Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-00922 1: X" J . ..n /' Ii 1 .~ '1 ips I i ''1 "" , ^. " " ,/ " .,,,,J' ~ IJ : 1('6 r6 10- j I 13 iey .'/ o Z LAW OFFICES FLOWER. MORGENTHAL. FLOWER & LINDSAY "'.lltl;~\."()NAL ('O....llAflIIN Fll E COpy II EAST HIGH STREET CARLISLE. PENNSYLVANIA 17013-3016 IAMI!.~ D, fLOWI!R ROOER M, MOROEMllAL IAMI!S D, flOWER. IR. CAROL!, L1NDMY (117) l.u.~m fAX: (117) lAJ.6S 10 OIETSCII '" MOR0l!Nl11A1, (1?15.I98.l) - flOWER. KMMER. MOROENnlAL '" floWER (198.l-1991) January 30, 1997 Dr. Robert Beaudry 3600 Gettysburg Road Camp Hill. PA 17011-6897 RE: DANIELS v. MILLER ORAL SURGERY. INC, and DR, ROBERT BEAUDRY CUMBERLAND COUNTY CCP NO: 96-922 (CIVIL TERM) Andrew Cline, Esquire David Fine, Esquire KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART 240 N. Third Street Harrisburg, PA 17101 Shawn A, Bozarth, Esquire 120 South Street Harrisburg, PA 17101 Dear Gentlemen: The Arbitration originally scheduled for March 13, 1997 at 1 :30 p,m., has been rescheduled for Thursdey, March 20, 1997 et 1 :30 p,m., to be held in the 2nd floor hearing room of the old courthouse, as set forth on the attached Amended Notice. Since almost everyone involved in the case has a distance to travel to the hearing, in the event of a snow emergency, a timely decision will be made as to whether to hold the hearing or postpone it. In such a situation, please be sure that you check with my office on the morning of the hearing. in case we have not been able to reach you, Thank you for your attention in this matter, Very truly yours, :~;n;:;~~W'" "",S". 'c Roger M. Morgenthal AMMlsm, Enclosure cc: Thomas E, Cheffins. Esquire (w/encl.) Philip H. Spare, Esquire (w/encl.) Dawn S, Sunday, Esquire (w/encl.) ~' (. Jl \ ~ \ j'. " /~OlJr:~L1nistrator -J\ ~.JPNE: 240.6200 '4 \7 O~ < awn A. Bozarth, Esquire ~aJi 120 South Street '10""'" ' Harrishurg. P A 1710 1 '3/;" .. ..." f' ;;.'-,,, -......,... -~... ,/ " I . i " '-<"~rO' -:: 1-'.7' I ,,/'" / ...... v,' ~/"2 ~. ~'-.~ ,./ 1,'40 < . , . I ATIORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF PHONE: 232.4227 ,1X~/Andrew Cline, Esquire .'rJi.1 ;(,J) i \-J ' David Fine, Esquire KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART I' ,I' / 40 N, Third Street : ,~' I ../ < ') " Harrishurg. P A 1710 1 ,.-, ) f: ):'(', ATIORNEYS FOR DEFEN?AN . r:, I ~ :I:~t MILLER ORAL SURGERY ." I I, ~ 'I ,J PHONE: 231.4500 /} " t"",;1 (;td..,r;!:/9, FAX: 233.2516 I .. > ~;):~~ ,'ij1'CL " ilt-J(.lh) Dr, R,llj)ert Beaudry rJ.tb /' ' \ , foil 360(~(feltysburg Road ",to /J,-l' Camp Hill, PA 17011-6X97 , DEFENDANT PH 0 N E: 'f&.".'}u4. ' '1 \S~ ,,-,"PhiliP H, Spare, Esquire J' ) SNELBAKER & BRENNEMAN ....o}( 44 West Main Street 3 ~ Mechanicsburg. PA 17055 l)) .,/r r:',,-' 'r '~ .,} '/' ,. ( r " "', ,"- 11.3:; " ) 'f C!fr~ ~ PzIL, :;'(IJ{ - )-;)nc( .: ') .; r/); ,,/,'1 _/i, ,) \. , I' ;/: ",.- .'! -, I "....,'_4 ;/.'1 "'1_ r .., ).A) .".- /~,",i . #',/~, .... :' (.,,~, ...,.: "'.: .",/ r. . ARBITRATOR PHONE: 697-8528 \ . I \f' ,/ } \~ ~~~~~ 6'F~~~~Yo~Swi~~IAM L. SUNDAY 1\)\ :', 'i 39 W, Main Slreel - I ,.- , 'J.}O (It i Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 I ~ ARBITRATOR PHONE: 766-9622 I ,.' .- ,,; ).." j , ,I,! " . i ,,' / . '" .., ' Tammy Daniels DBA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Daniels Janitorial Service v. NO. 922 CIVIL 1996 Miller Oral surgery, Inc. Dr. Robert Beaudry RULE 1312-1. The Petition for Appointment of Arbitrators shall be substantially in the following form: PETITION !'OR Al'l'OIN.........T 01' ARBITRATORS TO THE HONORABLE, JUDGES OF SAID COURT: Shawn A. Bozarth. E~auire , counsel for the Plaintiff in the above action (or actions), respectfully represents that: 1. The above-captioned action (or actions) is (are) at issue. 2..The claim of the Plaintiff in the action is $5.000.00. The counter-claim of the Defendant in the action is $. 0.00. ~ The following attorneys are interested in the case(s) as counselor are otherwise disqualitied to sit as arbitrators: Andre\# Cline, Esquire, David Fine, Esquire, and Shawn A. Bozarth, Esquire WHEREFORE, your petitioner prays your Honorable Court to appoint three (3) a!bitrators to whom the case shall be submitted. R~f;l~ SUb~itted' _ Shawn A. Bozarth, Esquire ORDER 01' COURT AND NOW, :J)UL".,J t/l... 17 , 19~, in consideration of the foregoing petition, f.o,l/t IlJUIl~htl'-M&.rq., :;>),,",:;? SPALE Esq., and:J:JtJWAl .J(,Iu,}AY , Esq., are appointed arbitrators in the above-captioned action (or actions) as prayed for. By th Court, , (.~\ P. J. (":LC.1j .C~f:CC r;: l' - "-j"';T',fiY "') 't- J' _J. T " " .J " >.! '_.J S~ n-:r. 17 r::i 3: 2!J ;- .' . cu\nq" "., ,... "'TY 101"...., .-i ,t) '........". Ii FG\'\ :.\ l.:,'::~}IU\ ~ .. . r ~ :r- ~ " ~ " " ~ - ~ M I~ M 3~ :c (..).... ;!... c.. ;;.., (OJ r- p~ ~:: ~m u::~ .... u c:: .., u.. on a 0 C"l iJ !\ ~,/al/1Sq5 aa:a2 PAGE a2 1l7&'i 15114 M [LLER I.FAL Sl.PI.;ER'{ COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYlVANIA COUNlY OF: CUlCBIIU.AHD NOTICE OF JUDGMENT/TRANSCRIPT ""-- PI.AlHTW: ___ ~IILS JANITORIAL SERVICE 139 S. 17TH STREET IUAR ~ HILL, PA 17011 VS. DQIINQANT: --- IiILLlJl ORAL SURGERY 3'00 OLD GETTYSBURG RD. CAMP HILL, fA 17011 L Ooc:lla No.: CV-0000"'4-U Oato FIItId: 111 16 " 5 ~ "-e-cw....: 09-1-01 -, CHARLES A. CLEIUH'1', JR. ~. 1106 CARLISLE ROAD CAMP HILL, PA T_ (717) 761-4940 170n ~ -, MILLER ORAL SURGIlY 3600 OLD GETTYSBuaO RD. CAMP HILL, fA 17011 THI$/S TO Nonn YOU THAT: Vudgrnent: --, 00 Judgment wu encerlld tor. (N1IlII) 00 Judgmenr wu entered 1QIInIl: (N1IlII) J'OR 'LAI~lrr _ ,_ DANIELS JANITORIAL SERVICE MILLIR ORAL SURGERY In lI1a amount 01 S J~:107.0. (0..) llZJ/U on; o Carnages will be '",'"..... an: (DII8 & TIme) o Thla case dismiSSed w1ll'loul prejudk:e. o poaaeallon grarad. O Possession granted r money JudgmenlIeIlOl satlslled wlthln lt1lny dayS. o PosslMIsion IlOI gr8l'1llld. o Levy il81ayed lOt _ daya Ql' 0 generally IhIylld. o Objection to IIIvy nu bMn ftIed IIld '-I/lg wll be held: DIIlII: Place; AIIiaunt of Judgn\cIm JUllgm8nl Co8llI Inl8l1IIl on Judgment N.tt1mtrt F~ . TOTAL U,207.08 U,147.28 $59.80 t.OO $.00 TIme: AN1 PARTY HAl THI RIQHTTO APNAL 'MTHI'l30 DA'" OfTHllOAnOl'JUOQMeNT IIY I'lUNQ A NOTICI 0' APPI!AL WITli nile 1_71_qt\ D.. PUA8 ML ClM8ICN. ~...... . . ~l8ttta JU8Ilc8 , , _ 'i ......... ihI (udgme(C- ~ ,. ~ _ ' .~~Ju.tJce ~;.".":. .. -.-.. '. ,;...~ ,__. \I. " - ~, ~'L ',. -> --. ~ ..... . 'J , ......, ~. \.' '--.. I cenify thai tnis is a tN 1-23-96 Oatil My commlll5ion expires ftr1l Monday of January. 2CQ2. AOPC31_ J 'J ~ '" \:. ---l, ~ ~ I ~ ~ J 1--'. PI'- f): . r,: ' ,.', , tf; l,.:. . . ',CJ c.\ ,,; '-; : L I ; ,~ ..... ~ ~'\") .... ~ \ \ +5~ ~ ~ '--- "- r- t..:J ~ ""'" -.. .~ ':i , I 'bl "" .."" -........J J ;:) J.i.. - j f'-' \ -- - .:: - \0 <J "- . ' .....:: ro ~ tJ \::: ~ ~ V' ....., .- Q,... -..::1'- .....:::;- ,-.J - - -<:;" ~-.-::::J \ ~ 'QJ.. \'- ' '- - \'- :: ,.... - .,j I) "0 .~ ~. '< ....:J. ~ ":l... If' .... I \ ~ ::... - ~ .:. .. r-- ,... -.:.. '- ..... v -.::; .... .... r- -: --- --- - "i~ ...... NOTICE O. APPEAL COMMUNWt-'l rH 01" tlENNS'flV4.NIA ,- i i COURT 0" COMMON .,UAS .-1 ! f H(J!\1 I I L "ii'lh,'( I. HI' ",'J!1:-1t_1 JUOICIAL DISTRICT '.it.} i J DISTRICT JUSTICE JUDGMENT COMMON PLEAS Nu q6-922 Civil T~rm NOTICE OF APPEAL Nol'Cl' <\ 'I'VI'1I th.lt till! .jPP1~11,.llt hJS hIed III th'! .thullu Court 0' CommlJll PI~.J" JII JflIW.J1 110m lhu JUdlilnl!r1f rl!rull!rt!d h"V tlw OI\lrIU JU'>liO! nil Ihtl d,ltl' Jill! III the e.IS!! J11tHlfjOJ1ud tltllow o'll LJ"c Or"!~;lIr.s.crl L!.~~ .Q."." 0" ............" 'ci,,. 1....-.,., 'UI. 0"....... ....,--------\.-.- __!l2::1:j.l1_______,__ __ 1_. .,.,. .,. cu.", . ._lZHlJ-'lZS5_____ l'L. ~.....- goo ......1......., I.Ll!) '~ationvide llrtvo, ___ __ _ __ _ ___. _ JI"rr19~II!'Jla 0"". 0,", ..HI.....".. - -- - t" 'OO. ....." ~. }/23/YO _ VlIn!!,l-,,-Jang,?!!lI1. S,~rytcre __ ...."-.ltLU"r .(~ri!l SIJfMU'h 111':.________ "..... CV 19 l)lJl)474-95 .... D' ...:....... :;......~ LT 1~. . _ ____ .___ t.f.~V!,___~nr_'_'_f.__,_________.____._______._ Thl' IllllCk '0\'.11 t~ sllJIlt!d ONL Y Wh~ll this nUfJllon I'" rcqulftfd under Pd, R C P J P N,) 1008B ThIs Nollce of ApJJcdl, when fI!Ct!lvmJ hy tht! DI'ilrlct Jmtlc~, wJll ()JJfHJIU .IS J SUPERSEDEAS tu the jlJllljlncllt fur PU'i5ltUHJI1 H\ thl') I;J'itl II .J/Jpell.,n, W.J$ C/OJllfliJlJt ($e6 P.I. RCPJP No. 1001(61 III J(:tlOn belore District JlIstlCH. ht' MUST FILE A COMPLAINT withm twe"IY 120) tlay. alrer '''mg hi. NOTICE 01 APPEAL. S'illl.HU'~ 01 P'luhcmur"ry ur O~putll PR.<\ECIPE TO ENTER RULE TO FILE COMPLAINT AND RULE TO FILE (TillS U!ctlOlI ol'orm to be used ONL Y when JPpel/.JUt W.:I$ DEFENDANT (see Pd. R.C.P.J.P, No. 1001(7) in iJCtJon before District Justlf:t!. IF NO T USED, detJCh Irom COIJy of notice of dPPf!al to be St1rved upon dppelleeJ. PRAECIPE: To P,othunotdry Enlt!r rule upon Daniels JanitoriaL Service N~m. of "p/Hllflf/ft/ (Common PI"., No. 96-922 Civil Term I w'thln twenty 1201 day. aft . appelleelsl, to hie a compldlnt '" thl" ,JJnm<l1 RULE: To --.!J.'l!IJ!'Jl1 J'm! tor illl Service N;Jmft of lPPtlIIHfsl S'~n yr. of ."".Il4nt or h,s oIf&dI"n"'y or d<JfMt .\ndt''!\t H. CUne , appelle.I,1 (11 You dIe notified that d rule IS hereby entered upon you to file a campl,NH In thiS Jppeal wlthll1 IweMy f2m days ..ft~, th~ dJt.! uf ser~lce of thiS rul~ upon you by penonal serVice or bV certlfu~d or registered mill!. 121 If y<>u do nOt rde a compla,nt Wllh,n thos I,me, a JUDGMENT OF NON PROS WILL BE ENTERED AGAINST yOU. (3) The dalt: of senllee of thiS rule .f serVice WillS by mad IS the date of mailing. Dale Feb. 21, ,19 96 I, "ope ]1.' <t() .#, , Z 'I.e. s-nt b ~S Receipt for " ~. Certified ~al' "p,""dud - X Nn 'n'U'."'. 1."~"'.1I, ,,,,,, Ma" ...."..,'~,,~ Do nor u~t1 10,' InltHll,t II .."........... \Stlt! AdvtJr1d __- ~ -- I ~i. '- 'f" t"). 1.. j _ ,. t t' 1.~_\(,f1 "'I , ~ t, ,';. ld!_" ~.-1t,!:?~ S1l3 616 Receipt for Certified Mail No lnsuraocff COVBfitue Provided 00 not use for InferniJ'lonal Mall lSOB Revltr'lf.tl ~ - ~U'#}\ i :."., ; 1 r . 1, - ;1. '.' ~ ,~~I ...., " lit- i .t j' ~. " . \!~ f "" ''''tl , ,:.; I"'HI'" . . , .~ "'''L GO . er> e O"II"'...,J ."., i ,r -; - .p,,' .' " ''''. ,., " 'lu'.U",!".f .,Ho"" .-,j" " ~ ~ l t o ... f )..' I' i ~ ,\; '. '\ '1' ':" i r}(1 i $ ! -'''I'' /J .;.",' ,,\ ",,", , /U L' .. "~.. $ /---l," ) ~.~'l.-- ...I. ,. ,"' " .,.. .~- {~ .q 1;"0 ".. .. i~ J~ w~^-: () , .,~ fE , ;~ L_ y, 0. (...J ,:&~ u'--. l~ t~ ~' ?~ ' ; ire :::':j ':} .; " ..n .::.:J u o~ <J UAWN A, aoaAATB. aSQUIU te., ;1,,.; I, i";\' ..' , , I' '," TAMMY DANIELS DBA DANIELS JANITORIAL SERVICE, 239 S. 17TH STREET CAMP HILL, PA 17011 I? la inti f f IN THE COURT OF COMMON rLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. No. 96-922 MILLER ORAL SURGERY INC. 400 NATIONWIDE DRIVE HARRISBURG, PA 17110 and DR. ROBERT BOUDREY, 3600 GETTYSBURG ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 1.7011-6897 Defendants Civil Action--Law N n T 1 " F. 'tol) lrAIIS OEE:U Jur.;n trl '~X,(JH'r. If '(1)1j wL:Jtl t.,J d"f~I\,J 'J<taLllst. UltJ ~t3Lma f!ljt forth 1n the (c" 11.iW irq p,'J'Jes, J'f":1J mLl:.lt. t,Jk~ !1.,;t t')f, ....i nl j n tWI,mt"'J (ZU I <hY3 'lfttH this C.::,lmpl.llnt ilno !'lot Lee at. :I'tl...'d, t.:} ttol:.f1rLn'l .'l wt~ttf!ln ,IFfJt:"HMIi:a "f:lt.:.moall,/ or: b'J .'tlt..Hflll/l'/ c1nd f111nq in writln(j with lh\l i.'t;'H"f. '(<IH.' dfJ!O\tll:Jl:'.!:f ur: Cbjll':ll.o!ld to thEi .::1<11.11\8 s.,t f')[1:h ~Tjlndf. Y')'J. YQU :HQ Wlttflllld tholt iC you hit ~'J do .s,) r.h... ';.;!Sf:l 100'1 pr..)f.;~ftd .tlith':,ul: 'j'}U and ,J jurj':il'rl,,:trJl: 1M,! lift Iffll,f:ltfj<J lFHloul yuu by th. Court YliUl'..'1l!: [l.ILth~r tiotl..:.. f'n <tH'1 m.,nti)/ cl3;irrl~.j in l;h., G0JllpLtint 'n: f.or any O"I',IH '::lalm Ot tullef l'qcluut,-"j b.j thlj PLt,lntitf. '{,)I..! mitl t.,i:ilii 1I\':ont!y O( p":.,p,,,rty ,)t' (;thac d'1t.t8 lU1PJrt;tnt to Y')u. 'tQU SHOt/tO 'r^K~: TH13 1'I\P~:R 'ro 'iutm LAWYEH AT ot/r::t::. IF yOU DO NoT HAVE ^ LAWYF,R OR CNmOT ,,\FFURD (tiE, GO 1'0 OR TE:!.EPH<..llf; THE OF.'f'fI:E ;JET FORTH m:t.ow TO ntlD Oll'r WllEI1.l:: YOU CAN GE'r LEGAL HELP. COI)WI' ^11MItH$~rRA'rOn (Jf' CUNBERLVW COUH'rY T1ElW FLOOR 1 COUrallOl.lJE S'~UARE CARLI3lE, PA 1/111 j 1P-;;.lO-6200 ~J () 'r r I~ r l' Le han demandad<.J -Ii u8t.~d @rl 1-1 ';'_',rtot. :.0 LW'.~J '-1uiu..fj ,j.,.tltf~jl1.ujf,! dt:! litHral:l dt:!tnandas expuestaa .u, 1,:1') l>t'Jill.l:01 8L;II.ll~ntlts, l..I..t....J tl8nv VL'Ilntli (1;l) db;j ,jQ pl:t~,:, 31 putlc da la ftli:ha dB l:t dtlmanda 'I Lt r"nl.fi':ldon. Uatti.;J ,jeb9 ptF.i/itmt:ll1:' \.0113. ,l~,u'L~f\C'i,l 1'~Kdtil I) on paL30lHl 0 p-:Jr aboq-ado y archivut ~n 1,1 ,'.;'~r.l.l:t !:In 'oa;ma $ii\:cit.,) aU3 d~(9nsa:.; 'J ti1,.; c-l:.)e-'::i'':lfata .J taoJ dtll!l:u1-Jaa ftn ,=,,:)r.tt3 dtt au persarl-l. Jlia 'l',ilJiI,jo qUl! ai u.gt4d no 58 d~flQndfj, 13 .:ortlf t~ma',) m~dld;.Hi Y f.'u.,<j., ftlllt!lt li03 ord.m (;,)ntr.:s ;j,,':~'i :Jln P'l!Ivt,) ii..l:fi~ ,:; tl.)tif!';.l'::L;f\ 'I p'Jl r;\.l<1l,tuLIJI: '1I,'l1-) <) al1vl'J 'lU4iI tlS pl'JdldQ fHl 1a PQt1clon 01"" .j1-J[tl4WJ,I. l1l'ittJ,j pu(t,j(~ s;.r,jet dirlf,f:;i~ .) t;'..u J}i:';pl-.d:tdtl3 ') r;tt.:,,,. .jCC&c:!10S im~oct'lntuB pata u~ted. LLl~:'1E:; ES'l'A DE}l,ANc.-'\ A Uti AHOl.;AOO INMEDI^TJ<..'--lfl.ITL sr rlO TtEtlE J\DOGAOO 0 sr NO TtEUE Et OUlERO ;;r.lFr'-:IEfHE CI:: Pru~N~ TAL SEfWIr:W, V^':^ Ell PER:iotU\ 0 LLt.}lr t'OH TEf.F.F'otlo A U\ OnCTtu\. ClJi'A OtR~:CC[ON :W EW;!J~NTll.J'\ AlV\.1O PAAJ\ A'lI::iH';!JfU, t)()fHJ~: m; FlJEm: r;ut/SEijlJ!1i M[$'!f:t/CtA I,f.(jJ\L. '=(~JRT A~[Nr3Tft""\TOR ot' CliMI1EHLi\ND COlJlfry TlHk!) HOI.)R 1 co;mTI/Ot.!:.iE :;Q~!AHZ GAilLrSLE, f'I-\ t'1U13 11! <Ii)-l:i'::;~'ll TAMMY Dfu~IELS DBA DANIELS JANITORIAL SERVICE, 239 S. 17TH STREET CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Or' CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. No. 96-922 MILLER ORAL SURGERY INC. 400 NATIONWIDE DRIVE HARRISBURG, PA 17110 and DR. ROBERT BOUDREY, 3600 GETTYSBURG ROAD CAMP HILL, PA 17011-6897 Defendants civil Action--Law COMPLAINT AND NOW, comes their Attorney, Shawn A. Bozarth, Esquire, and follows the following: I. The Plaintiff is a sole proproprietorship with a principal place of business at the address above, engaged in providing janitorial services. 2. Mi ller Oral Surgery Inc. is a Pennsylvania Corporation with principal places of business at the address of each defendant. 3. At all times relevant hereto, ~efendant Robert Boudrey was an agent, servant, or employee of Miller Or.al Surgery Inc. with actual or apparent authority to enter into contracts to bind his principal, Miller Oral Surgery Inc. 4. In such a capacity, Boudrey entered into a contract dated Daniels Janitorial Service by and through represents the July 13, 1992 with the Plaintiff for the cleaning of 3600 Old Gettysburg Road Office. See Exhibit A. 5. The Plaintiff thereafter and continuing to the present date, performed janitorial services as called for by the contract and was paid by Miller Oral Surgery Inc. 6. Beginning in January 1995, Defendant Miller Oral Surgery Inc. refused to pay for the services performed by the Plaintiff. . , Oo"~rftl Cn"dltin"~ All'~ecessary equipment an4 euppli.. ot com.ericial grade used tor cleaning .ervlce. vill b, Jupplled by Contractor.. ",mer-" Oral Surq. viII pruvid, paper product.,garbage baga,and trash can liner.! 1. EquiDment and SUDDlies 2. Liability Claus, Contractor vill not b, responsible it it i. unable to tultill any ot the terms ot this contract through cau.e. such as strikes,lockouts,act.s of God,accldsnts,or other circumstances beyond it. control. 3! , Contract Acceptance It is hereby acknowledged that the complete term~ and conditions of this agreement have been reviewed and accepted by Contractor,and Miller Oral Surg. ' . 4. Service Guarantee Contractor quarantees to Mt II.... Or~1 !':lIrn. t.hat immediate action will be taken on all complaints which are received. Thi. service i. to be performed on a one day per veele buis. ,. Cle~~ing Frequency 6. Time of Cleanlpg All services ~Ill be performed outside of the regular business hours of each tacili ty 7. Price The price for this work to be performed und~r the -Housekeeping Frequency ,Specifications. attached .heroto and made part hereof viiI be 219.00 +taxDer month including all labor, .upervision,equipment,and .upplles'Qthe~~an tho., furnished; . .. ~ -=:.::c- .., .,. - ~'- l'L Cl -' CJ \. ""U ~t.. 8. Tllral ,. , Ths lIonthly the terll ot thil Term o't- this' agrsement ehall be a poriod of one (1) y.ar commencing on ~~ and expir1ngon,.._"' . ~/ ~\... Tv'~l't-t .c~'h~ '!J~ \Gl \'i~ ' . charge of 219.00 +taxshall remain tirll tor agreement CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE It ia hereby acknowledged that the complete terms and conditions of this Agreement hive peen reviewed and Mc:red. ,bK ,c~ntractor and. , . By. ::::.. ~~~;> Daniels JanreOrial~ervice BY. .0J DATE I 7 / I ~ I .s~..~ r ~~~~Vl-. ~ IO\.oi' ; .:-~'" 01. . 1 'tJ7. ~ ..' l(' Extras to be included in the abovel -.z-" -'. -=:- 1. BurA1ah monthlY and wax as needed. Strip as needed '(extra charge). '2. Glla, monthly or ~s n~~ded~ . .... ,-...-.-. '. ,. TAMMY DANIELS DBA DANIELS JANITORIAL SERVICE 239 S. 17th Street Camp Hill, PA 17011, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA No. 96-922 Plaintiff v. MILLER ORAL SURGERY, INC. 400 Nationwide Drive Harrisburg, PA 17110 and ;\ DR. ROBERT BEAUDRY 3600 Gettysburg Road Camp Hill, PA 17011, Civil Action - Law Defendants NOTICE TO PLEAD TO: Plaintiff You are hereby notified to plead to the within new matter and counterclaim within 20 days of service hereof, or a judgment maybe entered against you. ,/ Date: Sr zt., 191~ Andrew H. Cline Pa. Supre e Court No. 29020 David R. 'ne Pa. Supreme Court No. 66742 Counsel for Defendant Miller Oral Surgery, Inc. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP The Payne Shoemaker Building 240 North Third Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101 (717) 231-4500 TAMMY DANIELS DBA DANIELS JANITORIAL SERVICE 239 S. 17th Street Camp Hill, PA 17011, Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA No. 96-922 v, MILLER ORAL SURGERY, INC. 400 Nationwide Drive Harrisburg, PA 17110 and DR. ROBERT BEAUDRY 3600 Gettysburg Road Camp Hill, PA 17011, civil Action - Law Defendants ANSWER WITH NEW MATTER AND COUNTERCLAIM OF MILLER ORAL SURGERY, INC. Defendant Miller Oral Surgery, Inc" ("MOS"), by its undersigned counsel, hereby offers its answer with new matter and counterclaim, 1. Denied. MOS is without sufficient knowledge to either admit or deny the averments of Paragraph 1 and those averments are therefore denied. 2. Admitted in part and denied in part. It is admitted that MOS is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business at 400 Nationwide Drive, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17110. It is denied that MOS currently has a principal place of business at 3600 Gettysburg Road, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, 17011-6897. 3. Admitted in part and denied in part. It is admitted that Defendant Robert Beaudry was an employee of MOS until March 1, 1996. It is denied that Defendant Robert Beaudry was an agent, servant, or employee of MOS after that date. The remaining averments of Paragraph 3 constitute legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the extent that those averments are deemed to be averments of fact, they are denied, 4. The averments of Paragraph 4 constitute a legal conclusion to whi~h no response is required. To the extent that those averments may be deemed to be factual averments, MOS is without sufficient knowledge to either admit or deny and, therefore, those averments are denied. 5. Admitted in part and denied in part. It is admitted that MOS made certain payments to Plaintiff pursuant to a contract that was terminated in March, 1995. After that time, there was no contract between the parties and MOS was not responsible to make any payments to Plaintiff. 6. Admitted. - 2 - 7. MOS is without sufficient knowledge to either admit or deny the averments of Paragraph 7 and, therefore, those averments are denied. 8 . MOS is without sufficient knowledge to either admit or deny the averments of Paragraph 8 and, therefore, those averments are denied. 9. MOS is without sufficient knowledge to either admit or deny the averments of Paragraph 9 and, therefore, those averments are denied. NEW MATTER 1. At all relevant times, Defendant Robert Beaudry was without authority to bind Miller Oral Surgery by contract or otherwise. 2, Plaintiff was notified on several occasions that Dr. Beaudry was without authority to bind MOS by contract or otherwise. 3. To the extent that Plaintiff is due any recovery, that recovery should be from Dr. Beaudry personally because any contract he entered into or pz'omise he made could not have been on behalf of MOS. 4. By letter of March 22, 1995, the business manager of MOS terminated any contractual arrangement between MOS and Plaintiff, - 3 - COUNTERCLAIM Nealiaence 1. On at least two occasions. Plaintiff's employees caused damage to carpet at the MOS facility at 3600 Gettysburg Road. Camp Hill. Pennsylvania. 17011-6897, 2. Specifically. in early 1995, Plaintiff's employees spilled bleach on carpet at the MOS facility at 3600 Gettysburg Road, Camp Hill. Pennsylvania, 17011-6897, and caused signifir.ant and irreparable damage to the carpet. 3. Specifically, in April. 1995. Plaintiff's employees spilled oil on carpet at the MOS facility at 3600 Gettysburg Road. Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, 17011-6897, and caused significant and irreparable damage to the carpet, 4. Plaintiff's employees were under a duty to exercise care in their work. 5. In damaging the carpet. Plaintiff's employees breached their duty to exercise care in their work. 6. The a~tions of Plaintiff's employees were the proximate cause of certain damage to carpeting at the MOS facility at 3600 Gettysburg Road, Camp Hill. pennsylvania, 17011- 6897. - 4 - 4, On March /2, 1996, Daniels Janitorial tiled a complaint before this Court. 5. On September 30,1996, MaS tiled its answer with new matter and counterclaim, The answer with new matter and counterclaim was endorsed with a notice to plead, 6. On October 2, 1996, Daniels Janitorial tiled .t praecipe for a rule of reference to arbitrators and on October 17, 1996, tiled a petition for appointment of arbitrators, 7, On January 21. 1997. this Court issued a notice of hearing of board of arbitrators setting the arbitration hearing for March 13, 1997, On January 29.1997, the hearing was rescheduled for March 20, 1997, 8, On March 20, 1997 an arbitration panel awarded Daniels Janitorial $3789,10 and found for Daniels Janitorial on MaS's counterclaim, 9, [n its new matter, MOS made the following averments: [, At all relevant times, Defendant R"bert Beaudry was without authority to bind MOS by contract or otherwise, 2. Plaintiff was notified on several occasions that Dr, Beaudry was without authority to bind MOS by contract or otherwise, 3, To the extent that Plaintiff is due any recovery, that recovery should be from Or, Beaudry personally because any contract he entered into or promise he made could not have been on behalf of MaS, 4. By letter of March 22, 1995. the business manager of MOS terminated any contractual arrangement between MaS and Plaintiff, 10. [n its counterclaim MOS made the following averments: I, On at least two occasions. Plaintifrs employees caused damage to carpet at the MOS facility at 3600 Gettysburg Road, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, 170[ 1.6897, 2. Specifically, in early 1995. Plaintifrs employees spilled bleach on carpet at the MOS facility at 3600 Gettysburg Road, Camp Hill. Pennsylvania, 17011.6897, and caused significant and irreparable damage to the carpet. 3. Specifically, in April, 1995, Plaintiffs employees spilled oil on carpet at the MOS facility at 3600 Gettysburg Road, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, - 2 - 17011.6397, and caused significant and irreparable damagllto the carpet. 4. Plaintiffs employees were under a duty to exercise care in their work, 5, In damaging the carpet, Plaintiffs employees bleached their duty to exercise care in their work, 6. The actions of Plaintiffs employees were the proximate cause of llertain damage to carpeting at the MaS facility at 3600 Gettysburg Road. Camp Hill. Pennsylvania, 17011.6397, 11, Daniels Janitorial failed to file a responsive pleading to MOS's new matter and counterclaim within twenty days after service of MaS's answer with new mailer and counterclaim, as required by Pa, R,C,P, 1026(a), In fact, Daniels Janitorial has not to date tiled a reply to the new matter and counterclaim, 12, Rule 1029(b) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedures slates, in pm, that fuctwll averments in a pleading to which a responsive pleading is required are admitted when not denied specifically or by necessary implication, See also Newspaper Guild o/Greater Phila.. An.nO y, Philadelphia Daily News. Inc" 164 A,2d 215, 218 (Pa, 1960); Edmond y. Southea.ftern Pa. Transp, AUlh, 651 A,2d 645, 646 n,4 (Pa. Commw, 1994); Spain y, Vicente. 461 A,2d 833 (Pa, Super, 1983), 13, The averments in paragraphs 1-4 of MaS's new matter and in paragraphs 1.6 of MaS's counterclaim are therefore admitted by Daniels Janitorial. 14, By admitting to the averments in paragraphs 1-4 ofMOS's new matter. Duniels Janitorial cannot prevail on its breach of contract claim allainst MOS, 15, By admitting to the averments in paragraphs 1.6 of MOS's countercluim, Daniels Janitorial admits to liability for the damalle caused to MOS's prupI!rty by employe!:, of Daniels Janitorial, ,3- WHEREFORE, Defendant Miller Oral Surgery, Inc, respectfully requests that this Court grant its Molion for Judament Oll. the PlelIdings against Plaintiff Daniell! Ianitorial Service and in favor of Defendant Miller Oral Surgery. 100" make a finding of liability againsl Daniels Janitorial on MOS's eO\lltlerclaim, and seIche case for trial on damages, Respectfully submitted, Dale: 4{"'/"::f "') - ,n~ .,. r~~~ An . w H, Cline Pa. Supreme Court No, 29020 David R. Fine Pa. Supreme Court No. 66742 L, Francis Cissna Pa. Supreme Court No, 77418 Counselfor Defendant Miller Oral Surgery. Inc, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LL' The Payne Shoemaker Building 240 North Third Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101 (717)2314500 " " - 4 - TAMMY DANIEL:!! DIBIA DANIELS JANITORIAL SERVICE 239 S, 17th Street Camp Hill, PA 17011, Plainli ff IN THE COURT Of COMMON PLEAS Of CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA No. 96-922 v. MILLER ORAL SURGERY, INC, 400 Nationwide Drive Harrisburg, PA 17110 and DR, ROBERT BEAUDRY 3600 Gettysburg Road Camp Hill, PA 17011, Defendants Civil Action. Law CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that, on April 4, 1997, I served a true and correct copy of the foregoinll upon the following by first-class U ,S. Mail, postage-prepaid: Shawn A, Bozarth, Esq, 120 South Street Harrisburg, P A 171 0 I Samuel L. Andes, Esq, 525 North Twelfth Street P,O, Box 168 Lemoyne. PA 17043 ~' . "1-4/1. L. F cis Cissna TAMMY DANIELS DBA DANIELS JANITORIAL SERVICE 239 S 17rH STREET CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Plaintiff IN THE COURT Of COMMON PLEAS Of CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v 96-922 MILLER ORAL SURGERY 400 NATIONWIDE DRIVE HARRISBURG, PA 17110 and DR. ROBERT BOUDREY, 3600 GETTYSBURG RD CAMP HILL, P A 17011-6897 Civil Action--Law ANSWER TO NEW MATTER/COUNTERCLAIM 1. Denied for the reason that as specified in the complaint and as contained in the exhibits therein. Boudrey was an officer and agent of Miller Oral Surgery, 2, Denied for the reason thaI as sprcified in the complaint and as contained in the exhibits therein. Boudrey was an officer and agent of Miller Oral Surgery, 3, Denied for the reason that as specified in the complaint and as contained in the exhibits therein, Boudrey was an officer and agent of Miller Oral Surgery. 4, Denied for the reason that as specified in the complaint and as contained in the exhibits therein, Boudrey was an officer and ag~nt of Miller Oral Surgery, NEW MATTER/COUNTERCLAIM 1. Denied for the reason that as specified in the complaint and as contained in the exhibits therein, the Plaintiff properly performed their cleaning duties and did not cause the alleged damage, 2, Denied for the reason that as specified in the complaint and as contained in the exhibits therein, the Plaintiff properly performed their cleaning duties and did not cause the alleged damage. 3, Denied for the reason that as specified in the complaint and as contained in the exhibits therein, the Plaintiff properly perfonned their cleaning duties and did not cause the alleged damage, 4. Denied for the reason that as specified in the complaint and as contained in the exhibits therein, the Plaintiff properly perfonned their cleaning duties and did not cause the alleged damage. 5, Denied for the reason that as specified in the complaint and as contained in the exhibits therein. the Plainliff properly performed their cleaning duties and did not cause the alleged damage. 6, Denied for the reason that as specified in the complaint and as contained in the exhibits therein, the Plaintiff properly perfonned their cleaning duties and did not cause the alleged damage, WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff demands that the NEW MATTER/COUNTERCLAIM BE DISMISSED, RESPECTFULL Y SUBMITTED, DATE:Afrll ~ ~ 1- CSe, Qt Shawn A. Bozarth Esquire Attorney for the Plaintiff 120 South Street Harrisburg. P A 17101 717-232-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Shawn A. Bozarth, Esquire, hereby certify that I mailed by first class mail prepaid or by hand delivery a copy of the document to which this certificate of service is attached to: Samuel L. Andes, Esquire Andrew Cline, Esquire Attorney for Dr. Robert Boudrey Attorney for Miller Oral Surgery Inc. 525 N. Twelfth Street Kirkpatrick & Lockhart P.O. Box 168 Payne Shoemaker Building Lemoyne,. PA 17043 Harrisburg, PA 17101 ~QL-- Shawn A. Bozarth, Esquire 120 South Street Harrisburg, P A 1710 1 717-232-4227 DATE: VERIFICATION I, G~" ~ ' verify that the facts contained in""the preceding document attached hereto are true, accurate, and correce to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief subject to the penalties of unsworn falsification contained at 18 P.C.S.A. 54904. DATE: s. I, " ,- 0' {.' ..: ..... , .' UJ' ..-: l. . .... fi: , " ,... .J "1"; GI ] C. 1.1;) I c. L , :..... .. u r- "::J (.1 ", .....J T A;\\MY DANIELS OBA OANIELS HNlTORIAL SERVICE 239 S 17"' STREET CAMP HILL, PA 17011 Plaintiff IN HIE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v 96-922 MILLER ORAL SURGERY 400 NATIONWIDE DRIVE HARRISBURG, FA 17110 and DR ROBERT BOUDREY, 3600 GETTYSBURG RD CAMP HILL, PA 17011-6897 Civil Action--Law BESPONSE TO MOTION FOR JUDGMt:NT ON THE PLEADINGS AND M9TION TO STRIKE 1. Defendant Miller Oral Surgery has filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings concerning alleged admissions made by failure to respond to a New Matter filed with the Answer 2. The instant Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings was filed after an arbitration trial on March 20, 1997, which found in favor of the Plaintiff 3. The essence of this dispute is the two principals of Miller Oral Surgery Inc., Dn. Boudrey and Reedy could not practice together; and now, after lengthy litigation, they have split up, and refuse to pay for the services which each engaged separately 4. The Plaintiff is one of those providers of cleaning services, whom Reedy refuses to pay. 5. As the documents attached to the Complaint indicate, there was no is&ue concerning the qualit} of cleaning services until Reedy's dispute with Boudrey, and Boudrey renewed the Plaintiffs contract. 6. The Motion should be stricken for the lollowing reasons: a. It is untimely and improper under Rule 1034 in that a trial has occurred: "(a) After the relevant pleadings are closed, but within such time as not to CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Shawn A. Bozarth, Esquire, hereby certify that 1 mailed by first class mail prepaid or by hand delivery a copy of the document to which this certificate of service is attached to: Samuel L. Andes, Esquire Andrew Cline, Esquire Attorney for Dr. Robert Boudrey Attorney for Miller Oral Surgery Inc. 525 N. Twelfth Street Kirkpatrick & Lockhart P.O. Box 168 Payne Shoemaker Building Lemoyne,. PA 17043 Harrisburg, PA 17101 \. awn . Bozarth, Esquire 120 South Street Harrisburg, P A 17101 717.232.4227 DATE: ~t'r\\ ~J 91- .... 0' r {~ : v: " -. \- .' '-.;,\", u.' . ('1 )",; (,~, . ' :;..-; [::"- ,.... ,. , I Ll: ep :1 C~( I .' " ,. .' ~./ ... c,- \i.~ u.. , .. i .~ " r- :j () cr u II ~.: \ ~p51 \'\ftJllt,lluJn \Danu:h, TAMMY DANIELS d/b/a DANIELS JANITORIAL SERVICE, Plaintiff I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 'I CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYlVANIA i I NO: 922 CIVIL 1996 I VI. " II I MILLER ORAL SURGERY, INC. and DR. ROBERT BEAUDRY, Defendant CIVIL ACTION. LAW 0AItl We do solemnly swear (or affirm) that we will support. obey and defend the Constitution of the United States end the Constitution of this Commonwealth and that we will discharge the duties of our office with fidelity. ! .~ ft1 t'l~~J- i oger . MorgenthaJ. squire (Chairman) '\) 1I~ O-lJ2 / d--e ~ . Spa,a, .qui,a ;~-~O~ - Robert P. Kline, eaqui . ~ AWARD We, the undersigned arbitrators, having been duly appointed and sworn (or affirmed), make the following award: (No'., ff _IIItl'N I", .,... '" .......tWd. Ih..., wll IN "","'My J"',.' VeiL, rL:u,.~.-,~ '^' il il Ii """ I . , '""""it v..,-. r-'wCl'\ #' Arbitrator. dissents. (In."r name if applicable, I -Q ;~l' luh/L I, tl- l~ Roger M. Morgenthal, ~8qUire (Chairman) Dale of Haaring: Thursdav. March 20. 1997 Dala of Award: nl....,cl 2.iJi /'1'7-/ (il1kY:~~~ c "'c'" :~ '""'; . . Q <--t1~(-- ( Roburt P. Kline. Esqulro