HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-0197 orphansIN RE: : ~ I'~~THE' cO'~RT OF cQMM0~ PLEAS .... OF~
~ : ~MBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
ESTATE OF THOMAS D. NEIER, : ~0': 21-96-0197
DECEASED :
: ORPHANS' COURT DIVISION
IN RE: PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION
BY THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
DECREE NISI
AND NOW, this /~~
day of SEPTEMBER, 1998, the action of
the Board of Appeals is reversed and Petitioner shall be
permitted to elect under Section 9113(a) of the Inheritance Tax
Act and to prepay inheritance tax with interest to November 17,
1996. Petitioner is directed to tender payment to the Department
of Revenue within ten (10) days after the date this order becomes
final. This order shall become final unless exceptions are filed
hereto within ten (10) days.
By the
Edward E. Guido, J.
Carl C. Risch, Esquire
For the Petitioner
Nicholas J. Lamberti, Esquire
For the Commonwealth
Department of Revenue
:sld
IN RE: - : IN THE COURT OF COMMON pLEAS oF
: CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLWANIA
ESTATE OF THOMAS D. NEIER, : NO. 21-96-0197
DECEASED :
: ORPHANS' COURT DIVISION
IN RE: PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION
BY THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
BEFORE GUI DO, J.
OPINION AND DECREE NISI
Before us is a petition for review of a decision by the
Pennsylvania Department of Revenue which denied Petitioner's
election under section 9113(a) of the Inheritance and Estate Tax
Act (72 P.S. ~ 9113(a)). A hearing de novo was scheduled before
this Court at which time the parties submitted the matter on
stipulated facts. Briefs were subsequently filed by each party.
This matter is now ready for disposition.
FINDINGS OF FACT~
The parties filed the following stipulation of facts which
we adopt for purposes of this opinion:
1) Thomas D. Neier, Decedent, died February 20, 1996,
residing in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, whereupon Letters
Testamentary were issued by the Register of Wills of Cumberland
County to the Petitioner on May 5, 1996.
2) On August 7, 1996, Petitioner filed the Pennsylvania
inheritance tax return with the Register of Wills of Cumberland
County.
3) On November 27, 1996, Petitioner filed a supplemental
Pennsylvania inheritance tax return, along with Schedules "M" and
NO. 21-96-0197 ORPHANS' ~OURT
"O", With-'the ~egister of Wills of Cumberland COunty''~' S~hedule
"O" is a form to make an election under § 9113(a) (SpoUsal _
distributions) .
4) Petitioner did not request an extension of time to file
its (sic) Pennsylvania inheritance tax return on a timely basis
pursuant to 72 P.S. § 9136(d).
5) Petitioner attached Schedules "M" and "0" to the
supplemental return filed nine months and seven days after
Decedent's date of death. The purpose of the supplemental return
was an attempt to elect that all of the assets in a trust created
for the sole use of the Decedent's surviving spouse during the
spouse's lifetime be treated as a taxable transfer in the
Decedent's estate pursuant to ~ 9113(a) of the Inheritance and
Estate Tax Act of 1991.
6) By attempting to make this election, Petitioner
attempted to choose to "prepay" inheritance tax on assets
presently valued at $123,050.56; the surviving spouse's remainder
interest.
7) Petitioner included a check with the supplemental Return
in the amount of $7,397.03, the amount of tax potentially due
under the prepayment election.
8) The Department of Revenue did not record this payment as
a prepayment under ~ 9113 (a); rather, the Department reduced the
amount due in the late filed supplemental return to zero and
recorded the $7,397.03 as a tax credit.
NO. 2 1-'96-0197 ~RPHANS'' COURT
9) On January '22, 1998, Petitioner protested~o~ the Bo%rd
of Appeals, Department of Revenue seeking a change in! this
application of the $7,397.03 amount to a prepayment under
9113(a) .
10) On February 9, 1998, the Board of Appeals of the
Department of Revenue denied Petitioner's Protest maintaining
that a ~ 9113(a) prepayment election cannot be made on a
supplemental return filed more than nine months after the death
of the Decedent.
11) The Commonwealth would benefit in the short term by
Decedent's spouse prepaying inheritance tax under § 9113 (a) , but
may not benefit in the long-term, depending on subsequent events,
if it permits this prepayment election, which it claims to be
filed late, to be deemed a valid election.
12) On April 8, 1998, the Department sent the Estate a
check in the amount of $7,397.03, as a refund.
DISCUSSION
The issue before us is whether the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania Department of Revenue correctly denied Petitioner's
election not to have Section 9113(a) apply to certain trust
assets.~ Since the election was made on a supplemental
~Section 9113 (a) of the Inheritance and Estate Tax Act
provides as follows:
(a) In the case of a transfer of property for the sole use
of the transferor's surviving spouse during the surviving
spouse's entire lifetime, all succeeding interests which
follow the interest of the surviving spouse shall not be
NO. 21-96-0197 ORPHANS' COURT
inherit'ance° 'tax return filed morgan nine months. ~after
Decedent's-death, the Commonwealth_ takes the position that-it was
not timely and, therefore, not valid.2 Petitioner argues that
the language in Section 9113 (a) is directory, not mandatory, as
to the time and manner for making the election. Additionally,
Petitioner argues that the Commonwealth's interpretation is
overly technical, works an undue hardship on her, and defeats the
purpose of the statute.
The crux of this case is whether the directive of the
statute that "the transferor's personal representative may elec%,
on a timely filed inheritance tax return" is mandatory as to time
and manner of the election. After a thorough review of the
briefs, as well as the applicable law cited therein, we are
satisfied that it is not.
Petitioner points out that the word "may" can never be
subject to tax as transfers by the transferor if the
transfer was made by a decedent dying on or after January 1,
1995, provided that the transferor's personal representative
may elect, on a timely filed inheritance tax return, to have
this section not apply to a trust or similar arrangement or
portion of a trust or similar arrangement.
72 P.S. ~ 9113(a)
2Section 9136(d) of the Inheritance and Estate Tax Act (72
P.S. ~ 9136(d)) provides that inheritance tax returns "shall be
filed within nine months after the death of the decedent."
However, it also provides that an extension of six months may be
granted if requested prior to the expiration of the original nine
months.
NO. 21-96-0197 ORPHANS' COURT
interpreted as being mandatory.3 Therefore/, she argues that the
statute is clearly directory and not mandatory. Unfortunately,
our decision is not quite that easy. The word "may" in Section
9113(a) applies to the making of the election itself. The
language referring to the time and manner of the election is
neither clearly directory nor clearly mandatory, it is neutral.4
However, we do agree with Petitioner that the language of
Section 9113(a) is directory. We base our conclusion on the
reasoning of the Superior Court in County of Allegheny v. Pa.
Pub. Util. Comm., 192 Pa. Super. 100, 159 A.2d 227 (1960). In
that case Allegheny County had entered into a contract with a
public utility which, due to an oversight, was not immediately
submitted to the Public Utility Commission as contemplated by the
parties and required by statute. Several years after the
effective date of the contract, Allegheny County attempted to
void it. The Superior Court was called upon to interpret section
911 of the. Public Utility Law, which provided, in relevant part,
3See Werner v. Hospital Serv. Plan of Lehigh Valley, 144
A.2d 575, 187 Pa. Super. 244 (1958). Werner held that
"[a]lthough the word 'shall' might, in a proper setting, be
interpreted as permissive, the word 'may' can never be given the
imperative meaning." 144 A.2d at 577.
4By contrast the various cases cited by the Commonwealth in
its brief dealt with statutes which were clearly mandatory. In
each of those cases the word "shall" or "must" was used when
referring to the time and manner of the election to be made or
the thing to be done. Those courts properly determined that such
strong language made time and manner of the essence of the thing
to be done. See e.q. FDIC v. Board of Fin. and Revenue, 368 Pa.
463, 84 A.2d 495 (1951), Biro v. Commonwealth, 707 A.2d 1205 (Pa.
Commw. Ct. 1998).
NO. 21-96-0197 ORPHANS' COURT
as follows:
No 'contraCt or agreement between any public utility~and~any
municipal corporation shall be valid unless filed'With the
commission at least thirty (30) days prior to its effective
date ....
66 P.S. ~ 1351. In holding that provision to be directory rather
than mandatory, the Court stated:
Where, as here, construing the language as mandatory would
so seriously impair the purpose of the statute as to amount
to a defeat of that purpose, we must consider its provisions
as directory. [citations omitted] When time and manner are
not the essence of the thing required to be done, the
statute will be regarded as directory and proceedings under
it will be held valid, even though the command of the
statute as to form and time has not been strictly obeyed.
[citation omitted] While the word 'shall' is used in
connection with the validity of the contract or agreement,
it is not used in connection with the procedure to be
employed in establishing such validity. In the latter
regard, time is not of the essence.
192 Pa. Super. at 110-111, 159 A.2d at 232-233.
Applying the reasoning of Allegheny to the case at bar, we
are convinced that the directive as to the time of the election
under Section 9113(a) should not be construed to be mandatory.
The Purpose of the instant statute is to raise revenue for the
Commonwealth and to allow taxpayers a choice as to when certain
assets will be taxed. If we were to construe the instant
language as mandatory, it would not only deprive petitioner of
her choice, it would also deprive the Commonwealth of current
revenue with no guarantee that it would be replaced with future
revenue. Since the election was made only nine months and seven
days after the decedent's death, and since the Commonwealth can
show no prejudice, we find that the election should be allowed.
NO. 21-96-0197 ORPHANS' COURT
DECREE NISI
!
AND NOW, this t day of SEPTEMBER, 1998, the action of
the Board of Appeals is reversed and Petitioner shall be
permitted to elect under Section 9113(a) of the Inheritance Tax
Act and to prepay inheritance tax with interest to November 17,
1996. Petitioner is directed to tender payment to the Department
of Revenue within ten (10) days after the date this order becomes
final. This order shall become final unless exceptions are filed
hereto within ten (10) days.
By the Court,
Carl C. Risch, Esquire
For the Petitioner
Nicholas J. Lamberti, Esquire
For the Commonwealth
Department of Revenue
:sld
/s/ Edward E. Guido
Edward E. Guido, ~J.