HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-9 Civil
JAMES KEVIN HOLT AND
ANDREA HOLT,
PLAINTIFFS
IN THE COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
V.
BRANDON N. THOMAS a/kla
BRADLEY THOMAS AND CATHERINE:
THOMAS,
DEFENDANTS 06-0009 CIVIL TERM
IN RE: MOTION OF DEFENDANTS TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
BEFORE BAYLEY. J. AND GUIDO. J.
OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT
Bayley, J., September 15, 2006:--
On January 3, 2006, plaintiffs, James Kevin Holt and Andrea Holt, filed a
praecipe for a writ of summons against defendants, Brandon N. Thomas a/kla Bradley
Thomas and Catherine Thomas. The Sheriff filed a return attesting that on January 6,
2006, "the within writ of summons was served. . . by handing [a copy of the writ] to
BRADLEY THOMAS, SON," at "6 Edgewood Drive, Mechanicsburg, pa."1 Plaintiffs
filed a complaint on April 4, 2006. The suit arises out of an automobile accident in
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania on January 15, 2004. Plaintiffs allege in their complaint that
(1) defendant, Brandon N. Thomas, a/kla Bradley Thomas, was operating a motor
vehicle involved in the accident, (2) "Defendant Brandon N. Thomas a/kla Bradley
Thomas was under the age of 18, and therefore, a minor," and (3) "Defendant Brandon
N. Thomas a/kla Bradley Thomas, a minor at the time, was using the vehicle owned by
1 The Sheriff's return also attests that defendant, Catherine Thomas, was personally
06-0009 CIVIL TERM
Defendant Catherine Thomas with the permission of Defendant Catherine Thomas."
On June 7, 2006, plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the complaint "by substituting
'Bradley Thomas' for 'Brandon Thomas a/kla Bradley Thomas' in the caption and
throughout the body of the Complaint." The issue was briefed and argued on
September 6, 2006. The two year statute of limitations expired on January 15, 2006.2
An amendment to the complaint, after the statute of limitations has run, cannot bring in
a new and distinct party to the action. See Saracina v. Cotoia, 417 Pa. 80 (1965). In
Cianchetti v. Kaylen, 241 Pa. Super. 437 (1976), the Superior Court of Pennsylvania
stated:
The operative test, is ". . . whether the right party was sued but under the
wrong designation, or whether a wrong person was sued and the
amendment was designated to substitute another and distinct party."
In Saracina, the plaintiff was struck by an automobile driven by Robert Cotoia.
Plaintiff's complaint named Robert's father, Anthony Cotoia, as the defendant. After the
statute of limitations had run, the plaintiff attempted to amend the complaint to change
the name of defendant from Anthony to Robert Cotoia. The Supreme Court concluded
that the complaint could not be amended because Robert Cotoia was a new and
distinct party. However, the Court stated, quoting Powell v. Sutliff, 410 Pa. 436
(1963), "If the right party was in court as a result of service of process and it was merely
his or its designation which was sought to be changed, we would be prone to permit the
amendment."
served with a copy of the writ at the same time.
-2-
06-0009 CIVIL TERM
242 PaC.S. S 5524.
-3-
06-0009 CIVIL TERM
In Cianchetti, in 1968, plaintiff, was struck by an automobile owned and
operated by Henry J. Kaylen. Suit was entered against Harry J. Kaylen, and a sheriff
personally served him with the complaint. Harry J. Kaylen died in 1965. After the
statute of limitations had run, plaintiff sought to amend the complaint to change the
name of the defendant from Harry J. Kaylen to Harry J. Kaylen also known as Henry J.
Kaylen. The amendment was denied. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed.
The Court stated that, "The issue in the instant case, therefore, is whether the
appellants, in fact, sued Henry J. Kaylen, but merely used the erroneous designation of
'Harry J. Kaylen,' or whether the appellants, in fact, sued Harry J. Kaylen." The Court
noted that the complaint alleged that defendant, Harry J. Kaylen, is an individual
residing at 2147 Chestnut Avenue, Ardmore, that on the day of the accident he
operated and owned a Rambler automobile and that he negligently struck plaintiff. The
Court concluded that, "Because Harry J. Kaylen died in 1965, the only possible
defendant to the instant action was Henry J. Kaylen." Henry J. Kaylen was the sole
resident of 2147 Chestnut Avenue, Ardmore, and the right party, Henry J. Kaylen, was
served with process by the sheriff.
In the case sub judice, (1) the correct name of the defendant, Bradley Thomas,
was set forth in the caption and the body of the complaint, (2) he was correctly
identified in the complaint as a minor being under the age of 18, who lived at 6
Edgewood Drive, Mechanicsburg, Pa, and who operated the motor vehicle involved in
the accident on January 15, 2004, and (3) he, "the son," was personally served with a
-4-
06-0009 CIVIL TERM
copy of the complaint by the sheriff. Plaintiff may amend the complaint by substituting
the name Bradley Thomas in the caption and throughout the complaint for "Brandon
Thomas a/kla Bradley Thomas," because Bradley Thomas, who was personally served
with a copy of the complaint, was the right person named as defendant under what was
partly a wrong designation.
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this
day of September, 2006, the motion of defendants to
amend the complaint, IS GRANTED. The amended complaint shall be filed within
fifteen (15) days of this date.
By the Court,
Edgar B. Bayley, J.
Christian C. Hugel, Esquire
502 Market Street
Lemoyne, PA 17043
For Plaintiffs
W. Darren Powell, Esquire
305 Front Street
P.O. Box 999
Harrisburg, PA 17108
F or Defendants
:sal
-5-
JAMES KEVIN HOLT AND
ANDREA HOLT,
PLAINTIFFS
IN THE COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
V.
BRANDON N. THOMAS a/kla
BRADLEY THOMAS AND CATHERINE:
THOMAS,
DEFENDANTS 06-0009 CIVIL TERM
IN RE: MOTION OF DEFENDANTS TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
BEFORE BAYLEY. J. AND GUIDO. J.
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this
day of September, 2006, the motion of defendants to
amend the complaint, IS GRANTED. The amended complaint shall be filed within
fifteen (15) days of this date.
By the Court,
Edgar B. Bayley, J.
Christian C. Hugel, Esquire
502 Market Street
Lemoyne, PA 17043
For Plaintiffs
W. Darren Powell, Esquire
305 Front Street
P.O. Box 999
Harrisburg, PA 17108
F or Defendants
:sal