HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-00888
'\
o
13
j9
,
-7
o
'3'
-
~
,"
,
"
"\
,
\
i
//
/
~
F
J
(yJ
()O ,
()o I
I i\
j
I
~
CT
J.
JOSE ANTONIO TOLEDO.
Plaintiff
~ IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY.
PENNSYL VANIA
v.
CIVIL ACTION. LAW
NO, 96.888
ESTHER TOLEDO,
Defendant
IN CUSTODY
PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE
Please withdraw my appearance on behalf of Esther Toledo in the above.
captioned mailer.
Dated: ~~- '2.1 -qr"J
...",<fully .obm'..". ! ('
PRAECIPE TO ENTER APPEARANCE
Please enter my appearance on behalf of Esther Toledo in the above-
captioned maUer.
""'"lbh
I
I Barbara mple-Sullivan, Esquire
549 Bridge Street
New Cumberland, PA 17070
(717) 774-1445
Supreme Court I.D. 32317
J.
JOSE ANTONIO TOLEDO.
Plaintiff
: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY.
PENNSYLVANIA
v,
CIVIL ACTION. LAW
NO. 96.888
ESTHER TOLEDO.
Defendant
IN CUSTODY
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Barbara Sumple-Sullivan, Esquire, do hereby cenify that on this dale
I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing PRAECIPE TO WlTHDRA W
AND ENTER APPEARANCE in the above-captioned mailer upon the following
individual by first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
Thomas D. Gould, Esquire
30 West Main Street
Shiresmantown, PA 17011
Joanne H. Clough, Esquire
845 Sir Thomas Coun Suire:rtA
Harrisburg, PA ~o
. ,A" -d? ~
DATED:~~/"1 ~ --
./ Barbara Sump Ie-Sullivan, Esquire
Counsel for Defendant
549 Bridge Street
New Cumberland, PA 17070
(717) 774-1445
Supreme Coun J.D. No, 32317
" :1
f!l~ I
I
;
9~~ I !
, ,
I ~ ,
a.~~5 ,
I
... I ! .... :1 :> ..,
I ~; :: =1' a ... S
i~5~; ... 1~.Jj!:
, .... ,
~~ .~ .;1, ~ ,~~
~ . ..... : II
~~ ~ ~ 21 ~~12f
,
~ !~~ 0 ~ ~ = i.
.... .s iI
:k ; fa IS ' ~:I
i
~
JOSE ANTCtoIIO TOLEDO,
Plaintiff
: IN THE CXXJRT OF Cl:.i'lI'1OO PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND CCXJNT'{, PENNSYLVANIA
:
vs.
: NO. 96-888
CIVIL TERM
ESTHER TOLEDO,
.Oefendant
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: IN CUSTODY
auJflR 011' cnm
AliI) 101, this 1t/) day of ))' LI
consideration of the attached Custody Conciliation
and directed as follows:
1. A Hearing is scheduled in Court Roan>> tl , of the
ClIllberland County Court House, on the .5-[ Ij day of .. ill A. '" _. ,
1997, at q"J(1 o'clock "''--.m.. at which time testimonY'in this caae will
be taken. At this Hearing, the Father, Jose Antonic. Toledo, shall be
deemed to bEl the moving party and shall proceed initially with testimony.
Counsel for the parties shall file with the Court and opposing counsel a
Memorandum setting torth each party's position on cUfltody and also setting
forth a list of witnesses who will be called to testify at the Hearing
along with a Sl.llTlllary of the anticipated testimony of each witness. This
Memorandum shall be filed at least ten (10) days prior to the Hearing date.
, I I.
(, I
Report,
1997, upon
it is ordered
2. This Court's prior Order dated April ll, 1996 is vacated and
replaced by this Order, which shall continue in etfect pending Hearing or
agreement of the parties.
3. The Mother, Esther Toledo, and the Father, Jose Antonio
Toledo, shall have shared legal custody of Allison E. Toledo, born December
28, 1993.
4. The parties shall consult with each other in making all major
decisions affecting the Child's health and well being, including, but not
limited to, major medical, religious and educational decisions.
5. The Mother shall have primary physical custody of the Child.
6. The Father shall have partial physical custody of the Child
on alternating weekends from Thursday atter work until Monday morning and
during one additional weekend per month from Thursday after work until the
following Saturday at 12:00 noon. Unless other arrangements are made by
agreement of the parties, the Father, or another responsible adult who is
familiar to the Child, shall pick up the Child from the daycare provider on
the specified Thursday afternoons and shall return the Child to the daycare
provider on the specified Monday mornings.
7. In addition, the Father shall have partial custody of the
Child for five weeks (no more than two to be taken consecutively at a time)
each year when the Father has leave from work, upon providing forty-five
(45) days advance notice to the Mother. The Father's periods of custody
,
\
1
.'
i
,
...
under this provision shall rot be scheduled to conflict with the Mother's
peri0d9 of holiday custody.
O. The parties shall alternate custody of the Child on holidays as
follows:
A. The Father shall have custody of the Child in even numbered
years on Easter, July 4th and Thanksgiving and in odd
numbered years on New Years Day, Memorial Day, and Labor
Day. For the Christmas holiday, the Father shall have
custody of the Child in odd numbered years fran December 24
at 5:00 p.m. until December 25 at 12:00 p.m., and in even
numbered years, from December 25 at 12:00 p.m. until
December 26 at 7:00 p.m. The Father shall have custody of
the Child in every year on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day and
Columbus Day.
B. Tho Mother shall have custody of the Child in even numbered
years on New Years Day, Memorial Day and Labor Day, and in
odd numbered years on Easter, July 4th and Thanksgiving.
For the Christmas holiday, the Mother shall have custody of
the Child in odd numbered years fran December 25 at 12:00
p.m. until December 26 at 7:00 p.m., and in even numbered
years fran December 24 at 5:00 p.m. until December 25 at
12:00 p.m. The Mother shall have custody of the Child in
every year on Presidents' Day and Veterans' Day.
.
9. The holiday custody schedule shall take precedence over the
regular custody schedule and shall begin at 5:00 p.m. the evening before
the holiday and continue until 7:00 p.m. on the day of the ~oliday, unless
specified otherwise in this Order.
10. For all cllBtody exchanges under this Order which do not take
place at the Child's daycare provider, the parties shall exchange custody
at a location halfway between their respective hares in Maryland and New
Cumberland. The specific location shall be established by mutual agreement
of the parties.
,
~.
11. If either party decides to relocate his or her residence, the
relocating party shall give the other party a minimum notice of sixty (60)
days so that, if desired, the custody arrangement could be renegotiated.
12. Both parents understand the need to provide a loving and
stable environment for the Child and agree to place their personal
differences aside and work for the best interest of the Child.
13. Both parties shall encourage contact between the Child and
the other party. Neither party shall make derogatory conments about the
other in the presence or hearing of the Child.
14. Each party shall provide the other party with reasonable
telephone access to the Child.
15. Each party shall provide the other party with his or her
-,
current home address, home telephone number and work telephone number. The
parties shall update this information as necessary.
BY THE COURT,
ce: 'l'hQll1il8 D. Gould, Esquire/Counsel
Eat;her Toledo/Defendant-Mother
Joanne H. Clough, Esquire
/J;/
Heas, J.
~...,~l 3/",)97
,J,.~.
JOSE ANTCtUO TOLEOO,
Plaintiff
IN THE OJURT OF CC'.f1MCll PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
.
.
.
.
vs.
NO. 96-888
CIVIL TERM
.
.
ESTHER TOLEDO,
: CIVIL ACTIOO - LAW
: IN CUSl'ODY
Defendant
PRIm JUIlGB: ltevin A. IIe88
aJffi'CVY cn.cILIATICN SlMU\IN RBl'CRI.'
IN AaDUlANCB WlTH 0JmERLAND c:xlNl'Y RIILB a? CIVIL PR) "" 'l.RB
1915.3-8, the undersigned Custody Conciliator submits the following report:
1. The pertinent information concerning the Child who is the subject
of this litigation is as follows:
IWIB
Dl\TB 01." BIRTII
CUUU!Nl'Ly IN aJST(DY a?
Allison E. Toledo
December 28, 1993
Defendant/Mother
2. An initial Conciliation Conference was held in this matter on
April 2, 1996, which resulted in an agreement whereby the parties had
shared legal custody, the Mother had primary physical custody and the
Father had substantial partial physical custody of the Child. The
agreement was entered as a Court Order on April 11, 1996. The Father
subsequently filed a Petition to Modify and a second Conciliation
Conference was held on December 12, 1996, with the following individuals in
attendance: The Father, Jose Antonio Toledo, with his counsel, Thanas D.
Gould, Esquire, and the Mother, Esther Toledo, with her counsel, Joanne H.
Clough, Esquire.
3. At the conclusion of the Conciliation Conference, the parties were
very close to reaching an agreement on a custody schedule and it was agreed
that the parties would finalize the details of an agreement with the
assistance of counsel. The Conciliator was subsequently notified by
counsel, however, that the negotiations had broken down with respect to
minor details, and no agreement had been finalized. There is now sane
question as to whether the Mother is represented by counselor will be
representing herself in these proceedings. In order to finally resolve
this matter, it appears to be necessary to schedule a Hearing. However,
the Conciliator is hopeful that the parties will find that the custody
arrangements proposed in the temporary recOl111lended Order are serving the
best interests of the Child and the Hearing will not ultimately be
necessary.
4. The Father's position on custody is as follows: The Father's
Petition for Modification was based on the fact that since the prior Order,
he had moved from Cumberland County to Maryland. The Father propoeed a
shared custody arrangement whereby the parties exchange custody on a weekly
...-.
basis since the Child is still of preschool age. Although the Father was
willing to tt'Y an extended altemating weekend partial custody arnngement
with an extra weekend each month, he sought to have his additional weekly
pet'iods of custody increased to provide more contact with the Child. Due
to the travel distance, the Father is not able to get to the Child's
daycare provider by 5:00 p.m. and proposed that his gidfriend (with whan
the Mother gets along well according to the Father) or another responsiblll
adult be able to pick the Child up frem daycare when he is unable to do so.
5. The Mother did not believe a weekly shalred custody arrangement
would be in the Child's best interest and therefore opposed the Father's
proposal. The Mother was agreeable to the extended alternating weekend
partial custody schedule with one additional weErkend period per month for
the Father. The Mother opposed the Father's request for a substantial
increase in his weekly periods of custody throughout the year. Finally,
the Mother sought to have only the Father provide transportation of the
Child frem the daycare to the Father's residence.
6. Although not included in the reconmended Order due to the
SCheduling of a Hearing, the Conciliator encourages the parties to follow
through with th~ir tentative agreement to obtain counseling for the purpose
of improving comnunications b6tween them and to assist them in managing an
ongoing custody schedule in a manner beneficial to their Child.
.'
7. The Conciliator recomnencls an Order in the fom as attached.u
fY\~dl & 19'-)7
Date .
~~..~
Dawn S. Sunday, Esqu r
CUstody Conciliator
I
t
j
..
t
l
~l
.>
JOSS ANTONIO TOLEDO,
IN THE COURT OF CO~~ON PLEAS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff
v. I
I
ISTHER TaL&DO, I
I
Det.Ad.At I
NO. 96-888 CIVIL TIRM
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
I
I
I
CUSTODY ACTION
'U-TRUL M&MORANDUM OF PLAINTIFF, JOB& A. 'rClLJ:DO
This custody case began when the Plaintiff was reassigned by
the Marine corps to do recruiting out of Baltimore, MD. The
Plaintiff filed a Petition to Modify Custody on November 19, 1996.
A pre-Hearing Custody Conference was held before Dawn Sunday on
December 12, 1996, Both parties were represented by counsel at the
conference, After a lengthy discussion a tentative agreement was
reached. The specifics of the agreement were to worked out and
submitted to Ms. Sunday.
The negotiations centered around
Plaintiff's desire to annually have six (6) uninterrupted week long
periods of time with his daughter. The Defendant did not want to
gi ve him more than four (4) weeks and wanted to restrict his
uninterrupted periods to times to when he was on leave from his
employer.
After much negotiations and an impasse regarding the number of
uninterrupted weeks, counsel sent it back to Ms. Sunday for a
recommended order. On March 7, 1997 Judge Hess signed Ms.Sunday's
recommended order setting the uninterrupted time at five (5) weeks.
The order also set this matter for a June 5, 1997 hearing.
.-
Although the Plaintiff would like to see his daughter every
day, and had requested shared custody of alternating weeks, he is
willing to abide by the current order with minor changes. He would
like to need to give only 30 days notice of his uninterrupted week
long periods and he would like the restriction removed regarding
the need for him to be on leave from hiy employer during his entire
time of uninterrupted periods. In exchange he would agree to also
allow Defendant five (5) weeks of uninterrupted periods and also
would agree to require that the uninterrupted times be in
conjunction with one of the parties regular weekend periods.
The following are a list of the witnesses that the Plaintiff
intends to call at the hearing,
1. Jose A. Toledo, plaintiff, testify as to his relationship
with his daughter and his living and employment situation.
2. Esther Toledo, Defendant, testify as of cross examination
regarding her living and employment situation. Also her attempts
to restrict the relationship between plaintiff and his daughter.
Her attempts and threats to cause injury to plaintiff's employment
status.
3. Liz and Chip Jackson, observations of the relationship
between Plaintiff and his daughter.
4. Brenda Twigg, Daycare provider, observations and
commitment of plaintiff to his daughter.
S. Deanna Williams, observations of Plaintiff with his
child. Observations and interaction between herself, Plaintiff and
Defendant and child.
6. Eliaa & Donna Betancourt, observations of the interaction
between the parties and their child.
7. Danny & Lucy Betancourt, observations of the interaction
between the parties and their child.
8. John C. Rosero, his relationship with Defendant and his
relationship with Plaintiff's child.
The activities between
Defendant and her child and Plaintiff and his child.
Respectfully submitted,
?tn.ml h ~tI
Thomas D. Gould, Esquire
1.0.1 36508
2 E. Main Street
Shiremanstown, PA 17011
(717) 731-1461
Fax 761-1974
JOS!!: AIITONIO TOLIlDO, I IN THB COURT 0.. COIOCON PLUS
I CUMBIRLAlfD COUlln, PEHHSYLVJUlIA
PI.bUff I
I
V. I NO. 96-888 CIVIL TERM
I
ISTHBJt TOLEDO , I
I CUSTODY ACTION
Defendant I
PITITION TO MODI"Y CUSTODY oanER
i
I
,
i
I
,
!
I
I
1. The Plaintiff is Jose Antonio Toledo residing at 367
Constitution Court, Glen Burnie, MD 21061.
2. The Defendant is Esther Toledo whose last known address
was 613-B Geneva Drive, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, PA
17055.
The Plaintiff seeks to Modify the Order dated April 11, 1996
by providing for a shared custody order consistent with his work
schedule and the best interest of his child.
Respectfully submitted
,I
-Jtnn~/J'J) ~Jd
Thomas D. Gould, Esquire
ID #36508
2 E. Main Street
Shiremanstown, PA 17011
(717) 731-1461
Fax 761-1974
I
"
YBRUI CA'I' 10.
I , JOS8 Antonio Toledo, hereby certify that the foreqoinq
PI'I'I'I'IO. 'l'O MODlry CUS'I'ODY Oao&R is true and correct to the best
of my knowledqe, information and belief. I understand that false
statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.
Section 4904 relatinq to unsworn falsification to authorities.
DATED:
/'5;,.,/ji/ /,,:/YC1'
, .". ~-.., ~/ (
L (' "-. (
'( "Y~....)-,~~- ,...J.... ~-~. :.r
;Jose Antonio Toledo
Plaintiff/father
/
r
r
APR 11 1996 ~r-"-
JOSE ANTCNIO 'roLEOO,
plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF CCt1MON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND 0JUN'l"[, PENNS'iLI/ANIA
v,.
: NO. 96-888
CIVIL TERM
':.. :
Defendant
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN CUSTODY
ESTHER 'roLEOO,
ClUlER or CXXJRJ.'
. AND NtW, this / / f1.-
upon consideration of the attached
ordered and directed as follows:
day of tL,,,,,; j
Cuatody ~it'ion
, 1996,
Report, it is
1. The Mother, Esther Toledo, and the Father, Jose Antonio Toledo,
shall have shared legal custody of Allison E. Toledo, born December 28,
1993. The parties shall con.sult with each other in making all major
decisions affecting the Child's health and well being, including, but not
limited to. major medical, religious and educational decisions.
2. The Mother shall have primary physical custody of the Child.
,
3. The Father shall have partial physical custody of the Child on
alternating weekends from Thursday aftet' work until Monday morning and
during the intervening weeks from Thursday after work until Friday morning.
Unless prior arrangements are made, the Father shall pick up the Child from
the childcare ,provider by 5:00 p.m. on the specified days and return the
Child to the daycare provider on the specified mornings.
4.
follows:
A.
The parties shall alternate custody of the Child on holidays as
The Father shall have custody of the Child in even m.uooered
years on Easter, July 4th and Thanksgiving and in odd numbered
years on New 'lears Oay, Memorial Oay, and Labor Oay. For the
Christmas holiday, the Father shall have custody of the Child
. in odd numbered years from December 24 at 5:00 p.m. until
Oecentler 25 at 12:00 p.m., and in even numbered years, from
Decetri:ler 25 at 12:00 p.m. until December 26 at 7:00 p.m. The
Father shall have custody of the Child in every year on Martin
Luther King, Jr. Day and ColUJri:lus Oay.
B. The Mother shall have custody of the Child in even nurrbered
years on New Years Oay. Memorial Oay and Labor Oay, and in odd
nurrbered years on Easter, July 4th and Thanksgiving. !'or the
Christma.s holiday, the Mother shall have custody of the Child
in odd nurri:lered years from Oeceriler 25 at 12:00 p.m. until
Oecetri:ler 26 at 7:00 p.m., and in even nurri:lerod years from
Oecetri:ler 24 at 5:00 p.m. until Oecerri:ler 25 at 12:00 p.m. The
*
.
.
Mothel:' shall have CU.!ltody of the Child in every year on
Pl:'esidents' Day and Vetel:'ans' Day.
5. The parties shall exchange custody of the Child fol:' holidays at a
public place to be mutually agned upon by the parties. The holiday custody
schedule shall take pncedence over the regular custody schedule and shall
begin at 5:00 p.m. the evening before the holiday and continue until 7:00
p.m. on the day of the holiday, unless specified otherwise in this Order.
6. The Father shall have custody of the Child for two consecutive or
non-consecutive weeks each year upon providing forty-five (45) days advance
notice to the Mother. The Father's custody under this provision shall not
be scheduled on Mother's periods of holiday custody.
7. If either party decides to relocate and the relocation would
require a change in the custody schedule, or if the proposed relocation
exceeds a fifty (50) mile radius, the relocating party shall give the other
party a minimum noti.::e of sixty (60) days so that, if desired, the custody
arrangement could be renegotiated.
8. Both parents understand the need to provide a loving and stable
environment for the Child and agree to place their personal differences
aside and work for the best interest of the Child.
9. Both parties shall encourage contact between the Child and the
other party. Neither party shall make derogatory cOllll1ents about the other
in the presence or hearing of the Child.
10. Each party shall provide the other party with re~sonable te~ephone
access to the Child.
11. Each party shall provide the other party with his or her current
home address, home telephone number and work telephone numl:ler. The parties
shall update this information as necessary.
12. The provisions of this Order shall supersede the custody provisions
of this Court's prior Order dated December 7, 1995 under docket number
95-6713.
13. This Order is entered pursuant to an agreement of the parties at a
Custody Conciliation Conference. The parties may modify the provisions of
this Order by mutual consent. In the absence of mutual consent, the terms
of this Order shall control.
BY THE COURT,
cc: Thanas D. Gould, Esquire
Michelle Stokes, Esquire
tV 'f ~ fl. -#ld4.
levin A. Hess, Judge
TRUE COPY FROM RECORD
In TVOltit1lOl1Y whereof, I here unto set my hind
........ "... ""'~. ~
r~-f'k-. ~ 01 . I 711
JufL'tl., 'J .
P,Olhu.~y
"-
1,<
t"i
.'") ,
C. .,
r "--j !
-.~1
, }
~) . ;.j ,J
~:' JC)
,
-~- J
,.. , }
...~> - .' 1\
,:'1
::""'J
-<
\
,
',11 IT; I FF' S 1:E:TUrm - OUT or COUNTY
, ,\:cF NI J: 1 'J'Jh -illi<le13tl P
CUMMUNWF:A'. rH IJI-' P,:NNSYLVMUA:
CLJUNrY 'iF CUMtlUlLAND
TUl.I.;DU JUS.; AN ruN III
vs.
rUU,Du I:Sf'IIER
_H. Thomas Kl,ne
, Sheriff, who
being duly sworn according
and inquiry for the within
to law, says. that h... mad... a diligent search
named defendan t, to wit I TOIYOO .;STIWR
but vas un~bl~ to tocute
dmputl~md the ~hertff of
Her
,n hi:;, baitiwick. lie therofore
OAUPII [N CUIJNTY
__ County. Pennsylvan,a.
tll aerv," t.he 'nthi.n CUMI'I.AINT - CIJSTUOY
OAUI-'IIIN CiJlJNTV
County,
receipt of
Pennsylvania.
lJn ['C'cember ~jth.
the' attached return from
t 'J')f;
"
thi.s office vus in
Sheriff's Costs I
Docketing
Out of County
Surcharge
DAUPHHI COUNTY
lR.00
9.00
2.00
30.50
S~~.50 THOMAS GOULD
12/05/l9'3('
So an3vers:.
,
,,' ( . .
_"/> .'>'~.,.~.;tV rO"-___~
, . '-. ~
W, Thomas K11ne, Sher1ff
'--j~"L4- G,'. ~ I~-
, Prothonotary ,
I
,
I
I
f
i
,
SVllrn and subscribmd to before me
th18 /-3 ~ day of J01n.. L..J
lY "1._ A, O.
,.
"
Mary Jane Snyder
Ho.JI ~_ .tdt., Um:IJly
Office of the Sheriff
William T, TLl/ly
Soljt;/for
MIchael W. Rinehart
A31iiat8rn Chle' Oeputy
Ralph G. McAllisler
ChlfJr Df)PI~I~
OlllJphln (;f)unry
I-f8rrJ50UfU. Ponn!"yl\lnn,~ "'01
(11! j <.'!;t -?6dU
J, R, Lotwick
Sheriff
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OP DAUPHIN
SHERI'"S RETURN
No. 0554.T - _ -96
OTHER COUNTY NO. 96-888
AND NOW. November 26, 1996 at 1,19PM served the within
ORDER TO COURT, PET TO MODIFY CUSTODY
TOLEDO ESTHER
Upon
by per8on~11y h~nding to
TOLEDO ESTHBR 1 true attested COPY(ies) of
the origin~l ORDER TO COURT, PET TO MODIFY CUSTODY and making known to
him/her the contents thereof at P,O,E. VILLA TERESA NURSING HOMB
1051 AVILA AD,
HARRISBURG, PA 00000-0000
SWorn and subscribed to
before me this 26'rH d"'Of NOVUlBER, 1996
<:1_. I , . ! \
\ ,.. r, "" /1 I ' ,
'-...It ;,-, {......,". C "';., U~
I PROTH~JO~Jy' I Li, / I
9~
~erif! of Dauphin County, Pe.
G ~ '7-- eLl
BY ,: '::"""i(. , !",c...:.c....J-e-
DEPUTY SHERIF'
JR
Sheriff's COStSI
$30,50 PD 1i/25/96
RcPT NO 086657
_-..II
l~ I"''' r....,.,..... CT I ...-,-..olt_ .-i,-_--_S ~-l I -1.....'.-.:~~~-......,. ~ l ..'(.:--....'1
.. -~.";~ ""-.......... t 'w':'4u"...,';'i _ '-00.,J,.._...... .-,,_........, "',1
...-:.....!""Icoyl"--'....
I _.H,,",,, __l.t....
,JfJ~-i~ ^r\ttJrlll.1 'l'oledo
.,-S.
Ft." I ht'1 1'0 I Nln
::-ra,
96-888 Civil Term
:!'-
~ow.
Nov. 22. 1996
:9_ 1. S:~..z:]' O~ C::;'[3:::?,,!,.A..'i1J CO-:.~~y. ?..~ c:J
~=-~ "-r:= tb .r:-r;r ol
Dauphin
Cwu:::r ~ ==-.::: .:.:. 9.'1::;
~ ~\;==---u =:b.t -....I. :it == ::=:r-== ~d :.:~ ~i == ?f..:_:=.
/',;...r>-"'" , ~
~';:-",:.r"---~ l' - 'P; ~
S4L-~ c~ C:=::er.:d C~u:tT. ?~
.
.l '::::d.,~t or-... .
~ ..... ==e.--n~
:iow, ~9 , o'':!cc:: "t
.- .--
--'"-.
~~ ""....:.. I
'J?OQ I
U
'=r :.u:c:!:i ::J ~
I- ....:,: ai = :,~. ..f
....
U1d = i:::awu :0 . .
:.::: ,:::~-""'I: :::.-::r.
So a::sw::i,
I
".~'l' of
Cowo:r. ;>,s.
.
~w-::::. ::c! s::~::e:: t:e= .
.:, _6:!=i
l~_
cosn
'~... ....Ic:::
~cru..'.CZ
~:uJA""17
.3
5
~~ r
m~m
~gE-<:;o
~"':.'i ..... 5
..... ~
i~fi~J ..... ~ I H
~ ~j "" '0
- c: .. '"'.1 <9
~~ ~ I 1.g ~ !::
~~ ~ go. . 21 i If!. eo;; ."
~ ~>< 'll. 11 =..
~ ~..,~ 0 g j! loi'''1Ii. 0 ~ ~
:~H H l 1- ~
~5 ~ "D ,9
g : ;1
~ . MJ 0, ~ ~
E-<~~ f 8 ..
~ &
~
1
.
JOSE AN'I'ONIO TOLEOO,
Plaintiff
IN THE COlJR'l' OF <nIMON PLEAS OF
: CUMBERLAND COUN'l'Y, PENNSYLVANIA
:
vs.
: NO. 96-888
CIVIL TERM
:
Defendant
: CIVIL ACTION - LAW
: IN CUSTODY
ESTHER TOLEDO,
MID 101, this ~ day of
upon consideration of the attached Custody
ordered and directed as follows:
J4~
ConcH ation
,
Report,
1996,
it is
i
i
!
i
I
I
[
I
!
I
auJI!R (N <nRr
1. The Mother, Esther Toledo, and the Father, Jose Antonio Toledo,
shall have shared legal custody of Allison E. Toledo, born Decentler 28,
1993. The parties shall consult with each other in making all major
decisions affecting the Child's health and well being, including, but not
limited to, major medical, religious and educational decisions.
2. The Mother shall have primary physical custody of the Child.
3. The Father shall have partial physical custody of the Child on
alternating weekends from Thursday after work until Monday morning and
during the intervening weeks from Thursday after work until Friday morning.
Unless prior arrangements are made, the Father shall pick up the Child from
the childcare provider by 5:00 p.m. on the specified days and return the
Child to the daycare provider on the specified mornings.
4, The parties shall alternate custody of the Child on holidays as
follows:
A. The Father shall have custody of the Child in even nuntlered
years on Easter, July 4th and Thanksgiving and in odd nuntlered
years on New Years Day, Memorial Day, and Labor Day. For the
Christmas holiday, the Father shall have custody of the Child
in odd nuntlered years from Decentler 24 at 5:00 p.m. until
Decentler 25 at 12:00 p.m., and in even nuntlered years, from
Decentler 25 at 12:00 p.m. until Decembet' 26 at 7:00 p.m. The
Father shall have custody of the Child in every year on Martin
Luther King, Jr. Day and Columbus Day.
B. The Mother shall have custody of the Child in even nuntlered
years on New Years Day, Memorial Day and Labor Day, and in odd
nuntlered years on Easter, July 4th and Thanksgiving. For the
Christmas holiday, the Mother shall have custody of ~he Child
in odd nuntlered years from Decentler 25 at 12:00 p.m. until
Decentler 26 at 7:00 p.m., and in even OI.ll00ered years from
December 24 at 5:00 p,m. until Decentler 25 at 12:00 p.m. The
i
,
)
.~'
')
l~,
1
','
I
;
\
i
l
~
.~
t
\
~
1
,
~
Mothe~ shall have custody of the Child in every yea~ on
P~esidents' Day and Vete~ans' Day.
5. The pa~ties shall exchange custody of the Child fo~ holidays at a
public place to be mutually ag~eed upon by the pa~ties. The holiday custody
schedule shall take p~ecedence oVe~ the ~egula~ custody schedule and shall
begin at 5:00 p.m. the evening befo~e the holiday and continue until 7:00
p.m. on the day of the holiday, unless specified otherwise in this Order.
6. The Father shall have custody of the Child for two consecutive or
non-consecutive weeks each year upon providing fo~ty-five (45) days advance
notice to the Mother. The Father's custody unde~ this provision shall not
be scheduled on Mother's pe~iods of holiday custody.
7. If eithe~ pa~ty decides to relocate and the ~elocation would
requi~e a change in the custody schedule, or if the proposed relocation
exceeds a fifty (50) mile ~adius, the ~elocating party shall give the other
party a minimum notice of sixty (60) days so that, if desired, the custody
arrangement could be renegotiated.
B. Both parents understand the need to provide a loving and stable
envirorunent for the Child and agree to place their pe~sonal differences
aside and work fo~ the best interest of the Child.
9. Both parties shall encourage contact between the Child and the
other party. Neithe~ party shall make derogatory comments about the other
in the presence or hearing of the Child.
10. Each party shall provide the other pa~ty with reasonable telephone
access to the Child.
11. Each party shall provide the other party with his or
home address, home telephone number and work telephone number.
shall update this info~tion as necessary.
her current
The parties
12.
of this
95-6713.
The provisions of this order shall supe~sede the custody provisions
Court' s p~ior O~der dated December 7/ 1995 under docket number
13. This Order is entered pursuant to an agreement of the parties at a
Custody Conciliation Conference. The parties may modify the p~ovisions of
this Order by mutual consent. In the absence of mutual consent, the terms
of this Order shall control.
BY THE COURT,
cc:
Thomas D. Gould,
Michelle Stokes,
'I
1\
,I
~
. Hess, Judge
Esquire t IP'....
Esquire P1, b,L
'},........ I~
If( 11)/4' '
I'"
:1
,
;.
..
-- -- .,--~--
",.. ,-r}
; 1,....'
.....
~
i
~
~~
- ~
, \\
~~'
, ~ \)
11'_
( 0,
r:
I.;
(
, ,
L..'
1..-
. '
l
.
" ,
t.: ~;1 '_J
~
''\
'~ \D
^t\j
~
.,. i
~~
\,1.
~ '''''I"
\0- IX Z _
. <( :n :t; .l.
~ )0 z 0 M
. W - ~Ul "
z., ,
i a: % ~ ~
g W :I ,...
J ~ N i
~
"
JOSE JUl'l'OIlIO TOLJ:DO , I III THE COURT OF COMMOR PLEAS
I CUMBERIJUlD COUllTY, PIIlIISYLVAIIIA
Plaintiff I
I
V. I 110. 96- ~~: $J- CIVIL 'l'SRM
I
BS'l'HIIR TOUDO, I CIVIL ACTIOII - LAN
I
DefeDclan1: I CUSTODY ACTIOII
ORDER OF COURT
AIID liON, upon consideration of the attached complaint, it is
hereby directed that the
appear before _O"-W{\ )
'7;cl W. M",f) 'St
:>'It-day of Iff"~
parties and their re!\1pective counsel
S~~J~y . Esquire, the Conciliator, at
/"I'J..c k"..,', \. SJo...,., on the
-
tJ') ,
1996, at .111 _.M., for a Pre-Hearing
Custody Conference. At such conference, an effort will be made to
resolve the issues in dispute; or if this cannot be accomplished,
to define and narrow the issues to be heard by the court, and to
enter into a temporary order. Either party may bring the child who
is the subject of this custody action to the conference, but the
children's attendance is not mandatory. Failure to appear at the
!
,
~
conference may provide grounds for entry of a temporary or
permanent order.
J
t
J
i
I
I'
.
1.
I
I.
For;:)fJ Court,
/ft/ ~." A.d"..b~/
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE
OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP.
OFFICE OF THE COORT ADMINISTRATOR
COURTHOUSE, 4TH FLOOR
CARLISLE, PA 17013
(717) 2'0-6200 EXT 6200
JOSS AJlTOJUO TOLIlDO , I IN THI COURT or COMMON PLBAS
I CUMBIRLAJlD COUJI'rY, PEDSYLVUIA
Plaintiff I
I
Y. I 110. 96- CIVIL TERM
I
ISTHBR TOLIlDO, I CIVIL ACTIOII - LAN
I
Defendant I CUSTODY ACTIOII
CUSTODY COMPLAIIIT
TO THB HOJIo.a.'.~ JUDOIS or SAID COURT I
1. The Plaintiff is Jose Antonio Toledo residing at 80
Fisher Road, York Haven, York County, Pennsylvania 17370.
2. The Defendant is Esther Toledo, residing at 613-B Geneva
Drive, 124, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17055.
3. Plaintiff seeks custody of the following child:
IAHI PRESENT RESIDENCE
Allison E. Toledo 613-8 Geneva Drive
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
J!gD
12/28/93
The child was not born out of wedlock.
The child is presently in the custody of Esther Toledo, 613
Geneva Drive, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania 17055.
During the past three years, the child has resided with the
following persons and at the following addresses:
'eraODa
Addr.....
Dat..
Mother
613 Geneva Drive
10/95 - present
12/28/93 - 10/95
Mother & Father
80 Fisher Road
--
,
,
I
t
\
t
l
I.
,
, ,
, '
I ~~
),
I ~'
I,
-
The mother of the child is E~ther Toledo, currently
residing at 613 Geneva Drive, Mechaniceburg, Pennsylvania 17055.
She 1. married to Father.
The father of the child 1s Jose Antonio Toledo, currently
residing at 80 Fisher Road, York Haven, Pennsylvania 17370.
He is married to MotheI',
4. The relationship of Plaintiff to the child ie that of
father. The Plaintiff currently resides with the following
persons: None
5. The relationship of Defendant to the child is that of
mother. The Defendant currently resides with the following
persons:
..... Relation.bip
Allison E. Toledo Daughter
John c. Rosero Male Friend
6. Plaintiff has not participated as a part or witness, or
in another capacity, in other litigation concerning the custody of
the child in this or another court. However a custody provision
was included in a Stipulated Agreement, approved by the Judge Hess
on December 7, 1995, docket No. 95-6713, relating to a Protection
From Abuse Petition.
Plaintiff does not know of a person not a party to the
proceedings who has physical custody of the child or claims to have
custody or visitation rights with respect to tae child.
t,
-'
I verify that the statements made in the Custody Complaint are
true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are
made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4904, relating
to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date:
, v
,W,;:, '';'.,''
.... ~ "
l ) '1 . ,;
" ./', ..... /. -" .. -, .
M~ I t ;,:6':':'- ~ '" e:,. f{.--
"Jose Antonio Toledo
"
~ i
.
I.
"
4
.....
JOSE ANTONIO TOLEDO,
Plaintiff
IN nlE COURT OF COMMON PUiAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
'11"
~0888 C1VlL
t
,
vs,
ESTHER TOLEDO,
Defendant
CIVIL ACflON - LAW
IN CUSTODY
ORDER,
AND NOW, this
I :l. ~ day of June, 1997, following hearing and careful
.onsideration of the testimony addu.ed, it is ordered and directed that:
l. The mother, F.sther Toledo, and the father, Jose Antonio Toledo, shall have shared
legal custody of Allison E. Toledo, born December 28, 1993.
2. The parties shall consult with ea.h other in making all major decisions affecting the
.hild's health and well being including, but not limited to, major mediclll, religious and
educational decisions.
3. The mother shall have primary physical custody of the child.
i
I
~
4. The father shall have partial custody of the child on alternating weekends from
. Thursday after work until Monday morning and during one additional weekend per month, every
4
other month, from Thursday after work until the following Saturday at 12:00 noon.
5. ln addition, the father shall have partial custody of the child for five weeks (no more
f.
than two to be taken consecutively at a time) each year when the father has leave from work,
upon providing forty-five (45) days advance notice to the mother. The father's periods of
'.
custody under this provision shall not be scheduled to conflict with the mother's periods of
holiday custody.
6, The parties shall alternate custody of the child on holidays as follows:
A. The father shall have custody of the .hild in even-numbered years on Easter, July
I
I
,
, ,
. ..' .'
--
FED i')FF1~E
C'.: ~, : .." ",j"''';/"''fi1"''R'I
." ...I.,l,j I
91 JUlI12 f':1 2: 59
C,"". ',., . ",i\'/Y
'.n,L.....I.~/'.\.. \."t\,l~,.
FENNS m:J\NU\
,
.
I
,
,
:1
I
, '
i
t
,.
,.
"
;j!
,
I;,
I
I.'
-
~th and Thanksgiving, and in Ildd.numhered years on New Year's Day, Memoriill Ihy.
and Labor Day. For the Christmas holiday, the father shall have custody of the child in
odd-numb.,red years from December 2~th al 5:00 p.m. until December 25th at Il:OO
I
,
I
I
,
noon, and in even-numbered years, from December 25th at 12:00 noon until December
26th at 7:00 p.m. The father shall have cu.stody of the child in every year on Martin
Luther King, Jr. Day and Columbus Day.
B. The mother shall have custody of the child in even-numbered years on New
Year's Day, Memorial Day and Labor Day, and in odd.numbered years on Easler, July
l
t
!
i '
I
,
4th and Thanksgiving. For the Christmas holiday, the molher shan have custody of the
child in odd-numbered years from December 25th at 12:00 noon until December 26th at
7:00 p.m., and in even-numbered years from December 24th at 5:00 p.m. until December
25th at 12:00 noon. The mother shall have custody of the child in every year on
Presidents' Day and Veterans' Day.
7. The holiday custody schedule shall take precedence over the regular custody schedule
and shall begin at 5:00 p.m. the evening before the holiday and continue until 7:00 p.m. on the
day of the holiday, unless specified otherwise in this order.
8. For all custody exchanges under this order which do not take place at the child's
daycare provider, the parties shan exchange custody at a location halfway between their
respective homes in Maryland and N~w Cumberland. The specific location shan be established
by mutual agreement of the parties.
9. I f either party decides to relocate his or her residence, the relocating party shall give
the other party a minimum notice of sixty (60) days so that, if desired, the custody arrangement
could be renegotiated.
r
10. Both parents understand the need to provide a loving and stable environment for the
child and agree to place their personal differences aside and work for the best interest of the
'.
,
~
-
<hill!,
11. Both parties shall encourage contact between the child and the other party. Neither
party shall make derogatory comments about the other in the presence or hearing of the child.
12. Each party shall provide the otht'r party with reasonable telephone access to the
<hild.
13. Each party shall provide the other party with his or her current home address, home
Ich:phone number and work telephone number. The parties shall update this information as
necessary.
BY THE COURT,
I
Thomas D. Gould, Esquire
For the Plaintiff
I fr '-'-
Barbara Sump Ie-Sullivan, Esquire
For the Defendant
~4'~<l. &>/13/'1?
..JJ. f -
:rlm
}
\_,;
"
,-',
-i
(;
"