HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-879
RANDA J. TODD, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff/Respondent : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
:
:
:
v.
: DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION
:
:
DENNIS M. BERDANIER, : No. 99-879 CIVIL
Defendant/Petitioner : PACSES NO. 624110738
ORDER OF COURT
th
AND NOW
, this 6 day of June, 2012, following the Non-Jury trial and upon
consideration of the briefs filed by the parties,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DIRECTED
that the Defendant’s Petition to Modify
GRANTEDTERMINATED.
is . The Defendant’s alimony obligation is The termination shall
beretroactive to December 22, 2010.
By the Court,
M. L. Ebert, Jr., J.
Ann V. Levin, Esquire
Attorney for Plaintiff
Lori K. Serratelli, Esquire
Attorney for Defendant
RANDA J. TODD, : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
Plaintiff/Respondent : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
:
:
:
:
v.
: DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION
:
:
DENNIS M. BERDANIER, : No. 99-879 CIVIL
Defendant/Petitioner : PACSES NO. 624110738
OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT
Ebert, J., June 6, 2012-
Background
Before this Court is Mr. Berdanier’s Petition to Modify or terminate alimony payments
1
to Ms. Todd. Mr. Berdanier (“Petitioner”) is 61 years of age and Ms. Todd (“Respondent”) is 65
23
years of age. The parties were married in June of 1984. This was Petitioner’s first marriage
and Respondent’s second marriage. The marriage lasted approximately 5 years until 1988-1989
4
when the parties separated. On August 23, 2000, the parties entered into an agreement and
5
stipulation resolving the economic issues of their divorce. On November 29, 2000, an Order was
entered for parties to file a praecipe to transmit the record of the August 23, 2000, proceedings so
that a final divorce decree could be entered incorporating the terms of the agreement. Pursuant to
6
the agreement, Petitioner was to pay Respondent $500 per month in alimony.
1
Petition to Modify, filed Dec. 22, 2010.
2
Notes of Testimony 4, 40 [hereinafter N.T. __].
3
N.T. 4, 41.
4
N.T. 4-5.
5
N.T. 3-4; Petitioner’s Exhibit 1 [hereinafter Pet.’s Ex. __].
6
N.T. 6; Pet.’s Ex. 1.
1
Dennis M. Berdanier
Petitioner was employed as a woodworker by the Defense Department in New
7
Cumberland, Pennsylvania for the past 30 years. Pursuant to the FERS retirement system,
Petitioner was eligible for retirement after attaining the age of 60 and completing 30 years of
89
service. In October of 2010, Petitioner reached those milestones and retired. Petitioner’s ending
10
salary was approximately $41,000 a year. Currently, Petitioner receives a $1,442.48 monthly
11
annuity payment. Petitioner has a joint checking account and savings account with his current
12
wife with a balance of $1,450 and $3,000, respectively.
13
After retirement, in March 2011, Petitioner was diagnosed with colon cancer.
Petitioner’s cancer appears to be in remission after surgery and chemotherapy treatments in
14
2011. As a result of the cancer, Petitioner exhibited symptoms including numbness, depression,
15
nausea, and a decrease in energy level. Additionally, Petitioner has learned that he suffers from
scarring on his lung that results in a shortness of breath, a deteriorated lower spine, liver damage,
16
and a herniated abdomen which will require additional surgery.
17
Petitioner stated that his current total household expenses were $3,900 per month.
These expenses include all household expenses such as utilities, auto insurance, car payments,
7
N.T. 6-7.
8
N.T. 8.
9
N.T. 8.
10
N.T. 9-11, 28; Pet.’s Ex. 2.
11
N.T. 11-13; Pet.’s Ex. 3.
12
N.T. 35-36.
13
N.T. 13.
14
N.T. 13.
15
N.T. 14.
16
N.T. 14-15.
17
N.T. 31.
2
18
health insurance, student loans, and food. However, these expenses include costs associated
with Petitioner’s current wife and thus, the total amount of expenses is less than the $3,900 per
19
month initially estimated.
Randa Jean Todd
Respondent has an Associate’s degree from Harrisburg Area Community College in
20
Human Services. Respondent was employed for 9.5 years with the Department of Commerce
21
as a crew leader or an interviewer with the Census Bureau. Her employment with the federal
22
government ended in 1991.
After working for the Department of Commerce, Respondent worked as the Director of
23
the Domestic Violence Shelter at the Harrisburg YWCA between 1998-1999. Again, this was
almost 10 years after the couple separated. Respondent claims that she was fired from the
24
YWCA because she “mentioned” at work that Petitioner had thrown a sawhorse at her. She
claims that the YWCA could not have an abused spouse working as a Director of the Domestic
25
Violence Shelter. The Respondent provided no other evidence to support this allegation, and
this Court having worked with victims services for many, many years does not find the
Respondent’s account of her firing credible.
In 1999, Respondent filed for and now receives social security disability in the amount of
26
$855 per month due to back and spine related injuries. Since 2001, Respondent has been
18
N.T. 31-33.
19
N.T. 32-33.
20
N.T. 40.
21
N.T. 41.
22
N.T. 42.
23
N.T. 42.
24
N.T. 43.
25
N.T. 43.
26
N.T. 44, 69.
3
2728
receiving Medicare. Respondent does not receive any other source of income. Respondent has
29
estimated her monthly expenses at $1,441.25.
Respondent receives housing assistance from HUD to live in a mid-income apartment for
30
senior citizens. Respondent’s rent is $476 per month but only pays $82 per month out of
31
pocket. Respondent has an Agency on Aging waiver which provides her help through a worker
that does chores around the house such as laundry, cooking, cleaning, and grocery shopping five
32
days a week for 2-5 hours per day. Wegman’s provides Respondent with unsold fruits,
33
vegetables and bread. Respondent has, in the past, received assistance from the Lions Club for
34
vision screening and glasses. In addition to the county, state, and federal assistance helping
35
Respondent with living expenses, she has received help from her church community and son.
36
Respondent has been diagnosed with a multitude of medical conditions. Respondent’s
past and present medical conditions include, inter alia, breast cancer, atrial defibrillation,
shortness of breath, kidney stones, arthritis, shingles, depression, bladder incontinence, visual
37
impairment, obesity, and hypothyroidism. Respondent is on a regimen of medications and
38
vitamins to regulate her illnesses. For the past two years Respondent has been using a
wheelchair, however, she can self-transfer in and out of the wheelchair when necessary and
39
operates an accessible van. Although Respondent’s doctors have recommended back surgery,
27
N.T. 45.
28
N.T. 45.
29
Respondent’s Exhibit 9 [hereinafter Res.’s Ex. __].
30
N.T. 39-40.
31
N.T. 40, 60.
32
N.T. 54.
33
N.T. 60.
34
N.T. 56.
35
N.T. 60.
36
N.T. 51-52.
37
N.T. 52.
38
N.T. 71.
39
N.T. 73.
4
40
she has refused the surgery because “it is just too invasive for [her].” Respondent has qualified
41
to live in a skilled nursing facility, but she has decided to remain living on her own.
Discussion
“[T]he Divorce Code expressly provides that any alimony order may be modified,
suspended, terminated, reinstated or a new order made upon changed circumstances.” McFadden
v. McFadden, 563 A.2d 180, 183 (Pa. Super. 1989) (internal quotations omitted). An obligor
may seek a modification of an existing alimony order when the changed economic circumstances
are continuous and substantial. Id. at 182. “Pennsylvania case law clearly establishes that
retirement can serve as the basis for the changed circumstances of a substantial and continuing
nature necessary to modify an alimony award.” Id. at 183 (noting that voluntary retirement
qualifies as a substantial change).
In considering a modification of an alimony award “the court must consider all relevant,
including those statutorily prescribed for at 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 3701, Alimony, (b) Relevant Factors
(1)-(17).” Isralsky v. Isralsky, 824 A.2d 1178, 1188 (Pa. Super. 2003). The factors enumerated in
section 3701 used in determining the “nature, amount, duration and manner of payment of
alimony” are as follows:
(1) The relative earning and earning capacities of the parties.
(2) The ages and the physical, mental and emotional conditions of the parties.
(3) The sources of income of both parties, including, but not limited to, medical,
retirement, insurance or other benefits.
(4) The expectations and inheritances of the parties.
(5) The duration of the marriage.
40
N.T. 72.
41
N.T. 71.
5
(6) The contribution by one party to the education, training or increased earning
power of the other party.
(7) The extent to which the earning power, expenses or financial obligations of a
party will be affected by reason of serving as the custodian of a minor child.
(8) The standard of living of the parties established during the marriage.
(9) The relative education of the parties and the time necessary to acquire
sufficient education or training to enable the party seeking alimony to find
appropriate employment.
(10) The relative assets and liabilities of the parties.
(11) The property brought to the marriage by either party.
(12) The contribution of a spouse as homemaker.
(13) The relative needs of the parties.
(14) The marital misconduct of either of the parties during the marriage. The
marital misconduct of either of the parties from the date of final separation shall
not be considered by the court in its determinations relative to alimony except that
the court shall consider the abuse of one party by the other party. As used in this
paragraph, “abuse” shall have the meaning given to it under section 6102 (relating
to definitions).
(15) The Federal, State and local tax ramifications of the alimony award.
(16) Whether the party seeking alimony lacks sufficient property, including, but
not limited to, property distributed under Chapter 35 (relating to property rights),
to provide for the party's reasonable needs.
(17) Whether the party seeking alimony is incapable of self-support through
appropriate employment.
23 Pa.C.S.A. § 3701(b)(1)-(17).
After a review of the record, this Court grants Petitioner’s request to modify or terminate
alimony. Petitioner’s voluntary good faith retirement is a change in his economic situation that is
both continuous and substantial. See McFadden, 563 A.2d at 183. Petitioner’s changed
circumstances allow him the opportunity to demonstrate why the existing alimony order should
6
be modified or terminated. See id. at 184. An analysis of all factors in light of the record has led
this Court to conclude that Petitioner’s obligation to provide alimony to Respondent should be
terminated.
In the case sub judice, the determinative factors weigh in favor of terminating the existing
alimony order. Petitioner is now in his early 60s and facing a substantial decrease in earning and
earning capacity with his retirement. In addition to a decrease in earning, Petitioner’s health has
declined since his diagnosis and treatment of colon cancer. Additionally, Petitioner suffers from
depression and other physical conditions, such as scarring of his lungs, which are only now being
diagnosed and treated. Furthermore, the record does not indicate that 1) Respondent contributed
overly significantly to the marital estate, 2) made extraordinary contributions as the homemaking
spouse, or 3) was a factor in increasing Petitioner’s earning capacity during marriage.
Regarding the length of marriage, Petitioner and Respondent’s marriage lasted only
approximately 5 years, from 1984-1989. During the parties’ period of separation and before their
divorce, Petitioner provided Respondent with support. After their divorce in 2000, Petitioner has
42
continued to faithfully pay $500 per month in alimony to Respondent. Petitioner has been
supporting Respondent three times longer than the actual length of their marriage. Although this
Court is sympathetic to Respondent’s numerous medical conditions, the length of the marriage
and cohabitation between Petitioner and Respondent in comparison to the amount of time
Petitioner has been paying alimony and would be required to continue to pay alimony with a
reduced income, is inequitable. See Teodorski v. Teodorski, 857 A.2d 194, 201 (Pa. Super. 2004)
(citing DeMarco v. DeMarco, 787 A.2d 1072, 1081 (Pa. Super. 2001)). Therefore, after a review
42
Since November 2010, Petitioner has an arrears balance of $7,711.37 as of Feb. 3, 2012 for payments made to the
Pennsylvania State Collection and Disbursement Unit.
7
of the record in consideration of section 3701(b) factors, this Court finds that Petitioner’s
alimony obligation is terminated.
Accordingly, the following Order is entered:
ORDER OF COURT
th
AND NOW
, this 6 day of June, 2012, following the Non-Jury trial and upon
consideration of the briefs filed by the parties,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DIRECTED
that the Defendant’s Petition to Modify
GRANTEDTERMINATED.
is . The Defendant’s alimony obligation is The termination shall
beretroactive to December 22, 2010.
By the Court,
M. L. Ebert, Jr., J.
Ann V. Levin, Esquire
Attorney for Plaintiff
Lori K. Serratelli, Esquire
Attorney for Defendant
8