Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1863.Aug041.1-2 t / , /< ,(4_ kJ- L 7 4 f/G/ 3 c f 7 4- c- � L L- �Y � L L L" O - � CAL /4 & 7 ( j 3 /2 • L // J t r!!y „S /( 2Y t Ay7;j J d c e J 1��p -Y�- ems. 4_..4.4. c ic�v, ago `-” djl`/l��^--- OP /G.—C ; C X (7-te--4- Elk•-•••-•--140 . ( 1:' e....-2.-s 1. 7 ; C-1..-Ir....--e 1;4 , p et ,„ t C Y 1 c /l /c /f / j • ✓cI z. cel) ut. "X( 4, Cr (4..& ar c,,, /7' , +S l Ftc • �c ( r C t C I. l°l�s 7 etnL c i GC-cc i2� r 21 tr t4fU C' i.l, / / , e • / - -e e % .�. -7 /�-C./ di C eC e c�dc--or, 7 -../ z".._.2 71 . /•0 1 -71_ / , ,,--- i 1/1 t . 27/ f, % -,� I. eumh Land (f untq, oo. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to the Sheriff of Cumberland County, CM.12-iLW Oa qui Etaao 7 l a� in the Court of Common Pleas, to wit, of the term of , ,,. in the year of our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and fifty F before J.R.MES H. GRAHAM, Esq., and his associate Judges of the same Court, did, by consideration of the same Court, recover against f /r /1 late of your county, az a certain sum of e<LLe4, =Z1 d6<2u4, ��,, �� y f i 6 lawful money of Pennsylvania, debt, as also CYu-e -e F-«, . C� Y� L� which to the, id in the same Court were likewise adjudged for 4, damages which Z_ sustained by occasion of the detention of that debt, whereof the said convict as appears of record, V. • • AND wolawszz.,1 the said Judgment to preserve the Lien, according to the act of as- sembly in such case made and provided, should be revived, as is suggested to us by the said riGu Y�.G..c so -i L7 "2/._ as also execution of said Judgment remains to be made, as on the information of the said we have received, and we being willing that those things which in our same Court are rightly acted, should be brought to due execution ; THEREFORE, we coznznand you that, by good and lawful men of your bailiwick, you make known to the said that / be and aprar before our said Judges at Carlisle, at our Court of Common Pleas, there to beheld the sjeaut .Monday of • next, to show cause, if any / X why the said ought not to have - y said judgment revived as aforesaid, and why he ought not to have execution against for 'i debt and damages