HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-117 MiscellaneousCOMMONWEALTH
ALL THAT CERTAIN LOT OR
PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED
AT 336 OLD GETTYSBURG
PIKE, MECHANICSBURG,
PENNSYLVANIA, AND
DESCRIBED WITH
PARTICULARITY AT DEED
BOOK 147, PAGE 680,
RECORDER OF DEEDS OFFICE,
CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
: 02-117 MISCELLANEOUS
PETITION FOR FORFEITURE
BEFORE HESS. J.
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter arises from the forfeiture and condemnation of real property, pursuant to the
Controlled Substances Act, 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 6801 et seq. The defendant/real property is real
estate located at 336 Old Gettysburg Pike, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, along with all
its improvements, appurtenances, buildings, and structures.~ The owner of the property is one
Roxanne E. Weaver, the claimant in this matter, and the lien holder is Principal Residential
Mortgage, Inc., of Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County.
The seizure of the property by the Commonwealth came about as the result of
investigations that began in May, 2001, conducted by agents of the Office of the Attorney
General, Bureau of Narcotics Investigation and Drug Control. On May 12, 2001, Bureau agents
~ As described in Deed Book No. 147, p. 680, Recorder of Deeds Office, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.
02-117 MISC.
received a tip from an informant that one Adam Chronister was engaged in the distribution of
marijuana. The informant indicated that he had purchased marijuana from Chronister in the past
and that Chronister was living with his girlfriend, Carly Weaver, and her parents, Roxanne and
James Weaver, at the residence that is the subject of this action. The phone number provided by
the informant as the one at which Chronister could be contacted was later determined to be
assigned to James Weaver at the 336 Old Gettysburg Pike property.
The informant also indicated that he had purchased marijuana from Chronister at the
subject property and that Roxanne and James Weaver were present in the residence during the
time that the transaction occurred. Furthermore, the informant told the Bureau agents that pound
quantities of marijuana were visible in the living room of the residence.
On the basis of this information, one of the Bureau agents directed the informant to
contact Chronister at the above-mentioned telephone number in order to set up a meeting to
purchase marijuana. This meeting occurred, as did a number of subsequent meetings. At
Chronister's direction, the last took place at the Weaver residence. On numerous other
occasions, Bureau agents followed Chronister to and/or from the 336 Old Gettysburg Pike
residence before and after these transactions. The culmination of these transactions was the
arrest of Chronister: he was charged with three counts of Possession With Intent To Deliver and
one count of Criminal Conspiracy.
Upon Chronister's arrest, a search warrant was executed on the residence at 336 Old
Gettysburg Pike. The search discovered various quantities of marijuana, books on
manufacturing marijuana, and a duffle bag containing $3,720.00. In addition, not far from where
James Weaver was sitting, there was an open duffle bag containing seven pounds of marijuana
02-117 MISC.
packaged in freezer bags.
be accurate:
Moreover, we find the scene, as described by the Commonwealth, to
While Mr. Weaver sat at the coffee table
manicuring marijuana, Roxanne Weaver was in the
kitchen preparing dinner. The marijuana in the
house on the day of the search warrant was
packaged identically to the marijuana purchased by
the informant on a prior occasion and the
marijuana seized from Chronister on the day of his
arrest.
Letter Brief in Support of Commonwealth' s Position, at 3.
A number of individuals have testified on the claimant's behalf. Adam Chronister
testified that he dealt large quantities of marijuana out of his car, but that he never kept marijuana
in the Weaver household, aside from the particular day on which the search warrant was
executed. The credibility of this testimony is, at best, questionable. Among other things, it is
belied by a June 6, 2001, recording wherein Chronister tells the informant that he has "more
[marijuana] nuggets at home."
James Weaver testified that he was unaware of Chronister's illegal transactions. As the
Commonwealth points out, this testimony, too, is questionable in light of Mr. Weaver's plea of
guilty to Criminal Conspiracy with Chronister to deliver marijuana. This conclusion is bolstered
by his statement to the Court, during his sentencing proceeding, that he "knew what was going
on in the home was not right." Transcript of Sentencing Proceeding of April 2, 2002, at 7.
Roxanne Weaver has testified that she had knowledge of neither the seven pounds of
marijuana that were discovered in her home, nor of Adam Chronister's drug dealing activities
out of her home.
02-117 MISC.
Pursuant to the Drug Forfeiture Act, the Commonwealth bears the initial burden of
showing the existence of a nexus between the unlawful activity and the property subject to the
forfeiture. Once the nexus is established, the burden shifts to the claimant to establish the
innocent owner defense. Com. v. $2523.48 U.S. Currency, 538 Pa. 551,694 A.2d 658 (Pa.
1994). The Forfeiture Act provides the following regarding an owner's burden of proof:
(j) Owner's Burden of Proof. - At the time of the
hearing, if the Commonwealth produces evidence
that the property in question was unlawfully used,
possessed or otherwise subject to forfeiture under
section 6801(a), the burden shall be upon the
claimant to show:
(3) That it was not unlawfully used or possessed by
him. In the event that it shall appear that the
property was unlawfully used or possessed by a
person other than the claimant, then the claimant
shall show that the unlawful use or possession was
without his knowledge or consent. Such absence
of knowledge or consent must be reasonable under
the circumstances presented.
42 Pa. C.S.A. {} 6802(j). The question thus arises whether the law requires proof that it was
"reasonable under the circumstances" for the particular owner, who is challenging the forfeiture,
to have known about the unlawful use or possession of the property, or must the owner
demonstrate that it was reasonable for any owner to have lacked knowledge concerning the
unlawful activities.
The claimant argues that the latter standard imposes a greater burden on the owner "in
that his or her alertness would have to be compared to any other owner's in a similar situation."
Letter Brief in Support of Claimant's Position, at 1. In Com. v. $ 2523.48 U.S. Currency, the
court dealt with this query in the context of a case where the unlawful use or possession was
without the owner's consent:
02-117 MISC.
The standard for determining lack of consent is not
whether the property owner did as much as another
property owner did to prevent illegal activity. As
we stated earlier, the standard is one of
reasonableness; what is reasonable for one
property owner may not be reasonable for another.
All of the circumstances surrounding the property
owner's actions, or lack of action, must be
considered in determining if they were reasonable.
Com. v. $ 2523.48 U.S. Currency, 649 A.2d at 661-62. The claimant points out that the
Forfeiture Act's language, "reasonable under the circumstances," modifies both "knowledge"
and "consent." We agree with the claimant that it is logical to conclude that that the standard for
"knowledge" would be the same as that set forth by our Supreme Court for "consent."
Hence, the dispositive question here is whether it was reasonable under the circumstances
for Roxanne Weaver to have lacked knowledge of Adam Chronister's illegal drug activities on
her property. The claimant contends that, applying the above standard, and because "[t]he
commonwealth's evidence was not substantial," Ms. Weaver's supposed lack of knowledge
would be reasonable. We disagree.
Roxanne Weaver admitted that she was being supplied with marijuana by Chronister
while he was staying in her home. She admitted that she was aware that Chronister was
cultivating marijuana plants on her property and, too, that she suspected that he would harvest
these plants. Ms. Weaver realized that the use of marijuana in her home was a frequent
occurrence--use not just by others, but, also, by herself. She admitted having full knowledge of
her husband's drug-related history. In sum, Ms. Weaver can only be assumed to be familiar with
the appearance, smell, handling, growth, and other pertinent characteristics of marijuana.
Nevertheless, her counsel argues that "the household's regular use of marijuana would have
02-117 MISC.
permeated the air, thus prohibiting her from noticing the smell of large quantities found...
during the search." Letter Brief in Support of Claimant's Position, at 5. We are not convinced.
To the contrary, it was decidedly unreasonable, under the circumstances, for Roxanne Weaver to
have been without knowledge of illegal drug activities on her property.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2003, upon consideration of the petition and after
hearing, it is ordered and decreed as follows:
The prayer of the petition is granted.
All claims of right, title or interest ofRoxanne E. Weaver and James M. Weaver, and any
other claimant in the defendant/real property except that of Principal Residential Mortgage, Inc.,
and all other valid liens and encumbrances perfected on the defendant/real property before the
date of seizure which is March 4, 2002, are hereby declared to be terminated, revoked and
rendered null and void. The real estate located at 336 Old Gettysburg Pike, Mechanicsburg,
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, as described with particularity in Deed Book 147, Page 680,
Recorder of Deeds Office, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, and as attached, along with all of
its improvements, appurtenances, buildings, structures and all other items, is hereby condemned
and forfeited to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of Attorney General, pursuant to the
Judicial Code, Chapter 68, Controlled Substances Forfeitures Act, Sections 6801-6802, 42
Pennsylvania C. $.A. Section 6801 et seq., for distribution, use or disposition in accordance with
law.
When and if the defendant/real property is sold, the net proceeds of said sale shall be
forfeited, after all valid liens and encumbrances, which includes the Principal Residential
Mortgage, Inc.'s note secured by its mortgage on the defendant/real property, and all expenses of
6
02-117 MISC.
forfeiture and sale thereof have been deducted and paid to the proper authorities, to the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of Attorney General, and the Cumberland County
District Attorney's Office pursuant to the Controlled Substances Forfeitures Act, an Act of June
30, 1988, Act No. 1988-79, 42 Pennsylvania C.S.A. Section 6801 et seq.
This order shall be recorded in the Recorder of Deeds Office for Cumberland County as
proof of judgment and transfer of title to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of Attorney
General, in order that the property may be sold.
Any persons residing in said residence shall vacate the premises within forty-five (45)
days of service of this order.
residence.
Service shall be made by delivering a copy of this order to the
BY THE COURT,
Doreena C. Sloan, Esquire
Deputy Attorney General
Robert N. Tarman, Esquire
For the Claimants
Jonah D. Levin, Esquire
For Principal Residential Mortgage, Inc.
:rlm
Kevin A. Hess, J.
02-117 MISC.
COMMONWEALTH
ALL THAT CERTAIN LOT OR
PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED
AT 336 OLD GETTYSBURG
PIKE, MECHANICSBURG,
PENNSYLVANIA, AND
DESCRIBED WITH
PARTICULARITY AT DEED
BOOK 147, PAGE 680,
RECORDER OF DEEDS OFFICE,
CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
02-117 MISCELLANEOUS
IN RE: PETITION FOR FORFEITURE
BEFORE HESS. J.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2003, upon consideration of the petition and after
hearing, it is ordered and decreed as follows:
The prayer of the petition is granted.
All claims of right, title or interest ofRoxanne E. Weaver and James M. Weaver, and any
other claimant in the defendant/real property except that of Principal Residential Mortgage, Inc.,
and all other valid liens and encumbrances perfected on the defendant/real property before the
date of seizure which is March 4, 2002, are hereby declared to be terminated, revoked and
rendered null and void. The real estate located at 336 Old Gettysburg Pike, Mechanicsburg,
Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, as described with particularity in Deed Book 147, Page 680,
Recorder of Deeds Office, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, and as attached, along with all of
its improvements, appurtenances, buildings, structures and all other items, is hereby condemned
and forfeited to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of Attorney General, pursuant to the
Judicial Code, Chapter 68, Controlled Substances Forfeitures Act, Sections 6801-6802, 42
Pennsylvania C.S.A. Section 6801 et seq., for distribution, use or disposition in accordance with
law.
When and if the defendant/real property is sold, the net proceeds of said sale shall be
forfeited, after all valid liens and encumbrances, which includes the Principal Residential
Mortgage, Inc.'s note secured by its mortgage on the defendant/real property, and all expenses of
forfeiture and sale thereof have been deducted and paid to the proper authorities, to the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of Attorney General, and the Cumberland County
District Attorney's Office pursuant to the Controlled Substances Forfeitures Act, an Act of June
30, 1988, Act No. 1988-79, 42 Pennsylvania C.S.A. Section 6801 et seq.
This order shall be recorded in the Recorder of Deeds Office for Cumberland County as
proof of judgment and transfer of title to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of Attorney
General, in order that the property may be sold.
Any persons residing in said residence shall vacate the premises within forty-five (45)
days of service of this order.
residence.
Service shall be made by delivering a copy of this order to the
BY THE COURT,
Kevin A. Hess, J.
Doreena C. Sloan, Esquire
Deputy Attorney General
Robert N. Tarman, Esquire
For the Claimams
Jonah D. Levin, Esquire
For Principal Residemial Mortgage, Inc.
:rlm