HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-1575 CRIMINALCOMMONWEALTH
DEVONNE ERIC STATON
IN RE:
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
01-1575 CRIMINAL TERM
MOTION OF DEFENDANT TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
BEFORE BAYLEY, J.
OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT
Bayley, J., January 17, 2002:--
Defendant, Devonne Eric Staton, is charged with counts of unlawful possession
with intent to deliver a schedule I controlled substance (marijuana),1 and unlawful
possession of a schedule I controlled substance (marijuana)? Defendant filed a motion
to suppress evidence upon which a hearing was conducted on December 18, 2001.
The issues were briefed and are ready for decision. We find the following facts.
On July 8, 2001, at approximately 3:50 p.m., Trooper Tony Todaro of the
Pennsylvania State Police, stopped a car for speeding at 75 miles per hour in a 65 mile
per hour zone on the Pennsylvania Turnpike in Upper Frankford Township,
Cumberland County. The Trooper went to the driver's door. The driver was Doralee
Thorpe. The trooper smelled burnt marijuana coming from inside the car. He saw what
he believed to be some marijuana residue in the driver door area. Trooper Todaro was
1 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30).
2 35 P.S. § 780-113(16).
01-1575 CRIMINAL TERM
experienced with what marijuana and residue looked like, and with the smell of burnt
and raw marijuana. Trooper Todaro told Thorpe why she was stopped. He asked her
where she was going and where she had come from. She said she had come from
Atlantic City and was going to Pittsburgh. Thorpe had an Avis rental agreement for the
2000 Lincoln Town Car. The rental was in the name of David Williams. The document
only authorized Williams to operate the vehicle. The document set forth that the
vehicle was rented on June 16, 2001, and was due to be returned on June 22, 2001.
Thorpe told Trooper Todaro that David Williams had authorized her to use the vehicle.
Trooper Todaro returned to his vehicle, and summoned another trooper. He ran
a radio check on Thorpe's driver's license. It was valid. The trooper then returned to
the car and asked Thorpe to step outside. He gave her a written warning for speeding.
He then asked her about the odor of marijuana that he had smelled coming from inside
the car. Thorpe denied any involvement with drugs. Another state trooper arrived.
Trooper Todaro, while standing outside the driver's door, asked the right seat
passenger, defendant Devonne Staton, about the odor of burnt marijuana. He told the
trooper that he had smoked marijuana in the car earlier that day, but that no marijuana
was in the car at that time. Trooper Todaro got Staton out of the car and patted him
down. Nothing was found. The driver was also patted down and nothing was found.
While the other trooper watched Staton and Thorpe, Trooper Todaro searched the
interior of the car. He found nothing inside the interior. The residue was too small to
-2-
01-1575 CRIMINAL TERM
collect. Trooper Todaro then opened the trunk of the vehicle with a key he had gotten
from inside the car. With the trunk lid up, the trooper smelled raw marijuana. There
was a blue duffel bag on top of some other luggage in the trunk. Trooper Todaro asked
who owned the duffel bag. Defendant said that the bag was his. The trooper opened
the bag and found four large, wrapped bundles of raw marijuana, plus numerous
Ziplock bags of marijuana. Defendant and Thorpe were arrested. The car was
impounded and towed to the Pennsylvania State Police Barracks. Later that day,
Trooper Todaro questioned defendant, and obtained some statements from him.
DISCUSSION
Defendant maintains that he was subject to an illegal search, therefore, all
contraband seized by the state police, and the statements he made to Trooper Todaro
at the State Police Barracks, must be suppressed. Trooper Todaro lawfully stopped the
car, in which defendant was a passenger, for a speeding violation. Upon (1) smelling
the odor of burnt marijuana coming from inside the car, and (2) seeing what he had
reason to believe was some marijuana residue in the driver door area, Trooper Todaro
had probable cause to believe that a search of the car would result in the discovery of
contraband. Commonwealth v. Stainbrook, 324 Pa. Super. 410 (1984);
Commonwealth v. Arnold, (01-0123 Criminal, Cumberland County, October 4, 2001 ).
After Trooper Todaro issue the driver a written warning for speeding, defendant told the
trooper that he had smoked marijuana in the car earlier that day. Because Trooper
Todaro already had smelled the odor of burnt marijuana coming from inside the car,
-3-
01-1575 CRIMINAL TERM
and saw what he believed to be some marijuana residue in the driver door area, the
investigative detention that followed the completion of the traffic stop for speeding was
based on reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot. Thus, defendant's
statement to the Trooper during this period of investigative detention further bolstered
his probable cause to believe that there was contraband in the car. Trooper Todaro did
not obtain his information involving contraband in such a way that he could have
secured a search warrant before he stopped the car. Unless the car was searched or
impounded, the driver was likely to leave and the contents could never again be
located by the police. Accordingly, there were exigent circumstances that warranted
the search of the car without a search warrant. Commonwealth v. White, 669 A.2d
896 (Pa. 1995); Commonwealth v. Stewart, 740 A.2d 712 (Pa. Super. 1999). Once
Trooper Todaro had probable cause to believe that there was contraband in the car, he
could lawfully search the interior and the trunk. Commonwealth v. Rosenfelt, 662
A.2d 1131 (Pa. Super. 1995); Commonwealth v. Elliot, 416 Pa. Super. 499 (1992);
Commonwealth v. Bailey, 376 Pa. Super. 291 (1988).
For the foregoing reasons, the following order is entered.
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, this
suppress evidence, IS DENIED.
day of January, 2002, the motion of defendant to
By the Court,
-4-
01-1575 CRIMINAL TERM
Edgar B. Bayley, J.
Edmund Zigmund, Esquire
For the Commonwealth
George Matangos, Esquire
For Defendant
:saa
-5-