Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCP-21-CR-0000903-2006 COMMONWEALTH : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : V. : : JOSE M. MUNIZ, : CP-21-CR-903-2006 Defendant : IN RE: OPINION PURSUANT TO PENNSYLVANIA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 1925 Defendant Jose M. Muniz was convicted on February 7, 2007 of Indecent Assault, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3126(A)(1), and Indecent Assault of a Person Less than 13 Years of Age, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3126(A)(7), after a nonjury trial before this Court. After a period during which Defendant was a fugitive, Defendant was finally sentenced on October 14, 2014. At sentencing, the current revision of the Megan’s Law registration requirements was read to Defendant. Defendant filed a post-sentence motion seeking to compel this Court to require Defendant to register under the version of Megan’s Law which was in effect at the time of Defendant’s conviction. This Court denied Defendant’s post-sentence motion on December 2, 2014, from which Defendant has appealed. Defendant contends that this Court erred in enforcing the current registration and notification requirements of the Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Act, colloquially known as Megan’s Law or SORNA. (Concise Statement of Errors Complained of on Appeal, filed January 12, 2015). However, as was articulated in detail in Commonwealth v. Perez, 97 A.3d 747 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014), retroactive application of SORNA does not violate the ex post facto clause of either the federal or state constitutions. See also Coppolino v. Comm'r of the Pa. State Police, 102 A.3d 1254 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2014) (holding that applying the provisions of an update to Megan’s Law to a previous offender who had completed his sentence did not violate the ex post facto clause). Being clearly bound by our appellate courts on this issue, we are satisfied that we properly denied Defendant’s post-sentence motion. January 15, 2015 ________________________ Kevin A. Hess, P.J. Matthew P. Smith, Esquire Chief Deputy District Attorney Timothy L. Clawges, Esquire Chief Public Defender 2