HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-1267 supportELIZABETH C. MENGLE,
Plaintiff
VS.
DAVID C. MENGLE,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
1267 SUPPORT 1994
DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION
DR 23,434
ORDER
AND NOW, this ]Z * day of December, 2000, our order of June 8, 2000, is amended
to provide that the payor shail pay on account of this support order the sum of $660.00 per
month. It is further directed that unreimbursed medical expenses, exceeding $250.00 annually,
shall be paid 66% by defendant and 33% by the plaintiff. All other terms and conditions of our
order of June 8, 2000, including the effective date thereof, shall remain in full force and effect.
BY THE COURT,
DRO
K~A. Hess, J.
Rebecca Hughes, Esquire
For the Plaintiff
Keith O. Brenneman, Esquire
For the Defendant
'rlm
ELIZABETH C. MENGLE,
Plaintiff
VS.
DAVID C. MENGLE,
Defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
1267 SUPPORT 1994
DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION
DR 23,434
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This is a case involving the support of three children. The child, Benjamin Mengle, born
July 12, 1983, is in the primary physical custody of his mother. The parties share equally
physical custody of the remaining two children, Cera, bom November 7, 1987, and Forrest, bom
May 20, 1987. Both parties recognize that there is no formula in the Pennsylvania Support
Guidelines which address this situation. The entry of our order in this case is based upon the
following calculations.
We ascribe to the plaintiff an income/earning potential of $2,000 net per month. To the
defendant, we ascribe a monthly net income of $4,000. The time which each parent spends with
the children is equivalent to Mr. Mengle having primary physical custody of one child and Ms.
Mengle having primary physical custody of two children. Mr. Mengle' s share of support for two
children is $1,011.12 per month. Ms. Mengle's share of the support of one child is $351.45.
After the necessary subtraction, we are left with the appropriate monthly support in this case of
$660.00. No adjustment shall be made for medical insurance coverage paid for by the defendant
as said medical coverage is redundant and there is, in any event, no additional cost associated
with the beneficiaries of this order.
ORDER
AND NOW, this /Z-~' day of December, 2000, our order of June 8, 2000, is amended
to provide that the payor shall pay on account of this support order the sum of $660.00 per
month. It is further directed that unreimbursed medical expenses, exceeding $250.00 annually,
shall be paid 66% by defendant and 33% by the plaintiff. All other terms and conditions of our
order of June 8, 2000, including the effective date thereof, shall remain in full force and effect.
BY THE COURT,
DRO
Rebecca Hughes, Esquire
For the Plaintiff
Keith O. Brenneman, Esquire
For the Defendant
K/A. Hess, J.
:rim