Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-06312 ~ ~. . ~ ... ..' ... ....... .>>'~ .">> .'... ... -:41:' .. ~. .lCCo ... ... .:c..)nollCo".lfCo::olICo':..A'II> ...... 410'::_" ~ - - .. . 8 8 8 . * 8 ~ . * ~ .. ~ j ~ ,~ . 8 ~ ~ $ " ~ ~ w ~ ~ !' ~ ~ . ~ , . . . 8 $ IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY STATE OF '* PENNA. $ Vel'SlIS ..n..........n....... 1\ I, " :i :1 1\ II .. c:AR~ ~E:!\,N.~!".~ .B~,l\DIiA~. PLAINTIFF N (I. ..~.~,~..~...~.!Y.I~...t?~~.. " ., ................................ .................................................... .~ ~ PARRISH TOM BRADHAM ~ $ DEFENDANT ~ . ~ ~ tI ~ . ~ ~ g ~ $ ~ ..' ~ ..' DECREE IN DIVORCE ANDNOW~~..~...... 19..9.~, It Is ordered and decreed that ........... ~~~~. ~~~t:l~~~ .J;!~~.~1!r:-~. .. . . .,. .. . . .., plaintiff, and. .. .. .. . . ... . . . .. .. . .~~~~.1;f!J:I. :r.Ql1 .1l~.l\QJ:I~1'I. . . ... .. . . . . .., defendant, are divorced from the bonds of matrimony. The court retains jurisdiction of the following claims which have been raised of record in this action for which a final order has not yet been entered; NONE .............................................................'/.;/........, ..-_..-,.~/ /.- .. .. ... .. ......................................... '/'" ........... e $ M ... n y Th :0: p w ~~ " ... .~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ .,. ~ ..' ~ ~ <: ~---- -- . ",----'. :~:. ':>>:0 ~:. .>>:. .:.:. .~. .:.: i~ /. !~ ,.. l~ ~ '0" -~..__..--_-.....~..-~..._.....--...---..........-...-.. ..~ ,~~.,.~.'~ .:.:. .:.:. .:.:. .:+:. .:.:. .:.:. <.:. .:.:. <.:. -:.:. .:.:. .. ., ^1I~~i:~~~ f'. ~ ~l. K~.4 .~_~J. ~~Olh~notRrY ./ :cFP tt35.(X) bue.. tol1nYy ^.'-"-".:"~'~ri~~~ ' c! I "".",,y tJd.~~;rIA~~ ;.;J.t/'f~ ~~~ ~. . f', ~ ~..-, " " ~ ,~ "-' . \. '. . IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. CARA ROGERS-BRADHAM VI, PARRISH BRADHAM Plaintiff No. 6312 Defendant Civil 1995 It appearing that the Master's report in the above stated caee has been filed for ten days. that no exceptions have been filed thereto, that the costs have been fully paid and that all the requirements of law and Rules of Court have been met, you are hereby directed to submit the said case to the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, Pa., at the next sitting thereof. To M l.,rlll'V fur 'Ia 11111 fr. Certified Legal Intern Lawrence E. Welker Prothonotary Dated November 19, 1996 ~. , .-t1 I, " <- Common Pleas of C be stated case. have all lIaLl'n ~ Co & "'- KATHERINE C. PEARSON Supervising Attorney ~ Prothonotary of the Court of d County. do hereby certify that the costs in the above .. ..'d. 100''''" 'h. ........ f.::! tary. .... ," , . . CARA J. ROGERS-BRADHAM, Plaintiff : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : CIVIL ACTION - LAW : IN DIVORCE : NO. 95-6312 CIVIL TERM V. PARRISH T. BRADHAM, Defendant CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Lisa A. Mallory, Certified Legal Intern, Family Law Clinic, hereby certify that I am serving a ltUe and correct copy of a Praecipe to Transfer and a Proposed Order of Court granting the plaintiff a dlyorce on the grounds of indignities to the person under Section 3301(a)(6) of the Divorce Code on Parrish T. Bradham. residing at 16 Moss HI1I Lane, Wlllingboro, New Jersey 08046, by first class United States mail, postage prepaid, the:z:!. day of December, 1996. rAl m A:-fY0/jmlJ USA A. MALLORY Certified Legal Intern FAMILY LAW CUNIC 45 North Pitt Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-2968 Fax: (717) 243-3639 ~''', ". , ' ~ M ~ c t 8 8~ .... ( ~i ~2 - :0: (~j!~ c ", '" "/tj i:i-: I .'~6 a:PI u 'b(5 r-: L'-' iiJa. q a I' '0 0 In . . 4. _ . J ~,,..-,-,,,,,;_:ii!';,;;4lJ,",,:r"r);",f-,::CI'f:'.r,,:';~'.~,,<. ~ ("""I ',,-,' ~~-.~~~ _,. ~.'-. ..,c.,~' , CARl. J, ROGERS-BRADHAM, Plaintitt . . IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 95 - 6312 CIVIL I va, : : PARRISH T. BRADHAM, Detendant . . . . : IN DIVORCE MASTER'S REPORT n \0 ~ c..:~ en ~. z ~ tl3~" a 1 ,"1 ~- II ~~'~. . t'j' I -. c:o .-.... _...< c::c !i: ~; (') S;t: - - ~ .. z ..., -' -:; co) proceedings held bet ore E. Robert Elicker, II, Divorce Master cumberland county Courthouse, 9 North Hanover street, Carlisle, pennsylvania proceedings held on November 7, 1996, commencing at 9:00 a.m. APPEARANCES: Katherine C. Pearson, supervising Attorney Lisa A. Mallory, certified Legal Intern The Family Law Clinic ~ " -- PROCEDURAL HISTORY The Master, at the beginning of the hearing scheduled for November 7, 1996, at 9:00 a.m., stated on the record the background of the case prior to the testimony of the attorney for the wife and the wife. The Master's opening remarks are transcribed and included herein as a statement of the procedural history which will be part of the record and part of the Master's report. Also included is the testimony of Lisa A. Mallory, certified legal intern regarding service of the notice of the hearing. (opening remarks transcribed from the hearing) THE MASTER: Today is Thursday, November 7, 1996, the date set for a Master's hearing in the Bradham case. Present in the hearing room are the Plaintiff, Cara J. Rogers-Bradham and her counsel from the Family Law Clinic, Katherine C. Pearson and Lisa A. Mallory. Katherine Pearson is a supervising attorney and I,isa Mallory is a certified legal intern. The divorce complaint in this action was filed on November 2, 1995, raising grounds for divorce of irretrievable breakdown of the marriage and indignities to the person. In the file is a certificate of service which was filed on November 22, 1995, from the Family Law Clinic certifying that a true and correct copy of the divorce complaint was served on the Defendant at the Dauphin County prison, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania ,""" -'""" by personally handing a copy to him on November 22, 1995. On August 14, 1996, the Master was appointed in these proceedings. The Master, after reviewing the file, scheduled a hearing for November 7, 1996, and sent a notice to the parties and counsel for the plaintiff. The notice epecifically indicated that the testimony would be limited to grounds for divorce of indignities to the person. The service of the order and notice setting the hearing will be addressed in the pre-testimony remarks of the counsel for the plaintiff. No economic issues have been raised in the action and the Master has been informed that Mr. Bradham will not sign an affidavit of consent. The Master has also been advised that the parties were separated in May 1995 which would mean that the plaintiff would have to wait under the code section 3301(d) to file an affidavit in May of 1997 which would be the expiration of a two year period of separation. The plaintiff has indicated she wishes to proceed today on the grounds of indignities not having to wait until the spring of 1997 to complete her divorce proceedings. Therefore, we are going to take the testimony of the plaintiff and any witnesses which she may present on the grounds of indignities to the person. Mr. Bradham has not appeared today in the Master's office. At present it is 9:20 a.m. We have had no contact from Mr. Bradham by telephone or mail indicating that he has any intention of participating in the divorce action at this time. 2 . V""!-.-"l' -.-_',t~.." ,J',.'~o:._:,;l., ~""'C7- " '""" Th.r.fore, we will take the t.stimony of the Plaintiff and her witn... or witn..... and prepare a r.port. Th. report will be filed and notice of the filing of the r.port and a copy of the report will be .ent to coun.el and the parti... The current addre.. which w. have for Mr. Bradham, as not.d in the c.rtificat. of service dated October 31, 1996, is 16 Mos. Hill Lan., Willingboro, N.w Jersey 08075. It should be noted that Lisa A. Mallory did attach a certificate of service to a report which she has submitted in this action on behalf of the Plaintiff which was served on the Defendant at the address above stat.d by first class United states mail, postage prepaid, the date of sending the report being October 31, 1996. Ms. Mallory, would you be sworn? Whereupon, LISA A. MALLORY having been called as a witness testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION BY THE MASTER: Q Ms. Mallory, would you state for the record the method of service of the notice of the hearing for today on the Defendant? I have previously noted that there is a certificate of service in the file indicating how the divorce complaint was served but we would ask you to address, for the record, how the notice of today's hearing was served. A The notice of today's hearing was sent to Mr. 3 . ~ ~ Bradham on, I guess, two occasions. One was sent to an address that we obtained from the probation and parole department that he moved to upon being released from prison. The letters never came back to us. The other letter of the notice of hearing was sent to him at the 16 Moss Hill address in New Jersey. We also -- since he does call Cara periodically -- we did have her orally tell the date, the time, and location of the hearing end the purpose of the hearing. Q She can testify about that communication? A Yes. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The parties were married on August 17, 1991, in Philadelphia, pennsylvania, and separated in May 1995. 2. This is the first marriage for both parties. A minor child was born of the relationship, a daughter, who is 6 years of age, Shacara Rogers-Bradham. The child resides with wife. 3. Wife is 31 years of age having been born on January 26, 1965. She resides at 2206 L Cedar Run Drive, Camp Hill, cumberland county, Pennsylvania. 4. Husband is 34 years of age having been born on September 24, 1962. He resides at 16 Moss Hill Lane, Willingboro, New Jersey. 5. Wife has been a resident of pennsylvania all of her life except for approximately three months. She has lived in cumberland county, pennsylvania, for the last two to three years. 6. The divorce complaint was served personally on the Defendant at the Dauphin county prison, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, on November 22, 1995. A certificate of 4 ,-., ~ service was filed by the Family Law clinic on the same date. Notice of the Master's hearing was sent by the Master to the Defendant at 16 Moss Hill Lane, Willingboro, New Jersey, and no mail has been returned from the postal service. Also, the plaintiff verbally notified the Defendant during a telephone conversation that the hearing before the Master was scheduled tor November 7, 1996, at 9:00 a.m. and Plaintiff's counsel sent notice by mail. 7. Wife is employed as a telemarketer for EDS corporation; husband is unemployed. One child was born of the relationship, Shacara, who resides with the mother. wife does not receive any child support from husband for the child. 8. Husband was mentally and physically abusive toward wife, causing wife to have to relocate in order to try to avoid husband. 9. Husband would engage in conduct on a continuing basis where he would demand sex from wife and would become physically abusive if she refused to act in a way husband thought she should act. When husband became enraged he would strike wife causing injury to her and would call her abusive names such as bitch, whore, slut, fat, and ugly. 10. On one occasion when wife refused to have sex with husband he became verbally abusive becoming more enraged and then struck wife on the face with such a force causing her teeth to come through her skin on her jaw requiring wife to seek out medical treatment. 11. Husband demanded sex from wife every night and if she refused he would engage in name calling, cursing, and on occasion physical abuse and would force himself on to wife sexually. 12. Husband, on occasions, accused wife of having sexual relationships with other men which wife denied; however, husband would tell wife if she would not engage in sex with him that he would go to another woman and wife saw him on occasions, when she followed him, caressing and making sexual advances toward other women. 13. Wife stated that husband abused drugs and that when he used drugs his personality would change and he would become abusive toward wife. 5 ~ I"". . 14. Wife was frightened of husband and had to live her life in such a manner when she was in his presence that she would not do anything to upset him or anger him. The tension was unbearable and wife had to remove herself from the relationship in order to alleviate her stress and her fear of physical abuse. 15 Following the separation, wife was not fearful and felt better about herself and was able to conduct her life without the stress of having husband around and having the fear that he would abuse her. 16. Wife did not engage in any conduct which would cause husband to react to her in the ways that she described husband acted. CONCLUSION OF LAW Wife is an innocent and injured spouse and husband's conduct toward wife was of such a continuous nature as to make her life intolerable and burdensome. DISCUSSION The Master is satisfied that wife did not conduct herself in such a way as to provoke husband's conduct toward her and that she is an innocent and injured spouse. Husband's conduct toward wife on the other hand, caused her unbearable stress and anguish and made her fearful for herself and her child. The Master is satisfied that husband engaged in physical contact with wife which resulted in injury to her person, that he was verbally abusive toward wife calling her degrading names and that he accused her, without cause, of 6 .~>.....;;.,.~.;:.. '~'" ~--,." '.'.~" '.' ..,. .:.,.., '".' ,., r-, havinq relationships with other men. Allor this conduct toward wire by husband made her rearrul and caused her excessive stress which resulted in her havinq to remove herselr rrom the marital relationship. The conduct or husband toward wire was or such a continuinq nature that under no circumstances could wire sustain the marital relationship and, in fact, wire has made errorts by movinq and relocating to avoid and terminate all contact with husband. RECOMMENDATION wire is entitled to a divorce on qrounds or indiqnities to the person under Section 3301(a) (6) or the Domestic Relations Code. Respectrully submitted, [tUJti,. E. Robert Elicker, II Divorce Master 7 CARA J. ROOERS-BRADHAM, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW : IN DIVORCE PARRISH T. BRADHAM, Defendant . : NO. 95- ~3/~ CIVIL TERM NOTICE TO DEFEND AND CLAIM RIGHTS You have been sued in court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in the following pages, you must take prompt action. You are warned that if you fail to do so, the case may proceed without you and a decree of divorce or annulment may be entered against you by the court. A judgment may also be entered against you for any other claim or relief requested in these papers by the plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important t() you, including custody or visitation of your children. When the ground for the divorce is indignities or irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, you may request marriage counseling. A list of marriage counselors is available in the Office of the Prothonotary, Cumberland County Courthouse, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. IF YOU DO NOT FILE A CLAIM FOR AUMONY, DIVISION OF PROPERTY, LAWYER'S FEES OR EXPENSES BEFORE A DIVORCE OR ANNULMENT IS GRANTED, YOU MAY LOSE THE RIGHT TO CLAIM ANY OF THEM. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 The Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County is required by law to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. For infonnation about accessible facilities and reasonable accommodations available to disabled individuals having business before the court, please contact our office. All arrangements must be made at least 72 hours prior to any hearing or business before the court. You must allend the scheduled conference or hearing. Court Administrator Cumberland County Courthouse Carlisle, PA 17013 717/240-6200 . v. : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : CIVIL ACTION - LAW : IN DIVORCE CARA 1. ROOERS-BRADHAM, Plaintiff PARRISH T. BRADHAM, Defendant . ; NO. 95- (.3/J.. CIVIL TERM ~OMPLAINT UNDER 13 Pa.C.S. 1111 3301(0)(6'1. 3301(c) and 3301(dl OF THE DIVORCE CODE The plaintiff, Cara Rogers-Bradham, by her attorneys, the Family Law Clinic, sets forth th.: following cause of action: 1. Plaintiff is Cara Rogers-Bradham, who currently resides at 2206 L Cedar Run Drive, Camp HiI1, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17011. 2. Defendant is Parrish Bradham, a resident of Cumberland County, who currently resides at Cumberland County Prison, 1101 Claremont Road, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013. 3. Plaintiff has been a bona fide resident of Cumberland County and the Commonwealth for at least six months immediately previous to the filing of this Complaint. 4. Plaintiffand defendant were married on August 17, 1991 at Philadelphia. 5. Plaintiffand defendant have lived separate and apart since May 1995. 6. There have been no prior actions of divorce or for annulment between the parties. 7. The marriage is irretrievably broken. 8. Plaintiff avers that defendant, in violation of his marriage vows under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, has offered such indignities to the person of the . plaintiff, his Injured and IMoccnt spouse. as to render the condition of the plaintiff Intolerable, and life burdensome. 9. Plaintiff has been advised that counseling is available and that plaintiff or defendant may have the right to request that the court require the parties 10 participate In counseling. WHEREFORE. plaintiff requests the court to enter a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage. Date /~.r / Artur Korniluk Certified Legal Intern /trm~1-- THOMAS M. PLACE ROBERT E. RAINS KATHERINE C. PEARSON Supervising Attorney GAIL R. SHEARER Staff Attorney FAMILY LAW CUNIC 45 North Pitt Street Carlisle. PA 170\3 717/240-5204 o o. . . . , COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND SS. I verify that the statements made in this Divorce Complaint are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge and belief. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. fi4904. relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Date: / /ij~ G ~'~~~&ih Cara Roge radham Plaintiff ....,.." t ~ " ~ ~ " ......,." .....,- -,~ ,..1- ...: ;;i."~' "":;7, );;.... h " .,1Ft.,.. ,-too-:.} .., '..,".;':" ,;!'"':1v"" :.:'~,- III ("Ig:;l:l '-:;. 0- 2Ec.J<4; .... ~-r..o~'. CI O'-~"" . <>-,'" N e.fc:o:~ ~ :!w~w 't-..I ll.::a::It,Q. ...", ';;:I~; ~.. . ' ...., ~ .,,--.... . ~ , . . II I V. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION-LAW IN DIVORCE CARA J. ROGERS-BRADHAM, Plaintiff PARRISH T. BRADHAM, Defendant NO. 95.~31.;t CIVIL TERM PRAECIPE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS To the Prothonotary: Kindly allow Cara J. Rogers-Bradham, Plaintiff, to proceed in fonna pauperis. I, Artur Korniluk, of the Family Law Clinic, student attorney for the party proceeding in fonna pauperis, certify that I believe the party is unable to pay the costs and that I am providing free legal service to the party. The party's affidavit showing inability to pay the costs of litigation is attached hereto. Date: ~PJ / $@ Artur Korniluk Certified Lcgallntern thw/I-t-, Y-- ROBERT E. RAINS THOMAS M. PLACE KATHERINE C. PEARSON Supervising Attorney GAIL R. SHEARER Staff Attorney THE FAMILY LAW CUNIC 45 North Pitt Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-2968 Fax: 243-3639 ~"t~.;i~l..~..,~,....;t'. . . .. . . ., . v. : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : CIVIL ACTION - LAW : IN DIVORCE : NO. 95- CIVIL TERM CARA J. ROGERS-BRADHAM, Plaintiff PARRISH T. BRADHAM, Defendant 1. I am the plaintiff in the above matter and because of my financial condition am unable to pay the fees and costs of prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding. 2. I am unable to obtain funds from anyone, including my family and associates, to pay the costs of litigation. 3. I represent that the information below relating to my ability to pay the fees and costs is true and correct. (a) (b) ",J ,"".~.'-, AFFIDAVIT SUPPORTING PETITION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED INFORMA PAUPERIS (c) Name: Cara J. Rogers-Bradham Address: 2206 L Cedar Run Drive, Camp Hm, PA 17011 Social Security No.: 189-54-5335 Employment If you are presently employed, state Unemployed Employer: N/A Address: N/A Salary or wages per month: NI A Type of work: NI A If you are presently unemployed, state Unemployed Date of last employment: January 1990 Salary or wages per month: $10 per hour Type of work: Candy Packer Other income within the past twelve months None Business or profession: Student Other self-employment: None Interest: None Dividends: None Pension and annuities: None Social security benefits: None ~~ "--~.',~,-"",,,," . ,'- .. '. .~. ..,:-;,. .- . f' . ~ fa . Support payments: None Disability payments: None Unemployment compensation and supplemental benefits: None Workman's compensation: None Public Assistance: $316.00 per month Other: rood stamps: $212.00 per month (d) Other contributions to household support None (Wlfe)(Husband) Name: If your (wlfe)(husband) Is employed, state No Employer: NtA Salary or wages per month: Nt A Type of work: NtA Contributions from children: None Contributions from parents: None Other contributions: None (e) Property owned Cash: None Checking account: $5.00 Savings account: $5.00 Certificates of deposit: None Real estate (Including home): None Motor vehicle: Make, Year 1982 Oldsmobile Delta 88 Cost , Amount Owed $ 0 Stocks; bonds: None Other: None (t) Debts and obligations Mortgage: 0 Rent: $29.00 per month Loans: None Other: electric: $ 40.00 per month gas: $ 40.00 per month telephone: $ 40.00 per month gas for car: $ 50.00 per month clothes: $100.00 per month rood: $212.00 per month (g) Persons dependent upon you for support (Wlfe)(Husband) Name: None Children, If any: Name: Shacara Rogers-Bradham Age: 5 Other persons: None Name: NtA Relationship: NtA 4. I understand that I have a continuing obligation to inform the court of Improvement In my financial circumstances which would permit me to pay the costs Incurred herein. III ,j . ..... . 5. I verify that the statements made In this affidavit arc tnIe and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. 14904. relating to unsworn falsification to authorities. Date~ f" ~.c' ~~~. - :t;-~6~" ~ ~'D~~ . .'~...~ ('.1 ~...~tfr ~~~o-. f-J ....-;;; ...c.> '" ~ ~ . i , .. , '. .. o. It ., . . .. . CARA J. ROGERS-BRADHAM, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff, : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. : CIVIL ACTION . LAW : IN DIVORCE PARRISH BRADHAM, Defendant, : NO. 95-6312 CIVIL TERM CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Artur Korniluk, Certified Legal Intern, Family Law Clinic, hereby certify that I served a true and correct copy of the Divorce Complaint on Parrish T. Bradham, alias Parrish Perry, currently incarcerated at Dauphin County Prison, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, by personally ........ . oop, .. hhn "" 22'" "" 0' NO~~ ~ _~ Artur Korniluk Certified Legal Intern THE FAMILY LAW CUNIC 45 North Pill Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-2968 ;, j-i:,."..,~'~'i',;i.'"~_""_".-"",, ~,' "-0"-,;,-,<,'>41"''-':,,,,,,';,);-1.; '~' ",;~i "-". ' '. '",.;""-"",,-;,,,"" on en - ::lC ..... o .... '" ,...., ,.. c> :.0: ",:.;,.'""",""'.,;"... ~ ~~. t-~ u,(.':;::)... ozo;! .&;,nr.)... .....::;0>- o....z-' Q~C~ t~~~:Z:: == w~.t:C .t. .....;:nUl ;:%Q.. ~::> 0<'> . ., , . .. ....,,'.,.; CARA J. ROGERS-BRADHAM, Plaintiff va. I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA NO. 95 - 6312 CIVIL . . P <.0 !tl V\ ... - ""i;" .:5 :~'J 0)( , ....: "'I .,..... ~~..:. I -" C;~. . ~ '" -- (:> r"'" :,) ~:: ... ::~ ~-;('. ,) ';'""1 .. >". - <3 .. ',-i dl(1;e ~d ~ PARRISH T. BRADHAM, Defendant, . . : IN DIVORCE Notice of Filina Master's ReDort The report of the Master has been filed this copies have been sent with this notice to counsel of record and the parties. In accordance with P.R.C.P 1920.55 within ten (10) days after the mailing of this notice and report exceptions may be filed to the report by any party. If no exceptions are filed within the ten (10) day period, the Court shall receive the report, and if approved, shall enter a final decree in accordance with the recommendations contained in the report. r /( L,d. ftc ;.d<;;t> Date: 11/8/96 E. Robert Elicker, II Divorce Master Note: If exceptions are filed, file the original with the Prothonotary and a copy with the Master's office. At that time, the party filing the exceptions should notify the court reporter in the Master's office so arrangements can be made for a transcript. Upon completion of the transcript and receipt of payment the entire file will be returned to the prothonotary's office for transmittal to the Court at time of arguMent on the exceptions. If no exceptions are filed, counsel shall prepare an order of Court consistent with the recommendations and provide a proposed order of Court to the Master. . . counsel shall also prepare and provide with the proposed order of Court a praecipe. to the Prothonotary directing the prothonotary to submit the case to the Court for final disposition. The Master will then transfer the file with the proposed order of Court and praecipe to the Prothonotary's Office for docketing and transmittal by the Prothonotary to the Court. . Form available in the Prothonotary's Office and the Master's Office. (H2t the praecipe to transmit the record form as set out in P.R.C.P. 1920.73(b).) '1' ., CARA J. ROGERS-BRADHAM. : IN THB COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff. : CUMBBRLAND COUNTY. PBNNSYLVANIA v. . . : CIVIL ACTION . LAW : IN DIVORCE pARRISH T. BRADHAM. Defendant. . : NO. 95-6312 CIVIL TERM AND NOW. ORDER APpOINTING MASTER ~ ~r{3!A( (<t'..v- ~ ~')t rr. 1996, f,? " . Esquire. Is appointed master with respect to the following claims: divorce. jJ:/; .~ , J. ,; ..j ~.~. OF THF m(lTH()~'tJTNlY 9GAUG 14 PH 2: ~8 CU'W.il~Ri.A\I';; CCUNlY PENNSYlVANIA .... " CARA J. ROGERS-BRADHAM, Plaintiff v. PARRISH T. BRADHAM, Defendant IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION- LAW IN DIVORCE NO. 95-6312 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF MASTER Cara Rogers, Plaintiff, by and through her attorneys, the Family Law Clinic, moves the court to appoint a master with respect to the following claims: (X) Divorce ( ) Annulment ( ) Alimony ( ) Alimony Pendente Lite and In support of the motion states: () () () () Distribution of Property Support Counsel Fees Costs and Expenses 1. Discovery is complete as to the claim for which the appointment of a master is requested . 2. The defendant has not appeared in the action. 3. The statutory ground for divorce is 3301(a)(6). 4. The action should be considered contested because defendant has declined to sign a consent. S. The action does not involve complex issues of law or fact. 6. The hearing is expected to take 1-2 hours. -'-'.f.,...., , ; '-"._,';<'.;.rki!,....~:..;.__,,;.',.;-,.,.. 7. Additional information, if any, relevant to the motion: attempts have been made to try and obtain consent from the defendant; the parties have not been separated two years to allow a divorce to be granted pursuant to fi 330I(d)(l)(i). Date ~ I CA /q is, ~s~ SHANNON S. PlERGAL 1 Certified Legal Intern , .~ 11~ (. ~ THOMAS M. PLACE ROBERT E. RAINS KATHERINE C. PEARSON Supervising Attorney GAIL R. SHEARER Staff Attorney /' , ,.- , ( . " .. FAMILY LAW CUNIC 45 North Pitt Street Carlisle, PA 17013 717/240-5204 . ' .", . ~. = I~ - ~ ..1Z ~i ~ ~ :c Q.. r:J~ ~ en ii I ~ c..'J ;1 ~ \D ~ cn L.. ,. CARA J. ROGERS-BRADHAM, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OP PIalntiff, : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. . . : CIVIL ACTION - LAW : IN DIVORCB pAlUUSlI T. BRADHAM, Defendant, . . : NO. 95-6312 CIVIL TERM CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Shannon S. Piergalllni, Certified Legal Intern, Family Law ClInic, hereby certify that I am serving a true and correct copy of Motion for Appointment of Master on Parrish T. B(ildhaiii~ reSiding at 221 Elm Street, Camden, NJ 08102, by depositing a copy of the same In ."' . ' !"',' -i ,the United States first class mail this 9th clay of July, 1996. ~;~' .:, ~~ ~~-5, ~',-\Q~ r,,' - ;: Shannon S. Piergallini \ ,., Certified Legal Intern '-;~ THE PAMlLY LAW CLINIC 45 North Pitt Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243-2968 .{;' ,c. -'I . ~,,- 0 ~ '~~ N ..:r ~ & :c Q,. JI en I '0' ~ .. Cl: ~" ,OD ;t.' en ", I.; 1"1':. "_'_"0:.:, ,'" ;-, ';. '.. ... ~ .. CARA J. ROGERS-BRADHAM, Plaintiff IN THB COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PBNNSYLV ANIA v. PARRISH T. BRADHAM, Defendant CIVIL ACTION- LAW IN DIVORCE NO. 95-6312 PLAINTIFF'S REPORT FOR DIVORCE MASTER'S HEARING AND NOW, comes the Plaintiff, Cara Rogers-Bradham, by her attorney, The Family Law Clinic, and presents this report as follows. The statutory ground for divorce in this mallCr is 23 Pa.C.S.A fi 3301(a)(6). The sole issue at this hearing is the indignities suffered by Plaintiff during her marriage to the Defendant. The following information relates to that claim: 1. MARRIAGE: The parties were married on August 17, 1991 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Plaintiff, Cara Rogers-Bradham resides at 2206 L Cedar Run Drive, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011. Plaintiff is 31 years old and is employed as a telemarketer. The Defendant Parrish Bradham is 34 years old. One child was born of the marriage. That child is Sbacara Rogers-Bradham, age 6, and she resides with Plaintiff at 2206 L Cedar Run Drive, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011. 2. INDIGNITIES - ABUSIVE LANGUAGE. PHYSICAL ABUSE. AND INFIDELITY: There has been a pallCrn of conduct during the marriage in which the Defendant becomes abusive if the Plaintiff denies his request for sex. Ocnerally, if the Defendant initiates sexual relations, and the Plaintiff does not consent. the Defendant becomes angry and begins to verbally abuse the Plaintiff by cursing at her and using vile names toward her. He repeatedly, falsely accuses her of having affairs. In addition to verbal abuse Defendant has resorted to physical violence, including forcing the Plaintiff to submit to sex against her will; cohabitating with other women; and continually harassing and tormenting the Plaintiff to force her to comply with his sexual and nonsexual demands. 3. WITNESSES: Plaintiff Cara Rogers-Bradham . ~ 4. EXHmlTS: Plaintiff does not Intend to offer any exhibits. . 5. SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONSI Defendant has declined to consent to the divorce on the arounda or 23 PI.C.S. I 3301(c). ~ J{'m A. (Jt(}t~ USA A. MALLORY Certified Lcaallntem .~~. C./lA.-..- KATHERINE C. PEARSON Supervising Attorney FAMILY LAW CUNIC 45 North Pitt Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717)243-2968 ~';,:__-_ .....>:.:-.~.~)_"""A.~..........~ti~..~~...~;"'\"..;_._:..'..,.-~ '.- I T .oII"l'l;_:;i;41 dim A. ~/~ USA A. MALLOR Certified Legal Intern V. PARRISH T. BRADHAM, Defendant : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : CIVIL ACTION - LAW : IN DIVORCE : NO. 95-6312 CIVIL TERM CARA J. ROGERS-BRADHAM, Plaintiff CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Usa A. Mallory. Certified Legal Intern, Family Law Clinic, hereby certify that I am scrvlng a true and correct copy of Plaintiffs Report for Divorce Master's Hearing on Parrish T. Bradham, residing at 16 Moss Hill Lane, Willingboro, N.J. 08075, by f11'St class United States mail, postage prepaid, the 3k:t day of Ctkbfl /] , 1996. FAMILY LAW CUNIC 45 North Pitt Street Carlisle, PA 17013 (717) 243.2968 Fax: (717) 243-3639 C'.,,",,,;. -;'~_,J.:i~,,'.6:.::~;<:~li ~o;.<, ; ,',.;'-,-J....i.'~i:~~;...;;N't';...i:t,' '~,;..>w:;:,;.;o"..., -.," CARA J. ROGERS-BRADHAM, . 1N THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff . : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA I CIVIL ACTION - LAW . . VB. . NO. 6312 CIVIL 1995 . PARRISH T. BRADHAM, . . Defendant : IN DIVORCE STATUS SHEET s t 'f. ~I ACTIVITIES: .~~ t for Novambar 7. 1996. 9100 a.m. A CARA J. ROGERS-BRADHAM, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA vs. . CIVIL ACTION - LAW . . NO. 6312 CIVIL 1995 . PARRISH T. BRADHAM, . . Defendant IN DIVORCE ORDBR AND NOTICB SETTING HBARING To: Cara J. Rogers-Bradham Katherine C. Pearson Parrish T. Bradham , Plaintiff , Counsel for Plaintiff , Defendant Counsel for Defendant You are directed to appear for a hearing to take * testimony on the outstanding issues in the above captioned divorce proceedings at the Office of the Divorce Master, 9 North Hanover Street Carlisle, Pennsylvania, on the 7th day of November , 1996, at 9:00 a.m, at which place and time you will be given the opportunity to present witnesses and exhibits in support of your case. By the Court, ~ CJA..o...f \::: . Harold E. Sheely, Judge Date of Order and Notice: 8/16/96 By: Divorce Master IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP. Court Administrator Fourth Floor, East Wing Cumberland County Courthouse Carlisle, PA 17013 Telephone (717) 240-6200 * Testimony will be limited to grounds for divorce of indignities to the person. ';.-."- _;'.,;.1._~;".; .,- :.'" L.. ~ ~ ~ n ~ . f i\:. 'i. ~ N ~ ~~ - I~ M /- . :::l c.. ::z: t3~ ~ it 0- \ <>;: ,)~ Q fi: .::r ". Q u,. N :). ~ \1' e;) b~~ "., r:: w ..... a IS b; .. ~ L IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA C; 0.0 NO. 95 - 6312 CIVIL S U' :... - :!lu, C3 [[1(,' ..;.: i!i. ..~! (t, ~t'" I ~:; 0) ..~L ;.r.':c. '-:'(' ;L-!.:. ::J -, The report of the Master has been filed this date CARA J. ROGERS-BRADHAM, plaintiff vs. o "TI ~f:1 ;:"J :;, ~ ::;1 - t~ - ;";1 .. ;::j to) >' (N ~ and PARRISH T. BRADHAM, Defendant, IN DIVORCE Notice of Filina Master's ReDort copies have been sent with this notice to counsel of record and the parties. In accordance with P.R.C.P 1920.55 within ten (10) days after the mailing of this notice and report exceptions may be filed to the report by any party. If no exceptions are filed within the ten (10) day period, the Court shall receive the report, and if approved, shall enter a final decree in accordance with the recommendations contained in the report. [f(ot;ffbJw Date: 11/8/96 E. Robert Elicker, II Divorce Master Note: If exceptions are filed, file the original with the Prothonotary and a copy with the Master's office. At that time, the party filing the exceptions should notify the court reporter in the Master's office so arrangements can be made for a transcript. Upon completion of the transcript and receipt of payment the entire file will be returned to the prothonotary's office for transmittal to the Court at time of argument on the exceptions. If no exceptions are filed, counsel shall prepare an order of Court consistent with the recommendations and provide a proposed order of Court to the Master. ":' n . J1"jJ_ttlLt:... ~.iflW,:::tp~h;~f~q'.~:;"'0<. . Counsel shall also prepare and provide with the proposed order of Court a praecipe. to the Prothonotary directing the Prothonotary to submit the case to the Court for final disposition. The Master will then transfer the file with the proposed order of Court and praecipe to the Prothonotary's Office for docketing and transmittal by the Prothonotary to the Court. . Form available in the prothonotary's Office and the Master's Office. (H2t the praecipe to transmit the record form as set out in P.R.C.P. 1920.73(b).) A y n-, . ;., Wi;. CARl. J. ROGERS-BRADHAM, Plaintiff : IN THB COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA . . vs. : NO. 95 - 6312 CIVIL : : : IN DIVORCB C') \.0 ~ e en . :.>e ~I ~Ul <:) 4 t;.; ..:: ~s:; I ~ (D ~~ i:: i - - - ~ .. ~ (,oJ PARRISH T. BRADHAM, Defendant MASTER'S REPORT Proceedings held before B. Robert Elicker, II, Divorce Master cumberland County Courthouse, 9 North Hanover street, Carlisle, Pennsylvania proceedings held on November 7, 1996, commencing at 9:00 a.m. APPEARANCES: Katherine C. Pearson, Supervi~ing Attorney Lisa A. Mallory, certified Legal Intern The Family Law Clinic ....:.~"""._~.,.""'~...,4t,.\t.~~T1~t~J,1 :~~~~~;'{"~"c:" ~ .,,'O.^ t'"". PROCEDURAL HISTORY The Master, at the beginning of the hearing scheduled for November 7, 1996, at 9:00 a.m., stated on the record the background of the case prior to the testimony of the attorney for the wife and the wife. The Master's opening remarks are transcribed and included herein as a statement of the procedural history which will be part of the record and part of the Master's report. Also included is the testimony of Lisa A. Mallory, certified legal intern regarding service of the notice of the hearing. (Opening remarks transcribed from the hearing) THE MASTER: Today is Thursday, November 7, 1996, the date set for a Master's hearing in the Bradham case. Present in the hearing room are the plaintiff, Cara J. Rogers-Bradham and her counsel from the Family Law Clinic, Katherine C. Pearson and Lisa A. Mallory. Katherine Pearson is a supervising attorney and Lisa Mallory is a certified legal intern. The divorce complaint in this action was filed on November 2, 1995, raising grounds for divorce of irretrievable breakdown of the marriage and indignities to the person. In the file is a certificate of service which was filed on November 22, 1995, from the Family Law Clinic certifying that a true and correct copy of the divorce complaint was served on the Defendant at the Dauphin County Prison, HarriSburg, Pennsylvania i"""' o by personally handing a copy to him on November 22, 1995. On August 14, 1996, the Master was appointed in these proceedings. The Master, after reviewing the file, scheduled a hearing for November 7, 1996, and sent a notice to the parties and counsel for the plaintiff. The notice specificallY indicated that the testimony would be limited to grounds for divorce of indignities to the person. The service of the order and notice setting the hearing will be addressed in the pre-testimony remarks of the counsel for the plaintiff. No economic issues have been raised in the action and the Master has been informed that Mr. Bradham will not sign an affidavit of consent. The Master has also been advised that the parties were separated in May 1995 which would mean that the plaintiff would have to wait under the code section 3301(d) to file an affidavit in May of 1997 which would be the expiration of a two year period of separation. The plaintiff has indicated she wishes to proceed today on the grounds of indignities not having to wait until the spring of 1997 to complete her divorce proceedings. Therefore, we are going to take the testimony of the plaintiff and any witnesses which she may present on the grounds of indignities to the person. Mr. Bradham has not appeared today in the Master's office. At present it is 9:20 a.m. We have had no contact from Mr. Bradham by telephone or mail indicating that he has any intention of participating in the divorce action at this time. 2 ""'" ""'" Th.refore, w. will take the testimony of the Plaintiff and her witn... or witn....s and prepare a report. The report will be filed and notice of the filing of the report and a copy of the report will be .ent to counsel and the parties. The current address which we have for Mr. Bradham, as noted in the c.rtificate of service dated October 31, 1996, is 16 Moss Hill Lane, Willingboro, New Jersey 08075. It should be noted that Lisa A. Mallory did attach a certificate of service to a report which she has submitted in this action on behalf of the Plaintiff which was served on the Defendant at the address above stated by first class United states mail, postage prepaid, the date of sending the report being October 31, 1996. Ms. Mallory, would you be sworn? Whereupon, LISA A. MALLORY having been called as a witness testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION BY THE MASTER: Q Ms. Mallory, would you state for the record the method of service of the notice of the hearing for today on the Defendant? I have previously noted that there is a certificate of service in the file indicating how the divorce complaint was served but we would ask you to address, for the record, how the notice of today's hearing was served. A The notice of today's hearing was sent to Mr. 3 ~ 0 Bradham on, I guess, two occasions. One was .ent to an address that we obtained from the probation and parole department that he moved to upon being released from prison. The letter. never came back to us. The other letter of the notice of hearing was sent to him at the 16 Moss Hill address in New Jersey. We also since he does call Cara periodicallY -- we did have her orally tell the date, the time, and location of the hearing and the purpose of the hearing. Q She can testify about that communication? A Yes. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The parties were married on August 17, 1991, in Philadelphia, pennsylvania, and separated in May 1995. 2. This is the first marriage for both parties. A minor child was born of the relationship, a daughter, who is 6 years of age, Shacara Rogers-Bradham. The child resides with wife. 3. wife is 31 years of age having been born on January 26, 1965. She resides at 2206 L Cedar Run Drive, camp Hill, Cumberland county, Pennsylvania. 4. Husband is 34 years of age having been born on September 24, 1962. He resides at 16 Moss Hill Lane, Willingboro, New Jersey. 5. Wife has been a resident of pennsylvania all of her life except for approximately three months. She has lived in CUmberland county, Pennsylvania, for the last two to three years. 6. The divorce complaint was served personally on the Defendant at the Dauphin county Prison, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, on November 22, 1995. A certificate of 4 /'""'\ ".. service was filed by the Family Law Clinic on the same date. Notice of the Master's hearing was sent by the Master to the Defendant at 16 Moss Hill Lane, Willingboro, New Jersey, and no mail has been returned from the postal service. Also, the Plaintiff verbally notified the Defendant during a telephone conversation that the hearing before the Master was scheduled for November 7, 1996, at 9:00 a.m. and Plaintiff's counsel sent notice by mail. Wife is employed as a telemarketer for EDS Corporation; husband is unemployed. One child was born of the relationship, Shacara, who resides with the mother. Wife does not receive any child support from husband for the child. Husband was mentally and physically abusive toward wife, causing wife to have to relocate in order to try to avoid husband. Husband would engage in conduct on a continuing basis where he would demand sex from wife and would become physically abusive if she refused to act in a way husband thought she should act. When husband became enraged he would strike wife causing injury to her and would call her abusive names such as bitch, whore, slut, fat, and ugly. On one occasion when wife refused to have sex with husband he became verbally abusive becoming more enraged and then struck wife on the face with such a force causing her teeth to come through her skin on her jaw requiring wife to seek out medical treatment. Husband demanded sex from wife every night and if she refused he would engage in name calling, cursing, and on occasion physical abuse and would force himself on to wife sexually. Husband, on occasions, accused wife of having sexual relationships with other men which wife denied; however, husband would tell wife if she would not engage in sex with him that he would go to another woman and wife saw him on occasions, when she followed him, caressing and making sexual advances toward other women. Wife stated that husband abused drugs and that when he used drugs his personality would change and he would become abusive toward wife. 5 .'....1'. .."_.,,;;c"!*'i"f';2;.!<"'~."_,"'."r""'-"'; /"". , -'-'" 1""\ 14. wife was frightened of husband and had to live her life in such a manner when she was in his presence that she would not do anything to upset him or anger him. The tension was unbearable and wife had to remove herself from the relationship in order to alleviate her stres. and her fear of physical abuse. 15 Following the separation, wife was not fearful and felt better about herself and was able to conduct her life without the stress of having husband around and having the fear that he would abuse her. 16. Wife did not engage in any conduct which would cause husband to react to her in the ways that she described husband acted. CONCLUSION OF LAW Wife is an innocent and injured spouse and husband's conduct toward wife was of such a continuous nature as to make her life intolerable and burdensome. DISCUSSION The Master is satisfied that wife did not conduct herself in such a way as to provoke husband's conduct toward her and that she is an innocent and injured spouse. Husband's conduct toward wife on the other hand, caused her unbearable stress and anguish and made her fearful for herself and her child. The Master is satisfied that husband engaged in physical contact with wife which resulted in injury to her person, that he was verbally abusive toward wife calling her degrading names and that he accused her, without cause, of 6 ,...,...",,_~,' ',i. ."_..t,~",:,"""4'-'i4L'~~~0~~~Ji,~j.qm~~j<,,, o ('1 having relationships with other men. All of this conduct toward wife by husband made her fearful and caused her excessive stress which resulted in her having to remove herself from the marital relationship. The conduct of husband toward wife was of such a continuing nature that under no circumstances could wife sustain the marital relationship and, in fact, wife has made efforts by moving and relocating to avoid and terminate all contact with husband. RECOMMENDATION Wife is entitled to a divorce on grounds of indignities to the person under section 3301(a) (6) of the Domestic Relations Code. Respectfully submitted, ~a;L.-1 E. Robert Elicker, II Divorce Kaster 7