HomeMy WebLinkAbout99-780 supportRAYMOND H. KISS
Vo
PHYLLIS E. WILKE
· IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
· CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNS_Y_LVANIA
:
:
' NO. 99-00780 SUPPORT
:
· PACSES # 672101478
:
:
IN RE' PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
BEFORE GUIDO, J.
AND NOW, this
ORDER OF COURT
~"1~ day of AUGUST, 2000, for the reasons set forth in
the accompanying opinion, it is hereby ordered and directed as follows:
1 .) Defendant's child support obligation from November 12, 1999, through
March 31, 2000, is set at $385.51 per month.
2.) Defendant's child support obligation from April 1, 2000, forward set at
$1077.02 per month.
3.) Upon providing proof to the Domestic Relations Office and plaintiff that the
child is covered under her health insurance, defendant's child support obligation shall be
c.~educed t_9$1012.03 per month. Thereafter' defendant shall maintain health insurance
, .
~verag_¢~ilon the child.
4.) Except as modified herein, our order of September 9, 1999, shall remain in
full force and effect.
Jacqueline M. Vemey, Esquire
For the Plaintiff
By the
Matthew Eshelman, Esquire
For the Defendant
Domestic Relations Office
'sld
RAYMOND H. KISS
ge
PHYLLIS E. WILKE
· IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
· CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
o
· NO. 99-00780 SUPPORT "::" '
·
' PACSES # 672101478
·
IN RE: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
BEFORE GUIDO, J.
.OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT
On November 12, 1999, defendant filed a petition to decrease the current child
support order. On December 16, 1999, a conference was held in the Domestic Relations
Office. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Domestic Relations Officer, we denied
the Petition for Modification. Defendant filed a timely request for hearing de novo which
was held before this Court on May 18, 2000. The parties have filed briefs in support of
their respective positions. This matter is now ready for disposition.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1) The original support order was entered on September 9, 1999. Pursuant to that order,
defendant was directed to pay $677.00 per month for the support of her child Eva Rose
Wilke Kiss, bom July 1, 1998.
2) No appeal was filed from that order.
3) At the time of the entry of the original order, defendant was employed for the
Venator Group earning an annual salary of $70,000.
4) Defendant is an alcoholic. On September 15, 1999, she made arrangements to enter
into an inpatient alcohol treatment program.
99-00780 SUPPORT - PACSES # 672101478
5) Defendant entered into that program on September 29, 1999. Her inpatient treatment
continued through October 27, 1999.
6) After her release from the inpatient portion of the program, defendant entered into a
residential treatment program in New York City. She went to that location to be near her
daughter who was living in New Jersey.
7) Defendant actively looked for work while in New York City.
8) Defendant was released from the residential treatment program just before Christmas
in 1999.
9) Defendant actively pursued employment in her field, after her release from the
residential treatment program.
10) While defendant could not immediately find work in her field, she did find odd jobs
paying in the range of $7.50 per hour.
11) Defendant found work in her field effective April 1, 2000.1
12) Defendant currently works for Eckerd Drags in the Pittsburgh area at an annual
salary of $68,000.
13) Defendant's earning capacity from the date the petition was filed on November 12,
1999 through April 1, 2000, was $7.50 per hour or $1300 per month gross. This results
in a net monthly earning capacity of $1048.71.2
14) Since April 1, 2000, defendant has had an earning capacity or actual earnings of
$68,000 per year. Her net monthly eami.ngs from that time forward are $3883.54.
15) Plaintiff works for Delphi Automotive. At all relevant times, his net monthly
income has been $3526.
However, she elected to accept a different position that did not begin until April 10, 2000.
This presumes a filing status of single.
99-00780 SUPPORT - PACSES # 672101478
16) Plaintiff has primary custody of the parties' child.
17) Defendant visits with the child occasionally.
18) The plaintiff currently pays $124 per month to provide medical coveragE_for the
child.
19) Effective July 10, 2000, defendant's employer will provide medical coverage for the
child without charge.
20) At all relevant times, plaintiff has had and Will continue to have a child care expense
of $736 per month.
21) Defendant filed her petition to modify the existing order on November 12, 1999.
The effective date of any modification should be that date.
DISCUSSION
Defendant takes the position that she is entitled to a reduction in her support
obligation for the period of time that she was unemployed or underemployed as a result
of her treatment for alcoholism. Plaintiff argues that the modification is not warranted
because defendant deliberately and voluntarily quit her job to avoid paying child support.
Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1910.16-2(d) provides in relevant part as
follows'
(d) Reduced or Fluctuating Income.
(1) Voluntary Reduction of Income. Where a party voluntarily assumes a
lower paying job, there generally will be no effect on the support
obligation. A party will ordinarily not be relieved of a support obligation
by voluntarily quitting work or by being fired for cause.
(4) Income Potential. Ordinarily, a party who wilfully fails to obtain
appropriate employment will be considered to have an income equal to the
party's earning capacity. Age, education, training, health, work
experience, earnings history and child care responsibilities are factors
which shall be considered in determining earning capacity.
99-00780 SUPPORT - PACSES # 672101478
The term "ordinarily" used in the above role recognizes that there are certain
circumstances in which a voluntary reduction in income may result in a corresponding
reduction in child support. See Roberts v. Bockin, 315 Pa. Super. 52, 461 A.2d 65'0'
(1983).
The standard to be applied to cases such as the one before us was enunciated by
the Superior Court in Corimes v. Grimes, 408 Pa. Super. 158, 596 A.2d 240 (1991) as
follows:
to modify a support obligation based upon reduced income, a petitioner
must first establish that the voluntary change in employment which
resulted in a reduction of income was not made for the purpose of
avoiding a child support obligation and secondly, that a reduction in
support is warranted based on petitioner's efforts to mitigate any income
loss. In effect, petitioner must present evidence as to why he or she
voluntarily left the prior employment and also as to why the acceptance of
a lower paying job was necessary.
/d. at 163,596 A.2d at 242. We are satisfied that defendant has met the above standard.
Therefore, her petition for modification will be granted.
The parties do not dispute that defendant has been an alcoholic for many years. In
fact, her drunken failure to pick their daughter up from daycare was the precipitating
cause of their separation. What is in dispute is the timing, motive, and sincerity of
defendant's decision to quit her job in order to seek treatment for her alcoholism. Having
seen and heard the defendant testify, we are satisfied that her decision to seek treatment
was not in any way motivated by a desire to reduce or to avoid her child support
obligation. Rather, the decision stemmed from the realization that her life was spinning
out of control and that she needed professional help.
99-00780 SUPPORT - PACSES # 672101478
Furthermore, the defendant did everything in her power to mitigate her income
loss. She actively sought employment in New York City while in the residential
treatment portion of the program. She actively pursued work in her field as soon as she
completed her treatment. We were particularly impressed by the extent of her efforts to
obtain another job in her field. It took her only about three months to find a job earning
substantially the same amount she was earning at the time the original order was entered..
Based upon the findings of fact set forth above, we will set defendant's child
support obligation at $385.51 from November 12, 1999, through March 31, 2000.3 The
obligation shall be increased to $1077.02 effective April 1, 2000.4 It shall be decreased
to $1012.03 per month upon defendant providing proof to the plaintiff and the Domestic
Relations Office that the child is covered under her medical insurance.5
AND NOW, this
ORDER OF COURT
day of AUGUST, 2000, for the reasons set forth in
the accompanying opinion, it is hereby ordered and directed as follows:
1.) Defendant's child support obligation from November 12, 1999, through
March 31, 2000, is set at $385.51 per month.
2.) Defendant's child support obligation from April 1, 2000, forward is set at
$1077.02 per month.
3.) Upon providing proof to the Domestic Relations Office and plaintiff that the
child is covered under her health insurance, defendant's child support obligation shall be
The guideline calculations is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
The guideline calculations are attached hereto as Exhibit B.
The guideline calculations eliminating plaintiff's cost for health insurance is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
99-00780 SUPPORT - PACSES # 672101478
reduced to $1012.03 per month. Thereafter, defendant shall maintain health insurance
coverage on the child.
4.) Except as modified herein, our order of September 9, 1999, shall remain in
full force and effect.
By the Court,
/s/Edward E. Guido
Edward E. Guido, J.
Jacqueline M. Vemey, Esquire
For the Plaintiff
Matthew Eshelman, Esquire
For the Defendant
Domestic Relations Office
:sld
8 C~ ................................................ --..: ...................... ~ .............. . SENSUlDEUN[}
I~~rtmt
$750 x 40 = 300~ grcss
(]nJ_ldc~m~ $736/nnnth
Hsalth ~ $124Jrgnth
12, 1999 to IVbrd% 31, 2000
EXHIBIT A
Auditi01fi~i Fa?iiyi i!!t--I !i}ii '. i} i }~i..',,,:,.':::i.i~',;!.ii:',~i } ii} i:: ','i ! !! ?'!:: ",: :::i.i. 'l~ i ?~}~: :}::~::~:~::'~}: ~?~:;'~:~ ~:~ ~' ~ : ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ :~} ~
Ifi~iUde~+~- ~:~ ~hil~d:'~0~¢~'~'::~:: ...... ~'~ ...... }'l'~'~h'~}'h'~"F~'~h'~'" [YI ~ASditi'°n'al"'N'ee~'~'~'i I'~ .... t'/l~'i~a[~'"~"'~ .... ~""~'~ '~'.'~ ...... ~
[.~0~nb~..b~.Cb. il.B~$~!.~ReS, i'ding:'wit.t'~...' ~ ..... t................ .... ....... ... :1"1'. .... ........ :. .... :......::..:.....~ ..... .I ...... z I':::~:~:.:~ ~:..
MOnthi;~~.?;Jet Ir~40me :~ ~~ ;~ ':l so.s.~4 I.:'. s~.~.oo I~ ........... ....
COmbined..rVlopt}i!y Net Inco~ne ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o~54 ~
-.: ::::::::::::::::::::: .... ::.:::-:~ .... :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: =============================================================== ::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::: . .-::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ...... :::: ....... :..:~...:::::::::::
Defendant /;Plaintiff
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ....... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :: :: :::. ::: : : : :::::::- : : : : ::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
~.~-~I.---~-- · ~ ~J ! ~[:':: ::':[~::' ':::~:: :':: "::::":::' '::: =====================~.~ i.-, ~% ======================================================== :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~ ~::: : :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~ ~' ' :::: '::::::::::::::::::
..~a:c.n::r,.~ren~':~-::uulue,lne::uu.,~.........=........_ q~t,u-,': .................... · .................... ' ..................... · ............................. ~.-:~:,:~-- .............. ':::' .......... ':' ...... ' ........... --~:,::~ .............. ·
......... .... ' .......... ':: ~ ...... i:":: ' :':"::::-~ ...... "~";:'~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ..... ......... · .................. '6~:::99 ...... ' .... ':: ...... ': ::'
'Insurance .Pr:~m!:u~n:.Ad/u.otm ~::~:. t:.:~::~::.:~::~:~:: ..~: ~... .... .....................
~0talO. bligati0fi'¢VitP ~dji3stmerhts~ ~ ~ :~ :~; ~ io~;o~ .~ ~ :: ; ~ .
=================================================================== :: ============================================================================== :.:.:::.::::: ::::: : :-::::::. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .-:-.: : ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
..
~'~c~'~'.~ ...... ~"':';'~ .... .'. ............. r:~'[x~ ....... '"'~:":;", ........... "~.'~'~"~:";~'~:"~ ....... ~"~"~'['~,',[~;~'~u~.o'~L.~.:~["'l'''~'','['r~'',~','~','~['c~,~,,'s~'~ ....... ~ ...... ~ .... ~':'"'~"'~"
::: :...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:/::.:::.:.:j.:.:.:.:.:.:.: :.:.:/.:.:.:::.:.:.:.............:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:/.:.:.:.:/.:.:.:.:.:.:.:...U :.:.: :.:.:.:.:.:.: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.:.:.:.u.:.:.:.://.:.'/J.'.:J.:/.:.:.:.:.~.:.:.:.:.:.:.'/.:.:.:.:.:/.:.:/. ,u.:.:.'.:.:.:.:..:...: :.:...:J/..'.:.u.:.:.U.:.:.U.: ::.: u.u:
EXHIBIT- B
"C~SE 1~:"it672t0147_,8 Ii ~ i R~~OND Hi KISS
include! i Child care!~ ir:~sur~n~ep~emi I I ~ AdSi(i°nal
~oo~. ~ =~=..~. oo I
:co:rnbined~Men~tply Net i;r~come ~ ~ ::
MOnthly SUbPO~-; ; ~ ;::::.:~:~::~:~:~:~-~:: .............. ' .
'....: - ............................................ .: ............... ..:::~:~ ~:::~::::::: ! 1~ oo I
" '::::'::::::: :~:::: :::' :: :: 0 ': :: :: ::' :' ' : ~':::: : ": :::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ":: .... :::::::::::::::::::::::: ==============================================================
.................................................................... . :::::: :::: : : ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
- f.. '.: ::,.:..:':::. ::...~. :.,...~:~ .... '..:::..:: ============================== :::::::::::::::-:: :-: . ~ ~:~:~'~;~:~..::"~...:...:;~;
TOtal Obligatio~ ~/i~h Adjustments
TOta. I..Mon.th!, ....... %~ .... ~ ...............................
E~fe~ant $68,0~ arn~al ~
Ch~ ]~ $736/rrcnth
EXHIBIT - C