HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-00752
"
,
"
'~
,
,
, ,
f ~
..
,<
'll"
,
,
, '
"
No.
f~. ~!,JI
Civil Term
"
I"
IJ. · :!
~~~-
~
vs.
~ (I.J~ l1>.__
Court Of Common Pleas
Cumbo Co.
,"
"
, ,
I"
"
;"1
"
"
"
"
n
,I'
J 11_,
,
r,l
i",/
')1
"
, ,
"
,
,
i
."'..,. '
,
'i
#,
I.
, I
i
,
11,1
,
I
.. ,
I
I
\
l
, .', ," q
,'lr.,'
j,
..' ", ..
",
,
t' .
.
" ~, '
,
'.I I"
",
I
I
-,'
, ,
"
,
,
, , , Ii
,
"
, , "
,
" "
, ,
I
,
{ , ,
;1 ,
, ,
"
"
" i-t
I, !i
, "
" 'I
,
!I 1,/
,
, , , ,
"
" 0,1
I\i'"
I-I
,
l}
'"
"
,
"I
"
"',
,
,
"
"
,
I,
'\
"
u
"
'i
, ,
, "
"
'Ii
,'I
,
,
"
I II':
,
Ii
"
"
"
,
,
,
Jil,
;j"
),-
"
,
t;j
"
,
(j'
,
"
,
"
,-J'
II \
Ii
"
I,.
"',';
li
i', Q
,I, tit
~'lHI ,
0.1',11
Ii, ~,
"1",
,;f,;jJ,__
;I~!:j.:~
~r:c ~
("d
!,no;.;
~'I
...~
'9,
0."
'11
'1,"["
'n~
.,
~
r;Jr
~.-.'J :',~
':J :<1
.1.'"1
:':"I\f
~:l
J.
, ~ll I
.....
,
, ,
l()
0\1
"Tl
r1j
',I}".)
,I
Ii
J-t
il
..
;,1
'I
.""",
"\;:,
yl,'""tJ
~"..
I,
"
jl,
"
Ii
'.-1
~...)
"
,r:,>
:..c:"
lj
"
"
,
,
, ,
!Ll
II
" ,
I)
I,
,
"
'i
'II
,
"
"
"
,
"
I'
.J>!
,,'
\ ~iI
'I
<I ,
"
"
"
"
"
, ,
"
, ,
,
" .,
"
'It, I'
, ,
, "
"
January 31, 1996
"
To the Prothonotary I
I hereby certify that the enclosed copy of the Adjudication and
Order In the Matter of the Disciplinary Action Against the Carl Bricker
Company, F~le No, 93-60-00144, Docket No, 0119-60-93, issued January 23,
1995, is a true and correct copy of the original on file in the Bureau,
,
,~ Il/'
./'< /1 'Ji:"l, ...;.ItVf I! ,I (-/',u'__/
Carot y Cress, Comm ss oner
Bureau of afessional and
Occupational Affairs
DCIWAF :ddw
, , "
"
, ,
"
,
,
,
'" "
, ,
,
, "
, " .) , ,
I , , , , "
I, , ,
"
, ,
" i" , I ,
, "
" ,
63 El.S, 5818,10(27),
The Commonwealth alleges in its Order to Show Cause the
following I
that Respondent is a business located at either Post
Office Box 183, Camp Hill. Pennsylvania 17011 or 296 Frederick
Street, Hanover, Pennsylvania 17331; that Respondent has never
been
licensed as
a
vehicle dealer
.
in
the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania by the Board; that between February 1991 and May 1992,
the Respondent purchased at least ten vehicles and sold at least
,
fOUl:' vehicles at the Pennsylvania Auto Dealers Exchange in york,
Pennsylvania; that between January 1992 and July 1992, the
Respondent purchased at least four vehicles and Bold at least four
vehicles at the Harrisburg Auto Auct ion in Mechanicsburg,
Pennsylvania; that between February 1992 and October 1992, the
Respondent purchased at least two vehicles and sold at least
seventeen vehicles at Your Auto Auction, Inc. in Jonestown,
Pennsylvania; and that between .January 1992 and September 1992, the
Respondent purchased at least twelve vehicles and sold at least ten
vehicles
at York Sprin~s Auto Auction in York Springs,
pennsyl vania,
The Commonwealth's Order to Show Cause charges Respondent
with violating Sections 5(a) and 10(27) of the Act, 63 P,S.
55818,5(a) and 818,10(27), in 63 counts in that Respondent bought
and sold 63 vehicles without being licensed to do so,
In addition to any other disciplinary action, the
Commonwealth also seeks the imposition of a civil penalt.y against
Respondent pursuant to Section 19(C) of the Act, which provides as
3
DISCUSSION
The Commonwealth has established through documentary
evidence, and Respondent has admitted, to violating Section 5 (a) of
the Act, 63 P,S, 5818,5 (a) I by engaging in the business of a
vehicle dealer without being properly licensed to do so,
The Commonwe\llth' s charges that Respondent violated
Section 10(27) of the Act, 63 P,S, 5818,10(27) cannot be sustained,
because that section is applicable to licensees of the Board and
persons seeking licensure by the Board. Respondent is neither,
As to Respondent/s violation, Respondent appeared before
the Board but presented no mitigating evidence, Respondent
acknowledged his violation but professed ignorance of the need for
a 1 icense, The Board does not find Respondent's professed
ignorance credible when weighed against evidence that Respondent
has been selling numerous vehicles at auction since approximately
1988, that Respondent since March 1988/ ident:fied himself to one
auction as a used vehic.le dealer, and that Respondent traded 63
vehicles from F'ebruary 1991 to October 1992 at four different
auctions, The Board simply does not accept Respondent/s assertion
that he engaged in the level of activity he did, for the length of
time he did, and at auctions throughout the Commonwealth and never
had an inkl ing that he was required to be licensed by the Board,
Respondent's asserted belief that he did not need a license because
he possessed dealer registration plates issued by Pennsylvania
Department of Transportation is also not credible. Respondent
identified himself to the Pennsylvania Auto Dealers Exchange as a
8
\Ill"') ,1...\ l.~r ,'v,'l\ t h')l\l)h t hIP I'I!l\Uuy 1 vnn iLl O'lpartmF.lnt of.
Tl'.\nap,~l't.lt r,m r'ltl11'hl r'l!'.llutr.ltiol\ plateu tl:J him as a utility
tuil.H" dealer. This augglilsto to the Board that Respondent had
some 3Wllreness that I?ennsylvania Department of Transportation does
not license dealers to buy and sell vehicles I and that it issued
registration plates to R.espondent so that he could move his utility
trailers on the roadways of the Commonwealth, ~, 67 Pa, Code
553.3(a)(1) .
Regardless of Respondent's actual state of mind, Section
5(..1) of the Act, 63 I?,S, 5818.5(..1). does not require the Reapondent
to have knowledge that he was required to be licensed to engage in
the business of dealer, Even if the Board were to accept
Respondent's position, it would serve only to mitigate slightly
against the imposition of a civil penalty.
Respondent's unl icensed activity undermines the entire
licensure system which is designed to protect the public against
not only dishonest dealers but also against itinerant dealers and
dealers unable to provide basic repair facilities. Licensed
dealers must meet numerous facility requirements, possess or
contract for repair facilities, and must make other substantial
investments in the licensed dealership, to help assure the
protection ,~ the public, Respondent, as an unlicensed dealer,
represents a threat to the public because he need not meet any of
the requirements for licensure, The fact that Respondent traded in
high mileage vehicles accentuates the potential risk to consumers
because such vehicles are more likely subject to mechanical
9
Respondent's Addres~1
Car1 Bricker Company
P,O, Box 183
camp Hill,PA 17011
and
Carl Bricker Company
296 Frederick Street
Hanover, PA 17331
,
Commonwealth's Attorney, David L, Callihan, Esquire
P,O, Box 2649
Harrisburg, PA 17105-2649
Board Counsell
File N61
Date Mailed I
, ,
L
I'
, '
," II
,
n.
','.",,"
,J'I
, ,
" 'j
"
"
.,
,
, '
,
'J.;
"
Wade A, Fluck, Esquire
P,O, Box 2649
Harrisburg, PA 17105-2649
93-60-00144
..
'i
, .\
,. ,
, ,
:1'
,
,
"
, ,
,
,
,
';,,
"
'.1\
'j;
12
I I,
:J ~ 199~
, ]"
"
,
'"
, ,
;.'1<
"
, ,
, I;
.,
"
,.
, '
'J
1'1
"
]11,
,
1,
, .
,
I
.
'i\
,
"
I-I "
.11
I'
!"
1'1 I
,
"
'J
q,
Id
;-,1
,
,
"
,
"
;1
I'
"
,
q
"
\' I
-j!
Ii
I'
,
,
,
,
,
Y\ ,'~
~ ~
'~ \
, f".
ttt)1'
~~~
~,~
~
"
~..~..~
',} ~
'W ~
~,~,
"
~'
,
"
I,
, , , , , "
,
, ,
, ,
,
d ,
,I
"
\
,I, ,
,
, ,
"
t
~
~
~
"
"
,
"
,
"
,',
"
"
,
III
,
-;"
o
, J ! ~ .
';/tli
t
'_I'
i.'J
h .J
t ~"
~';-'I )
b",
~"_i:_;
~;' ,
I',
"
,
"
iI 1.1
'p
, '
. !
".
"
"
Ii;
~. ~,
d/)
.'11
f';]!
r.rt
;'-'1
ti!,7.}
'~ 19'"
d..
I
" 'J',"~
' I
"~'iI';
".' 1
, 'i~-l
~~
,..-
tlo...;I
....,
1-..'
. ~,
~.)
..
,....,
"".
,
,
,
"