary of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, the said court being a court of record, does hereby certify that annexed to the original hereof is the whole and entire record as remanded from the Commonwealth court, in compliance with Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure 2571 and 2572 (e) . An additional copy of this certificate is enclosed with the original hereof and the clerk or prothonotary of the lower court or the head, chairman, deputy or secretary of the government unit is hereby directed to acknowledge receipt of the remanded record by executing such copy at the place indicated and by r~turning the same IMMEDIATELY. , e~~L~ Deputy ProthonotarY/Chlef Clerk PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN IMMEDIATELy TO: OFFICE OF THE CHIEF CLERK COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA P.O. BOX 11730, SOUTH OFFICE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PA 17108 (717)7a3-3215 OR 783-7058 (Seal of Court) Record Received: ~ (). ~VtJ.1iM- slgna .ure) A~ 1~]u-t4.t.t; Reason tor Remand Date record Remanded At firmed November 3, 1997 SPK qf -41' ~ Oct :I, 1997 SU.'" COURT or 'IDmSYLVANIA IIIDDL. DISTRICT NOTIC. 0' 'ILIlfO 'ITITIOIf 'OR ALLOWANC. 0' AP,BAL 'ROM CONNOIfIIALTB COURT . DOCKIT NO. 3357 C.D. 95 AT'f'Y .01 ..TITIonl. Johll B. IIrou:lo., I.quir. JOlIN II. .aOUJOS, LOUISI .ROUJOS, 1lAJl0LD ltRBTZINO, J'BAN ltRBTZINO and ROlllaT LII. JACOIIS .:i~ .ITITIONKRS V. CAlLISLII .0aouoII COUNCIL NORIIAN llLAM and MARY LOU ROBBINS, Int.rv.no~. RBSPONDBNT NO. 0733 N.D. ALLOCATUR DOCltllT liii DATI 'IITITION 'OR ALLOWANCII 0' AP.BAL rILED. 1:1/16/96 .*.*.*.*.*....********.*.**....* DIS'OSITIOX. DIIMIIID DISPOSITION DATB. 09/08/97 AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 1997, the petition for Allowance Of Appeal is hereby DENIED. PC. .oaleAllD OlIOIlfAL RBCOlD TO NIDDLII DISTRICT - JlAJlRISBURO ( ) OaIGINAL RlCOlD .ILID. If OTIC. O. 'ILINO SIIIIT axITKD TO Lowaa COURTS. 10/0:1/97 ...........*..***..**.....*.. RBCOIfSID.lATIOR .ILID. DI.'OSITIOX DATI. DIS'OSITION. RECORD REMITTED: cc. ...t Publi.bing Co. C~.rc. Cl.aring Iou.. Nead Data Ceatral CC. . cu.berland/Civil . Nu.b.r. 95-4166 Civil T.~ S8/11U1 IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOlIN H. BROUJOS, LOUISE BROUJOS, HAROLD lCRETZING, JEAN KRETZING, and ROBERT LEE JACOBS, Appellants NO. 3357 C.D. 1995 ARGUED: September 13, 1996 v. CARLISLE BOROUGH COUNCIL BEFORE: HONORABLE JAMES GARDNER COLINS, pre.ident Judqe HONORABLE DORIS A. SMITH, Judqe HONORABLE GEORGE T. KELTON, Senior Judqe OPINION BY JUDGE SMITH FILED: Noyell)be;r 14, 19.9.6 John H. BroujoB, Loui.e Broujofl, Harold Kretzinq, Jean Kretzinq and Robert Lee Jacob. (COllectively, prote.tant.) appeal from an order of the Court of Co_on Plea. of CUlIIberland County that dismissed prote.tants' appeal from a deci.ion of the Carlisle Borouqh Council (council) qrantinq approval of a preliminary .ubdivision and land development plan on behalf of Windsor Building Corporation (Wind.or). The legal and equitable owner. of the .ubject property, Mary Lou Robbins and Norman Elam, t/d/b/a Windsor, are before the Court as Intervenors. The is.ue pre.ented i. whether the Council, in approvinq the preliminary plan, abu.ed it. discretion and cOllllDittederrors of law by failinq to require compliance with the applicable provisions of the Borough'S Subdivision and Land Devolopllent Ordinance and Zoninq Ordinance. . On March 14, 1995, Wind.or filed an application with the Borou9h for approval of a preli'alinary plan to subdivide Interv.nor.' 1.26-acre tract and to construct four dupl.x.s with ei9ht .ingle-family, .emi-detached dwellinqs. Each duplex i. to h.ve . .eparate garag. and is intended to be .old for up to '140,000. Int.rv.nor.' property front. on Cemetery Av.nu. to the north .nd abuts a middle .chool to the south. Cemet.ry Av.nu. i. ....ntially an all.y and is un.vonly pav.d. Th. subj.ct .ite consi.t. of an op.n area with some dilapidat.d structur.s that were u..d wh.n it wa. a commercial flower bu.in.... Th. prop.rty i. locat.d in an R-2 medium-d.nsity r.sidential diatrict, in which dnvle-family s.mi-d.tached dw.llings ar. sp.cifically p.rmitt.d a. of right. In it. pr.liminary plan, Windsor r.qu..t.d a modification of r.quir.m.nts pursuant to Section 226-14 (A) of the Borou9h'. Subdivi.ion and Land Dev.lopm.nt Ordinanc.' to allow a l....r right-of-way width for C.m.t.ry Av.nu.2 and al.o to d.l.t. curbing 'Thi. ..ction provid.. that the Council: may qrsnt a modification of the requir.m.nts of on. (1) or more provision. if the lit.ral .nforcem.nt will .xact undue hard.hip b.cau.e of p.culiar condition. pertaining to the land in qu..tion, provided that .uch modification will not bel contrary to the public inter..t and Ulat the purpo.. and int.nt of this chapt.r are ob..rved. Zorh. right-Of-way width for C_.t.ry Avenu. i. 34 f..t, Whioh i. 16 f.et 1... than the required 50 f..t. In 1971, wh.n the property was de.d.d from Interv.nor Robbi...' pred.ce..or-in-title 2 and .idewalk. on the north aide of Cemetery Avenue. J The preliminary plan wa. initially approved by the Borough's Planning Commi..ion. Following a public hearing, the Council approved the plan with the two requ..ted modifications. Without taking any additional testimony, the trial court upheld the Council's approval of the plan. prote.tant., neighboring homeowner., appeal.4 Protestants first argue that Cemetery Avenue is an alley intended only to be u.ed for acce.. to the rear .ide of properties otherwise abutting a atreet: they aver that when they purchllsed their home. on Eaat Ridge street they aasumed that they had the unimpeded use of the alley to .ervice their properties. To support their poaition, Protestants note thllt Section 226-23 (C) of the Subdivision and Land Developlllent' Orlli.nance requires a minimua 50- foot right-of-way, and they '1on~"nd that a waiver of this to Protestant Kr.tzing, a right 'of 'w.J.Y of 34 feet wa. resarved, which was the requirement for a local street at that time. J As recommended by the B~.~ugh's engineer, the deletion of curbing and sidewalk requirements on the north side of Cemetery Avenue will allow rainwater to collect in a drain syste. without being restricted by . curb and aidewalk. Windaor must install a curb and sidewalk on the aouth .id. of Cemetery Avenue where the duplexes will be built. 4In a land u.e appeal, where the trial court ~oes not take any additional evidence, this Court'. Bcope of review is limited to determining whether the local governing ~ody committed an error of law or an abuse of discretion. HIXr v. Lancaster County Plannina Comm'n, 625 A.2d 164 (pa. cmwlth. 1993), aooeal denied, 538 Pa. 677, 649 A.2d 677 (1994). "[T]tlo governing body abuse. its discretion when its finding" of fact are not supported by substantial evidence." ~. at 167 3 require.ent ehould have been the subject ot a variance betore the Borough'. Zoning Hearing Board. In .\pDeaI of Piori, 635 A.2d 743 (pa. C1Dwlth. 1993), aDDeal denied ~~ Piori v. Bensalem Townshi;, 538 Pa, 638, 647 A.2d 512 (1994), this Court reattirmed the well-established rule that where a .unicipality haa enacted a subc1!vi.ion and land develop.ent ordinance, the "municipality's qoverninq body haa exclusive juriSdiction to hear and render tinal adjUdication. in applications tor approval ot subdivi.ions or land development.." !d. at 745. In the pre.ent cas., Section 226-3 ot the SUbdivi.ion and Land Development Ordinance desiqnates the Borouqh's Council, not the Zoninq Hearinq Board, as the authority to review, .aJre reco.endations and approve or disapprove all preliminary and tinal .ubdivi.ion plat application.. In view ot ADDeaI of Piori, the trial court correctly concluded that because the plan met all zoning require.ent., the .tandard. tor qrantinq variance. to loninv requlation. do not apply to granting moditicationa ot require.ent. under the Subdiviaion and Land Development Ordinance. A. noted by the trial court, a 34-toot riqht-ot-way wa. re.ervad by the predecca..or-in-title to the leqal owner ot the .Wlject property when it wa. .ubdivided in 1971. Under the .ubdivi.ion and land develop.ent ordinance in ettect at that ti.e, 34 teet wa. the exi.tinv requir..ent tor a local .treet. Hence, there i. evidence ot record to indicate that Ce.etery AV8nue wa. intended to be a local atreet. In any event, revardle.. of tha 4 wi 4th ot the right-ot-way, the plan requirel Windlor to pave the cartwar ot cemetery Avenue to a wi 4th ot 22 teet, which meetl the current minimUIII pavement wi4th requirement. ot Section 226-23 (C) (1) ot the Sub4ivi.ion an4 Lan4 Development Or4ir.ance tor a local Itreet. Accor4ingly, thil Court conclude. that the Council did not err or abu.e it. dilcretion in modifying the right-ot-way wi4th requirement. . prote.tantl contend that tbe Council erre4 in approving the plan becau.e thl propo.ed dlvelopment doe. not provide tor orderly expan.ion or tor compatibility with exilting hou.e. a. require4 by Section 255-21 ot the Borough'. Zoning Ordinanc3, a general prov18ion describing the intent of the R-2 D18trict. Specifically, prot..tantll argue that the tour duplex hou.e. on Cemetlry Avenue are not compatibll with ex18ting bou.ing, which i. predominantly e1ngll-family, and tbat in approving the duplexe. the Council failed to con.idlr the exi.ting .ingle-family cbaracter of the aria a. requirld by Slction 255-2(B) of the Zoning Ordinance. A. noted by thl trial cuurt, Slction 255-22(B) of the Zoning Or4inance Iplcifically provide. that .ingle-tamily, .emi- detache4 dwelling. are a u.e pel'1llitted by right in any R-2 Di.trict. "It i. well .ettled that .peciUc provi.ion. in an or4inance control over gelleral provi.ionl." Anneal of parrell' 481 'Section 226-9 ot the SubcUvilion a...4 Land Develop.ent Or4inance 4etine. "CARTWAY or ROADWAY" a.: "That portion CJt a .treet which 18 illprove4, 4e.ignated or inten4e4 for vehioular u.., including pave4 ara.. tor any on-.~~eet parking." !l A.2d 1186, 11811 (pa. Cmwlth. U84). Therefore, the .pecific providon in Section 255-22 (8) mu.t take precedence over any veneral "intent" requirement. .et forth in the Zoninq ordinance. Further, becauee .ingle-family, .emi-detached dwelling. are penltted on the .ubject property Be of riqht, they may not be con.idered incompatible with the general intent of the Zoning Ordinance. In any event, becau.e of chanqe. in the neiqhborhood, the area i. no lonqer comprieed excluaively of .inqle-family dwellinq. . In addition, Section 603.1 of the Penn.ylvania Municipalitie. Planning Code (MPC), Act of July 31, 11168, P.L. 805, .. amended, added by Section 48 of the Act of Denellber 21, .11188, 53 P.S. 110603.1, provide.: In interpretinq the lanquage of zoninq ordinance. to detenine the extent of the re.triction upon the u.e of the property, the llInquage .hall be interpreted, where doubt exiet. a. to the intended meaninq of the lanquage written and enacted by the qoverninq body, in favor of the property owner and aqain.t any implied exten.ion of the r..triction. In 111115, when the plan wa. eubmitted, the area had been rezoned to R-2 for at laa.t five ye.r., and ba.ed upon the evolvinq nature of the area, thi. Court conclude. that the Council did not err or abu.e ite di.cretion in approvinq the preliminary plan. Prote.tant. next contend that the approved plan doe. not .eet the intent and objective. a. eet forth in Section 255-2(C) (1) of the Zoninv Ordinance in that it will not promote, proteot and 6 facilitate the public health, .afety and general welfare ot the area. Specitically, Prote.tant. a..ert that the development will create dangerous condition. for elderly re.ident. walking or children playing in the alley when it i. turned into a .treet.The record indica tee that the.e e.fety cone erne were coneidered by the Council. The approved plan providee for a .idewalk and a curb on the south .ide of Cemetery Avenue in front ot the propo.ed duplexes in order to accommodate pedeetrian traffic. Further, the tire chief opined that the propo.ed u.e would generate le.. automobile traffic than the previous commercial u.e and that tire apparatus would have adequate acce.. to the properties. In short, there is .ubetantial evidence of record to indicate that there i. no need for a eidewalk and a curb on the north side ot the etreet. Moreover, the absence of a .idewalk and curbing on that .ide ot the etreet will protect it from etorm water runotf. Finally, Protest ante contend that the Council (1) tailed to make findinge a. to whether Cemetery Avenue i. a de.ignated .treet, (3) failed to li.t the ten conditions to which the developer agreed and (3) permitted hearsay te.timony from the tire chief, who claimed that there would be no problem tor trucks re.ponding to that area.' Purauant to Section 508 (3) of the MPC, 'Prote.tante did not rai.e the que.tion of ce.etery Avenue's de.ignation a. a .treet either before the Councilor on appeal to the trial court. Accordingly, it i. waived. Pa, R.A.P. 302(a). 7 53 P.S. n0508 (2), when a preliminary .ubdividon plan b approved, the qoveminq body need not make findinqa of tact or concludon. ot law to .upport it. decillion. It i. only where a plan i. not approved that the dechion denyinq approval mu.t .pecify the plan'. detect. and cite to .pecific provi.ion. of the ordinance that were violated. Herr v. Lancaster Countv Planning Comm'n, 625 A.2d 164 (pa. ClDwlth. 1993), aDDeal denied, 538 Pa, 677, 649 A.2d 677 (1994) . In .UlDlDary, it i. well eatabli.hed that the approval ot a .ubdivi.ion plan may not be withheld where the plan complies with all applicable requlation.. Akin v. South Middl.'ton Town.hip Zonina Hearina Board, 547 A.2d 883 (pa. ClDwlth. 1988). Al.o, a .ubdivi.ion plan may not be required to meet .tandard. that are not contained in the subdivision ordinance. !d. In the pre.ent ca.e, the Council properly determined that Wind.or'. preliminary plan met all requirement. of the Borouqh'. Zoninq Ordinance. Furthermore, the Council did not err or abu.e ita dhcretion in qrantinq the moditication. from the requirement. of the Borouqh'. Subdivi.ion and Land Development Ordinance tor Cemetery Avenue'. riqht-of-way Thi. Court's review of the record indicate. that the Council did li.t the ten condition. aqreed to by Windsor, the developer. IAI Certified Record, Council'. JUly 5, 1995 Special Meetinq Minute., Consent to Subc!ivi.ion/Land Development Plan Approval with Condition.. Fred Bean, the Borouqh Manaqer, te.tified that he asked the fire chief whether, qiven the width of the .treet, he could vet a truok into this area and the fire chief felt comfortable that he eould. 8 width and ddewalke ancS curbinq. The order of the trial court ie a ff i 1'IIed. JI.~~~ IS A. 5 IT , Judge President Judge Colins dissents. , ' . " ('ummunweallh uf l'enn'ylvania ('UUlllY uf ('umherland } '" I. Prothonotary , Prulhunulary of the Cnurt of ('ommo,\ IJlca~ in and for ~aid ('uunty. du herehy eerlify that the fureguing i, a full. 'rue and eu"ecl cupy uf thc whule record ufthe cuse therein stated. wherein John H. Broujos. Louise BroujnR. Har d and Jean Kretz ing & Robert r pp .TR(""nh Plaintiff. and Carlisle BorouQh Coun~l Defendant _. a' Ihe ,ame remain, of record Case No. 3357 C. D. 1995 hcfure the ,aid ('uurl at Nu. 95-4166 of Civil Term, ".0. 19_, In TESTIMONY WIIF.RF.OF. I have hereanln ,el mv hand and affixed lhc ,eal of ,aid Court Ihi. Fifth day oi January ", 0.. 19~, I , ' , ) { J aLli.!tP,.c<cL. ~L~N~v /3.,: ~'iJ~tL a .W..1u""t, I'r"'h,,",,w, ~"4J I. Harold E. Sheely Pre,idcnt Judge of 'he Ninth Judicial Oi.lrkt. comp",ed of thc County uf ('umherland. du certify that -1,awrence E. Welker, Prothonotary , hy whom the annexed record. certificale and attestation were made and gi"cn. anll who, in hi'\ own proper handwriting. thereunto sub!l!ocribed hi!l!o name and affixed Ihe ,ealuf the Court of Cnmmon Plea, of ,aid Cuunty. wa,. at Ihe time 01'.0 doing. and now i. Prothonutary in and fur ,aid Cuunly of Clnnoorlanrl in Ihe Common"eallh uf Penn'ylvania, duly comm;"iuned and 4ualified to all of whose acn a. .uch full faith and credit are and uughl to he given a, well in ('uurts '7JI'jU icature a' elsewhere, and that the .aid record. certificate and J.tlfstation arc in duc rorrn of 11.1"" and f' ~. by th~ pro cr ~fficer. (;/ /SJr.. ~,<-<.~-'<, _,Yj'UcA Prc,jd udtl<<: Commo"""calth 01' Pennsylvania ('uunly uf ('umherland }" I. Lawrence E. Welker , Prothunutary of the ('ourt of ('om:non Pie.. in and for Ih~ said ('uunly, do certify Ihat thc "onorahle Harold Eo SooAly by whom the foregoing auc!\lation WiH made. and who ha~ thereunto subscribed hi, name, W3!1, at the lime "I' making thereor. and .till i, Prcsid.nt .Iudgc "I' Ih. ('ourt "f Common Pitas, Orphan' Courl and ('ourt or Quarter Se"i"n, of Ih. reacc in and fur ,aid ('ounly, duly ('ummi"ioned and 4ualified: to all who.. act. as such l'ull faith and credit art~ and ought to he gi",'cn. as ",ell in ('ourts or judicature as rl!litwhcrc. IN TESTIMONY WllrR 1'01'. I havc hereunto ,,,~t m.. hand and affi.'tl.cd the ",co.,! 01 \aid ('OUrI Ihi, ---5.tlL_ day of JanudJ:Y_,.. ,~.ll. IL.9iL. Xa lfe' If iLl ( , ,!~jJ"_ ,'It..i._~______ /J.; .[/~r"t..tl. d }vJt. t.. J )~Vr"'h"n"I.'" ""'" ~ t'I i a' ~ .., ~ z z " ~ g ~ ~ ? ? [ a ~ /"l <D ~' ,... U1 ....' 8. ~ Co :c I '"J /"l f- . .. U1 ~ ~ ro i "" ~ .... i "" .. i c... '" n - ~ [. . .. < c... n c 11 .., i ...' . .. - " ,... /"l <;l ~ < fo' a = 6i .... ro ,... '" :Ill '" ~ rt ~ U1 /"l " l .., ~. ~ ~ Q r :Ill @ 3 3 = ~ r r") Ql :c g a r ~ ~ " I ~ '< - PAal fiD. 1 - 16 17 18 19 - 21 22 23 - 24 25 - 26 27 - 137 138 - 2n 223 224 - 228 229 - 238 239 - 241 -~..., ,--, eounly or Amons the Recor~' an~ Proceed ins, enrulle~ in Ihe courl or Common Pleu in and ror the in Ihe Commonweallh or Pennsylvania to No. ('OPY OF ClUnbe r 1 and No. 115"! CD 1'l'l5 95-4166 Cjvil l.rm, 19 i, c"ntain.~ the rollowinS: Apr:euriin("e l>OCKF.T ENTRY JOHN H. BROUJOS, I.OllISE BROl/JOS, HAROl.n KRETZING, JEAN KRETZING, AND ROBERT (,FoE JACOBS VS. CARI.ISI.E BOROUGH COUNCIl, Aug. 3, 1995, Notice of l.aml Use Appeill. filed. Aug. 3, 1995, Writ of Certiorari, issued. Aug. 4, 1995, Certificilte of Service, filed. Aug. 4, 1995, Motion for a Stay, filed. Aug. 8, 1995, Order of Court, filed. AND rKM, this 8th day of August, 1995, a Rule is entered agai,nst the Borough of Carlisle to show cause why the not ion for a stay should not be granted. Rule returnable at iI hearing to he held at 2:30 p.m.. Monday, August 14, 1995, in Courtroom Number 2. Appellants shall provide notice to appellee, the owner of the property, the developer and the attorney for the developer. By the Court. Edgar B. Bayley, J. Aug. 8, 1995, Certific.ate of Service, filed. Aug. 9,1995, Notice of Intervention, filed. (by Roger M. Morgenthal, Esq.) Aug. 11. 1995, Stipulation, filed. Aug. 15, 1995, Order, filed. AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 1995, upon motion for a stay of the action by the Carlisle Borough Council on the application of Norman Elam, 'fA Windsor Building Corp., for development of the Cemetery Avenue plan, it is ordered and dec.reed that the action by the Carlisle Borough Council is stayed. Carlisle Borough Council will take no further action on final approval or issuance of a buIlding permit and the landowner Mary Lou Robbins and the developer Nonnan Elan, trading as Windsor Building Corp., shall not proceed any further to develop, construct, or excavate the land until f.inal disp:lsitJ,on of the appeal hils been lMde. By the Court, Edgar B. Bayley, J. 1995, Notice of F'iling of Record (with enc.losures), filed. 1995, Transcript of Public Hearing before Carlisle Borough Council, Aug. 18, Aug. 28, filed. Sept. I, 1995. Praecipe for List lng Case for Aryument, filed. By: Roger M. Morgenthal, Fsq. for Int~rve rs Oct. 10, 1995, Notice of Filing of Supplemental Record, filed. Or.t. 31, 1995, Opinion and Order of Court:, HIed. AND NOW, this list day ot October, 1995, the within appeal, IS DISMISSE . By the Cou!'t, Fdgar B. Bayley, J. Nov. 28, 1995, Notice of ^pr~al., filed. Notice is hereby given that .John H. BnmjnA, et aI, Appellants above named, Ilerehy appeal tn the Ccmnonwealth Court of Pennsylvania fran the order ent<.lred ln thls miltter nn the Hst c1ilY of October, 199",. This order has been entered tn the docket ilS evidenced by the attached tent By: .John H. Brotlins, E:sq. .'\ "'.... 4, Appellel! is Borough Council of Carlisll!, a municipal corporation organized pursuant to appropriate laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with principal offices at '3 West South Street, Carlisle, Cumberland Counly, Pennsylvania. " The premises in question in this appeal, a 1.26 acre tract located along Cemetery Avenue, Borough of Carlisle, Cumberland Counly, Pennsylvania, is located in an R-2 Residential District under the provisions of the zoning ordinance of the Borough of Carlisl'l. 6. The tract of ground along Cemetery Avenuo is owned by Mary Lou Robbins 52 E Ridge Street, Carlisle, 7, On March 14, 199~, Windsor Building Company filed with Borough Council an application, Number 9~.IOO, for preliminary approval to divide the property and construct eight single-family, semi-detached dwelling units, 8, On July 5, 1995, Council by motion granted preliminary approval of the subdivision plan modified to waive the required ~O foot right of way for Cemetery Avenue and to waive the requireml'\nt of curbing and sidewalk on the north side of Cemetery Avenue, The only record of the action of the Borough is the minutes of the meeting of July 5, 1995, a copy of the unapproved minutes being attached hereto as Exhibit A. 9, The action of Borough Council, in approving the subdivision described in paragraph' was arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion and contrary to law in that: (a) The decision of Borough Council to permit the owner of premises located along Cemetery Avenue to construct eight single-family, semi-detached dwelling units bordering on a service alley and not on a street violates Section 2H-12 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Borough of Carlisle, Council erred in its decision, in that it permitted 1'.... ~ building on and use of an alley that was designed and intended for use only for servi~e lIt~ess to properties on East Ridge Street. The Borough Code defines alley as "a minor way, which mayor may not be legally dedicated, and is used primarily for vehi~ular service a~cess to the rear side of properties otherwise abulIing on a street." Cemetery Avenue is an alley used primarily for service to the rear side of properties, The proposed development deprives property owners on East Ridge Street abutting on the alley in the rear of its use for service and transforms this alley to a function primarily for access to a housing development. (b) Borough Council erred in approving the preliminary plan, Under the requirements of Zoning Code Section 255-21, the intent of a R-2 Medium Density Residential District is to: (i) "provide for orderly expansion of areas that offer residential neighborhoods at a medium density," The proposed development does not provide for an orderly expansion; on the contrary. it is disorderly expansion, since it creates four duplex houses on a single tract in an overwhelmingly single detached dwelling area, (ii) "carefully control the types of housing to ensure compatibility with existing houses," The proposed development is not compatible with existing housing, which is single dwelling predominantly, In addition, the permitted use test of intent, as set forth in Section 255-21, and the overall objectives and goals of the Zoning Code were not applied; (iii) "carefully protect these areas from uses that may not be fully compatible." Eight semi-detached dwellings huddled on a back alley cramped on one side by a right-of- way of insufticient width (36 feet instead of so feet) and on the other end by a 12-14 feet alley with a proposed confusing one-way traffic direction, with a 35 foot street failing to meet ,-,...., '-- thl! 50 foot requirement of the Borough Code. with insufficient storm waler management, with problems of access for firetighting equipment and waste disposal are not fully compatible with the area, (c) Borough Council erred in approving the preliminary plans by not following the Intent and Objectives found in Section 255-2 (B). The zoning by the Borough Council of the area as an R.2 area "was adopted with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the existing character of the various areas within the Borough of Carlisle and their respective suitability to particular uses," The proposed development is not only inconsistent with the "existing character ot" the zoned area of Ridge Street within the Borough of CRI'lisle; it is contrary to the single dwelling character, Council has permitted an area in the backyard of East Ridge Street properties intended as a backyard area to be converted into a development which should face on an existing street. The owners of properties on East Ridge Street at the time of purchase of their homes had a right to rely on the alley as an alley and the area as one upon which eight semi-detached houses would not be built, The plan seeks to develop land where there is no normal street and to convert an alley into a street. which in turn has forced the developer to ask for variances of street size. curbing requirements. and sidewalk requirements, The attempt to corrupt the intended use as a service alley has resulted not only in the need for one waiver after another; it creates traffic safety hazards for the children; aggravates storm water problems; and encroaches on the privacy expected by homeowners in their backyard alley, Council was advised by its staff that Council could even assess the East Ridge Street property owners fronting on East Ridge Street with an as"essment to construct sidewalks and curbing on their property abutting on the alley. Not only would this be I if .-. ~ denial of equl\l protection of the laws, It would require existing garages lII1d buildings abulling directly on the alley to be torn down This construction of garages lII1d buildings on lII1 alley is consistent with the service concept, not with "orderly" explll1sion of lII1 existing single family IlII1d use; not with a eight owner complex with the potential of 24 ,to 30 additional persons lII1d up to sixteen cars. (d) Borough Council erred in approving the preliminary pllll1s by violating Section 2~~-2, The proposed development does not "promote, protect, lII1d facilitate, , , tho public health, safely, general welfare, , , vehicle parking, . , lII1d other requirements" for those living in the existing homes lII1d of the proposed homes, The nonhern side of Cemetery Avenue has no setbacks, because of existing garages lII1d other structures, Blind and dangerous conditions for children running and playing in the neighborhood will exist if this alley is turned into a street. Children in the street in the face of oncoming traffic will be forced to expose themselves to the oncoming traffic, deprived of a sidewalk on the nonh side of the street. The grlll1ting of a waiver by Borough Council not to install curbing lII1d sidewalks further creates health, safety and general welfare concerns, (e) Borough Council erred in approving the preliminary pllll1s by violating Section 2~~-2 (C) in that it did not "prevent. , , overcrowding of land .." danger and congestion in travel... " (t) Borough Council erred in approving the preliminary pllll1s in that it did not follow the interpretation of Section 255-8 (B). "Whenever a use clearly is not permitted by right, by condition or by special exception by this chapter anywhere in tho borough, the use is prohibited in the borough, except that the appliclII1t may apply to the Zoning Hearing Board,' ,..t~ ~ Allhough the use of semi-detached dwellings is permiued, the application of that use is not permil1ed and requires approval of the Zoning Hearing Board. which has not been applied for or sranted. (s) Borough Council erred in approving the preliminary plans in that it did not require the developer to submit proof that Cemetery Avenue has been accepted as a Borough Slreet and that the Borough has maintained and plowed the alley, There is nothins of record to prove that Cemetery Avenue is an accepted Borough streel. (h) Borough Council erred in approving the preliminary plans in that it did not require a SO foot right-of-way for a new local street, as required under Section 226-23 (C-3). grantins instead a waiver for a 35 foot right of way, which should have been the subject of a variance before the Zoning Hearing Board, (i) Borough Council erred in approving the preliminary plan in that it did not follow Section 226-14(A), "The modification should not be contrary to the public interest and the purpose of and intent of the ordinance," for all of the reasons given in the preceding averments, (j) Council erred in approving the preliminary plan in that it failed to include within the motion and the decision the ten conditions referred to in the minutes only as "ten conditions" to which the developer agreed, (k) Council erred in its decision. in that the plan failed to include a storm water management plan or provisions for storm water managemenl. ~ ~ WHEREFORE, Appellants request that this Court hold a hearing on the matter, reverse the action of the Borough Council of Carlisle, and direct that the subdivision application which is the subject of this appeal be denied, r , ." August 3, 1995 ,/ r' , ,,~...' ~.,\~ Jo n Hl BrO~jOs:-;Sq ire BRbJos, GILROY & HOUSTON, P.C. 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013 717/243.4574 7171766.1690 FAX# 717/243.8227 , , " " ,,,"", .- MINUTES CARLISLE BOROUGH COUNCIL Public Hurl.. DRAfT Robblu Denlo,..nt July 5, 1995 Councilmllll Ocker clllled lhe meelinfllo order al 7: 30 PM, The followinll members of Council were presenl: Chenok. Giordllllo. Hermll/l. Ocker, Owens. and Spill, Also preaenl were: Solicitor Schorpp, Ml1I\afler Bean. Public Works Oireclar Keiser, PlanninglZoninlJlCodes Manaller DennIS, and Secrelary Lay, Mr, Ocker Slated that the public heanns II concemins Ihe Robbins Propeny Development He explained thatlhe ClIllisle SubdivisionILand Developmenl Ord:nllllce reqUlrtS thar Borouflh Council render a <ltclsion Il/ld conununicale itlo lhe applicanl within 90 days of the date on which the plan was reviewed by dIe Borouflh Planntns Commiuion, Aftcrreviewing the plan Council may approve the plan. approve the plll/l with conditions. or disapprove lhe plan, If the application is denied in terms 15 liIed, the decision shall lpecify the defects found in lhe applicalion and describe the requirements which have nol been met and shall in each case recite the provisions of the slatUle or ordinance relied upon. Mr, Ocker encourafled Council to make a derision inunediately aflerlhe public hemnfl. He Slated Ihat the residents of the neiflhborhood have allended several mtctinfll prior 10 this and he would be hesitanllo have them come 10 an additional meeting, ROfler Morgllllthal. the applicanl's auomey, slaled Ihal he reviewed Ihe staff reconunendations and the conditions tharstaff sug.esred for approval of Ihis project He explained that he Il/ld the applicanl are in full aflleement of the conditions, Mr, MorganthaJ asked Doafl Brehm. the applicanl's enflineer, to explain whal the project involves. Mr, Brehm Slaled thatlhe propeny is localed on Cel11Alrery Avenue and would consisl of four buildinlls each consistillS of Iwo units. Each unit will consiSI of a two car ,1UI1lCl and two additional parking ~paces in the driveway, The IICluaJ street width proposed is 22 feel and will have a curb on the south lide of the Slreel only, Also proposed is 10 overlay the Illley onlo East Ridlle Street There would be landscapins on the development and the Irees loured in the bock of the propeny would be preserved, Mr, Brehm llaled thai the mlllumum density requirements for this propeny il up 10 alltllSl 10 units, The propolal is well under 10 units, Mr, Spilz llSked if the back portion of the propeny abuts the school propeny and if il does, will there be a buffer between the propenies, Mr. Brehm swed rhal il does and there is a grove a Irees in the blll:k of the propeny alonfl with the sanitary sewer. Ms. Chenok Slated Ihal previously the developer mel with the residents 10 discuss the project She asked if any lunestions were given by the neighbon reflardinsthe prujecl. Mr, Morganthal stated thaI the residents did nOI offer any eonluuctive IUfl.eluons. Nomlan Elam. a relidenl al 2' North Acorn Drive, Boilin. Sprinlll il the developer of the projecl. He lubmilred a leuer 10 Council (atlached) describinflthe project Mr, Giordano asked if the units will be for sale or rent, Mr, Elam staled thaI they would be for sale ara lll/llle from 5130,000 to 5139.000, Mr. Giordano asked whal will be on the north side of the stree.since curbinll will only be inswled on the south side. Mr, Brehm staled that Ihe north side has . series of auafles and il would be hard to have curb there, Since some of the propenies are lower Ihan th, !IreCl. the I.reel will be buill so the waler will drain the lower properties, This will make the lilOalion beller so the warer will nol pond in the back of the lower properties. If curbinl is inswled on the north side of the street. il would serve as a dam (or the wawr and would make the silOation worse, Mr, Owens asked if the developer is wtllinfllO ..lithe propeli)' 10 the residenlS of this area, MJ, Elam stared thai he would be and in facl he already offered to sell ilIa the residents, Mr, Ocker !laled thal he was concerned aboulthe open !plll:e in Carlille, Mr, Brehm sfared thai when Robbins was occuPyinll the D~) ~\ r.r ,I \, '." -,,-.. . , DRAFT ,......, Public Hellrins . Robbin's DevelL, .ent PBse 2 property, there were jusI WI mony ~lcenhou,., and p'llking Illell.'l WI whal i. being propo.ed now, He explained thallhe units Ille !lCt 20 feel apart excepl for the IWlt unit which i. 30 feel apart, John Broujos, B Nsident of 78 Easl Ridlle Street, slated that he represented the neishborbood. He submitted to the record a letter which .tates his opinion resardins the project. This leltcr is allllched. Harold Kretzing, a resident of 80 East Ridge Street aIId the owner of 633 South Bedford Street WIIS concerned for the safety of the children in the neiShborhood, the width of the street, if flfe equipment would be Bble to IICcess the buildings in clllle of B fire, and if there would be adequate parkins provided when the residents of the units hBve guests, Mr, Ocker stated thut the proposal Willi reviewed by the Fire Chief and he stated that lhe widlh of the Streel would be adequute for flfe apporalus 10 access the development. Mr, MorgallthaJ asked Mr, Kreiling if there would be llIIything he would like to see developed on the proposed sile, Mr, Kretzing stated that he did not want the Illea developed, Raymond Wickard. a resident of 10 East Ridge Street. slllted that the cartway would be less than 17 feet. Presently IwO cars CM' t pass one 1lII00her on the street. He also sla,..d that some of the trees on his propeny would be to be removed in order for cnn to make the turn in the street. Mr, Spitz IlSked Mr. Wickard if he Willi a resident of this area during the time Ihat Robbin's Flowers was occupying lhe propeny, Mr. Wickard staled that he was, Mr, Spitz asked if 8 family cars al the minimum would be more traffic ulilizing the street than when Robbin's Flowers was in business in the areB, Mr, Wickard believed most of the traffic for Robbin's Flowers used Bedford Street although he did not pay thBt much auention to Ihe traffic because it was never a problem. Mr. Brouj08 did not believe il was fair 10 compare the Robbin's Flowers business with the proposed development. He stated thaI al the time Robbin's Flowers was a non.confonning use and il could nol be changed. Ms, Chertok clarified thaI some of Mr, Wickard's trees would have to be removed or cut back. Mr. Wickard staled that his trees are spreading over the srreellllld as a resulllwo CIllS would nol be able to pass one another, Ms. Chertok then asked if Mr, MOlganthlll or the developer of Ihe prcject approached Mr, Wickard regardinll removinll or cuuinll back the trees, Mr, Wickard stated thaI they did not. Jarl Yilkema, a resident, staled thai the proposal is out of keeping with the neighborhood, He expressed concern with tire apparatus, Ilarbase trucks. UPS trucks. elC, accessing the street. Ms. Chertok staled that it is has already been clarified as to the flJ'e apparalUS accessins the street. She then asked if there was any disclllAion on the larller vehicles accessing tho slreet. Mr, BellO statod that it was stafrs recommendation to have traffic ellit off of Ridse Street. Therefore. when a delivery would come into one of the units they would come in off of Bedford and then would exit in the same way, This would eliminate tryinlllO negotiatc the turn in the avenue, Jack Mullen, a resident of 635 HighlllOd A venue, Slated thaI he is opposed 10 the plan because the neishborhood is very unique. He believed that the development would take away the characler of the neighborhood. Louise Brouj08, a resident of 78 East Ridlle Slreet. slaled thaI she would hate to see the open space be developed, She Slated the residents were nol asked 10 buy the property, She was concerned for lbe safety r)f the children, Ms, BroujOll slaled that the Robbin's Flower Shop traffic did not cause a problem for the neishborhood, Larry Footc. B realeSlalC appraiser, Slated thai the nature of housing in the neipborhood is sinllle family delaChed dwellings, He explained that when the confonnily is not keptlD a neighborhood the propeny values drop. He believed lbat if the developmenl WIIS approved il would nOI confonn with the present housinll in tile neillhborhood and therefore decrease lbe value of the houses in Ihe lIIea. Mr, Spitz IISked DRAFT .-, '...... DRAFT July 5, 1995 l'tlxman Elam 25 N. /\corn Dr. Boiling Springs, PA 17007 To The Carlisle Borough ColU'\Cil: Approxi.rrately two years ago I signed a purchase oontract to buy the Robbins property on cene,tary Avenue in Carlisle. 'nle property was zoned n.2 an:i ten units were allowed to be built on the property. I trought ten units were too many an:i decided on a to rrake the area less cro;.tied an:i be well within the limits allowed. I wanted to construct 4 d\ll?lexes with nice features such as garages with brick facing, sara units with porches, beautiful laOOscaping and trees. Features that would add value to the property and not detract EIan the surround- ing area value. I have agreed to all of the borough I s requirements~ an:i recarm- endations. I have done e~.rything I have been asked to do. To date, I have spent close to $16.000.00 of my personal money on technical 'NOrk an.::! legal fees. SOre of the people living nearby are CXlncemed. I feel they have a right to be CXlncerned if I were bw.lding smething unappealing. I do rot inte:id to build: a "shoe box". I have spent a lot of tirre and careful consideration on the design of the fu= duplexes to care up with smething attractive and loOuld fit in nicely with the area. I have rret with CXlncerned neighbors to discuss this. They knew the property was zoned R- 2 for a long tirre an:i !lad plenty of t.irlIl to lN5ke an effort to change or ",urchase it. I agree with the lxirougn staff that the new requirarents for Camtary Avenue will carry the traffic. Itlst all of the nearby residents do not have young children an:i with the layout of the steet it 'NOUld be a low vol\llll! area for tra.ffic like mst any otl1e.r neighborhood. I will offer to gi~'e up my purchase CXlntract if the nearby residents want to Wy the ~ ard fully reimburse me my expenses. I believe in l\IIerica an:i the idea of Free Enterprise. I am a working man trying t.o IJBIte a living. I have the right to ~ the property an:i Mrs. Robbins also has a right to sell her pzoperty to me. I ask you to consider this rratter in my favor. '!hank you for your tirre. Sincerely, }L~L---" l'tlIn1llll ElaI . i'--' Loui.. and John B. Broujo. 78 B. Ridge Street Carlisle, PA 17013 DRAFT 717 249 3048 lAX 717 243 8227 Hay 10, 1995 Borough Council 33 We.t South Street Carlisle, PA 17013 RBI Robbin./Wind.or Propo.ed Oevelopment Oear Council I I repre..nt the citizenl of the Bait Ridge Street ar.a who oppo.. the above development. Bnclo.ed i. a li.t of persons directly involved by having properties bordering on the alley known as Cemetery Avenue and others who live in the neighborhood which i. affected by the change in the character of the neighborhood by this development. Contrary to the .tatement of the developer that there is only one reque.t for waiver--th. 34 foot right of way for the requir.d 50 foot right of way. There lU" at l.a.t tlu:ee vari.ation. from the COd.'1 1. The reque.t to u.e a 34 foot right of way for the .treet in.tead of . 50 foot right of way. 2. The u.e of a 12 to 14 foot riqht of way in the alley off Ridqe Street; which create. a serious and potentially life- endangering condition for two way traffic and even for one-way traffic. The Dature of the location of qaraqes and building. on the alley create. a hazard. 3. Th. ab.ence of a lidewalk on the north ,ide of the propo.ed .treet. Where children are concerned--both tho.e of pre.ent property owners and tho.e of any of tho propo.ed hou.e.--acce.s of the safe haven of a lidewalk from vehicle traffic risk. injury. 4. The proposal violate. the intent .s laid out in the Zonina Ordinanc., A. Section 255-121 An alloy i. defined a. "a ainor way, which mayor may not be leqally dedicat.d, and i. u.ed priaarily for vehicular service acce.. to the rear .ide of properties otherwise abuttinq on a street." B. Sec~iQn 255-21: "The intent of the R-2 Med1UID Density / . ~dential District is to: . 4/J A. Provide for the orderly expansion of areas that offer residential neighborhoods at a medium density." B. .. .carefully control the types of housinq to .nsure compatibility with existina houses." C. Carefully protect these areas from uses ~hat may not be fully compatible. section 255-2: Intent and Obiectives Zoning "was adopted with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the existina character of the various areas within the Borough of Carlisl. and their respective suitability to particular u.e.." Section 255-8 Interoretation . . . . the provision. of this chapter shall be interpreted as the minimwB requirements for the promotion of health, safety, morals and general welfare. Where this chapter conflicts with any rule, regulation or ordinance, the greater restriction upon the use of building. or premi......or upon requiring larger open spaces shall prevail, regardless of it. source." 5. Approval would sanction turning alleys of the Borough into .treet. for development requiring alteration of one good planning requirement after another. Whenever th.re i. an attempt to circumvent good plAnninq techniques by forcing a development into a place wh.re development was not intended, the planner is forced to start altering other sound planning requirements and the Borouqh is a.ked to grants changes where the ordinance and good planning never intended that there be changes. TBB PROTESTANTS ASK THE COUNCIL TO BOLD A PUBLIC IlBARING on this i.sue becau.e ot the serious precedent that it would set in the Borough for cramming buildings in alley lots without adequate consideration for the existinq character of the community and protection at our youth. Sincerely yours, John B. Broujo., for Protestant. .-.. - DRAFT PROTESTERS Professor Paul &: Birsirta Angiolillo 76 E. Ridae Street /7 ~ ~~ John &: Louise Broujos 78 E. RidBe Street CostaS &: Mary COlnopoulos 635 S. Hanover Street Cora Douglas 37 E. Ridlle Street Lloyd &: Martha Heffelfinger 90 E. RidBe Street JudBe Roben E. JlU:obs 45 E. RidBe Street Harold &: lean Kretzill8 80 E. RidBe Street Geraldine Loose 34 E. RidBe Street / -'S~ Raymond &: Barbara Wickard 10 E. Ridge Street f.Lvv~ -J ~~ l~ t,~i'~~ ..t J:,~~'-Il ~T-, J, ~- 'N c--<'-' 7~~'_ r-<-~L3e s -r-, . r- L)vl.-~ ~~_ Se..i~-G~'- 33 ~cJ e :..t-s-z $._ . . l:vv.'~' L~" f:.-s-~L .) _ /L....--re..v j ~. L~ ,-S!-. u ~ _~ 11/J.1_ ~)'~-L I~'-r' 3 jf'>):::.~JLgv S -t- , ~ 1"'\ " I,; go ...." t c.,... Vl "" ....., ::.:: '. - ~ , , .", "...., lJ a- il 5: 'I!c ~"rJ0 :;r 5~ ~- ::l ~ ~ I ~ '''It p j ~ ~ ~~ ~ ii h ~ ~ ~~ ,.,. ill i . l~ N "10 " 1~~.-l ~ ~ II j },n ~~ ~ * t , j , 1 , ,~ " , ~ " & :} " r " Ii ~ l ~ ~ ~l ',n p " .,\'" ." ~ ~ :; <~ 2 ~ ~ , :'l .. ~ ~ ~~, 'f ~ i ~ , I. i J tl t. -' i a ~ ,. [ ~i I~.' ~,~ ~~; ~ Cell 41111j'; 'oote Wj.~ Sd , ....,,\'---- I'.' "1' "~; .'\'.;,:,_;-'-":;~l'\~;, _ '" " Yil:' <u,.. . " ,~'QP CNLJ.... ',",i,O:, ,""'_...41. ,"" ; '" ',' '.11013 ' , _) - " ~l- ":_ i" \'" ' :;, ,I - _ - I , ,I" Mil'I'I!I:MIlM I .... .... . ...... ' . .............--.- J ........-......-.--- ..." ' . ' ,,,.......................",_ 1. 0""1 HI"~', '/""'" , . J . .. .............--, ' ;t.L.~,-, =__~......_ a. 0..........., " J I I I I "'- I' ,...... ,""""'- John H. BrouJOI, Louise BrouJol. Harold Krealn,. Jean Krealnl. IDd Robert Lee .-obe Appelllllll IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUN1Y, PENNSYLVANIA NO, 9!1-4166 CIVIL TERM v. Cadl.le Boroulh COlUlcil APPEAL FROM LAND USE Appellee MOTION FOR A STAY AND NOW come Appellants 10hn H, Broujos, Louise Broujos, Harold Kretzing, lean Kretzing, and Robert Lee lacobs through their attorney Broujos, Gilroy, & Houston, PC, in accordance with Land Use Appeal proceedings under the Act of July 31, 1968, PL 80S, as amended, 53 PS II003-A (d), and set forth the following: 1. Appellants have filed an appeal with the Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County in the above listed maller, requesting the Court to hold a hearing and to reverse the decision of the Borough of Carlisle approving a preliminary plan of II developer, 2, Appellants request your Honorable Court to grant a stay of the action appealed from to prevent finalllpproval and issuance of a building permit and to prevent the landowner, MIllY Lou Robbins, and the develop~r Norman Elam, trading as Windsor Building Corp., from August 4, i995 e lan~d unt~e ~peal has been finalized. \ \ \ ' "~X: ___ proceeding to excavate, construct, or develop Jo~n H, Broujos, Esq re Bro\Qosj Gilroy, & Houston, PC 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013 7171243-4574 717/766-1690 FAXII 7111243-8227 """\ ,.,., . , ~. .. " <:: .., .,. - " ,t.' , N , ~ ,.' t:l , , ,"'" ".... John H. BrouJo.. Louile BrouJo.. Hanld KRtdnl. oIeu KRlzlnl. IlPCI Roben Lee .-obl Appellull IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA NO. 9S.4166 CIVIL TERM , ~ v, , ': Cadl.l. Boroulb Council APPEAL FROM LAND USE Appell.. CERTIFICATE m' SERVICE I, John H, Broujos, Esquire, hereby certify that I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion for Stay and Order 10 Show Cause at a hearing schedule for Monday, August 14, 1995, at 2:30 p,m, in Courtroom No, 2 before the Honorable Edgar B. Bayley, upon the following persons by hand delivery on August 8, 1995, to the following addresses: Edward L, Schorpp, Esquire Solicitor for Carlisle Borough Council 36 S, Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Roger M, Morgenthal, Esquire Counsel for Windsor Building (developer) II E, High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 AND ALSO upon Mary Lou Robbins by United States Mail, First Class, Postage Prepaid, on August 8, 1995, to S2 E, Ridge Streel, Carlisle, PA 17013, ( \ ) ''-~ 1'\(., ~, Broujo~, Js;re Attorney for APpJlants BROUJOS, GILROY" HOUSTON, P.C, 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013 717/243.4S74 FAX #717/243.8227 22 <:\wp.ll \ !WI' r\pI~I\I:I.m,l'" -.. ,-. AND NOW, this q+L A~\~- , 1995, I, Roger M. day of Morgenthal, Esquire, of the law firm of FLOWER, MORGENTHAL, FLOWER & lINOSA V, Attorneys, hereby certify that I served the within Notice of Intervention this day by depositing same in the United States Mail, First Class, Postage Prepaid, in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, addressed to: John H, BrouJos, Esquire BROUJOS, GILROY & HOUSTON, P,C. 4 North Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS Edward L. SChorpp, Esquire as S. Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE FLOWER, MORGENTHAL, FLOWER & LINDSAY Attorneys for Plaintiff By " l~fl11 lfivi- Roger M, Morgenth'I, Esquire 10 II 17143 11 East High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-5513 II .-., ,..., :..:.,.. "" '" (...9 , , (3 U'l .., ao_ ;:c ~ ::. ., . . ~ ~ .- . John H. Broujol. Louise Broujol. IIIrold Kntzloa. Jflln Kntdna. IlIICI R.lbel1l.ee _obi A ppellIRtI IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS or CUMBERLAND (.'OUN1Y. PENNSYLVANIA . . NO. 9S.4166 CIVIL TERM v. CIliI,le Borouah Council APPEAL FROM LAND USE Appellee ORDER AND NOW this ~~y of August, 1995, upon motion for a stay of the action by the Carlisle Borough Council on the application of Norman Elam, T A Windsor Building Corp" for development of the Cemetery Avenue plan, it is ordered and decreed that the action by the Carlisle Borough Council is stayed. Carlisle Borough Council will take no funher action on tinal approval or issuance of a building permit and the landowner Mary Lou Robbins and the developer Norman Elam, trading as Windsor Building Corp" shall not proceed any further to develop, construct, or oxcavate the land until final disposition of the appeal has been made. / I ~ . BY THE COURT: .;/ J. , , ,I .- '. -- -- John H. Bl1Iujol. Loulle BroujOI, Harold Kntzlnl. .lelll Kntzinl, ...d Robert Lee _obi A ppellanll IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNlY, PENNSYLVANIA I' , NO. 9!l-4166 CIVIL TERM Cllil.le BOl1lulh Council APPEAL FROM LAND USE ~: , I v. Appellee ~ '....r.'1 ,-""I STIPULATION AND NOW this ~ , t.!I. day of August, 1995, the below parties stipulate and consent to entry of an order of stay of proceedings in accordance with the Act of July 31, 1968, PL 80S, as amended, S3 PS II003-A (d), copy of which order is attached hereto, ~yn IllLlJ,~'-v1r- Roger M~o~:'hal, Attorney 'for Windsor Building and Mary Lou Robbins, Landowner ~~~ghOf \' r-(" . " \ (... . J~h~~';r~~j~s~~;r~~p;Jj~:s Carlisle ~ ~ JOHN H. BROUJOS, LOUISE BROUJOS, HAROLD KRETZING, JEAN KRETZ lNG, and ROBERT LEE JACOBS Appellants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA NO. 95-4166 CIVIL TERM v, CARLISLE BOROUGH COUNCIL Appellee APPEAL FROM LAND USE NOTICE 0' fILING 0' RECORD Pursuant to the Writ of Certiorari issued by the Cumberland County prothonotary in the above referenced matter, the Appellee, Carlisle Borough council, files the following record in connection with these proceedings: 1. Plan application. 2. preliminary plan. 3. Written request for modification signed by Roger M. Morgenthal, Esq., under date of May 10, 1995. 4. certified copy of minutes of the Carlisle Planning Commission meeting of April 27, 1995. 5. Certified copy of the minutes of the Carlisle Borough Council meeting of May 11, 1995. 6. Proof of publication of public notice of the public hearing and special meeting held by Borough Council on July 5, 1995. 7. Applicant's (Intervenor's) Exhibit 1. 8. Applicant's (Intervenor's) Exhibit 2. 9. Protestants' (Appellants') Exhibits 1-11 (photographs). 10. Letter addressed to Carlisle Planning commission under signature of John H. Broujos, Esq., dated April 26, 1995. d7 ~ >- . u .... ::e .,," -tt I" j ; -I o ':,',"1. N I....~".".f _ '~,.':':l'_ __ J ' '-., ,- d':' C'r:J ' - . g :, .'} .',," i~ i~ ; !I in" ... ... .I~ ~~~~ ~~ all ~ o I;; ~ ~ :r:: - u ~ :s ~U~ i~~i; ai ~ e ~ .. ~ IE w ~ ~ ~ ~~ i~ '" ou~:z ~ II! :s '" i3 d~lsi' ~ :s III E ~ i '" ~ ~ is :l1 ~ Z u < ...l .'. .... . w. , 0;1 "'. , 8 /t?fl5 .. Page 2 Mr. Brian M. Dennis Borough of Carlisle March 13. 1995 .-.. Should you have any questioDll concerning this project. please contact our ofBce. Sincerely, ~s;.-?L~ Douglas S. Brehm, President Statler-Brehm Associates, Inc. DSB/pg Enclosures " cc: Mike Adler Roger Morganthal Norm Elam CD STAnER. BREHM ASSOCIATIS. INC. . , ' ~~/ '~/q6 . Submtsslon Date SUBDMSION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CBECKUSTFORPRELmuNARYPLATS NAME OF PlAN: ~ll"',ul~~ Su"~III""""I.Glloll)~.,.fa:..Wi~.,t..b,.u..,.~~. o Carlisle Borough AppUcatlOIl fee. (See attached schedule.) o Submltted 20 days pnor to monthly Planning Comrru.sslon meeUng. o Cumberland County Review Fee The fee schedule for SubdIviSIon and Land Development Plats submItted for Cumberland County Planning Commission ReView and Report action Is as {ollows: , I , , Subdivision Bv-1&U $70.00 base fee. plus $ 2.00 per lot, first 25 lots, plus: $ 1,00 per lot over 25 lots. ~!lldmttal Land Dt!Vf!IQDm~nt $70.00 base fee. plus: $ 2.00 per dwelling unit. first 25 dwelling ulUts. plus: $ 1. 00 per dwelling ulUt over 25 dwel1.lng ulUts. I I I 1 ! I, I , I' t l l I, Non.Restdenttal Land DeveIQoment $70.00 base fee, plus: $ 2.00 per acre (or fractlCln thereofl. Ilrst 10 acres. plus: $ 1.00 per acre (or fraction thereofl. over 10 acres. All fees are to be paid by check. made payable '0 the "Cumberland County Planning Commission." (AppUcaUoD wW be submitted to the County by . CUlllle) o One reproducible copy of plan or plat. o 1\ve1ve copies of the plan. !( indicate page slZe:~'X~ 0( Scale not less than 100 feet per Ulch (50.feet per Inch recommended). . Plan labeled PRELIMINARY PLAT, 18 Name or ntle of proposed Su bdlvlSlon/Land Development. ~ Date plan was prepared and dates ot subsequent reviSions. /) North point and scale. ~ II .. WI II . Ill( ~ ~ .- ~ Jll . iii( jQ' . BI LocaUon map covenng sutnc1ent area to establ1sh the locatIOn of the sUe WIthin the Borough. Name. address. signature md phone number of owner or app1lc:J.nt. Names of owner.! of all abutt.tng unplotted land and names of aU abutting subdMslons. Name, address. phone number. signature and :seal of profesalOnaI engineer. architect or land5cape arch1tect cert1fy1ng the plat and the professional land surveyor cerufytng the accuracy of the plat per1meter swvey. Track bounda.rles by beanng and dlstances. deed references according to records of t.he Recorder of Deeds md prevtous subdlvlS10ns and land developments. All ex1stlng propeny lines. eallelllents and rtght-oC-ways and the purpose for which the eallements of nght-o{.ways have been established. Zoning d1.sU1ct In which the propeny IS situated and zonlng of abuttlng properties. Note zorung requ.trel1lents and aU var1ance or speclal e."ll:ept1ons approved by the Zorung Hearing Board. All exlIItlng streets on or adjacent to the tract, Induding name. rtght-of-way width and pavement width. All exlstlng buJIdlngs, ~ntt:..y and storm sewers, water malDS. culverts. hydrants and other slgnlflcam m~nm~de features on or abutting the tract. Water courses. marshes, rock OUtcropll. wooded areas and areas !mown to be underUned with limestone. Exlsung :md proposed contoun. at vertIa1 fntervaIs of two-feet (2'), Ilve-feet (5') required wbere the aIope exceeds 15%. Unlesa plan IS for subdivisIOn purpoees of adding or deleting property 11Des. Total square (ootage and acreage of land. number and area of lots. area of right- of.ways. etc. _ Location. WIdth and approximate grade of aU streets. rlght-of.ways and easements. Lot number, proposed lot lines. with appraxlmate dimensions of lot 1U1laS: proposed minimum :setbaclr. l1nes (or each street and yard. recreatlon area. pubik: bu1ldlngs. pubUc areas and parcels ollaDd. rlght-oC.ways. and eale"'~nts proposed to be dedlcated or re5em!d (or public u:se. LocatIOn of any exlSUIlg or proposed site IIlIprovements such all curb, sldewalks. walkways. driveways. tIre bydrants. etc. TypICal crou-sectlOl1 of streets. lDcluding a curb and centerline prollIe. An IIIdlcaUon of the general w"tlnn 01 ellIItlng and proposed water maIDs. SlIJI1tary sewen. electl1C. gas. telephone, cable TV. and stonnwater catcb bUlnS and lines. etc.,lnC.Iudlng plans and prollles of aU water maJns, san1tary sewer ma1na and storm sewers. . " " ,--- . Ceneral plans for collecUon. detention or retention of ronoft'surface _ter and Its outfall. etc. a Data. lncluc1lng a water model, su1flc1ent Jp show adequate proviSions for rellable. safe and adequate water supply(Lt:.'"T"7'ef.) Approval blocks lntended to be signed by the appropriate olIlcers of the PiannInC Commls81on. Borough Coundl. County P1annlDg Ct""mh'.,lon and thll Borough Engineer. lI( b( Sewer plan revt310n module for land devdopment If o.ece5SllIy. o ~ Wherll appUcable. lnfonnaUon on potential for sinkholes and special consauct1on procedures to be taken to prevent substdence. o iliA Flood pla1n Jnformauon If necessary. o We. EnVlronmentaltmpact study. ~ Wherll appUcable, evidence that the Carllsle School DIstr1ct has been advUIed of the proposed Subdlv1s1on/Land Development plan. o WA Trallk: Impact study. o WPr Staglq Information. OtJ/A Copy of the PennDor hlgbway occupBIJCY perm1t appJ.....tf(l~. wbere reqWnld. o Other material . please list. ~ THlI CDCKLIaT JUS BDl'f AIIJIIlI:VIATID Al'fD DESIGDD fO AID TD .unICAi'lT I1'f PUJ'AJlII'fO IIIS/DR M'LJCATIOIf. 11II:.APPUCAl'IT II UnJIUD TO CJIAP1'I:Jl 228 IUBDIVISIOIf/LAlfD DEVJ:LOPKDT or 1111: BOROUGS or CAllLISU'S CODE or OIlDIl'fAl'fCES rOR A LlSTIl'fO or AU. ugtlIUD stIBIGTTALS. LAW OfFICES FLOWER, MORGENTHAL, FLOWER & LINDSAY A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 11 EAST HIGH STREET CARUSLE. PENNSYLVANIA 17013-3016 JAMES 0, PLOWER ROOER M. MOROEmHAL JAMES 0, fLOWER. JR. l:.'ROL J, UNDSA Y BlETSCII " MOROENlllAL (Im-I9&l) FLOWER. KRAMER. MOROI!NI'HAL " PLOWER (19&1-1991) (TI7) 2UJm PAX: (717) ~10 May 10, 1995 HAND DELIVERED Members 01 Borough Council Borough 01 Carlisle 53 West South Street Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013 RE: Preliminarv Subdivision/Land Develooment Plan Windsor BuildlnQ Comoanv Gentlemen and Ladies: I represent the applicant in the above-relerenced matter which is scheduled lor consideration at your May 11, 1995 meeting. The plan proposes the construction 01 eight (8) townhouses, to be sold to individual purchasers in lee simple, on property currently owned by MIllY Lou Robbins. We are requesting that Borough Council grant two modifications ot requirements pursuant to section 226-14 01 the Subdivision and Land Development chapter ot the Carlisle Borough Code. The first modification requested Is from the requirement that the project be accessed by a public street at least 50 teet wide. Because at the manner In which surrounding property was developed, a maximum right-ol-way at 34 feet is all that is available. At the time that the right-at-way was reserved by the property owner, the Borough Code required only 33 teet, but that has since been amended to require the greeter width. A cartway 01 ample width to serve this project can be constructed within the existing limits. so that any traffic traveling to and from the proposed project could be safely accommodated. A decree awarding real estate dated January 11, 1972, and issued in the course of the administration of the Estate 01 Evelyn N. Robbins, deceased, vested the subjeet property in Francis W. Robbins, the current owner. A copy ot the decree awarding reel estate, as recorded in Cumberland County Deed Book "L', Volume 24, Page 6S1, i. attached hereto. Said decree grants a right-at-way as lollows: Members of Borough Council May 10, 1996 Page Two "TOGETHER with a right-of-way over the Northern most twenty-two teet of the premises known as 634 South Bedford Street described in Deed from FranCIS W. Robbins, Administrator of the Estate of Evelyn N. Robbins, Deceased to Harold G. Kretzlng and wife, dated March 25, 1971, which said twenty-two feet wide right-ot- way together with the twelve feet wide public alley adjOining It on the North, constitute a thirty four feet wide right-of-way and which 34 feet wide right-of-way Francis W. Robbins, his heirs and assigns, shall have the right to dedicate as a public right-of-way or street." Mrs. Robbins, and any successors or assigns of her title to the premises, cannot provide a right-of-way wider than 34 feet. At the interseetlon of Cemetery Avenue with Bedford Street, the existing rigm-of-way is bordered by properties owned by Harold G. Kretzlng, et. we. and Martha N. Heffelfinger, whose property lines define the edges of the existing right-of-way. Dr. and Mrs. Kretzing purchased their property from the Estate of Evelyn N. Robbins, deceased, by a Deed dated March 25, 1971, and recorded in Deed Book "Z" , Volume 23, Page 934. That Deed, a copy of which is also attached hereto, contains an express provision reserving the right-o~-way in a total width of 34 feet. The second modification requested is from the requirement that curbing be constructed on the Northern side of Cemetery Avenue. Because of the fact that numerous garages located on that side of the street are placed at different elevations, it would be difficult or impossible to construct a curb which would follow the elevations necessary. Additionally, it is believed that storm water could pond on the properties located on the North side of Cemetery Avenue. The applicant has discussed this matter thoroughly with Borough staff, and it is believed that Borough staff agree that the modification of this requirement would be appropriate. The Robbins property is in an R-2 medium density residential district, and, in accordance with Carlisle Borough Code seetlon 255-22 (B), single family semi-detached dwellings such as are proposed by Windsor Development Corporation are a use permitted by right. We submit that the project envisioned for the Robbins site is compatible with the letter and the intent of the zoning ordinance, with the neighborhood as it currently exists and fully appropriate to the tract in question. To prohibit this development through the literal enforcement of the Borough Code as It now exists would exact undue hardship upon both Mrs. Robbins and the developer because of the peculiar conditions pertaining to the property, to wit: the inability to provide an additional rlght-of- way width to meet current requirements; and the existing garages and differing elevations along the North side of Cemetery Avenue. These modifications will not be contrary to the publiC Interest, and they will not violate the purpose and intent of the other subdivision and land development provisions of the Code. ,. .. . "I~ ..1-' "\.'" , . " ~ .' ~ III U. I:ITAT. or I:V&LYIf III T1IIl COUIIT or COMMON ,u:AI or CUIlIIlLAIfD COUIfT'l. II. lIOaalNs, D8CIlAUD lll't. !,!!$ - ~'~i A"D NOW. tIl&. Utlt day of JuuUT. 1.12. .1 /O:u"o'el..lI. A- ..... PZIINSYLVAIlIA OIlPIlAIfS' COUll,. DIVISIOIf, 110. ':l.. ,. 70 - "I'" ~ DECIIIlI: AWAIlDIIlO IUAL !STATE E. So T.. II -"ae lIlat 1Il. Pint &ad Pia.' A.ow. ud Sob..l. of 1'...,...eeI DI.lribuUoa of V....I. W. lI.bbln. Adm.a1atnlO. of Ill. latata of E.....'a If. IIMbl... I... of Ill. lIo......e" 0' Cull.I.. CllDlb"t... C....,.. P_.,I........ o....ottt, "'n b.... mod .... .,t..rtI.od Ia ......... "'.Ia.' ...d lIul.. of Court .1Id 1Il. ...... b..lae b_ ooanratd .....1...." by 1Il. OI1lItoa.' Court DI'II.I... of Ill. Cumb..lud County C...... ., C_... PI... _ J.......,. II. IIn. Uld II ..,...Iae Ill.. .ald Admlnllln'..1n Ill. hoIIo.eeI 1It....I. of D1ot.IMU_ .ltllD. d1.IriIluIl.. of 1Il. Illlfttuno. dotcrlllod ..a1 , " ...... .. 1lla..llla blad, III. .rd..od, &dlude_ &ad d........ ALL lIla. ..rtaIa ..... ot 1_d ....Ill.. wllIllll. rip""'''' ll.nIa ....Ianeel ..111... Ia tIl. s.c-d Ward of tilt 80"""eIl of Culla'.. C_1aM COUD17. P._.,I.....I.. _..... 18d d..orlbtd .. tollowll ISODl!lIllO at . ,.Iat .. Ill. Mo.lIl.n 11a. of Iud ,..."., of WIW_ P. :fabl.. _ o. ",......, of 111_ ... J..... _011 ptlalla Ole _dr:ld SI._ 11111 ,.ct. _. (7) Iaoll.. W.Ol of 11I0 W.ot.n lla.., SblIJ' 1101 t_ wi.. Soulllltdl'ord SI.oct 18. ..hloll p.la. .t b'Cl1IIllIlC I. Ia Ill. iltulll.....d Qt...... 0' lIa. d1'1\4Iaf _,..U" 0' I\, C. Bobll. J.. ud "". oa. Dr. If'FOld O. KrOl".' oad ..II. Julo... .. '2 oad 40 .u.lll... Slrftt, ...PMtI..I7. .d .baa ..1..1 01 be.IMln. l. a. lite Soudtwtltern ton,. 01 ,nail.' .own .. 134 Soulllltdlord SI.... o......,td 10 Huold O. 1Cn1l1a,... wlI"lI7 dtccl do... .....Ilu. I"" Ill.... '...ID ..Id pola. .. Ill. ,I... of bt""""" lIalIe Ill. .a1e1 M_... 11a. of load aow 0. '......17 of 1:1_ II. 1..... ID . ".....17 dl...U.. a cU...... of EleIl""""" (131 ,.... PI" mID.... .... or I.... ... ,alat la Ill. mo..... 11M oil.... .... or "'...,1' oIl'naol. 11'. _....w. 11I_. 01_ .... .ut.n lIa. oI.lId 1.114 .ow .. I_.PI, of ma.l. W. 1I_la. la . If_.ly _u... . dl...... 01 Ole 1IlIadn. '11.,..,. U"I ,.... 'l'Il.n. (3) In.ft.... ...N.. I.... 10 . polol...... Soulll... IIn. of . T..... (III ,... "'.. publl. 01117' 'b..... 01.... tllo ""'lIItn lIa. 01 ..Id Tw.I.. 1111'... wi" ,.bll. .11., .. Ul 1.....1' dI........ . dl_..' IICIl17-IIl... CUi'.... n.. 141 ........ .... .. I.... 10 . polo' .t Ill. I I, I ,. i I , T , 101I ':;(241. li511 " ,1 . . , . .VOlr TillS INO.NTU/C' ~r/r,V&$SnN. tAU loW.. rrancl. W. Rabtuna. Adlrnnl.ltacor ill o)tOt...u~. . .- f., ................., "'...., TWonly Thou..n" rive Hundred ($20,500,00)... .. __ _ "_....n - .__. _ ._,....._.._ n -.-_low'Ili._oI...U""gS,.,... C. hint i. .... ..... .. cAt __ OtantH. .. .... W... ... -.. .... U/I", Acm" .Ac "...", .-"., iI ...., .......,.'.4 ltal "..,.. ............ ...." 1U..nI. ,.1.......4....."...... ~ ., tAu'''-''' doe. ...... -_..." 1Ue.. .......... _....... IOi4 GtQnco". tbolr hit" ond ...'qnl. "I lonlne, laV llwl 'nURUoa. L ALl.. Ch41 COMln crOCI ot 14nd wuh lh. 11IlI1MUWnI.nl..th.reon 'Ncted IUUI'. In tho SeCOnd Wire! ot tho BorOUCIh at C4rllll.. Cubelllnd Ci)un'y. Pennl."lvlntl, boundod <lad d..erlbod .. toUow.~ '- IIECrNNING It <Jo polnl I)" cho WOllom 11M ot SI.xIY (101 tOlt w1da $ol.llh IItdtord SUDOl 11\ lIno 0' lone! (ormorly 01 Wlllla.. r. NObI.. now 0' toms,"y 01 Elwood M. lank.: thonce by Illd Un, 01 tond .m)W or tomuwlv ot tlWO\'\CI MI. r.nkl. In /1 WI.cody dlracuon . dUtanCjl 01 On. Hundred Eleven (111) '.11. SeVlln (7) Inr:h.1 to I potnl In.. Un. whlen II the Southwlrd IXwnllon 01 IIn. dlvldlnt prope"I.'1 0' A. C. BObla. fr. and Wl'lIond Or. Harold G. lCreelln9 OM wtrl known 1.12 Gnd 10 ~Il fUdql SII'OIC. rl.peeU~ly: thlnce .Iont ~hl Sou:lh..rd eatenllon ot ..td aivldlnq lina I" 4 Nortl\orly alr.euon 4 dllune. 01 One HunclI'ed rUly-.lx (151) tCOI <1lonq Ilnd "taln" lay th. HI'r. of Evelyn H. RaDtUn., OIcMlld, (part 0'01. IAlqor trQe~ 01 land 01 Whleh the wlUun conveyed prl",". w.... fom.rly I pen), tQ .a pennl on tho Soulhom Un. 01 . fw.lw (UI fill wide public elllV: thone. <llonq the SouUWlm hnl ot ..,d rw.lw U:U tlal wld. pubjla .1l.V &..1.twlrdly . alllanco 01 On. ltundred tl.~n Clll) fMl, SoYan (7t Inchl' to. point on thl WOllom IIno 01 .old SlXlY (SOl f.ol wldl SOU~b IIctfon;t, 5'11": thencl IIon9 laid Wo"w.,d Une of Sixty (60J f..c wlo. SouCh I4dtord Slrulln I South,ray dlllclLan · cH'lAncI ot One HundNd Fifty..... nUl 'Ill to I POlnl In IIn. 01 lend now 0' formorly 01 Elwood M.. l.nk.. the plac. 01 SroIHNING. CONTAINING 0.. "._ Fllty-.IX (1511 '"' In tnlnl .10"" ..... W....m IIn. 01 Suny IlOIlo.. Will. :loo.h _'on! 5...... lad ....ndln; W........IV tII.nll...". 411 on Glyon wldth. dlllancl of On. Huncirld Eleven (111) '''I. Seven'f1I Inchll, 4ne! h4VUIq thofllOft 'NCted . two .tory Ita... dweUlnq bou.. Iuarm II lAd numbered U4 Soulh hcUord S""I~ EXCEPTING end ntMMnq t "."rUI...... to the HI'n 01 Eve!yn N. ~bbln.. Cae...ad. thllr h.l,. .nd asIl4n" I n9hl--of....v 0'4' th. Nonb.m raOIl 'tWInly. two (:12) 'nc ~ th. wlthtn con....,.. prwmll.' _tUCA MI4 TwlntY""'CWO (22) fl.. Wl". r'qhl"'OI-way toq.cn., WKh thl 1"\ftlve (l:lU ,.., wtd. pubUo IU." ."101n1n9 II on. the Nonh CO.IUlul. . thirty-four 1341 f..c wtdai I1qh'",of......, uo wtuca Thlrt.,-,ow (34) 'eel wldl rt4hl"",'-wIY the H.ir. of Eveiyn H. RDbtttn., OIeu'lcI. IntI'lb.11 hltts Inci I..,qnl. 'hall!\aft the rlQhl 10 dldlca.. I' I PUbUG rl9b1-of1'" 01 In.l. [(: SliNG. _ 01 '110 ",","II.. whloh Ro_ /. F_n.nd WIlt, by 4." do." April!'. 1131 .lId -.nIocIln tII. 01110... tII. _r 01 DNd. lII.nd fot Cumberland Counlv It ClrU'!I. Pann.y....Ilia. I. DHd look -1-, \101. 10. pa" III. 9ro.1I4.nd c:onwyod 10 Fronoll/. _........ Cwlvn N. _1.0, ......nd Ind wlf.. TIIo ..'d Fro.GII/. RMIII.. 110_ cUed Oft "_r II. IUJ, UU.1O "ld P.....I... rwaalAlldi ""lId bY' Q""IUon o.zaw 101111, In hll '~YI", lfOU'., CuolVII N. _.... "Z2J1IIII9~ ,.." - CERTIFICA TION/ ATTEST A TION I, Lucretia A. Hefnefinger, Recording Secretary of the Borough of Carlisle Planning Commission do hereby certify and attest that the attached is a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Carlisle Borough Planning Commission meeting of April 27, 1995, which were adopted by the Carlisle Borough Planning Commission on May 25, 1995. , )'t ~ r ' , {I If 0..,. , Lucretia A. Hefnefi Recording Secretary l.di11~" ::Tf L..... er August 18, 1995 ,I ! , PLANNING and ZO!.NG COMMISSION CARLISLE, PENNSYL VANIA BOROUGH HALL CARLISLE PENNSYLVANIA 17013 MINUTES Planning 'Inti Zoning Commission Meeting held on Thursday, April 27, 1995 Members Attending: Ron Simons, Vice Chainnan, Ethel Carryer, Harry Herb, Timothy Hoy and Dennis Lebo, Borough Officials Attending: Brian Dennis, Planning/Zoning/Code Manager, and Michael Keiser, Public Works. The meeting was called to order at 5: \5 pm by Vice Chairman Simons, The minutes for the meeting held March 23, \995, were unanimously approved on motion by Ms, Carryer and second by Mr. Herb, Items Pendinlllhe Planninll Commission's Review ';1;" \, The Planning commission considered a final minor subdivision plan submitted by General Mills for its propeny on Shearer Drive, Pam Fisher of Fisher, Mowery and Rosendale, representing General Mills, explained that the plan shows the subdivision of 1.0352 acres from the General Mills propeny to be sold to Allen Distribution, the owner of the abuning propeny, Allen Distribution is purchasing this piece of property to provide additional area for access to the site, The plan meets all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, Conclusion: The Planning Commission, upon motion by Harry Herb and second by Timothy Hoy, unanimously voted to recommend approval of this final minor subdivision plan by Borough Council, 2, The Planning Commission considered a final minor land development plan submitted by Masland Industries for the construction of an addition to Building No. I at 50 Spring Road, Pam Fisher of Fisher, Mowery and Rosendale. representing Masland Industries, explained that Masland Industries is proposing to construct a 565 square foot addition to meet the ADA requirements to its Carlisle Spring Road Building No, \, The improvement will be located on the north side of the existing facility. It will house elevator and stair towers and a lobby, The site currently exceeds the allowable maximum building and impervious area coverages established by the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed expansion will result in a further increase in these coverages, At its meeting on April 6, 1995, the Borough Zoning Hearing Board voted to authorize the necessary variallces to allow these increases, Pursuant to Section 226-\7 of the Subdivision and land Development Ordinance, Masland has requested a waiver to the requirement to submit a preliminary plan. As authorized by this section, the Borough Manager has approved this request. The submission meets the requirements for consideration as a final minor land development. Pam Fisher. representing the applicant, stated that the applicant agrees with the conditions recommended by staff. which are as follows: \, Pursuant to Section 226-19 (A-\) of the Subdivision and land Development Ordinance. the scale of each drawing shall be shown on the plan, 2. Pursuant to Section 226-\9 (A-IS) of the Subdivision and land Development Ordinance. the total square footage of the building addition shall be shown on the plan, 3, Pursuant to Section 226-21 (A-I3) of the Subdivision and land Development Ordinance. the building setback for the new addition shall be shown on the plan, 4, Pursuant to Section 226-19 (A-IO) of the Subdivision and land Development Ordinance, the date of the decision of the Zoning Hearing Board authorizing variances to Sections 255-92 (A-6) and 255-92 (A- 7) of the Zoning Ordinance shall be shown on the plan, Conclusion: The Planning Commission. upon motion by Harry Herb and second by Timothy Hoy. unanimously voted to recommend approval of this final minor land development plan by Borough Council. subject to the conditions recommended by staff 3. The Planning Commission considered a preliminary subdivision and land development plan for the Robbins Property Development submitted by the Windsor Building Corporation, The plan subdivides the \,\ acre tract into eight (8) lots. upon which eight (8) single-family semi-detached dwelling units will be constructed, The average size of each lot is 5,895 square feet. Access to the dwellings will be provided from Cemetery Avenue. which is proposed to be improved with a twenty-two (22) foot wide cartway, with an eight (8) inch wide concrete curb on the south side, A four (4) foot wide tree lawn and four (4) foot wide sidewalk are also proposed for the south side of Cemetery Avenue. Each dwelling unit will have a driveway providing two (2) off-street parking spaces and a two car garage, Under Section 226-23 (C-I) of the Subdivision and land Development Ordinance. design for new local streets requires a minimum right-of-way width of fifty (50) feet. The existing right. of . way abutting the Robbins tract currently consists of thirty-four (34) feet. This right-of.way was created prior to the establishment of the current subdivision and land development requirements, Accordingly, the applicant is seeking a waiver 10 the fifty (50) feet right-of-way requirement, In addition, the applicant is seeking a waiver to the requirement of in sIal ling curbing and sidewalk on the north side of Cemetery Avenue, This is the rear side of eight (8) 4/27/9~ Planrung Commission Minutes Pale 2 not be utilized by the residents on E, Ridge Street and additional curbing could create a stormwater problem, All other public improvements will meet established zoning, subdivision and land development, and public works specifications. Roger Morgenthal, representing the applicant, stated the applicant is in receipt of staffs recommended conditions and will address the conditions as pan of the final plan, These conditions are: 1. Pursuant to Section 226-29 of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, appropriate street trees shall be planted at intervals of not less than thiny (30) feet nor greater than fifty (50) feet within a tree lawn ofa minimum width of four (4) feet. The plan currently depicts six (6) street trees. With the current spacing, two (2) additional trees are required to meet this standard, Such trees shall be shown on the final plan, 2, Pursuant to Section 226-21 (B-1 I ) of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, the developer must agree to cmter into a development agreement and provide the financial security required to guarantee the construction of all public improvements proposed for the land development. 3, Pursuant to Section 226-31 (B-2) of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, ten percent (10%) of the total tract shown on the plan, or 0,11 acres shall be dedicated to the Borough for public recreational purposes. Such :and must meet the recreation area location .,.. criteria established in Section 226-31 (C) and shall be shown on the final plan, In-lieu thereof, the Borough may, upon agreement by the applicant as established in Section 226.31 (E), accept the construction of recreation facilities, the payment offees in-lieu thereof, the private reservation of land for recreational purposes, or a combination of the foregoing, Upon such agreement, the fee to be paid in-lieu of the required dedication ofland shall be SI,IOO (i.e" calculated at the rate ofSIO,OOO per acre for each acre ofland required to be dedicated). 4, Pursuant to Borough Public Works Standard Specifications, curb and sidewalks shall be designed to pass stormwater beneath the sidewalk rather than over the sidewalk, Such design shall be shown on the final plan, 5, Pursuant to Section 226-19 (J-3) of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, the proposed text of the instrument creating the proposed utility easements shall be submitted for rolview and approval by the Borough Solicitor. Such instruments shall be recorded prior to recording the final plan, In addition. a nole shall be placed on the final plan stating that the proposed sanitary sewer system located upstream from proposed mllll hole J03-A shall be privately owned and maintained, 6, Pursuant to Section 226-19 (A-19) of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, all water and sanitary sewer service laterals shall t-e completely shown on the final plan, ~127/9' Planning Comnussion Minulcs Pap) 7, Pursuant to Section 226-19 (A-I?) of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, stop signs and street name signs meeting Borough Public Works Standard Specifications shall be shown at all intersections on the final plan, 8, Pursuant to Section 226-19 (A-I?) of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, streetlighting meeting the requirements of Section 226-23 (L) ofthe Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance shall be shown on the final plan, Mr, Morgenthal further stated that the applicant met with the neighbors and discussed the project to see if any common-ground could be reached to try to make the development more acceptable to the neighbors, Mr, Morgenthal presented a sketch plan to show the placement of the garages and houses on the property and how they would appear. once constructed, Mr, Broujos faxed a letter to Mr, Morgenthal stating he and his neighbors were opposed to the entire plan, Mr, Morgenthal stated the proposed project is pennitted under the zoning ordinance, is less dense than what is pennilled under the ordinances, and meets the requirements established by the Zoning and SubdivisionlLand Development Ordinances, with the exception of the width of the roadway, The Planning Commission previously voted to grant a waiver to this requirement. Mr, Herb asked if the applicant would consider placing screening along the rear of the project, The applicant would be more than willing to consider placing screening on the final plan, .:....., John Broujos stated that at the meeting betw~en the neighbors and the applicant, he asked if the applicant would consider fewer units, The applicant said no and therefore Mr, Broujos felt it closed the doors as far. as they were concerned, Mr, Broujos stated they would accept screening, Mr, Broujos expressed concems over the reduction of the required right-of-way width to 34 feet, the absence of sidewalk along the nonh side of Cemetery Avenue, and the improvement of an alley to a street. Mr, Simons stated that it is not the responsibility of the developer to place sidewalk along the opposite side of the street. It would be the responsibility of the property owners on that side to install the sidewalk, Mr, Broujos expressed concem about the portion of the alley which runs north and south, This alley is narrow -- approximately 12 feet wide -- and suggested this alley be changed to one way, Mr, Morgenthal stated that he contacted several neighbors regarding this change and the neighbors did not want a one-way alley. Mr, Broujos does not feel the proposed development meets the intent of the ordinance, The density of the housing, in his opinion. is not compatible with the surrounding dwellings, 4127/9' Planning CommissIon Minutes Page 4 Mr. Simons asked if any neighbors were in favol' of this plan. Mr. Brehm and Mrs. Robbins approve of this plan as submined. Mr. Brehm is a neighbor and the planner tor the plan. Mrs. Robbins is the current owner of the subject propeny. Mr. Morgenthal reiterated that the density of this project is less than what is permitted by the ordinance. The applicant feels this project could not be reduced any funher beyond the eight units proposed. Mr. Morgenthal agreed with Mr. Simons that the applicant is not required to install sidewalks on property outside of the development. Mr. Keiser stated that the ponion of the alley which runs east and west will be sufficient enough to accommodate two-way traffic. The ponion of the alley which runs north and south will encounter passing problemJ between cars because it is not sufficient enough to accommodate two cars. One car will have to yield to another oncoming car. ",~.' Mr. Lebo asked Mr. Keiser if there is a need for one way traffic on this alley. Mr. Keiser stated that he reviewed the ITE trip generation ligures for various types of development in this area. The l10wer shop that was previously located on this property, according to the ITE, would generate 106 trips per day. The existing residential properties in the area using Cemetery Avenue generate approximately 96 trips per day The new eight unit development would create 47 trips per day for an overall total of approximately 143 trips per day. This figure is well below the total number of trips generated when the flower shop was in operation. Mr. Keiser stated that even though there may be an occasional conflict between vehicles on Cemetery Avenue running nonh and south, this will not be a major problem. However, if the Planning Commission desires the added safety of a one-way street, it is the recommendation of staff that Cemetery Avenue be designated as one-way from Ridge Street to Bedford Street, excepting the north-south section of Cemetery Avenue that dead ends below the east-west section, which should remain open to two-way traffic. If a one-way street is established, on-street parking could be allowed on the south side of Cemetery Avenue along the new duplex housing units. Conclusion: The Planning Commission, upon motion by Harry Herb and second by Timothy Hoy, voted to recommend approval of this plan by Borough Council, subject to the conditions recommended by staff. The mol ion passed on a three to one vote. Mr. Simons voted to against the motion. 4. The Planning Commission considered a report concerning possible amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to effect several changes in the administration of signs in the Borough. SincClthe spring of 1993, the Planning Commission, the Chamber of Commerce, the Downtown Carlisle Association (DCA), and the Historical and Architectural Review Board (HARD) have been discussing several changes to the sign regulations administered by the Borough. These regulations are primarily included in Article XXII of the Zoning Ordinance. The committee of Chamber, DCA, and HARB representatives met on February 7 and March 13, 1995, to finalize recommendations for consideration by the Planning Commission and Borough Council. The report rel1ects these recommendations. 4/27/9' Planning CommIssion Minutes Pap' The Planning Commission took the following action on the recommendations contained in the report : I. SIGN ORDINANCES. On motion by Mr. Hoy and st'cond by Mr. Herb, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that Chapter 203 of the Code of the Borough of Carlisle be repealed in its entirety. Chapters 203 and 255 of the Code of the Borough of Carlisle both regulate signs. Chapter 203 was adopted as Ordinance No. 1506, which was approved 3-13-69 Chapter 255 is the Borough Zoning Ordinance adopted as Ordinance No. 1600, which was approved 9-22-88. Article XXII, to include Sections 255- 195 through 255-211, of the Zoning Ordinance specifically pertains to signs. Section 255- 207 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes that, the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance in 1988 did not repeal the Chapter 203 Sign Ordinance. Accordingly, signs are regulated equally by both ordinances. However, there are some discrepancies between the two ordinances. Furthermore, the Zoning Ordinance provides a much more comprehensive set of regulations than the Chapter 203 Sign Ordinance. Section 255-207 should be amended to reflect this. '.1.' 2. DEFINITION OF A SIGN. On motion by Mr. Hoy and second Ms. Carryer, the Planning Commission voted 3-2 to amend the definition of a sign to include interior signs that are not attached to permanent interior walls and are clearly visible from a public right- of-way. Section 255-196 (A), which establishes the applicability of the Sign Ordinance, should be amended to state that any sign meeting the definition of a sign included in Section 255-12 shall be subject to these regulations. The definition should further be amended to eliminate paragraph D, which exempts signs erected by public officials. Mr. Lebo and Mr. Herb voted against this motion. The Planning Commission had previously recommended a policy that exempted all interior signs from the sign regulations. The Chamber, DCA, and HARD recommended that the pelicy retain some control over interior signs placed in windows and window display areas. Bob Davis, representing the HARB, and Karen Shughart, representing the Chamber of Commerce, argued a need to retain control over window signs and to not allow merchants to circumvent the sign regulations by placing permanent signs in storefront windows without a permit, particularly in the Historic District. Mr. Lebo and Mr. Herb argued interior signs should not be subject to the regulations, except to prohibit words or images that are obscene, pornographic, or are highly offensive to public decency 3. NAMEPLATE SIGNS. On motion by Mr. Hoy and second by Mr. Herb, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that Section 255-196 (B) be amended to establish that all nameplate signs, memorial plaques, and historical tablets that do not exceed one (I) square foot in area and include no commercial advertising be exempt from the sign regulations. This will allow various types ofnameplnte signs (e.g., those indicating the name or address of an occupant, the year of construction of a building, or memorial plaqueslhistorical tablets erected by non-governmental bodies) to be erected without a permit. 4/27/9' Planning Commission Minules Pap 6 ~. ''''. 4. TEMPORARY SIGNS. On motion by Mr. Hoy and second by Mr. Herb, the Plarming Commission unanimously voted to recommend that Section 255-195 (H) be anlended to classify a temporary sign as any sign erected on a propeny for a limited time that advertises a limited-time event, sale, offer, activity, or the like at a location and that Section 255-199 (B-5) be amended to allow the display of temporary signs, provided that no temporary sign shall be maintained for a period in excess oflhirty (30) days. In addition, no exterior sign should be considered a temporary sign, except as may be expressly authorized by another section of the ordinance. Mr. Lebo initially asked if this section could be consolidated with the section discussed under issue #8 below. Mr. Dennis informed that Commission that Section 255-195 deals with signs in commercial and industrial districts, while the other ser.tion deals with signs in residential and institutional districts. The section for commercial signs currently provides no regulations for this type of sign, except to state that they do not require a permit, pursuant to Section 255-199 (B-5). 5. BANNERS AND FLAGS. On motion by Mr. Hoyand second by Mr. Herb, the Planning Commission voted 3-1 to recommend that Section 255-197 (D) be amended to establish that pennants, spinners, streamers or any moving object used for commercial advertising purposes, excluding banners and l1ags when authorized under other sections of the sign ordinance, are prohibited. Mr. Lebo voted against the motion and argued that the section should be eliminated in its entirety to allow banners, flags, pennants, spinners, streamers, and other moving objects without regulation, except when they encroach into a public right-of-way. ';::. 6. OUTLINING OF ROOFl.INES, DOORS, WINDOWS, OR WALL EDGES WITH NEON LIGHT TUBING FOR ADVERTISING PURPOSES. On motion by Mr. Hoy and second by Mr. Herb, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that Section 255-197 (H) of the Zoning Ordinance, which identifies "the outlining of the rooflines, doors, windows, or wall edges by illuminated neon light tubing for advertising purposes" as being prohibited, be eliminated. 7. SIGNS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY, TREES, UTILITY POLES, ROCKS, OR OTHER NATURAL OBJECTS. On motion by Mr. Hoy and second by Mr. Herb, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that Section 255-197 be amended to prohibit signs on public property or public right-of-ways, unless erected by a governmental body. or unless required to be so located by order of a govemmental body. In addition, permanent signs painted on, attached to, or supponed by a tree, utility pole, stone, cliff, or other natural object should also be prohibited. 8. SPECIAL EVENTS SIGNS. On motion by Mr. Lebo and second by Mr. Herb, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that Section 255-198 (H), which allows temporary signs advertising fairs, social events, auction sales, and the like, be amended to allow one (1) special event sign that does not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet on each ofiu two (2) sides to be erected for each one-hundred linear (100) feet of lot frontage. Such signs may be erected no earlier than twenty (20) days prior to the event, must be removed within ten (10) days following the eveut, and in no instance shall be 4127/9' Planning Commission Minutes Pap 7 Sl maintained for a period of time in ~~cess of thirty (30) days. No sign permit or bond should be required. 9. FLAGS. On motion by Mr. Hoyand second by Mr. Herb, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that Section 255-199 (8) be amended to permit flags with commercial advertising when accessory to a permitted business or commercial establishment sign, subject to the following restrictions: ( I) are clearly accessory to a permil1ed business or commercial establishment sign; (2) are limited to one (1) flag per business establishment; (3) are no larger than three (3) feet by five (5) feet and in good condition; (4) are displayed only during business hours; (5) are insened in a wall mount, with the bottom of the flag a minimum of seven (7) feet above the sidewalk; and (6) do not project greater than six (6) feet over the public right-of-way. No permit should be required to erect an accessory l1ag. Commercial flags may not be permitted to be displayed using existing sidewalk receptacles, which are public facilities reserved for public purposes. The ordinance currently makes no provision for this type of sign. "III\W' 10. BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT SIGNS. On motion by Mr. Hoy and second by Mr. Herb, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that Sections 255-199 (B-2), (B-3), and (8-4) be amended to establish one section that regulates the placement of signs on the front, side, or rear of commercial buildings. This section should state that one (I) or more signs may be attached to or mounted on a building front, sides, or rear, provided that the total area of such sign or signs does not exceed one ( I) square toot for each one (I ) linear foot of the building front, sides, or rear upon which the signs are erected, except that no building shall be limited to less than thirty-five (35) feet in total sign area. In addition, the total sign area on each building front, side, or rear shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the area of the building face upon which the signs are mounted. This is a cClDsolidation of e~isting regulations. 11. SANDWICH BOARD SIGNS. On motion by Mr. Hoyand second by Mr. Herb, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that a sandwich sign be defined in Section 255-12 as a free standing sign containing two faces thaI are attached at the top and open at the bottom so as to allow the sign to stand without a pole or other base and that Section 255-199 (8) be amended to permit sandwich board signs when accessory to a permitted business or commercial establishment sign, 9ubject 10 the following restrictions: (I) are clearly accessory to a p.lrmitted business or commercial establishment sign; (2) are limited to one (1) sandwich board sign per business establishment; (3) are not more than two (2) feet by three (3) feet on each face of the sign; (4) are displayed only during business hours; and (5) are placed on private property or on the public sidewalk, provided that they do not protrude more than three (3) feet from the building line of the merchant's premises and allow for a minimum of five (S) feet of sidewalk to be available for pedestrian traffic. 411719' PllIIlIUDg Commisaion Minutes PapS No permit should be required 10 erect an accessory sandwich board sign. The ordinance currently makes no provision lor this type of sign. 12. SHOPPING CENTER SIGNS. On motion by Mr Hoy and second by Mr. Herb, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that a shopping center be defined in Section 255-12 as a tract ofland controlled by a single landowner and developed u a single entity for a number of comm~rcial establishments and Section 255.199 (C) be amended to allow a free-standing shopping center sign for each street frontage provided that none of the establishments within the shopping center will be permilled to erect an individual free- standing sign. Furthermore, the section should be amended to allow a group sign for shopping centers with fewer than ten (10) independent establishments. 13. GARAGE SALE SIGNS. On motion by Mr. Hoyand second by Mr. Lebo, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that no changes be made to the regulations for garage sale signs. Staff had recommended that Section 255.201 (D) be amended to require that garage sale signs may only be erected on the premise at which the sale is being conducted. The Planning Commission felt that this was unnecessary. ".....-. 14. OVERHANGING SIGNS. On motion by Mr. Hoyand second by Mr. Herb, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that Section 255-199 (B-6) be amended to establish the maximum sign area for overhanging signs as six (6) square feet on each of its two (2) sides, to allow one (I) overhanging sign per business, rather than per lot, and to eliminate the requirement that overhanging signs be constructed entirely of wood. The area of the overhanging sign will be included in the calculation of the maximum area of signage allowed under policy issue number 10 ibove. 15. SIGN PERMITS. On motion by Mr. Hoy and second by Mr. Herb, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that Section 255-203 be amended to exempt temporary signs (issue #4 above), accessory flags (issue #9 above), no-trespassing signs (~255-198C), directional signs (~255-198D), contractor's signs (~25S-198G), and temporary special events signs (~255.198H) from requiring a permit. This section should also be amended to state that fees for permits are established by Section 120-7 of the Code of the Borough of Carlisle. Currently, the section states that fees are established by resolution of Council, which is incorrect The ordinance is currently written to require sifll permits for real estate signs, no-trespassing signs, directional signs, contractor's signs, and temporary special events signs. 16. VARIANCES. On motion by Mr. Hoy and second by Mr Herb. the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that Section 255-208 (C), which requires that the Planning Commission be provided with an opportunity to provide an advisory review prior to any granting of a variance a sign by the Zoning Hearing Board, be eliminated. This will more clearly establish the independent authority of the Zoning Hearing Board to issue variances. 4127/9' Planning Commission Minulc.\ PallC9 ....., - CERTIFICATION/ATTESTATION I, Julie D. Lay, Borough Secretary of the Borough of Carlisle do hereby certifY and attest that the attached are true and correct copies of the following minutes: 1. Carlisle Borough Council meeting of May 11,1995, which were adopted by Carlisle Borough Couneil on June 8, 1995; 2. Public hearing held by the Carlisle Borough Council on July 5, 1995, which were adopted by Carlisle Borough Council on August 10, 1995; 8.nd 3. Special meeting of the Carlisle Borough Council on July 5, 1995, which were adopted by Carlisle Borough Council on August 10, 1995. pieD. Lay \ orough Secretary August 18, 1995 (Seal) f ~ , iil ,"J., "'/ ",'.,j,\ '-'i:: .-,,' 141 . OOIINQJilIE~ .' CARLISLE BOROUGH COUNCIL MEETING May 11, 1995 President Duncan called the meeting [0 ordl:r at 6:30 PM. C'.ouncilmember Owens led the invoc:u:ion and pledge of allegiance [() the flag. After a roll call by the SecrelllrY, the following Counci1members were present: D\IIlc:u1, Chenok. Ocker. Spitz, and Owens. Also prese:lt wen:: Mayor Wilson, Solicitor Schoepp, Manager Bean. Assistant Manager HielSCh, Parks and Recreation Director DiNunzio, Public Worla Dim:tor Keiser, Planning/Zoning/Codes Manager Dennis. FIre Chief Boyles and SecrelllrY Lay. p,.~id@nt''J R@oort and R@cognition 0' M@mhers A motion was made to appoint Richard Ocker as a voting delegate at [he 96th Annual Pennsylvania League of Cities and Municipalities Conference which will be held on June 23, 1995 in Re:1ding, Pennsylvania. OwenslChertolc. All aye vote. A motion was made to appoint Robert Owens as an alternate voting delegate at the 96th Annual Pennsylvania League of Cities and Municipalities Conference which will be held on June 23, 1995 in RC3ding, PeMsylvania. Ocker/Chenolc. All aye vote. Ms. Chenok informed Council that the Institutional Committee is currently working on twO issues. The first is to work with Diclcinson College and try to find a solution [() the off campus studentS disturbing the residents in the area of the College. The second is [() teqllC$t from !be C1rlisle Hospital updateS on their contributions to charilllble organizations during the year of 1994 and so far in 1995. Ms. CheIlOk stated that the commiu.ce will be giving Council a repon of their findings in June. Mr. Spitz stated that he has noticed car1lHtlor~ currently running for Council have made statt:metltS regarding certain issues that they want to implement if they are elected. He explained that in !be past most of these issues were tried but failed. He wished the candidates would have shown their suppon when the issues were being considmd by Council. Mr. Ocker introduced a scout group that is sponsored by the Wagner United Methodist ChIll'CIL The group is working for their Eagles badge and they :ue mluired to aaend a Council meeting and to write a leac:r 11) an elected official. Mavor'~ R.nnrt Mayor Wilson informed Council that the 1995 fireworks display for the 4th of July will be sponsored by the Fraternal Otder of Eagles. The firewOIts will be held at the Carlis.le Higb School Swdium. Mayor WIlson presented the Carlisle Exchange Club with a proclam!lrinll establishing Apri129tb as Arbor Day. Sch.@dul@d Sn~!lken The Exchange Cub pnlsented the Borough with a $250 check in honor of Arbor Day. This money will be Wlcd to plant treeS in the Borough. Council Minutes 2 May II, 1995 142 Roben Davis pn:scnted five Historic31 and ArchileaumI Review Board awards for rhe year of 1994. A copy of Mr. Davi.$' pn:senllltion is:1ltlCl1ed. John Morefield, pn:sident of the Clrlisle Regional Performing Arts CenlCr (Theater), requested that the Borough submit a grant O1pplication througb the DCA's Downtown Pennsylvanill program on the The:uer's behalf. A copy of ~Ir. Morefield'~ presenllltion is anacbed. If the funds are found to be spent for ineligible purposes. then the Theater would n:imburse the Borough f(l' :lilY expenses this cre:lted. Mr. Spitz asked if the The:ucr is self-sustained and if the complete make.up of the c.utisle n:siden13 are involved. Ms. Che:nok asked if the The:llCr was privately owned. Mr. Morefield slllted thal is a non-profit orgnni7.riQn and has a Board made up of 21 members. which are all owners of the ThellUlr. President Duncan expla.ined that 3 public he3ring is requin:d befon: submission of the grant. A lIlOtion was made to hold a public he3ring to receive public comment and alOI'e infomwion on the grant submission for the Carlisle Regional Performing Arts CenlCr (The:llCr). Owens/Oem. All aye vote. Con!'il@nt .\.efndn Mr. Ocker made a motion to approve the consent agenda. Mr. Owens seconded thc lIlOtion. All aye VOle. The Consent Agenda conClined the following: Public hearing minutCS of AprillO, 1995, Agenda Session minuteS of April 10, 199', and the minuteS of the n:gular business meeting of April 13, 199'. Attendance approvals to include: Finance Director to attend Government rUWICe Officers Association (GFOA) annual c:onfenmce at Baltimon:. Maryland. June 1().14. 199'. PenonneURisk Managcr [0 attend the Harrisburg Chapter Intcmational Personnel Management Association Spring Confcn:m:e at Mcchanicsburg on May IS. 1995. Mayor WtIson. Councilman Owens, Councilman Ocker and Manager Bem to attend the PLCM 96th Annual Convention at Rc:Iding. Pennsylvania from JWlc 2151 to June 24th. Approval of Bills and InveSlDlent Transactions to include: AS OF APRD.. 30, 1995 Gener3l Fund......... ............. ....... ................. .$382.669.80 WIller Fund................... ................................432,508.77 Sewer Fund .................................................. 175.702.72 Se1f-lnsurance Fund ............ ............... ........... ........221.33 P:lrking Fund .......... ........... ......................... ....13,520.27 Highway Aid Fund...................................................O The HisUlric3l Archilectural Review Bolltd n:femls to include the following: I. A requcst was submitted by auistopher Bec1ccr for the propeny siawed al 2 SoUlh Hanover Srn:et to en:ct rempaary signage. The three (3) square fooc round wooden silD will be placed above the enuance dDa'. The silD identifies Cbristopher's GoumICt Coffee &: Te:L II is yellow with blue lettering. The sign will be mainClined f(l' a period of sixty (60) days. COWlcil MinUleS 3 May 11, I99S 143 2. A request was submitted by Dickinson College for th~ ~perty ~~ aI ~ I North College SlteCllO repair the roof and gult1:IS on the building. This 15 an m-kind replacement. 3. A request was submitted by Dickinson College for the Tome Building situated on Louther 5a=t to repair the gutters and roof valleys on the building. This is an in-kind replacement. 4. A request was submitted by Dickinson College for the property situated aI 32 South West Street to repair the soffit and roof on the building. This is an in-kind replacement. 5. A request was submitted by Dickinson College for the property situated at 159 West High Street 10 replace the slate roof on the building. This is an in-kind replacement. 6. A request was submitted by Dickinson College for the property situated aI 201 West High Street to replace the copper downspouting on ll}e b.lilding. This is an in-kind replacement. 7. A request was submitted by Michael & l.avon Noggle for the property situated aI 10 West Pol1Uiet Street to t':I'CIC~ sign age. The wood sign with routed edges will nave dimensions of 22" by 2S". It will Slate "Hidden Tre:1Sures FlIle gifts and collectibles: Quest Custom Embroidery" with logos. The sign will be white with black and te3llellCring and maroon pinstripes. In addition, nours of operation will be specified in vinylleners on the door. S. A request was submitted by Mark MlImm~ for the propeny situated at liS - 117 West High Street 10 replace the canvas on an existing rell'1lCC1ble awning. The maa:rial will be maroon. 9. A request was submitted by Debra E1am for the property silllall:d al 115 South Hanover Street to obtain remporory approval for signage. The signs are painted on the storefront windows stating '1'ropix Paradise Tanning Salon; All New Sunquest Beds; Phone 2S8- 8499" and "Bring a Friend; Gain Extra Sessions," The windows contain appro,,;"""..ly 27 square feet of signage. The signs will be in place for sixty (60) days. 10. A requcst was submitted by Sue Schlegel for the property situated aI \60 South Hanover Sa=t 10 repair and/or replace the decking on the second floor porches. W coden lOngue. and-groove decking will be used. This is an in-kind replacement. 11. A request was submitted by John Weigel for the property silllall:d al50 East High Street to erect remporury signage. The sign will swc "JOHN WESLEY WEIGEL m; A TIORNEY AT LAW." The sign will have dimensions of 6 x 18 inches and will be painted dark blue with while vinylleners. The silPl board is l'eCl3IIgWar with roUllded comers, The sign will be located beneath the existing sign on this building for a period of sixty (60) days. 12. A reqUCSt was submitted by fun Collins for the YIU.,.,ny silllall:d all55 South Hanover Street to erect sigrJage, Vinyllellm stating "Realty Execwive Re:LIlors" have been applied to the window shade hanging in the storefront window. The sign has dimensiOIlS of 48 x 24 inches. This sign is in addition to twO (2) existing wall signs. The lettering is I1:d with blue logo. The shade is white. The sign will be cut from the window shade and placed in a wooden frame to be permanendy hung in the front window. 13. A request was submiltled by the Historic Carlisle P:utnm flX'the I""l""'" situated U 152 East Higb SlteCllO undertake renovadons on the building. The proposed scope of wert includes: (I) replace windows at the side and re3l' of the jl.opett)' to add tluee additional wood windows; (2) reslOn: first floor t'C3I' enclosed pon:lllO an open pon:h; (3) eliminate gften plastic rooting material and substimre cle3l' acrylic material; (4) replace rear hip section of tin roof with new tin roof; and (5) replace gutters and doWIISpQUlS. 144 CoWlCil MinuteS 4 May ll. 1995 Cnmmllnitv P'mnninr 4. Ollolltv .at.L.i.fl A motion was made 10 approve the Otizen P:lniciplltion Plan which applies to HUD's Consolidated Plan development/amendment process. Ocker/Owens. All aye vote. A motion was made 10 approve a final tnioOt:' subdivision plan submined by Goenera1 Mills for ilS propeny on Shearer Drive. Ocker/Owens. All aye vote. A motion was lI1lIde 10 approve a final minor 1and development plan submiaed by Masland Industries for the construction of an addition w Building No. I 3.1 50 Spring Road subject to the aaached conditions. Ocker/Chenok. Donald Mowery was present and sClted thlU he agreed to and signed the conditions. After the question was c:illed. the motion unanimously passed. A request was submitted by Dickinson College for a rezoning of the approximate 7.8 acre ~ loc:1tcd 3.1 the nonheast corner of Or.mge Street llIId the Coll1'llil right-of-way (fonnerly the Kinney Shoe Bedford Planl/Warehouse) from 12 Light Industria1to INS Institutional A motion was made 10 dr.Iit and advertise 3D ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance and to hold a public hearing on June 5, 1995,3.17:30 PM to solicit input and mare information regarding this request. Ocker/Chenok. Soliciwr Schoepp advised Council w reserve their judgement of the request until they receive all input that would be presented at the public he:lring. After the question was called the motion passed Wlanimously. A motion was made to approve a request from the Fraremal Order of E:lgles for an extension to the dt.tlline for recording the FmaI Subdivision Plan and Fmal l..J.nd Development Plan for 26 E. High Street. After the question was called the motion passed 3 - I with Mr. Owens voting against the motion and President Duncan abstlining. (Affidavit is aaached.) A meeting of the Community Planning Quality of Life Committee was scheduled for Monday, June .5th.lU .5:1.5 PM. F1nonce A motion was made to award the bid for a new Grader to Elliot & Frantz. Inc., the low bidder. lU a total cost of $134,589. Owens/Spitz. All aye VOte. A motion was made to award the bid for Bitwninous and Concrete materials w the low bidders of each item. Owens/Spitz. All aye vote. Mr. Owens informed COWlcil that he received a response back from Senator Hal Mowery regarding Act 339. The letter is aaached. Pmrk!l :and R~rfation A motion was made to approve the Parlts and Recn::uion Plan update as recommended by the Pans and Recreation Board. Chenok/Owen5. Mr. DiNunzio reviewed the plan. Mr. Ocker asked if a map could be provided to show where the ~maining green spaces arc in the Borough. Mr. DiNWlzio swed that this would be done. Mr. Bean explained that the recendy proposed pool improvementS arc not included in this plan because it wu assumed that the Borough would be receiving a DCA grant. However, these :1i"e high-priority capital improVCIDCllts. After the question wa.~ c:illed the motion passed IIMn;mousiy. A motion wa'.! made to approve a lease witb !he C1pital Are3 Intermediatl: Unit. tenD of lease 10 be from JuJy I. 199.5 to JWle 30, 2000. Chenok/Owens. All aye vote. Council MinIllleS , May II, 199' A motion WllS IDlIde to ask the PW iUId Recrnoon Bow to Ilive Coum:lIll recommendAtion on what C3ll be done to bellulify the arell on "K" Street where the ice ~Iu1Dnll rilllt WllS IOCllled pn:viously. OIenolclOcker. All aye YOUl. Puhllc ~rI'.t., A l1lOticn was IDlIde to PllSS two resolutionlllllfeein lto compl Y with the rules, re~llIrions and 1r.Linin, sllU1dards eslllblished by the MuniClplll Pollee Oft\cen EdUCIltion and Tnuning ColJllll1Ssion while receivinl funds !'rom the Commonwealth of Pennsylvllllia. Ocker/Chertok. All aye vote. A aIOtion was IDlIde to :wthorize the dosW'C of the tlrsl block of Easl Hiah Streel on SundAy, June II. 199', from 1:00 PM to 2:00 PM for the purpolllO( hOKanl a ceremony honoring the insmllation of the neW Pennsylvania SllIIC E311es President ChenolclSpitz. Ms. Chenok stated that the c10swe should be authorized bec:lulll street closwes have been aulhorized for other privaa: oral1llWllODS. Council sbould not d1sanlllish betwee:l orpnizaIions once they lIlCCl :111 of lite reqwmnents for the closwe. Mr. Owens swcd that he could not see the benelit to the Borou&h for this clolwe. Mr. Ocker Sll1led liI4l the IIRllllO be closed c:wses a safety haz:ud. Presidenl DUllCan swed liI4l the Ilpplicant is payml for :ill expenses inC'lll1'Cid by the street cloSIRI- Mr. Spitz swed chal i( IlIlY orsllllimtion comes before Council and meets the criuma IlIld pays for the expenses, then they should be supported. After a roU c3lI VOle the motion pwed 3 -2 with Mr. Owens and Mr. Ocker voting IlgainSt the motion. Puh"&! Work! Mr, Spitz elqlreSSed concern IlboUl HUn's section 8 housinl prolfl1lD. He explained that too lDlUly people abuse this prolflll1llll1d like :ldvullaae at lite vouchers. He silled that it is rime (or people involved to take action IlI1d clC411 up this prop.m. Ms. Chenek qreed with Mr. SpilZ. CommUflU., "annin. " OualU. fJI LII. Mr. Ocker SllLIId that Council may consider Il ~liminary subdivision and laIId dcvelopmCllt plan (or the Robbins P'tuyg1Y Development. submiacd by !be Windsor Buildinl Company. Roser MorpnIhaL the repraenllllive o( the :JW1lc=t, saued thll he :K:cqlled aU o( lite conditions. Mr. MOI1ullhal explained to Council r.tw due to an exisrinl strUCmre, the right of way c:lD't be any wider than 34 (eeL He tIIrtbcr smrallllll the app1lcant met with me neighbors and discussed the projcc:t to see If IlI1Y COI1ll1lOll-1I"lWId could be re:u:hcd to try to make !be developrDCIIl more aa:eptable to lite nciahbon. The density 0( this project is less than what is permiltlld by the ordinan.ce, John Broujol wu prescnt as a resldenl of the ue:a o( the project and as a repre5Cnwive of his neipbon. A copy of Mr. BrouJos' com:cms is attaI:hed. Mr. Broujos asked COWlcilto conduct a public he:lrinl reprdinllhis issue in order for them to he:ll' all of !be concerns from the residents. Mr. Ocker swcd thll he would like the rll'C OUe{ and Council to review the I"~ befOl'll the public helIrina. Ha then IIlIde a moriOll to hold ~ public hearing on July'. 1995 ill 7:30 PM. Solil:ilOl' Schorpp scued lhat if CoWlCil decides to visil die site he would not Willi them to do il ouuid.e the praeru:e o( Mr. Morpnthlll or Mr. Broujos wi their clients and il should be:ldvenised. He wed Mr. Morpnlhallllld Mr. Broujos if they would mind if Council and die fire OUd viSited the lot individually. They swed tha1 this would be fine. Ms. Cbcnok _onded the mouon. ACta: the quesaon WllS CIllled the motioa passed UIIIIIimous1y. ~o Council MinuteS R.nnrt! -. 6 ~ May 11. 1995 146 Ms. Chenok requested that the mid.block crosswa.lk.s agllin be considen:d by Council. She explained thlll they are two dangerous for pedeslriaJls. ~sident Duncan staled that since Mr. Giordano is not present at this meeting, he woulrt be notified of this request and asked to place it in IIis commiaee. Mr. Bean stared that he has received some information on House Bill 11218. This bill establishes a SllllC wide building code with wllich all municipalities would have to comply. The code is similar to the BOCA Code, which is what l.he Borou~ has now, except that it Ql1't be amended like the BOCA Code. It also requiIes that the code otficials be certified. which would be 3D expense to the municipality. Any money that would come from pennit fees would have to go intO a restricted fund and only be used for building purposes. PLCM has taken a stand to oppose this bill. Mr. Bean suggested Council endorse PLCM's position by means of a letter to A! Masland. Mr. Owens made a motion to draft and send a letter to Representative A! Masland endcrsing PLCv1's position on House Bill 11218. Mr. Ocker seconded the motion. All aye VOle. Mr. Ocker slllltd thal PLOi has also taken a slllIId againSt the proposed repea1 of the federll1 assault we:1pOns ban and ~ed that Counc'J also slllIId behind PLCM on this issue. Mr. Owens agreed and made a motion to SUPPOll PLCM by letter. Mr. Ocker seconded the motion. All aye vote. Chief Margeson Staled that most of the police organizations have agreed with this SWld. Ms, Chenok stated that Counc'J must be neutr.1l when developers come before Council with requests, She did not believe this was happening. Mr. Ocker stated that the developer must come to Counc'J prepared and re:l.dy to answer questions regarding his proposal. Mr. Spitz requested that another letter be drafted by Council regarding the 911 issue. He explained that he wants actUal facts and figures on where the money is being spent. President Duncan stated that due 10 the absence of Mr. Giordano. it will have to be refemd into his committee. President Dunc3D recessed the meeting until after the executive session. 1'hen: was no funber business to come before Council after the executive session. The meeting was adjourned al 10:20 PM. ~~l G. L1~'_ D.Lay B up SecIetary (seal) DlI8can Council President 147 "-!.T"'~'_ .._ . .,...,_.,.. _..i. - "', :,..:';;"..~,.. ,'- . ,'r' ,,,~,.,,;f~ "'.'.1l:....n:..t'\~ ..?~.\.'.', .... ~E~D"':' ,.~"'-~~..,..~ <D , 1 ! It..~~ _ IlJi~ ~L9_+~~ pn~ ~:_.l~rdhl -ij~~silt1e I -rY'Q.~ " I Ct-~~ ---=>~('S eu-..-U1Cj ~ ~~~""t'l .. . ~~.er-!!cA,~ ('l/l' C'\ds-~Y'" ~ V1 (. ~., \Isk 6eH\c..~ ~ ~ +ht.s vo.l\ey (" ~e- eaNcj l'1ocr'.S _._. I ~~ _QI'l.dJde::. /1'<'1.<:' ~'1~ .' bu.t:: -.0 _~~ :l" <'~~~I<t - 1'), -~'Y1<~~~ _ci:s_ea.:.~__k.ld.Lnqs.2Lcu.~(.~ ~ ~~:n1d._ . ~_1C\~ \94~ cev+/I1U. ~ -ndML-1.\I'" ctl 4E~ hit \ Id L "'lCs s:.b.'l1 ~J." I ~,..,._' ..i~~~t~~.I~~ '-~f1~ M~ .::.t ~~, 11 'i"-t~ (IA ~e: ihskV1_C \ \') I-:,-h-i. t r~~u.t'1Lh(lW1b 1l\I-H~L~?~' C'" Irt'\' u-ct Q..V"d IlJ I ~..,.:1"i It ho",d~ ) \^'C~ i:'t;::~~r:~~ n~~ l"h ~f ~L.l one -U1e rY1o"""'J -bkdcs ~ bll1 om.a +mrfY!~ ro ,..ll t ' -CD 0 11 e-ro u) hCv'l lat$ , I [l~ Cr+- d :pre\"" ~n. IV\~ a:e. :~e<':~~,"I~ hI..., ~, .~ V"l9 r~~v:"ci. I ~,JIS\~I<:, ~'I1"+LlJt'- ('P,' ,1~ ~\. Cnal)(ttbr-. LL~'~ ~''1i""L~ ~ - .._,.~~ .~~.'.';I,,"'.'-;'.'.~.t"""."""', , :..,;.... .::.....~.:""~~.....:l;r. ~..,. '~;,.. ,~~~ rl.~lt...:6..):"~...1oL~':~""*5~~...--:;.-'''' .. ~..,.. .....~~ -,;!F:<A I"~l'.:f.r.to;.f.l~ ~~ ,k'~:~.;r.~.~K. :~..r . , 148 _~-=~"1lM ': ' ".' < . ,.":..':'. '""';;.r.~~'~V." . . . ".. . . f"?...,"""....;S.;; . I ., .. . '" j.o!....... .. - "'-" . ...~ . .. If ~ ...... ~.:..~... -""- . ! GD I '~ s ' n : ~~€: eo:;+O'cl/, ~:,,"""T'. ;:;-r ah :_l-'.YlS+oV'IC.J d\~+r,d-- \~ ~1~ ~'.LJ11~j- , - Ie- \i I '^, .I ,~ , I r . :i""t', I Y' S C.UY\ /. \1 , :~ ~u;..Ln~g.e..-J S ~ps:.r- O\et , I , , I' C},Y\c{ J'-"vt:...,. ~ I~ ~ '.'~ ; .': : .' . t' .. ':'; 'i' ~; ,; .; ,.:. .;". 'fl4ill ~ ",d . C rl A l1s.1e- {S -w.. JtS~l I~ C'.l.l""""Ioo.\n.'Y\d. C'tllJI~ s QV'~U""'" o~d. ~~ _h.,,~ __ *,,,:1- CO. ..ld e- I "tU.~'>l"~- Look~ ~ l.'~ ~cL S ~ -hku brj {"\J \1~.I"'t~S v""~~-\-J~ - l- ~ . .... "3 I I :. i '. fv\t:"'~'" a.'l"l'J~ ILL I. ~ y, j ~ ~s: ~ Cr.........., ~o--da....+u"\., +~~ L",~1r 10~"/lJh~ h~'I\Jo'''' - ~lL~" ~ =ir~:h<'=cl- ~ nr~:t ~t~ "~ :: ~~2~.~.~.~::~~ ~:~~ (~,~, 152 , I I I I I...... ""'.' i I I ';":;"'>.', . ......,'.....'f'l4_~~ ....-~~(::.._~'~ _._~.-:s.t:...~.t,._~--- 'o..(~""'I'.'- -t!'o;. .......""'.~ ........ ...,'. "';.''':.1:;;0'0, ';.'. -.:1.-, .',lo'.......,_..'...:......~ :'\;.......-w.i?- 'r:;~'. '.~~~'1.J.. ..I._ "::0 ,,' ,:;",~'':.'''' ....~J. .....' ' ;.. 1(,'. ..... ...~... '1-. "{."',...... ..........~....!).9l"'';-::..i....:..-:.::;.J ~i;.?;...1 ,~..:, ~~.......;,.I. '" .\!:L'.."''I...-'.~.,.'5IJ.::6._.:.".'' ;. ....:.-..;"C'.-:r.x..~ ..~~~!~.....,..:' ~ . '.\. _::::,"~"". ~ '.~'.4'. '. c ..... .... .~-."........~.. I . I - -----..--- ----.--.- -@- . - --"-"- -...-.... .. :.App.rc<:.(.a..-hc-......._-- - . - .. -- .. -- - -. J : it ~=~ii-::~~l_ L:+~: s~Yn~ . one~"hd.s ~ ~st I~~F iYlj edrhe.A- _Qa.I.\IE.te'.s . F\ 'fst U\-lib:lQhw,,\(.k c~ ~h nsl _ _.._ ProC.~r-'\''"i-~ 3CSP~ a~ CU-'- Lc-cl.J~-:~ A~ ._J)~r\ot\~ S 1\11!1r (924 ___Fi.~-llt.C.- _l".So _~ t~ of. _CtJA.. ClwQ./'\d , ___wL\'\~--k.,."taYtt-'--------_. -. -- - - --.-- _ __._.N\!.\\:b--b.k~~~--aLh h\S-to rl!;._ -- -- _._pm~~-J~_~_L~~~~-... _~~~t.of_1"~--\crn.*i~._ _CIrr.\d.. _~ _~_I'na.iJ,:d:aJi'Y14."Y\c.e--- .Jt'..~d...-. . ___~~-h~.r_-the--rcasn,~B~+ _~.~L{ - .. __-b~ F\~_Y C.C__f:~___~e~_\J\_~_ --(:-- ----- _~..:h~.\.a:h ~l~.~-~ ------- ----- Cl\,4.......~ '. ~ ~ Ov....J.c. I;' ~ __"'~. ~l ~~ ~~bo\sc ____...______. ____~UL&\tJ:b~~-~~ ~-Ak-_.----r -P-rt~~tp~~-p~~ _Ct.rn\~__~-\.4I(LI~..--~... --..-.-.---- .-.,.. ..-.-----.- . ~ ~ " . . r " ' .~ ',", ~ . '. I : '. ' - j :i.? (j) ". .f ._~o II cl~~. ~^l~lb~;-:' ~l\;- ..-.t be-hind _ L55 E.. lftjh. st~ ~~.__ ~c-v-. _wi tl -h ho\ _.~a-_r\~_.c.ddrb d\. ._~_ . ~ hf~b(" s.~+__~ _ ...___ _____ A .., +~ L .....c ~TtN"j 0a...."\J~.. --.. --- ~ I k +L... ~ I...(. t.SE-.cc:P a.""", e""..,J \6-.- CCli~E: "(}4SC ~. . ~ P' a.~ ~,d W \ \'1nc.,. k 0 ^..:~. DE:s i 5 n~ ~ _ '^- - Lec.oJl, c.Ac~d-e-~_,.i'Jl -r ..\U~~4v4~~ ~ ~tC~ec\ J"ts+e.~l<:, _bV1Uc. _~~ .___. G~.",... ~ rd \ Y1Cf) ~ _4:~~L~ _ _<..(...,+\".<1.... .. -~~ -fl1tS .--5enlCe:... c(1er1W._b_(.(.((olCr,y___ . de:mO\'\.S~~ _::tbd- __hO.O__~~c...:b..~ - ~"~~-hl~ib.l4._bl~eeLc.~0il:\-_ .olc\..ne\.Bh.ball.'\.r _..~.._-.. ...--. - . - .~'~.J::hl.s-~b\~~-l.:L.~.. -LQfma..,d....~..,...,d. ~ JJ~eoJu., .:'-h~u...~~ ---. W~u::L_l~..~_'tLUJ_pl~fL -T.~~____~_~l~, .. ~- '~:~:~'. f~I;'~~1j/~ ~~""~~~::~:~:\'.",:':', ~..I~:;:-.': :~~;,,;~'~~i;:::':;.~~::r::.;;:: ~S~:::~f!..:i~;.::~~i.:1., ~8 , '.;:: ". ::';'., ,;.,;, . ,;; ';'::~::';' ", ., 154 _~~~\.".. ',. _..~n-:"""'~'-""')".l>,,,,,~r"'w . ," ." .. '\~ ~.. or. ............... . '. . ll. . .. At<:: ._,'" 4'~~'~"~'''~' .J<.'''f:l.,.....~~'.~''.,..: '. . " .~. '~'" ....~":r".;;l\...' 1':\0.... ~'.. . .;r'-'~! .,,11: C~.l-r'~ .~.;. ...-.-.- .- ..- -- --- ~_3.---._._._...__.__._..__. .--..-. -. . -. - .-... ._ t -~,~. ..0.... _~ccc:l... .~\e"". rs . 8ccd . .blll~\'f'\e.ss ._~ .. .\J\(..~\G.. o.~Atb-t. ~+'~e:I oJ: ~~c... '5 _ \?i~ s.\. h~.o..~r81'\ +i,ct-+ ~e,~ _~~~ h~e- ~~ _l~ h~ l V1O--to"4 S , ..... .. ~ ~ <:..~ l4. o..'<i At b-\:; .~,~ i~ Ca-l. h~~,S' .~~~ .. ~~t-Q:- 'Shop - G p~ V'r'1~ r~ N~ at l~~+"--.. ... ,.- . _.._.JhG_5ic~. LS.~mea ~Qu.;.J.i""" 'iL<-{.e.l:i40 . . ~~_~J~..b-rd ___enl'\CE:._Al~.. 1'ka... .:s ~~ ~ ...a,u......rece3~I..~l~_.~o....._ot~,Y.\j ..~ .-... _~U~~l~lo._~ ,.-6_ C\-es+ _.:Jk.:.o~0t3.-= _Co.n.~_a.nc\_Ed._~r.~El~_tt.<m~ _-M.me-. (~. ._I..~_L~__~o..~cL~~"l.ba., ':~. _ch~- -bha\c:t\<:..__~t.ll.s.t~--'U.-Q..-f' \a.~j"..l \.ue-..cv..,.,.J . _~_Co'Y\du.d.-Io~e".lh.e5~ - WE=__a/'t e-..gJGtct . _-+bey _dtct ---.--.---- - -- .-- . --- ......--- . __Ae.~~...:b~~*-a.v..-.J~)C\.l:s.c.rd ..--- ._&L~ - u..lLll~-p-t-.~ CA.-...j- f _r--~~-pcc:\l.w-m_.._- .- --- .- .-- .. r .--...--'--"---' . -' . .. .. . I _......._...JU~~~"'\.;:.:::-r _ .~,.jIo;.ol!' 4'i'~''Wl;':;:';i4'~_'':--'';-':J.V''',':'''ll''---'~ ~'.'....... ,o::~;:r~=- ;\.....~......,..,.,..::... 155 ';'~~~~~'f:.~~~'S~:~- ~;, , . ''''" -~"'.~":.::1,..":-::. ....-,.-::-:--~..-~.R-:.....:-~.,lt*~~ .. .... . "......: ..".,.,.........~,........~-::.....I... '"f<o',...~' ~~ . ,.y.'" ",::'. :..... :"!,:!',,,r-'. ....I...~::;~...:....-.-.:.~. ~.' @ ...____.. m :Il ~ Ca,c \is le ,,. "- -6",,,,, u.J ,+h.:,..,~J Ila.w ctttC:es a.,Y\c\ +h~.~ m~ . ~eA~~ si3n~ +ho....+ ~ ~- .. . HAl2.~ 1ClSt- ~~ ~t I1QW ~ . +L .t~~~~~UJY\c...~ o-f (PQ~ a.th:n\i~ 1lu.. ~ d~ee.\ ~+ ~cl ~ ~ CCv\si~d +0 '(C~~ +hc- h'c5.tcni<.. d~c.';" i"riC51- o..ppropV\o..-b~ l~ +ho....+.:.~J . ~ +Iu. l~L.v"" offi<'~-~. ..C.\..lOheY\-I-"~ .~ ~__."-"+_ t1_W.__8cu..+:h-~{._- . ..-:tbls. h~O'Me- __b..-\-e. ._"tc...kl~__.__ I3...lld.\-"j-~ a..e.. 6"""'o..<-~ ~~-- .~ LI1-b __o"y\~ t>{--av-v- . mWYI..d:.\.c~. _ n~~t __(~r~-tv-aJ;1t~\ ~_.o ~-.R(.~ ..n._____ . .. ...' __ H __ _ _ ,,'_'__" ___._. H.. _ _ "--~+tr.J {h~_.s tBV>Q.~-e: .c' l.'\4Ad. .~C~h;t-~-_tA.,..., -~ b(!;vc: O~GVl~--.-. . ._ WLll-h~. r I~ g~ --~~ _+.0 -~ he- ~FCli\r' .".1. --.- - .-..---... "'''.~'~ ~""~'W;~f' ,.....-,;.. ""':'t' 1ll'''...r ".~ . '. (,""" rr::'''- ~_f;",-l'... n'':'"'' ,. "~' '\" '40... ,.'.' , ql"''QI:.~~ w 'II: a' ~ ~.. ' .'......:, '.. ,......~ . . ,.\. . ~ . .~'~ " I I " '" -.'" ",- 156 ,. . '::l~"'~~"'~-""'~.::r.; '~If.('''''~'''~~''_-''''' "_''P,~.~'~, . _, ' ,....to ,160 .I!!~'."~:""""ol"", ''-.." ~..,'~~~..l' ..,... .;.:'Jl;:::-..<w-;.-.'..,.~._.,,:.;-,-.:.: ;..'~,.!tl:f - :.~;,.r..:.;..:.. ';.J,J. . ,," _.,.~.................. 4~ _.,~.'''.', ..,'."....,....._.,...:""_' ~'" ,,",.-.-,' ~I... ,.W1f..},L" ,~"...."....., ..,.~I...,....(;,"J.,.i~l~.""".~-.'....l. '." . ";:'''''~'r' ..<..:W. ....._t;~I"..\....,;.....\.:,.-.;...'~-:~_.-. ~..,_~.(.{-:....'.. ,,,"~".'- ..-".' .~...r-....("'"..~~ " --.--.-----.. --......- --@... \ - .... .._ . _._.. _u' .___..._ -.- --.. -... . .:l[S . . Cu..I... ...~~ I+Y ~ hlo5kCc. ._ cc~ .. .,(05 _.+rLt.~ ..~ w'i le~oW'f'. ~ its .Va.t1.Ct;:~ o~ . ea.~~ . . _ ...J'/I.{)./I.kic Q~ . Pu.b I c:p~d J'(,.L.!.+ C"fU., ~~C<.30) IS \"\OIn'\eet ....reV"'.I.he-.ma...t~ . ~;~~"'~\ IS Ie IEn~ (",.,I ""^- s 'S\'~ 1.._.~_:IhEt R...b.s .bl..... ~t~e- r~&J\ls~ ~ ,~ p'f'O"lAq +0 ' : arncl ~ ~1' ~.._c~~ _L\~.~. pl!.3 .. ..- .beer;(-:r+--~-_._._._-----_._._._. .--. .--..-. .. _ ..._f?ec.o~M_~_~I~kJ-..-:-~ ._.l~..~ c.ad.lr__ ~ ~~ ""o..e e: , c..l~_ )~._~~b'~ \. _C1I'rIJ__._ ._dee-..... :. '-'^aA..\~-~~ ~._~f.cr''''~8~(...(,)~ l~~ -cP _a.hj'C)V,.,'_~_~-V....lJ.) _'f:\~L.o.f-__.... ...~~_~__~. 4-hrsf...~u.~d,&:.____ . .- . .. .._._A;e.erm~. _i:brs.~J~.~4'O.e-. cv L"" d b 8~ _.~._Je:f?_G~ o~er_~,t.~cUJ~C~f- _~:::.~r.-:Ce~_~r'~~~_~~~__._' .... .._._._ ..w__ . \ --:- ~,:.7 :-'~.~ i-'/' .... \ .. ..., I. ..' J ,,," ;... - ~r: '. _.~ ..-;;;~:~.~.~.~ :~.:'~I~"~;~"'~ .' -'. ',: -.. \ ...,..~_. .:;..... .. ,'" ~. " . '! .... :.......~..' \ @ ~ -c"".c:. ~l.J.. C;~I"\U~i._ ~ll"I~ "'~ "L\.1L1 s /... I /I I ..:.. t _,' . , 1'1 r-T" '"t1. ~ ~.J~ I ....t" i..' -'''1 Ifl ..,,' L.:....~,c.. - (\ I~ ~~ ,. L.:f' ,'. II. ",' -~.:.,.,:~ L Q. c .....J. ~-- _ J !..ru..'Y'...d. . .- ' ~. ~ ~~~. ,~' , . ~ ~~~~~_c6. ~'.-~.f+:~" , u, lb ell L~~..:l:c "'-' --\- ...J-"'-t;"\~t." r ~r~-:p .- , ""..c(~ ~...f~+;{'C:- ,;.I.IClJ.\J \ :-~- _J "..1/1..u~ ~. , ~ "I 'eLl ~ . .'ji.J FF"'-\ €.~"" ~.,..., \1'JI'T~ ~, ,...... -b~~,,~;<'!i~~ ~.4~ I'" ClUldJ -+c, f-~;1f' If.; m~~i ....J....t G-l.bnr li~ _~~ tlt< .JZt.+r"1 ....t~~~~ ' \N.~ -4.,-" ....~-~rp ~ c ~~ G ~., J" " J~ ~~ ~~- ~, . SIL .~" b)- -H"r~ 1= +- o ~..~':::.:"i~;.i:;;i,'5'~~ RESOLUTION 05-11-95-01 160 BOROUGH OF CARLISLE CIT!ZEN PARTICIP~TION PLAN IN CONNECTION WITH CONSOLIDATED SUBMISSION FOR Ht1D COMMUNITY PUNNING ;\NO DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND THE RELATED PERFORMANCE REPORT AND AMENDMENTS MAY 1995 WHEREAS, the Borough of Carlisle is an entitlement community under the Federal Community Development Block Grant funds; and WHEREAS, the U.S. Depar~ent of Housing and Urban Development has combined the Final Statement, Camprehenslve Housing Aff.ordability Strategy, and.communi~y Development submission requi~ements under the COBG Program lnto one document known as the Consolidated Plan; and WHEREAS, the U.S. Depart~ent of Housing and Urban Development has combined the Grantee Perfo~ance Report and ~~S Annual Performance Report submission requirements under the coaG Program into one document; and WHEREAS, the Borough currently has a Citizen Participation Plan under its COBG Program; and WHEREAS, the Borough is required to adopt a new citizen Participation Plan which incor~oratas the revised requirements, as published in under 24 CrR ?arc'91. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, ~~at the Borough of Carlisle adopts a revised Citizen Jilarticipation plan in conformance with the new rule and as described in Attachment I to this resolution. ADOPTED, this I/+},. day of May, 1995. BOROUGH OF CARLISLE u\ AcM:~( CCL1.< lr~A. ijuncan, 'Presiden""e"' A'rl'EST: ~({UJ D ~l" ,cretar'/ (Seal) 161 BOROUGH OF C.\RLISLE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN IN CONNECTION WITH CONSOLIDATED SUBMISSION FOR IiUO COMMUNITY PLANNING .'lND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ,\NO THE RELATED PERFORMANCE REPORT AND .'\MENDMENTS MAY 1995 In accordance with new regulations trom the u.s. Department ot Housing and Urban Develocment, the Borough will replace its Final Statement, community Develo~rnent Plan. and Comprehensive Housin~ Af!ordability Strategy submlssions undftr its Entitlement Commun~ty Development BLoCK Grant Program with the Consolidated Plan. Similarly, the Grantee per:ormanca Report and CHAS Annual Perfo~ance Report will be consolidaeed into one l:eporting docUlIIent. The purpose of this plan is to encourage citizen pareicipation during the developmtint of the aorough of Carlisle's Consolidated Plan, amendments to its Consolidated Plan, !nd the Consolidated Plan Performance Report. The Citizen Participation Plan is intended especially to encourage participaeion among low and moderate income persons in the Borough, as well as persons living in the Borough's low/mod income Census Tracts and neighborhoods. as well as public housing. ~ summary of ~~e Citizen Participation Plan was advertised in thG Carlisle Sentinel, a newspaper of general circulation in the Carlisle area, on April 6, 1995. A proof of publicaeion is attached to this plan. The cumberland county Housing Authority has been consulted duri~g the development of the citizen participation plan in order to maximize coordination with that agency and its tenants. I I. OaveloDment ot the Consolidated ?lan Consu 1 ta. t: ion a. The Borou~h will consult with other public and private agencies that provlde assisted housing, health services, and social services (inCluding those focusing on services to children, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, homeless persons) during preparation of the Consolidated Plan. The Borough will consult with the State Heaith Department to examine existing data ~elated to lead-based paint hazards and poisonings, including health department data on the addresses of housing units in whicn children have been identified as leaa poisoned. '!'he Borough will notHy and consult with adjacent jurisdictions to the extent practicable when preparing the description of priority non-hou9ing community needs. This portion of the Con- solidated Plan shall also be submitted to the State and County. The aorough will consult with the Cumberland county Housing Autnority to the maxi~um extent possible to assess the neeas of the residents of public hou~ing and to coordinate programs. This would incluae coordination ot the COBG ~roqram with PUDlic Housing modernization proqr.ams (ClAP), Drug Elimination Grants, etc. This shall especially apply it the Housing ~ut.~orit: =eceive. Com';)r9henli"e Grant ~undinq. b. c, c:1. 2 LbO: citizen ParticiD~ a. A public hearing shall be held prior to adoption ot the Consolidated Plan at a time and place which is convenient to low and moderate income ~ersons. The hearing must adhere to the following requirements: * The hearing must be advertised as a display advertisement in the non-legal section of the Carlisle Sent~nel no less than one week prior to the hearing date. This ad shall specify that persons with disabili~ies and non-EngliSh speaking per~ons shall receive special accommodation upon request in order tQ take part in the near ing . * The hearing will cover the general purpose of the Consolidated Plan, the needs assessment (af!ordable nousing, nomeless, special needs), st=ategic plan, and action plan for the following year. * The proposed use or funds under the community Development Block Grant Program ~ill be covered at this hearing under the action plan. * The amQunt of CCBG funding available, including program income, will be made public at the nearing. * The range of ac~ivities which may be undertaken with the COBG funds wlll be covered a1: the hearing. * The estimated benefi~ or proposed activities to low and moderate income gersons shall be stated at the hearing. * The Borough will list ~~e steps is will undertake to minimize the displacement or low/moderate income households through its federally-funded programs and ~~e steps it will take to relocate displaced low/modera1:e income households, even it no displacement is anticipated (see attached alltidisplac8lllent and relocation plan). * The Borough will $tate when the CCBG funds will be available for us.. b. A summary of the Consolidated Plan shall be published as a display advertisement in the non-legal section of the Sentinel. This summary shall at a minimum state the purpose ot ~~e Plan. a summary of the contents ot the Plan and the locations where the Plan may be reviewed by the public, c. The Plan shall be made available for public review at the Borough Manaqer's Of!ice, tho Bosler Yree ~ibrary, and the Cumberland County Redevelopment Authority. Reasonable numbers ot ere. copies shall be made available to citizens upon request. The Plan will be made available in accessible formats to persons with disabilities upon request. Accommodations to non-Enqlish speaking persons will be made in order to give them access to the Plan upon request. d. The Plan shall be made available for public review tor a minimua ot 30 days aftar ehe advertisement of the summary in the Sentinel, No action by Council may occur until this comment period expiru. 3 ~~nsolidatAd Plan Develocment (Continued) e. The Borough shall consider all comments concerning the consolidated ~lan. A summary ot all comments received shall be attached to the submission to HUD. The Borough's rationale tor not addressing any comment or comments must also be included in this summary. Amendments a. COIVDliance Compliance with the Citizen ?articipation Plan is required if the Borough undertakes a substantial amendment to its consolidated ?lan. This would include: . The creation of a new activitYi . The deletion ot an activitYi . A change of purpose, scope, or beneficiaries ot an activity; or . An increase or decrease in funding ot an activity by 25% or more. c. Public Hearina a. The amendment shall be advertised as a display advertisement in the non-legal section of the Sentinel no less than one week betore the public hearing. It shall be stated that special accommodation will be made to persons with disabilities and non-English speaking persons upon request. b. A public hearing must be held prior to the adoption ot a substantial amendment. The nature of the change shall be discussed, as well as the specitic shitts in funding, the range of activities available, and the proposed benetit to low and moderate income persons. The hearing shall be held at times and locations which are convenient to low and moderate income persons. c. not be implemented (Council approval) tor after the public hearing to allow for . The amendment shall a period of 30 days pUblic comment. d. The Borough must consider all comments received during the Citizen Participation ~rocess. A summary of all comments received with regard to the amendment shall be attached to the program amendment. The Borough'S rationale for not addressing any comment or ~omments must also be included in this summary. e. The amendment must be submitted to HOD, This may be done on a case-by-case basis or at the end of the program year. P.rfo~anc. Renort a. The Sorough shall hold a public hearin~ regarding its performance in carrying out the Consol~dated Plan for the previous program year. This hearing shall be held at a time and location which is convenient to loW and moderate income person.. 163 4 l~ T~is ~earing s~all be advertised as a display advertisement in the non-legal section of the sentinel no less than one week prior to the ~earing. c. Accommodation must be made ~or persons with disabilities or non-Englis~ speaking citizens upon request. This fact shall be included in the advertisement for the public hearing. b. d. The Performance Report shall not be a~proved by councilor submitted tor at least 15 days followlnq the public hearing in order to allow tor public comment. The Borouqh shall take any comment into consideration in its Performance Report. A summary of all comments shall be attached as part of the report. The Borough'S rationale tor not addressinq any comment or comments shall be included as part of its summary. IV. M..tinas All public meetinqs relacing to the Consolidated Plan shall be advertised with reasoltable and eimely noeice to the public. This shall be interpreted to be no less than one week prior to said meetings. v. Availabilitv of the Consolidated Plan As stated above, the Consolidated Plan shall be made available for =eview during its development at the Borouqh Manaqer's Office, the Bosler Free Library, and the Cumberland County Redevelopment Authority. The Plan shall be available year-round at the Redevelopment Authority for citizen review. ACC89S to Records In addition to the Consolidated Plan, access to all records involving the COBG Proqram, CRAS, eRAS Annual Performance Report, and Consolidated Plan submissions shall be made available to the public upon request. T8chnical Assistance Technical assistance to interested persons and aqencies with regard to the Consolidated Plan and the COBG Program shall be made available to the public to the extent feasible upon request. This will include aqencies which wish to undertake aceivities utilizing COBG ~unds. ~II. COMDlaints The Borough or its agent shall respond to all complaints relatinq to the ConSolidated Plan or its components in writinq in a timely manner. Where practicable, this shall mean within 15 working days ot receipt of the complaint. 165 '. A'ITACHMENT BOROUGH OF CARLISLE Residential Antidisplllcement and ReJOc.:ltioll Assistance Pion under Section I04(d) of the Housing and Community Development Ad of 1974, as Amended The Borough of Carlisle will replace all occupied and vacant occupiable low/moderate income dwelling units demolished or converted to a use other than as low/moderate income b.ousing as a direct result of activities assisted with funds provided un,er the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, as described in 24 CFR Part S70.606(b)(1). All replw::ement b.ousing will be provided within three (3) years of the commencement of the demolition or rehabilitation relating to conversion. Before obligati.ag or expending funds that will directly result in demolition or conversion. the Borough of Carlisle will make public and submit to HUD the following information in writing: 1. A description of the proposed assisted activity; 2. The general location on a map and approximaIe number of dwelling units by size (number ofblldrooms) that will be dem.olisb.ed or convened to use other than as low/moderate income dwelling units as a direct result of the assisted activity; 3. A time schedule for the commencement and completion of the demolition or conversion; 4. The general location on a map and approximate number of dwelling units by size (number of bedrooms) that will be provided as replw::ement dwelling units; S. The source of funding and a time schedule for the provision of replacement dwelling units; 6. The basis for concluding that eacb replacement dwelling unit will remain a low/moderate income dwelling unit for at lwt ten (10) years from the date of initial occupance; and 7. Information demonstrating that any proposed replw::ement of dwelling units with smaller dwelling units (e.g., a 2-bedroom unit with two l-bedroom units) is consistent with the bousing of low/moderate income b.ouseholds. The Borough of Carlisle will provide relocation assisWlcll, as described in 570.606(b)(2), to each low/moderate income bousebold displaced. by the demolition of housing or by the conversion of a low/moderate income dwelling to another use as a direct result of assisted activities. 168 CONSENT TO SUBDMSIONILAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL WITH CONDmONS RE: Preliminary Subdivision and Land Development Plan Robbins Property Development, Windsor Building Company (REVTSED) Staff reconttnellds that the Carlisle Borough Col1llCil approve the above ~ subdivisioollaad develop1l1Cllt plan subject to the fuliowmg conditions: l. Pursuant to Section 226-29 of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, appropriate street trees shall be planted at intervals of not less than thiny (30) feet nor greater than fifty (50) feet within a tree lawn ora minimum width offour (4) feet. The plan curremly depicts six (6) street trees. With the current spacing, two (2) additional trees are required to meet this standard. Such trees shall be shown on the fina1 plan. 2. Pursuant to Section 226-21 (B-1 I) of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, the developer must agree to enter into a development agreement and provide the financial security required to guarantee the constrUction of all public improvements proposed for the land development. 3. Pursuant to Section 226-31 (B-2) of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, ten percent (10%) of the total tract shown on the plan, or 0.11 acres shall be dedicated to the Borough for public recreationai purposes. Such land must meet the recreation area location criteria established in Section 226-31 (C) and shall be shown on the tinaI plan. In-lieu thereot: the Borough may, upon agreement by the applicant as established in Section 226- 3 I (E), accept the constrUction of recreation ticilities, the payment of fees in-lieu thereot: the private reservation of land for recreational pwposes, or a combination of the foregoing. Upon such agreement, the fee to be paid in-lieu of the required dedication of land shall be Sl,loo (i.e., calculated at the rate ofSlO,OOO per acre for each acre of land required to be dedicated). 4. Pursuant to Borough Public Works Standard Specifications, curb and sidewal1cs shaI1 be designed to pus stonnwater beneath the sidewalk rather than over the sidewalk. Such design shall be shown on the IinaI plan. S. Pursuant to Section 226-19 (1-3) of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, the proposed text of the instl'UJllent creating the proposed utility easements sha1I be submitted for review and approval by the Borough Solicitor. Such instruments shall be ~orded prior to ~ording the fina1 plan. In addition, a note shall be placed on the fiDaI pial sutina that the proposed sanitary sewer system located upstream fiom proposed man hole J03-A shall be privately owned and maintained. 6. Pursuant to Section 226-19 (A-19) of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, all water and sanitary sewer service laterals shall be completely sbown on the final plan. 7. Pursuant to Section 226-19 (A-I'7) of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, stop signs and street name signs meeting Borough Public Works Standard Specmcations shaI1 be shown at all intersections on the 6nal plan. 8. Pursuant to Section 226-19 (A-I7) of the Subdivision and Land DevelopDIllllt Ordinance, strellllighting meeting the requirements of Section 226.23 (1.) oflhe Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance shall be shown on thelina1 plan. 9. Pursuant to the requirements of Secrion 226-13 (H) of the Subdivision and Lmtd D'Vllopment Ordinance, "NO OUTLET' signs shall b, posred at the ent1T:11lCtlto C,met'ry AVlntlefrom Bedford Street and "DO NOT ENTER" $lgns shall be posted at w,sr,m termiTIUS of the eost-w,sr secrion of Cem'tery AVlnue whe" it intU$tlcts with the north-south s,etion ofCllmet'ry Av'nue. The sight disranCtl at this intersection is obstructed by an existing garage, which is situated on th, com" of the rlght~f-way. This posting will prohibit Vlhieles from tummgfrom the east-wesr secrton of Cern't'ry A Vlnu' onto its north-south section. This will nol prohibit two-way rrafftc along this s,erionfor the resJd6ntial propertiesjronting on S. HanoVlr Street. Pursuant 10 SeCRon 116-/9 (A-/7) of the SubdivIsion and Land Development Ordinance, these signs shall be shown on th, final pian. 10. Pursuant 10 Section 226-13 (A-7) of the Subdivision and Land D~/opment Ordinance, theeOS/-west section of Cemetery Avenue shall be renamed on the ftnaJ plan. By ,igaiag below, I bmby attest that I have mid the above and do UDdcrswId and aa:ept tbeIe coaditioas for approval of the aboVlll referenced plan. 1? ~ M, /VI v:~ J110__ ~ 10 I 'f9.r Sipture of ApplicaDt or AppliCllllt's Representative - I ~ "" rLpfG.:GM-l- NIIIII of Applic:am or AppliCllllt's Rcpresemuive 169 AFFIDA vrr STATE OF PA ss: ~. . COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND Before me, the undersigned Notary Public, this day personally appeared William A. Duncan, 333 West Willow Street, who, being duly sworn according to law deposes and says: I' I That he has abstained from voting on a Community Planning and Quality ofllie Committee item, submitted by the Fraternal Order of Eagles for an extension to the deadline for recording the Final Subdivision Plan and Final Land Development Plan for 26 East High Street. This item was cOIUlidered by Carlisle Borough Council under the Community PIAnn;ng and Quality ofllie Agenda on May 8,1995. Mr. Duncan abstained from the vote due to a conflict of interest in that he has done legal work for the applicant's neighbor. ~~ ~ Subscribed and Sworn to before me this 5th day of June, 1995. ~[J.~~hL ulie D. Shu art.Lay- J ,_s.I ..l iI!I O. 9'ucI1M. ~, Ptll: ~..1.A1bo. ~C<ulIp ", ':."........ElipM_3, I. -:. ~ '.....~.:....1.,.~1 111-'" III / :lInDI.-nIICT a HAIIU'-D". MOW.IIY. JII. '...A"I ... ...., MAIN CAIl"TO&. ..,11..0.... ........."....,,. ''''Ie4NI .".,..,.,..... CONMITT... ..1". . .,OUTH tlJIN.NCI INT.....".........".... .......... ...."'.Lle.... eM"'"'''''' U.OII . 'Noua,,"y p",aLIC H.......'" . w...,.... .-OL.,CY CO..'~. .,"'...Ie ........0".. .n........T 11'VOY COMM...ION GOV."".". CO...IUION .0. CM'L.OII.N . ".,,'LIO IN".....wl......NT... COUNCIL. 0" LoO". .,..1IIt call. C DIIT.Ic-r o"P'C&l '.1.1 ..U"." 110.. ......VHL.... .~ a DI.,..IC'I' O."ICIlt ..lIT O..ICI 110. au NiIW la..oo".'la.o. "A ..,... .,n.... 1._ 'erurle of 'emt.~hJ/mia May 8, 1995 a DIIT.,n o.,,,'caa It. N. "ANOWn .,....,. c........... ".. ..,.., .,.,........ . Robert Owens.. Chairman. Finance Conunittee Carlisle Borough Council Borough of Cariisle 53 West South Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Dear Mr. Owens: Thank you for contacting my office regarding your concerns with the proposed elimination of the Act 339 State Subsidy for Sewer Treatment Plant Operations. As you know Governor Ridge's proposed Fiscal Year 1995-1996 budget for the new Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection does not include an appropriation for Sewage Treatment Plant Operations. This would eliminate $36.5 million in funding that was available in fiscal year 1994-1995, funding that provided needed capital to municipal treatment facilities which in turn keeps costs down for your customers. During this week's budget hearings Secretary Seif indicated that the Department would consider a compromise rather than the proposed outright elimination of the grants. The Governor also indicated that negotiations on this program or any other budget item are never out of the question. Please be assured that my Senate colleagues and I will thoughtfully consider any proposal that would eliminate Act J 3 9 funds. Thank you again for contacting me with your concerns, and if 1 can be of further service to you in this or any other matter regarding stale government, please fee! free to contact me. ~~ Harold F. Mowery, Ir. SeJWor. 31st District HFM. Ir.1I11 ,,~'~._.-3:Jt." '. Loui.e and John B. Broujo. 78 E. Ridge Street Carlisle, PA 17013 717 249 3048 FAX 717 243 8227 MAy 10, 1995 Borou9h Council 33 We.t South Street Carli.le, PA 17013 RBI Robbine/Windeor Proposed Development Dear Council I I represent the citizene of the Bast Ridge Street area who oppo.. the above development. Enclosed is a list of persons directly involved by havin9 properties bordering on the alley known as Cemetery Avenue and others who live in the neighborhood which is affected by the change in the character of the neighborhood by this development. Contrary to the sta.tement of the developer that there is only one request for waiver--the 34 foot right of way for the required 50 foot right of way. There are at least three variations from the Codesl 1. The request to use a 34 foot right of way for the street instead of a 50 feot right of way. 2. The use of a 12 to 14 foot right of way in the alley off Ridge Street; which crsates a serious and potentially life- endangering condition for two way traffic and even for one-way traffic. Th$ nature of the location of garages and buildin9. on the alley create. a hazard. 3. The absence of a sidewalk on the north side of the proposed strset. Where children are concerned--both tho.e of present property owners and those of any of the proposed houses--acce.. of the safe haven of a sidewalk from vehicle traffic risks injury. 4. The proposal violates the intent as laid out in the Zonina Ordinance: A. Section 255-121 An alley is defined as "a minor way, which mayor may not be legally dedicated, and is used primarily for vehicular service acee.. to the rear side of properties otherwise abutting on a street." B. Section 255-21: "The intent of the R-2 Medium Oen.ity , , 175 Residential District is to: A. Provide for the orderly expansion of areas that offer re.idential neighborhoods at a D1ediUIII density." B. ...carefully control the type. of housing to ensure compatibility with existina houses." C. Carefully protect the.e areas from use. that may not be fully compatible. Section 255-2: Intent apd Obiectives Z~ning .wa. adopted with rea.onable con.ideration, among other thing., of the exi,tina character of the various arsa. within the Borough of Carlisle and their respective suitability to particular u..... Section 255-8 Internretation " . . . the provisions of this chapter .hall be interpreted a. the minimum r.quirement. for the promotion of health, safety, morals and general w.lfare. Wh.re this chapter conflicts with any rule, regulation or ordinance, the greater restriction upon the u.e of building. or premis.....or upon requiring larg.r op.n space. shall prevail, regardle.s of its source." 'I' ' 5. Approval would sanction turning alleys of the Borough into .tr..ts for development requiring alteration of one good planning requirem.nt aft.r another. Wh.n.ver there i. an attempt to circumvent good planning techniqu.. by forcing a development into a place where d.velopment was not intended, the planner is farced to start altering other Bound planning requirements and the Borough i. asked to grants changes where the ordinance and good planning n.ver int.nd.d that there be chang... TUB PROTBSTANTS ASK TBB COUNCIL TO BOLD A PUBLIC HEARING on this i..u. because of the .erious prec.dent that it would set in the Borough for cramming building. in alley lots without adequate consideration for the existing character of the community and protection of our youth. Sincerely yours, John B. Broujos, for Protestants "'"'" ~ MINUTES C~LEBOROUGHCOUNCL PI1bUe RIUittI Rabbltu DnaplDtA! July!. 1995 CoUllCilmu Ocker ClIiled lIIe lI1IellDI lO order :u 7:30 PM. The (ollowinlllll1l1ben ot CoUKil wen preIIInt: Cheltok. Gionlltao. HeI'1l1BD. Ocker, Owens, ;Utd SpilZ. Al30 prellaI w_: SoUcilOr SclIorpp, Maaapr BUll, PubUc Worka Oireclor ~lser, PllIIIW1f1/ZoOlDIiC.xla Maaacer 0e11llia, aad Screcuy L.1y. Mr. Ocker swed Ibll lIIe public bOlllUlllS CODCenUDI tile Robbw Proporry Oevolopmonl. He uplaiatd lIIalllle C;\flisle SubdiVlsionlL.1ad Dovetopmenl OnliDattce reqllilel dill Boroup Council mIdor a dociJioD ;Utd cOOl1DuniclI1O illO lIIe appli=l withiD 90 days at tile dale on wbiclt the platt wu reviewed by lIIe Boroup P1lI1I11ial CommiSlioD. After revieWUlI the platt COUDciI my lIWfOve tile pll1l. approve the plllD wIlli conditions. or disapprove lbe plan. lllbe appliC31lon is denied in lOlIDS as ft1ed. the decision shill specify tile defecrs found iD lbe appliQlioD alleI describe Ibe requiromoars whiclt have DOl boon mol aad sltlll iD elcb case rocilO Ibe provisloDS ot Ibe SWUIO or orcIiJwtce reUed upon. Mr. Ocker eocourqed COUDCillO make D docislOD lOIIDodiately mer lbe pubUc hel1.llll.. !Ie swed tIw lbe residenrs ot lbe aeipborhood have I11lODded sever1ll mceDll.S prior lO this aad be would be hesiL:l1ll10 have tItem come to ;Ut addllioaal me81U11. Rorer McqtAthal,lbe applic:ull's iIIIOmey, swed rJw he reviewed lite sWfrocollllllOl1Cll1ioDl aad the conditions dw sWl su....rod (or approval ot this projecl. He explained tIw he aad tile applic:ttu :tie in l'uU apmeDI of lbe conditions. Mr. MOIJOI1lba.1 ubld Dou. BroIuD. tile applic:utl's eDrme-, lO uplain wlw tile project involves. Mr. Brehm s1l1led dw the propeny is 10ClU8d aD Cemerery A_ua aad would cODlill of four buildiDp <elICIt cODSil1iD1 of lWO uaill. EacII WI will coDli.sl of a twO car ..... and lWO 3ddilioaal parkial spaces in Ibe clriveway. The acIIIIlsaeel ""ellb proposed iI 22 feel :IIId will IIave a CIIItt OD lbe SQUlb side ot tile saeel oaly. AlIo propelled illO overlay tile alloy onlO Eaa R1dp SII'eet. Tben would be l~scnpiD. on lbe dovelopmeDI:tlld lite rrees 10Cl1r0d in lbe bacIl of lbe propeny would be preserved. Mr. Brellm swed tIw lite awtimum density requintaetta for tbis properlY is up to 1II1_ 10 uaill. The propouI is well under LO units. Mr. SpilZ aakod if tile back porlioa of tile propeny abuIs tile lCllool property IUd if II does, will rhoro be :1 butter belweeo the properties. Mr. Bnbm sllmd dw il does and lbenl is a IIfOve :1_ in tbe beck of lbe prt;lpeny a1011l wilb tile satliwy sower. MI. ClJenok swed tIw previoUlly lbe cleveloper DIll with the resideD.. to discuu tbe projecL Sbe ubd if aoy sugeslioDl were riveD by lbe aeirhbon re.1ldiD1 dte projecl. Mr. MorpI1lba.1 s1lled dw !be raiclenll did nOI otter :tIIy cODSauclive sugeslioDS. NolllW1 E1am. a residettl :\I 23 North Accn Drive, Boilia. SpriDp is lbe cleveloper of tile projecl. ne subali1lecla tener !O CoulICil (aaached) describin. tile projecl. Mr. Gionll11o liked if lbI uaill will be (or lIIe or IIIDI. Mr. EIIm swed tballbey would be for sale;l\ a lUge from SI30.000 to SI39,OOO. Mr. GiOldaao ulted wlw will be on tile Dom side ot the _I siaco curltiol will only be iasIIIIed CD tbe SOIIdl sidI. Mr. Bnbm sWld dw tile Dom side lias a sana of .anaa and ie would be benito have curb lbenl. Siace some of lbe propeniOl lIflI lower tbaa lIIe Sll'Oe\, the saeel wiU be buill so tile war wiU drain dte 10_ propeniu. Thi.s wiU maD the sinwioD bellOr so tbe waror will DOl poad iD tile bIclt of lbe 10Mr propeniII. II curbiD. II iDStllled on !be nonb side of tbe sll'eet. il would ,... II a dam for tile _ aod would maD lite sill1OtiOD wane. Mr. 0...01 aakod if tile cleveloper il wtIlla. to selllbl property to tile raicleall of tltiI area. Mr. Elam sw.d lIIII he would be aad iD (:tel he alnady oifoncl to seU it 10 tbe raidllnll. Mr. Ocbr sllmd lbaa be wu concmted IIbouI dle open ll*8 iD C.IfIisle. Mr. BnIuD swed dw -Itea RobbillS WII oecupyial tile 224 PI1blic Hearin,. Robbill's DeveIO("'\t ~ hp2 propmy, tIl.... wen JUlt :tII1W1Y pweDhoUHIIIId pG;itt,_ u wbu is beme propollCl now. He oxplaitted 1Iw lIle wtilS an SOl 20 foot "Pan except for the Iul wt wbicb is 30 (001 "Pan. lolut Broujos, a residant o( 78 ElISt Ridle SlI'OOl. swod 1Iw be repnaonred the neipborbood. He submuled 10 lito recant a leaer whicb swoa his OpllliOll AI,antill, the proJCl. nus 1_ is _bed. Harold Knltzin,. a midant of 80 E:tsl Ridge Street:uld the OW1lef ot 633 Soulb Iledfonl SlI'OOt wu coacemed (or tile saiery ot the children in lbe lIOiibboxbood. clto wid1ls of the slleOt, if fire equipl1lllnt wollld be able 10 IlCCOSS lbe bwldiDp in CI1SIl of a linl. md if tile.. would be Ildeq\1llO puiin, provided wben lIle reaidentS ot lbe UDIlS bave !lUlSSlS. Mr. Oem swed litat the proposal IVU reviewed by the F"tn1 Chief l1IId he stared tbal tile WIdth of clto sneet would be adeq\llll for tire :tppIrUIlS 10 ~ tile developmenl. Mr. M011l111tba1 uked Mr. Knltzinl iflbore would be a.nytlling he would like 10 see developed on tile proposed sue. Mr. KRtzinl stwd llW be did nOI W&DIlbe :tAla developed. RaymoDd Wickanl. a midenl of 10 East Ridle SIReI. swed dtat the canway would be loss titan 17 (001. Praently two C4n can't pus oDel1llolbor on tile SlnlCl. He also swcd 1Iw some of t.Ita ans on his property IVollld be to be Almoved ill order for cm to m.aU tile nIr11 in tile SlAleL Mr. Spilll1S.Ud Mr. Wickard if he IOU a n:Sldanlo(lbis aRll dunnlllto time tIuu Robbin's Rowen IVa oc:cupyinl tile property. Mr. Wickard swcd lIw he IVII. Mr. Spill asked if S (amiIy cm at the rninil11um wollld be more lrI11'fIc uDlizing lbe sant titan wilen Robbin's ROwaN IOU in bUliDaaa LD the aru. Mr. Wickard believed ISIOSt ot the lI'Ifllc ior Robbill's Flowm used Bodford SlI'OOllIItIloup he did DOt pay !bill lSIucb lIIIOnlion to the cratftc becll11SO It IOU never a problem. Mr. Broujos did nOI believe it wu (1Iir to comparelba RobbiD' s Flowen blllinOSl 'Mitlllne proposed developl1lllnL He stWd lIw at lbe time Robbill's Flowers IOU a Don.oConforminl use iUld itcollld nOl ~ obupd. Ms. CMrlok ctuiflccl tbal some of Mr. Wickard's IIMI WOIIid bave to be rtl1DOved or cut blck. Mr. Wickard stared tltIllIis a-. an spnll1linl over lbe saacl1lld as a mlllt two cm wollld DOt be :able to plU one a.notller. MI. Cltanolt tIlen ukad if Mr. Morpnlbll 01' the developer of lbe project :IpprIlICI1ad Mr. Wickard relanliD, rtl1DOviDl or cullinl IlKI.: lbe 1nlOS. ~. Wicbnl stared tbal dtoy did DOL 1111 Yi1bma. a ....ideeL stared tbal tile proposal is out of kleepiDl 'Mitll the naii/lborilood. !Ie OllpnlSOd COl1C1II1I witll tire "PIJUI111I, larbqe aucllS. UPS trueks. ea:. _iII,lIle SInlOL M.s. Chaulk stared lIw il is bu aInlIdy beat cJarided lIS 10 the dre :tppuat1II 3CC111iD, tlla _L Sbe than uked if tbae wu any dlIc:uuion on tlla III'l\lIf vehicles ICC-';~I t.Ita stnOl. ~. B.... swecll.l1ll it wu sW'f's lOC011III1endation to baw IlItlk: eail off of Ridp SInlOL Therefore. wbon a dell nry would come illlO ODO of the unitS lbey would coma ill off of Bedford iUld tIten wollld exit in dlo _ way. This would olimitwe IlYiDs 10 1II101i.. the lIIIl1 ill lbe avonue. lICk MulIell, a residant of 63$ HillblaDd Avenue, sWIll rJw be is opposed 10 the plan bec:ue me naipborllood is VOTY unique. He believed 1Iw t.Ita development would taD away the cbanocter of t.Ita l1Iipborllood. Louise BroujOl. a reaidanl ot 781!11S1 Rid.. SInlOl, sllllld dw she lVOuld Iwe to sea tho 0pIII spce be daYlllopod. She slated tho reaideDlS were DOl uked to buy the propony. She wu concarnod (or tile satery of lbe cbildnn. lid.. BroujOl stwd tltIl the Robbill's Flo_ Sbop rntfIc: did DOl ClI11IO a problem for lbe l1Iii/lborllood. Lmy POOle, a rat_ ~, silled 1Iw the IIIIIft of bouainl in tho nali/lborbood is sillsHI family "--..... dwol1ittp. He explained 1Iw wben lIle coniormiry is DOl UIK in II naipbcxttood tho propeny VIl_ drop. He beUeved dw if tha developmanl WII :IlIII'Oved ;1 would DOl conform Wllb lbe prunl bouIitt, in lbe lIOipborbood aDd thorelilra decreaH lba Yliuo ot till h~ in tho 3Iell. Mr. SpitZ aaUd 225 C/3 ""'" ~ 227 July 5, 1995 ~ E:lam 25 N. Ac:lrn Dr. BoiliJY;J Sprinqs, PA 17007 'll:l '!be carlisle BorOUgh CouI1Cil: ApproxiIMtely t:'t.o years aqo I siqned a ~ cont::3C: to buy t:bB ~ins propertY on CeaBtary Avenue in C3rlisle. '!be propertY was zoned R-2 and ten units were ..1l~ eo be built on the~. I ttoJqht ten units were too many and decided on a to IMke the area less ~ and be well within the limits ..1 1 ~. I wanted to consc:uct ~ dur;llelGlls with nice teatureS sue!!. as garaqes with bric.'t fllCinq, 5aI8 units '..nth porches, beautiful ~in; and t..'"88S. Features that would add value 1:.0 the ~ and not det..""3Ct fran the sur.r;ound- inq area value. I have aqreed 1:.0 all of the i:xJrouI;h's ~ acd ............. erx:Ia.tions. I have dens everythi.nq I have been asked to eo. To date, I have spent close to $16,000.00 of rtrf r;:e..."'S011al i1D1eY on tecbnical '.\IO%:lt and legal fees. Sc:11e of the people living nearby are concez::1Sd. I feel they have a right to be ooncsrned if I we..."1l building sansthinq~. I eo not interid to ~1i1""a "shcl! box". I have spent a lot of tine an:i care-"uJ. =widerat.ion on the design of the future duplexes t:o o::rne \Ip with SCJlIlt:.'ti.nq att..""3C""..ive and ...oulA fit in nics.ly with the a.r:ea. ! Clave l11lt: with ccncsr1'l8i neic;hbors to di.sc'J,Ss this. by knew t.'1e property was zoned R-2 for a lonq ti!IB aDd had I?lent'/ of tiIIB to make an effort to c:ha.D;e or 1?Utt:-'lase it. I agree with the borouqt! staff that the R8'of requi.rellImtS for Ca1IItarY AvernlIIl will ='/ the traffic. IoDst all of the ceaxi:ly residentS de not have young chi.ldren and with the layout of the steet it would be a. low vo.llme a.tU for traffic J.i.l<e lUlst any ot.'1a::' neiqhbo.rhcod. I will offer to give up rrrt purc.'lase w.lt...~ if the cearlly ces1dents WlInt to buy the pzoper'CY and fully reiJl1m3e lIB tTlf expmses. I be.l.ieve in .m!rlca and t:bB idea of Free Enterprise. I am a. ~ llBI1 t:yinq to IIIIke a. livinq. I have the right to purdIa.se the ~ aai Mrs. ~;".. also has a. right to sell her ~ eo IlII. I ask you to """CO;"'..'" this 1IBtt.er in rtrf favor. 'lbank you for your t:.in. Since-"1lly, }L~. ~~ .. . . . ",...~ 230 ,.-, Louise &Del John II. Broujoll 78 B. Ridqe Strllet Carlisle, PA 17013 717 249 3048 !AX 717 243 9227 llay 10, 1995 Sorouqh Council 33 We.t South Street Carlisle, PA 17013 R!: Robb.iDs/Windsor Proposed CevelC9JII8nt Oear Council: t represent the citizens of the !ast ilidqe St::eet area who oppo.e the above developlll8nt. !nclolled is a li:st of persons directly involved by havinq properties bord.erinq on the alley lalown as Cemetery Avenue &Del others who live in the aaiqh.borhood which is affected by the chanqe in the character of the aaiqhborhood by this develo~nt. Contrary to the statllDl8nt of the developer that there is only one requ...t for waiver--the 34 foot riqht of way for the requi.rlld 50 foot riqht of way. Therll are at lea.t three variations from the Code.: 1. The request to I1S8 a 34 foot riqht of way for the str_t in.te.d o~ a 50 foot riqht of way. 2. The u.. of a 12 to 14 foot riqht of way in the alley off Ridqe Str.et~ wbiah create. a serious and potentiaJ.ly llf_ ."danqer.iDq conctition for two vay t::aff:.c and even for one-way traUic:. The natuJ:e o~ the location of. qaraqes and buildinqs OD the alley c::.at.. a. hazard. 3 . The ai:l.8DCe at a sidewalk on the aorth side of the propOlled .t.:c.~. Where childr.n are concerned-both thOIl. ot pr..ent property owners and tho.e of any of the propolled hoa.e.-u:C." of the sate haven of a sidewalk from vehicle traffic: ri.lU injury. ". The proposal violat.s the intent all laid out in the Zonina Ordinanc8: A. Section 255-12: AD alley is defined u '. JDiDor -y, whieh II&Y or II&Y aot be legally dedicated, and i.s l1.ed priJlarily for vehi~ saniee acce.. to the rear side of p%'CllertJ.e. ot:heniJIe abutt:i.nq OD a sceet.' B. Section 255-21: "The intent of the R-2 *diWII D8JUlity .. 231' .'...., ,,-... .. Re.identi&l District is to: A. Provide for the orderly expansion or areas that offer residential neiqh.borhoods at a medium density." B. ...carefully control the types of housinq to ensure compatibili.ty with existinc:r houses." C. Carefully protect these axeas from uses that may not be fully compatible. Section 255-2: Intent and Ob~ectives Zoning .was adopted with reasonable consideration, amonq other thinqs, of the existinc:r character of the various areas within the Borough of Carlisle and their respec':ive suitability to particular uses.. Section 255-8 Intercretation II. . . the provisions of this chapter shall be interpreted as the minimum requirements for the promotion of heal~~, safety, morals and general welfare. Where this chapter conflic':s with any rule, regulation or ordinance, the greater re~t=iction upon the use of buildings or pramises...or upon requizing larger open spaces shall prevail, regardles. of its source." 5 . Approval wou.l.d sanction turninq alleys of the Borough into sereets for development requiring alteration of one qood pl~nninq requirement &fter another. Whenever there is an attempt to circ:umvent good pl"""; "q technique. by forcinq a developlllllnt into a place where development was not intended, the planner is forced to start alterinq other sound pl~"ni nq requirlllll8nts and the BorouCJh is a.ked to grants chanqe. where the ordinance and good planninq never intended that there be changes. 'rB! PRO'rES'rAN'!S ASJ: TBE COUNCIL TO 1I0LD A PUBLIC IIEA1UNG on this i.:IIue becau.e of the .erious precedent that it wou.l.d .et in the. Borouqh for C~mM;nq buLldinqs in alley lots without adequate consideration for the existinq character of the Ct"l1lllll11fti.ty and protecti.on of our youth. yours, pl'ote.tants I 233 MINUTES C~LEBOROUGHCOUNcrL RobblDl Denlopll1l1ll July 5. l!I95 COUDeilma1l Owens c:tlled tile mec!1llg (0 OM :l& 9:30 PM. The (oilowing members oi COUDeil were pnlHnl: Chenek. Oionlllno, H.rm.... Ocker, Oweos, mcI SpitZ. Also preaenl were: Soliciwr Sl:borw, MllUpr BOl111. Public Worlcs Director ~iscr, PIllllDialliZooittl/Cildes Mat1agOI' 0011111I, md Sec:re1llY LAy. Mr. Owens swed thll the purpose (or tlti.s moo!1llg is 10 discuss Ill. RobbiDI Prn>,ltItY DovelopmenL Mr. Owcns explliDed tlw if COWICU vora ror 3pproval tIllllthe prelimlury subdivisioD iIIId land developmellt pllll willllO into lIiCtioD. SolicilOr Schoqlp swed tIlll tile pll11 meelS ill of the rtqwmnelllS of the Borou&!l's SubdiVlSIOD and Land Developmelll 0nIitulDce W1t1l Illc OICO\laOll of thtee irem.s. II wu his OptniOIl that the use proposed by lbe platt meeu the requiRmeDu oi Illc lonillll On1iDl1I1CO. Thereiore. lbe rJuee delieienClN wl\ich 3ppelll3lO: I. The IlIl:k oi lbe required '0 fOOl 'N1W:l rigbl.oi.way for C4m.lely A venue whicb is belllg cOMposed nOl :IS iI1I aveDue or :tIIey bullS beiDlI proposed 3S a loc::U screel md WIll be a loco.l screel after II is tUlly developed. 1 The plan does nOl depicl curbillg 00 tile north side oi Cemelely A venue. 3. Tho plan does nOl depiCl sidewalk OD die DOnb side of C4DlClely A venue. Therefore, if il is CaUDeu's desire to approve tile pre!imiJwy piau, CoUIICit mllll SJI1II what:n ellnsidenld 10 be modificanollS oi slll1dD1ds. Council would be SJI1IliDl a mCllii&:ltioa of tbe rtquiml riabt-of....y wicldt sWldJrd lII1d a modiflc;WoD of tile s1l1l1dlld reqwriul curbialllld sidewalk on lhe lIon1l side of c..1I1Al1erY A VOI1UO. Thmfore, if mere is a mollon to ~ il mUSl iDc.Iude lbe 3pplOvaI of tIlose dImI modilIcDtions. Mr. Ocker 1W*! that there were 10 coodiriollS. Mr. DeII1Iis UlI1ICd dill tile developer by siped lIIId acreed to all of tbe COlldiriollS. Mr. Ocker made a motiOll ro '1'1II'O" lite subdivision aDd laud deveJopmelll plan willi modi1lcarioll ill lhe lilrelI deliC1lllt areas subject ro tile lII1IiCbed 10 conditioo.s. M.s. CIttlnok secoDded lite morion. AfI<< a roll call VOle tile motioD pwed , co 1 '.vith Mr. Hamata voWll apiDsa tile morion. Mr. Sou swed dill lite apanmeDI builclittgaelt door is beitt,101IOYllCd. Ha received a 1_ from McCowl Homea requesliDlJ to QJKO SC3ffolcliDlI ill lbe aII.y befwceD \be Borougb builcliD, iIIId die aparattent buildiD" .micll would clOM tbe alley. The 1_ Ulllllllllllbat die scaffolcliD, would be ill pIKe for 7 ro 10 days. Mr. Giordano swed that a time limil musI be SOL He mIde . motiOll lO cIOM lite aII.y up ro 10 workiDt days elcludin, b..s weI11ber. Mr. Oclter SllCllllded 1M moriOlL All aY' VOle. n.. _tin, wu adjourned at 9:'0 PM. Cf:2tJ-'f , ~.~ Robin 1.. 0_ Cl)III1Qj Vice-PrIeidInI ~' tll~ 1.)r.u/ ~ O.l..1y f Boroup SecnllrY (Seal) 234 CONSENT TO SUBDIVlSION/LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL WITH CONDmONS RE: Prelimin:1ry Subdivision and Land Development Plan Robbins Property Development, Windsor Building Company (REVTSED) Staff' rec(............rI. thu tbe C.1riisle BoroUib CouDcil apprcMl tbe above n:ti:raK:ed subdivisiallllali dlIYeIopmc:m plan subject II) dID lillIowiDg mnrIirinn,; L Pwmant to Section 226-29 ofth" Subdivision and Land Developmem Orriinonce, appropriate street: trees shall be planted at imervals of not less than thirty (30) &et: nor greater than fifty (SO) feet within a tree lawn oh m;n;rm,m width offour (4) feet. The plan curremly depictS six (6) street trees. With the curreDt spacing, two (2) additional trees are required to meet this standard. Such treeS shall be shown on the fina1 plan. 2. Pursuant to Section 226.21 (B-I1) of the Subdivision aDd I..1nd Development Ordinance, the developer must ~ to enter imo a development agreement and provide the flnonci:d security required to guarantee the COJ1StI'W:tion of all public improvemems proposed for the land development. 3. Pursuant to Section 226.31 (B-2) of the SubdiWion aDd LaDd Development Orriinonce, tea percent (10%) of the total tr1l:t shown on the plan, orO.11 aaes shall be dediC"tNl to the Borough for public l'CIQ'e\tri~1 purposes. Such landlDU3t meet the reaeation area location criteria established in Section 226-31 (C) and shall be shown on the fina1 plan. In-lieu thereot: the Borough may, upon agreemeu.t by the applicant as established in Section 226-31 (E). accept the COIISauaion ofrecnlation.!icilities, the payment offees in-lieu thenlOt: the private reservalion of!alld for reaeatioaal puIllOses, or a combilllCion of the foregoing. Upon such ~.. the fee to be paid in-lieu of the required dedication oflaad shall be Sl,1oo (Le., "'\Io'lotNl at the rare ofS10,OOO peraae for each acnI oflaad required to be dedicated). 4. Pursuant to Borough Public Worla SlaIIdanl Specilicazious, curb and sidewalks shall be designed to pus stonawater beneath the sid8walk rather than over the sidewalk. Sw:h design shall be s.bown on the fina1 plan. 5. Pursuant to S<<:tion 226-19 (Y-3) of the Subdivision and L.md Development Orrli.......~ the proposed tat of the iasttumlll1t cnlIIIiag tbe proposed uD1ity easaaems shall be submitted for review aDd approva1 by the Borough Solicitor. Such instruments shall be l'llCOrded prior to recording the fina1 plan. In Mlditioa, a DOte shall be piaA:ed OD the t1na1 plan swing thIt the proposed Sllliwy sewer sy!UIID locar.ed upsnun from proposed lIIlIQ. hole 30J-A shall be privasely owned and rn.;......-I ~"."'1 235 o. Punuam to Section 226-19 (A-19) ot'tIIe Subdivision IIId Laud DewlIopDlOllt Orrlinant'e, all water aDd sanitary seww ssvice Iaun1s sbalI be completely shown OD the final plan. 'I. Pumwu to SectiOD 226-19 (A-I7) of tile Subdivision and Laud DllYdopmear Orditw1c:e, stop sip and street aame sip "II: ;"1 Borough Public Works Standard Spec:iiic:aziOIl3 sha.Il be shown at all imerseclioll3 on tile fiaa.I plm 8. Punuaat to Section 226-19 (A-I7) oCtile Subdivisionand.UadDevelopmeat Ordinance, sueediglning meeting the requiremeaa of Sec:tioa 226-23 (L) of the Subdivision ami L.md Development Orrii.......... shall be shown on !be 6aa.I plan. 9. Punuont to m. requiTlmmrs of s"ctiOft 226-13 (H) of tIw SubdMsion and Land D.w/opm.nr Ord/1fQ1IC., "NO OUTLEr srgn,r shall ~ posud at tIw mtI'aIIU Ie C."..tlry Av."," from a.dford Sm.t and "DO NOT ENTER" sigm shaJ1 In ptMtId at wstml tlrmi7ru3 of m. eart_st s.ction at Cil1MWy A_ whMn it i7rt6n<<:rs with tJw rrorth-sOllth s.c:ton of Cem.tlry Awmur. 1M sight distDncs at rJris mun.ctton is obstruct", by an aisting galull'"' which if sirum.d Oft tIw C017IU of tIw right-of-way. 17ris posting will prohibit whicJ.s from tl/mirrgjrom tIw Iart-W&lt srction of CIl1Mt6ry Awnu onto its 7IOrrh-l/OUth S.cDOn. 1'1ri.Jwill not prohibit two-way rrafIlc a/onr this ~ctton for m. nsidlmtiDJ propcniu fi~ on S. HIJII01IV Sm,t. PunuDnt Ie s.ctton 226-/9 (A-/7) ofm. Subdivision and LandD~ Otriihwa, u..s. slgJU shaJ1 In shown on the jinaJ plan. /0. Pvmumt to s.ction 226-Z3 (A-7) of. SlIiJdMsion andLandDrM~.__J Ordinanc.. tJw Iart-wst ~ctton of C61MtI1y A_ shtzJl In rmt:11Md an m. ftnaJ plan. By si&DiD& bdaw, I bcreby allII:st: tbII& I baw rad dIr: abcml mci do \llAutoud mci aca:pctbesa .....-.;"." ill' approval of tbII ahow I1Ili:rtItaIi pJm. sir71:CI;!:t~.~~.e of!1~ I~ /i9r' ~ /'J-.. ~u.J- NIIDD of Appiiclar or Appliclm's Lv. ..:.. I' -- State of Pennsylvania, County of Cumberland. ss: ,"'" PROOF OF PUBLICAT!QNt'"\ JUll11995 11 ~q.QlD Marian M. welsh ofTHESENTINEL, of the County and State aforesaid, being duly sworn, deposes and says that THE SENTINEL, a newspaper of general cIrculation In the Borough of Carlisle, County and Slate aforesaid, was established Oecember 13th, 1881, since which date THE SENTINEL has been regularly Issued In said County, and that the printed notice or publication attached hereto Is exactly the same as was printed and published In the reular editions and Issues of THE SENTINEL on the following dates, vlz . Copy of Notice of Publication , 10 Publlo Notlc.. I~~"~ NOTICE IS HEQl8V GIVEN .t..t tf'I. Clrtl... I, lereytll C,uMI' will mHt on W.dn.IdIY 1 J4/Jf a. '115, 1":30 p.nt, In"'" Town HI" 0; r C"'I". MunlC'P" 81.1.,1"" S3 W. Soull'l ' net, c.rNII~ CumbertMd COuntV. F'enr\lyl~ ; ...tINlI,... wtIcft Mm..nd... p'*lo helrItIQ lie _ on I prallmlnOly oulIdlYlIIonlllncl I *.~ pfan .ubmttted by .'- WlndIGI IulIdltIg Company lor 'lie A_ ~_"Y ~.ftl toollld on-C.m.tery Av.nu.. ' ............ public ""-" I puOlle mootInG I of 1110. Cou",H Ift.IU. conduol'd ,1 ' ....ofIIIiII.lIonm..,IMIak. enon_.........- --- ~~. ....,...ofllClU,bu...... ~enl pI~ .' ..,' ....,..;.'... ~ Imom,llon OM b. oblainld from ~1Idtna DMllcm 0' tf'l, Cltfl... 801'0110" ...-_ Won. Departm.nt. Allnl.,....d per. ton niWlCed IOltllInd I"" pubMo Mating lAd I :::.. ~ENNI~' .' 1 ~odeM""ClIr JUliE LAY 10<..." s........, June 20, 27, 1995 " , Affiant further deposes that he Is not Interested In the subject matter of the aforesaid notice or advertisement, and that all allegations In the foregoing statement as to time, place and character of publication are true. -7p~ ~ MU 7/6/95 Sworn to and subscribed before me this 6th day of J\llv ,19 95_ .1A)t4 7: ~Ub"C My commission expires: . 14'3'7 FLOWER MORGENTfR. FLiJt.JER L.INDSAY . 71n49!l~ llU'~l - ;~_. ~"" Ja. Qllray .. ~".U" Tll _ :il43al511a lONN H. '.OUJOI "UlaT x. 12IUlOY c:aralIftlPIID e. HOUlTON 8ROUJOS, GILROY" HOUSTON, p,c:. 4TTOIlNIYS 4T LAW . NOaTH HANova 1TIlD1' c.uwILI, PUlNI\'1.VANI,\ 17011 72'.UIo4I7. 11,.,.,1_ 'AXa UI ....,., Apdl 26, 199' Borouah of carUaI, PIIlllUDI COllUlliaioa '3 W. Soudl StrMt C.lillo. PA 1'7013 . REI h11ad.all71ubdlvtaloa LIIId Deftfopnllllt PJ.q .bIUe Pro...., Devtlopllllllt Dar PIII1I1IoI Commiuion: I 11II Ipulrin. tbr molt of tIIo propony ownon to th, ner ot IUd" SUitt 011 C.utery AVID. ft'oIrdr1. till propoMd devolopra.lI. Th, pmPtftY OWDIrIIN IIICtd U 1UIch,d. W. II1It with tII, devIIop.. IIId IN oppoMd III die etirt devtlopmonl pJaa. The subcliviliOll _ :IOaiD. otdhwle. of lb, BORluah lIfIVor iznoadod for CODItl'UCaOD of umi.detac.b.d duplllCll in tIl, rear 0' sin", fuaily hoUIII borderia, on . ...vie, aI1ey which wu illNadecl u , WYiee al1ty only and ISOt ... subdlvilioa tborouahflN. The lOti... o.b&notw of Ii._ StrMt it .mllo daru:hed clMWap. tKCept for 1W'O dupl.... OIl' on IIch ade of IIdp Streit. 111.. ~ dupl.. hat OIl . ClauI., streit IIId Dot on III &111)' . CIDlItIIy Aveaue i. aothia. mON !bin . IWfOW alley flltladecl . &.....nee all., 10 lb, rear 01 txieciJl. ham.. It WU Dot intIDded u . IlrMt OIl which .pI clllpl... could bo buill thl obIncter 0' till ... to die ....01 till dwtlUap co BIll lUqo 5trMt i. lIOt _deD1I1I, It i. & MrYioe... It i. . Otld _bad caly 0tII pn-<<llliq 1l0IHIO.ltu.mia. \1M of . ftOWll' vtI&dla.llIaWty, wblah b.u b.. dflCllll1lAud ftlr ~. tift y..... The ham. 11011, IuI lUcIa. 5.... WIt, pureblMCt '/ridl dI, lIIIdenlaadIa. dial Ill, IN. to tile t..,. IlOrtilllll 01 tlI., boJa. 'NIl reaidoa1ialaad priv... na.. 'NIl 110 uademaacUn. :18 the 04.127/95 14.311 ~1.OWER MORGENTHA. Fl..CLIER LINDSAY. 71.7249!5537 GJ03 .~ tilt)' may l'IOllve liquid Aiel. tel AID. tor till liley, Thl o.aJy reIIOIl it curia. tIsI ft8IIlI of IvtIIU. i. to rlOlivI Uqutd AI. file fbndl. Thl tppllClllt &bould bl Nqutnd to aubmif prool to till PIIIlIlin. COlllmlulOll dill Cun.cary Av.WI ku bee acctptld u a Boroqb road. rn Iddldoa. till IIlPIIClIIIt Ihollld b. requirtd to Ihow 'dIat tile Borouah hu IlWAtlinld IIld plowed thl alley, IfFectiVlly It not le.llly. tIl. Borolllb _ IblDcIoalel Cemtttry A VIIIIII it it eVIr accepttd it. III addlUClD, wollld dll loro. be IIAdena1WI. thl saow plowiq ot Ctmtttry AVIIl\ll if the propoaed developme, i. IppI'Ovld? Snow pJowia. reqWreI a lI1n1 IfOUlld. NaviptiD. dI, riaht bad lIInl '* dI, llOnb'W_*.. comer ot lbe development nlay be ditilcult if not impoaibll without II1IIIipulatioa. , The privacy ot 1*10III in their baclcyardl &Ion. Bat l1dp Stnet 1I10wd bl prowcted. 11111 ia part of 1Ivlq. At I... two at d11 born.. have l"III' laral wiDdow txpolllrll that would oompl'Ollli.. their privacy. The noie. level would b, IlIbll&Dtially anlf., IIld dI, tramc IIltivity would &grIYIItII dI, IlYin. ccmclitiou. TII. wUVII to inltllJ curbin,lDd sldewal1cs 011 dI, lIOnb aide lAdlCltll th.IISa.! difftculty of ICCOmmocWiD. thi. dtve!OPDllllt IPPllldaae into till rear ot a residetill area. II the applicant... tba dellwellta will Dot be utilized by tII. reeid.. on !&It llld,1 StrMt, the appliClllt i. compl-.!y d1VOZl:ed hem realIty. The KrttziD. childrell cd other neipbamood children have rIIIl \Ill aad doWll dw uley tor yell'J. Iy puulaa . siellWllk 011 the aoulb sleII only, th, chilclrea will b, eempelled to UN tII. soudllidlwtlk &lid crou thl ItrIet to let into tAt rear ot dI, iut JUd., Sltllt propll'd... TIll wUver of pllllillll ourbiq ill bee.... it wollld Cftllt . ItIDrIlI watI' problem l'lIiaea the qlZllliOft ot wh.,. dll stonD WItIr would the 10. Wok of curillnl 011 the north sid, could or... problem, toz dll flIU' ot Jut R.I. Sll'IIt propfl'tl... It ia iroaio tIw Ib, 80ro"", stUf Polley BritilD, SUDlIDIIy impJi.. tIw . modlll_on ot ordiDlIICI reqWnmeatl i. juatlfled "II dI. Illlra.lllllorllla1lat wiJlllCICf 1IIIdlIIlwdabip b,cllIIt of peculiar COJIcIltlona . . . " Th, IIDdu. bardlblp. .. IIlI'lrtIItly viewld hem tlse _dpoint 01 11&1 c1w.lopmWlf owa.,. &lid Dot ot dll tIIiIflDl ownlfS. Th, UIIcN1 haniabip i.. ill tict is upon thl Millin. ftlidema. i SIDet Slotiotl 226-I<I(A) ItItII lb.. "tb. modi11calcm Ihould lIot b. coarnry to the pllbllc iJmrIIt IIId lbl purpo.. of &lid illtlnt 0' the ordllllllCl," tile PIO'-*' c.ltl tbi, . jUIDilcatioD A'lt objtcdoa of the propolld develoPllllllt. Pro1utwI aUo ... tbaa 111, Borouab not CODstder thl addltIoaaI flVllllI' received tram tbi, dlvelopmanl u . ...... tor lppI'OYaI. ra .d NClOIIu:a.aaoal, r do lICIt - Illy recol1lDllllclatiOll tal' laadaClpjll1 0' ,"""ilia of .,. /dad to Provide 10 Ib, property "'WIlen lrozstina 011 Jut llld.. Streit dI. pftVICY eo wfllda .., III IIltitlttl, 'tIrdI- 01 wheda. it It rlCl\lilld. Widl ,.,... to pnrlCl... WI poun Ollt tbat IOGI, y.....1IO dI.. wu. 1lJ..jlt 10 c1weiop dI, potion eo tht fill ot Iaat lidp Siner OIl tII. nonll tide, wbIda 'NIl deaild. I b..l..... "'4;:27;"'5 101'39 !'LOWER MORGEN~ FLa.ER LINDSAY" 717:24seeB7 004 tIw till P1111Diq Co......iuion IIld the BoroucD auld mrl,w tIIi. dtellion to dlNnnin. the rtIIOlII to trelt WI II I prececleat tor dlllyml dlMlopm... a1on, I strvive aUt)' .... Th, staft' ill i.. Policy llilftnl Summary hu f'&lllld to brinllO the Plannill' Commiuion'. utllltlOIl the following: A. Alley i. detbsecl II "I minor WI)'. which IDI7 or III&)' not b. IqaUy dldlcattcl, ud It IIIId prilllllily tor V4IIUClII!u strvive lCeUlto lIIe I'8Ir licit of propeni.. othllWlH mUniD, on I...t" Stcdon 2.5.5.12 ot till ZOllin, Code. 11un III dO two weyt allow it, CIlllIIery AVIIIIlI i. III alley IIIId primarily tor IllViClIO tile l1U .. 01 pIOptni... 11Ie propoad develOpmlllt tIIDItbrmI tIIi. aU.,. to I ftancUCIIl primlrily lor ll:eUlIO I holllill' developmlllt. B. "Th, iDtItlt of tII, 1,.2 Medium Deaaily ...._rial District i. to: A. Proviclt for the onIerly _utlion ot.... that oft'er relicltatial uiabborhoocb Il . m.cUum d.lity," SlICltion 2.55-21. 111, prope.ad devalopmlllt do.. Dot proonclt!'or III orderly explll.lion; on tII. OODtruy. it il I dUont.ly tllpllllton. C. "Th. inllllt ~ 111, 1\-2 MedlWft Dlnthy ....da1ial Dlftricr it to: '" D. Clllfully CQDuo.I tII. !)'p" of hollli.q to tllllII'I compllibillty witll m.ft... hl!!,..." StodOD %55-21. Th, propo.lId tWveJopmct it not compltibl. wtda ailtiDl bouIinS. The sd abould have pojmtcI out to III, P1I1111iD, CollUlliuloD ad tII, Pllmdnl Commisalon should IlOW oouidar III.. III.. i. . distiActlOII betwta a lI_ittlld \WI (lIlIlldecaclllld dwtIUoa) .d tile 1......t1~ md "'....... at lB. oI..udltlCbed dWlWaat compadbl, ~. tII, "1lIU" cd tile "1KiIdD, holllll." It ia not 11I0. tor lb. PIIlUlinI ColIImiIIioa lad tile aoroush to lay tbIt tbit il a permitCWd 11II IIld nop th... It IllI1ft tile apply to .. plllDittlclllM lb, tilt ot intlllt . Nt lonb ill I_on 2".21 cd tII, ovenll objlOtlvu lIIld IOU 01 tbe Zotriq Coc1a. D. on. 111_1 at dI, 1-2 MlIdiIllD l)lIIlity ....c&.1t1l D1nriot l. 10: ... C, Carltl&lJy Pf01- tII... .... bom \IHI !bat may QOi be ftI1Iy oompaibJ.." Section 2.5'.%1. Oa lb. tUe at it, liallt IllDicletlchecl cIweIlinII huddlad 0111 beck 1111)' c.rIIIIped in 011 ODe .e11 by . rialltoot-WI)' 01 ill.luMcilllt wtcldl, (3" IDllllld of .50') lad 011 tile other ed by I 12.1.' aUey with I propo.ad COJIf\aaUI. ...way tratllc dinodon lit DOt fIllly CCllllJlatibl. III. ....... Th, ... ill Act should b. -.IIlIly prat-.d i.a IICCOIdIace willa tile illtlD'l at tIl. ordluu:.. I, SlOioa 255.3, Jmea11Dd Obi_we, .... ia tubplfllllPh B tIw tile .IDIW11 "'NIl Idoplad witll ,.r""'I. oonGdtniOll, IIDClIlI odI.- *iap. 01 the ..i.fllI, .....- 0Id1. varlOIII .... ~thUa .. Ioroqb ot CarIlIl, aad tIIIir IIIplCttYe SllillbiUty II) pertioular IlIU. " 11IiI prIlJlCIItd UYtIOIIIlII_ it IlO1 conal I_I widl ... ...;.., cIJan_ 01" the IllAad ... 01 IIdp Street ~1bIn tbe IIoroqla 01 CIrlIIl.. " I, t1IIdIr dI. ... ,...qoa. .. JlIOYiIiaae 01 Ib, f-i", OtdlDaaCI "haw beta dIIlplld 110: (I) prGIIIOt8, plallllt, ad "'1111II . , . .. pUUc hllhb. Mtety, . , , ,..11 MIllin . . . vehicl. parIUn. . . , aacI oth. requif""ll .... 1'Ilt prapo.... dIwIopment ... DOt pI'GaIOIt, JlIOCIOt, cd tulIl.. .. IIIIey lid ....... 0Id1. I_II. .d 01 till cIUIdrc oldie .... boda 01__ .. IIId 01 tIl, PftIpO u ~...... W.!law did Ibollt tta. 0<V27~~ 14.40 F1..a.ER l'IJRGENTHA.. Fl.CLIER L.INDSAY ~ ?1}~49!l!5B7 006 lilU ud tIlm WU DO illdlClltillD tIw tIl. prMcy .-Joyed by peopl. ill tUir beoIcylld WQllld be ilIcradld IIpOft by eiiPt d....lin.. .. could .lIIi.Iy have IIl.at twlnl)' fbur peopl. ovll'lll ud ptrllapa limen lllIrL III adctitiOll, dltrt WQllld b, tnIIIo ftom I\IIIiI, tnllldl. ..d pant... n, propoHCI deYtJopmlftt WO\I.Id ..... . IlIbItIDtIa1l11lC1l1Dt o( traffic, mOVtlllct, IIId cbild &Clivill-. C_1ItIry Avcu. i. ~wi_ by OODItl'IIctiOlll ... we C1IItOmay 10 . NIl' ..met all" IIld IIOt IV a ItrMt. POI iuttac:e. tIl.. we ..... dIIt abU* dlrllOtly GftfO the alley, On. 01 du 4OI'Il...... llYC It It _lUd. 011. way, would baY. . tile 1a....QUOII 01 two Ill". 011 tIl. 'oVlIttVn lide of tIl. dIvelOlllllct a prll' .. 4I'1U1I . bUild 0CII'DIr. AIOIIS tII. cu,. IIOrdlm poniOIl ot CtmIIIry A'VWl1It, ...... uut _. IIld SIl'UCtIII'tI abut widell wollld an.. blllld IIld dIIl.trOUI ooaclition. tbr CIbl1_ nlllllla. lad playlD. ill lb. neipbodlood. Th... an pr....tIy a llumb. of chlIcInft ill the lleiPborhood who nIIl up and doWD lb. alley. Grltldcbilclru of __tI aloaa l!aIt RJcIp StrMt !lOW bave cd willla lb. ftIaan bay. ICCMI IV lb. III." III m.ir l1IIIDia. ad playlDa. which will llNIIe . very dlaall'OUI coaclltiOll. Th. atlmpt. to 1II.... a ItrIIt ollt ot thll alley viol.. tbt normal Bonnap requirtlllct !or M!baob. Th_ it no ... on the northn du ot CallI..,. A....ue blC&lll' ot the fXiItiD, ..... ud other SlnICtUnI. Th.. it a l'eIIOll tor _1Gb: aot 0II1y Ulthllicall)' but fa tInDI 01 iiiit)'. Th... i.OII. blJJld comer or IIItI'IDOeWIy after mother aIon, the propoeed rold !bat would Icd themeelvtl 110 !be . danlaa Q\d'I tnl. ot riIIt.. AIry ItWmpt to malr. . OIl' way sawlt oat 01 th. all." ecUaCeat to the BoIdalr propeny WQllld IIavt two .eo..... (1) it would iaOODvtnicce IIdtr1)' lad oth. occupatl on Soutb HInovtr StrtIt wbou ..... Ibm to the NIl .d utIu. 1b. alley tOJ' in.... .d.... T Th._WIy peopl. pu'tlcularJy, CODIidIl. of Mr. .d" MIl. CoItopoulolllld Mr. .d MrI. xmpklvqb. .ollld ISOt be oompellld lD lIIIIce lb. joura." II'OlIIId tIul block tor _lb. 1b. ctrlllCt or exit lD thlir J'IOIIII't)'; cd (2) . . lUIW ot aplri... than win b. 10111. vlbicl.. thlt will ~ 10 taIct a Ibonout out of 1b, propollcl cltvIlopm_ U'yiq IV dart OUI ol1b, lilt)' ratbar tII. 10 lI'Ouad the blooJc. 11liI will haw a __ey 10 _ IIIOdlIr _1110III OOIIdItioa. not om)' 10 two OIIcollliD. vlbicl-. bill lD .,. c1illdna that ilia)' b. plll)'ila. ia tile .... Ia lddltioa, it 'WOuld Nqui,. 1Illo1'Ctlll*lt, wtUola wollld ...llIt ill complalatl &om -........ ... peopJ. IN YIolalia. .y OIl.WCY ...... 1111 dIvtIopmlDt viol... theflq1DllII\llDt oIhaviq. By (50) fboI riPt-ot.WIlY. ne IIoroutb Cocle WIll DtYtr latIadld to "1I11111~"- C!"'......I". lipt llllitl buo ., pvGIl of land Ii., IIVUIld OIl a co.... of tile 1IonIqIa. Th. ........... ot laylq out the Boroup ill ...... WIll to ........0_ ctMt1lap IIOftI ... ~ bur DOt 11011I Ill.,.. Ii-uatl.uy, Ctmlflly A....Uti. AD 1111)' tbIIit lIOt repJarIy m.uataiatd _ pJOMd by till .oraUlll. 11a. .orauP Iau lIot tI'tllStd c.m.-y AvcUl .. a BotouP ..... WIll tho. . .. 04/77/ge 14.:59 FlI'JWER I'IJRGEN~ Ft.a.ER LINDSAY . 71214~87 '" Q0S oIIl1dr. IDcllfllldo.blldre of IIliIliq boas.. 011 !lit IUclae Stnet. 'I1II PlIlU1izl. Commi..on should oouIdet !be implllt OD daildr. wUbfll die prvpOIId 4InIOpmlllt who wlU bel'llftll.lal lip lad clown tis. alley IIId uolllld die com. DIU the Boltlc:k'. propeny. who will be wID..le to the veb.loular t:l'UlIo. CbilclnD uanl CalClry Avcl.ll who III In the way ot. vebicl, 011 Ill. GaI1Wlly wi1l have DO pJac, to 10 011 .. nonblll'll lid,: tJaey wlU hav. eo cro. lIIe alley ill boAt ot lI'lltIla to lit eo .. IItety of . eiclawalk. rn die SlID. lIc:Uon IIDd. lUbpancnph C(2). tis. Ordln.1lI bII blMll dllilDld eo "pn\'tIlt 011. or IDOrt of the followiq: OYerorowdlq oIl.cl . . '. cIIapr md CODptUoD III travel. . ,". nu. iatel1t II viol_ by dI, propoNd rubcllovlaon. P. SIClCiCIA 255., OQ Inwprtcatioa lDdl... lbar "lIIe provialODl of lilt. chapell' shill b. itutrprtClcl u Ill. minimam requirtmID" ftlr me promotiOD otbllllb. SIffl)', moral, lad lillII'll weJIIrt. WIs.. lbia _tv COIliIlow with lIlY rule, I'Ipiarion or ordlaaac.. lhe J1IatW rtIIricdOD 1IpOlI1ll. 11II of bv.lldIap or p,-;.., . , . or upoD requlriD, larl. open .... mall prevUJ, nprdl.. at lillOlIrCI." Wh.. t!aIrt III 10 lDIDy q1i1lli0lll illvolwct in dIl, mbdJvlaion, IIJo.b . tis. 50' riaJlt of way. tht oa..way IIIty to lb. nOltllwwr. Ibe 1101I: of two 1iclaw&Ika, IDd OOIIIU"lIlItioa oa _rilll, . MrYIce IIIty. Ill. colllllllllloa 1h0000d strlclly Ipply all of tIl.. claYiIiOlll .d bd ..... Ib, pro~OI'd clavtIopmlllt, panlCNlIIriy wilb &'IIP1Ot to tJae ordlVO'IlI rtCl'lIinm.t of "fIqU&rlll.I... ClpID 11I-" . Tll.. III oJ_I, requlrtmtlltlllld oolldltloulD tbl, Pf01Iollcl cfM.e10PlDeat tltu could be PNMlltld to tile 7Ntlnl HllriDlloant to, 1IIlPI'OYIl. StcUoa 2.55., 011 illt..I~Ii"", ill . ~ B. .... dlat "Wh.ever . 11M oJ_ it DOt plnlli1alcl by riFt, by OOIldltioa or by IpIlIial txoept!on by dIiJ c.bIIItW ~.. 1D tile boroup, Ill. lilt I, prohibiMd in Ib, borouab, MOIpt dlat tII. IppUlIIDt may appJy (0 th, 2DIlUlI ~, board." Protlllln chum ... altJaoucb tis. III' of ....udlclcbtd dMIliDp 1I1*'lDia.d. the applicadoa 01 tIIa 11M '0.1_ it not ptnaittld by riabt. by oonclltloa or by ......1 --ru=: eel nquint IODin, btaria, board dealllea. n. pro...,. rtq\IM dI. PJaaDia, Collllllilaion 10 DOC to ""'0-.. tis. cure SIlbdJvietoa. Th. prottettrt NqIlM tIIar the P1I1U1ia, CbDlnUuion cIlrect tha BMr Ride. Street_dent IIItIlIbtrl&ymoad Boblt rtOIIII himllll &om 'IOtiq oa. 1bfa ltIu. It Brov,jol J'J4__ aim . , . . . I'. , ... :~" ~ ';; 1.:.;,;::::.:.~.: ;..'.:;;:~: '>':,;; :i~t:~:"';'it;.:'::J;~~:': l .... ." ' .. .: ""'; t';;' ;' i,~' f":f,. ':':; ': . I .' '. , , .... .:. .: . ...'. : .. ".,,:. '.1':./;:~.;::~;1!.. , .,t. . .,. 1""\ ~ " ZONING ( ChlP"'r 255 ZONING ARTICLE I General Provfllolll I 255-1. Lone and short IIUn. I 255-2- Intent and objeedva I 255-3. Eatabllahment of controls. 125504, Types of eontroL I 255-5, Eatabllahmoent of dlstrlcll. 1 255-6. Lot slzea. 1 255-7, Zonlne Map; district boundarl.. 1 255-6. Interpretadon. ( . 251-9. CompadbWty I.C.... munlelpal boundarlee. . 255-10. Municipal .- exeepted. ARTICLE II DefInJdolll and interpretation 1 255-11. Word ...... '255-12. T.rma defined. . 255-13- Interpretadon of relUladoltl. ARTICLE m R-l Low Density ResIdential ~rIet I 255-14. Inlln!. I 2llG-15. VIII permitted by rI.h!. C 25llO1 ..... ", .. '. '. " '. . '.., ,". :~:, .' ,'," 'I, ..'.: ': '. III . CARLISLE CODE . 256-16. Acc_ry_ . 285-17. Speclalexeepdon_ . 255-18. Are. and bulk ...1Uladona. . 256-19. Addldonalllelbacka for dweWnp. . 256-20. Addldonal requl...menll. ( . .: ' " . . . " . . : .;' .: r~ :,:..::.,~.:;,~: ,'. .?<:::; : :'!.'.:,: . : .;:, ARTICLE IV R-2 Medlum Denllty Retldentlal Dlltrlet . 255-21. Intent. . 255-22. U_ pennltted by rlpt. . 256-23. Acc_ry_ . 255-2.. Speclalexeeptlon.- . 255-25. Are. aDd bulk recuIadona. . 255-26. Add1tIonal letbacka for dwellJnp. . 255-27. Add1donaI requlnmenll. ( .' ARTICLE V R-3 HIrh Del1llty Relldentlal DWrlet . 255-28. Intent. . 255-29. U_ pennltted by rlpt. . 25lI-3O. ~ry_ . 255-31. Special exception .... . 255-32. A.... and bulk "'1Ulado11l. . 285-33. Addltlonal letbackl for dweUlnp. . 255-34. Addltlonal requJnmenll. , I': ,'.',: ~ ..; :;i':. ";" ' .' ~ '. "",::,:..: . ',:: :.::' '.< ~.:\,::::" I I I 25502 ..... (", .- -- ,-., . 2&6-5 CARLISLE CODE . 2&6-1 :.;;;' . ~,:'~ . ';' ,.>.:.:.; , " C.) Central BUlilllll District C.2 Shoppinr Center Diatrlc:t C.3 General Commercial District C4 Neirhborhood Commercial District 1.1 General Industrial District 1.2 Lirht IndUltria1 District INS IlIIItitutional District OS Open Space District FP Floodplain aru (an overlay district) HP Historic: Preservation District (an overlay district) .. ~ .. ' . 2M-6. Lot.... Any lot and the o\lE'n spacel and yards NQuired on it mUlt equal or exceed the minimum sizes pr-=ribed by tItia chapter for the distrlt:t in which the lot ia Ioeated. / i . 25&-1. ZoRina Map: dfetrlct botmdari.. It. Adoption of Zoninr Map. The anu within the borouIb Umita u uairned to each diatriet and the location of. boundariel of the distrlc:ta tIlablished by thia chapter an shown upon the Zoninr Map, which, lllptlter with all explanatorY matter thereon. ia decIared to be a put of this chapter and shall be kept on file with the Borourh Secretary.' u. and whenever. ehan.. are lIIIde in boundarlee or other matters included on the said ZoRin, Map. such ehan,. in the map shall be lMde within nve (5) dayI aftIr the amendment baa been approved by the Borourh Council. but failure to make IUCh ehanp within suc:h time shall not invalidalll the ehanp. B. District boundary lines. The district boundary Iillfl shall be shown on tht lonin, Map. District boundary Iina art inltnded to coincide with lot lines. center Iina of street rich. of.way and allay rilitlKf.way, the corporate boundary of the boroulh or III dimenaioned on the map. Dimenaionl. when star.d. shall take pnoedenct over lot Iin... In cut of doubt or , EdI..... ~"" A ..... " .... Zooloo Ill.., ill._ .. .... .... 0/ ..... ._. .," ....;. ..... :"', ".,' ',' '.' ' .:' ','. . . . . : ~ : : . : . : .' , ,; 26616 s.... ;; ". [' c {. ,,' .c' :.. : ~ - . . ., . 2~1l CARUSLE CODE f 255-12 1. The words ~ueh u." "includ1!ll," "includini" and .specifically" (~ IIIall provide examples but shall not by themselves limit a provision only tAl items specifically mentioned if such itel'l1ll would not otherwise comply with the provision. 'I M. Where a seneral provision and a specific provision may conllict. the specifie provision shall supenede the i'neral provision. unlesa stated otherwisu. .'. ,'. ,,', : ,~;:.:,,: ~i;('. '", "~.,,, .'.. ":~r~" , ...~.,:~~:i::i~:)::i:~.i '. .' " '. f 255-12. Terms dellned. Th. followinr words and phl'l1S8S, as used in this chapter. shall have the meaninr riven by this section: ABUT - The marinlr of ~ common lot line by areas ot contillUous 101.5, except not includlnlr 101.5 entirely separated by a street or a nonintennittent waterway, ACCESS DRIVE - A privately owned, eonatrueted and maintained vehicular lICC1!lI8 I'OlIdway _il1&' more than one C (1) dwellinlr unit, commercial or industrial \lie. See alIlo "driveway." "'.' '", .'." , ~ :' . ACCESS POINT or HIGHWAY ACCESS POINT - One (1) combined inrreselerresa point, or one (1) clearly defined lnrrreu point separated (rom another clearly defined ewnsa point onto or (rom a publie st_t. ACCESSORY BUILDING - A subordinate buildlnlr. the use ot which ia eustAlmarily incidental to that of the principal buildinr. which is used for an accellSOry use and which ia located on the same lot. ". ;'\',":'; ..:'-",:. !: ,:;:,..,;:.:...;:.: : : ";'. -.': ;:~;~!~, . . .". ACCESSORY USE or ACCESSORY - A use conducted on the sam. lot as a prineipal use to which it is related and located ,ither within the aame structure or in an 3Cc:euory structure or u an aceesaory use of land; a use which is clearly incidental to, and cuslDmarily found in connection with a particular principal use, 25520 S.2I... (~ .;.r ,""', .. -'\ - .. . 12M-12 ZONING I 255-12 (- ACCESSORY STRUCTURE - A strueture. such II a private prap or private swimminlr pool. Mrvinlr a PUrpoM customarily Incidental to the WIt of the principal buildinlr and located on the same lot as the principal buildinlr. ACT 247 - The Pennsylvania Municipalities Planninll' Code, Act 247 of 1968, II amended, or its succet!lOr lePlation.s ADJACENT - Includes contiruous Iota that share a CIOmmon lot line or that are separated by a street or "'ate~. ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES - Any businelll function in which there is no rerular contact with the pneral publie and as to whieh no materials. producta, goods or prepared foods are stored except Cor olllce consumption. ADVERTISING SIGN - See .Slill" or "billboArd.. ADULT BOOKSTORE - An estabillhment havinlr a siillifl- cant or substantial portion of the value of ita stock-in.trade or of the total items of ita stock-in-trade (whichever is more inclusi~) in books, films. mapzines, video tapes. novelties or other periodieala which are distinruished or characterized by their emphasis on malter depictinll'. describina' or reJatinlr to sexua1 activities or nudity. Th_ items shaI1 include but not be limited to materials that are iJlepI to sell to minors under Pennsylvania Slate Law. ADULT DAY-CARE CENTER - A WIt that involves the care and supervision of persons who are primarily over lIP seventeen (17); who are phyaically handicapped, elderly or are mentally retarded; and that clearly primarily involves care for periods of less than eiihty (SO) hours per person durinII' the averap seVlln-day period. ADULT MOVIE THEATER - A buildinlr. a portion or all of whieh is UMd for presenting motion pictu.... slides or video tape disks or similarly reproduced imaaes distinruished or charaeterized by a siilliflo:ant emphasis on matter depictinlr human sexual activities for obeervation by pel'llOns therein. This shall include but not be limited to any theater thet shows anyone (1) or multiple motion pictures that have received a I .EdUop', NOW'! ~ .1.1 P.s.. IBl(11 .1 wq. .. ~'. i: ',;' \: ,:..::<:~~ ~ ~~:.: ;,~.~ :;!-: ..:l:~r;:;:: ( . ,;.: :.;" " .:.,::::',1:;, . ." :. ," ;;:,f'!l'T~i ':,:, ";":. ' l 25621 3.:tJI. II .. ", " . II~ ratinr of "X. or su_r ratinr from the Modon Pleture Auociation of Ameriea or illlsueeesaor orpnization. AGRICULTURE - Includes .crop tannin'" and .animal hw.bandry." See definitions of each. AIRPORT or AIRSTRIP - An area ot land which is desirnallld, uaed or intended to be used tor the landin, and take off of airplanes or ultralfl(ht aircraft, and any appur~ nant arus which are desirned to be used tor airplane support taeilitles such as maintenance. muelin, and parkin, tacilities. Airports and aintripe shall be approved and shall mlltt all the applicable slate ~Iations. ALLEY - A minor WIlY, which mayor may not be Ieplly dedlc:ated. and is used primarily tor vehicular service _ to the rear side ot properties otherwise abut tin, on a street. ALTERATIONS - Includes but is not limited to the foIlowinr: A. All incidental chanrw or replacement in the nonstructu- r ral parlll of a buildi11l or other structunll. \.... " . 512 CARLISLE CODE . 256-12 I , , I I ..' :";::-;':.,::1<:: .:.;.~ '..1:[ ;::: .i ::; !;;.: .:: .:~: i ~:U ..',' .;..:.'. , , .'.. ~ i"":': ; ['"., .ri,~; .:. =, ;.1,;" , ~ :,i;".:',:~V:: :" ,. : " ,.. . ~ "-. :..:;.,::iE':,: '.:. ::i' :.i ',:,,; B. Minor chanl\llS or replacement in the structura1 parta of a buildinc or other structure. limited to the tollowinc examples and others of similar character or extent: (1) Alteration of interior partitions to improve livability in IlOnconforminc residential buildinrs, provided that no additional dwellinc units are created thereby, (2) Alteration of interior partitions in all other lYI* of buildinp or other structures. (3) Makinc windows or doon in exterior walls. (4) Strenrtheninc the load.bearinr capacity in not more than ten percent (10%) of the tota1 floor ana to permit the I1CCllmmodation of a specialited unit of mvhinery or equipment. 25622 I.IS.. ('"' .~ (~ ;.,~ : ;:; I, '; .. ~, . : -,":1' ,'-"'. . 266-12 CARUSLE CODE 5 2S6-12 I.. . ' . -' :",.-'.~:,,:'.' " .," : - . , . ," -' " : ': ~;; ; " . . .- ,'," ". '~. , , "t ._" . ",;-t. . , ',' ,-:. ,'\0, , ! "t 'I ' .' "',-: ; : : ,~ I. :,: , . ,'.' c., ""... <"., ' """"', I ..' '.. ". .' '.' "'.. .. . I , , , AUTO REPAIR GARAGE - Buildlnlll and land where ~ repairs of motor vehicle are conducted. This 11M may a1Io Include retail salo!ll of IIIIOline and auto parts and the ,torap of vehlclea bein, currently serviced. M~r repain Include mejor mechanical and body work, strail!hteninl of body parta. paintin,. weldin,. sto...... of automobile not in operatin, condition or other work involvinl noise. "are, turn.. smoke or other characteristics to an extent snater '''an IIOnnally found in service slatio1\l, For the purpoltl of r.ltis chapter. this .hall also Include c!Qeely similar repain of boar.s. AUTO SERVICE STATION - Buildinp ....d land U'tl1lI where Jl1IlOline, oil. grease. batterie. tl... or automobile _rio!ll are supplied ....d dispensed at retail and where minor repain may or may not be conducted. U. pennillible at a aervice station do not include major medtanical and body work. strai,hteninl of body parts, paintln,. weldinl or other work involvinl noise, 1Iare, tum.. smoke or other char:ll:teril- ties to an extent IlfUter than are eus!omary and incidental to the ae1e of paoline. An auto service station may include the II&le of food and common houae1told producll II a clearly _ry use. provided that the total parkin, requirtmenta of Article XXI are complied with. BASEMENT - An encloeed area partly or completely below ,nde. A floor level shall be colllidered a buildinl storY if more than thirty percent (30'16) of the perimeter of the exterior WIlla at the basement ceilinlline are five (Ii) f.... or mo.... above If~" BED-AND-BREAKFAST - The lilt and 0CCIIJlt.11CY of a ,incl.family detached dwellinl tor accommodatinl tnnIieni I\IfIlI for rent within the other requinlnentll of tItia chapter. BLAST or BLASTING - The explOlion of dynamita. black powder. fuse, blastlnl cap, detonaton. electrie squibe or otIwr exploel_ as rqulated and defined by the rtlUlatiolll of the Commonwalth of Penl\llYlvanie. BLOCK - A tl'll:t of land bounded by streell: a public park; rtIlroed ri,ht-of.way. excludinl sidinl and spun: lIlellor corporate boundary line of the boroulh. , "'.:. '" ,:....'.'...,...:,..:,..,'..'.. ',.:!, ~_.:~:.::... ,.,:.',t. .': '. " . . . . ., " >::.;\:,;;; i;,;, ,. 25524 I.... ~ . . ':' ,"','i, c c (, . 256-12 CARLISLE CODE g 251).12 BUILDING LENGTH - The horizontal measurement ( be~n the two (2) mOBt distant portiona. other than portiona I mlllured dilll'Onally. o( anyone (1) buildinr or o( the total o( two (2) or more attached buildinp. BUILDING LINE - The line n1nninr parallel to the street line such that it is closest to the street line while still touchinr the nearest portion o( the neareet buildinr. ','of ' ;: I. ,,', '::,.." ','., .:" ,.", BUILDING SETBACK -- An area o( land measured a speeifie distance from and panJleJ to a street line or lot line. ',J' within which no buildinp shall be placed, except as expresaly pennitled. See poeaible reduction o( front yard setbacks in . 255-172. BULK - The cubic volume o( a buildinr. BUILDING. PRINCIPAL - A buildinr in whieh is conduc. ted the principal we o( the lot on whieh it is located. BUILDING WIDTH - The horizontal measurement between the furthest portiona o( two (2) struetural walls 0( one (1) buildinll' that are l\lIRerally parallel. measured in one (1) C pneral direction that is mOllt closely parallel to the required lot width. For a townhowse, this width shall be the width o( each individual dwellinr unit. CABARET - A club. bar. tavern, theater. hall or similar place which (eatures toplesa (emale or bottomlesa male or female dancers. entertainers or emplOYe&!; strippers; simulat- ed sex aclI; or similar entertainers or entertainment. CAMPGROUND - A wse thllt is primarily recreational in nature that involves the wse o( tents or sites 1_ (or recreational vehicles for transient and SIMOna! occupancy by persons recreatini' or travelers. or the wse of tents or cabina (or . seuona! occupancy by orpnized rroupe o( persons under lIP .,,' ,',.,',' ". ei.hteen (18) and their <:ounselors. ". " CARPORT - An open space (or the sto~ of one (1) or more vehicles in the same manner as a private prap. Any "carport" <:overed by a permanent roof shall be considered a build in.. If the permanent roof is attached to the prineipal buildin.. it shall be considered to be part o( that building. 25526 ( S.ZI... -. ,-. I 265-12 ZONING I 255-12 (" CONDOMINiUM - Real estate, portions of which are deeill1ated for Stparllte ownership and the remainder of which is deeill1at.ed for common ownership solely by the owners of thcee porti01lll, created under either the PenlllYlvania Unit Property Act of 1963 or the Pennsylvania Uniform Condomin- ium AcL' To ensure adequate provision for maintenance of roads :ll\d shared taciliti., development of condominiums or conversion of an existinll' de'llllopment into condominiums shall always be treated as a subdivision and land developmenL , ' :,'1,'. , ,., . : .. .~' CONSTRUCTION SITE - Trai:t area. CONVENIENCE STORE - A use that primarily sells both routine household goods and prepared foods to the general public, that has a total buildinll' square footage of less than live thol1lBRd (5,000) square feet and that is open lonll'\!r than twelve (12) hours durinll' the average weekday. CONVERSION APARTMENT BUILDING - An existinll' buildinlr converted into rental dwellinll' units. COUNCIL - The Boroull'h Council of the Boroull'h of Carlisle. CROP FARMING - The cultivatinll', raisinll' and harvetrtinll' of products of the soil and the storage of th_ products produced on the Pnlmises. The definition of crop farminlr shall also include orchards and Christma5 tree farms, but shall not include animal husbandry, commercial forestry, ridinll' ll:lIdemiee or kennels. ',.::t:, "". <.. CULTURAL CENTER - A buildinll' and/or land open to the public which contains exhibits of clearly artislie or cultural intel'tllL such as a museum, art pllery or indoor nature study ana. ',:<: :: DAY.CARE CEw.'ERlCHILD NURSERY SCHOOL - A uae involvinll' the supervised c:are of children outside of their home under age iixtetln (16), clearly primarily for a period of eirrhteen (18) hours or less. This use may also include educational programs that are supplementary to state- Nquired education. · _. _ ... III P..C.U I 3101 .. _ Li: L 25529 S.II... /7-0 ""'" 1"", ( I 255-12 ZONING I 256-12 ( wute material of any kind that does not operate under a lIIIIitary landfill permit iSllued by DER and that does not meet the definition and requirements of a junkyard. DWEUING - A buildinll' desiened or U5ed as the Iivinll' quarten for one (1) or more family.' The term "dwellinll'" shall not include boardinll'house, hotel, motel. hOllpital. nursinll' home. fraternity, sorority house or any sroup residence. A dwellinll' may include a dwellinll' that meelll the definition of a "modular home." DWELLING, MULTIFAMILY - A buildinll' desill'lled and OCl:upied as a residence for three (3) or more families. This specifically includes Il'lU'den aparlmenlll. mid-rise apartments or slnll'le-family attached dwellinlll. See delinitiona of "prden apartments" and "mid.rise apartments." DWELLING, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED - A build- ~ used by one (1) family, havinll' only one (1) dwellinll' unit and havinll' two (2) side yards. DWELLING. SINGLE.FAMILY SEMIDETACHED - A buildlnll' used by one (1) f.Jl'llily, havinll' one (1) side yard and one (1) party wall in common with another buildinll'. This is commonly known as one-half (~ of a twin or a duplex house. DWELLING, SINGLE. FAMILY ATTACHED OR TOWN. HOUSE (ROW) - A building used by one (1) family and havinll' two (2) party vertical walls in common with other buildinlll. such as row house or townhouse, except in the C&M of end buildinll'S attached to such dwellinll'S. which ani also intended to be ineluded in this definition. ; '. , :" "~' -, :', >"1.[ ~ I ;':';' ~" " DWELLING. TWO-FAMILY DETACHED -- A buildlnll' U5ed by two (2) families. with one (1) dwellinll' unit amutpd over the other and having two (2) side yards. DWELLING. TWO.FAMILY SEMIDETACHED - A buildinll' used by two (2) families. with one (1) dwellinll' unit arranpd over the other, havinll' one (1) side yard. and one (1) party wall in common with another buildinll'. 7 '.ell"'" NotlII Drawin.. N'nMn.lnllh. varioUl dwtllln. ''''' ....IrMhIdtd II \M fftd of ......,hap..,. ,.:' ,..;.. :<. :~~." , , c 25531 a.... '. 5 2M-12 CARUSLE CODE 5 2M-12 DWElliNG UNIT - One (I) dwellini occupied by one (1) ( family. See definition oC "Camily." Each dwellini unit shall I. have Its own sanitary. sleepini and cookini Cacilities and [ separate access to the outside or to a common hallway or , balcony. I EMERGENCY SERVICES STATION - A buildini for the '.'.', houainlr oC fire, ambulance. rescue. police or paramedic : ',t. ;; h ~ .... ':"'" equipment and Cor related activities. A membership club may .; ":' '. '.' . be included as an access1ry use. AlllO. this use may include houaini for sueh emerrency personnel wttilf/ on call. " .,.,.' EMPLOYEE - The ttiihest number oC compensated work- ers. includinll both part. time and full-time. present on a lot at any one (1) time during the average week. EXERCISE CLUB - A Cacility that oflers indoor or outdoor recreational facilities, sueh as the Collowinr. weirht room. exercise equipment, nonhousehold pool. racquetball courla and trainini (or these activities. ( FAMILY - One (1) or more persons [but not including more than tItm (3) persons not related by blood, COIIter relationship, marriap or adoption] Iivini together in a sinll'le dwellini unit and maintaininll' and funetionini as a common household. In Idditlon. a maximum oC one (1) person who is clearly a domestic employee may be housed within a dwellilli unit. A Ifl1UP home shall not be considered a "lamily." FENCE - A man.made barrier placed or arranged as a line .' of demarcation between lots or to enclOlle a lot, or portion thenaC. that is constructed oC wood, wire mesh, chain.link '" metal or chain.link aluminum and/or plastic inserts. Man. '... . . . " .": ::' , made barriers constructed principally of other materials. .' .' includinlr but not limited to brick. concrete or cinder block, shall be considered a "wall." The term "wall" does not inelude eneineerini retaininlr walls. which are permitted uses as nfJlded in all Districts. The terms "Cence" and "wall" do not Include barriers of landscaped materials, includini hedges. 25532 t 1.26... -, -. I 256-12 ZONING I 265-12 ( FINANCIAL :NSTITUTION - An establishment primarily Involwd with Ioana and monetary. not material. transa.etions and that haa 1'OIltine inte1'll:tions with the public, Ineludini banks. savinp and 10A1I. finance companies and c~it unions. FLOODPLAIN - Unless otherwise specifically stated, includes the entire on..hund~-year floodplain. This includes FP.l (F1oodway). Fp.2 (F100dway Frinet) and FP.3 (Approx. imated Floodplain) as dellned by I 2S6-110. FLOOR AREA - The sum of the iI'OlII habitable area of the _n1 lIoon of a buildini or buildinlJl meaaured from the interior face of exterior walls or from center lines of walla separatini two (2) buildinp. In particular. "floor area" ineludes but Is not limited to the tollowinJ: A. Basement space, if it meets the requirements of a buildini story. B. Elevator shafta, stairwella and attic s~. whether or not . lIoor has beln laid, providini structural headroom of eirht (8) feet or more. .... .",', ""'::',!,.,' ;;. :'..-, ( " ."", ...." ~: ,', . .... ;. C. Roofed terraces, exterior balconies. breezeways or porcl1es, provided that over fifty percent (50'16) of the perimeter of these is encloeed. D. Any other IIoor space used for dwellini pu~ no matter where located within the buildinlf. E. A_ry buildinp, excludinlf space used (or ~ry off-street parkini or used for loadinlf bertha. F. Any other floor space not spec:ifiea1ly excluded. exeludinlf IJlICI used tor air-alndilioninlf machinery or coolinlf towers and similar mechanical equipment sarvinil the buildinlf. FRATERNITY or SORORITY - A type of boardinirhouse, rtlfIIlated U il\1ch, except where a fraternal orpnization 1s ~ in a eolltp<lwned and eollep.manapd dormitory. in which CIll1l it shall be I'tiUlaled as a dormitory. { 265:la a.... .' . 256-12 CARLISLE CODE . 256-12 .... ,.t.; IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - Any area covered by a struc. ture, pavlnr or other man-made COlIer which haa a c:oelflclent of nznoff of eirht-tenths (0.8) or rreater. II determined by the Borourh Enrineer. Area required to be It1ft in pervious surfaces may be located In a different zoninl' district than the use, provided that Nch land area is abuttinl' or adjacent and that is deed restricted from further development. The "maximum impervious eoverap. shall be the total area of impervious Nrfaces divided by the total lot area. INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT - Includes the I-l and 1-2 Districta. INDUSTRIAL USE - Includes manufacturinl', dist.ribution. warehousinr and other operatiOIll of an industrial and not primarily a commen:ial or residential nature. INTERIOR CIRCULATION - The pattern of traff/e within a parkill&' lot or similar paved area. JUNK VEHICLE: A. A motor vehicle, recreational vehicle, trailer or truck, or the chlllis or body of such vehicle. that does not meet at Ieut twv (2) of the followinr three (3) conditiona: (1) Does not display a 1ic:e1ll8 plate with a current state rqistration sticker. (2) Does not have a valid slate safety inspection sticker, (3) Cannot be immediately operated on a public street. B. Also, any motor vehiele that haa been demolilhed beyond NUOnable I'1!peir shall be colllidered a "junk vehicle.' JUNKYARD - An area of land with or without buildinp, includinr land inside a bui/dinl not completely enc:loeed. used for the storap of used and discarded materials. includinl but nol limited to WBslAl paper. /'l1IS. metal, buildinl' malAlrials, house fumishinl3. machinery. vehicles or parts thereof, with or without the dismanllinl'. processinr. salvap. sale or other 1118 or disposition of the same. The depoeit or storap on a lot of two (2) or more unlicensed or wrecked vehicles, or the major pari thereof. shall be dt!lmed to constitute a .junkyvd.. except . " .<', '::;,:.,'r:,!~:';:;.:.:'r" '. ':'1.". ",' ' '., ;. ':;'.:,.'. " . " :.: : ',' 25536 S.II.. ., ~.. ( c '.. t. . 2M-12 CARLISLE CODE I 256012 MANUFAcrURED HOME - A structure, transporlllble In one (1) or more sections. which is built on 11 permlll1ent chassis and Is desirned (or u~e with or without a permanent foundation when conneeted to the required utilities. For t100dplain manailment PU1"l10681, the term "mlll1ufactured home" aJlIO ineludes park trailen, travel trallen and other similar vehicles placed on a site (or rreater thlll1 one hundred tirhty (180) consecutive days. f :. 1 "': ~ . . , ;'.... MANUFACTURED HOME PARK - A parcel or contii'\!- oua parcels of land divided into two (2) or more manufactured ". home lots (or rent or sale. ::. MASSAGE - The performance of mlll1ipulative exercises on a humin body by another penon that involves the hlll1ds and! or mechlll1icaJ device. MASSAGE PARLOR - An establishment that meets all of the followinr criteria: A. M11IIl1l\lI!I are performed for compensation on one (1) penon by one (1) or more other penons. C B. The penon conduetinlf the IIIUIa&'t dote not hold a valid Iicelllt u a health care prol_ional or ml1lllll1i' therapist illueel by the CommonwaJth of Pennsylvania or, in the event that no such Iicenainlf p..-lure is at the time provided by the CommonwaJth of Pennsylvania, another ute, it any, whOlle Iicensinlf requirements may be approved from time to time by Boroulfh Council. [ADMaded ~1()'1989 by On!. No. 1638, approved ~ I().I_] C. The masups are conducted within private or ltIIIiprl- vate rooms. " , D. The UIt ia not clearly a cuatomary and incidental .' . . . . .. _ry lilt to a permitted exercise club. .,: '" .. '. ..." . '~ - . MATERIALS - Articles which are componenll at a futun pnJduct. " 2663lI ...... f. ,," '"'I -, f 261).12 ZONING 5 265-12 ( MEDICAL OFFICE or CLINIC - A use involving the treatment and examination of patient.s by state-Iicensetl physicians or dentist.s, provided that no overnight patient.s shall be kept on the premises. This use may involve the \elItinll' of tiuu~. blood or other human materials for medical or dental purpoees. MEMBERSHIP CLUB - An area of land or building used by a recreational. eivie. social, fraternal, relie;ous. political or labor union assoc:iation of persons for meetinp and routine soc:ializinll' and recreation that are limited to members and their oceasional guests, but not including members of the Il!neral public. This use shall not inelude a !arret ranre for outdoor shooting, boardinghouse. a tavern. restaurant open to the general public or an auditorium unless that particular use is permitted in that district and the applicable requirement.s of that use are met. MID-RISE APARTMEN'l'S - Three (3) or more dwellinll' units within a buildinll' that is higher than thirty.five (35) feet or three and one-half (3~ stories. whi~hever is less. MINERAL EXTRACTION - Ineludes all activity which remoVl!l from the surface or beneath the surface of the land some bulk mineral resources by means of mechanical excavation. 'Mineral extraction" includes but is JIOt limited to the excavation necessary to the elltl'l1Ction of sand, gravel. toplOil. limllltone, sandstone. c:oaI, clay. shale and iron ore. The routine movement of and replacement of topsoil durinII' coMtruction shall not by itself be coMidered to be mineral extraction. MOBILE HOME - The same meaning as 'manufactured homL" . '~.' ~ . ..Jl':. ;'. ,:,:,.,. ';.:~. . ..... ( '. ,', '" \' ',. ,. '. ' " :.~!.' ':":':':l.. .' MODULAR HOME - A type of dwelling that mMla a definition of sinr;le-family detached dwelling. single-family Mmidetaehed dwelling. townhouse or garden apartment that is in substantial part but not wholly produced in sectioRl off the site and then is assembled and completed on the site. This shall not include any dwelling that meets the definition of ( 2M39 ...... > I 512 CARIJSLE CODE 8 2150-12 . . . . '. ',.., ", '0' ','; ,,' mobilt/manufactured home. nor shall it include any dwellin~ that does not I'I!llt on a permanent foundation. nor any dwellin~ intendlld to be able tD be moved to a different site once _mbllld, nor any dwellin~ that would not fully comply with any and all applicable buildin~ codes. A modular home aIJO shall not include a home that ineludes only one (1) substantial pi_ prior tD delivery on the site. MorEL or H<Yl'EL - A buildinr or a rroup of buildinllS. havln~ units containinr sleepin~ aeeommodations which are available for a temporary. rental occupancy by transients routinely for periods shorter than seven (7) consecutive da)'1. MUNICIPAL USE - A use owned by the Borourh of Carliale for a sovernmental purpoee. This shall also include an emlll'll'tncy servicea station. if such station located is approved by Borou~h Couneil. MUNICIPAUTIES PLANNING CODE - Pennsylvania Act 247 of 1968. III amendlld.1O ",';.;'" r ~ ,-,' . .... l"" " ." NONCONFORMING BUILDING OR STRUCTURE - A buildin~. structure or pan of a structure manifest1y not dsil!18d to \lOIIIply with the applicable 1lI8 or ext.ent of 1lI8 proviaiona in this chapter or amendment hereafter enacted. or which doeI not conform tD one (1) or more of the applicable _ or bulk l'lII\Ilations of the zonin~ district in which it is located. on the lIftective date of this chapter Qr u a result of a subsequent amendment thereto, where such buildin~ or structure wu lawful prior to enactment of the chapter or amendment. [Amended 8-16-1989 by Ord. No. 1637. approwd 8-10.1989) NONCONFORMING 1m - A lot, the area or dimenaion of which WlLS lawful prior tD the adoption or amendment of this chapter but which fails tD conform tD the requirements of the zonin~ district in which it is located by nuona of such adoption or amendment. [Amended 8-10.1989 by 0nI. No. 1637. approved 8-10.1989) .'.....-. " . . ~. ' .... , It Edl..... :01.... s.. 5.1 P.s. I 10101 II... 25540 ...... (' c c -., -. ,.;:,. " . ':' ~. , ..>..,;..:..:.:?,:!,~<,;,...;. ., ~~ - .. ~: " .. . '," 5512 ZONING 5512 (- PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT - An area of land controlled by a sinll'le landowner and developed as a sinll'le entity ror a number or industrial firms and planned and approved within the requirements or the (-2 District. ( PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT or PRD - An area of land, controlled by a landowner, to be developed as a sinll'le entity (or a number or dwellinw units or combinatlon or residentlal and nonresidential uses, the development plan ror which does not correspond in lot size, bulk, type of dwellinw or use, density or intensity, lot COYe1'llllll and required open space to the reaulalions established in any one (1) district created rrom time to time under the provisions of this chapter. [Amended 8-10.1989 by Ord. No. 1637, approved 8-1()' 1989) PLANT NURSERY - The raisinW of trees (lor tran4p!ant- inw). ornamentals. shrubs. fiowers or houseplants ror commer- cial sale. Retail sales shall only be allowed on the premiaes only of plants and trees raised on the premises, unless retail sales are permitted in the district. This use may include rreen- houses. but shall not include commercial forestry. This use may include oullide :Jtorall" and display. PREPARED FOODS - Foodstuffs and/or drinJea which have been cooked, chanll'll. cleaned or otherwise altered ror public consumption. PRINCIPAL BUILDING - The buildinw in which the principal use or a lot is conducted. Any buildinw that is physically attached to a .principal buildinll'" shall be considered part of that .principal buildinw.. . "::;:',H;;",::<~: , . .. ' . . ':~':; : ,:,~: :;:;~i, t :;: ~:::~:~;i'~ ,:.;;;fot~': ::~ ,. . :. ~ ':.,..... '.' ,. : .- ; : ;. ,', . ~ .;,;f;::j;:..: " ":", ':'. .. . " ;;:i:i:i :i:~i ~~~ ~~; ~;:i.: :;.1,:' ;;;.! :~~'::; ;:~;: !i::~:! :;;h~: ~~i:1~~i;~1i;;~~;~!;;it: (Cont'd on pep 25643) (I "1 ..... .'::,....:':: . ,;~", ' ; . '. ',' ~ '.: ,,~ . ~ " . , . '. . ..,." ".: , ": l' . ~ : ','.' '.. ..,' .; '.. , I 256-12 CARLISLE CODE I 255-12 TRADE SCHOOL - A f..:i1ity that is clearly primarily ( _ intended for education of a work. related skill or craft or hobby and that d_ not primarily provide state-required education to persons of lips four (4) to nineteen (19). This shall include a dancinr school. martial arts school or ceramics school. ':'. ;. .. TRUCK TER.'rfINAL - A use in'lOlvinr a larre variety of materials. inludinr materials owned by numerous corpol'llo- tions, beinr transported to a site to be unloaded :uld reloaded onto vehicles that are primarily tl'lloCtor trailers. A "truck terminal" shall not include a use that primarily involves distribution of individ'Jally addresaed paclalres weirhinr an avenre of less than seventy (70) pounds each when delivered in vehicles smaller than tl'lloCtor tl'lloilers. .,": "" ',:" ...: USE - Any purpose for which a buildinr or other structure or a tl'lloCt of land may be desirned. arranred. intended. maintained or occupied. and any activity, occupation, businl!88 or operation carried on in a buildinr or other structure or on a tr..:t of land. VARIANCE - The rrantinr of permi.laion by the Zoninr ( Hearinr Board to use or alter land or structures which requires a .variance" from the strict application of a requirement of the Zoninr Ordinance. "Variancea'" shall be rranted only II permitted under the Municipalities Planninr Code. Act 247, II amended. It . . '<":.;, '..... .'i'.... VIDEO ARCADE - Any commercial use oP'ln to the reneral public that includes six (6) or more electrical or electronic amusement machines that are operated by coins or tokens with monetary value. The use of five (5) or fewer such machines is a permitted by rirht acceI80ry use to any commercial use. .. .. :';"" ...... WALL - See "fence." WATER SYSTEM - A system deairned to tl'llon5mit water from a source tAl users in compliance with thti requirements of the appropriate state arencies and the borourh. It 1E001I....)I_ s.. sa '.5.110811.. al. 25562 s.l&. It (, .' ~ ~ 'r', ',' ,~. I 518 ZONING I 2155-18 ,,:":>":,,:',';...: '.. " . " '. B. Buildlnr setback line: forty (40) feet minimum for principal and acceuory structurea and uses. C. Lot width at street line: forty.five (45) feet minimum. except one hundred twenty.five (125) feet minimum for any lot with a driveway enterinr onto an arterial street or if a lot area of one (1) acre or more is required. D. Lot width at minimum setblA:k line: seventy.five (75) teet minimum. i l , , awn ..... ..... ' .... E. Buiklinll covenre: thirty percent (3006) maximum. F. Impervious covel'llore: fifty percent (50%) maximum. ..t. (Cont'd on pap 2I56lI7) ( ',,'. .:.... ." ,,' .." ....:,-;. -O.,;:,'I.:,..t",:.I.; 0".. ;: i,..;;',:::; ,;'.' ,,;. ,. 135' :.:,':. :.:., I 255-21 CARLISLE CODE I 255-23 ARTICLE IV R.2 Medium Density Residential Diatrfct ( ,. , .:.:.!;::"",~,::.: ~..'.:,-;,::i'<il".[.; .:' I 255-21. Intent. The intent oC the R.2 Medium Density Residential District is to: A. Provide tor the orderly expansion ot areu that ofter reaidential neirhborhoods at a medium density. B. Carefully control the types oC housinr to ensure compatibility with existinr houses. .....:.,,; ...... , C. Carefully protect these areas lrom uses thai may not be fully compatible. i I i f 255-22.: Uses permitted by r1rht. In any a":f District. land, buildin(lS or premises shall be used by rirht Cor one (1) of the Collowinr. but lor no other: A. Sinrle-tamily detached dwellinlr' c B. Sinrle-Camily semidetached dwellini\'. C. 0, Crop Carminr, '-." Planned reaidential development within Article XVIII and the Municipalities Planninr Code, I... l..;'jl '( U I , I,,' ('../ ) I 25~23. Acceaeory_ Only the Collowing :u:cessory uses shall be permitted: ,..' , .' . ',',' ~. : ',' '-'.: " ',' . ;:. '. '." .'. ..,.'., ,. . ::.'.'. ,".'....., A. Residential acces80ry uses. [See I 255-1790(12).] B. Private swimminr pools and tennis courts. [See I 256- 178A(34)(a) and (c).) 25558 (oo ,;. ,..... " , ',' , I I , , " ,.:Ior. ",. "'f' !'. .......... .,. '. .- .. .u._~_.___~.._~._._..__.___.__,..._._.._ 2 ~ 1 EXIIIBI'l'S 2 APPLICANT DESCRIPTION IDENTIFIED 3 Aerial photograph 11 4 2 Engineer's drawing 11 5 6 PROTESTANTS 7 1 Photograph 30 6 2 photograph 30 9 3 Photograph 30 10 4 Photograph 30 11 5 Phot.ograph 30 12 .... 6 Photograph 30 13 7 Photograph 30 14 8 Photograph 30 15 9 photograph 30 16 10 Photograph 30 17 11 Photograph 30 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 e 25 ..P.C.R.S (117 ) 258-3657 or (600) 863-3657 .. - ... .._----_.~-_.- ~~~.__._.--_.._.__.._...-. --.---.-..---.---.---.- 8 ....-~ preserve the trees that are back here in the back of the 2 property that currently exist, and only take down what 3 would be necessary to get the water service lines in. And 4 we've also proposed some landscaping throughout the 5 properties there. 6 MR. OCKER: Roger, do you have other presenters 7 tonight? 8 MR. MORGENTIlAL: I have Gne other presenter, 9 yes. I do have a question or two I'd like to ask Mr. 10 Brehm. 11 MR. OCKER: Please do. 12 BY MR. MORGENTIlAL: I I . "1 . 13 Q Are you familiar with the density requirements 14 for this particular property in this zone? 15 A Yes. I don't have the number in my head. I do 16 know that when we looked at this, the actual density 17 requirements for maximum density would have permitted, I 18 think, up to, at least, ten units on the property, maybe 19 more. And we decided to go with a little bigger house and 20 keep the density down. So this is well below the 21 allowable density for the property. There's plenty of 22 open space there, plenty of green space. 23 Q And last question. What is the width of the 24 cartway that would be constructed? " ) .~ ," 25 A That would be 22 feet. Again, we tried to C0me C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3651 or (800) 863-3657 ... .. 10 1 testify later as to the exact specifications of the 2 structure, so perhaps that would answer some questions. 3 MR. OCKER: We'll hold that question then. 4 MR. GIORDANO: Is he the developer'? 5 MR. MORGENTHAL: Yes, sir. 6 MR. GIORDANO: I'll wait until he's on. 7 MR. BREHM: I would point out before Norm gets 8 up to speak, the front of the house faces Ridge street, so 9 when he's talking about a brick face, that face would be 10 what the neighbors are looking at. 11 MR. SPITZ: The back part of these properties, 12 do they abut the school property? (' . 13 MR. BREHM: Yes. It's all school district 14 property. 15 MR. SPITZ: Is there a buffer between the back 16 and the school aligning -- what is that? 17 MR. BREHM: At the back of the property, 18 there's a grove of trees back there, and it's in the area, 19 I guess, where Mr. Phelan got in trouble with the 20 volleyball court, or something was built down in that 21 area. There's also the sanitary sewers down in there. 22 Most of that is on school property. The trees do come 23 onto the Robbins' property Just a iittle bit. I've got 24 them kind of shaded there, but those woods are quite I ....... 25 thick. C.P.C.R.S (717) 256.-.1657 or (800) 663-3657 .... ,. 12 ,~ 1 is going to happen after the bulldln'ls are built, their 2 sold, the tenants ate In, and then the properties change 3 hands, a new person cmnes In? [s that new person going to 4 require council to widen the street and give them a wider 5 street than 12 feet on that one alleyway that you can't 6 expand? what's going to happen there? I don't like the 7 idea of these facing an alley. Wo have an alley, not a 8 street. 9 MR. MORGENTHAL: If I might respond to that, we 10 have asked council for a modification requirement with i. . 13 in order to make it meet the 50-foot requirement. Because 11 regard to the overall right-of-way width based on the fact 12 that there is no additional land which could be acquired 14 that 50-foot requirement is in the land development part 15 of the borough's code rather than the zoning part, 16 council, we believe, is the appropriate body that must 17 rule on that request for the modification. If this is 18 approved as is, as we propose, the cartway width, the 19 actual paved area should be in line with what the borough 20 street is, the 22 feet. And I don't think that anyone who 21 would move in, knowing what the approved plan is and 22 knowiqg what the existence of space is on the ground, 23 could possibly require anything additional from council. 24 Il's an impossibility. .,....' 25 MR. HERMAN: What I would rather see is getting C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 - .. 1 4 1 cau~e a traffic jam for eight families. 2 MR. OCKER: Anymore questions? 3 MS. ClIER'l'OK: l had a question, not necessarily 4 for you, but I just thought maybe you would know the 5 answer that Mr. Morgenthal had explained to council 6 previously that the applicant had met with the neighbors 7 and discussed the project to see if any common ground 8 could be reached to try and make the development more 9 acceptable to t.he neighbors. Is that what we currently 10 see? Obviously they're not real thrilled, but were there 11 any other possibilities that were presented to you to draw 12 in this plan? r t 1 3 MR. MORGEN'I't1AL: I think I can speak to that. 14 Prior to the May 11th, 1995 council meeting when we were 15 last before you, we had a meeting with the neighbors on 16 site with Applicant's Exhibit Number 2 present, and we 17 were willing to answer questions. In fact, we did answer 18 some questions, walked with the various folks around the 19 property and attempted to solicit comments, which might be 20 incorporated, either in design or landscaping or anything 21 of that nature. 22 Unfortunately I understand the position of the 23 neighbors has been they just don't want development, and 24 we received absolutely no suggestions of any constructive .j 25 nature to this point. C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 -- ... 16 letter, to everythllltj that the borouqh staff has wanted me 2 to do. 3 The hOlls," is <Jo i nq to be three bedrooms, two 4 and a half baths. They will have a basement. And outside 5 of that, that's all [ can say. It's been a long drawn-out 6 affair. We've done everythinq we know to do to make it 7 happen. So if you do have questions, you can go ahead and 6 ask. 9 MR. MORGENTHAL: One thing I wanted to ask 10 about, the question was ~aised before about the outside of 11 the structure; what would be brick and what might be some 12 other material. Can you comment on that? .. 13 MR. ELAM: The garage, as the neighbors well 14 see, will be brick. The actual face of it -- and each 15 garage will have a little wall out from it three or four 16 feet as a cosmetic appeal. Also the house, as the 17 neighbors will see, the house will also be brlck faced, 16 and the rest will be a vinyl. It's not going to be no red 19 or purple or pink or nothing like that. 20 MR. OCKER: Questions from council? 21 MR. GIORDANO: We settled the brick issue. Are 22 these units going to be for sale or rent? 23 MR. ELAM: They'll be for sale, We would like 24 to keep the price range, if we can, due to the expense, ,,.., 25 from 130 to $139,000, if possible. C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 '-" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 11 12 . ~ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 .. ... 19 MH. GIORDANO: Thero's going to be storm drains on that street-? MR. UREHM: That's right. There's none there now. MH. GIORDANO: That will take care of the people that really abut there, their drainage will go away? MR. BREHM: That's right. Their drainage will go away. MR. GIORDANO: I've got a quest ion for our borough engineer. With no curb there, can that street be maintained without a curb. MR. KEISER: Absolutely. And the developer is following my recommendation for construction. MR. GIORDANO: Thank you. MR. OCKER: Are there any questions for the developer at this time? Bob? MR. OWENS: Thank you, Mr. Ocker. This information that you passed through council, and I draw your attention to the fourth and last paragraph where you spoke about giving up your purchase contract. Did you discuss this element with the neighbors in your conversations with them? MR. MORGENTHAL: At one time, we spoke some C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 ........ .... - 20 amount, 2 MR. OWENS: One moment. Let me finish this. 3 You say, I will offer to give up my purchase contract if 4 the nearby residents want to buy the property and fully 5 reimburse me my expenses. I believe in America the idea 6 of free enterprise. I am a working man trying to make a 7 living. I have the right to purchase the property, and 8 Mrs. Robbins also has a right to sell the property to me. 9 I ask you to consider this matter in my favor. Thank you 10 for your time. 11 My particular interest is in the first sentence 12 of your quote. Was this fully discussed with the "t 13 14 .--....) 15 neighbors if they didn't want this kind of a property behind them to enhance the rear of their properties, you're willing to sell the property to them if they want to buy it.? MR. ELAM: Yes, sir, I am. 16 17 18 ~IR. MORGENTHAL: May I just add one thing? Mr. 19 Elam, of course, is the developer. The other interested 20 party is Mrs. Robbins, who's here this evening. And on 21 the record at the last meeting, May 11th, we had made that 22 offer as Mr. Elam stated in his letter, and we would still 23 be more than happy to proceed with any kind of discussions 24 in that direction. It's something that has not really led 25 to active negotiations, but it's been on the table for a C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ ~ 21 lot longer. MR. OWENS: This presents us with a possible win, win situation. MR. ELAM: I also want [ think I mentioned it to Mr. Broujos one time -- and he can state if it's true or not or if I'm accurate -- that that may come later or something like that, I think he said, and that was it. So that's all, THE CHAIRMAN: Roger? MR. SPITZ: I guess the question would be, this is a public right-of-way. It's been used before when the Robbins Flowers was there. Is this not on our sidewalk program, or why HAS this particular area been omitted from what other -- I don't like the term allies. I don't think we have alleys. I went through this before. In the future, was there going to be sidewalks and curbing put down this avenue? MR. BEAN: No, We don't require the curbing and sidewalk on avenues that do not have residential properties attached to it, MR. SPITZ: But when it does become residential if th is does -- MR. BEAN: They're going to build it on the north side. MR. SPITZ: But the curbing on the other side C.P.C,R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 . :. ... " 22 1 would be amended'! 2 MR. HEAN: As Mike stated, that's our 3 recommendation based on the topography of the area and the 4 garages and the rear yards. 5 MR. SPITZ: Okay. That's all. 6 I know there's a lot of concern, MR. OCKER: 7 Norm, about open space and landscaping. Someone mentioned 6 awhi Ie ago that there would be added open space. Would 9 you speak to that d little bit more? That concerns me. 10 Let's talk about landscaping and open space. 11 MR. ELAM: It would be hard to say we could 12 make the units -- I forgot how many feet apart we Jo have 13 them. 14 MR. BREHM: I might be able to just give you a 15 1 i t tle idea. I can compare the open space here to the 16 Robbins' property as it was as a business. We have some 17 old photographs of when they were in business back then, and when we went through to do our storm water calculations, just as an example, there were many buildings and parking areas dnd greenhouses, roof tops, on this property as what we're propos i ng. They were all 16 19 20 21 22 cluttered up at the one end, and part of the building is 23 still there, but when they were in full swing, you had 24 more stuff on this property percentage wise than what 25 lwe're proposing right now. That included -- they had a C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (600) 663-3657 ~, 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 r) 13 '.1' 14 1 5 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 .... . concerns. ,. - "'--------26-l [ have eight grandchildren that play, and they run back and forth there. In fact, three of them used to live there. And guess where does tho liability lie? Does it lie with the developer or the borough council if this is made a street and in traffic one of them are hurt? Secondly, I have concern about fire code. The fire chief was supposed to look at that. That's a tight place to get fire equipment into, and especially with a narrow alley coming by the Wickard place. I guess we all have a concern where the guests are going to park. You say there's room in the driveway, but if two people have parties at the same time and more than two guests, where's the overflow of traffic going to land up? In my garage driveway? Will there be basements? Have you ever seen the back of that property when there's been a heavy rainstorm and the water has come off the mall? It's a pond back there. I don't know when you met with the neighbors, but I never heard about it. You never met with me. MR. BROUJOS: Harold, r have a question. BY MR. BROUJOS: Q Mr. Kretzing, you consider that, for your purposes of utilizing that alley as an alley, you now have a right of access to that alley? C,P,C.R.S (7171 258-3657 or (600) 663-3657 ,.-., 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1:":. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ -- 27 A Yes. Q And you consider that that right would be substantially denied by not only the people parking there, but their guests and others? A There's that possibility. MR. BROUJOS: Thank you. MR. MORGENTHAL: May I just ask Dr. Kretzing two questions? BY MR. MORGENTHAL: Q Dr. Kretzing, your property is here, I believe, at the corner of South Bedford and Cemetery Avenue? A Here and here. Q And you purchased your property from the Robbins family'? A Right. Q Would you be willing to sell back to them any amount of the property in order to allow that Cemetery Avenue to be widened to a 50-foot right-of-way? A Probably not, unless you want to pay $50,000. Q And the other question. Is theI'e anything you would like to see built on that site? A No. MR. MORGENTHAL: Thank you. MR. OCKER: Harold, you asked a while ~go about fire chiefs checking this particular -- I had a concern c'P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 --., I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 t,.. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ....... - 28 about that, too, and I have a note here that the plan has been reviewed by the borough fire chief. It's the opinion of the fire chief that the plan provides adequate access to the development for Bedford street for fire protection. In addition, two new fire hydrants are proposed in the plan, so that would answer one of the questions you had. MR. KRETZING: I would think that would be ideal for maybe two houses back there. In fact, I talked to Mr. Robbins once about it, that I would like to buy the property just behind my lot because I had thought personally of building a house back there. MR. OCKER: proceed, John. MR. BROUJOS: We call Raymond Wickard. Give your name and address and speak loudly so they can hear you. MR. WICKARD: My name is Raymond Wickard, and I live at 10 East Ridge street, which is adjacent to the narrow alley that goes back to the Robbins' property. We have -- well, we have our landscaping pretty much right up onto our line, which everybody else does that is next to any alieyway in the neighborhood. I was looking at a few existing, and almost all of the existinq alleyways, the landscaping is right on the edge of things. And, of course/ in order to have any traffic, more than one car --- actually tllo cars can't pass C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 11$ ,-, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 l:t 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 .-- ~ 29 there now. Any cars that go In and out have to wait for one to get by before the other one can come out. And I measured the cartway, and it's less than 17 feet, and that's from stone markers that were In there whenever I purchased my property and built my home. So those are old. They've been there for a long time. Actually it's 16 foot 9. That's aLl the space that's there. The property that's on the other side of the alley, they have a concrete curb along their side, which I assume is where the original curb line was because it sort of lines up with things. And at the back end of their property, the garage sets right on the corner. There's absolutely no room there to make a turn. So it's a very narrow thoroughfare, and it would require most of my trees to be ripped out to change it. That's about all I have to say in that regard. John has a couple photographs that shows the existence of the trees I'm talking about in relation to the cartway. BY MR. BROUJOS: Q I'll ask you to identify this. What picture is this of the alley and what perspective? A That's standing on Ridge Street, looking toward the Robbins' property. Q t'Ll show you the second one, and can you identify that one? C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 I "r, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ""'" ~ 30 A Same thiny. Q Is that a iittle closer to the alley? A Yes. Q And identify this picture. A This is the same shot, only taken a little bit back the alley a little bit farther. Q I show you this picture. Oescribe the scene there. A This one here shows a picture of the Bostock garage, which is built right on the corner of their property. It's almost a lime building. Q And describe this picture in terms of the buildings and the relationship to the corner. MR. SCHORPP: I f I can interrupt for a second, I think we have to, in some fashion, have these photographs identified for the record by numbering them or something. Otherwise the record is going to be very confusing. MR. BROUJOS: Mr. Ocker, what's the last one? MR. OCKER: Number three. MR. BROU,JOS: I'm going to ask that these be identified as Exhibits 1 through 10 of the property owners. (Protestants' Exhibits Nos. 1 - 10 were marked for identification.) C.P.C.R.S (717) 258~ 3657 or (800) 863-3657 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 <<';'. 13 14 1 5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ ~ 31 Q [show you Number 5, and describe Number 5. A Number 5 Is the picture of the Bostock garage, and it's right on the edge of the cartway. Q Describe 6. A This Is looking east toward the Robbins' carriage shed, which is where the original business was. Q Describe 7. A This is looking farther south, and it's the rear end of the properties that face South Hanover Street; the Fry residence and Costopoulos', and on out farther is the Phelan r.esidence, Q Identify this object here. A There's a telephone pole or car pole sitting right on the corner of the line, sort of in the middle of things. Q Identify Number 8. A This is looking the same distance, only it's a shot that shows the rear farther out to the south, a little bit better than the last one. Q And describe Number 9. A This is standing at the rear of my father-in-law's garage looking toward Ridge Street. My father-In-law's building is facing South Hanover Street, and this is at the rear of his property. Q Does he use Cemetery Avenue or this alley for C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 10 12 f'~. , " 13 ~ ... 32 1 transportat Lon'? 2 He uses both. A 3 And how? What directions? Q 4 Well, generally he backs out of his garage and A 5 goes east on Cemetery Avenue, and when he's coming home, 6 he usually turns In off of Ridge street onto -- 7 Q Describe Number 10. A Number 1l.J is looking toward Ridge street from the rear of my in-laws' property. Q And describe number 11 in terms of the objects on each side of the right-of-way and this object here. 8 9 11 A This is looking south on the alley. The Bostock residence is on the left-hand side. The curbing 14 and tree stands right on the curb line. On the right-hand 15 side is a row of Hemlocks which are planted, more or less, 16 on what would be a curb line. 17 With respect to that corner that's been shown Q 18 in the pictures, would you venture any observation on 19 whether, in your opinion, a fire truck can fit through in 20 that corner? 21 Well, a fire truck would have problem getting A 22 through there without scraping sldes. Like I said, the 23 cartway, itself, only measures 16 foot 9 lnches, and 24 that's if you were able to go back to the curb. 25 MR. SPITZ: Mr. Wlckard, were you living in C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 ".. 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 "" "" 33 your residence at the time Robbins Flowers was -- MR. WICKARD: Yes, I was. MR. SPITZ: Are you saying that eight family cars, at a minimum, would be more traffic coming in and out of that road than there was when Robbins Flowers was flourishing business? MR. WICKARD: That's hard to say. I always thought that a good bit of Robbins' traffic used Bedford Street, although I never paid that much attention to it. It was never a problem, although the problem was back at that corner, and Mr. Robbins used to be concerned about cars coming in when somebody was coming out because of the narrowness of that turn. His parking lot, more or less, encouraged traffic to come in from the other direction. I think that probably most of the people that went back there probably came in by me but didn't leave that way. If his customers came in, they probably come in that way, but they didn't leave that way. But like I said, I don't know. I'm just making an observation ten years after the fact, you know. MR. SPITZ: John, do you have some sort of traffic study you're going to present later? MR. BROUJOS: No, MR. WICKARD: I do know a couple times Mr. Robbins requested that I shear my shrubbery a little bit. C,P.C,R,S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 170 -. ~ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ..\'~ 13 \"'.' 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 .-- ~ ....__.__~~___~.____ .._._.___._.~_u___...__._.__ ,__ .... __._. _.____.__" _..n___ ________ 35 MR. m;;AN: r have had a discussion with Chief Boils on this issue, and I asked him a specific question given the roadway width of this developn~nt shown in the plans. He felt very comfortable in getting a fire truck or trucks in this area. And to be honest with you, Mr. Broujos, I didn't ask about backing up to return. His main concern was to take care of the public safety concern of a fire, and this could be adequately done. I'm not sure if the bigger issue is backing up when you leave. But to me, the main concern was making sure the fire trucks got in to be able to fight the fires if one would occur. MR. BROUJOS: I didn't make any objection to that testimony because it's the nature of these proceedIngs, but I still think the chief should be here. MR. SPITZ: Dick, to clarify my own question awhile ago, it's stated here in the conversation between Mr. Lebo and Mr. KeIzer that the flower shop generated 106 trips per day, and that the new eight-unit development would create 47 trips, MR. WICKARD: I'd say that traffic was heavy, maybe, not on a daily basis. r mean, it was heavy around holidays. It wouldn't have been that heavy on a daily basis. MR. SPITZ: Okay. C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 .~" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 t'. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 .-. "*' 37 tree in the Borough of Carlisle, you know, when you plant trees in the tr'ee line. My tt'ees are sort of in that location. So they're spreading out over the line, which never seemed to create a problem. But with two cars trying to pass, it would create a problem. Two cars couldn't pass without -- well, really wrecking them. MS. CHERTOK: Is part of the plan, then, that Mr. Morgenthal or somebody from the Robbins' development group has approached you and discussed with you removal of those trees? MR. WICKARD: No, they haven't. MS. CHERTOK: Thank you. MR. BROUJOS: Any other questions of Mr. Wickard? MR. OCKER: Did we make note awhile ago that there were 11 pictures and not ten? Do we have that somewhere? MR. SCHORPP: I have tha t, yes. MR. OCKER: Proceed, John. MR. BROUJOS: Call Mr. Uilkema. MR. UILKEMA: My name is Jarl Uilkema. I live at 85 East Ridge. This is the first time I have attended one of these hearings, but I think what's being proposed here is entirely out of keeping with the neighborhood. That's what I mostly object to. There are other things C.P.C.R.S (717) 258--J657 or (800) 863-3657 171 ......... ,1',.0-..,,; 39 alley, and [ presume that if this goes through on the south side, somebody wIll be knocking at the door pretty soon and wanting to build something on the other side of our alley. And it is an ailey, also, and it is wider than the alley that's now called Cemetery Alley. MS. CHERTOK: Fred, you apparently had a his opinion is that there would be no problem getting fire discussion with the chief, who has confirmed for you that apparatus through this street if it were to be created as such? MR. BEAN: Yes. MS. CHERTOK: Did you have any additional discussion with regard to the types of vehicles that have just been mentioned; the garbage truck, UPS truck? I know that they're not as long as some fire trucks, but, of course, they could be taller or wider. Had some thought been given to the vehicles that are going to be accessing this on a daily basiS? MR. BEAN: Only to the extent that the initial plan submitted by the applicant showed traffic egress and ingressing from the alley from both ends, and it was staff's re~ommendatLon to consider the no-entrance into the alley exiting Ridge street. tn other words, when a delivery would come into one of the apartment units, one of the town houses, they wouid have to come in off of C,P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 /7' .- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 . ';. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~"'" ,.-. --------..,-'-'----1 41 First, I would like to say that that green spot is very close to my heart, and [ would hate to see it eradicated. And the other thing [ would like to say for the record, we were never, never asked to buy the property, and either were the Angiolillos. [ just wanted the record straight on that. My big concern is really the children. Can you imagine 16 garages, all those cars, visitors, running up and down that alley? As everyone has been mentioning, it is an alley. I have grandchildren. Kretzings have grandchildren, and our neighborhood is becoming a family oriented neighborhood, and I really would like for you to consider their safety, MR. BROUJOS: Would you comment on the activity of other vehicles during the time that it was a flower business? MS. BROUJOS: Yes. I had four acti ve children, and the Kretzings had six active children, and we never had a problem. Occasionally on holidays there would be some traffic, but not anything to be concerned about. MR. BROUJOS: Questions by the board? MR. OCKER: Questions, please, from council. MR. BROUJOS: No questions by the board. Larry Foote. BY MR. BROUJOS: C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .::- 13 14 15 16 1 7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ ,. 42 Q Please give your name and address. A My name is Larry Foote. I reside at 3441 Wagners Gap Road in Carlisle. Q What is your occupation? A Real estate appraiser. Q And just briefly what training have you had to qual ify you? A Well, I've taken all of the appraisal and institute courses leading to the MAl designation, and I've taken all the courses and fulfilled the experience requirements for general appraisers certification by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Q Are you also a licensed broker? A Yes, I am. Q And in that capacity, have you appraised properties in the Carlisle area? A Yes, I have. Q And are you familiar, generally, with property in the Carlisle area and specifically in the area of Ridge street? A Yes, I am. Q Have you observed that area, which is a subject of this development? A Yes, I have. Q And have you been personally to the tract of C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 171 ,--. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ...''It 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ "... 45 family dweiling in an aroa of slngio families and also an opportunity to buy a slngie family dwelling In an area of duplexes, can you co~nent on the Impact? A If I understood your question correctly, if there were a property, a single family detached dwelling for sale in a totally single family detached neighborhood and an identical house for sale in a neighborhood where there were single family detached dwellings and duplexes or town houses, I feel that an average buyer, if those two properties were priced at the same price, the consumer would purchase the single family detached dwelling in the neighborhood of all single family detached dwellings given the opportunity to buy either one of those homes at the same price. MR. BROUJOS: Questions by council? MR. GIORDANO: Larry, is that property zoned right for these type of houses? MR. FOOTE: Yes. R2, medium density residential. MR. GIORDANO: Now, what you're saying that these type houses and the single dwellings don't mix. Is that what you're saying? MR. FOOTE: That's correct. MR. GIORDANO: Why are developers coming in here, like the Dickinson College, making a development C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 /82. ,-, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .'. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 -- ~ west of Walnut Court whore I live where they have mixed houses, where they have single dwelling and row houses? Why are they doing that if they can't qet their value of money out of it? Same area where I live, I'm walnut court. I li ve MR. FOOTE: It's good for the developer because they're going to get more units per acre of land, and typically you'll find that those homes are lower in value than the single family detached. Walnut Court is another example. I t would have an adverse impact on the single family detached property values. In other words, if anyone of. you here could buy $180,000 single family detached dwelling in an all single family detached dwelling neighborhood or you could buy the same house for the same $180,000 in an area where you would have town houses or duplexes across the street, which would you buy? Is there any of you who would say, I'll take the one across the street from the town houses rather than across the street from the other $180,000 home? MR. GIORDANO: Why are developers building houses like that? MR. FOOTE: The smaller homes? MR. GIORDANO: No, the big homes and town houses, a mixture. Why are developers building houses like that? C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-,3657 or (800) 863-3657 46 liJ ~ ,.... 47 MR. Foon;: [don't see that happening. MR. GIORDANO: They did it up at Wainut Court. MR. FOOTE: That's the only place I see that happening. MR. GIORDANO: Then the college has come in here with a plan on west of that there, in the land west of us, proposed for town homes and big homes. MR. FOOTE: They're trying to maximize the land use. I think if you ask the residents of that neighborhood where you have the mixed use, if you look at the property's sale prices, per square foot sale prices, you'll find that the per square foot sale prices of the single family detached dwellings that are not directly across the street from the town houses will be higher than those that ~re. And marketability has affected the marketing time for those single family detached dwellings which are adjacent to the duplexes or town houses. Th marketing time will be greater because given the option of, do you want them over here where they're all single family detached or do you want a house over here across the street from town houses and duplexes. They're going to opt for the area where it's all single family detached, and there's only onB thing that's going to give them enough incentive or motivation to buy a house across the street from the town houses dnd duplexes, and that's to C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-)657 or (800) 863-3657 """,", 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 t":. 13 1 4 1 5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ ,........ 48 lower the price. And that's what we see happening in the market place. The developer is going to -- typically they'll build the units, like the town houses or duplexes, on land that's less desirable. The lots are smaller, but they're going to get more units per acre. It's more profitable. MR. GIORDANO: But it's still mixed, though? MR. FOOTE: Oh, yeah. THE CHAIRMAN: Roger? MR. SPITZ: Larry, suppose these houses are built in this general area. As a licensed appraiser, how much percentage wise would you depreciate the houses in that area? MR. FOOTE: It's hard to pull a figure out of the air, which is what that would amount to. However, I have done this in the past in areas of all single family dwellings versus single family dwellings and other uses. I did a study like that out on Alexander Spring Road, and the.e was a marked significant decrease in appreciation of those houses. It's hard to say. I could say ten. Somebody else could say five, I'm not prepared to prove that figure at this point. but that can be proven by taking samples of properties that sold in all residential single family detached neighborhoods versus another neighborhood, and look at the sale prices per square foot C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-)657 or (800) 863-3657 J8S ,......, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. '. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... ~ 49 and compute the difference, the ratE!. MR. SP[TZ: You just can't give me a figure right now? MR. FOOTE: It would be unqualified. It would be a guess. probabl y t.en to 15 I would say, maybe, in this situation, because of the value of the homes, which you're looking at $180,000 homes out here, maybe as much as 20 percent. But, again, my crystal ball is no better than yours. MR. SPITZ: That's d hypothetical? MR. FOOTE: Yes, that's a guess. MR. SPITZ: Thank you. MR. KEISER: Mr. Foote, wha: would you say is the average in single family residential property in Carlisle neighborhood rate of appreciation currently? MR. FOOTE: Probably six to eight percent. MR. KEISER: Annually? MR. FOOTE: That depends on the neighborhood. I mean, if you look at a neighborhood, you can get different rates of appreciation and different rates in Carlisle, and it depends on what the surroundings are. Houses across the street from the factories, like, P.R. Hoffman, Tire and Rubber, certainly won't increase or appreciate the value at t.he same rate as the ones in the Old Mooreland section where you have all single family C.P,C.R.S (717) 2583657 or (800) 863~3657 1St, ~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .,C'. 13 .......,.. 1 4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ""'" ,..., 50 detached ~esldential p~ope~tles. MR. KEISER: What would you say is the cu~~ent rate of appreciation of p~ope~ties on East Ridge street? MR. FOOTE: I would not say -- I could not say ", what the app~eciation of ~ate is on East Ridge St~eet because there have not been enough sales and ~esales on ~he same p~ope~ties on Ridge Street. I know that because I have recently appraised two prope~ties on East Ridge street, and there's a very short supply of compa~able sales in that area. People tend to stay the~e almost fo~eve~. There just haven't been many comparable sales. So that's the way you would establish an appreciation rate. Look at what a house at 60 East Ridge Street sold fo~ five years ago, look what it sold for, again, this year, if no changes have occurred, no physical improvements have been made, the difference would equate to be the appreciation rate. But we don't have enough sale and resale properties in that area to calculate that. MR. KEISER: How can you come to the determination that these prope~ties are decreasing in value? MR. FOOTE: Did I say they're decreasing in value? MR. KEISER: The rate of app~eciation is decreasing. C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 o~ (800) 863-3657 --. 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 .". 13 ".". 14 1 5 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ .-" 51 MR. FOOTE: Old I Hay that? MR. KEISER: I und'!t'stood you to say that. MR. FOOTE: You think that [ said that the property values on East Ridge Street are decreasing? MR. KEISER: No. The rate of their appreciation is decreasing if these units are built, MR. FOOTE: Oh, will decrease? Yes, I did say that. MR. KEISER: Help me understand how you can make that determination if you don't know what they're appreciating at without that building. MR. FOOTE: Let me run through this for you again. If you can buy a property, a single family detached dwelling in an all single family detached dwelling neighborhood for $180,000, you buy the identical property, built by the same builder, in an adjoining neighborhood where there are single family detached dwellings and duplexes or town houses, both exactly the same house, their clones, they're both on the market for $180,000, which one would you buy? MR. KEISER: I would buy the single family house. MR. FOOTE: You would buy the one in the neighborhood of all single family dwellings. MR. KEISER: That's right. C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 ,..... ,..... 52 ,-, 1 MR. FOOTE: Now, what can [ do to entice you to 2 buy the one that has town houses and duplexes across the 3 street', Is there anything [ can do to make you want to 4 buy that house? 5 MR. KE [SER: [don't think you' ro compar ing 6 apples and apples, in my mind. 7 MR. FOOTE: It's not. What would I have to do 8 to get you to buy that house in the mixed use 9 neighborhood? Say lower the price, What do you think I 10 might do? 11 MR. KEISER: Let me try to explain to you what 12 the specific problem is in what you're saying here. ... 13 You're telling me that these properties, the rate of 14 appreciation is going to decrease, but I don't think 15 you're taking in account what's already behind these 16 properties. There's a dilapidated structure back there 17 that's really not appealing. I don't understand how you 18 can say what you're saying when you don't consider what's 19 in place currently. 20 MR. FOOTE: What I'm saying is I'm explaining 21 what conformity is all about and the impact of lack of 22 conformity in a neighborhood, generally. That's all I'm 23 saying. I'm trying to illustrate how that works, how the 24 principle of conformity works. 25 MR. KEISER: And I think to do that correctly C.P,C.R.S (717) 258 3657 or (800) 663-,3657 /8'1 -., 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 ,1<) 13 ','",' 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 .... ~ 54 Q HIghland Avenue, as well? A No. Q Now, on ~ast Ridge street, is it not true that there are a number of duplexes? AVes. Q So they're existing? A Yes. r. said predominantly single family detached, but there are a couple of town houses. Q Now, you've spoken about the number of increases that you would expect or problems you would expect if this property came in there, how the impact would have on that. You're speaking in theory, are you not, rather than individual sales that are lost or something of that nature? you're speaking in appraising theory? A I don't know so much theory as it is what actually occurs when you don't have conformity. Q But you're not basing this on actual sales that were made or not made, are you? A No. Q Now, are there not other factors that influence a person buying or not buying in the neighborhood besides whether there are duplexes in the single family neighborhood? A Sure. C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 ~ ,......, 56 ......., 1 got more traffic coming and going. Not everybody loves 2 kids going through their back yards. I don't know if they 3 have that problem or not. I'm just talking about a 4 potential for that in an area where you're adjacent to a 5 school. So there is a benefit because of the proximity to 6 the school, if that's what you're leading up to. 7 Q But if you consider the benefits versus 8 detriments, would you agree there is, a least, a slight 9 detriment to the neighborhood? 10 A I don't know. 11 Q Let's go back a few more years since this is an 12 old neighborhcod. How about when they put the MJ Mall in f') 13 across the way. Did that have an effect? 14 A I would say that that probably would have had 15 an adverse impact on the neighborhood. In other words, a 16 commercial use adjacent to a residential neighborhood 17 would tend to have an adverse impact on residential value, 18 generally. 19 Q How about the proposed construction across the 20 way from the Alliance Home where they're going to be 21 putting in many more apartmepts? 22 A I don't think so because there is an existing 23 situation there, and where they're placing those is off to 24 the side. They're only putting two units in there, as I 25 recall, because I appraised that for the Alliance Home. C.P.C.R.S (717) 258~J657 or (800) 863-3657 -, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 12 "~ 13 f " 14 1 5 1 6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ 1""1 58 Thank you. think that's all I have. MR. BROUJOS: I have somD questions in rebuttal, if 1 could. B'f MR. BROUJOS: Q Is it correct that your observations, when you were questioned about them being based on appraiser theory are, in fact, based on your experience? A Yes. Q And are most of the observations based and standards that are used in appraisal and evaluation based on experience? A That's correct. Q Given as a constant matter the addition to property, schools, shopping, roads, is it your testimony tllat this proposed development would have a tendency to lower the values of the properties? A 'fes, only because of its style and design of not being single family detached dwellings. Q And is it correct that with respect to your last question from Mr, Morgenthal about the effect of two single family dwellings, as there are more dwellings, that would tend to have more of an adverse impact in that development area? A 'fou mean at greater density? Q 'fes. C.P.C.R.S (717) 258,3657 or (800) 863-3657 /15 ~ ~ 60 detached dwellings? Q 'les. A 'les. Q And what would that effect be? A Lowering them. MR. MORGEN'rfIAL: Thank you. B'l MR. BROUJOS: Q Did you, in your consideration of the R2 medium density district, consider the intentions set forth in the ordinance, which I alluded to in my earlier remarks? A 'les, I did. MR. BROUJOS: No further questions. Any questions from Borough Council? THE CHAIRMAN: No questions. Proceed, John. B'l MR, BROUJOS: Q For the record, just one more question of Raymond. Mr. Wickard, what respect to the operation of a florist shop in the past at the Robbins' location are you aware of a manner in which he moved goods back into and supplies back into the shop? A Pertaining to what? Q From the Ridge street area. A Well, occasionally he would -- if he was getting freight in on a tractor-trailer, rather than to C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 /q7 "'-.. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 '. 13 t , 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 .. . 62 street -- It's not In accordance with the ordinance. It's a vioiatlon, and Il's another exception they're asking for. In addition, there was an observation, well, the problem of laking water out; it's there, but we're going to try and soLve it. And I would say, again, attempting to make a street and to put buildings that are not in conformance with the character of the neighborhood is causing one violation, one exception after another. Now, the observation and the fact, I believe, it was that there are a series of garages that had to be accounted for and that it was difficult to make the transition. And there, again, the developer and his planner are saying, in attempting to change an alley into a street, we have to make another and that's about a fifth exception. So they eliminate the curb. I think you have to give serious consideration to the fire fighting issue, and I won't go into that anymore. There is no question that these people have been willing to negotiate a purchase. There has been testimony unrefuted that Louise, my wife, we weren't asked, and Anqiolillos weren't asked, and there is always an opportunity for some negotiation for purchase, and that's a matter that's aLways open. 1 regret that Hoger, again, this time has said C.P.C.R.S (717) 258 3657 or (800) 863-3657 --. , 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 . . 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ""'" I""'" 1----- 63 that there were no suqgeslions and no discussion. Actually there was dIscussion, and it simply was a matter that thore was no aqreement. The reasons that arc qiven are numerous. First the character, and, in fact, this changes the character of the neighborhood. There are now app~oximately nine units just on the southern side of Ridge street from an alley that's 16 foot 9 inches wide down to Bedford street, and two of those are a duplex. All of a sudden, we have four more duplexes, which changes it from roughly one out of nine in that area from beinq a duplex, a very compatible design, to five out of nine being duplexes. The precedent is really important. The effect of this decision would go far beyond. As far as the question of buildings being built along alleys, if that's wrong, it shouldn't have been done. And if it wasn't good planning and it wasn't in conformance with the ordinance, it shouldn't have gone through. We cited five separate situations where there's violations. The children is a major issue. Backing up a fire truck, backing up of UPS and garbage collection, it creates hazards for children, And! have to mention children, aqain, ~ecause it involves a grandchild now and a grandchild in lIlovcmber and the numerous Kretzing grandchildren and children. What's going to happen is C.P.C.R.S (7'7) 258,3657 or (800) 863-3657 7,00 -- ~ 65 ,....., 1 Brief closing remarks, Roger. 2 MR. MORGEN'l'f1AL: Yes. r'll try and make this 3 very brief. 4 Apd 1 26, 1995, Mr. Brou )OS wrote a letter, 5 which I think is probably part the record here. And among 6 the things, he points out in the third paragraph, we met 7 with the developer and are opposed to the development 8 plan, and I think that sums up the situation here. 9 There's no question that these folks are very 10 sincere in their open decision, but I would suggest that 11 simply not wanting something to commend, whether it's 85 12 percent or 100 percent, is not and never has been a legal .t 1 3 reason for another property owner to be deprived of the 14 use of his or her property. We have asked for a number of 15 waivers. That is true. The only one we characterize as 16 significant is the overall width of the right-of-way, 18 Back in the 1960s, I believe it was, when that 17 simply because there Just isn't anything more available. 19 30 or 34 foot strip was reserved, that's all that was 20 required by the ordinance then. The important point is 21 not to look at the overall width of the right-of-way. I 22 think we have to look at the cartway. The testimony of 23 our engineer is the cartway is going to be 22 feet, and it 24 you look at Section 226-23 of your ordinance for a local 25 street, the minimum for a local street is a 22-foot C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 2.02 ~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 . .. 13 , 14 1 5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~ ~, 67 like to leave it the way it is. My clients have come in and proposed a deveLopment which is in conformity with the ordinance to the greatest extent possible. We suggest that it is appropriate and compatible with the neighborhood, and we ask that you give us a favorable approval. Thank you. THE CHAIRMAN: At the beginning of our meeting, members of council, I enco~raged you to make a decision tonight. This has been before us now for a couple of months, and as I said, these people have been to three meetings. This is the fourth. So I woulj encourage you to make that decision tonight. Are you ready to make a decislOn? MR. SCHORPP: Mr. Ocker, before you do that, if I can interrupt, with your permission. I want to make sure that we have a complete record as far as what's transcribed for what has occurred this evening. Let me read for both Mr. Morgenthal and Mr. Broujos what I perceive to be essential parts of the record aside from the testimony. And if either of you have any objections to either of those items, pLease interject your objection after I've listed it. It wouLd be my impression that the record should include the original pl~n application; the 25 preliminary plan; the written request for modification of L C.P.C.R,S (717) 258 3657 or (800) 863-3657 ~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ...", , ~"", 66 standards in the lE!tter fl'om Roqer Morqenthal dated May 10/ 1995; minutes of thE! Planning Commission meeting of April 27, 1995; minutes of the Borough Council meeting of May II, 1995; proof of publication of public notice of the public hearing which was held this evening; proof of publication of the public notice of the special meeting that's being held this evening; two exhibits offered by the applicant this evening; photographs 1 through 11 offered by the residents this evening; Mr, Brou)os' letter of April 26th, 1995 addressed to the Planning Commission; and I believe that that would complete the necessary submissions into the record. This matter did appear before the Planning Commission and Borough Council in 1994 as solely a request for modification of standards without an accompanying plan, and the matter was tabled at that time. I see no reason to include those minutes unless either one of you request that they be included. MR. BROUJOS: What minutes were they, again? MR. SCHORPP: They would be the minutes of the Planning Commission of July 20th, 1994 and the Borcugh Council meeting of August II, 1994, at which the request for the modification of standards was tabled. I believe that all of the information required for that has already been -- or has been covered, again, as part of the instant proceedings. C.P.C.R.S (717) 2583657 or (800) 66)-3657 2.05 .-.., 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 12 .'t 13 1 4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 -- ~ 70 essential part of the meeting and it should stay. MR. SCHORPP: And your letter was sent on behalf of the residents that you're objecting to. Is that correct, Mr. Broujos? You're objecting to including in the record your letter that you sent on behalf of the resident.s? MR. BROUJOS: Yes. We made our point on behalf of the residents. MR. SCHORPP: It would be my advice to council that the letter ought to be considered a part of the record if Mr. Morgent.hal request that it be included. THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you for your advice. MR. SCHORPP: I belleve that should conclude the transcript or the record of the actual hearing, itself . THE CHAIRMAN: One more person to speak, please, DENNIS LEBO: My name is Dennis Lebo. I live at 514 Northwest street in the borough. As d resident of the borough who is concerned about subjective application of property owners' rights as well as the tax base, I'd like to make a few observations. I've heard the objectors prestHlt the 1 r case four times, and, at least, three occasions, Mr. Broujos and others have stat.ed that their highest desire would be C.P.C.R.S (717 \ 258-3657 or (800) 86J -3657 207 ... - 72 ..-. 1 on th~t basis and you voted for the rezoning of the Giant 2 tract, you owe the folks on South Spring Garden Street 3 qui te an apology. Or conversely / I f a shopping center 4 across the street from R2 houses is not lacking in 5 compatibility or changing the character which appears as 6 Mr. Broujos believes since his firm represented Giant in 7 those proceedings, those garages back to back certainly 8 are not incompatible. 9 As far as his argument over safety is 10 concerned, at your May meeting, there was a discussion 11 presented that it should be decided that you were going to 12 believe the staff when there was conflict between you .". 1 3 and/or the staff in the second party. I'm sure you read 14 the minutes, and T/ll try to refer to them from the two 15 Planning Commission meetings held on this plan. I know 16 that Mr. Keizer was questioned quite directly about the 17 safety issues in that he is confident that it is a plan 18 that should not be rejected for safety reasons. In fact, 19 the min1ltes, and it has also been referred to this 20 evening, also stated that the staff recommend approval. 21 So those of you who hold that position that the staff 22 should be believed should not vote against the plan for 23 that reason. 24 As a taxpayer, I feel if you deny this plan, 25 you should reduce borough expenditures, not only to offset C.P.C.R.S (117) 258~3657 or (800) 863-3~57 1.09 ~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 1 2 .';) 13 14 1 5 16 17 16 19 20 2,1 22 23 24 25 ~ ,..... 74 F~Dnk hUH one mo~e quest Lon. MR. GlORLJANO: [have one question for ou~ bo~ough flngLneer. [n fal~neHH to the people that live on Ridge St~eet, you say there will be no cu~b or sidewalk in the rear of theL~ building. Will that ba fo~eve~, or sometime down the ~oad, can anothe~ council make them put a cu~b o~ sidewalk Ln'? MR. KEISER: You~ ordinance p~ovides you the authority within 30 days written notice to any property owners to require curb and sidewalk construction. MR. GIORDANO: Say this again, now. MR. KEISER: Your current ordinance on the book gives you, as a council member or the council, the authority to require within 30 days written notice directing any property owner in the borough to construct a curb or sidewalk. You have the authority to do that. Your current ordinance. MR. GIORDANO: But what I'm saying, five years down the road or ten years down the road, they say to them, you have to put a curb and sidewalk in the back, they have to do this? MR. KE[SER: That is a possibility, yes. MR. BEAN: Just a follow-up questLon on that. I heard a little bit from Mr. Brehm on this. Maybe you C.P.C.R.S (717) 258~3657 or (800) 863-3657 2./1 .'-" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 11 12 .".. 13 I" 14 1 5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ ".., ._----_..-~-----_._._--_._---- .._-~-_._~--~---- can expand on it a little bit, Mike. On the topography on that, what would that mean trying to put a curb and sidewalk in that area: MR. KEISER: You'd have to fill some of the lots. You might have to lower some of the lots to get an even grade. Right now if you put curb and sidewalk in, there will be definite restrictions to drainage on site to the properties, which could cause them some flooding problems. MR. GIORDANO: In other words, what you're saying, let it alone? MR. KEISER: That's my recommendation. Let it cross the street and get into the drain system that the developer is proposing to build. MR. BROUJOS: Since that observation is made, I have to make a very serious objection to that opinion because if you're saying that a property owner that lives on Ridge Street that already has sidewalk in the front is subsequently going to be subject to a potential council down the line assessing and imposing sidewalk and cushion on the rear of their lot, it's extraordinary. It's deprivation of property without due process. It's unfair, and it shows you the defect of this entire jury-rigged system to try and make a street out of an alley in that area, Because one after another we're seeing four, five, C.P.C.R,S (717) 258~3657 or (800) 863-3657 75 " "" ~ ..-.. 1 six, seven changes that are being made and opinions being 2 given to a development. 3 MR. MOHliEN'l'HAL: With all due respect, I thInk 4 Mr. Keiser's point and r don't want to put words his 5 mouth, but that is on the books now and has nothing to do 6 with what our requirements are. 7 THE CHAIRMAN: I close the hearing at this 8 time. 9 Members of council, are you ready to make a 10 decision tonight? If you are, r' 11 turn the meeting over 11 to Bob, and we'll open our meeting and make a decision. 12 Are you ready? II'. 13 MR. OWENS: Members of council, we're reviewing 14 now the information that's before us, and that is 15 considering a preliminary subdivision and land development 16 plan of the Robbins' property development, which is 17 submitted by the Windsor Building Company, 18 We've indicated by accent that you are ready to 19 make a decision on this. 20 Mr. Solicitor, if my wording is correct, then 21 if we vote yes to the approval, then the preliminary 22 subdivision and land development plan goes into action. 23 If we vute no, then it's done. It's a moot subject as of 24 th.l.s evening. r would ask your advice, sir, since we have 25 the possibility of a tied vote. If It is a tie vote, it's C.P.C,R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 76 """" 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 t:t 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 '" ~ 77 my understanding that it cannot be an approval, so it stands, then, for a disapproval. And then we can call within four or five days, as I understand your information, for a meeting to have either the mayor and/or the president of council vote. It would have to be the mayor to come in and cast his vote in order to break the tie. MR. SCHORPP: Let me amplify on what you're legal posture is this evening. First of all, let me say that I gave you some confusing information before the meeting about the possibility or the situation if there is a tie vote. I'll clarify that for you in a minute. As I understand from my discussion with borough staff, the preliminary plan, which you have before you, meets all of the requirements of the borough/s subdivision and land development ordinance, which appears in Chapter 226 of the Code of the Borough of Carlisle with the exception of three items. It ,is my opinion, also, that the use proposed by the plan meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance, which appears in Chapter 255 of the Code. Therefore, the three deficiencies which appear are, number one, the lack of a required 50 foot wide right-of-way for Cemetery Avenue, which is being proposed not as an avenue or as -- we do not like to call them alleys, but is being proposed as a local street and will C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 ll1 ,~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .:';. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ 1'*\ ....---.-~..._--_._-_._,_.---~.-----_._--_._---_...- ..-..------.-..--.-. 80 ordinance, whch are not being met in the conditions, which are not being met by this plan. have prepared language for you, which I will read now and [ will repeat later If it is your desire to move to deny the plan. And if you so desire, your motion should be to deny the prelIminary plan approval because the right-of-way of 50 feet required under section 226-23C1 is not provided and no modification that this standard should be granted under Section 226-14. Additionally or separately, you may add or act on individually a further concern that the absence of curbing and sidewalk on the north side of Cemetery Avenue violates Section 226-22 of the Code of the Borough of Carlisle, which section incorporates the public works standards specifications into your subdivision ordinance, and those specifications include the requirement for certain curbing and sidewalk, and that no modification of that standard should be granted under Section 226-14. The motion should further state that granting of the modifications are not deemed to be in the public interest and/or that purpose and intent of the subdivision and land development ordinance will not be observed. So that if you do move to deny the preliminary plan, you must be very specific and refer to those areas. Those sections, from my revIewIng your staff's review, are the C.P.C.R.S (717) 258 3657 or (800) 863-3657 ,"'""" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 12 f"* 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... ,... 81 only sections which you could point to to deny this plan. MR. OWENS: Thank you, M~. Solicitor. Members of council, you have heard the Intense briefing from our solicitor giving us language for a motion to approve and also a motion to deny. If I could summarize the motion to approve, we would have to grant a modification standard on three deficiencies. In essence and on a motion to deny, we would have to state specifically the languages described by the solicitor coming from the ordinance. Before I entertain a motion, I will ask for any discussion from members of council. Mr, Ocker? THE CHAIRMAN: There were ten condi tions. \'Ie have verification that the other seven of them have been met. MR. DENNIS: We have a signed statement that they agree to the ten conditions that are in your __ THE CHAIRMAN: Okay. MR. SCHORPP: And you should handle those in your normal fashion if you move to approve them. MR. OWENS: Any other discussio~s from members of counci l? Mr. Ocker, being the community planning and quality of life chair of the committee, I would entertain a motion from you. c.p.c.n.S (711) 2583657 Dr (800) 863-3657 218 I~ -- ~ 1 THE CHAIRMAN: I move that we appr-ove the 2 subdivision iand development plan with modification of 3 those thr-ee deficient ar-eas, and I would ask the 4 repr-esentative of the WIndsor- BuildIng Company if you 5 approve of the ten conditions, we have ver-ification and we 6 can make that par-t of our- minutes. I so move, Mr-. Vice 7 President. 8 MR, OWENS: It's been properly moved by our 9 Chairman, Mr-. Ocker-, that we appr-ove the preliminary 10 subdivision plan with modification of standards for those 11 three deficiencies. 12 Do I have a second? .t 13 14 MS. CHERTOK: Second. MR. OWENS: Second. It's been properly moved 15 on the second that we do have the council approve this. 16 You've hear-d the motion. 17 18 MR. SPITZ: Call for- the question. MR. OWENS: Question being called for. We will 19 now pI.oceed to vote. I'd like to have a roll call vote on 20 this. 21 Madam See r-etary? 22 23 24 25 MS. LAY: Cher-tok? MS. CHERTOK: Yes. MS. LAY: Gior-dano? MR. GIORDANO: Yes. C.P,C.R.S (717) 258 ,3657 or (800) 8f3-3657 1'--..........,'r;...--::.:::..~._ti\_! " ' I'.... 82 2.19 ~ ,.., -, MS. LAY: Herman? MR. HEHMAN: No, MS. LAY: Ocker? MR. OCKER: Yes. MS. LAY: Owens? MR. OWENS: Yes. 2 3 4 5 6 7 MS. LAY: Spitz? 8 MR. SPI'l'Z: Yes. 9 MR. OWENS: The motion has been approved five 10 to one, and it is a motion. Motion carried. 11 Mr. Ocker'! 12 THE CHAIRMAN: Before we close, I would just .""'1I , '~i!" 13 like to thank John and Roger for doing their homework. 14 It's very interesting and a joy for me to sit here and 15 watch you two work so eloquently. I just want to thank 16 you for the time you put in and also to add for the 17 excellent advice he gave to counsel. Thank you very much. 18 (Whereupon, at 9:40 p.m., the hearing adjourned. ) 19 ~o 21 22 23 24 25 C.P.C.R.S (717) ~5B-3657 or (BOO) B63-3657 B3 -- "'" _._...----_.-.~~_.. .. ------~-----_.._---.-----.-- 84 ~ I hereby certify that the proceedings and 2 evidence are contained fully and accurateiy in the, notes 4 5 Ii 7 8 9 10 1 1 12 (") 13 ",'t.,l' 11;,1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 taken by me on the within proceedings, and that this copy is a correct transcript of the same, t'! j Public ~,I I r I l ;'1, ' , ", ;1' C.P.C.R.S (717) 258-3657 or (800) 863-3657 " , -- ~ PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT (MuM llc t)'pcwribr'ft ..... -.bmltlrd in duplincr. TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY: Please li.l Ihe wilhin mailer for the n.:xt: ,/) '" .." Pre-Trial Argumenl Courl x c...) t-' tv Argumenl Courl ..........____.___...__...____._______.___...__.______MU____________...______________.__...___..___........___.........__ JOHN H. BROUJOS, LOUISE BROUJOS, HAROLD KRETZING, JEAN KRETZING, and ROBERT LEE JACOBS, Appellants . . c.a IN THE COURT OF COMIibN PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA 95.4166 CIVIL TERM v. CARLISLE BOROUGH COUNCIL, Appellee APPEAL FROM LAND USE and NORMAN ELAM, and MARY LOU ROBBINS, Intervenors 1. State maner 10 ba argued (I.e., plaintiff's motion lor new trial. defendants' demurrer to complaint. etc.); Appellant's Land Use Appeal 2. Identify counsel who will argue case: (a) lor Appellants: Address John H. BrouJos. Esquire 4 N. Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (b) lor Intervenors: Address Roger M. Morgenthal. Esquire 11 East High Street Carlisle, PA 17013 3. I will notify all parties In writing within two days that this case has been listed lor argument. 4. Argument Court Date: Call 01 Argument list Date: October II, 1995 N/A Dated: C! l /1 J - ..~ ~~.:Vl Roger M. Morgenthal, Esq e Anorney lor Intervenors 223 ... .. JOHN H. BROUJOS, LOUISE BROUJOS, HAROLD KRETZING, JEAN KRETZING, and ROBERT LEE JACOBS Appellants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA NO. 95-4166 CIVIL TERM v. . . . . CARLISLE BOROUGH COUNCIL Appellee APPEAL FROM LAND USE NOTICI or rILING or SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD Pursuant to an agreement of counsel, in the above referenced matter, the Appellee, Carlisle Borough Council, files the fOllowing item to supplement the record in connection with these proceedings: 1. Letter of May 10, 1995, from Louise and John H. Broujos to Borough Council together with attachment. Respectfully submitted, BY'~~~ Edward L. Schorpp, sq. Solicitor for Borough of Carlisle Landis, Black & Schorpp 36 South Hanover Street Carlisle, PA 17013 717 - 243-3727 ce: John H. Broujos, Esq. Roger M. Morgenthal, Esq. ""'" -. ~. -- Louise and John H. Broujos 78 B. Ridge Street Carlisle, PA 17013 717 249 3048 FAX 717 243 8227 May 10, 1995 Borouqh Council 33 West South Street Carlisle, PA 17013 RBI Robbins/Windsor Proposed Development Dear Council I I represent the citizene of the Bast Ridge Street area who oppose the above development. Inclosed is a list of persons directly involved by havinq properties bordering on the alley known as Cemetery Avenue and others who live in the neighborhood which is affected by the chanqe in the character of the neighborhood by this development. Contrary to the statement of the developer that there is only one request for waiver--the 34 foot right of way for the required 50 foot riqht of way. There are at least three variations from the Codesl 1. The request to use a 34 foot right of way for the street instead of a 50 foot right of way. 2. The use of a 12 to 14 foot riqht of way in the alley off Ridge Street; whioh creates a serious and potentially life- endanqering condition for two way traffic and even for one-way traffic. The nature of the location of garages and buildings on the alley creates a hazard. 3. The absence of a sidewalk on the north side of the proposed street. Where children are concerned--both those of present property owners and those of any of the proposed houses--access of the eafe haven of a sidewalk from vehicle traffic ri.ks injury. . 4. The proPQsal violates the intent as laid out in the ZoninQ Qrdinanc.1 A. Ssction 255-121 An alley is defined as "a minor way, which mayor may not be legally dsdicated, and is ueed primarily for vehicular eervice access to the rear side of propertiee ot.herwi.e abut.ting on a street." B. Ssction 255-211 "The intent of the R-2 Medium Density 71.l' A .) ... . Re.idential Di.trict i. tOI A. Provide for the orderly expansion of areas that offer re.id.ntial neighborhoods at a medium density." B. ...carefully control the types of housing to en.ure compatibility with existina houses." c. Carefully protect these areas from use8 that may not be fully compatible. Section 255-21 Intent and Obiec:tivel! Zoning ''Was adopted with rea.onable con.ideration, among other thinga, of the existina character of the various areas within the Borough of Carlil'le and their respective suitability to particular uses." Section 255-8 InterDretatiQn ".. .the provision. of this chapter shall be interpreted as the minimum requirements for the promotion of health, safety, morals and general welfare. Where this chapter conflicts with any ru.le, regulation or ordinance, the greater restriction upon the use of buildings or premi.e....or upon requiring larger open spaces ahall prevail, regardle.. of it. .ource." 5. Approval would .anction turning alleys of the Borough into .treet. for development requiring alteration of olle good planning requirement after another. Whenever there i. an attempt to circumvent good planning technique. by forcing a development into a place where development was not intended, the planner is forced to start altering other sound planning requirements and the Borough is a.ked to grant. change. where the ordinance and good planning never intended that there be changes. THE PROTESTANTS ASK THE COUNCIL TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING on this i..ue becau.e of the .eriou. precedent that it would set in the Borough for cramming buildings in alley lots without adequate con.ideration for the existing character of the community and protection of our youth. ~~YO",,' John H. Bro~~ P'ote.tants I 2Z," -- ,-... JOHN H. BROUJOS, LOUISE BROUJOS, HAROLD KRETZING, JEAN KRETZING, and ROBERT LEE JACOBS, APPELLANTS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. CARLISLE BOROUGH COUNCIL, APPELLEE V. NORMAN ELAM and MARY LOU ROBBINS, INTERVENORS 95-4166 CIVIL TERM BEFORE HOFFER. J. AND BAVlwEV. J. ORDE~ OF COUBI AND NOW, this ~day of October, 1995, the within appeal,lS DISMISSED. / By the Court, John H. BrauJos, Esquire For Appellants Edward L. Schorpp, Esquire For Appellee Roger M. Morgenthal, Esquire For Intervenors ~ If Edgar B. Bayley, J. ( :saa ,""' r'. 95-4166 CIVIL TERM "modification of requirements" under Section 226-14A of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance of the Borough of Carlisle for, (1) the lack of required right- of-way width of Cemetery Avenue, a public street the developer will Improve, and (2) to delete curbing and sidewalk on the north side of Cemetery Avenue. The developer's subdivision and land development plan with the requested modification of requirements was approved by the Carlisle Planning Commission, Borough Council then held a public hearing on July 5, 1995,2 At the conclusion of the hearing, Council voted to approve the plan with the two requested modifications of requirements. A letter of approval was Issued on July 17. 1995. Cemetery Avenue Is perpendicular to South Bedford Street. Appellants, Harold and Jean Kretzlng, own a home, other than the one In which they live on East Ridge Street, on the southwest corner of South Bedford Street and Cemetery Avenue. That property, numbered 634 South Bedford Street. is to the east of the property of Intervenors, and was deeded to the Kretzings In 1971 from the estate of Evelyn N, Robbins, a predecessor in title of intervenor Mary Lou Robbins. That conveyance reserved a right-of-way for expansion of Cemetery Avenue to 34 feet, which was the existing right-of-way requirement for such a local street in the Carlisle Subdivision and LI'.nd Development Ordinance, That ordinance was subsequently amended to Increase the minimum right-of-way width for such a street from 34 feet to 50 feet. 2, A public hearing on a subdivision plan is not required by the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance or the Municipalities Planning Code. 53 P.S, S 10508(5). -3- 2 ')1 - .),,- ......-- ,-.. 95-4166 CIVIL TERM The approved plan requires Windsor Building Corporation to pave the cartway of Cemetery Avenue to a width of 22 feet, which meets the minimum pavement width required In Section 226-23C(1) of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance. The right-of-way width of 34 feet cannot be increased to the minimum 50 feet required In the ordinance because an additional 16 feet would Infringe on the Kretzlng property at 634 South Bedford Street. The approved plan allows a modification of the right-of- way width to 34 feet. The approved plan also allows a modification deleting a curb and sidewalk required in Section 226-22A of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance on the north side of Cemetery Avenue, This modification, granted upon the recommendation of the Borough engineer, will allow rainwater to collect Into a drain system the developer will build which, without being restricted by curb and sidewalk on the north side of Cemetery Avenue, will protect the properties to the north from water, Water will drain from those properties into the system. Windsor Building Corporation must install curb and sidewalk on the south side of Cemetery Avenue where the duplexes and garages are to be built. DISCUSSION Appellants maintain that Borough Council violated Article IV, Section 255-21 of the Carlisle Borough Zoning Ordinance in failing to address whether the proposed use of the land will "be in harmony with the character of the neighborhood or would unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of the surrounding property." The neerby single-family homeowners who spoke at the hearing in opposition to the plan -4- ~ ~ 95-4166 CIVIL TERM Municipalities Planning Code. (Emphasis added). The use of intervenors' land for single-family semidetached dwellings Is "permitted ~ r!.Qb1" In an R-2 District: Appellants' and Intervenors' properties are all In a designated medium density zoning District that already contains duplexes on East Ridge Street. Therefore, the use objected to by appellants herein, as set forth In Braun. v. Swarthmore Borough, .upra, "can hardly be held to be proscriptions of an otherwise lealtlmate use of one's orooertv." (Emphasis added). Appellants further maintain that Borough Council abused Its discretion In granting the two modifications of requirements, which they argue are not supported by substantial evidence. The modifications of requirements from the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance were for the right-of-way width of Cemetery Avenue of 34 feet rather than 50 feet, and the dflletlon of a required curb and sidewalk on the north side of Cemetery Avenue.. The modlf:catlons were granted under Section 226- 4, There is no need for a variance or special exception under the Borough zoning ordinance because the developer's plan meets all zoning regulations. The standards for granting variances to zoning regulations, repeatedly referred to In the brief of appellants, do not apply to granting modifications of requirements under (he Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance. Wlmbledon Court Aa,ocl.te. Appeal, 85 Pa, Commw. 517 (1984). The Borough zoning ordinance regulates the lawful use of land; the ordinance under which the two modifications of requirements were granted sets standards and procedures for the subdivision and development of land as set forth In the Municipalities Planning Code at 53 P.S, Section 10503(5), authorizing local ordinances with: Provisions for encouraging and promoting flexibility, economy and Ingenuity In the layoutllnd design of subdivisions and land developments including provisions authorizing the planning agency to alter site requirements and encouraging other practices which are In accordance with modern and evolving principles of site planning and development. (Emphasis added,) -6- -- ,-, 95-4166 CIVIL TERM 14A of that ordinance which provides: Modification of requlrementa. The Borough Council mav arant a modification of the reaulrements of one (1) or more provisions If the literal enforcement will exact undue hardshlD because of peculiar conditions Dertalnlna to the land In auestlon, provided that such modification will not be contrarv to the Dublic Inter.t and that 1hI DurDose and intent of t~lls chaoter are observed. (Emphasis added),' The record of the hearing on July 5, 1995, demonstrates that Borough Cout1cll considered this provision. The peculiar conditions pertaining to the land are that the right-of-way available for a local street to provide access to the subdivision Is limited to 34 feet, although a street can be paved to an allowable width of 22 feet, and that drainage from the street must be directed to the south In order to protect the properties to the north of Cemetery Avenue on which there are residences facing East Ridge Street. Literal enforcement of the subdivision ordinance will create an undue hardship on intervenors in that a lawful use of this property for duplex housing will be prevented in a zoning district specifically designated for medium density housing. The word "chapter" as used in the modification of requirements section 226- 14A, refers to the entire Borough of Carlisle Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance titled in Section 226-1, Among the purposes of the chapter set forth In Section 226-2, are: 5. This Is the standard set forth In the Municipalities Panning Code at 53 P.S. S 10512.1. -7- :Lj~ . ~ ~:f ....: ,. ~:,,.:.. ,. " .r' '. " '" - u' ~_ ' t 11 ....\.1 -. =!~ ,j' ... _.. r..cJ roo"" Judge Anigned: Judgment: . PYS510 1995-04166 cumb~and County Prothonotary's Office Page 1 Civil Case Inquiry ~ APPEAL - ZON rNG Filed.. .. . . . .. 8/03/95 3:54 BAYLEY EDGAR B .00 Superior Co Execution Date Sat/Ois/Gntd. . Jury 'l'rial.... 0/00/00 0/00/00 ..............................................................**................ General Index Attorney Info BROUJOS JOHN H APPELLANT BROUJOS JOHN H BROUJOS LOUISE APPELLANT BROUJOS JOHN H KRETZING HAROLD APPELLANT BROUJOS JOHN H KRETZING JEAN APPELLANT BROUJOS JOHN H JACOBS ROBERT LEE APPELLANT BROUJOS JOHN H CARLISLE BOROUGH COUNCIL OF APPELLEE SCHORPP EDWARD L ..........................**.................................................... * Date Entries * ...................**........................................................... APPEAL FROM DECISION OF ZONING HEARING BOARD WRIT OF CERTIORARI ISSUED MOTION FOR A STAY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ORDER OF COURT - IN RE MOTION FOR A STAY - RULE ISSUED ON BOROUGH OF CARLISLE RETURNABLE 8/14/95 @ 2:30 PM CR 2 - BY JUDGE EDGAR B BAYLEY - COPY MAILED AND PERSONALLY GIVEN TO ATTY BROUJOS 9/10/95 NOTICE OF INTERVENTION STIPULATION ORDER - IN RE MOTION FOR A STAY OF ACTION - GRANTED - BY JUDGE EDGAR B BAYLEY - NOTICE MAILED 8/16/95 NOTICE OF FILING OF RECORD - EXHIBITS FILED IN BASEMENT TRANSCRIPT FILED PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT BY ROGER M MORGENTHAL ESQ NOTICE OF FILING OF SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT - DATED 10/31/95 - DISMISSED - BY EDGAR B BAYLEY J ................................................****............................ * Escrow Information * * Foes' Debits Bea Ba.l. pvmts/Adi End Bal * .............*....*...*..................~......,....*.......................... il~i~~~~ ~ 2~n ~ B~~~ ~H~n~~~ 08/15/95 81~~'~n ~ IYO/95 1 131/95 35.00 35.00 .00 .50 .58 '.88 5.00 5.0 5.00 5.00 .00 ------------------------ ------------ 45.50 45.50 .00 **..*..*****.******...............................................tt.....*...**. * End of Case Information * .......**.*........................................n..............**....**...... APPEAL ZONING TAX ON APPEAL SETTLEMENT JCP FEE TRUE COPY FROM REOOAD In T IiStlnalyWllereul. I I\lJrfl unto set,..,.... ~:.,~ l!':t .. or Uldt~: ) (' Carlisle. PI. t., >'l{~ Y I /l1-p \Q 71 0.. _, I I ( . 'othono&alY 1/1 t~J I -'<-J ( ( , ,....... "..U IN TH~ COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENh. _LVANIA NOTICE OF DOCKETING APPEAL Docket No: 3357 C.D. 1995 Filed Date: 11/28/95 Re: BROUJOS, KRETZING , JACOBS v CARLS. COUNCL Lower Court No.: 95-4166 CIV I )./ n I q5 A Notice of Appeal, a copy of which is enclosed, from an ord.r of your court has been docketed in the Commonwealth Court of P.nnsylvania. The dock.t number in the Commonwealth Court is endorsed on this notice. The Commonw.alth Court docket number mUdt b. on all corre.pondenc. and docum.nts filed with the Court. Under Chapter 19 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate proc.dure, the Notice of Appeal has the effect of directing the Court to transmit the certifi.d record in the matter to the Prothonotary of the Commonwealth Court. The co:plcte record, inclu~ing the opinion of the trial judg., should be forward.d to the Commonwealth Court within forty (40) day. of the date of filing of the Notice of Appeal. Do not transmit a partial record. Pa. R.A.P. 1921 to 1933 provides the standards for preparation, certification and transmission of the record. The address to which the Court is to transmit the record is .et forth on page 2 of this notice. NOTICE TO COUNSEL A copy of this notice is being sent to all parties or couns.l indicated on the proof of .ervice accompanying the Notice of App.al. Th. appearance of all counsel has been entered on the record in the Commonw.alth Court. Counsel has thirty (30) days from the date of filing of the Notice of Appeal to file a praecipe to withdraw their appearance pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 907(b). Appellant or Appellant's attorney should review the record of the trial court, in order to insure that it is complete, prior to certification to this Court. (Note: A copy of the Zoning Ordinance must accompany r.cord. in Zoning Appeal cases). Th. addre.... to which you are to transmit documents to this Court are set forth on Page 2 of this Notice. If you have special needs, please contact this court in writing a. soon a. pos.ible. Low.r Court Judge: Honorable Edgar Bayley Jr. Attorn.y: John H. Brou1os Attorney: Edward L. Schorpp Attorney: Roger M. Morgenthal Notices Exit: 12/12/95 , I , ~ I..'",' f_ i .'-) " I I . J ...t Prothonotary l.' d' .~J ':!J',' j", ')'~ ll"') l.~rn -... ~ ~': 1''- " "rf .. --j -, (/1 -' .. .. "'P;Pfl ,.-;77) JOHN H. BROUJOS, LOUISE BROUJOS, HAROLD KRETZING, JEAN KRETZING, and ROBERT LEE JACOBS, Appellants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 95-4166 CIVIL TERM v. CARLISLE BOROUGH COUNCIL, Appellee APPEAL FROM LAND USE and NORMAN ELAM, and MARY LOU ROBBINS, Intervenors AND NOW, the day of , 199_, after consideration of the be held on the day of , 199_ In Courtroom No. _, within Petition, and upon motion of Roger M. Morgenthal, Esquire, a hearing Is scheduled and shall Cumberland County Courthouse at o'clock _.m. for the purpose of determining whether Respondents' appeal Is frivolous; and to consider requiring Respondents to post a bond as a condition of proceeding with their appeal. BY THE COURT: J. <:\~I\RDpr\PIdI\I!I.m,""\...r .. A JOHN H. BROUJOS, LOUISE BROUJOS, HAROLD KRETZING, JEAN KRETZING, and ROBERT LEE JACOBS, Appellants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 95.4166 CIVIL TERM v. CARLISLE BOROUGH COUNCIL, Appellee APPEAL FROM LAND USE and NORMAN ELAM, and MARY LOU ROBBiNS, Intervenors AND NOW, come Norman Elam and Mary Lou Robbins, Intervenors, by their attorneys, Flower, Morgenthal, Flower & Undsay, and state the following: 1. Plaintiffs are the equitable and legal owners, respectively, of a certain tract of land situate In the Borough of Carlisle, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, which is the subject property of this land-use case. 2. Respondents are neighboring property owners of the subject tract, who have appealed unsuccessfully from the granting of land development approval by the Borough Council of Carlisle and are currently appealing from a dismissal of their prior appeal by Your Honorable Court, In an opinion by Judge Bayley dated October 1995 a copy of which Is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A', ,.J~&' '. r:\~ 1\lWpr\Pldl\I~.m,I'''\.mr ... ,....., 3. On Novomber 28, 1995, Appellants appealed from Judge Bayley's decision to the Commonwealth Court, and a copy of the docketing Information from the Commonwealth Court Is attached hereto as Exhibit "B". 4. The Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code Section 1oo3-A(d) [53 P.S. 511003. A(d)] provides, Inter alia, that the landowner whose use or development Is In question may petition the Court of Common Pleas to order the Appellants to post bond as a condition to proceeding with the appeal, and that the court shall hold a hearing to determine If the filing of the appeal Is frivolous. Said section further provides that the amount of any bond required shall be within the sound discretion of the court. 5. Pursuant to the aforesaid Municipalities Planning Code Section, Petitioners waived their right to request a bond prior to the argument and decision of the Initial appeal to the Cumberland County Common Pleas Court; but they now revoke said waiver. A copy of the said Municipalities Planning Code Section is attached hereto as Exhibit "C". 6. Even though the appeal has been taken to the Commonwealth Court, your Honorable Court retains Jurisdiction for he purposes of considering this petition, as specifically set forth In a decision by Honorable Genevieve Blatt, Judge of the Commonwealth Court In the case of .QQlliJ ~Ino Hearing Board of the City of Wilkes-Barre. 465 A.2d 53 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1983), at pg. 56; a copy of said opinion is attached hereto as Exhibit "D". Said opinion refers to Section 1008(4) of the Municipalities Planning Code, which section has been replactld by 1oo3-A(d). 7. Petitioners believe and therefore aver that the appeal flied by Respondents Is without merit, Is frivolous and Is flied for the purposes of delay. 1 ,. ,,-, , . I ' \ ExmBIT "A" ""'Ilil ,.-" JOHN H. BROUJOS, LOUISE BROWOS, HAROLD KRETZING, JEAN KRETZING and ROBERT LEE JACOBS, APPELLANTS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNlY, PENNSYLVANIA v. CARUSLE BOROUGH COUNCIL, APPELLEE V. NORMAN ELAM and MARY LOU ROBBINS, INTERVENORS 95-4166 CIVIL TERM BAYLEY, J., October 31, 1895:- . Appellants, John H. and Louise BrouJos, Harold and Jean Kretzlng, and Robert Lee Jacobs, and Intervenor, Mary Lou Robbins all live in single family residences on East Ridge Street, Carlisle. Appellants filed an appeal from a decision by appellee. Carlisle Borough Council, granting approval of a preliminary subdivision and land development plan of Windsor Building Corporation. Intervenor Mary Lou Robbins il the legal owner, and Intervenor Norman Elam, t/d/b/a Windsor Building Corporation. II the equitable owner of the property on the plan which Is separate from the reeldence of Mary Lou Robbl",. The transcribed record of the proceedings before Borough Council hu been lodged In this court, briefs flied, and argument held on October 11, 1995, without the taking of additional evidence. Jurisdiction i. under the Munlclpalittes Planning Code at 53 P.S. Sectlon 11 C02.A. The standard of review II ....... -. 95-4166 CIVIL TERM whether the Cartlsle Borough Council committed a manifest abuse of discretion or an error of law. Brauns v. Swarthmore Borough, 4 Pa. Commw. 627 (1972). Intervenors' property Is 1.26 acres frantlng on Cemetery Avenue to the north and the Cartlsle Area School District's Lamberton Middle School to the south. In Cartlsle, an avenue Is a euphemism for an alley. The rear of the residential properties of Intervenor Robbins and appellants BrouJos and Kretzing borders Cemetery Avenue to the south.' Cemetery Avenue Is currently unevenly paved. Intervenors' site consists largely of an open area with some dilapidated, unoccupied structures that were utilized when the site was fonn8l1y a commercial flower business operated by the Robbins family. The properties of the appellants, and Intervenors are 811 In an R-2 Medium Density Residential District under the Cartlsle Borough Zoning Ordinance. While there are predominately single-family dwellings on East Ridge Street, there are also single-family semidetached dwellings. On March 14, 1995, Windsor Building Corporation flied an application with the Borough of Cartlsle for approval of a prellmil18!y subdivision and land development plan to subdivide the 1.26 acre tract of Intervenors and construct four duplexes with eight single-farnlly, semidetached dwellings. Each three bedroom duplex will have a lep8l1lte duplex garage. The developer Intends to sell each dwelling to an 1nc:llvldUII owner In an anticipated range of up to $140,000. The developer requeeted. 1. Appellant Jacobs lives In the next block of East Ridge Street on the oPpollte Ilde of the Itreet. -2. """" "-"1 95-4166 CIVIL TERM "modification of requirements" under Section 226-14A of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance of the Borough of Carlisle for, (1) the lack of required right- of-way width of Cemetery Avenue, a public street the developer will Improve, and (2) to delete curbing and sidewalk on the north side of Cemetery Avenue. The developer's subdivision and land development plan with the requested modification of requirements was approved by the Carilsle Planning Commission. Borough Council then held a public hearing on July 5, 1995.2 At the conclusion of the hearing, Council voted to approve the plan with the two requested modifications of requirements. A letter of approval was issued on July 17, 1995. Cemetery Avenue Is perpendicular to South Bedford Street. Appellants, Harold and Jean Kretzing, own a home, other than the one In which they live on East Ridge Street, on the southwest comer of South Bedford Street and Cemetery Avenue. That property, numbered 634 South Bedford Street, is to the east of the property of intervenors, and was deeded to the Kretzings in 1971 from the estate of Evelyn N. Robbins. is predecessor In title of Intervenor Mary Lou Robbins. That conveyance reeerved a right-of-way for expansion of Cemetery Avenue to 34 feet, which was the exlstlng right-of-way requirement for such a local street In the Carlisle Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance. That ordinance was subsequently amended to Increue the minimum right-of-way width for such a street from 34 feet to 50 feet. 2. A public hearing on a subdivision plan is not required by the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance or the Municipalities Planning Code. 53 P.S. S 1 Cle08(5). -3- ~ ,1'''' 95-4166 CIVIL TERM The approved plan requires Windsor Building Corporation to pave the cartway of Cemetery Avenue to a width of 22 feet, which meets the minimum pavement width required In Section 226-23C(1) of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance. The rlght-of.way width of 34 feet cannot be Increased to the minimum 50 feet required In the ordinance because an additional 16 feet would Infringe on the Kretzlng property at 634 South Bedford Street. The approved plan allows a modification of the rlght-of- way width to 34 feet. The approved plan also allows a modification deleting a curb and sidewalk required In Section 226-22A of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance on the north side of Cemetery Avenue. This modlflcatlon, granted upon the recommendation of the Borough engineer, will allow rainwater to collect Into a drain system the developer will build which, without being restricted by curb and sidewalk on the north side of Cemetery Avenue, will protect the proporties to the north from water. Water will drain from those properties Into the system. Windsor Building Corporation must Install curb and sidewalk on the south side of Cemetery Avenue where the duplexes and garages are to be built. DISC\JS$IQN Appellants maintain that Borough Council violated Article IV, Section 255-21 of the Carlisle Borough Zoning Ordinance in failing to address whether the proposed use of the land will 'be in harmony with the character of the neighborhood or would unreuonably Interfere with the use and enjoyment of the surrounding property." The n..my Ilng'.family homeowners who spoke at the hearing In opposition to the plan -4- ~S~ ~ r 95-4166 CIVIL TERM all feel the character of the neighborhood will change.~ Their views are not surprising although, Interestingly, a commercial business had previously been operated on Intervenors' property u a non-conformlng use. Article IV, Section 255-21 of the Borough Zoning Ordinance sets forth that the Intent of an P..2 Medium Density Residential District Is to: A. Provide for the orderly expansion of areas that offer residential neighborhoods at a medium density. B. Carefully control the types of housing to ensure compatibility with existing houses. C. Carefully protect these areas from uses that may not be fully compatible. Appellants' position Is without IIsml merit because Intervenors' property I. In an R.2 DIstrict under Article IV, Section 255-22 of the Borough Zoning Ordinance, which provides: u... permitted J2x.J:1g,b!. In any R.2 District, land, buildings or premises ibJII. be used by right for one (1) of the following, but for no other: A. Singl.famlly detached dwelling. B. C. Crop farming. D. Planned I'8IIldentlal development within Artfcle XVIII and the 3. Appellants called a real estate appralser who offered an opinion that the development will not be In conformity with the neighborhood, and that It will adVetlely affect the marketability of the slngl..family reeldences In the area. -5- .2S7 \' """" -. 954166 CIVIl.. TERM Municipalities Planning Code. (Emphasis added). The u.e of Intervenors' land for slngl.famlly semidetached dwellings Is 'permltted lrl 1fgbt' In an R-2 District: Appellants' and Intervenors' properties are all In a designated mmIYm density zoning District that already contalns duplexes on East Ridge Street. Therefore, the use objected to by appellants hereln, as set forth In Braun. v. Swarthmore Borough, supr., 'can hardly be held to be proscriptions of an otherwise JlglSlmate use of one's Dro~.' (Emphasis added). Appellants further malntaln that Borough Council abused Its dlscretfon In granting the two modifications of requirements, which they argue are not supported by substantial evidence. The modlf!catlons of requirements from the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance were for the right-of.way width of Cemetery Avenue of 34 feet rather than 50 feet, and the deletfon of a required curb and sidewalk on the north side of Cemetery Avenue.. The modifications were granted under Section 226- 4. There Is no need for a variance or special exception under the Borough zoning ordinance because the developer's plan meets all zoning regulations. The ltandarcls for granting variances to zoning regulations, repeatedly referred to In the brief of appellants, do not apply to granting modifications of requirements under the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance. Wlmbl.don Court AI.oclat.. Appeal, ee Pa. Commw. 517 (1984). The Borough zoning ordinance regulates the lawful..e of land; the ordinance under which the two modifications of requirements were granted sets standards and procedures for the subdivision and development of land as set forth In the Municipalities Planning Code at 53 P.S. Section 10e03(5), authorizing local ordinances with: Provisions for encouraging and promoting flexibility, economy and Ingenuity In the layout and design of subdivisions and land developments Including provisions authorizing the planning agency to alt.r site requirements and encouraging other practices which are In accordance with modem and evolving prlnclpl.. of site planning and development. (Emphasis added.) ~ ~,.." ,.- 95-4188 CIVIL TERM 1~ of that ordinance which provides: Modlflcatlon of requlrement8. The Borough Council reaulrements of one (1) or more provlllonslUbLllSllll IDforcement will exact uncwt)1ard'blR because of -* provided that such modification will and that IbI Dureose andJntent Qf ~t!Js chaDter are observed. (Emphasis added).' The record of the hearing on July 5, 1995, demonstrates that Borough Council considered this provision. The peculiar conditions pertaining to the land are that the rfght-of.way available for a local street to provide access to the subdivision Is limited to 34 feet, although a street can be paved to an ailowable width of 22 feet, and that drainage from ~e street must be directed to the south In order to protect the properties to the north of Cemetery Avenue on which there are residences facing East Ridge Street. Uteral enforcement of the subdivision ordinance will create an undue hardship on Intervenors In that a lawful use of this property for duplex hoUllng will be prevented In a zoning district speclftcally designated for medium denalty housing. The word .chapter" as used in the modification of requirements section 228- 1~, refers to the entire Borough of Carlisle Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance titled In Section 226-1. Among the purposes of the chapter set forth I" SectIon 226-2, are: 5. this Is the standard let forth In the Munlclpalltlee Panning Code .. 53 P.l . 10512.1. .7. ~ ,.... 85-41ee CIVIL TERM John H. BrouJo., Esquire For Appellants Edward L Schorpp, Esquire For Appellee Roger M. Morgenthal, EsquIre For Intervenors :aaa . I .' i,' .. Jj,' .... ~~ f IN THE ~vMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF DOCKETING APPEAL Docket No: 3357 C.D. 1995 Filed Date: 11/28/95 Re: BROUJOS, KRETZING , JACOBS v CARLS. COUNCL Lower Court No.: 95-4166 CIV A Notice ot Appeal, a copy ot which is enclosed, trom an ordsr ot your court has been docketed in the Commonwealth Court ot Pennsylvania. The docket number in the Commonwealth Court is endorsed on this notice. The Commonwealth Court docket number must be on all correspondencs and documents tiled with the Court. Under Chapter 19 ot the Pennsylvania Rules ot Appellate Procedure, the Notice ot Appeal has the ettect ot directing the Court to transmit the c~rtitied record in the matter to the Prothonotary ot the Commonwealth Court. The complete record, inClUding the opinion ot the trial jUdge, should be torwarded to the Commonwealth Court within torty (40) days ot the date ot tiling ot the Notice ot Appeal. Do not transmit a partial record. Pa. R.A.P. 1921 to 1933 provides the standards for preparation, certitication and transmission Qt the record. The address to which the Court is to transmit the record is set torth on page 2 ot this notice. NOTICE TO COUNSEL A copy of this notice is being sent to all parties or counsel indicated on the proot ot service accompanying the Notice ot Appeal. The appearance ot all counsel has been entered on the record in the Commonwealth Court. Counsel has thirty (30) days from the date ot tiling ot the Notice ot Appeal to tile a praecipe to withdraw their appearance pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 907(b). Appellant or Appellant's attorney should review the record ot the trial court, in order to insure that it is complete, prior to certitication to this Court. (Note: A copy of the Zoning Ordinance must accompany records in Zoning Appeal cases). The addresses to which you are to transmit documents to this Court are set forth on Page 2 ot this Notice. It you have special needs, please contact this court in writing as soon as poseible. Lower Court Judge: Honorable Edgar Bayley Jr. Attorney: John H. Brouj08 Attorney: Edward L. Schorpp Attorney: Roger M. Morqenthal Notices Exit: 12/12/95 Prothonotary .-' .-' ~ ,..... /" \,.. ... '- 3357L 17/f'f~ Jaba R. BntuJo.. Loubt BntuJo" .....Id Kn....., .It. KatClfq, ... ....It 1M _0. AppeD... I IN 1111 COURT 0' COMMON PlIAS 0' I CUMBDUAND COUN'n', PENNSYLVANIA I I I NO. 95-4166 CWn. TERM I I I APPEAL fROM LAND USE I Y. CIdIII. SOnt..... Couadl Appell.. NonCE OF APPEAL Notice is hereby liven thlllohn H. Broujos, et ai, Appellants above IlIlDICI. hereby Ippeal to the Commonwealth Coun of Pennsylvania from the order entered ill this matter 011 the 3111 day of October, 199'. This order has been entered in the docket u evidenced by the lttIChed copy of the docket 4IItry. November 21. 199' 10 UI0S, GILROY. HOUSTON. P.C. 4 ortb Hanover Street Carlisle, PlIII1sylvlllia 17013 7171243-4'74 7171766.1690 PAX 117171243.1227 rRUE COr-V n~OM RS'';;::'';~D '1'\ '!'asllmor.y whllrec:,1 h"6 '.!:1") ctl r:,y ..:r.o j Iht sec:1 of s;.!~ :;0.;1 it C..ni:::3, Pa. :;;11 ,;!~~,dal u1 "Y7'f," 19 &jr "~,,: ~t~~ ,'j ,. ~ ,.... EXHIBIT "C" , ' .."", 53 P.S. 0 ll002-A ,..... Note. of Oeelllonl MUNICIPAL" QUASI-MUN. CORPS. J"'adlcUon I Sperl.. ne.p"on. J Wel", .) I. Jurladlcllun Trial (ourl properly JclcrmmciJ lhlll equity \iJc uf courl did nut h~ye Jurj~tJiI;IIOIIIl\lC' plllP' ttty uwncn' (I)mpluinl alle.ina .ubillJry lind l,'0I' prjcjo~ Ul,;lllln by Il.)wn~hip In dcnyini their pw. ptl\ctJ ~utxlj"'l~jun. Chri~lmlln v. Town~hlp of OoUilil~'1. ()()~ I\.;!d 4.17, Cmwllh,199;!. Courl of cOmmtl/l pICii$, aflCI dj~ml!'l"lnll prop' eny O'IoIIC:I\' complaint In cquiry alleyi"g Jrhl' trilry anL! capricious iicUon by lown5hlp In deny. inl propo!'tCd '1ubdL\lSion, ~houhJ haYc fran~(crrc:d cue to 111110 \idc of !:OUlI ilnu trealed it >1'1 apr~al from lIo,",ernmcnlal Jcd~jon. Chn\lmUII 'Y. TUllonship or OuUtl.JJU, W2 ,\,lJ 457, Crn....llh, 1992. ClJmmnn Plus Court dhl nol have ju,j!uJlc'ion 10 hear "prea! (rom lownship lOninij hearing bourd'. dcnMI of properly owne', applil.:'OIlilln I'llr lOlling; ~Driance under Eminenl D\lmaln Code. where prupcrry 'lwnen failed 10 \Cck 10 invllli. tJlllc oldinance or It) punut elldu~lvl \1'IUlo~ rcmctJ~ ~lf IIppclllina tJcnllll of their rcquulcd ...rillnce 10 Cuun of Common Pic", whhln )0 dllY& 11\ requited hy 51111UIC. .53 P.S. Odhner \" TowOf,hip of Woodward. .599 A,2d ~'/'). I.U PI. Cmwllh. 4.50. II}9I. Z. Spttlll u"pllun. Fullowing It loninll hellrin. txlllr(j', dctmrd "ppro"'bl Ilf IIn IIpplkallun for It !opecial nccplltln under .'13 P,S, t HjlK)H('i). Ihe \Ole ,rmC'dy 10 chuJlenge Ihe appro...al i~ IIn oppeal within )0 day. under ~3 P,S.' IIOH!-A. and n011t rique,. for an injunClion made 4.~ dllY. a(ICllne Itpprov. .11. City of Tilu\"'llle .... lc~ko. 12 D. At C,.oClh 290.11111, J. W.,...., Party waiver. ill rip' 10 \ctek review flf (ondi. lion!! impo&ed h~ lOnina nearin, hoard if lite' parly ha. failed In lake Itmely apreal. Town!!hip of Harmun v. Smith. 113ft A.2d 2M. 1"1 PI. CmlNtlh. 1M. 19'JJ I 1l003-A. Appeal. to court; eommeneement; Itay of proceedlnp (I) Land use appeall, shall be entered Ji:i of COl1N>e by the prothonotary or clerk upon the ruing of lllllnd use appeal notice which concisely 14et.s forth the grounda on whlth the appellant relies, The appeal notice need not be verified, The land usa appeal notite shall be accompanied hy a trne copy thereof, Ib) Upon nUng of a land ...e appeal, the prothonowy or clerk shall forthwith, .. 01 course. liend to the governing body. board or agency whose decision or IlCtlon haa been appealed. by "'Ili.tered or certl1led mail. the copy of the land use appeal notice, together with a writ of certiorari commanding 14aJd governing body, board or agency, within 20 dayl' after receipt thereof. to cfortify to the CQW't I~ entire record In the mlttfr In which the land UMe appeal has been taken. or a true llnd complett! copy thereot. includinr any transcript ot te14timony In exi8t.ence anll available to tho governing body, board or .,eney Ilt the time it received the writ ot certiorari, (c) [( the appellunt 18 II. penton oth(>r than the landowner at the land dirtctly involv@{] in the decililtln or action appealed frum. the appellant. within ~even daYK after the land "'" appeal I. rued. shull .erve a true copy or the land ...e appeal notite by mal1inglald notico to the landowner or hi8 attorney at his la:tt known address, For identitlcltton of such hmdowner. the appellant mllY rely upon the record 01 the municipality Ind. In the event of good faith mu.takeli lUI to 14uch Identity, miy make tlueh service nunc pro tune by leavo of court, (d) The minI( of IIn appeal in court under thlli ~tetlon 14hall not Ktay the aetJol\ appealed from. hut the appellant..' may petition the court having jUrisdiction 01 land use appelllH for U 14wy, II the uppelllJntJ.l are pcrllonH who are KlM!kinll' to pnvent a us. or development II! the land 01 another. whether or not a Ktay V. llOurht by thorn. 01.. landowner- whllKe WIll llr developl\1ent Iii in '1Uf!Ktion may petitJon the l!Ourt to urdtt tht appellunt., to pfJ~t bond lU' a condition to proceedini( with the appeal. After th. petition tor poHtln)l1'1I hond il4 proRented, the court shall hold a hearinK to detemtine II the twn. or the appelllil\ trIvnlouR, At the hearing, evidence may he presented on the merits or the caat!'. It Khull he the hurrltm of the Iiandowntl'lt to prove the appeal I. trivoloUJ. After l'onMlderatlon ot ",11 t'vldence prt'''E'ntE'11. If the Ct)Urt determlneK that the Ippealls trtvoloUI\, It ~hull Kl'ant the petition ror pnlltini( :I, bond. The right to petition the court to order the appellants to plllit hune! may he waiv~d by the appelleiJ. but Iluth waiver may be revokf'rl hy him If an IIpppall" taken (rom annal c1eciBilJn ot the court, The question 01 thl' amullnt of thp hond ~hlJlI he within the ~uuncl tllMeretion of the court. An ord.r difnyjn!it' n petition for hunl! Ilhull he interloclItnry An order ,lirectil1l1' t.he respondent to thlt pE'tit.lon for plll~tin~ Il ~lIlf1d to p()~r II Iltlnd l"hull he Interlocutory. U 1&1I appeal I, 1116 '7f \ ~ MUNWIPAL 81 QUASI-MUN. CORPS. 53 P.S. 0 l1004-A Hille 2 tAk.n hy a mpond.nt to the p..'tltion for poatlnK a bond from an order of tho court dlamlaaln, a land ua. appeal for refusal to polIl . bond. auch ....pondln, party, upon mollon'of petition.r and, after h.llI'in,ln thl court havin, Jurl.dlctlon of land uso apptalt', IhaIl bet liable for aU ruaonable OOllta. fx~nsell and attorn.y fees Incum?d by petltlo',.r. 1968, ;uIy 31. P.L.806. No. 247, llI't. X-A, j loo.'l-A, added 1981l, Dec. 21, P.L. 1329. No. 170, , 101, a/fectiv. In 60 daya. "'_ra' , Ca,u.. I NoIko oC a_I Partl.. .J Not.a or Deel.lon. RJfiby v. Boarl.l of Sup',,, of Unity Tp., t'lJ.5 A.2d 7211. 160 Pa,Cmwhh, rt22, 199,), Tuwnship board of supcrvillOn' nOlic. of liP. peal (rom decision 01 lownlhip lonill' hearinll board incorporaled by refere"c. hurln. board', fh'dl"Ks and conchulona aniJ aa,\Crtcd thai find. inp wIre nol 5upportc!J by evidenc. and WII. ,nuncollS a. mall'r of hlW, and. (hul. noliee of appCIII 5,1 funh conl:iM:ly alounlb upon which board of luperJjaon relied; boariJ of suptrviKln appeuled from hurin. board's decision directi". lonina offlur 10 iiYue bUlld!n.. permit It) con. Ifrucr wasle relo'Yc:lln. focilil)'. Summil Tp. Bd, ur Sup'r! II. Summit Tp, Zonina Hcarina Bd., 571 A,.2IJ 5f1O. 132 Pm.Cmwlt". II, 1990. L I. ....nl Appeal by )'OUlh hom. of township board 01 IUplMlOn' IMn,.1 01 am.ndmenl 10 conditional UN plrml! 10 Incr1111C mwmum II" of jU\'.nil.. houlCd II )'oom home did not C(.'f1l1lilulC Ille appeal 01 OIIaJ.nal conditional l&II permit, but wind appuJ from applicaUon 10 npllnd exisl. In, condlllena! UH; Ibut. appeal from bu.rtJ's dlniaJ of Imendment WII nOI precluded duc 10 hom.'s lallure 10 appeal orillnal conditional Ule permit M.I Blounl Youth Home of Pcnn.~yl\la. 111., Inc. y, Buffalo tp" 639 A.2d 1282. 162 ",Cmwllb, 703, 1994, 1Ippe'.1 denlc:d M(\ A,2d 1182. .t ("pilon Challen," failc:d 10 file proper appeal from zonlna decision with prolhonulary of counry court. ..here h. incolleClly upfiuncd hi'l Ippeal as ci...i1 "C1ion In equlr)/. Thomn.... City tll Wilkes. Barre Zonlna !.\d" 4'120 1\.2d MO, I.iJ Pa.Cm..llh. 1%, 1993, J. Partl" Zonlna hllrin, board was nOI required 10 be named as appellee in land uae Jppeal und"r Pennsyl...ania Municiplllifiu Plunmll' Cod., Zclalll'r ..., KJay, 640 A..211 ~Il, 163 P"Cmwlth, 221, 1994 I. Node. 01."... Appellanl', faUult '0 HIVe on landowner hi. nollet ot appelll ot dedBion of lowruhip board of IUptrvllOn apprcwln. I.ndowner', subdi...isklR pt.n did not jusllfy dicmlual 01 .ppeal: landown. er promptly '..m.d 1,)1 nlln. 01 appeal and inler. vtlltd In .ppel' fl.,u daye after II WIS filed, .lnd landowner did nOI .,Iabllsh lhllll II hid suffllcd any Onandal conHqUCnc:." betause of appeal. . Il00f-A. Intervention Within the 30 ~aya lint followln, the ftlln, or a land U'" appeal. II thl appeal ill from a board or ...noy of a munJoipalJty. tho municipality and any own.r or lanant of property dlnetiy Involved in the actlon appealed from may Intlrven. .. of cour.e hy nllnK a notlc. l)f Intervention, ICCQmpanitd by proof olservicf ot the ~ame, upon each appellant or .ach appellant', counaol of """rd. All olh.. Inlarventlon ,boll be Kovlrned hy the PenMylvanla Rull. of Civil PrO<edure. 19l18, July 31. P.L.806. No, 247...... X-A, I 1004-A. added 1981l. D.c. 21. P.L. 1329, No. 170. t 101. ./flctlve in 60 day.. Not.. or Decl.lona CMIInId'" ... ''''''atloa .J DlKrtI'" I ....,.,., OWIIIn' .11OdI1'" J .J. C....llruetloa 1M ."lIe.llun Rialll 10 Inlerven. punUllnl lu Munlciplllllie\ Plllnnln. Coda and r.lI,llllnl rulll'~ l~ only Iri.. IlIcd wharf. ~Ialulory l'ind use appc(ll hlt~ heen nled: In almnc:e fit such appeal. ubjll'ctlln ,imply hall' no rlalu 10 intll"'enlinn. l\ppUclllion or Rouy . A\.'IOCluln Ship Rnllel lund tiel, Parr. nC"hip, 4'lJ4'I A,ld 2.11. 14'11 Pd:mwllh, ~2, 199,l cuunry plannina ctlmmj~5111n Wll~, In ,ffect. "I.enlo')" 01 lowmhlp lor purpme~ 'II \Iillule making munic:lpllliry pruper pllrty In Inf~rvllnlt ..h." appeal is f~om a.tney of lfttlnlclpllH~: iIlthouah luwn8hip huel nol lake" an~ ;u.:lllln llll'. 517 I. DIN""" Whtlh.r 10 pant ptIritlon 10 inr.rtene In zon. in. appeal I. wlt"In dllcrellOn 01 Irlal r.oun, Stanbro v. Zonin. Hfllln. Bd, 01 Cranberry Tp., ~M A.21! IW, UO ,..Crnwllh, IW. Cm.llh,19H'i. ,...., II' I. · I!l Ii ~ 'I.,~, . ii/II:. 111'. I! , , ~ ' '. I I I r .'. /" Ii 'I .. " , Ii ~~ I:' II I' ;!, ", , I, ., .' (") U") 0 !; c.J1 "1\ .ot.; '_~ :..,-J ,.11 CDq! ("., ':0 ~.. . J N 'li /~ . &I. N ...;.: :- ~:~ ,') !:.::l.; ;1:"0 , '~,:J. ;t;l'") "::: .~ 'i :t.~ (~J ~ :~;: ~~~ ~.;j . ~'1 '" "":'00, "''O' 0.0 ~ I ~ "...' ... ;..... ;,;)n/u- JOHN H. BROUJOS, LOUISE BROUJOS, HAROLD KRETZING, JEAN KRETZING, and ROBERT LEE JACOBS, APPELLANTS V, CARLISLE BOROUGH COUNCIL, APPELLEE V. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NORMAN ELAM and MARY LOU ROBBINS, INTERVENORS 95.4166 CIVIL TERM ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this '1-" day of December, 1995, the Petition to Require Posting of Appeal Bond, IS DENIED. To obtain a bond under 53 P.S. ~ 11003-A(d), the appeal must be frivolous. The issue of whether Borough Council properly granted the two modification of requirements for the preliminary subdivision and land development plan is not frivolous; therefore, there is no need for a hearing and there is no basis for requiring the posting of a bond. ,I J By the Court, / E~dLwJ- I - " f2 (0 ~ ~~ N ~Q N !3 8"'" -' "" ) ~., 7' -r" ~ 'o.,) ii: ;. -:,. ~~.~ ~-~ 9 ' ' &,,-: ,.... ::.;*f,') J'-_ (',I i.:~ ~~; {"II' (.'. L-- I, :.1 luJ I~H~ (.;.j {:-";.:... I.' V"l :"5 r.:J 0:,1)- q ". . ...' .1 "