Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-04231 CIVIL DESIREE M. NICKLE, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF Plaintiff CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION-LAW v. JASON B. JUMPER, NO. 2015-4231 CIVIL TERM Defendant CUSTODY OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT HYAMS, J., MARCH 29, 2021 I. PREAMBLE A very wise person who remains anonymous once said on the topic of Co-parenting: compete. You will never win, and your child will lose. Collaboration does not mean you must always agree. Compromise, pick your battles, and back each other Anonymous II. BACKGROUND The parents have each filed Modification Petitions and have whittled down the outstanding issues to the very narrow issue of which school district the child should be attending starting the 2021/2022 school year. The child is currently in the first grade at Kindergarten until the pandemic caused school closures in March 2020. Father lives in o live at least part time in his household (half siblings and step siblings) who attend CASD. The Mother works in Carlisle during the school week, and therefore the child attends a daycare program approximately fifteen minutes away from Mothers home before and after school on the he is self-employed and he does not schedule himself to work if his children are in his care and not in school. The physical custody schedule is 50/50 with Mother having the child Monday, Thursday and every other weekend and Father having the child Tuesday, Wednesday and every other weekend. The parents agree that the physical custody schedule works well and should not change. III. FINDINGS the child factors and an analysis of the testimony and evidence presented at the March 25, 2021 hearing as it relates to those factors. Although Mother presented evidence on the rankings between the schools and school districts involved, both parents conceded that they child might be negatively to be the most convenient when all things were considered in terms of both households and the work schedules/distances involved. He also felt the child would perform well in his district because she would be attending the same school and riding the bus with a step sibling with whom she is very close. Following careful analysis of all the best interest custodial factors in relation to this narrow issue of school district, the court finds that it is in the best interest of the child to remain in her current school district and change th entering the 4 grade. IV. DISCUSSION ng to do with pointing out our faults and everything to do L.R. Knost ORDER OF COURT th AND NOW this 29day of March, 2021, after a hearing in the above captioned action, it is hereby Ordered and Directed as follows with regard to the custody of the minor child, S.R.J.: The custody order dated February 10, 2021 shall remain in full force and effect with the modification that S.R.J. will continue to attend her current school within the Boiling Springs ndrdth school district for 2and 3grade. The child will begin to attend 4 school district, Carlisle Area School District. If there is a substantial change within a accordance with this opinion, the parties may mutually agree to modify the terms of this court order. However, if there is a substantial change (par school performance drastically changes, etc.), and the parties cannot mutually agree to modify the order of court, either party may file a Motion for Modification. BY THE COURT: _________________________ The Honorable Carrie E. Hyams Jeanne B. Costopoulos, Esq. PO Box 22018 Sarasota, FL 34276 Counsel for the Plaintiff Jason B. Jumper 30 Willow Grove Rd. Carlisle, PA 17013 Pro Se Defendant