HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-05157
'.
\-;\~ - ~
\ D . -' ~
\ 'v\. ,-. '-,
I
-.... ........ ~ ~
1:::;-- V"- ~q '/l
'\ ", ,,, .........
."
<,
D<j ,...,." :::?
~ --l
~\
~ w
" -t:' ~
\....'~_. " .....
-\ \'. ;-'1 ~
-, . ~.- ~
, " -~~ -
~, \ c..o
\ U'1
(J.
---~_.._------ .-
(ThiS pro(d of .'iIHVi<..'IJ UU~;i tit: Ill.rn WI iIliN f IVf (,i,) lJA'r " ,;; ! f n 'J'.~) t,':I.' ",J/ICL' of dJltJO(l/, (flock i1pp/icablo bOXl!s)
PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTlCF. OF APPf:AI, AND RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT
COMMONWlALTH OF PENNSYlVANIA
COUNTY 0' ---------------~.----: .,
AFFIDAVIT: I heleby ',Wfhlr or uffllm Ih~l' I ~\!rd,d
o (I (Opy ni 1111' ~J(;!If'! ,-,1
((1dlf1 01 ~_t'IVI::d_
"!r:f'ip' allot 11lld 1""111n
'\ppf~ul, C()rlI1T1!J1I PI!"l'. I!
)'}
[Hid "POll !ho IlPl'.di..!. it; ,1'.','_1
Ii
1111,,11 thu [)i!olricl JU!lllcc do,jgnolnd ,horoln on
'.'.' .JI ~'" _" tl 1) by (cml1flod) frcgi5lercd) moll, :lender's
. ____________...._"___n_________._____._. on
"';!.' 'i) (rr"p'hi't:dj '1hld. s('ndnr'.. hJCOipt ollochod herelo,
...r; l,l) j:;" ',""ll"''';'
h,
o (ll1d flJ,:I'lr fh'.ll .,",~"d tlH~ Io;,,!,. !(1 fill! 1 I .n,r ".Id
,','-, .'1"0
'~'l' \i\"_h'~ NO!lcu 01 1\ppunl upon lhe (Jppolloo(s) 10
[-J h, pCliun'll <;nr....l(p ['J by (cOfllflud) (reglsterod)
wholTl thu Rule \'.'I~ uJd"l~~r;d uP'.
lllClil, ~eflJ('r'... ft}U.~lpt nf1n,:hc I hL'I.~fo
5WORN (AfFIRMl::O) AND SUnSCRI!\lD b[t(;P.E Ml
lHI5 _DAY or .__.___~_ 19
SIQnetUt. 01 amanl
SlgnarufO 01 oU/clal t>-,!rl.'II' ''''1<''1: ,;";;;;'-;;;WiJ-;:-;;' ,,'
Til",ofofflclDI
My commission 6ltpiros. on
.,19,__,
"
'.
~
.
~~~
:c
Q...
.-4
~
(Y)
.
UI
~~ ..
,.
;'.
r--
........
lh
V>
,
~-~
,...., ..,.~
F_\fILES\DATAFILIi\l.iIiNIXX",,'\n10H('(11
Cru...t IGIOW' 10'" 31 AM
Ilnwd_ 1~'OVnll_2611AM
LARRY WARNER, ANNA WARNER,
KENNETH HOLLINGER, JONIETT A
HOLLINGER, tldIb/a
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE,
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO, 5157 CIVIL 1995
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v.
KENNETH TREGO and ETHEL TREGO,
Defendants
NOTICE
You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the
following pages, you must take action within twenty (20) days afier this Complaint and Notice are
served, by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and tiling in writing with the
court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you, You are warned that if you fail
to do so, the case may proceed without you and a judgment may be entered against you by the court
without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief
requested by the Plaintiffs. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you,
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE, IF YOU DO NOT
HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET
FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP:
By_{;J. 00---- R- (I
W. Darren Powell, Esquire
Ten East High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-3341
Court Administrator
Fourth Floor
Cumberland County Courthouse
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
Telephone (717) 240-6200
MARTSON, DEARDORFF, WILLIAMS & OTTO
Attorneys for Plaintifrs
Date: October 5. 1995
,
. _:'....
P I1lU5\DATAFILII'.aENDOCU'n10nCn 1
(',.ued: IlWWSIO.I)AM
alJ'tlMd. 1~".nI12617AM
LARRY WARNER, ANNA WARNER,
KENNETH HOLLINGER, JONIETT A
HOLLINGER, tldlb/a
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE,
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 5157 CIVIL 1995
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v,
KENNETH TREGO and ETHEL TREGO,
Defendants
COMPLAINT
I, Plaintiffs, Larry Warner, Anna Warner, Kenneth Hollinger and Jonietta Hollinger are
adult individuals tldlb/a Mountain View Terrace, a Pennsylvania general partnership with a place
of business at 250 Beetem Hollow Road, Newville, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17241.
2. Defendants Kenneth and Ethel Trego are adult individuals with a place of residence
at Lot 36, Mountain View Terrace, Newville, Pennsylvania 17241.
3, At all times relevant hereto, Plaintiffs were in the business of operating dnd
maintaining a mobile home park known as Mountain View Terrace,
4. At aJltimes relevant hereto, Defendants, pursuant to an oral, month-to-month lease,
leased Lot 36 in aforesaid mobile home park from Plaintiffs,
5, Pursuant to said lease agreement, monthly advance payments of$135,OO were to be
paid to Plaintiffs for said Lot.
6. Pursuant to the Park Rules and customs, which are incorporated into said lease
agreement, a late fee of $1.00 a day is assessed for rent over seven days late.
7, Beginning in June 1995, Defendants failed to timely make monthly rental payments
for Lot 36 as per the lease agreement.
8. On or about August II, 1995, Plaintiffs' tiled a Landlord and Tenant Complaint
against Defendants with District Justice Shulenberger,
9. As a result of said action, Plaintiffs received a judgment in the amount ofS505,50
and possession of said real property,
10. Defendants have paid S285,OO toward said judgment for back rent.
II. Defendants have, despite said judgment for possession. continued to unlawfully
remain in possession of said Lot without payment of rent or late charges,
COUNT I
BREACH OF CONTRACT
12, Paragraphs I through 11 of this Complaint are incorporated herein by reference,
13, The aforedescribed conduct of Defendants constitutes a breach of contract.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Honorable Court to enter judgrnent against
Defendants and in favor of Plaintiffs in the amount of $220.50, plus all further rents and late fees
accruing until possession of said property is returned to Plaintiffs, and all costs and interests allowed
thereon by law.
COUNT II
lJNJlJST ENRICHMENT
14, Paragraphs I through 13 of this Complaint are incorporated herein by reference,
15. As a result of Defendants' failure to pay arnounts owed and continued unlawful
possession of said real estate, Defendants have been unjustly enriched in the amount of said amounts
now and amounts due until possession is returned to Plaintiffs.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Honorable Court enter judgment
against Defendants and in favor of Plaintiffs in the amount of$220.50, plus all further rents and late
fees for the rnonths of continued possession, and all costs and interests allowed thereon by law.
MARTSON, DEARDORFF, WILLIAMS & OTTO
By
W. Darren Powell, Esquire
Ten East High Street
Carlisle, P A 17013-3093
(717)243-3341
Allorneys for Plaintiffs
Date: October 5, 1995
LARRY WARNER, ANNA WARNER,
KENNETH HOLLINGER, JONIETTA
HOLLINGER, l/d/b/a
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE,
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 5157 CIVIL 1995
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v.
KENNETH TREGO and ETHEL TREGO, :
Defendants
ANSWER
COMES NOW, Defendants Kenneth Trego and Ethel Trego who do hereby aver as follows:
1. Adrnitted.
2. Adrnitted.
3. Adrnitted.
4. Admitted.
5. Adrnitted.
6. Adrnitted.
7. Admitted in pan.
It Is admitted that cenain of the DefendUllts' rent payments were
late. However, the Defendants closely consulted with Plaintiffs whenever such a late payment was to
occur.
8. Adrnitted.
9. Adrnitted in pun und denied in pan. While the Defendants admit that the Plaintiffs
received a Judgment in the amount of $505.50 in possession of suid real propeny in their suit before
the District Justice, the Defendants deny that this is the amount owed to Plaintiffs.
10. Admitted.
.
II. Denied. It is specifically denied that the Defendants have unlawfully remained in
I possession of said lot without payment of rent or late charges. Rather, since the Defendunts huve
.1 filed an uppeal, IlIId said appeul ucts as u supersedeus upon the prior judgrnent, the Plaintiffs' legul
conclusion in Pamgraph II is in error.
COUNT I
BREACH OF CONTRACT
12. Pamgraphs I through II of this IInswer lire incorporated herein by reference.
13. Denied. It is specifically denied that the Defendllnts' conduct constltntes II brellch of
any contmct.
WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request this Honorable Court to dlsrniss the
Plaintiffs' suit.
COUNT II
UNJUST ENRICHMENT
14. Pamgraphs I through 13 of this answer are Incorporated herein by reference.
15. Denied. Defendants have not been unjustly enriched in that they have continued to
pay each rnonth to the Prothonotllry auy IInd all rent due and owing to the Plaintiffs as a result of the
oral contract that wus reuched between the Plll1ies.
WHEREFORE, the Defendants respectfully request this HOllomble Court to dismiss the
Plaintiffs Complaint.
Respectfully submitted,
KA YER & BROWN
II Z:,
By: I I./~I / ft.-I.
., I
Jamcll J. K~I er, 9<quire
Su~(eme . 1.0. #50838
Li IJCrt Y La t
4 ElIst LillCrty A venue
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-7922
Attorney for Defendants
Date: I 0 ! 17 /., )'
-.
.
;t~
~ ~i\~
f: '
1 ~
. J;.
p"
l,.I..~ ,fl.
.,
...
'S
r:r
Vl
~ a;
.....:~("tj
7j~o
~.c"'"
o bO-
Q., ,- <:
c:I:Q.,
~ ~ .
'" tJ
C ~
. c ""i:
'> ., "l
~!-W
;.
C M
C 2 0
:t~~ ...
,,~
o~o ~
... e- c '"
1XI_0 :::: lV'-
"O<l:U o.ii fa
..J >
C Vl~ d'~
roa>o 41.0 2
E,- ,c._ Cll
"'o~ ':'~ll.
CIl-w W
>-<i- ~~
ro 0
:.: 0: )!1 o'
m
<l: u '1
rOCT 191995Jn
LARRY WARNER, ANNA WARNER,
KENNETH HOLLINGER, JONIETTA
HOLLINGER, t/d/b/a
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE,
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 5157 CIVIL 1995
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v.
KENNETH TREGO and ETHEL TREGO, :
Defendants
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this _ day of
, 1995 the Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash
Appeal from District Justice is dismissed.
BY THE COURT,
J.
CCI
W. Darren Powell, Esquire
Counsel for Plaintiffs
James J. Kayer, Esquire
Counsel for Defendants
\
\
I
,4
LARRY WARNER, ANNA WARNER,
KENNETH HoLLINGER, JQNIETTA
HOLLINGER, t/dfDfa
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE,
Plaintiffs
v.
KENNETH TREGO and ETHEL TREGO, :
Defendants
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 5157 CIVIL 1995
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this _ day of
Appeal frorn District Justice is dismissed.
eel W. Dbrren Powell, Esquire
Counsel for Plaintiffs
James J. Kayer, Esquire
Counsel for Defendants
, 1995 the Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash
BY THE COURT,
J.
LARRY WARNER, ANNA WARNER,
KENNETH HOLLINGER, JONIETTA
HOLLINGER, t/d/b/a
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE,
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 5157 CIVIL 1995
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v.
KENNETH TREGO and ETHEL TREGO, :
Defendants
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO OUASH APPEAL
COMES NOW, Kenneth Trego and Ethel Trego, by and through their attorneys,
Kayer & Brown, who do hereby aver as follows:
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
5. Admitted.
6. Admitted.
7. Denied. Plaintiffs avennents in Paragmph 7 are conclusions of law and require
no response. By way of further answer, Pa. R.C.P.D.I. No. 1002 indicates that appeals rnay
be tiled rnore than thirty (30) days after the date of judgment upon good cause shown.
8. Denied. Avennents in Plaintiffs' Paragraph 8 are a conclusion of law and
require no response.
PRAECIPE FOR LISTING CASE FOR ARGUMENT
(Must be typewritten and subni.tt~ in duplicate)
TO THE PROTHONOTARY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY:
PlellSe list the within matter far the next ArgU\lE!Ilt COUrt.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAPTION OF CASE
(ent:iJ:e caption ITIIlIt be stated in full)
LARRY WARNER, ANNA WARNER, KENNETH HOLLINGER, JONIETTA HOLLINGER, t/d/b/a
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE
( plaintiff)
VB.
KENNETH TREGO ANQ ETHEL TREGO
11,_1
( Deferxiant)
No. 5157
civil
19 qC;
1. state matter to be argued (i.e..
darurrer to CQItllaint, etc.):
Appeal from District Justice
plaintiff'S arotion for new trial. defendant's
Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Defendants'
2. Identify counsel who will. argue case:
(a) far plaintiff: W. Darren Powell, Esquire
~: Ten East High Street, Carlisle, PA 17013
(b) far deferxiant: James J. Kayer, Esquire
Address: 4 East Liberty Avenue, Carlisle, PA 17013
3. I will notify all parties in writing within 0.0 c\ay6 that this case has
been listed for argurent.
4. ArgUrerlt COUrt Date:
December 6, 1995
'H~ \h;~~:' ~ ~
09-3-02
Il., 'is. 5/ j-1 &:u r:..-..
COMMON PLEAS NOTIFICATION
PLAINTIFF REQ~~~~RM
fMOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE I
250 BEETEM HOLLOW ROAD
NEWVILLE, PA 17241
L ~
V5.
DEFENDANT: NAME "",ADORE"
~REGO, KENNETH & ETHEL I
LOT 36 MT. VIEW TERRACE
NEWVILLE, PA 17241
L ~
Docket No,: LT-OOOO 124-95
Dale Flied: 8/11/95
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND
"'" No
OJ Name Hon.
HELEN B. SHULENBERGER
~ P.O. BOX 155
27 W. BIG SPRING AVENUE
NEWVILLE, PA
'_17171776-3187 17241
HELEN B. 5HULENBERGER
P.O. BOX 155
27 W. BIG SPRING AVENUE
NEWVILLE, PA 17241
Disposition Date: 8/25/95
PI.... be advl,ed that an appeal hat been flied In the above caplloned C81O. Kindly UIO thit form to indicate the ,..urb
In thl, cue, and r"um to thalleuing authortty (lilted above).
RESULT OF APPEAL Common Pleaa Judge
SUMMARY APPEAL
APPEAL STRICKEN. Ipp..1 hoo been dl..llow.d,
APPEAL DISCONTINUED - app.al hal be.n dllonllnu.d by appalllnl.
DISTRICT JUSTICE DECISION UPHELD. court hoe ,..ch.d eam. dlcl.lon 00 orlglnll dl.trlct lu.tlc. dlcl.lon
_ dl.trlcllultlcl offlc. 1110 coll.ct romllnlng flnll/co.to,
APPEAL SUCCESSFUL. court hoe rolchod dlcl.lon flVo,"blllo dlrlnd.nl.
full rofund 10 be leau.d by dl.trlct lu.llcl offlc..
""l1lol ,olund 10 be loou.d by dl.trlcllu,Uc. officI,
REVISED DISTRIBUTION OF FINES AND COSTS
" dilt,lct JUltlce office I, to l..u8 . partial r.fund, pie... Indlcete an)' new dlltrlbutlon In the amount(l)
at fin.. and COlta as . ,..uh 01 the court'. decl.lon,
FINE
COUNlY CRT COST
STATE CRT COST
STATE CST!
HEARING COST
EMS
CAT
JCP
DVC
evc
CCD
OTHERlpl.... .paclfy)
CIVIL APPEAL
APPEAL STRICKEN. Ipp.al h.. be.n dl..llowld,
APPEAL OISCONTINUED - .PPI.I hoo be.n dl.conUnu.d by Ippolllnt.
DISTRICT JUSTICE DECISION UPHELD. court hoo ,..chod tho .om. docl.lon ..Ih. dl.trlct lu.tlco ludgm.nt.
OISTRICT JUSTICE DECISION DISMISSEO - court h.. rolchod . docl.lon thlt do.. nol concu, wllh thl dl.trlct lu,UcI Judgmlnt.
WRIT Of CERTIORARI
WRIT STRICKEN. .ppe.1 hoo b..n dl,"lIow.d.
WRIT DISCONTINUED & writ haa bean dllcontinued bV appallant.
OISTRICT JUSTICE DECISION SET ASIDE - Ihl c... will be ,.h..rd duo to Irr.gul.rlty. I.ck oljurl.dlctlon, or Impro"", ..nu.,
WAIT DISMISSED. dlltrlct JuaUce decl.lon was not found to be flawod, lacking jurl.diction . or having Improper venue.
STATEMENT Of OBJECTION (PI.... gl... g.n.,.llummlry ofth. ,..ulll)
OBJECTION DISCONTINUED. obJoctlon has bean dilconlinued bV the appellant.
OBJECTION DENIED. objection has been denied by Ihe Court of Common PIODt.
OBJECTION UPHELD. cppellcnt'. obloction h.. been uph.ld by tho Court 01 Common Pl....
LARRY WARNER, ANNA WARNER,
KENNETH HOLLINGER, JQNIETTA
HOLLINGER, l/d/b/u
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE.
Pluintiffs
v.
KENNETH TREGO und ETHEL TREGO, :
Defendunls
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 5157 CIVIL 1995
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this _ duy of
Appeal from Dlstricl Justice is dismissed.
cc:
w. Darren Powell, Esquire
Counsel for Plaintiffs
James J. Kayer, Esquire
Counsel for Defendants
, 1995 lhe Plaintiffs' Motion to Quush
BY THE COURT,
J.
LARRY WARNER, ANNA WARNER,
KENNETH HOLLINGER, JONIETT A
HOLLINGER, 1I000/a
MOUNT AIN VIEW TERRACE,
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO, 5157 CIVIL 1995
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v.
KENN'~TH TREGO and ETHEL TREGO,
Defendants
b-iOT10N TO MAKE RULE ABSOLUTE
AND NOW, come the Plaintiffs, Larry Warner, Anna Warner, Kenneth Hollinger, Joniella
Hollinger, IId/b/a Mountain View Terrace, by and through their attorneys, MARTSON,
DEARDORFF, WILLIAMS & OTTO, and hereby respectfully request this Honorable Court to grant
their Motion to Make Rule Absolute and in support thereof, avers as follows:
I. Defendants tiled an appeal from a District Justic~ Order on September 27, 1995.
2. On or about October 5, 1995, Plaintiffs, in response to such appeal, tiled a Complaint
and a Motion to Quash Appeal from District Justice (hereinafter referred to as "Motion to Quash"), ·
3. In said Motion to Quash, Plaintiffs sought to quash Defendants' appeal as untimely
and in violation ofPa, R,C.P.D.J. 1002 and also for recovery of costs incurred in responding to such
untimely appeal. A copy of that Motion to Quash is all ached hereto and marked as Exhibit "A".
4. On October 12, 1995, this Honorable Court entered a Rule against Defendants
Kenneth Trego and Ethel Trego to show cause why their appeal should not be quashed pursuant to
Pa. R,C.P.D.J, 1002, This Rule was returnable in seven days from service. A copy of said Rule is
attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
5. Plaintiffs served Defendants with said Rule on October 17, 1995, the period in which
to show cause under the Rule having now eKpired.
6, Defendants tiled a Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Appeal (hereinafter
referred to as "Response"). A copy of said Response is attached hereto as Exhibit "C".
7, In said Response. Defendants admit that the relevant District Justice judgement was
entered on August 25, 1995 (see Response at paragraph 6) and also that they filed their appeal on
September 27.1995 (see Response at paragraph 7),
8, Defendants have failed to show cause why their appeal should not be quashed.
9, Defendants' averment that they filed their appeal within thirty (30) days of receipt
of judgment does not support a tinding that their appeal was timely or that they have good cause to
extend the statutorily prescribed period in which to tile an appeal. Goldberil v Goldberi. 315 Pa.
Super, 333, 461 A.2d 1307 (1983).
10, As a result of Defendants' blatantly untimely and frivolous appeal, Plaintiffs have
incurred attorney's fees in excess of$500.00.
I \. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover attorney's fees in responding to this untimely,
frivolous appeal. 720 Partnership v City of Philadelphia. 129 Pa. Commw. 300, 565 A,2d 518,
Appeal Denied, 525 Pa, 652, 581 A.2d 577 (1989),
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Honorable Court enter an Order: (I)
Making the October 12, 1995 Rule absolute and quashing Defendants' appeal; and (2) Requiring
Defendants to reimburse Plaintiffs in the amount of $500,00 for attorney's fees incurred as a result
of Defendants' untimely appeal.
MARTSON, DEARDORFF, WILLIAMS & OTTO
By Cu.Q. _ \? >0- 4
w. Darren well, Esquire
Ten East High Street
Carlisle, P A 17013.3093
(717) 243.3341
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Date: October 26. 1995
exhibit A
F PllUDATA11lr.G~00C1"'1:0m40 I tInr
L'fIIIII& IlHm.I04JAM
a....... IMmlul5J.w
oc~ C J 199si9-'
LARRY WARNER. ANNA WARNER.
KENNETH HOLLINGER. JONlETT A
HOLLINGER. tldlb/a
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE.
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY. PENNSYL V ANlA
NO. 5157 CIVll. 1995
CIVll. ACTION - LAW
v.
KENNETH TREGO and ETIIEL TREGO.
Defendants
ORDER
AND NOW. this _ day of . 1995. upon careful consideration of
Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Appeal from District Justice. said Motion is hereby GRANTED, and
Defendants' appeal is dismissed.
BY TIlE COURT
1.
-
~
,
-
EXHIBIT "A"
LARRY WARNER. ANN/\ WARNER.
KENNETII HOLLINGER. JONIETTA
HOLLINGER. tldib/a
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE.
Plaintiffs
IN TIlE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAl'ID COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA
NO, 5157 CIVIL 1995
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v,
KENNETII TREGO and ETIlEL TREGO.
Defendants
MOTION TO OlJASH APPEAl. FROM DISTRICT mSTICE
AND NOW, come the Plaintiffs. Larry Warner. Anna Warner. Kenneth Hollinger, Jonielta
Hollinger, tldib/a Mountain View Terrace. by and through their attorneys, MARTSON.
DEARDORFF. Wll.LIAMS & OTTO. and hereby respectfully request this Honorable Court to
quash the Defendants' appeal and in support thereof. avers as follows:
1. Plaintiffs Larry Warner. Anna Warner. Kenneth Hollinger and Jonielta Hollinger are
adult individuals tldib/a Mountain View Terrace. a Pennsylvania general partnership with a place
of business at 250 Beetem Hollow Road. Newville. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17241.
2, At all times relevant hereto. Plaintiffs operated and maintained a mobile home park
business.
J, Defendants Kenneth and Ethel Trego are adult individuals with a place of residence
at Lot 36, Mountain View Terrace. Newville. Curnberland County. Pennsylvania 17241.
4, On or about August 11. 1995. Plaintiffs tiled a Landlord and Tenant Complaint
against the Defendants with District Justice Shulenberger. docketed at No. L T -0000124-5. A copy
of said Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit" A."
5. In the aforesaid Complaint. Plaintiffs requested recovery of certain monies due for
past rent and possession of real property,
6, On or about August 25. 1995. District Justice Shulenberger entered judgment against
the Defendants and granted possession of the property to Plaintiffs, A copy of said Notice of
Judgement is attached hereto as Exhibit "B,"
NOTICE O' APPIAL
cOMMONWlAl'" Of .....nVAIIIA
Of CO"U';"fl ruM
of C'ro-~1aDd eouat,
Jl.GICW IllI11ICf
09-3-01
llela B. SbQ1ubecI.r
FROM
OISTllCF JUSTICE JUDGMIHT
cOMMllN PUAI No. '5-5157 C1ri1 fUll
NOTICE OF APPEAL
-
Notlc. I. glv.n Ihal Ih. appellanl hili IlIed In Ih. abav. Court al Cammon Pi.... an appeal from Ih. judgm.nt ,.nde<ed by Ih. DI.lrlcl Ju.tlc.
an !h. dal" and In Ih. ..... m.nllaned below.
leDDeCb & !tbel.. ~D
-
8/15/95 ~c.la Vi.. Tarc.c.
09-3-01 $hal..becaeC
laMP-" 1tM1
'It.
TA 19
LT 19::&14-9"-' ,.
Thll black will be SIgned ONk'i w .n iii. nalatlan I. r.qui/.d und.r Po. R.C,P,J.P.
No. 10088. ' , . '.
Thl. Notlc. af ApPeal. wh.n rec.lved by Ihe DI.lrlct Ju.tlc.. will aperal. a. a
. ,
SUI'tRSlDEAS ta iii. Iud m.", lor pa lOll In Ihli ca...
..: ...... ,
; ....:; /: It:;' '...
. t:. '. -
:,' '," . .. ~n.'/KJIlO"IYOI .""ry
_ ,J
'. . PRAECIPE TO'EIlTER RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT AND RULE TO FILE
,. . ,'...
(ThiS sllCt/On of form 10 ()euleil~NL v'when eppellenr was DEFENDANT(see Pe, R,C.P,J,P, No. 1001(7) In action oelore Dl&lrlclJus/iCe.
IF NOT USED. deleen from COlifq! ~otice of appea/lo oe served upon appellee),
PRAECIPEl Ta PralhanalOly
-
/
/I appellenl was CLAIMANT (SH Pa. R,C.P,J.P.
No. 1001(6) In aC110n Oetore Dlslr/cl Justice.
he MUST FILE A COMPLAINT within /W8nry (20)
days aft" filing his NOTICE of APPEAl..
J
Enl., ,ul. upon
............041 n Vf... -r.ppJWl!.
N.m. 01 aDOII/ft(.}
. appell..('), la fll. a cOmplaint In ",I. ..""...1
,Common Pi.... Na.
9'.5151,C1vil 'fUll
) wUhln tw.nty (20) days aft., ..rvic. 01 ,ul. or .uH.' .ntry 01 lu-lgment 01 nan prOt.
SigM"". ~ I ..--- 0I1N'1fDf"lIY' DI ~
RULEs To ,.,........~" V4.... ,..........
Name 01 IA>>UINlI,
. app.II..I'),
~ ",' .
(I) You are natllled ,ha' a rul. I. h.,.bV .nl.rod upon you 'a iii. a camplalnlln Ihl. app.al w"hln tw.niy (20) days aft", th. date 01
....Ic. 01 thillul. upon you bV p.rsanal..rviC. a' by c.,"fl.d or r.gill.rod mall. ' '., .. .,";' :';" '
'.
(2) II Vau do nal fiI. a camplalnl wilhln ,hi. lime. a JUDGMENT OF NON PROS WilL BE ENWlEQ'AGAINST YOU.
.... ' .
" . .
~ ,- . j' , . " .'
". ,..' .
. -.' . .' '"
, "~I" ",-.' . I. C'4 . I'
i",.," I..:' ~ - '.1.'
I .: :'. ...,.1 ,,' ""71-lP,o,,,,,,,,,,,,,,or,c,
~t ,;
(3\ Th. dote af ,.,..,IC. of thil rule if ,eN Ice wa' bV mad is the dare of mailing.
Jot.:
seot. 21 . 19-'5
copy TO BE SERVED ON APPELLEE
lOPC 312.10
EXHIBIT B
LARRY WARNER, ANNA
WARNER, KENNETH
HOLUNGER, JONIETTA
HOLLINGER, t/d/b/a
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE,
PLAINTIFFS
V.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION-LAW
KENNETH TREGO and
ETHEL TREGO,
DEFENDANTS
95-5157 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COUBT
AND NOW, this J1:.- day of October, 1995, a Rule Is entered against
defendants, Kenneth Trego and Ethel Trego, to show cause why their appeal from the
entry of a Judgrnent by a District Justice should not be quashed pursuant to Pa. Rule
of Civil procedure D.J. 1002. Rule returnable seven (7) days after service.
?:v,
Edgar B. Bayley, J. ,
W. Darren Powell, Esquire
F.or Plaintiffs
"
James J. Kayer, Esquire
For Defendants
., .' .~
,,'
-, -...,....'"
.. .-
, ',nd
:saa
I 30..,,' C1-c;C,' 7 .1.f
u~L~..c.:.,' )J""..f"\,(........
>f.J~.t- '. iOIl:0l10lary
EXHIBIT "B"
EXHIBIT C
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS'
MOTION TO QUASH APPEAL was served on Plaintiffs' counsel by First-class mail, postage
prepaid, by forwarding a true and correct copy unto:
W. Darren Powell, Esquire
Ten East High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Date I tJ i! -; I,; "
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certifY that a copy of the foregoing Motion to Make Rule Absolute was served this
date by depositing same in the Post Otlice at Carlisle, P A, tirst class mail, postage prepaid,
addressed as follows:
James J, Kayer, Esquire
KA YER AND BROWN
4 East Liberty Avenue
Carlisle, PA 17013
MARTSON, DEARDORFF, WILLIAMS & OTTO
Byld O~ r~~
W. Darren Powell, Esquire
Ten East High Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
(717) 243-3341
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Dated: October 26, 1995
,
NOV 0 1 19#
LARRY WARfIlER, ANNA WARNER,
KENNETH HOLLINGER, JONIETTA
HOLLINGER, t/d/b/a
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE,
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 5157 CIVIL 1995
CIVIL ACTION.. LAW
v.
KENNETH TREGO and ETHEL TREGO, :
Defendants
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this j.Jday of '-1Ul/th../;fA..
allend a hearing set on the ..fdny of"--1U~'-t:.~1.
, 1995 the parties are directed 10
J.()Jd.. '1
, 1995, at}L!::. rn. in Courtroom .6.
_ of the Curnberland Counly Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. At Ihal hearing, testirnony will
be taken to delermine whether Ihe Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash the Defendants' Appeal should be
granted.
BY THE cotj /
J / I
I '
J.
cc: Wayne D. Powell, Esquire
Jarnes J. Kayer, Esquire
I
I . J
\\\~\'<'.~ .j(
()ll~
LARRY WARNER, ANNA
WARNER, KENNETH
HOLLINGER, JONIETTA
HOLLINGER, t/d/b/a
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE,
PLAINTIFFS
V.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION.LAW
KENNETH TREGO and
ETHEL TREGO,
DEFENDANTS
95-5157 CIVIL TERM
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this J1:...... day of October, 1995, a Rule Is entered against
defendants, Kenneth Trego and Ethel Trego, to show cause why their appeal from the
entry of a Judgment by a District Justice should not be quashed pursuant to Pa. Rule
of Civil procedure D.J. 1002. Rule retumable seven (7) days after service.
By,the Court/ 17
(~ {j:J
Edgar B. Bayley, J. ,
W. Darren Powell, Esquire
For Plaintiffs
C:cd'" '-"....
,,,,C'.~..l /0/,:31 'l {',
/:, f'.
James J. Kayer, Esquire
For Defendants
:saa
LARRY WARNER, ANNA WARNER,
KENNETH HOLLINGER, JONIETT A
HOLLINGER, Vd/b/a
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE.
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
NO, 5157 CIVIL 1995
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v,
KENNETH TREGO and ETHEL TREGO.
Defendants
MOTION TO OIJASH APPEAL FROM OISTRICT JIJSTICE
AND NOW, come the Plaintiffs, Larry Warner. Anna Warner, Kenneth Hollinger, Joniella
Hollinger. tldIb/a Mountain View Terrace. by and through their allorneys. MARTSON.
DEARDORFF, WILLIAMS & OTTO, and hereby respectfully request this Honorable Court to
quash the Defendants' appeal and in support thereof, avers as follows:
I, Plaintiffs Larry Warner, Anna Warner, Kenneth Hollinger and Joniella Hollinger are
adult individuals tldIb/a Mountain View Terrace. a Pennsylvania general partnership with a place
of business at 250 Beetem Hollow Road, Newville. Cumberland County. Pennsylvania 17241.
2. At all times relevant hereto, Plaintiffs operated and maintained a mobile horne park
business,
3. Defendants Kenneth and Ethel Trego are adult individuals with a place of residence
at Lot 36, Mountain View Terrace, Newville, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17241,
4, On or about August 11, 1995. Plaintiffs tiled a Landlord and Tenant Cornplaint
against the Defendants with District Justice Shulenberger. docketed at No. L T .0000124-5, A copy
of said Complaint is allached hereto as Exhibit "A."
5. In the aforesaid Complaint. Plaintiffs requested recovery of certain monies due for
past rent and possession of real property,
6, On or about August 25. 1995. District Justice Shulenberger entered judgment against
the Defendants and granted possession of the property to Plaintiffs, A copy of said Notice of
Judgement is allached hereto as EKhibit "B,"
8-11-9S
Ie fee
.. 'Ii ,0 tiE M.."..., """""" ...
, ' . ' ~ NMHIT YOU FOR THE POSSESSION
. 4 ' _ ',.j ,..' .... .'''~ fp " , . .'. ," \' ~ lt~, .~
_' ,:::~fi' ~~.~' I ' '", , " ",<,," 'P::i./'~"'~lV.':~;;~:
" ' {~""'" 1OnEREALPAOf'ERTY. TO WIT: " .:'. ' :' ...' ""i."-';" :;:~U.I
'.;/411..\:,'h!,l\'-....,....),I.;...j.~f:!~r- "~';I.. ... ...1...ue....AI'IoI...,..OF'~ 'J'~If,. ',Y~jr1
~ '.' . '":,1~.:).!~~~t't.~':.'(" ,of 'i'.~I,. ~.:. .., . n 1~"""".IU"" >;',.: ..,;~tf'" 1_"i.t...
,;':1:' h ~~qF1liEREALPROPERTYNnEN.tOIMT"OF, '. ;,,:';',' ,',..." ~ 'ft" '{~',~"':'
".'1 ~ ," ,. IHJ.... . fLN]OATEINTHEN.tOUNTOF .' ,..t~1 ;l'..j,:,,:~;.
...,~,~w~.....;'" ,"M,.~~DUE~UNlWDONHEARlNGom, "" ~;""~l · "
~:t;i'fHE~~~ER AllEGES THAT:;. ,",' ':. ' ;,) :\;,:.~,~ 1
,"; ~1~r~~~~.~jo~.~~AHY;OF~FEAL'PROPERTV;16 ,f~:' t~'}" S:./~ ''"? .,~...":~~,,..Jt,.~~ ~'
"~"~J" ..~",~,'~~I\~~n;' :.":z-",.."" " ,'~ , >, ' .'..'.'. '(;,1\"
,I "'''' .,.. \ .' j , , .l.
.. " t. 1lI~ -LNQ.OllO OF nw PROPERTY. " .. ...' '1.,. . ,',.
,tl.':"';~QfI~TlE~lOYOUORTO .' ":',~' ..lHiR~
',' .'~'.~i;fi~'REMtM:MsGlVENNNXORlWlCEW1THUW.OA ",..'1'."',:: .,'::. / ,~~W
~ . "" . . r ", . ~ , . " ..' -, : .: . ;~', '-4''''0\ ~
, ' . ~~LNlEfJ,1tEolEAMSOFntEL.ENlE...........,;,:> jI\..".;o:t'AilMt, , .
a.' 1tE TERM FOR WItCH lllE PROPERTY WAS LEASEO OR RENTED IS FlllY ENllEO, OR ';' -' .f);'" "
, , ~fi) A E~ ~ RESULTED BY REASON OF A BREACH OF 1tE CONDlTlONS OF THE LEAaE. n:i ' .' '''\
'....,\~~:- ';;i~;,~~' ",u"h'i_t'. ill t~t .7'~':~;;~~)i.:i.
. Jtl- ~...~.;.' . .:,.~ .' '." " ',..,....~"~'Il.],,J,'
. J.l';::;k:~ "'L'_:" .. \ .,' l~-V~':' ';I
,. :!' ,~Z~~, . ;:;'li~(ua~.urot;~AE..wNED=:r'" ;..:\f;~!:.~i~~~.,~:i~(~;
,,; t,t..' "fEN!. .' . ~ I , ... . .," -':.. ,,' "1\ j
'~-1liEIlEALI'IlPPERTYANDAEFUSElOGlVEUPIT9POSSE ":: ',.." ,:,~"...,' "f<,',-
~ . '~t:;-11-~~f'1l{.~.,~ ~'''';\\'\'' "'..""r" _III".. .,.;'_I','.'.r:.~...~~.~.!~..i.
'. ...." '......'l.,.v...~.... .. '~".' ~." . .' \ .\1. . '/ '-"c.,\~;>( ',t..,:
'\.f~:.J.,-ii. I~< ", '~\', (~.., , ,.'.. ;f.~_ }:,,,Io ~~V-":i:-..&""" l~-
"/~'[l5r..,..l /.\ " .....,.,Ii'".." "'-l-V--,,,',
.. .. ')1' "-<\' . ;'-.' "- ,..,{ ....."1. .,'. ,'- \.,. -L.'.-'
.....1 ~.j : \' " >'0, -1 ~.,... ...~..,.., -;-" ';.L":#~"'"
,)-~,,,,'J.-.,t t'-_. tJ\. f. J . . .\,-,. ..--" . '-"'A..:~.
;-"l~~;"':~~ '. . ,,_,~' . ...... . I - ~~:~;~~...1~~
,~~'.:~,~"J;: '~",. . ~ _ .,~.I.,~r-Jl[..~
, 'ct e/lIrm'e.r .. fIcla IOIlor1h In thIo cOl1lllolnl 8I1l true and ~ III the beet cI my IulllWlldgo. ,
';~~?"*" ~ tD,lhI'...... cI !B Pe, ~'4Q04 ......tlrQ 10 UfIlWDrn _ta eulhOI1IIe& '.~'.:'
.. -~'.-\
II. 8halenbuaer
Di.trict Juatica 09-3-02
27 W. Iii .prinl Aya.
P. O. Box lSS
......1118, PA 17241
(717) 776-3187
tQ:AN.~O~~.M-lIrt5
'~'" ,',?,. ~..*. ,.., "
~
s 48.00
s )n,oo
s 79.S0
DATE PAID
FlUNG COSTS
SERVICE COSTS
TOTAL
8-11-9S
.
.
....
PIaIntltI'a Attorney
-1
J
I
10M....., 10'" ~.., M." II
TENANT COMPLAINT
!' 1. j:_..t !-,\} \ .
PlAJNTlFF
EE
AND
ADDRESS
Kt. View Terrace
250 a.ete. Hollow load
Nawville, PA 17241
]
DEFENOANTlSI
VS.
NAME
,1 D ANO
, ADORE SS
~
a
\ D NAME
~ AND
ADDRESS
l.ennatb , Ethel Trelo
Lot 36 Mt. View Terrace
Newville, PA 17241
Addruss
) ...i~.!"....;~.;,..,.~..~'.!.:4,~ \,_~.
. 4- ,'"I"a....~1~~'~_t:\,.'<t';"I".;
'~:t:':-' ;'.~' ; '~-.. ;.T":...~.:.'.l.';_.-~\:; .'
I'l>ln
HEARING IS 5CHEOULEO BY THE DISTRiCT JUSTICE AS FOLLOWS
lOCATlON DATE"Tt.lE
PA 17241 t 25 1"5 '130. ....
,F YOU HAVE A DEFENSE 10 th,s cOOljllajnl you may preacnt ,t al the i'<la"ng, IF YOU HAVE A CLAIM Illl'linsl the PIalnlIll arioIrlllllll cI .. C>l:Q4lllIlCy
01 the pt1Ifl1lses. whirh Is wottun lhe D..I"ct Juslce iu"sd"Ioon and whoth you ,nlend to ...."t al lhe hearing, YOU MUST FLE " on . ~ ""m al
this 011"8 BEFORE THE TlME act 101 the rea"ng IF YOU DO NOT APPEAR AT THE HEARING. 8 jo.dgment lor possesslon and coal8. and lot damage.
aNt renl il claimed, may nt.>ver1heloss bt! ~nlCfed OQc1lOSI you, A JUd\.monl 39a1OS1 you ror poaaession mDV malJlt In )UJr EVICTlON hem the ilea
AOPC310 1,83
EXflIBIT "A"
EXHIBIT B
-
t'~MMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNT'{ OF: CUMBERLAND
NOTICE OF JUDGMENT/TRANSCRIPT
, I
.....OlolNo,'
09-3-02
PLAiI'lTIFF: __....AllIlIUlI
~OUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE
250 BEETEM HOLLOW ROAD
NEWVILLE, PA 17241
L
DEFENDANT: VS.
r;; ....... .... ADDIOlI
TREGO, KENNETH , ETHEL
LOT 36 MT. VIEW TERRACE
NEWVILLE, PA 17241
L
OJ......:Hoft.
HELEN B. SHULENBERGER
-, P.O. BOX 155
27 W. BIG SPRING AVENUE
NEWVILLE, PA
T~a17)776-3187 17241
LARRY WARNER AND KENNETH HOLLINGER
250 BEETEM HOLLOW ROAD
NEWVILLE, PA 17241
Docket No,: LT-0000124-95
Date Flied: 8/11/95
THIS IS TO NOTIFY YOU THAT:
[!] Judgment was entered lor: (Name) MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE
[!] Judgment was entered against: (Name) TREGO, KENNETH , ETHEL
In the amount 01 $
505.50
(Date) 8/25/95
on:
o Damages will be assessed on:
(Date & TIme)
o this case dismissed w~houl prejudice.
[!] possession granted.
O possession granted il money judgment Is not
satisfied w~hln thirty days.
o Possession not granted.
o Levy Is stayed lor days or 0 generally stayed.
o Objection to levy has been filed and hearing will be held:
Date: Place:
\\ St""~
Amount 01 Judgment
Judgment Costs
Interest on Judgment
Attorney Fees
$429.00
$76.50
$.00
$.00
$505.50 :
TOTAL
q S' E.~.\~ ~t 30 ~,
Time:
ANY PAR1Y HAS THE RIGHT TO APPEAL WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF JUDGMENT BY FlUNG A NOTICE
OF APPEAL WITH THE PROTHONOTARY I CLERK OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CIVIL DIVISION.
E-;;tCA.(" Date.&lL 15 ,JA!...-G,rL.z."-t/" ,DlstrictJustlce
I ceolly that this is a true and correct copy of Ihe record 01 the proceedings containing the judgment.
Date
, District Justice
My commission expires first Monday 01 January, 2000.
SEAL
EXHIBIT "B"
.......'11' ',...,
\...,: ---.,>
l':
.,
-.I
.,
-.I
....;
:'
EXHIBIT C
NOTICE OF APPEAL
COMMONWIAL1H or PlNHlYLVANIA
COUll or COMMON rLIAI
of cu.berland CouDty
JUlltCIAL DIIT1ICI'
09-3-02
Helea B. Shu1e"bUlar
fROM
DISTRICT JUSTICE JUDGMENT
COMMON Pt..AS No. '5-5151 C1"U "enl
NOTICE OF APPEAL
,
Noll.. II gl..n that Ih. opp.llonl hOI fll.d In ,h. obo.. Court of Common Pleal an app.al from tho ludgm.n' r.nd.rod by tho Olltrl.1 JUIII..
on ,h. date and In th. .01. m.nUonod below,
lenDeth & tthelll IIU
,-
09-3-02 Shule.beraar
,-
/25/95
Hoentaln View Terrac.
..
,IN<
l.....th & Idlel 'h'e 0
TA 19 '
LT 19::12~-95' '. ' '
Thll blo.k will be Ilgn.d ONLV w iri hll no'allon II required under Po. R,C,P.J.P,
No. I008B, " .' .' . .'
Thll Notl.e of Appeal, w~en re..I.ed by Ihe OI.lrl.1 JUIII.e. will ape,ale 01 a
. .' .
SUPERSEDEAS to iii. lu~ m.~t lor pou Ion In 'hli 'ole.
i '.i: ',.. .-J'" ,() I,..,
~. . . nf'uI. 0 Prol.honOl.ry Of e,aufV'
/I appellanl was CLAIMANT (see Pa. R,C,P,J,P.
No. 1001(6) In action befOle Dlstrlc/ Jus/Ice,
he MUST FILE A COMPLA/NT within twenlY (20)
days afler filing his NOTICE of APPEAL
/
..... "PRAECIPE TO'ENTER RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT AND RULE TO FILE
'0' '. ,'. "
(This section ofform /0 lje,uJelf0NL '('when appellan/ was DEFENDANT (see Pa. R.C.P,J.P, No, 1001(7) In action before D/strlc/Justlce.
IF NOT USED. detach from coPy~q~ ~otlce of appeal to be served upon appellee),
PRAECIPE: To Prothonotary
Enter rule upon
Mn.m...... n vt.v ,.......e...
Name 01 appellee(sJ
, appellee(I), to Iii. a .omplalntln 1/111 appeal
(Common Pleal No.
95-5151Civl1,.era
) wUhln twenty (20) day. aile, ler.l.e of rule or luffer .ntry 01 ludgmen' of non pros.
Signlluf.vf appt"atl, 01 hi. .1lOfMY Of JQlIIJI
RULE: To
Mnllftt'-Cn V4."" 'r.....,....-..
Nlme 0' IIppellH("
, appellee(.),
. . .." ,
(1) Vou are noUlled that a rule I. hereby enlered upon you 10 file a .omplalnt In Ihll appeal wllhlniweniy (20) daYI of'er the date 01
" 'f
service of thll rule upon you by perlonollervlce or by certified or registered mall. ... . . .~ " .' ". . ~ '. I . '
I' ....
(2) If you do not file a .omplolnt wllhln Ihls time, a JUDGMENT Of NON PROS Will BE ENT~REll"AGAINST VOU, '.
; ;- - ~ j '. _ . f '... ~ ;','~
. . .: .' :", - .
"~I' '..,; , I. ~ , 1."
,," .' J . ,; , "/;k- ,- ..t i
"'~ :".,'.!.. .~~"'r/P'OI""'""'''OIP''!''r
(3) lhe date of lervlce of thl, rule If service was by mail I, the date of mailing,
Ii.
I
Dale:
Bent. 27 ,19J5
COPV TO BE SERVED ON APPELLEE
AOPC 312.81)
EXfIlBlT "C"
LARRY WARNER. ANNA WARNER.
KENNETH HOLLINGER. JONIETTA
HOLLINGER. t/d{b/a
MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE.
Plaintiffs
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA
NO. 5157 CIVIL 1995
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
v.
KENNETH TREGO and ETHEL TREGO. :
Defendants
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW. this _ day of
. 1995 the Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash
Appeal from District Justice is dismissed.
BY THE COURT,
J.
cc: W. Darren Powell, Esquire
Counsel for Plaintiffs
James J. Kayer, Esquire
Counsel for Defendants
9. Denied. Avennents it' Plaintiffs' Paragmph 9 are a conclusion of law and
require no response. By way of further answer. it is admitted that the Defendnnts filed an
appeal on September 27. 1995. a date within thirty (30) days of their receipt of the Di~1rict
Justice's judgment.
10. Denied. Avennents in Plaintiffs' Pamgmph 10 are a conclusion of law and
require no response.
1L Denied. Avennents in Plaintiffs' Paragmph 11 are a conclusion of law and
require 110 response.
12. Defendants are unable to detennine the vemcity of the avennents in Plaintiffs'
Paragmph 12 said avennents.
WHEREFORE. the Defendants respectfully requests this court to dismiss the
Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Appeal.
Respectfully submitted.
KA YER & BROWN
Date:
folr,;f'I"}
'It.. 'ir. j'/J~1 &v 1:s-..
COMMON PLEAS NOTIFICATION
PLAINTIFF REQ~~~~RM
!MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE
250 BEETEM HOLLOW ROAD
NEWVILLE, PA 17241
L
va.
OEFENDANT: lWoIE.... AOOAE88
fTREGO, KENNETH , ETHEL
LOT 36 MT. VIEW TERRACE
NEWVILLE, PA 17241
L
Docket No.: LT-0000124-95
Dale Flied: 8/11/95
'0
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
OUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND
lllolNo:
\,.
09-3-02
W NInw: Hon.
HELEN B. SHULENBERGER
~. P.O. BOX 155
27 W. BIG SPRING AVENUE
NEWVILLE, PA
T_ (717) 776-3187 17241
HELEN B. SHULENBERGER
P.O. BOX 155
27 W. BIG SPRING AVENUE
NEWVILLE, fA 17241
Disposition Dale: 8/25/95
PII... be Idvlood th.I In IPpoII h.. bl.n WId In Ih. .bov. copllon.d c.... Kindly uoo thll lorm to Indlc.tl tho ,,"ullo
In thll ..... end rotum to th.luulng .uthorlty (1IIt.d .boVI).
RESULT OF APPEAL Common Plea8 Judge
8UMMARY APPEAL
APPEAL STRICKEN. .pp..1 h.. b..n dll.llow.d.
APPEAL DISCOI'ffiNUED 0 .pp..1 h.1 b..n dllonllnu.d by .pp.lI.nt.
DISTRICT JUSTICE DECISION UPHELD. court h.1 ,IDChld I.m. d.clllon .. orlgln.1 dlltrlct jUltlc. d..lllon.
__ dll~ICl JUlllc, offlc.l. to coll.ct r.m.lnlng IIn.oIcoltl.
APPEAL SUCCESSFUL. .ourt h.. r..ch.d d.clllon f.vor.bl. to d.l.nd.nt.
full r.'und to be I..u.d by dllt,lct JUlllc. olllc..
p.rtlal ,olund to b. I..u.d by dlltrlcl jUlllc. 0111...
REVISED DISTRIBUTION OF FINES AND COSTS
II dlltrlCl JUltI.. 0111..1. to I..u. . p.rtlol relund. pl.... Indlc.t. .ny new dlllrlbutlon In the .mount(l)
of fin.. Ind coat. a. . ,.IUIt of the court'1 deCillion.
FINE
COUNTY CAT COST
BTATE CAT COST
STATE CST!
HEARING COST
EMS
CAT
JCP
DVC
CVC
CCD
OTHER(pl....lpoclly)
CIVIL APPEAL
APPEAL STRICKEN 0 .pp..1 h.. boon dll.llow.d.
APPEAL DISCONTINUED. .pp..1 h.. boon dllconllnuod by .pp.lI.nt.
DISTRICT JUSTICE DECISION UPHELD. .ourt h.. ...ch.d the I.m. d.clllon .1 tho dlllrlcl jUltlc. Judgm.nt.
DISTRICT JUSTICE DECISION DISMISSED. court h.1 r..chod 0 d.clllon th.t do.. nol con.ur ..IIh tho dlltrlCl jUlllc. Judgm.nt.
WRIT OF CERTIORARI
WRIT STRICKEN. .pp..1 h.. b..n dllOllow.d.
WAIT DISCONTINUED 0 wrll h., b.on dl.conllnu.d by .ppoll.nt.
DISTRICT JUSTICE DECISION SET ASIDE. the co.. will b. reh..rd duo tolrr.gul.rlly, I.ck 01 Jurlldlctlon. or Impropor v.nu..
WRIT DISMISSED. dlltrlcl JUltl.. d.clllon W.I not found to b. tI.wod. I..klng Jurlldlctlon , or h.vlng Impropor v.nu..
8TATEMENT OF OBJECTION (Pl.... glv.. gln."I.umm.ry 01 tho ,,,ulI,,
OBJECTION DISCONTINUED. obJ.ctlon h.1 b..n dllcont;nuod by tho .pp.lI.nt.
OBJECTION DENIED. obJ.ctlon h.1 boon d.nl.d by Ih. Court of Common Plo...
OBJECTION UPHELD. .ppoll.n!'1 objo.tlon h.. boon uphold by tho Court of Common Pl....
AOPC 729-95
FORM PRINTEDI
9/29/95 11119:18
.,
...J
.,
...J
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
;.OUNTY OF: CUMBERLAND
"'~(:IlttNcJ:
. 09-3-02
NOTICE OF JUDGMENT/TRANSCRIPT
Il'twne.tlon.
PLAINTIFF: .....E....""""'..
~OUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE
250 BEETEM HOLLOW ROAD
NEWVILLE, PA 17241
L
DEFENDANT: VS.
r,; NAME aI1d AlXlfIfOO
TREGO, KENNETH , ETHEL
LOT 36 MT. VIEW TERRACE
NEWVILLE, PA 17241
L
Docket No.: LT-0000124-95
DatoFlled: 0/11/95
-.l
..,
HELEN B. SHULENBERGER
.....- P.O. BOX 155
27 W. BIG SPRING AVENUE
NEWVILLE, PA
f~~ (717)776-3107 17241
-.l
..,
HELEN B. SHULENBERGER
P.O. BOX 155
27 W. BIG SPRING AVENUE
NEWVILLE, PA 17241
THIS IS TO NOTIFY YOU THAT:
[!] Judgment was enlered for: (Name) MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE
[!] Judgment was enlered against: (Name) TREGO , KENNETH , ETHEL
In the amount of $
505.50
(Date) 0/25/95
on:
o Damages will be assessed on:
(Dale & Time)
o This case dismissed without preJudice,
[RJ Possession granted.
O PossesslDn granled II money ludymenlls nDt
satlsflod wllhln thirty days.
o Possession not granted.
o Levy Is stayed lor _ days or 0 generally stayed.
o Objection to levy has been flied and hearing will be held:
Dale: Place:
Amount 01 Judgment
Judgment Costs
Interesl on Judgment
Atlorney Fees
$429.00
$76.50
$.00
$.00
$505.50
TOTAL
Time:
.. . . ~ ,"'..
." ., ,.,. "', '
. . ~ .., of' I '. ~ '
ANY PARTY HAS THE RIGHTTO APPEAL WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF JUDQt,1~NT!JY FILIN~~ t-l~TICE
OF APPEAL WITH THE PRO~HONOTARY I CLERK OF THE COURT OF COMM~N~~L:~C.IYIL DIYISIOf'r .
('.....,/ Dale <)(~ /' i/ ,".. ';.: (.',Dlstfl.ctJUstilte
..__6. p .__ .' ' .. . . t. . .. . .,
, I~' . '. . .
I cer1lfy that this Is a true and carrecl copy 01 the record of the proceedings Cdnlaln.lng lh!J Jl!dgmenl:'
,', ,
Dale . .' ,. Qlslrlcl Justice
My commission expires first Monday 01 January, 2000.
SEAL
AOPC315.94